Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/6/2002 - STAFF REPORTS (11) DATE: MARCH 6, 2002 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE CONDEMNATION AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FOR THE PUBLIC PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A MULTI-STORY PARKING STRUCTURE IN THE DOWNTOWN RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing concerning the acquisition and condemnation of certain real property parcels in the downtown for the purpose of constructing a multi-story parking structure. It is further recommended that following the public hearing, the City Council adopt a resolution finding and declaring the public interest and necessity for acquiring said properties. SUMMARY: The City of Palm Springs has been working to assemble the parcels necessary to construct a 388-space parking structure in the downtown. The best site for the structure, based on the proximity to parking demand and the cooperation of the private property owners, has been the area behind the east side of the 200 block of South Palm Canyon Drive. The parking structure itself would face Indian Canyon Drive and Baristo Road, with the primary ingress and egress located on Baristo. The property acquisition arrangement that has been satisfactory to the majority of the affected property owners has been a swap of the fee interest in their land (plus their previously-paid in lieu parking fees) for reserved spaces in the structure. The one exception to this was with the owner of the Saloon property; that transaction necessitates the cash acquisition of the structure and relocation of the commercial tenant. The owners of the bank building at 296 South Palm Canyon Drive have balked at the Acquisition Agreement: that property will also need to go through condemnation. Since all the Acquisition Agreements needed to be signed by March 1, 2002, with all outstanding issues resolved, in order to meet the construction timetable for the structure agreed to by the City and property owners, the City needs to proceed with the condemnation of the following two properties: the parking lot behind 296 South Palm Canyon Drive, and the Saloon property at 255 South Indian Canyon Drive. BACKGROUND: The City of Palm Springs has been working for the past year to assemble the parcels necessary to construct a 388-space parking structure in the downtown. Adequate parking has been a major problem for the downtown for over three decades, and was even considered one of the blighting conditions that led to the creation of the Central Business District (CBD) Redevelopment Project Area in 1973. With the success of the downtown's "arts & entertainment" strategy over the past five years, the parking problem downtown has grown even more acute. Based on a survey of parking demand by the Downtown Development Center in 2000, two-thirds of the parking shortage in the CBD is south of Tahquitz Canyon Drive. The original proposed site for a structure was behind Plaza Mercado, but there were concerns about the ability of Belardo Road and/or Arenas Road to carry the volume of traffic /0A necessary to serve the structure. Additionally, concerns were voiced by the adjacent neighborhood about the aesthetics of the structure, including those of massing, scale and the appropriateness of the location. The City convened a "Parking Think Tank" comprised of downtown property owners and merchants, as well as City staff and a Council subcommittee to evaluate the options: (1) expansion of existing surface lots and on-street spaces in the downtown; (2) creation of new employee lots outside the downtown core; or, (3) creation of a downtown parking structure that could serve both customers and employees in a safe, well-lighted structure. The Think Tank's March 26, 2001 recommendation, based on the availability of land and other resources, was to pursue the expansion of existing lots and on-street spaces in the downtown, as well as construct a new parking structure in the downtown. There did not exist a feasible long-term site near the downtown for a remote employee lot. After considering several alternative sites, the Think Tank recommended the land behind the east side of the 200 block of South Palm Canyon Drive_ The parking structure itself would face Indian Canyon Drive and Baristo Road, with the primary ingress and egress located on Baristo. City Council's directive in accepting the Think Tank recommendation at its April 25, 2001 meeting was that the project was to be a "public-private" partnership, meaning that the private sector needed to come up with half of the project cost. This was to accomplished by the contribution of the land to the facility in return for long-term parking rights, as well as the on- going long-term purchase of employee spaces on the top level of the deck. The former avoids the acquisition cast, the latter provides an on-going source of revenue to the City to help off- set a portion of the debt service or annual operating costs. The acquisition arrangement that has been satisfactory to the majority of the affected property owners has been a swap of the fee interest in their land (plus their previously-paid in lieu parking fees) for reserved spaces in the structure, From the beginning, the one exception to the land-for-parking arrangement was with the owner of the Saloon property; that transaction always necessitated the cash acquisition of the structure and relocation of the tenant and is included in the project budget. The tenants have already been interviewed by the City's relocation consultant, Overland Resources, and a calculation of the City's relocation liability has already been determined. An MAI appraisal on the property was prepared by the firm of Dozier Appraisal Company, which determined the fee value of the property to be $314,900. The amount of $45,000 was determined to be the value of the fixtures, furniture, and equipment (FF&E); all of that value flows to the tenant, the owner of the Saloon. The owner and tenant have a lease that precludes any payment to the tenant (aside from the FF&E) in the event of a City condemnation of the property; however, the tenant feels he is entitled to more compensation and is disputing the settlement amount. The City's only responsibility is to pay the owner for the property: the owner and tenant then need to negotiate an equitable arrangement satisfactory to both parties. Since an amicable settlement between the parties does not look forthcoming on the City's timetable, it is necessary to proceed with the eminent domain taking in order for the court to determine the equitable share of value. All the Acquisition Agreements needed to be signed by March 1, 2002, with all outstanding issues resolved, in order to meet the construction timetable for the structure agreed to by the City and property owners. Therefore, the City needs to also proceed with the condemnation of the parking lot behind 296 South Palm Canyon Drive. One of the owners did participate in at /a A- - least one Think Tank meeting, but did not voice his opposition to the project. The partnership that owns the property was negotiating a lease with Sav-on, but placed the blame for the failure of the lease to move forward on the proposed structure and have subsequently refused to enter a cooperative Acquisition Agreement. Since the Sav-on lease failed, the owners have been unwilling to consider a land-for-parking Acquisition Agreement based on the same terms and formula acceptable to all the other property owners, but rather have suggested that the City condemn the property. In a condemnation of the property, the owners would receive the cash value of the land, appraised at$437,000 for 19,820 square feet, but receive no parking rights of any sort, either reserved or unreserved. Any tenant leasing the building would need to purchase all of its parking needs through the in-lieu fee. The City mailed offer letters to both property owners on February 1, 2002. Both owners rejected the City's offer. Should the City Council approve the Resolution of Necessity, the City Attorney will file for an Order of Immediate Possession on both properties. Since the Saloom structure is currently occupied property, it will take a minimum of 90 days for that order to go into effect. The Order of Immediate Possession on the bank building, however, should only take 30 days to go into effect. Meanwhile, the City is conducting a Phase II environmental study on the property to test for any evidence of environmental contamination on the site, since it was previously home to an automobile service station. The project is truly of benefit to the entire downtown, which is now suffering from a shortage of parking. Unique to the project is the high level of private sector support in the project, which will reduce the City's cost and therefore create additional opportunities to develop more parking in the downtown. These con emnations are necessary because of the unique circumstances in both cases. Jon Raymo d D e or of Community & Economic Dev nt Approve -by: City Manag Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Affidavit of Mailing REVlPV7O BY DEPT, OF FINANCE Joe's World Famous Saloon 255 So.Indian Canyon phone:(760)325-9993 P.O.Box 4688 Fax:(760)318-0319 Palm Spnngs.CA 92263 Cell:(760)408-1902 F.mail:willhidepnVw@a pmdt8y. net February 20, 2002 MAL David Alshire, City Attorney David Ready, City Manager f NA Smoot, Assistant City Manager 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 �( l Jerry Ogburn �}n 1 Redevelopment Director 6 C" 0 109 So. Indian Canyon C, a Palm Springs, CA 92262 [_A Re: APN 513-154-007 (Parking Lot Project) �ZrZ.��I_—�} Letter dated February 8, 2002 Gentlemen; In reviewing this letter, I have become very confused about the actual amount the City of Palm Springs is offering to Mr. &Mrs. Adamo and myself. I cannot determine if the City is offering $314,900 or$629,800. I have been asking for the breakdown of how the figure was determined so that I may discuss this with Mr. &Mrs. Adamo. Verbally, Mr. Ogburn stated that $45,000 was for fixtures and equipment, $128,000 was for the leasehold value and the balance was for the land and improvements. Mr. Ogbum also stated that this was broken down in the appraisal that the City has received and that Mr. Dozier,the appraiser could get me a copy. My secretary then contacted him as Mr. Ogburn had instructed and Mr. Dozier stated that he needed Mr. Ogburn's written authorization. On February 19, 2002 when she saw Mr. Ogburn he stated to her that he needed to discuss this with the City Attorney first. Mr. Adamo allowed me to look at his copy of the appraisal,which I thought was available through the City, and this thoroughly confused me more. So I am asking that you put in writing to me the actual amount the City is offering with an itemized breakdown of the figure by February 25,2002 so that I have the appropriate time to give you a justifiable response as you have requested. Sincerely, Jo I. Pagano, er Joe's world Famous oon I 3 -& -CDz- Joe's World Famous Saloon 255 So,Indian Canyon Phane� 76 - P.O.Box 468E ( 0)325-9993 Palm S FU'(760)31"319 prings.CA 92263 Ca11:(760)40&1902 Emai1;w11hidcpng,no@pmdigy. net February 20, 2002 David Alshire, City Attorney David Ready, City Manager f}1knSmoot, Assistant City Manager 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 V/U�cl .Terry C Cl ( t()L� G� Redevelopment m Director 109 So. Indian Canyon C A- v� A-C M J' Palm Springs, CA 92262 (.a�,�/� . _C�Z�_2p���Z Re: Relocation Money for Joe's World Famous Saloon �-�^'�'" Gentlemen; G In reviewing the package that Overland Resources gave me, I have become very confused about the actual amount the City of Palm Springs is offering to relocate my Business, As I understand from that document the amount will be approximately$75,000. 1 feel it would take at least$100, 000 to relocate my business and get it re-established. So 1 am asking that you put in writing to me the actual amount the City is offering by February 25, 2002 $o that I have the appropriate time to give you a justifiable response. Sincerely, Jose®rld gano, O 7oe' F us Saloon, DECLARATION OF PERSONAL SERVICE I,_ ii ✓ declare: 1. The facts below are known personally to me and if called upon to testify, I could and would competently testify thereto. 2. 1 am employed b / cated at 3. On Februa>y 19, 2002, 1 caused opy of the Notice of Intention to Adopt a Resolution ol'Necessity for Acquisition of a Portion of That Certain Real Property Identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 513-154-007, located in the City of Palm Springs to be personally delivered to owner(s)/tenant(s) of such property, at each of the following addresses: Mr. Thomas A. amo Mr, Joe Pagano Mrs. Eileen . Adamo 255 S. Indian Canyon Dr. �1�Cc i1T 777 W. Drama Rd. Palnx Springs, CA 92262 Pal 'prings, CA 92262 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that he foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 19th day of February, 2002, at, California. eclarant IRV#19129vl _3_ �` •'� �� DECLARATION OF PERSONAL SERVICE ��rli� declare: 1. The facts bel are luiown personally to me and if called upon to testify, I could and would competently testify thereto. 2. I am employed b located at 3. On February 19, 20 2, 1 cans a copy of ne Notice of Intention to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity for Acquisition of a Portion of That Certain Real Property Identified as Assessor's Parcel.No. 513-154-007, located in the City of Palm Springs to be personally delivered to owner(s)/tenant(s) of such property, at each of the following addresses: Mr. Thomas A_ Adamo Mr. Joe Pa o Mrs. Eileen C. Adamo 255 S. I ran Canyon Dr. f/Yr 777 W. Panorama Rd. Pal prings, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that he foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 19th day of February, 2002, a5 t i , California. l�I��7THff E,[7G�d/l�° 15 grant IRV 919129 v1 DECLA1tATION OF PERSONAL SERVICE 1, i declare: 1. The facts below 2re known personally to me and if called upon to testify, I could and would competently testify. thereto. 2. 1 am em loyed b3 / _ " Flocatcd at 3. On February 19, 2002, I cause A original of the Notice of Intention to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity for Acquisition of a Portion of That Certain heal Property Identified as.Assessor's Parcel No. 513-154-033, located in the City of Palm Springs to be personally delivered to owner(s) of such property, at each of the following addresses: Mr. Shaoul I. Levy r"Shaul IvYe?i�hi � �� 296 Palm,Canyon, LLC Claire's Collection 201 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A26 110 East Ninth St., Suite C-871 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Los Angeles, CA 90079 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that he foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 19th day of February, 2002, a4 i pi r California. 1%FffX Declarant IRV#19127 v 1 -3- RESOLUTION NO. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY OF ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON INDIAN CANYON DRIVE IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,CALIFORNIA, IDENTIFIEDASTHE PARKING LOT PORTION OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 513-154-033 AND ASSESSORS PARCELNUMBER 513-154-007, FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING A DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE , WHEREAS, adequate parking has been a major problem for the downtown for over three decades, and was even considered one of the blighting conditions that led to the creation of the Central Business District(CBD) Redevelopment Project Area in 1973 and has been a continuing issue in the development of the downtown; and WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs has been investigating the acquisition of various interests in property, including fee interest, located along the west side of South Indian Canyon Drive between Baristo Road and Arenas Road, identified as a portion of Assessors Parcel Number 513-154-033 and Assessors Parcel Number 513-154-007 for the purposes of constructing a parking structure in the downtown (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2002, after no less than 15 days written notice to the owner of the property referenced above and more specifically described and depicted in the legal descriptions and maps attached hereto as Exhibits"A-1"and"A-2"and Maps"B-1"and"B- 2", respectively, which legal descriptions and maps are incorporated herein by reference, the City Council of the City of Palm Springs held a hearing for the purpose of allowing the owner a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the following matters: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project; and 2. Whether the project is planned or located in a manner which is most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and 3. Whetherthe property proposed to be acquired is necessary forthe project; and 4. Whetherthe offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 had been given; and 5. Whether the City had properly exercised all of its statutory responsibilities and duties antecedent to the exercise of eminent domain against the property; and WHEREAS, the City Council, as a result of such hearing, has determined that the public health, safety, and welfare require that the City acquire various interests in the properties more particularly described herein (the "Property"), for the purposes of constructing a parking structure in the downtown (the "Project"); and ! Q c, WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs is authorized to acquire the Property under its own charter and Government Code Section 37350.5 and 40404, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, that the City Council does hereby find, determine and declare upon evidence presented to the City Council as follows: SECTION 1. The property to be acquired is located within the City of Palm Springs, County of Riverside, State of California, and is located on the west side of South Indian Canyon Drive between Baristo Road and Arenas Road, and otherwise identified as the parking lot portion of Assessors Parcel Number 513- 154-033 and Assessors Parcel Numbers 513-154-007. The Property the City seeks to acquire, and the Property interests sought, consist of fee simple title interest to approximately 19,280 square feet of parking lot and 3,566 square foot parcel with a structure on it. SECTION 2. The public interest and necessity require the Project, in that the City's Downtown Parking Plan, including the imposition of an in-lieu parking fee for the development of new parking spaces in the downtown, require the development of additional parking in the downtown. In addition, the acquisition of the Property described in as Exhibits"A-1"and "A-2"and Maps "13-1" and "13-2", respectively, is necessary for the Project because the work of the City Council subcommittee and Parking Think Tank has identified this site as the most impacted in the downtown by the shortage of parking. SECTION 3. It is further found and determined that said public improvement is planned and located in a mannerwhich would be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. SECTION 4. The offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the record owner in a letter dated February 1, 2002- The City's acquisition agents have attempted to negotiate with the record owner,subsequent to this offer, but such negotiations have not proved successful in securing the necessary property interests outside of more formal procedures. SECTION 5. To the extent any of the property to be taken herein is devoted to a public use, the City finds that the proposed use for the Project is compatible with, or more necessary to, such public use, and that the City is authorized to acquire the property pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510 and 1240.610. SECTION 6. The Project meets the criteria of a Class 32 categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15332 of the California Code as an In-Fill Development Projects. Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in this section: 1. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. 2. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, /0C 3. The project has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. 4. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. 5. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public l services. SECTION 7. The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs made a finding of the Project's general plan conformance pursuant to Section 65402 of the California Code at its February 27, 2002 meeting. The Project meets all applicable provisions of the City's General Plan and is a right of zone use under the City's Zoning Ordinance. All other development standards can be met or mitigated through the City's development process. SECTION 8. The law firm of Burke, Williams&Sorensen, City Attorney for the City of Palm Springs, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and prosecute in the name of the City such proceedings in the Court having proper jurisdiction thereof, as may be necessary for the acquisition of the Property described herein, and to prepare and file such pleadings, documents,and otherwise prosecute such actions as may be necessary in the opinion of such attorneys to acquire for the City the Property. Such attorneys are specifically authorized to take whatever steps and/or procedures are available to them under the Eminent Domain Law of the State of California,including,but not limited to,seeking orders for prejudgement possession of the property. Adopted this day of 2002 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA By City Clerk Mayor REVIEWED &APPROVED: /Oc3 I 'I I! EXHIBIT"A-1" I{ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SALOON PROPERTY A$SESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 513-154-007 LOT 19 OF FLOCK 29 OF PALM SPRINGS TOWNSM AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 9 AT PAGE 423,RECORDS OF SANDIEGO COUNTY,CALIFORN[A,: SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD W ANY. PREP Y SANB INC JO L. S ORNPLS.4146 ��p�1AL Lgntj o -zzaesNrcte 0=6roz ¢o�w` 4 SANg0 SG9 0 a No.LS4t46 * Ev.630.04 N} t 'yT J /b � y EXHIBIT"A-2" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 296 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED RARCEL: ALL TEAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13574 AS RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 73 AT PAGE 52,RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1,THENCE SOUTH 890-53'-07"WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 A DISTANCE OF 145.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 006-05'-27"WEST A DISTANCE OF 150.02 FEET: THENCE NORTH 890-52"-48"EAST A DISTANCE OF 145.34 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL I; THENCE SOUTH 000-05'-38"EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 150.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD IF ANY. /0 C 5� EXHIBIT"A-1" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SALOON/APARTMENT PROPERTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 513-154-007 I All that real property situated in the City of Palm Springs, County of Riverside, State of California as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 432 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 513-154-026 All that real property situated in the City of Palm Springs, County of Riverside, State of California described as Lot 19 in Block 28 of Palm Springs, in the City and County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 9, Page 432 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California. Except that portion thereof lying Easterly of a line which is Westerly of and 50.00 feet measured at right angles from the center line of East Avenue (now known as Indian Avenue) as conveyed to the City of Palm Springs by Deed recorded June 30, 1966 as Instrument No. 67758, Official Records of Riverside County, California. EXHIBIT "A-2" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 296 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE PROPERTY A 19,280 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 513-154-033 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (sic), AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1 AND LETTERED LOT"A"OF PARCEL MAP 13574,AS SHOWN BY PARCEL MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 73 PAGE(S) 52 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16 IN BLOCK 28 OF PALM SPRINGS, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 9 PAGE(S) 432 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 890 52' 48" EAST, 145.99 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 16 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 000 00' 22" WEST, 50.00 FEET ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 16 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF;THENCE SOUTH 891 52'34"WEST, 145.91 FEET ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 16 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;THENCE NORTH 00105'27" WEST, 50.01 FEET ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 16 TO THE NORTH POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT MINERALS AND OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES UNDER SAID LAND BELOW A DEPTH OF 500.00 FEET WITHOUT RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY, AS RESERVED IN DEED FROM ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC REFINING COMPANY, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION), RECORDED JULY 29, 1977 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 145106 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 6, 1995 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 405952 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AS TO THE EAST 100.00 FEET OF LOTS 13 AND 14 IN BLOCK 28 OF PALM SPRINGS, IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 9 PAGE(S) 432 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. MAP "B-1" MAP OF SALOON/APARTMENT PROPERTY II I 24 F I 11 . t ti7� y 08 q © 3 zz &r 4 08 P/ OPa w is xr �d Q UT Q is V n I rid B /T �Q - � tYtS/d1 n'r=• 1 @@a./TAc� h ' i .vJ,l e0ogig .,! �Yrs/sr 1MS y1 , Q Per/ e QI q S O.H/Act N � 1 tM� ti M�11� 1I >L1e,1� ASSESSOR'S MAPBK.5/3 PG• /5 nIVERS10E COUNTY, CALIF. DEC 0 ! 1999 i i MAP "&2" ! MAP OF 296 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE PROPERTY � A 111rf. 24 I I IL .Sd l f7C �y i!O 22 va 'L N -e14 �f — _ _ 4 g 4 154 zI 23 y l PO U on I Sew, gil r JMrJ/a2 �vr l i e009 .l �,vrs/sa ••s3s , Q port t 0 CL Am;, '? r ASSESSOR'S AIAPBK.5/3 PG. /5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF. DEC 0 r if7 A '7