Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/13/2008 - STAFF REPORTS - 4.B. .IO�pALM Sp? ry 41 U H 4 �, everw• P` 9�/rFORN� CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT February 13, 2008 OLD BUSINESS Subject: PROPOSITION 218 ELECTION FOR VARIOUS CITYWIDE STREET LIGHTING AND PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 From: David H. Ready, City Manager Initiated by: Public Works and Engineering Department SUMMARY On January 16, 2008, property owner protest ballot proceedings (Proposition 218 elections) were conducted for increasing existing annual special assessments in six of the City's Maintenance Districts. Upon conclusion of the proceedings, only one Maintenance District approved increased special assessments (Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 —Vintage Palms). RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt Resolution No. , "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 FOR THE PALM SPRINGS PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8"; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. , "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 WITHIN THE PALM SPRINGS PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8; and 3) Provide staff direction, as appropriate, on the matter of continued General Fund subsidy to supplement restricted assessment revenues; elimination and/or reduction of services; and abandonment (dissolution) of those Special Districts wherein proposed increased assessments were denied. ITFM NO. "�v� City Council Staff Report February 13, 2008- Page 2 Proposition 218 Election STAFF ANALYSIS: On January 16, 2008, property owner protest ballot proceedings (Proposition 218 elections) were conducted for the following Street Lighting and Parkway Maintenance Districts: 1. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Belardo Road Area - 165 Properties) 2. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (McManus Drive - 25 Properties) 3. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Eagle Way Area- 43 Properties) 4. Parkway Maintenance District No. 6B (Parkside Estates - 93 Properties) 5. Parkway Maintenance District No. 7 (Sunrise Norte Tract - 53 Properties) 6. Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 (Vintage Palms Tract - 62 Properties) These Districts have been operating with expenses exceeding the maximum allowable assessment levied, as a result of limitations imposed by Proposition 218, Staff previously recommended that expenses in those Districts be reduced to the level allowed by assessments collected, however, the City Council directed the City Engineer to schedule Proposition 218 elections to allow the neighborhoods a third and final opportunity to consider increased special assessments. At the conclusion of the Proposition 218 elections, only one of the Maintenance Districts approved increased special assessments (Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 -- Vintage Palms). All other neighborhoods denied the City's proposed special assessment increase. Following is a summary of the financial status of the five City Maintenance Districts that denied the City's proposed special assessment increase, as was previously outlined in the Preliminary Engineer's Reports adopted by the City Council on November 7, 2007: 2008/2009 2008/2009 Maintenance District Maximum Estimated Difference Assessment Expenses Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Belardo Road Area $9,027 $12,000 ($2,973) Lighting Maintenance District No, 2 McManus Drive $4,250 $20,500 ($16,250) Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 Eagle Wa Area $1,129 $2,750 ($1,621) Parkway Maintenance District No. $1 818 $3,550 ($1,732) 66 Parkside Estates Parkway Maintenance District No. 7 Sunrise Norte $23,747 $30,100 ($6,353) 1 One-third of the electrical system for McManus Drive is not functioning, an estimated electrical repair cost of 510,000 has been included in the estimated expenses. 000002 City Council Staff Report February 13, 2008- Page 3 Proposition 218 Election It is necessary to receive appropriate direction from the City Council regarding the funding for these five City Maintenance Districts. Each Maintenance District is discussed below, with options outlined for consideration by the City Council. Lighting District No. 1 (Belardo Road Area) Regarding Lighting District No- 1, the improvements within this District are continually failing, as the lighting system was constructed 40 years ago, and as this District has an existing deficit, there is no surplus of funds available with which a new lighting system may be designed and installed- Eventually, this system will become inoperable. Replacement of the lighting system (estimated at $500,000 or more) would require budgeting of City funds. Since SCE utility bills ($9,000) equals and will soon exceed the total assessment that can be levied ($9,027), the following three options are possible: 1. Continue General Fund subsidy (approximately $3,000 for the 2008/2009 fiscal year) indefinitely; or 2. Maintain electrical and lighting services to the extent revenues cover expenses (i.e. shut off the lights for certain periods of time) 3. Abandon and dissolve the District. (Staff recommendation) It should be noted that options 1 and 2 do not provide additional revenue that allows for the creation of a surplus in the District budget of any magnitude to fund major repair or replacement of the lighting system. Lights that are currently inoperable will not be repaired, unless additional General Fund revenues are appropriated for the repairs. Lighting District No. 2 McManus Drive Regarding Lighting District No- 2, this District was established to cover expenses for operating and maintaining a few street lights along McManus Drive between Saturmino Drive and Sunset Way, for 25 properties- The estimated 2008/2009 expense for electricity (taken from existing SCE utility bills) is $8,500 — twice the total maximum assessment of $4,250 levied in the District. Sometime in spring 2007, approximately one-third of the City owned electrical system on McManus Drive operating the lights failed. As the District budget has no surplus funds to allow the City to investigate and repair the electrical system, four of the lights on McManus Drive have not operated since the failure. It has been estimated to cost $10,000 to repair the electrical system, which has been added to the 2008/2009 District budget to be recovered by increased assessments. As a portion of the lighting system remains inoperable and repair costs ($10,000) significantly exceeds the total assessment that can be levied ($4,250), the following two options are possible: 1. Continue General Fund subsidy (approximately $16,250 for the 2008/2009 fiscal year) indefinitely; or 2. Abandon and dissolve the District. (Staff recommendation) Q�Q�1�3 City Council Staff Report February 13, 2008 - Page 4 Proposition 218 Election It should be noted that the four residents from Lighting District No. 2 that attended the neighborhood workshop on January 10 indicated their support of dissolving the District and removing the lights. Lighting District No. 4 (Eagle Way Area) Regarding Lighting District No. 4, this District was established to cover expenses for operating and maintaining street lights along Birdie Way, Divot Lane, Eagle Way and Par Drive, for 43 properties. The estimated 2008/2009 expense for electricity (taken from existing SCE utility bills) is $750; however, District administration and maintenance is estimated at $2,000. Although SCE utility bills ($750) are less than the total assessment that can be levied ($1,129), administration and incidental miscellaneous expenses cause the total assessment collected to be exceeded. The following three options are possible: 1. Continue General Fund subsidy (approximately $1,600 for the 2008/2009 fiscal year) indefinitely; or 2. Dissolve the District and continue to maintain the street lighting, requiring subsidy from the General Fund of $750 or more annually; (Staff recommendation) or 3. Abandon and dissolve the District. Parkway District No. 6B (Parkside Estates) Regarding Parkway District No. 613 ("Parkside Estates"), this is a Parkway Maintenance District for landscape maintenance of existing parkways along Avenida Evelita and Calle San Raphael, where homes have rear yards abutting these streets (a total distance of approximately 1,000 feet). It appears that at the time this District was established in 1980, more extensive parkway landscaping may have existed along these streets. However, at some point in the past, a new sidewalk was constructed along the parkway, removing most of the previous landscaping. The only landscaping that remains, and is maintained as a part of this District, are ten street trees. Annual operating expenses include approximately $1,900 for the City's landscape maintenance Contractor (currently Merchant Landscape Services, Inc.) and $150 for irrigation, as well as incidentals and administrative costs, for a total of approximately $3,550_ Although DWA utility bills ($150) are less than the total assessment that can be levied ($1,818), contract landscape maintenance costs ($1,900) exceed the total assessment collected. The following three options are possible: 1. Continue General Fund subsidy (approximately $1,700 for the 2008/2009 fiscal year) indefinitely, or 2. Eliminate contract landscape maintenance (tree trimming and other minimal maintenance), maintain irrigation service, and reduce overall costs to less than the total assessment that can be levied; or 3. Abandon and dissolve the District. (Staff recommendation) City Council Staff Report February 13, 2008- page 5 Proposition 218 Election Parkway District No. 7 (Sunrise Norte) Regarding Parkway District No. 7 ("Sunrise Norte"), this is a Parkway Maintenance District for landscape maintenance of the existing parkway along the north side of San Rafael Drive between Mountain Shadow Drive and Sunrise Way, for 53 properties. Sunrise Norte was a City initiated law-income development. This District was established in 1990, prior to Proposition 218, and did not include an automatic escalator (i.e. Consumer Price Index) to the maximum assessment, and beginning with the 2005/2006 fiscal year, annual expenses exceeded the total maximum assessment received. Estimated 2008/2009 costs are $30,100. Although DWA utility bills ($7,400) and SCE utility bills ($1,100) are less than the total assessment that can be levied ($23,747), contract landscape maintenance costs ($19,600) will soon exceed the total assessment collected. The following three options are possible: 1. Continue General Fund subsidy (approximately $6,400 for the 2008/2009 fiscal year) indefinitely; or 2_ Reduce contract landscape maintenance services by half and take other steps to reduce overall costs to less than the total assessment that can be levied; (Staff recommendation) or 3. Abandon and dissolve the District. Pursuant to direction received for the five City Maintenance Districts that did not support an increased assessment, staff will return appropriate Resolutions to City Council at a future meeting for adoption, implementing the direction received. In light of the approval of increased special assessments for Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 by the Vintage Palms neighborhood, two Resolutions are recommended for adoption implementing the levy of the increased assessments for the 2008/2009 fiscal year, FISCAL IMPACT: Depending upon direction received from Council, the fiscal impact can range from $0 to approximately $29,000 for the 2008/2009 fiscal year. City Council Staff Report February 13, 2008-Page 6 Proposition 218 Election Submitted: David J. Barakian Thomas J. Wilson Director of Public Works/City Engineer Assistant City Manager David H. Ready, City M r ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolutions 000006 ATTACHMENT RESOLUTIONS 000007 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 FOR THE PALM SPRINGS PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, beginning with §22500 (hereafter referred to as the "Act"), did by previous Resolution order the City Engineer to prepare and file an Engineer's Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the "Engineer's Report") in accordance with the Act, in connection with the annual levy and collection of assessments for the Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 (hereafter referred to as "District No. 8") for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2008, and ending June 30, 2009; and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared and filed the Engineer's Report with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council the Engineer's Report; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and finds that the levy has been spread in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed, as set forth in the Engineer's Report. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. The Engineer's Report as presented consists of the following: a) A Description of District No. 8 and Improvements. b) The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Services, Operations and Maintenance) c) A Description of the Method of Apportionment resulting in an Assessment Rate per Levy Unit within District No. 8 for fiscal year 2008/2009. Section 3. The Engineer's Report as presented, is hereby approved, and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection. 000008 Resolution No. Page 2 Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation and final approval of the Engineer's Report. ADOPTED THIS 13th day of February, 2008. David H. Ready, City Manager ATTEST.- James Thompson, City Clerk CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on February 13, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: NOES- ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James Thompson, City Clerk City of Palm Springs, California RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 WITHIN THE PALM SPRINGS PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, initiated proceedings and declared its intention to levy special benefit assessments against parcels of land within the Palm Springs Street Lighting Maintenance District No_ 8, (hereafter referred to as "District No. 8") for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2008, and ending June 30, 2009, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, beginning with §22500 (hereafter referred to as the "Act"), to pay the costs and expenses of operation, maintenance, repair and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council the Engineer's Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the "Engineer's Report") in connection with the proposed levy and collection of special benefit assessments upon eligible parcels of land within District No. 8, and the City Council did by previous Resolution approve the Engineer's Report; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to levy and collect assessments against parcels of land within District No. 8 for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2008, and ending June 30, 2009, to pay the costs and expenses of operation, maintenance, repair and servicing of street lighting and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Following notice duly given, on January 16, 2008, the City Council held a full and fair Public Hearing regarding the levy and collection of assessments, and considered all oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons. The City Council has determined that the property owners in accordance with the requirements of Article XIIID of the California Constitution, have approved the assessments so presented. Section 2. Based upon its review (and amendments, as applicable) of the Engineer's Report, a copy of which has been presented to the City Council and which has been filed with the City Clerk, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: 000010 Resolution No. Page 2 a) The land within District No. 8 will receive special benefit by the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements and appurtenant facilities within the boundaries of District No. 8. b) District No. 8 includes all of the lands receiving such special benefit. c) The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within District No. 8 is in accordance and apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all eligible parcels in proportion to the special benefit to be received by each parcel from the improvements and services for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2008, and ending June 30, 2009. d) In accordance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution, following a property owner protest ballot proceeding conducted January 16, 2008, in accordance with state law, the assessment amounts described in the Engineer's Report are approved at amounts greater than the maximum assessment amounts previously approved by property owner petition or balloting. Section 3. The Engineer's Report and assessment as presented to the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby confirmed as filed. Section 4. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made, which improvements are briefly described as the maintenance, operation, administration and servicing of the improvements related to landscaping and lighting improvements and all appurtenant facilities related thereto. Section 5. The maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping and lighting improvements and appurtenant facilities shall be performed pursuant to the Act and the County Auditor of Riverside County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each parcel of land the amount of levy, and such levies shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the levy shall be paid to the City Treasurer. Section 6. The City Treasurer shall deposit all money representing assessments collected by the County for District No. 8 to the credit of a fund for the Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, and such money shall be expended only for the maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping and lighting improvements and appurtenant facilities as described in Section 4. 000011 Resolution No. Page 3 Section 7. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the District No. 8 levy for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2008, and ending June 30, 2009, Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the levy with the County Auditor upon adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED THIS 13th day of February, 2008. David H. Ready, City Manager ATTEST: James Thompson, City Clerk CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on February 13, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James Thompson, City Clerk City of Palm Springs, California 000012 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ENGINEER'S REPORT PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 "VINTAGE PALMS" FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PALM S �1 rr 'D�f' U cn 'QpRRATE9 Intent Meeting: November 7, 2007 Public Hearing: January 16, 2008 Confirmed: February 13, 2008 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Engineer's Report Affidavit Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, "Vintage Palms" This Report describes the District including the improvements, budget, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2008/2009, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 7th day of November, 2007. C 28931 By: EX ' dr David J. Barakian, P.E. JT IM Director of Public Works/City Engineer 9�OF CAI�F�� City of Palm Springs Civil Engineer C 28931 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ENGINEER'S REPORT PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 VINTAGE PALMS Fiscal Year 2008/2009 The Undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California. OQ� David J. Barakian, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the 7th day of November, 2007, (nes Thompson, City Clerk ity of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, on the 13th day of February, 2008. *es Thompson, City Clerk lity of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - ............................................. - -- - - 1 A. Introduction ......................................... .. -- .. .. -- ............. 1 B. Overview...... .......................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT.................................................................................. • . 2 A. Description of the District ....................................................... .. .. .. .. 2 B. Description of Improvements and Services ....................................................2 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT..................................................................... • . 4 A. General............ ..........................................................................4 B. Benefit Analysis............. .. .. .............................................................4 C. Assessment Methodology.......................................................... • 5 D. Assessment Formula..........................................................................5 DISTRICTBUDGET................ .. .................................................................. 6 A. Description of Budget Items ...........................................................................6 B. District Budget- Fiscal Year 2008/2009 ................................... .....................7 APPENDIX A— District Diagrams....................................... .. .. .. .. .. .......................9 APPENDIX B —Assessment Roll............................................... .. -- .. .. ........ 13 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Engineer's Report (hereinafter referred to as the 'Report) is to set forth the engineering analysis and findings for the levy of assessments in the City of Palm Springs (hereinafter referred to as the "City") Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 ("Vintage Palms"), (hereinafter referred to as the "District"), for fiscal year 2008/2009, in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 3, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "1972 Act") which is part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code and as provided by Article XIII D of the California Constitution (hereinafter referred to as "Article XIII D"). This District was formed to supplement certain City revenues and help finance the costs of providing for parkway maintenance within the District's boundaries. This report is prepared for the levy and collection of annual assessments for District for fiscal year 2008/2009. The City initiates proceedings for annual levying of assessments within the District by passing a resolution, which states that the District was established under the Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the name and location of the District, and preliminarily approves the Engineer's Report. The report prepared by the engineer must include an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram, i.e., map of the District showing the boundary of the District and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements against the parcels or lots which benefit from the improvements. Once the report is completed it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After the report is approved, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy and collect assessments, describes the improvements, and refers to the report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the proposed assessments. In 2004, the City initiated proceedings to increase the existing maximum annual assessments within the District, such that additional improvements to the street lighting system could occur, and that funds collected for this District could equal the current costs to operate and maintain the improvements. At the July 21, 2004, City Council meeting, a Public Hearing was conducted and a property owner protest ballot proceeding concluded, with the failure of the proposed increase to the existing maximum annual assessments within the District. This Engineer's Report continues to disclose the fact that the District is operating with a deficit, and continues to require the supplement of General Fund revenues from the City to operate and maintain the improvements within this District. In 2005, upon adoption of the confirmed Engineer's Report for this District for the 2005/2006 fiscal year, the City Council directed the City Engineer to schedule property owner protest ballot proceedings on the matter of approving an increase to the maximum annual assessment, as necessary to increase assessments to cover estimated annual expenses and to implement a Consumer Price Index ("CPI") annual inflator. At the July 19, 2006, City Council meeting, a Public Hearing was conducted and a property owner protest ballot proceeding concluded, with the failure of the proposed increase to the existing maximum annual assessments within the District. The Engineer's Report continued to disclose the fact that the District is operating with a deficit, and continued to require the supplement of City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 1 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms General Fund revenues from the City to operate and maintain the improvements within this District. In 2007, upon adoption of the confirmed Engineer's Report for this District for the 2007/2008 fiscal year, the City Council directed the City Engineer to schedule a third and final property owner protest ballot proceeding on the matter of approving an increase to the maximum annual assessment, as necessary to increase assessments to cover estimated annual expenses and to implement a Consumer Price Index ("CPI") annual inflator. On January 16, 2008, the property owner protest ballot proceeding was conducted, and in accordance with requirements of the California State Constitution Article XIIIC and XIIID ("Proposition 218"), increased annual assessments and implementation of a CPI annual inflator were approved. This Engineer's Report has been prepared in accordance with the previous City Council direction. B. OVERVIEW The District described in this report includes all lots and parcels within the residential area identified as "Vintage Palms", consisting of Tract 24853-1 and the remainder portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 25864 consisting of approximately 55 acres of vacant land. The City proposes to annually levy and collect special assessments to continue the maintenance of the improvements within the proposed District. Assessments within the District are proposed to be levied annually, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the 1972 Act") and in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution Article XIIIC and XIIID ("Proposition 218"). The assessments described in this Engineer's Report (hereinafter referred to as the "Report") shall be levied upon each parcel within the boundaries of the District and assessments shall be proportional to the special benefit received from the maintenance of the improvements. For the District, a benefit assessment rate per Parcel is established based upon estimated and actual operations and maintenance costs for the year. This establishes the maximum approved benefit assessment rate ("Maximum Rate") for the current year. Commencing with fiscal year 2009/2010, and then each subsequent year, the maximum assessment rate is proposed to be increased based upon the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Orange-Riverside County Area ("CPI"), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for the latest monthly statistical data available each year at the time the Engineer's Report is prepared, with the CPI for the same monthly statistical data from the prior year, and shall then adjust the maximum existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. This Report describes the District and the proposed assessments for fiscal year 2008/2009. The annual budget for the maintenance and operation of the improvements is based on estimated expenses for the upcoming fiscal year. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Parcel Number by the Riverside County ("County") Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Parcel Numbers and specific City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 2 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms Fund Numbers to identify on the tax roll properties assessed for special district benefit assessments. City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 3 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT A. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT The District originally included all lots and parcels within the residential area identified as "Vintage Palms", consisting of Tract 24853-1 and the remaining portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 25864, for a total of 62 single family residential lots and two vacant parcels. However, on May 5, 2004, by Resolution 20920 adopted by the City Council, Planned Development District 290, Tentative Tract Map 31848 (otherwise originally known as "Palm Springs Village" and subsequently as "Avalon") was approved. Included In the City Council's approval was the requirement to incorporate the existing parkway landscaping along the west side of Avenida Caballeros, north of San Rafael Drive, into the project. This segment of parkway landscaping would be transferred over to the project, and ultimately, a private Home Owners Association, for maintenance. In April 2006, the project commenced construction, clearing and rough grading was begun. Confirmation was received from the developer that removal of the parkway landscaping along the west side of Avenida Caballeros north of San Rafael Drive within the District would occur prior to June 30, 2006, (the end of the 2005/2006 fiscal year). Therefore, with the 2006/2007 Engineer's Report, it was identified that the westerly landscaped parkway along Avenida Caballeros north of San Rafael Drive, originally included in the District, was eliminated and excluded (de-annexed) from the District. All future parkway maintenance of this area will be the responsibility of the adjacent property through a Home Owners Association and recorded Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's), for the project now identified as "Avalon". Therefore, the remainder portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 25864 consisting of approximately 55 acres of vacant land, (previously identified as two vacant parcels by Assessor's Parcel Number 669-330-035 and 669-330-036), now included as part of the "Avalon" project, have been removed (de-annexed) from the District. The remaining parkway landscaping along the east side of Avenida Caballeros north of San Rafael Drive, and along the north side of San Rafael Drive adjacent to the Vintage Palms development, represent the improvements included in the District, to benefit the 62 single family residential lots within Tract 24853-1. The purpose of the District is to ensure the ongoing maintenance and servicing of parkway landscape improvements installed in connection with development of properties within the District. This District will provide the financial mechanism (annual assessments) by which the ongoing operation and maintenance of these improvements will be funded. The District structure, proposed improvements, method of apportionment and assessments described in this Report are based on improvement plans including all estimated direct expenditures, incidental expenses, and reserves associated with the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. B. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES The purpose of the District is to ensure the ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of parkway landscape improvements within the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, palm trees, turf areas with mowing strips, desert indigenous trees and ground cover, annual flowers, a sprinkler irrigation and emitter drip system, landscape drainage system, walkways and associated appurtenant facilities located in the dedicated landscaped parkway (street right-of-way) on the north side of San Rafael Drive and on the east side' of Avenida Caballeros north of San Rafael Drive, and all materials, equipment, ' Modified by the 2006/2007 Engineer's Report, previously the west side of Avenida Caballeros was included in the District, but was Subsequently de-annexed from the District and absorbed for maintenance by the adjacent project, "Avalon". City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 4 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms utilities, labor and appurtenant facilities related to the operation and maintenance of the parkway landscape improvements. The estimated annual cost to provide and maintain the improvements within the District shall be allocated to each property in proportion to the special benefits received. The Method of Apportionment described in this Report utilizes commonly accepted assessment engineering practices and has been established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the provisions of Proposition 218. Improvements and Services Permitted Pursuant to the 1972 Act As generally defined by the 1972 Act and applicable to this District, improvements and the associated assessments may include one or more of the following: 1) The installation or planting of landscaping; 2) The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities; 3) The installation or construction of public lighting facilities including, but not limited to, street lights and traffic signals; 4) The installation of park or recreational improvements including, but not limited to, all of the following: a) Land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, and drainage; b) Lights, playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms; c) The acquisition of land for park, recreational, or open-space purposes; 5) The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof; 6) The acquisition of any associated existing improvement; 7) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing including the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement including, but not limited to: a) Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvements; b) Grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities; c) Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; d) The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; e) The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti; f) Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements; g) Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements; 8) Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to: City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 5 City of Palm Springs--Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms a) The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; b) The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices; c) Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; d) Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; e) Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and, f) Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment. Landscaping Improvements The parkway improvements may include, but are not limited to, all landscaping material and facilities within the District. These improvements include ground cover, shrubs, trees, plants, irrigation and drainage systems, ornamental lighting structures and associated appurtenant facilities located within the District. In 2007, the entire east side of Avenida Caballeros parkway landscaping was removed and replaced, at the cost of Sun Cal -- developer of the adjacent Avalon project. Pursuant to a Court ordered Settlement Agreement between the original developer (Trans West Mousing) and representatives of homeowners within the Vintage Palms neighborhood, agreement included the developer's obligation to revise the existing desert landscape improvements along the east side of Avenida Caballeros to be consistent with parkway landscaping improvements to be installed along the west side of Avenida Caballeros. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT A. GENERAL The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, parks, open space areas and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district or District may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided within the District to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, Article XIII D requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Article XIII D provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS All improvements associated with this District have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the properties within the District to their full potential, consistent with the development plans. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8-Engineer's Report Page 6 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms individual property owners for the development of such properties, and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of maintenance and operation of the improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties. The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each assessed parcel within the District receives benefit from the improvements. The special benefits associated with the parkway improvements are specifically: • Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements; • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area; • Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space, open space areas and landscaping; • Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention; • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well- maintained improvements associated with the properties; and • Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise. All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District. Although the improvements may include landscaping improvements and other amenities available or visible to the public at large, the maintenance of these improvements is only necessary for the properties within the District and are not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the District boundary. Therefore, any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large- C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The method of apportionment for the District calculates the receipt of special benefit from the respective improvements based on the actual land use of the parcels within the District. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is equated to the overall land use of the parcel based on the parcel's actual land use or proposed planned development, and is reliant upon the special benefit received from the improvements planned within the District. To identify and determine the special benefit to be received by each parcel, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the District improvements as well as individual property development within the District. The costs associated with the improvements shall be fairly distributed among the parcels based upon the special benefit received by each parcel. The maintenance and operation of the landscaping improvements provides special benefit to all parcels within the District adjacent to the improvements. The total assessment was previously apportioned with 59% of the total District costs levied against the 62 single family lots within Tract 24853-1 and 41% of the total District costs levied against the remainder portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 25864 consisting of approximately 55 acres of vacant land, (previously identified as two vacant parcels by Assessor's Parcel Number 669-330-035 and 669-330-036). The apportionment was determined by the length of the adjacent landscaped parkways, with the westerly landscaped parkway along Avenida Caballeros representing 41% of the overall length of landscaped parkways within the District. City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 7 City of Palm Springs--Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms However, with the absorption of the westerly landscaped parkway along Avenida Caballeros for maintenance by the adjacent project, "Avalon", the apportioned 41% of the District costs representing that portion of the District was eliminated and de-annexed from the District in fiscal year 2006/2007. Therefore, the apportioned 59% of the District costs, representing the remaining portion (easterly landscaped parkway along Avenida Caballeros and the landscaped parkway along San Rafael Drive) now represents 100% of the District costs beginning in fiscal year 2006/2007. The District costs will be equally apportioned to each parcel within Tract 24853-1 on a per lot unit basis. All lots are assessed the same amount as each is a single-family lot and receives equivalent benefit. D. ASSESSMENT FORMULA Any new or increased assessment requires certain noticing and meeting requirements by law. Prior to the passage of Proposition 218 (California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID), legislative changes in the Brown Act defined a "new or increased assessment" to exclude certain conditions. These conditions included "any assessment that does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed." This definition and conditions were later confirmed through Senate Bill 919 (Proposition 218 implementing legislation). The purpose of establishing an Assessment Formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which could add to the District costs and assessments. This District provides for an annual adjustment to the Maximum Assessment Rate based upon the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles-Orange-Riverside County Area. The Assessment Formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment for the current fiscal year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment. The Maximum Assessment is equal to the initial Assessment (approved by properly owners within the District) adjusted annually based upon the Consumer Price Index. Beginning in fiscal year 2009/2010 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment would be recalculated and a new Maximum Assessment established within the District. The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District's annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment less than or equal to this Maximum Assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year. Although the Maximum Assessment will increase each year, the actual assessment may remain unchanged. The Maximum Assessment adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase to the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjustment maximum amount. If the budget and assessment for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the required budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner balloting. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be subject to balloting. City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 8 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms DISTRICT BUDGET A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS For the purpose of estimating costs for the maintenance and servicing, actual costs are used where possible. But where actual maintenance experience is lacking, cost estimates will be used to determine costs, as follows: Parkway Landscape Maintenance: Includes maintenance labor, materials and equipment required to properly maintain the authorized improvements and services within the District. Water costs: The cost of irrigation water for the parkway landscaping to be maintained is based upon actual Desert Water Agency billings on publicly landscaped areas being maintained within the District. Electrical energy costs. Energy costs included are those necessary for the operation of irrigation controls and decorative (ornamental) landscape lighting improvements. Incidental costs: These are costs for special items, such as costs of levying the assessments with the County Tax Collector, anticipated utility rate increases, or other such costs, and are determined individually. Another Incidental Cost is the expense of Assessment Engineering services. This includes costs of performing annual assessment engineering, determining existing or estimated costs, retaining of consultants, preparation of the Engineer's Report, and other related costs, such as publication of notices, mailings, elc. Another Incidental Cost is the County Assessor-Tax Collector's charge of $25 per County assessment account plus $0.20 per levied parcel, to place the assessments on the tax rolls. This charge will be distributed between the benefit Districts. Miscellaneous: All cost estimates shall be rounded to the nearest dollar, except where specified differently above. The total amount to be levied on any parcel will be rounded to an even number to accommodate collection on the property tax bill in two equal installments. B. DISTRICT BUDGET This report has been prepared pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code) and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). See next page. City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 9 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms B. DISTRICT BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 ("VINTAGE PALMS") Formed in 1990 A. PARKWAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Budget Items 2008/2009 Estimated Cost 1. Landscape Maintenance a. Contract Cost $ 10,000 b. Palm Tree Trimming $ 500 2. SCE Utility bills $ 1,200 3. DWA Utility bills $ 2,310 4. Incidentals $ 2,000 5. Labor& Administration $ 1,500 $ 17,510 Note: Maximum approved assessment was $17,510 in Fiscal Year 2008/2009, with a CPI annual inflator effective Fiscal Year 200912010. B. Actual Costs vs. Assessments Summary: Account (Deficit) as of 6/30/06 = ($42,410) Assessment in 2006/2007 � $6,878 Actual Costs in 2006/2007 = 16 518 Account(Deficit) as of 6130107 = ($52,050) Assessment in 2007/2008 = $6,878 Estimated Costs in 2007/2008 = 14 806 Estimated Account(Deficit) as of 6/30/08 = ($59,978) C. 2008/2009 ASSESSMENT Estimated cost for 2008/2009 ($17,510) Estimated Account(Deficit) as of 6/30/07 = ( 59 978 Total = ($77,488) Maximum Allowable Assessment= $17,510 with annual Consumer Price Index adjustment beginning in 2009/2010. D. Number of parcels = 62 single family lots E. Cost in 2008/2009 per parcel = $282.42 ($17,510 divided by 62) F, Actual Costs vs. Assessments History(Previous Closed Out 5 Years): Actual Costs: 02/03=$18,940; 03/04=$20,486; 04/05=$22,580; 05106=$20,699; 06/07=$16,518 Assessments: $11,657 $11,657 $11,657 $11,657 $6,878 G. Budget (Expenditure Detail), see Account No. 001-2451-43570 City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 10 City of Palm Springs--Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms APPENDIX A - DISTRICT DIAGRAM The parcels within the Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 ("Vintage Palms"), are shown on the current Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Map Book 669, Page 33, and Map Book 669, Page 52. The County Assessor's Parcel Map along with the Assessment Roll constitutes the District Assessment Diagram. A copy of the Parkway Maintenance District No. 8 ("Vintage Palms") boundary is shown on the following pages. City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 10 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms l6 55p' i N Or MN J� _ F 1 v / V 4•\4�wA N. x all i1 K ,fir p J4 Qp k @+�t� Tj - [IAFAE QI I?V� VO) � mar prrr�vrcr � � 5� ,k 44 A ro se N�AxNrAtAjmx ,qm ffm-l F� I I k\MFrr w.r 64PAOPERMS FORMED 1980 VTCTNT r'1` F&fF' •n ruu City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 11 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No, 8, Vintage Palms 521 HJd:.i�4'C• i i RXY A °2 Q© }�°,® j°®I9k t ®t 1 3 a,220 rt y�' ©6Ac.2 J?r R6 ze Pi4132 p/ y y. ln.vr[ �� Y [aeygr n •p. iY rr V! x.a, O.ATAti•ee rs JO ar 3r 3J �•� gg e! y R O.A3 A43 O.JHAe.f 0,/9 AcY 01.,t OQJA..t O.ZZAk A! � �'/M1N: �• r4N ya. LM pt• Y•/H /� T ® 522 r9 ro °a Of DISTRICT BOUNDARY F aaa A...4 a.esnet ? O Ja ,yyY dT c..cN A ORE Ae.t /T Q a O +3 1 45 � O O 35 r rc O.A6 Ae2 rJ .rHACS /6 Y •.cw tl.19 Ac.t �IL 4s -1!if• � Ad O O.eBA 1 aE{nci/f y ew nr O.r//w3 4 J5 O q� 0,/9 Aut Q 50 t 45 /6 ® JT y DRr Ac.f 0,2/AAc /+ /36 y QPIAe� y i•i�P/AeA '021M; /3 O 52 02/AeJ O.VAc 0,2 l rA O Y k : /81• 3 {/ 40 39 _ r'6'rrm u4•r'1 n♦r. If SAN SORRENTO a19A4# 54 xrl u in 50 55 5C 67 •M /O /� io• �• aSTAr:/ 0,%.y,f tv°,PP.yt. °.23k4 y M 1 9 O i'Faf e. Yixr salty 0./9ht y _ 0,E5AG,t y,O.Lbnc! ar/Ag* �aPah '�O,APAete C`H O erJx .r.J. axap rnrr n .r..q ii.a nre � Nb'bbPT err-e^ ww. 3 d 5 5 i 6 M 0..96Ae.l o'rr 0,23Ac.f °.ESna.d �a2rAmA C � 52l P /jJr— City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 12 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms APPENDIX B - ASSESSMENT ROLL Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the Riverside County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor's Parcel Map(s) associated with the Secured Roll. A listing of parcels proposed to be assessed within this District, along with the assessment amounts, is shown on the following table. City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 13 City of Palm Springs-Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSMENT ROLL PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 ("VINTAGE PALMS") FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 FUND NO. 68-2624 ASSESSOR'S ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR'S ASSESSMENT PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER 669-521-001-8 $282,42 669-521-025-0 $282.42 669-521-002-9 $282.42 669-521-026-1 $282.42 669-521-003-0 $282.42 669-521-027-2 $282.42 669-521-004-1 $282,42 669-522-001-1 $282.42 669-521-005-2 $282.42 669-522-002-2 $282.42 669-521-006-3 $282.42 669-522-003-3 $282.42 669-521-007-4 $282.42 669-522-004-4 $282.42 669-521-008-5 $282.42 669-522-005-5 $282.42 669-521-009-6 $282,42 669-522-006-6 $282.42 669-521-010-6 $282.42 I 669-522-007-7 $282,42 669-521-011-7 $282.42 669-522-008-8 $282.42 669-521-012-8 $282.42 669-522-009-9 $282.42 669-521-013-9 $282.42 669-522-010-9 $282.42 669-521-014-0 $282.42 669-522-011-0 $262.42 669-521-015-1 $282.42 669-522-012-1 $282.42 669-521-016-2 $282.42 669-522-013-2 $282.42 669-521-017-3 $282.42 I 669-522-014-3 $282.42 669-521-018-4 $282.42 669-522-015-4 $282.42 669-521-019-5 $282.42 669-522-016-5 $282.42 669-521-020-5 $282.42 669-522-017-6 $282.42 669-521-021-6 $282.42 669-522-018-7 $282.42 669-521-022-7 $282.42 669-522-019-8 $282,42 669-521-023-8 $282.42 669-522-020-8 $282.42 669-521-024-9 $282.42 669-522-021-9 $282.42 City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8-Engineer's Report Page 14 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 8, Vintage Palms ASSESSOR'S ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR'S ASSESSMENT PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER 669-522-022-0 $282.42 669-522-029-7 $282.42 669-522-023-1 $282.42 669-522-030-7 $282.42 669-522-024-2 $282.42 669-522-031-8 $282,42 669-522-025-3 $282.42 669-522-032-9 $282.42 669-522-026-4 $282.42 669-522-033-0 $282.42 669-522-027-5 $282.42 669-522-034-1 $282.42 669-522-028-6 $282A2 669-522-035-2 $282.42 TOTAL = 17,510.04 City of Palm Springs, Parkway Maintenance District No. 8—Engineer's Report Page 15