Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/5/2008 - STAFF REPORTS - 2.G. °FVALM Spy 'y u � rro erocm• C�``F°R N City Council Staff Report March 5, 2008 CONSENT CALENDAR Subject: APPROVAL OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT From: David H. Ready, City Manager Initiated by: Public Works and Engineering Department SUMMARY The City of Palm Springs is a co-Permittee to the Whitewater River Watershed Municipal Stormwater Permit (Permit) issued to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC) by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7 (CRWQCB), on September 5, 2001. The Permit has expired and is currently being re-issued by the CRWQCB for a new 5-year term. The Permit is necessary to comply with federal regulations regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) practices within the City. Included in the terms of the Permit is the need to establish a cooperative agreement regarding administration and implementation of the various programs and actions required by the Permit among all the co-Permittees to the Permit. The proposed Implementation Agreement was prepared by RCFC and Riverside County. A prior version of the Implementation Agreement was previously approved, and will be terminated upon approval of the latest version. Approval of the proposed Implementation Agreement is a necessary action to comply with the terms of the City"s NPDES Permit. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Terminate Agreement No. 3846, approved September 3, 1997, and 2) Terminate Agreement No. 4829, approved February 18, 2004; and 3) Approve Agreement No. , a Cooperative Agreement between the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD), the County of Riverside (County), the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), and the Cities of Banning, Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage (Cities), for implementing the terms for compliance with the National Discharge ITEM NO. City Council Staff Report March 5, 2008 - Page 2 NPDES Permit Implementation Agreement Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit (NPDES Permit) issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region (CRWQCB-CRB); and 4) Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. STAFF ANALYSIS: The NPDES Program is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution. In 1972, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) was amended to provide that discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States from any point source is effectively prohibited, unless the discharge is in compliance with a NPDES Permit. The Clean Water Act was amended in 1987 to establish a framework for regulating municipal and industrial stormwater discharges under the NPDES Program. In 1997, the City adopted Chapter 8.70 of the Municipal Code which incorporates regulations of the NPDES Program. The City is one of several co-Permittees to the NPDES Permit issued to RCFC by the CRWQCB. Issued for 5-year terms, an original NPDES Permit was issued in 1996, and a subsequent NPDES Permit was issued in 2001, currently the CRWQCB is preparing to re-issue a new NPDES Permit. The NPDES Permit regulates the City's current NPDES Program. The previous Permits required a similar Implementation Agreement that facilitates the cooperative efforts of all of the associated co-Permittees, those being. RCFC, Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), and the cities of Banning, Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage. The Implementation Agreement generally requires the co-Permittees' cooperative efforts to enforce the NPDES regulations, such as: regulation and enforcement of local ordinances and regulations, inspection and reconnaissance surveys of municipal storm drain systems, submittal of required reports and information to CRWQCB through RCFC, and implementation of the Best Management Practices (BMP's) and/or programs and activities to ensure compliance with the NPDES Permit. The Implementation Agreement also outlines cost sharing requirements related to the NPDES Permit, which are related to: public education, monitoring, sampling, inspection, enforcement, and reporting. The City of Palm Springs is excluded from costs associated with public education and monitoring programs, as these costs are covered by a previously adopted Whitewater Watershed Benefit Assessment Area that assesses fees to property owners for costs associated with the NPDES Program. The City of Palm Springs is required to participate in cost sharing related to consultant services necessary to prepare manuals or develop programs and prepare studies relevant to the NPDES Permit, as well as cover the individual co-Permittee fee for the NDPES Permit. The City's share of the consultant services cost is apportioned based on the population of the cities and County, with fixed percentages for RCFC and CVWD. City Council Staff Report March 5, 2008 - Page 3 NPDES Permit Implementation Agreement Similar Implementation Agreements were approved by the City of Palm Springs on September 3, 1997, and again on February 18, 2004, which were related to the prior NPDES Permits. These Agreements should be terminated, to be replaced in full by the proposed Implementation Agreement, which will provide for a continuation of the cooperative efforts required to implement the NPDES Permit and its regulations among all of the various agencies that participate in the NPDES Permit. Staff recommends the Implementation Agreement be approved as presented, as it continues an existing cooperative agreement between the various agencies that participate in the Whitewater River Municipal Stormwater Permit issued to RCFC on behalf of the City, who is a co-Permittee to the NPDES Permit. The proposed Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: NPDES Program costs have continued to increase as consultant services on behalf of the co-Permittees were necessary in the negotiation of a new NPDES Permit with the CRWQCB. Estimated costs to the City for fiscal year 2007/2008 are approximately $34,000 but will decrease to $28,000 for fiscal year 2008/2009 as the NPDES Permit negotiation is completed with the CRWQCB, See Attachment 1 for a break-down of estimated NPDES Program costs shared among the co-Permittees. The Implementation Agreement maximizes cost savings to all co-Permittees by centralizing what would be individual program costs required of each Permittee. The NPDES Program costs are budgeted each year as part of the Public Works and Engineering Department budget. SUBMITTED: OV, �0" T J David J. Barakian Thomas J. Weil§on Director of Public Works/City Engineer Assistant City Manager David H. Ready, City Manager Attachments: 1. NPDES Program Cost Sharing Estimate 2. Agreement City Manager Proposed Presentation 07/08 Estimated 08/09 07108 CVWD $26.551.00 $25,467.02 $29,983.68 Banning $21,177.21 $20,299.28 $17,124,94 Cathedral City $38.458 23 $37,588.58 $36,843.35 Coachella $26,506.90 527,823.78 $29,306,17 County $78,756.01 $75,409.95 $72.866 49 Desert Mot Springs $16,571.80 $16,911.62 $14,261.09 Indian Wells $3,662,80 $3,572 86 $3,763.22 Indio $53,947.37 $55,773.36 $58,744.84 La Quinta $28.865 69 $29,707.81 $31,290.58 Palm Desert $37,297,27 $35,968.63 $37,884.96 Palm Springs $34.961.82 $33,644.92 $28,382.86 Rancho Mirage $12.552.13 $12,249 81 $12,902.45 RCFC&WCD" $26,551.00 $28,467.02 $29,983,68 TOTAL $405,861.23 $405,884,64 $403,338. 11 Does not include additional regional program costs paid for by District's Benefit Assessment AGREEMENT National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stonnwater Discharge Pen-nit Implementation Agreement (California Regional Water Quality Control Board- Colorado River Basin Region) This Agreement, entered into by the RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (RCFC&WCD), the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (COUNTY), the COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (CVWD), and the CITIES OF BANNING, CATHEDRAL CITY, COACHELLA, DESERT HOT SPRINGS, INDIAN WELLS, INDIO, LA QUINTA, PALM DESERT, PALM SPRINGS and RANCHO MIRAGE (CITIES), establishes the responsibilities of each party concerning compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Pcrmit (NPDES Permit)issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board- Colorado River Basin Region(CRWQCB-CRB) pursuant to Order No. 01-077. RECITALS A. WHEREAS,Congress in 1987 added Section 402(p)to the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S_C.§1342(p)); and, B. WHEREAS, Section 402(p) of the CWA requires certain operators of MS4s, industrial facilities and persons conducting certain construction activities to obtain NPDES Pennits before discharging storm water into navigable waters; and, C. WHEREAS, Section 402(p) further requires the Federal Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) to promulgate regulations for NPDES Pen-nit applications; and, D. WHEREAS,EPA promulgated such regulations and adopted them in November 1990; and, E. WHEREAS,pursuant to the CWA,EPA has delegated authority to the California State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB)to administer the NPDES Permit process within the State; and, F. WHEREAS, SWRCB has in turn delegated its NPDES permitting authority to -I- "I'll I'lG the Regional Water Quality Control Boards to administer the NPDES Pen-nit process within the boundaries of their respective regions; and, G. WHEREAS,RCFC&WCD and CVWD are authorized to provide for the control of flood and storm waters within their respective jurisdictions and are empowered to investigate, examine, measure, analyze, study and inspect matters pertaining to flood and storm waters; and, H. WHEREAS,on March 9,2006,RCFC&WCD,COUNTY,CVWD and CITIES reapplied for an area-wide NPDES Permit in accordance with the current NPDES Permit(Order No. 01-077, NPDES No. CAS617002) which expired on September 5, 2006; and, i. WHEREAS, it is anticipated that CRWQCB-CRB will issue a new NPDES Pen-nit to RCFC&WCD,COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES in approximately March 2008 pursuant to Section 402(p) of the CWA; and, J. WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit designates RCFC&WCD and COUNTY as Principal Pennittees and RCFC&WCD, COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES as Permittees; and, K. WHEREAS, RCFC&WCD, COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES are to perform and/or execute certain activities and responsibilities prescribed in the NPDES Permit; and, L. WHEREAS,RCFC&WCD and COUNTY,as PRINCIPAL,PERMITTEES,are willing to undertake certain activities in order to facilitate implementation of the NPDES Permit requirements; and, M. WHEREAS, cooperation between RCFC&WCD, COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES in the administration and implementation of the NPDES Permit and resulting programs and actions is in the best interest of all parties; and N. WHEREAS, RCFC&WCD established the Whitewater Watershed Benefit Assessment Area(BENEFIT ASSESSMENT)pursuant to RCFC&WCD Ordinance 14 on May 14, 1991 to offset RCFC&WCD's program and administrative costs associated with the development, implementation, and management of the federally mandated NPDES program and RCFC&WCD is willing to utilize BENEFIT ASSESSMENT funds to support RCFC&WCD's role as PRINCIPAL PERMITTEE and to support regional program costs to the extent BENEFIT ASSESSMENT funds -2- 000003 are available. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 1. NPDES Permit A true and correct copy of the NPDES Permit issued to RCFC&WCD, COUNTY,CVWD and CiT1ES by CRWQCB-CRB pursuant to Order No.01-077is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety and made a part of this Agreement Future NPDES Permits replacing or amending Order No. 0 1-077 shall similarly become a part of this Agreement upon issuance by CRWQCB-CRB_ Said document(s) shall collectively be referred to as"the NPDES Permit"for the purpose of interpreting this Agreement- 2- Incorporation of Federal and State Laws. All applicable Federal and State laws and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of the NPDES Permit, as then written, and as they maybe amended during the tern of this Agreement, shall govern in the event they conflict with any provision of this Agreement- 3- Delegation of Responsibilities. The responsibilities of each of the parties to this agreement shall be as follows: A. Public Education Program. RCFC&WCD shall conduct public education activities on a regional basis that focus on reducing non-point source pollution within the NPDES Permit area. RCFC&WCD shall be reimbursed for its costs by COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES in accordance with the cost sharing provisions set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement- B. Monitoring Program. RCFC&WCD and CVWD shall perform or coordinate sampling of surface water and urban runoff in accordance with the provisions of the NPDES Permit Monitoring and Reporting Program contained therein. The location of the sampling sites (Sites) shall be determined by RCFC&WCD and CVWD, subject to approval by CRWQCB-CRB. More specifically: 1. RCFC&WCD shall coordinate implementation of the NPDES -3- 0 GOO 0 7 Permit Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. RCFC&WCD shall reimburse CVWD for all of its costs associated with sample collection and laboratory analysis 3_ RCFC&WCD shall he reimbursed by the CVWD, COUNTY and CITIES for implementation of the NPDES Permit Monitoring and Reporting Program in accordance with the cost sharing provisions set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. C. Consultant's Services and Cooperative Agreements. In the event RCFC&WCD requires the services of an agency,consultant or consultants to implement NPDES program requirements, prepare manuals, develop programs or perform studies relevant to the entire permitted area pursuant to this Agreement, the cost of said consultant services shall be shared by RCFC&WCD, COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES in accordance with the cost sharing provisions set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES shall be notified in writing of RCFC&WCD's request for proposals from consultants, selection of a consultant,consultant's fee,contract timetable and payment schedule,and be allowed the opportunity to participate in decisions related to consultant's services D. Principal Permittee Duties. RCFC&WCD shall coordinate, implement and, when required, contribute to regional NPDES Permit compliance activities; establish and update a uniform data submittal fonnat; prepare annual reports; forward information received from RWQCB-CRB to the COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES; inform COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES of state and federal regulations pertaining to the MS4; and chair Desert Task Force meetings. RCFC&WCD shall be reimbursed for said duties [IW] bythe COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES in accordance with Section4 -4- of this Agreement. E_ Desert Task Force. Each Permittee shall designate staff representatives to the Desert Task Force in writing to the RCFC&WCD. The Desert Task Force shall be responsible for coordinating regional NPDES Permit and Monitoring and Reporting Program compliance activities, including related communications with the RWQCB-CRB, updates to this Implementation Agreement, and compliance with Total Maximum Daily Loads(TMDLs)and other compliance orders issued by the RWQCB-CRB affecting the MS4 Permit, NPDES MS4 Monitoring and Reporting Program and/or the Whitewater River Watershed Municipal Storrnwater Program Stonnwater Management Plan. In addition, the Desert Task Force, or sub-conunittees thereof, shall be the forum for distribution, discussion, and decision-making of items related to agreements and consultant selection related to regional compliance with the NPDES Permit. F. Regulation and Enforcement. COUNTY and CITIES shall be responsible for the adoption and enforcement of their ordinances and regulations within their respective jurisdictions to ensure compliance with the NPDES Permit. This includes the exercise of land use controls, the exercise of police powers and the enforcement of ordinances that COUNTY or CITIES presently have adopted or will adopt in the future, provided, however, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring COUNTY or CITIES to exercise such powers, controls or authorities in any particular maimer. G. Inspection of MS4 facilities(consisting pnimarily of stonn sewer pipe and channel infrastructure). RCFC&WCD, COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES shall perform reconnaissance surveys oftheirMS4 Facilities as requiredby -5- 00Q'� �9 the NPDES Permit. Any wet weather or dry weather sampling or field screening for the reconnaissance surveys shall be the responsibility of the COUNTY or CITIES,depending on where the discharge originates. Each Permittee shall be responsible formaintaining any records,tables or other data that are needed to support the reporting of the survey results to CRWQCB-CRB. Fl. Submittals to CRWQCB-CRB. RCFC&WCD shall coordinate and submit all required reports and information related to the regional compliance progf-am to CRWQCB-CRB. COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES shall maintain sufficiently adequate records,information and/or data concerning their program development and implementation activities to enable RCFC&WCD to provide all required reports and submittals in a timely manner. COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES shall produce or supply such records, information and/or data in a reasonable manner upon request of CRWQCB-CRB or RCFC&WCD. RCFC&WCD shall also keep adequate records, information and/or data concerning its program development and implementation activities and produce or supply same in a reasonable manner upon request of CRWQCB-CRB. I. Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Programs_ Unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, RCFC&WCD, COUNTY, CVWD and CITIES shall be responsible for implementing each of the BMPs and/or other programs and activities required by the NPDES Permit in accordance with their authority. 4. Cost sharing. Costs for services to be performed in accordance with Sections 3.A_,3_S_,3.C. and 3.1)of this Agreement shall be shared in accordance with the following formula: IC = (TC-RCFC&WCD-CVWD) x (IP/TP) Where, -6- �� �T � IC = Individual Cost TC = Total Cost RCFC&WCD = RCFC&WCD Cost-Shared Amount CVWD = CVWD Cost-Shared Amount IP = Individual Population TP = Total Population The Total Cost (TC) shall be determined based on the following formula TC = Shared Costs + Credits - Debits Where, Shared Costs = Estimation of upcoming fiscal year's cost for services to be performed in accordance with Sections 3.A., 3.B., 3.C. and 3.D of this Agreement. Credits = Portion of estimated Shared Costs for the previous fiscal year that were not expended. Debits=Portion ofactual Shared Costs which exceeded estimated Shared Costs for the previous fiscal year_ RCFC&WCD's share shall be 7% of the Total Cost. CVWD's share shall be 7% of the Total Cost. The population of CITIES shall be based on the latest California State Department of Finance population figures issued in May of each year. COUNTY population shall be based on the most current Tax Rate Area (TRA) information best fitting the NPDES Permit area. If RCFC&WCD's compliance costs for administering and complying with the NPDES MS4 Permit and this agreement are less than available BENEFIT ASSESSMENT Revenues for that fiscal year and RCFC&WCD's BENEFIT ASSESSMENT fund has sufficient reserves, RCFC&WCD may opt to use the excess BENEFIT ASSESSMENT revenues to offset the compliance costs for the portions of COUNTY and CITIES of BANNING, DESERT HOT SPRINGS,PALM SPRINGS and CATHEDRAL CITY within the BENEFIT ASSESSMENT based on each aforementioned party's population within the BAA. Population shall be based on the most current TRA and/or California Department of Finance information best fitting the BENEFIT 7 ASSESSMENT boundary. 5. Term of the Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date the last duly authorized representative of RCFC&WCD, COUNTY,CVWD or CITIES executes it. The Agreement shall remain in effect until the date that the CRWQCB-CRB issues a new NPDES Permit, unless each of the parties withdraws sooner in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 6. Additional Parties. Any public agency(Agency) which incorporates after the date of issuance of the NPDES Permit and/or after the date of execution of this Agreement may file a written request with Principal Permittees asking to be added as a party. Upon receipt of such a request, Principal Permittees shall solicit the approval or denial of each Permittee_ If a majority of the Permittees, each having one, co-equal vote, approves the addition of the Agency, the Principal Permittees shall ask CRWQCB-CRB to add the Agency to the NPDES Permit as an additional Permittee. Once the Agency is made an additional Permittee to the NPDES Permit,this Agreement shall be amended to reflect the addition,and the Agency shall,thereafter, comply with all provisions of the NPDES Permit and this Agreement. Upon execution of the amended Agreement,the Agency shall be responsible for the shared costs in accordance with Section 4 of this Agreement for the current and any subsequent fiscal year. 7. Withdrawal fromtheApreement. Any party may withdraw from this Agreement 60 days after giving written notice to the Principal Permittees and CRWQCB-CAB. The withdrawing party shall agree in such notice to file for a separate NPDES Permit and to comply with all of the requirements established by CRWQCB-CRB. Withdrawal from the Agreement shall constitute forfeiture by the withdrawing party of its share of any costs paid as described in Section 4. of this Agreement and is conditioned on the payment of all costs accrued in accordance with Section 4. The withdrawing party shall be responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of its withdrawal. The cost allocations to the remaining parties shall be recalculated in the following fiscal year, in accordance with Section 4. 8. Non-compliance with Permit Requirements. Any party found to be in non- -8- GOOK- 2 compliance with the conditions of the NPDES Pen-nit shall be solely liable for any lawfully assessed penalties resulting from such non-compliance. Common or joint penalties shall be calculated and allocated among the responsible parties as determined by the CRWQCB-CRB and any related proceedings and according to the formula outlined in Section 4 of this Agreement. 9. Amendments to the Apreement. Except as provided in Section 6,this Agreement may be amended only by consent of all parties to the Agreement. No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and duly signed by the authorized representatives of all parties to the Agreement. 10. Authorized Signatories. The General Manager-Cbief Engineer ofRCFC&WCD, General Manager-Chief Engineer of CVWD, the Executive Officer of COUNTY and the City Managers of CITIES (or their designees) are authorized to execute this Agreement and all amendments hereto, to take all other procedural steps necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement and to file for and obtain an NPDES Permit(s) or amendments thereto_ 11. Notices. All notices shall be deemed duly given when delivered to the designated Desert Task Force representative by hand; or three(3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid. 12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid,illegal or unenforceable,the validity,legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby. 13. Consent to Waiver and Breach. No provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused,unless the waiver or breach is consented to in writing and signed by the party or parties affected. Consent by any party to a waiver or breach by any other party shall not constitute consent to any different or subsequent waiver or breach. 14. Applicability of Prior Agreements. This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter;all prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and undertakings concerning the NPDES -9- Permit within the limits of CRWQCB-CRB's jurisdictional area are superseded hereby. 15. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts or copies (counterparts) by the parties hereto. When each party has signed and delivered at least one counterpart to the other parties hereto, each counterpart shall be deemed an original and,taken together, shall constitute one and the same Agreement,which shall be binding and effective as to the parties hereto. -10- Q'HO IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date the last duly authorized representative executed it. This Agreement will only become effective when fully executed by each of the parties hereto. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By By WARREN D. WILLIAMS MARION ASHLEY, Chainnan General Manager-Chief Engineer Board of Supervisors, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: JOE RANK NANCY ROMERO County Counsel Clerk to the Board By By David 1-1. K. huff, Deputy Deputy Dated: (SEAL) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By By LARRY PARRISH JOHN TAVAGLIONE, Chairman County Executive Officer Board of Supervisors, County of Riverside Dated: ATTEST: NANCY ROMERO Clerk to the Board By Deputy (SEAL) JEU:pin ps\xxxxxx 11/02/07 APPROVED AS TO FORM: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT By By STEVE ROBBllVS General Manager-Chief Engineer By JOHN W. MCFADDI N President Dated: -12 Q© QQ � APPROVED AS TO FORM: CJTY OF BANNING By By City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk -13- 0006117 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY By By City Attomcy Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk -14- APPROVED AS TO FORM: CiTV OF COACT ELLA By By City Attomey Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS Ey By City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: By Dated City Clerk -16- WON APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF INDLAN WELLS By By City Attomey Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk Qo'uun1)" APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF INDIO By By City Attomey Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk -18- 9GO022 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF LA. QUANTA By By City Attomey Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF PALM DESERT By By City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS By By City Attomey Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk -21- QG06125 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF RANC110 MIRAGE By By City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: By Dated: City Clerk -22- 099026