HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/19/2008 - STAFF REPORTS - 00 From the desk of:
W e4gzU r(3 M44-K04Vn/
691 N. Belardo Road
Palm Springs, CA 92262
(760) 325-0277 FAX: 325-8228
email: wbkms@=Lcom
To: The Mayor and City Council of Palm Springs
Palm Springs City Staff
Subject: "Re-packaging" as a first step to RE-Market Downtown Palm Springs
Date: March 19", 2008
Summary:
As any marketing strategist would tell you, Councilman Mills was correct in
his assumption that all marketing plans begin with the creation or recreation of a
"product" to establish the appeal to its consumers. When standard brands re-
launch or introduce to a new or extended demographic; one that they have targeted
to translate into eventual sales, it begins with design or re-design, and the creation
of "the brand packaging and image".
Comment: Planting at bases of Palm Trees along Palm Canyon:
Although, in my twenty years as a resident, 1 have clumsily stumbled, even twisted
an ankle ortwo due to the uneven sidewalks and bases of these trees, I do not think
that planting, simply planting shrubs and greenery at the base will solve any
problems. In a matter of hours, perhaps weeks, these well intended plant beds will
be trampled, and the ongoing cost of maintenance and replanting of same will likely
exceed the initial cost!
Recommendation:
LIKED THE IDEA THAT WAS PROPOSED BY COUNCILMAN HUTCHESON: Consider
how many counties in this state have "Adopt a Highway" programs.
Concurring also with Mayor Pougnet,we are heading into a recession, and tax payer
dollars in our budget should be highly guarded. We are also approaching a greater
divide between the "haves" and the "have nots". Those who have, can afford to
give. Given the strong relationships within our"fund raising community"; inclusive
of the relationships with various neighborhood organisations, I think the "Adopt a
Tree" concept is an excellent idea. PLANTERS that encase the base of trees should
be considered. They could be wooden, and shaded, painted in colors conducive to
the overall look, i.e. "Repackaging of the Image of Downtown Palm Springs". This
d3�/9 faoa8
�iC3,G/Li L11N7ME�I�T-
s
ideas creates an opportunity for those in the community who would like to be apart
of the "New and Improved" re-creation of Downtown Palm Springs. I also concur
with Councilwoman Foat: Uptown is not another city. We need to bridge that gap
and create a thematic consistency to appeal to both tourists and locals. All of Palm
Canyon should be a part of this uplift!
Comment: Vacant stores and Empty Windows:
As in any real estate venue, empty is bad. Empty is ugly. Empty brings down th
value of property in proximity. Empty lacks attraction. Empty is bad the overall
image of our community!
Recommendation:
AGAIN, I LIKED THE IDEA THAT WAS PROPOSED BY COUNCILMAN HUTCHESON:
Fine Art in the Windows!
Another part of the science of marketing is trend watching and or creation of trend, There
are two main rails of MARKETING TRENDS in this country right now. Just turn on your
television, and what do you see? GREEN MARKETING AND GOODWILL MARKETING! If
Donald Trump and Oprah Winfrey are hosting shows on Network television,you mustknow
that we are already on the right tract with all of the Events and Fund raising that are done
in our community, Motivated by same, I propose we are capable to rise to this challenge!
Let's turn it up a notch, and make it work for the DOWNTOWN area. Make Fine Art
apart of the "repackaging"of our Downtown Corridor. The DPA, in association with
the IAFCE (International Arts for Cause Exchange), can .provide what is
needed...NOW!
Showcasing Fine art in empty windows will enhance the appearance of property
available; it my even draw potential clients to the location as future tenants. Beyond
that, through our relationship with the IAFCE, if any of the featured works are sold,
we can contribute to the Downtown Improvement "Product Redesign" campaign.
Currently, we have, in archives, several large framed pieces that can be "loaned"
and/or "commissioned" for this effort.
IF< IF¢IF, in the Fall, these store locations remain empty, we can consider an
additional option: Weekend Galleries that would feature additional works that can
provide a cash flow(commission based) income to the property owner(which may
even exceed current rent demands),in tandem with continual supportfor Downtown
improvement.
The DPA, interfacing with the IAFCE are prepared to turn-key an opportunitythat will
further enhance Palm Springs as an "Art Community/Destination", whilst raising
Goodwill marketing funds to help achieve a new and improved Downtown!
RE: THE FOUNTAIN
Addendum: Just in case you did not receive this email:
PERSONAL NOTE:AS SOMFONE WI.10 HAS NO LESS THAN TWENTY WORKS OF ART IN HER BATHROOM ALONE,1 FIND
IT DIFFICULT TO CRITICIZE THE"ARTISTIC VALUE",AS ART IS,AND WILL ALWAYS BE,SUBJECTIVE
Wanted to share a few things to consider: Having lived in proximity to this project
since its inception, there were a few things not mentioned or considered.
Notwithstanding the space it takes away from the park, and the costs that the city
has incurred to date, let me share my "observations of concern":
LIABILITY:
(1) Phase one; when it was "working": I used to refer to this as Jimmy's "sky is
falling report", as he was the one who drove past it several times a day and would
come home furious about the danger: the kids would swing on the dra in
swinging, things,andiump off into the water. Thatwas when it was working. I finally
called Jerry and "warned" of POTENTIAL.liability: what would happen if a child was
injured? He responded,then, that the city"had no liability as this was a piece of art".
HMMM...maybe someone should post a sign to that statement of fact, I thought, and
responded.
IMAGE:
(2) Phase Two: Later, it was used as a daily bath for the homeless who sought to
refresh themselves each day. I would find it difficult to believe that the fountain was
not a draw to this area for these unfortunate folk.
In sum, if the Department of Parks and Recreation continues to host Art Festivals in
the park, and these event are not only a bridge between Downtown and Uptown for
tourists and locals to attend,that creates a diverse artistic backdrop to the gateway
to our downtown, why not give them more room? Why revisit a situation that has
already cost this city so much money, and COULD cost the city MUCH more. We
were very lucky that no child was injured when the fountain was working. We are
very fortunate-to have a community that cares about its homeless population, and
seek solutions for same outside the downtown"curb appeal" demands for our local
economy.
Why risk doing this again? Why not quit while we are ahead in these two areas of
liability and image, and use the space to create something bigger and better(the art
fairs) that all who visit and live here can enjoy?
The fountain has never been a draw to Palm Springs, uptown or downtown. It has
never provided anything for our city other than cost, exposure/liability, and an
eyesore that takes up too much space that could be better used for the benefit of
ALL....at least.,..MORE....with less COST, and removing any potential LIABILITY or
IMAGE problem. Something to consider?