Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/3/2008 - STAFF REPORTS - 2.P. �O?PAMSA4 i2 u' u r N CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 2008 CONSENT AGENDA SUBJECT: APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH HNTB CORP. TO CONDUCT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $581,647.00 FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Department of Aviation SUMMARY A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grant has been received which will provide approximately 85% funding for an updated Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan study. This action is to approve a Professional Services Agreement with HNTB Corporation to commence the study. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement for the Airport Master Plan with HNTB Corporation in an amount not-to-exceed $581,647.00, 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. STAFF ANALYSIS: The most recent Master Plan for the Palm Springs International Airport was conducted in 2003. The FAA requires airports to maintain a current five year plan, and has provided Palm Springs a grant for this purpose. As required, the study will follow FAA prescribed methodology mandated for airport planning which includes, in part: a full inventory of airside, landside and terminal facilities; demand/forecasting analysis; evaluation of the Airport's compliance with FAA design standards; development of airport improvement alternatives, including feasibility and environmental factors, etc. A detailed scope of work can be found in "Attachment A" of the attached Agreement. ITEM NO._(�� City Council Staff Report September 3, 2008 -- Page 2 Master Plan— HNTB Agreement The projected timeframe from "Notice to Proceed" to the completion of the study is approximately one year. However, if the study reveals that additional environmental evaluations are required, those would be addressed under a separate program and require additional funding, which may also be eligible for FAA grant funding. A detailed program schedule is included in "Attachment E" to the Agreement. The consultant being recommended to complete this study, HNTB Corporation, a California company, was selected in accordance with the City and FAA procurement guidelines for professional services. During this Statement of Qualification (SOO) process, four responding firms were ranked by a selection committee according to their aggregate qualifications. A particular qualification of the chosen vendor is their experience in successfully completing other airport master plan services for Los Angeles International Airport, Ontario Airport, San Bernardino Airport and San Diego International Airport. FISCAL IMPACT: Airport Improvement Project Grant 3-06-0181-42 was awarded by the FAA to fund the majority of the Master Plan study process. Total project funding is as follows: $ 495,500 (AIP 42 — FAA Grant) 415-6600-56083 $ 25,618 (City share) 415-6400-56083 $ 60,529 (City share) 415-6400-50000 Total Contract $ 581,647 Consistent with FAA mandates on master planning contracts, a third party independent fee estimate was conducted and has affirmed the appropriateness of the contract amount. l ak-1 Thomas Nolan Executive Director, Airport David H. Ready, Cater Attachment: HNTB Contract Services Agreement Exhibits 1 i Revised: 6130108 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES m, 5912361 Palm Springs International Airport Airport Master Plan ATTACHMENT A Scope of Services Preamble Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) is a commercial service international airport located in Palm Springs, California. The Airport is owned and operated by the City of Palm Springs and serves the Coachella Valley region of California, an integral part of the Southern California region and economy. Both operations and enplanements at PSP are anticipated to increase as the Coachella Valley continues to grow -in population and becomes more popular as a tourist destination. The Airport will be required to handle greater numbers of passengers, cargo, and operations- The Master Plan Update will help guide the Airport's future as the air carrier airport serving the Coachella Valley and help frame the-Airport's role within the greater Southern California region: - -- This document is a draft final scope of work for a Master Plan Update for Palm Springs International Airport. This scope of work is respectfully submitted by HNTB Corporation (HNTB)- HNTB and its partners will complete the project from its inception through completion according to the scope, schedule, and budget agreed to with the City of Palm Springs, owner and operator of Palm Springs International Airport. 8/15/2008 1 of23 Final Document Final Submifial 09 j 1 L Element 1: Project Definition / Goals & Oblectiyes The focus of Element 1 is to fully define the project and frame the Master Plan Update Goals & Objectives. The result of this element will be a clear scope of work for the Master Plan Update including a project schedule, budget, and work plan. The scope of work, proposed schedule, and proposed budget will be reviewed by the Los Angeles Airports District Office (ADO) of the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA's) Western Pacific Region. HNTB will assist in coordination with FAA's local staff at the direction of PSP- Task 1.1 Project Definition HNTB is working with PSP staff and the LA ADO to define the master plan scope. The intent of the scope of work, project schedule, and project budget is to provide PSP and HNTB with sufficient guidelines, budget, and schedule to prepare a final master plan document that will effectively serve Palm Springs International Airport. The project scope described herein will be completed according to the fee and project schedule submitted as attachments to the contract. Project definition is intended to specify three primary elements: 1. The level of effort the proiect will encompass. This level of effort will be based on available—budget, the priorities---of the Airport, and the complexity of anticipated analyses. A level of effort determination will allow the consultant to concentrate effort in key areas. 2. Preliminary identification of environmental considerations of concern at PSP. It is assumed that this Master Plan will result in the recommendation to implement a program or projects that will require further environmental analysis under NEPA and/or CEQA (note that CEQA analyses are not eligible for FAA funding). However, the master plan scope, schedule, and fee may be revised to allow for additional preparatory work in support of potential environmental analysis. 3. Stakeholder Involvement and Public Partici ation- a. Technical Committee: PSP and HNTB will establish a Technical Committee made up of Interested parties that may include airport employees, airport tenants, City of Palm Springs representatives, representatives of other Coachella Valley communities, agencies, or interested parties. The Technical Committee is expected to consist of 10 to 15 members not including HNTB or PSP staff. b. Public Meetings: This scope provides for preparation for two public meetings. These will be "open house" format with display boards and a brief presentation. PSP will advertise for the meetings and provide a location for the meetings- As stated in FAA AC 150/5070-613, "the level of public involvement in airport planning should be proportional to the complexity of the planning study and to the degree of public interest." The meeting schedule has been prepared with consideration of the above project definition. 8/15/2008 2 ot23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 l� Task 1.2 Develop PSP Goals & Objectives PSP and HNTB will work together to develop Goals & Objectives for the airport that will provide the foundation upon which the Master Plan is based and provide evaluation criteria against which any project alternatives will be measured. At a minimum, the goals and objectives will identify safety, environmental, financial, community, and aeronautical goals. It is expected that the Goals & Objectives will be a reflection of airport management and the community at large and their vision for the future of PSP. Meetings: Meeting;1,:11:1IP3P Masten Plan Technical Committee meeting'�1 ,-Project Kck off and Goals&'Ob'jectiv,es M6elfing,1.2: PSPMaster'Plari'Public Meeting 1 ellveirab'le's: Fina[.Scope,, Schedule;and Budget'as attachments to'Final Co,ntract, Technical ,Report,l: .PSP Master'Piar Goals & Objectives (8 %X 1.1; Black'&White, Maximum 5 Pa es 8/15/2008 3 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 ,rn Element 2: Data Collection, Surveys, and Inventory of Existing Conditions The purpose of Element 2 is to collect pertinent Airport data, survey Airport tenants and users, conduct an inventory of existing facilities and their respective conditions, and to compile a basic record of historical changes to Airport infrastructure. The results of the Inventory will be used to determine the Airport's capability to meet future levels of aviation demand. Identification of physical facilities includes: • Airfield Facilities,Airspace, and Air Traffic Control Procedures; • Commercial Passenger Facilities; • Concessions; • Passenger and Baggage Screening Facilities; • General Aviation Facilities; • Cargo Facilities; • on Airport Support Facilities; • Infrastructure(e.g. utilities serving the airport and their capacities); • Access, Circulation, and Parking; and • Property Assessment. Mapping of land use and access patterns in and around PSP will be conducted for consistency with local and regional transportation needs and future plans. Documentation of environmental conditions that should be considered in the identification and evaluation of alternatives will be prepared, noting the potential projects that may need additional review in the future. The high level evaluation will determine the need for Federal and/or State level environmental clearance for prior to implementation. Task 2.1 Data Collection PSP will provide HNTB with copies of airport facility reports, local and regional reports, and any studies pertaining to the Airport, its facilities, its tenants, or the local and regional community that could or would impact the Airport and its development. Examples of such studies include previous master plans, terminal development reports, prior forecasts, tenant plans, engineering reports for key facilities (e.g. runways/taxiways/eprons/terminals), community economic reports, and other community development reports and/or studies. Task 2.2 Inventory Airport Facilities Task 22.1 Inventory Airfield Facilities Airspace and Air Traffic Control Procedures Airfield facilities will be inventoried, including numbers, dimensions, general conditions, and types of runways, taxiways, aprons, lighting, and NAVAIDS. Information will be 8/15/2008 4 of23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 gathered from discussions with PSP staff, review of existing drawings and photographs,and from on-site visual inspection. The air traffic environment will be inventoried, including NAVAIDS, standard operating procedures and letters of agreement in use by the ATCT and TRACON, and published terminal procedures including IAPs, STAR$, and DPs. Task_222 Determine Runway Capacity The capacity of the PSP runway system will be initially determined utilizing FAA guidelines presented in Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5060 —Airport Capacity and Delay. The results of the initial capacity study will provide the framework for determination of further capacity and delay study at PSP and whether the Airport could potentially experience a capacity shortfall in future years based on the results of the aviation activity forecast. Task 2.2.3 Inventory Passenger Terminal Facilities The purpose of this sub-task is to document the condition of the existing airport terminal and provide an evaluation of the level of service provided to passengers/users. Terminal facilities and their usage have changed since the previous terminal facility inventory was conducted as part of the previous master plan. The inventory effort will focus on-passenger processing functions, passenger and baggage security screening, holdrooms, concessions, baggage claim facilities, and EDS facilities_ The inventory will rely on data provided by PSP as well as a terminal walkthrough by the terminal planning lead consultant to provide familiarity and yield observation of facility functionality. The inventory will reflect planned improvements to the passenger terminal facilities including upgrades to the terminal processor building, ingress and egress areas, and passenger circulation. Particular attention will be paid to the unique needs of PSP travelers, the prevalence of oversized baggage (e.g. golf clubs), and the ability of the existing facilities to convey the lifestyle of Palm Springs and Coachella Valley to visitors and residents alike both aesthetically and functionally. The terminal inventory will collect data including area measurements for primary functional terminal areas including ticketing lobbies, holdrooms, baggage claim and other supporting facilities. The information gathered as part of the terminal facility inventory will provide the foundation for the development of terminal facility requirements. Task 2.2.4 Inventory Landside Facilities The landside facilities consist of Airport access roadways and transit systems, roadway circulation, parking facilities, rental car facilities, and shared ride airport transportation systems. Existing airport access, circulation, and parking facilities will be inventoried by reviewing existing roadway and facility plans, base maps, orthophotos, air photos and gathering available data (e.g. parking transaction data, passenger surveys). The information collected will be used to update the roadway access, circulation, and parking facility inventory and any previously prepared requirements. Where available, PSP will provide 8/15/2008 5 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 I� traffic counts for airport access and circulation roads. The data will help identify capacity-constrained areas and define the operational characteristics of each component, such as curbsides, ground transportation services, and parking and rental car facilities. Particular attention will be paid to Airport ingress and egress areas, the cell phone waiting lot, as well as the existing parking facilities for overflow parking. A premium will be placed on identifying characteristics of the overflow parking lots utilized during holidays and other busy periods. Planned improvements to the airport's rental car facility (e.g. consolidated rental car facility) will be noted and assumed to be existing facilities per direction of PSP. Task 2.2.5 Inventory General,Aviation Facilities General aviation (GA) facilities and FBOs will be visited in order to update the GA Inventory. Tenants will be given a survey questionnaire to complete which will be designed to obtain information on the type of GA utilizing their facilities, amount of available hangar space, apron, support facilities, auto parking available and utilized, current flight schedule, peaking characteristics, and anticipated near-term requirements. Task_2.2.6 Inventory Other On-Airport Facilities HNTB will inventory and describe other on-airport facilities, including fuel storage facilities (e.g. capacity, supply system, settling time), maintenance and operations facilities, service facilities, FAA facilities (e.g. the ATCT), and any other airport facilities not defined by airside, terminal, or landside. Information will be obtained from existing reports and drawings, interviews with PSP staff, and on-site visual inspections. Existing ground support equipment (GSE), the availability of electrical hookups for parked aircraft and their usage, and other factors relevant to the air quality analysis (such as airline usage of aircraft APUs)will also be inventoried. Task 2.2.7 Inventory Existing Utilities Primary existing utility infrastructure will be inventoried including electrical lines, gas lines, sewer lines,water lines, and communications lines. The level of inventory will be based on available data readily available from the airport and/or City of Palm Springs. No surveying of utility infrastructure will be conducted. Locations of utility feeds/tie-ins to municipal utility system will be located and information regarding infrastructure age, capacity, and condition will be presented, if available. Task 22.8 Regional Setting and land,Use Data on existing land use and land use planning and zoning regulations will be obtained from local, state and federal agencies. Existing and planned land use mapping will be updated. 8/15/2008 6 o£23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 �Q The Land Use Inventory will also address key areas where PSP is not in compliance with standards and regulations according to FAA guidelines. In particular, airport property not currently meeting aviation land-use requirements will be noted and any portions of safety areas and protection zones that fall outside of airport boundaries will be noted and inventoried. Task 2.2.9 Weather Data A 10 year sample of weather data at PSP will be obtained from the National Climatic Data Center or other suitable source. The weather data will be compiled to provide necessary information on weather conditions and runway configuration and usability (e.g. density altitude) at PSP for environmental analyses- (The collection of weather data may have an expense of approximately$250) Task 2.2.10 Environmental Setting The environmental setting of the PSP will be established based on previous planning and environmental studies conducted at the airport, and consultation with various agencies responsible for monitoring environmental conditions and granting permits. FAA Order 5050.4 (NEPA environmental guidance for airports) will be utilized for guidance in performing a preliminary review of potential impact categories and outlining areas that may be of concern at PSP- Further identification of potential impacts will be evaluated within the alternatives evaluation task- Meeting,s", Meeting,2.1: „PSP,Master Plan'Technical Committee Meeting 2 - PSP MasterPlan,inverito of,Cxistin"Conditions ' Site'Visit; p SIte,Visi,t 11: Facility'Inventory.,-Up'to 4 Consultant staff, 3 days/nights Deliverables: Draft Technical',Report Z lmventory' 'of Existing'Con'ditions (8 ""/z x ,11, Black&Whi#e.with-Color Fi 'ores Tables, 40 to 60" es 8/15/2008 7 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 Element 3: Aviation Demand Forecast An updated Master Plan Forecast of aviation demand will help determine the need for new or improved infrastructure at Palm Springs International Airport (PSP). HNTB has substantial experience in aviation forecasting nationwide and particularly in Southern California. The Master Plan Forecast will include all the activity categories required for a master plan, namely passenger activity, aircraft operations, cargo, general aviation, military and busy day/peak hour forecasts. Forecasts will be prepared for 2008, 2013, 2018, 2023 and 2028. The assumptions and methodology will be fully documented to ensure that the forecasts are credible and defensible. Task 3.1 Collect and Review Data The following data will be assembled and reviewed: • Prior forecasts and market studies including the revised Palm Springs International Airport(PSP) Market Study and PFC Revenue Forecasts if available. • Airport passenger, cargo and aircraft operation activity records. • Official Airline Guide (OAG) Schedule data. • Historical Origin-Destination (O&D) Survey data • USDOT T-100 passenger data (The collection of some data may have an associated cost, which is documented within the project budged and fee estimate) Task 3.2 Prepare Forecast Assumptions The results of the data collection effort will be used to prepare a list of key forecast assumptions. The assumptions will include but not be limited to: • Socioeconomic forecasts for the Coachella Valley, Southern California, the United States, and international markets. • Future tourist and other development in the Coachella Valley. • Future fuel and other air carrier operating costs- • Future air fares- • Future regulatory environment. • Development of other regional airports • Long term developments in aircraft design • GA assumptions, specifically the growth of very light jets (VLJ$) and the air taxi industry, and • Short list of potential forecast scenarios. A list of recommended key assumptions will be prepared for review by PSP. Changes, if any, will be incorporated as necessary. Task 3.3: Prepare Domestic and International Annual Passenger Forecasts Passengers will be broken out into resident O&D and non-resident O&D traffic. Resident and non-resident passengers are subject to very different driving factors — the former 8/15/2008 8 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 w { dependent on local demographic and economic forces and the latter on non-local economic forces and tourist development. The O&D forecasts will be developed primarily by using top-down regression models which correlate local and national socioeconomic conditions as well as industry conditions (air fares, airline service plans, etc.). The forecasts will be supplemented with a bottom-up analysis of potential new non-stop markets, based on existing O&D thresholds for non-stop service to PSP for both winter and year-round markets and anticipated passenger growth rates. The passenger forecasts will be used to generate forecasts of passenger aircraft operations, including aircraft type and frequency- The aircraft operation and fleet mix forecasts will incorporate the findings from the analysis of potential new non-stop markets in passenger enplanement forecasts. Task 3.4: Cargo Forecasts Air cargo tonnage and aircraft operation forecasts will incorporate the most recent trends at PSP and the domestic air cargo industry- The operations forecast will include a breakdown by aircraft type. Task 3.5. Air Taxi, General Aviation, and Military Forecasts Air taxi and general aviation based aircraft and operations forecasts will be prepared to reflect potential growth in-both the local market for general aviation activity and the role- - increased corporate and on-demand jet activity could have on PSP. The forecasts will consider the introduction of VLJs and their potential impact on tourist destinations such as Palm Springs- A forecast of military operations will also be prepared. Task 3.6: Derivative Forecasts The annual passenger and aircraft operations forecasts, combined with existing and projected seasonal trends at PSP, will be used to prepare busy day hourly profiles and peak hour forecasts- Gate requirement forecasts will also be prepared. The derivative forecasts provide the basis for determining airfield, terminal, and landside facility requirements. Task 3.7: Forecast Scenarios Given current uncertainty about the national economy, fuel prices, and the status of the airline industry, it is prudent to examine scenarios to ensure that the recommended master plan alternatives and implementation plans are sufficiently flexible to accommodate a wide range of potential activity levels. The exact definition of these scenarios will be determined with the input of PSP in Task 3.2. Task 3.8, Forecast Coordination A draft forecast report will be prepared for PSP review. Components of the forecast will then be revised, if necessary, and transmitted to the FAA's Los Angeles ADO for approval. The Contractor will coordinate with FAA Headquarters in Washington, DC if necessary, to obtain approval. The draft forecast documents will be revised to 8/15/2008 9 of23 Final Documeut Final Submittal 09 �I incorporate PSP and FAA comments in the final Master Plan Update technical report. One trip is budgeted to present or discuss the report. In addition, HNTB staff will be available to discuss the forecast via telephone as needed. Task 3.9: Deliverables Deliverables will include a draft forecast for PSP review and a draft forecast for FAA review. All the forecast elements will be incorporated into the final master plan update report. The text, tables, and exhibits in each draft will document the assumptions, methodologies, and results of the analysis. Meetings:'. Meeting,11: Forecast Kick Off(Teleconference) " Meeting 32f''.PSP'Master'Plan Technical Co,mmittee'Meeting '3 -,&aft Aviation'Demand'Forecast'Presentation' Dellverable; Draft,Technical,Rep'oit'3; Forecast of Aviation Activity for Palm,Springs International'Airport(8 %s!k11, Black85SWhite;Approxilnately50 Pages+ Tables anc(A endices 8/15/2009 10 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 l � Element 4: Facility Requirements Facility Requirements are a determination of necessary improvements to airport infrastructure based on the condition of the existing airport infrastructure and its capability of accommodating the anticipated levels of passengers and operations as determined in the aviation activity forecast. Facility Requirements will be prepared for the airport airside facilities, terminal facilities, and landside facilities. The facility requirements will also be determined based on criteria established during the development of the airport's goals and objectives. The goals and objectives will determine the desired level of service the airport wishes to provide for future airport users and tenants- Task 4.1 Airside Facility Requirements Task 4.1.1 Runway Capacity Requirements The capacity of the existing two runway systems will be determined during the inventory phase of the Master Plan Update based on the derivative forecasts prepared in Task 3.5, Runway facility requirements will be based upon the existing two runway system's capability of accommodating the anticipated volume of operations in future years at a given level of delay- Acceptable future delay levels will be determined as part of this task, based partly on the airport's goals and objectives, as well as the desired level of service. Should it be found that PSP has insufficient capacity--to -handle-the forecast- - volume of operations at an acceptable level of delay, needed capacity requirements will be determined. Deliverable: DraWTechnlcal Report 4a:,',PS,P Master PIan,AirFeld Capacity Analysis 6^/x;11-;'Black`&Whife, C'olor',Fi uses;5 to 10'Pa 'es Task 4.1.2 General Aviation Runway Improvement Feasibility Study PSP currently has two runways. The second, smaller runway is designed to accommodate category A & 6 general aviation aircraft. A feasibility study will be conducted as part of the facility requirements task to determine the potential for improvements to the runway such that it could potentially accommodate limited category C & D operations. The purpose of the study is to determine whether limited improvements to the GA runway could both increase capacity and provide an alternative runway to utilize during maintenance or reconstruction of the primary air-carrier runway at PSP or during emergencies. Deliverable:,,; ?,9 Draft Technical 'Report 4b:,,' PSP ,Master Plan Runway Improvement' Feasibility"Analysis (8,'/x;z 11, Black"&'White, Color Figures,,b to 10 Pa es Task 4.1.3 NAVAIDS Requirements PSP's existing NAVAIDS are limited to visual approach aids including a Visual Approach Slope Indicator(VASI) (Runway 13R-31 L) and Precision Approach Path Indicator(PAP[) 8/15/2008 11 of23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 J Y (Runway 13L-31R) and GPS. The airport does not currently have an Instrument Landing System (ILS) with a localizer or glide slope indicator. An evaluation of NAVAID technology and the potential for establishment of an instrument approach will be completed. The analysis will consider future activity levels and existing weather factors that limited airport operations due to the lack of an ILS. Evaluation of the timing of establishing an ILS will also be considered. Emerging technologies including satellite based navigation will be evaluated for its compatibility for use at PSP and the potential timing of a FAA establishment of such a system. Task 4.1.4 Taxiway and Apron Requirements The existing taxiway system's condition and layout will be evaluated for its ability to accommodate the existing and forecast volume of operations. Improvements to runway exit taxiways, circulation, and staging areas will be evaluated and recommendations made for improvements where necessary. Task 4.2 Determine Terminal Facility Requirements The PSP terminal consists of a single level passenger processor, a two story concourse with boarding bridges and the recently opened commuter concourse for regional jet and_ turbo-prop aircraft. There currently are capacity issues with the terminal during peak periods, occurring mostly in the ticket lobby and baggage claim area. Though the boarding concourses are both relatively new facilities, the passenger processing facility remains largely true to its 1960s era origins. Although the baggage claim area was renovated and expanded in 1992 during phase 1A of the. Airport expansion program, it no longer meets demand at a suitable service level during peak travel periods. The same can be said about the ticket lobby, which received a finish upgrade and minor expansion during Phase 1A of the airport expansion program. The Terminal Facility Requirements will analyze the suspected deficiencies of these facilities for handling existing and future passengers and operations levels. Security screening facilities for passengers have recently expanded. This study will analyze its capacity to handle future demand. Current terminal improvements include the removal of the temporary holdrooms and reconfiguration of the open court yard. Standard planning criteria will be utilized and facility requirements will be based on passenger traffic volumes during an average day during the peak month. Task 4.2.1 Gate Requirements The total gate requirements will be calculated based on average day peak month passenger and flight schedules. The gate requirements will determine the total number of gates by aircraft category for three future years. 8/15/2008 12 of23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 � S Task 4.2.2 Ticketing & Check-In Requirements HNTB will calculate the total ticketing and passenger check-in area requirements based on peak period demand levels. Requirements include total ticketing hall size requirements, number of ticketing positions, and the airline ticket office facilities. Technology improvements will be accounted for, such as remote check-in, self service ticketing kiosks, and gate information display systems. Task 42.3 Baggage Screening Facilities Current EDS screening is decentralized with individual CTX machines. Bags are manhandled by TSA staff. It is expected that these facilities will be unable to handle future demands for standard size bags and oversize luggage including golf clubs. PSP's current plans include in-line screening at a new centralized bag room at the south end of the ticketing wing. HNTB will evaluate alternatives for Reveal machines at the ticket counter, handling of oversized baggage, and other ticketing area improvements. Task 4.2.4 Baggage Claim Requirements HNTB will determine total baggage claim area requirements including baggage claim hall circulation, baggage claim unit types and sizes, and the total number of required baggage claim units. Task 42.5 Concessions Re uirements An assessment of concessions requirements will be prepared for use in development of terminal concept planning. Concessions requirements will be based on providing a high level of service for airport customers relative to PSP peer airports in the domestic U.S. market. Task 4.2.6 International Facilities HNTB will inventory the existing facilities in the Signature Flight Support building and evaluate their ability to meet future international activity levels at PSP. Task 4.3 Landside Facility Requirements Task 4.3.1 Airport Access Required airport access improvements will be determined based upon the information gathered during the inventory phase and the capacity of the existing system to accommodate projected demand levels and characteristics of typical airport users. If survey data is available, airport user characteristics will be applied to determine the ability of the existing airport access system to meet future demand levels. Traffic congestion within the airport access and circulation roadway network will be evaluated 8/15/2008 13 of23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 j� � and a determination will be made for potential improvements to allow more efficient traffic flow. Task 4.3.2 Airport Parking Requirements for meeter-greeter parking, short-term parking, long-term parking and remote parking will be prepared for the average day during the peak month. These requirements will identify potential parking capacity shortfalls that may exist or materialize in future years_ Task 4.3.3 Rental Car Facilities Requirements for rental car facilities will be determined based on average day, peak month demand levels and will account for planned improvements to the existing rental car facility. HNTB will work closely with the airport to determine rental service levels expected at PSP and requirements will reflect the goals and objectives set forth at the outset of the plan. Task 4.4 General Aviation Facility Requirements General Aviation facility requirements will account for based aircraft and forecast increases in general aviation and corporate jet activity. GA requirements will include aircraft hangar facilities including GA and corporate hangar facilities, apron facilities, tie down facilities, corporate terminal facilities including customs and immigration, GA landside access and parking, and aircraft maintenance. Task 4.5 Support Facilities Support facilities include but are not limited to aircraft rescue and fire fighting, aircraft maintenance, airport maintenance and operations, third party facilities, and fueling facilities including the fuel delivery infrastructure for piston and turbojet fuels. Based on the inventoried conditions, electrical, gas, sewer, water, and communications lines utilities will be evaluated for their capability to support additional airport infrastructure. Meetings: ",Meetin9'4.1: "P'SP Master Plan Technical Co'mm'iftee'Meeting 41- Draft Alr ort Facili '''R'e' uir'ements,PFesertation Deliverable; Draft-Tech'nical,'.Report ,4:. .,Facility Requirements for Palm Springs' 'IhternationatAir 'oit 8'Wx 11';"Black&White,Approximately 25,Pages) 8/15/2008 14 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 �7 Element 5: Pre are and Evaluate Alternatives The key purpose of the Master Plan Update is to develop a plan of action for the airport to meet the needs of its future users. With the inventory, forecast, and facility requirements in place, alternatives for development of the airport will be prepared. The alternatives will be prepared with respect to the airport's goals and objectives as the goals and objectives will frame the alternatives evaluation criteria. Task 5.1 Define No-Build Alternative The initial alternative will assume that the airport continues to operate without any major infrastructure development projects that would require environmental action per the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) or the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)- The no-build alternative will establish a base-line to evaluate the impacts of any potential build alternative and can be carried forth through the NEPA/CEQA process. Deliverabl'e,: DraftiNo-Build'Alternative Exhibit,(11X17, Color), Task 5.2 Prepare Airside Alternatives The preparation of airside development alternatives will identify potential improvements in the runway system including modifications to the existing runway system, - improvements to the-NAVAID systems, and improvements to airport runways,-taxiways,and apron areas. The purpose of the airside components is to provide a safe and efficient air operations area that meets the existing and future capacity needs of the airport. Though alternatives will be prepared with respect to the goals and objectives set forth at the outset of the master plan, consideration will be given to all potentially feasible alternatives. Up to three preliminary airside alternatives will be developed. Deliverable: . U0;19'3 Airside Alternative Fxhibits,(1}1X17,. Color); Task 5.3 Prepare Terminal Alternatives Terminal alternatives include development scenarios for the terminal facilities including the passenger processor and concourses. Alternatives will be prepared with respect to the Master Plan Update goals and objectives. Up to three preliminary terminal alternatives will be developed. Deliverable'- Up;toi3 floor:plans of„fWkbuild'scenarios, up to 3 cross sections; up to 3 passenger;.flow 'dia'grams showing,primary and:secondary passenger, flows at,both the:arrivals and'departures levels for'each configuration' all„11X14;Color• i Task 15.4 Prepare Landside Alternatives The Airport has already identified several key deficiencies in the landside system, most notably the airport's Inability to fully accommodate peak holiday overflow parking. Further, the Airport currently has rental car facility improvements planned and nearly underway. Landside alternatives will evaluate future accommodation of parking and 8/15/2008 15 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 iL 6 rental car facilities for the short term and long-term. Potential improvements to Airport access will also be developed and evaluated during the landside alternatives evaluation. An evaluation of structured parking solutions at PSP will be completed with the goal of minimizing and mitigating visual impacts and preserving PSP's existing aesthetic with regard to the vistas of the terminal along Tahquitz Canyon Road. Up to three preliminary landside alternatives will be developed. Deliverable; ^j' Up Yo 3'LandsideAlternative Exhibits(11X17, Color), Task 5.5 Develop Alternatives Evaluation Criteria There will be four general sources for evaluation criteria: 1. Airport Master Plan Goals &Objectives 2. The "best planning tenets and other factors"set forth in FAA AC 150/5070-SB 3. Environmental criteria 4. Fiscal factors During the alternatives development phase of the project, additional evaluation criteria may be considered due to the findings of the inventory and forecast tasks. Evaluation criteria will remain as objective as is practical and will, where possible, provide a clear process for determining which alternative or component of an alternative best meet the evaluation criteria. Though the master plan process is not intended to provide a comprehensive environmental evaluation or analysis per NEPA or CEQA, it will provide a general framework and allow PSP to consider the environment in selection of a preferred alternative, and in preparing for subsequent environmental analyses under NEPA/CEQA. Where appropriate, FAA Order 5050.4 will be utilized as guidance in the preliminary environmental analysis. Further, this early level of environmental consideration will help expedite subsequent environmental analyses by identifying impacts and allowing for the potential dismissal of alternatives from the NEPA/CEQA process if those alternatives do not effectively meet the Master Plan goals and objectives or provide relative utility. Task 5.6 Evaluate Alternatives Once the evaluation criteria are established, each alternative will be objectively evaluated and compared to the other alternatives utilizing the criteria developed in Task 5.5. The initial evaluation of alternatives is intended to remain objective and provide a ranking based upon a given alternative's ability to best meet the Master Plan Update goals and objectives. Though the outcome of Task 5.6 will rank the various alternatives, the highest ranking alternative will still be subject to alternation and refinement. Task 5.7 Prepare Combined Alternative and Draft Alternatives Technical Report Upon the initial evaluation of alternatives by functional area, up to three combined alternatives will be prepared and evaluated based on the criteria developed in Task 5.5 8/15/2008 16 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal.09 A draft technical report describing the alternatives, their components, and the evaluation and ranking process will be developed. The purpose of the technical report is to provide a summary description of alternatives, present the evaluation criteria, and detail the application of the evaluation criteria to the various alternatives by functional area. Meetings: "' '. Meeting:5-1: Alternatives;Workshop; Up,to,A HNTB staffwill'meetwith PSP„:krpodlstaff to' discuss'dhe„preliminary altematives, evaluation criteria matrix,and,fi'nal a(tematives'�evaluatlon': Meeting 5.2: PSP Master'P'lan Technical C'br mitt'ee'Meetirig 5: Draft Airport Alternatives Presentation Mee'tin' '•5:3:' PSP, Master,Plan Piabl'c g ., Meeting; 2:, , Draft",Airport Alternatives Prese,ntati'on rl " Deliverable Draft,Technical ReporV6. Master' Planr:Alternatives for 'Palm Springs. lnternational`Airport (8,'/',x'.1.1 with, x 17 color figures, Approximately' '25 Pa 'es,includin fi res and table's'i,U 8/15/2008 17 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 �i� Element 6: Select Preferred Alternative and Develop Phasing Plan The purpose of Element 6 is to select a preferred alternative and develop a phasing plan for implementing the various functional components. Task 6.1 Select Preferred Alternative The short list of alternatives prepared in Element 5 will have been evaluated, presented to the technical committee, and presented at a public meeting. PSP will be able to select a preferred alternative for implementation based upon review of the evaluation, the input of the technical committee, and public input. The preferred alternative may include combining features of alternatives, further developing a proposed project component, and analyzing the feasibility of specific components. The primary objective of Task 6.1 is to select and refine the final preferred alternative. Task 6.2 Prepare Preferred Alternative Phasing Plan A phasing plan for the development of the various components of the preferred alternative will be developed. The phasing plan will identify how development will be phased from the Airport's existing configuration to the recommended future configuration. Trigger point activity levels will be established. These are points at which facility levels of service deteriorate-and new facilities are needed to provide the capacity to maintain an acceptable level of service. Trigger points will be developed for airfield improvements, terminal improvements, and roadway and parking improvements. Typically these points are based on either aircraft operations or passenger enplanements and an industry- accepted level of service standard and will rely on the facility requirements analysis. D.eliverahler Draft'rTechnical Report 6:, PSR'Master Plan Preferred.Alternative,and Phasin 'Plan" 8/15/2008 18 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 Element 7: Airport Layout Plan The purpose of this element is to update the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for PSP. AC 150/5070-66 (including Change 1, dated 5/1/07), Chapter 10 and Appendix F will provide general guidance for the preparation of the Draft ALP. However, where appropriate, the PSP ALP may deviate from AC guidance due to available information or lack thereof. Documentation of such instances will be provided. The FAA Los Angeles ADO ALP checklist will guide ALP components where appropriate. However, in order to provide a concise and readable format specific to PSP, there may be deviations from the ALP Checklist as appropriate and documented. The previous PSP ALP Update was completed in 2003. The previous ALP is assumed to be available in a useable AutoCAD .dwg format and will be provided to HNTB. All associated external reference files, images, and supporting digital data will be provided to HNTB. (Note: This scope of work does not account for creating a new airport layout from aerial photo data. HNTB has had an opportunity to evaluate the condition of the existing PSP ALP and determined the level of effort for Task 7 partly based upon the condition of the existing digital files). Task 7.1 Prepare Draft Airport Layout Plan (ALP) HNTB will prepare a Draft ALP for Palm Springs International Airport. HNTB will submit, at the airport's direction, one (5) copies of the Draft ALP to the Los Angeles ADO for review and comment. Preparation of the Draft ALP will utilize existing AutoCAD files and electronic data provided by PSP. (Note: This scope of work does not include any additional data collection such as aerial photographs, survey data, or other digital or static information that may be necessary for preparation of the Draft ALP.) The Draft ALP will consist of the following sheets (upon initial draft, some sheets may be combined where appropriate and when readability can be maintained): 1. Cover Sheet 2. Data Sheet 3. Airport Layout Drawing 4. Airport Airspace Drawing (FAR Part 77 Surfaces) 5. Terminal Area Drawing 6. Airport Property 7. Runway Departure Surfaces Drawing (Note: guidance for this drawing recommends an aerial photo base map, this detail and other details of this drawing will be refined at the time of preparation and the scope and budget may be adjusted accordingly, PSP will be responsible for providing all survey data regarding elevation of any obstructions) 8. Airport Land Use Drawing 9. Exhibit A (Land Acquired for Noise Mitigation Purposes), as defined in FAA Advisory Circular 15015100-17 — Change 6, 11/7/05 (All property and parcel information recommended by FAA for inclusion in Exhibit A is to be provided by PSP. This scope does not include any property or parcel data collection on the part of HNTB). The Exhibit A prepared along with the Airport Layout 8/15/2008 19 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 22 Plan will be dated with the Airport Layout Plan and this scope does not provide for any further updates to the Airport's Exhibit A. Task 7.2 Incorporate FAA Comments into Draft ALP FAA comments on the Draft ALP will be incorporated into the Draft Final ALP and changes documented in a spreadsheet for final review by FAA. Task 7.3 Finalize Draft ALP Based on FAA Comments and Prepare ALP Narrative Report A narrative report describing the drawings, their purpose, and the unique aspects of the PSP environs will be prepared. Upon receipt of FAA approval or conditional approval, HNTB will insert FAA approval into signature block and provide PSP with three copies of ALP. Meetings: I;.. ALP,Review'Meeting 1: 2;HNTB.staff and PSP staff will,review the Draft "ALP,fpn'accuracy and,completeness..,' ALP'Review Meeti'n'g'2- 2 HNTB'staff and PSP'staff,.will'revievr the Draft 'ALF for accuracy,and completeness,based on.FAA'Comments on 1' Draft.".,— - - Dall,verables Draft ALP,.suitable for submission to FAA(5 Copies, Full'S,cale) DrafC'Fir 71'/ l P'suitabl'e for sub'mission to FAA'(5 Copies,Full,Soale).' Draft ALP Narrative„Report suitable foK submission to;'FAA;(S ;Copies, FultScale) Final)"ALP,with FAA si nature 10 Co'ies, Fult,S-cale " 8/15/2008 20 of 23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 Element 8: Implementation Plan The implementation plan developed for Palm Springs International Airport will present a feasible approach to implementing the projects proposed as pan of the Airport Master Plan. The implementation plan will address the development of the updated capital improvement program, financial feasibility, and sequencing of improvements. Task 8.1 Assess Options for Maximizing Utility of Existing Facilities The airport's capital improvement program will be analyzed for compatibility with the proposed projects and any modifications to the CIP will be evaluated for feasibility with respect to budget, environmental, construction and other aspects. Task 8.2 Cost Estimates Rough order-of-magnitude cost estimates will be prepared for major airfield, terminal, and landside elements only. These cost estimates will be utilized to prepare a financial feasibility assessment as described in Task 8.3. Cast estimates will be based on other recent cost estimates for airport projects within the greater Southern California region_ Task 8.3 Assess Financial Feasibility 9 fnancial feasibility analysis will be performed to determine which project components can be prioritized based on assumed funding scenarios. Various sources of funding will be evaluated for each project component to determine whether the short and long term financial capacity of the airport can be maintained. Feasibility of specific projects, depending on the outcome of the alternatives analysis, can be evaluated (e.g. development of structured parking). Deliverable: q'rat�; Technical ,Report i 7: 'PSP',Master Plan Preferred Alternative Imp'Igmentation, Plan' (8'"/"X fi1;i fl x'.f 7 figures,'Black'&-White with Co'i6r illustrations es,a' rc riate,'u 'to 20. a es) ' 8/15/2008 21 of23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 Element 9: Prepare Draft Master Plan Document The purpose of this element is to provide for the refinement and revision of the seven PSP Master Plan Technical Reports and other supporting documentation. These technical reports are the foundation of the Final Airport Master Plan for Palm Springs International Airport- A draft executive summary will also be prepared which will highlight the results for quick reference and wider distribution to the general public and other interested parties. Task 9.1 Prepare MP Executive Summary HNTB will prepare the Draft Master Plan Executive Summary. This short summary will highlight the key findings of the Master Plan process and briefly describe the recommended actions. Deliverable: + Master,Plan`',Update Ex8cutive',S,Urn ry"(8 % X 11,'Black'&.1Nhite, 1 Color 11 Xi17 Iltustratior" u' to 5,152, es Task 9.2 Prepare Draft Final Master Plan Technical Report Prepare the comprehensive Draft Master Plan Technical Report. The Draft Mater Plan -- •- Technical-Report is a compilation of the seven Draft Technical Reports for the Palm --- Springs International Airport Master Plan. Each previous Draft Technical Report will be included as a chapter within the comprehensive master plan document. Further, the final technical report will reflect comments received by the Technical Committee on the Draft Technical Reports- Deliverable:, + Draft Flrlal,Palm Spdn,gs;International Airport'Master Plan 8/15/2008 22 of23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 Element 10: Flexible Task The flexible task allows for the establishment of a contingency to fund additional, as yet to be defined, scope or work. The purpose of providing an undefined task is to allow for PSP and HNTB to develop additional detailed areas of study pertaining to issues that may not be realized at the time of the project kick-off. Examples of potential additional scope of work include (but are not limited to): • Increased technical committee or public involvement • Detailed Inventory tasks • Additional forecast scenarios • Detailed facility requirement analyses • Development of additional alternatives • Collection and use of additional data for the ALP • More detailed alternative refinement, feasibility analyses, cost estimates, or phasing detail. A budget of not more than 10% of the total project fee will be set aside to cover Element 10, However, the initial Notice to Proceed will not authorize Element 10. Upon mutual agreement between PSP and HNTB, that an additional task is required, a supplemental scope of work, fee estimate, and schedule will be provided by HNTB to PSP and a supplemental notice to proceed granted prior to start of any additional work. Further, it is understood that Element 10 may not be allowable under the terms of PSP's FAA grant for the Master Plan. PSP will fund this element of the Master Plan. 8/15/2008 23 of23 Final Document Final Submittal 09 Palm Springs International Airport Airport Master Plan SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT A Scope of Services Summary of Elements, Deliverables, Meetings, and Tasks MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS SUMMARY: 1 - PROJECT DEFINITION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES 2 - INVENTORY 3 - FORECAST 4 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 5 ALTERNATIVES 6 - PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE AND PHASING PLAN 7 - AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP) 8 - IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (FINANCIAL PLAN) 9 - PREPARE FINAL DOCUMENT 10 - FLEXIBLE TASK 8/15/2008 1 of6. Final Document Final Submittal 08 27 DELIVERABLES SUMMARY - Technical Reports: Draft Tech Report 1: PSP Master Plan Goals & Objectives Draft Tech Report z: Inventory of Existing Conditions Draft Tech Report 3: Forecast of Aviation Activity at PSP Draft Tech Report 4: Facility Requirements Draft Tech Report 4a: Airfield Capacity Analysis Draft Tech Report 4b: GA Runway Improvement Feasibility Analysis Draft Tech Report 5: PSP Master Plan Alternatives Draft Tech Report 5: PSP Master Plan Preferred Alternative and Phasing Plan Draft Tech Report 7: PSP Master Plan Preferred Alternative Implementation Plan PSP Master Plan Executive Summary Draft Final PSP Master Plan ALP Narrative Report 8/15/2008 2 of 6 Final Document Final Submittal 08 I� DELIVERABLES SUMMARY - Graphics: Alternatives: No Build Alternative Airside Alternative 1 Airside Alternative 2 Airside Alternative 3 Terminal Alternative 1 Cross Section Terminal Flow Terminal Alternative 2 Cross Section Terminal Flow Terminal Alternative 3 Cross Section Terminal Flow Landside Alternative 1 Landside Alternative 2 Landside Alternative 3 Combined Alternative 1 Combined Alternative 2 Combined Alternative 3 Final Preferred Alternative Airport Layout Plan: (2 Drafts + 1 Final) Cover Sheet Data Sheet Existing Layout Future Layout Terminal Plan Airport Land Use Runway Departure Surfaces Airport Property 8/15/2008 3 of G Final Document Final Submittal 08 MEETINGS SUMMARY: Technical Committee Meetings: 1. Project Kick Off, Goals & Objectives 2. Inventory Presentation 3. Forecast Presentation A. Facility Requirements Presentation 5. Alternatives Presentation Public Meetings: 1. Public Meeting 1: Goals & Objectives 2. Public Meeting 2: Alternatives Site Visit: 1. Inventory Teleconference: 1. Forecast Kick-Off Workshops: 1. One Day Alternatives Workshop Undefined General Meetings: 1. Meeting 1 2. Meeting 2 3. Meeting 3 4. Meeting 4 5. Meeting 5 6. Meeting 6 8/15/2008 4 of 6 Final Document Final Submittal 08 v l�r TASKS: 1. Project Definition, Goals & Objectives Task 1.1 - Project Definition Task 1.2 - Goals & Objectives 2. Data Collection, Surveys, and Inventory of Existing Conditions Task 2.1 - Data Collection Task 2.2 - Inventory Facilities 2.2.1 -- Airfield, Airspace, ATC 2.2.2 - Runway Capacity 2.2.3 - Terminal 2.2.4 Landside 2.2.5 - GA 2.2.6 - Airport Support 2.2.7 - Inventory Existing Utilities 2.2.8 - Regional Setting, Land Use 2.2.9 - Weather Data 2.2.10 -- Environmental Setting 3. Aviation Demand Forecast Task 3.1 - Collect & Review Data Task 3.2 - Prepare Forecast Assumptions Task 3.3 - Domestic/Intl Annual Forecast Task 3.4 - Cargo Forecasts Task 3.5 - Air Taxi, GA, Military Forecast Task 3.6 - Derivative Forecasts Task 3.7 - Forecast Scenarios Task 3.8 - Forecast Coordination Task 3.9 - Deliverables 4. Facility Requirements Task 4.1 - Airside Requirements 4.1.1 - Runway Capacity 4.1.2 - GA Runway Improvement Feasibility 4.1.3 - NAVAIDS 4.1.4 Taxiways/Aprons Task 4.2 - Terminal Requirements 4.2.1 - Gate Requirements 4.2.2 - Ticketing & Check-in 4.2.3 - Baggage Screening Facilities 4.2.4 - Baggage Claim 4.2.5 - Concessions Requirements 4.2.6 - International Facilities 8/15/2008 5 of 6 Final Document Final Submittal 08 Task 4.3 - Landside Requirements 4.3.1 Access 4.3.2 - Parking 4.3.3. - Rental Cars Task 4.4 - GA Facilities Task 4.5 - Support Facilities 5. Prepare & Evaluate Alternatives Task 5.1 -- Define No-Build Alternative Task 5.2 - Prepare Airside Alternatives Task 5.3 - Prepare Terminal Alternatives Task 5.4 - Prepare Landside Alternatives Task 5.5 - Develop Evaluation Criteria Task 5.6 - Evaluate Alternatives Task 5.7 - Prepare Combined Alternative, Tech Report 6. Develop Preferred Alternative and Phasing Plan Task 6.1 - Select Preferred Alternative Task 6.2 - Prepare Phasing Plan 7. Airport Layout Plan Task 7.1 - Prepare Draft ALP Task 7.2-- Incorporate FAA Comments - Task 7.3 - Prepare Final ALP and Narrative Report 8. Implementation Plan Task 8.1 - Maximize Existing Facilities Task 8.2 - Financial Feasibility Task 8.3 - Cost Estimates Task 8.4 - Assess Financial Feasibility 9. Prepare Draft Final Report Task 9.1 - Prepare MP Executive Summary Task 9.2 - Prepare Draft Final MP Document 1O.171exible Task 8/15/2008 6 of 6 Final Document Final Submittal 09 Revised: 6/30108 EXHIBIT "B" CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS S$1236.1 i ATTACHMENT B 1 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 1 REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS No. 13-06 FOR AVIATION CONSULTING SERVICES FOR PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT f MARCH 2O06 I I I ' City of Palm Springs Procurement and Contracting Division 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way P.O. Box 2743 Palm Springs, CA 92263-2743 (760)323-8237 SOQ AVAILABILITY: The SOQ is available via the Internet at www.ci-palm-sPdngs.ca.us, click on "Departments" and go to "Procurement", then "Open Bids and Proposals". Upon downloading the SOQ, please contact Mari Lynn Boswell, Procurement Administrative Coordinator, via email at Moril_ynnBC?o ci.nalm-springs.ca.us to register as an offeror. Copies are also available from the City of Palm Springs, Procurement&Contracting Division, at 760-323-8237. $0013-06 Airport A-E Services Final&14-06 ] REQUEST for STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS (SOQ)No. 13-06 FOR AVIATION CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Dated March 15, 2006 I INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The City of Palm Springs, Department of Aviation (AIRPORT) is seeking statements of qualifications from qualified firms for providing Aviation Consulting Services inclusive of Architectural Design, Engineering Design, Environmental and Other Aviation Consulting Services to the Palm Springs International Airport in support of the Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP, included herein as Attachment"A"). i The palm Springs International Airport (Airport), a small hub airport, is owned by the City of Palm Springs and is operated by the City's Department of Aviation. The Airport is located in eastern-Riverside County, approximately 2-5 miles east of the central business district of Palm Springs, California (3400 East Tahquitz Canyon Way). The Airport serves as the major air transportation center for the entire Coachella Valley. In 2005 the Airport served approximately 1.4 million commercial passengers. Passenger enplanements are growing approximately 5% per year, while aircraft operations remain relatively stable. The Airport is a seasonal airport with approximately 14 air carriers serving the airport during the season (November through May)and approx-imately 8 air carriers serving the Airport during the off-season (June through October). In addition to commercial service, the Airport experiences a high percentage of corporate and general aviation. Please see the statistics attached as Exhibit W. PURPOSE: The purpose for this solicitation is to provide, on an as-needed basis, a variety of design PURand planning services for major projects included in the Airport's ACIP. I Aviation consulting services expected to be required over the next five-year period include, planning, environmental, architectural, engineering, construction monitoring and inspection, grant procurement assistance, non-AIP grant funding assistance and capital program, management assistance for various federal, state and locally funded projects. The successful consultant may also be called upon to perform other services as required. Airport improvements anticipated at the Palm Springs International Airport are listed in the attached Airport Capital Improvement Program submitted to the FAA in February 2006. This I Program is subject to change and will be updated annually with the FAA. The term of the contract will be for 5 years, or for whatever term is determined to be in the best l interests of the City. Airport improvement projects of immediate interest to the Airport are as follows: FY 2007-ACIP Soo 13.66 Airport A-F ServICes Final 3-14.06 Z [ cD al 1. Extend TNV J to the 300 ' to the southeast to access future aviation industrial area; 2. Rehabilitate/Overlay Runway 13U31 R- Pavement surface beyond useful life and associated intersecting taxiways south of runway 13U31 R- Pavement surfaces beyond useful lire; i 3- Rehabilitate Taxiway E and north cross Taxiways J, H. D, F and B - Pavement surfaces beyond useful life; 4. Airport Master Plan and associated environmental assessment; 5. Perform Environmental Assessment for Taxiway J northeast expansion and development of associated aviation industrial park scheduled for FY 2008; FY2008 -ACIP 1. Widen and Overlay Taxiway G-To allow access for larger corporate aircraft; 2. Upgrade and Extend T/W J to the northeast to provide access to northwest aviation industrial area. I SELECTION PROCESS: The City of Palm Springs/Palm Springs International Airport is utilizing a Qualifications Based Selection process complying with-Advisory Circular 1-50/1500'14D-to select a multi-dimensional firm to provide the Services covered by this solicitation. A firm may be selected from the qualification statements, or if deemed necessary, a limited number of companies will be invited to make a formal presentation- If undertaken, the format and date of the presentation will be established at the time of short listing. EVALUATION CRITERIA: Submittals will be evaluated for specificity, completeness, qualifications of personnel, demonstrated knowledge and experience in the aviation consulting services required by the Airport and adherence to the guidelines as specified in the "Information Required of Respondents and Format of Response"section below. Qualification statements will be evaluated utilizing the following criteria' 1. Firm's/Team's Experience and Qualifications; 2. Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel; 3. Work plan, with emphasis on firm's ability to perform ACIP projects identified as immediate. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF SOQs. All submittals must be received no later than: 4:00 P.M., local time, Friday, April 21, 2006. at the following address City of Palm Springs Procurement Division SOO 13-06 Airport A-rServices Final 3-14-00 3 c"Y V D 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262, INFORMATION REQUIRED OF RESPONDENTS AND FORMAT OF RESPONSE: Interested firms shall submit six(6) (original plus five) copies of its submittal by the deadline stated above. The proposal shall be no more than 25 double-sided sheets of standard 8 '/2 x 11" paper, and all pages shall be three hole punched. Statement of Qualifications shall not be stapled or permanently bound, rather, binder clips shall be used to assemble sheets_ Firms may choose to use cover and/or dividers; however, the maximum of 25 sheets shall not be exceeded. All submittals shall be sealed within one envelope and be clearly marked, "SOQ 13-06, STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR AVIATION CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT". Respondents are requested to format their SOQs so that the information provided corresponds directly to, and are identified with, the numbering scheme identified below. At a minimum, Respondents must provide the information identified below. A. Transmittal letter. Should include an introduction of the submittal, a brief summary of overall firm qualifications and a summary of the reasons why the City should select the responding firm to perform the identified services. 13; Virm name, complete address and zip code, telephonelfax-number,"type of ownership-(sole proprietor, partnership, corporation, joint venture, etc.), a brief history and structure of firm (include organizational charts), and identify those personnel with the ability to commit your firm to this project; C. Identify the team of professionals you propose to use to provide the necessary services to the Airport. Include any proposed sub consultants. CA List Architectural Design services provided by your firm and identify the personnel to be utilized. Succinctly and economically provide the qualifications of the personnel you propose to assign to Airport projects. Identify the California licensed professional(s)that will be assigned; 1 C.2 List Engineering Design services provided by your firm and identify the personnel to be utilized. Succinctly and economically provide the qualifications of the personnel you propose to assign to Airport projects. Identify the California-licensed professional(s)that will be assigned; C-3 List Airport planning services provided by your firm and identify the personnel to be utilized. Succinctly and economically provide the qualifications of the personnel you propose to assign to Airport projects; CA List Environmental services provided by your firm and identify the personnel to be utilized. Succinctly and economically provide the qualifications of the personnel you propose to assign to Airport projects; 0.5 Identify other Airport specialty consulting services in which your firm has expertise that may pertain to projects identified in the Airport's ACID, SOQ 13-05 Airport A F Services Final 3-1-0-p6 q � ry cY E C.6 Describe the organizational structure and project principals you propose to manage 9 p l P P Y P A 9 the multi-faceted team constructed to meet the Airport's needs. D. Other related qualifications: DA Describe your knowledge of and experience with Federal Aviation Administration regulations, policies, procedures,funding programs and specification requirements; 13.2 Identify your ability to design to your clients' project budget. Identify the steps taken to ensure projects are designed and constructed with your client's budget and the success of these measures in completing all phases of the project (design through f completion of construction) within budget. Give examples of projects including any II performed in Southern California; D-3 Describe your firm's commitment to and past experience with D.B.E. participation in contracts of a similar scope to that covered by this solicitation. Identify team members with a federal D.B.E. designation. D-4 Identify project management tools you propose to use to keep both your own staff on track and the Airport staff cognizant of current project status. D.5 Identify a contract of similar size and scope and describe how your firm applied its skills and abilities in the fallowing areas: (a) Responsiveness and attentiveness to client needs; (b) Creative ability; (c) Knowledge and understanding of the latest trends and systems used by other airports; j (d)Analytic capability; - (e)Oral and written communication skills; (f) Interaction with client's organization, i.e., other divisions and personnel (g) Sensitivity to funding constraints. E. For each of the projects identified as of"immediate interest": EA Identify key personnel and other resources to be utilized and indicate their availability for these projects; E.2 Describe your firms proposed workplan/methodology for architecturallengineering design or planning services (identify action items, timeliness, necessary Airport resources and information); E.3 Describe how your firm would manage these projects from start to finish, including the use of project management tools; EA Identify any potential problems associated with these projects and how you would work with Airport personnel to avoid/resolve them; E.5 Provide references for 3 recently completed projects of a similar nature where the key personnel identified above provided the professional services required. Identify the owner's representative(contact)and a phone number for each reference provided; $6013-06AirpartA-F services Final3-14-06 5 7 - -- E.6 For the referenced--projects,-provide examples of project budgeting and cost estimating procedures with results; i E.7 For the team identified to work on the Airport's "immediate interest" projects, identify current project load and commitments and their percentage of completion. FORM OF AGREEMENT: The successful Offeror will be required to enter into a contractual agreement, inclusive of insurance requirements,with the City of Palm Springs in general accord with the Contract Services Agreement form attached to the SOQ as Attachment"Co. AWARD OF CONTRACT: It is the City's intent to award a contract to the firm that can provide all of the services identified in the SOQ document. However,the City reserves the right to award a contract to multiple Offerors or to a single Offeror, or to make no award, whichever is in the best interest of the City. It is anticipated that award of contract will be approved by the Palm Springs City Council in June, 2006- A projected time-line is attached herewith. QUESTIONS: All inquiries regarding this solicitation shall be directed, in writing,to the City of Palm Springs, Procurement Manager, via FAX at (760)32M238, or delivered to the address above. If modification or clarification to the solicitation document (SOQ 13-06) becomes - necessary, a written addendum will be sent to each registered recipient of the documents. The deadline for receipt of questions is April 11,2006 at 4:00 PM. 4 I i l 3 1 I SOQ 19-06 Airport A-E Services Final 8-14-06 6 w Revised 6130/08 LXHEBIT "C" CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL 591236 1 �o� NNT9 Carphra4l•n 6151 W.Century Blvd. Telephone(310)417-8777 Engineers Architects Planners Suite 1200 Facsimile(310)417-5369 Los Angeles,California 90045 www,hntb.eom April 21,2006 ATTACHMENT C City of Palm Springs Procurement Division 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs,CA 92262 RE: SOQ 13-06,STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR AVIATION CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Ladies and Gentlemen: This is an exciting time for the City of Palm Springs and for Palm Springs International Airport(PSP). With the population growth in the Coachella Valley exceeding 400,000 and air-passenger service at PSP reaching record- breaking levels in 2005,the demand for airport expansion has never been greaten The City has put in motion a vital process that will allow the airport to grow effectively and meet future aviation demand. ---- A TEAM WITH UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS HNTB offers the City of Palm Springs a proven project approach to shape the projects included in the Airport Capital Improvement Program(ACIP)into to a successful development plan.HNTB's aviation center of excel- lence is located in Southern California with airport planning,environmental,architectural,and engineering staff available to serve you for marry years to came.Available to be on site to work with you every day,these profession- als have recent,relevant experience and are experts in their knowledge of local airspace,regulatory,design,and construction conditions. Two of the key individuals on our team are the project manager and deputy project manager. Our project man- ager,Andres Garcia,has led the planning and engineering efforts for many multi-task airport programs. Our deputy project manager,Joe Barden,has delivered airport master planning and design for over 10 of his 18 years of experience. He brings world class expertise with major airport terminal development programs. The City of Palm Springs can benefit from their experience with and passion for aviation facilities. They continually deliver great ideas and top quality service to our aviation clients. Additionally,HNTB offers local firms and individuals with experience well suited to this assignment. Principal among these is Gerhard Pichel,AIA,of GPA Architects. Gerhard has a detailed understanding of the existing terminal facilities and valuable relationships with airport staff that have been in place for over a decade- HNTB has provided services to our clients for more than 90 years guided by a principle we call 4-for-4. We pro- vide quality service,on time, within budget,and to the Client's satisfaction. We have fine tuned our firm to meet your needs with strong management and business systems that help our professionals deliver the services you need,HNTB offers skilled professionals with experience ideally suited to your requirements,and a philosophy of inclusion and mutual respect. We know how to join our client's team and work with others for success. For these City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB s� ti�� �,. •+ I �,., •.rdr• r, " w�wn ,.r �� ,v^,A \J:r .., -,. �w.rear F � �..._....n...�..�..?.'�i 4�i.....,., r. ....���..—.ice -.. _.... ._._.-...-.....-...ry e.uJ.ln... .m reasons,we have served some of our airport clients continuously for more than 40 years and currently have 19 multi-disciplinary on-call contracts at airports across the nation. One secret of making plans into reality is engaging internal and external stakeholders. Successful communica- tions programs are ongoing and collaborative,combine internal users and airport operations,and incorporate team building.HNTB's successes in consensus building have benefited our planning and design clients for decades.When teams commit early and remain engaged throughout a project,it creates a solution-driven plat- form for success. WHY THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS SHOULD SELECT HNTB: HNTB is best suited to your needs in 4 primary ways: 1.We lead the industry in on-call planning and design contracts and therefore know how to serve clients like PSP. 2.We have all critical resources in Southern California and can work effectively with local and specialist team members to deliver best value to PSP. 3. Our team has previously worked together successfully with other Southern California airport clients. 4. Our firm is organized to provide all planning,design,environmental,and construction phase services to PSP with one management structure and project delivery system. HNTB is committed to serving the City of Palm Springs and the Airport.The undersigned has the authority to enforce-this commitment-on-behalf of the firm" -- - - ---- We look forward to presenting details of our approach and demonstrating the excellence of our team at a staff interview. HNTB is interested in the opportunity to help sustain and enhance Americas Resortport. Sincerely, HNTB Corporation Michael A.Kraman Vice President City ai Palm Springs 2 HNTB Palm Springs International airport Rrm name,complete address and zip code, yield financially sensitive solutions for telephone/fax: airport clients. HNTB Corporation HNTB has brought value to many California 6151 West Century Boulevard,Suite 1200 airport clients including: Los Angeles,CA 90045 Apple Valley (310)417-8777-telephone Buchanan Field (310)417-5369-facsimile John Wayne(Orange County) Four out of five Type of ownership: Long Beach commercial airline HNTB Corporation is an employee-owned . Los Angeles International passengers in professional services corporation incor o- the United States F � P • Norman Y.Mineta San Jose International hoard their flights rated in Delaware. . Oakland International at airports where Brief history of the firm: . Ontario International HNTB has provided planning or design. Bounded in 1914,HNTB has gained . Sacramento International national and international recognition for . San Bernardino International providing architectural,engineering,plan- • San Diego Brawn Field ning,and environmental services to aviation • San Diego International clients since 1944. We have approximately 300 professionals in virtually every aviation • San Diego Montgomery Field specialty. Engineering News-Record ranks- • San Francisco International — I-TNTB#3 in aviation revenues- • Santa Barbara Having successfully completed more than Structure of the firm: $16 billion of airport projects,HNTB HNTB provides services through two large professionals have helped airports over- and functionally integrated subsidiar- come virtually every airport facility issue. ies. I•INTB Architecture,Inc-provides HNTB airport architectural and related services. I4NTB HNT6 curr@ntly provides on-tallraviation planners improve Corporation provides engineering and i' ervices,fpr�rnorrsantpss'fhe U S,Yncluthn ;., their service by related services. A third subsidiary,HNTB Clevel Logan InteHopkins l tfln l incorporating the Federal Services provides representation to clevI " HopkinsIrate)national' r;:,„ ,, rF g F p Gerald R Ford Yntern tmnal'(cra d Rap{, s) l design and con- federal clients. Hartsfietd-dack;pn,4Nntalnternational -, struction experi- HNTB Corporation has five geographic divi- Houston Airport$gsfgm'(Houston'!'ntcrcan- ;'y' tmenta7,tlptihy;and,C7lirigton) once of our staff sions for administrative purposes- Division indianapolls Inters ahonal into our plans. This presidents and their staff are responsible for Las Veoag p(cCarrer,International unique capability selecting office leaders,developing strate- 1 Mdryland Aeronautl4s✓Agency(Baltimore ,I enhances viability Washington Interriatidnal and Martin state) y h gies to serve clients,and adnunistration of Memphistnternatlonji^ I and constructibility the business and operationsofacompany Metrapohtah 0akla i�°fnternatronal'.p and helps to control with approximately 3,000 employees in 60 '. . Minhodpoli�!�t.Pa'(tlli(ternational ��' ��i pmla QI Irate n�fY�nal the cost of projects- offices. HNTB also has professional leaders Phoenix n R' for the services the firm provides,including ' "- " Ro aldeiiaggna rhor V grnational,� Combined with Inte )alopai staff experience in aviation,architecture,bridges,highways and . salt Lake,;ryily.,lntefget)pnal: ' airport manage- toll roads,rail,sports architecture,urban San Francisco Interrlpt)onal f Seattle7awma Inter ment and revenue nationar planning,and other market segments. .'led'Stevens'Anchorage International' development,our HNTB market segmentleadershel divi- m Washington 0ulleslinterhational Jm^; ^ : i plans and designs P sion presidents,office leaders,and project City of Palm Springs Palm Springs international Airport HNTB 3 ;3 v Hlh �f q , LL. R�G - � I N • t- e - —_._ .__ I�tiz�__i�_.-.- ... ."�*.vW' •'ix r� ' '..,..y.i,...w���ia ka"+ Y -i-. �� 744 I��y�fJ4"„J�:�,�, �y11 4,.�.:,,.::s.• �'�I::®.�uf managers recruit and retain effective profes- Personnel with the ability to commit your sionals to serve client needs. They collabo- firm to perform identified services: rate with other corporate staff to ensure the Office leaders and approximately 40 other professional development of HNTB employ- officers with power of attorney have the ees through training,work assignments,and power to bind the company to contracts and career development planning, the authority to provide all the resources HNTB also provides national resources in required to HE our obligations to clients. information technology for communica- Michael A_Kraman,Vice president,is the lions,professional service delivery,project office leader and Principal-in-Charge for management,and business management. Southern California and is able to commit These resources empower HNTB profession- the firm to this project. als to draw quickly and efficiently on the best available information and insight from any of the offices around the nation_ o`,el,4nKr^- N' Fig. 1 Firm Structure +'•�nnm win „PiglecG�Team� Northwest Noitherq Southern, office - 'Calgolnio ,California, Great LakeS. Central ;� 'Weft ortheast i Southeast Division' , Division rv,D[vlsion Divisions ,Division' MNTe HNTB' -HNTB;, Archit2cture,Idc :Corporation ',Fed'erallservices. '.HNTtt'evar afnd Shareholders City of Palin Springs HNTB Palm Springs international Airport M�t d9 i� h; ^?r ;iv`.1 '.H,� r�„w�n'�" .......v..,..�..... •,)t�'>�w nb�,..�Mr_..iPn.,..ir•.,. ..,....,..��.� �r� � .x�. . ,- .�'.J'a...� a`F : Within the office,project managers are Andres Garcia,Joe Barden and Gerhard empowered and authorized to perform Pichel will work side-by-side with the City services to our clients and direct the work and Airport to determine task assignment, of employees and subconsultants to meet scope,assess key staff requirements,and our commitment of 4-for4. provide qualified and dedicated staff for each project and service identified. Subconsultant Team Members Brandow&Johnston Location:Los Angeles Palm Springs International Airport Associates Consulting Years of Service: 61 New Concourse Structural Engineers Structural Aviation Services: Ticketing Wing Addition (BJASE) Baggage Handling Addition Structural • New building design . Oueing and Security Building • RenOvaLian/remodel Of existing Hold Room Buildings Addition buildings vehicle Inspection Facilities . Seismic repall and strengthening Lockheed Palmdale Complex services . Hangars and Maintenance Facikties Los Angeles International Airport . Tom Bradley International Terminal . Parking Structure Investigations • Blast Loading Evaluation of Communications Bldg -. John Wayne Airport Terminal and-Parking Structures -- -- GPA,Inc.(GPA) Location:Los Angeles Palm Springs International Airport Consuiting Architecture Years of Service: 301 • New Concourse Architectural Aviation Services: • Terminal Expansion Phases)and 2A . Skywest Airlines Gate Configurations Study&New • Master planning Striping Plan • Architectural and interior design San Diego International Airport • Construction administration services • Terminal West Expansion • New Commuter Terminal Los Angeles International Airport . Terminals 6,7&8 Modification(Phase 1 COS and Self- Service Check-in Facilities - Terminal 5 John Wayne Airport , Office/Tenant Improvements San Francisco International Airport . International Terminal Salt Lake City International Airport • Terminal Modification_&E_xp ansion LSA Associates,Inc.(LSA) Location:Palm Springs 5an Francisco International Airport Environmental Assessment Years of Service: 30 • Runway Reconfiguration Program Environmental Assessment Aviation - Master Plan Environmental Approvals Services: EI Toro Airport . Environmental analysis • EIR/EIS Resource planning and management Los Angeles International Airport • Noise and air quality analysis mitiga- . Master Plan Response to Comments tion monitoring Livermore Airport • CEOA/NEPA . EIR • Environmental Impact Reports(EIRs) Sonoma county Airport and Environmental Impact Statements • Land Use and Biological Resources Alternatives Analysis (EISs)preparation City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International airport HNTB 5 T. Metromedia Graphics(MMG) Location:Burbank Los Angeles International Airport (DSE/WBE/MBE/SBE) Years of Service: ? • Master Plan/EIS/EIR Graphic Communications Graphic Support Aviation Services: • South Airfield Improvement(SAID)EIR • Public outreach meetings and - LAX SAIP Public Hearings presentations LAWA News Watch Website • Website development and San Diego International Airport maintenance • Master Plan/EIR - Exhibits,reports and presentations • SAN Site Selection Program • RFQs/RFPs/SOQs Burbank Glendale Pasadena Airport Authority - Written communication and McCarran International Airport copy writing • Video production RBF Consulting(RBF) Location:Palm Desert Twentynine Palms Airfield Survey Years of Service:60+ • Topographic Survey EAF Survey Aviation Services: Twentynine Palms USMC • ALTA/ACSM,Boundary,Cadastrel, • Air Ground Combat Training Center Base Monitoring,and Construction • Master Plan Traffic and Parking Analysis Surveying Apple Valley Airport • Photogrammetry Long Beach Airport • Topographic Mapping • Taxiway"D"Design Topographic C17 Survey • Final Plat Preparation Geographic • Runway 12.30 Rehabilitation Information Systems(GIS) . Secui itv upgrade Global Positioning Syrtpm(CPS) Ontario International Airport -— - John Wayne Airport Oakland International Airport RMA Group Inc.(RMA) Location:Rancho Cucamonga Palm Springs International Airport Geotechnrcal Years of Service: 44 • Runway 13R/31L and Taxiways C and W Extensions Geotechnical Aviation Services: • Terminal Building Expansion • Evaluation of existing pavements San Bernardino International Airport • Design of new pavements • Airport Terminal Expansion and Seismic Retrofit • Inspection and materials testing • Taxiway Al Addition Needles Airport . Runway 11/29 Reconstruction Barstow-Daggett Airport Taxiways"A"and"C"Reconstruction Redlands Municipal Airport • Runway 8/26 and the existing parallel Taxiway"A" Reconstruction Twentynine Palms Airport Runway Pavement Reconstruction TMAD Taylor&Gaines Location:Ontario Los Angeles International Airport (TMAD) Years of Service:51 • New and Remodel Existing Bearding Gates Mechanical/Electrical/ M/E/P Aviation Services: Ontario International Airport Plumbing(M/E/P) Mechanical design . Parking Lot Expansion - Electrical design John Wayne Airport . Plumbing design . LDS Baggage Screening System • Civil design Air National Guard March AFB Air National Guard Channel Islands AFB City of Palm Springs 6 HNTB Palm Springs International airport r� tltl •. - ���tl �.,°,rj�k�J•x��l'�. er,'wgakup" Iw},fr, __. _ tlW a •. rr p� r e ."^�1, a p�ly e sMtyt4wyu _—_._ _ I - � a> `��f�'A9:n�'� 1'dW�7Md,ri)+t.dAt„_,�>."iA<a'L:➢W!;11--,,,: rr`)r.�,b . . �mM1M h IM`NA'AW!TKyI u., r. . iagA. eV „ l`� e `y ,R(r"�':•.`l:xlAvYM lln,,. C'..^...:..krdb..,�+:..6.4.,..„,r.^4-n. .,...,.mx-..,..,..«.^ ...., .�. ,.�. ....IV.^,« w. ,. ",... „�.,.� . ...��.�i.. ., i.. . dd4N .� .._ This section identifies the team of profes- vided,personnel to be assigned to the sionals the HNTB/GPA team proposes to Airport projects, and succinct qualifica- utilize to provide the necessary services tions for each team member.Numbers in to the Airport, For each discipline,we parentheses are California professional have identified the services to be pro- registration numbers- FelsonnelI . Passenger Terminal%P,lanning_and Prcgramininq,, ,,,,,,I� Joe,Bard en-Deputyproject Manager' 'ii; „ 1 Passenger Terminal Nslgri„ i,,:�i. . , �,-";,joseph Grogan,AIA'-ArChAecl.ure.i " Air Traffic Facility Design ,i; '; .i;�yS fi.',Gerhard Pichel„AIA�C6nsulting A`rchitech(#C696 All Operations FacilitieslDesign', ,lai eIR.Bruce,'JK,AIA-Terminal Architect' „I . Facilities Management Docum enta lion''' " 'i`7 Allen Berentes,A!A-Terminal Planner(#CI8332) '• ^••,'= t• Bob Tlndell;RA••Archiiecture'Construction 5upport- u-sz'l+w I'llmww�xw.g1. ,• 5e"ivlce „ _ . ., , Personnel, ,., .s - RumNayand Taxiwal;'Design'and Construction'^,', Andres Garcia,PE',-Project'Man2nen(ttC049077)' . Taxiway and ApronPaveme'nt Rehab Design ..,Jae BaYden'Qepilty PYQfect Manager ' Aircraft Ramp P,arkingand'Operation8 Gvaluatio(fs' '- 'i: Ron'5iecke;�PE,TC r,Can_d5lde P15i1ninq/Fhgineerinq(tl'S923-7 Civil; . Pavement Evaluations '�' r #1735 Traffic) , . Pavement Design and Rehadijitation", Megan Mgnl ic`one,;PF-Alrside Planning/I:nrylneeririq(IC5171G), . Pavement Life=cycle Cast Analyses ;;�,•,� . Steve Stroh,PE-Ainslde Planning/Engineering•f#5%87) ` Snigcs Planning'�zn,d Design , �:, ' % . Joy Umali,,EIT--'AirfieldiEngineering/Planning, • Airfield Ligntirig Signing and ControlSysteni,D,esign i; Ryan"Damery°EI7-Airfield Engineering/Planning :,Storm Drainage Modeling., Jose,Mortero'iLan'dside Planning/Engineering l . Surface Wafer Management Facility. '. '. Ardy baiiiwell-,A(rfield Lighting/Signage . NavigaVorlatand Landing Aids System Design'' i Tony Fermel ia,PEA-'Construction Issues/Sequencing'(#C55543) SecuritySystem Planning'ng and Desjgn,' „'. � -'_Djvjd CraPn �,ConSltWeClon 5upport Servl ' . Hydrant Fueling,System Design '( Bel Marel(-CADD',Support Ca,S ' • LandsidnFacility,Design ' . Gregq,3rondow,PhD_SE -Structural'(#2731G Civil;#7"039 Structural)] . Site,FacilityDesign ''" FdLyq'n;'PE,AGE.-Geotechnical,(#49969,Ciyd;#2362Geotecnnirab Lilo D'ele,Cru7�Mechanical / iit Blii Electrical '•'Michael R'Miller.1PLs=Surveys" ' p • _ „k ,.;ServlGel, 'Personnel i Master Plans -- -- '" .,,, 1. Joe,Borden,�Deputy,Project PApnager • Passenger Terminal,Plans, ;i;', 'a',,,'. ,I, FvanPfatller,Master l?lanning, I . . Alr'Traffic Planning ;.,,, . i�'":. Ron S,iecke,PE,TE„-..Landside Planning/Engineering(#59234'Civil; • Non-Aeronautical Revenue Facility planning #1735.Traffic), 4 Communi(y and Developin,enl Planning: Megan MOnLeone,PS-AIrside Planning/Engineering(#C51716) r. Passenger Activity and Operations Forecasting,I ,yl;, l'%'Stcve Stroh,PE'=Alrside Planning/Engineering ,(#59687)1,, . Aiiside/Airfield Planning ,, lerd'EngineeringlPlanning . Landside%Ground'TfansportaLi UJ1 plannmq l' i:-Ryon�amcry,Elf-Airfield Eng(neering/Planning " Cargo/Maintenance Facility'Planning ,t '')•%Jdse Morteroi•Landside,Planning"riginDori0g • AI CT Planning "' Minn'Tra n'r Landside Planning/Engineering ". Land Use Planning David Greene''Construction'Support Services . Airport Revenue,,Finaiicial'Planninq ' ! • I?atrick Kennonr,rorecastlnq , dD ModPllnq -' - J Kent'Vanden'OeveY,-Finance/Concessions . GA Foci iy'RBqulrements/Planning•;" .�Bdl Marek-CADDSuppont' ' ! 'Y' J. Tatjana Ortiz-Grapli¢Communications I City of Palm Sprinas Palm Springs International Airport 'HNTB 7 �7 rhnl• "r rngn • _ „ftl'v, r•"',:,'.m . ., 7R ,.'t.Ar nta�';ya'I ,IR-, M,. y C,y, N,,P``� fto �"Jarv!M`HiI Sit M ,.r.�... ." .,..��'J. _�p."q`.�,l..vu&{A£��il._,.�I,uw.r._.� ��.,_� .,r✓ aM1 i )ii' Services � PerSoniiel . I.,.N EPA Cnviionmenlal;Assessl nedts • Andres.GaIrcia,RE-,Project Manager(#C04907.7)-I . .NEPA Environmental Impact Statements�' .;,'�' I;. Jpe l3artlenh pepu Ly.Project Manager,.i � I I ,' - CEgA IOOal'S(udiesland Negative`Declwat,lons''('. ,_III, Gail5laha;AICP,-EnvironrnentaPAmess me'nt • COA'Mitigated Negative Declarations,' '� '• Lyn Calerdine-[nvironmental Assessment, CEgA Catagorjcal Exemptien,C(ATEH)" -'Kim Hutjh'es;PE,-6nviro'nmeilal Support , DocumenLatlon .�°� `� ' ; .i•lLillan Yan,'PE-'EnvPronmentalsppport/MMRP(#C05G2B9),' °• CEQAEnvironmental'Impact'Reports(EIR).;' 'r Dale Blount=Fnvi,i-ppm2,ntalAssesslnenl' " I. Mdigeticn Manitorino,and Rep6rhng•Program", " Tatiana!Ortir Graphic'Communication's ' Development -_".Trafflc Impact Studies Rart150 Noise5tudies;" Ir,rt • Single Event Noise Analysis ;' s•: ' • Clean War Act Section 404.and Section 401'; •,i`, i ,," i ' Studies ai • CleariWdter Act Stormwal;er,Management , DocomentatiM' Section 4(f)Parklands Studies '- • Cultural Re5ourceS,(HABSZHAER SHPO' Consullal'O"coordination w tti soverefgq',tfihes!'^ such as,A9qu6ACaliente' I Haiardous A9ater,ia l's 1_nvir6nmegCal Srfa,' -'— Assessments ' tiinCauall6y,Conforl$iiy,,Air`rozics,and Human �n H calth Risk Assdssment's - hndanger2d Species Ncl Sile,Assessmenls,�apd , ,i, " ',i !','; E, � Section 7;.`, . Consultation Roports, �,.' "'., .. •.Federal,State Of Gaifornla,andLOca Perrnit['ing'", ,t ' • Const'ruction�Documentativn t0'Meet.P011utlon .. - Control U,rements(SWPPP and - Puhlic Involvement ° °' I I. _ ,M,r�%,. ,�erV(k�*5.itwu+s%',.r�'..FI� �', .:>'' ..,... ,. ,F�rsbnnel•. �,. .n u,".`, ;�` ., , a' . Management ConSWling, " Angola Gittonsry=Management Consulting • rLFwance`,',. 1, Electranie Public O "Alrpo •, i'• ' �W�� :', •I,KPnt,V�iiden Oever'-Finance/Conce$sian$ -� - 'ulileach and iniormalion.," Programs "•�' - ,'' GIs Davelopment and SL p Ol,t 1 " I P City of Palm Springs HNTB Palm Springs International Airport Fig.2 Team Organization Chart .a�,rxtt,'f irrG �107 Imn,n,rth nal Mym i--•---�� Michael Kramann.K—Prrncrpal-rn-Charge d ---- �ndre'sGarcia„RE ---- t Jos'ep Barden •tr - - Evdr1,f fahle' '' Joseph Grogan,AIA ' ,, Ron Siecke;PE,TE,, •Megan Monticone,,I'E, ,'Gail Staba,AICP " ConsultlOg'Archltect Steve,Stroh, PE, Lyn Calerdine ;Gerhard Pich'eI, AlA (LSA) PA) SUPPORT 0,I5CIPLINES RES'l]URCE'To,OLs6x ,Airfield Fn9ineering/Planning'; Ternaln'aI,Plapning' , i,Finance/Corep-woos. �Geotechmeal^ Alr,lield Dralhege/Civil Design,- Envlrnnlnental'5uppor�t'IN1upp,' 'I,';rorecastfri,q M/E/P ' Alrfield,110hting/5i FAR,Pa1 It 1505tudy; CADD,suppor t Survey " NAVAIDS/AWDS ''i Perirpeler,F2n�e/Ser;urily,' n7,� „structural i GrephicCpmmunlcatian� 'Lar1(i$ide,PlanningfFn9lnearing Const9'l1C'ncwsupperGSegynncing,,1 Legend:GPA(GPA Architects,I nc.)I LSA(LSA Associates,Inc.) "Staff are HINTS unless otherwise indicated, City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB � w p, sae �W ` � • r _s � . p•"'..,�ri�M11.j' ww, ,,r: yd J `��',�.....`���....,...,....�..-l�^Pn, ....( 'v ilLY,.r.H.adrS�+';'ui, . • +, —.awl Resumes • Key Personnel Joseph K. Barden, Jr. Andres Garcia, PE Deputy project Manager - HNTB Project Manager - HNTB Education:MArch/1988/Architecture, Education:MA/1985/Engineering Admin- Arizona State University;BS/1986/Archi- tecture,State University of New York at istralion,George Washington University; Eufralo BS/1983/Civil Engineering,Universidad Aut6noma Metropolitana;Post-Baccalaure- Area of Expertise:Master planning, ate courses in Environmental Engineer- architectural design,terminal planning and ing/1987,University of Houston design,program criteria document prepa- California Registration: 1989/Professional ration and production,project manage- Engineer/California#C049077 ment,quality control and assurance_ Area of Expertise:Project management, Relevant Projects: planning,design,and construction admin- SAN Master Plan Update istration of airport facilities for tenants, Role:Project Manager airlines and cargo operators. Master Plan update to 2000 Plan com- Relevant Projects: pleted by HNTB ONT Master Plan and EIRIMS Alternatives development/evaluate short Role:Project Manager and long term planning options • Master planning for short-and long- Land use planning term improvements Environmental Impact Report • Preparation of a combined CEQA/NEPA Terminal program criteria document environmental document(EIR/EIS) INU Terminal Master Plan • Airport capacity assessment Role:Project Manager/Lead Terminal Apple Valley Airport,New Runway 8126 Planner and Associated Taxiways • Passenger processing capacity planning Role:Project Manager • Alternative development-terminal and • PS&E design preparation landside planning • New runway and taxiways construction • Consensus building approach to phased phase services implementation OAIC Taxiways B and C Rehabilitation Sitica-Rocky Gutierrez Airport Master Role:Project Engineer of Record Plan Addendum Taxiway design improvements Role:HNTB Project Manager • Construction phasing preparation ' Terminal development configurations Striping and demolition plans • Terminal conditions/facilities analysis and related facilities Addendum to existing master plan with recommended actions to meet future needs City of Palm Springs 10 HHTB Palm Springs International Airport Mff� V14 L„ .•,"w,&6_„n...:--,.:-a-.,.eu�,w _ _ .-�+°�•:.i.w..���c�..�.., _ SSSW�;�,r4�pnm'�-...�.,.�� Evan Pfahler Joseph L. Grogan, AIA Master Planning - HNTB Architecture- HNTB Education:BS/1996/Urban Planning and Education:MA/1975/Architecture,Univer- Design/University of Colorado at Boulder city of Florida;BA/1973/Design,University Area of Expertise:Airport Master Plan- of Florida ning,Runway,Taxiway,and Apron Plan- Registration:Registered Architect/CA ning,Cargo,General Aviation,and Ancil- NC22081 lacy Facilities Planning,Airport Layout Area of apertise:Planning and design Plans,Obstruction Analysis including for new airport terminals and the renova- Obstacle Free Zone(OFZ)analysis,applica- tion and expansion of existing terminals tion of FAR Part 77.and Terminal Instru- and facilities including specialty systems ment Procedures(TERPS). (passenger and baggage security screen- Relevant Projects: ing,baggage handling,passenger loading SAN Master Plan Update bridges,400I--Iz,preconditioned air,signage, Role.Deputy Project Manager/Senior FIDS/BIDS,and people movers). Facilities and Airside Planner of Record Relevant.Projects: • Master planning LAX Advanced Planning • Concept development Role:Manager of Facilities • Airside and comprehensive facilities • Implementation of$11 billion Master planning Plan SeaTac Airport Layout Plans Package - Planning,programming and design Role: Project Manager guidelines for Intermodal Transportation ALP update for existing and future Center,Consolidated Rental Car Facility, facilities Ground Transportation Center,Central PAR Part 77 Surfaces Terminal Area,Tom Bradley Interna- tional Terminal development,and West FAA Approval Coordination Satellite Concourse LAX Master Plan Tuscon International Airport Terminal Role:Facilities Planner/ALP Coordinator Expansion - Comprehensive ALP redevelopment Role:Principal-in-Charge and Terminal • LAX Master Plan ALP Narrative Report Planner - Runway and taxiway facilities analysis 160,000-8quare-foot expansion • TERPS Ticketing lobbies International Terminal passenger capac- New baggage claim facilities ity study SAN Terminal Role:Terminal Planner • $130 million, 14-gate,350,000-square- foot North Terminal Roadway and parking system Traffic congestion relief City or Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB i t QUO '4"�., i Gerhard Pichel, AIA Ron Slecke, PE, TE Architecture- GPA Landside Planning/Engineering Education:School of Architecture and - HN T B Engineering,Hamburg,Germany Education:MBA/2001/Business Adminis- Registration; 1972/Registered tration,Chapman University;BS/1989/Civil Architect/#C6965 Engineering,San Diego State University Area of,Expertise:Airport and terminal California Registration:2002/Professional planning,design and construction. Traffic Operations Fngineer/ITE; 1998/ Relevant Projects: Professional Engineer/California(Civil) #59234; 1993/Professional Engineer/Cali- Palm Springs International Airport fornia(Traffic)#1735 Terminal Expansion Phase I and 2A Role:Project Principal Area of Expertise:Airport landside cir- culation systems,including the design of • Ticketing and bag claim remodel/ parking facilities,curbside loading areas, expansion and multi-level terminal roadways. • New concourse design and construction Relevant Projects: SAN Terminal 2 West Sea-Tac Comprehensive Development Role:Consulting Architect Plan(CDP) • 10-gate terminal expansion Role:Landside Team Leader • Parking structure with check-in facilities . Landside circulation and parking • FIS facility Cox international air service preparation • Land and airside development Terminal area improvements for road- LAX Terminal 6,7&8 Modifications ways,parking,and curbside for EDS Ground transportation center and Role: Project Principal consolidated rental car facility concept • New terminal EDS baggage screening developments facilities design/construction ONT Master Plan • TSA Coordination Role:Landside Team Leader • Landside circulation and parking preparation • Long-range assessment for terminal roadways,parking and curbside Multi- modal access concept development SB1A Master Plan Update Role: Landside Team Leade • Landside circulation and parking preparation • Regional ground access review • Long-range requirements for a multi- modal cargo center analysis City of Palm Springs 12 HNTB Palm Springs International ,airport Idegan Monticone, PE Steve Stroh, PE Alrside Planning/Engineering Landside Planning/Engineering - HNTB - HNTB .Education:BS/1988/Civil Engineering, Education:BS/1991/Civil Engineering,San University of Colorado Diego State University,California California Registration: 1992/Professional California Registration: 1999/Professional Engineer/California#C51716 Engineer/California#59687 Area of Expertise:Airfield engineering Area of Expertise:Aviation landside plan- and planning including runways,aprons, ning and engineering,traffic and pavement taxiways,and other airfield-related duties design,grading and drainage design,layout compliant with FAA design standards. of horizontal and vertical alignments,cost Relevant Projects: estimating,preparation of project specifica- LAX South Airfield and NLA Studies tions,and FAA coordination, Role:Project Engineer Relevant Projects: • New parallel taxiway construction SAN Master Plan Update • Centerline realignment and rehabilita- Role.,Project Engineer tion of Runway 7R/25L Taxiway modifi- • Landside improvements designed to inte- cations grate into the existing roadway system • Relocation and/or modifications to • New parking structure maintenance roads - Taxi staging facility SAN Master Plan • Employee parking lot Role.Project Engineer LAXNW/SW Perimeter Enhancements • Airfield improvements for implementa- Role:Project Engineer tion of the Immediate Action Plan(IAP) . Perimeter roadway and security fence • New airport roadway system design John Wayne Airport,Taxiway Lima("U') - Drainage channel crossing Reconstruction • Fast-track design to meet heightened Role: Project Engineer security measures - Taxiway reconstruction BWI Lower Level Outer Roadway • Operation phasing Widening Airfield geometries Role: Design Engineer - Pavement design - Addition of a fifrh lane on outer roadway . Airfield lighting • Maintenance of pedestrian and vehicle traffic • Storm drain improvements Sediment and erosion control City of palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HHTB 13 �¢ eu ,• ` e *� �, �. e� e e.. ? �,.�„ >C•"��p'(Al�i�g l":, 0 r�l iM1i i Y. Gail Staba, AICP Lyn T. Calerdine Environmental Assessment - HNTB Environmental Assessment - LSA Education:MS/1990/Transportation Education:BA/1972/Physics,University Engineering,VC Berkeley;BS/1985/Envi- of California,Irvine ronmental Planning,UC Davis Area of Expertise: Airport and local Palm California Registration:1989/American Springs community environmental assess- Institute of Certified Planners#008656 ments;Environmental Impact Report Area of Expertise:Airport environmental (EIR),Environmental Itnpact Statement and mitigation planting;MMRP support; (EIS),and CEQA/NEPA preparation;and traffic and air quality mitigation;project FAA coordination. management of environmental review Relevant Projects: processes;permitting; and MR,EA and SFO Runway Reconfiguration Program EIS development. Role:SFO,Environmental Planning Relevant Projects: Manager SAN Airport Master Plan and EA/EIR Environmental approval process for Role.,Project Manager proposed reconfigured runways Environmental documentation to Draft EIWEIS preparation upgrade passenger and cargo facilities Coordination with over 30 regulatory Agency/public coordination agencies OAK Expansion Plan EIRIMS Oversight of preliminary plans for Role:Project Manager 30,000+acres of alternative mitigation . Environmental reports sites • Agency/public coordination SFO Master Plan Environmental • Tecltnical reports and analyses QA Approvals • Coordination with PAA Role:SFO Environmental Planning Manager OAK Surface Water Management • NEPA approval Program • Section 404 permits for 31 fill acres of wetlands and waters Role: Project Manager • Section 401 certification by the Regional • Surface water control program WQCB • Confining federally-regulated wetlands . Section 7 consultation with the U.S.FWS and minimizing bird habitat in an airport environment City of Palm Springs Boulder/Crescendo . Delineation contract management EIR • Agency coordination Role:Managing Principal Single family home development on two separate lots City of Palm Springs 14 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport •• •r • � � -pI�R`��"f rRt'6A"R,`�t,M'�di1 1�b iu4 �� t�1�.1 F,.1m... ,.G...,-.-...,,,�.�...."...,.,... ^f':VG fn'.'.� ,,.��...��....,�. �-. �«.."..,...,,...����.,t� _..f��mMn iMil,l:+M*rtW'N",. ,,� , , Resumes- Support Personnel Angela Gittens Education:BA/1967/Socrology, San i7rancisco International Airport Executive Overview Fairleigh Dickinson University Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport HNTB . TBI Airport Management,Albany,Burbank,Rick- enbacker,(Columbus,Ohio),Stewart(Newburg, New York),and international terminals at Atlanta and Toronto Airports Joy Urrah,EI7 Education:BS/2003/Civil Enoineering, . LAX Runway 25L Relocation&Center Taxiway Airfield Engineering/Planning University of California,Irvine Improvements HNTB . LAX Airfield Intersection Improvements- Phase I&2 • OAK Reconstruction of Aprons in the Vicinity of Hangars l-5 Ryan Damery,EIT Education:BS/2001/Civil Engineer ing, mccarren International Concourse D Study Airfield Drainage/Civil Design University of Illinois;Certificate in SAN Master Plan Update HINTS Project Management,UC Berkeley ;• LAX Remote Boarding Modifications Josh Day, EIT _ Education:BS/2001/Civil Engineering, �- LAX Runway 25L Relocation OAK Apron Landside Planning/Engineering Brigham Young University,Utah Reconstruction HNTB SLC Landside Development Program Minh Tran Education:BS/2003/Computer Science . LAX Advanced Planning Landside Planning/Engineering California Srate University of Fullerton SAN Master Plan Update HNTB Sea Tac Comprehensive Development Plan(CDP) Jose Mortero Education:M5/7982/Civil EnginePrinq LAX Advanced Planning Landside Plannmq/Engineering (Transportation Planning),University SAN Master Plan Update HNTB of Waterloo,Canada;BS/1977/Civil Engl- Sea-Tac Comprehensive Development Plan(CDP) _. nearing.University of the Philippines Andy Balkwell Education:MBA Candidate/Year/Chap- - SAN Master Plan Update Airfield Lighting/Signage man University;BS/2004/8iomedlcal i LAX Master Plan HNTB and Electrical Engineering/California LAX Runway 25L Relocation and Intersection _ State University Lond Beach _ Improvements Tony Fermel7a,PE Education: BS/1993/Civil EngimMrig, LAX Southside Taxiways Construction-Related Issues/ California Polytechnic University,San SAN Master Plan Update Sequencing Luis Obispo JWA Taxiway Lima("U') HNTB Reconstruction Registration:199 6/P ro f e551 o v a l 1 Engineer/California#C55543 Allen Berente5,AIA Education, BArch/1982/8a11 State PSP Terminal Expansion Planning and Terminal Planner University,/BS/1962/Environmen- Programming HNTB tal Science.Ball State University; LAX Various Projects(tenant improvements, BA/1976/Indiana University terminal expansions,and planning studies) Registration:Registered Archi• ONT Terminal Planning,Programming&Security test/1987/California#C18332 Improvements James R.Bruce,AIA Education: MArch/'I980/University - Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport Terminal Terminal Architect of Texas at Arlington;BArch/1977/ Expansion and Renovation HNTB Architecture,University of Texas at . Tucson International Airport Concourse Arlington; Expansion Registration:1982/Registered • DFW Airport Development Department On-Call Architect/Texas#8900 Design&Design Management Robert Tindell,RA Education' BArch/1971/University of - Tucson International Airport Terminal Expansion Architectural Construction Support Arizona Long Beach Airport Security Improvements HNTB Registration:1975/Registered ANC Seismic and General Rehabilitation Architect/Arizona#70358 City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 15 Resumes Support Personnel (continued)-Su David Green Education:BSCE/Construction Option, . Sea Tac Airfield Improvement Piciects Construction Support Services North Carolina State University Sea-Tac Concourse B,C,and Main Terminal HNTB Airfield Improvements . SLC Phase I Development Program Kim Hughes,PE Education:BS/1985/Civil Engineering, . ONT Master Plan EIS/ER Environmental Support Virginia Polytechnic Institute and SLC Part 150 Study Update HNTB State University ANC Part 150 Study Update and Environmental Registration;7991/Professional Assessment Engineer/Virginia#4654 Lillian Yen,PE Education:SS/1992/Civil Engineering, - LAX Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Environmental Support/MMRP University of California,Los Angeles Drcgram(MMRP) HNTB Registration.1996/Civil Engineer/ LAX South Airfield Improvement Program California#C056289 Dale Blount Education:MS,BS/1974/Area of Study: . SFO Wetland Mitigation Program Environmental Assessment Animal Science,Agriculture.University - Cahazon Band of Mission Indians Environmental LSA of Illinois.Urbana Program • Indian Avenue/1-10 Environmental Assessment/ M iticgated Negative Declaration Patrick Kennon Education:MS/1981/Economics, �•"SAN Master Plan Forecasts Forecasting University of Massachusetts; BS/1978/i• SFO Market-by-Market Forecasts HNTB Urban Planning,University of Virginia ONT Master Plan Kent Vanden Dever Education:MBA/1996/Real Estate/ Fresno Yosemite International Airport Terminal Finance/Concessions Finance,UriwersiYyof-Cincinnati,---- Expansion --.- HNTB BS/1988/Business(Decision Scr ANC On-Call Concessions Planning ences),Miami University Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport Bill Marek Education:AS/1999/Construction LAX Relocation of Runway 25L CADD Support Engineering and Computer-Aided Duluth International New Perimeter Road HNTB Drafting Design Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International Airport Runway and Taxiway Reconstruction Ed Lyon, PE,GE Education:BS/1989/Civil Engineering, • PSP Runway 13R/37L and Taxiways C and W Geotechnical Colorado School of Mines Extensions RMA Registration:Professional Engineer PSP Terminal Building Expansion (Civil)/California#49969;Geotechnl- SBIA Terminal Expansion and Seismic Retrofit cal Engineer/California#2362 Lito Dale Cruz Education:BS/1979/Mechanical LAX Terminal Improvements Mechanical Engineering,Far Eastern University, Air National Guard,March AFB Improvements TMAD Philippines Nam Bui Education:BA/1975/13hilosophy, - LAX Terminal Improvements Electrical University Saigon,Vietnam . ONT Parking Structure TMAD _ - Air National Guard,Channel Islands Improvements Michael R.Miller,PLS Education:BA/1972/English Literature . Long Beach Airport Taxiway D Survey California State University.Fullerton . ONT Laser Scan RBF Gregg Brandow,PhD,SE Education:MSCE/1968/Stanford . PSP Terminal Expansion Structural University;BSCE/1967/University of • LAX Bradley Terminal BJASE Southern California JWA Terminal and Parking Structures Registration:1973/Professional Civil Engineer/CA 422316;1977/Professional Structural Engineer/CA#2039 Tatiana Ortiz Education: Visual Arts/Graphic Design LAX Maslar Plan Graphic Communications &Computer Graphics, - SAN Technical Reports/Meeting Presentations Metromedia University of California,Los Angeles Burbank,Glendale,and Pasadena Public Extension Outreach PI"Ogram City of Palm Springs 16 NNTB Palm Springs International airport C R'.i`ndy'��4�_,...:..�?:;...u.r,'.;�:�;..'L:.�..�.....,.!.._._.�... ,n r,e; :�:iA<,�, n .. ,.. .._�4=�_--•i'Hpl^�a.i�ivan u�..�k.�,a._� D.1 Federal Aviation labor and materials,or the willingness of Administration (FAA) builders to compete for the project. HNTB aviation personnel apply FAA At HNTB,design to budget begins before design standards on a daily basis,and are we start work on a project. We seek thoroughly fbimilhar with Airport Design projects for well-established clients like the guides,Advisory Circulars,and Orders Airport with realistic understandings of the in addition to maintaining an up-to-date construction market and the factors that library of current FAA publications. HNTB influence project cost. We make our own supports organizations like the Airports appraisal of the nature of the work and the Council International—North America by adequacy of budgets in the Airport Capital reviewing and commenting on draft FAA Improvement Program. We vigorously guideline documents before publication for Pursue opportunities like yours to serve public use. clients with experience in planning,manag- Our staff is experienced in planning, ing and funding airport improvements. designing and construction services for Managing construction cost through design airport improvement projects funded requires an evolution from broad categories i through AIP,grants and PFC funds, litre unit costs of in place earthwork,airfield including AIP procedures and design Pavement,aid lighting systems to specific requirements,construction standards, quantities of materials and systems. Dur- grant assurances and certifications,and ing project work planning,we set up the — - closeout documentation. HNTB regularly framework for construction cost control, coordinates with all Business Lines of the We recommend the preparation of estimates FAA including Airports,Flight Standards, of construction cost at 15%,35%,and 65% Airway Facilities,and Capacity. design. These estimates enable HNTB and Specific to the FAAs Western Pacific the client to track project trends and external Region,HNTB is currently working closely influences on cost. The engineer's estimate with the regional office in one of the largest of completed construction documents projects of recent times-the LAX South before bidding provides a final opinion of Airfield Improvement Project. As part cost and opportunity to manage the content of the FAAs Operational Evolution Plan of the project against available funds. (OEP),this project has been elevated to the HNTB is committed to meeting our client's highest FAA circles in Washington,D.C. needs for cost control. We have developed innovative design solutions to facilitate D.2 Design to Budget construction;reduce airport operational To meet HNTB goals,along with our down-time;limit requirements for badging client we must both agree that the project or escorting construction laborers and is a success. Cost,quality and quantity delivery personnel;and phase construction are integrated measures that clients judge to minimize contractor costs. when measuring success. Design to budget D.3 DBE participation means balancing these three qualities even though neither the client nor HNTB can HNTB honors the intent and commitments fully control the time the project will start of our clients to their communities and or finish,external influences on the cost of to the requirements of federally funded Projects. Not merely meeting financial City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 977 57 ry q� •h F � bull 11 Recent examples of HNTB's record of cost control 11 90AhFleld' '58Z5,00' ' - '� '$750,089' _ei$16,900,000,, ri' :$12;f00,000'(©), .i l.Ramp ,a_ ,h .v, ) In-Progress,(C).d tong Beach' J-- -'d' $000,0oo! $966,535 ," $24,00000i0" $2350R Runway 1230 $Z4,000,00D000 C(CO)) . Rehbilitation 111 JWATaklway,"L"' " $300,000 . $54d,000 541500000, $4,3Z3,276(6)' i ,$4.472,284(C) objectives for participation,HNTB seeks office leader meet Recent to involve disadvan taged firms in roles that with operations sup- record of DBE and M/WBE participation empower them to become more capable port staff to examine and competitive. Recently,HNTB received the progress of the , a commendation from the City of Los project,concerns {,OAK North,. 1p•i Angeles City Council for exceeding the and opportunities Pieid z �` _ 15%M/W/DBE goals established for the the manager has ,LAx SAIIP i "15% ZzDh LAX South Airfield Improvement Project. identified,the plan SAN Master 25% 22�� HNTB pledged 19%participation and to to accomplish the .Plan,,' aJ date has achieved 22%involvement. balance of the work, DA Project Management Tools any pending changes in the cost,schedule, or contract terms of the project,resources HNTB project managers enjoy power- the project team will need to continue,and ful support from the firm in making our the financial status of the project. projects successful. Beginning with train- From these reviews,managers and office ing,project managers benefit from on-line leaders take action items as part of HNTB's file management,near-real Lime project 4_for-4 service.Office leaders often meet reporting,instant communications and directly with clients to verify client satisfac- information sharing,operations staff sup- tion.Formal client audits bring subject port of administrative responsibilities,staff matter experts from elsewhere in the firm resources for scheduling,expert analysis, to meetings with clients to obtain their quality assurance,and cost control. perspective on our performance. The HNTB Project Management Redbook A critical resource to HNTB managers and frames the structure of project delivery our clients is time reporting. Accurate and record keeping for all projects. This time reporting enables HNTB to know and resource,and its electronic implementation, prove the cost of our services,establish specifies the project contents, auditable overhead costs,and keep abreast • Work Plan of project expenses weekly,for comparison • Quality Plan to project progress. Every HNTB employee • Labor and Expense Management working on projects must record time • Communications daily on our web-based time cards in • Management Monthly Reviews hour increments. Automated reporting One example of these tools in action is the procedures make project labor charges monthly review. 'lie project manager and available to project managers the first day City of Palm Springs 1 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport INE"I .,..(u. °s''G° ..°it"I,Pa'LAe.M&ti4✓d,;.. L^.d�L". d-,d m ._-............,.M,. n.,.,..�_.W_. �' ...... .�5_-^ran . .._ 'S;M:�,n�nyT�lR,.�� of the week following the weekly time card • Long-term programming and conceptual period. We also track project expenses layout of terminal area improvement electronically,serving the same purposes alternatives for the BIR Study; of proving cost,substantiating auditable . Participation in public information overhead rates,and informing managers of program involving public presentations costs for comparison to progress. and workshops; HNTB's corporate administrative staff • Design and construction services£or provides business materials like insurance terminal area emergency generator and certificates,financial records,and other electrical upgrades; contractual obligations to our clients. r Services related to new airport security In summary,I4N'rJ3 facilitates project man- access control system;and agement with staff and electronic resources • Programming,design and construction to provide for consistency,lower costs,and documents for terminal 5th floor renova- manage the risks inherent in providing tions including conversion of the old professional services. All of these outcomes air traffic control tower cab to a security produce direct benefits to our clients. monitoring station. D.5 Contract of Similar Size and These projects required quick mobiliza- SCope tion;expedited services and assignment; and management of HNTB specialized In the City of long Beach selected- resources appropriate to each project. HNTBTB as an On-Call consultant to Long Beach Airport(LGB). Since then,HNTB By way of example,the City of Long Beach has provided a variety of services for the received a grant from the Department of airport in support of their development Homeland Security Urban Area Security program,including:terminal planning and Initiative(UASI)that enabled funding design,security enhancements,environ- for airport security improvements. The mental analysis and documentation,airfield grant had a fund withdrawal deadline that and other engineering assessments,and required HNTB to plan,design and prepare design and construction administration. bid documents in record time. The City and (a) Responsiveness and attentive- HNTB completed the project successfully. ness to client needs Like many cities,Long Beach relies heavily on federal funding to complete most of On-call responsibilities at LGB have their airfield construction projects. For the required immediate response in provid- pavement rehabilitation of Runway 12/30, ing services for a variety of planning and the FAA had recently transitioned to a new architectural assignments: system that based construction funding • Facility requirements analysis,concep- on actual bids received. During the design tual design,and final design for a perma- phase,the FAA could only grant a general nent concourse to accommodate rapid range of funding that might be expected, growth in JetBlue Airways service; This range had a large spread—over$5 mil- - Interim departures holdroom,passenger lion-which created an interesting dilemma security screening and baggage claim for the City,anxious to capture as much facility for other carriers; funding as possible but unable to specify City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB i g a project budget since the final funding Solution: New glass for the tower was amount was unknown. provided that would prohibit views into the To maximize federal funding,HNTB new command center while maintaining developed seven additive bid alternates that the exterior appearance of the facility. The the City could include or discard accord- tower beacon was also modernized while ing to funds availability. The FAA had also maintaining its historical character. offered the City end-of-fiscal-year funds. To Challenge: As a control tower,the 5th floor capture these funds,HNI TB quickly mobi- had limited access and egress. lized,expedited design and completed the Solution:HNTB worked with City Fire bid documents.As a result,the project was Department officials to design an egress bid on time and in line with the Engineers' path that included new lighted walkways anticipated estimate_ The City received the across the terminal roof. New interim funding for three of seven additive alternates. terminal facilities were added to provide The City of Long Beach has depended upon an additional passenger hold room area. FINTB to bring a wide variety of expertise These facilities were designed using scale, to their airport development program. massing,materials,and color that would Throughout the multi-year,multi-discipline least detract from the historical terminal. contract HNTB has been able to success- All of the plans and renderings that HNTB fully undertake all requested assignments_ prepared were presented and approved by while meeting the diverse requirements the City's Historical Landmarks Commis- outlined for each individual project. sion and Architectural Review Board. (b) Creative ability (c) Knowledge and understanding of The passenger terminal is designated by the latest trends and systems used the City of Long Beach as a historical by other airports landmark. This status presented many planning and design work required incor- challenges requiring creative ability on the poration of new passenger and baggage part of the I•INTB team, screening guidelines arising from govern- Challenge:As a historic structure,no modi- ment regulations and procedures hnple- fications could be made that would alter the mented after September 11,2001. These exterior appearance of the terminal. regulations and procedures were consis- Solution: The renovation was designed to tently tested,revised,and refined by the not exceed the existing physical mass of the Airport,Transportation Security Agency Lower so that seismic upgrades would not (TSA) and airlines.In addition,electronic alter the appearance of the building. check-in and operational procedures of Challenge:The 5th floor renovations to low fare carriers,such as JetBluc,had to be the passenger terminal converted the considered in the planning and design of abandoned traffic control tower to a existing and future facilities.HNTB was security command center for the Airport able to anticipate and respond success- This necessitated extensive repairs and the fully to new requirements and operational upgrade of finishes to the interior and exte- procedures as they evolved. rior of the building,all within the context Prior to the design of the rehabilitation of the historical structure_ of Runway 12130,HNTB studied other airports that bad successfully rehabilitated City of Palm Springs 20 HNTB Palm Springs international Airport their runways in the region(PHX,SIC, cil,approving agencies,and other public OAK,and SAN). Each used a different entities. HNTB prepared sections of public phasing solution. During the design phase, documents,available on the City�s wcbpage, HNTB used our relationships at these for inspection by all interested parties. airports to facilitate"lessons learned"meet- During certain phases of runway construc- ings,applying past lessons learned from tion,some general aviation air traffic was design and construction of these projects. temporarily diverted to smaller runways This information proved valuable to LGB, at LGB. HNTB often prepared exhibits, yielding a project that was easy to construct. power paint presentations,and other visual (d) Analytical ability tools that City staff used to brief the local Activity forecasting,programming and community or City Council of temporary facility requirements analysis were essential changes in flight patterns. to the EIR process. HNTB worked with the (f) Interaction with client's Airport and airline representatives in devel- organization, i.e., other divisions oping appropriately sized facilities to meet and personnel the demands of a variety of operational HNTB strongly believes that successful scenarios. Part of the analysis was develop- projects are the result of the collaboration ment of a viable concessions program for of all interested entities. At LGB,through -- _ incorporation into the overall building meetings,presentations,teleconferences,—.. program.HNTB presented its analysis and correspondence,HNTB routinely and recommendations in many public interacted with airport staff,City staff workshops conducted by the City Council's (engineering,zoning,building and safety, Aviation Advisory Commission. The results fire department,historic commission, of the analysis enabled the City to develop a architectural review board,accessibil- consensus program to carry forward. ity committee),FAA,TSA,airlines and The successful rehabilitation of Runway tenants,and other agencies and groups as 12/30 without negative operational impacts required for the assigned project. required smooth orchestration of all construction components- In addition to (g) sensitivity to funding constraints detailed phasing and third party coordina- tion,HNTB analyzed the availability of The City and HNTB established budgets construction materials(specifically P-401 for each project based on available funding asphalt)to verify timely delivery. and agreements with the funding parties (including City,FAA,TSA,airlines,conces- (e) Oral and written communication sionaires,and others)- skills On the runway rehabilitation project, It is critically important to present project HNTB understood the limitations of not information clearly and logically when it having a dearly defined construction bud- becomes part of the public record. HNTB get. To address this issue,HNTB developed routinely presented information orally in a series of additive alternatives that the meetings and presentations and in writing City used to capture the maximum federal (with graphics,tables,charts,3-D models, funding available and tracked the cost of and other visual tools where appropriate)to construction material and labor,develop- Airport staff,tenants,airlines,City Coun- ing cost estimates accordingly. As a result, City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 21 • r ��m 1��•w..w.r�.a� �M.t»�i`� w,�"..w��`A�u.rw, 5 t ' n! .. nM..''4w4, ..+nts,rw x 6 construction bids matched the expectations . Delete paragraph 1,S Pamiliarity with set forth by HNTB. Work,which is applicable to construction D.6 Identify Insurance Policies contracts. • .Modify references throughout from HNTB maintains General Commercial "world'to"sery'services,' since this is not a Liability,Worker's Compensation,Business contract for construction. Automobile,and Professional Liability . Delete references to"performance bond;' Insurance coverage which in our opinion since this is not a construction contract. conforms to the requirements of the City's • Delete liquidated damages provisions, standard Contract Services Agreement. since this is not a construction contract. Q.7 Contract Services • Revise the limits of indemnification. Agreement Terms and Conditions HNTB would seek to negotiate some changes for this contract,including: • Revise the standard of care for profes- sional services. j i I I City or Palm Springs 22 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport 32 --- - _ a � a a1 ,'ay vl•-. �'ti4'i. , .� _ fir.C ...,_.__'. �'^ -�d�.� 7. The Request for Statements of Qualifica- 4, Airport Master Plan and associated eons lists seven projects of immediate environmental assessment; interest; 5. Perform Environmental Assessment FY2007 - ACIP for Taxiway J northeast expansion and development of associated aviation 1.Extend T/W J by 300'tv the southeast to industrial park scheduled for FY 2008; access future aviation industrial area; 2. Rehabilitate/Overlay Runway 13L/31R- FY2008 - RCIP Pavement surface beyond useful life and L Widen and Overlay Taxiway G-to allow associated intersecting taxiways south for larger corporate aircraft; of runway 13L/31R-Pavement surfaces 2. Upgrade and Extend T/W J to the beyond useful life; northeast to provide access to northwest 3.Rehabilitate Taxiway E and north cross aviation industrial area. Taxiways J,11,D,F,and B-Pavement surfaces beyond useful life; - - Projects of Immediate Interest FE Pulm sunngs AIY Alusrvan I„ ,�4 x� . ' lem xnne ec Icm ry s,onoeure nre avlaelon �`% 5 ali0n � c� PoYsnnocr APFF 7nrminal , PFr FY 2007 ACIP Projects 'N FY 2008 ACIP Projects City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 23 _ 1 I n" ^p�,,. m„ YW6w(�yxq�'y,N y�,y. W^,, x• ;�y��•�ylyP.%'. • .._-----._ _. .1.�" l�tn�� aP+!'�y"Mfl> u��1 r�4:AlI�r+/J -M-7rfq� AI�I�.JI�r7^.Ir SFt,, .�, - 1. •• •r _— ______ —._._'� __ -.rr' � - 1��[��:,�r-�,w,�:�+,'�*Wkj,;...✓:Mw�d';:+�r`�^.'�";rk'�ri±;r�u..r'�Wya: . .. jr�+p r�u, •� �ray • � E.1 Key personnel and resources ,' - -- — -__� ___.,-._,. ............„_...,_, , ,_ ......_..; The table below relates key personnel W:� h'aVe,dl;Vlded t 'ie bdlance of�thiS seCtion',into directly applicable to the listed projects- i three;parts:,, Although these professionals are currently i ^NC'i . 'iWG,, C�]rrrICTN. serving other I�NTB clients,each has "!"iGi F�L/,ah1►VING ' time available to serve in their indicated r ;EuVIRL)R114 NIT'ACSERVICES' capacity. Withinthese sections; We pgovide,the recluntod informatio' n ifor the'projects of-imrnediate interest; seeking%'to minimize'repetitidn.and.improve;ease of. reading. "ufx,r� rn'uvd��dM" 2, IFY20P' "FY20G,�S •�r y11Yy'��yNnl,eri..m,.,, _,-45 Andre,'Gar41a ir,--r,.l. ,..c•— —_.I Project Manayer, Joe Barden. Uehr°ly ern/ec(Manager Evan Pfaliler, i Master Pldrinlp9 70°!0"' ' . ;,i,.I •' I I - 'Joseph Grogan yl . 90%J I" I Arcnrt@rtyr'e 'Gerhard PicheL(GFq) Arcndec re lu Ron Sioce, o;,lA_ Landside p1a79nipo/Enginoerinq . 40!°., ..I_........' ' i Megan Monticone' lia ° � . '1� 70 .X.I " A'irside'Rla7ning/Eag7neennq. 'I � � ,' Steve�SYrAh i � 1..� .' I 'i, �,� ll.i�',� � I' '•i Akside RanninglEngiheermg ' I I EnvironmentJI Assessment Lyn'Calertllne'((,SA) .. � __ _._.I ___— __ __,.L.1 ,i._•,.__Y. ^fovrrool»enblAgsesSri]Cnl' ( .^X 25°lp; F.._. . 11' , I L• b II" City of Palm Springs 24 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport i Engineering design Preparation of Bid Documents All the projects of immediate interest are — 750/a Submittal engineering design projects except FY 2007 — 100%Submittal projects 4 and 5. — Final Submittal E.2 Work Plan and Methodology Bidding Support Project work plans define the process of — Pre-Bid Conference communication for the client,regulators, — Response to Bidder's Inquiries Z the consultant,subconsultant,and third — Review of Bids parties affected by the project. They set out — Recommendation for Award the time and effort required to develop the • Construction of Improvements project from its conceptual structure to a • Construction Support completed deliverable, Each task represents _ Construction Monitoring(Inspection) a process that has inputs,resources,action, _ Response to Request for Information and results. — Change Order Review A typical design schedule applicable to — Field Memos our work for the Airport will include the _ punch List following items: — FAA Grant Reimbursement/Montbly • Issuance of Notice-to-Proceed Draw • Management Tasks Post Construction — Work Plan — Project Close-out — Quality Plan — Record Drawings — Subconsultant Agreements — Pavement Design Approach Kick-off Meeting — Progress Reports For rehabilitation or reconstruction proj- - Project Management Monthly Reviews ects,HNTB and our geotechnical engineer- ing subconsultant,RMA Group,propose a Pre-Engineering Services two-level design approach- - Survey First,we will prepare a pre-design pave- ment assessment based on existing geotech- - Data Collection/As-btdlt Review nical and pavement information and we — Validation of Project Definition with will develop a list of potential rehabilitation Client or reconstruction strategies for the project, • Preliminary Design This effort will provide a recommendation — Pavement Design of the best methodologies for consideration — Geometric Design(Horizontal at this site,subject to confirmation by Controls) geotechnical and other test data gathered Vertical Control(Profiles) later for design purposes. — Grading/Drainage We propose to develop preliminary pave- Airfield Lighting Layout ment sections suitable for the expected — Load Calculations aircraft traffic fleet mix,forecast number Development of Pavement Details of operations,and preliminary soils data currently available. This will allow us to — Construction Phasing assess the capacity of the existing structure City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport NNTB 25 „ _ cL i�Yi"jll'lah'k:nxy� am' ,1 � arc•.Fes' 45 1 to handle expected traffic through its potential Pavement P,ehabilitation Strategies e, design life. Other useful design input will �' support an assessment of the causes of the ”" r l p' hham�,,,, existing pavement state,and determine s m ,_, i major factors to consider for potential IHot.Surface , �I.,'Heater-scarification of the top.l to,l/2-inch of -Q future pavement rehabilitation designs. I Recycluig surfacing witti•addition of asphalt rejuvenating' a Initial conceptual design input informa- agents,arid Py .',. Finish with new asphall'surface tour,'overlay_. I �h tion includes: - ------------ r� Surface Milling and (• Mllllnry top l to 2,Inches,of existing surface; Pavement Age Re's Yfaping- ;f{'''placement of paving fabric suclias RavePrepC7 Pavement Material Properties iCombma dwith ,','�,overdlscrete'wide cracks prlorwifhbituminous Geolextlle Fabrics�. ".f l'ack'coat,and Aircraft Mix and Forecast Number of t __' _".+Rmsh with now as Halt surface mugs'overlay. �= P — — --— Operations Surface',Course' Complete removal of asphalt-scarification and Reconstruction'.. !' ,ccmpacbdP of existing aggregate base'and • Aircraft Traffic Patterns '.,Additidnai high quality base course and new • Wheel Loads _ - asphalt surface course _ • Aircraft Mishaps �, Removal of pavement and base-. eostruct , Aritcatlon and recampactlon of subgrade,and Environmental Conditions "I JTrbt�al�Nvem'[;t -�,:�� (.-New crashed aggregate,pose and surface course. After developing a preliminary list of viable I Recycling;.of� � 1^Removal,crushing„and rFplacelrenV_1 ' m alternatives,we will prepare life cycle cost {Pavement'and/dr' compaction aF exisOng surface/base mate)ials as Pase�Layers I a'nam'base cour•,se ana " analyses to determine a"short list"of reha-___ Fin wit? i4e asphalt"du"rface'tdutsc bilitation strategies with the best potential Note: __ for solving the existing problems. Included . For au rehabilitation strategies,the use of high-quality polymer or in these options will be pavement recon- modified asphalt binders should be considered for the asphalt not mix. struction.In some cases and depending • Although it generally proves to be cost prohibitive,the reconstruction of the taxiway using Portland cement concrete(PCQ should also be on the severity of the cracked pavement,a examined as a potential alternative. classic asphalt overlay on the existing sur- face may be an unacceptable strategy due to runways length. In addition,we may the high probability of reflective cracking. recommend geotechnical investigation The table at right shows potential pavement of the deeper(into subgrade)cracking rehabilitation strategies, phenomenon to address these damage After the initial studies,we propose that mechanisms during the design effort. FINT13's subconsultant RMA Group Using this approach,the HNTB team perform design level geotechnical investiga- will seek to understand the processes that tion as needed. This may include pavement caused pavement deterioration,and then coring and laboratory testing of the existing design to minimize their future action on pavement materials to supplement existing the new pavement. information. Other testing methods,such Pavement Design Input as non-destructive pavement testing,may The Master Plan provides some informa- also supplement data used to assess the tion regarding the anticipated traffic integrity of the pavement structure in situw volumes and aircraft mix for the design We may recommend supplementing as- of pavements at the airport. The dynamic built or existing coring data with a limited nature of the industry may warrant a coring program to adequately quantify validation of the future fleet mix and traffic existing layer thicknesses throughout the levels in conjunction with other planning City of Palm Springs 6, HNTB Palm Springs International Airporc • . e 1 . i...W Mew} „-�y,,.. •,'�u'�;",,.w� '9m.p�,.w .� �,..,.. ,-n - ` .. .,r, _�,w�.M1�;�7�''��«. - •,� . assignments at the Airport. This is espe- ingenuity,thoroughness,and experience of cially important for a fleet mix containing the I-INT13 team. a large number of heavier corporate jets, Consuuciion Impacts to Airport because of their tendencies to be especially Operations load damaging to asphalt pavements. Regardless of the rehabilitation technique, To provide a service life of 20 years under reconstructing the runway will require the desert environmental conditions,the pav- closure 0f portions of the runway as well as our experience in ing material should combine aggregate and cross taxiways. The Airport will be limited �d similar projects high-grade asphalt(AR-8000)with polymer to a single runway for the duration of the shows that polymer or rubber modifiers. Asphalt properties are construction. modified asphalt strongly contingent upon their temperature quickly offsets its 14NTB will work with Airport Manage- higher initial cost at the time of loading- In desert locations, by providing an this can be particularly problematic. merit and include construction contract extended useful life Harder grades of asphalt,such as Alt-8000, requirements to minimize construction and greater resis- perform well under high daytime tempera- impacts during closures- Close interaction tance to thermal tares,but become highly brittle and crack during design will be critical so that both cracking, g y the design team and the airfield operations readily during cold desert nights. Softer have a thorough understanding of the grades are subject to rutting under high fire loadings during hot temperatures- potential construction impacts. Airport — --Recent asphalt pavement research,verified operation impacts can be reduced by phas- ing each work area to maintain key cross by actual field performance,indicates that taxiways during construction. polymer or rubber modifiers can flatten HNTB design this Temperature-Viscosity curve effec- Material Availability incorporated these lively. While these modifiers add signift- The HNTB team can help plan for mate- options for Runway cantly to the cost of the initial construction, rial availability during construction by 8126 at Apple they reduce maintenance costs and increase alerting regional suppliers to upcoming Valley Airport and pavement life expectancy, material needs well in advance.This will included polymer- modified asphalt Optimum Pavement Rehabilitation aid greatly in maintaining sufficient supply as a bid alternative Strategy to keep construction on schedule. HNTB to the standard will work with Airport Management and FAA P-401. While initial design efforts will focus on viable rehabilitation strategies for the pave- the FAA to explore the possibility of using ment considering existing conditions,the local materials and mixes that will provide recommendation for the optimum method ample supply during construction within will consider other important factors such more reasonable costs. The FAA makes no as available funding and impact of con- exceptions for use of FAA p-401 (Bitumi- struction on Airport operations. nous Surface Course)mix for pavement surfaces used fox aircraft traffic,but this The HNTB team will assess these proposed does not apply to shoulder pavement. For strategies after we gather more informa- the shoulders,"green-book"asphaltic tion and collect input from other parties concrete (AC)is more readily available and involved in the project,such as Airport can be constructed more economically. Management,Airport Maintenance,FAA, the Airlines,and Airport Users. The strate- Construction Safety gies described in this section attest to the A safe construction environment lowers project cost and saves time. HNTB will City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 27 (,% 7 lt:`_ work with Airport Operations to define safe clients to discuss their expectations for construction equipment routes and effec- deliverables and we review the regulatory" tive communication procedures- We will requirements for projects of this type. For depict haul and construction routes and projects that may benefit from alternative staging and disposal areas in construction delivery methods,we identify alternatives drawings. In addition,the HNTB team and their subsequent pros and cons. Then will include mandatary construction safety the project manager and key team members requirements,founded on FAA criteria,in draft the work plan,labor and expense the specifications. estimate,and schedule that support our Construction Quality proposal to the client. The HNTB team will document and Upon execution of the contract for specific enforce quality control procedures and services,die HNTB project manager prepare a testing schedule detailing the completes internal documentation that type and frequency of testing required must include: for construction materials. The FAA has - Specific work tasks and their associated recently increased emphasis on testing and labor and expense budget; now includes provisions for aggregate and - Work flow diagrams; other materials having no risk of deteriora- - Schedule with milestones and deliverables; tion.over time. This includes testing for - Client/project team organization_ chart; Alkali Silica Reaction(ASR). - Project design criteria; E.3 Project Management - Client construction budget;and The Airport will benefit from selecting - Quality control plan. HNTB because the firm uses common These documents are the basic measures project delivery methods and systems for the project manager and task assignees use all projects,and we offer a single point of to enable our team to deliver services to the contact for contract and administration Airport as needed,when needed.HNTB matters,regardless of the task will make available required team members FiNTB's professional service standards and equipment. These processes also form require our project manager to develop a the basis on which office leaders review clearly written scope of work before begin- monthly project status. ning contract discussions with the client. The design team will include our project This document enables HNTB and the manager,design manager and supporting client to confirm their mutual understand- design specialists. Andres Garcia will ing of the intended result of the project•, manage these projects and take primary the work they and others must perform responsibility for their delivery.Megan to achieve the result; the time required for Monticone,Design Manager,will commit design,Procurement,and construction;and 100%of her time to the design assignments. the cost of professional services. The professionals listed in Section C (pages To prepare the scope of work,HNTB 7-16)will perform their specific tasks to visits the Project site and gathers available accomplish these projects. information on site conditions,airport Communication is vital to a successful operations,project definition,and work- project. HNTB project managers use ing conditions. Furthermore,we ask our telephone and in-person meetings,email, City of Palm Springs �8 HNTB Palm Springs International airport N ww �• e w f e `'` � AW .7 reports,and submittals for review to verify ment design will reflect the anticipated that our clients and team members remain traffic volume for each aircraft type. This fully aware of project issues and progress. is especially important for corporate jets E-4 Potential Problems withhigIt point loads from high pressure tires on single axles. qy FY 2007-Extend Taxiway J FY2007-Rehabilitate/Overlay Run- Construction Sequencing- The construe- way 72U31R and associated intersecting lion of the extension of Taxiway J could taxiways south of runway 13LI31R affect airport operations,including the Geometric Options closure of Taxiway W Close interaction during design will be important so that The definition of the design aircraft will both the design team and Airfield Opera- dictate the basis for the geometric layout. tions understand potential construction The current width of Runway 13L/31R impacts. HNTB will devise a construction meets the requirements of Airplane Design sequencing plan to minimize these impacts. Group (ADG)11. This group also requires Typically,the construction sequencing plan shoulder widths of 10 feet. However, will require endorsement by Airport ten- constructing wider shoulders protects the ants and other stakeholders,including FAA runway pavement and provides a stable Air Traffic:Control. area for the installation of light fixtures. Ait field Geometries-The design of the HNTB has used economical approaches at -----— - extension should meet the requirements other airports to meet operational require- of the current and anticipated aircraft fleet meets such as constructing shoulders mix. While it would be simple to design that have two pavement thicknesses. The the geometric layout of the extension for portion adjacent to the full strength runway the most demanding aircraft in the fleet or taxiway pavement will take the load mix,this is likely to yield the highest of maintenance and emergency vehicles construction cost. HNT13 will work with and meet the FAA width requirements. Airport Management to achieve balance The additional pavement,often called the between reasonable expectations of erosion control pavement,caps the adjacent demand and the project budget. infield,and is a thin layer of asphalt con- Condition of the Existing.AdjacentPave- crete over prepared subgrade. ment Surfaces-The extension of Taxiway planning and design parameters for J will abut existing pavement surfaces. airfield improvements will follow FAA The condition of these pavement surfaces design standards and recommendations to is important in scoping the project area, complement,but are not intended to take HNT13 will help contain the resulting proj- precedence over,aircraft operating rules ect scope and budget by providing accurate and procedures_ information and recommendations to sup- Pavement Condition Assessment port Airport Management decisions. The runway pavement has reportedly Pavement Structure-As with the geo. reached its useful life. Typical problems metric layout of the taxiway extension, with aging flexible airfield pavements in Pavement structure(composition) for this harsh desert environments include severe new facility will need to accommodate cracking of the surface course and deeper the most demanding aircraft. The pave- layers,surface bleeding and asphalt surface City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 29 t x 0 �0 C raveling. Seldom do these reflect structural projects to retard ultra-violet degradation rs, or load-related damage. and surface raveling. However,because of r The pavement assessment in the most the poor performance of the surface coats, recent Airport Master Plan indicates sub- or possibly from bleeding of incorrectly grade materials consisting of silty sands of designed asphalt mixes in the surface layer medium to high strength,with a weighted itself,much surface raveling is prevalent. California Bearing Ratio(CBR)of lo. This Fy 2007-Rehabilitate Taxiway E relatively high subgrade strength,combined and north cross Taxiways J, H, D, F,and B with the thicknesses of base and surface The rehabilitation of Taxiway E and north layers(as indicated from coring data) cross Taxiways J,H,D,and B has several appears to have provided adequate load similarities to the rehabilitation of Runway bearing capacity over the years. Environ- similarities it es terms re the pavement treat- mental damage appears to contribute to the 13L/3 however,presents ea bulk of the distress. The goal of the HNTB unique challenge Taxiway B,ho ho during construction. team will be to address the environmental damage and compliance with standard Given the similar character of the con, pavement design techniques. Design struction and the proximity of this project efforts will apply our knowledge of airfield to Project 2 FY 2007- Rehabilitate/Over- pavements in desert conditions. lay Runway 13L/31R and associated inter- High variations in temperature at Palm secting_taxiways south of runway 13L/31R, Springs,including daily temperature the Airport may choose to implement swings,are a standard feature of desert both projects at the same time,if funding environments,and they add significantly is available. The construction sequence could permit contractors to use their As individual pavement ment sections eexpandto the problems cracked pavements. equipment effectively,avoiding double mobilization,yielding a more economical and shrink with temperature variations, overall product. windblown debris will infiltrate cracks and prevent their closure during warmer The design of the proposed facilities must periods- Over time,this debris infiltration address the long-range goals and antici- tends to intensify the width and depth of pated future demand.An example of this cracks. It is especially difficult to keep forward thinking approach would be to add these cracks from severely damaging provisions in the design for a future taxiway pavement structures,and they must be planned on the north side of the Airport considered in any pavement design or as an extension of Taxiway J.The design rehabilitation effort. of the Taxiway E overlay must address the In addition to the widespread crack. long-range goals and anticipated role and ing,prior surface observations show function of the Airport which requires that planning and design standards reflect the surfacing areas b y t asphalt rich pavement anticipated demand restricting expansion surfacing,probably the result of that haveous capabilities.An example of this forward- surface treatments or seal coats that have performed poorly in the harsh desert flmil ing approach would be to add provi- sions in the design for a future taxiway seal oats would have been applied as main-chons. These surface treatments and planned on the north side of the Airport as sea]co tenance efforts or periodic rehabilitation an extension of Taxiway J. City of Palm Springs 30 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport _ _ 7R ..�..W...,,I,... - �....r✓--:........_ r—.,..a_..._.,........u....��-.�..�..i�;..._.�. H..'.%,TuidWWtl{�ii- =�-.•1.,1 •� ry ®fY 2008- Widen and Overlay Flexible Use Taxiway G- to allow for larger corporate The design of the extension of Taxiway J aircraft should account for all potential uses of this Z To minimize construction impacts, area. While Taxiway J primarily provides 1--1NTB would recommend phasing the airfield access for the Aviation Industrial qm work into particular work areas and using Area,portions of this extension could be temporary centerlines where possible. By used for aircraft parking/staging. Such conducting design meetings with.airfield areas have more restrictive design criteria operations to gain a full understanding of than operating surfaces. HNTB will work the airfield operations,this intersection with Airport Management to develop a construction could be phased to reduce reasonable range of potential uses,thus the impacts to the cross taxiways and thus setting the design criteria. airport operations. Interface with the Run-up Pad ®FY 2008 -Upgrade and Extend T/W The Taxiway J extension will interface with J to the northeast to provide access to the existing Run-up Pad for Runway 13L- It northwest aviation industrial area is important to revisit the need to maintain the Run-up Pad in its current location Implementation of Possible Mitigation and configuration. To protect the space Measures-The ACIP indicates this required for taxiing aircraft eastbound on project-will require environmenTl clear= Taxiway J,aircraft conducting pre-flight ante. Regulators may require mitigation procedures maybe relocated outside the measures during construction. The Airfield Taxiway Object Free area. This would Design Team will work closely with the require the extension of the current Run-up Environmental team in providing the Pad to the south. HNTB will work with required project(construction)information Airport Management and the general avia- needed to assess the project impacts and tion community at the Airport in develop- will learn first hand potential limitations ing layouts that will satisfy the users and during construction. the need to extend the taxiway. As an example,HNTB is applying this E. 5 _ References far 3 recently approach for a new 10, toot completed projects of a similar let taxiway at Louisvillee International Airport(SDF). HNTB also prepared nature where key personnel pro- a Project-Level Tiered Environmental vided the professional services Impact Report during the design of the required LAX South Airfield Improvement Proj- LAX Airfield Intersection Improvements ect. Per this project,we worked with the Package I environmental team in identifying the con- Mr.Jake Adams,III,PE struction related impacts and Master Plan Program Manager commitments and Mitigation Measures Los Angeles World Airports that applied to the project. Ultimately, 7301 World Way West,5th Floor these environmental conditions were Los Angeles,California 90045 translated into the bid documents that are Phone:(310)491-0810 Ext. 110 currently being implemented- City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 317 _ 71 . �...rbAn N ��. C• r,S'n I 1 PPP � nyp. IyW ♦ ry�avq�t., i"I n n Y5� y ' ' •nn rk u 1 .LongBeach Airport On-Call area,references such as R.S.Means,BNI Ms.Rachel Korkos,PE Public Works Costbook and Caltrans 44 Airport Engineer Construction Cost Data. HNTB augments City of Long Beach Department of these sources by monitoring the construc- Public Works Bureau of Engineering tion industry to assess the potential for 333 West Ocean Boulevard cost shifts due to material shortage or other 7 Long Beach,CA 90802 market forces. These forces have played a Phone: (562)570-2620 key role in the fluctuation and escalation OAKNorth Field Apron of key materials used in the construction (Hangars 1-5)d Taxiways B and C of airfield pavements(Portland cement, asphalt and course aggregate). In some Michael M PE asphalt foreign demand for these materials Port Supervvisorisor Engineer Port of Oakland has recently caused rapid price escalations. 530 Water Street Following are three recent examples of Oakland,CA 94607 projects in Southern California and the Bay Phone(510)627-1265 Area,all of which had consistent budgets and final engineer estimates: E.6 - For the referenced projects, • LAX South Airfield Improvements- provide examples of project budget- Following design and several scope ing and cost estimatirtq-procedures chaiiges,_=B estimated the construc --- --- with results Lion at$253,533,909. The low bid was Professional Service Fee Budget $241,770,113. This challenging estimate As part of the development of the work included new environmental(noise/air plan,HNTB develops a detailed Scope of quality emissions and traffic)provisions Work and then reviews until agreement is not typically included in airfield projects. met with the client before developing the At bid time,construction bidding was fee budget- unstable due to shortages of aggregate. Portland cement,and construction labor. HNTB then builds fee budgets with a bot- The contract included severe penalties tom-up and top-down approach. The bot- for late opening of taxiways and run- tom-up approach lists each task with labor ways,for which contractors exact a risk hours for each personnel category. We premium in the bid price. then apply negotiated compensation rates Long Beach On-Carl-HNTB estimated to calculate the fee. To validate the budget, Construction of Improvements to we apply commonly accepted guidelines for Runway Construction and Connecting Taxiways the cost of engineering services typically Runway Runways, anSigd Coage and Lighting associated with the anticipated construc- lion cost and reflecting the complexity of Improvements the project. and Associated Airfield Improve- Construction Budget ments at the Long LAX South Airfield $253533,909 $241,770,173HNTB uses multiple approaches to estimate Beach Airport to Iprovements probable construction costs. These include cost$19,755,500. Long Beach historical construction costs ofsimilar The low bid was on-Call $19.755,500 $I9,748,362 work in the Airport or the surrounding $19,748,362. OAK North Field $16,915,685 $12,735,363 City of Palm Springs 32 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport 72 xx"'oust�i4n,J"+W s,v,,l444� m!✓.1I.i�."'dF, ' a ' J v _ 1 - I I OAK North Field-HNTB worked north field. With contingencies,the � closely with the Port of Oakland to set HNTB estimate of probable cost for reasonable expectations for the cost of funding purposes was$16,915,885. The approximately 16 acres of replacement low bid was S12,735,363,allowing the general aviation and cargo apron in the Port to consider additional work. .w E. 7 - Current praject load, commitments, and percentage of completion W4 p!Y+rie�r)' `,Pe°s �'-.�,, r,yN + '9, 1. • m. c 1A dres G3rcla ° 1 Pro(Act M�fiager;(•^` ,L`AX SDUtIi,Airfield' � � 40°!°,, 80°/,. S,DFTaxiway'-A .,,•. --�, ,I '. '- . ' " �_ . � �' OAK North Field Ramp S°ro ��50OW 1 .toe Rarcien _ �. -;-De,puty,ProfeCt_Manager_ ,_\' !SDIA Terminal Plan, Ron Slecke Landside P tanning/Englneei,lny SEA CpP' - , . . . �I SDIA'Tef=minal'2 West Expansion - - '20% '2D°rla 58A Terminal Design. — 1046 ._ - -- 00"a°'. Megan.Mc Micolle I Airside Plahnlnq/Engineerincl, , .'SDF TaxNvay A� '" - i'' 4045 15% I -- Steve'Strch .. I"Airsldellarinmg/Engineering .' I LGB',Cn-C_alh ---.i. -50%.,,... -- 1'_.'._.�.—___ _ ..I LAX'security u� ,5% 95^/° •-------- -- J�oyUmdh - -_-... -----`-- g.necrµ µi h—_.-�.. .. -- �� -' .girtield,Plannlrlg/En i -ng _ LAX Alr_fi_ePd _ _ 'r50!o _-_•_" 804_0 Ryan Damery,.^ ^Airfield oralnage/Civil Desio.n %"LAX.South AiYheld' .I 30% .� .801/0 _JI Jose Mortero ' '"' Landsido Planning/Engineering ' SEAiCDP' T _: -; 1,�5°/v 70% SDIA'Terminal 2 West Expansion" 10% 2q%:• — _ ' Term°inal^D_esigtiW S°/ v4ndy Balkwcll 'Ail field L,ighking/slgnagQ r,LAXSoutn AirJleJd_ 25% ' .- M.-80% 'City,of LA;S,treet I,Mpro4ernents J 75%' 50% Tony fermella' ConSlrucllonRelated Issues/Segu.encing ;,LAX Sou,th''Airfleld, 400/c 80% brown Field,Electflwl Upgrede " 25%' 90% bavid Greene 1 ConSlrutt(gn,Support'(Landside-Alrsicie),', 1.405 GEC., 85%- �, 5%/ Bill Marek CADD,Support ' "LAX South Airfield: 25°Y° IClfy of LA Sll,eel h1lpravements - 7S°Po 50% Gregg-Brandow-- -,`Structural . . :Rose Bowe' -- - _-- .... 4b95._ .. . 50°!° I,Misc.Projects.,, , _ 60%,- - 90% Ed Lyan .. ���'Geetedhnical•�-_,�'___�-\'_.__ SANI3AG^Rou[eZlO " - 25% _ �' 70%i „ ,I . ^I;praeo DamJ„,._ _ 5°l°, Li to Deld Cruz m —'j M/t./,P(Mechanical/Plarnbili'g) '- i Cedar'S16di,Med Center_ --45% {TMgD) „ " : „ - , - _ -- Cambro_Manufacfurin�q _ __ 15"/0 _- ,Nam 8ul'' !,VIE/P(,Electrical) „�= U11 niversity of Califorrn�a,lrVlne^ 950/0 .-,. Y Marbeh"ea'd Coastal •'�:--20°% ^- ° =' I .Michael Miller Surve 0% _ (R8F) "I'College Park'I ha5e9T I "-'Jy 15/d �' � 70 Crown valley Par,Kway.Wioening 25% 390/9 - City of palm Springs Palm Springs International airport HHTB 33 73 W m� e Aviation Planning Projects • Alternatives Development-"On-Site FY 2007 -Airport master plate Work Charrertes with Airport Staff" and associated environmental • Evaluation of Alternatives-"On-Site assessment Work Charrettes with Airport Staff" This project combines the requirements - Recommended Alternative Description to • Land Use Plan Development and Final t% of updating the master plan to reflect T.s, Implementation Plan r+ demand trends and the aims of the airport with performing needed environmental • Order of Magnitude Cost Analysis and assessment of the plan. Addressing Financial Feasibility Analysis these tasks in coordination will enable • Conclusions-End of Master Plan the airport to save time and money by Successful master plans come from collabo- verifying that environmental screening ration among motivated airport sponsors, is part of the planning process and that experienced and insightful planners,and the plan provides the input required for engaged stakeholders. To achieve this,we future environmental approvals. We have commit to work with you in Palm Springs described the environmental component as we have worked on-site with other of this project in"Environmental Service airport planning clients. The heart of our Projects,' beginning on page 40. planning methodology is to maintain data -- - Project Manager Andres Garcia will rely-- and analysis in a controlled structure while _ on Deputy Project Manager Joe Barden to expanding the dialogue as freely as possible I lead the planning team and Gail Staba to to explore every avenue to a successful air- lead the environmental team. port program. We invest heavily in graph- ics to express concepts,because planning E.2 Work Plan and Methodology concepts become accessible to decision HNTB will develop a preliminary work makers best in pictorial form. plan while preparing the proposal for this E 3 Project Management task. The tasks will focus on the areas of special concern for the Airport,such a$ The Airport will benefit from selecting terminal expansion and options for inter- HNTB because the firm uses common proj- national passenger processing. The general ect delivery methods and systems for all of sequence of work will be: our projects,and we offer a single point of • Development of Master Plan Goals and contact for all contract and administration Objectives matters,regardless of the task. • Data Gathering on Existing Schedule, Andres Garcia,Project Manager,will focus Enplauements and Operations(Airport) on project administration and quality • Forecast/Regional Data Gathering- assurance. Joe Barden,Deputy Project Population Growth/Per Capita Income Manager,will lead the Master Plan effort • Development of Forecast assisted by Evan P£ahler. Joe and Evan recently delivered the final Airport Master • Existing Conditions/Inventory Assess- plan update for San Diego International ment Within Airport Property-Aixside, Airport. Grail Staba will lead associated Landside,Terminal And Ancillary/ Environmental Assessments,described Support Facilities below. Tatiana Ortiz of Metromedia • Facility Requirements based on Forecast Graphics,a certified DBE,will assist in City of Palm Springs 34 HNTB Palm Springs International Alrpor! 0. I the design and production of Master plan sadly lacking in other Southern California documents- She is also widely versed in the communities,and quality of life has eroded ZZ; use of web-based technologies for con- over recent decades for their want. Such is �1 sultant and client communication and for not the case in Palm Springs as the Airport public outreach. remains positioned to develop a plan that HNTB office management reviews the retains its charm and builds upon it. work product and expenditure of labor and One example of an opportunity for success capital monthly with the project manager is planning for a future parking structure, to verify we are fulfilling our commitments curb,and terminal expansion. At many to clients and to assist with staffing,sched- other airports,a multi-story parking tiling,or other project challenges. The garage stands in front of the terminal, electronic reporting systems for planning with curb lanes between and a pedestrian projects are identical to those for design, bridge between the two. This space can and all HNTB trains all our professionals in become a barren concrete canyon like their use_ the one at Seattle-Tacoma International E.4 Potential Problems Airport. Or,with foresight,bath the garage itself and the space between the The Airport is poised to confront substan- terminal and garage can be open,inviting, tial challenges in the immediate future. and reflective of the region_ Post 9111 airline traffic recovery has brought increased facility demand,but has As an example of thus consideration, at the not yet made airlines profitable. Build- new Panama City—Bay County Airport ing to meet—and in some cases,attract in Florida,HNTB recommended a buffer —demand when airline tenants can scarcely between the curb lanes and parking that pay their current bills will require airport served the dual functions of bomb blast management and your consultant to make diversion and regional expression. This the most from the least and find non-airline buffer called for gently curved,overlap- revenues to pay for changes. ping retaining walls that captured sand dunes and palm trees. For an airport We see three broad and related categories relocated from bayside to a wooded, of challenge before the airport,each with land-locked site,this concept preserved opportunities for success- the sense of arrival on the Gulf Coast so 1. Preserve America's Resortport, important to that airport. In concert with 2.Increase revenues from tenants and terminal architecture reflective of seaside passengers;and forms and experiences,this buffer cre- 3.Adapt airport land use to changing aced a sense of place that met the airport's demands. goals. To provide this amenity,the master 1. Preserve America's Resportport plan moved parking only 50 feet farther As with the rest of the Coachella Valley, from the terminal than would otherwise have been required, the Airport has to assimilate substantial growth in permanent and tourist popula- Terminal planning to accommodate tion. Retaining the very qualities that expansion of check-in facilities,explosive attract this growth will require vision,skill, detection systems for outbound bag- and discipline. These attributes have been gage,future gates,and a potential FIS will also enable you to plan for expanded City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HHTB �5 p_ 1 p �r - Z - • . - .. 1 •. . - q . �'Y1 � ..�... n [m. L. ....-.tea. a1.e Td!..mmG>lurn.—.....xu -�-�.r.�.-�a--r✓•,xLw.1,.d_... xy, a.nAU,ed... a`..^—y..ua concessions,improved surface access,and intended construction projects with their continuation of a high-quality passenger schedule for development and estimated experience. The HNTB team looks for- capital cost. Now,master plans must ward to developing a stakeholder process provide a road map to many possible to enable the City,airport management, outcomes,with a clear path to success no v. and concerned parties to develop a vision matter which element is built,and no mat- and specific solutions to capture and ter when. The environmental regulatory enhance the great attributes of America's regime,federal and state, only compli- Resortport, as we have done with other cates the planting process and increases airport clients. demands on airport sponsors to keep their 2. Increased Revenues options open. The Airport has already committed to The Airport will have to make important improving non-air-carrier revenues from decisions about relocation of rental car general aviation facilities and aviation ready facilities,the future of the general industrial land use. The next master plan aviation apron near the terminal,expan- should build on your prior efforts and help sion of the terminal including potential PIS maximize the potential from these areas. facilities,terminal curbs,and terminal area In the passenger terminal and around it, parking—to name a few. the next master plan should-address ways HNT13 helped the Port of Seattle refine its to maximize revenues from passengers expansion plans at Sea-Tacoma Interns- — and their companions. Fortunately,when tional Airport(Sea-Tac) to greatly reduce passengers perceive value in concessions costs,increase ability to build incremen- oiferings,they spend more. This does not tally,and provide multiple development require higher prices per item;it requires . scenarios for a tightly-constrained air- matching offerings to passenger needs port. This recent project highlights the and making the offer in the right place importance of taking the long view before and at the right time. We believe that the deciding,while airports still have room master plan will have a place for strong to maneuver.With planning foresight a concessions planning in the terminal and generation ago,the airport might have on the landside. HNTB's airport business avoided relocation of belly cargo facilities, service specialty group,led by Angela airline maintenance hangars,and access Gittens,has experience from the sponsor roads required to maximize the capacity of side and as consultants in helping airports the existing passenger terminal. Without improve their non-aeronautical revenues, criticizing those preceding us,we can This experience,paired with competence learn and apply lessons learned for our in design of terminal concessions,rental clients today- car facilities,and airline and aerospace HNTB's recent Juneau Airport Terminal support facilities,will be a great benefit to Area Master Plan included a potential PIS. the Airport. Our recent on-call planning at Cleveland 3. Land Use Hopkins included support for reconfigu- ration of a small,two gate PIS in an old Master Plans are all about land use, on concourse and site identification for an PIS and near airports. In a simpler time, able to process 600 passengers per hour. master plans defined a specific set of Other examples of detailed planning appear City or Palm Springs 3 6 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport 76 in Section D,where we describe our work E.6 - For the referenced projects, ri for the City of Long Beach. provide examples of project budget- We believe your understanding coupled ing and cost estimating procedures with our experience at other airports with results of similar size and relevant issues will professional Service Fee Budget provide a great development plan for your airport HNTB prepares a draft fee budget for the preliminary scope of work based on E. 5 - References for 3 recently our extensive master planning experi- completed projects of a similar ence. With the client,we confirm scope nature where key personnel and intent. Factors influencing planning provided the professional services budgets include: required • Sponsor goals and objectives San Diego International Airport • Funding available Master Plan . Data availability(e.g.,mapping,pas- Mr.Ted Anasis,AICP senger characteristics,and operations Manager-Airport Planning details) San Diego County Regional Airport • Forecasting approach Authority • Targeted areas of planning P.O.Box 82776 . Simulation requirements,ifany San Diego,CA 92138-2776 • Stakeholder and decision-maker Phone:(619)400-2400 communications Ias Angeles International Airport Master . Environmental approval process Plan-Advanced Planning Development We recommend the airport sponsors Mr.Michael Doucette develop a budget based on the work plan Long Range Planning that seems best at the outset,and allocate Los Angeles World Airports funds among elements of the plan as the One World Way project proceeds. Often,the planning Los Angeles,CA 90045 process reveals potential savings in one area Phone: (310)417-2344 that can fund useful further development Juneau Internatloria[Airport/Termini of another. Ultimately,as extensions of Area Master Plan your staff to accomplish the plan,we will Mr.Allan A.1leese be most effective working in a collaborative Airport Manager relationship with open financial project Juneau International Airport cost records. 1873 Shell Simmons Drive,Suite 200 Construction Budget Juneau,AK 99801 IiNTB recently completed order of mag- Phone: (907)789-7821 nitude cost estimates for the San Diego Master Plan recommended improvements. Working with client staff,HNTB and the SAN Master Plan EIR $4.200,000 52,o18,zz6 Authority met weekly in the spring of 2005 LAX Advanced Planning/MMRP $3,900,000 $3,600,000 to identify the most important components Juneau Terminal Area Master Plan $400,352 $400,352 —�, of two alternatives in the master plan, We City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HHTB 37 p�°�" � ' ,A,', •wyrp,'i.;vwrA.wk�� 'Mw'"�m "�S er V a • ° �. 4,a.:,ar11F'n?rfda„ ,'am ,,'.+i�' �• - �, e ., _ , ..,_""��'�,,,' ;f i�,u' -w:�,,<'. .;;`i,,;�.': -..ti'.,..4'a.e��++wprzrr l�«+wyr?� GA�.� ?`yfmM,4 RA' mp^ ~se •h'I calculated the size of facilities from the cost consultant reviewed our estimate and alternative plans in AutoCAD and applied overall totals varied less than 5%. unit costs for aviation facilities of similar Subsequent estimating of projects when r size and types in Southern California. As advanced planning provided a higher level designers of projects under construction at of detail confirmed the initial estimate as • airports throughout the West Coast,HNTB a solid order of magnitude budget for the z has excellent insight into fluctuations in Master Plan. materials and labor costs. A third party E.7 - Current project load, commitments, and percentage of completion MWw • ...;.,,^n 7 ',F. y,I.y.r, .•.,m °^. . .if Andres Garcia ";,i Piolect Manager ,' LAXFSoiitYi AirField '.hq°/n u80ly _I 'i SDF`Tanway Fl. .,'�; 15% r Is'!s ,! r _ _ Joe Barden, -. r._--py.. I Mpnayer? ^'�_;n`_,�h501A Terf-I Plan Ty.__. .�_.. Ile -500/0 Joe Barden ^f.De ut Prd ect' g % a Evan Pfa Here Master RlannIII "� SAWA6anced Planning i - 10%. 50°/a.' r J_oI Grogan Archil .-.turf Lead,'- -`,'' •, ; , 1:SanPa Barbara-ier,rninal Del'el pvme -- " �r" '0 - - I-Gerhard PichelCvnsullmg Architect '%~� - -W' SAN Terminal Z'"W Expansion, ProgramF Ron Sie ide Planni,n /Engineering J_SEA CDPCu„ment Phas,•_`_- '_'. ,.=r ..^I `10°/r 7D` . e, eke Lands ........ . g' _ _ f '"P ..1 SAN lei rninal 2 11 Expan ion ,20% r 20% En ineerifi _ - 0% Megan�Mvnticona' Al` I PlEirulirlg/" g .,._'=q,. jSDF'7wyA -15"h "Steve,Stroh .--_- Airside�Planningl[n(l(n,edrin`g" 'CGB,On=Grill -- LAX Seyurity; --'-5% - ---�95% �Joy um311- " rrr" y Ai icld.Planpiny'ICngnleer'mgv JY LAR;Sutith` 'irfieldr ` - -�^- 50% , I BO% .R ren Damery „ _x I Avfield,Drainage/Ci l'Desi n., r LAX South`Air el y --- y-• µ„ ^l,,^ I 80 _ MmhTran ILandslde,Plsinning/tngineeringn,ISCA'CDP__ f 15AN-Terrnral•2,II I Expansion ....... _.. „, _ 4, SBIArPrmrnal Design, Jose Mortero r, i'Landside;Planning%Erngineenrly I'SEA CDP' 5% j 70% :SAN 1"errilinal:7 West,�Expansion � � 19% 20% .i-r "rerininal Design e.J .9ernlln _ a_James R:Bruce. �n alAr � - " , - key _ ch ct - N:µ" �let',Lo6 ansion , `` i5% BO%I C ' � FLAX ConRAC Pa nin'g nd Sike'`5tudic^ _j _l __ i ALAS T-1 lid' .obb. , �p _ ___ r..15°A 10°h I Allen Beren[es" I�Te,l;minal Pl'ariner'I).,^ ',`r"rl', ` LAX Adyanced�Planninq? ' - ------ 10°/n f, "' �` ,9b9'°" " 5AN,Terminal2 West Expansion � _ 5°lv„ �20% j Doh 7indell = - -. - - - `' •_ (Ar'Chitecture) SBIA'TTer�irialbesign'�,;.� •a0% k-._. ....N•.." .._i.W.W�� .....i„ .. ..,.,,,.,,r. `iiLGB CIn-CeIII I .9511 City of Palm Springs 38 HINTS Palm Springs International Airport _ '� . wy, ,i�, „ei• ,m+l�, �an. -... h .,t . , w •xq ... . tvY w•"I1' r� c� v.a. E. 7 - Current project load, commitments, and percentage of completion (continued) ,',yq,Key Personnel I Role or lb�stjp in: j David Greene I Constructlon,1=6 (t '„ ,.I-405.GEC'i,,."'l. •,' a5"k i •5% z I (Landslde-Alrside)1:. . I v� f Kiln Hughes'•, Envlydnmental,Sup pot I T 'yr5AN,EIR/EA,n �G " "'25%• 75°/a':, -� I NY/NJ/PHL Airspace E,IS,%n. b 10% - "'60Uma-e IDCA'Deicing' Fairfax'CvuntyCE^. - Lillian Van Envirdnrrlentai Support/MMRP LAX MMRp Patrick Kennon roFacpskig9' _ANC Mas"Per Plan - --u--- -- _350/e ---r- - OOh,. SDF,EA -�- -- - -- '- --ZS%°. 500/0 _f _ LMSP,Relietiers: 25% 100/o"',_ Kent.Vanden Dever L`! Finani6/Concessions It,`,SBA Terminal DevelOpmenP 50/0 0% ,j T F Gl'een Air,port,ConcassionsProgram i, I,20% I` 7L,CoricessI Ions ConSUItInQ '.��'B'ermuda"1pternatiopal;Master Finan,:W SOW' '400h Pfanninq Roandke'Regional Master.,Flnancial Plan, "I 5"h" ,ANC Concessionsconsultmg,� _ ,150/0'f I�50%, DCA'Landside'Marloei Analysis: � ^- ~5%',^ ,.. ^25% I d r ;'I'Wousrcn;Ai po6[:5y5PamRevenue�Master 10%° 3G% - --- ---- - - I 'I ' Plan J Bill Marek ' ,CADb'Si7 , dFt T, - FLAX 56uthµAi.rfleld, ";{,";•':I F_._ ` �2596 iOt} o,ll LA Stma Improveinents„ Tanana OrYla^ ''"' ''�iG'kabtili.Comnlunicatiofhs'� ��` ' SA'N.Diego lnlernatlonal Airport "ter plan db./,o1 0 +(Metrornedla)' ii o .Mu ..� _ -_ ., r__� _ V E SAN Diegd/A55P-Airport Site Selection #0% 50%� i Prograrrtl City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 39 79 Ma r .f -,t, r A- •}- r, u •I __- .^d' . ,J,i icy���.� .:;�J..... �'S�Mp!N, • f�i�: � !, •� _ .•A �--._. __ ..._ ....,.. _._ed,� o---................�...--aWk a.......:... ..4o3_'H1ra.... a _i • Response to Comments Q Environmental Service Projects Cep Environmental assessment associated with • Final Environmental Assessment tithe airport master plan and for Taxiway J Documentation northeast expansion and development of • Findings,Record of Decision the associated aviation industrial park will Section EA highlights areas of involvement Na benefit from a single set of environmental in the master plan that HNTB recom- t consultants for both tasks. HNTB has mends our environmental team members • these consultants in house,and they are assist airport staff in scoping and perform- M currently working on comparable tasks ing. These areas include stakeholder in Southern California with the proposed involvement in developing opportunities HNTB planners and engineers. We will for potentially adversely impacted parties collaborate with LSAs Palm Springs staff, to benefit from airport development and under subcontract to HNTB,to perform developing public communications to specialized biological and resource stud- win support for the program consistent ies, Close collaboration reduces the time with environmental regulations. They and cost of environmental services,and extend into screening alternatives under improves both the plans and the environ- development to verify the master plan mental documents. can be permitted and constructed with reasonable cost for environmental mitiga -. Pro Work work dePian.and Methodology tion. They also include helping define the - i Project work plans define the process of scope of master plan technical analysis to communication for the client,regulators, support the ultimate preparation of the the consultant,sttbconsultant,and third Environmental Assessment,saving time parties affected by the project. They set out and money overall. the time and effort required to develop the project from its conceptual structure to a Much of the technical analysis in envi- completed deliverable. Each task represents ronmental assignments is office work, a process that has inputs,resources,action, but HNTB commits to maintain constant and results- and clear communication with the client, /� approving agencies,and stakeholders(in 0 FY2007-Airport Master Plan and a structured program managed by airport associated environmental assessment staff). We propose to integrate the delivery The fundamental work plan for an Environ- of this EA with the overall master plan mental Assessment includes: schedule,and to coordinate meetings,corn- • Agreement on the initial study checklist munications,and work product to deliver a and environmental assessment outline seamless service and resulting product. • Coordination with FAA 0 FY2007 •Environmental Assess- • Public Notices and$coping menr for Taxiway J northeast expansion • Special Studies and Resource Analyses and development of associated aviation • Administrative Draft Document-Confi- industrial park dential for Deliberative Purposes Only Our work plan will schedule data gathering, • Public Release Draft Environmental analysis,agency coordination,and public Assessment participation when required to address • Public involvement as required the procedural requirements of CEQA City of Palm Springs 40 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport t� Gl: ti • r r e• r • rr e• — x.ih .�,,i •� __ � � , • �,. fart �_p�kM'r y� WSW-,w..x...� �xn;.o..a.ux:,,. �,,..,._..�.�.�:...,'w�n � .,.,� �# •wa w and NEPA,and permitting of this project. assurance. Gail Staba will lead the EA Environmental resource areas of interest portion of the master plan task and the EA to successful permitting would most likely for Taxiway J and the associated industrial include noise,cultural resources,hazardous park. They will use HNTB's project man- materials,air quality,traffic,and stormwa- agement procedures and tools,described ter retention. more fully in the"Engineering Design" The HNTB team proposes the following section of Section E. approach in order to complete the Airport's HNT'E office management reviews the environmental documentation and permit- work product and expenditure of labor and ting most efficiently and at least cost: capital monthly with the project manager • Noise effects from PSP include issues of to verify we are fulfilling our commitments encroachment by residential uses adja- to clients and to assist with staffing,sched- cent to the north of the Airport in the 60 using,or other project challenges. The elec- CNEL contour. Linking this project to tronic reporting systems for environmental regional growth and the County Airport projects are identical to those for design, Land Use Plan would assist in improving and HNTB trains all our professionals in any growing public concerns. their use. • Early coordination with the Agua E.4 Potential Problems Caliente Tribe and the City Museum to develop a mitigation scheme(or pY 2007-Airport master plan and potential discovery of artifacts during associated environmental assessment construction will improve this process. The cost and speed of approval for master • Using environmental site assessment plan environmental assessments relates protocols,we will analyze potential for closely to public sentiment about the air- management of hazardous materials port and its plans for growth. Even when and the prior remediation of hazardous an airport has broad community support, materials on any industrial site. a vocal minority may force sponsors and • We will apply current protocols to the FAA to invest extra time and money address air quality conformity,air toxics, on analysis and reporting. Airports can and human health risk issues. These mitigate this risk: pose different acid major concerns to • Involving parties potentially impacted by the California Air Resources Board,the development and seeking benefits that Federal Aviation Administration,and offset adverse impacts can reduce airport the public. exposure to these risks. • For traffic and circulation,we recom- - Effective communications at the grass mend using the recently updated City of roots level cai defuse others who would Palm Springs General Plan Circulation capitalize on an opportunity to garner Element to the maximum extent possible. influence at the expense of the airport. • Stormwater management protocols will Regulators require analysis that uses dif- follow the City's SUSMP ferent data than airport planters use. For E.3 Project Management example,air quality analysis uses average day traffic,but airports plan for average day Andres Garcia,Project Manager,will focus peals month traffic. Preparing both esti- on project administration and quality mates concurrently from the same inputs City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HNTB 41 711 y. " '" W will save time and money. It will also E.5 References for 3 recently com- facilitate the approval process by showing pleted projects of a similar, nature the airport sponsor's attention to environ- where key personnel provided the mental concerns during planning. professional services required In order for the Airport to benefit fully Ontario International Airport Master from HNTB's environmental expertise Plan EIRIEIS and LSAs local environmental expertise, Ms_Paula L.McHargue �. the team will propose a work scope and Manager,Forecasting and Analysis r, timeline based on the environmental Los Angeles World Airports c requirements and existing Airport and City I World Way of Palm Springs information. As part of the p O-Box 92216 master plan,the environmental team will Los Angeles,CA 90009-2216 develop a project description and purpose Phone:(310) 646-9181 and need for action ready for use in NEPA and CEQA documentation. Oakland International Airport Develop- ment Program Supplemental EIR CEQA requires analysis of growth induce- Mr.Richard H.Sinkoff,AICP meat in proposed actions.The master plan passenger and flight forecast is very Supervisor Environmental Assessment important in evaluating growth inducing Port of Oakland and cumulative effects. 530 Water Street -- —._ Oakland,CA 94607 Other factors addressed in the proposed Phone; (510)627-1182 work plan may become problematic,and the environmental members of the team San Diego International Airport EIR will collaborate with master planners Mr.Ted Anasis,AICP to seek solutions that minimize airport Manager-Airport Planning exposure to these risks. San Diego County Regional Airport Authority P.O.Box 82776 FY 2007-Perform Environmental San Diego,CA 92138-2776 Assessment for Taxiway J northeast Phone: (619)400-2400 expansion and development of associ- ated aviation industrial park scheduled E.6 For the referenced projects, for FY 2008 provide examples of project budget- Environmental resource areas of interest ing and cost estimating procedures to the successful permitting of Taxiway with results J NE and Development of Associated Based on recent experience in Southern Aviation Industrial Park would most likely California,HNTB estimates the labor and include noise,cultural resources,hazard- expense required during planning,if appro- ous materials,air quality,traffic,and priate,and for other Environmental Assess- stormwater retention. The work plan lists ment tasks based on the following activities: these resource areas and our suggested . Agreement on the initial study checklist approach to minimize cost of services and and environmental assessment outline risk of delay-- Development of a Stable Project Description • Coordination with FAA • Public Notices and Scoping City of Palm Springs 42 HNTB Palm Springs International Airport JZ �,sj,rYM�)#rrkaty�'�iF�.;ir F�. �• ,.,;„ .� J, . ., � .� • Special Studies and Resource Analyses and effort for the work and develop a mute- • Administrative Draft Document-Confi- ally agreed budget for services. We estimate dential for Deliberative Purposes Only our costs based on recent past experience • Public Release Draft Environmental on similar projects in the region,including Assessment work at San Diego and in Long Beach. These • Public involvement as required assignments are on schedule and within • Response to Comments budget. Other comparable projects indude: • Final Environmental Assessment c: =�:,�., rti Documentation ONT Master Plan on-going; .Z•` I • Finding,Record of Decision EIR $4 Boo 000/EIS f- on-budget � Environmental staffs at the City and the OAK Development $571,000 On•goinq;Program Supple on-budgetAir ort have recent experience applicable to mental EIR i these tasks. Through discussions,HNTB and sAN Master plan on going; the airport will confirm the required scope EIR $2.500,000 I on-budget E.7 - project load, commitments, and percentage of completion ApdresG4rcia ; Prbjeck"M3nayer, :,i 7-'iLAY south Airfield' •, 40°r6" 80°/0 ' SDF Tnlv✓ay,A' ___ -p-- .15°/,-_ -,: IS°<i•,.,_ OAK'Romp; .1oe'Bartlen:- "DeputyProlectMenager ,' SQIAy�1'ermlhalPlan ' _ �. 40%' Gail St ; 'T�Envirorlmental'Assessmenk 'Ij SAN MP EIR/EA ` 50°!0 1^.mrn^rtrmmv+'mr vi. ryw •r. p..p '..�_. M,„ _.,.. .x.r.a. ..li 'Lyn Colpfd(ne , Enyinonmbntal Assessment' City of bvserl,Hat Springs EIR i TOP/u Zo°!°�'�' (LSA)' d• i BMW 5°�" SWo 77 (i0ulder5/Ctescendo EIR , - __ -----' -- _ � I 25"/° d�. " •.�.",i,>,;Y,d r' ;,�,. ,Indian Avenue/1-10 Interchange -- ~- ----j. ' 3%.. 95%+__I '�,.4hur4ld,r V550 - 45913 )Kim'Hugh@� •�Environmental support' ''! SAN EIR/EA _—___.__. ._ .. ' ,„.,„,„.„,_,•_. _:�_ ^f25% ^." '•/5%- '.i • I NY/NJ/PH'C"Airsp'ace f I. �°i - I •" Iov/0 60% FirfaxCountyCEf LlllioaYan„ ,I , w . . y,Environmental:Support/M. MRPSi LAX MM,RP° ;... 2500�4/pa_ _ 570%% ; Bvuof`,' ' nv eedl s 51KDle EironmentaI Supp r[A Porto la/I 10,1merchange j-, ' j99 GeneAutry Trail Projects ,Polo SLJ04e EIR' ' _ _ _ j'� 30Wu_' o. ;ilndian Avenue/I_IO Interchange., "I_! 4 ,3% + 95%+--1 " Riverside Econoniic.Developrn n4 Agency - `* - - 15°Po _ _$o"/° -di 1 1 - ----- ---- - ICVWI7�prFiJ'acis., ... TahanaDrtit Graphic Corn,nunlcdtions S'F'N'-Master,.Plan - -�' 40% 98°l° I Metromedia) • ---- -_.-. '..:....� ._ii. •.---- san�iego/A$$P-AirportSlte'Selection Program ` 40% V 50°h, City of Palm Springs Palm Springs International Airport HHTB 43 M n Revised: 6130/08 EXHIBIT "D" SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION 5612361 n ATTACHMENT D PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE BUDGET BUILD UP Elcrosnt/ Avi)IoA �SCnivrpM;�Lq,d PO �,l'PA .�,iiv�Mu.V 'ramliw .Admin�, GPA Ten-nlnal icmnnal GPA Admin Toed Hr Tdnl L�7Pr Task Elomentl7ask Namc �r?lamr&r Plr'"""r PI"'"""' rut �.�' n I'I"""n'vi n6n.,^ ., PnnGpal P%nnerlll Planners Hourly Rate: $" 21618 ,,,28d'$, 180, S,, 12al $ 101 $, ;,,,Di,,$: [' DO'I ,ac S 1Bol a U $ mo a as Element - ro eel a inition tGoals'&ObjectivesGoals' -, .. i1 - - 148 52UIOO 1.1 Pm.c Dvanlnan B 8 B 0 12 12 0 D 20 a 0 D 1111, _ 5_12140 12 'oovDlpp PSP Goal;&oh c�nvos B 8 18 0 12 16 0 0 20 0 0 o 00 'c13,pua Element85, q eql on, urveys,an nvontory•q 'ExistingCDnditlgnss ._I_".' - i';' - ... _ .ii' .. .j{� ; -'I e76l1.'�5101010 2.1 Data Collection a— 0 6 8 20 20i 40 16 r 0 a _ 0 _ 0 112 $11 GOO 22 Inv�entonr Airport Facilities v _ _ 7G4 40 InventoryAinleld Facilities,Airspace and Air 2.2.1 Trsfc Control Procedures v a a 0 24_ 0 _ 0 _ a _ _ _o __ 0 0 0 __ 32 53 840 2.2.2 Daton AC Runway Capadty a - o _ 16_ o_ 32 _40 a -0a o 01 o �J 92 511 140 2.2.3 Inventory Passenger Terminal Facilifiss a 0 a 12 32 a0 a 0 30 30 _ 10 0 192 $20246 22.4 Invonto Landsida Faalltles _ a - o z o 0 40_ 40 a o o o a e2 '7.TGO 2.2.5 Dinventory General Aviation Facilities o ' 0 0 0 16 40 16 0 0 0 0 0 72 SE 840 22.6 mvcniory Other On-Ali ort Facilities 0 0 a 0 10___ ao__ 12 0 0 0_ 0 a 68 584BO 2.27 Inventory Existing UINUOs _ 0 4 9 12 12 0 _ __-_a 0 20 10 o a 88 510,180 _ 2.2.6 Regional,Setting end Land Use __0 _ a 12 10 20 v o- 0 G o D_ a 6D $7,650 2.2.9 Woafher Data _ 0 0 a o 0 24 20 0 0 0 0 � o ao xeoo 22.70 EnvironmGnlal Se[1Inq o 0 2a _ - _0 2a 24 20 0 0 0 0 0 02� 31a 90a Elem'ent3-Aviation Demand Forecast - L uan, $7369O 3,1 Collect and Review Data a 2 0 a o _ 0 24 2 0 a D 0 30 $3 a0D Prepare Forecast Assumptions _^ 0 2 a 16 0 _ 12 12 2 0 a 0 01 44 $4950 Prepare Domestic and Inlematlonal Annual 3.3 Passenger Forecasts G 0 0 64 0 12 90 2 0 0 0 0 156 516510 3.4 cango Forecasts 0 a a a 8 12 32 2 0 0 0 0 62 SUED 3.5 Air Taxi,General Avlatign,and Military 0 0 D _ a a 12 32 2 0 a a o _ B2 _ $59aa 3.6 DBnvative Fome sts 0 0 0 16 _ a 12 32 2 0 a 0 0 SOW- T $6 ma 3.7 Forecast5cenanos a _ 3 0 24m 9 1.2 _40 2 0 0 0 0 09� 5a G90 3.8 Forecast Coordlnatlon 0 T a 0 4a 8 0 12 a 0 _ a al a 72 3e,460 3.9 Deliverables G 4 _ 0 _ 24 8 B M1O 12 Q`., _„0 _ _0 _ 0 98 $10,300 Element A w-173611jty RL Urrament5' I.76P $90540 4.1 Alrslde Faclli Requirements 4,1,1 Runway Capacity RC uirements 0 0 _18 D 18 40 40 0 a_ _ 0 o a 112 $11,560 —General Aviation Runway Improvement 4.1.2 Feasibili Stud 0 a 16 0 10 40 4o 0 0 0 0 0.112_. $11850 —__ 4.1.3 NAVAIDS Requirements 0 0 a 0 12 0_ _ 16 o 0 0 0 0 30 $4.080 4.1.4 Texiwa and Apron Re uirements 0 o B 0 12 16 0 _ o o D o o _ 36 s4,160 4.2 Determine Terminal Facility Requirements _ _ _ _ 4.2.1 Gate Requirements _ _ 0 4 V a _ _ B o 16 o o _ _ 10_ _o _ o _ 2 40 55530 4.2.2 Tlckefln &Check-In Requirements D 0 0 s ___o D_ a 0 10 0 ---0—l _ 2 28 53970 4.2.3 f3a a eg-Screenin Facilities a D 0 a a o a q 16 0___ a 2 28 35490 _ _ .. 42.4 Bap a eg Claim Requirements 0 0 0 9 0 18 0 0 1G o 0 2 42 35490 ` 42.5 Concession Re uiremnenfs 0 4 0 9 0 0 01 0 1G a 0 2 30 E5090 42.6 Infcrnaflonol Facilities o o v 9 0 1B _ _ ol_�_-_1G o D z az ss nee 4.3 LandsIde Facility RBquiramEntS _ _ -__ _ _ - _.. __ -_ ._ - 1 .__ 431 Airport Access _ D _o e _ 0 _ _ 0 16 i6 0 8� 0 0 0 48 55640 432 Airport Parking _ 0 D T0 16 16 0 e D 0 D 4e 35 a40 4,3.3 Rental Car Facilities D o B _ 0 _ D 16 15 DI D D D D 40 Saaoo 4,4 Genaml Aviation Facility Requirements _ . -_ D 0 B 0_ _ za 24 __ U. _ _ of __ 0_ D 0 _ D _s6 56,120 4.5 $LI Ort F3Cilities_ 0 0 8 __ 0_ 7,a 18 ___-0 DI 8 __ 68 S6 E00 t3I2 I2003 Element5.1 5 Pre are No rsde Altemati leernatives f �- - o i, l a ,I,0 III 'or_ 'o1 .o '� 16 _ 0 19 rr 1 �_ "so 40St86560 5.2 Define No-Bulld Altemativen --- D B a 3 ` _-_r- - _ �� 0 0 0 40 86160 0 a 9 e� P 24 0 0 0 0 0 $6160 _ 5.3 Pre ere Terminal Allem@bycs 0 _ _ 2 0, a 0 0 40 _ 00 20 4 180 525 520 5 10 __0 . -.4 - Prepare Landslde Alternatives _ o 0 2_ 2a _ 12 a _ o_ ea a _ _ o__ a 0 94 _ 59400 5.5 Develop Altemahves EvaWahon Criteria _ o o a o _ 0 1u__ za v 18 a _ 0 4 e4 $7450 ._ -_ 1 --_ l_ 4o 5.7 Propsre Altemahves Working Paper o e 6 32 Evaluate Altemah ro ves o____ 16 e 10 0 2a 1z 0 1a _ 0 0 96 S14410 Environmental Considerations az_ G 16_ _n o 2a _ _az o o o za __ a a a 1es o_ 0 0 108 $1a 520 ---$19 260 _ - _-- ova ap, rearre ernat vE an asing .IL ).i.l 'i Plan „ :I' ' �'i L�,�G� -'�P-77287106.2 Pre acre PeferredlAlternative Phasin Plan D a a e 24 24 24 D 10 0 D 4 120� 0 0 2 t0a Element 7-Air b'KLa.out Plan. - _ �'�I;'- - '.n_ - "I>' g 1 !' 216 31 120 7.1 Pre are ALP et 1t get n FAA Comments O o no 0 12 -o _ 60 _ o o D ---- 7.2 Finalize ALP Set Ba9edo to - � �D� � ,I a o 4o D 1oD _ _ o_ __ D o - �_ _ P _ 0 a 18a 517,320 -- �- �_ ..� .__ 0 112 S13,900 Element 8-IM' lam nlatlOn Plan _ IPr` M. 1,/P i,'. 'S2o-YCn Assess Options for Maximizing 9.1 Utility of Existing Facilities 0 10 12 a a-- 0 _ 16 0 _ 0_ D v 0 46 S]400 _8.2 Assess Financial FeaslbilltY _ a o 32 0 _ _0 __ 0 0 0 0 0 48 $7200 6.3 Project Sequencing f� l y f a 0 8 0 0 16 0 e 0 0 0 32 :$a 320 8.4 Pe arc Draft Chapter 7.Im lementabon Plan a - o V 20_... v D o 16 al 1DI 0 01 al 4S 5o t40 Element 9-Pre ara'DYaft.M Sibl PIaff DoCumen[' j, - "- - - - 180 .5224D0 9.2 Prepare MP ExecutiveSummal Ls vrt oo oe a6 D D 1e a0 D 10I D 0 D a8 $12,660 . ry$ . ... _ 0 ._01 1G - -_•"40.___— 0..--.._.�D.l_., p 0 0 a2 $9600 Elcmcnt.1.0--FlexiAla Task 1 17' °: 'l l _ -- - - :'m I . - - 6sz e77 10.1.. 1Flexible Task— _ _ - D 01 -•_1 .o. 01 o, - 01 0 01 i, 01 01 01 01 S52,977 Total Labor J�0 ,� - .. '-, - 'b „ QO_ - .137, - 4521,7 _420,,; 538.,. ^7M4 '1,096 -"941 '.i S041,if'"lice "'• -- 20. :�- 201 4,099 S'': 554,617 P1 ense Sumina Sae Next Sheet .�ida l - 'i�;'V,'t'h $27,a30 Tmvnl Fxpen Sle3a0 clma Relmbumeable Expense: S7.850 TOTALlABOR.AND.EXPENSE5 ' - ., "' -..'gglP':' >e ,, .. �" -.- '' $581,647 r I 1 c C7 8I25f2008 Revised- 6/30/08 EXHIBIT "E" SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE M236A I II _ - Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan Attachment E-Schedule of'Performance ID ©._..._. . - u ( 9ECTIVEy xaaay?, -TusloRmn-MRdN PmeocnsanTa L _ ._ ._. —.-,4f_fiov`-1 pnc 127m "�eeW. Mor am P'rsaY_. n— Jul A,vn,_�jiq ___ N�a nu nmo punYon 81nrz FHO 11 I NOTCETOPROCLap NTP iime, du au en O�1, - x 1 FROM=DEFINITION,SCAM LC J N11133 s 0 mMrC 1-PROJELTNILK aFFlGbais Idoyt Wodfommo and maj69 ISC12days 1 I e �, P119IJC bTTc 1-FOALS d OBJECTIVES Isar Wed 1115Y39 Wee 11600 Ixsstxl daye I -- sIPrvEPfj'ORY 43eaYe9 Ty.luNoerll M*n1TNme t hu i(iffliffia sud 21 TLMTG2-INVE�eY ldry Mon IIlltmO Mon W1710B 188n90dcyF 22­ J PORECAST 80 daysT Too I0Rm0 Mon 219109,1 I j JJ - r4O : - day? Wetl lQ Wind 29m9 ts:»02 e9ya cA— GFNEL rwEETING f I sey2 Thu1Rw. I I Thu 1Rpm930 95 4 rACI=REg111REMENT3 T30day[ Th41129109 Wed 5N1101133 n iXMTGA='MLIIITYRL[Ou1h9MENTs - tsry2 M7311W- Mon S�leloa'1$51115 days 55— GENERAL MCCTING2 1eoy7 Too 9117109 Tuo M7m0''J SE•• •• �6 ALTERNATIVES 1 -s-o n:yi5 Tuo 3NTm9 Mon LxL0919M1 -8n ALTERNATIVES WORKSHOP Idoy Tua 4R109 Tuo4c109 61 1, 65 ® jTL MM 5-ALTCRNATIVES Imys Woe umo9, Woe410109 64 'de" Pueyc MrC 2-A4TERNATIVES 1dxyP Thu410108 Tha 4RlO9 155 � 67 5-PREFERRED ALTERNATNE AND PHASING PLAN I 90eays Wee3/1em9i Tuo Tlxlm9{6638Hdry 70 GENLEETINF3 1dayP Tun TJ311o9I Tun Tg11o91 WFS-0 day -AIRPORT µYpgT FUN(ALP) 604y5 Wed Tl22m9 Tua 10N8109 6] TS GENERAL MEERNG4 1ea,7 Wae 1M4m9I Woe 10114100`1 l ' 76 e 4NIPLEMENATGN PUN(FINANCIAL PUN) xe days Tuc7121109 Thu 01271096T34 day y GENERAL MEETINGS 1dn}q Ftl egBm9 Fri 3@e/097e � I ex e-PREPARE FINAL ppCDMENT 2e days Fri 8121108 Tua f01Y09 T8 66 GENERAL MCCnNG A 1 doy Wad 10RNB Wed 10OIOB eA ee 119;PLEKIOLOWK 263 days, Tn-109109 M=n1011=11 t k 1 Ta a ry R P Pri^ olled YlP m9mss m Summary TCMsoun9 yr Plefn[I P MASTER PUN sk S.innu . D.T.Fd e116me Pm9raaa Rolled lip Talk eplt � �� � Fmn9 By Summary Public M99Wo Nod:All mewing dads srs ndm b. Mllesbns * Was up MllenlopnQ Eulmm.l Tam pnnsllnn Olher MseYn9 1 Pepe 10f1 ALL MEETING DATES ARE ESTIMATES.A6TIhL MCEnNG OATC-WILL OE SCHEDULED TIRCWMDIIT TYIE DURATION OF TWE PROJECT SASED ON PEP STAFF AVACASIuw.APPROPRIATE GATES FOR PUBLIC AND RESOURCCE VAUSL-TY. I 00