Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/1/2009 - STAFF REPORTS - 2.B. pLM S. c V N * F R CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Cq</FOa�P DATE: APRIL 1, 2009 CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING CHAPTER 5.79 OF TITLE 5 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO STATE VIDEO FRANCHISE HOLDERS. FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: James Thompson, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: Waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1759, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 5.79 OF TITLE 5 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO STATE VIDEO FRANCHISE HOLDERS." STAFF ANALYSIS: At its March 25, 2009, meeting proposed Ordinance No. 1759 was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember Foat, Councilmember Hutcheson, Councilmember Weigel, Mayor Pro Tem Mills, and Mayor Pougnet. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. This report provides for the City Council to waive further reading and adopt the ordinance. The ordinance shall be effective 30-days from adoption. r4ME.S THOMPSON, City Clerk DAVID H. REA anager Attachments: Ordinance No. 1759 ITFEW C10, 2 . 6 . PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1759 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ADOPTING CHAPTER 5.79 OF TITLE 5 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO STATE VIDEO FRANCHISE HOLDERS. City Attorney's Summary This Ordinance adopts Chapter 5.79 of Title 5 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code to implement the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006 pertaining to State Video Franchise Holders. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter 5.79 of Title 5 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is hereby adopted to read as follows: Chapter 5.79 STATE VIDEO FRANCHISE HOLDERS 5.79.010 Purpose. (a) This Chapter is designed to regulate video service providers holding state video franchises and operating within the City. As of January 1, 2007, the State of California has the sole authority to grant state video franchises pursuant to the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006 ("DIVCA"). Pursuant to DIVCA, the City of Palm Springs may receive a franchise fee and may receive a fee for public, educational, and governmental access (defined in this Chapter as "PEG" or "PEG access channels") from all state video franchise holders operating within the City. Additionally, although DIVCA grants all authority to adopt customer service standards to the state, the City has the responsibility to establish and enforce penalties, consistent with state law, against all state video franchise holders operating within the City for violations of such customer service standards. (b) It is the purpose of this Chapter to implement within the City the provisions of DIVCA and the rules the California Public Utilities Commission ("Commission") promulgated thereunder that are applicable to the City as a "local franchising entity" or a "local entity" as defined in DIVCA. Consistent with that purpose, the provisions of this Chapter are to be construed in a manner that is consistent with DIVCA and the applicable rules of the Commission promulgated thereunder. Ordinance No. Page 1 of 6 576777 1 5.79,020 Applicable Definitions. Terms used in this Chapter shall have the meaning as established in (1) DIVCA, and, if not defined therein, (2) Commission rules implementing DIVCA, and, if not defined therein, (3) Subchapter V-A of Chapter 5 of Title 47 of the United States Code, and, if not defined therein, (4) their common and ordinary meaning. References to governmental entities (whether persons or entities) shall refer to those entities or their successors in authority. If a specific provision of law referred to in this Chapter should be renumbered, then the reference shall be read to refer to the renumbered provision. References to any law shall be interpreted broadly to cover government actions, including any law now in force or subsequently enacted or amended. 5.79.030 State Franchise Required. (a) Except as the City Council may authorize pursuant to Article X of the Charter, no person may construct, operate, maintain, or repair a cable system or video service provider's network in the City without first obtaining a state franchise therefor. (b) A state franchise shall not convey rights other than as specified in this Chapter or in DIVCA or other applicable law; no rights shall pass by implication. (c) Except as otherwise provided by DIVCA, a state franchise shall not include, or be a substitute for: (1) Compliance with generally applicable requirements for the privilege of transacting and carrying on a business within the City, including, but not limited to, compliance with the conditions that the City may establish before facilities may be constructed, or for providing non-video services; (2) Any permit or authorization, other than a state franchise, required in connection with operations on or in public rights-of-way or public property; and (3) Any permit, agreement or authorization for occupying any other property of the City or private persons to which access is not specifically granted by the state franchise. (d) Except as otherwise provided in DIVCA, a state franchise shall not relieve a franchisee of its duty to comply with all laws, including laws of the City, and every state franchisee shall comply with the same. The City reserves its rights to the lawful exercise of police and other powers the City now has or may later obtain. (e) The City reserves the right to construct, operate, maintain or repair its own cable system or video service provider network. Ordinance No. Page 2 of 6 5762721 `9 S 5.79.040 Administration and Regulations. (a) The City may from time to time adopt rules and regulations to implement the provisions of this Chapter consistent with DIVCA. (b) The City Manager, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized to administer this Chapter and to provide or cause to be provided any notices (including noncompliance notices) and to take any action on behalf of the City that may be required under this Chapter, DIVCA, or under applicable law. (c) The failure of the City, upon one or more occasions, to exercise a right or to require compliance or performance under this Chapter or any other applicable law shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of such right or a waiver of compliance or performance, unless such right has been specifically waived in writing or its exercise by the City is not permitted by DIVCA. (d) The City may designate one or more entities, including itself, to control and manage the use of PEG access channels, and any PEG facilities and equipment owned, controlled or used by the City or the designated entity or entities. 5.79.050 Franchise Fee. A state video franchise holder operating in the City shall pay to the City a franchise fee that is equal to five percent (5%) of the gross revenues of that state video franchise holder. The term "gross revenues" shall be defined as set forth in Public Utilities Code Section 5860. 5.79.060 PEG Fee. In addition to the franchise fee required pursuant to section 5.79.050, a state video franchise holder operating in the City shall pay to the City a fee that is equal to one percent (1%) of the gross revenues of that state video franchise holder which fee shall be used to support PEG channel facilities. The term "gross revenues" shall be defined as set forth in Public Utilities Code Section 5860. 5.79,070 Payment of Fees; Examination of Business Records. (a) The Franchise Fee and PEG Fee shall be remitted to the City on a quarterly basis within 45 days after the end of each quarter for that calendar year. Each payment shall be accompanied by a detailed summary explaining the basis for the calculation of the Franchise Fee and PEG Fee. (b) If a state video franchise holder fails to pay the fees when due, or underpays the proper amounts due, the state video franchise holder shall pay a late payment charge at the annual interest rate equal to the highest prime lending rate during the period of Ordinance No. Page 3 of 6 576172 1 delinquency, plus one percent (1%). If the state video franchise holder has overpaid the fees, it may deduct the overpayment from its next quarterly payment. (c) Not more than once annually, the City may examine the business records of a state video franchise holder to ensure compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations related to the computation and payment of franchise fees. 5.79.080 Customer Service Penalties Under State Video Franchises. (a) The holder of a state video franchise shall comply with California Government Code §§ 53055, 53055.1, 53055.2 and 53088.2; the FCC customer service and notice standards set forth in 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.309, 76.1602, 76.1603 and 76.1619; California Penal Code § 637.5; the privacy standards of 47 U.S.C. § 551; and all other applicable state and federal customer service and consumer protection standards pertaining to the provision of video service, including any such standards hereafter adopted. In case of a conflict, the stricter standard shall apply. All customer service and consumer protection standards under this section shall be interpreted and applied to accommodate newer or different technologies while meeting or exceeding the goals of the standards. (b) The City shall monitor state video franchise holder's compliance with state and federal customer service and protection standards. The City will provide to the state video franchise holder written notice of any material breaches of applicable customer service and protection standards, and will allow the state video franchise holder 30 days from receipt of the notice to remedy the specified material breach. Material breaches not remedied within the 30-day time period are subject to the following monetary penalties to be imposed by the City in accordance with state law: (1) For the first occurrence of a violation, a monetary penalty of $500 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in effect, not to exceed $1500 for each violation. (2) For a second violation of the same nature within a 12-month period, a monetary penalty of $1000 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in effect, not to exceed $3000 for each such violation. (3) For a third or further violation of the same nature within a 12-month period, a monetary penalty of $2500 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in effect, not to exceed $7,500 for each such violation- (c) A state video franchise holder may appeal to the City Council, or a hearing officer as the City Council may appoint, a monetary penalty assessed by the City within 60 days after notice of the assessment. After relevant evidence and testimony as may be received, and staff reports as may be submitted, the City Council may uphold, vacate, or modify the monetary penalty consistent with the evidence presented. The decision of Ordinance No. Page 4 of 6 576171 1 the City Council, or hearing officer, on the imposition of a monetary penalty shall be final. 5.79.090 City Response to State Video Franchise Applications. (a) Applicants for state video franchises within the boundaries of the City must concurrently provide to the City complete copies of any application or amendments to applications filed with the California Public Utilities Commission. One complete copy must be provided to the City Clerk. (b) The City may provide any appropriate comments to the California Public Utilities Commission regarding an application or an amendment to an application for a state video franchise. 5.79,100 PEG Channel Capacity. (a) A state video franchise holder shall designate sufficient capacity on its network to enable the carriage of at least three PEG access channels. PEG access channels shall be for the exclusive use of the City or its designees to provide public, educational, or governmental programming. (b) A state video franchise holder shall provide additional PEG channels when the standards set forth in Public Utilities Code Section 5870 are satisfied by the City or any entity designated by the City to be responsible for PEG access. 5.79.110 Emergency Alert System and Emergency Overrides. A state video franchise holder must comply with the Emergency Alert System requirements of the Federal Communications Commission so that emergency messages may be distributed over its network. SECTION 2. _Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Chapter_ The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, words or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of 2008. STEVE POUGNET, MAYOR Ordinance No. Page 5 of 6 576272.1 ATTEST: JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2008 and was finally adopted at a regular meeting held thereof on the _day of 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM DOUGLAS C. HOLLAND, CITY ATTORNEY Ordinance No. Page 6 of 6 576772 1 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION a OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK James Thompson, City Clerk City Council Meeting Date: April 1, 2009 Subject: Ordinance No. 1759 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I, Kathie Hark, CMG, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1759, adopted by the City Council on April 1, 2009, was published in the Desert Sun on April 15, 2009. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. IL Kathie Hart, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Dolores Strickstein, Secretary, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of Ordinance No. 1759 was posted at Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board and in the Office of the City Clerk on April 10, 2009. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dolores Strickstein, Secretary PROOF OF PUBLICATION This is Space for County Clerks Filing Stamp (2015.5.C.C.P) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Riverside 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of Proof of Publication of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen ------_----- years,and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter.I am the principal clerk of a printer of the,DESERT SUN PUBLISHING COMPANY a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the city of Palm Springs, County of Riverside,and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside,State of -- California under the date all 24,1988.Case No 1454 Cr1y OF PALM SPRINGS Number 191236;that the notice,of which the ORDINANCE N0.1759 annexed is a printed copy(set in type not smaller AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL than non pariel,has been published in each regular OF THE Crrr OF PALM SPRINGS and entire issue of said newspaper and net in any ADOPTING CHAPTER 5,79 OF TITLE 5OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL supplement thereof on the following dates,to wit: CODE PE TAINING . TO STATE VIDEFRANSO ClryntJemey's Summeryry April 15a',2009 This Ordloaaw edoppfs Ceaptoe 5,7&of T tie 5 a/ the palm Springs Mmjnpal Code to rrnploment Inc Digital Plrn57ucture and V1dpp Competition Hol dors.of , peril to State Video Franchise ol JAMES THOMPSON do Clark a the that of All in the year 2009 Malin Springs 59 it, full rue hereby carte Ihal copy dnance NO nt due r.�a lull true ned Cauca copy and was Introduced at an adjourned regular meet.� I certifyOr declare under penalty of er or Ihar the Ongg oI llm Palm Springs City Gouncll on March 25 ( p tY P J y 00,and adooti d at a reggular mocLnp of the City foregoing is true and correct. VOID! ncll held an the April 1,2000,by the following AYES: Gottncilmempeis Foal Hutche,,Oh Dated at Palm Springs,California this—15`b,--day Ma o�lho aloe!-Prc-Tem Mill;, and - NOES: None - 2009 ABSENT None —of— - April -r----------------, AUSTAIN: None James Thomp„cn Q�y Clnrk City of Palm Springs,Cplifornia _ I Published:N15109 - C" w �J JJ N CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ORDINANCE NO. 1759 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ADOPTING CHAPTER 5.79 OF TITLE 5 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO STATE VIDEO FRANCHISE HOLDERS. City Attorney's Summary This Ordinance adopts Chapter 5.79 of Title 5 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code to implement the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006 pertaining to State Video Franchise Holders, I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1759 is a full, true and correct copy, and was introduced at an adjourned regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on March 25, 2009, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the April 1, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Foat, Hutcheson, Weigel, Mayor Pro Tern Mills, and Mayor Pougnet NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None es Thompson, City Clerk ity of Palm Springs, California ORDINANCE NO. 1759 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 5.79 OF TITLE 5 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO STATE VIDEO FRANCHISE HOLDERS. City Attorney's Summary This Ordinance adopts Chapter 5.79 of Title 5 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code to implement the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006 pertaining to State Video Franchise Holders. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter 5.79 of Title 5 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is hereby adopted to read as follows: Chapter 5.79 STATE VIDEO FRANCHISE HOLDERS 5.79.010 Purpose. (a) This Chapter is designed to regulate video service providers holding state video franchises and operating within the City. As of January 1, 2007, the State of California has the sole authority to grant state video franchises pursuant to the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006 ("DIVCA")_ Pursuant to DIVCA, the City of Palm Springs may receive a franchise fee and may receive a fee for public, educational, and governmental access (defined in this Chapter as "PEG' or "PEG access channels") from all state video franchise holders operating within the City. Additionally, although DIVCA grants all authority to adopt customer service standards to the state, the City has the responsibility to establish and enforce penalties, consistent with state law, against all state video franchise holders operating within the City for violations of such customer service standards. (b) It is the purpose of this Chapter to implement within the City the provisions of DIVCA and the rules the California Public Utilities Commission ("Commission") promulgated thereunder that are applicable to the City as a "local franchising entity" or a "local entity" as defined in DIVCA. Consistent with that purpose, the provisions of this Chapter are to be construed in a manner that is consistent with DIVCA and the applicable rules of the Commission promulgated thereunder. Ordinance 1758 Page 2 5.79.020 Applicable Definitions. Terms used in this Chapter shall have the meaning as established in (1) DIVCA, and, if not defined therein, (2) Commission rules implementing DIVCA, and, if not defined therein, (3) Subchapter V-A of Chapter 5 of Title 47 of the United States Code, and, if not defined therein, (4) their common and ordinary meaning. References to governmental entities (whether persons or entities) shall refer to those entities or their successors in authority. If a specific provision of law referred to in this Chapter should be renumbered, then the reference shall be read to refer to the renumbered provision. References to any law shall be interpreted broadly to cover government actions, including any law now in force or subsequently enacted or amended. 5.79.030 State Franchise Required. (a) Except as the City Council may authorize pursuant to Article X of the Charter, no person may construct, operate, maintain, or repair a cable system or video service provider's network in the City without first obtaining a state franchise therefor. (b) A state franchise shall not convey rights other than as specified in this Chapter or in DIVCA or other applicable law; no rights shall pass by implication. (c) Except as otherwise provided by DIVCA, a state franchise shall not include, or be a substitute for: (1) Compliance with generally applicable requirements for the privilege of transacting and carrying on a business within the City, including, but not limited to, compliance with the conditions that the City may establish before facilities may be constructed, or for providing non-video services; (2) Any permit or authorization, other than a state franchise, required in connection with operations on or in public rights-of-way or public property; and (3) Any permit, agreement or authorization for occupying any other property of the City or private persons to which access is not specifically granted by the state franchise- (d) Except as otherwise provided in DIVCA, a state franchise shall not relieve a franchisee of its duty to comply with all laws, including laws of the City, and every state franchisee shall comply with the same. The City reserves its rights to the lawful exercise of police and other powers the City now has or may later obtain- (e) The City reserves the right to construct, operate, maintain or repair its own cable system or video service provider network. Ordinance 1758 Page 3 5.79.O40 Administration and Regulations. (a) The City may from time to time adopt rules and regulations to implement the provisions of this Chapter consistent with DIVCA- (b) The City Manager, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized to administer this Chapter and to provide or cause to be provided any notices (including noncompliance notices) and to take any action on behalf of the City that may be required under this Chapter, DIVCA, or under applicable law. (c) The failure of the City, upon one or more occasions, to exercise a right or to require compliance or performance under this Chapter or any other applicable law shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of such right or a waiver of compliance or performance, unless such right has been specifically waived in writing or its exercise by the City is not permitted by DIVCA. (d) The City may designate one or more entities, including itself, to control and manage the use of PEG access channels, and any PEG facilities and equipment owned, controlled or used by the City or the designated entity or entities. 5.79.050 Franchise Fee. A state video franchise holder operating in the City shall pay to the City a franchise fee that is equal to five percent (5%) of the gross revenues of that state video franchise holder. The term "gross revenues" shall be defined as set forth in Public Utilities Code Section 5860. 5.79.060 PEG Fee. In addition to the franchise fee required pursuant to section 5.79.050, a state video franchise holder operating in the City shall pay to the City a fee that is equal to one percent (1%) of the gross revenues of that state video franchise holder which fee shall be used to support PEG channel facilities. The term "gross revenues" shall be defined as set forth in Public Utilities Code Section 5860. 5.79.070 Payment of Fees; Examination of Business Records. (a) The Franchise Fee and PEG Fee shall be remitted to the City on a quarterly basis within 45 days after the end of each quarter for that calendar year. Each payment shall be accompanied by a detailed summary explaining the basis for the calculation of the Franchise Fee and PEG Fee. (b) If a state video franchise holder fails to pay the fees when due, or underpays the proper amounts due, the state video franchise holder shall pay a late payment charge at Ordinance 1758 Page 4 the annual interest rate equal to the highest prime lending rate during the period of delinquency, plus one percent (1%). If the state video franchise holder has overpaid the fees, it may deduct the overpayment from its next quarterly payment. (c) Not more than once annually, the City may examine the business records of a state video franchise holder to ensure compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations related to the computation and payment of franchise fees. 5.79.080 Customer Service Penalties Under State Video Franchises. (a) The holder of a state video franchise shall comply with California Government Code §§ 53055, 53055.1, 53055.2 and 53088.2; the FCC customer service and notice standards set forth in 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.309, 76.1602, 76.1603 and 76.1619; California Penal Code § 637.5; the privacy standards of 47 U.S.C. § 551; and all other applicable state and federal customer service and consumer protection standards pertaining to the provision of video service, including any such standards hereafter adopted. In case of a conflict, the stricter standard shall apply. All customer service and consumer protection standards under this section shall be interpreted and applied to accommodate newer or different technologies while meeting or exceeding the goals of the standards. (b) The City shall monitor state video franchise holder's compliance with state and federal customer service and protection standards. The City will provide to the state video franchise holder written notice of any material breaches of applicable customer service and protection standards, and will allow the state video franchise holder 30 days from receipt of the notice to remedy the specified material breach. Material breaches not remedied within the 30-day time period are subject to the following monetary penalties to be imposed by the City in accordance with state law: (1) For the first occurrence of a violation, a monetary penalty of $500 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in effect, not to exceed $1500 for each violation. (2) For a second violation of the same nature within a 12-month period, a monetary penalty of$1000 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in effect, not to exceed $3000 for each such violation. (3) For a third or further violation of the same nature within a 12-month period, a monetary penalty of$2500 shall be imposed for each day the violation remains in effect, not to exceed $7,500 for each such violation. (c) A state video franchise holder may appeal to the City Council, or a hearing officer as the City Council may appoint, a monetary penalty assessed by the City within 60 days after notice of the assessment. After relevant evidence and testimony as may be received, and staff reports as may be submitted, the City Council may uphold, vacate, Ordinance 1758 Page 5 or modify the monetary penalty consistent with the evidence presented. The decision of the City Council, or hearing officer, on the imposition of a monetary penalty shall be final. 5.79.090 City Response to State Video Franchise Applications. (a) Applicants for state video franchises within the boundaries of the City must concurrently provide to the City complete copies of any application or amendments to applications filed with the California Public Utilities Commission. One complete copy must be provided to the City Clerk. (b) The City may provide any appropriate comments to the California Public Utilities Commission regarding an application or an amendment to an application for a state video franchise. 5.79.100 PEG Channel Capacity. (a) A state video franchise holder shall designate sufficient capacity on its network to enable the carriage of at least three PEG access channels. PEG access channels shall be for the exclusive use of the City or its designees to provide public, educational, or governmental programming. (b) A state video franchise holder shall provide additional PEG channels when the standards set forth in Public Utilities Code Section 5870 are satisfied by the City or any entity designated by the City to be responsible for PEG access. 5.79.110 Emergency Alert System and Emergency Overrides. A state video franchise holder must comply with the Emergency Alert System requirements of the Federal Communications Commission so that emergency messages may be distributed over its network. SECTION 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Chapter. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, words or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance 1758 Page 6 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2009. STEPHEN P. POUGNET, MAYOR ATTEST: JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF PALM SPRINGS) 1, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1759 is a full, true and correct copy, and was introduced at a regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on the 25th day of March, 2009, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 1st day of April, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember Foat, Councilmember Hutcheson, Councilmember Weigel, Mayor Pro Tern Mills, and Mayor Pougnet. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. James Thompson, City Clerk City of Palm Springs, California Ordinance 1759 Page 7 JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM DOUGLAS C. HOLLAND, CITY ATTORNEY