Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/21/2010 - STAFF REPORTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME l.fJ P ,J'. , 3 r lf, I0t 2 I ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT Receipt#: 201000416 State Clearinghouse#(If applicable): Lend Agency: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Date: 04/22/2010 curmly Agency cfFiling: Riverside Document No: 201000416 Project title; CASE 5.1082 AMND PDD 321 AMND "DELANO"A 53 UNIT RES, DF.VF.LOPMENT Prujeut Apphuant Name.' O&M LLC Phnne Number: Project Applicant Address: 1 MAC ARTHUR PL H300 SOUTH COAST METRO CA 92707 PI clect Appla•aw: Private Entity CHECK APP LlCABLE FEES: ❑Environmental Impact Report ❑ NegatNP.f),:ClnYartoll ❑Application hee water Diversion(State Water Kesnurces Control Roard Only) ❑Project Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs M1 Coway Adminlstrauan Fee $04,00 © Project that is exempt from fee.e(f)FO No h;(fect Determination(Form Aduched)) ❑ Project that is exempt from fae.P(Noire of Ex'emptlnn) Total Received S64.00 Signature and title ufperson receiving payment: P �/ Notes: Notice of Determination Form C To: ❑ Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency) City of Palm Springs PO Box 3044, 1400 Tenth Street,Room 212 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way Sacramento,CA 95812-3044 Pa palm Springs, CA 9226f County Clerk (Addles) County of . Riverside County Clerk APR r? P01� P.O. Box 751 . Riverside, CA 92502-0751 4RRY W LVARL) CLERN —'—M Meye Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Case 5.1082 AMND PD➢ 321 AMND "Delano" A 53 unit resi.dpriti.al. development Project Title Edward Robertson 76D 323 8245 Strife Clearinghouse Number Lead Agency Area Code/Telephone/Extension (if submitted W Clearinghouse) Contact Person Southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros & Alejo Road (Approximately 8.5 acres) Project Location(include county) Project Description: See attachment for further description. l This is to advise that the City of Palm Springs, CA has approved the abn described project on ... .. .. .__—_......_._..._....._.._._... . .. ....._........ LcaA AgcncY I„ Rpspp°sihlc Agency April 7, 2010 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project (Date) 1.The project[Uwill Zwill riot]have a significant effect on the environment. ❑Au Envirunxnunl.al impact Rapurl wab pl'epervd ILr this prujocl.pursuant In Lilt provisions of CEQA. VA A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures[®were ❑were not] made a condition of the approval of the project. 4.A statement of Overriding Considera Lions [E]was VIwas not] adopted for this project. 5,Findings[were ❑were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final LAR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at: �Q,j"C� +� .��•IC] Principal Planner' Sir trn•c.(P i•Agun,y) /Axle Title Date received for filing at OPR! JnnuurV 2004 26 pp1 M sA City of Palm Springs tA Department of Planning Services * 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Spring%, CA 92262 Tel: 760-323 8245 • F= 760 322 8360 /FORN�P Supplemental Information for Notice of Determination—CEOA Form C Case 5-1082 AMND PDD 321 AMND "Deland' a 53-unit residential development at the southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road in Palm Springs, CA Project 1)escrintion: The project is an amendment to a previously approved Planned Development District and Tentative Tract Map. The applicant proposes to amend the project by changing the units from condominiums to single family homes and reduce the unit density from 84 residential units to 53 residential units. The amendment also eliminates a community building and common recreational pool and related amenities and proposes instead individual swimming pools on individual lots. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project was previously adopted by the City Council on April 19, 2006. Pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CF,QA), the preparation of further environmental assessment is not necessary since the proposed amendment proposes a lower density project. The City has determined that the amendment proposes no additional impacts, and actually reduces potential impacts by proposing 31 fewer units. The project as amended could not, therelirre, result in any new environmental impacts beyond those already identified and assessed in the adopted mitigated negative declaration. Action.• On April 7, 2010, the Palm Springs City Council approved Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321 TTM 34165 AMND subject to conditions of approval and recertified the Mitigated Negative Declaration as an adequate analysis of the project under the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, CA 92263-2743 • Wcb: �.palmsprings-ca.gov APR-22-2010 THU 04128 PM CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FAX NO. 7603228360 P. 03 NOTICE OF DETERMINATI"N �I;Iv°a�l°C011N �� MAY 2 3 2006 From: To: Research City of Palm Springs ily In .?r47p ^-'M,m6yer Office of Planning and Res 1400 Tenth Street, Room ea Department of Planning Services Deputy P.O. Box 2743 Sacramento,CA. 95814 palm Springs, CA 92253 2743 x County Clerk P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92502-0751 Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21100 or 21152 of the public Resources Code. Applicant Name: Nexus Development Address; 1 MacArthur Place;i300, Santa Ana, California 92707 Talephone Number: 714-546-5600 Project Title: Case 5.1082—PD-321,TTM 34165 Edward obertson 8 4 Area Cade/ State Clearinghouse No, Lead Agency Telephone (M sUCmided W CI�da9�u�1 Contact Person Project location: Southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros&Aleje Rd.(444 Avenida Caballeros&1013 Alejo Road),Palm Springs, Riverside County, California Project Description, The project consists of a Planned Development District (PD) to establish design Irion with the standards Tentative Tract Map has proposed filed wallowsidential condom ubdlvisvn of helsi a fourn r avndammium Pley- in urposes, and Architectural Approval Is also requested- ngs has approved the above described project with approval This is to advise that the City of Palm Spri effective on April 19,2°°6, and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project I_will%will not]have a significant effect an the environment, - " 2. An Environmental ImpaotReport was prepared for this project pursuant to provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to he provisions of Ct=QA• 3, Mitigation measures[ X were__were not]made a condition of the approval of the project. 4, A Statement of Overriding Conelderatione [_was%was not]adopted for this project. 5. Findings[%were,_,_were not]made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certlfy that the I%Negative Declaration F Final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval]is available to the General Public at: of P Im S in °e sAm nt o Nla In Ws r Cali is Cl April 21 2006 Pnncioal lanner ' nature Age Date Title 1 APR-22-2010 THU 04:26 PM CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FAX NO. 7603228360 P. 04 California Department of Fish antrGame Certificate of Fee Exemption Ds Minimis Impact Finding Project Title: Case 5.1082— PD-321, TTM 34165 Project Location (including County): Southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road (444 Avenida Caballeros and 1013 Alejo Road), Palm Springs, Riverside County, California Name and Address of Project Proponent: Nexus Development, 1 MacArthur Place #300, Santa Ana, California 92707 Project Description: The project consists of a Planned Development District (PD) to establish design standards and guidelines for a proposed 84-unit residential condominium complex. In conjunction with the PD, a Tentative Tract Map has been filed to allow subdivision of the site for condominium purposes, and Architectural Approval is also requested. Findings of Exemption: 1. An Initial Study has been conducted by the City of Palm Springs to evaluate the potential for adverse environmental impacts. 2. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared by the City of Palm Springs. 3. The lead agency has no evidence before it, including the Information In the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and public comments, to indicate that the proposed project could have any potential for an adverse effect on fish and wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the fish and wildlife depends. Certification: 1 hereby certify that the lead.agency has made the above findings and that based upon the record, the project will not individually or cumulatively had an adverse-effect on fish -or wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Agril 21, R006 , Edw rd D. b son Date Principal Planm6r City of Palm Springs CI TY OF PALM SPRINGS PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK City Council Meeting Date: April 21, 2010 Subject: Ordinance No. 1771 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I, Kathie Hart, CMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1771, adopted by the City Council on April 21, 2010, and a summary of said ordinance was published in the Desert Sun on May 1, 2010. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. �L4a9 Kathie Hart, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING 1, Kathie Hart, CMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of Ordinance No. 1771, and ordinance summary was posted at Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board and in the Office of the City Clerk on May 1, 2010. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1L Kathie Hart, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk The Desert Sun Certificate of Publication 750 N Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs,CA 92262 760-778-45781 Fax 760.778.4731 State Of California as: No1036 County of Riverside CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ORDINANCE No.17/1 AN ORDINANCE OF, THE CITY OF PALM SWRING,. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE Advertiser' 5.1082A ND-PDO 321 A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL POD AMENDM&`f FOR A POD IN LIEU OF A CHANGE OF ZdNE REVISING THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS/LEGALS PROJECLFROAM84 OONR$JON INDIVIDUAL UNITS PO BOX 2743 LOTS WITH UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT STAND- ARDS AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE SECTION PALM SPRINGS CA 922632 14 SPECIFIC PLAN TO PERMIT SINGLE FAMI- LY AREUAS ON AP IN PROXIMATELY 848 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENIDA CABALLEROS AND ALEJO ROAD 0 A 2000208051 P7hle M Seri,mnapq/merfardelyly In n n I14 88 KMmu Be uller)aad HR(RssldermaI ) rand uea era f end rBvisea a pr; approved' PO f In lieu d grange W on redup the de05F of the Irom HQ on s� a larcri/y antra, fw an �pro�l yy 8Aa acres parcel or rand Mcated at the aoul0eaeI tur- ner of AveMde Cabe Name aridA/sib lioad. I am over the age of 18 years old, a citizen of the United CERTIFICATION States and not a party to, or have interest In this matter. I hereby certify that the attached advertisement appeared STATE OF CALIFORNIACOUNTY OF LIFRIVE RBI H in said newspaper (set in type not smaller than non parlel) CITY OF PALM SPRINGS sa in each and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any I JAMES THOMPSON,CM Clark of the City of supplement thereof on the following dates,to wIe palm Springs Calilornlq,do arabyCertaythator- anance No.t771 is a tun,true and correct copy, and was kamtluoad at a regular meetl of the Porn_Spange City Counoll.on April 7 $, o,and Newspaper: .The Desert Sun ado at a rereggular mooting of the City Casn.if fist on AprII 21,2010,by the following vole; AYES; Ceuprlcilmember Mille Councilmember 5/1/2010 WeI% Maayyor Pro Ysm Hutcheson, NOES, None YPrPougnat.- ABSENr; Counalmember Foat ABSTAIN: Nate James Thompson,City Clerk City of Palm Springs,California Published:W1110 I acknowledge that I am a principal clerk of the printer of The Desert Sun, printed and published weekly in the City of Palm Springs, County of Riverside, State of California The Desert Sun was adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation on March 24, 1088 by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, Stale of California Case No, 101236. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. Executed on this 1st day of April, 2010in Palm Springs,California. Declarant Q7ti CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ORDINANCE NO. 1771 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE 5.1082 AMND — PDD 321 , A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PDD AMENDMENT, FOR A PDD IN LIEU OF A CHANGE OF ZONE, REVISING THE PROJECT FROM 84 CONDOMINIUM UNITS TO 53 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS WITH UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE SECTION 14 SPECIFIC PLAN TO PERMIT SINGLE FAMILY UNITS IN THE MBR AND HR LAND USE AREAS ON APPROXIMATELY 8.48 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENIDA CABALLEROS AND ALEJO ROAD City Attorney's Summary This Ordinance amends the Section 14 Specific Plan to permit single family units in the MBR (Residential Medium-Buffer) and HR (Residential High) land use areas and revises a previously approved PDD in lieu of change of zone, reducing the density of the project from 84 condominium units to 53 single family units, for an approximately 8.48 acres parcel of land located at the southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road, CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1771 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was introduced at a regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on April 7, 2010, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 21, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember Mills, Councilmember Weigel, Mayor Pro Tern Hutcheson, and Mayor Pougnet NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Foat ABSTAIN: None es Thompson, City Clerk — ity of Palm Springs, California. ORDINANCE NO. 1771 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE 5.1082 AMND — PDD 321, A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PDD AMENDMENT, FOR A PDD IN LIEU OF A CHANGE OF ZONE, REVISING THE PROJECT FROM 84 CONDOMINIUM UNITS TO 53 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS WITH UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE SECTION 14 SPECIFIC PLAN TO PERMIT SINGLE FAMILY UNITS IN THE MBR AND HR LAND USE AREAS ON APPROXIMATELY 8.48 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENIDA CABALLEROS AND ALEJO ROAD City Attomey's Summary This Ordinance amends the Section 14 Specific Plan to permit single family units in the MBR (Residential Medium-Buffer) and HR (Residential High) land use areas and revises a previously approved PDD in lieu of change of zone, reducing the density of the project from 84 condominium units to 53 single family units, for an approximately 8.48 acres parcel of land located at the southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road. WHEREAS, Nexus Development (O & M, LLC), ("Applicant') has filed an application with the City pursuant to Section 94.03.00(G) (Modification of Final Development Plan for a PDD) of the Zoning Code requesting approval for an amendment to a previously approved preliminary and final Planned Development District for a residential development on an approximately 8.5 acre parcel at the southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321 & TTM 34165 AMND was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2010, a public hearing on Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321 & TTM 34165 AMND was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the project has been determined to be a project subject to environmental analysis under CEQA; and WHEREAS, the original preliminary Planned Development District (Case 5.1082 PDD 321, TTM 34165) was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on March 8, 2006 and the PDD and TTM was reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 19, 2006, and Ordinance No. 1771 Page 2 WHEREAS, the original PDD 321 was approved with 84 condominium dwelling units with private streets and a common pool and recreation building on an approximately 8.48 acre site at the southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road, and WHEREAS, the amendment application for PDD 321 proposes a gated community of 53 single family attached and detached residential units on individual lots and private streets on an approximately 8.48 acre parcel, and WHEREAS, the amendment proposes to add single family homes as a permitted use in the MBR and HR land use areas in the Section 14 Specific Plan on an approximately 8.48 acre parcel at the southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road, and WHEREAS, the original Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 34165 was submitted as a single lot map for condominium purposes, and WHEREAS, the amended TTM 34165 is submitted as a subdivision map of 53 single family residential lots with common private streets and off-street parking areas, and WHEREAS, at said hearing on March 24, 2010, the Planning Commission, after carefully reviewing and considering all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented, certified the environmental analysis was an adequate assessment of the project's impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that with the mitigation measures proposed reduced any potentially significant impacts to less than significant and voted 4-2-1 to approve Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321 subject to conditions of approval, and recommended approval by the City Council of Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321 and Tentative Tract Map Amendment TTM 34165 AMND subject to conditions of approval, and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs to consider Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321 & TTM 34165 AMND was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2010, a public hearing on the amendment application was held by the City Council in accordance with applicable law, and WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the meeting on the project, including but not limited to the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City has prepared an environmental study and concluded that significant adverse impacts may occur as a result of the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project was previously adopted by Ordinance No, 1771 Page 3 the City Council on April 19, 2006- Pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the preparation of further environmental assessment is not necessary since the proposed amendment proposes a lower density project. The City has determined that the amendment proposes no additional impacts, and actually reduces potential impacts by proposing 31 fewer units. The project as amended could not, therefore, result in any new environmental impacts beyond those already identified and assessed in the adopted mitigated negative declaration. Section 2: Pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (E) "Planned Development Districts" of the Zoning Code, a Planned Development District (PDD) may be established in accordance with the procedures required by Section 94.02.00 "Conditional Use Permit". Furthermore, Section 94.03.00 (G) provides that Planned Development Districts may be modified by following the same procedure outlined in 94.02.00. Section 9.1.4 "Specific Plan Amendments"of the Section 14 Specific Plan provides that "Amendments to the Specific Plan require review and approval by the Palm Springs Planning Commission and the City Council; final approval rests with the Tribal Council." Findings are hereby made in support of the requested amendment to the previously approved Planned Development District#321 as follows: a. That the use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Zoning Code; The project proposes a development of 53 residential single family, detached and attached dwelling units. The PDD application requests revisions in the development standards of the Section 14 Specific Plan and the Zoning Code, including approval of single family residential units on these specific parcels located in the MBR and HR land use areas. The Zoning Code authorizes PDD's for residential uses and therefore the request is consistent with this finding. b. That the use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; The PDD proposes a development of 53 residential dwelling units on approximately 8.48 acres. The project site is zoned RGA(8), the General Plan and Specific Plan both denote residential land uses for these parcels. The proposed density of the project is less than the maximum permissible in the General Plan, Specific Plan and for the Zone. Providing Ordinance No. 1771 Page 4 a variety of residential unit types in walkable distance to downtown is desirable to invigorate and revitalize the downtown and uptown commercial areas. The project is therefore in harmony with the existing and future uses specifically permitted in the zone proposed. c. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate such use, including yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping and other features required in order to adjust such use to those existing or permitted future uses of land in the neighborhood; The site is approximately 8.48 acres in size. The project proposes 53 dwelling units at a density of approximately 6.25 du/ac, which is below the maximum allowable density for this zone. The Specific Plan requires special landscape frontages along Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road, to which the project design conforms. Although the SP prohibits single family residences (SFR's), the underlying RGA zone allows SFR's to the R-1-C standards (10,000 sf lots). The PDD amendment proposes to amend the SP to allow single family residences on lots averaging 5,683 square feet on these specific parcels in the HD and MBR land use areas. Thus if approved, the proposed amendment would be consistent with this finding. d. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use; The project proposes primary vehicular access to the public streets from a gated access drive off Avenida Caballeros. The access drive is provided with a turn-around to prevent cars from backing onto Caballeros. The General Plan requires this segment of Caballeros to be developed with landscape medians to control traffic flow, enhance safety and create an attractive streetscape. The entry to the development is in conflict with a recently installed landscape median and requires the median to be removed to provide an adequate southbound left-turn lane on Caballeros. The City recommended the entry drive be located further south to align with the existing entry drive into the Palomino residential development to the west for better traffic movement. This would allow some of the landscape median to be preserved while providing the necessary left-turn pocket in to the proposed development. This was rejected by the applicant. The traffic flow can be successfully accommodated with removal of the median island but the aesthetic goals of the General Plan and Specific Plan will not be achieved. A condition of approval is included to substitute the landscape medians for Section 14 Gateway elements, which provides an acceptable aesthetic alternative.. e. That the conditions to be imposed and shown on the approved Ordinance No. 1771 Page 5 site plan are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include minor modification of the zone's property development standards A draft set of conditions of approval are proposed in the attached Exhibit B. Section 3: The development standards for the individual lots in PDD AMND 321 are hereby revised and amended to be as shown in the attached Exhibit A Section 4: Pursuant to the City Council Policy dated September 17, 2008, there are no recognized "Public Benefits" proposed by the applicant or required by the City. Section 5. Pursuant to California Law, an ordinance was prepared for two readings before Council for the approval of amended PDD in lieu of a change of zone and a thirty-day waiting period before it is effective allowing the approval of Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321. Section 6. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after passage. Section 7. Publication: The City Clerk is hereby ordered to and directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance, and to cause the same or summary thereof or a display advertisement, duly prepared according to law, to be published in accordance with law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that, based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321, as the amended preliminary and final PDD for the subject project, subject to development standards set forth in Exhibit A and conditions set forth in Exhibit B. ADOPTED this 215t day of April, 2010. David H. Ready, City Manager ATTEST: James Thompson, City Clerk Ordinance No. 1771 Page 6 CERTIFICATION: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1771 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was introduced at a regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on April 7, 2010, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 21, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember Mills, Councilmember Weigel, Mayor Pro Tern Hutcheson, and Mayor Pougnet NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Foat ABSTAIN: None James Thompson, City Clerk City of Palm Springs, California Ordinance No. 1771 Page 7 EXHIBIT A PDD 321 AMND; TTM 34165 AMND - LOT AREAS, SETBACKS AND COVERAGE AREAS S.P. TABULATED PERCENTAGES__ SETBACKS&_YARDS Lot Li. LOT Lot Bldg Drive- Patio/ Cover- Drive- Open soap # Area Area Pool way Walks a e way Space a N'LY S'LY FLY MY 1 5758 1660 360 177 1627 32% 3% 68% 34% 4 3-- 7 h 3/° 70'Y° 31%v 4 -27f-- 2 5560 1660 360 177 1627 33 ...__�.,.___r_ _— ° ° 5 6 28 3 6163 1660 360 177 1627 30% 3% 73% 38% 4 5 7 27 4 7719 1661 360 177 1627 24% 2% 78% 50% 23 5 6 28 5 6414 1661 360 188 1072 29% 3% 74% 49% 28 6 ..5 -6,_.. 6 5882 1661 360 188 1134 31% 3% 72% 43%v 28 6 5 0 7 5833 1661 360 188 684 32% 3% 72"/° 50%m -28 6 5 4 8 5852 1661 360 188 1134 32% 3% 72% 43% 28 6 5 0 9 5809 1661 360 188 884 32% 3% 71% 50% 28 6 5 4 10 6120 1661 360 188 1072 30% 3% 73% 46% 27 6 5 0 11 6673 1662 360 71 1198 26% 1% 75% 51°/ 34 0 20 5 12 4953 1662 360 222 660 38% 4% 66% 41% 0 0 21 8 13 5547 1661 360 263 906 35% 5% 70% 42% 0 5 21 8 14 5710 1661 380 222 880 33% 4% 71%v 49% 5 0 20 8 15 5545 1661 360 263 906 35% 5% 70% 42% 0 5 21 8 16 1 5708 1 1661 360 222 660 33% 4% 71% 49% 5 0 20 8 17 5545 1 1661 360 263 906 35% 5% 70% 42% 0 5 21 8 18 5710 1 1661 360 222 660 33% 4% 71% 49% 5 0--��- --�-20 8 19 7418 1 1661 360 263 906 26% 4% 780 57% 0 20 21 8 20 6362 1 1661 360 188 1015 29% 3% 74%_ 49% 7 29 6 0 21 5939 1601 360 188 1015 31% 3% 72%v 48% _.._8 29 ......0 -4- - 22 5981 1661 360 168 1015 31% 3%v 72% 46% 7 29 5 0 23 5907 1661 360 188 1015 31% 3% 72% 45% 6 29 0 5 24 5950 1661 360 188 1015 31% 3% 72% 46% 6 29 5 1 0 25 6478 1661 360 188 1 1015 29% 3% 740/ 50% 6 28 0 5 26 7724 1660 360 177 1627 24% 2% 70% 50% 0 24 9 26 27_ 5582 1880_ 360 177 1827 33°1° 3% 70% 31% 4 0 7 � 26 28 6120 1660 360 177 1627 300 3% 73% 38% 0 5 7 27 29 6352 1660 360 177 1627 29% 3% 74% 40% 9 0 6 28 ................_ ...-......_ .._.._.._.. . % .... . 30 6085 186D 258 288 758 32°/v 5%v 73% 51% 16 17 5 17 31 5126 1660 258 180 743 38% 4% 68%v 45%v 10 20 5 11 32 5257 1660 258 .,. ..288•.. ....-..7.....�...,..._-...._..— -.-.5% 58 37% 5%v 68% 44% 16 17 5 11 33 5281 1 1660 258 288 758 37% 5% 69% 44% 16 17 5 11 34 5109 1 1660 258 180 743 36% 4% 68% 44% 10 20 5 11 35 5998 1660 258 288 758 32% 5% 72% 51% 16 17 5 -11 -_-- 36 5756 1660 258 353 773 35% 6% 11% 47% 4 20 5 4 37 4740 1600 258 407 773 44% 9% 65. 35%v 4 235 4 . . .... .___....._ -_.__ __. . . 38 4567 1660 258 353 773 44% 8% 64% 33% 4 20 5 9 39 4567 1660 258 353 773 44% 8% 640/. 33% 4 20 5 9 40 4745 1660 258 407 773 44% 9% 65% 35% 4 23 5 4 41 5219 1660 258 353 773 396/ 70/6 68% 42% 4 20 12 9 42 6092 1660 258 288 758 32% 50/6 73% 51% 16 17 5 17 43 5125 1660 258 180 743 360/6 4% 68% 45% 1 10 19 5 11 44 5256 1660 258 288 758 37% 5% 68% 44% 18 17 5 11 45 5280 1 1660 1 258 288 758 37% 5% 69% 44% 13 20 5 11 46 5089 1660 258 180 743 36% 4% 67% 44% 10 20 5 11 47 5998 1660 258 288 758 32% 5% 72% 51% 16 17 12 11 48 5756 1660 258 407 773 36% 7% 71% 46% 4 19 5 4 49 4747 1650 258 407 773 44% 9% 65% 35% 4 23 5 4 50 51, 4568 1660 258 407 773 45% 9% 64% 32% 4 19 5 9 .... ...----. ........ .._... _- 40-F - -. ... ._.... 8 1660 2587 773 45% 9% 64% 32% 4 19 5 9 52 4765 1660 258 344 765 42% 7% 65% 36% 4 23 5 9 _.................. .-.. _... .._......7_....._.__-....—.—_. ....._ .__ 53 5221 1660 258 4D7 773 40% 8°Ia 68%v 41%v 4. 19 1 12 9 Avg. 5683 Ttl 301225 88004 16032 13312 60652 EXHIBIT B Case 5.1082 AMND PDD 321 "Deland' a subdivision of 53 single family attached and detached residences, and TTM AMND 34165 Southeast corner of Avenida Caballeros and Alejo Road CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK