Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/7/2005 - STAFF REPORTS (4) � c N Rlaqi EO q9'V c.1 1F `P City Council Staff Report DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: CASE TTM33542 / 5.1038 PD-310 — AN APPLICATION BY VIA ESCUELA LAND PARTNERS, LLC FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 33542 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 310. THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP IS A ONE LOT CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.57 ACRES AND A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT TWELVE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS IN THE RESORT OVERLAY ZONE, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIA ESCUELA AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE C-1 AND R-3, SECTION 3, APN 504310035. FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Department of Planning Services SUMMARY The Planning Commission voted 6-0 (1 absent) at the July 13, 2005 meeting to recommend the City Council Order the filing of a Notice of Exemption and Approve Planned Development District 310 and approve Tentative Tract Map 33542 of approximately 1.57 acres into one lot condominium map, for residential condominium. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 33542 AND CASE NO. 5.1038 — PD310 FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A ONE LOT CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.57 ACRES AND A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT TWELVE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS IN THE RESORT OVERLAY ZONE, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIA ESCUELA AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE C-1 AND R-3, SECTION 3, APN 504310035 Item No. 1 . C . City Council Staff Report September 7, 2005 -- Page 2 BACKROUND: The Planning Commission met on June 22, 2005 and voted to restudy the proposed project. The Planning Commission was concerned about the building distance for the western structures, the eastern structures where acceptable because they were staggered. The Planning Commission was also concerned about the density, the drive isle looked too narrow. On July 10, 2005, the Architectural Advisory Committee reviewed the revised plans and may a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission met on July 13, 2005 and voted 6-0 to approve the project. The proposed project is a Tentative Tract Map to create a one lot condominium map for the construction of 12 residential condominiums within a Resort Overlay to the underlying C-1 and R-3 Zone designations. Per Section 92,12,01, the C-1 Zone allows multiple-family residential use, but must comply with the development standards of the R-3 Zone designation. The subject property is also subject to a Resort Overlay designation. The Resort Overlay designation is intended to provide for accommodations and services for visitors while guarding against the intrusion of competing land uses. The proposed project is to construct 12 residential condominiums and is subject to findings that the proposed use is compatible with its surroundings and that the subject property is not appropriate for other uses allowed by right within the underlying zone. In addition the Planning Commission shall not recommend approval of a residential development within the Resort Overlay unless it makes finding for the Conditional Use Permit Per Section 94.02.00 of the Zoning Ordinance, uses permitted by conditional use permit in an underlying zone district may be incorporated into the planned development district with the full force of a conditional use permit without requiring separate application for a conditional use permit. The proposed project revised the site layout to stagger the buildings, revised the internal circulation, and changed the color scheme. The proposed project did not reduce the number of units, for the applicant has indicated that a reduction in units will make the project not feasible. ADJACENT LAND USES, GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING: Adjacent land uses are the following: City Council Staff Report September 7, 2005 -- Page 3 General Zoning Land Uses Plan North H43/21, C-1, R-2, R-G- Via Escuela, Multiple-Family Residential, L6, L4 A(6), R-1-C Single-Family Residential Sout L4 R-3 Multiple-Family Residential h East H43/21 C-1 Palm Canyon Drive, Vacant, Hotel West L63/21, R-G-A(6) Multiple-Family Residential i ANALYSIS The General Plan designation is H43/21 (High Density Residential). This provides for a maximum density of 21 units per acre. The proposed project of 12 dwelling units is well under the maximum allowable density is for the site. The project proposes has the multiple-family residential within the C-1 portion of the property. The C-1 Zone allows multiple-family residential use, subject to the R-3 development standards, but the Planned Development District will define the development standards for the multiple-family residences. Staff has prepared a table that outlines the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance with the proposed development standards for the Planned Development District. Multiple Family Residential — R-3 Required Proposed Lot Area 20,000 square feet 68,424 square feet Lot Width 140 feet 197 to 335 feet Lot Depth 175 feet 232 to 291 feet Density 34 units (1 unit/2,000 square 12 units feet) Building 24 feet 23.5 feet Height Front Yard 25 feet 30 feet, except 10 (Major Thoroughfare) architectural columns at 28.5 feet Side Yard 24 feet along south property 10 feet line 20 feet along Via Escuela 16.5 feet Rear Yard 24 feet along west property 10.5 feet at building height of line. 12 feet 24 feet at building height of 23.5 feet Building 15 feet 11 to 13 feet for east Distance structures City Council Staff Report September 7, 2005 -- Page 4 15 feet for west structures Parking 24 covered 24 covered Requirements 3 guest parking 12 guest parking The proposed project will have access from Via Escuela and no access from North Palm Canyon Drive. Via Escuela is a fully improved street which has the capacity to carry the type and quantity of traffic anticipated by the proposed development. Therefore the proposed project will have minimal traffic impact. The proposed project meets and exceeds the parking requirements per Section 93.06.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. The multiple-family residences have 2 covered parking spaces and 1 guest parking space per unit. This exceeds the required parking of approximately 1.75 covered parking spaces and 0.25 guest parking space per unit. The proposed two-story elements for the condominiums are approximately 24 feet from the west property line, approximately 48 feet from the structures to the west, and approximately 72 feet from the two-story elements to the west. The proposed two-story elements are approximately 16 feet from the west property line and approximately 140 feet from the existing structures to the east. The proposed two-story elements are approximately 10 feet from the south property line and approximately 80 feet from the existing multiple-family residences. The proposed project has a maximum height of 23.5 feet. The visual impact to the surrounding properties will be minimal because of the distance and building height of the proposed project and the surrounding properties. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as the proposed project meets the conditions outlined for in-fill development projects. NOTIFICATION A public hearing notice was published in the Desert Sun newspaper. A public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within 400' of the project site. As of the writing of this report, staff has received no comments. City Council Staff Report September 7, 2005 -- Page 5 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Draft Resolution 3. Draft Conditions Of Approval (Exhibit A) 4. Copy of Planning Commission Report i aig A. wi g AICP David H. Ready, arty Manager Directo lannin S rvices RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 33542 AND CASE NO. 5.1038 — PD310 FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A ONE LOT CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.57 ACRES AND A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT TWELVE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS IN THE RESORT OVERLAY ZONE, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIA ESCUELA AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE C-1 AND R-3, SECTION 3, APN 504310035 WHEREAS, Via Escuela Land Partners, LLC ("Applicant') has filed an application with the City pursuant to Section 9.62 of the Municipal Code, Section 94.03.00 of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 92.25.00 of the Zoning Ordinance for a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development District to allow the construction of 12 residential condominiums in the Resort Overlay Zone, located at the southwest corner of Via Escuela and North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-1 and R-3, Section 3; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs to consider the application for Case 5.1038 PD-310 and TTM33542 was given in accordance with applicable law; and WEHERAS, the Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of multiple-family residential in the Resort Overlay has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission, subject to the City Council approval of the Planned Development District; and WHEREAS, on September 7, 2005, a public hearing on the project was held by the City Council in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds that, Tentative Tract Map 32806 is categorically exempt from environmental assessment per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 2: The proposed project has multiple-family residential within the C-1 portion of the property. The C-1 Zone allows multiple-family residential use, subject to the R-3 development standards. The multiple-family residential use in the C-1 Zone is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance for the use, but the Planned Development District will define the development standards for the multiple-family residences. The following table outlines the development standards for the single-family residences: Multiple Family Residential — R-3 Required Proposed Lot Area 20,000 square feet 68,424 square feet Lot Width 140 feet 197 to 335 feet Lot Depth 175 feet 232 to 291 feet Density 34 units (1 unit/2,000 12 units square feet) Building Height 24 feet 23.5 feet Front Yard 25 feet 30 feet, except 10 (Major Thoroughfare) architectural columns at 28.5 feet Side Yard 24 feet along south 10 feet* property line 20 feet along Via Escuela 16.5 feet* Rear Yard 24 feet along west 10.5 feet at building property line. height of 12 feet 24 feet at building height of 23.5 feet Building Distance 15 feet 10.5 to 13.5 feet* Parking 24 covered 24 covered Requirements 3 guest parking 12 guest parking Section 3: Pursuant to Section 92.25.00 of the Zoning Ordinance, the multiple-family residential land use is appropriate in the Resort Overlay subject to the following findings: and a. That the proposed use is compatible with its surroundings; The subject property is adequate in size and shape for the proposed multi-family and is surrounded by a mixture of hotel, commercial, single-family residences, and multiple-family residential properties. The proposed project is serviced by fully improved streets that have the capacity to carry the type and quantity of traffic expected to be generated. b. That the site in question is not appropriate for other uses allowed by right within the underlying zone; There is a shortage of housing in the City of Palm Springs and the proposed project would contribute to the housing supply for the City. The proposed project is desirable for the community and is in harmony with the Housing Element and objectives of the General Plan. Section 4: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474 (Subdivision Map Act), the City Council finds that with the incorporation of those conditions attached in Exhibit A: 1. The proposed Tentative Map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan designation for the site is H43/21, High Density Residential. The General Plan allows up to 32 dwelling units on the project site. The applicant is proposing 12 dwelling units. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The design of improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 the Planning Commission finds that the proposed subdivision and the provisions for its design and improvement are compatible with the objectives, polices, and general land uses and program provided in the City's General Plan. All street, drainage, and utilities improvements will be constructed to the standards of the General Plan and Conditions of Approval associated with TTM 32732. The Planned Development District development standards have been determined to be compatible with overall goals and policies of the General Plan in order to provide quality architecture, open space and distinctive landscape elements. Therefore it is concluded that the Planned Development District development standards and Conditions of Approval will not be in conflict with the overall intent of the General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development contemplated by the proposed subdivision. The project proposes the subdivision of approximately 1.57 acres into a one lot condominium map for the construction of 12 residential condominiums. The proposed development is under the maximum allowable density of 32 units, as permitted under the General Plan. The subject property is surrounded with a mix of single-family residential, multiple-family residential, hotel, and commercial uses and is consistent with the surrounding developed properties. 4. The design of the proposed subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The subject property is less than five acres and is surrounded by fully developed properties. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements must comply with the conditions of approval including, but not limited to, the application of the Uniform Building Code Seismic Safety Standards, and the City of Palm Springs Fugitive Dust Control Ordinance in order to ensure public health and safety. 6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The applicant will be required to construct on and off-site improvements. Therefore the design and the type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing the City Council hereby approval: (A) Order the filing of a Notice of Exemption; and (B) Approve Planned Development District 310 for: 1. A conditional use permit to allow the construction of 12 residential condominiums in the Resort Overlay Zone; and 2. Establish development standards for the 12 residential condominiums; and (C) Approve Tentative Tract Map 33542 of approximately 1.57 acres into a one lot condominium map, for 12 residential condominiums subject to the conditions in Exhibit A located at the southwest corner of Via Escuela and North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-1 and R-3, Section 3, APN 504310035. ADOPTED this 7th day of September 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA David H. Ready, City Manager ATTEST: I James Thompson, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE TTM33542 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CASE 5.1038 PD-310 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT VIA ESCUELA LAND PARTNERS, LLC SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIA ESCUELA AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the Director of Planning Services, the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief or their designee, depending on which department recommended the condition. Any agreements, easements or covenants required to be entered into shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. ADMINISTRATIVE 1. The proposed development of the premises shall conform to all applicable regulations of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, or any other City Codes, ordinances and resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations. 2. The owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Palm Springs, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City of Palm Springs, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or administrative officers concerning Case TTM33542 — Tentative Tract Map and Case 5.1038— Planned Development District 310. The City of Palm Springs will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs and the applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney.. If the City of Palm Springs fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Palm Springs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the applicant's consent but should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except, the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein. 3. That the property owner(s) and successors and assignees in interest shall maintain and repair the improvements including and without limitation sidewalks, bikeways, parkways, parking areas, landscape, irrigation, lighting, signs, walls, and fences between the curb and property line, including sidewalk or bikeway easement areas that extend onto private property, in a first class condition, free from waste and debris, and in accordance with all applicable law, rules, ordinances and regulations of all federal, state, and local bodies and agencies having jurisdiction at the property owner's sole expense. This condition shall be included in the recorded covenant agreement for the property if required by the City. 4. This project shall be subject to Chapters 2.24 and 3.37 of the Municipal Code regarding public art. The project shall either provide public art or payment of an in lieu fee. In the case of the in-lieu fee, the fee shall be based upon the total building permit valuation as calculated pursuant to the valuation table in the Uniform Building Code, the fee being 1/2% for commercial projects or 1/4% for residential projects with first $100,000 of total building permit valuation for individual single-family units exempt. Should the public art be located on the project site, said location shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning and the Public Arts Commission, and the property owner shall enter into a recorded agreement to maintain the art work and protect the public rights of access and viewing. 5. Pursuant to Park Fee Ordinance No. 1632 and in accordance with Government Code Section 66477 (Quimby Act), all residential development shall be required to contribute to mitigate park and recreation impacts such that, prior to issuance of residential building permits, a parkland fee or dedication shall be made. Accordingly, all residential development shall be subject to parkland dedication requirements and/or park improvement fees. The parkland mitigation amount shall be based upon the cost to acquire and fully improve parkland. The fee shall be collected by the Planning Services Department. 6. The Project will bring additional residents to the community. The City's existing public safety and recreation services, including police protection, criminal justice, fire protection and suppression, ambulance, paramedic, and other safety services and recreation, library, cultural services are near capacity. Accordingly, the City may determine to form a Community Services District under the authority of Government C. Section 53311 et seq, or other appropriate statutory or municipal authority. Developer agrees to support the formation of such assessment district and shall waive any right to protest, provided that the amount of such assessment shall be established through appropriate study and shall not exceed $500 annually with a consumer price index escalator. The district shall be formed prior to sale of any lots or a covenant agreement shall be recorded against each parcel, permitting incorporation of the parcel in the district. CC&R's 7. The applicant prior to issuance of building permits shall submit a draft declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CC&R's") to the Director of Planning Services for approval in a form to be approved by the City Attorney, to be recorded prior to approval of a final map. The CC&R's shall be enforceable by the City, shall not be amended without City approval, shall require maintenance of all property in a good condition and in accordance with all ordinances, 8. The applicant shall submit to the City of Palm Springs, a deposit in the amount of $2,000, for the review of the CC&R's by the City Attorney. A $250 filing fee shall also ' be paid to the City Planning Department for administrative review purposes. Cultural Resources 9. Prior to any ground disturbing activity, including clearing and grubbing, installation of utilities, and/or any construction related excavation, an Archaeologist qualified according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines, shall be employed to survey the area for the presence of cultural resources identifiable on the ground surface. 10.The project area has the possibility of buried resources. A Native American Monitor shall be present during all ground-disturbing activities. a) Experience has shown that there is always a possibility of buried cultural resources in a project area. Given that, a Native American Monitor(s) shall be present during all ground disturbing activities including clearing and grubbing, excavation, burial of utilities, planting of rooted plants, etc. Contact the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indian Cultural Office for additional information on the use and availability of Cultural Resource Monitors. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor shall contact the Director of Planning Services and after the consultation the Director shall have the authority to halt destructive construction and shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, the Qualified Archaeologist shall prepare a treatment plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and Agua Caliente Cultural Resource Coordinator for approval. b) Two copies of any cultural resource documentation generated in connection with this project, including reports of investigations, record search results and site records/updates shall be forwarded to the Tribal Planning, Building, and Engineering Department and one copy to the City Planning and Zoning Department prior to final inspection. Final Design 12. Final landscaping, irrigation, exterior lighting, and fencing plans shall be submitted for approval by the Department of Planning Services, Department of Public Works, and Department of Parks and Recreation, prior to issuance of a building permit. Landscape plans shall be approved by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's Office prior to submittal. All landscaping located within the public right of way or within community facilities districts must be approved by the Public Works Director and the Director of Parks and Recreation. 13. An exterior lighting plan in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Section 93.21.00, Outdoor Lighting Standards, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to the issuance of building permits. Manufacturer's cut sheets of all exterior lighting on the building and in the landscaping shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. If lights are proposed to be mounted on buildings, down-lights shall be utilized. No lighting of the hillside is permitted. GENERAL CONDITIONS/CODE REQUIREMENTS 14. The Planned Development District approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years. Extensions of time may be granted by the Planning Commission upon demonstration of good cause. 15. If the use of the subject property is ever changed, the City reserves the right to modify or revoke this Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Development District application. 16. The project is subject to the City of Palm Springs Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The applicant shall submit an application for Final Landscape Document Package to the Director of Planning and Zoning for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Refer to Chapter 8.60 of the Municipal Code for specific requirements. '17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Fugitive Dust and Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Building Official. Refer to Chapter 8.50 of the Municipal Code for specific requirements. 18. The grading plan shall show the disposition of all cut and fill materials. Limits of site disturbance shall be shown and all disturbed areas shall be fully restored or landscaped. 19. Separate architectural approval and permits shall be required for all signs. A detailed sign program shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. 20. All materials on the flat portions of the roof shall be earth tone in color. 21. All awnings shall be maintained and periodically cleaned. 22. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from all possible vantage points both existing and future per Section 9303.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. The screening shall be considered as an element of the overall design and must blend with the architectural design of the building(s). The exterior elevations and roof plans of the buildings shall indicate any fixtures or equipment to be located on the roof of the building, the equipment heights, and type of screening. Parapets shall be at least 6" above the equipment for the purpose of screening. 23. No exterior downspouts shall be permitted on any facade on the proposed building(s) which are visible from adjacent streets or residential and commercial areas. 24. Perimeter walls shall be designed, installed and maintained in compliance with the corner cutback requirements as required in Section 9302.00.D. I 25. The design, height, texture and color of building(s), fences and walls shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 26. The street address numbering/lettering shall not exceed eight inches in height. 27. Construction of any residential unit shall meet minimum soundproofing requirements prescribed pursuant to Section 1092 and related sections of Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. Compliance shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director of Building and Safety. 28. Submit plans meeting City standard for approval on the proposed trash and recyclable materials enclosure prior to issuance of a building permit. 29. Details of pool fencing (material and color) and equipment area shall be submitted with final landscape plan. 30. No sirens, outside paging or any type of signalization will be permitted, except approved alarm systems. 31. No outside storage of any kind shall be permitted except as approved as a part of the proposed plan. 32. Vehicles associated with the operation of the proposed development including company vehicles or employees vehicles shall not be permitted to park off the proposed building site unless a parking management plan has been approved. 33. Prior to the issuance of building permits, locations of all telephone and electrical boxes must be indicated on the building plans and must be completely screened and located in the interior of the building. Electrical transformers must be located toward the interior of the project maintaining a sufficient distance from the frontage(s) of the project. Said transformer(s) must be adequately and decoratively screened. 34. The applicant shall provide all tenants with Conditions of Approval of this project. 35. Standard parking spaces shall be 17 feet deep by 9 feet wide; handicap parking spaces shall be 18 feet deep by 9 feet wide plus a 8 foot walkway at the right side of the parking space and shall be designated as "van accessible". 36. Handicapped accessibility shall be indicated on the site plan to include the location of handicapped parking spaces, the main entrance to the proposed structure and the path of travel to the main entrance. Consideration shall be given to potential difficulties with the handicapped accessibility to the building due to the future grading plans for the property. 37. Curbs shall be installed at a minimum of five (5) feet from face of walls, fences, buildings, or other structures. Areas that are not part of the maneuvering area shall have curbs placed at a minimum of two (2) feet from the face of walls, fences or buildings adjoining driveways. 38. Parking lot light fixtures shall align with stall striping and shall be located two to three feet from curb face. 39. Islands of not less than 9 feet in width with a minimum of 6 feet of planter shall be provided every 10 parking spaces. Additional islands may be necessary to comply with shading requirements. 40. Shading requirements for parking lot areas as set forth in Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be met. Details to be provided with final landscape plan. 41. Parking stalls shall be delineated with a 4 to 6 inch double stripe - hairpin or elongated "U" design. Individual wheel stops shall be prohibited; a continuous 6" barrier curb shall provide wheel stops. 42. Concrete walks with a minimum width of two (2) feet shall be installed adjacent to end parking spaces or end spaces shall be increased to eleven (11) feet wide. 43. Tree wells shall be provided within the parking lot and shall have a planting area of six feet in diameter/width. 44. The development standards for the multiple-family residences are as follows: Multiple Family Residential — R-3 Required Proposed Lot Area 20,000 square feet 68,424 square feet Lot Width 140 feet 197 to 335 feet Lot Depth 175 feet 232 to 291 feet Density 34 units (1 unit/2,000 12 units square feet) Building Height 24 feet 23.5 feet Front Yard 25 feet 30 feet, except 10 (Major Thoroughfare) architectural columns at 28.5 feet Side Yard 24 feet along south 10 feet* _property line 20 feet along Via Escuela 16.5 feet* Rear Yard 24 feet along west property 10.5 feet at building line. height of 12 feet 24 feet at building height _ of 23.5 feet _Building Distance 15 feet 10.5 to 13.5 feet* Parking 24 covered 24 covered Requirements 3 guest parking 12 guest parking POLICE DEPARTMENT 45. Developer shall comply with Section II of Chapter 8.04 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 46. Prior to any construction on-site, all appropriate permits must be secured. FIRE DEPARTMENT 47. Shall comply with all Fire Department codes and regulations ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 'The Engineering Division recommends that if this application is approved, such approval is subject to the following conditions being completed in compliance with City standards and ordinances. Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. STREETS 48. Any improvements within the public right-of-way require a City of Palm Springs Encroachment Permit. 49. Applicant shall obtain State permits and approval of plans for all work done on State Highway 111. A copy of Caltrans requirements shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 50. NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE 51. Construct a 170-feet long by 12-feet wide bus turn out at the southwest corner of North Palm Canyon Drive and Via Escuela. Construction of a bus stop shelter shall be required, with a design compatible to project architecture as approved by Sunline Transit Agency and the Director of Planning Services. Bus stop furniture and other accessories, as required by Sunline Transit Agency, shall be provided by the developer. 52. Remove the existing curb returns at the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection of North Palm Canyon Drive and Via Escuela and construct new curb returns with spandrels in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 206. 53. Construct a 6 feet wide cross-gutter across the west side of the intersection of North Palm Canyon Drive at Via Escuela in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 200. 54. Check the operation of the irrigation and electrical lighting system for the existing palm trees located along the frontage of the property in consultation with the Parks and Recreation Department, and make necessary repairs as directed by the Director of Parks and Recreation. 155. All broken or off grade street improvements shall be repaired or replaced. VIA ESCUELA 56. Construct a 24 feet wide driveway approach in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 201. The centerline of the driveway approach shall be located approximately 88 feet west of the east property line as shown on the approved site plan. 57. The entry shall not be gated. Insufficient space is provided for safe turn-around of vehicles unable to enter the project. 58. Construct an 8 feet wide sidewalk behind the curb along the entire frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 210. 59., All broken or off grade street improvements shall be repaired or replaced. ON-SITE 60. All on-site private driveways, drive aisles, parking areas and other common access areas shall be constructed in accordance with the approved site plan. All drive aisles shall have a 24 feet minimum width. 61. Construct curbs, curb and gutter, and cross-gutters as necessary to accept and convey on-site stormwater runoff to on-site detention basins and/or parkways, in accordance with applicable City Standards. 62. Construct a minimum pavement section of 2'/z inches asphalt concrete pavement over 4 inches crushed miscellaneous base with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal, through the full width of the travel way (a minimum of 24 feet wide excluding the gutter at the centerline). If an alternative pavement section is proposed, the proposed pavement section shall be designed by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. 63. Parking shall be prohibited along the private street except for designated parking areas. SANITARY SEWER 64. All sanitary facilities shall be connected to the public sewer system. New laterals shall not be connected at manholes. 65. An on-site private sewer system shall collect sewage from the development and connect to the public sewer system in North Palm Canyon Drive. Sewer plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. Private on-site sewer mains shall conform to City sewer design standards. A profile view of the on-site private sewer mains are not necessary provided sufficient invert information is indicated on the plan view, including elevations with conflicting utility lines. Connection of the on-site private sewer system to the public sewer main shall be connected as a lateral and not to an existing manhole or with a new manhole. Plans for sewers other than the private mains, (i.e. building sewers and laterals from the buildings to the on-site private sewer mains), are subject to review and approval by the Building Division. 66. All on-site sewer systems shall be privately maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). Provisions for maintenance of the on-site sewer system acceptable to the City Engineer shall be included in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) required for this project. 67. A minimum 10 feet wide easement for sewer purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the benefit of the Home Owners Association across the southeast corner of the property, within the area designated for Unit 7, as necessary to facilitate construction of the on-site sewer system and connection to the public sewer main in North Palm Canyon Drive. GRADING 68. Submit a Precise Grading Plan prepared by a California registered Civil Engineer or qualified Architect to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The Precise Grading Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permit. j A Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall be prepared by the applicant and/or its grading contractor and submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The applicant and/or its grading contractor shall be required to comply with Chapter 8.50 of the City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, and shall be required to utilize one or more "Coachella Valley Best Available Control Measures" as identified in the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook for each fugitive dust source such that the applicable performance standards are met. The applicant's or its contractor's Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall be prepared by staff that has completed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Class. The applicant and/or its grading contractor shall provide the Engineering Division with current and valid Certificate(s) of Completion from AQMD for staff that have completed the required training. For information on attending a Fugitive Dust Control Class and information on the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook and related "PM10" Dust Control issues, please contact Elio Torrealba at AQMD at (909) 396-3752, or at etorrealba@AQMD.gov. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan, in conformance with the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook, shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division prior to approval of the Grading plan. The first submittal of the Grading Plan shall include the following information: a copy of final approved conformed copy of Conditions of Approval; a copy of a final approved conformed copy of the Site Plan; a copy of current Title Report; a copy of Soils Report; and a copy of the associated Hydrology Study/Report. 69. Drainage swales shall be provided adjacent to all curbs and sidewalks to keep nuisance water from entering the public streets, roadways, or gutters. "70. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit, issued from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Phone No. 760- 346-7491) is required for the proposed development. A copy of the executed permit shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to approval of a Grading Plan. 71. In accordance with City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, Section 8.50.025 (c), the developer shall post with the City a cash bond of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) per disturbed acre for mitigation measures for erosion/blowsand relating to this property and development. 72. A soils report prepared by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer shall be required for and incorporated as an integral part of the grading plan for the proposed development. A copy of the soils report shall be submitted to the Building Department and to the Engineering Division prior to approval of the Grading Plan. 73. In cooperation with the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner and the California Department of Food and Agriculture Red Imported Fire Ant Project, applicants for grading permits involving a grading plan and involving the export of soil will be required to present a clearance document from a Department of Food and Agriculture representative in the form of an approved "Notification of Intent To Move Soil From or Within Quarantined Areas of Orange, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties" (RIFA Form CA-1) prior to approval of the Grading Plan. The California Department of Food and Agriculture office is located at 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert (Phone: 760-776-8208). DRAINAGE 74. All stormwater runoff passing through the site shall be accepted and conveyed across the property in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. For all stormwater runoff falling on the site, on-site retention or other facilities approved by the City Engineer shall be required to contain the increased stormwater runoff generated by the development of the property. Provide a hydrology study to determine the volume of increased stormwater runoff due to development of the site, and to determine required stormwater runoff mitigation measures for the proposed development. Final retention basin sizing and other stormwater runoff mitigation measures shall be determined upon review and approval of the hydrology study by the City Engineer and may require redesign or changes to site configuration or layout consistent with the findings of the final hydrology study. No more than 40-50% of the street frontage parkway/setback areas should be designed as retention basins. On-site open space, in conjunction with dry wells and other subsurface drainage solutions should be considered as alternatives to using landscaped parkways for on-site retention. 75. Provisions for the interception of nuisance water from entering adjacent public streets from the project site shall be provided through the use of a minor storm drain system that collects and conveys nuisance water to landscape or parkway areas adjacent to North Palm Canyon Drive and Via Escuela, and in only a stormwater runoff condition, pass runoff directly to the streets through parkway or under sidewalk drains. I 76. The project is subject to flood control and drainage implementation fees. The acreage drainage fee at the present time is $6,511.00 per acre per Resolution No. 15189. Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 77. Easements for drainage purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the benefit of the Home Owners Association across the southeast corner of the property, within the area designated for Unit 7, as necessary to facilitate construction of the on-site drainage system with overflow to North Palm Canyon Drive. I GENERAL 78. Any utility trenches or other excavations within existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets required by the proposed development shall be backfilled and repaired in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 115. 79. All proposed utility lines shall be installed underground. 80. All existing utilities shall be shown on the grading plans. The existing and proposed service laterals shall be shown from the main line to the property line. 81. The original improvement plans prepared for the proposed development and approved by the City Engineer shall be documented with record drawing "as- built" information and returned to the Engineering Division prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Any modifications or changes to approved improvement plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to construction. 82. In accordance with Chapter 8.04.401 of the City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, all existing and proposed electrical lines of thirty-five thousand volts or less and overhead service drop conductors, and all gas, telephone, television cable service, and similar service wires or lines, which are on-site, abutting, and/or transecting, shall be installed underground unless specific restrictions are shown in General Orders 95 and 128 of the California Public Utilities Commission, and service requirements published by the utilities. A detailed plan approved by the owner(s) of the affected utilities depicting all above ground facilities in the area of the project to be undergrounded, shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to approval of any grading plan. The existing overhead utilities across the west property line meet the requirement to be installed underground. The developer is advised to investigate the nature of these utilities, the availability of undergrounding these utilities with respect to adjacent and off-site properties, and to present its case for a waiver of the Municipal Code requirement, if appropriate, to the Planning Commission and/or City Council as part of its review and approval of this project. If utility undergrounding is deferred in accordance with specific direction by the Planning Commission and/or City Council, the record property owner shall enter into a covenant agreeing to underground all of the existing overhead utilities required by the Municipal Code in the future upon request of the City of Palm Springs City Engineer at such time as deemed necessary. The covenant shall be executed and notarized by the property owner and submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. A current title report; or a copy of a current tax bill and a copy of a vesting grant deed shall be provided to verify current property ownership. A covenant preparation fee of $135 shall be paid by the developer prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. 83. Contact Whitewater Mutual Water Company to determine impacts to any existing water lines and other facilities that may be located within the property. Make appropriate arrangements to protect in place or relocate any existing Whitewater Mutual Water Company facilities that are impacted by the development. A letter of approval for relocated or adjusted facilities from Whitewater Mutual Water Company shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to issuance of a grading permit. 84. Nothing shall be constructed or planted in the corner cut-off area of any driveway which does or will exceed the height required to maintain an appropriate sight distance per City of Palm Springs Zoning Code Section 93.02.00, D. 85. All proposed trees within the public right-of-way and within 10 feet of the public sidewalk and/or curb shall have City approved deep root barriers installed per City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 904. MAP 86, A Final Map shall be prepared by a California registered Land Surveyor or qualified Civil Engineer and submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. A Title Report prepared for subdivision guarantee for the subject property, the traverse closures for the existing parcel and all lots created therefrom, and copies of record documents shall be submitted with the Final Map to the Engineering Division as part of the review of the Map. The Final Map shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits. 87. Easements for sewer and drainage purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the benefit of the Home Owners Association, as required by these conditions. TRAFFIC 88. All damaged, destroyed, or modified pavement legends and striping associated with the proposed development shall be replaced as required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. r 89. Install a 30 inch stop sign, stop bar, and "STOP" legend for traffic exiting the development onto Via Escuela in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing Nos. 620-625. 90, Construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be provided for on all projects as required by City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. As a minimum, all construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be in accordance with State of California, Department of Transportation, "Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones" dated 1996, or subsequent additions in force at the time of construction. 91. This property is subject to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee which shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. 92. A fair share contribution for the installation of a future traffic signal at the intersection of North Palm Canyon Drive and Via Escuela shall be made to the City, The amount has determined by the City Engineer from data provided in a traffic study prepared by George Dunn Engineering, revised December 11, 2003, and using estimated peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed development. The fair share contribution is $572. Payment shall be made prior to approval of a final map. I of23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plainer: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton DATE: JULY 13, 2005 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SERVICES CASE TTM33542 / 5.1038 PD-310 — AN APPLICATION BY VIA ESCUELA LAND PARTNERS, LLC FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 33542 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 310. THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP IS A ONE LOT CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.57 ACRES AND A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT TWELVE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS IN THE RESORT OVERLAY ZONE, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIA ESCUELA AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE C-1 AND R-3, SECTION 3, APN 504310035, RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: (A) Order the filing of a Notice of Exemption; and (B)Approve Planned Development District 310 for: 1. A conditional use permit to allow the construction of 12 residential condominiums in the Resort Overlay Zone; and 2. Establish development standards for the 12 residential condominiums; and (C)Approve Tentative Tract Map 33542 of approximately 1.57 acres into a one lot condominium map, for 12 residential condominiums; located at the southwest corner of Via Escuela and North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-1 and R-3, Section 3, APN 504310035. SUMMARY: The Planning Commission met on June 22, 2005 and voted to restudy the proposed project. The Planning Commission was concerned about the building distance for the western structures, the eastern structures where acceptable because they were staggered. The Planning Commission was also concerned about the density, the drive isle looked too narrow. The applicant has revised the site plan to achieve the 15 foot building distance for the western structures and has ensured a minimum of 24 feet of drive isle and 32 feet width between garages. On July 10, 2005, the Architectural Advisory Committee will review the revised plans. 2 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff planner: Matthew Peske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton BACKGROUND The proposed project is a Tentative Tract Map to create a one lot condominium map for the construction of 12 residential condominiums within a Resort Overlay to the underlying C-1 and R-3 Zone designations. IPer Section 92.12.01, the C-1 Zone allows multiple-family residential use, but must comply with the development standards of the R-3 Zone designation. The subject property has a Resort Overlay designation. The Resort Overlay designation is intended to provide for accommodations and services for visitors while guarding against the intrusion of competing land uses. The proposed project is to construct 12 residential condominiums therefore, the proposed project is subject to the Planning Commission making findings that the proposed use is compatible with its surroundings and that the subject property is not appropriate for other uses allowed by right within the underlying zone. The Planning Commission shall not recommend approval of a residential development within the Resort Overlay unless it makes finding for the Conditional Use Permit Per Section 94.02.00 of the Zoning Ordinance: uses permitted by conditional use permit in an underlying zone district may be incorporated into the planned development district with the full force of a conditional use permit without requiring separate application for a conditional use permit. The Architectural Advisory Committee reviewed this project on March 21, 2005 and recommended restudy of the project. The concern was the site layout, that the proposed project seemed to be too dense and the structures too close together. The AAC wanted to see the structures on the west side of the property staggered like those on the east side of the property. The AAC recommended removing 2 of the structures to give more space between the buildings and change the color scheme. The AAC was also concerned about the front entry of the garages, they suggested that some of the garages have side entrance. The proposed project revised the site layout to stagger the buildings, revised the internal circulation, and changed the color scheme. The proposed project did not reduce the number of units, for the applicant has indicated that a reduction in units will make the project not feasible.. The Architectural Advisory Committee reviewed the revised site plan on April 25, 2005. The AAC approved the architecture and landscape. However the AAC recommended a restudy of the building distance. The AAC asked the applicant to remove 1 or 2 buildings to create a greater distance between the buildings. The applicant has indicated that the removal of 1 or 2 units will make the project not feasible. The applicant also indicated that with the Architectural Advisory Committee 3 of23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton approving the architecture, landscape, and colors; that they would like to proceed to Planning Commission. ADJACENT LAND USES, GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING: Adjacent land uses are the following: General Zoning Land Uses Plan North H43/21, C-1, R-2, R-G- Via Escuela, Multiple-Family Residential, L6, L4 A(6), R-1-C Single-Family Residential South L4 R-3 Multiple-Family Residential East H43/21 C-1 Palm Canyon Drive, Vacant, Hotel West L6 3/21, R-G-A(6) Multiple-Family Residential ANALYSIS The General Plan designation is H43/21 (High Density Residential). This provides for a maximum density of 21 units per acre. The proposed project is under density at 12 dwelling units (or 38% of allowed density) because allowable density is 32 dwelling units. The proposed project has the multiple-family residential within the C-1 portion of the property. The C-1 Zone allows multiple-family residential use, subject to the R-3 development standards. The multiple-family residential use in the C-1 Zone is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance for the use, but the Planned Development District will define the development standards for the multiple-family residences. Staff has prepared a table that outlines the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance with the proposed development standards for the Planned Development District, Multiple Family Residential — R-3 _ Required Proposed Lot Area 20,000 square feet 68,424 square feet Lot Width 140 feet 197 to 335 feet Lot Depth 175 feet 232 to 291 feet_ Densit 34 units 1 unit/2,000 s uare feet 12 units Building Height 24 feet 23.5 feet Front Yard 25 feet 30 feet, except 10 architectural (Major Thoroughfare) columns at 28.5 feet Side Yard 24 feet along south property 10 feet* line 20 feet along Via Escuela 16.5 feet* Rear Yard 24 feet along west property 10.5 feet at building height of 4 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton line. 12 feet 24 feet at building height of 23.5 feet Building 15 feet 11 to 13 feet for east Distance structures 15 feet for west structures Parking 24 covered 24 covered Requirements 3 guest parking 12 guest parking The proposed project will have access from Via Escuela and no access from North Palm Canyon Drive. Via Escuela is a fully improved street which has the capacity to carry the type and quantity of traffic anticipated by the proposed development. Therefore the proposed project will have minimal traffic impact. The proposed project meets and exceeds the parking requirements per Section 93.06.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. The multiple-family residences have 2 covered parking spaces and 1 guest parking space per unit. This exceeds the required parking of approximately 1.75 covered parking spaces and 0,25 guest parking space per unit. The proposed two-story elements for the condominiums are approximately 24 feet from the west property line, approximately 48 feet from the structures to the west, and approximately 72 feet from the two-story elements to the west. The proposed two-story elements are approximately 16 feet from the west property line and approximately 140 feet from the existing structures to the east. The proposed two-story elements are approximately 10 feet from the south property line and approximately 80 feet from the existing multiple-family residences. The proposed project has a maximum height of 23.5 feet. The visual impact to the surrounding properties will be minimal because of the distance and building height of the proposed project and the surrounding properties. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), whereas the proposed project meets the conditions outlined for in-fill development projects. NOTIFICATION A public hearing notice was published in the Desert Sun newspaper. A public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within 400' of the project site. As of the writing of this report, staff has received no comments. 5 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plainer: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton G Dire or of Planning Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Draft Resolution 3. Draft Conditions Of Approval (Exhibit A) 4. Copy of Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 5. Notice of Availability 6. Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feslce TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton RESOLUTION NO. j OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 33542 AND CASE NO. 5.1038 — PD310, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT A FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A ONE LOT CONDOMINIUM MAP OF APPROXIMATELY 1.57 ACRES AND A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT TWELVE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS IN THE RESORT OVERLAY ZONE, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIA ESCUELA AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE C-1 AND R-3, SECTION 3, APN 504310035 WHEREAS, Via Escuela Land Partners, LLC ("Applicant') has filed an application with the City pursuant to Section 9.62 of the Municipal Code, Section 94.03.00 of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 92.25.00 of the Zoning Ordinance for a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development District to allow the construction of 12 residential condominiums in the Resort Overlay Zone, located at the southwest corner of Via Escuela and North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-1 and R- 3, Section 3; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider the application for Case 5.1038 PD-310 and TTM33542 was given in accordance with applicable law; and WEHERAS, the Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of multiple-family residential in the Resort Overlay has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission, subject to the City Council approval of the Planned Development District; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2005, a public hearing on the project was held by the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission voted to restudy the ; and WHEREAS, on July 13, 2005, a public hearing on the project was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds that, Tentative Tract Map 32806 is categorically exempt from environmental assessment per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 7 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plarmer: Matthew Peske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton Section 2: The proposed project has multiple-family residential within the C-1 portion of the properly. The C-1 Zone allows multiple-family residential use, subject to the R-3 development standards. The multiple-family residential use in the C-1 Zone is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance for the use, but the Planned Development District will define the development standards for the multiple-family residences. The following table outlines the development standards for the single-family residences: Multiple Family Residential — R-3 Required Proposed Lot Area 20,000 square feet 68,424 square feet _Lot Width 140 feet 197 to 335 feet Lot Depth 175 feet 232 to 291 feet Density 34 units (1 unit/2,000 12 units square feet) _Building Height 24 feet 23.5 feet Front Yard 25 feet 30 feet, except 10 (Major Thoroughfare) architectural columns at 28.5 feet Side Yard 24 feet along south 10 feet* property line 20 feet along Via Escuela 16.5 feet* Rear Yard 24 feet along west 10.5 feet at building property line. height of 12 feet 24 feet at building height of 23.5 feet Building Distance 15 feet 11 to 13 feet* for the east structures 15 feet for the west structures tParkingLRequirements 24 covered 24 covered 3 uest arking 12 guest parking Section 3: Pursuant to Section 92.25.00 of the Zoning Ordinance, the multiple-family residential land use is appropriate in the Resort Overlay subject to the following findings: and a. That the proposed use is compatible with its surroundings; The subject property is adequate in size and shape for the proposed multi- family and is surrounded by a mixture of hotel, commercial, single-family residences, and multiple-family residential properties. The proposed project is serviced by fully improved streets that have the capacity to carry the type and quantity of traffic expected to be generated. 8 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5,1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton b. That the site in question is not appropriate for other uses allowed by right within the underlying zone; i There is a shortage of housing in the City of Palm Springs and the proposed i project would contribute to the housing supply for the City. The proposed project is desirable for the community and is in harmony with the Housing i Element and objectives of the General Plan. Section 4: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474 (Subdivision Map Act), the Planning Commission finds that with the incorporation of those conditions attached in Exhibit A: 1. The proposed Tentative Map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan designation for the site is H43/21, High Density Residential. The General Plan allows up to 32 dwelling units on the project site. The applicant is proposing 12 dwelling units. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The design of improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 the Planning Commission finds that the proposed subdivision and the provisions for its design and improvement are compatible with the objectives, polices, and general land uses and program provided in the City's General Plan. All street, drainage, and utilities improvements will be constructed to the standards of the General Plan and Conditions of Approval associated with TTM 32732. The Planned Development District development standards have been determined to be compatible with overall'goals and policies of the General Plan in order to provide quality architecture, open space and distinctive landscape elements. Therefore it is concluded that the Planned Development District development standards and Conditions of Approval will not be in conflict with the overall intent of the General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development contemplated by the proposed subdivision. The project proposes the subdivision of approximately 1.57 acres into a one lot condominium map for the construction of 12 residential condominiums. The proposed development is under the maximum allowable density of 32 units, as permitted under the General Plan. The subject property is surrounded with a mix 9 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feslce TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton of single-family residential, multiple-family residential, hotel, and commercial uses and is consistent with the surrounding developed properties. I4. The design of the proposed subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and I unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The subject property is less than five acres and is surrounded by fully developed properties. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements must comply with the conditions of approval including, but not limited to, the application of the Uniform Building Code Seismic Safety Standards, and the City of Palm Springs Fugitive Dust Control Ordinance in order to ensure public health and safety. 6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The applicant will be required to construct on and off-site improvements. Therefore the design and the type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing the Planning Commission hereby: (A)Order the filing of a Notice of Exemption; and (B) Approve Planned Development District 310 for: 1. A conditional use permit to allow the construction of 12 residential condominiums in the Resort Overlay Zone; and 2. Establish development standards for the 12 residential condominiums; and (C)Approve Tentative Tract Map 33542 of approximately 1.57 acres into a one lot condominium map, for 12 residential condominiums; ADOPTED this 13th day of July 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 10 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plauier: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA I Planning Commission Chairperson Planning Commission Secretary 11 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton I EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE TTM33542 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CASE 5.1038 PD-310 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT VIA ESCUELA LAND PARTNERS, LLC SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIA ESCUELA AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE I JULY 13, 2005 Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the Director of Planning Services, the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief or their designee, depending on which department recommended the condition. Any agreements, easements or covenants required to be entered into shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. ADMINISTRATIVE 1. The proposed development of the premises shall conform to all applicable regulations of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, or any other City Codes, ordinances and resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations. 2. The owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Palm Springs, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City of Palm Springs, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or administrative officers concerning Case TTM33542 — Tentative Tract Map and Case 5.1038— Planned Development District 310. The City of Palm Springs will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs and the applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney. If the City of Palm Springs fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Palm Springs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the applicant's consent but should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except, the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein. 3. That the property owner(s) and successors and assignees in interest shall maintain and repair the improvements including and without limitation sidewalks, bikeways, parkways, parking areas, landscape, irrigation, lighting, signs, walls, and fences between the curb and 12 of 23 Application Complete: 3118105 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton property line, including sidewalk or bikeway easement areas that extend onto private property, in a first class condition, free from waste and debris, and in accordance with all applicable law, rules, ordinances and regulations of all federal, state, and local bodies and agencies having jurisdiction at the property owner's sole expense. This condition shall be included in the recorded covenant agreement for the property if required by the City. 4. This project shall be subject to Chapters 2.24 and 3.37 of the Municipal Code regarding public art. The project shall either provide public art or payment of an in lieu fee. In the case of the in-lieu fee, the fee shall be based upon the total building permit valuation as calculated pursuant to the valuation table in the Uniform Building Code, the fee being 1/2% for commercial projects or 1/4% for residential projects with first $100,000 of total building permit valuation for individual single-family units exempt. Should the public art be located on the project site, said location shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning and the Public Arts Commission, and the property owner shall enter into a recorded agreement to maintain the art work and protect the public rights of access and viewing. 5. Pursuant to Park Fee Ordinance No. 1632 and in accordance with Government Code Section 66477 (Quimby Act), all residential development shall be required to contribute to mitigate park and recreation impacts such that, prior to issuance of residential building permits, a parkland fee or dedication shall be made. Accordingly, all residential development shall be subject to parkland dedication requirements and/or park improvement fees. The parkland mitigation amount shall be based upon the cost to acquire and fully improve parkland. The fee shall be collected by the Planning Services Department. 6. The Project will bring additional residents to the community. The City's existing public safety and recreation services, including police protection, criminal justice, fire protection and suppression, ambulance, paramedic, and other safety services and recreation, library, cultural services are near capacity. Accordingly, the City may determine to form a Community Services District under the authority of Government C. Section 53311 et seq, or other appropriate statutory or municipal authority. Developer agrees to support the formation of such assessment district and shall waive any right to protest, provided that the amount of such assessment shall be established through appropriate study and shall not exceed $500 annually with a consumer price index escalator. The district shall be formed prior to sale of any lots or a covenant agreement shall be recorded against each parcel, permitting incorporation of the parcel in the district. CC&R's 7. The applicant prior to issuance of building permits shall submit a draft declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CC&R's") to the Director of Planning Services for approval in a form to be approved by the City Attorney, to be recorded prior to approval of a final map. The CC&R's shall be enforceable by the City, shall not be amended without City approval, shall require maintenance of all property in a good condition and in accordance with all ordinances, 13 of 23 Application Con7plete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plamier: Matthew Pestce TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton 8. The applicant shall submit to the City of Palm Springs, a deposit in the amount of $2,000, for the review of the CC&R's by the City Attorney. A $250 filing fee shall also be paid to the City Planning Department for administrative review purposes. Cultural Resources 9. Prior to any ground disturbing activity, including clearing and grubbing, installation of utilities, and/or any construction related excavation, an Archaeologist qualified according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines, shall be employed to survey the area for the presence of cultural resources identifiable on the ground surface. 10. The project area has the possibility of buried resources. A Native American Monitor shall be present during all ground-disturbing activities. a) Experience has shown that there is always a possibility of buried cultural resources in a project area. Given that, a Native American Monitor(s) shall be present during all ground disturbing activities including clearing and grubbing, excavation, burial of utilities, planting of rooted plants, etc. Contact the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indian Cultural Office for additional information on the use and availability of Cultural Resource Monitors. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor shall contact the Director of Planning Services and after the consultation the Director shall have the authority to halt destructive construction and shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, the Qualified Archaeologist shall prepare a treatment plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and Agua Caliente Cultural Resource Coordinator for approval. b) Two copies of any cultural resource documentation generated in connection with this project, including reports of investigations, record search results and site records/updates shall be forwarded to the Tribal Planning, Building, and Engineering Department and one copy to the City Planning and Zoning Department prior to final inspection. Final Design 12. Final landscaping, irrigation, exterior lighting, and fencing plans shall be submitted for approval by the Department of Planning Services, Department of Public Works, and Department of Parks and Recreation, prior to issuance of a building permit. Landscape plans shall be approved by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's Office prior to submittal. All landscaping located within the public right of way or within community facilities districts must be approved by the Public Works Director and the Director of Parks and Recreation. 13. An exterior lighting plan in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Section 93.21.00, Outdoor Lighting Standards, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to the issuance of building permits. Manufacturer's cut sheets of i 14 of23 Application Coinplete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plamler: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton all exterior lighting on the building and in the landscaping shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. If lights are proposed to be mounted on buildings, down-lights shall be utilized. No lighting of the hillside is permitted. GENERAL CONDITIONS/CODE REQUIREMENTS 14. The Planned Development District approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years. Extensions of time may be granted by the Planning Commission upon demonstration of good cause. 15. If the use of the subject property is ever changed, the City reserves the right to modify or revoke this Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Development District application. 16. The project is subject to the City of Palm Springs Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The applicant shall submit an application for Final Landscape Document Package to the Director of Planning and Zoning for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Refer to Chapter 8.60 of the Municipal Code for specific requirements. 17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Fugitive Dust and Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Building Official. Refer to Chapter 8.50 of the Municipal Code for specific requirements. 18. The grading plan shall show the disposition of all cut and fill materials. Limits of site disturbance shall be shown and all disturbed areas shall be fully restored or landscaped. '19. Separate architectural approval and permits shall be required for all signs. A detailed sign program shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. 20. All materials on the flat portions of the roof shall be earth tone in color. 21. All awnings shall be maintained and periodically cleaned. 22. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from all possible vantage points both existing and future per Section 9303.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. The screening shall be considered as an element of the overall design and must blend with the architectural design of the building(s). The exterior elevations and roof plans of the buildings shall indicate any fixtures or equipment to be located on the roof of the building, the equipment heights, and type of screening. Parapets shall be at least 6" above the equipment for the purpose of screening. 2I3. No exterior downspouts shall be permitted on any facade on the proposed building(s) which are visible from adjacent streets or residential and commercial areas. 24. Perimeter walls shall be designed, installed and maintained in compliance with the corner cutback requirements as required in Section 9302.00.D. 15 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plazmer: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton 25. The design, height, texture and color of building(s), fences and walls shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 26. The street address numbering/lettering shall not exceed eight inches in height. 27. Construction of any residential unit shall meet minimum soundproofing requirements prescribed pursuant to Section 1092 and related sections of Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. Compliance shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director of Building and Safety. 28. Submit plans meeting City standard for approval on the proposed trash and recyclable materials enclosure prior to issuance of a building permit. 29. Details of pool fencing (material and color) and equipment area shall be submitted with final landscape plan. 30. No sirens, outside paging or any type of signalization will be permitted, except approved alarm systems. 31. No outside storage of any kind shall be permitted except as approved as a part of the proposed plan. 32. Vehicles associated with the operation of the proposed development including company vehicles or employees vehicles shall not be permitted to park off the proposed building site unless a parking management plan has been approved. 33. Prior to the issuance of building permits, locations of all telephone and electrical boxes must be indicated on the building plans and must be completely screened and located in the interior of the building. Electrical transformers must be located toward the interior of the project maintaining a sufficient distance from the frontage(s) of the project. Said transformer(s) must be adequately and decoratively screened. 34. The applicant shall provide all tenants with Conditions of Approval of this project. 35. Standard parking spaces shall be 17 feet deep by 9 feet wide; handicap parking spaces shall be 18 feet deep by 9 feet wide plus a 8 foot walkway at the right side of the parking space and shall be designated as "van accessible". 36. Handicapped accessibility shall be indicated on the site plan to include the location of handicapped parking spaces, the main entrance to the proposed structure and the path of travel to the main entrance. Consideration shall be given to potential difficulties with the handicapped accessibility to the building due to the future grading plans for the property. 16 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plamier: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton i 37. Curbs shall be installed at a minimum of five (5) feet from face of walls, fences, buildings, or other structures. Areas that are not part of the maneuvering area shall have curbs placed at a minimum of two (2) feet from the face of walls, fences or buildings adjoining driveways. 38. Parking lot light fixtures shall align with stall striping and shall be located two to three feet from curb face. 39. Islands of not less than 9 feet in width with a minimum of 6 feet of planter shall be provided every 10 parking spaces. Additional islands may be necessary to comply with shading requirements. 40. Shading requirements for parking lot areas as set forth in Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be met. Details to be provided with final landscape plan. 41. Parking stalls shall be delineated with a 4 to 6 inch double stripe - hairpin or elongated "U" design. Individual wheel stops shall be prohibited; a continuous 6" barrier curb shall provide wheel stops. 42. Concrete walks with a minimum width of two (2) feet shall be installed adjacent to end parking spaces or end spaces shall be increased to eleven (11)feet wide. 43. Tree wells shall be provided within the parking lot and shall have a planting area of six feet in diameter/width. 44. The development standards for the multiple-family residences are as follows: Multiple Family Residential — R-3 Required Proposed Lot Area 20,000 square feet 68,424 square feet Lot Width 140 feet 197 to 335 feet Lot Depth 175 feet 232 to 291 feet Density 34 units (1 unit/2,000 square 12 units feet) Buildin Height 24 feet 23.5 feet Front Yard 25 feet 30 feet, except 10 (Major Thoroughfare) architectural columns at 28.5 feet Side—Yardr24 feet along south 10 feet* property line _ 20 feet along Via Escuela 16.5 feet" Rear Yard 24 feet along west property 10.5 feet at building line. height of 12 feet 24 feet at building height of 23.5 feet Building Distance 15 feet 11 to 13 feet for east 17 of 23 Application Coinplete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton structures 15 feet for west structures Parkin Re uirements 24 covered 24 covered 3 guest parking 12 guest parking POLICE DEPARTMENT 45. Developer shall comply with Section II of Chapter 8.04 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 46. Prior to any construction on-site, all appropriate permits must be secured. FIRE DEPARTMENT 47. Shall comply with all Fire Department codes and regulations ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The Engineering Division recommends that if this application is approved, such approval is subject to the following conditions being completed in compliance with City standards and ordinances. Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. STREETS 48. Any improvements within the public right-of-way require a City of Palm Springs Encroachment Permit. 49. Applicant shall obtain State permits and approval of plans for all work done on State Highway 111. A copy of Caltrans requirements shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 50. NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE 51. Construct a 170-feet long by 12-feet wide bus turn out at the southwest corner of North Palm Canyon Drive and Via Escuela. Construction of a bus stop shelter shall be required, with a design compatible to project architecture as approved by Sunline Transit Agency and the Director of Planning Services. Bus stop furniture and other accessories, as required by Sunline Transit Agency, shall be provided by the developer. 52. Remove the existing curb returns at the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection of North Palm Canyon Drive and Via Escuela and construct new curb 18 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton I returns with spandrels in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 206. 53. Construct a 6 feet wide cross-gutter across the west side of the intersection of North Palm Canyon Drive at Via Escuela in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 200. 54. Check the operation of the irrigation and electrical lighting system for the existing palm trees located along the frontage of the property in consultation with the Parks and Recreation Department, and make necessary repairs as directed by the Director of Parks and Recreation. 55. All broken or off grade street improvements shall be repaired or replaced. VIA ESCUELA 56, Construct a 24 feet wide driveway approach in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 201. The centerline of the driveway approach shall be located approximately 88 feet west of the east property line as shown on the approved site plan. 57. The entry shall not be gated. Insufficient space is provided for safe turn-around of vehicles unable to enter the project. 58. Construct an 8 feet wide sidewalk behind the curb along the entire frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 210. 59. All broken or off grade street improvements shall be repaired or replaced. ON-SITE 60. All on-site private driveways, drive aisles, parking areas and other common access areas shall be constructed in accordance with the approved site plan. All drive aisles shall have a 24 feet minimum width. 61. Construct curbs, curb and gutter, and cross-gutters as necessary to accept and convey on-site stormwater runoff to on-site detention basins and/or parkways, in accordance with applicable City Standards. 62. Construct a minimum pavement section of 2'/z inches asphalt concrete pavement over 4 inches crushed miscellaneous base with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal, through the full width of the travel way (a minimum of 24 feet wide excluding the gutter at the centerline). If an alternative pavement section is proposed, the proposed pavement section shall be designed by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. 19 of 23 Application Coinplete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton 63. Parking shall be prohibited along the private street except for designated parking areas. SANITARY SEWER 64, All sanitary facilities shall be connected to the public sewer system. New laterals shall not be connected at manholes. 65. An on-site private sewer system shall collect sewage from the development and connect to the public sewer system in North Palm Canyon Drive. Sewer plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. Private on-site sewer mains shall conform to City sewer design standards. A profile view of the on-site private sewer mains are not necessary provided sufficient invert information is indicated on the plan view, including elevations with conflicting utility lines. Connection of the on-site private sewer system to the public sewer main shall be connected as a lateral and not to an existing manhole or with a new manhole. Plans for sewers other than the private mains, (i.e. building sewers and laterals from the buildings to the on-site private sewer mains), are subject to review and approval by the Building Division. 66. All on-site sewer systems shall be privately maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). Provisions for maintenance of the on-site sewer system acceptable to the City Engineer shall be included in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) required for this project. 67. A minimum 10 feet wide easement for sewer purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the benefit of the Home Owners Association across the southeast corner of the property, within the area designated for Unit 7, as necessary to facilitate construction of the on-site sewer system and connection to the public sewer main in North Palm Canyon Drive. GRADING 68. Submit a Precise Grading Plan prepared by a California registered Civil Engineer or qualified Architect to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The Precise Grading Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permit. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall be prepared by the applicant and/or its grading contractor and submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The applicant and/or its grading contractor shall be required to comply with Chapter 8.50 of the City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, and shall be required to utilize one or more "Coachella Valley Best Available Control Measures" as identified in the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook for each fugitive dust source such that the applicable performance standards are met. The applicant's or its contractor's Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall be prepared by staff that has completed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Class. The applicant and/or its grading contractor shall provide the Engineering Division with current and valid Certificate(s) of Completion from AQMD for staff that have completed the 20 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plarmer: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton required training. For information on attending a Fugitive Dust Control Class and I information on the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook and related "PM10" Dust Control issues, please contact Elio Torrealba at AQMD at (909) 396-3752, or at etorrealba@AQMD.gov. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan, in conformance with the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook, shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division prior to approval of the Grading plan. The first submittal of the Grading Plan shall include the following information: a copy of final approved conformed copy of Conditions of Approval; a copy of a final approved conformed copy of the Site Plan; a copy of current Title Report; a copy of Soils Report; and a copy of the associated Hydrology Study/Report. 66. Drainage swales shall be provided adjacent to all curbs and sidewalks to keep nuisance water from entering the public streets, roadways, or gutters. 70. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit, issued from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Phone No. 760-346-7491) is required for the proposed development. A copy of the executed permit shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to approval of a Grading Plan. 71. In accordance with City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, Section 8.50.025 (c), the developer shall post with the City a cash bond of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) per disturbed acre for mitigation measures for erosion/blowsand relating to this property and development. 72. A soils report prepared by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer shall be required for and incorporated as an integral part of the grading plan for the proposed development. A copy of the soils report shall be submitted to the Building Department and to the Engineering Division prior to approval of the Grading Plan. 73. In cooperation with the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner and the California Department of Food and Agriculture Red Imported Fire Ant Project, applicants for grading permits involving a grading plan and involving the export of soil will be required to present a clearance document from a Department of Food and Agriculture representative in the form of an approved "Notification of Intent To Move Soil From or Within Quarantined Areas of Orange, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties" (RIFA Form CA-1) prior to approval of the Grading Plan. The California Department of Food and Agriculture office is located at 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert (Phone: 760-776- 8208). DRAINAGE 74. All stormwater runoff passing through the site shall be accepted and conveyed across the property in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. For all stormwater runoff falling on the site, on-site retention or other facilities approved by the City Engineer shall be required to contain the increased stormwater runoff generated by the development of 21 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planrier: Matthew Peske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton the property. Provide a hydrology study to determine the volume of increased stormwater runoff due to development of the site, and to determine required stormwater runoff mitigation measures for the proposed development. Final retention basin sizing and other stormwater runoff mitigation measures shall be determined upon review and approval of the hydrology study by the City Engineer and may require redesign or ' changes to site configuration or layout consistent with the findings of the final hydrology study. No more than 40-50% of the street frontage parkway/setback areas should be designed as retention basins. On-site open space, in conjunction with dry wells and other subsurface drainage solutions should be considered as alternatives to using landscaped parkways for on-site retention. 75. Provisions for the interception of nuisance water from entering adjacent public streets from the project site shall be provided through the use of a minor storm drain system that collects and conveys nuisance water to landscape or parkway areas adjacent to North Palm Canyon Drive and Via Escuela, and in only a stormwater runoff condition, pass runoff directly to the streets through parkway or under sidewalk drains. 76. The project is subject to flood control and drainage implementation fees. The acreage drainage fee at the present time is $6,511.00 per acre per Resolution No. 15189. Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 77. Easements for drainage purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the benefit of the Home Owners Association across the southeast corner of the property, within the area designated for Unit 7, as necessary to facilitate construction of the on-site drainage system with overflow to North Palm Canyon Drive. GENERAL 78. Any utility trenches or other excavations within existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets required by the proposed development shall be backfilled and repaired in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 115. 79. All proposed utility lines shall be installed underground. 80. All existing utilities shall be shown on the grading plans. The existing and proposed service laterals shall be shown from the main line to the property line. 81. The original improvement plans prepared for the proposed development and approved by the City Engineer shall be documented with record drawing "as-built' information and returned to the Engineering Division 'prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Any modifications or changes to approved improvement plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to construction. 82. In accordance with Chapter 8.04.401 of the City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, all existing and proposed electrical lines of thirty-five thousand volts or less and overhead service drop conductors, and all gas, telephone, television cable service, and similar 22 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Planner: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton service wires or lines, which are on-site, abutting, and/or transecting, shall be installed underground unless specific restrictions are shown in General Orders 95 and 128 of the California Public Utilities Commission, and service requirements published by the utilities. A detailed plan approved by the owner(s) of the affected utilities depicting all above ground facilities in the area of the project to be undergrounded, shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to approval of any grading plan. The existing overhead utilities across the west property line meet the requirement to be installed underground. The developer is advised to investigate the nature of these utilities, the availability of undergrounding these utilities with respect to adjacent and off- site properties, and to present its case for a waiver of the Municipal Code requirement, if appropriate, to the Planning Commission and/or City Council as part of its review and approval of this project. If utility undergrounding is deferred in accordance with specific direction by the Planning Commission and/or City Council, the record property owner shall enter into a covenant agreeing to underground all of the existing overhead utilities required by the Municipal Code in the future upon request of the City of Palm Springs City Engineer at such time as deemed necessary. The covenant shall be executed and notarized by the property owner and submitted to the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. A current title report; or a copy of a current tax bill and a copy of a vesting grant deed shall be provided to verify current property ownership. A covenant preparation fee of $135 shall be paid by the developer prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. 83. Contact Whitewater Mutual Water Company to determine impacts to any existing water lines and other facilities that may be located within the property. Make appropriate arrangements to protect in place or relocate any existing Whitewater Mutual Water Company facilities that are impacted by the development. A letter of approval for relocated or adjusted facilities from Whitewater Mutual Water Company shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to issuance of a grading permit. 84. Nothing shall be constructed or planted in the corner cut-off area of any driveway which does or will exceed the height required to maintain an appropriate sight distance per City of Palm Springs Zoning Code Section 93.02.00, D. 85. All proposed trees within the public right-of-way and within 10 feet of the public sidewalk and/or curb shall have City approved deep root barriers installed per City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 904. MAP 86. A Final Map shall be prepared by a California registered Land Surveyor or qualified Civil Engineer and submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. A Title Report prepared for subdivision guarantee for the subject property, the traverse closures for the existing parcel and all lots created therefrom, and copies of record documents shall be submitted with the Final Map to the Engineering Division as part of the review of 23 of 23 Application Complete: 3/18/05 Case 5.1038 PD-310 Staff Plamier: Matthew Feske TTM33542 Staff Engineer: Carol Templeton the Map. The Final Map shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits. 87. Easements for sewer and drainage purposes shall be reserved on the Final map for the benefit of the Home Owners Association, as required by these conditions. TRAFFIC 88. All damaged, destroyed, or modified pavement legends and striping associated with the proposed development shall be replaced as required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 89. Install a 30 inch stop sign, stop bar, and "STOP" legend for traffic exiting the development onto Via Escuela in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard I Drawing Nos. 620-625. 90. Construction signing, li lighting and barricading shall be provided for on all projects as 9 9 9 P P 1 required by City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. As a minimum, all j construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be in accordance with State of California, Department of Transportation, "Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones" dated 1996, or subsequent additions in force at the time of construction. 91. This property is subject to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee which shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. 92. A fair share contribution for the installation of a future traffic signal at the intersection of North Palm Canyon Drive and Via Escuela shall be made to the City. The amount has determined by the City Engineer from data provided in a traffic study prepared by George Dunn Engineering, revised December 11, 2003, and using estimated peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed development. The fair share contribution is $572. Payment shall be made prior to approval of a final map. @ V PA M S.o City of balm Springs u. Office of the City Clerk an 3200 E. Tal uitz Canyon WayPalm Springs, California 92262 * C� OFNiEO^p * 9 Y � C qd %P Tel (760)323-8204 • Fax: (760) 322-8332 • Web.wwwci palm-springs.ca.us/F04tN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing, to consider a Tentative Tract Map of approximately 1.57 acres to create a one lot condominium map and a Planned Development District to construct 12 residential condominiums at the southwest corner of Via Escuela and North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-1 / R-3, Section 3, on September 7, 2005. A copy of said notice was mailed to each and every person set forth on the attached list on the 24th day of August, 2005, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid, and depositing same in the U.S. Mail at Palm Springs, California. (289 notices mailed) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Palm Springs, California, this 25th day of August, 2005. r' %,AMESTHOMPSON City Clerk a /kdh H'\USERS\C-CLMHearing NoticesWffdavit-ViaEscuelaLandPartners.doc Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 i I F ppLM SA City of Palm Springs V r N * Office of the City Clerk * C eRPORPTED,9 RS Y Y � PP 3200 P Tah uitz Canyon Way Palm Springs,so California 92262 C * /PORN�Q' Tel. (760)323-8204 a Pas: (760)322-8332 • Web: www.ci.palm-springs.ca.us '9< August 24, 2005 Ms. Claudia Salgado Bureau of Indian Affairs 901 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Dear Ms. Salgado: IRE: City Council Meeting — September 7, 2005 Via Escuela Land Partners, LLC The City Council of the City of Palm Springs will be conducting a public hearing relating to the above referenced subject on September 7, 2005. Attached are 9 copies of the public hearing notice to be forwarded to the appropriate Indian landowner(s) within the 400 ft. radius of the project location. The parcels of Indian owned land within the 400 ft. radius of the project are listed below: 1.502-432-005 502-432-014 502-432-023 502-310-033 502-432-016 502-432-006 502-432-007 502-432-015 502-432-008 Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions or concerns, 323-8206. Sincerely, V"O& Kathie Hart, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk /kdh H\USERS\C-CLMHeariog NohcesTublic Hearing Notices to BIA-VoEscuelaaloc Attachment: Public Hearing Notice (9 copies) Post Office Box 2743 0 Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO. 5.1038-PD-310 /TTM 33542 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 33542 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 310 VIA ESCUELA LAND PARTNERS, LLC VIA ESCUELA AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a public hearing at its meeting of September 7, 2005. The City Council meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. The purpose of the hearing is to consider for a Tentative Tract Map of approximately 1.57 acres to create a one lot condominium map and a Planned Development District to construct 12 residential condominiums at the southwest corner of Via Escuela and North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-1 / R-3, Section 3. This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), whereas the proposed project meets the conditions outlined for in-fill development projects. Response to this notice may be made verbally at the public hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the Planning Commission by letter(mail or hand delivery) to: Mr. James Thompson, City Clerk City of Palm Springs 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 If any individual or group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at or prior to the meeting. Notice of Public Hearing is being sent to all property owners within four hundred (400) feet of the subject property. An opportunity will be given at said hearings for all interested persons to be heard. Questions regarding this case may be directed to Matthew Feske, Department of Planning Services, (760) 323-8245. Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, portavor flame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar con Nadine Fieger at 760-323-8245. mes Thompson City Clerk IN Department of Planning Services W E Vicinity Map S t VIA OLIVER.A O VIA ESCUELA � � z 5 {¢ d z MARISCAL RD z I SANTA ELENA RD ` I 1 Legend SITE =1400'_Radius I I CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO.: TTM 33542 /5.1038-PD-310 DESCRIPTION: An application by Via Escuela Land Tentative Tract Map / Partners, LLC, for a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Planned Development District Development District for approximately 1.57 acres to create a one lot condominium map for the construction of 12 APPLICANT: Via Escuela Land Partners, LLC residential condominiums at the southwest corner of Via Escuela and North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-1 / R-3, Section 3, APN 504310035. `1 r„ t-rIV qr. ��r� 0'F Pt1},.M J, PROOF OF PUBLICATION This is space @q(;oulit>0t r -rdfOAStr np (2015.5.C.C.P) ca i 4 Cl..',:.r,.• No. 3334 STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL County of Riverside CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO.5.1038-PD-310/TTM 33542 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 33542 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 310 VIA ESCUELA LAND PARTNERS, LLC VIA ESCUELA I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of 1 AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE the Count aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council Y g g of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a ears,and not a part to or Interested in the publlc hearing at is meeting of September 7, Y party Y 005. The City Council meetng begins at 690 above-entitled matter.I am the principal clerk of a m. In the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. printer of the,DESERT SUN PUBLISHING The purpose of the hearing is to consider for a COMPANY a newspaper of general circulation, Tentative Tract Map of approximately 1 57 acres and published in the cat of Palm Springs, to create a one lot condominium map and a printed P Y Planned Development District to construct 12 res- County of Riverside,and which newspaper has been idential condominiums at the southwest corner of Via Escuela and North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the C-1 /R-3, Section 3. Superior Court of the County of Riverside,State of California under the date of March 24,1988.Case Number 191236; that the notice,of which the v ao.� """".... annexed is a printed copy(set in type not smaller J It -1 than non pariel,has been published in each regular ��-.,C1 1 ; and entire issue of said newspaper and not in anyV supplement thereof on the following dates,to wit: N. _ i August27"' 2005 -------------------------------------------"'__-------' --------------------------------------------------------------- All in the year 2005 _ I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. This project Is categorically exempt fromenviron- mental review ppursuant to Section 15332 (In-FIII ,._,_ a Development Projects) of the California Environ- Dated at Pal t Ito Sr •1ggs,California this-----27 ,----day mental Quality ro (CEQA),whereas the propiron- �, project meets the conditions outlined for in-fill de- velopment projects. of----—Au st�'- - "/ -----------L-- ' - 2005 _g r_I /� + Response to this notice may be made verbally at the pu in hearing and/or writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the Planning Commission by letter(mall or hand de- 1 _ livery) to: -"--""' + T""---"""'�-"-"""'---'-"""---- Mr. James Thompson, City Clerk V Si natur¢ ` City of Palm Springs g , ".� \ 3200 East Tahqultz Canyyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 If any individual or group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those Issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or In written correspondence at or ppri- or to the meeting. Notice of Public Hearing Is be- ing sent to all property owners within four hun- dred(4. feet of tyre subject property.An oppor- tun, will be given at said hearings for all inter w paled persons to it heard. Questions regarding - \1 this case may be directed to Matthew Feske, De-partment of Planning Services, (760) 323-8245. Si necesita ayuda con esta carts,porfavor Ilame a Is Ciudad de Palm Springs , puede habiar con Nadine Fieger at 760-323-8245. James Thompson City Clerk Published:August 27, 2005 /p 3 r6 /%TM r A '-j a-,� 6 , e'filo s 009 600 190 009 600 191 J 009 600 197 David Mayer&George Rooney James Cole Ernest Carabba&Leslie Phillips 4711 Herman Dr 2454 E Palm Canyon Dr#1B 33651 Windlass Dr Tarzana, CA 91356 Palm Springs, CA 92264 Monarch Beach, CA 92629 I 009 600 199 009 600 212 009 600 213 John Bell Jr. George&Tobette Doroshow Arlyn Vik 2454 E Palm Canyon Dr#iD 2454 E Palm Canyon Dr#213 130 Woods Loop Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palrim Springs,CA 92264 Santa Fe,NM 87505 009 600 217 009 600 254 ✓ 009 602 820 Margot Skinner J B Traver Jr.&S J King Springs Resort Palm 325 N Stratford Ln 2454 E Palm Canyon Dr#3C 2677 N Main St#800 Wichita, KS 67206 Palm Springs,CA 92264 Santa Ana,CA 92705 501 090 019 501 090 020 501 460 001 Rps Resort Corp Rps Resort Corp Pasquale Vincent&Susan Glad Picchio 1600 N Indian Ave 1600 N Indian Ave PO Box 2067 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92263 501 460 002 501 460 003 501 460 004 Platinum Investments Inc Debra Preston Charlene Phillips 215 E 8th St 2298 N Indian Canyon Dr#C 2298 N Indian Ave#D Los Angeles,CA 90014 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 005 501460 006 501 460 007 Mary Walsh Roger Motley Donald Pedrola 2298 N Indian Canyon Dr#E 2298 N Indian Canyon Dr#F 2298 N Indian Canyon Dr#G Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 008 501 460 009 501 460 010 Any Tamayo Margaret Tuttle Constance Greaser 2298 N Indian Ave#H 2268 N Indian Ave#A 4735 La Villa Marina#C Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Marina Del Rey,CA 90292 501 460 011 501 460 012 501 460 013 Karen Sandberg Tamara Espejo&Jordan Kyle Margid Mary Lawyer 605 E Amado Rd#607 2268 N Indian Canyon Dr#D 2268 N Indian Canyon Dr Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Sprigs,CA 92262 501 460 014 501460 015 501460 016 Larry&Vicki Harmon Candace Terry Gary Teti 2260 N Indian Canyon Dr#A PO Box 2124 13894 Nunni St Palm Springs,CA 92262 Rancho Mirage,CA 92270 Sylmar, CA 91342 501 460 0117 501 460 018 501 460 019 Charles&Verna Murray Douglas Leon Born William&Tammy Hatton 14010 SE 61st PI 5036 Echo St#16 2260 N Indian Canyon Dr#F Bellevue,WA 98006 Los Angeles, CA 90042 Palm Springs, CA 92262 4� ♦ , n G �?r9 501 460 020 501 460 021 501 460 022 Sheri Campbell&Helen Smith-bradley Susan Brown Thomas Sotham 2298 N Indian Ave#C 18152 Donmetz St 2252 N Indian Ave#C Palm Springs,CA 92262 Northridge,CA 91326 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 023 501460 024 501 460 025 Dennis Rosenburg Dennis Rosenberg Ben Rocca&Sue Rocca 2252 N Indian#D 3666 E Pasco Barbara 2252 N Indian Ave#F Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 026 501460 027 501 460 028 John Conley George&Katalin Farago Bassam Raer PO Box 1397 2252 Indian Ave 2252 N Indian Canyon Dr#1 Palm Desert,CA 92261 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 029 501 460 030 501 460 031 Leona Mccabe Donna Lemberg&Seymour Moreno Donna Arias &Constance Sharp 8816 Ridge Ave 49 3702 Lees Ave PO Box 4826 Philadelphia,PA 19128 Long Beach,CA 90808 Palm Springs,CA 92263 501460 032 501 460 033 501 460 034 Antonio&Ilma Silva David Peterson&Victoria Peterson Norman&Florence Marcus 1340 Garretson Ave 1318 Belmont St NW 10604 Rochester Ave Corona,CA 92879 Washington,DC 20009 Los Angeles,CA 90024 501460 036 501 460 037 501 460 038 Mark Moonier&Charles Bilbrey I1 Smith Irma Borden 4351 17th St 1 Calle Navarros 2286 N Indian Ave#C San Francisco,CA 94114 Rancho Mirage,CA 92270 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 039 501460 040 501 460 041 Vince&Beatrice Castiglione Alice White Mary Quintero 1114 S W ycliff Ave PO Box 1185 4417 Yellowstone St San Pedro,CA 90732 Palm Springs,CA 92263 Los Angeles, CA 90032 501 460 042 501 460 043 501 460 044 Steven Cook&Hal Stradley Evelyn Sherman Gruttadauro 2222 N Indian Ave#A 2222 N Indian Carryon Dr#B 2222 N Indian Ave#C Patin Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 045 501 460 046 501 460 047 Jennifer Gomez&Patricia Wetzel Richard Schwabauer&James Dillon Richhart 1901 N Pepper St 2222 N Indian Canyon Dr#E 18591 Jocotal Ave Burbank,CA 91505 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Villa Park, CA 92861 501 460 049 501 460 050 501 460 051 Angela Smith Ronald Ulreich Harry Ward&Evelyn Wright Jr. 37696 Breeze Way 2230 N Indian Canyon Dr#A 356 Vista Baya Palm Desert,CA 92211 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Newport Beach,CA 92660 a 501 460 052 501 460 053 501 460 054 Katherine Laule Harry Christ&John Bullington Canyon Indian&Daybreak Group 2230 N Indian Canyon Dr#C 269 Chattanooga St#A 2019 W Chapman Ave Palm Springs,CA 92262 San Francisco,CA 94114 Orange,CA 92868 501460055 501 460 056 501 460 057 Derwyn Bunton Jeffrey&Gillian Scott Luann Hensley 900 Ewteeop 11260 Overland Ave#8F 2230 N Indian Canyon Dr#1-I New Orleans,LA 70130 Culver City,CA 90230 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 058 501 460 059 501 460 060 Michael&.Lynda Quintana Norman&Giberson Viva Maclachlan Thomas Bobak&A B Carolyn 10662 Pamela St 700 N 63rd St 4312 Torres Ave Cypress, CA 90630 Seattle,WA 98103 Fremont,CA 94536 501 460 061 501 460 062 501 460 063 Salvatore Comacchio&Arnold Fingerh Lawrence Baird Jose Flores 110 E Via Escuela C 2246 N Indian Canyon Dr#E 2246 N Indian Canyon Dr#F Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 460 064 501 460 065 501 470 009 Maria Teague&Aim Barron Kevin Smith&Christine Dsouza Judy Tones 1726 Winston Ave 2246 N Indian Ave#H 13055 Magnolia Blvd Upland, CA 91784 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Sherman Oaks,CA 91423 501 470 010 501 470 011 501 470 012 Thomas&Patricia Sinclair Kathryn Tomasino Laura Moreno 526 Passillora Dr 354 W Stevens Rd 2166 N Indian Canyon Dr#D La Habra,CA 90631 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 470 013 501 470 014 501 470 015 Dorothy Hedd Kathleen Day Net&Florinda Villanueva 2166 N Indian Canyon Dr#E 2166 N Indian Canyon Dr#20 2166 N Indian Canyon Dr#G Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 470 016 501 470 017 501 470 018 Nebojsa P'ejic&Radana Dmitrovic Joyce Morrow&Adrian Grimani Moor Josie Plagge 2166 N Indian Canyon Dr#H 2120 N ffidian Canyon Dr#A 2120 N Indian Canyon Dr#B i Patin Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 470 019 501 470 020 501 470 022 Alex Powell Ps Richard Holdway&Craig Magaw 855 W Walnut St 1243 Oakwood Dr 720 W Gordon Ter#7L Compton,CA 90220 Arcadia,CA 91006 Chicago,IL 60613 501 470 023 501 470 024 501 470 025 Barbara Limardo Diedre Sharpe Arnold Fingerhood 110 E Via Escuela#A 5455 N Alto Dr 110 E Via Escuela#C Palm Springs,CA 92262 San Bernardino,CA 92404 Palm Springs,CA 92262 501 470 026 501 470 027 501 470 028 V Barbara Isaacs Sonia Moseley A Donald&Judith Long -A 110 E Via.Escuela#D 110 E Via Escuela#E 44284 Lowtree Ave Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Lancaster,CA 93534 501 470 029 501 470 030 501 470 031 Barbara Buckman Rene Beaudry John&Isabel Fewel 11345 Gladwin St 128 E Via Escuela#B 3661 Liggett Dr Los Angeles,CA 90049 Palm Springs, CA 92262 San Diego,CA 92106 I 501 470 032 501 470 033 502 43 00 Andrew&Adrianne Earle Vito Anthony&Paulette Teti Usa 502 128 E Via Escuela#D 2910 Juanita PI PO Box 2 5 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Fullerton,CA 92835 Palm Spr' g CA 92263 502 432 006 502 432 014 504 223 003 James Cole Doroshow Lita Maria Frost 2454 E Palm Canyon Dr#1B 2454 E Palm Canyon Dr 42B 2423 N Junipero Ave Palm Springs,CA 92264 Palm Springs,CA 92264 Palm Springs, CA 92262 504 224 001 504 224 010 504 224 016 Ruthe Feldman Stewart John Ocarroll&David Milani 9200 Hazen Dr 2491 N Palm Canyon Dr 685 Noe St Beverly Hills,CA 90210 Palm Springs, CA 92262 San Francisco, CA 94114 504 232 002 504 232 004 504 232 016 Matthew L P Tage Christopher Agustin&Barbara Baker Marie Tuchfarber 42988 Falls Ave 2137 N Girasol Ave PO Box 1412 Big Bear]Lake,CA 92315 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92263 504 233 001 504 233 002 504 233 003 Matthew Tage Shaun Lether&Matthew P Tage Gustavo Davila PO Box 4041 420 W Via Escuela 2127 N Cardillo Ave Big Bear]Lake, CA 92315 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 504 233 004 504 233 005 504 233 006 George Shhnko&Raymond Nocera Julie Fey Alfred&Eleanor Mercado 1203 Putnam Ave 459 S Palm Canyon Dr 68195 Modalo Rd Plainfield,NJ 07060 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Cathedral City, CA 92234 I l 504 233 007 504 233 012 504 233 013 Sanaz Favier Shawn&Theresa Mccullough David Hoffman 2285 N Cardillo Ave 2140 N Girasol Ave 2136 N Girasol Ave Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Sprigs, CA 92262 I 504 233 014 504 233 015 504 233 016 Richard&,P R Schwartz Doris Butler Shaun Lether&Matthew Tage 2122 N Girasol Ave 2114 N Girasol Ave 420 W Via Escuela Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Sprigs,CA 92262 i s I 504 241 001 504 241 004 504 241 005 Irma Salinas Bardomiano Ramirez Richard Casabonne 1180 Eddy St#C 69333 E Palm Canyon Dr#196 2151 N Junipero Ave San Francisco,CA 94109 Cathedral City,CA 92234 Palm Springs, CA 92262 504 241 006 504 241 007 504 241 008 Francine Dickson&Raymond Snyder Adele Rimkus Disarro 78585 Avenue 41 2185 N Junipero Ave 830 E Santa Anita Ave Indio,CA 92203 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Burbank,CA 91501 I I 504 241 009 504 241 010 504 241 Ol l Joseph Mcclaskey Max&Suzi Bubeck Marie Scamara i 5400 Simpson Ave#6 2274 N Cardillo Ave 2232 N Cardillo Ave Valley Village,CA 91607 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 I 504 241 012 504 241 013 504 241 015 Jane Chalmers Edward&Dixie Adkins Leon Reichbach&Herrin Reichbach PO Box 4293 2132 N Cardillo Ave 2112 N Cardillo Ave Palm Springs,CA 92263 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 I 504 242 001 504 242 002 504 242 006 Hemant&.Zorma Khatri Riccio's Inc Tom Conway&Annex Land Tramview 2135 N Canyon Dr 2155 N Palm Carryon Dr 100 S Sunrise Way#444 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 504 242 007 504 242 008 504 242 009 Dori Lewallen&Toni Mazzeo Lawrence Sofonio Kenneth Turner 2249 N Palm Canyon Dr 2300 N PaLn Canyon Dr 101 States St#7 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 San Francisco, CA 94114 504 242 012 504 242 013 504 242 014 Noimann Larsen Kent Waterman Kurt Buchholz&Daniel Adams It 62 E El Escndero 2144 N Junipero Ave 196 Castle Hill Ranch Rd Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Walnut Creek,CA 94595 I I 504 250 007 504 250 010 504 250 011 Stephen&L J Goldberg Mark Vincent Sofonio Ladd&Patricia Cameron 2837 Suncrest Blvd 1516 S Manzanita Ave 1276 N Palm Canyon Dr#2 El Cajon, CA 92021 Palm Springs,CA 92264 Palm Springs, CA 92262 504 250 012 504 250 014 504250015 l Richard&Patricia Leon Thomas Dobbs Thomas Dubbs 230 W Via Olivera#3 11684 Ventura Blvd#416 11684 Ventura Blvd#416 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Studio City,CA 91604 Studio City,CA 91604 I 504 250 016 504 250 017 504 250 018 Del Mar Properties I Llc Del Mar Properties I Lle Del Mar Properties I Llc 1300 Bristol St N#200 1300 Bristol St N#200 1300 Bristol St N#200 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Newport Beach,CA 92660 I k I ' 504 250 019 504 250 020 504 250 022 Del Mar Properties I Lie Del Mar Properties I Lie Del Mar Properties I Lie �I�l1 1300 Bristol St N#200 1300 Bristol St N 9200 1300 Bristol St N#200 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Newport Beach,CA 92660 504 250 023 504 260 015 504 260 019 Mark Vincent Sofonio Del Mar Properties I Lie Northern Capital Partners Inc 1516 S Mauzanita Ave 1300 Bristol St N#200 PO Box 50 Palm Springs,CA 92264 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Lake Arrowhead,CA 92352 i 504 260 021 504 260 022 504 270 009 Catherine Meyler Livebythepark San Jacinto Ltd Partners Senate Group Trust 3423 Ben Lomond PI 61736 Onaga Trl 2150 N Palm Canyon Dr i Los Angeles,CA 90027 Joshua Tree, CA 92252 Palm Springs,CA 92262 I 504 270 013 504 270 015 504 281 003 Dorothy Shea Marcel Masoud Bassirian Tristan Rogers 2299 N Indian Canyon Dr Marcel Mas Bassirian 483 W Via Escuela Palm Springs,CA 92262 250 E Palm Canyon Dr Pahn Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92264 i 504 281 004 504 281 007 504 281 008 Tyrus&Mary Hawkins Peter Taylor Michael&Leslie Ray 469 W Via Escuela 2025 N Via Norte 2699 White Rd#150 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Irvine,CA 92614 504 282 005 504 282 006 504 282 007 Romwald Connolly&Desmond Morga Theodore Neal Boden Barry Mantell&Shelley Mantell 5044 Diamond Heights Blvd 5133 E Conant St 420 W Santa Elena Rd San Francisco,CA 94131 Long Beach,CA 90808 Palm Springs, CA 92262 I 504 291 006 504 300 004 504 300 007 Deborah Garber&Kathleen Hosford Ralph Patterson Tola Korsunski 715 Big Horn Ave 1335 Londonderry PI 1310 18th St#5 Sheridan,WY 82801 Los Angeles, CA 90069 Santa Monica,CA 90404 I 504 300 026 504 300 027 504 300 028 Cameron Grenier Robert&Francoise Sheppard M Christopher Pena PO Box 520 303 W Via Escuela 3324 State St#A San Juan Capistrano,CA 92693 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Santa Barbara,CA 93105 1 504 302 001 504 302 002 504 302 003 Mary Bowers Toby Quezambra John Prince&Lillian Prince 2601 E Ocean Blvd#511 2074 N Mira Vista Way 3289 Vosburg St Long Beach, CA 90803 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Pasadena,CA 91107 I 504 302 004 504 302 005 504 302 006 Eduardo Canasco Diane Hamner Michael Santo&F M Hutchinson 272 Laurel Canyon Blvd 2056 N Mira Vista Way 1276 N Palm Canyon Dr#205 Los Angeles,CA 90046 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 I l I 504 302 007 504 302 009 504 302 010 Mohammad&Shirin Kargozar Randall Vanderiet Paul Tucci 2045 Birkdale Ave 2036 N Mira Vista Way 236 Sanchez St ' Upland, CA 91784 Palm Springs, CA 92262 San Francisco, CA 94114 504 302 011 504 302 012 504 302 013 Paul Freedman Mark Neveu Constance Barnes &Dawn Smoley 946 Kenyon Ave 4557 Longridge Ave 2016 N Mira Vista Way San Leandro,CA 94577 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 Palm Springs,CA 92262 I 504 302 014 504 302 016 504 302 017 Steven&Gloria Harding Lenora Torres Dixie Kanold 2014 N Mira Vista Way 2010 N Mira Vista Way 319 W Mariscal Rd Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 504 302 018 504 302 019 504 302 020 Ernest Amezcua Jeffrey Kaplan&Stephen Kaplan William&Nina Drapeau 17526 Maidstone Ave PO Box 9576 532 Heneretta Dr Artesia, CA 90701 Laguna Beach, CA 92652 Hurst,TX 76054 504 302 021 504 302 022 504 302 023 Toby&Maria Quezambra Michael Blatchford Ronald Wells&R S Carole 329 W Mariscal Rd 327 W Mariscal Rd 2464 Castlemont Ct Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Simi Valley,CA 93063 504 302 024 504 302 025 504 302 026 Paul&B K Lechevalier Clarissa Ryterbrand M Linda Perkins 25401 Remesa Dr 1073 W Buena Vis 5853 Keniston Ave Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Los Angeles,CA 90043 504 302 027 504 302 028 504 302 029 Charles Sachs Lemaster Paul Roide 3907 Vineland Ave 176 Loch Lomond Rd 12872 Valley View St#10 Studio City,CA 91604 Rancho Mirage,CA 92270 Garden Grove, CA 92845 504 302 030 504 302 031 504 302 032 Brice Allen Jones Jessica Davis Triad Resources Llc 355 W Mariscal Rd 357 W Mariscal Rd 359 W Mariscal Rd Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 504 302 033 504 302 034 504 302 035 A L Walkup Ramon Maraffi Thomas Lnigan 1264 N Sweetzer Ave#103 345 W Mariscal Rd 4713 W Ballast Point Blvd West Hollywood,CA 90069 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Tampa,FL 33611 504 302 036 504 302 037 504 302 038 Thomas&Suzan Barron Johnson Andrew Merskin&Sven Vennen Ginger Schackne 713 E Level St 369 W Manscal Rd 11840 Gorham Ave#2 Covina,CA 91723 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Los Angeles, CA 90049 I � 504 302 039 504 302 040 504 302 041 1� Peggy Lewis Patrick&Durelle Hatlestad George Gonzalez b PO Box 924 PO Box 1342 4402 The Strand Ross,CA 94957 Williston,ND 58802 Manhattan Beach,CA 90266 504 302 042 504 302 043 504 302 045 Lyle&Marlys Vonesh Tammy Harrison Gilbert Dicenzo 18485 Santa Isadora St 375 W Mariscal Rd 2306 SE 8th Dr Fountain'Valley,CA 92708 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Renton,WA 98055 504 302 046 504 310 027 504 310 033 Thetus Nelson Shilo Imi Palm Springs Palm Court Llc PO Box 4504 11600 SW Shilo Ln 1983 N Pahn Canyon Dr Palm Springs, CA 92263 Portland, OR 97225 Palm Springs,CA 92262 504 320 005 504 320 017 504 320 026 Yoo William Reed Garner&Robert Lemley Pahn Springs Super 8 Lodge Ltd 791 Saint Katherine Dr 1800 N Palm Canyon Dr 1611 County Road B W#320 La Canada,CA 91011 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Roseville,MN 55113 504 320 028 504 320 029 504 350 002 Yoo Dorothy Shea George Gegenwordr&Jacquelin Gegen 791 Saint Katherine Dr 495 Las Palmas Dr 3836 Linden Ave La Canada,CA 91011 Santa Barbara,CA 93110 Long Beach,CA 90807 504 350 ON 504 350 004 504 350 005 Michael&Joanne Friday Brenda Culhane Thomas&Carolyn Bobak 1872 N Mira Loma Way PO Box 5505 4312 Torres Ave Palm Springs,CA 92262 Frisco,CO 80443 Fremont,CA 94536 504 350 006 504 350 007 504 350 008 Black Antoni Cembrzynski Linda Larson j' 5247 Melvin Ave 369 S Doheny Dr#510 1860 N Mira Loma Way Tarzana, CA 91356 Beverly Hills,CA 90211 Palm Springs, CA 92262 i 504 350 009 504 350 010 504 350 011 T David&Charee Estes Francois Taillefer Francois Taillefer 206 Calle Cortez 1854 N Mira Loma Way 1854 N Mira Loma Way i San Clemente,CA 92672 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 504 350 012 504 350 015 504 350 016 Ladonna Wilson Mark Lee S J&Patsy Massarella 7341 Indio Ave 17969 Cabela Dr IS 18 N Mira Loma Way Yucca Valley,CA 92284 San Diego,CA 92127 Palm Springs, CA 92262 � 504 350 021 504 350 022 504 350 023 Ruth Alvarez Robbins Nezha Roide, 392 E Stevens Rd 022 15 Rock Top Rd PO Box 4575 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Sedona,AZ 86351 Palm Springs, CA 92263 i I 504 350 024 504 350 025 504 350 027 1 '' Melvin Schwartz Brian Johnson Andrew Starke 1820 N Mira Loma Way##D 1836 N Mira Loma Way 1901 E Baristo Rd Patin Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 504 350 028 504 350 029 504 350 030 Moses Bekunda Laura Angell Glenn Kenyon&Roberto Verdeses 1536 S Fairfax Ave#8 4327 Hazelbrook Ave 858 Chenery St Los Angeles,CA 90019 Long Beach,CA 90808 San Francisco, CA 94131 504 350 031 504 350 032 504 350 033 William Fields III&Alan Walter Ann Miller Rodney Dow 4164 Ventura Canyon Ave 320 W Santa Elena Rd 1729 E Palm Canyon Dr#113 Sherman Oaks,CA 91423 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92264 504 350 034 504 350 035 504 350 036 Donald Stone Linda Ferguson Lois Pamon 5403 Newcastle Ave#47 344 W Santa Elena Rd 457 W Longden Ave Encino, CA 91316 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Arcadia, CA 91007 504 350 037 504 350 038 504 350 039 Betty Mcnees Nancy Brown Vet Cal 68305 Encinitas Rd 354 W Santa Elena Rd 352 W Santa Elena Rd Cathedral City,CA 92234 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92262 504 350 040 504 350 041 504 350 042 Otwell S J&Patsy Massarella Joshua Baird 18566 Madrone St 103 River Bend Park 374 W Santa Elena Rd Hesperia,CA 92345 Lancaster,PA 17602 Palm Springs,CA 92262 I 504 350 043 504 350 044 504 350 046 Janet Spiegel Kim Langhorst Cynthia Detiege 453 E Taliquitz Canyon Way 1744 Myrtle Ave 100 S Sunrise Way#735 Patin Springs,CA 92262 San Diego,CA 92103 Palm Springs,CA 92262 504 350 047 504 350 048 Ronda Sklar James Wyatt i 440 S El Cielo Rd 45 5140 Diamond Heights Blvd#A205 Palm Springs,CA 92262 San Francisco, CA 94131 I I I I I Co� B 7-os � � � p NEIGHB4OiRHOOD COALITION REPS August 2005 MS APRIL HILDNER MR TIM HOHMEIER 66PIes i-p6:ALL AAC Agendas (TAHQUITZ RIVERS ESTATES) (DEEPWELL ESTATES) Public&ONIPP Meetings, HSPB Agendas 241 EAST MESQUITE AVENUE 1387 CALLE DE MARIA PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 MS ROXANN PLOSS MR STEVEN PERRIN MS SHERYL HAMLIN (BEL DESIERTO NEIGHBORHOOD) (DEEPWELL RANCH) (HISTORIC TENNIS CLUB AREA) 930 CHIA ROAD 1334 INVIERNO R\DRIVE 565 WEST SANTA ROSA DRIVE PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 MR JOHN HANSEN MR BILL SCOTT MS DIANE AHLSTROM (WARM SANDS NEIGHBORHOOD) (LAS PALMAS NEIGHBORHOOD) (MOVIE COLONY NEIGHBORHOOD) PO BOX 252 540 VIA LOLA 475 VALMONTE SUR PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 MR KENT CHAMBERLIN MR BOB MAHLOWITZ MS PAULA AUBURN (TENNIS CLUB AREA) (SUNMOR NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP) (SUNRISENISTA CHINO AREA) 373 MONTE VISTA 246 NORTH SYBIL ROAD 1369 CAMPEON CIRCLE PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 MR BOB DICKINSON MS MALIKA ALBERT (VISTA LAS PALMAS HOMEOWNERS) (CHINO CANYON ORGANIZATION) 755 WEST CRESCENT DRIVE 2241 NORTH LEONARD ROAD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 MODCOM AND MR PETE MORU771 HISTORIC SITE REP PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE PO BOX 4738 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-4738 CASE NO.5.1012/5.1049 Verification of Mailing PLANNING SERVICES DEPT CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 923263 I I i I I I CASE 5.1038/TTM 33542 CASE 5.1038/TTM 33542 MR MARK DUPONT MR SKIP GOODELL SPONSORS&O VIA ESCUELA LAND PARTNERS 29-360 SOUTH LAGUNE DRIVE 50855 WASHINGTON ST#204 CATHEDRAL CITY CA 92234 LA QUINTA CA 92253 CASE 5.1038/TTM 33542 CASE 5.1038/TTM 33542 TKD ASSOCIATES COACHELLA VALLEY ENGINEERS SUITE K2 77-899 WOLF ROAD#102 41-750 RANCHO LAS PALMAS DRIVE PALM DESERT, CA 92211 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 04 pA�M SA�� City of Palm Springs c Department of Planning Services 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way ,+ F Palm Springs, CA 92262 Telephone: 760-323-8270 l/FOVut Fax— 760-322-8360 E-mail: LorettaM@ci.palm-springs.ca.us F A X TRANSMISSION Date: July 1, 2005 To: Claudia Salgado, and Bernadine Saldana Bureau of Indian Affairs From: Loretta Moffett, Senior Secretary Planning Department Subject: JULY 13, 2005 - Planning Commission Hearing Via Escuela Land Partners, LLC Case 5.1038 /TTM 33642 There are nine Indian landowners in this project: `-- APIV Numbers are: 5021-432-005 502-432-006 502-432-007 502-432-008 502-432-014 502-432-015 502432-016 502-432-023 502.-310-033 1 am enclosing nine notices and ask for your assistance in forwarding to the Indian landowner involved. Thanks for the help! Enclosures: 10 notices aF FkA1 S A� u` k M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: Craig A. Ewing, AICP Director of Planning Services DATE: September 7, 2005 SUBJECT: City Council Agenda Item 1 C— Case TTM 33542 / 5,1038/ PD-310 Supplemental Information — Recommended Conditions of Approval cc: Thomas Wilson File The Engineering Department notes that Conditions 67 and 77 will require adjustments to the landscape and pool features of Building No. 7, in the southeast corner of the site. The Department also recommends that condition No. 82 be amended to read as follows: `In accordance with Chapter 8.04.401 of the City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, all existing and proposed electrical lines of thirty-five thousand volts or less and overhead service drop conductors, and all gas telephone, television cable service, and similar service wires or lines, which are on-site, abutting, and/or transecting, shall be installed underground unless specific restrictions are shown in General Orders 95 and 128 of the California Public Utilities Commission, and service requirements published by the utilities. A detailed plan approved by the owner(s) of the affected utilities depicting all above ground facilities in the area of the project to be undergrounded, shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to approval of any grading plan. "The existing overhead utilities across the west property line meet the requirement to be installed underground." f a