HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/15/2012 - STAFF REPORTS - 1A Page 1 of 2
Jennifer Nelson
From: Steve Pougnet
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 2:10 PM
To: Jennifer Nelson
Subject: Fwd: Item 1A. on Wednesday's agenda
Attachments: 2Oct96_PlanningMemo.pdf; ATT00805.htm
Please print all this out for me.
Thanks
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: rjuliansf@aot.com
Date: February 12, 2012 2:29:05 PM MST
To. Rick Flutcheson.@palmsprings ca,gov, Ste_v_e,Pougnet a palmsprings-ca.goy
Subject: Item IA. on Wednesday's agenda
Steve and Rick,
I am concerned about the misrepresentations made by the planning director in the 73-page staff
report for Item 1.A on Wednesday's agenda. The issues behind this item have been festering for two
years now, adversely impacted by misrepresentations, disinformation, and the withholding
of crucial data from both the public and Council which define in simplest terms what was covered by
the 1996 Class 1 Historic Designation of City Hall. The current 73-page staff report and months of
hearings would have been unnecessary if the attached memorandum, obtained via a public records
request, had simply been shared with HSPB and Council.
Pages 10 and 44 of the current staff report show a propos so u io I es in the second
"WHEREAS"that the original designation of City Hall excl the site and group o
supporting documentation has ever been produced by staff for this c ssertiorr-Pro bly
because it is not true.
Even more bizarre, staff flip-flops are found on page 13 of the current staff report. There the second
"WHEREAS"of Resolution 33-A states that the original designation did not"specifically include the
original site and grounds of City Hall."This assertion is also untrue, as evidenced by the attached
1996 memorandum from the 1996 Planning Director at the time City Hall, and several other Albert
Frey-designed properties we simultaneously designated historic by Council. Most early historic
designations contain little background information, but none suggests designation of a building
exclusive of its site. Any attempt to retroactively rewrite existing Class 1 designations as not
inclusive of the site jeopardizes all designations and places Council in the exceedingly awkward
position of potentially have to review or revise all existing nominations to clarify whether or not the
site is protected. This would be as unproductive as it is counterintuitive. HSPB is the historic site
preservation board, not the historic building, structure, or monument board.
Please see the second paragraph under"BACKGROUND" in the attached 1996 memorandum.
The following content regarding the historic designation of City Hall is extracted for your
convenience. The former planning director's words are definitive about what was covered by the
Class 1 designation of City Hall: "The recommended Class 1 designation protects the architecture
2/13/2012
Page 2 of 2
and historic integrity of the sites in that the structures and their sites may not be modified, no objects
removed, without the approval of City Council; usage may be limited to the extent that it may impair
the integrity of the site."
Clearly the entire site of City Hall is included in its Class 1 designation. Adoption of the badly written
and misleading resolution currently proposed by staff for Item 1 A. would be destructive. With
thousands of visitors now in town to celebrate Modernism Week, the world will be watching to see if
City Council does the right thing in this case on Wednesday. If it cannot, the public trust
required for the successful revitalization of downtown will be dealt a crushing blow.
Robert Stone
Warm Sands
2/13/2012
DATE: October 2, 1996
TO:` City Council
FROM: Director of Planning & Building
HSPB-33 - POTENTIAL DESIGNATION OF SELECTED ALBERT FREY STRUCTURES
AS HISTORIC/ARCHITECTURAL SITES
RECOMMENDATION:
The Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) recommends that the City Council receive
public comment and review information regarding the designation of the following as historic
sites:
1.Frey House II - 686 Palisades Dr.
2.Valley Station - Palm Springs Aerial Tramway
'3.Loewy House - 600 Panorama Rd.
'4.Palm Springs City Hall - 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
5.Carey-Pirozzi House - 651 W. Via Escuela
6.Tramway Gas Station - 2901 N. Palm Canyon Dr.;
and the HSPB further recommends that the City Council designate the structures as Class I
Historic Sites due to their import to the City's architectural heritage.
BACKGROUND:
The HSPB recommends that these structures be granted a Class 1 Historic designation.
Chapter 8.05 of the Municipal Code provides for the designation of historic sites. The HSPB
has determined that these sites meet this Chapter's definition of historic sites as they 1)
embody the distinctive characteristics of the Modern movement of architecture and the
methods of construction practiced in this movement, especially as adapted to the California
desert environment; and 2) represent the significant local examples of the master architect
Albert Frey, FAIA, whose individual genius influenced his age. The documentation to
support the architectural significance of these structures to the City of Palm Springs is
attached.
The recommended Class 1 designation protects the architectural and historic integrity of the
sites in that the structures and their sites may not be modified, nor objects removed, without
the approval of the City Council; usage may also be limited to the extent thatit may impair
the integrity of the site. The interiors of structures are not affected by the proposed
designation. "The City Councl's approval of rnodifications is delegated to the HSPB by
Chapter 8.05 except that appeals of an HSPB decision are heard by the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENTS/NOTIFICATION/HSPB ACTION:
The property owners, and those located within 300 feet of these properties, were notified of
the City Council hearing by regular mail. A Notice of Public Heating was published in The
Desert Sun on September 22, 1996.
Neil Annenberg (Palm Springs Oil Co.) , owner of the Tramway, Gas Station,''protested the
proposed designation at the hearing of the Historic Site Preservation Board on September 10,
1996. His concern regards the future use of the property with this designation in place.
Staff recommended that the HSPB postpone designation until such time that a study session
could be scheduled to discuss the impact of this designation on Mr. Annenberg's property.
Iq2.
ddsignation of the Tramway Gas Station, feeling that the architectural significance of this
structure to the community is such that it deserves designation along with the remaining Frey
sites being recommended. The HSPB unanimouslyrecommended designation
gnation of the
remaining five sites,
Rtchard E.' atena`de Doug la Evans
Secretary, HSPB Director of Planning & Building
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Map
2.Documentation re: Albert Frey &the Structures in question
3.HSPB Minutes -9/10196(to follow)
4.Resolution
�O�pALM sp4
ii
c
v m
C4</PORN
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2012 PUBLIC HEARING
SUBJECT: CASE HSPB #33: RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND AN EXISTING
CLASS 1 HISTORIC DESIGNATION FOR PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL
TO INCLUDE SITE PARKING AND LANDSCAPE AREAS, LOCATED AT
3200 EAST TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, A CLASS 1 HISTORIC SITE
FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager
BY: The Planning Department
SUMMARY
Under Section 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code (Historic Resources), the City
Council may designate properties as "Class 1" historic sites. On October 2, 1996, the
City Council adopted Resolution No. 18907 designating Palm Springs City Hall a Class
1 Historic Site. The City's Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) has recommended
that the Class 1 designation be amended to include the parking lot and landscape areas
surrounding the building. The Council will conduct a continued public hearing (from
September 22, 2010) and determine if the existing historic designation should be
amended. Notification of this hearing was published and mailed on January 5, 2012.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. : "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE CLASS 1 HISTORIC
DESIGNATION OF THE PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL TO INCLUDE THE CONCRETE
PLAZA IMMEDIATELY FRONTING THE MAIN AND COUNCIL CHAMBER
ENTRANCES AT 3200 TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY".
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Historic Site Preservation Board has initiated an amendment to the existing Class 1
designation for City Hall to expand the designation to include the parking and landscape
areas surrounding the City Hall building. No other changes to the existing designation
are proposed. If adopted by the City Council, such amendment would:
ITEM NO. ��
City Council Staff Report February 15,2012
Case: HSPB No.33/3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way Page 2 of 7
1. Place the entire property (as opposed to only the City Hall building) under the
provisions of Municipal Code Section 8.05 (Historic Preservation).
2. Require the City Council to forward any proposed changes to the parking lot or
landscaping to the HSPB for review.
A full project description, historic assessment report and Staffs findings and
recommendations can be found in the attached staff report to the Historic Site
Preservation Board dated April 13, 2009.
PRIOR ACTIONS
On September 10, 1996, the Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) conducted a
public hearing unanimously recommended to the City Council designation of the Palm
Springs City Hall as a Historic Site, Class 1.
On October 2, 1996, the City Council conducted a public hearing and unanimously
approved the Palm Springs City Hall as a Historic Site, Class 1. The Council resolution
included the following language:
"Section 4. No permits for the exterior alteration to the...Palm Springs
City Hall...shall be granted without prior approval of the Historic Site
Preservation Board and/or the City Council, pursuant to Chapter 8.05 of
the Palm Springs Municipal Code; approved alterations shall maintain the
historic architectural integrity of the building."
On March 9, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board initiated an amendment to the
approved historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall to expand the designation to
include the site's landscape and parking area. The HSPB also adopted a 120-day Stay
of Demolition on the landscape and parking areas.
On May 11, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board conducted a public hearing and
voted 7-0 to recommend amendment of the Class One historic designation of City Hall
to include the entire site.
BACKGROUND AND SETTING
The Palm Spring City Hall was construction in the 1950's (with subsequent additions)
during the mid-century modern architectural wave that swept through the desert at that
time. Among the best-known architects of that era, Albert Frey with then-partners John
Porter Clark and Robson C. Chambers undertook the design of the City's government
center. The architectural features and merits of the building are described below.
The site is located at the northwest corner of the eastern terminus Tahquitz Canyon
Way at El Cielo Road. City Hall, the Police and County government buildings to the
south and the Palm Springs International Airport to the east define this part of the City
as the community's government center. Certain common features define all these
02
City Council Staff Report February 15,2012
Case: HSPB No. 33/3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way Page 3 of 7
facilities, including low-rise buildings, significant street setbacks, parking lots in front of
the buildings and predominantly low landscaping, usually in the form of lawns.
ANALYSIS
In the October 2, 1996 staff report to the City Council, the Palm Springs City Hall was
included with several other Albert Frey structures as recommended for designation as
historic sites, Class 1. The report cited Joseph Rosa's, Albert Frey. Architect (1990;
Rizzoli International Publications, Inc.) for much of the information used to analyze the
property's architectural and historic importance. However, no specific mention is made
of the building's relationship to the site or site conditions (lot size, shape, setbacks, etc.)
nor is there a discussion of the design of the parking lot and landscape areas. The
record is silent regarding any design or historic significance associated with the grounds
of the City Hall complex.
In Mr. Rosa's book, a site plan for City Hall is reproduced, but only the cement plinth in
front of the building is included:
O
PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL, PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Staff has also investigated the possibility that famed landscape architect Garrett Eckbo
may have designed the landscaping for the site. However, a review of the Eckbo
archives at the University of California has revealed no drawings, prints or manuscripts
for the property. The archives include photos of the site, but there is no evidence to
indicate that Mr. Eckbo had any involvement in the design of the site's landscaping.
Based on the record, there does not appear to be any acknowledged architectural or
historic significance to either the parking lots or landscape areas surrounding the
building.
Staff notes that absent any specific information, it may still be possible to ascribe
significance based on site conditions and features. Public comment has been received
03
City Council Staff Report February 15,2012
Case: HSPB No.33/3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way Page 4 of 7
to suggest that the parking lot's layout provides certain unobstructed views of the City
Hall building from Tahquitz Canyon Way. According to this argument, any revision that
would allow cars to park where they are currently not parking would inhibit the views of
the historic building. There is some merit to this argument if there can be found historic
significance to the open views of the site.
One example of such significance can be found in how the building is set on its base.
The low-rise building that reflects the mid-century modern ethic includes the concrete
base — or "plinth" — that has long been a characteristic of important buildings.
Government buildings, churches, banks were classically placed on massive foundations
that included a long series of steps from the ground level to the entry:
The low-rise nature of Palm Springs City Hall compressed the plinth to a flat concrete
base with only a few steps:
ri
04
City Council Staff Report February 15,2012
Case: HSPB No. 33/3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way Page 5 of 7
This concrete element is not protected by the current designation, but is an important
element in setting the scale of the building within the meaning of a government facility.
Whether it is important to view the building and base from off-site is a separate issue.
Government buildings are often located and designed to be prominently viewed from
surrounding areas. It is more difficult to achieve such prominence with a low-rise
building on a flat lot; however, the placement of parking to the sides of the main City
Hall entries, as well as the use of an unadorned lawn provides an open view of the
building from the street. Staff recognizes these elements as design choices, but it is not
clear whether they rise to the level of"historic".
During the time of the building's initial construction, the development of the Tahquitz/ El
Cielo area was generally devoid of significant landscape or other features and the
buildings sat in a fairly open and unobstructed landscape:
�I�I �III�I II
However, other features were soon introduced, including a fountain at the airport,
statuary on several sites and trees throughout the area, which combined to interrupt the
originally unimpeded views. Consequently, it does not appear that the City ever
considered the open and visible look of City Hall or other public buildings to be of
singular importance. Monuments, statues, other decorative elements and trees were
placed in front of the low-rise buildings; these created a more complicated setting and
demonstrated that more than views of the building were important to the community.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
As noted above in Background and Setting, Section 8.05.020 of the Municipal Code
provides the definition of an historic site: "An historic site is any real property such as: a
building; a structure, including but not limited to archways, tiled areas and similar
architectural elements, an archaeological excavation or object that is unique or
05
City Council Staff Report February 15, 2012
Case: HSPB No.33/3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way Page 6 of 7
significant because of its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship or aesthetic
effect'. Seven other qualities are listed therein:
(1) That is associated with events that have made a meaningful contribution
to the nation, state or community; or
(2) That is associated with lives of persons who made meaningful contribution
to national, state or local history; or
(3) That reflects or exemplifies a particular period of the national, state or
local history; or
(4) That embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of
construction; or
(5) That presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect
whose individual genius influenced his age; or that possesses high artistic
value; or
(6) That represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components
may lack individual distinction; or
(7) That has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to national,
state or local history or prehistory.
In review of the records and photographs, staff believes that several of the findings can
be made to extend the historic designation to include the concrete steps and walkway in
front of the building. This plinth element embodies the distinctive characteristics of the
mid-century modern style, as applied to a public building (finding no. 4) and appears to
be part of Albert Frey's design plan for the property (finding no. 5).
While the parking lot and some of the landscaping are also part of the original design,
the record fails to demonstrate that they represent part of the deliberate or historic
design scheme of the City Hall building. Further, staff does not recommend extending
historic designation for the parking lot and landscaping on the basis of protecting views
from off site; such off-site views do not appear to be a historic element of the site.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board recommend to City
Council the amendment of the Class 1 historic designation for the Palm Springs City
Hall to include the concrete steps and entry plaza in front of the main entrance and
Council Chambers.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
In accordance with Section 15331 (Historical Resources Restoration/Rehabilitation) of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed amendment is
categorically exempt from environmental review as the proposed designation meets the
conditions outlined for preservation of a historic resource.
06
City Council Staff Report February 15,2012
Case: HSPB No. 33/3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way Page 7 of 7
NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to section 8.05.140 of the Municipal Code of Palm Springs, All property
owners within four hundred (400) feet of the subject property have been notified and
notice was made in a newspaper of general circulation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
oEr ' . Ewi F ICP Thomas J. Wilson
Director of nn g Services Assistant City Manager, Dev't Svcs
David H. Ready
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map
2. Draft City Council Resolution
3. Resolution #33A of the HSPB
4. HSPB Staff Reports and Meeting Minutes (excerpt) of March 9, April 13, and May
11, 2010
5. Related HSPB exhibits
6. City Council Resolution No. 18907
07
Q QpLM Sp '
�- City of Palm Springs
z
v �^ Office of the City Clerk
" 3200 E. Tahquirz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, CA 92262
TeL (760)323-8204 • Pax: (760) 322-8332 • TDD: (760)864-9527 • Web:www.palmspringsca.gov
Cq</FORN�P
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Meeting of January 18, 2012, Item No. 1.A.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING CLASS 1
HISTORIC DESIGNATION FOR PALM SPRINGS CITY
HALL TO DENY THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION
BOARD'S REQUEST TO INCLUDE SITE PARKING AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS, AND AMENDING THE
DESIGNATION TO INCLUDE THE CONCRETE PLAZA,
LOCATED AT 3200 EAST TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, A
CLASS 1 HISTORIC SITE (HSPB 33)
The City Council of the City of Palm Springs continued the hearing to Wednesday,
February 15, 2012, Council Chamber, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, at 6:00 p.m., or
as soon thereafter as possible.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
State of California )
County of Riverside ) ss.
City of Palm Springs )
I, James Thompson, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, certify this Notice of
Continuance was posted at or before 6:00 p.m., January 19, 2012, as required by established
policies and procedures.
James Thompson
City Clerk
NOTICE OF CONT-C@yHall HSPB 33 2012-01-18.doc 08
Post Office Box 2743 0 Palm Springs, California 92263-2743
V o vuw s,.�c
Department of Planning Services
Vicinity Map
ATION W'Y
'
._CMC DRIVE W
PLNMCR AVE
4
O UWDRAVE <
I
. . ........... L......
I s
' w I
� ANDREAS RD w
0
ETAH ITLCMYONVVY
I
i
Legend
Q 400 ft buffer
® project site J'
Surrounding Parcels
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CASE NO: • HSPB - 33 DESCRIPTION: Amend the Palm Springs City Hall
Class 1 Historic designation (Case No. HSPB 33) to
APPLICANT: City of Palm Springs include the City Hall site including landscape and0 g
Historic Site Preservation Board parking areas.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE EXISTING HISTORIC
CLASS 1 DESIGNATION FOR PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL, 3200
EAST TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, TO INCLUDE THE CONCRETE
STEPS AND PLAZA AREA IN FRONT OF THE MAIN (SOUTH)
ELEVATION
WHEREAS, Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code allows for
the designation of historic sites; and
WHEREAS, ON October 2, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
18907 adopting a historic designation, Class 1 for the Palm Springs City Hall
building, but excluding the site and grounds; and
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board
conducted a public hearing in accordance with applicable law and voted to
recommend amending the existing Class 1 historic designation of the Palm
Springs City Hall to include the entire site in the historic designation; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the steps and plaza fronting the Palm
Springs City Hall shall further the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.05; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the steps and plaza fronting the Palm
Springs City Hall shall promote the sensitive preservation of said site; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered all of the
evidence in connection with the designation, including but not limited to the staff
report, application and historical research, all written and oral testimony
presented, and notes the following:
1. That the concrete area in front of the main entries to the Palm Springs City
Hall embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of
construction, because the steps and plaza, as a base or "plinth", reconcile
the distinctive characteristics of the mid-century modern style with the
traditional design of a public building.
2. That the concrete area in front of the main entries to the Palm Springs City
Hall presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect
whose individual genius influenced his age; because the steps and plaza
appear to be part of Albert Frey's design plan for the property; the life and
work of Albert Frey has been well-documented; and his work is recognized
world-wide as significant toward the development of the modern
10
movements of architecture, especially as he adapted such styles and
movements to the local environment.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Class 1 historic designation for the Palm Springs City
Hall is hereby amended to include the concrete steps and plaza in front of the
main (south) entries of the building, subject to the following conditions;
1. All future exterior modifications including but not limited to building, site,
landscaping, lighting, walls, and fences shall require Architectural Approval
pursuant to Section 94.04.00 of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance.
2. No permit for the alteration of the building exterior or the steps or entry
plaza fronting the main (south) building entries, including any and all of the
defining elements and characteristics shall be issued without prior approval
by the Historic Site Preservation Board.
3. That the City Clerk submit the Council Resolution to the County recorder for
recordation within 90 days of the effective date of this resolution.
4. All existing or previously approved alterations shall be considered
acceptable.
ADOPTED THIS xxTH DAY OF MONTH, YEAR.
David H. Ready, City Manager
ATTEST:
James Thompson, City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS )
I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby
fl
certify that Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
James Thompson, City Clerk
City of Palm Springs, California
i2
RESOLUTION NO. 33-A
OF THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD OF
THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND
THE EXISTING HISTORIC CLASS I DESIGNATION FOR
PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL, 3200 EAST TAHQUITZ
CANYON WAY, TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE SITE OF THE
PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL.
WHEREAS, Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code allows for. the
designation of historic sites; and
WHEREAS, ON October 2, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 18907
adopting a historic designation, Class I for the Palm Springs City Hall building, without
specifically including the entire site and grounds, and
WHEREAS, on February 9, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board, by a vote of 7 to
0, initiated an application to amend the existing historic designation of the Palm Springs
City Hall to consider including the entire site; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Historic Site Preservation Board of the City
of Palm Springs to consider designation of the Palm Springs City Hall site as a Class I
historic site was issued in accordance with applicable law; and ,
WHEREAS, on April 13 and May 11, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board
conducted a public hearing in accordance with applicable law to consider amending the
existing Class I historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall to specifically include
the entire site; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the site of the Palm Springs City Hall shall further the
purpose and, intent of Chapter 8.05; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the Palm Springs City Hall site shall promote the
sensitive preservation of said site; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Site Preservation Board has carefully reviewed and considered
all of the evidence in connection with the designation, including but not limited to the
staff report, application and historical research, all written and oral testimony presented,
and notes the following:
1. The site of the Palm Springs City Hall provides an important element as the
setting of the building within the meaning of a government facility.
13
2. The site design is a part of the original plan of the Clark, Frey, Chambers
Williams and Williams design of the City Hall.
THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Finding 1: That the Palm Springs City Hall and site is associated with events that have
made a meaningful contribution to the nation, state or community, as the city expanded
from the downtown core to the east to create a new government complex, and
Finding 3: That the Palm Springs City Hall and site reflects or exemplifies a particular
period of the national, state or local history; because the city was among the first to
develop an entire civic complex in a non-traditional style, and
Finding 4: That the Palm Springs City Hall and site embodies the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period or, method of construction; because the building and its
site are component of the distinctive characteristics of the contemporary architectural
interpretation of civic center buildings.
Finding 5: That the Palm Springs City Hall and site presents the work of a master
builder, designer, artist, or architect whose individual genius influenced his age; or that
possesses high artistic value because the steps and plaza appear to be part of Clark,
Frey, Chambers, Williams and Williams design plan for the property; the life and work of
Albert Frey has been well-documented; and his work is recognized world-wide as
significant in the development of the modern movements of architecture as he adapted
such styles and movements to the local environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the
Historic Site Preservation Board recommends that the City Council amend the Class I
historic designation for the Palm Springs City Hall to include the entire site subject to the
following conditions:
1. All future exterior modifications including but not limited to building, site,
landscaping, lighting, walls, and fences shall require Architectural Approval
pursuant to Section 94.04.00 of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance.
2. No permit for the alteration of the building exterior or site, including any and all of
the defining elements and characteristics shall be issued without prior approval
by the Historic Site Preservation Board. .
3. That the City Clerk submit the Council Resolution to the County recorder for
recordation within 90 days of the effective date of this resolution.
4. All existing or previously approved alterations shall be considered acceptable.
ADOPTED this 11`" day of May, 2010
14
AYES: DeLeeuw, Grattan, Ploss, Strahl, Williams, Marshall, Gilmer
NOES: none
ABSENT: none
ABSTENTIONS: none
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
15
Historic Site Preservation Board—Minutes • Page 2 of 5
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
6A. Case RSPB 33 (Palm Springs City Halo —An application by the City of Palm
Springs Historic Site Preservation Board to amend the designation of the
Palm Springs City Hall to include the City Hall site as a Class 1 historic site at
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Zone CC, Section 13.
Director Ewing summarized the staff report. Chair Gilmer reviewed his own memo
previously e-mailed to the Board and offered his arguments for designation of the
entire site, The Board discussed the request.
Chair Gilmer opened the public hearing. John Tymon spoke in favor of designating
the entire site. No other speakers came forward, and Chair Gilmer closed the public
hearing.
Board member Grattan confirmed that the parking lot modifications currently under
review would not be 'grandfathered' under the draft condition that allows all
previously-approved alterations.
M/S/C (Ploss / DeLeeuw, 7-0) To approve the draft resolution prepared by Chair
Gilmer to recommend amendment of the Class One historic designation of City Hall
to include the entire site, subject to the following amendments:
1. The architects of record be listed as Clark, Frey, Chambers, Williams and
Williams, and
2. The hearing dates of both April 13 and May 11, 2010 be listed.
7. CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL REQUEST(S):
7A. Case HSPB 3 (Welwood Murray Library)—An application by the City of Palm
Springs to remodel and expand the existing public library at 100 S. Palm
Canyon Drive, a Class One historic site, Zone C-B-D, Section 15. (CE)
Assistant Planner Mlaker presented the staff report, including staffs
recommendation to approve the request. Speakers on behalf of the applicant
included Ana Escalante, Alex Meyerhoff, Barbara Roberts (City Librarian) and Al
Smoot, project manager. The Board discussed a number of issues:
use and design of the outdoor plaza, including public access and
landscaping
design of the addition, including relationship to the building, its historic
elements, scale, materials and color
use of the site and plaza in relation to adjacent buildings and development
accessibility to the site and availability of restrooms to the community room
placement and use of interior furnishings
Is
>OEpALM Sp9
.,y
c
V N
x x
x coa......`.
c'411 FORN�P
Historic Site Preservation Board Memo
Date: May 11, 2010
Case No.: HSPB — 33, Amendment; City Hall
Application Type: Amendment to Historic Designation
Location: 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Applicant: Historic Site Preservation Board
Property Owner City of Palm Springs
Zone: C. C. (Civic Center District)
General Plan: Public/ Quasi-Public
APN: 502-150-005
From: Craig A. Ewing, AICP, Director of Planning Servi45
On April 13, 2010, by a vote of 5-0-2 (Marshall and Williams absent) the Historic Site
Preservation Board continued the public hearing on the above application to its May
meeting. The continuance was granted in part at the request of Vice Chair Marshall, as
well as to provide for additional research and opportunity for public comment.
As of the writing of this memo, no new research information has been submitted to the
City. Consequently, there is no additional analysis to provide the Board, and staff
continues to recommend that the Board recommend to the City Council amendment of
the Class 1 historic designation of the City Hall to include the concrete steps and entry
plaza in front of the main entrance and Council Chambers.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map
2. Draft Resolution
3. Staff Report, April 13, 2010
4. Draft Meeting Minutes, April 13, 2010 (excerpt)
17
°4 4tM SpSi
Department of Planning Services
Vicinity Map
Q
0
_.... ......CIVIC DRIVE\h'._.
PIAMOR AVE
1¢
tt
m
p LIVMOR AVE
1 �
I a
W_
Z �
i J
W ..... .9 R0
1 1
0
I I
Legend
® 400 ft buff]Parcels
project sit }
I
Surroundi ,
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CASE NO: HSPB - 33 DESCRIPTION: Amend the Palm Springs City Hall
Class 1 Historic designation (Case No. HSPB 33) to
APPLICANT: City of Palm Springs include the City Hall site including landscape an4 $
Historic Site Preservation Board parking areas.
RESOLUTION NO. 33-A
OF THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD
OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
AMEND THE EXISTING HISTORIC CLASS 1
DESIGNATION FOR PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL,
3200 EAST TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, TO INCLUDE
THE CONCRETE STEPS AND PLAZA AREA IN
FRONT OF THE MAIN (SOUTH) ELEVATION
WHEREAS, Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code allows for the
designation of historic sites; and
WHEREAS, ON October 2, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 18907
adopting a historic designation, Class 1 for the Palm Springs City Hall building, but
excluding the site and grounds; and
WHEREAS, on February 9, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board, by a vote
of 7 to 0, initiated an application to amend the existing historic designation of the
Palm Springs City Hall to consider including the site; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Historic Site Preservation Board of
the City of Palm Springs to consider designation of the Palm Springs International
Airport's west fagade a Class 1 historic site was issued in accordance with
applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board conducted a
public hearing in accordance with applicable law to consider amending the
existing Class 1 historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the steps and plaza fronting the Palm Springs City
Hall shall further the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.05; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the steps and plaza fronting the Palm Springs City
Hall shall promote the sensitive preservation of said site; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Site Preservation Board has carefully reviewed and
considered all of the evidence in connection with the designation, including but not
limited to the staff report, application and historical research, all written and oral
testimony presented, and notes the following:
19
1. The steps and plaza fronting the main (south) entries of the Palm Springs
City Hall provide an important element in setting the scale of the building
within the meaning of a government facility .
2. The steps and plaza appear to be part of the original plan of the Albert Frey
design of the City Hall.
THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That the concrete area in front of the main entries to the Palm
Springs City Hall embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or
method of construction, because the steps and plaza, as a base or 'plinth",
reconcile the distinctive characteristics of the mid.century modern style with the
traditional design of a public building
Section 2: That the concrete area in front of the main entries to the Palm Springs
City Hall presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect whose
individual genius influenced his age; because the steps and plaza appear to be
part of Albert Frey's design plan for the property; the life and work of Albert Frey
has been well-documented; and his work is recognized world-wide as significant
toward the development of the modern movements of architecture, especially as
he adapted such styles and movements to the local environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing,
the Historic Site Preservation Board recommends that the City Council amend the
Class 1 historic designation for the Palm Springs City Hall to include the concrete
steps and plaza in front of the main (south) entries of the building, subject to the
following conditions;
1. All future exterior modifications including but not limited to building, site,
landscaping, lighting, walls, and fences shall require Architectural Approval
pursuant to Section 94.04.00 of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance.
2. No permit for the alteration of the building exterior or the steps or entry
plaza fronting the main (south) building entries, including any and all of the
defining elements and characteristics shall be issued without prior approval
by the Historic Site Preservation Board.
3. That the City Clerk submit the Council Resolution to the County recorder for
recordation within 90 days of the effective date of this resolution.
4. All existing or previously approved alterations shall be considered
acceptable.
ADOPTED this 13th day of April, 2010.
AYES:
20
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Craig A. Ewing, AICP
Director of Planning Services
21
Page 1 of 1
Craig Ewing
From: Barbara Marshall [atomicbee57@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 5:39 PM
To: John@johngilmer.com; Craig Ewing
Subject: HSPB 13 Apr Agenda
Hi Craig and John,
I would very much like to participate in the discussion on agenda item 6B, HSPB-33 Amendment; City Hall, and
respectfully request that the item be pulled from the 13 Apr agenda and rescheduled for discussion at the May HSPB
meeting.
Cheers,
Barbara.
22
4/8/2010
Historic Site Preservation Boa0minutes Page 2 of 5
Tuesday, April 13, 2010 DRAT
ncluding if disclosure of the pending HSPB decision was provided to prospective
b rs and the improved conditions at the site.
M/S Strahl / Grattan, 4-1, opposed Ploss, 2 absent Marshall and Williams)
To contin the item for 60 days.
Staff noted that the item uld be returned to the Board at its meeting of June 8,
2010.
M/S/C (DeLeeu / Ploss, 5- , absent Marshall and Williams) To re-open
Public Comments
Chair Gilmer invited any public comments, espe on the above item.
Frank Tysen, 175 S. Cahuilla Road, reported that the ga etween the Community
Church and the Orchid Tree is not secure and that the fenc etting is not being
maintained. He has met the new owners and was impressed ' their level of
interest in the property. Mr. Tysen also reported on the economic i rtance of
preserving smaller historic hotels.
—�► 6B. Case HSPB 33 (Palm Springs City Halo — An application by the City of Palm
Springs Historic Site Preservation Board to amend the designation of the
Palm Springs City Hall to include the City Hall site as a Class 1 historic site at
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Zone CC, Section 13.
Director Ewing presented the staff report and noted the request from Vice Chair
Marshall to continue the item. The Board asked about past landscaping in front of
the site.
Chair Gilmer opened the public hearing.
No speakers came forward, and Chair Gilmer continued the public hearing.
The Board discussed continuance of the item, including the practice of granting
Board member continuance requests, the ability to conduct more research into the
archives, the timing of related parking lot improvement plans and the potential for
receiving additional public testimony.
M/S/C (Strahl / DeLeeuw, 5-0, 2 absent Marshall and Williams) To continue
the matter to the next meeting.
F.
7
Case SP 09-001 27 (EI Paseo Building) - A request by
property owner to revise existing building m to include one eight
23
• •
MEMO REGARDING EXTENDING THE HISTORIC SITE
DESIGNATION OF PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL (HSPB 33) TO
INCLUDE THE CITY HALL SITE
Date: April 13, 2010
Location: 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Property Owner City of Palm Springs
Zone: C. C. (Civic Center District)
General Plan: Public I Quasi-Public
APN: 502-150-005
A memo to the City of Palm Springs Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) regarding
amending the existing historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall at 3200 E.
Tahquitz Canyon Way. The proposed amendment would expand the existing
designation to include landscape and parking areas. Such amended designation would:
1. Place the entire property under the guidance of Municipal Code Section 8.05
2. Require the City to maintain the buildings consistent with that ordinance,
PRIOR ACTIONS
• On September 10, 1996, the Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) conducted
a public hearing unanimously recommended to the City Council designation of
the Palm Springs City Hall as a Historic Site, Class 1.
• On October 2, 1996, the City Council conducted a public hearing and
unanimously approved the Palm Springs City Hall as a Historic Site, Class 1.
The Staff Report contained the following language:
"the recommended Class 1 designation protect the architectural and historic
integrity of the sites in that the structures and their sites may not be modified, nor
objects removed, without the approval of the City Council; usage may also be
limited to the extent that it may impair the integrity of the site...The City Council's
approval of modifications is delegated to the HSPB by Chapter 8.05 except that
appeals of an HSPB decision are heard by Council."
24
Historic Site Preservation Board City Hall Memo Page 2 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment -Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
The Council resolution included the following language:
"Section 4. No permits for the exterior alteration to the...Palm Springs City
Hall...shall be granted without prior approval of the Historic Site Preservation Board and
/or the City Council, pursuant to Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code;
approved alterations shall maintain the historic architectural integrity of the building."
[NOTE: There is nothing in this language that excludes site protection.]
• On March 9, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board initiated an amendment
to the approved historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall to reaffirm its
intended designation of the entire site including the site's landscape parking lot
design. The HSPB also adopted a 120-day Stay of Demolition on the landscape
and parking areas.
BACKGROUND AND SETTING
Definition of an Historic Site.
Section 8.05.020 of the Municipal Code provides the definition of an historic site as
follows:
(a) Historic Site.
An historic site is any real property such as: a building; a structure, including but not
limited to archways, tiled areas and similar architectural elements; an archaeological excavation
or object that is unique or significant because of its location, design, setting, materials,
workmanship or aesthetic effect and:
1. That is associated with events that have made a meaningful contribution to the nation,
state or community; or
2. That is associated with lives of persons who made meaningful contribution to national,
state or local history; or
3. That reflects or exemplifies a particular period of the national, state or. local
history,- or.
4. That embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of Construction;
or.
5. That presents the work.of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect whose individual
genius influenced his age; or that possesses high artistic value; or
6. That represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack
individual distinction, or
7. That has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to national, state or local
history or prehistory.
A Class 1 Historic Site may also qualify for historic designation at the federal, state
and/or county level.
25
Historic Site Preservation Board City Hall Memo Page 3 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment -Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
Designation of Historic Sites.
The City Council is authorized to designate Historic Sites.
The Historic Site Preservation Board makes recommendations to the City Council that
certain sites be designated as Historic Sites in accordance with Section 8.05.135 of the
Municipal Code. The Board may initiate studies, surveys and investigations it deems
necessary to adequately gather information in consideration of a recommendation.
Conditions that apply to Class 1 Historic Sites.
According to Section 8.05 of the Municipal Code, the following shall apply to a Class I
Historic Site;
I. It shall meet the definition of an historic site as outlined in Municipal Code
Section 8.05.020.
2. An archival file shall be maintained on the property by the City.
3. It may be qualified as historic' at the federal, state, and/or county level.
4. The structure/site may not be modified nor objects removed without the approval
of the City Council.
5. The use may be limited by the City Council to the extent that it may impair the
integrity of the site.
6. A plaque explaining the historic nature of the site will be installed at the site.
7. Compliance with all rifles and regulations for Historic Sites and Historic Districts
under Article IV of Chapter 8.05 of the Municipal Code shall be required.
DESCRIPTION
The original designation of city Hall as a Class 1 Site was ratified by the City Council on
10/02/96. The Staff Report read as follows: ""The recommended Class 1 designation
protects the architectural and historic integrity of the sites in that the structures and their
sites may not be modified, nor objects removed, without the approval of the City
Council; usage may also be limited to the extent that it may impair the integrity of the
site. The City Council's approval of modifications is delegated to the HSPB by Chapter
8.05 except that appeals of an HSPB decision are heard by the Council. The Current
Planning Director has indicated that the Council's approval of the Class 1 designation
deleted the protection for the site and covered only the building. However, no support
documentation for this assertion has been forthcoming.
Although it has-been widely believed that designation by the City Council included the
entire City Hall site, as a precaution, the HSPB has decided to forward an amended
nomination to the City Council to reaffirm its intended designation of the entire site, and
asked the planning staff to prepare a nomination to that effect. The response from the
staff was to modify the request of the HSPB and prepare a resolution that proposed
extending the boundaries of the designation to include only that portion of the site that
contained the walkway that connects to entrances to the Administration building and the
26
• •
Historic Site Preservation Board City Hall Memo Page 4 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment -Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
Council Chambers. The staff based its decision on the fact that in Joseph Rosa's
biography of Albert Frey, "no specific mention was made of the building's relationship
with the site nor is there a discussion of the design of the parking lot and landscape
areas." It should be pointed out that no discussion of the design of the parking lot and
landscape areas of any of the illustrated Frey projects is included in.the Rosa text.
The Palm Spring City Hall was constructed in 1957 as part of an overall Civic Center
project. Palm Springs was one of the first American cites to build an entire Civic center
in a contemporary style. The site is located at the northwest corner of East Tahquitz
Canyon Way at El Cielo Road. City Hall, along with the Police Station and the Riverside
County Building to the south and the Palm Springs International Airport to the east,
define this part of the City as the community's Civic Center. Certain common features
define all these facilities, including low-rise buildings surrounded by setbacks that
include low landscaping, usually in the form of lawns, and islands of parking set in the
landscape.
City Hall was designed by the architectural firm of Clark, Frey & Chambers.' The
architectural features and merits of the building are described in Joseph Rosa's Albert
Frey, Architect(1990; Rizzoli International Publications, Inc.) for much of the information
used to analyze the property's architectural and historic importance:
"When Frey returned from a trip around the world at the end of 1955, he completed the
final scheme for one of his most important public building, the Palm Springs City Hal!
(1952-57). While traveling, Frey's interest in the relationship between pure form and
function was renewed, and this interest is reflected in the City Hall by the creation of a
separate volume for the Council chamber. The main volume of the building is linear and
symmetrical, with a wing extending from the rear of the main entrance. To the right is the
Council Chamber, which is higher than the rest of the building, as function requirements
of the public assembly hall were used to shape the space. All of its perimeter exterior
walls are stepped to improve the acoustics and to bring in north light. The entrance to
the Council Chamber is more elaborate than the main entrance. A sign above it states
°The People Are The City," and it is marked by a poured concrete disc held up by four
columns. The disc corresponds to the void left by a circle removed from the rectangular
metal plan that marks the main entry. The building is constructed of concrete block in
which every two rows are aligned in relation to each other, thereby creating a pattern of
squares in elevation."
In the October 2, 1996 staff report to the City Council, the Palm Springs City Hall was
included with five other structures designed by Albert Frey as recommended for
designation as Class I Historic Sites.
1 (The original structure was designed in collaboration with E.Steward Williams,A/A,and additions(Emergency
Operation Center in 1964,New Conference. Rooms in 1972&Community Development Wing in 1984,designed by Mr. Williams,
have been made over the years.)
27
Historic Site Preservation Board City Hall Memo Page 5 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment -Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
ANALYSIS
Over the course of his career, Albert Frey was well-known for the siting and the context
of his projects. Virtually all of projects were site specific, often incorporating large
elements such as boulders already existing on the site into their designs. Other
projects, such as the Palm Springs City Hall (which was part of a larger Civic Center
master plan) benefitted from his experience with Modernist Master Le Corbusier, where
designs were sited as objects in a field of greenery, i.e. objects in space. Although this
formalist dates from classical times, and was reinterpreted concept in the siting of
Palladio's famous villas, it was Le Corbusier's Villa Savoye of 1928 that informed Frey's
work, most notably on the famous freestanding Aluminaire House of 1932 and the Palm
Springs City Hall only 23 years later. No landscape architect is credited for the City Hall
project, thus reaffirming the master's (Frey's) hand in the site planning that created the
building's setting.
It would only be a surprise to a lay person that the first design exam an architect must
complete to begin securing his license is the Site Planning exam. It is with the site plan
that an architect decides how a building will be designed. The building's relationship
with the site is of paramount importance in the resolution of the program and the
aesthetics that ultimately decide how a building factions and ultimately how it will
appear. With the City Hall design, the building is centered on the site and available for
viewing from all sides; the site plan reads almost like an architect's flow diagram with
the parking modules placed nearest the functions they serve; on the east is the parking
for the public attending hearings in the Council Chambers; on the west is parking
reserved for visitors headed to City Hall's administrative entrance. These two areas are
connected by an elegantly curving roadway, resulting in a view of the building that is
essentially unobstructed.
Clark, Frey & Chambers used sophisticated architectural devices of centering and re-
centering on the facade of City Hall to express the functions within. The main block of
City Hall is symmetrical in plan about its central axis — the main entry. The addition of
the bris-soleil to facade and the raised plinth of three steps to the east links the main
entrance with its square canopy and circular void, to the Council Chamber entrance,
with its circular canopy which is the positive of the main entries void. This creates a
central element with the two entrances flanking it and balancing each other. This gives
prominence to this portion of the building, which not coincidentally houses the mayor's
offices. In much the same way, the central panel of open lawn, allowing unobstructed
views of the two entrances and the central linking element, refocuses the eye to this
central element and the two entrances. The building and site are in stasis. The setting
reinforces this concept with it's tripartite layout of object (parking), void (lawn), object
(parking). The two parking lots are carefully placed objects, aligning with the edges of
the central building composition, highlighting the important elements of the building and
serving an integral role in the reading of the building. The original design of the
landscaping (from early aerial photographs) had a strip of desert landscaping running
28
• •
Historic Site Preservation Board City Hall Memo Page 6 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment -Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
between the parking and vehicular access and the front of the building from street to
street. This should be taken into account in any future landscaping of the site, as it
served.to further define the central panel of lawn in front of City Hall as `special'.
Public buildings are particularly important examples of properties where the landscape,
and especially the open space surrounding the building, adds to the significance or
setting of the property. Setting is the physical environment of an historic property; it
refers to the character of the place in which the property played its historic role. It
involves how, not just where, the property is situated and its relationship to surrounding
features and open space. Setting often reflects the basic physical conditions under
which a property is built and the factions it was intended to serve. In addition, the way
in which a property is positioned in its environment can reflect the designer's concept of
nature and aesthetic preferences. The setting includes the placement or arrangement
of buildings and other resources on their sites. With public buildings, it is especially
important that the historic appearance and land uses, including landscape features, and
vegetation that characterized the property during the period of significance including
gardens, walls, roadways, grading, fountains, open space be maintained.
In Palm Springs' Civic Center, these features and their relationships should be valued
as part of the original civic center design, not only within the exact boundaries of the
City Hall property, but also between that property and its surroundings including the
relationships between the other buildings, features and open space that comprise the
Civic Center complex.
Based on this understanding, the importance of the architectural and historic
significance of the site plan the parking lots or landscape areas surrounding the building
must be acknowledged.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
As noted above in Background and Setting, Section 8.05.020 of the Municipal Code
provides the definition of an historic site: "An historic site is any real property such as a
building, a structure, including but not limited to archways, tiled areas and similar
architectural elements, an archaeological excavation or object that is unique or
significant because of its location, design, setting materials, workmanship or aesthetic
effect. Seven findings are listed therein:
(1) That is associated with events that have made a meaningful contribution to
the nation, state or community; or
(2) That is associated with lives of persons who made meaningful contribution
to national, state, or local history; or
(3) That reflects or exemplifies a particular period of the national, state or local
history; or
29
0
Historic Site Preservation Board City Hall Memo Page 7 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment -Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
(4) That embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or, method
of construction; or
(5) That presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect
whose individual genius influenced his age; or that possesses high artistic
value; or:
(6) That represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components
may lack individual distinction; or
(7) That has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to national,
state or local history or prehistory.
I would ask that the Board consider these points in its discussion of the potential
amendment to City Hall Historic Site Designation to clarify the inclusion of it's site.
One potential Draft Resolution is attached for the Board's consideration.
30
• i
Department of Planning Services
Vicinity Map
eMeuw
ire
It—IL
AM
�6
leg
I ' 1
uond
ffR
l H
dRtiuer
WMai#site .
.'&uttweu&pg Farcela 7
CITE' OF PALM SPRINGS
CASE NO • HSPB-33 DESCRiPTiQN Amend the Palen Springs Ctty Hall
Clasps 4 Histatt designation (Case No. RSPB 33) to
APPLJCANT:City of Pah Springs include the City Hain site induding tandecape, and
Historic Sias Presenration,Board parking areas
31
•
RESOLUTION NO. 33-A
OF THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD OF
THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND
THE EXISTING HISTORIC CLASS I DESIGNATION FOR
PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL, 3200 EAST TAHQUITZ
CANYON WAY, TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE SITE OF THE
PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL.
WHEREAS, Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code allows for. the
designation of historic sites; and
WHEREAS, ON October 2, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 18907
adopting a historic designation, Class I for the Palm Springs City Hall building,
without specifically including the entire site and grounds, and
WHEREAS, on February 9, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board, by a vote
of 7 to 0, initiated an application to amend the existing historic designation of the
Palm Springs City Hall to consider including the entire site; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Historic Site Preservation Board of
the City of Palm Springs to consider designation of the Palm Springs City Hall
site as a Class I historic site was issued in accordance with applicable law; and
NN-lb Mc�l 0� 7-No
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2010, the Historic Sife Preservation Board conducted a
public hearing in accordance with applicable law to consider amending the
existing Class I historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall to specifically
include the entire site; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the site of the Palm Springs City Hall shall further
the purpose and, intent of Chapter 8.05; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the Palm Springs City Hall site shall promote the
sensitive preservation of said site; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Site Preservation Board has carefully reviewed and
considered all of the evidence in connection with the designation, including but
not limited to the staff report, application and historical research, all written and
oral testimony presented, and notes the following:
32
i
I. The site of the Palm Springs City Hall provides an important element as
the setting of the building within the meaning of a government facility.
2. The site design is a part of the original plan of the Clark, Frey & Chambers
design of the City Hall.
THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD HEREBY FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
Finding 1: That the Palm Springs City Hall and site is associated with events that
have made a meaningful contribution to the nation, state or community, as the
city expanded from the downtown core to the east to create a new government
complex, and
Finding 3: That the Palm Springs City Hall and site reflects or exemplifies a
particular period of the national, state or local history; because the city was
among the first to develop an entire civic complex in a non-traditional style, and
Finding 4: That the Palm Springs City Hall and site embodies the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period or, method of construction; because the building
and its site are component of the distinctive characteristics of the contemporary
architectural interpretation of civic center buildings.
Finding 5: That the Palm Springs Ci Hall and site presents the work of a master
builder, designer, artist, or archite whose individual genius influenced his age;
or that possesses high artistic v ue because the steps and plaza appear to be
part of Clark, Frey & Chambers design plan for the property; the life and work of
Albert Frey has been well-documented; and his work is recognized world-wide as
significant in the development of the modern movements of architecture as he
adapted such styles and movements to the local environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing,
the Historic Site Preservation Board recommends that the City Council amend
the Class I historic designation for the Palm Springs City Hall to include the entire
site subject to the following conditions:
1. All future exterior modifications including but not limited to building, site,
landscaping, lighting, walls, and fences shall require Architectural
Approval pursuant to Section 94.04.00 of the Palm Springs Zoning
Ordinance.
33
9 •
2. No permit for the alteration of the building exterior or site, including any
and all of the defining elements and characteristics shall be issued without
prior approval by the Historic Site Preservation Board.
3. That the City Clerk submit the Council Resolution to the County recorder
for recordation within 90 days of the effective date of this resolution.
4. All existing or previously approved alterations shall be considered
acceptable.
ADOPTED this _day of May, 2010
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
34
ih-
tE
Lelt �+: a'
.. . ... ..a_ .._,
'x*?I
. i�v: ,
Jim
ui
,?ALM gp�
.y
c
V N
k k
* ryCPo9PfF�,e� ;
C'94
/P01tN\p
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report
Date: April 13, 2010
Case No.: HSPB — 33, Amendment; City Hall
Application Type: Amendment to Historic Designation
Location: 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Applicant: Historic Site Preservation Board
Property Owner City of Palm Springs
Zone: C. C. (Civic Center District)
General Plan: Public/ Quasi-Public
APN: 502-150-005
From: Craig A. Ewing, AICP, Director of Planning Services
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
An application by the City of Palm Springs Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) to
amend the existing historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall at 3200 E.
Tahquitz Canyon Way. The proposed amendment would expand the existing
designation to include landscape and parking areas. Such amended designation would:
1. Place the entire property under the guidance of Municipal Code Section 8.05
2. Require the City to maintain the buildings consistent with that ordinance,
RECOMMENDATION
That the Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) recommends approval to the City
Council amending the historic designation of the City Hall to include the site's landscape
and parking areas. A draft resolution is attached for consideration.
36
Historic Site Preservation Board ft Report . Page 2 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment-Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
PRIOR ACTIONS
• On September 10, 1996, the Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) conducted
a public hearing unanimously recommended to the City Council designation of
the Palm Springs City Hall as a Historic Site, Class 1.
• On October 2, 1996, the City Council conducted a public hearing and
unanimously approved the Palm Springs City Hall as a Historic Site, Class 1.
The Council resolution included the following language:
"Section 4. No permits for the exterior alteration to the...Palm Springs City
Hall...shall be granted without prior approval of the Historic Site Preservation
Board and / or the City Council, pursuant to Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs
Municipal Code; approved alterations shall maintain the historic architectural
integrity of the building."
• On March 9, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board initiated an amendment
to the approved historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall to expand the
designation to include the site's landscape and parking area. The HSPB also
adopted a 120-day Stay of Demolition on the landscape and parking areas.
BACKGROUND AND SETTING
_Definition of an Historic Site.
Section 8.05.020 of the Municipal Code provides the definition of an historic site as
follows;
(a) Historic Site.
An historic site is any real property such as: a building; a structure, including but
not limited to archways, tiled areas and similar architectural elements; an archaeological
excavation or object that is unique or significant because of its location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship or aesthetic effect and:
1. That is associated with events that have made a meaningful contribution to the
nation, state or community; or
2. That is associated with lives of persons who made meaningful contribution to
national, state or local history; or
3. That reflects or exemplifies a particular period of the national, state or local
history; or
4. That embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of
construction; or
5. That presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect whose
individual genius influenced his age; or that possesses high artistic value; or
6. That represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may
lack individual distinction; or
7. That has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to national, state
or local history or prehistory.
37
Historic Site Preservation Board Is Report . Page 3 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment-Palm Springs City Hall April 13, 2010
A Class 1 Historic Site may also qualify for historic designation at the federal, state
and/or county level.
Designation of Historic Sites.
The City Council is authorized to designate Historic Sites.
The Historic Site Preservation Board makes recommendations to the City Council that
certain sites be designated as Historic Sites in accordance with Section 8.05.135 of the
Municipal Code. The Board may initiate studies, surveys and investigations it deems
necessary to adequately gather information in consideration of a recommendation.
Conditions that apply to Class 1 Historic Sites.
According to Section 8.05 of the Municipal Code, the following shall apply to a Class 1
Historic Site;
1. It shall meet the definition of an historic site as outlined in Municipal Code
Section 8.05.020.
2. An archival file shall be maintained on the property by the City.
3. It may be qualified as 'historic' at the federal, state, and/or county level.
4. The structure/site may not be modified nor objects removed without the approval
of the City Council.
5. The use may be limited by the City Council to the extent that it may impair the
integrity of the site.
6. A plaque explaining the historic nature of the site will be installed at the site.
7. Compliance with all rules and regulations for Historic Sites and Historic Districts
under Article IV of Chapter 8.05 of the Municipal Code shall be required.
DESCRIPTION
The Palm Spring City Hall was construction in the 1950's (with subsequent additions)
during the mid-century modern architectural wave that swept through the desert at that
time. Among the best-known architects of that era, Albert Frey with then-partners John
Porter Clark and Robson C. Chambers undertook the design of the City's government
center. The architectural features and merits of the building are described below.
The site is located at the northwest corner of the eastern terminus Tahquitz Canyon
Way at El Cielo Road. City Hall, the Police and County government buildings to the
south and the Palm Springs International Airport to the east define this part of the City
as the community's government center. Certain common features define all these
facilities, including low-rise buildings, significant street setbacks, parking lots in front of
the buildings and predominantly low landscaping, usually in the form of lawns.
In the October 2, 1996 staff report to the City Council, the Palm Springs City Hall was
included with several other Albert Frey structures as recommended for designation as
historic sites, Class 1. The report cited Joseph Rosa's, Albert Frey, Architect (1990;
Rizzoli International Publications, Inc.) for much of the information used to analyze the
property's architectural and historic importance:
38_
Historic Site Preservation Board is Report • Page 4 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment-Palm Springs City Hall April 13, 2010
"When Frey returned from a trip around the world at the end of 1955, he
completed the final scheme for one of his most important public building,
the Palm Springs City Hall (1952-57). While traveling, Frey's interest in
the relationship between pure form and function was renewed, and this
interest is reflected in the City Hall by the creation of a separate volume
for the Council chamber. The main volume of the building is linear and
symmetrical, with a wing extending from the rear of the main entrance. To
the right is the Council Chamber, which is higher than the rest of the
building, as function requirements of the public assembly hall were used
to shape the space. All of its perimeter exterior walls are stepped to
improve the acoustics and to bring in north light. The entrance to the
council Chamber is more elaborate than the main entrance. A sign above
it states "The People Are The City,"and it is marked by a poured concrete
disc held up by four columns. The disc corresponds to the void left by a
circle removed from the rectangular metal plan that marks the main entry.
The building is construction of concrete blocks in which every two rows
are aligned in relation to each other, thereby creating a pattern of squares
in elevation. (The original structure was designed in collaboration with E.
Steward Williams, AIA, and additions (Emergency Operation Center in
1964, New Conference Rooms in 1972 & Community Development Wing
in 1984, designed by Mr. Williams, have been made over the years.)
No specific mention is made of the building's relationship to the site or site conditions
(lot size, shape, setbacks, etc.) nor is there a discussion of the design of the parking lot
and landscape areas. The record is silent regarding any design or historic significance
associated with the grounds of the City Hall complex.
ANALYSIS
In Mr. Rosa's book, a site plan for City Hall is reproduced, but only the cement plinth in
front of the building is included:
PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL, PALM SPRINGS, CAUFORNIA
39
Historic Site Preservation Board*Report • Page 5 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment-Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
Based on the record, there does not appear to be any acknowledged architectural or
historic significance to either the parking lots or landscape areas surrounding the
building.
Staff notes that absent any specific information, it may still be possible to ascribe
significance based on site conditions and features. Public comment has been received
to suggest that the parking lot's layout provides certain unobstructed views of the City
Hall building from Tahquitz Canyon Way. According to this argument, any revision that
would allow cars to park where they are currently not parking would inhibit the views of
the historic building. There is some merit to this argument if there can be found historic
significance to the open views of the site.
One example of such significance can be found in how the building is set on its base.
The low-rise building that reflects the mid-century modern ethic includes the concrete
base — or "plinth" — that has long been a characteristic of important buildings.
Government buildings, churches, banks were classically placed on massive foundations
that included a long series of steps from the ground level to the entry:
et __
1
The low-rise nature of Palm Springs City Hall compressed the plinth to a flat concrete
base with only a few steps:
Qd
Historic Site Preservation Board *Report • Page 6 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment-Palm Springs City Hall April 13, 2010
This concrete element is not protected by the current designation, but is an important
element in setting the scale of the building within the meaning of a government facility.
Whether it is important to view the building and base from off-site is a separate issue.
Government buildings are often located and designed to be prominently viewed from
surrounding areas. It is more difficult to achieve such prominence with a low-rise
building on a flat lot; however, the placement of parking to the sides of the main City
Hall entries, as well as the use of an unadorned lawn provides an open view of the
building from the street. Staff recognizes these elements as design choices, but it is not
clear whether they rise to the level of"historic".
During the time of the building's initial construction, the development of the Tahquitz / El
Cielo area was generally devoid of significant landscape or other features and the
buildings sat in a fairly open and unobstructed landscape:
II
41
Historic Site Preservation Board-0 Report • Page 7 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment-Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
However, other features were soon introduced, including a fountain at the airport,
statuary on several sites and trees throughout the area, which combined to interrupt the
originally unimpeded views. Consequently, it does not appear that the City ever
considered the open and visible look of City Hall or other public buildings to be of
singular importance. Monuments, decorative elements and trees were included among
the low-rise buildings; these created a more complicated setting and demonstrated that
more than views of the building were important to the community.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
As noted above in Background and Setting, Section 8.05.020 of the Municipal Code
provides the definition of an historic site: "An historic site is any real property such as: a
building, a structure, including but not limited to archways, tiled areas and similar
architectural elements, an archaeological excavation or object that is unique or
significant because of its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship or aesthetic
effect". Seven other qualities are listed therein:
(1) That is associated with events that have made a meaningful contribution
to the nation, state or community; or
(2) That is associated with lives of persons who made meaningful contribution
to national, state or local history; or
(3) That reflects or exemplifies a particular period of the national, state or
local history; or
(4) That embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of
construction; or
(5) That presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect
whose individual genius influenced his age; or that possesses high artistic
value; or
(6) That represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components
may lack individual distinction; or
(7) That has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to national,
state or local history or prehistory.
In review of the records and photographs, staff believes that several of the findings can
be made to extend the historic designation to include the concrete steps and walkway in
front of the building. This plinth element embodies the distinctive characteristics of the
mid-century modern style, as applied to a public building (finding no. 4) and appears to
be part of Albert Frey's design plan for the property (finding no. 5).
While the landscaping and parking lot are also part of the original design, it is not clear
from the record that they represent part of the deliberate or historic design scheme of
the City Hall building. Further, staff does not recommend extending historic designation
for the parking lot and landscaping on the basis of that protecting views from off site
does not appear to be a historic element of the site.
42
Historic Site Preservation Board 4 Report • Page 8 of 8
Case HSPB-33 Amendment-Palm Springs City Hall April 13,2010
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board recommend to City
Council the amendment of the Class 1 historic designation for the Palm Springs City
Hall to include the concrete steps and entry plaza in front of the main entrance and
Council Chambers.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
In accordance with Section 15331 (Historical Resources Restoration/Rehabilitation) of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed amendment is
categorically exempt from environmental review as the proposed designation meets the
conditions outlined for preservation of a historic resource.
NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to section 8.05.140 of the Municipal Code of Palm Springs, All property
owners within four hundred (400) feet of the subject property have been notified and
notice was made in a newspaper of general circulation.
-A"F' F
wing, A
Direc or of Plap irV Services
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map
2. Draft Resolution
43
RESOLUTION NO. 33-A
OF THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD
OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
AMEND THE EXISTING HISTORIC CLASS 1
DESIGNATION FOR PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL,
3200 EAST TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, TO INCLUDE
THE CONCRETE STEPS AND PLAZA AREA IN
FRONT OF THE MAIN (SOUTH) ELEVATION
WHEREAS, Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code allows for the
designation of historic sites; and
WHEREAS, ON October 2, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 18907
adopting a historic designation, Class 1 for the Palm Springs City Hall building, but
excluding the site and grounds; and
WHEREAS, on February 9, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board, by a vote
of 7 to 0, initiated an application to amend the existing historic designation of the
Palm Springs City Hall to consider including the site; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Historic Site Preservation Board of
the City of Palm Springs to consider designation of the Palm Springs International
Airport's west fagade a Class 1 historic site was issued in accordance with
applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2010, the Historic Site Preservation Board conducted a
public hearing in accordance with applicable law to consider amending the
existing Class 1 historic designation of the Palm Springs City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the steps and plaza fronting the Palm Springs City
Hall shall further the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.05; and
WHEREAS, the designation of the steps and plaza fronting the Palm Springs City
Hall shall promote the sensitive preservation of said site; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Site Preservation Board has carefully reviewed and
considered all of the evidence in connection with the designation, including but not
limited to the staff report, application and historical research, all written and oral
testimony presented, and notes the following:
44
1. The steps and plaza fronting the main (south) entries of the Palm Springs
City Hall provide an important element in setting the scale of the building
within the meaning of a government facility .
2. The steps and plaza appear to be part of the original plan of the Albert Frey
design of the City Hall.
THE HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That the concrete area in front of the main entries to the Palm
Springs City Hall embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or
method of construction, because the steps and plaza, as a base or "plinth",
reconcile the distinctive characteristics of the mid-century modern style with the
traditional design of a public building
Section 2: That the concrete area in front of the main entries to the Palm Springs
City Hall presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect whose
individual genius influenced his age; because the steps and plaza appear to be
part of Albert Frey's design plan for the property; the life and work of Albert Frey
has been well-documented; and his work is recognized world-wide as significant
toward the development of the modern movements of architecture, especially as
he adapted such styles and movements to the local environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing,
the Historic Site Preservation Board recommends that the City Council amend the
Class 1 historic designation for the Palm Springs City Hall to include the concrete
steps and plaza in front of the main (south) entries of the building, subject to the
following conditions;
1. All future exterior modifications including but not limited to building, site,
landscaping, lighting, walls, and fences shall require Architectural Approval
pursuant to Section 94.04.00 of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance.
2. No permit for the alteration of the building exterior or the steps or entry
plaza fronting the main (south) building entries, including any and all of the
defining elements and characteristics shall be issued without prior approval
by the Historic Site Preservation Board.
3. That the City Clerk submit the Council Resolution to the County recorder for
recordation within 90 days of the effective date of this resolution.
4. All existing or previously approved alterations shall be considered
acceptable.
ADOPTED this 13th day of April, 2010.
AYES:
45
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Craig A. Ewing, AICP
Director of Planning Services
46
rider one of the sides of the house. The only strong vertical element is the back of the fireplace, which
denotes located at the intersection of the two.rectangles. At this junction, the walls become static and
separate and de m tside from the inside. As you enter the house, you pass through one of the walls and
find yourself"outside" ag nter a room, one must pass through one of the wall planes again. The pool
comes into the house, also blurring ' ction between the outside and inside. These elements break the
boundaries of enclosure in the same way that rojects into the desert to claim part of the landscape as
private space. Loewy contributed to the design of the 'th pickled wood around the pool area, the
interior furnishings and the cosmetic streamlining of the living r ' ing.
Another change in the partnership occurred in 1952, when Robson C. rs (1919- ),
who had been an employee of the firm since 1946, was made a partner and the the
PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL
When Frey returned from a trip around the world at the end of 1955, he completed the final scheme for one of
his most important public buildings, the Palm Springs City Hall (1952-57). While traveling, Frey's interest in
the relationship between pure form and function was renewed, and this interest is reflected in the City Hall by
the creation of a separate volume for the Council Chamber. The main volume of the building is linear and
symmetrical, with a wing extending from the rear of the main entrance. To the right is the Council Chamber,
which is higher than the rest of the building, as functional requirements of the public assembly hall were used to
shape the space. All of its perimeter exterior walls are stepped to improve the acoustics and to bring in north
light. The entrance to the Council Chamber is more elaborate than the main entrance. A sign above it states
"The People Are The City," and it is marked by a poured concrete disc held up by four columns. The disc
corresponds to the void left by a circle removed from the rectangular metal plane that marks the main entry.
The building is constructed of concrete blocks in which every two rows are aligned in relation to each other,
thereby creating a pattern of squares in elevation. [The original structure was designed in collaboration with E.
Stewart Williams, AIA, and additions (Emergency Operating Center in 1964, New Conference Rooms in 1972
& Community Development Wing in 1984), designed by Mr. Williams, have been made over the years.]
The partnership of Clark, Frey & Chambers was dissolved at the end of 1956, the most
lucrative year of Frey and Clark's 19 years together. When Clark left the firm, the name
was changed to Frey & Chambers. Clark, who had dealt with the business aspects of the
firm, wanted to concentrate more on large commercial, public and institutional structures at
the expense of residential work. Frey, however, was interested in designing a variety of
structures. During the partnership of Frey and Chambers, their larger buildings developed a
greater fluidity, with each project expressive of its function. The residential work also
changed at this point. While Frey was still exploring experimental housing issues on a small
scale, he began to infuse his buildings with the metaphors pertinent to each project.
As the years pas 's ability to site the residential works on the natural outcroppings of mountain sides
and on their lower cont ou Although not fully realized in his work of the 1950s, one can, nevertheless,
see then the genesis of ideas that w successfully executed in the 1960s. In the Carey House (1956, 651
W. Via Escuela, 1983 Frey alteration), Frey a client the "average suburban house" that she had
requested, yet still respected the unique natural forma eland. This interaction between two seemingly
dissimilar concerns created an unusual building. The house is arious levels above the ground plane,
which provides a carport below and exposes the rocks and boulders that c st of the site. Changes in
elevation, expressed in the building volume, occur only at the floor plane, and the onsequently sloped to
accommodate the various ceiling heights that result.
While the house at first looks like the quintessential suburban house, on closer observation, it becomes apparen 47
that it is an assembly of industrial materials that needs no maintenance. The exterior walls are sheathed with
asbestos cement board fastened with exposed screws. The windows are steel sash casement and the window
zone is differentiated from the wall zone by the use of colored ashectos rrment hnard 7,hP hn,... :. ..
lo -
RESOLUTION NO. 18907
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE FREY HOUSE II, THE
VALLEY STATION OF THE PALM SPRINGS AERIAL ,
TRAMWAY, THE LOEWY HOUSE, PALM SPRINGS CITY
HALL, AND THE CAREY-PIROZZI HOUSE AS CLASS 1
HISTORIC SITES.
+ a= rwx
WHEREAS the Frey House H, the Valley Station of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, the
Loewy House, Palm Springs City Hall, and the Carey House have contributed substantially
to the historic architectural diversity of the City of Palm Springs; and
WHEREAS the Frey House 1I, the Valley Station of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, the
Loewy House, Palm Springs City Hall, and the Carey-Pirozzi Rouse have long been
landmarks of the City of Pahn Springs for residents, architectural students and visitors; and
WHEREAS the Frey House 11, the Valley Station of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, the
Loewy House, Palm Springs City Hall, and the Carey-Pirozzi House together constitute a
significant portion of a body of work designed by the architect Albert Frey, FAIR, along
with various partners; and
WHEREAS the life and work of Albert Frey, FAIR, has been well-documented, and his
work is recognized world-wide as significant toward the development of the International ,
style and other modern movements of architecture, especially as he adapted such styles and
movements to the local environment; and
WHEREAS the Pahn Springs General Plan provides for the long-term preservation of
significant architectural and historic buildings; and
WHEREAS Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code provides for the designation
of sites with architectural and historic significance; and
WHEREAS on September 10, 1995, the Historic Site Preservation Board held a public
hearing to recommend the designation of the Frey House 11, the Valley Station of the Palm
Springs Aerial Tramway, the Loewy House, Palm Springs City Hall, and the Carey-Pirozzi
House as historic sites and unanimously recommends to the City Council designation of said
properties as Class 1 Historic Sites; and
WHEREAS the City Council concurs in the recommendation of the: Historic Site Preservation
Board regarding the architectural and historic value of the Frey House H, the Valley Station
of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, the Loewy House, Palm Springs City Hall, and the
Carey-Pirozzi House; and
WHEREAS the designation of the Frey House 11, the Valley Station of the Palm Springs ,
Aerial Tramway, the Loewy House, Palm Springs City Hall, and the Carey-Pirozzi House
shall further the purposes and intent of the General PIan and Chapter 8.05 of the Palm
Springs Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS the designation of the Frey House II, the Valley Station of the Palm Springs
Aerial Tramway, the Loewy House, Palm Springs City Hall, and the Carey-Pirozzi House
shall promote the sensitive preservation and restoration of said sites.
49
R18907
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Springs,
California, as follows:
Section 1. The Frey House II, the Valley Station of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway,
the Loewy House, Palm Springs City Hall, and the Carey House were
constructed during the period 1946-1965 and have since contributed to the
' historic architectural diversity of the City of Palm Springs.
Section 2. The Frey House II, the Valley Station of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway,
the Loewy House, Palm Springs City Flail, and the Carey House are excellent
examples of the Modern architectural movement in the City of Palm Springs as
designed and adapted by the renowned architect Albert Frey, FAIR.
Section 3. a.The Frey House II, owned by Albert Frey ("Owner"), and located at 686
Palisades Dr., shall be designated as a Class I Historic Site pursuant to
Chapter 8,05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. The site is located on Lot
10, and a portion of Lot 8, of Palm Springs Palisades, M/B 19/23, Riverside
County, California; APN 513-110-020.
b.The Valley Station of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, owned by Mount
San Jacinto Winter Park ("Owner"), and located at the westerly terminus of
Tram Way, shall be designated as a Class 1 Historic Site pursuant to Chapter
8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. The site is located on a portion of
Sec. 7, TAS., RA.E., Riverside County, California; APN 505-020-012.
c.The Loewy House, owned by James Gaudineer ("Owner"), and located at
600 Panorama Rd., shall be designated as a Class 1 Historic Site pursuant to
' Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. The site is located on a
portion of the SW1/4 SE114 of Section 3, T.4S., RAE., Riverside County,
California; APN 504-292-014.
d.Palm Springs City Hall, owned by the City of Palm Springs ("Owner"), and
located at 3200 E. Talrquitz Canyon Way, shall be designated as a Class I
Historic Site pursuant to Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code.
The site is located on Lot 16 of Palm Valley Colony Lands, MB 14/652, San
Diego County, California; APN 502-150-005.
e.The Carey-Pirozzi House, owned by Vincent & Karen Phozzi ("Owners"),
and located at 651 W. Via Escuela, shall be designated as a Class 1 Historic
Site pursuant to Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. The site is
located on Parcel 1, R/S 27/75, Riverside County, California; APN
504-193-002.
Section 4. No permits for the exterior alteration to the Frey House II, the Valley Station
of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, the Loewy House, Palm Springs City
Hall, and the Carey-Pirozzi House shall be granted without the prior approval
of the Historic Site Preservation Board and/or the City Council, pursuant to
Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code; approved alterations shall
' maintain the historic architectural integrity of the building.
Section 5. The Owners shall permit the City to demark the Frey House H, the Valley
Station of the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, the Loewy House, Palm Springs
City Hall, and the Carey-Pirozzi House as historic sites with a plaque of the
City's choosing.
Section 6. This resolution, and the historic designation put in place by it, shall not affect
title to the subject properties.
49
R18907
Page 3
Section 7. The City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to submit this resolution to the
county recorder for recordation within 90 days of the effective date of this
resolution.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of October, 1996. '
AYES: Members Barnes, Hodges, Oden, Spurgin and Mayor Klefndienst
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: CITYY OF PAL S4City
kanager
NIA Gity Clerk /
REVIEWED &APPROVED: 1
50
Jay Thompson
From: Craig Ewing
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 11:59 AM
To: Jay Thompson
Cc: 'debrahovel@gmail.com'
Subject: FW: Parking lot
To: City Clerk
The e-mail below was directed to the City Council. Please forward or include in their
mail. Thank you.
Craig A. Ewing, AICP
Director of Planning Services
City of Palm Springs
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
760-323-8269
"Go all the way, then come back. "
- Harley Earl
-----Original Message-----
From: Debra Hovel [mailto:debrahovel@gmail.coml
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:32 AM
To: Craig Ewing
Subject: Parking lot
Craig Ewing
Palm Springs City Council -
Dear Sir,
I am most distressed to read that the parking lot at City Hall is not being included under
the Historic Site Preservation designation.
These buildings were sited so much more sensitively than today. It would be a shame to
lose the chance to save it.
My husband and I are citizens of Minneapolis and Palm Springs. I can not stress enough how
important the historic architecture is to us.
We chose Palm Springs because of the concentration of historic buildings and preservation
efforts. It is part of the charm and Brand of the city. We are on a 3 year plan to
relocate permanently.
Please consider the entire site as protected as you proceed with the plans. I know your
part in this is not easy. We are counting on your vision for the future of the city to
protect the precious past.
Sincerely,
Debra and Richard Hovel
This message sent from my iPhone. Debra Hovel
51
1
Page 1 of 1
Kathie Hart
From: Kathie Hart
Sent: February 22, 2010 4:44 PM
To: Craig Ewing
Cc: 'Edward Robertson'; Terri Hintz
Subject: Case 3.3377-MAA Appeal
Attachments: 4815_001.pdf
Tracking: Recipient Delivery
Craig Ewing Delivered: 02/22/10 4:44 PM
'Edward Robertson'
Terri Hintz Delivered: 02/22/10 4:44 PM
Edward Robertson Delivered: 02/22/10 4:44 PM
Craig:
Please find attached an appeal to the Planning Commission on the City Hall Parking Lot Rehab
Project. This request was received in our office on February 8, 2010, along with the appeal fee of
$305.00, a copy of the receipt is attached.
It should be noted this item should be presented to the Planning Commission for consideration
within 45-days, by March 25, 2010.
Feel free to contact me if there are additional questions.
Thx!
Kathie Hart, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
City of Palm Springs
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs,CA 92262
F� (760)323-8206 1 8 (760)322-8332
Z Kathie.Hart@Palm5pringsCA.gov
Please note that City Hall is open 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.Monday through Thursday,and closed on Fridays at this time.
From: City Clerk [mailto:iR4570-cm@ci.palm-springs.ca.usj
Sent: February 22, 2010 4:29 PM
To: Kathie Hart
Subject: Attached Image
Nk\ kn wmvu k1-
52
05/19/10
F,ECEIVE0
February 8,2010PALH
City of Palm Springs 2i0 FEB -B Pfi 4 31
Department of Planning Services }t F E 5
Attn: Planning Commission(Mr. Leo Cohen, Chair) C 1'Y Ct E R K
P. O.Box 2743
Palm Springs, CA 92263-2743
Subj: Case No. 3.3377-MAA; City Hall Parking Lot Rehabilitation
Ref: (a)Director of Planning Services letter of January 25,2010
Pursuant to section 9314.04(Appeals)of the Palm Springs Municipal Code,the
undersigned hereby appeal,to the Planning Commission,the approval decision of
the Palm Springs Director of Planning in reference(a).
This appeal is based on numerous serious concerns including:
HISTORICAL
Failure to gain the approval of the city's Historic Site Preservation Board
(RSPB)for a significant site change to a properly designated.Class 1
Historic Site(the Pahn Springs City Hall). This failure is a violation of
local ordinances and CEQA responsibilities(see attachments(1)and(2)).
Documented evidence that the proposed reconfiguration of the parking lot
will negatively affect the City Hall's historic view shed.
PROCEDURAL
- Characterization of the subject project as a Minor Architectural Addition
(MAA)thereby effectively circumventing Planning Commission review.
A city government-wide pattern of failure to address negative public
comment concerning the project.
FISCAL
- The unnecessary expense associated with the design and implementation
of a parking lot reconfiguration during a period of fiscal crisis.
- Decrease in the number of available parking spaces(the reconfiguration
eliminates five spaces).
DESIGN and SUSTAINABILIW
A widespread perception that the current landscape architecture proposal is
"over-designed"and"over planted-and seriously detracts from the
simplicity and sophistication of City Hall site,one of the city's most
important architectural resources.
53
Despite our strong support for the creation of a sustainability garden next to
or near city hall,placing such a garden in front of one of our most beloved
architectural resources is both inappropriate and unnecessary.
The applicable appeal fees($305.00)are enclosed. If you have any questions,please
contact Mr. Gary Johns at(760)327-7290.
Sincerely,
David Lee 1G
432 W.Hermosa Place 2428 S. Sierra Madre
Palm Springs,CA 92262 Palm Springs,CA 92264
J Brett Klein
74 33 wp .Drive 456 Bradshaw Lane
Palm DeseM 92260 Palm Springs,CA 92262
Palm Springs Modern ittee Mark Nichols
J.IL Roberts,Vice President 1502 E.Baristo Road
P. O. Box 4738 Palm Springs, CA 92262
Palm Springs, CA 92263
Attachments:
(1)PSPF letter of August 23,2009 (with additional attachments)
(2)McGrew Architecture letter of Febniary 5, 2010
2
54
PALM SPRINGS
PRESERVATION
,lk FOUNDATION
August 23,2009
The Honorable Steven Pouguet
Mayor of palm springs
3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs,CA 92262
Subject: CITY HALL PARIONG LOT RECONFIGURATION
Dear Mr.Mayor,
The city's current proposal to reconfigure the parking lot of the Palm Springs City Hall
(designed by Clads,Frey&Chambers(1952))replaces aview of great architecture with a view
of unsightly car grills. The proposed reconfiguration blocks sight lines drat have been in place
forge than fifty years and does not reflect well on the city's stewardship of this world-
renowned modernist icon. Attachments(1)and(2)provide visual aids that amply ilhrshate our
concerns.
To summarize,the proposal to reconfigure the parking lot was included as a"consent"item
entitled"City Hall and Dog Paris Parking I&Repairs"in the January 7,2009 city council
meeting agenda. As you know,consent items are typically routine items of minor importance
that do riot receive apublic hearing. However,far from being a in=repaving of the parking
lot,the consent item included a wholesale reconfiguration ofthe City Hall parking lot
Far more alarming has been an inexplicable decision by the planning department to not let the
Historic Site Preservation Board(HSPB)review the parking lot reconfiguration despite the fart
tbat the City Hall(along with alost of other Albert Frey-designed buildings)was designated a
Class I historic site in 1996. City Council Resolution No. 18907 of October 2,1996
unequivocally states that the"Palm Springs City Hall...shall be designated as a Class 1 historic
Site pursuant to Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code." Further,an October 2,
1996 planning department memorandum to the city council on the designation clearly states
that:
.The recommended Class 1 designation protects the architectural and historic
integrity of the sites in that the structures and their sites may not be modified,nor
objects removed,without the approval of the city Council;usage may also be Iimited
to the extent that it may impair the integrity ofthe site....Tbe city Counreal's
approval of modifications is delegated to the HSPB by Chapter 8.05 except that
appeals of an HSPB decision are heard by the Council"(emphasis added).
Regardless of any perceived ambiguity in the"building versus site,distinction,such ambiguity
should argue that the HSPB review the matter. I'm sure you agree that ambiguities in city
i00 S.Sundae Way,Sutra A#465, Palm Sptrgs,CA s22sz-sna
76D•837 7117 • i "g •-www
. 55
A ,mil W
policies and precedent decisions should never be used as an excuse to circavent review by a
city board or commission.
On August 10,2009 the city's Architectural Advisory Committee(AAC)reviewed that portion
of the Tahquitz Canyon Way Median Design Concept that feaduedthe proposed City Hall
parking lot reconfiguration. During that review AAC members were pointedly and repeatedly
told by the contractor representing the city that a discussion of the reconfiguration was not
within their purview. Nevertheless,some AAC members voiced serious concerns about the
reconfiguration.
Because the parking lot reconfiguration has now been hm43ed into the Tahquitz Canyon Way
Median Design Concept,at this date it is difficult for members ofdhe public to register their
concerns. Nevertheless,we will soon encourage our membership to state their objections to the
reconfiguration(as provided for on the city's Sustainability web page).
Recognizing that"shp and fall'legal concerns may be driving the paddng lot repaving project,
we encourage the city to repave the parking lot in its cument configuration Not only will this
save money,it should have no impact on the city's Tahquitz Canyon Way sustainability efforts.
While the city has a generally good track record of encouraging public input,the handling of
this matter has served as a textbook example ofwhat can happen when public input is not
aggressively solicited. The obvious schrtlon is to ensure thatthe review of such matters,by the
city's duly appointed boards and commissions,be liberal in scope. A liberal review process not
only brings specialized expertise to bear but provides the public with an opportunity to express
their views.
I hope you will make a personal effort to rectify this matter and review the opaque(versus
transparent)city processes that have allowed such a proposal to progress this far. The foundation
can be contacted at(760)837-7117 or via email at' undation org.
Sincerely,
Rosu M04.54W J,
Ron Marshall
President
Attachments:(1)Photographs of cars in proposed reconfiguration bloddW sight lines
(2)Overhead graphic ofpm;medrmonfigmation impacting sight Imes
Copy to(with ararlimemems):
City council mernbers G.Foat,C.WAls,L.Weigel and R.Hutcheson
City Manager(Mr.D.Ready)
Chair,Plamring Commission
Chair,Historic Site Preservation Board(J.Gilmer)
Chair Sustainablity Commission
Chair Architectural Advisory Committee
PSModCom(Mr P.Momzti)
Desert Sun(Mr.M.Honore)
2
. 100 S.Sunrise Way,Sure A#465, Pskn SpkW CA OM-6778
76G837-7117 ag * wawMspaservataftundayonag
56
5
,!, yFy P��`> a'> �.T`�y�".`.vi.,•<�3*tAd .�Y�.�F��y�sg
IJ
'r'K y'�+' k x t vn....+�e•r� ,r
'9t.'t22o�
FT}
74?
d h
^� Y
c !
Today
� yV
F� t
s
X
J. nv y
Tomorrow?
cal i
Cam in proposed reconfiguration blocking sight lines
Attachment I
58
rE �II
yy 1N
.if. rJ is
a ify � x
ti
Current
196 RES" PNRQN6 WIM
6 RDOW'BLE FARKM SPKkr+
Cars
E
ijlT17il
Cars
Cars �,�..__ Y ;L� TI L_''
U��1�T 1'E
Cars I
�i Cars �ikffi L ;
-
- TAFWJRZ C�. lYW1 NAY
Proposed
- �Qg RE,i,i(pR PA[tl01C soncss - ...: i
Cars
sa _ ..:::. :......_,
_�"1-rfun L f - Cars I
Cars Cars `• '% " L
Cars Cars i
z
Blocked sight lines
(Note that 5 parking spaces are actually lost in the proposed plan)
Attachment 2
5-9
if
fit- . S wg
41
4. 11 q
. a �` �• sew �+ CD
a � N
o rao
10
'. gg
w• .rod'
•°, K � � � •'2 �+ S g w �� N :, Fes+
� � j
MCGREW/ARCHITEC URE
February 5, 2010
To Whom It May Concern:
Re: Recent approval of redesign for Palm Springs-City Hall porking layout and landscaping
At the request of`a group of concerned citizens, I have prepared a'brief analysis on the CEQA
issues relevant to this project.
Background
Palm Springs City Hall was designated a Class 1 Historic Site by aeon of the City Council
per Resolution No. 18907 as recorded on October 8, 1996. The resolution protects not only
the building, but also the site as indicated in the Planning Directors recommendation:
' he recommended Class i designation protects the architectural 'und'bistoric
integrity of the sites in that the structures and their sites may not be modified, nor
objects removed, without the approval of the City Council; usage may also'be
limited to the extent that it may impair the integrity of the site... . The City
Council's approval of modifications is-delegated to the HSPB by Chapter 8.'05
except that appeals of an HSPB decision are heard by the Council."
During a January 7, 2009'City Council meeting, a redesign of City Hall parking layout was
placed on the consent Calendar and approved without'a public hearing orpYior iedtew by the
Historic Site Preservation Board, as would normally be required under Chapter 8.05 of
Planning Code. Monday January 25, 2010,the City's Planning Director approved a new City
Hall landscape design that incorporates the revised parking lot layout after the Architectural
Advisory Committee voted to turn it down.
When CEQA Applies
Resources listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register are
resources that must be given consideration in the CEQA process. Historical resoiti'ces are
recognized as port of the environment under CEQA (PRC Sections 21002(b), 21083.2, and
21084.1). Properties of local sighifitance that have been designated under a local
preservation ordinance (local landmarks or landmark districts) or that have been identified in
a local historical resources inventory may be eligible for listing in the California Register and
are presumed to be significant resources for purposes of CEQA unless a preponderance of
evidence indicates otherwise (PRC Section 5024.1, 14 CCR § 4850). Additionally, all
projects undertaken by a public agency are subject to CEQA. This includes projects
.. ARCHr1ECTURE + PRESERVATION
674 SOUTH GRFNFALL ROAD•PALM 5PRWG5,CAUFORNIA 92264 V60)416-7819 .
61
A4+a C W6t 1y (2-)
To wh m R may concem
Paw 2 '
FeWdMy S,2010
undertaken by any state or local agency, any special district (e.g., a school district), and any
public college or university.
A project that has been determined to conform with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for the;Treatment of Historic.Properties con.generallybe considered to be a project that.will
not cause a significant.impact (14 CCR Section 15126.4(b)(1)). In fact, in most cases if a
project meets the Secretary;,of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties it
can be considered categorically exempt from CEQA(14 CCR Section 15331).
Analysis of Project Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
The following Standards are to be applied to specific rehabilitation projects in a reasonable
manner,taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility.
(1)A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires
minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building:and its environment.
Analysis: The proposed project complies with this Standard.
(2) The historic character of a property shall.be retained and preserved.The removal,of
historic materials and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.
Analysis: The proposed project removes historic materials.and spaces that characterize
the,prapetty. and therefore does not comply with this Standard.
(3) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use.
Changes made to create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural
features or architectural elements from other buildings,shall not be undertaken.
Analysis: The existing historic resource currently exists as a physical record of its time,
place, and use. The proposed project would al►er that record, and therefore does not
,..cgmp1y with this Standard.
(4)Most properties change over time;those changes that have acquired historical
significance in their own right shall be preserved.
Analysis: N/A
ARCHITECTURE + PRESERVATION
674 sounl CaRENFALL ROAD•PAIM SPRINGS,CAUFORMA 92264•(760)416-7819
62
I
To whom R may oommm _
page:3
Febrtmry 6.2010
(5) Distinctive features,finishes,and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship
that characterize a historic property shall be=preserved. :a.
Analysis: In this case, the distinctive features in question are the setting for the existing
building. This setting maximizes the visibility of Gty Hall from Tahquitz Way. Under the
proposed project, this visibility will be substantially impaired. The proposed project
would after the setting, and therefore does not comply with this Standard.
(6) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. When the severity of
deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature,the.new feature shall match the old `
in design,color,texture, and:other visual qualities and,where possible,.materials.
Replacement of missing features slrall.be substantiated by.documentary, physical,vr_pictorial
evidence.
Analysis: The proposed project would replace deteriorated materials andfeatures with
new ones that do not match the old in color, texture and other visual qualities, and
therefore does not comply with this Stargiord:
(7) Chemical or physical treatments such as sandblasting,that cause physical damage to
historic materials shall not be.used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate,shall
be undertaken by the gentlest means possible.
Analysis: N/A
(8) Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved.
If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken;
Analysis: N/A
(9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic
materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and
shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the
historic integrity of the property and its environment.
Analysis:The proposed alterations and related new construction destroy historic
materials that characterize the property, and are incompatible with the massing, size,
scale, and architectural features that comprise the historic integrity of the property and
its environment. The proposed project therefore does not comply with this Standard.
ARCHIII:CRJRf: + PRE56NATION
674 SOUTH GRENFALL ROAD•PAIM SPRINGS,CATIFORNIA 922" (760)416-7810
63
To wt10m l may CenOBI11 _
POW4
Febmuary5,2010 - ..
(10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a
manner that if removed in the future,the essential form and integrity of the historic property
and its.environment would be.unimpaired.
Analysis: The proposed•pmlectmay comply with this Standard
Compliance Summary
The proposed project fails to comply with Standards 2, 3, 5;6,&9. -Consequentlythe
project may not be considered categorically exempt. Instead, based.upon this analysis,.the
praiectwill result in a significant neaative environmental imnact
Who Insures CEQA is:Being Followed Properly?
In a way, the people of Calffomio bear this responsibility. But, ultimately, it is the judicial
isystem that insures public agencies are fulfilling.:their obligations under CEQA: There is no
CEQA "police" agency as many members of the public mistakenly assume. Rather it is any
individual or organization's nght.to pursue litigation against a public agency that!is bekeved
to have violated its CEQA responsibilities,:
Although the Office of Historic Preservation can, and often does, comment on documents
prepared for CEQA purposes (or the lack thereof), it is important that the public be aware
that such comments are merely advisory and do not carry.the force of law. Comments from
state agencies and other organizations with proven professional qualifications and experience
in a given subject can, however, provide valuable assistance to decision-makers as well as
provide substantive arguments for consideration by o judge during CEQA litigation.
. ARCHITECTURE + PRTERVA110N
. - - 674 SOUTH GRENFALL ROAD-PAM SPRINGS,CAUFORNIA 92264•.V60i 416.7819
64,
To whom H may cencem ..
Page;5
F'ebmENY5,20 O -
Conclusion
The approval of_th_is protect without review. by-- HSPB constitutes a Ylolaticih_of the.public .
trust and is in conflict not .only with the local ordinance, but is also a violation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as detailed in the foregoing analysis. Based
upon this analysis, it appears that the Planning Staff and/or the City Council have violated
not only their own local ordinances, but their CEQA responsibilities as well.
Sincerely,
Patrick McGrew
PMcbc w/attoclimept
ARCHnECRJRE + PRESERVATION
674 SOUM GRENFALL ROAD•PALMSPRINW,CALFORNIA 92264-:(760 n 416-7 119
65
To whom R may concern - -
Page:6 -
Fehmery 6,2010
Historic Consultant QuaRRw6ons
Professional Quali99alipre Standards: The Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part bl defines tha minimum education
and experience required to perform historic preserwstion identification,evaluation,zegalratiori,and treatment activiiias. The
minimum professional qualifications in architecture are a professional degree inarchilbeh he&plus at least two years full-time
experience in architecture; or a State license to practice arch0eckma. Patrick McGrew meets or exceeds all professional
qualifications. .
Patrick McGrew received his Bachelor of Architecture from the University of Oklahoma in 1265. He has been actively -
engaged in the archilecturd profession, specializing in historic preservation, since then. McGrew has been a licensed
architect In the Stale of California since 1970, ce well as a holder of the NCARB (national licensing) certificate. He
possesses an in-depth knowledge of all procedures and standards utilized in the identification,evaluator,registration,and
treatment of historic properties ce evidenced by his lengthy career known for the depth and breadth of accumulated
architectural/histoioal knowledge. He places a high value an the obledivily and completeness of his written works. He has
several years experience in research,writing,practicing and teaching architecture with an academic and histories agencies
and institutions. He has made a sebdantial conhibuHon through research and publication of a body of scholarly knowledge
in the field of California architedurel history. His experience has included the preparation of nuo{erous flgWc resegn;K,
reports, National Register nominations, and Son Francisco and Palm Springs historic aRe hanitnpRms; as watts'"
Rreparation of plops and specifications for architectural preservation projects. He regolotes his firm through the use of ethics
standards developed by the Society of Archilecti rol Historians. .. -
Patrick McGrew's knowledge and reputation in the field of historic preservation provided the basis his public service as the
long-time President of San Francisco's Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board,which extended over an eighteen year spun
beginning in 1978 when he was first appointed by then-Mayor George Moscone;he served the niodten years under Mayor: .
Dianne Feinstein..Although he served less than a year under Mayor Art Agnos,4 was Agras who declared November 17,
1991 as 'Landmarks of San Francisco Day'to honor the publication of McGraw's fast book,Landmarks of Son Francisco
(Harry Abrams,New York, 1991). Reappointed in 1992 by Mayor Frank Jordon,McGrew sewed-four more years:on San
Fmncisco's landmarks hoard. McGrew's second book,Landmarks of Los Angeles was published by Abrams in 1994. His
acknowledgment by.government and/or regulatory agencies,combined with W.McGreWs impressive list of publications on
California's historic architecture, is a testament to his proficiency as a leading expat,in California architectural history. He
has received many awards for his work during a rRstinguls hed career. In 1995, his book The Historic Houses of Prestdio
Terrace,received on award of honor from the California Heritage Council.
Upon the occasion of Mr. McGrev/s induction Into the City Club of San Froncisra's Walk of-fame, Mayor W01ia Brown
declared November 30, 2003 ors 'Patrick McGrew Day in Son Francisco,and a Commendation from the United States
Senate Was presented in recognition of McGreJs'distinguished career and outstanding contributions to the City of Son
Francisco.' In ZOOS, Patrick McGraw moved to Palm Springs,where he recently completed a monograph entitled Donald
Wexler,Architect .
Memberships and Affiliations:
Board Member&tedurer:Architedure&Design Council,Palm Springs Art Museum
Board Member Palm Springs Preservation Foundation
Palm Springs Architectural Advisory Committee -
Palm Springs Historical Society
Society of Architectural Historians,Southern California Chapter
National Trust for Hiitoric Preservation
- ARCHITECTURE- + PRESMATiON
674 SOUTH 4;3, F ROAD•PALM SPRINGS,CALIFpRNIA 92264' {P6'O)416-7a 9- -
66
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
REC6+D BY: CR O1OGDO32$52
PAYOR: PS MODERN COMMITTEE
TODAY'S BATE; 02/22/10
REGISTER DATE: 02/22/10 TINE: 17:11
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
OTHER CHARGES SVCS . E3C5.00
CUST IB: APPEAL 1/25/10
TOTAL DUE¢ S30.GO
CHECl( PAID: $335.00
CHECK NO: 1850
TENDERED: $305.00
CHANGE: 9.00
6 7,
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION
City Council
Meeting Date: January 18, 2011
Subject: HSPB 33 — City Hall
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
I, Kathie Hart, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby
certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to each and every
person on the attached list on January 5, 2012, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid,
and depositing same in the U.S. Mail at Palm Springs, California. (52 notices)
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
IL4i�
Kathie Hart, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Kathie Hart, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby
certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Desert Sun
on January 7, 2012.
1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
&MAB
Kathie Hart, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Kathie Hart, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby
certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at City Hall, 3200 E.
Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board and in the Office of the
City Clerk on January 5, 2012.
1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
4\1rV
Kathie Hart, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
68
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
AMEND THE DESIGNATION OF THE PALM SPRINGS CITY HALL— HSPB 33 TO INCLUDE
THE CITY HALL SITE AS A CLASS 1 HISTORIC SITE AND
3200 EAST TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will
hold a Public Hearing at its meeting of January 18, 2012. The City Council meeting begins at
6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm
Springs.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation of the Historic Site Preservation
Board to amend the Palm Springs City Hall Class 1 Historic designation (Case HSPB 33) to
include the City Hall site including landscape and parking areas. The subject site is addressed
as follows: 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way (APN 502-150-005).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This request is categorically exempt from review
pursuant to Section 15331 (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), whereas the proposed designation meets the conditions
outlined for preservation of a historic resource. The application is available for public review in
the Planning Services Department, City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs,
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Thursday.
REVIEW OF PROJECT INFORMATION: The staff report and other supporting documents
regarding this project are available for public review at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
to 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Please contact the Office
of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these
documents.
COMMENTS ON THIS APPLICATION: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the
Public Hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the City
Council by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to:
James Thompson, City Clerk
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Any challenge of the proposed in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the
Public Hearing described in this Notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk
at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]). An opportunity will
be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. Questions regarding this case
may be directed to Craig A. Ewing, AICP, Director of Planning Services, at (760) 323-8245.
Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, porfavor Ilame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar
con Nadine Fieger telefono (760) 323-8245. -�
;James Thompson
City Clerk
69
N
L° y�
Department of Planning Services W E
Vicinity Map s
i
° _..
ATiDN WV
--CHIC DRINE W._.
i........ PLFJMOR AVE
1
p I im
__.. s.
I
O IIVMOR Fur < '.
4
.a= E5 _ p
j
ANDR�S RC
o I
w
0
_ I
ETAH ITZCANYONWY
_ t I
Legend
Q 400 ft buffer
® project site
Surrounding Parcels If
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CASE NO: HSPB - 33 DESCRIPTION: Amend the Palm Springs City Hall
Class 1 Historic designation (Case No. HSPB 33) to
APPLICANT: City of Palm Springs include the City Hall site including landscape and
Historic Site Preservation Board parking areas. 70
PALM SPRINGS kECEIVEC
1 PRESERVATION "�}' s
1 ,,. FOUNDATION 2012JA1417 PM2: 57
J4int:S .-H0V,i;0- ;,
January 13, 2012 CITY CLERK
The Honorable Steve Pougnet
Mayor of Palm Springs
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Subject: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CITY HALL CLASS 1 DESIGNATION (RSPB#33)
Dear Mr. Mayor,
Over two years ago,under the California Public Records Act,we requested documents related to city
council Resolution 18907 of October 2, 1996 which granted Class 1 historic site status to our City
Hall, the Frey II House,the Valley Tramway Station,the Loewy House,the Carey-Pirozzi House and
the Tramway Gas Station. The city's response to our records request included an October 2, 1996
planning department memo to the city council. That memo explained the intent of Resolution 18907
and states, in part,that:
"The recommended Class 1 designation protects the architectural and historic integrity of
the sites in that the structures and their sites may not be modified, nor objects removed,
without the approval of the city council..."(emphasis added)
Accordingly, it is our view that Resolution 18907 clearly and unequivocally protects the sites
identified in the resolution. We also believe that the first"contrary"interpretation of Resolution 18907
(which surfaced about two years ago)was motivated by bureaucratic expediency when it was realized
that the city hall's parking lot reconfiguration project had not been properly staffed through the
Historic Site Preservation Board. This is a view the city's Planning Commission largely concurred
with at its' September 8, 2010 meeting.
To give this proposed amendment fuller context, the HSPB recommendation before you to designate
the city hall site was home out of a profound frustration by many HSPB board members that the board
was being deliberately circumvented(we would invite you to review the video of the relevant HSPB
meeting). The HSPB directed staff to designate the entire site but unfortunately the staff report before
you quibbles and effectively ignores even that simple direction. However,that is not our primary
concern: we are more concerned that if you support the recommendation to amend HSPB#33 you will
give credibility to and legitimize the Planning Director's recent misinterpretation of Resolution 18907
(i.e., that the resolution applies to the buildings and not their sites). By such an action city council
would implicitly remove the protections already afforded to the five remaining sites protected under
the resolution.
To put it simply, you will take one step forward and five steps backwards for the city's historic
preservation program.
1775 East Palm Canyon Drive,Suite 110-195,Patin Springs,CA 92264
(760)837-7117 • info@pspn;servationfoandation.org • www.pspr=rvationfoundation.org 71
Subject: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CITY HALL CLASS 1 DESIGNATION(RSPB#33)
We found the staff report confusing and even contradictory,to wit,the verbiage on page 25
("Description"first paragraph)states:
"The Current Planning Director has indicated that the Council's approval of the Class 1
designation deleted the protection for the site and covered only the building. However, no
support[ing] documentation for this assertion has been forthcoming." (emphasis added)
Based upon such a lack of supporting documentation,we reiterate that the Planning Director's recent
interpretation was flawed and that there is no need to act upon the amendment before you.
In short,the issue before you really isn't about sightlines,the musings of architectural historian Joseph
Rosa or how many steps constitute a"plinth." Rather,it is simply: "What was the intent of the city
council when it passed Resolution 18907 on the evening of October 2, 1996?" We submit that the
council's intent was obvious: that duly appointed city boards review significant changes to the
buildings and sites of the six identified historic properties.
In previous city actions over the last fifteen years interpretations of Resolution 18907 have included
changes to the sites. For example,as recently as October 2008 and March 2009 the HSPB reviewed
changes to,not the building, but rather the signage and landscape lighting on the Tramway Gas Station
site.
For all of these reasons we ask that you re-affirm the clearly stated intent of the previous city council
to confer Class 1 historic designation to all six of these buildings and their sites.
If you have questions regarding this matter,please contact us at(760) 837-7117.
Sincerely,
Ron Marshall
President
Copy to:
Council members G. Foat,P. Lewin,R.Hutcheson, C.Mills
PSModCom(Mr. C. Menrad)
2
1775 East Palm Canyon Drive,Suite 110-195,Patin Springs,CA 92264
(760)837-7117 • info@pspresmationfoundation.org 9 www.pspresmationfoundafon.org 72
Page 1 of 1
Jay Thompson R ECEI v ECG
From: Ginny Foat
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:14 PM 2012 JAN 18 PM 3* 30
To: Jay Thompson JAhES ldur",k
Subject: FW: TONIGHT: Proposed Amendment re City Hall Designation CITY CLERIC
FYI
From: MRIMBER@aol.com [mailto:MRIMBER@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday,January 18, 2012 1:34 PM
To: Ginny Foat
Subject: TONIGHT: Proposed Amendment re City Hall Designation
Dear Mayor Pougnet and City Council Members;
I strongly concur with the PSPF letter you received regarding tonight's Agenda
Item No. 1.A and beseech your appropriate action:
As in municipalities nationwide and previously noted and enforced in Palm Springs,
historic designation defines SITE as site; not building, component, or amenity
selectively. As in sites referenced in Mr. Marshall's letter regarding Resolution 18907,
in designating the E. Stewart Williams Santa Fe Federal Savings SITE the entire
property was properly designated not partial amenities as subsequently suggested by
some. Regardless of any perceived timely or optimistic potential of a restaurant or
condominium tower that might have come at that site today's future social, economic,
and cultural potential stems from what IS happening there...motivated primarily by
efforts of reasonable and stalwart preservationists who understand the inherent value
of building a better tomorrow by properly protecting and including essential historic
assets. Such vital lessons must not be unheeded.
By acting on the Item before you regarding City Hall, if we had the Mona Lisa only her
smile could be designated. Let's not redress her as Lady Gaga (now) as we shouldn't
have updated her as Madonna (then) when she was at the peak of popularity. There
is an essential and beneficial place for them ALL to make a better place.
Respectfully,
Robert Imber
760-641-9908
73
1/18/2012