HomeMy WebLinkAbout23066 RESOLUTION NO. 23066
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE 2007 PALM SPRINGS GENERAL
PLAN ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 22077, CHANGING
THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCEL
LOCATED AT 1000 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE,
TAPPAN ENTERPRISES, FROM NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (NCC) TO HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (HDR) AND AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN
TEXT ON RESIDENTIAL USES TO ESTABLISH AN
ALTERNATIVE METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATING
DENSITY FOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES AND
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, Tappan Enterprises, ("Applicant') has filed an application with the
City on pursuant to State of California Governmental Code Sections 65350 — 65362
(General Plan amendment) and pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (Planned Development
District) and 94.07.00 (Zoning Map Change; Change of Zone) of the Zoning Code, for a
General Plan Amendment seeking to change the land use designation from NCC
(Neighborhood Community Commercial) to HDR (High Density Residential) and to
amend the General Plan text relating to the methodology for calculating density for
assisted living facilities and a to establish a Planned Development District (PDD) in lieu
of a change of zone, to establish uses and development standards for construction of
an assisted living facility at 1000 North Palm Canyon Drive; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of
Palm Springs to consider Case 5.1237 GPA PDD 357, was given in accordance with
applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on November 22 2011, a public hearing to consider Case. 5.1237
GPA PDD 357, was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable
law; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is considered a "project' pursuant to the terms
of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"); and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Planning Commission carefully reviewed and
considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project,
including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented
and voted 4-0-1-1 (Motion Klatchko, second Conrad, abstain Munger, absent Hudson)
to approve the preliminary Planned Development District in lieu of a Change of Zone,
subject to Conditions of Approval in Exhibit A, and recommending approval of an
Ordinance of the City Council approving a Planned Development District in lieu of a
Change of Zone for the roughly 1.43 acre parcel at 1000 North Palm Canyon Drive, and
Resolution No. 23066
Page 2
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm
Springs to consider Case 5.1237 GPA PDD 357, was given in accordance with
applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on January 4 2012, a public hearing to consider Case. 5.1237 GPA
PDD 357, was held by the City Council in accordance with applicable law; and
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, an Initial Study has been conducted and the City has concluded that
potential significant impacts may occur as a result of the proposed project, however
with the incorporation of mitigation measures as outlined, those impacts will be reduced
to less than significant levels; therefore a Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby
adopted.
SECTION 2: Pursuant to State of California Governmental Code Sections
65350 — 65362, although there are no specific findings for a General Plan Amendment
the City Council has evaluated the requested GPA based upon the following:
a. Compatibility of the proposed designation with adjacent land uses.
b. Consistency of the proposed designation with development patterns of the
neighborhood.
C. Potential adverse impacts to existing or future development in the vicinity.
Findings of compatibility of the proposed land use designation with existing
adjacent land uses.
The project site is surrounded by a variety of existing land uses that are generally
harmonious with the proposed high-density residential land use designation and the
proposed assisted living facility. The project would create a high-density specialized
form of residential units in close proximity to retail, commercial, and medical office uses.
This complementary set of uses would enhance one another, potentially invigorate the
pedestrian quality of this neighborhood and reduce the dependency on passenger
vehicles for residents in the vicinity.
Findings of consistency of the proposed land use designation with development
patterns in the neighborhood.
The requested change in land use from NCC to HDR is consistent with
Resolution No. 23066
Page 3
development patterns, goals and policies of the General Plan for the City's vision for the
Uptown neighborhood as a vibrant, pedestrian-oriented retail, commercial and
residential mix of uses. Of particular significance is the site's proximity to the Desert
Regional Hospital and the various medical offices that surround that facility. Residents
of an assisted living facility will likely have need for on-site medical and health-related
care-givers and services; however, a facility of this type in close proximity to the full-
service health care facilities of Desert Regional would be particularly beneficial for both
residents and health care providers who provide offices and professional medical
services in this area.
Potential adverse impacts to existing or future development in the area.
The General Plan Amendment proposes an appropriate methodology for
calculating density for assisted living facilities. The GPA amends the description of
residential uses by adding the following statement:
"Assisted Living Facility uses may be permitted in residential land use
areas. Maximum permitted number of beds for assisted living facilities
(density) shall be based upon calculation of equivalent traffic impacts for
assisted living facilities as compared to that of the maximum number of
standard dwelling units per acre for each land use area, provided they do
not create significant design, parking, traffic or other impacts to the
surrounding neighborhood. This comparison shall be in accordance with
the latest edition of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generator
Handbook."
Assisted living facilities generate significantly less traffic impacts per bed or per
dwelling unit, than conventional residential dwelling units. Residential units also general
fewer trips and lesser traffic impacts than special retail or commercial uses that might
occur on the site under its present General Plan designation of NCC. As such, the
proposed methodology for evaluating density based on equivalent traffic impacts is
sound and reasonable. By changing the land use designation from NCC to HDR and
using a density calculation that assures traffic impacts will remain at or below levels
already accepted in the General Plan EIR, the proposed amendment does not create
potential adverse impacts to existing or future development in the area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the City
Council hereby approves Case 5.1237 GPA, a General Plan Amendment, changing the
land use designation from NCC to HDR for a roughly 1.43 acre parcel at 1000 North
Palm Canyon Drive and amending General Plan text for residential uses describing an
alternative methodology for calculating density for assisted living facilities based on
equivalent traffic impacts, in the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan, as adopted by
Resolution No. 22077.
ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2012.
Resolution No. 23066
Page 4
DAVID H. READ ANAGER
ATTEST:
22
AMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS )
I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do
hereby certify that Resolution No. 23066 is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on January
4, 2012, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmember Hutcheson, Councilmember Lewin, Councilmember Mills,
Mayor Pro Tern Foat, and Mayor Pougnet.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
AMES THOMPSON' CITY
CLERK
City of Palm Springs, Californiaot/Z5120It