HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/5/2012 - STAFF REPORTS - 1.A. ppLM S,•�
iy
4t
V N
t
L e
+C CO'M1ORAIEO+ »
44
1
FOIL CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 5, 2012 PUBLIC HEARING
SUBJECT: Case No. 5.1273 — ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED DIRECTOR
REFERRALS FOR LAND USE PERMITS, MINOR ARCHITECTURAL
APPROVALS AND ADMINISTRATIVE MINOR MODIFICATIONS
FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager
BY: Planning Department
SUMMARY
On November 22, 2011, the Planning Commission initiated the Zone Text Amendment
to allow the Director of Planning Services the option of referring to the Planning
Commission applications for Land Use Permits, Minor Architectural Approvals and
Administrative Minor Modifications. Following a public hearing on July 11, 2012, the
Planning Commission adopted a recommendation to allow such referrals. A draft
ordinance reflecting the Commission's recommendation has been prepared for Council
consideration. A public hearing is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony;
2. Waive the reading of the ordinance text in its entirety and read by title only; and
3. INTRODUCE ON FIRST READING ORDINANCE NO. _, "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS
94.02.01D.3, 94.06.01.13.2 AND 94.04.00.E.2.A OF THE PALM SPRINGS
MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO DIRECTOR REFERRAL OF MINOR
PERMITS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION"
BACKGROUND:
The Zoning Code establishes certain permits to address minor development issues:
• Land Use Permits for unusual, temporary or accessory land uses;
• Minor Architectural Approvals for exterior design changes; and
• Administrative Minor Modifications for limited relief of setbacks and other
standards.
To assure flexibility in the Code's application as well as provide for its expeditious
ITEM NO. -t. A.
City Council Staff Report September 5, 2012
Case No. 5.1273—Zone Text Amendment—Director Referrals Page 2 of 6
implementation, these permits are assigned to the Director of Planning Services for
review and action. Each permit's procedure is summarized below; however, all these
permits have a common feature: The Commission may not review any application for
one of these permits, unless the Director's decision is appealed. The Commission
recommends a set of Zone Text Amendments that would grant the Director authority to
refer to the Commission any application for one of these permits.
ANALYSIS
Land Use Permits (LUP's)
LUP's are governed by Section 92.04.01.D.2 and D.3, including the following procedural
requirements:
2. The director of planning and building shall cause to be made such
investigation as will provide all necessary information to assure that
the action on each such application is consistent with the intent and
purpose of this chapter.
3. After completion of the investigation, the director of planning and
building shall approve the land use permit, subject to those
conditions of approval he may deem necessary.
Note that Section 3 states that the Planning Director "shall approve" a Land Use Permit.
This means that uses governed by Land Use Permits may be seen as "by right" uses,
but subject to conditions of approval to address potential operational or compatibility
problems. As a result, uses subject to Land Use Permits can be placed between those
uses allowed "by right" (and not subject to any conditions) and those uses subject to a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — which may not only be conditioned, but may also be
denied when individual cases fail to meet the required findings. The following chart
shows the continuum of land use types, with the most permissive category on the left:
Allowed, Allowed, May be allowed, Not allowed
No conditions Maybe conditioned May be conditioned
"by right" Land Use Conditional Prohibited
Permit Use Permit
May not be May not be May be Must be
prohibited prohibited prohibited prohibited
Staff believes that adding a provision that allows the Director to refer Land Use Permit
applications to the Planning Commission will not significantly alter the LUP concept. It
will, however, allow the Director to respond to specific Land Use Permit applications that
raise unusually complex or public issues. By referring unique and difficult applications
to the Commission, the Director can assure that the community — through the Planning
Commission — has a chance to weigh in on what would otherwise be a staff decision.
Like the other permits discussed below, it is anticipated that only a very small
percentage of applications would be referred to the Commission.
02
City Council Staff Report September 5, 2012
Case No. 5.1273—Zone Text Amendment—Director Referrals Page 3 of 6
Minor Architectural Approvals (MAA's)
MAA's are governed by Section 94.04.00.E.2:
a. Staff-Level Approvals. Minor architectural applications which are
acted upon by the director of planning services, or designee, shall
include repaints, retools, walls, fences, entry features, signs, sign
programs landscaping plans, minor grading plans, exterior lighting
plans, and additions which do not increase existing floor area by
forty percent (409,o) for single-family residential and twenty-five
percent (2596) for all other development subject to this section. The
director of planning services may consult with the planning
commission architectural advisory committee in review of minor
architectural applications.
Minor Architectural Approvals can cover a variety of significant changes to building
exteriors, as well as significant additions to non-single family structures. Two recent
projects that were processed as MAA's were the Mercedes-Benz automobile dealership
expansion / remodel and the Saguaro Hotel repaint / relandscaping. The dealership
was unanimously recommended by the Architectural Advisory Committee and
subsequently approved by staff. The Saguaro Hotel repaint was initially rejected by the
AAC and then received a split recommendation. Staff concluded that Planning
Commission action would be appropriate but could only achieve that by denying the
request and forcing the applicant to file an appeal, which occurred.
Either project could have warranted Planning Commission review given the highly
visible location of each business. Adding a referral option to the Minor Architectural
Approval would allow staff the opportunity to involve the community in important design
decisions without creating a record of denial and appeal.
Administrative Minor Modifications (AMM's)
AMM's are subject to Section 94.06.01.6.2 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code:
2. Before the director may approve a minor modification pursuant to
the provisions of subsections (A)(9) through (A)(12) of this section,
the director shall find, based on evidence presented, that the
modification as approved will not have any detrimental effect on
neighboring properties. Before the director may approve a minor
modification pursuant to the provisions of (A)(4) through (A)(8) of
this section, the director shall make all of the following findings,
based on evidence presented.
a. The requested minor modification is consistent with the
general plan, applicable specific plan(s) and overall
objectives of the zoning ordinance;
b. The neighboring properties will not be adversely affected as
a result of the approval or conditional approval of the minor
modification;
C. The approval or conditional approval of the minor
modification will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of persons residing or working on the site or
in the vicinity; and
03
City Council Staff Report September 5, 2012
Case No. 5.1273—Zone Text Amendment—Director Referrals Page 4 of 6
d. The approval of the minor modification is justified by
environmental features, site conditions, location of existing
improvements, or historic development pattems of the
property or neighborhood. -
The director shall make the decision in writing within five (5) days
after the filing of a complete application or after approval of the
planning commission. One (1) copy shall be mailed to the applicant
and one (1) copy shall be filed with the chair of the planning
commission and the director.
In the case the minor variance process known as Administrative Minor Modification, the
likelihood of an application raising significant issues for neighbors and the community-
at-large is even lower than could occur with LUP's and MAA's. A reduction of lot
dimensions or in the number of parking spaces is limited to no more than 10%. Wall
height increases and setback (yard) reductions cannot exceed 20% of the standard.
The City's experience with AMM's has yielded very few appeals or controversies.
Nevertheless, staff supports the referral option here should the need for public review
arise.
Proposed Amendments
Staff proposes draft zone text amendments to establish a referral option for the
following permit:
- Land Use Permits. Amend Section 94.02.01 D.3:
3. After completion of the investigation, the director of planning and
building shall either approve the land use permit, subject to those
conditions of approval he may deem necessary, or refer the entire
matter to the planning commission for review and action.
- Minor Architectural Approvals. Amend Section 94.04.O0.E.2. a:
a. Staff-Level Approvals. Minor architectural applications which are
acted upon by the director of planning services, or designee, shall
include repaints, reroofs, walls, fences, entry features, signs, sign
programs landscaping plans, minor grading plans, exterior lighting
plans, and additions which do not increase existing floor area by
forty percent (409,66) for single-family residential and twenty-five
percent (25%) for all other development subject to this section. The
director of planning services may consult with the planning
commission architectural advisory committee in review of minor
architectural applications, or refer the entire matter to the planning
commission for review and action.
- Administrative Minor Modifiations. Amend Section 94.06.01.132
...The director shall make the decision in writing within five (5) days
after the filing of a complete application or after approval of the
planning commission. One (1) copy shall be mailed to the applicant
and one (1) copy shall be filed with the chair of the planning
commission and the director. The director may also refer the entire
matter to the planning commission for review and action
04
City Council Staff Report September 5, 2012
Case No. 5.1273—Zone Text Amendment—Director Referrals Page 5 of 6
Based on a brief review of prior years' activity, staff believes that no more than one or
two referrals per year is likely to occur.
Required Findings
In accordance with Section 94.07.01.A.2, any zone text amendment must be evaluated
to determine if it is, "...consistent with the intent of this Zoning Code and the general
plan..."
Zoning Code Consistency
The proposed zoning code amendments are consistent with the intent of the zoning
code, because, according to Section 91.00.00, the Zoning Code is adopted "For the
purpose of promoting and protecting the public health, safety and welfare of the people
of the city of Palm Springs and to provide for the social, physical and economic
advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of land
resources...". The amendments propose to allow Planning Commission review of those
rare applications for minor permits (LUP's, MAA's and AMM's) that in the opinion of the
Director of Planning Service have potentially significant impact on the neighborhood or
community. Staff believes that these additional review options will enhance community
involvement in land use and thereby directly promote and protect the public welfare and
improve the orderly planned use of land resources.
General Plan Consistency
The proposed zoning code amendment is consistent with the intent of the general plan,
as follows: The intent of the General Plan is expressed in "The Palm Springs Vision"
contained in the opening pages of the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan:
The Palm Springs Vision
- A world-renowned desert resort community where residents and visitors
enjoy safe neighborhoods, an exciting social environment and a relaxing
leisure experience.
- We enhance our natural, cultural, and historical resources with sustainable
economic growth and high style.
- We provide responsive, friendly and efficient public services within a
government that fosters unity among all our citizens;
The proposed amendments will help provide responsive and efficient government by
assuring that minor projects receive appropriately simpler reviews, while major projects
— even while processed under minor permits — receive greater scrutiny in the most
efficient and expedited manner.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed
Zone Text Amendments have been deemed a "project". Staff has determined that the
propose zone text amendments (Case 5.1280 ZTA) may be deemed Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land
Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. The
05
City Council Staff Report September 5,2012
Case No. 5.1273—Zone Text Amendment—Director Referrals Page 6 of 6
proposed zone text amendments propose only insignificant changes to the procedural
requirements of minor permits, and do not result in any increase in land use densities.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
A. E g, AICP, Dir. of Ping Svcs Thomas J. Wson, Asst. City Manager,
Dev't Svcs
e�a
David H. Ready, Cit ger
Attachments:
1. Draft Ordinance—Zone Text Amendment— Director Referrals of Minor Permits
2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, excerpt (July 11, 2012)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6234
4. Planning Commission Staff Report (July 11, 2012)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 94.02.01D.3,
94.06.013.2 AND 94.04.00.E.2.a OF THE PALM SPRINGS
MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO DIRECTOR
REFERRAL OF MINOR PERMITS TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION (CASE 5.1273 ZTA).
City Attorney's Summary
This Ordinance amends the procedural requirements for
Land Use Permits, Minor Architectural Approvals and
Administrative Minor Modifications to allow the Director of
Planning Services to refer applications for these permits to
the Planning Commission for action.
The City Council of the City of Palm Springs hereby finds:
A. On November 22, 2011, the Planning Commission initiated a Zone Text Amendment
(Case 5.1273 ZTA) to modify the Zoning Code to allow the Director of Planning
Services the option of referring to the Planning Commission minor development
applications.
B. The proposed amendments are considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and the it has been recommended
that the proposed amendments be determined to be Categorically Exempt from the
provisions of CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations)
of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed
zone text amendments propose only insignificant changes to the procedural
requirements of minor permits, and do not result in any increase in land use
densities; and.
C. A notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs,
California for Case 5.1273 ZTA (Zone Text Amendment) was given in accordance
with applicable law.
D. On July 11, 2012 a public hearing of the Planning Commission was held to review
said case, and at said hearing the Planning Commission reviewed and considered
all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including,
but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented, and
voted to recommend a Categorical Exemption for the project under CEQA and
recommend approval of the proposed amendments.
07
Ordinance No._
Page 2 of 4
E. A notice of public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California
for Case 5.1273 ZTA was given in accordance with applicable law.
F. On September 5, 2012, a public meeting on Case 5.1273 ZTA was held by the City
Council in accordance with applicable law, and at said hearing the City Council
carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with
the hearing on the project, including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written
and oral testimony presented.
G. A Zone Text Amendment is adopted by ordinance and includes two readings and a
thirty-day period before it is effective.
H. An ordinance has been prepared for two readings before the City Council for the
approval of Case 5.1273 ZTA.
I. The proposed zoning code amendments are consistent with the intent of the zoning
code, because, according to Section 91.00.00, the Zoning Code is adopted "For the
purpose of promoting and protecting the public health, safety and welfare of the
people of the city of Palm Springs and to provide for the social, physical and
economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of land
resources...'; and the amendments propose to allow Planning Commission review of
those rare applications for minor permits (LUP's, MAA's and AMM's) that in the
opinion of the Director of Planning Service have potentially significant impact on the
neighborhood or community; and that these additional review options will enhance
community involvement in land use and thereby directly promote and protect the
public welfare and improve the orderly planned use of land resources.
J. The proposed zoning code amendment is consistent with the intent of the general
plan, because, the intent of the General Plan is expressed in "The Palm Springs
Vision" contained in the opening pages of the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan:
The Palm Springs Vision
- A world-renowned desert resort community where residents and visitors enjoy
safe neighborhoods, an exciting social environment and a relaxing leisure
experience.
- We enhance our natural, cultural, and historical resources with sustainable
economic growth and high style.
- We provide responsive, friendly and efficient public services within a
government that fosters unit among all our citizens;
and the amendments will help provide responsive and efficient government by
assuring that minor projects receive appropriately simpler reviews, while major
projects — even while processed under minor permits — receive greater scrutiny in
the most efficient and expedited manner.
03
Ordinance No._
Page 3 of 4
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Pursuant to CEQA, the City Council hereby determines that the propose
amendment (Case 5.1280 ZTA) are Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA
under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for
the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed zone text amendments
propose only insignificant changes to the procedural requirements of minor permits, and
do not result in any increase in land use densities.
Section 2. Section 94.02.01 D.3 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to
read:
3. After completion of the investigation, the director of planning and building
shall either approve the land use permit, subject to those conditions of approval
he may deem necessary, or refer the entire matter to the planning commission
for review and action
Section 3. Section 94.04.00.E.2.a of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to
read:
a. Staff-Level Approvals. Minor architectural applications which are acted
upon by the director of planning services, or designee, shall include repaints,
reroofs, walls, fences, entry features, signs, sign programs landscaping plans,
minor grading plans, exterior lighting plans, and additions which do not increase
existing floor area by forty percent (40%) for single-family residential and twenty-
five percent (25%) for all other development subject to this section. The director
of planning services may consult with the planning commission architectural
advisory committee in review of minor architectural applications, or refer the
entire matter to the planning commission for review and action.
Section 4. Section 94.06.01.6.2 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to
read:
2. Before the director may approve a minor modification pursuant to
the provisions of subsections (A)(9) through (A)(12) of this section, the
director shall find, based on evidence presented, that the modification as
approved will not have any detrimental effect on neighboring properties.
Before the director may approve a minor modification pursuant to the
provisions of (A)(4) through (A)(8) of this section, the director shall make
all of the following findings, based on evidence presented:
a. The requested minor modification is consistent with the
general plan, applicable specific plan(s) and overall
objectives of the zoning ordinance;
09
Ordinance No._
Page 4 of 4
b. The neighboring properties will not be adversely affected as
a result of the approval or conditional approval of the minor
modification;
C. The approval or conditional approval of the minor
modification will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of persons residing or working on the site or
in the vicinity; and
d. The approval of the minor modification is justified by
environmental features, site conditions, location of existing
improvements, or historic development patterns of the
property or neighborhood.
The director shall make the decision in writing within five (5) days after the
filing of a complete application or after approval of the planning
commission. One (1) copy shall be mailed to the applicant and one (1)
copy shall be filed with the chair of the planning commission and the
director. The director may also refer the entire matter to the planning
commission for review and action.
Section 5. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be
published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take
effect thirty (30) days after passage.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2012.
STEPHEN P. POUGNET, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DOUGLAS HOLLAND, CITY ATTORNEY
10
RESOLUTION NO. 6283
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF CASE 5.1273 ZTA, A PROPOSED ZONE TEXT
AMENDMENT FOR SECTIONS 94.02.01D.3, 94.06.01.B.2 AND
94.04.00.E.2.A OF THE PALM SPRINGS ZONING CODE TO
ALLOW THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SERVICES THE
OPTION OF REFERRING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICATIONS FOR LAND USE PERMITS, MINOR
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS AND ADMINISTRATIVE MINOR
MODIFICATIONS.
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2011, the Planning Commission initiated a Zone Text
Amendment (Case 5.1273 ZTA) to modify the Zoning Code to allow the Director of
Planning Services the option of referring to the Planning Commission minor
development applications; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are considered a "project" pursuant to the
terns of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and the it has been
recommended that the proposed amendments be determined to be Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land
Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act because
the proposed zone text amendments propose only insignificant changes to the
procedural requirements of minor permits, and do not result in any increase in land use
densities; and
WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm
Springs, California for Case 5.1273 ZTA (Zone Text Amendment) was given in
accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on July 11, 2012 a public hearing of the Planning Commission was held to
review said case, and at said hearing the Planning Commission reviewed and
considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project,
including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony
presented.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that
the City Council determine that the proposed zone text amendments (Case 5.1273
ZTA) are Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA under Section 15305
(Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California
Environmental Quality Act because the proposed zone text amendments propose only
insignificant changes to the procedural requirements of minor permits, and do not result
11
Planning Commission Resolution No.6283 July 11, 2012
Case 5.1273 ZTA Page 2 of 3
in any increase in land use densities.
SECTION 2: Pursuant to PSZC Section 94.07.01 (Zoning Ordinance Text
Amendment), the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. The proposed zoning code amendments are consistent with the intent of the
zoning code, because, according to Section 91.00.00, the Zoning Code is
adopted "For the purpose of promoting and protecting the public health, safety
and welfare of the people of the city of Palm Springs and to provide for the
social, physical and economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and
orderly planned use of land resources..."; and the amendments propose to allow
Planning Commission review of those rare applications for minor permits (LUP's,
MAA's and AMM's) that in the opinion of the Director of Planning Service have
potentially significant impact on the neighborhood or community; and that these
additional review options will enhance community involvement in land use and
thereby directly promote and protect the public welfare and improve the orderly
planned use of land resources.
B. The proposed zoning code amendment is consistent with the intent of the
general plan, because, the intent of the General Plan is expressed in "The Palm
Springs Vision" contained in the opening pages of the 2007 Palm Springs
General Plan:
The Palm Springs Vision
- A world-renowned desert resort community where residents and visitors enjoy
safe neighborhoods, an exciting social environment and a relaxing leisure
experience.
- We enhance our natural, cultural, and historical resources with sustainable
economic growth and high style.
- We provide responsive, friendly and efficient public services within a
government that fosters unit among all our citizens;
and the amendments will help provide responsive and efficient government by
assuring that minor projects receive appropriately simpler reviews, while major
projects — even while processed under minor permits — receive greater scrutiny
in the most efficient and expedited manner.
12
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6283 July 11, 2012
Case 5.1273 ZTA Page 3 of 3
t
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends that the City Council determine that the proposed
zone text amendment Case 5.1273 ZTA is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of
CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) of the
Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act and also recommends adoption
of an ordinance to approve a zone text amendment (Case 5.1273 ZTA), as set forth in
Exhibit A.
ADOPTED this 11 th day of July 2012.
AYES: 6, Munger, Vice Chair Hudson, Klatchko, Roberts, Calerdine and Chair
Donenfeld
NOES: 1, Weremiuck
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
f�qA
f jj¢ Ctaig A. Ewing, AICP
Director of Planning Services
13
t�
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 94.02.01D.3,
94.06.01.13.2 AND 94.04.00.E.2.a OF THE PALM SPRINGS
MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO DIRECTOR
REFERRAL OF MINOR PERMITS TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION (CASE 5.1273 ZTA).
City Attorne y's Summary
This Ordinance amends the procedural requirements for
Land Use Permits, Minor Architectural Approvals and
Administrative Minor Modifications to allow the Director of
Planning Services to refer applications for these permits to
the Planning Commission for action.
The City Council of the City of Palm Springs hereby finds:
A. On November 22, 2011, the Planning Commission initiated a Zone Text Amendment
(Case 5.1273 ZTA) to modify the Zoning Code to allow the Director of Planning
Services the option of referring to the Planning Commission minor development
applications.
B. The proposed amendments are considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and the it has been recommended
that the proposed amendments be determined to be Categorically Exempt from the
provisions of CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations)
of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed
zone text amendments propose only insignificant changes to the procedural
requirements of minor permits, and do not result in any increase in land use
densities; and.
C. A notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs,
California for Case 5.1273 ZTA (Zone Text Amendment) was given in accordance
with-applicable law.
D. On July 11, 2012 a public hearing of the Planning Commission was held to review
said case, and at said hearing the Planning Commission reviewed and considered
all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including,
but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented, and
voted to recommend a Categorical Exemption for the project under CEQA and
recommend approval of the proposed amendments.
14
Ordinance No._
_ Page 2 of 4
E. A notice of public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California
for Case 5.1273 ZTA was given in accordance with applicable law.
F. On 2012, a public meeting on Case 5.1273 ZTA was held by the City
Council in accordance with applicable law, and at said hearing the City Council
carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with
the hearing on the project, including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written
and oral testimony presented.
G. A Zone Text Amendment is adopted by ordinance and includes two readings and a
thirty-day period before it is effective.
H. An ordinance has been prepared for two readings before the City Council for the
approval of Case 5.1273 ZTA.
I. The proposed zoning code amendments are consistent with the intent of the zoning
code, because, according to Section 91.00.00, the Zoning Code is adopted "For the
purpose of promoting and protecting the public health, safety and welfare of the
people of the city of Palm Springs and to provide for the social, physical and
economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of land
resources...'; and the amendments propose to allow'Planning Commission review of
those rare applications for minor permits (LUP's, MAA's and AMM's) that in the
opinion of the Director of Planning Service have potentially significant impact on the
neighborhood or community; and that these additional review options will enhance
community involvement in land use and thereby directly promote and protect the
public welfare and improve the orderly planned use of land resources.
J. The proposed zoning code amendment is consistent with the intent of the general
plan, because, the intent of the General Plan is expressed in "The Palm Springs
Vision" contained in the opening pages of the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan:
The Palm Springs Vision
- A world-renowned desert resort community where residents and visitors enjoy
safe neighborhoods, an exciting social environment and a relaxing leisure
experience.
- We enhance our natural, cultural, and historical resources with sustainable
economic growth and high style.
- We provide responsive, friendly and efficient public services within a
government that fosters unit among all our citizens;
and the amendments will help provide responsive and efficient government by
assuring that minor projects receive appropriately simpler reviews, while major
projects - even while processed under minor permits — receive greater scrutiny in
the most efficient and expedited manner.
15
Ordinance No._
Page 3 of 4
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Pursuant to CEQA, the City Council hereby determines that the propose
amendment (Case 5.1280 ZTA) are Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA
under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for
the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed zone text amendments
propose only insignificant changes to the procedural requirements of minor permits, and
do not result in any increase in land use densities.
Section 2. Section 94.02.01D.3 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to
read:
3. After completion of the investigation, the director of planning and building
shall either approve the land use permit, subject to those conditions of approval
he may deem necessary, or refer the entire matter to the planning commission
for review and action
Section 3. Section 94.04.00.E.2.a of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to
read:
a. Staff-Level Approvals. Minor architectural applications which are acted ('1
upon by the director of planning services, or designee, shall include repaints, '��✓J
reroofs, walls, fences, entry features, signs, sign programs landscaping plans,
minor grading plans, exterior lighting plans, and additions which do not Increase
existing floor area by forty percent (40%) for single-family residential and twenty-
five percent (25%) for all other development subject to this section. The director
of planning services may consult with the planning commission architectural
advisory committee in review of minor architectural applications, or refer the
entire matter to the planning commission for review and action.
Section 4. Section 94.06.01.13.2 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to
read:
2. Before the director may approve a minor modification pursuant to
the provisions of subsections (A)(9) through (A)(12) of this section, the
director shall find, based on evidence presented, that the modification as
approved will not have any detrimental effect on neighboring properties.
Before the director may approve a minor modification pursuant to the
provisions of (A)(4) through (A)(8) of this section, the director shall make
all of the following findings, based on evidence presented:
a. The requested minor modification is consistent with the
general plan, applicable specific plan(s) and overall
objectives of the zoning ordinance;
16
Ordinance No._
Page 4 of 4
b. The neighboring properties will not be adversely affected as
a result of the approval or conditional approval of the minor
modification;
C. The approval or conditional approval of the minor
modification will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of persons residing or working on the site or
in the vicinity; and
d. The approval of the minor modification is justified by
environmental features, site conditions, location of existing
improvements, or historic development patterns of the
property or neighborhood.
The director shall make the decision in writing within five (5) days after the
filing of a complete application or after approval of the planning
commission. One (1) copy shall be mailed to the applicant and one (1)
copy shall be filed with the chair of the planning commission and the
director. The director may also refer the entire matter to the planning
commission for review and action.
Section 5. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be
published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take
Q
effect thirty(30) days after passage.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2012.
STEPHEN P. POUGNET, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DOUGLAS HOLLAND, CITY ATTORNEY
17
�pALMSA4
iy
c
A.
Y N
4au1t^'
Cq</FORN%P Planning Commission Staff Report
July 11, 2012
Case: 5.1273 ZTA
Application Type: Zone Text Amendment (ZTA)
Location: City-wide
Applicant: City of Palm Springs
From: Craig A. Ewing, AICP, Director of Planning Services
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
An application by City of Palm Springs to amend Sections 94.02.01 D.3, 94.06.01.13.2
and 94.04.00.E.2.a of the Palm Springs Zoning Code to allow the Director of Planning
Services the option of referring to the Planning Commission applications for Land Use
Permits, Minor Architectural Approvals and Administrative Minor Modifications.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Open the public hearing and receive any testimony.
2. Adopt the attached draft resolution recommending the City Council amend the
Zoning Code to allow the Director of Planning the option of referring to the
Planning Commission applications for Land Use Permit, Minor Architectural
Approvals and Minor Modifications.
PRIOR ACTIONS TAKEN ON THE PROJECT:
On November 22, 2011, the Planning Commission initiated the Zone Text Amendment
regarding the referral option for the Director of Planning.
ANALYSIS:
The Zoning Code establishes certain permits to address minor development issues:
• Land Use Permits for unusual, temporary or accessory land uses;
• Minor Architectural Approvals for exterior design changes; and
• Administrative Minor Modifications for limited relief of setbacks and other
standards.
18
Planning Commission Staff Report July 11,,2012
Case 5.1273—Director Referrals: LUP's, MAA's and AMM's Page 2 of 6
To assure flexibility in the Code's application as well as provide for its expeditious
implementation, these permits are assigned to the Director of Planning Services for
review and action. Each permit's procedure is summarized below; however, all these
permits have a common feature: The Commission may not review any application for
one of these permits, unless the Director's decision is appealed. This report proposes a
set of Zone Text Amendments that would grant the Director authority to refer to the
Commission any application for one of these permits.
Land Use Permits (LUP's)
LUP's are governed by Section 92.04.01.D.2 and D.3, including the following procedural
requirements:
2. The director of planning and building shall cause to be made such
investigation as will provide all necessary information to assure that
the action on each such application is consistent with the intent and
purpose of this chapter.
3. After completion of the investigation, the director of planning and
building shall approve the land use permit, subject to those
conditions of approval he may deem necessary.
Note that Section 3 states that the Planning Director "shall approve' a Land Use Permit.
This means that uses governed by Land Use Permits may be seen as "by right" uses,
but subject to conditions of approval to address potential operational or compatibility
problems. As a result, uses subject to Land Use Permits can be placed between those
uses allowed "by right" (and not subject to any conditions) and those uses subject to a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — which may not only be conditioned, but may also be
denied when individual cases fail to meet the required findings. The following chart
shows the continuum of land use types, with the most permissive category on the left:
Allowed, Allowed, May be allowed, Not allowed
No conditions Maybe conditioned May be conditioned
"by right" Land Use Conditional Prohibited
Permit Use Permit
May not be May not be May be Must be
prohibited prohibited prohibited prohibited
Staff believes that adding a provision that allows the Director to refer Land Use Permit
applications to the Planning Commission will not significantly alter the LUP concept. It
will, however, allow the Director to respond to specific Land Use Permit applications that
raise unusually complex or public issues. By referring unique and difficult applications
to the Commission, the Director can assure that the community — through the Planning
Commission — has a chance to weigh in on what would otherwise be a staff decision.
Like the other permits discussed below, it is anticipated that only a very small
percentage of applications would be referred to the Commission.
19
Planning Commission Staff Report July 11, 2012
Case 5.1273—Director Referrals: LUP's, MAA's and AMM's Page 3 of 6
Minor Architectural Approvals (MAA's)
MAA's are governed by Section 94.04.00.E.2:
a. Staff-Level Approvals. Minor architectural applications which are
acted upon by the director of planning services, or designee, shall
include repaints, reroofs, walls, fences, entry features, signs, sign
programs landscaping plans, minor grading plans, exterior lighting
plans, and additions which do not increase existing floor area by
forty percent (409,66) for single-family residential and twenty-five
percent (25%) for all other development subject to this section. The
director of planning services may consult with the planning
commission architectural advisory committee in review of minor
architectural applications.
Minor Architectural Approvals can cover a variety of significant changes to building
exteriors, as well as significant additions to non-single family structures. Two recent
projects that were processed as MAA's were the Mercedes-Benz automobile dealership
expansion / remodel and the Saguaro Hotel repaint / relandscaping. The dealership
was unanimously recommended by the Architectural Advisory Committee and
subsequently approved by staff. The Saguaro Hotel repaint was initially rejected by the
AAC and then received a split recommendation. Staff concluded that Planning
Commission action would be appropriate but could only achieve that by denying the
request and forcing the applicant to file an appeal, which occurred.
Either project could have warranted Planning Commission review given the highly
visible location of each business. Adding a referral option to the Minor Architectural
Approval would allow staff the opportunity to involve the community in important design
decisions without creating a record of denial and appeal.
Administrative Minor Modifications (AMM's)
AMM's are subject to Section 94.06.01.B.2 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code:
2. Before the director may approve a minor modification pursuant to
the provisions of subsections (A)(9) through (A)(12) of this section,
the director shall find, based on evidence presented, that the
modification as approved will not have any detrimental effect on
neighboring properties. Before the director may approve a minor
modification pursuant to the provisions of (A)(4) through (A)(8) of
this section, the director shall make all of the following findings,
based on evidence presented:
a. The requested minor modification is consistent with the
general plan, applicable specific p/an(s) and overall
objectives of the zoning ordinance;
b. The neighboring properties will not be adversely affected as
a result of the approval or conditional approval of the minor
modification;
C. The approval or conditional approval of the minor
modification will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
20
Planning Commission Staff Report July 11, 2012
Case 5.1273—Director Referrals: LUP's, MAA's and AMM's Page 4 of 6
general welfare of persons residing or working on the site or
in the vicinity, and
d. The approval of the minor modification is justified by
environmental features, site conditions, location of existing
improvements, or historic development patterns of the
property or neighborhood.
The director shall make the decision in writing within five (5) days
after the filing of a complete application or after approval of the
planning commission. One (1) copy shall be mailed to the applicant
and one (1) copy shall be filed with the chair of the planning
commission and the director.
In the case the minor variance process known as Administrative Minor Modification, the
likelihood of an application raising significant issues for neighbors and the community-
at-large is even lower than could occur with LUP's and MAA's. A reduction of lot
dimensions or in the number of parking spaces is limited to no more than 10%. Wall
height increases and setback (yard) reductions cannot exceed 20% of the standard.
The City's experience with AMM's has yielded very few appeals or controversies.
Nevertheless, staff supports the referral option here should the need for public review
arise.
Proposed Amendments
Staff proposes draft zone text amendments to establish a referral option for the
following permit:
Land Use Permits. Amend Section 94.02.01D.3:
3. After completion of the investigation, the director of planning and
building shall either approve the land use permit, subject to those
conditions of approval he may deem necessary, or refer the entire
matter to the planning commission for review and action.
Minor Architectural Approvals. Amend Section 94.04.00.E.2. a:
a. Staff-Level Approvals. Minor architectural applications which are
acted upon by the director of planning services, or designee, shall
include repaints, reroofs, walls, fences, entry features, signs, sign
programs landscaping plans, minor grading plans, exterior lighting
plans, and additions which do not increase existing floor area by
forty percent (409,6) for single-family residential and twenty-five
percent (259/6) for all other development subject to this section. The
director of planning services may consult with the planning
commission architectural advisory committee in review of minor
architectural applications, or refer the entire matter to the planning
commission for review and action.
Administrative Minor Modifiations. Amend Section 94.06.01.132
...The director shall make the decision in writing within five (5) days
after the filing of a complete application or after approval of the
planning commission. One (1) copy shall be mailed to the applicant
21
Planning Commission Staff Report July 11, 2012
Case 5.1273—Director Referrals: LUP's, MAA's and AMM's Page 5 of 6
and one (1) copy shall be filed with the chair of the planning
commission and the director. The director may also refer the entire
matter to the planning commission for review and action.
Based on a brief review of prior years' activity, staff believes that no more than one or
two referrals per year is likely to occur.
Required Findings
In accordance with Section 94.07.01.A.2, any zone text amendment must be evaluated
to determine if it is, "...consistent with the intent of this Zoning Code and the general
plan..."
Zoning Code Consistency
The proposed zoning code amendments are consistent with the intent of the zoning
code, because, according to Section 91.00.00, the Zoning Code is adopted "For the
purpose of promoting.and protecting the public health, safety and welfare of the people
of the city of Palm Springs and to provide for the social, physical and economic
advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of land
resources...". The amendments propose to allow Planning Commission review of those
rare applications for minor permits (LUP's, MAA's and AMM's) that in the opinion of the
Director of Planning Service have potentially significant impact on the neighborhood or
community. Staff believes that these additional review options will enhance community
involvement in land use and thereby directly promote and protect the public welfare and
improve the orderly planned use of land resources.
General Plan Consistency
The proposed zoning code amendment is consistent with the intent of the general plan,
as follows: The intent of the General Plan is expressed in "The Palm Springs Vision"
contained in the opening pages of the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan:
The Palm Springs Vision
- A world-renowned desert resort community where residents and visitors
enjoy safe neighborhoods, an exciting social environment and a relaxing
leisure experience.
- We enhance our natural, cultural, and historical resources with sustainable
economic growth and high style.
- We provide responsive, friendly and efficient public services within a
govemment that fosters unity among all our citizens;
The proposed amendments will help provide responsive and efficient government by
assuring that minor projects receive appropriately simpler reviews, while major projects
— even while processed under minor permits — receive greater scrutiny in the most
efficient and expedited manner.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed
22
Planning Commission Staff Report July 11, 2012
Case 5.1273—Director Referrals: LUP's, MAA's and AMM's Page 6 of 6
Zone Text Amendments have been deemed a "project". Staff has determined that the
propose zone text amendments (Case 5.1280 ZTA) may be deemed Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land
Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. The
proposed zone text amendments propose only insignificant changes to the procedural
requirements of minor permits, and do not result in any increase in land use densities.
NOTIFICATION:
A public hearing notice was advertised in accordance with the requirements of State law
and local ordinance. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received any
comment.
Craig A. Ewing, AICP
Director of Planning Services
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Resolution and Ordinance
23
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION
O.Y.
City Council
Meeting Date: September 5, 2012
Subject: Case 5.1273 - ZTA
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
I, Kathie Hart, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby
certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to each and every
person on the attached list on August 21, 2012, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid,
and depositing same in the U.S. Mail at Palm Springs, California. (6 notices)
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
�L
Kathie Hart, CIVIC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Kathie Hart, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby
certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Desert Sun
on August 24, 2012.
1 declare Wnunder penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Kathie Hart, CIVIC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Kathie Hart, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby
certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at City Hall, 3200 E.
Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board and in the Office of the
City Clerk on August 21, 2012.
11/declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Kathie Hart, CIVIC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
24
The Desert Sun Certificate of Publication
750 N Gene Autry Trail
Palm Springs,CA 92262 P E G E i Y i:.'t
760-778-4578/Fax 760-779=473f)F ?s L M S
2012 AUG 27 AN 9: 07
State Of California ss: J E ri- 1 i i `f r .
County of Riverside C f T Y CLERK
Fpublichesi6
NOTICE OF PUBLIC 14EARINQ V Advertiser: , CITYCOUNCIL I
CITY OF SPAINGS,
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS/LEGALS 4273ZIA--ZONETEXTAkIMME'
PO BOX 2743 G DIRECTOR.REFERRALS ON CERTAIN
PALM SPRINGS CA 922632 ?ERWISAND APPROVALS
- EREBY AMEN thetthue.--City Council.. ..
of Palm Springs, :California, will hold
ring at- its meetfrof September
2000334053 , . The City Of
meeting begins at
6:00- P-m:, in the Council Chamber at City Hall,
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, palm S
The Purpose of this hearing.is to consider an pnn9s
by the-City of Palm Springs for a zone mendnyarrt
text amendment
(ZTA) to allow the Planning Director to,refer to the
I am over the age of 18 years old, a citizen of the United Planning Commission applications for Land use Permits,
States and not a party to, or have interest in this matter. I Architectural Review Approvals;and MirwF Mod
ificatfons.
hereby certify that the attached advertisement appeared -
in said newspaper (set in type not smaller than non panel) ENWRONMENTAL -DETERMINATION: The project- is
in each and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any Proposed as Categorically Exempt from the terms. of
supplement thereof on the following dates,to wit: the California Environmental Outility Act-CCEQA') under
Section 15M(Minion Afterstions in Land Use Llmiletlons)
The Desert Sun Newspaper.
Of:the Guidelines for the'Calffomia Environmental Quality
. Act..Members of the public may view this document at the.
Planning Services Department, 8:0
city Hall,3200Esst Tahqu0
8/24/2012
Canyon Way,Palm Spring%betwesn the hours:of o am.
to 11:00 am.and 2-00 p.m,to 5:00 p.m.;MO
Thursday,and submit written c r ry through
City.Council meeting. - comments at,w prior to,.the
RVAEW OF INFORAIIATION: The staff report and other
supporting documents regarding this 'are available for
Public review at City}tall between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
I acknowledge that I am a principal clerk of the printer of to 11;00 am.and-2:00 p.m:to 6,00 p.m.,Monday through
The Desert Sun, printed and published weekly in the City ThUr3daY. Please contact:the Office of the City Clerk at.
of Palm Springs, County of Riverside, State of California. (760)323-8204 if you would like to.schedule an appoifarrrerrt
The Desert Sun was adjudicated a newspaper of general to review these documents,
circulation on March 24, 1988 by the Superior Court of the tbMMENT ON THIS
Count of Riverside, State of California Case No. _ APPLICATION: Response to this
y notice may be made verbally at the Public Hearing and/or in
191236. writingbefore the nearing.Written comments:may be made
to the City Council by letter(for mail or hand delivery)to:
declare under penally of perjury that the foregoing is true to
Thom e peon;City Cleric
and correct. Executed on this 24th day of August, 2012 in - 3200 E.Tahquftz Canyon Way
Palm Springs,Califon' Palm Springs,.CA 92262
. Any challenge of the Proposed
to raising
projed at furtm�belaarted-
only those issues raised at the public hearing.
. descried in this notice, or in written correspondence
} delivered to the City Cleric at,or prior to,the Public hearing...
(Government Code Section 65009M
Declarant' Signatur An opportunity wilfbe�given at said hearin for ell intereste[!
Persons to be heard. Questions regarding this.case may
becliregted to Crag A Ewing, A1CP, birector,okPlannij
00mceS,st(760)323,8245.
S Wide con.esta carts,Porfavor llame a Is Ciudad
de Palm Springs Y Puede.hablar con Nadine Fieger telefono
(760)323-8245.
Kalhie.H-art CMC
Pubtished:.tV28/12 ChiefDeputy City Clerk
�• .>,.m„
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CASE 5.1273 ZTA—ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT
AUTHORIZING DIRECTOR REFERRALS ON CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPROVALS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold
a public hearing at its meeting of September 5, 2012. The City Council meeting begins at
6:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs.
The purpose of this hearing is to consider an application by the City of Palm Springs for a zone text
amendment (ZTA) to allow the Planning Director to refer to the Planning Commission applications
for Land Use Permits, Architectural Review Approvals, and Minor Modifications.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The project is proposed as Categorically Exempt from the
terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations
in Land Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. Members of
the public may view this document at the Planning Services Department, City. Hall, 3200 East
Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.
to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday and submit written comments at, or prior to, the City
Council meeting.
REVIEW OF INFORMATION: The staff report and other supporting documents regarding this are
available for public review at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.
to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk at
(760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these documents.
COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the Public
Hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the City Council
by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to:
James Thompson, City Clerk
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at
the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk
at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]).
An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. Questions
regarding this case may be directed to Craig A. Ewing, AICP, Director of Planning Services, at
(760) 323-8245.
Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, porfavor Ilame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar con
Nadine Fieger telefono (760) 323-8245.
Kathie Hart, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
25
a4v}
Ow
MR PETE MORUZZI
d ° T ,i 'ta'i, PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE
Er P.O. BOX 4738
IhS :.. .. .......:..... . . .r.. ........_r...
PALM SPRINGS,CA 92263-4738
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.1273 ZTA
sm
�38 t I`I`i6 a `g, `° PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT MRS.JOANNE BRUGGEMANS
9 ,:... }¢# G13 ° gTTNSECRETARY/5.1273ZTA 506 W.SANTA CATALINA ROAD
PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS,CA 92262
PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263-2743
MS MARGARET PARK
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA
�- .. ' INDIANS
5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE
PALM SPRINGS, CA 92264
SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS LUEBBEN JOHNSON&BARNHOUSE,
uh ° ATTN:JOSEPH ONTIVEROS LLP
ATTN: RICHARD C.WADE, PARALEGAL
CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGER Tn
EN
7424 4 STREET NW
P.O. BOX487 LOS RANCHOS DE ALBUQUERQUE, NM
SAN JACINTO, CA 92581 87107
9 5Aa
IA
' MOpgo' 1D z MR PETE MORUZZI
HQ
[ eITals IST BI PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE
P.O. BOX 4738
PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263-4738
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.1273 ZTA
'i a; 3'v "!ggj PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT MRS.JOANNE BRUGGEMANS
°i=i•I! i': I .' ATTN SECRETARY/5.1273 ZTA 506 W.SANTA CATALINA ROAD
PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262
PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263-2743
MS MARGARET PARK
AGFktk €E BAfk- UILL&-' AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA
' .. INDIANS
5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE
PALM SPRINGS,CA 92264
SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS LUEBBEN JOHNSON&BARNHOUSE,
lil.Erg55
��� ATTN:JOSEPH ONTIVEROS LLP
� R`Eik �� - CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGER ATTN: RICHARD C.WADE, PARALEGAL
Y -r 7424 4 STREET NW
.; s' ,x ,;,,.; ,3'`c,,M p P.O. BOX 487 LOS RANCHOS DE ALBUQUERQUE, NM
SAN JACINTO,CA 92581 87107
SPONS 40
IA