HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/5/2012 - STAFF REPORTS - 2.X. O�p pLM Sp�'L
i
O
V N
Cg41FORN�P CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 5, 2012 CONSENT AGENDA
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT AGREEMENT NO.
6256 WITH PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, INC. FOR AIRPORT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager
BY: AIRPORT
SUMMARY
This action would award an amendment to the professional services contract of Parsons
Brinckerhoff Aviation Inc. for civil engineering and design services related to the
airport's upcoming FAA funded terminal apron pavement rehabilitation, taxiway "G", and
airfield surface markings project, and some miscellaneous on-call professional services.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve Contract Amendment No. 1 to Parsons Brinkerhoff Inc. Agreement No.
6256 Airport professional services engineering contract for bid phase design
services under FAA AIP Project No. 3-06-0181-049-2012 terminal apron and
taxiway G pavement rehabilitation, thermoplastics airfield markings construction
management and on-call professional services projects in the amount not-to-
exceed $853,534.27.
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents including up to
ten (10%) additional change order work as required to address changes in the
project scope.
STAFF ANALYSIS
The Federal Aviation Administration puts considerable emphasis and expectations on
airports to maintain all of the airside pavements for the primary purpose of safety. As
pavement reaches the end of the useful life, debris can be generated from the failing
asphalt and can cause serious damage to aircraft engines if ingested. To effectively
manage all of the airside pavements at Palm Springs International Airport, a
ITEM NO.
City Council Staff Report
September 5, 2012 -- Page 2
Contract Amendment No. 1 — Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
Airport Professional Services
comprehensive Pavement Condition Inventory was conducted to assess the condition of
all of Palm Springs International Airport's airside pavements. The results of the
comprehensive analysis indentified the asphalt pavements surrounding both the Bono
and Regional Concourses and Taxiway "G" as the areas in most need of
rehabilitation. Staff has submitted this pavement rehabilitation project to the Federal
Aviation Administration and they have approved the project as eligible for 90% grant
funding. The Airport Commission supported this recommendation and unanimously
approved this priority project in the airport's 2012/13 capital improvement program.
In addition to the needed pavement rehabilitation projects, the FAA has authorized a
new preformed thermoplastics product for the purposes of replacing surface paint at
airports. This same technology has been used for years on public roads and has now
been sanctioned for use on taxiways at airports. Under the analysis and
recommendation of staff, the Airport Commission voted unanimously to include the use
of thermoplastics technology at Palm Springs International Airport based on the fact that
it will enhance airfield safety and save time, labor and expense for the next dozen or
more years, by reducing routine painting.
City Council has already approved a five year general services base contract in July
with Parsons Brinckerhoff Aviation and the attached contract Amendment will engage
the professional services necessary to complete the design and bid phase of these
projects. This consultant, who was selected from a recent national procurement
selection process, possesses an extensive background with these exact same types of
paving projects.
Also included in this contract is a line item for other as-needed professional services
including any FAA technical information requests, survey, CAD, facility analysis,
environmental mandates and other miscellaneous airport specialized work outside of
this project as needed by staff to address airport maintenance or repair issues that
materialize over the normal course of airport operations.
Staff will ensure that these projects are designed and constructed in a manner that
minimizes any disruption to the operations of the airport and all elements will be
strategically phased in order to preserve the safety and efficiency of airline operations.
It is anticipated that the construction will not begin until after peak season.
FISCAL IMPACT
Fees paid to Parson Brinkerhoff for these three projects will not exceed the amount of
$853,534.27. This fee was developed in strict accordance with requirements set forth by
the Federal Aviation Administration. The process included formulation of the scope of
services by staff and then again reviewed by an independent third party estimator.
Hourly rates from the Parsons Brinckerhoff base contract were then applied to the hours
of the scope to calculate the fee. The FAA will be funding 90% of this fee and equates
02
City Council Staff Report
September 5, 2012 -- Page 3
Contract Amendment No. 1 —Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
Airport Professional Services
to $731,731.50. The remaining share of$121,803.50 will be funded with airport funds
that were budgeted and available in account number 416-6401-56123. $40,500 of this
amount will be dedicated to miscellaneous on-call professional services that may be
required for the on-going maintenance and operation of the airport.
Thomas o an,
Executive Director, Airport
David H. Read r anage
Attachment:
Agreement
03
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO AGREEMENT NO. 6262 —AVIATION CONSULTING SERVICES
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of the 5th day of Sep-
tember, 2012 (the "effective date") by and between the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, a
California charter city and municipal corporation ("City"), and Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.,
(herein "Consultant") as follows:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City owns and operates Palm Springs International Airport ("Air-
port") located in Palm Springs, California for the convenience of the general public.
WHEREAS, City and Consultant entered into that certain Consulting Services
Agreement No. 6262 for Aviation Consulting Services ("Agreement"), as duly amended
from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement to increase work assign-
ments.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and sufficient consideration, the parties agree as
follows:
1. Exhibit "A", Scope of Services, is hereby amended to add the following on-call
Engineering Services for additional resident professional services for the Termi-
nal Apron & Taxiway "G" Design, along with Thermoplastic Installation and Pro-
fessional Services Projects, Federal Airport Improvement Project AIP No. 49, and
miscellaneous on-call professional services for on-going maintenance and opera-
tion of the airport (Task 1 is described in the Proposal from the Consultant at-
tached to this Amendment No. 1):
Task 1 —AIP (Airport Improvement Program) Apron and
Taxiway "G"Taxiway Design $ 718,534.27
Task 2 - Airfield Thermoplastic Construction Management,
when and to the extent authorized by FAA, based
upon contract hourly rates, not to exceed $ 94,500.00
Task 3—Misc. Non-AIP Planning & Environmental,
based upon contract hourly rates, not to exceed $ 40,500.00
2. Except as previously modified in this Amendment No. 1, all other provisions of
the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 04
Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc.
Palm Springs International Airport
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as of the date first
written above.
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRING
a municipal corporation
By: By:
City Clerk City Manager
APPROVED AA TO FORM:
By: _ j
a6ktorney
CONTRACTOR: Check one: _Individual_Partnership_Corporation
Corporations require two notarized signatures: One from each of the following: A. Chairman of Board,
President, or any Vice President: AND B. Secretary, Assistant Secretary, Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer,
or Chief Financial Officer.
By: By:
Signature(notarized) Signature(notarized)
Title: Title:
State of State of
County of County of
On before me, On before me,
personally appeared personally appeared who
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory who proved to me on basis of satisfactory evi-
dence to be the person(s)whose name(s) evidence to be the person(s)whose names(s)
name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they and acknowledged to me that he/she/they exe-
cuted the same in he/her/their authorized executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(is), and that by his/herttheir sigma- capacity(is), and that by his/her/their signa-
ture(s)on the instrument the person(s), or the tares(s)on the instrument the person(s)or the
entity upon behalf of which the person(s) the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted, executed the instrument. acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under
the laws of the State of California that the under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct a foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS my hand and official seal. WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Signature: Notary Signature:
Notary Seal: Notary Seal: 05
==too
YEAR
Mr. Thomas Nolan
Palm Springs International Airport
3400 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Re: Project Name: PSP Terminal Apron Rehabilitation—Design Services
Dear Mr. Nolan:
We are pleased to present this proposal for airfield engineering services at Palm Springs International Airport
(PSP). This project will be Task Order 1 on our on-call contract with PSP. The Terminal Apron Rehabilitation
design will be funded under the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)Airport Improvement Program(AIP)
grant number 3-06 0181-049-2012. This scope of services is within the limits of the Airport Capital
Improvement Program(ACIP) project description and is based on the ACIP description and discussions with
Airport staff. Construction services will be covered by a separate cost proposal, but an order of magnitude
has been separately provided for budgeting purposes.
Project Description
Palm Springs Airport(PSP)will be reconstructing the asphalt portion of the commercial apron around both
terminals, as well as taxiway 'G'. This is approximately 1.3 million square feet of asphalt pavement. A portion
of the existing apron edge lights, concrete panels and concrete joint sealant will also be replaced. This Task
Order will cover the design of approximately$6,300,000 of airport construction improvements. Following is a
detailed break-down of the scope of each task and a list of services.
1. Phase 1 and Phase 2 Apron Reconstruction
The existing asphalt apron and taxilanes around the main terminal and terminal expansion area are in
poor condition. The pavement has been identified in the Pavement Maintenance and Management
Plan (PMMP)as having a low Pavement Condition Index(PCI)and the PMMP suggests removal and
replacement of the AC section. Based on a site walk by Parsons Brinckerhoff, the PCI and
recommendation for removal are appropriate. Most of the PCC apron is in satisfactory condition, but
failing joint sealant was noticed on many panels. Some PCC panels at the PCC/AC edge are
cracked and may also require replacement. Restriping of the reconstructed taxiways and taxilanes is
required. Additional striping of the approaches to the gates will also be required.
Environmental clearance has been approved by the FAA in a letter dated April 22, 2009. The FAA
determined the project is Categorically Excluded as it relates to NEPA.
The first design phase of the project is to gather field data and as-built grading, storm drain and utility
plans to determine the existing pavement section and look for potential conflicts. Following the initial
investigation, a Parsons Brinkerhoff survey crew will perform a topographical survey sufficient for
design. The survey will capture all at-grade utilities, flowlines, grade breaks and sections every 50'to
100'for asphalt pavement elevations through the project area. The crew will also establish the joint
patterns on the PCC terminal apron pavement but will not survey the entire area. A geotechnical
investigation will be performed by RMA, an on-call contract team member. RMA will perform ten (10)
cores to establish existing pavement thickness and subgrade conditions. Based on the geotechnical
results, Parsons Brinckerhoff will perform pavement thickness design using FAARFIELD. The airport
will provide aircraft counts for an aircraft mix design. Initial determinations will be provided to the
airport in a Basis of Design (also called a Preliminary Engineer's Report), indicating proposed
pavement sections and summarizing the project purpose, scope, calculations and studies.
Over a Century of
Engineering Excellence 06
After data collection, Parsons Brinckerhoff will begin design per the submitted Basis of Design (BOD)
and instruction from the Airport. Design will conform to the standards set forth by the FAA Advisory
Circulars(ACs). Deliverables include demolition, grading, paving,joint, storm drain, striping,
construction phasing, construction safety, lighting, signage and erosion control plans. In addition to
plans, Parsons Brinckerhoff will provide a hydrology/hydraulics study,technical specifications,
engineer's cost estimate, Basis of Design (final engineers report), SWPPP/NOl documents for
submittal to the RWQCB and a Safety Risk Analysis.
Demolition plans will show the full limit of removals for pavement and utilities. The plans will indicate
existing pavement type and thickness based on the geotechnical investigation and as-built plans.
Utilities to be relocated/replaced will also be shown. Utility specific trenching and patching for
construction of utilities will not be shown on the demolition plans.
Grading plans will identify all new pavements by type and thickness, across the project footprint.
Plans will also show any adjacent off-pavement graded areas. Grading plans will identify flowlines,
ridgelines and drainage structures. Fine grading will be provided in tight areas like behind the
baggage claim and service yard areas. Maximum and minimum slopes will be per ADA requirements
in personnel areas and Advisory Circulars in aircraft movement areas.
Paving and joint plans will indicate the AC paving lane directions and take in to consideration
maximum and minimums of acceptable airfield paving. Joint plans will indicate the limits of PCC joint
seal replacement. If any PCC panels are replaced, proper sizing and reinforcement of those panels
will also be shown.
Storm drain plans will reflect the results from the hydrology/hydraulics study. Reinforced concrete
pipe will be utilized in all locations on the airfield and will be shown in plan and profile.
Striping plans will show all striping for the newly constructed asphalt apron and taxiway areas.
Taxiway edge, centerline, and terminal lead-in stripes will be provided. Surface painted gate
designation signs will be replaced where removed for construction and repainted on the remaining
apron. Three or four aircraft parking areas will be striped as well. No further PCC apron marking, like
nosewheel parking locations, engine proximity, or roadway striping will be done in this project.
Construction phasing plans will break the project into the major components of the construction
phasing. The plans will show the limits of work for each phase and the appropriate safety
precautions, like low profile barricades, black-out striping and taxiway closures. These plans will be
coordinated with the Airport to determine the required open areas and preferred phasing. The
phasing plans, in conjunction with the haul route and staging area plans will also be utilized in filing
the Construction Safety Phasing Plan with the FAA.
Lighting and signage plans will show the removal and replacement of any non-LED lights in the
project footprint. Elevated or load-bearing taxiway edge light LEDs will be installed and coordinated
with the recent resignage and relighting project.
Erosion control plans will be prepared for the project They will also support the Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)submittal to the RWQCB.
07
A pro-active approach to safety, promotes safety culture with all personnel,within the movement
and non-movement areas alike for the benefit of reducing the likelihood and severity of
accidents, reduce the costs associated with accidents. This scope will comply with FAA's Order
5200.11 to conduct a Safety Risk Assessment of the planned construction work in conjunction
with the development of the CSPP for the planned construction work will apply a formal
procedure to identify hazards associated with the planned construction and use of the facility
after the construction activity is over, assessment of the hazards and analysis of the risks of the
hazards,and determining appropriate mitigations of each.
The goal of the SMS activity will be to identify hazards and safety concerns of project
stakeholders early in the design process to allow ample time to design mitigation solutions for
identified hazards.
While per the latest change to Order 5200.11. PSP does not fall into the mandated category of
airports that must conduct an SMS/SRM for this project, it is acknowledged that in the coming
years the FAA will phase in these requirements to include PSP. However, more importantly, the
SMS/SRM activity can be beneficially incorporated into the normal CSPP activity at a
reasonable cost and will allow the airport to slowly become accustomed to the process, thus
preparing themselves for the forthcoming rule and further promote their culture of safety.
While an SRM may not be required by the Airports Division of the FAA,the Air Traffic Division
(ATO) may conduct an SMS SRM. All projects will be screened by ATO to determine if an SRM
will be conducted on it. Stakeholders for the SMS/SRA will include: Airport Ops, Airport
Engineering, ARFF, FAA ADO, TSA, a min. of 4 airlines from the pool of AA, Allegiant Air,West
Jet, UA, Sun Country, Delta,Alaska Airlines, Horizon Air, US Airways, Frontier,Virgin America,
Sky West,fuelers, food service deliveries.
The SMS/SRA stakeholder meeting will be held in conjunction with the CSPP preliminary review
meeting, The agenda of the SRA portion of the meeting will be to the following activities assume
that the ATO will not initiate a SRM Panel&that the SRM will be compliant with 5200.11 &
correspond with the CSPP formulation. It is expected that no FAA SRM panel will occur for this
project but that Parsons Brinkerhoff will lead in an SRM review as part of this scope. For the
tasks and associated time of each, it is expected that the project will be bid in one package thus
requiring one CSPP and one SRM review.
Our proposal for the above-described work will be a lump sum of seven hundred eighteen thousand five
hundred thirty-five dollars ($718,535) per the attached task and cost breakdown sheet. In the event
additional services beyond this scope are requested by PSP, an addition of scope and price will be required.
We can begin work immediately upon receipt of your written notice to proceed and signed Task Order.
Scope of Work
A. Preliminary Engineering Services
The Engineer shall provide the following preliminary engineering services:
a. Meet with Airport personnel to walk the job and discuss special site conditions and concerns of
the Staff. Perform preliminary visual condition surveys of the existing pavements, electrical and
drainage conditions to identify, locate, and measure pavement distress for repair or replacement
as part of the project.
b. Perform the geotechnical investigation in conformance with FAA Standards for the proposed
improvements. The geotechnical investigation shall include 10 data cores and 10 exploratory
borings(up to 15 feet in depth) in the asphalt area for reconstruction and none in the existing
08
PCC areas. Laboratory analysis on the bores will be performed including soil classification,
gradation,Atterberg limits, and CBR tests. Subgrade stabilization alternatives will be analyzed.
Present the result of the geotechnical investigation in a report for inclusion as an appendix to
Basis of Design.
c. Assess the structural adequacy of the existing pavement along haul routes to accommodate
construction equipment based on the result of the geotechnical investigation and record drawing
research. Make recommendations as to construction equipment weight restrictions and
specialized construction equipment requirements based on existing structural sections and
subgrade soils.
d. Perform topographic surveys of the apron and taxiways as needed for design. Survey shall
consist of cross-sections at 50-foot to 100-foot intervals along the pavement to be reconstructed,
with data collected for the width of the TSA to determine flow lines and drainage patterns. Digital
terrain models and existing ground contours will be generated from the survey data.
e. Meet with PSP to refine the scope to the extent of the anticipated project.
f. Perform preliminary engineering for the proposed improvements including developing pavement
designs and preliminary preparation of construction cost estimates. Identify all underground
utilities and conduits from as-built records and other necessary components to assure the apron
project meets the useful life. Make a recommendation on which alternatives to pursue.
g. Prepare a preliminary Basis of Design to explain the existing condition, identify the proposed
solution(s)and design alternatives, and outline the design decisions.
B. Basic Design Services
The Engineer shall provide the following basic engineering services:
1. Design Phase
a. Once PSP concurs with the preliminary design and preliminary Basis of Design, PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF will prepare Contract Plans for all proposed improvements. Final plans will
be provided on 22-inch by 34-inch Bond (paper)sheets as well as in electronic format
(AutoCAD 2008). Plans for intermediate design review will only be provided in printed format.
b. Prepare Specifications and Contract Documents that conform to FAA Standard Specifications
and Advisory Circulars, California Public Contract Code, City of Palm Springs General
Provisions, Special Provisions, and ordinances related to Airport Construction.
c. Prepare detailed estimate of quantities and probable construction costs.
d. Develop a Construction Phasing Plan with methods to maximize safety and minimize
disruption to Airport operations.
e. Develop a Construction Safety Phasing Plan to meet the requirement for FAA submittal of a
safety and phasing plan that addresses the 43 item checklist currently provided by the FAA.
In conjunction with the CSPP, comply with FAA's Order 5200.11 to conduct a Safety Risk
Assessment of the planned construction work in conjunction with the development of the
CSPP for the planned construction work. The SRM/SRA will apply a formal procedure to
identify hazards associated with the construction and post-construction of the facility, and
assess the hazards and analyze the risks of the hazards, and determine appropriate
mitigations of each.
09
f. Coordinate the Project with the FAA, PSP, the City of Palm Springs, and other affected
parties. Prepare Special Provisions in the Bid Documents that outline limitations on the
Contractor with respect to disruption of Airport operations.
g. Submit up to six copies of check sets of full-size contract drawings and Specifications at 30%,
60%, and 90%completions for PSP and FAA review and comment.
h. Provide up to six sets of the Basis of Design,which summarizes the design principles applied
to this project, geotechnical investigation and pavement elevation, and presents a detailed
estimate of construction costs.
i. Prepare one complete set of signed final Plans and Specification incorporating PSP, City of
Palm Springs,and FAA review comments, including sponsor certification that the plans and
specifications meet the FAA standards for the airport design.
2. Bidding Phase
a. Prepare the following Bid Documents: Instructions to Bidders, Proposal Forms, Sample
Agreements, Bid Notice and other required Contract Documents utilizing standard documents
provided by both the Airport and FAA.
b. Attend a pre-bid conference and site walk at the airport.
c. Respond to inquiries and request for clarification from bidders and issue addendums to the
Plans and Specifications, if required.
d. Consult with PSP concerning acceptancetrejection of the bids and the responsibility of the
bidders and proposed subcontractors.
e. Prepare a Bid Abstract for all bids received in compliance with FAA requirements.
C. Additional Engineering Services
Only if authorized in writing by PSP, the Engineer shall furnish additional services of the following
type, which will be paid for as indicated in the"Compensation for Services"section of this proposal.
a. Additional services due to changes in general scope of the project or its design, including, but not
limited to, changes in size, complexity, or character of construction after the 60% design phase.
b. Revising, redrawing, or changing designs, Plans, Specifications, Reports or other Contract
Documents after they have been reviewed and approved by PSP and the FAA.
C. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by 1)work damage by fire or
other cause during construction; 2)acceleration of the work schedule involving services beyond
normal working hours; or 3)Contractor default due to delinquency or insolvency.
d. Additional services in connection with the Project not otherwise provided for in this proposal.
Compensation for Services
The Engineer shall be compensated for the services described under"Scope of Work"as follows:
A. For engineering services outlined in the Scope of Work, Item A, Preliminary Engineering Services and
Item B, Basic Design Services, PSP shall pay the Engineer a lump sum of seven hundred eighteen
10
thousand five hundred thirty-five dollars($718,535)which includes all labor, materials, equipment,
printing, outside services, traveling, costs, and incidentals as necessary to complete the work.
The total compensation to the Engineer(Excluding any additional services)under this task order is
the lump sum amount of seven hundred eighteen thousand five hundred thirty-five dollars
($718,535).
B. For any additional services authorized in writing by the Airport, the Engineer shall be compensated
according to the Standard Billing Rate Schedule included as Exhibit B of the agreement. Scope and
fee will be negotiated on a task-by-task basis.
The total compensation to the Engineer(excluding any additional services) under this task order is the lump
sum amount of seven hundred eighteen thousand five hundred thirty-five dollars($718,535).
Responsibility of Palm Springs International Airport(PSP)
In addition to the general obligations provided in the agreement, PSP shall provide the following:
• A design representative with complete authority to transmit instruction and information, receive
information, interpret policy, and define decisions.
• Access to the project site and escort for the Consultants personnel, as required.
• Available data, drawings,"As-Built"drawings, and other information related to the project.
• Review of draft documents within a reasonable amount of time and provide review comments in
writing. All PSP review comments for various individuals and departments shall be provided in writing
and will be returned to the Engineer as a single package representing all PSP review comments.
• Protection of Parsons Brinckerhoff supplied digital information or data, if any, from contamination,
misuse, or changes.
11
Schedule of completion
Final documents, ready for PSP use in bidding to determine FAA funding will be delivered to PSP by March 1,
2013. This assumes a start date of September 1, 2012, per execution of a Task Order. This schedule also
assumes PSP will deliver written comments on the design submittals within fifteen (15)working days of
receiving plans and will deliver written comments on the 30%, 60%and 90%design submittals within fifteen
(15)working days from submittal. If PSP requires additional review time, the delivery date of the final bid
documents may be extended accordingly and a revision of project design costs may be warranted.
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me at(909)888-1106.
Best Regards,
PARSONS BRIINKER�H�OFFFF,, Inc.
_b `jC,sue
Douglas B. Sawyer
Senior Vice President
Cc: File
12
PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT(PSP)
APRON AND TW'G'RECONSTRUCTION
Design Engineering Cost Estimate
IS
SII1 $173 183 f142 Si 3121 Eta 5164 f121 9123 35p 31 f55 S15D St f1tS 143 3f00 51G 3153
1.0 14p. !0 ' 80 `40 M. 0"40 "W "/6 'M a p0 '0 0 0 '6 0 6 0 p. _0 M. . - ,im .
1.1 Wpi al n a 40 80 M 40 B0 384 S 3450401
12 IAfLulb 40 /0 64 41,55794
1.3 ON e ID BO BO 80 16p Siam 0 36030.10
1.4 AlkntlM nCTermla Meetl 16 16 32 S 769645
1.5 30%60%90%t00%Subm9hls 4 18 18 32 i 89¢00 S ivm.
1.6 P eatAtlmbtlsb9tlon BO 14
0 t32 5 26.4 0544
1.7 LID/LEEO
1.9 0DCe 0 S
0 f 1 143.51 f 101{354
2 M15` .:- . 90/ __SS •0 �-1]D2 .. p b. 10. 0 � � w. p. vA
21 Sak.6Me1 1 2 2 8 a 20 i ]409.76
22 Xldex ehrt 1 2 2 8 0 20 S 409.78
2.3 1 2 2 8 6 M 5 2 409.76
2.0 PI3n 1 { 8 16 28
m PMn 1 4 8 18 29 3 288.96
26 Pkn 5 1 4 4 87 10 3 19 Tap
27 Plu ik 2 4 40 p0 104 5 915277
20 Can an3 9 2 6 0 24 42 3 46058
29 Phm 8 2 1 10 8 24 54 6 803A 37
2.10 Eroeinn ConVaI NOW 1 2 8 24 34 3 3417,05
9.11 Eloelon Canl6el Pkm 9 2 40 BO 127 S t2 w965
2.12 Erosgn CaNOI 0.k9e 2 2 { 24 30 f 290322
Mil P4vemenlp ltlbn Pkn. 6 4 8 40 40 00 172 5 1728927
Z14 B1ed10f50n P1ene 0 2 4 40 8 40 111 f 8 00
215 i99e1•41Beefl 1 4 12 4 20 S 1.61540
216 Pevemmt mt� l COtN01 5 12 {0 7? 46 120 224 f 27 M..40
217Pb and B49din Pl•n 6 24 60 16 80 80 120 0 5 3040,49
2.18 nne013d1' 4 24 4p 56 40 20 Bo 240 S 2580689
219 JviiMP4vl Pkn 9 18 6 120 1" i SO3.5{
220 Pevi ex Mel p 113 2 4 12 12 ?D 20 66 3 779528
2.21 Jo1M0etSA3 } 4 12 20 56 5 8790,40
E2 Pew111.1dN Phn 6 i6 40 90 120 224 f 2T.M.42
22]Pevemrd LYtXin Ok96e 2 2 4 16 18 is 54 3 6314.39
2.24 Pewmetd W111in Mwizi1 6 4 12 40 1td 218 $ 25553.68
225 8 ,Tn Min M. 4 2 4. 40. 100 146 5 14 923.51
225 51o}m G9h Prodke 2 4 24 80 108 $ 1067019
23T 4 4 40 44 5 091.73
236 6itfleldL bW Pkn 4 18 8 18 40 BO 160 3 26538
2 Al B d Be 2 6 e 4 4 40 64 3 9.51127
2]0 0L9e1d wn 4 16 e 4 20 50 im i istima56
221 Ab94k mk 1 • • 2 40 6 0.49441
232 PoSX Sh ke 120 IN 224 3 959.60
2]]OWPPP 4 40 20 IB {0 120 S 11 39710
2]{ 16 00 40 20 1% 5 tt19553
236 f Iola 1• 40 60 160 2% E 42120.34
236 C ruWlon Pan 24 4 20 48 f BSAO
237 ON0f. 107 107 S 2384382
p, - 0 �W_ '1 3t'7 0 s "x M 10 0 .•1, .dP a oh ^•_97' ^; .➢, ,r; ry _~5 i15,
3.1 Oe0le0bniwl AMA Oro 4 is 16 28 76 14 24 ITS 5 25000 3 2 81l
0
�••rwwex 9 -m' 6 9 :� W440 9 ;prM D"i rl entl o in 60 60 1B63 37704.99
0 ._ ., p • ,_..41p 0
5.1 RRe1NCNeeue l.T bid 40 4D 50 160 S 1978M
f
TahY. t' 0=YO A9:3 'fiE `ry FiIY•%1 .S 0..- ' 0 e ,'. ,«•NI':. ='fi. 8.1p0 WS
I"�° cu.m...vr°a.wev�Pawnv.4Om wm1N.w
W