Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/9/2005 - STAFF REPORTS MAR 2 2 2005 C �ECC,v�p ERRATUM `fi C��r;:, ' TO THE i NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE SALTON SEA ECOSYSTEM AND PRESERVATION OF ITS FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES Notice is hereby provided clarifying the lead agency designation for preparation of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR)for the Restoration of the Salton Sea Ecosystem and Preservation of its Fish and Wildlife Resources. The California Resources Agency is the lead agency responsible for complying with provision of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for preparation of the PEIR. The NOP of February 27, 2004 identified the California Department of Water Resources and the California Department of Fish and Game as the co-lead agencies for conducting this environmental review. While DWR and DFG will continue to share the obligation for preparing the environmental document for the Salton Sea Ecosystem Management Plan on behalf of the Resources Agency, the Resources Agency is and will continue to-be the lead agency for purposes of this environmental review. As part of the environmental review process, DWR and DFG are continuing to accept comments regarding the scope and content of the PEIR. Written comments should be directed to: Charles Keene Department of Water Resources 770 Fairmont Avenue, Suite 102 Glendale, California 91203 The NOP is hereby amended to reflect this clarification. firs;. C�� NIn-c G�SSe YAYnl ,t '17 •�^f;' .=u� J.W. 1.' J .1�1�,t •'Jx{ �rL��.��tl li�'4• •�•r.DebtoT `MerR¢�sduices - `3tatus . • - .'IYSalton'.Sea Muthoil ..7� :'+. ��'r� ,�: �,a ua, -� �,y";"�Y'—„'�.'�?. r . +a�!.0 ucf" '�✓�`�z i��agn4lfcnle'ye'�ulill�'hni,1„il Md�A� ;:, ';':r• :,;..-_;;" ,arm" Y' ,�',y.[iov:'.S�N en � i,;, . �r.v ''' ';+°�,v.;i'i.� .M lia A"f, ...y;"•i' ,.,4+itli�°��l.J'e!n ��'r"4i,r° i,,.�.x�"I'.J:i.��i .'r •_lil..',. _y.:�..�...,j�4y,,. .LPk" y t' �vy> I�•ra:ln� �'is'm��" What's going on,.... .,,,:<.F' r' . � x -F �,.H, a r', ..,1.. Problems 1 tote ro Iss, in -'w^"r4' .F'11t'9Y"r',�r';WI,.M r>:•s .r","{''i�c�;, .a "ri _:''r; i..',� -°.IO,CAIFIC @Ctl e, M^CA4FED:6s,�(-neltaoroararna -finnncinl��� '•.,;w..,.,r-,a, :e. 'y'r,��,;yr�'d.°?tii'i-° .."v„•ili7cl ''^km�"-F1rnf 'r'n "-1Jgr . — ' _ „��. ,w,, b k(it ,, n!i,{ (G�' YNosefiiO yr ""WIN ,''.�;.tlS�•iali TN—M�:-,;`6.+w n• i•. :� °?{ir S>','^•_J i�", ,.'• .. ;�._r?. , ,i'y�i:,.�.p,� '-���''�''�''' "°4 i„r x"4;� r.'.,.y".w..'r, r, �, r;��.�=,.�i!ta;. -YSka It ature Gg36 ,mill' n., ��'•.i!1{f �`i1P1 ccI�ife�g7t, ¢�d pco 'aii Tell-. 0, In F' w, �>tb , r � � :, ; ; :,.�SrA fiwoaa.�rt' �Wt,JaC' 'w'�' i;{'.�, . �•;�:, IedC1'BI��IIn11 n"' � �e�•'A�,� Ih ^,� , ,`r ,I�..yr `'r• ;;r�,� ;rf� :� b� r 1�](A'� Ar 'Y,J1u rrr owR Chart,f r� I.. A �_V�lUj'f2t�)®6- 1 i 'f Message:M thls'kointq .;', "` - t�'I��I �I. „ SOUen Sca ' t �' 1 n -"'{,y_ i, Locar Rnxbrurion Plon�y If local nlliCi.Jn and cis is leaders aCcupl the star"eo,rtwl Outcome,x u u 111 likli gut i, 'ii,�i �i.jbr,l; - �' :`` n •' lunA� m n r c .. prolCd(bat inhi6lrs econnnm dwdupmcnt ��•, y _r_ �_` �s� ....h ry/n . ____ ID- and facililaU% r-of-hasio s.e •future nu 0.r i MluBea ` \''• �'\mil �''�" :. essa eae 'Rest of T61 ;,') n"Rhr& = II f.ncally u•ClcrrcJ rro'cc[is achlm'alilU Lcc:ursc . I I J verlmearnwral " A1.iY'a x Incat Grtifiu con du land�svafrr,IIuJ l'll', ro nuepmra I:u•„es[fodill .ip gj'.1itly l' r•1' uresn,rrla6t In Lr rPC nOurcc 'a'��riAl?�W'lI�.� ,�i�•IF'.:Ivsq��'iVp,, _ ,.`:n.�y:';l�RJ;;r�lti 4'+'w"U1fJ1' ,ciAi� i ..l = f rI`itiy ,iN`F'r Cn'.W�..s:f:sBY'';W ' tl"f`V''�i '�:t!tA;iY!p ;:rt Y.a p":. 1,•.yrwl^ l.,.w N. r. . Mc' d' _n.ra�T. isiY•'" a�SYJ'.^'��m r"F J1.4T �'1 y�1� Or it ,n Y�'r T—tiuihrtJ�'J"+�"r,.ti��.J_.�•�� :ryr r� .1�C Yw���.�A.l.� •o,� ' vr'I"r•-�i.� p�'.��:71N:; �.nr.; °ii XYT,A'�� �� .,� ,� •.i,>V•!: .�; ,;F. tom, x�?.'b! N [„� I • �mcal R.:mc+rron Pron' - ."i` yll":^,Lri = r`rh'_ �• 1A •�-r� - wcur spn,�.,,,� swoca If co,uou III Ila$. , ";i.k��1* y�1�M':I� - I,'4"i X•t, WILCFL9f1 _�F.Y.ry ,r_y ,�� '" 4 , '-' USORHoOel. ,950 c,�A.:. �v _ nyll a;ti P,hr �Ma,il'w . 5a IIIJ 2 ,:rw,1,V+�+'jt+,MoAx�.4"� •' . �Mrt . 1" i'F. Ir ., �1 . . „ wi• 'in vtd4 r.p�:N„^M_.q nfu °(}'�� L ,. J,k'V�:�:a�+w �1,�:_''"r�'''„'"'f�'Ir r$.id A�yvyf�,lY'�rl''i lfp`'Mia7 Yy'.,r f"+NI}%LiYA.�r.li ,.:_ e ... r 'r .,. x..alron Sca H'` -�'q 'uYi,+, •i '�Local RnePoroflOn Plan - :� � • �yy [��.� .: � " `'�' Projected 35•Year Population Growth „r .'�H'i., x +-••(•. w,.oo.olcpmomm 1 iw.e,.----YYa alnon - - , y ,:?�..,.�M w.iiu s�„fimn In ,' r�� 16QOA00 d ; r 1 {,' ,r`s.[ `r ri ".'•;�e- ennl- nunpn .{I ;r�1+�... ';i, h• s,y,.^�y�: :8'n ` 00,000 I• ,,[ ;h,� ihellaValle • I',; •;<':�.:`'�� ;R ;,, "ia C:-: {r. 1,000000 MI Coachella y ;vF3{ :I. 800000 l t .:1' ..,� ;.:'yaa✓`��r+ ';�',« !ni� J�i; 'rr'ral soa000 ❑ImperialValley �'�i nYnane n�svlei �'•(''�`-is��� - 1��{' 5 -exg avenue '•` ^-«`. ,.•. 'tr'.-: ,k',,,r'' 2004 2020 2040 71 i, 11 ..,'w, '5. ��j'p' :1,t 9'.I;.,��::L r i.6�IF, h'i^ilnr 1,4 �•;^,t I1,6'r„�'� ;nl t'� I:,f"'J'.a AWI,t�..�".r r'x.•n:"I,I-;'[. r �,p,l l•'. q.rm� •Nq,..e"n' � � l I.,,' r r., n 1�1. .�'�i� .0„�Yj�% ..r - .N(.',::•Y') nf:!i e��:'�}1 il4h �"�d;�fil r,h"�i}M"1„'lW� u: J� pW.edd mcn.s.In lssass.d vquR<I=n In lRo w.r �`i;', �.1 -aw..reulleaut 1064 After Saltpn sea re:ter.aun 9,� ,• ` HOW MUCK Laval FUnGing is Passible With IF07 'Yr".'•Fr •Y � rn nnnemLNel �'}4 - 1nax..en mllnn orrvew rn y'n •��^f,k vemum,q Scnooa c.mlro-sn• Irn r5� •' Impotlalcounty Moen 100p0 R4 59,5 '' thm.. nradl mdy,d ery AyvhenJln, "•N-1 , Ir -Ja.?tM1 ,I al-erslde Cpun[y 9o,ono N,000 es=.1 Sta.9 i ty'I} _' Imp[rin co. ga's 526.1 ftM 05.3 '•�.`p"'`.� Tw6L 238,000 36,8pp ' p• S21A '•t 'I C�achdla 128 55.5 ICA ]].2 IsA'l w •eyondid lrewme...•cwen•5ese se•mil..l.<net mere ct tneallanel td[;dr yn '"i� T=id: S21,3 S81 $ao SGa �'l`dP hmro,cum vaw„p,lu MpmJ mmr]vwso.-SRJ FmIan ",^�)ri. Ima mmnnA VJoulenm Ceammavalrytrdgoop.SJiJ Pillion k'i¢`l _d Ar' a""Iw aJly..rbu4kutr•rn•wdewWyonlNaamNg Niyo J Suunn Rr,rN tlymwxl�� ,-r,;Rm•ry p•,nyvmu ar'{' � `J� Lend w� .r' •,eC1,,,,dnr.minrNmllllon 6p•ew• ` Ay TAy ,I'll ryr-In n "1,!'i °v "r' 1•m• •i51�i'1 .I�,�Mrl'.N'/i F�'e ..G['d o. .r.9: nwiti{'^f ;',}nl`(IrO�'. „+ ,YC': ' 'G_linM— yT. 1P 'Pnt,J,h''fJl iti0i '.'1i iy Ir nil 'i '�i IiJ 1' 'i iL'[. '+ SSA's str4te&f—2005- 'Prroposcd'Salton�Sea'Loca1'CtintrotAci''J t Ws(lii"ng-ief4n'.' IPinviiled'S invides3 t mc•,5 ,J Mid $ 00 million A-- ] npply.�T 4qi''_•"f,'[`rC7cu�l-��^N lfi., � ;M "' 1 1, �. nbnta7elnon felleiglfunding, _. }ffA;'�L1iflLCA slfyyll' lvrtl:mn5'•��iimbYbler'prnJrei;rl(yJ:, - 1q`'�y�tid 4J,\I,?rl.�l�^,i;,ik,'j,(�a:Stry.Tr'4aC'I•etC'T.al?._.i� ;'.��,�ir?�+:,1=:1�;.�1ri[IlcWtln(Ing a�cniy'.( -1�',�''-C2"'.l��c��vn...n-j" ,f' .i71�!^*i!�J}"i,>.rc�lu�i'fl;'C.�.e''�'''nliy l;(5?7.M-', ��V^�n1'',I"•'cjj�7Zi; :r- ;li ,ilfllt'. liyi. lJ .CJ I�.fdZga J - r ;rh`t"'7-ll 1;-_}ii]SJ �d 1>' u prJictaF:, ' rn i( ruM,Yn r L.fY" Y I(,nimr� l ill ,Jh l' v q -rhnlG ..Y' IT^�m'IY�'� •d x .� �};,}f 1 ;�; 7. vP31- �r�ar� ,l'� y I M I 'I , tMw' ld w ° � i ti Nfal, wJ tl� 3 Proposed'Salton a'LocaPConUbl,Ad' 7' .J& ;l 6 64- ;14 An lvo.0 It .............. Rivals pitching their plans for future of the Salton Sea I The San Diego Union-Tribune Page I of 4 SignOgM.cQ .Co'tri CCL PRINTTHIS Rivals pitching their plans for future of the Salton Sea By Michael Gardner COPLEY NEWS SERVICE March 9,2005 SALTON CITY—The gasping Salton Sea is awash in dreams and schemes. A power struggle to command the restoration process and take = control of development along the shores of this salty sump-tumed- wildlife—haven has consumed the Imperial Valley, attracted the attention of New York bond markets, and produced a head- shaking alliance involving one of the state Capitol's legendary figures, former Assembly Speaker Willie Brown. PE PEATTIE/ Union-Trlbu ne The prospect of reviving the Salton Sea has Visions of a second Palm Springs have sparked a land rush. created a real estate bubble enveloping Promoters of competing restoration plans clash in coffee shops much of the lake. and council chambers. Water barons prowl in search of new supplies, and a shoreline Indian casino is in the mix, or so some Partin-_the sea claim. The campaign to secure state and federal acceptance of ambitious, competing plans to reinvent the sea is intensifying as the Schwarzeaegger administration chews over costs and consequences. Each alternative could scale the S1 billion mark. While the state is not expected to divulge its path until the end of 2006, state Sen. Denise Ducheny, D- San Diego, has introduced conceptual legislation to chart the region's future as much as the sea's rebirth. The Salton is a sea of contradictions. It's a vast lake in the desert, nourished and poisoned by fame runoff water,both morgue and nursery for rare migratory waterfowl. Its salty bounty is undrinkable, yet it plays an instrumental role in San Diego's water supply. Two years ago, the Salton Sea was a nagging loose end in a complex, seven-state pact to share the Colorado River and clear the way for the San Diego County Water Authodly to buy enough water from Imperial Valley farmers to serve 400,000 households a year. Negotiators eventually became unstuck when the Imperial Irrigation District agreed to refill the sea through 2017. L—TEIL-4 Vt . N - Left unsettled, however, is who would be in charge of 6--3/O 9 z 0� the restoration project of dikes and wetlands, and a htrr,;//si�nnr--ndir-ponrinilhi� r.lirlc^hilitYrnm/nt/rnt?a^tine=rntr:titlP=piva1^+nif-1iinA+ Rivals pitching their plans for future of the Salton Sea The Sara Diego Union-Tribune Page 2 of 4 potential $300 million budget to dilute salinity, control unhealthy selenium levels and limit dust pollution. And, who would police growth if a revitalized sea attracts new homes and hotels? u' Rivals are pitching their plans in Coachella, Calexico and the state Capitol. The Salton Sea Authority, a consortium of local government agencies and the Torres-Martinez Indian tribe, wants to pay for its restoration plan by tapping the $300 million state account and raisin.- an additional PEGGv Pear tE/Union-Tribune $500 million from investors attracted to the During the 1950s and early 1960s, the Salton Sea was a development potential. popular retreat far B-list celebrities, sunbathers, golfers and anglers. But the sea faded as a top tourist destination after a rash of bird deaths and rising salinity, levels. "We intend to play hardball on a major-league level," said Gary Wyatt, an Imperial County supervisor and chairman of the Salton Sea Authority. And their ace is none other than former Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, the flamboyant San Francisco liberal. The authority will invest S 10,000 a month on Brown, a lawyer who can tap a wealth of connections in the political world and financial markets. "He knows how to get things done," Wyatt said. Wyatt and Ron Enzweiler, the authority's executive director, are unlikely traveling salesmen as they make the rounds from city council chambers to Capitol corridors, Wyatt is from the small town of Brawley and spent years as a civilian expert on crime prevention with the Imperial County Sheriffs Department. Enzweiler is Harvard-educated with an engineering degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. They and others want to revive the sea of the booming 1950s and early 1960s, when it was a popular retreat for B-list celebrities, r'?t sunbathers, golfers and anglers. But the sea faded as a top tourist destination after a rash of bird deaths and rising salinity levels. riY. II 9 The Salton Sea Authority's plan is not uncontested. The Imperial Group, made up mostly of fanners, has come up with its own plan out of fear that Riverside County would hog development and the 1 money it brings in. The sea straddles Imperial and Riverside counties, leading to cross-border jealously and animosity. "We're tired of puttin.- up the water and money for other people's economic well-bein.-," farmer Ronnie Leimgruber said. The group's proposal intends to spread development and share the faits of an economic boom throughout the lake and county, said Heidi Kuhn, whose family runs cattle and makes cheese. "We want a tluiving tax base, too," Kuhn said, "to protect the PEGGY PEAT71E/ unlon•Tribune an economic opportunities that o with the sea and the water." American Avocets foraged for Food In Be 1�P g evaporating pool of water at Bombay Beach on the shore of the Salton Sea, which Is http://siunons ndieco.nrin111-i- clirt•ahility rnm/ni/rnt?artinn=rn1 I tit1—T?ival�+nit-t,ina+ m/nQonni Rivals pitching their plans for future of the Salton Sea I The San Diego Union-Tribune Page 3 of 4 If flashy resorts and high-end residences sprout, farmers could be one of the few remaining wetlands for bullied into giving up more water to protect the precious shoreline migrating birds. and views of monied interests, she said. "Guess who wins when it's multimillion-dollar gated communities versus Imperial Valley farmers?" Kuhn asked rhetorically. Her characterization of a wealthy lakeside mecca might not be far-fetched, even though some have described the sea as a smelly stoup dotted with dead birds. Wyatt and Enzweiler's pitch suggests that New York bond traders are tempted to underwrite restoration costs in return for a big payday from developers. Speculators also are hungry for land. A recent auction due to tax default of empty lots measuring 8,000 to 10,000 square feet drew bids as high as $14,000. "There was a time when I couldn't get 150 bucks for those lots," said Donna Yarnell, a 42-year veteran of Imperial's treasurer-tax collector's office. "It's astounding." The real estate bubble has enveloped much of the lake. Nearly a half century ago, a Salton City developer abandoned the town, leaving behind roads and utilities but few houses. Today, those empty lots recently valued at $2,500 to $3,000 have doubled in price on the open market. "If you're looking for a bargain, you're not going to get it," said county assessor Jose Rodriguez, who has been a resident since the early 1960s. Imperial County Supervisor Larry Grogan, a skeptic who described the various development plans as "hype," said his advice to landowners is "take the money and run." Water is king of the desert. And here, charges are plying over what could happen to leftover supplies once the sea is reborn. The giant Metropolitan Water District has filed claims for water on the New and Alamo rivers, which both carry used irrigation water to the Salton Sea. An early state prognosis suggests that in the worst circumstances, such as drought, the sea may receive only 500,000 acre-,feet a year, less than half of what it takes in now. Metropolitan and the state deny there's any covert bid to create a new pool of water. "Before people run off and argue over the water, let the process unfold," Metropolitan's Dennis Underwood said. Still, Underwood doesn't deny that Metropolitan would like to tap the region —if the final compromise allows it. "This (more water) is not the goal at the end of the rainbow," he said. "This is one resource." Supporters of the Imperial Group and Salton Sea Authority proposal also have accused each other of wanting to profit from the water. hll,O: ,i -nnm,,^nrliPennrintthi- rli^7-^hilitvrnm/nt/nnt>-^tirr -rl' titl- n' 7 r^_inimr— ^ Rivals pitching their plans for future of the Salton Sea I The San Diego Union-Tribune Page 4 of 4 And there is skepticism over whether the federal government, which owns vast tracts nearby, has any interest in saving the sea at all. "The federal government's plan is to let the sea die and then say it's dead and we can't fix it. That's unacceptable. We can't allow that," Wyatt said. John Keys, commissioner of the federal Bureau of Reclamation, said decisions must wait until after the environmental studies are in- "We're working with the state and the authority to see what can be done and should be done out there," Keys said. California's resources secretary, Mike Chrisman, said the state isn't planning to act unilaterally. "We aren't suggesting for a minute that we want to ram anything down anyone's throat," he said. On top of these concerns, skeptics also wonder whetber potential projects can,withstand earthquakes and whether local taxpayers will be handed a bill if the plan flops since Riverside and Imperial counties are part of the Salton Sea Authority. These divisions are expected to fester into and beyond 2007,when the state unveils its final restoration plan. "If this project were easy and simple, it would have been done a long time ago," said Jeanine Jones,the state's lead on the project. But the sews residents are itchy for progress. "They started studying the sea at the same time they started going into space,"homeowner Conrye Farris said- "We're on the moon. What have we done here?" »Next Story>> Find this article at: http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050300/news_i ngsalton.htm[ ❑ Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article. Hi-t •// ' -c- - � - -° ttl is rli•l ahilit+, r nn/nt/r t7 tirn -nt°tit1 ni+ al itrhin O1A Ion/7(1(15 March , 2005 The Honorable Denise Moreno Ducheny California State Senator, District 40 State Capitol, Room 4081 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: SB 1081; Salton Sea Local Control Act Dear Senator Ducheny, 1 am writing to express my strong support for the Salton Sea Local Control Act(SB 1081) in the form proposed by the Salton Sea Authority. l also wish to impress on you the importance of local control in the design,permitting, financing and construction of the restoration project following completion of the state's current study in December 2006. From the local perspective, a successful Salton Sea restoration project nxust integrate land use planning in the area around the sea with a long-term water management plan and preservation of the sea as an ecological ireasure. Since land use planning and in-basin water management are local matters controlled by member agencies of the Salton Sea Authority, it is imperative that implementation responsibility for the overall project be given to the Authority upon completion of the state's study in December 2006. The Authority's proposed language for SB 1081 will allow for this integration and assignment responsibility to the Authority which together will enable implementation to commence immediately in 2007 as a locally financed and managed endeavor. The key to the Authority's implementation plan is its ability to sell$500 million in tax- allocation bonds using the authorization granted by the legislature in 1999 to form an Infrastructure Financing District (7TD). We understand that an economic study performed in 2003 projected $20 billion in new investment within the 1FD over a 30-year build-out period once the restoration project is underway. Given the 5%to 7% growth rate the eastern Coachella Valley has experienced in recent years and the enhanced development and recreational opportunities that a healthy Salton Sea will create, the projection of$20 billion in new investment is highly conservative and easily achievable. Contrarily,without a restored Salton Sea, economic development in the eastern end of our valley will be adversely impacted and odor problems may depress existing property values. We rather trust our local elected officials to solve these problems using local funds rather than relying on state officials beset by budgets problems, competing interests, and political pressures to transfer more water out of the Salton Sea basin. I encourage you to support the Salton Sea Authority's proposed language for SB 1081 so that a locally preferred, multi-purpose restoration project can be commenced in 2007 by the Authority as a public/private partnership. Please contact me directly if you have any questions regarding this issue. Thank you for your leadership and support. Sincerely, Name: Address: `r -L-t-t 02 f 0'7 ftCc.S,