HomeMy WebLinkAbout23493 RESOLUTION NO. 23493
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING
WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AT
THE TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 2014, SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION, AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO
PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS.
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Palm
Springs, California on Tuesday, April 22, 2014, at which there will be submitted to the
voters the following question and measure:
Shall an Ordinance amending the Museum Market YES
Plaza Specific Plan so as to approve a hotel (a
Kimpton brand) of approximately 185 rooms,
restaurants, meeting rooms, retail and ancillary uses,
located within Block C of the Museum Market Plaza
Specific Plan at the Northeast corner of West NO
Tahquitz Canyon Way and Belardo Road, be
approved?
WHEREAS Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the California Elections Code
provides for the filing of written arguments and rebuttal arguments for City measures
submitted at municipal elections.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council authorizes any and all members of the City
Council to file a written argument in Favor OR Against the City Measure, accompanied
by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on
behalf of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and
signature of at least one of its principal officers, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3,
Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of California, and to change the argument
until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk, after which no arguments for or
against the City measure may be submitted to the City Clerk. No argument shall
exceed 300 words in length.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of
California, when the City Clerk has selected the arguments for and against the measure
which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the City Clerk shall send copies of the
Resolution No. 23493
Page 2
argument in favor of the measure to the authors of the argument against, and copies of
the argument against to the authors in favor. The authors may prepare and submit
rebuttal arguments not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with
the City Clerk, accompanied by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s)
submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization,
and the printed name and signature of at least one of its principal officers, not more than
10-days after the final date for filing direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall
immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
SECTION 3. Any written argument or rebuttal argument filed with the City Clerk
shall be accompanied by the Statement of the Author Form required by Section 9600 of
the California Elections Code. The City Clerk shall provide such form upon request.
SECTION 4. The City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of
the measure, not to exceed 500 words, showing the effect of the measure on the
existing law and the operation of the measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by
the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall print, or cause to be printed, in the Official
Sample Ballot, the entire text of the arguments for or against the measure, and the
rebuttal arguments, in uniform type, style and spacing.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PALM SPRINGS CITY
COUNCIL THIS 17T" DAY OF JANUARY, 2014.
DAVID H. READY, C NAGER
ATTEST:
AMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS )
I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that
Resolution No. 23493 is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a special
Resolution No. 23493
Page 3
meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on January 17, 2014, by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmember Foat, Councilmember Lewin, Councilmember Mills, Mayor
Pro Tern Hutcheson, and Mayor Pougnet.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
MES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK
City of Palm Springs, California 0,1,7jz014