HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/15/2014 - STAFF REPORTS - 1.C. �O pALM$A•P iy c u n C °O"roan°`0�P" 4<IFOR CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15, 2014 Public Hearing SUBJECT: AN APPEAL ON BEHALF OF PALM SPRINGS, LLC, OF THE DECISION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONTINUE THE REVIEW OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 TO CONSTRUCT A 150-ROOM HOTEL AND ANCILLARY COMMERCIAL USE LOCATED AT 400 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE AND THE FAILURE OF THE PLANNING COMMISION TO FIND THAT THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE OF THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. CASE NO. 5.1091- PD324-APPEAL FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Department of Planning Services SUMMARY The City Council will consider an appeal on behalf of Palm Springs, LLC, of the Planning Commission's decision to continue the review of the final development plans for Planned Development District 324, a proposal to develop a 150-room hotel and approximately 32,705 square feet of commercial retail space at 400 North Palm Canyon Drive and the failure of the Planning Commission to find the final development plan for Planned Development District 324 was in substantial conformance of the preliminary development permit as approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony; 2. Adopt Resolution No. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE APPEAL OF PALM SPRINGS, LLC, AND FINDING THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 150-ROOM HOTEL, ANCILLARY COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND FREE STANDING PARKING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALEJO ROAD AND NORTH ITEM NO.1�---- City Council Staff Report October 15, 2014--Page 2 5.1091-PD324—Appeal—Final PD Review PALM CANYON DRIVE AND FINDING THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NUMBER 2006109031 AS SUFFICIENT AND APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN." BACKGROUND AND SETTING: The development of the subject property has been the subject of several proposals advanced by the Developer and reviewed by the City since 2006. (See Exhibit "A".) The current project is an application by Palm Springs, LLC, for Planned Development District 324 and consists of a 150-room hotel, approximately 32,705 square feet of ancillary commercial retail, restaurant and parking structures. The Planned Development District established the use, design standards and the configuration of the site plan. The property is approximately 4.1 acres of vacant land bounded by Alejo Road on the north, North Palm Canyon Drive on the west, North Indian Canyon Drive on the east, and existing commercial development on the south. The Developer is pursuing the review and approval of the Final Development Plan for Planned Development District 324. The Preliminary Planned Development Plan was previously approved by the Planning Commission on December 11, 2013, and by the City Council on April 2, 2014. Staff Review: There are no specific findings for a Final Development Plan, however, PSMC Section 94.03.00(E)(4) requires that the Final PD Plan be "substantially in conformance" with the approved preliminary PD plans. Based on this requirement and the AAC's review and favorable recommendations, staff recommended the Planning Commission find the project in substantial conformance with the preliminary PD. Staff's recommendation was predicated on several considerations. The Final Development plans maintain the same mixed-use character as the Preliminary PD project with a 150-hotel, retail/commercial, bar and restaurant uses. The ground level will feature approximately 32,705 square feet of commercial retail spaces, a restaurant and a bar. The amount of parking spaces provided by the applicant remains the same as with the preliminary PD. Pursuant to the parking requirements of the Palm Springs Zoning Code, the total required parking for the development is 226 spaces. The development will have 283 parking spaces; the amount is consistent with the preliminary PD. The applicant indicated that members of the public will have free access to the parking spaces. The proposed development still consists of a four-story building with the upper two stories used for hotel guest rooms and suites. The layout calls for the proposed 150 rooms to be distributed across the lot with private garden spaces around each room. The preliminary architectural design in a "desert contemporary" vernacular is retained in the final plans. Basic building massing and heights remains consistent and within the guidelines of the approved planned development district. Staff also determined that the proposed final development plans provided additional architectural details with refined 02 City Council Staff Report October 15,2014--Page 3 5.1091-PD324—Appeal—Final PD Review project information. Comments and recommendations from the AAC and the Planning Commission at the initial preliminary review were incorporated into the final development plans as well. Improvements in the final development plans from the preliminary include: 1. Refinement and elaboration of the building facades facing public streets- 2. Extension of canopy along Palm Canyon to increase shade on the retail tenant spaces and pedestrian sidewalk areas. 3. A more intimate arrival statement created for arriving guests to the hotel. 4. Significant emphasis placed on the building elevation, walkways and landscaping along Indian Canyon to provide a more pleasant pedestrian experience. 5. A public pedestrian connection was created for guests parking in the north parking structure, allowing easier access from Palm Canyon to the public parking garage. 6. A bulkhead was designed behind screening in the parking structure to block vehicle lights. o _ r' t �d•>rjr SITE PLAN AAC Review of Preliminary PD Plan: On October 7 & 21, 2013, the AAC reviewed the preliminary development plans and asked the applicant to consider the following: • A wraparound of the ground level retail on the south side; • Improve the overhang on the east side of the project; • Add bulkhead on the east to block vehicle lights; and • Provide additional corner options on the northwest section of the site. The applicant incorporated the comments into the final plans and the AAC recommended approval to the Planning Commission. 03 City Council Staff Report October 15,2014--Page 4 5.1091-PD324—Appeal—Final PD Review AAC Review of Final PD Plan: On August 25, 2014, the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) reviewed the project and recommended approval with the following condition: 1. The maximum front panel separating store front fagade along North Palm Canyon Drive shall be 8 feet long. Any individual tenant improvement involving the front panel fagade exceeding 8 feet shall be subject to review by the AAC. First Commission Review on September 10, 2014: At its public hearing meeting of September 10, 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project. The Commission was generally favorable with the direction of the project, however, the Commission voted to continue the Final PD review and requested further refinements to the project and asked for the following additional detailed exhibits and materials for the next hearing: 1. A new 3-D exhibit of south side elevation and building elevation. 2. Address hotel guest experience at the ground level. 3. An exhibit illustrating additional detail of parking structure. 4. A landscaped site plan with walkways around parking areas with access to Palm Canyon, Alejo and Indian Canyon. 5. Exhibits illustrating screening and appearance of the 10-foot gap on the south side elevation. 6. Exhibit pointing out application and placement of materials on the exterior. 7. "Blow-ups" of street level views / close up of portions of buildings. 8. Visual renderings detailing scoring of concrete and how it will appear. Second Commission Review on September 24, 2014: At the second hearing held on September 24, 2014, the Commission reviewed the above-referenced materials and exhibits but voted to continue the hearing to a date uncertain. The decision to continue the item was based on the commission's findings that there were a number of items that remained unresolved from the conditions of approval of the Preliminary Planned Development Plan. The three major unresolved elements identified by the Planning Commission are as follows: 1. The relationship of the project to the street and public sidewalk on the Indian Canyon and Alejo street frontages: The vast majority of the lineal frontage on the Indian Canyon and Alejo frontages is occupied by parking structures, driveways and service access points, which presents a "back of house" aesthetic to these two streets. The wall height and long expanses of these frontages requires a much more articulated and sensitive design, as was displayed in the preliminary PD plan. The commission also reiterated concerns about glare and light spillage from the garage openings after dark, and did not feel that the applicant had adequately addressed these concerns identified in the initial review. 2. The height and bulk of the building: In discussing the massing of the project, the Planning Commission noted that the height of the structure on the Palm Canyon frontage would be approximately 45 feet at the front setback line, with even greater height along the Indian Canyon frontage. The commission members described the upper-level elevations as "overbearing" and "heavy," and found 04 City Council Staff Report October 15,2014--Page 5 5.1091-PD324—Appeal—Final PD Review them to be inconsistent with the step-backs required by the city's Downtown Urban Design Plan. The commission opined that further design work was necessary to bring the project into conformance with adopted requirements. 3. Materials and detailing: As shown on the submitted application, the exterior materials utilized on the project will be primarily limited to smooth-finished white plaster and glass. The commission voiced a concern that the material palette was extremely limited for 4.1 acre project, and that the preliminary PD plan utilized a larger variety of colors, materials, and textures, which added greatly to the richness of the project. Commissioners noted that they were generally supportive of the minimalist design as proposed, but that a greater variety of color, texture and pattern was needed to be consistent with the preliminary plan. APPELLANT'S APPEAL: On September 30, 2014, a letter of appeal was submitted to the City on behalf of the developers, Lawrence and Graeme Rael. Below are the grounds for appeal and Staff's response: 1. The Planning Commission did not make proper findings required by law at its September 10, 2014 meeting but continued the project. Following that meeting, Mr. Lawrence Rael met with staff and provided all additional materials necessary to address the concerns of the Commission at that time, even though the Commission ignored the directions of the staff at that hearings which directions were specific to them to determine if the project plans were in substantial conformance with the approvals received from City Council on April 4, 2014. Staff is in agreement with the Commission's requirement for additional materials and exhibits following the initial review on September 10, 2014. At this meeting, the Commission wanted to see exhibits illustrating pedestrian connectivity within the ground floor and points of access to the three streets bounding the project site. Also, the Commission asked for additional exhibits showing the south side elevation and how the approximate 10 foot gap between the hotel and the existing buildings on the south side is treated. A request by the Commission to modify the mass of the building at the Final Development Plan review would be in keeping with Section 94.03.00(G), so long as the submitted Final PD Plan does not differ significantly from the approved Preliminary PD Plan. As submitted, the size of the building is consistent with the previously approved preliminary PD Plan. Changes made to the landscape plans were in response to directions from the AAC; the appellant earlier indicated that fully developed final landscape, irrigation and exterior lighting plans will be taken back to the AAC for review and recommendation to the Planning Commission. The updated preliminary landscape plan was reviewed by the AAC and the AAC was supportive of the revisions and directions. 2. The Planning Commission did not make findings as required by law at the September 24, 2014 meeting. Messrs. Rael respectfully disagree fl City Council Staff Report October 15,2014--Page 6 5A 091-PD324—Appeal—Final PD Review with the Planning Commission's conclusion that the project is in need of further aesthetic redesign. More importantly, Messrs. Rae/ believe that the Planning Commission did not make proper findings as required by law, specifically, that the project is in substantial conformance with approved development standards, and must therefore be approved. The Planning Commission is now attempting to further redesign the project, over the recommendations of both staff and the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC'). This action by the Planning Commission goes beyond what is required of its law. Prior to and during the Planning Commission meeting of September 24, Planning Staff evaluated the developers' proposal for the final development plan approval and determined that the submittal meets the requirements of the Palm Springs Zoning Code, Section 94.03.00(E)(4), (Final Development Plan — Approval by Planning Commission); namely, the final development plan is in in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary development plan. Furthermore, based on past practices, staff also concluded that the submitted materials and exhibits were consistent with the established list created by the Planning Department (See Attachment 3). Staff notes that it is within the Commission's purview to request additional materials, exhibits, and time for clarifications before decisions are made on a significant project such as the Port Lawrence project. To this end staff worked with the appellant to provide all the required exhibits and materials following the initial review and in staffs opinion, the revised material substantially complied with the Commission's requests 3. As explained above, the Report prepared by staff plainly stated that the final development plans maintain the same mixed-use character and the same architectural design as the Preliminary PD project, with hotel, retail/commercial, bar and restaurant uses. The basic building massing and heights remain consistent and within the guidelines of the approved planned development district. Furthermore, the preliminary architectural design, which was a "desert contemporary" vernacular, remains the same and has been reviewed by the AAC and recommended for approval. The appellant's assertion regarding staffs conclusion in the Commission's report is accurate. The Planning Commission, however, did not make a finding that the Final PD Plans are substantially in conformance with the preliminary PD Plan. In this case, staff analysis and conclusion that there is sufficient evidence on the record for the Council to determine that the final development plan is in substantial conformance with the preliminary development plan is based on Code requirements and past precedents of similar cases. CONCLUSION After receiving public testimony, the City Council may adopt the attached resolution upholding the appeal and finding that the final development plan is in conformance with the preliminary development plan. Should the Council determine that sufficient 06 City Council Staff Report October 15,2014--Page 7 5.1091-PD324—Appeal—Final PD Review evidence exists to uphold the Planning Commission's decision, a new resolution would be presented at the next regular City Council meeting. NOTIFICATION A courtesy notice of the appeal hearing was advertised in the Desert Sun and was mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received any written correspondence. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact. David H. Ready, City Filinn Fagg, AICP Director of Planning Services Attachments: A. Prior Actions 1. Vicinity map 2. Draft resolution 3. Application Checklist for PD Submittals 4. Appellant's letter of appeal to City Council 5. City Council Minutes of April 2, 2014 6. AAC Minutes of August 25, 2014 7. Planning Commission Minutes of December 11 , 2013 8. Planning Commission Minutes of September 10, 2014 9. Planning Commission Minutes of September 24, 2014 10. Planning Commission staff report of September 10, 2014 11. Planning Commission staff report of September 24, 2014 12. 11 X17 Booklet of Approved Preliminary PD Plan 13. 11 X17 Booklet of Submitted Final PD Plan - 07 City Council Staff Report October 15, 2014--Page 8 5.1091-PD324-Appeal-Final PD Review Exhibit "A" Prior Actions On September 13, 2006, the Planning Commission approved the Preliminary Planned Development District and recommended approval of the PDD and TTM 34190 to the City Council. On October 4, 2006, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and approved Preliminary Planned Development PD 324 and Tentative Tract Map 34190, On July 9, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of an amendment to the Vesting Condominium Map to the City Council. On July 30, 2008, the City Council approved an amendment to the Vesting Condominium Map. On October 28, 2009, the Planning Commission approved a one-year time extension from October 4, 2008 to October 3, 2010. On September 22, 2010, the Planning Commission granted a one-year time extension request from October 3, 2011 to October 2, 2012. On August 8, 2011, the AAC reviewed a proposed amendment to the Preliminary PD and recommended approval with several comments to the Planning Commission. On August 10, 2011, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved a 175-room hotel and ancillary commercial retail use amendment but not the site plan as proposed. ON September 7, 2011, the City Council reviewed and approved the proposed amendment to the Preliminary Planned Development District for a 175-room hotel and ancillary commercial retail. ON October 7, 2013, the AAC reviewed the proposed amendment to the project approved by the Council on September 7, 2011, and provided comments to the applicant. On October 21, 2013, the AAC considered the project and by a unanimous vote recommended approval to the Planning Commission. ON December 11, 2013, the Planning Commission approved the proposed amended project and recommended approval to the City Council with conditions. ON April 2, 2014, the City Council approved the amended preliminary planned development district project for a 150-room hotel and ancillary commercial retail space. 08 City Council Staff Report October 15,2014—Page 9 5.1091-PD324—Appeal—Final PD Review On August 25, 2014, the AAC reviewed the Final Development Plans and by a unanimous vote, the AAC recommended approval to the Planning Commission with comments and conditions of approval. On September 10, 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed a proposed final development plan and voted to continue the hearing with direction to the application to provide additional materials and exhibits. On September 24, 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed the new exhibits provided by the applicant and voted to continue the review process to an indefinite date with additional comments. I 09 UIFORN "' N Department of Planning Services W E Vicinity Map RIA PD C1 C1 RIB TA R2 R,3 0 PD g R3 i R1A R1A o aewNvuvw E RIB 1B r z U J Q V 6 CHIND DR z R3 O R1 B PD R1A LCU CBD RIB c I-R MBR a CBD z i z CU z a � z ir i CBD i CU RA o ? REO O D n C CBD Legend Site AAMDO RD O SM Site Radius Q Zoning CBD CU 7RA RA CBD Parcels CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO: 5.1091 Final PD 324-Appeal DESCRIPTION: Consider an appeal regarding the September 24, 2014, Planning Commission's action. Requesting final Planned Development District plans approval to construct a mixed-use development consisting of a 150-room hotel with ancillary retail, restaurant, and parking structure at 400 North Palm Canyon Drive. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE APPEAL OF PALM SPRINGS, LLC, AND FINDING THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 150-ROOM HOTEL, ANCILLARY COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND FREE STANDING PARKING STTRUCTURE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALEJO ROAD AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE AND FINDING THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NUMBER 2006109031 AS SUFFICIENT AND APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The City Council of the City of Palm Springs finds: A. Palm Springs, LLC, filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to continue Final Development Plan review for the previously approved Planned Development District 324 and the Planning Commission's failure to make findings of conformance with the preliminary development plan for Planned Development District 324. B. On December 11, 2013, the Planning Commission approved an amendment of a previously approved Planned Development District 324 for the development of a 150- room hotel, ancillary commercial retail space and a parking structure. C. On April 2, 2014, the City Council approved a proposed amended project to develop a 150-room hotel, ancillary retail commercial and a parking structure. D. On September 10 and 24, 2014, the Planning Commission held a public meeting to review the final development plans for the project. E. On September 24, 2014, the Planning Commission voted to continue the review of the final development plan to a date uncertain with directions to the applicant to make additional changes to the project and to prepare and present additional exhibits and material for review by the Planning Commission. F. On September 30, 2014, Palm Springs, LLC, pursuant to Chapter 2.05 of the Municipal Code, filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council as described in Recital A. G. A courtesy notice of the appeal hearing before the City Council to consider Case No. 5.1091-PD324-APL was given in accordance with applicable law. it CC Resolution No. October 15,2014 5.1091 PDD 324—Appeal Page 2 of 4 H. On October 15, 2014, a public hearing on the appeal was held by the City Council in accordance with applicable law. I. The City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the meeting on the appeal, including but not limited to the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The final development plan is consistent with the amended preliminary development plan previously reviewed under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and determined that such development plan is a "project" under CEQA. An updated traffic study and subsequent environmental analysis was prepared under the provisions of CEQA; a determination was made that the amended preliminary plan will not result in any new additional impacts beyond those that were previously identified and addressed and that adequate mitigation measures had already been incorporated into the project. In assessment performed in conjunction with the amended preliminary development plan, it was concluded that the mitigated negative declaration and the subsequent environmental analysis covered the issues the City addressed, including topics such as land use policies, safety, aesthetics, geological resources, noise effects, and traffic impacts during construction and operation of the project. In addition to the mitigation measures included in the mitigated negative declaration, conditions of approval in support of the subsequent environmental analysis and the previously adopted mitigated negative declaration have been included in the final development plan. The previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006109031 is therefore determined as sufficient and appropriate environmental documentation for the final development plan. Section 2: Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.05.030, the appellant's stated grounds for the appeal includes the following: A. The Planning Commission did not make proper findings required bylaw at its September 10, 2014 meeting but continued the project. Following that meeting, Mr. Lawrence Rael met with staff and provided all additional materials necessary to address the concems of the Commission at that time, even though the Commission ignored the directions of the staff at that hearings which directions were specific to them to determine if the project plans were in substantial conformance with the approvals received from City Council on April 4, 2014. The Planning Commission is now attempting to further redesign the project, over the recommendations of both staff and the Architectural Advisory Committee ("AAC'). This action by the Planning Commission goes beyond what is required of its law. B. The Planning Commission did not make findings as required by law specifically that the project is in substantial conformance with approved 12 CC Resolution No. October 15,2014 5.1091 PDD 324—Appeal Page 3 of 4 development standards. Messrs. Reel respectfully disagrees with the Planning Commission's conclusion that the project is in need of further aesthetic redesign. More importantly, Messrs. Reel believe that the Planning Commission did not make proper findings as required by law, specifically, that the project is in substantial conformance with approved development standards, and must therefore be approved. C. The Report prepared by staff supports a finding and determination that the final development plans maintain the same mixed-use character and the same architectural design as the Preliminary PD project, with hotel, retail/commercial, bar and restaurant uses. The basic building massing and heights remain consistent and within the guidelines of the approved planned development district. Furthermore, the preliminary architectural design, which was a "desert contemporary" vernacular, remains the same and has been reviewed by the AAC and recommended for approval. Section 3: The City Council finds and overturns the decision of Planning Commission to continue the review process of Final Development Plan for Planned Development District 324 and further finds that the final development plan is substantially in conformance with the previously approved preliminary plan development 324 for the construction of a 150-room hotel, ancillary commercial retail space and parking structure on approximately 4.1 acres of vacant land located at southeast corner of North Palm Canyon Drive and Alejo Road, subject to the previously approved Conditions of Approval and other applicable provisions of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. ADOPTED this 15th day of October, 2014. David H. Ready, City Manager ATTEST: James Thompson, City Clerk 13 CC Resolution No. October 15, 2014 5.1091 PDD 324—Appeal Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James Thompson, City Clerk City of Palm Springs, California 14 APPLICANT'S REQUIRED MATERIAL CHECKLIST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD) I Please read carefully to ensure a complete application. Incomplete applications may be rejected The following items must be completed before a Planned Development District application will be accepted. Please check off each item to ensure completeness. Refer to the REQUIRED MATERIALS list of this application for more details of each item. Applicant City Use l PRELIMINARY PD OnIv Onl Conceptual Plan: 1. Application & Environmental Assessment (original&three(3 copies) ❑ ❑ Detailed Site Plan: 2. Minimum 24" x 36" (5 copies, 1 colored) ❑ ❑ 3. Reduced copies 8-1/2" x 11" (3 copies) ❑ ❑ Architectural Elevations (all sides of each building): 4. Minimum 24" x 36" (3 copies, 1 colored) ❑ ❑ 5. Reduced copies to 8-1/2" x 11" (3 copies) ❑ ❑ i Colors and Materials Exhibits: 6. Colors and Materials Sample Board with manufacturers names and product numbers (maximum 8"x 13" x 3/8" thick) ❑ ❑ Miscellaneous Exhibits: 7. Landscape Dev. Plan (2 copies, 1 color) On Site Plan ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Floor Plans & Roof Plans (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 9. Site Cross-Sections (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 10. Drainage Map (2 copies) On Site Plan ❑ ❑ ❑ 11. Topographic Map (2 copies) On Site Plan ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. Preliminary Grading Plan (2 copies) No Grading ❑ ❑ ❑ 13. Public Hearing Labels (3 sets) ❑ ❑ 14. Project Sponsors Labels (4 sets, if any) ❑ ❑ 15, Existing Site Photographs ❑ ❑ 16. Preliminary Title Report (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 17, Existing locations of on-site utilities and ❑ ❑ Special Studies: 18. Soils Report (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 19. Slope Study (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 20. Geo-technical Report (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 21. Traffic Study (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 22. Air Quality Study (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 23. Hydrology (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 24. Sewer Study (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 25. Biological Study (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 15 . . .PDD Applicant City Use PP Y Only Only Special Studies (continued) 26. Noise Study (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 27, Hazardous Materials Study (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 28. Housing Analysis (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 29. Archaeological Report (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 30. Groundwater Analysis (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 31. Water Quality Report (3 copies) ❑ ❑ 30. Other (3 copies) ❑ ❑ Final PD Plans: 31. Site Plan (5 copies) ❑ ❑ 32. Elevations (4 copies) ❑ ❑ 33. Floor Plans (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 34. Roof Plans (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 35. Grading Plans (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 36. Landscape Plans (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 37. Irrigation Plans (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 38. Exterior Lighting Plans (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 39. Sign Program (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 40. Mitigation Monitoring Program ❑ ❑ 41. Cross Sections (2 copies) ❑ ❑ 42. Development Standards ❑ ❑ 43. Architectural Details as requested by staff or Architectural Advisory Committee ❑ ❑ Planning Department,checked by: Date: (Please continue to next page) 16 -.PDD R U TAN John Ramirez � Direct Dial:(714)4)662-4610 RUTAN 6 TUCKER, LLP E-mail jramirezo rutan.com 1014 OCT - I AM 9: 45 JAi -S 'i,U, . K (� September 30, 2014 CITY CLER VIA FEDEX Mr. James Thompson City Clerk City of Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Re: Notice of Appeal: Planning Commission Decision- Palm Springs, LLC, Mixed-Use Development, 400 North Palm Canyon Drive Case 5.1091 PD 324 Continuance of a Final PDD Approval Dear Mr. Thompson: This law firm represents Palm Springs, LLC, the applicant in Case 5.1091 PD 324 (the "Project") for the planned mixed-use development by developers Lawrence and Graeme Rael consisting of a 150-room hotel with retail and parking structure. By way of this letter, pursuant to Palm Springs Municipal Code Chapter 2.05 et seq. Messrs. Rael are hereby appealing the Planning Commission's decision made on September 24, 2014 (Appeal to City Council). The Project was most recently presented to the Planning Commission on September 24, 2014 for approval of the Final PDD. At that time, staff provided a detailed report supporting approval of the Project and provided a detailed staff report explaining that the applicant's Final PDD plans are in substantial conformance with the previously approved Preliminary PDD plans. Thus, staff requested Planning Commission approval of the Final PDD. The above notwithstanding, on September 24, 2014, the Planning Commission voted once again to continue the Project. The Planning Commission appears to have recommended a continuance believing that the Project is in need of further aesthetic modifications. Messrs. Rael appeal this finding for reasons which include, but are not limited to those listed below. 17 611 Anton Blvd, Suite 1400, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 PO Box 1950, Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1950 1 714.641.5100 1 Fax 714.546.9035 10321025193-0001 Orange County I Palo Alto I www.rutan.com 7555865.3 a09/30/14 RUTAN RUTTH 6 TUCKER,LLP Mr. James Thompson September 30, 2014 Page 2 The Planning Commission Did Not Make Findings As Required By Law, Specifically That The Project Is In "Substantial Conformance" With Approved Development Standards. Messrs. Rael respectfully disagree with the Planning Commission's conclusion that the Project is in need of further aesthetic redesign. More importantly, Messrs. Rae] believe that the Planning Commission did not make proper findings as required by law; specifically, that the Project is in substantial conformance with approved development standards, and must therefore be approved. The Planning Commission also did not make proper findings required by law at its September 10, 2014 meeting but continued the project. Following that meeting, Mr. Lawrence Rael met with staff and provided all additional materials necessary to address the concerns of the Commission at that time, even though the Commission ignored the directions of the Staff at that the hearings which directions were specific to them to determine if the project plans were in substantial conformance with the approvals received from City Council on April 4, 2014. The Planning Commission is now attempting to further redesign the project, over the recommendations of both staff and the Architectural Advisory Committee ("ACC"). This action by the Planning Commission goes beyond what is required of it by law. As explained above, the Report prepared by staff plainly stated that that the final development plans maintain the same mixed-used character and the same architectural design as the Preliminary PDD project, with hotel, retail/commercial, bar and restaurant uses. The basic building massing and heights remain consistent and within the guidelines of the approved planned development district. Furthermore, the preliminary architectural design, which was a "desert contemporary" vernacular, remains the same and has been satisfactorily refined and articulated in the Final PDD plans, which have been reviewed by the ACC and recommended for approval. Based on the foregoing, we believe the Project is in substantial conformance with approved design standards, and that the Project therefore satisfies all the requirements necessary for approval. We look forward to providing the City Council with further detail at such time as this appeal is heard. We hereby request that we be timely provided any notices of hearings and any staff reports, Board packets, and communications or submittals by, to, or from any other interested parties (including, without limitation, the project applicant) prior to any hearing scheduled on this appeal. 1032/025193-0001 18 75558653 ROM Oil 4 RUTAN RUTAN 6 TUCKER,LLP Mr. James Thompson September 30, 2014 Page 3 Enclosed with this notice of appeal letter is a check made payable to the City of Palm Springs in the amount of$546.00 for the appeal fee. Sincerely, TAN & T7CKER, LLP John irez JAR:Ir 1 031/025 193-0001 19 15558653 49/30/14 REQUEST FOR TREASURER'S RECEIPT TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT, CASHIER DATE: Iu-14 FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE PLEASE ACCEPT $ 'l � FROM: FOR: 4'(m�p��QL 9*A& PUBLICATIONS — 001-34106 OTHER CHARGES — CURRENT SERVICE — 001-34110 CREDIT ACCOUNT NO. CIRCLED ABOVE BY ORDER OF Ruta n' &Tucker, LLP UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 3�9 p 6 9 61.1 Anton.Blvd.,Suite 1400 18300 Von Kerman Avenue f6 Costa Mesa,CA. 92626 Irvine, CA92612 Date: September 30, 2014 -- ««+++www+w++wr«+rwxxwxxwxxw+«++w++wr++r++xwrxwwxwww«<ww+irxww+++rr+wwxwxwwww«x� +++546.00wxw Par Five hundred forty-six and OD/100 $ _ J �Tyy�,�'' IGLREQUIREDER$500000PAY TOTHERDER P Palm Spnrlgs City Clerk 8 SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDED.DETAILS ON SACLC UJ Od 20 .. .. .. . ._...... .... . City of Palm Springs Office of the City Clerk 3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs,CA 92262 Tel:(760)323-8204 • Fax(760)322-8332 • TDD: (760)864-9527 • Web:www.paimspringsca.gov October 2, 2014 Mr. John Ramirez Rutan &Tucker, LLP 611 Anton Blvd., Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 RE: APPEAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 24, 2014, PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON CASE NO. 5.1091 PDD 324. PALM SPRINGS, LLC, REQUESTING FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLANS APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 150- ROOM HOTEL WITH RETAIL AND PARKING STRUCTURE AT 400 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE. Dear Mr. Ramirez: This letter serves as notice that the subject appeal has been scheduled for review by the City Council at the regular meeting of Wednesday, October 15, 2014. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. and will be held in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way. A staff report on the matter will be forwarded to you approximately five (5) days prior to the hearing. Please feel free to contact me at (760) 323-8204 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ?James Thompson y Clerk CC! Planning Department Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 21 Kathie Hart From: webcustomerservice@ontrac.com Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 8:52 AM To: Kathie Hart Subject: OnTrac Package Delivery Confirmation: C11332500020095 Hello, This is an automated email response from OnTrac. The package tracking number C11332500020095 has been confirmed as delivered. Delivery Name : RUTAN AND TUCKER POD Signature : khristy Delivery Time : 10/03/2014 08:50 AM Status Code : DELIVERED Reference : CITY CLERK For more information please visit us at our website at http://www.ontrac.com or call us at 800-334-5000. Thank you for using OnTrac! 22 t NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM SPRINGS APPEAL OF CASE 5.1091-PD324 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF PDD 324 A 150-ROOM HOTEL AND RETAIL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 400 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hear an appeal at its meeting of October 15, 2014. The City Council meeting begins at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. The purpose is to consider an appeal filed by John Ramirez, Rutan & Tucker, LLP, representing Palm Springs, LLC, regarding the September 24, 2014, Planning Commission's action regarding final Planned Development District plans approval to construct a mixed-use development consisting of a 150-room hotel with ancillary retail, restaurant, and parking structure at 400 North Palm Canyon Drive. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project under the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and was previously adopted by the City Council. Pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Act (CEQA), the preparation of further environmental assessment for the proposed final development plan is not necessary since the circumstances of the preliminary project have not changed or intensified. Members of the public may view this document at the Planning Services Department, City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, and submit written comments at, or prior to, the City Council hearing. REVIEW OF PROJECT INFORMATION: The staff report and other supporting documents regarding this appeal are available for public review at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these documents. COMMENTS: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the appeal hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the City Council by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to: James Thompson, City Clerk 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior, to the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]). An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. Questions regarding this case may be directed to Edward O. Robertson, Principal Planner, at (760) 323-8245. Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, porfavor Ilame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar con Nadine Fieger telefono (760) 323-8245. ames Thompson, City Clerk 23 N Department of Planning Services W E Vicinity Map s C1 C1 RIB F 2 PD R3 g R3 a_ R1A � R1A z 18 GRANVIA VA LMONfE RIB z U J 1B 090 a n a HINO DR z R3 p R1B PDL:A CU CBD RIB a o HR MBR a CBD a n o a CU z rc a z z CBD a CU 4 RA L � REO 0 a o r< 0 CBD Legend Site AMADO RD '. 500ft Site Radius O Zoning CBD CBD CU 7RA Parcels CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO: 5.1091 Final PD 324-Appeal DESCRIPTION: Consider an appeal regarding the September 24, 2014, Planning Commission's action. Requesting final Planned Development District plans approval to construct a mixed-use development consisting of a 150-room hotel with ancillary retail, restaurant, and parking structure at 400 North Palm Canyon Drive. 24 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL Date: October 15, 2014 Subject: Case 5.1091 — PD 324 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN —400 North Palm Canyon Drive AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board, and in the Office of the City Clerk on October 7, 2014. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to each and every person on the attached list on October 7, 2014, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid, and depositing same in the U.S. Mail at Palm Springs, California. (297 notices) I ldecllare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1�1—�a. Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk 25 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SB Current Occupant USA,BIA 513-082-038 513-082-038 508-531-025 1201 E HIGHLAND AVE 151 W ALEJO RD 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 126 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92404-4607 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5666 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 MARTIN,JAMES ROBERT Current Occupant SPRINGS, PALM 009-600-902 009-600-902 513-081-006 PO BOX 1310 277 E ALEJO RD 2415 CAMPUS DR STE 140 LOWER LAKE CA 95457-1310 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6073 IRVINE CA 92612-8530 COMMUNITY REDEV AGENCY CITY HEYSER PALM SPRINGS PROPERTY Current Occupant OF PALM SPRINGS LLC 513-081-006 2-035 414 N PALM CANYON DR 3200 E2-043 10415 FAIR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262- 3200 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY 10415 FAIRGROVE AVE PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6959 TUJUNGA CA 91042-1903 Current Occupant VUCICH, CATHY LYNN Current Occupant 513-082-035 507-540-006 507-540-006 369 N PALM CANYON DR 627 EDGEMONT LN 542 N INDIAN CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5601 PARK RIDGE IL 60068-2650 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6030 USA 508 Current Occupant LUCCI, ANTHONY 508-531-059 508-531-059 009-600-572 NONE 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH8 401 W RADIO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-1600 Current Occupant DORT, RANDY L Current Occupant 009-600-572 507-540-003 507-540-003 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH8 595 THALIA ST 548 N INDIAN CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651-2517 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6030 BRAMOWETH,LARRY Current Occupant WOLF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES 513-082-006 513-082-006 LLC 911 W RACQUET CLUB RD 461 N PALM CANYON DR 513-081-010 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-1841 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 125 N HALSTED ST STE 203 CHICAGO IL 60661-2159 Current Occupant CAVANAUGH,PROP HEAVENSTONE,THE COLLECTIONS 513-081-010 513-082-008 507-540-008 351 N INDIAN CANYON DR 445 N PALM CANYON DR 707 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY STE PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6015 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 23 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-0128 HOFFMAN,MICHAEL S Current Occupant LUCARELLI,ROBERT F 513-082-011 513-082-011 507-540-001 650 S EUGENE RD 423 N PALM CANYON DR 552 N INDIAN CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92264-1514 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6030 USA 508 ALFONZO, DAVE Current Occupant 508-531-044 009-600-550 009-600-550 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 219 326 E HILLSDALE ST 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 219 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 INGLEWOOD CA 90302-1526 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 USA, BIA FEDERAL,NATL ASSN Current Occupant 508-531-023 009-600-896 009-600-896 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 124 1800 TAPO CANYON SV2202 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 124 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 SIMI VALLEY CA 93063- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 USA, BIA ALLEN,KENNETH RAY Current Occupant 508-531-011 009-600-838 009-600-838 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 112 852 E GRANGEVILLE BLVD SPC 75 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT It 2 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 HANFORD CA 93230-2267 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 POUNDERS, STEVEN M Current Occupant USA,BIA 009-600-562 009-600-562 508-531-053 3525 TURTLE CREEK BLVD#20BC 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH2 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH2 DALLAS TX 75219-5510 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 USA,BIA WESTGATE,JOHN C Current Occupant 508-531-037 009-600-543 009-600-543 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 212 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 212 277 E ALEJO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6073 333 N PALM CANYON Current Occupant USA,BIA 513-082-036 513-082-036 508-531-040 201 WILSHIRE BLVD STE A28 333 N PALM CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 215 SANTA MONICA CA 90401-1209 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5658 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 USA 508 FLECK,ANNE SAMPLES,B THOMAS 508-531-014 009-600-845 009-600-546 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 115 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT It 5 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 215 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 USA, BIA OCHOA, PHILIP Current Occupant 508-531-024 009-601-166 009-601-166 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 125 575 6TH AVE UNIT 910 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 125 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 SAN DIEGO CA 92101-8624 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 WILSON,MARK Current Occupant USA, BIA 507-540-002 507-540-002 508-531-061 550 N INDIAN CYN DR 550 N INDIAN CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH10 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6030 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 JOHNSON,NANCY J Current Occupant COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 009-600-575 009-600-575 AGENCY CITY OF P S 916 8TH AVE 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PHI 513-081-017 PUYALLUP WA 98371- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 3200 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6959 Current Occupant CORK N, BOTTLE SPRINGS,PALM 513-081-017 009-618-576 513-081-005 342 N PALM CANYON DR 342 N PALM CANYON DR 2415 CAMPUS DR STE 140 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 IRVINE CA 92612-8530 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM CANYON THEATER GROUP USA, BIA 505-325-003 009-603-835 508-531-039 PO BOX 2743 538 N PALM CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 214 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5526 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 USA 508 PRINZ, RAINHARD Current Occupant 508-531-013 009-600-843 009-600-843 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 114 332 S CANON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 114 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212-4516 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 BRANDON,MARJORIE Current Occupant GLEMBOTZKI, LYDIA 009-600-545 009-600-545 009-600-833 1333 JONES ST 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 214 26326 FOREST LN SAN FRANCISCO CA 941094179 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 TWIN PEAKS CA 92391- Current Occupant USA, BIA USA,BIA 009-600-833 508-531-035 508-531-009 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 110 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 210 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 110 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 RODRIGO,JOHN 546 N INDIAN CANYON DR Current Occupant 009-600-541 507-540-0042825 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY 507-540-004 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 210 546 N INDIAN CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 STE D1 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6030 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6908 SPRINGS,PALM Current Occupant LEVIN,KENNETH 513-081-004 513-081-004 507-540-005 2415 CAMPUS DR STE 140 456 N PALM CANYON DR 544 N INDIAN CANYON DR IRVINE CA 92612-8530 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6030 HEINZEN, RICHARD DONALD Current Occupant TRIPODES,PETER JACK 009-600-803 009-600-803 009-600-904 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 101 277 E ALEJO RD 1310 GATES PL PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6073 SOUTH PASADENA CA 91030-3623 Current Occupant USA 508 Current Occupant 009-600-904 508-531-026 508-531-026 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 201 NONE 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 201 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 USA, BIA CITY OF PALM SPRINGS O DONNELL GOLF CLUB 508-531-001 513-070-008 009-603-378 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 101 PO BOX 2743 301 N BELARDO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5600 Current Occupant USA,BIA USA,BIA 009-603-378 508-531-047 508-531-034 446 W ALEJO RD 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 222 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 209 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 USA,BIA HANSEN& STOCKWELL MEDICAL Current Occupant 508-531-008 PROF CORP 009-600-830 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 109 009-600-830 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 109 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 411 BATE CRES PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 SASKATOON SK CANA- SIERRA, LA UNIVERSITY LORDI, JAMES ANTHONY FERREL, SHARALYN 505-322-004 009-600-553 009-600-540 4500 RIVERWALK PKWY 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 222 33 SKAGIT KY RIVERSIDE CA 92505-3344 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 BELLEVUE WA 98006-1021 Current Occupant SILVERMAN,JOEL Current Occupant 009-600-540 513-081-014 513-081-014 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 209 10620 S HIGHLANDS 110#486 310 N PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 LAS VEGAS NV 89141- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 USA,BIA SHAIN, WENDY D Current Occupant 508-531-052 009-600-560 009-600-560 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH 400 N SUNRISE WAY APT 102 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PHI PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6591 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 WICKHAM, WILLIAM R Current Occupant WOLF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES 507-193-011 507-193-011 LLC PO BOX 15 330 E VIA COLUSA 513-081-021 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-0015 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6049 125 N HALSTED ST STE 203 CHICAGO IL 60661-2159 Current Occupant THREESIXTY,PS Current Occupant 513-081-021 513-081-009 513-081-009 378 N PALM CANYON DR 15445 VENTURA BLVD#711 360 N PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403-3005 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 USA, BIA SIERRA, LA UNIVERSITY WILLIAMS,DONALD E 508-531-030 505-322-002 513-081-007 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 205 4500 RIVERWALK PKWY 4511 E SUNNY DUNES RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 RIVERSIDE CA 92505-3344 PALM SPRINGS CA 92264-1553 Current Occupant USA, BIA DILLON,THOMAS C 513-081-007 508-531-033 009-600-539 391 N INDIAN CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 208 1200 NICOLLET MALL APT 601 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6015 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403-4413 Current Occupant USA,BIA FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 009-600-539 508-531-007 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 208 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 108 1800 TAPO CANYON RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 800 APO SIMI VALLEY CA 93063-6712 Current Occupant THE ROSE PETAL TRUST Current Occupant 009-600-818 009-600-568 009-600-568 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 108 1220 ROXBURY DR PH 1 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH5 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 LOS ANGELES CA 90035-1037 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 SPRINGS,PALMS Current Occupant USA, BIA 513-081-023 513-081-023 508-531-060 HICKORY PARK CIR# 140 494 N PALM CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH9 IRVINE CA 92612- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 RODRIGO,JOHN Current Occupant CHARLTON, ALLEN R 009-600-574 009-600-574 009-600-536 330 W STEVENS RD 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH9 419 GOLD MINE DR PALM SPRINGS CA 922624222 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94131-2527 Current Occupant USA 508 Current Occupant 009-600-536 508-531-056 508-531-056 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 205 NONE 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH5 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 PALM CANYON INV INC Current Occupant WOLF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES 513-082-028 513-082-028 LLC -019 77900 AVENUE OF THE STATES 301 N PALM CANYON DR 125 N AL PALM DESERT CA 92211-8003 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5672 125 N GO IL 60 61 S15 203 CH[CAGO IL 60661-2159 Current Occupant LIDDY,VICTORIA RICE Current Occupant 513-081-019 513-082-039 513-082-039 354 N PALM CANYON DR 1425 S INDIAN TRL 435 N PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262- PALM SPRINGS CA 92264-8817 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 USA,BIA BAKERJIAN,MARTHA E Current Occupant 508-531-054 009-600-563 009-600-563 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH3 PO BOX 1310 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH3 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 LOWER LAKE CA 95457-1310 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 PROJECT 92 Current Occupant USA, BIA 513-081-016 513-081-016 508-531-049 303 N INDIAN CANYON DR 340 N PALM CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 224 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6015 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 EMERY, BRUCE Current Occupant SPRINGS, PALM 009-600-555 009-600-555 513-081-003 4650 STAUFFER PL 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 224 2415 CAMPUS DR STE 140 OAKLAND CA 94619-3032 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 IRVINE CA 92612-8530 USA, BIA USA,BIA VIRAG, FRANK K 508-531-043 508-531-017 009-600-856 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 218 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 118 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 118 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE Current Occupant ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDRENS CORPORATION 009-600-549 FOUNDATION 001 009-600-549 52379 IR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 218 5000 PLANO PKWY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 12379 MIRACLE HILL RD CARROLLTON TX 75010.4900 DESERT HOT SPRINGS CA 92240-4010 Current Occupant WOLF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES PROP,MCB J 508-031-001 513-081-022 462 N INDIAN CANYON DR 513-081-018 448E 4TH ST PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6018 125 N HALSTED ST STE 203 HINSDALE IL 60521-4661 CHICAGO IL 60661-2159 Current Occupant USA, BIA USA, BIA 513-081-022 508-531-041 508-531-015 390 N PALM CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 216 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 116 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262.6086 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 GARTHOFFNER, RUTH M Current Occupant PEGUES,MARCUS 009-600-847 009-600-847 009-600-547 3432 S PECK AVE APT 103 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 116 6417 LEWIS AVE SAN PEDRO CA 90731-6867 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 LONG BEACH CA 90805-2427 Current Occupant USA, BIA LA, DE LAURA 009-600-547 508-531-050 009-600-556 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 216 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 225 1450 CALIFORNIA ST PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 IMPERIAL BEACH CA 91932-3218 Current Occupant ROSE, ALEXANDER Current Occupant 009-600.556 513-082-034 513-082-034 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 225 5369 TRACI DR 463 N PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 SANTA BARBARA CA 93 1 1 1-1464 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF USA,BIA ELFORD, WILLIAM J PALM SPRINGS 508-531-057 009-600-569 513-082-040 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH6 911 N STADIUM WAY PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 TACOMA WA 98403-2834 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-2743 Current Occupant CITY OF PALM SPRINGS O DONNELL GOLF CLUB 009-600-569 513-070-010 009-603-086 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH6 PO BOX 2743 301 N BELARDO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5600 USA,BIA WACHS,STEVEN EARL Current Occupant 508-531-045 009-600-551 009-600-551 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 220 239 ATTICA DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 220 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 LONG BEACH CA 90803-3609 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 LIGER, BRADFORD M Current Occupant HEINZEN,DOMINIC F 508-531-063 508-531-063 009-600-578 210 E VIEW RIDGE DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH12 210 E VIEW RIDGE DR EVERETT WA 98203-2017 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 EVERETT WA 98203-2017 Current Occupant USA,BIA JOHNSON,ROANLD G 009-600-578 508-531-020 009-600-882 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH12 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 121 PO BOX 1559 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 MILTON WA 98354-1559 Current Occupant POST##519 AMERICAN LEGION DEPT GARCIA,JOSEPH 009-600-882 OF CALIF 513-082-027 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 121 513-082-021 419 N PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 400 N BELARDO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5654 USA, BIA MERCADO, ISRAEL Current Occupant 508-531-019 009-600-879 009-600-879 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 120 PO BOX 41 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 120 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 MONTE RIO CA 95462-0041 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 Current Occupant COLONY CANYO PARTNERS LLC Current Occupant 508-531-067 1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 507-195-018 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 209 999 2850 572 N INDIAN CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6030 LOS ANGELES CA 90067-4627 LYLE, SCOTT A Current Occupant USA,BIA 513-082-002 513-082-002 508-531-028 2898 N SUNRISE WAY 483 N PALM CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 203 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-2326 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 USA,BIA HOUSE, RICHARD M Current Occupant 508-531-003 009-600-909 009-600-909 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 103 USS RONALD REGAN CVN 76D 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 203 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 FPO AE 09542- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 THREESIXTY,PS Current Occupant HOME BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 513-081-020 513-081-020 CORP 15445 VENTURA BLVD 9 711 368 N PALM CANYON DR 508-531-065 SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403-3005 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 277 E ALEJO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6073 BERARDI,MARIO HEINZEN, RICHARD HARLEY THE CORRIDOR LLC 507-195-022 009-600-809 505-324-001 343 E VIA COLUSA 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 103 9300 FLAIR DR FL 6TH PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6048 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 EL MONTE CA 91731-2851 Current Occupant PROJECT 92 Current Occupant 505-324-001 513.081-011 513-081-011 515 N PALM CANYON DR 303 N INDIAN CANYON DR 311 N INDIAN CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5543 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6015 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6015 SCOTT, WALTER M Current Occupant USA,BIA 009-600-566 009-600-566 508-531-022 7717 S 1 16TH ST 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH4 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 123 SEATTLE WA 98178-3840 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 SKAAR, LAYNE L Current Occupant MOLAZADEH, ALI 009-600-892 009-600-892 513-081-015 3221 B ST SE 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 123 310 N PALM CANYON DR AUBURN WA 98002-8833 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 Current Occupant OWEN COFFMAN POST 519 USA, BIA 513-081-015 AMERICAN LEGION 508-531-005 324 N PALM CANYON DR 513-082-022 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 106 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5642 400 N BELARDO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5654 ANDERSON,ROBERT P Current Occupant USA,BIA 009-600-813 009-600-813 508-531-031 PO BOX 135 277 E ALEJO RD 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 206 KLAWOCK AK 99925-0135 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6073 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 BURCH,RALPH D USA 508 HEINZEN, RICHARD H 009-600-537 508-531-055 009-600-811 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 206 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH4 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 103 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 Current Occupant REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF Current Occupant 009-600-811 PALM SPRINGS 505-324-002 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 104 505-324-002PO BOX 2743 151 W ALEJO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5666 PALM, CANYON TERRACE Current Occupant USA, BIA 513-082-042 513-082-042 508-531-046 888 S FIGUEROA ST STE 1900 395 N PALM CANYON DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 221 LOS ANGELES CA 90017-5324 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5684 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 M&T BANK Current Occupant WEISMANN,RICHARD R 009-600-552 009-600-552 009-600-535 1100 WEHRLE DR 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 221 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 204 WILLIAMSVILLE NY 14221-7748 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 USA,BIA USA,BIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF 508-531-004 508-531-029 PALM SPRINGS 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 104 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 204 513-082-023 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 3200 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6959 USA, BIA GNAND,ERIC Current Occupant 508-531-038 009-600-840 009-600-840 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 213 6234 LOURDES TER 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 113 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 SAN DIEGO CA 92120-3010 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 USA, BIA MILLER,JERRY Current Occupant 508-531-048 009-600-554 009-600-554 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 223 PO BOX 6848 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 223 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 BIG BEAR LAKE CA 92315-6848 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6087 HOME BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT USA,BIA PENSCO PENSION SERVICES INC CORP 508-531-032 009-600-816 508-531-066 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 207 PO BOX 1625 SAN DIEGO CA 92112- PO BOX PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 GUERNEVILLE CA 95446-1625 Current Occupant SPRINGS,PALM Current Occupant 009-600-816 513-081-002 513-081-002 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 107 2415 CAMPUS DR STE 140 434-456 N PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 IRVINE CA 92612-8530 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262- PENSCO TRUST CO USA,BIA DAVILA,DAVID J 009-600-544 508-531-012 009-600-538 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 213 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 113 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 207 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 USA, BIA USA,BIA WHITELY NORTH,CRISTINA 508-531-006 508-531-018 009-600-858 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 107 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 119 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 119 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 HEAVENSTONE,THE COLLECTIONS WRIGHT, LYNETTE C Current Occupant 009-600-579 5 1601 415 HERITAGE SASKATOON 009-60 0-579 560 N I -007 NDIAN CYN DR CANADA 277 E ALEJO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262- PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6073 USA, BIA USA,BIA HALM, ERIC C 508-531-064 508-531-036 009-600-542 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH13 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 211 1701 CLINTON ST APT 302 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6075 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 LOS ANGELES CA 90026-4153 Current Occupant USA 508 VA, PFC CONDO 009-600-542 508-531-021 009-600-887 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 211 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 122 5214 MONTA VISTA DR E PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6086 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 EDGEWOOD WA 98372-9307 Current Occupant USA,BIA OCKERMAN,DARLENE MEARS 009-600.887 508-531-051 009-600-558 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 122 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 226 3201 RIDGE LN PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6083 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6089 REDONDO BEACH CA 90278- Current Occupant USA,BIA CARLSON,GAILYN A 009-600-558 508-531-010 009-600-835 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 226 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 111 9623 24TH ST E PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6089 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 EDGEWOOD WA 98371-2122 Current Occupant USA,BIA USA,BIA 009-600-835 508-531-027 508-531-002 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 111 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 202 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 102 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6084 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 FROMAN, SANDRA S Current Occupant FILIMOWICZ,GREGORY CHARLES 009-600-906 009-600.906 009-600-806 1920 HANCOCK ST 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 202 4593 CARTWRIGHT AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2000 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6085 NORTH HOLLYWOOD CA 91602- Current Occupant MILOT, DAVID A Current Occupant 009-600-806 507-195-014 507-195-014 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT 102 11555 SE 8TH ST STE 200 375 E VIA COLUSA PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6082 BELLEVUE WA 98004-6447 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6048 GAUDINEER,JAMES JAY Current Occupant LA SIERRA UNIVERSITY 513-082-007 513-082-007 505-322-001 600 W PANORAMA RD 457 N PALM CANYON DR 4500 RIVERWALK PKWY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-2742 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5665 RIVERSIDE CA 92505-3344 Current Occupant PROJECT 92 383 INDIAN CANYON 505-322-001 513-081-012 513-081-008 575 N PALM CANYON DR 303 N INDIAN CANYON DR 535 N BELARDO RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5524 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6015 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5607 Current Occupant HOFFMAN, MICHAEL S Current Occupant 513-081-008 513-082-013 513-082-013 383 N INDIAN CANYON DR 650 S EUGENE RD 407 N PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6015 PALM SPRINGS CA 92264-1514 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 GROMAN, RICHARD USA, BIA ROBERTS,RUSSEL R 508-031-002 508-531-058 009-600-570 12165 SUMMIT PL 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH7 277 E ALEJO RD UNIT PH7 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210-1366 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-6074 RICCIO ALEJO BUILDING GENERAL Current Occupant PARTNERSHI 513-082-026 513-082-026 493 N PALM CANYON DR 1635 S SUNRISE WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262-5602 PALM SPRINGS CA 92264-8572 City Council Minutes April 2, 2014 Page 3 requested the Applicant address the access TO u site from Sunrise Way, and stated it would be better to approve the s for the entire site. Councilmember Lewin thanked the Applicant for the exc t project, and stated the City Council has an obligation to look at t ong-term future of the site. Councilmember Foat stated the project is ood project and stated she is prepared to approve the project. MOTION: Adopt "A RESOL ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRIN CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36693 SUBDIVIDE ONE LARGE PARCEL INTO TWO LOTS RESULTI IN A 10,070 SQUARE FOOT LOT AND A REMAINDER APPROXIMATELY 58,831 SQUARE FEET AT THE CORNER EAST SUNNY DUNES ROAD AND SOUTH SUNRISE WAY, E R-1-C AND RMHP, SECTION 23 (CASE TPM 36693)." Moil Councilmember Foot, seconded by Mayor Pro Tom AYES: Co ember Foot and Mayor Pro Tern Hutcheson. NOES: ouncilmember Lewin, Councilmember Mills, and 1.13. PALM SPRINGS, LLC FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PPD) 324 TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 150 ROOM HOTEL WITH ANCILLARY RETAIL, PARKING STRUCTURE, AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 34190 AT 414 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE (CASE 5.1091 PDD 324): Edward Robertson, Principal Planner, provided background information as outlined in the Staff Report dated April 2, 2014. Mayor Pougnet opened the public hearing, and the following speakers addressed the City Council. LAWRENCE RAEL, Applicant, commented on the history of the project, commented on the setback to the revised project, and introduced his project team who outlined the project. 26 l City Council Minutes April 2, 2014 Page 4 MATTHEW BOUSQUETTE, commented on the impact of this building to the surrounding properties and how the project works with the surrounding properties, requested the A/C units and trash bins be moved to another area of the site. ROBERT FARRAN, Palm Springs, stated his opposition to the proposed amendment to the PDD and requested the City Council delay approval and the impact to the surrounding properties due to trash and electrical placement in proximity to the surrounding properties. JOY BROWN MEREDITH, commented on the meetings with the businesses in the Downtown area, stated the project has evolved into a beautiful project, and stated Main Street has voted in support of the project. FRANK TYSEN, stated the amended project is more appropriate to the community than the previous projects, commented on the attributes of the project, and stated his support for the project. LAWRENCE RAEL, Rebuttal, commented on the location of the trash and air conditioning units, and requested the City Council approve the project. No further speakers coming forward, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Foat requested the Applicant address the creation of the road and the trash enclosure, the width of the buffer area and clarify that no vehicle access would be allowed in the buffer. I Mayor Pro Tern Hutcheson commented on the ancillary trash unit and suggested that the provision be eliminated, requested the Applicant address the current landscaping on the lot, the number of bike racks, the public benefit, the public access to parking and the number of parking spaces, and any charge or free public parking. Councilmember Mills requested the Applicant address the amendments to the previously approved plan, recommended the architectural plans be submitted prior to final PDD approval and requested the City Council consider an intermediate step for architectural approval prior to full engineering plans, requested the Applicant address the comments made 27 City Council Minutes April 2, 2014 Page 5 by the Architectural Advisory Committee, the preliminary landscape plan, commented on the foot-traffic, the controlled v. non-controlled parking structure, the ancillary trash collection, the proposed glass railing around the pool, the height of the parking level and provide some amendments to the parking structure walls, the color/material board, commented on Condition ENG 14 and the proposed diagonal street parking, and Condition ENG 28 regarding the median island and requested a full landscape design rather than all stamped concrete. Councilmember Lewin requested the Applicant address the controlled 15 foot alley way, requested the Applicant consider decorative grates on the tree wells, stated his support for the lack of a water element, the proposed shade overhang on Palm Canyon, requested a retractable overhang for summer months, the use of other type of shade trees on Palm Canyon, and commented on traffic circulation and the exit on Indian Canyon. Councilmember Foat requested the Applicant address the ancillary trash enclosure, requested the City Council consider the removal of the median on Alejo, the look of the project from the Park and Alejo, and the location of the air conditioning. Councilmember Lewin commented on the location of the ancillary trash enclosure, and requested Staff address the proposed Alejo median. Mayor Pro Tern Hutcheson requested the Applicant address the ancillary trash enclosure, the alley access, and the addition of two conditions. Mayor Pougnet commented on the public parking and the creation of 100 parking spaces, the ancillary trash enclosure, the branding of the hotel and the lack of the announcement of a brand hotel. Councilmember Mills addressed the comments from the property owner south of the project, and commented on the property setback. Councilmember Foat requested the City Council consider adding a condition for a security camera in the setback. ACTION: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 23527, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 28 3 City Council Minutes April 2, 2014 Page 6 NUMBER 2006109031 AS SUFFICIENT AND APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 34190, PALM SPRINGS, LLC, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 150 ROOM HOTEL, ANCILLARY COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND FREE STANDING PARKING STRUCTURES ON THE APPROXIMATELY 4.1 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALEJO ROAD AND NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE (CASE 5.1091 PDD 324)," amending the Conditions of Approval as follows: (i) removing Condition ENG 28, (fi) all exterior elevations, decking, landscaping, color board, etc., shall be required to be submitted and approved by the AAC and the Planning Commission prior to final approval of the PDD, (N) require pedestrian access on Palm Canyon from the ground-level parking garage, (iv) restudy of the parking elevations on the street to allow some fenestration, (v) rework the comer of Alejo Road and Indian Canyon, (vili require the ancillary trash location have no openings from the exterior, (vii) requiring a security camera in the non-vehicular alley, (viii) require the non-vehicular alley to have a locked gate, and (ix) require bike racks be incorporated throughout the development, and 2) Direct the City Engineer review the required median on Alejo Road, including the stamped concrete. Motion Councilmember Mllls, seconded by Mayor Pro Tom Hutcheson and unanimously carried on a roll call vote. Mayor Pougnet stated he has a business related conflict of interest with respect to Item 1.C., would not participate in the discussion or the vote, and left Council Chamber. 1 CODE SECTION 53083 TO APPROVE 11 SPECIAL NOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOCUS INCENTIVE AREAS PR M GRANT AGREEMENTS: John Raymond, Director of Commun- Economic Development, provided background information tlined in the Staff Report dated April 2, 2014. 00*0 Councilmember requested staff address the number of projects recommen or approval, and requested Staff address the other types of sees that submitted applications. 29 Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes August 25,2014 4. PALM SPRINGS, LLC, REQUEST FOR FINAL PDD PLANS APPROVAL FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED- USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 150-ROOM HOTEL WITH RETAIL AND PARKING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 400 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE PD324, (5.1091-PD-324). (ER) MEMBER PURNEL noted his abstention on this project. PRINCIPAL PLANNER ROBERTSON summarized the staff report. He also stated that it is the staffs recommendation to approve the final PDD plans to submit to the planning commission. MEMBER HIRSCHBEIN asked if the presentation that was approved last October could be viewed again. PRINCIPAL PLANNER ROBERTSON showed the board the previous plans. CHAIR FAUBER noted the only change was the addition of an access to the parking lot on Alejo Road. PRINCIPAL PLANNER ROBERTSON acknowledged that was a recommendation. MEMBER FREDRICKS asked if there was a more detailed landscape plan. PRINCIPAL PLANNER ROBERTSON answered that there is one as stated in the staff report. CHAIR FAUBER invited the applicants to present their case. GRAHAM RAEL explained the attributes the project would bring to the City of Palm Springs. JOSEPH SMART, architect, summarized the proposed project objectives and the Board's previous comments and concerns. BORIS MATHIS, architect, explained the improvements to the plans and the additional architectural designs. RON GREGGORY, landscape architect, detailed the proposed landscape design. BORIS MATHIS answered that the plan has a center division. 4 30 Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes August 25,2014 MEMBER HIRSCHBEIN stated that he would like to see a site plan with Palm Canyon Drive's elevations. He also asked if there was a reason as to why the retail space did not expand to the property line. BORIS MATHIS explained that the City Council had made it a condition to have a 10 foot gap. The purpose is also to provide an additional access point other than the parking lot. MEMBER HIRSCHBEIN stated that the 10 foot gap disrupts pedestrian flow. BORIS MATHIS maintained that the addition space is not necessary for the overall proposed project. MEMBER HIRSCHBEIN questioned how much space lies between the store fronts and the property lines. BORIS MATHIS answered that there is a 10 foot setback. MEMBER FREDRICKS asked if the tree box sizes would remain the specified size. RON GREGGORY explained that the boxes are shown with their minimum size and have potential to be larger. MEMBER SECOY-JENSEN asked if there had been another restaurant added. PRINCIPAL PLANNER ROBERTSON stated that there is still one tenant restaurant and the other shown is outdoor seating for the hotel's restaurant. This would not affect parking. MEMBER SECOY-JENSEN expressed her excitement for the project and reminded the applicant that the wooden louvers could become an eye sore if not done properly. MEMBER SONG stated that the overall look of clean white linear shapes is disrupted by the wooden trellis. JOSEPH SMART said the wooden trellis adds on as a compliment to the design. CHAIR FAUBER asked if there would be additional wood structures beside the trellis. BORIS MATHIS answered there would not be any other structures. The wooden trellis is a piece of furniture. 5 31 Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes August 25,2014 MEMBER SONG questioned if the floor to ceiling glass store front would provide an excessive amount of sunlight. She also questioned if the proposed project has too many elements that may not end in a cohesive manner. Additional renderings are needed to provide a better understanding. BORIS MATHIS showed some details on the presentation. MEMBER HIRSCHBEIN asked why the pilasters that separate the store fronts were 30 feet wide. BORIS MATHIS said the purpose was to distinguish each establishment. CHAIR FAUBER asked if the guest room doors were also going to be wooden. Also if the roof that was coming down to the pavement would be one plane, BORIS MATHIS answered that the guest room doors would be wooden and the roof would be one continuous plane of the cement plaster. CHAIR FAUBER asked how much control would be placed on the facade of the store fronts. He also asked if the fountain would have small structures. BORIS MATHIS said the objective of the proposed project is to maintain a cohesive project with minimal change to the proposed project designs. The fountain would not have small structures it is only water splashes. MEMBER SONG asked if more of the natural stone structures could be placed and why the location of the faux turf was set as it was. RON GREGGORY answered that they did not want the stones to become places to have people sleep on and the turf cannot be where it will have car wheel disturb it. MEMBER SECOY-JENSEN moved to approve as submitted to planning commission. PRINCIPAL PLANNER ROBERTSON added that no more comments could be made as this would be the final decision for the Architectural Advisory Committee. The board may add conditions to its approval. Any significance change will be subject to additional review by the board. M/S/C (Secoy-Jensen/Fauber, 6-0) Approved to submit to the Planning Commission on the condition that if the columns that separate the store fronts exceed 8 feet the board will review it. 6 32 Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 2013 ZTA). (MM Director Wheeler reported that this project would be br ack for the Commission's review once all issues have been addressed. ACTION: Table. Motion: Commissioner e, seconded by Commissioner Roberts and unanimously carried on a roll e. AYE ommissioner Calerdine, Commissioner .Klatchko, Commissioner Lowe, 2C. PALM SPRINGS, LLC, FOR AN AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 34190 FOR A 150-ROOM HOTEL AND ANCILLARY COMMERCIAL RETAIL DEVELOPMENT AT 414 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE; ZONE PDD 324, (CASE NO. 5.1091-PD324 / TTM 34190 AMND). (ER) Principal Planner Robertson presented an overview of the proposed project as outlined in the staff report. He corrected an error on page 7 regarding parking where 212 spaces were listed and 226 is correct. Chair Donenfeld opened the public hearing portion of the meeting: LAWRENCE RAEL, president, Rae] Development, introduced the architect who will be providing the presentation and all the consultants will be available to answer questions. HAGY BELZBURG, project architect, presented a computer simulation of the proposed project relating to the reduction of density for the hotel creating small bungalows and allowing continuation of the retail fabric down the street. Mr. Belzburg addressed the height, setbacks, massing, rooms, swimming pools, courtyard connectiv'dy and desert landscaping. BOB HELBLING, commented that this project is even better and liked the idea of the modem bungalow concept; he spoke in favor of the project. KIM WESTBROOK, commercial developer, spoke in favor of the proposed project and commended the applicant. 4 ] Page 33 1 Planning Commission Minutes December 11,2013 JOY MEREDITH, downtown business owner and president of MainStreet, commented that having this new project connecting downtown and uptown would be incredible. She said that lots of changes have been made and spoke in support of the project. FRANK TYSEN, said architecturally nice features, however, is concerned with the scale of the building and project should have an E.I.R. and more discussion on public benefit. He questioned adding another 150 rooms to the city. LAWRENCE RAEL, applicant, thanked all the speakers for their comments and was available to answer questions from the Commission. There being no further appearances the public hearing portion was closed. Commissioner Calerdine said the plans look really exciting and asked the architect to walk them through one of the plans from the lobby to the third or fourth floor hotel rooms next to Amado. Commissioner Roberts thanked the applicant for a great new design. He asked about the design on level two and why consideration was not taken for retail opportunities on Indian Canyon. Mr. Belzburg addressed his concerns and explained the concept of the project. Vice-Chair Hudson noted that the parking portion is split into two areas and questioned if the northern parking will be controlled or paid for parking. Mr. Rael responded that discussions have been on-going with the City in designing this parking and they were working on a negotiated agreement to make the north parking public and the south side will be valet parking. Vice-Chair Hudson asked if there will be access to the _parking from Indian Canyon. Mr. Rael answered as it is currently designed no; but there may be something that might be able to be incorporated into the project. Vice-Chair Hudson expressed concern that the bungalow village will not be visible from the street and commented on the lack of activity given to Indian Canyon. He feels the Indian Canyon elevation needs more attention to the pedestrian streetscape. Commissioner Weremiuk reiterated concern about access from the retail parking on Palm Canyon. She expressed concern with the lack of pedestrian streetscape on Indian Canyon and would like to see trees that provide shade and encourage walking. Commissioner Klatchko concurred with the comments from the Commissioners and suggested perhaps lowering the plateau about five feet on the north end to give better Visibility of the hotel rooms from the street. He has the same concems with the north parking and pedestrian access. It would be helpful for more access points for parking. 5 1 P a g e 34 7i Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 2013 Chair Donenfeld commented that it is unfair to expect the developer to make Indian Canyon more viable; that is the City's responsibility. Lawrence Rael appreciated the Commission's comments and agrees with the comments made regarding the corner on Indian Canyon; but the project is still a work in progress and they will be back with an even better project. ACTION: Find that the previously adopted mitigated negative declaration is sufficient and appropriate environmental document and approve the amended project and the Final PD to return to the Commission with the following considerations: 1.) The Indian Canyon side to be reconsidered to allow more pedestrian circulation. 2.) Activate the Alejo/Indian corner. 3.) Utilize extra space on the 2nd floor over the garage to give more connectivity to the 3rd level hotel rooms from the street view. 4.) Pedestrian access to be created from the ground level parking garage on the north onto Palm Canyon. 5.) Replace some of the northern ground floor parking to allow for commercial space on Indian Canyon and/orAlejo Road. 6.) Parking structure lighting to be shielded from the street. Motion: Commissioner Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Lowe and unanimously carried on a roll call vote. AYES: Commissioner Calerdine, Commissioner. Klatchko, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Roberts, Commissioner Weremiuk, Vice Chair Hudson, Chair Donenfeld A recess was taken at 3:23 pm. The meeting reconvened at 3:35 pm. ELEMENT OF THE 20 GENERAL PLAN ADDRESSING THE HO EDS OF ALL ECONOMIC SEGMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY(CA -GPA). (ER) Chair Donenfeld opened the public hearin of the meeting: JUDY DEERTRACK, subm' documents and spoke about a general plan amendment that was ted that changed the density limitations for land use classification �ovide as impacted the Housing Element and will compromise the cty's abili income housing. 61Page 35 3 Edward— After speaking with Doug Hudson last night, please contact the either Lawrence Rael or his architect, and have them prepare to address the following points at Planning Commission this afternoon: • The appearance of the garage structures from the pedestrian level along Indian Canyon and Alejo — specifically addressing the detailing of the screen materials, and what the view will be at night with the interior illumination coming from the garage structure. • Specific details of the landscape treatment in front of the garage structures along Indian Canyon and Alejo, and shading of the pedestrian sidewalk. • There is a concern with the building encroaching into the right-of-way along Palm Canyon — see Elevation 3 (North Elevation), where the upper levels of the building and the canopy cantilever over the ground level. • The City Council may move forward with two-way traffic on Indian Canyon — if that is the case, it would be preferable to have parallel spaces along the Indian Canyon frontage instead of the diagonal spaces as shown on the plan. Please let them know that they may need to reconfigure the diagonal parking spaces. 36 Planning Commission Minutes September 10,2014 Commissioner Weremiuk spoke in support; noting that the east side is the area that needs the most help. ACTION: To approve and recommend approval to the cll. Motion: Commissioner Middle conded by Commissioner Lowe and unanimously carried 5-0-2 olI call vote. AYES: Co loner Lowe, Commissioner middfiEw Commissioner Weremiuk, ce-Chair Klatchko, Chair Hudson Commissioner Calerdine, Commissio 2. NEW BUSINESS: legal 2A. PALM SPRINGS, LLC, REQUEST FINAL PDD PLAWILAPPROVAL FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRI 4 T ONSTR11101, MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSIST G OF A 1 HOTEL WI ETAIL AND PARKING STRUCTURE L D AT 4 RTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE PD324, (5.1091-PD-3 Staff requested a short k to set- a pr ion. A recess was tak :54 p he me me 07 pm. Principal Planner Ro on nted th oposed project as outlined in the staff report. LAW E RAEL, lica troduc imself and provided details about the project. JOSEPH S T, SMS A tects, oject architect, presented the project using a power point pr tation pe 'ning to the site plan, hotel entry, parking garage, view corridors and the level king down the scale of the project. He addressed the architecture, elevati Canyon, shade studies, hotel entrance, Indian Canyon and Alejo frontage, pa tructure, sketches of the spa pool, view corridor entries to the units and materials. RON GREGORY, described the hardscape design, fountain elements on the center of outer court, plant materials will be selected for its appropriateness for the desert location, Alejo Road landscape view, meandering walkway and landscape lighting. The Commission commented on: 3 37 1 Planning Commission Minutes September 10,2014 -The north side on Alejo Road and Palm Canyon looks stark; -The angled parking on Indian Canyon can be a potential problem for stacking; -The transition road with exit road on Alejo Road will impact the traffic patterns on both streets; LAWRENCE RAEL clarified that a median on Alejo Road has been conditioned for the project. The Commission asked further questions and/or corn on: -Shade studies around the corner; -Angled parking on Indian Canyon could be a aza oject is over-parked; -Eliminate parking spaces on Indian Can nd provide itional pedestrian and landscape space; -Concerned about stark architecture d uncertain ab angled parking; -Good to see the 3D models; impressed with itectuAand lands palette; Chair Hudson expressed the foil omments: 1. Building is very simple; a t ex of min st architecture. Minimalism demands fine de ' ' g with se ivity rials cale. 2. Materials are 3. Pedestrian ectio m the el p structure to adjacent streets need to be 4. Indian Canyon lej d need destrian sidewalk. 5. No s of the ect; would like to see more material of 6. itional 3D ings close ' d far away 7. ap betwee 'Idin thetically and functionality. 8. Th estrian ex p nce i middle of the summer. 9. The h latform h n area at needs to be paved; a very stark area. 10. The re n gs do show the 5 foot drop at the pedestrian connection between th tel dr area and Indian Canyon. 11. Elements are The development team a dressed the Commission's concerns and questions. ACTION: To continue and direct recommend the following modifications: 1. Provide new 3D exhibits for the south side of the building and podiums. 2. Provide additional details for the parking structure; the pedestrian access to Palm Canyon and walkway around the parking structure with an exit onto Alejo Road and Indian Canyon. 4 38 2 Planning Commission Minutes September 10,2014 3. The Engineering Department to provide information regarding the angled parking and two way streets on Indian Canyon. 4. How will the mechanical area be soundproof for the adjacent neighbors? 5. More details on the materials for the exterior of the building. Motion: Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Vice-Chair Klatchko and unanimously carried 5-0-2 on a roll call vote. AYES: Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Mid Commissioner Weremiuk, Vice-Chair Klatchko, Chair Hudson ABSENT: Commissioner Calerdine, Commissio A break was taken at 3:36 pm. The meeting resumed at 3:57 pm. 2B. PALM SPRINGS PROM DE, LLC UPDATE EXTERIO ELEVATIONS OF BLO OF TH WNTOWN PA M SPRI S RENOVATION PROJECT AT NORTHWEST CORNE OF ANDREAS ROAD AND PAL C DRI ONE CBD (CASE .3606 MAJ). (DN) 2C. PALM SPRI PRO ADE, FOR A EVISED A HITECTURAL APPLICATION N CT A -STORY COMMER L BUILDING ON BLO TH PA SPRINGS RE ATION PROJECT L E HWE OF ANDR S ROAD AND PALM ON DRI NE (CAS 06 MAJ). (DN Interim r Evans 'ded ground informatio for Building A. Mr. Evans reported tha ilding B is midd uilding that i y approved as a single-story building with th eption o inging back archi ral details for the Commission. He stated that the a nt ha bmitted the ed drawings, a new two-story building and an alternate pro I is site. Associate Planner New pre ed the proposed projects as outlined in the staff report. Chair Hudson ope the public comment portion of the meeting: JOHN W AN, applicant, explained the overall project and the open-space. He requ d the opportunity to provide an alternate plan for Block B and does not want to up approvals he already has. He has worked very hard to move this oroiect forward 5 39 3 Planning Commission Minutes 2 September 24, 2014 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1 , ACTION: Approve the Planning Commission Ming ugust 27, 2014 and September 10, 2014 (as amended). Motion: Commissioner Were seconded by mmissioner Roberts and unanimously carried 6-0- roll call vote. AYES: issioner Calerdine, Commis ' e, Commissioner Middleton, Commissioner Roberts, Commis Wer k, Chair Hudson �i 2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: . 2A. PALM SPRINGS, LLC, F NAL PD S APPROVAL R PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 32 STRU MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 150-ROOM H RET D PARKING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 400 NO H PALM YO E, Z D324 (CASE NO. 5.1091 PD 324). (ER) Principal Planner son re wed the PDD pla as outlined in the staff report and presented the m tion at were a to the project. Commi ne tha missed the last meeting when this proje presen rev the D d minutes pertaining to this project. Commiss Roberts s tha as not able to review the project and requested a summary Co is 's con s discussed at the previous meeting. Chair Hudson sta he Co ssion's concerns at the last meeting: • Pedestrian acc the parking structure to the adjacent streets - sidewalk connections have en incorporated. • Additional exhibits to the south elevation - some exhibits have been provided. • The grade change between the automobile drop-off at the hotel and pedestrian connection to Indian Canyon (5 ft. drop) - applicant has included a stair element and a ramp. • A request for a more detailed look at the building and type of materials - not much detail has been provided. • Additional 3D images of the project - close up and from a distance - not enough has been provided. 40 Planning Commission Minutes 3 September 24, 2014 Chair Hudson invited the applicant to come forward and present the project: LAWRENCE RAEL, applicant, stated that they are in substantial compliance with the original approval and addressed the modifications made to the project. JOSEPH SMART, SMS Architects, provided a presentation of the south side elevation, 3D setbacks, ground-level hotel experience including the vehicle arrival, courtyard, landscaping, walkways, building materials and railings, corative screen panels and shading study for the building. Chair Hudson opened the public comments an ppearances coming forward he closed public comments. Commissioner Roberts provided the follo omments: • Project has areas that are very succe espe ' on Alej d. • Further revise the upper qWies of the educe the ng and there are areas that are expos • The upper floor looks hea al. Commissioner Middlet ovided th lowi ment • There are thing t are gr this ct. • Landscaping od bu ed-up p rees do not provide shade. • Concern about lel ed par on Indian Canyon. • Fi ery r, ional colors on the upper floor may be ion Co i er Weremiu vide following comments: • The a parking elimina ed and add additional landscaping to enhance Indian C • The buildin too and does not have enough variation on the exterior materials. • The building is to se to the street and looks heavy. Commissioner Calerdine stated that he is satisfied with the site layout but does not like the colors and materials. ACTION: To continue to a date uncertain to allow the applicant to come back with the following revisions to the project: • The applicant to make some changes - especially from the 2nd floor up, perhaps stepping it back or least some material options for texture. 41 Planning Commission Minutes 4 September 24, 2014 • Provide better shading along the Indian Canyon and Alejo Road frontages. • Screening of the parking areas (along the Indian Canyon and Alejo Road) frontages needs to be improved. • Provide better articulation especially of the guest rooms. • Revise the upper stories of the building to reduce the massing and incorporate more sculptural elements. • Remove the angled parking and replace with additional landscaping on Indian Canyon. Motion: Commissioner Roberts, seconded by missioner Weremiuk and unanimously carried 6-0-1 on a roll call vote. AYES: Commissioner Calerdine, Commi r Lo ommissioner Middleton, Commissioner Roberts, Commi r Weremiuk Chair Hudson ABSENT: Vice-Chair Klatchko 3A. CONT'D - BARISTO GRO OR A CHANGE FROM R-3 TO -2 AND AN AMENDMENT TO A PRE O PRO LANNED DEVELO ENT DISTRICT (PD-288) F HE THI ND PH OF THE PD I UDING NEW ARCHITECT II C G E REMAINI UNITS ON THE VACANT LAWLOC ON T SI LUGO R BETWEEN ARENAS ROAD A ARIS ROAD E 5.0977- PD288 D, ZC AND TTM 36626). (DN) ACTIO rem rom a Motion. missioner emi conded by missioner Lowe and unanimously carried 6- n a roll call AYES: Co loner C dine, C missioner Lowe, Commissioner Middleton, Comm er R s, C missioner Weremiuk, Chair Hudson ABSENT: Vice-Cha 313. CONT'D - DOUG C. JONES FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE TO CONS T CT TWO WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES CONSISTING OF TY-SIX FOOT TALL MONOPOLES, EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM PE TED ZONING HEIGHT, DESIGNED AS PALM TREES AT A VACANT P L OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF GOLDEN SANDS MOBILE ME PARK AT 3430 NORTH SUNRISE WAY, ZONE O (CASE NOS. 5.132 P AND 6.533 VAR). (DN) Ll 42 iy a V N nN`R °4411:0 ��P Planninq Commission Staff Report Date: September 10, 2014 SUBJECT: PALM SPRINGS, LLC, REQUEST FOR A FINAL PDD PLANS APPROVAL FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 150- ROOM HOTEL WITH RETAIL AND PARKING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 400 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE PD324, (5.1091-PD-324) From: Department of Planning Services SUMMARY The Planning Commission to review Final PDD plans of a previously approved Preliminary Planned Development District consisting of a 150-room hotel with ancillary retail, restaurant and parking structure. The property is the vacant 4.1-acre site bounded by Alejo Road on the north, North Palm Canyon Drive on the west, North Indian Canyon Drive on the east, and commercial development on the south. RECOMMENDATION: Find that the Final PD plans are in substantial conformance with the preliminary PD standards; approve with recommended condition from the AAC. PRIOR ACTIONS /APPROVALS: 10.07.13 The AAC reviewed the proposed amendment to the project approved by the Council on September 7, 2011, and provided comments to the applicant 10.21.13 The AAC considered the project and by a unanimous vote recommended approval to the Planning Commission. 12.11.13 The Planning Commission approved the proposed amended project and recommended approval to the City Council with conditions. 04.02.14 The City Council approved the proposed amended project to develop the 150-room hotel, ancillary retail commercial and a parking structure. 08.25.14 The AAC reviewed the project and by a unanimous vote recommended approval to the Planning Commission with condition of approval. Background: Preliminary Planned Development 324 (PDD 324) established development and design standards that were proposed by the applicants for a new 150-room hotel, ancillary 43 retail and parking structure project. The preliminary approval called for a substantial Planning Commission Staff Report September 10,2014 Port Lawrence 150-Room Hotel 5.1091-PD324—Final PD Plans Page 2 of 4 conformance review prior to final approval by the Planning Commission. The Final Development plans maintain the same mixed-use character as the Preliminary PD project with a 150-hotel, retail/commercial, bar and restaurant uses. The ground level will feature approximately 32,705 square feet of commercial retail spaces, a restaurant and a bar. The proposed development still consists of a four-story building; the upper two stories are hotel guest rooms and suites. The layout calls for the 150 rooms to be distributed across the lot with private garden spaces around each room. The preliminary architectural design which was a "desert contemporary' vernacular remains the same. Basic building massing and heights remains consistent and within the guidelines of the approved planned development district. Location 414 North Palm Canyon Drive 414 North Palm Canyon Drive Proposed Use Mixed-use; Hotel & Commercial Mixed-Use; Hotel & Commercial Lot Size 4.1 Acres 4.1 Acres FAR: Total Area 171,160 Sq. ft. 171,160 Sq. Ft. Building Coverage 57,969 Sq. ft. 34% 57,969 Sq. ft. 34% GP &ZO Density Approved PDD 324 37 Units per acre 37 Units per acre Architecture Contemporary Contemporary Phasing N/A N/A Building Coverage 34% 34% Front Setbacks: North Palm Canyon 9.10-13.0 Feet 9.10-13.0 Feet Indian Canyon 12.5-17.5 Feet 12.5-17.5 Feet Side Setbacks: Ale'o Road 4.5-13.0 Feet 4.5-13.0 Feet South Side 11.7-14.8 Feet 11.7-14.8 Feet Stories 4 4 Height 51 feet 51 feet Hotel Units 150 150 Commercial Space 32,705 Sq. Ft. 32,705 Sq. Ft. Restaurant Space Yes Yes Event Spaces Yes Yes Swimming Pools 2 2 Roof Top Terrace None None Parkin • Hotel Free standing parking structure Free standing and surface parking Parking; Commercial Free standing parking structure Free standing and surface parking Total Parking Spaces: Required: 226 226 Provided: 283 283 Site Circulation Ingress, egress, access and Ingress, egress, access and parking per City Standards parking per City Standards Access into hotel Street Level Entry Point Street Level Entry; Palm Canyon Drive Common Open Space 17% excluding hotel patios & 17% excluding hotel patios & balconies balconies 44 Planning Commission Staff Report September 10,2014 Port Lawrence 150-Room Hotel 5.1091-PD324—Final PD Plans Page 3 of 4 AAC Review Comments on 08.25.14: On August 25, 2014, the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) reviewed the project and recommended approval with the following condition: 1. The maximum front panel separating store front fagade along North Palm Canyon Drive shall be 8 feet long. Any individual tenant improvement involving the front panel fagade exceeding 8 feet shall be subject to review by the AAC. The comments below were made by the AAC at the preliminary review. The applicant has since incorporated the comments into the final plans. •' Consider a wraparound of the ground level retail on the south side • Improve the overhang on the east side of the project. • Add bulkhead on the east to block vehicle lights • Provide additional corner options on the northwest section of the site. Plan Conformance: The proposed final development plans provide additional architectural detail and include refined project information. Comments and recommendations from the AAC and the Planning Commission have been incorporated into the final development plans as well. Differences between the preliminary and final development plans include: • Refinement and elaboration to the building facades facing public streets • Extension of canopy along Palm Canyon to increase shade on the retail tenant spaces and pedestrian sidewalk areas. A more intimate arrival statement created for arriving guests to the hotel. • Significant emphasis placed on the building elevation, walkways and landscaping along Indian Canyon to provide a more pleasant pedestrian experience. • A public pedestrian connection has been created for guests parking on the north Parking Structure allowing easier access from Palm Canyon to the public parking garage. • Bulkhead has been designed behind screening to block vehicle lights. Landscape Plan: Fully developed final landscape, irrigation and exterior lighting plans with planters on Palm Canyon Drive will be taken back to the AAC for review and recommendation to the Planning Commission. The AAC reviewed an updated preliminary landscape plans and was supportive of the revisions and directions. CONCLUSION: The proposed final development plans have been reviewed by staff and the AAC. And it has been determined that the final plans are in substantial conformance with the previously approved development standards, therefore asks the Planning Commission to approve the Final PDD with the recommended condition of approval. '��4 �77 — - ward O. Robertson ouglas . Evans Principal Planner Interim Director of Planning Services 45 Planning Commission Staff Report September 10,2014 Port Lawrence 150-Room Hotel 5.1091-PD324—Final PD Plans Page 4 of 4 Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Draft AAC Minutes from the meeting of August 25, 2014 3. 11"x17" Booklet containing Site Plans, Floor Plans, Elevations and Landscape Plans 46 iy O V N pa LIA C441FORe�P Planning Commission Staff Report Date: September 24, 2014 SUBJECT: PALM SPRINGS, LLC, REQUEST FOR A FINAL PDD PLANS APPROVAL FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 150- ROOM HOTEL WITH RETAIL AND PARKING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 414 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE PD324, (5.1091-PD-324) From: Department of Planning Services SUMMARY On September 10, 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed Final PDD plans of a previously approved Preliminary Planned Development District consisting of a 150-room hotel with ancillary retail, restaurant and parking structure. The Commission voted to continue the hearing and directed the applicant to provide additional exhibits and materials for a further review. RECOMMENDATION: Find that the Final PD plans are in substantial conformance with the preliminary PD standards; approve with the recommended condition from the AAC. Background: The project site is the vacant 4.1-acre site bounded by Alejo Road on the north, North Palm Canyon Drive on the west, North Indian Canyon Drive on the east, and commercial development on the south. According to Section 94.03.00(4) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code, Final Development Plans requires approval by the Planning Commission. The Code further states..."The final plan shall be substantially in conformance with the approved preliminary plan and shall incorporate all modifications and conditions to the preliminary development plan made by the commission and city council'. Preliminary Planned Development 324 (PDD 324) established development and design standards that were proposed by the applicants for a new 150-room hotel, ancillary retail and parking structure project. As submitted, the final development plans maintain the same mixed-use character and the same architectural design as the Preliminary PD ,project with a 150-hotel, retail/commercial, bar and restaurant uses. The ground level will feature approximately 32,705 square feet of commercial retail spaces, a restaurant and a bar. The proposed development still consists of a four-story building; the upper two stories are hotel guest rooms and suites. The layout calls for the 150 rooms to be distributed across the lot with private garden spaces around each room. The preliminary 47 Planning Commission Staff Report September 24,2014 Port Lawrence 150-Room Hotel-5.1091-PD324—Final PD Plans Page 2 of 3 architectural design which was a "desert contemporary" vernacular remains the same. Basic building massing and heights remains consistent and within the guidelines of the approved planned development district. On August 25, 2014, the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) reviewed the project and found it to be in substantial conformance with the preliminary design and thus recommended approval to the commission with one condition. The condition states as follows: 1. The front panel separating store fronts facade along North Palm Canyon Drive shall be a maximum of 8 feet long. Any individual tenant improvement involving the front panel facade exceeding 8 feet shall be subject to review by the AAC. Planning Commission Action on 9.10.14: On September 10, 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed the project and voted to continue the item with the following directions to the applicant: 1. Provide new 3-D exhibit of south side elevation and building elevation. 2. Address hotel guest experience at the ground level. 3. Provide an exhibit illustrating additional detail of parking structure. 4. Provide a landscaped site plan with walkways around parking areas with access to Palm Canyon, Alejo and Indian Canyon. 5. Provide exhibits illustrating screening and appearance of the 10 foot gap on the south side elevation. 6. Provide an exhibit pointing out application and placement of materials on the exterior. 7. Provide "blow-ups" of street level views / close up of portions of buildings. 8. Provide visual renderings detailing scoring of driveway and how it will appear. Since the last hearing, the applicant has met with staff and has provided additional exhibits addressing the concerns of the commission. Landscape Plan: As previously stated fully developed final landscape, irrigation and exterior lighting plans will be taken back to the AAC for review and recommendation to the Planning Commission. The AAC reviewed an updated preliminary landscape plans and was supportive of the revisions and directions. CONCLUSION: The proposed final development plans have been reviewed by the AAC and recommended for approval. It has been determined that the final plans are in substantial conformance with the previously approved development standards, therefore, staff is asking the Planning Commission to approve the Final PDD with the recommended condition f approval. Edward O. Robertson Fli n Fagg, AICP Principal Planner Director of Planning Services 49 Planning Commission Staff Report September 24,2014 Port Lawrence 150-Room Hotel-5.1091-PD324—Final PD Plans Page 3 of 3 Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Final PD Resolution 3. Draft PC Minutes from the meeting of September 10, 2014 4. Minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of December 11, 2013 5. Draft AAC Minutes from the meeting of August 25, 2014 6. 11"W" Booklet containing Site Plans, Floor Plans, Elevations and Landscape Plans. New exhibits provided: • South side elevation • Southwest corner rendering (showing 10' foot gap treatment) • Auto Court Plan • Renderings • Ground floor exhibit illustrating pedestrian access • Street Level Site Plan illustrating landscaping treatment around parking structures. • Rendering depicting northeast corner of building. • Enlarged Exhibit showing auto court and illustration of score joint. • Additional exterior renderings. 49 r OPEN SPACE CALCDIATXNN ' AE01 LOT IAf1 1T,19914 xfovxxorcxsMrr asvmsf smN 1Ao a .. a — 11LNaLMFX.VKF YPIRS AIIx Cwbns',e�uLimwum P54x'Y[,%91CJN ary z lip aEaaa[AorcxsvAce rmsvYsr 4 5 _ iq 17 -18 19 20` 21 22 aCNxmFNS E,OPfNw WS.RY w:l% Cplvn:rmf+nnmmmrYur�!{�P51.1LHW41C]ai RfpAlfO M1TN S91fL pKN R15NIJ P@I.@SY IS mx ISxtl Mb BtivLYNkpra.baa.MNlx Nc /LIVKLVd DILENPEX Io sxN sgx6Y 35 YSM CMmn'.mWrmnunrsyYpxP$NCYl,WO1C 3D Yff PARgNG ANALYSIS nff ma na nff no a'a ara svr alr sEa RRa' slG' , L �'a' 1er st`P xa N•Y sf1 I A A a a a a a a a a - � A A a • a- mrtL®,H RPWIs ImmPOYB PECUPE RBW IW FO0LL9x]S xEouxE IpTEL SIR1MiGL WIMUSF PMLmLpII INCEXIW1 w13tlES5 MS DID W] B11pprCEr(IOIE IElT1 PNIXIXG 'N.LA)ES SFA F(SIAIMANISB124'.E 81flIICRPE w1M 119 i0rw PN W NG xw.u�fNSNcslawaxrsexf,fss rxlxnxof rorK noxA ...... cnSEDIMHMMSUlTUM if ryssr YaIFR MIIm+zEDEYxwlMfxrsGalmu ENII W CE ro Nu1Eua P"PNIXG SIPIKTIgE'MIX1IIiOLMPPA(ING EVFMIsvKF t . SPICES 'ISOItlIFf IK\Y6PHSf/AYMKIPNS/CRtSNYEHIN/Sv ' OE4£N/.f^RCE AVG-IAWY MEdfPYNJAmIP � 310N8lPEEIP.IPoJNGBPILEB EVEN!SaLESIaLroIAI ICES .LLCMGN Xa:Vx CM'IW OR�I]W 3lPEEIGWFW sPK6ILRIGN iOIaL SWIREDPMIXML 9KF5 MSMLES Sild£i PMMINL mPL6 roiPLPKDPaRNNG SPICES r � CSFSIREEr N19PACEfi , roIaLPRCPoA➢vMxNG svIRS ti15PN£S 5 A ^ g i A _ 5 b ® eru uPRDxuArt Launox DE sr Yrunm�"xwxem"`cNru 011'J �11'tl �Ittl 011U 7St'IY 0 �/ J r A SMPOA b r��VCCrr�JJJ]�VCCrY JJJ fi � �xff o Vk $,r - - b ^ff /.r "� JIWYI QIF510 rvr ra �m F .. NrDarawEe"afeslma.N hxra aLs+Dle srcarar V NEsrNauxrwxwrlCEswfR M1tt151fgF30i Cii10ES.W1 Aw R p LFsaAelE lNsialwxrre°N F 'L IEYHBCf ltll6 '- OIESIIL'WBVrEM1A .A x AWIESfCRI Cf �I r - N •F i x .:. � I C .h �Sltl 011tl 10 `'xr Ao -1 �. V ` - � 31 b' f." Ill YLE1PUES�CM'B gxGli k PDDLYNswlWlxaxc � uewuurflv,AmrxlYnrt w"Dfcx,wP I Inmmmww S: Cp`p �'`! CC``- T10AEYELfi OFXmFLWE8rPW16 K ..f- Aft'6r.ar u ' IIONN __ DVHi1FAV&ERUW LEGALDESCWPTION I- - - r� FT - N R Ecm"P.WI6fYNm,LCN11Y0FPNEP9LE srxlf of _ _ _ .,...c_. — +f• .. _ _ - _ _ - _ uuroxxu"xwsmes EGuaxx µ t rr mrtarrvE TMnm NrxeNxsaWmnWwx"l�wu � .�'}'4�" .A� P,V&flN b134310YJ A" TIEIgRrIgiLVRRr.WSWRfo IEEr Ci LOillx&oGINCf A4 � sNawm INsox DBE xNmxx Mti♦tt"LYss lamRDsmswDNm - - PIRC6d(v13W1t03wWWN IINSWrIWxr rEmxHxaurof¢im Lar 1 w soar NCG swxrvm uwox NuxmoxRPaSY}"xws,lXvcDlW3msrx DEm RlV11Y,LYKWIA '. ' Paac¢cImma ) -. . '--- .. ...APPROVED BY PLANNINfr^^..tiomL.�l�61o<N------ LmlwaDarNDEPaIusPRxrs. wM, Case#51mDate12-41, 3lnrdal.i PNAIEL O IHSWIA>t`i wsY� W> "m°°°"°'° APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL B w IS Y WP R[tl950SSxpfIW CgM1Y.CWWVSa PAVCELE:b11W1Nfi1 �m Case#-lf5XS-3aDate X22^'X ndlal xsm A T 1' 1R' T IOTINOTIEmR11g1Y15SE XTEwEn Y1b5SffICi LT S.INBLOLXN GR4PHIL$LAIE 1'-NYd' ssn°e"Irs.rssRY�m uw WPnFxN%cxMw mofuws ucawsoPsw INCHINCPEWSSHOYMAPEATFUL XS EONTHESHEET Resolution# Ordinance# SITE PLAN 50 .`,I N xxP �Y1NW m" �mN�Y1WW £ " APPROVAL SUBJECT TO ALL REQUIRED & 24A4W.W MMTIEWY"PwYSWINS.INWM m M5FP1pYm Aim CONDITIONS BY ABOVE BODIES L.l IIHIRUBII W.SSIW.CiF1tVL PEOMOSCF PNETBIDECOLMY,CKIf"VNa. _ _ _ J - 1PSSEIBPC HOG is IN c 1 DCK WROADw ALIS AND OOC 4� m5 EVENTFACRRIESI x'�D 3E STUDIOS RELATED AREAS 012 A 1� 10,0323F I 0 INp00 INDOOR PARKING AREA REA � Ih AREA 'S11 � 10 1G' 21589 5 W SF � _ FAB STOREROOMS R � PREPARATION AREAS -..� 010 I S6T SF Jih-` T GROUND LEVEL LOB aw LOBBY - wRT DIG tl£v 9/]SF a x TRASH f B Pnip� ���ICf3 1Z� s GINEERI G - - DISPLAY KITCHEN OX 2 6 e� RETAIL - 101 RESTAURANT&BAR IVC3F f . I RETAIL RETAIL PHIAL RETAIL RHAII RETAIL R TAIL RETAIL RETNL RETAIL d-mL 26WTWO I29S '2801 1315 12'n I12 lu_ - 5 -100 1W " 111 PTo 2220 SF 'fi95F 151]S I,SPI SF c3]93F _S-ET a0i05F $WO SF NORTN PALMCANYON DRIVE GROUND FLDOR � 51 acne=� =1 xoaTx _ AP "Y 1 r 1 IINLOA NG IX6 SPAX)S RELATED EgBSF AREAS ,nx�Wl mz o 0U SF I INDOORPARNING a INDOOR PARKING 1 ] ARTA ® AREA m 131 t %SF AB STORERC ;i 599 SF Q EPARIN ARE 010 1,.yig etv RouxDLEVE aeev PIES 9]]SF i NEE _ TRASH i RMM �L�� 31 INEERING '�q�, VKRCHE - ' 'SERVICES \ i rs-n p4C IDES R RUST flf SF ny RESTAURANT BAR r. s RETAIL 2NQSF pETNL RETAIL NL RETAIL RUM - RUM N RETAIL RETAIL RETAIL RETAY RETAIL 1E6 M r 11V 1A3 1]BO 1Y15. 12iN 101 103 i_1pJ 1W 1W IN105 2%5 SF t 8'q IN, 55F 2%SSE 20155 3.%OSF 2%O SF 3.%OSF 1.11E SF i6]i 5F 6tT 5F 1S9T SF 29]95F Y PALM CANYON and INDIAN CANYON STREET VIEWS 52 vorc eemw �X FFKLLO d CFBIiO y LEM@BELdV 1PICM TIA.e 1 GENERAL STORES& s PRINTINGI max ovw r0 STATIONARYSTORES IC@ STgI08 ML. bP114PIlfIM.. MMUSBRIEFING AREAICINCUTATION _ y ® - 120SF d ,- � wOLrR PARKING � a NTO ARIA vavxiN&BELON 211 1DN>s DIRECTOR OF SALES m f &MARKETINGOFFICE I,T L_ — 112SF � ovpro mnr Esi BEIOW FALE EMPLOYEE Ntv EM SHOWERS,TOILETS& CHANGE AREA EARNING& ovswro ErExr Fi—m-1 DIELOPMEN snoEasuvx * a 'S' 341SF EPARTMEN 143 ~ 40. SF oven TO vnTw BELOW NM BELO v ..TO wmavwrcxLN eELwr - ove'To rd:srlunurt cv:rv-.r vErAL eaav i eeLcw.v _ 1 I r V . SECOND FLOORS 53 — scue Nu a 1 .oNm — _ J -- - - - - -- - - - - --- ---- -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - 1 ¢ 4 4 6 WE I• __ A.-__ GYMNASIUM 4 r w 1. - I - SPA FITNESSN --_.-J RECREATIONAL FACILMS MORN STATION f" AO I DROP SAFE M# - N5 OILM FRONTOFRCE E o,e MANAGER 1 BACK UP KITCHEN, N4, r 1DISMASH Ayy I 1� QA STLS 383E GE LOG3Y m ° 1 1 „nsF FE c sr RAGEAREA OR �. - . y, I^a :ep` EQNMENT&LI EN 2- I T _ 558SF -y �1 11 a i -a 11 ' w I � � 363AY SUITEA .� � �/ 1 SPECIALEVENTS �:F RENTAL ..r" .+ v -r r• °i THIRD FLOOR I . 54 eVNE ltf=IU 1 xaxTx i //////bi/l11 .. 1. MAIM �f W ; e I. m r a FOURTH FL-- � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - ---- --- --- ------- -- - -- - - - - - - ----- -- -- - - - - - - I I � I I L � I I � I I I MECHANICAL PLANT I M W ;HB SfF I 1 � I1 • GUESRE 4.0 Nnr TSU Ij L— --- _.. r--- - - - - - - J -- -- - - -- - -- FIFTH ROOK I�.1 1 57 �oP�x L A]IYJ J H G iF F F) C B -is_io � zsa � ua y sa y ua y ua y az a' y ua � ua T -ees• rs iy e µ.r Bg. i ¢ ar GUESTROOM + yr',... b GUESTROOM - 4 b e _ GUESTROOM b GUESTROOM GUESTROOM GUESTROOM b 77371 I1 RETAIL y INDMR PARKING AREA M 1 hi N.PAlA1CINV6NDR. .,I gNDIN,['NIYfM:DP L EAST-WEST SECTNIO I� ache vie=ra a x , arD/ 1 M 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 , 12 �13 14 1F r�• ma ma as ma ma ma• ma ma ma xa as as xa IL N ,C.LINE MF 1fiY is GUESTROOM IA 0&1Y GUEST SUITE 7 ® 56 III} GUESTROOM GUESTROOM b GUESTROOM UESTR 773 631 3, 853 ® :1 I b g 4 b L BOARDROOM INDOOR PARG F I b i a 4 pNo AREA 7D7 Iwxaq eu+rwoR OFFICES oRroaetevaETl e r, 31 R WTR LINE C p NORTH-SOUTH SECTION �,FI J v swE.mr=ra � . -. • • ••• •• • • I� MINra-liff - � __ _ ___ •� . • - • • • • • • • - - _. i.—j -..� � iE iw� �—an �s!ww�.! .� ��� INS ���1 � � '.! .; i,.•� '.i'fi l�l ON Ma II�j r p �� �!L f �+ IJ11LI it - E1 � - ��- _ _.��� 1 �I � • ,• '' - ••• •••. -• • • _ �- • _ 7 � �Y �i _ 'may __ �J ��`' - I 1� �I 1 _ ur NIN r M19 .,I : :� � �. �b `�i .I fir- + NE = y �— h/ ,a�,�• .f :—.-G� h: i-.. I � f�_G! i'�pi Y'I`W�'� uiau. � �'.' . ■'. Lnlr��� �101 IF 1 - I €i !Y', M.E lail8"ia ' r".. isil•� III =�� �u R :a=fiN t'S li��_' f1i17�S � ►� ►�� �� � �e po �' f iIIOIY�!� _ ..�.,�nl'�-Ti � 0 lit ,ills 'I' k- `', I I Fplimi� � =�: �I0. ��� ,•' ;�I 1 2 'M - 10 A 6P A TP N'd' d N'V. y na d _ JJ'tl A YP V YP y YP A SP y &M MYN]IELWi5WPWAW LN G.d BIICDIlF98fl61tXiRCYr1EPMlEMY1XE 1E.. F i11111 E 1111 .EE IRp1 PAERE.Ic NNJp FFMMNIK4Yf iPML4 LBFNf%ISEAWNLPI&&E6.1EX11NE8 AlW M.PoR ALL WIL]WfPNiB VIIM.Y£WiFAV1 P.4Ei1E 9IEE1 \\ a9RM1TC,RFFlECiNE�NPI1LA M.iCgIM aSrH IEV¢RSiH ( I f f \ r r If f a 1 � _ r NtIPLL yC[WµA9gCI[56% "IW T"N' IIL01EIIw•rsEXrms.RnWL eEroxo &war�swwwr flfJpll®C010ifrE W f#M1N LCMFN LiEELLMOSLIPE fFAIVEs J WEST ELEVATION•PALM CANYON DR. f-1 SCNE Nf�I'd L 12 13 15 '.6 . '17 18 s,EEL&MaWll P.vxlm oraccREr. rn.raR u1 Iwr¢a,EsrMnMs A+o� L¢EL DECXPFNLEIFR uwo&am uwxW&sx mIBL aIE¢DIMPAllf�Paxrm n&tt rur; CE1fNf XMIIXFA4U M9 FPVES M.KPNL IpRfi£BiRW18.W1]PoI IEVEICKXPEPI1EiER wNJDIIIDN WMAA WIUIXYfAw1E8. �_ \ � CFIEHIRA519l EAYIXNq FAYEe' iYPFgtILLWYU'GY i1WIFb wow�uwxnWrmW mates X I \ �. nP EmuL WISQY RLLMC-. }� NYOWLTUPRFAQW 0.WWlrlLRFf1£CIfYEi RP S �C 1W.RP IMI¢FLPW[5 t I ® f A OVi R.STA 4M IYJI¢EMR4VLE(MT � DIM%( 1pI1CI4G ES9) p%LiFXp V.VEi 910EWNttPENCXE46 PLONiLp9 N1NM liJir:4Pn'1I .0 SDLEILAWNSFVWBF,DND PXiEMED%MCAElEW1490U1FD CEIEMM RIMLLP. CLRIENRIEEL UMYAEfFATME^e WEST ELEVATION•PALM CANYON DR. I� scue.mr•ro [ 60 11 10 9 - 2 � 1 ar ar ma _c x'P.' m's ar ea XnrsuiuimanxswAsneuneraLEsme LEeeRPusiEPwamixenwxnxsxes AP LWiirP.FdtµLRMe SM FIttR P➢]FB 3 IAnCUARPxNIKLYI%ALPKIEPNiYP FLflM11CHFIECURISlEP U1PFOLEB A]OJ LBFMPIKiFRw31COlN6 pNglfllVlFS g1gL 611PAgWL3',PwRN MpF CAEY,M. MIICWiEp IXNIKHE'MIGL MLIWlT9 FpPIll WlEL4LP$IPLU6 ' ILLNNFALMRKLFRiVF/LES CELFHI R159iFKCU 1CPCWiiAAµ%ixGwA3%ULMPEELECME ' MML RXd SiXRCpRIgpK ■ I L _ \ FAM meoixrow mesxevnun uou= -a - ,� �ceeEm Pusisnwsuoo�rd Roucx Hlasxes sErwo ���xse � ammuuiEoixaxasrsaiwcK Pairswx nP.FOR uLxu—D&- KreL lD- rmanao rueow aP Paxre o siEn iueEs POR vFwiwcPeACE scLnnr cuss olsnnr cAss.PwwixouanKLuxlx PPAe[s EAST ELEVATION-INDIAN CANYON DR. II II uxWF nr-rr U exr exiar�anwwKixuM PaErnLa cEA�rn nasEPwswomdrmumlPxNrs , itPCMi:T9.fORPLLIM65n10.0fFROCFB A411L+A.1lHi INK0.4rlEIfC'x Pai1EKKTP LB:PNMFD pIAr GPEY'.nP. FORµLID14FKCU RA31FN W3KK GhSnmYS [EUEMPiA51EP FIFLU FA9Pa dRr%. IN..LVH19.W F1FCINE 1FAWSUCOMbR0Y91 f%115HE$ IOPLML,M.RA OLL RN65LHRWiPOSS MKf Ul9i I H AH KrlE1NCAl PAiIE W I.M. Kpµ1 Kry[ASCIA gh51EA3NiKf3 µNOildEµ{MAy VdMhyfAµ(5— �\� h y ^�� — f I .Ix .I}i15 FI]E E61SSs5iAIP LWdx6 CCIX 11 .IF��.,Fc b-L I. u x N.� EAST ELEVATION-INDIAN CANYONEAST ELEVATION-INDIAR CANYON OR� sLPLErer=rr 61 A B C D E F G H J K 19Y $fi y I'V ]ta' . nI I VP I IIY X 4P I VP ` LfIB1l R13191W 9YWIX6RM131Fl16N3 CE1FlfM5191W&COlH6ROLYHFlN51Fb M1CWlEGMIN A4YlEIWLII MTIEMi.11P.FCP MIILIMIEGIXIJ11SYlElKKKPR1ERNM ALLN]NFA9CURP9I6 NFfILFB iQ1.U11A RiCV.i451Ex 51PfICE4 IMIF.l SUFKEX5IECWEI£XIGS�ILE SLFFl GIWNPNIS PNNIEG W461EV,iYP. SMOOTH"MOOGNON OOELpR09E0CP Fqi 4lIpR WEBrW%IM4 FOM i O LOI FlNLSHRp51EnppKRRMV i igi&WARMigi.LLLfME51XRWR .... EGP MRLMIIX.4EYEMSK1UfE.1i FXlRNCE r1ROPVIXG1V 15%V1nc 1EELCCrX£ ]1RP i rox PNy[PMRIgI sr ^, one 1 ExrwvcE ioaxEaFett a1ACI1L GiPxi .WILVI]F➢.VWMAIgi PUMPo51FFl PoR vuwxGawcESEcuun cErortRaGrmvxexoom Rxax,Flidl lox SIMfPCE PoR%bJL VIEEO gBRAY NORTH ELEVATION-ALEJO RD. Inl scME ry�rra' 62 • - • • .- • - - .- amp' %/ i - a -.► - •'„fit„- A --- + r aj •�. 11 11 1' 1 11 R / p 1 P I IN MINE e 177- • - • - . . . • . . _ ��!! � � 3. ��_- ..r. � 12-- immi—I . � II-M�raaaJ ��u�T�Yali 4,�940, emu{, �� I� �• I . , ts I u FM 07 MIN NMI' wi UNNI" '. ,. WIN Ilia a �m6 � i � -- I S3 ,'' i /� Y a$. _ 14,d�1�■ t flJ I it ltlp — _ t-a�,, ?,i,tl■ • # ����1T��� =yar .,aMIL'.I�� >�.ii.rl ��• III � will y I#1 371 �11�I MV Me-' 't � v h �I�1 ia' .r,� !• _ c.a ' ►_�a , ►_� ►� lfl'►i �II sli.i t �13� 1 nl�l Y� ~ —,: +5'■ _ .�W.��t) 1��'�I + 1 ' .m�.![46{Sk.CiIY .� s.J����—�� �1� � ■ sYi]R1�6-71f ]i�'n` 7'il" I�+y.i' ',J_�■ \ G s =i Frs io •"^ ,�; ' Ih! r. tILE.��[S ' e �I:E —I�w�. �N alL �' I I. FI III I'�i ; . ' - - - •• • • _ •_ •- d1e 1� - i S III Ls _�F� I �h �� Q I I,Y t. l __ Jill 110 ► •_ i _ a 1 � pip, IU I�1�■L - ii.rJtiI� �I T`V. kj ".i '01 SF UP B�A FACILITIES 090 41 INS • • • • • • • • • • •_ _ _ p .�I 1 — YI �\ •" =---fit I I II • .I 1 /I, � ���� � III II,, � NO �� rrd�� uls■ PL r - IIII - F�°1i: .. � 1•. •� ►��"�„ '� sue, L Min I Imo° Lis sl.-..� y 'J p6i ` . i. .I�.� t'Jt �I..� ! -s.Nn F�AIA� �iRlie� !!u>.�R.Jt.rll'a•� �W �31 L+ �M73AMEN - -_- In -" i1i� 11 tl�-' ��r�rJl"11° ►1 ;!IL.�11• :;,t�r,��al�rr�s� ®�i� - I ■1;11 .';., '"I]►^�i1b��hrcncill'�ihl,l�'LhFT�IT711'�`�'/�'�■ 1�..81�1' to I�� .At•rs"y'��---� —IYtt-i!-�t..n'%.li•ti li�� � S�`���if.S'SZI��Id:��.s7.�.2u -'r1G'AYC'ISI�:aG.a����� _✓6'.I —��� Less ape More Garden • _ _ and Water ZI Y� s i[ PbECREA3 'b. "MERSOI`F�E ON G wUORAGE ■ ■ _ ; Elevation Change 1■ E �L ST ME FOR a v Explore Hidden 8F�1P PUBLIC NODES • , / • Pools ff%iRu �i� #NRu 1iFr. - 'Y• i y �-l•�P m STNAGE � :: 1 an MN i I FM `l�-■� INENall, Nil 1111 Bit- at Plantings and Gardens POOLS and PATHS at THIRD FLOOR 67 e ti h + , ► , a� PRIVATE GARDENS : 1 • MID :j 1 4 � W9SI ARE S jf .y�>�y k •� , al; R 1 10 .,• _ < • NATION 010 1,567 SF`•. ROUND LOBBY 016 �Y � �INEER 3 F >_ 31 ;mrw� ✓' /` 020 RESTAURANT&BAR �. ..o .., aRETAIL RETAIL TAIL .-771 PALM Y OASIS EXPERIENCE 4ail • Ida.- ,tea .YrS.''I :. '� sip .40 t -- . `f any 4 . / ��\1"�1 l' 1. • ; { r c II i 1 { R > n r i L y 4 i i , I} 7k 1 + , > i i is d 41 �I� I l } ? F N S •� f V � � Y , 'r � + •�? •., � ,,� � '$ p✓_ _ ')`' � 'tn y., .� ° mow.•. �s \ i • Z rtri lk JL l r wiepx� axowupuuexw B1pPEFROXf WILUV8Y91fN6 NrtES rl IE nmwsEo alsou uanolun nxsl W IrnunEn *o PRpxoE.w W=PFN WKE apsm io*xPi a SIMNFSSSIEA W xRXI.YNNnY WMER[0.al IMIEPIAI. 'Wi1EfAa'H8fFF1 fUi BntN WN{KIIA@t Nf S IFAX Bill6 EEIH P W f11G a1 Eg1LL WS PAIWMi B1FW1Up FAGVM:9.p¢ICLUiFO qq PA4H C VCdXGHCNp x xpin fAWON pt Alp E NFIJ W. T6 WR9W IMYBE 45Ep I.i BEIECRp1IHFCME 6EMHI515V91 NOTE& INECLRIBIWNL9Ri PHWNGSTKCIUF fMXEB Nll E BBxUIE Mpl ilE Cglcl£lE RYA(W SI9A'lI1PFSICMLYnEHWE ULWG111L[f TE BxIXM1Wll5 sILL0.VFM YHIXUiNW MO PHWXGBifWC1UE8. .• Nl1FPUL RITI[W 1LLiflM'LFAlX1RSh11IDCNEMAA6lER 1 1 xp�UiG15iwIBAIp FILEpfINSN cflEMf1A5191 WMFACTAER F UAOPS I - vNliE uoouWreczrolpmxal crcr lAuw:�Wscaaecalun uwunw' �.� E%IFPI_N[i1g16RN16 WpiWIXxLSiRLCIVE ExunW.usaxuaau u. RmorumaF Wnsw:u wnuu Rvw nuilmueEPREsort®xPERscx _ rtISP�WTroucEi�EENmaorsoFne wia Poox vwrs wall mix swmx.wo WaYpcHsr Y'� NSIERNIRIATdlHR11Gh5PFLI1GCf CCxIROL ANHB.YD PfY£Ue. a � 1 _ 91NM1RSHlEp fJMNAEIF WIMxERWEMI . 4lnMNmw.l.p ` _ Pl9iNIPfUMFAWNIS Rx]PEABPASIYE RXISX W.YBERW0.l5®FOR WAIYJBIE . 911PFACE6 bnWi RlxNr - •� iwwt4F+ • ' 4�xM yxlWw..x.plWWl W x000 Dp PIHWING.iPEwmEClEasruxFnio wnx Arouuilar. ——rpi uwwrae W npPRaPcem APPucnnarp oEBFaPEo xarex cERrux E[IEROREAVFa,FUPNinxE Rsi1EYr� di MEgHTY WDMWEEIEAEMB O�rraW�rl 72 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ,FINAL PD PLANS APPROVAL xrnPrumx CASE NO.SA WW IDKECKCCSATKM: --— PFougA OPesvK£. AxP.maF n r ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY CO ITTEE PPDYIDFO CPFN SPKE q.S1145F R3.144a MXfEPPSYL4m.01 L.afl DATE]? •xEouRO CFEMSP.SCE Im LEYE11C491 W5uaI fl4%Cf CPENs rEx PSFKb3I�P CANNER ENIPNILEro aIE IEYBPNWNO PwwmOPEI VKE UIaaIOPmmro"an 4Ossuss MMN>Mx Wmc.x REluf®ffB19'ACE MRB L IQPE"T.SXn 71021H4 IILSWFLOTMFAI PxowmaPFH 9PKEA]LEY81aPENrosNYl IWIUMF olmM alX.PEH0.MC9]09.M.o PLANNING COMMISSION ENrvwvss rorMOX¢aPua.MD roTMmTMP. _ ]1Llow '(isa" M DATE PLANNER rm OFwcoxc Cw E ss.xerm sF 'u" TmuM OF alMa5 paft.G nw.aF AOMI N,,VNMa PKEsoRXINQWI ``ry'(�I�TI..I VNIM Da.NFW..Es 31945" °' w APPROVAL SUBJECT TO AE'eTSb1ES' oFx.PUMCurvaxoz.aroTu REQUIRED CONDITIONS BY ABOV Ea�g Fv I DIAN CANYON ROAD IEELI Xu ursem EF wm.rnv: xwasP Pwlxe.an alsTwv 1 .� L¢ELx xomuw usn.aX i iEVEI`Mrom Mun: xFaass rk.. - F- ♦, -. � -. 'a j - _ •_ :: I �` rorubulExc rAFA uvnlmX I� I �� ,` NwxowWTELaunoxaF I Pnrc¢n OlEsrary KKawNT PARKING ANALYSIS I I - T IHMopwT¢rlx-,PINxFSM MELM,mxmM ,SIm R%IM RCYSR 'A x _ _ x¢WM mNA16}ISP¢]I.IE 71, I I I 11 _ 11111 oTEL Sal Ix3vKY5 . •xusEDIMLOPFm m sr EMCE" usua. I'NmosFl mnwrssn,.xsrNrnwvrsalouP:.E i i L ED YY)NSM1l545 M5INLWNR.1/tElE35 xIWIS%CV IOIN IfIXW/RFA �CMMRCxL?F!A'"Q:�PA�ISPKE%�Sf T ACS aT.AofH1IXYfMISIBNIK 1]MMr3.K£ I I I ■ I _ tax fVE � 1.NMIEf Atn4m}15f/MMLIN1OWSfCR45NXEVEMSFICY Q 'RAVXOCKN/sPKFMFA�XIgX TkRFIITif MJNW[G.IF%MG REpD _ MNT N0E ty.E . LVExr3PKESIBTUTK 0 AKES ba— flIY M6Lx:PINiIC. ; AT CSAOEwrIMPMMwsm,nuu ..Is wPFKE PMu KOFssIPFET bYKES O — cmMELMPUMMcsIatiTUTK vKEs . TOMPMMSPMESRmUPm A¢bPKfS W fAYlormulPlAllMc mKESgIDYIpm au F. J LEGAL DES RIPTIDN 1 , TvnsrwESOf cuEsmoaxs - I IJ _ 11 WFVNMS1UMOF l INTECmao Mlfi N Cp OFMRWE5T,3TEOF - �J ST0RESUW7EIS xE.LLPMJ{Tflry PLfi I1 MFA Y I w CMFdO1.CfSCP8E0NSF0LgYs Q 1 `I_ Maal5AIMMIIRIA TENIATMTMCrW N,m.09M.A8L4M141EICXOFT,EfpEWr1M. LU - sass- vMC¢.S lStuela3N rJ. J rllewmxEKrlecraxulMmfEEr OFLor IIxmLCx vOFPuusPxxcs.M ,��� \ sxmNsr ,� PocL mTx sauouuuxO _ ` pPPxOMWTELaLInOxaF WJONFlIE IXb0Ox9 PM£N Of AVP8.120]PCB Cf BMI pE(YJCgM,r.CM1FpUli ■ wOL OE[t MO oYtBxwffsidrv&IE➢ING.SL ou,UDaoMxc NPmouWT¢rI.ISIx IIErxrt PMc¢e ISlsallOi uo m31 rIE SWIIfALY f2Ci0N3Y.IR 14fFEr CF LTIIN9I.CIXEIC£PPL.I9ROXGS.ta bHGVNBY .■■■�I111 WPdIflIEIX PDCX9PM£WCi Wis,PELCARi015Ml oEfd LOLMY,CKNfA'D. PMMacylsmlMMl rnw�¢LEE�LERU L0TIIXK¢R210FPMMPPPlI A8WP] &W 0NAEIx. LPKEIVOF IEPOPUSCP SSX pE(iICO.MY.CMhOIHA Pru¢¢blxblmsl � _ _ - LM3NKXKAUPMMb'RM A$WVNNWf MW.RE.b)WIF 6E4 QF 11EfLPO50FSW DECO WIMY.[MFO"NM 'F N'' �� POALEL E1513091ftlI DF LMOTEM]RIIERY33FHT 6T,ENESTERY,63.3FEFf Cf LDr 3.MPLIX!(M OFFMM Dim s.taN"" "° mfl "w° "�mD W 4MP°sa NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE CDIMry MPDPN A E%CE9UXG nEREFKYr3(NESIFPlr la m FEEr of 11E M1R11EKr Ima FEET CC mT ary Ka"xl N GRIMF➢TO n E ary Ci PNY sfl01t3.Sr ofHl PCCgOF➢sB1Fl VR M.ISm Rb INb1NLN[i1!NJ.Hlm.ORICIK IIEC00.K Ci Pry£figE LCIMfr.LMf pMA ®N 73 . HOTELAugust 11,M14SITE PLAN I�X/ RAELCORP RAEL DEVELOPMENT COPP �� a-In�l o-lnPo oEsl�nPalm Spnngs,CA 92262 ■ ARCHITECTS I II II R I I I I II I I \ I d I I II II <Z I I l� I I I II II I II _ I I t _ -W4 NE-0RDAo - __ ° -HW,oq IMAx INDIAN CANYON DRIVE I I _2 5 3 A �_'_ —— - 50011'CC'E `. 637.33' 1 7 _____ __ - � __ ° _ ____—_ -- __ ____ __ I -� _ __1 __ ___ 4 _ __ _ _ _ 7'T___ [I 7U-� 27---- �__ ____� o �Q-_�/iJ L7-- nT-17 -�-�_ i0D'14'D(I'E 580.70• ell S457b'13'EP. �. o I.. II II '' I I r• - "� I i / F , I � I I 1V II a In II. _�i � i• � I i I i S0OVT57E.-25.00' I I I I II _-__ --__-I ,- I E 111 1111 P - d �, i 11 d •I '- _ I_. �I L\I II Ilj III I OLERROw PAWIW D--18951'SY _ z •h 1 T=9.98' __ II I I L=15.69' wove _ - - .I _ - -- - - - - ---- ---- \�:'�_ _ _ _-- - �_-- -- Z L _�--- - -- ---- --- �� "-➢N.N CANYON DPoVE - 1 t J ____ lama° ED Ru III - --, _ 1w 15'— D'.I+D PAW CRYON WI4 II II I e• z r 1n o• � II f3UPHIC SCPLE 1'=3°'d' INCH INCREMENTS SHOWN ARE AT RILL SCA.E ON THE SHEET 74 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC MAP A°�111''°14 17848 Skypark Cir PS Hotel !414 �rit�q Irvine, CA 92614 04 Plametl OerNopnlenl0istric13i/ 10 949. 757. 3240 414 N.PAm Canyon Rive www.sms-arch.com Palm Spnnga,CA W62 ialim ARCHITECTS n Up _ _ i [L IN19pCE RUN a 1a04 W YOU OR, INDIAN CANYON DRIVE __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ k _J — ]66]f1 ]].361C ]651FL 1.2IFE ]6 Ntt ,, T 7503ID t3 MiC - a T t661T: tfi 06L t55V (t5]3L (]5➢6tt ]].ISiL ]]60iL ]J9nG ]].15TC ]3C61L — JIT!— ]ems _U In ]6.@tt ]]95TC1 .� _ (]s Mtt r— _ NOTES. OAPPPING14G P L MAPPING SWRCE'. ME E%ISTNG iOPOH+APHIL �'�•� TC I I I. ✓ L -S / I eTC ' 1 -'T T N WAS DEMOLITION BT INLAND AERIAL THE SON NARCH 8. 1 ` J EXIST ARM OEM UMFBE: CLEARING G OF THE SITE. r _ —_ l AND C G CN91E IITLITES EXISTING ONSIIE UTILITIES NERE REMOVED fill - D CAPPED AT ME PROPERTY LINE AT THE TIME OF SITE n t I —1 �� _ _ _-- _ -- �"'�' . ul r1 --.� DEuONLON IN 2007 77 977C n9]TG ne9R IIB9 I '1_rt 3. PROPOSED DRAINAGE' THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS ARE 6 CFI 791 ], T ]51e1C SHOWN ON THIS CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN PROPOSED STORM IY 11' eNMNX6 PERIYERP 6 6 6 6 Ci I ]]°AFS L e r IDS,' 7I9efS a WATER OUALITY TREATMENT AND HYDROLOGY ARE INCLUDED IN ME N �_ 1y �t9.eoO of EXISTING PRELIMINARY WOMP REPORT THAT IS PART OF THE CURRENT I I —BUILDING PERIMETER LOADING I I I BUIDLING PLANNING suRMnaL 09..CUM a � I �� I I � 1 NI WAR) Mxx ] 4, ROPES: u0 SUBsiArvTAL(2'.1)SLOPES ARE EXPECTED ON Tn15 PIiIIX-pIMT1E I (pSf[p/Ay) PROALL EX STING ppOp p�M Ram BE£A%� i9 i �—' -L.`.l ti�l " f �' -; '� • i — — 5. ALL f%IMP DECORATIVE STREET(PROMPTED IN PLACE,EXCEPT AND L REMOVAL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PROMPTED IN PLACE,E%CEPi j III CLUBS 79.M M90 �Prl II/ y r RENOVAL APPROVED BY THE CITY_ N ttPB G OJTIFR 1 ]9 - PRCPptTY UXE II 12. WO EH 5 Hom aXST Roos mm J m el 1 GU aAB DUE IENl lr PARKMC It f GtiiifA � (J ]9.anc unrs —.— OF 1 Naw BUEW--J °F'F 7 90 L_ -T o 79 TO F 1 I. I J t9i�S�]I� it< 1 1 i 1 1 J Fs - NDGO M20-1 r r-- �I ��J _ till m. wm CATCHER Tm ~ S'� �- Bt' ���.. ezwfF I el.wer ____ /L __ __ --__ _ c "� WAR�Rm0M0 siUFM to 6lTc a h]I3 ii TO w e a _ I 1 — ' rim �� rolatt F.F.RAN I F.F. 81.30 I v l 76 nam Bow F.F.=7720 r I 1 F.F.-80.701 FF.=79.90 of _ _ yp nDm N:E.x F.F.=76.70 III O I i ROOR BREAR-1 mµ0lx0%ORYM) —I FLOW BREAx—{ ilMp BRGN 1F 6 fi ff FRCPOSCD SIpXI • EX 0230f5 i � BaIMIG PFmuETEX zax n.tOrc uwx(RDOF DRAIN) R6Ef5 BUI erszTn z. fULMES W � p 6 a b� F I — c — nmrs- 6. s nbNs et]6E5� Bl]YS -iF5 BTIIiS- I9 TCF5 N °• ( If ] 9ro �]&0Itt ` C 7tI6B1G / $ \i5R9 J 97 Y1 75.53TC h1eLro 9tt 9.TC ]e M Y (]6 ]651Te212TC OXIX5i.CLUB WTIFR D]R LURB WE N PdNI 1 5 TDPWIX a F INIERI _2 _ ] _ �fr PALM CANYON DRIVE 1 — " e 1 II �r I i- f - II _ - _ -1 -F - - - ---� - \If 12a w w 15, U' 4' T V iq 0' GRAPHIC SCALE V=WU' INCH INCREMENTS SHOWN ME AT FILL SCALE ON THE SHEET August11,2014 CONCEPTUAL GRADING �/+ PLAN AND STORM DRAIN 17848 Skypark Cir PS Hotel PLAN Irvine, CA 92614 l♦ Plannevelopment yoU l w tl De 757.3240 414 Palm Cannyon OTrve wwsms-arch.com Palm Springs,CA 92262 �4•u Yy1 r <Z �_-_- Indian CanyonDnve -- -- 9 S.fte � 5 � y 1 f Palm Canon Drive _ Photos Index Map 1 i 2 I O IL Ok I Y • fi i 4 5\ 6 7 8 . fit - 9 l 10 11 12 70" p g�,11,101, Existing Site Photos 17848 Skypark Cir Irvine, CA 92614 ` P Hotel PWmetlDe elopmentolstr 3N 949. 757. 3240 !I' ,1 C1e Palm fang.Drive Palm Spdnps,Gl 9M, w .sms-arcb.com G ili L.ITC c, 1 2 �3 3.3 5.3 6 6.8. 7 9.8 11 12 12.3 12.6 13 14 15 15.9 16 16.817 18 18.518719 19.7720 21 vs vs rc-r ,rr &-r sa ar, u'r ems , Isr A sr �_ 11u escA Is ur Ix sa v-1. Izr Irr rs va Irr ar es nv es 3na NORTH INDIAN CANYON ROAD MOTELTRARN ENCLOSURE EBOPERT u. I ...,L� I o n 0 0 o D D a a Y B n c RETAIL I EN RI=SVREEM RE •SN STUOSTUDIOENCLOSVEI-ORRRE I � I HOTEL LC1➢AYG COCK • I I� o 0 o P o T o 0 0 ' 1 — o q o o C IE o n a p o • �� III I � — � i ❑ 1 O I '� 1 STORY PUBLIC PAAgNG STRUCTURE ' O p T p ZERO CURB LANE b J ., Q SON. } LL] I HOTEL 4 F.3 F.3 P a ' 1 STORYRKiNG HOTELSTRUCTURE NEC LRXPMECAU a }�{��//]j�� PARpNG STRUCTURE EGUIPwExi ❑ LINE OF CANOPY ABOVE D D L 0 �. OO � ELECTRICAL ROOM o a D D I p I SOH. RESTAURANT p Izr J I - ❑ E 0 _ o 0 0 _ - ❑ n r J RETAIL a I � RETAIL RETAIL j N I c C N M1 K � z ❑ u L ® © � ❑ ❑ c I K - - -- - --- ----------- - -a a A WQ' E lOC' , ]9'4' ' Ttl � yp � y'J' A 311'0' A 1YV ,T* 16S I14' W�._11.1' lY' 16'!'. `gS ]p'd' � I14 ]1-T f5' ]YP W.r 1 2 4 6 6.8 8 10 11 12 12.312.6 13 15 15s lc 16.817 18 18.518719 19.7 20 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE ®N GROUND A/'�ryry��� ,' I RAELCORP • TEL FLOOR RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORPPS H `` 11 '' `` ul,.erwLroecarc ���—�//����yy //��y�/�-� rn 414 N.Palm Canyon DmNE Palm Spiings,CA 92262 ARCHITECTS 1 2 3 3.3 4 5 5.3 6 6.8 7 8 87 9 '.9.8 10 11 12 12.3126 13 14 15 15.9 16 16.817 18;18.518.719 19.7 20 21 Nor 3Y4' LV teS ! tfd' _ ! 3IY h11' @A' YId !Y }SY IS-1P qP W`T f! MP Nd SA ISd Ifd 1S9 XS L-1' I'p tH+ m IIP ITO' ar S }I:i HS SS4 W aWOW - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- b gy A GUEST OOHS i GUES- 004+5 — I _ � UEST R A I I Hs A E EST ROOM GUEST la -11TSPA L k k I tmm_ P d T y r ji ❑ G ❑ J�I_TT RPOOL D. ` SoEST ROOMS. - - i S Ri I E I W GUEST ROOMS :n._1 E.. I . . - - a RON n _. LOBBY - - e a tra ESTRWlAS p GUESTR OMS ❑ ❑ ❑ I F c v 1= S a F.3 pfr I r7 BMILWNCE I - .€ I = ' - ❑ G k _ WE R _ H U[ST a OUTDOOR DINING I . H A I I I � I I p I I p 3.0 HAY GUEST SUITE EST R UEST RODE I h - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - _ - _ - - - - -- -- ------- -- - - � Atl Ld ♦ Ir-r ♦ 195' ♦ Nd' .7 it- }}'-I' ♦ .1 4'-3; 25'-9' 11-V f tlS! 159' ;6 }H 0' ]00' S6' y6 1!P 156 2 3 3.3 4 5 53 6 87 9 f9.8 11 16 16817 18 18518719 197 20 21 ®N 78 SECOND �' ' RAELCORP • HOTEL FLOOR RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORP Planned Deorelopoamat District 3U !ftq"m 110 414 N.Palm Canyon Drive uww.a.oea•c Cu�A F1 c�1- r%p o DE rn Palm Spd.g.,CA 9U62 ."'" ARCHITECTS 2 . 3 33: 4`. 5`5.3 6 6.8 7 8 87 9 9.810 11 1212.3126 13 14' 15 15.916 16817 1818518719 19720 21, ]Ctl bd Ir.r r IId ad r.lr MI. btl ffi nY n-m "a, Ise rr Nd }!A' sd mf 14V ISA' 9r a.r 1P ler rd TM' Ird er sr V, Ss ]Or - - -- -- - -- - ' ' - -- - -- - ' ' — — ' - - _ -- - -' ' --- ' - - - - - - - t A. GUEST ROGMS GUEST B. ROM R.M r ROOMS -- ' I o fi I cuasT ' POOMs n IT o l GUEST -.� ROOMS GUEST SURE- I - 4 UrtE I Rr' E GUEST b p GEMcss RooMs C ' GUEST F — � RW MS GUEST Roovs F d I k F.3 F.3 GUEST - p GUEST -1 ROOM SUITE l RCGM B 9 M Cj ROOMS y H x � H I I I _ 308d GVE3T.UITE �( WES GUES ROgAs K ROCIAS e � - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- I 3tlV ar "1 aS yeE 1'-IP U-1. S, rS 9T aaP IVS IYr fd ]da, 31d SP 16R IIV 156' ]PV Nd' at Yr Ar To Fr !d D'r !8 Xtl %d .. _ _. 4 5 5.3 6 - 6.8 7 8 87 �9 '9.8110 11 16 16317 1818-518719 19.720 21 79 PSHOTEL THIRD RAELCORP FLOOR � yK II',I REEL DEVELOPMENT CNRP �� �� 414 N.Palm Canyon Dnve 0-ARO-I(1P0 DESIGf t L ARCHITECTS 1 2 3 3.3 4 5 5.3. 6 6.8: 7 8 8.7 9 98: 10 �11 . �12 12.312.6 13 14 15 15.9 16 16811 18 18518.719 19.7 20 21 y`�na ya n'-r Irr ns rar p.r ar (4 nr tYnP @x 14! !—♦ ]ea na sr ter itr IS'r na Ts 'S ar rs aS tra ar rs vJ ,r^• so T ■ -------------- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- A, ' I -1 :I B I ri — — GUEST _ I _ RWM6 _ 1 I D. RWMS l I I E Goes 6 ROLM6 ' F y w f— — d _-- - GUEST SURE rr ll I y ^ ROCM6 /� V G H. H I y r I I I L - - - - _ - - -nl_ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ - _ _ _ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ M ao- t aV 1.L'%r 05a,♦ ! I ♦—! — r s -J-♦— —_-J166 ♦_VP h-�sr 15'a ___r a.E t dur ♦9's V. t "-r es t1' ♦_ ies na� �rv�, n.r as rr as tsaa ♦io'.r isr es :ea pes t r e's , n'a y serr 6 '6 8 7 8 . 87 9 9.8 10 11 12 12.3126 13 14-' 15 ' 16.817 197 20 21 J ` ®" 8 U FOURTH 111 RAELCORP HOTEL FLOOR wOa S %'EL DEVELOPHENT CORP II, Planned Development District 324 hP, CH(1?I CH/1P0 DESIGfI ^"^ ARCHITECTS i Al _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ .. —_ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __— _ 1 AdMR l 5,1 PI PIK PI lid lid 10 1 n � i 421- vi, Sir All, I L _ aN 81 . ROOF , RAELCORP HOTELPLAN K -'LiNl -�-- 1% �%%Planned DewlopmentDistnct324 al !114 rk � 1.1-44 4 Palm Springs CA 92262 14 N.Palm Canyon Drive CHl1?I l Exisio I iai ARCHITECTS JICRL e to fio Id SUMMER SOLSTICE(4:00pm) FALL EQUINOX(4:00pm) 2 Allis , . 1000000 e s WINTER SOLSTICE(4:00pm) 3 SPRING EQUINOX(4:00 4 SOLAR � ' ' RAELCORP •PS HTEL STUDY (3d AEE DEVELOPMENT COAL Planned Development District 324 Views) ;T 1 414 N.Palm Camon Drive CHN 04%PO DESon Palm Spnngs,CA 92M2 ARCHITECTS 1 2 3 3.3 4 5 5.3 6 6.8. 7 8 8.7 9 9.8: 10 11 12 12.3 12.6 13 14 15 15.9 16 16.3 "7 18 '18.518.719 19720 21 y II4 S'V II'r I 114T ` we ram, &V xy 1�'dy for � it 1V �'1 y ISr N any } we .5`8. 15'8 � 114' � 154. � NV i "V 11 w, �Yr we y 'IV 1.T.6S= 11 r "as 11 I i NORTH-SOUTH SECTION 11 1"=20'-0' A ,B.. C : D . E F F.3. G H J K y Iro- as ` a.lr a.1r ar Irr ar y Ira Vo- yr I � -1 ° EAST-WEST SECTION 2 1=111 L' BUILDING83 RAELCORP SECTIONS I �A,_ ��',�N� ;_. Palm Springs,CA 92262 414 N.Palm Canyon Drive . , . ..... CHl1�I CH(1?O DESIGfI PS HOTEL Planned Develo,enent District 324 i ARCHITECTS .� � 8 '6 "59 s5 .4 13 12 6 12 3 12 11 10 ,9.8 9 87 8 7 6.8 6 58 ., 4 ., 3 2 1 _ rs A r e8 Fr 1rs no rs rel rP SRr w4r 6r Ma a+ Sr IIa NMC er 64E mS Ir-W s+ tr xr IIn' r4r xY VB I,'z x+ xr GIA99019MV G9E9 VN.WNOOISEO GLAsG.'FIAY.MSAN.O.. ALUMINUMIGUSSRANNG5Y5TEM CLASSpSPUYCASESWANNCD2ED CEMENTPUSTEAW/8MWTHBWU3HFN191E8 CEMENT PIASTER 0 SMOOTH&ROUGH FINISHES ALUMINUM FRAMES ALUMINUM FRAMES ALUMINUM FRAMES ARTIWUTE RAN-YMETRIULPATTERN',En' US pqi CVUTED HAN p91'METRICK PATTERN,TYP FOH v _ - AU- OMFASCIAPLASTERSUREALES ALL IWNFASCM FEASTER SURFACES CEMEM PLASTER NY9MOOTX S RWGX FINI9XE3 b ARTICULATED M AN ASYMETRIGL PATTERN,TYP.FOR ALL NONFASC ALLYAINLMIGUSS FAILING SYSTEM N PLASTER SURFACES IT >7 l M m ANNODMEOALUMINUMORPAINTEOSTEELTUSESFOR RO-LUP DOOR.COLOR TO M4TGI NIMCENi EMRPNCETO PARKNG PARKING GMC£8ECURIN EAST ELEVATION 1,._20..0" 1 2 3 33 1 5.3 5 - 8 8.7 9 9810 11 1212312,6 13 14 15 '15.916 ,n81- 18 18.518.7'.9 19720 21 a+ xr +Tr ,es xv r-tr V-r b? !s ]BY N-1P Wz @r r a+ xr SUP xr Mr II 95'P Sir m( re aY mY ar es :rr ra x+ C6IENEPU9TQt YWSMGOTXSTIR&ROVGNFI %ULATEDpS GU85019FlAY CASES Vtl NINCdZEDAL11MM1UM CEMENTPUSTECU—DNRWSMEXTX&ROUGX FINI31 CUSSgSPUYGSESNYANNO KVMIARTNUM ///AWNINIINIGVBB RNLING ALLMNONFABCN FIABiERBVRFACEB�ERN TYP FOR FWWE9 �- -� 7ALL NJNSASCMPLISTERA_METR9URFACE9 PATTERN,iYP. FRAMES / 9Y8TEM _ o- _ ALUMINUM/CiAW RNUNG 9YSTEM / b BVSTENLNIGLPBB RPAIN` - - - - - - -F 7.47( ANNOD2EDAUUANUM ANNODMEDALUMINUM µrypplEOALUMINUM ANNW —LLMINUM `µNWIZEDALUMINUM STOTiEFRIXIi STOREFRONT STOREFRONT STOREFRONT STOeccerwT WEST ELEVATION 2 A B C D E F F3 G H J K D Nr A ar N-IY xH1' aP M'+ Is, xS Rr A Sra y CEMENT ITERN W SMOOTH&RWTTERN6HE8 ALUMINUM IGLA&4 RAILING 9VSTEM� CEMENT PLASTER VF SMOOTH S ROUGH FIN18XE3 CEMENTPLASTE RN ASMOO N&RWCTT FlHISNES ARTICUTATEOIN AN ASYMETRIGL PATTERN', - FOR µTWUTEDINµA31METRICAL PATTERN;TYP,FOR AATWUtEOINANAS ME.R:CAL PATTERN;TYP.FOR ALL NONFASLMPUSTER SVRFALE$ - ALLNOR-PASCIAPLASTER SURFACES ALLNON-FASCA Fo EF FACES - C,fA86pSPUYUSESWIANNOOREO GLASS DISPLAY y GUSSPSPUYCASESVMANNOOIZEO 1 1 b ALUMINUM FRAMES ALVM - nph :IZED b ALWINJM FRAMES _ F-7 ANNOOZEDALUMINUM k 1 _ STOREFRONT _ +. ■ b ANN]OI3EDALVYINVMq!PAINTED STEEL TLHS FCR ALUMINUMIGLISS WllUNG 9Y9T FM -ENTRPNCETOPARgIq ANNWIZEDAWMINLM CEMENT PLASTER WI 9MOOTX S ROUGH FINISHES 77 PARKING GAPTGE BECUflTTY STOREFRONT ARTICULATED IN ANASYMETRIGL PATTERN,TYP.FOR ALL NON FASCIA PIASTER SURFACES NORTH ELEVATION 3 MAIN ENTRANCE ELEVATION 4 84 r=mo. 1,=234P AuguI EXTERIOR RAELCORP • TEL ELEVATIIONS ����K RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORP PS H414 N.Palm Canyon Dons, `�H�Palm Songs,CA 9n62 o-v\i:i o4\po oEsun "° ARCHITECTS 11 1.1 45 9 - 8 -- 8 7 6.8 4 33 3 2 1 Goss DIsvIAr cases W NuxooaED ALUMINUM FRAMER - z � iH6 .P fP 1PP IVS 1RIY ]BY fS ]bd YYI' T-11' bd fr8 I1+T YY bd 5a :L CEMEW PLASTER W AIOOTM A ROWM RNISHES —CEMENT PIASTER W SMOOTH\RCUCAI FINISHES CEMENT PLASTER S' W SMOOTH dROWS FINSI ALUMINUM/fiAH9 RAILIN38YHTEM � iN:LYAlE01N ANA8YMETRIGLPATTERN,TYP.FOR GV88 pBPLAY WSEB WANXCUNED ARTICUIATEOINANAHYMETRIGLPATTERN.TYP.FOR MTICLEATEO INN ALIETRICAL PATTERN,TYP.FOR li I �' N014FA8CM PIA SU PILASTER RFACES µUMMUY FHIYEB ALL NON-FASCIA PIASTER SURFACES PIL NIXiFABGA PIASTER SURFACES — I � AWMIMIM IGIAS4 RNLING SYSTEM I ' 1 s 1 1 _ - 1 1 ROLUW DOOR.COLOR TO MATCHAOIACEW EWRANCE TO PMNING ANWOIZED&UNMIN UM OR PAINTED STEEL TUBES FOR DOUSED ALUMINUM OR PAINTED STEEL TUBES FOR PARWIGWRAGESECURRY FVUNU GGV FSECURITY EAST ELEVATION 20 197 19 18.718.5 118 - " 16 15.9 "i3 126 � 1 � 1 CEMENTPIABTER WSMOOTHBRWpIFWIBIES YP ZI'd SIR fS ITS NY TV 1Bt I& 11'.I' Sd 18d Ifd IPv - y 51 ARPCUUTEO IN Ax RSW ETRGL PATTERN TYP.FOR ALLNONFSCW PIASTER SURFACES (YA88018PIAYCABEB WYANNONZED GIABBDISPUYCABESWMNONZEO , µUMNUM FRAMER ALWIN IAFFNI , M ", ALUMNURI1iASSRPIUNGSYSTEM \+ I \r b 1 pRMEM PIASTER KY FMOOTH50.0UCY4 FIHI8NE8 L. IATEO IN ANASYMETRICALPATTEAHTYF FOR Al--W ABCNPUBTERSURFACER —s GUSS DISPLAY CABS W ANNOpZEO - 4 AWMINUM FPAMEB , — 1 - I 1 - EAST ELEVATION 2 85 EAST RAELCORP ■ HOTEL ELEVATION �'' o.LRa�.R.o.�m anEL DEVELOPMENT CORPPlanned Development Disbriet 3N w 414 N.Pal.CanIFon Dr. a-InPl oHnpo oEslon Pill.Springs,CA 92262 ARCHITECTS 15 B 16 15.8 18 185 18-1 19 7 20 E - I 28x 5s 1. yP ISP ffP 9.1 1A'g' Irr rP all IrP Fr eP ]M1r rP YP CEMENT PASTES W SYME T I6 ROUOH FINISHES GLASS dIRAY GASES W ANN]MSEO ALUYINUY ALUMINUM/GVSS SPICING FOR IN AN FSLASTRICAL PATTERN',1W. FRAMES SYSTEM I FCR ALL NCNFTEGN PIASTER eURfAGEB 1 IMOO ALUMINUM/GLASSR LING , r75 I SVS EM Y / t7ZJ T ��ATIr 77 ANVCOI}EIALUMWUM ANN]gIED.MAIN ANtlOQEOAIUMINLM STOREFRONT STOREFRONT STOtRF.NR WEST ELEVATION ' 1 2 3 33 4 5.3 6° - 8 83 _ I YIP llP 1TT Iry bP T-tr aP L YP (3 IS, 10.# MPS ISP CY SP I 31P SP CEMENT PIASTER W SMOOTH SRONGM FIN DIES GLASS OISWAY CASES W ANpOlFOALUMIMM CBAENT NIASTER W SMCODI S ROWRFINISHES MTIRlA µ IN ARNMETRIC PATTERN;TW FOR FRAMES ARIICIRATEO IN AN ASVMETPoGAL PATTERN;TYP. ALL NO%fAECN PLASTER SURFACES FOR ALL NONFASCM PILASTER SURFACES ; / ALLMINJMf GLASS RNNNO � -. Y SYSTEM ALUMINUM/GLASS RANNG SYSTEM R i STC ROM STOREFRONT WEST ELEVATION 2 86 HOTELAuguet11,2014 WEST ELEVATION RAELCORP RAEL CEV CLOPMrNI COS°PS 414 N.Palm Canyon Ddve a-viRI a-inPo oEsun ARCHITECTS A C5 C D E F FS G H J ,er A nr A m'-lo A an• A Rrr A ,sr A nr A ,Pr A ar A nr A CEMENT PLASTER W S&I S ROUGH FlNSXEE CEMENT PLASTER WSMCOTX 6 ROUGH FINISHES ARTICULATED IN AN ABYMETRICAL PATTERN:TYP.III ARTICULATEDINANASYMETRICALPATTEFN,TYP.FOR KL NCH .A PLASTER SURFACES -- ALL NO-FASCIA PIASTER SURFACES CUSS OLE MUSES W ANFpDQED N \ w ALUYNUYFRNAES �� -"- - -- CIUIRSCUS CA5E5 WANN0gIED ALUMINUMMINW1 FgAMES I b TIM I V,t, � •Y�l ANNODI?ED ALUMINUM OR PAINTED STEEL TUBES FOR ALUMINUM IGUSS FAILING SYSTEM --ENTRANCE TO PARI(ING ANNODIZED ALUMINUM PARgNG WRAGE SECURITY STOREFROM H G F F NORTH ELEVATION 1 CEMEWPIASTERWSWJOTXdROUGXRNSYES ALUMINUMIGLASSIMMUNGSYSTEM AA NCIN-F SCUPI-ASMETRICALPATTERN;ttP FM ALLNIXATEDIRPLASTEfl MICACES GLASS ISS Y G&WSWANNODUSED ...— _. -.-...ALUMINUM fgM1E5 ANNOOISED ALUMINUM STOREFRON17= I L� 71!7! 1 I ■ CEMENT PLASTER W SMOOTH 8 ROUGX FINI81E8 ARTIWLATEDINANASYYETRICAL PATTERN',TYP.FOX ALL NOWFASCN PLASTER SURFACES MAIN ENTRANCE ELEVATION 2 87 NORTH �'' RAELCORP ELEVATION RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORP • 414 N.Palm CaWon Drive O Va O-I!1?O DESIGfI Palm Springs.CA 92M2 "^""" ' ARCHITECTS - - . . _ - - - - 18—_--185--187 --19-------19.7---•20-.-- I I I I 191i TpEAIYI F", I NfA311EN1. ',I:I AiYFMl YFM3 1RFAlYF11f3 lil& fWS iE mN I F ELEVATOR 'I Y I I I W I MFNI 1' Mi lit u til I BON inl fq✓r 6N ST A PUIM 1WIiY � YOOY •••� I LA Ila. IY FAAI PoR RCIAIUiNIN WIY. LgMGE I I cv �YCA pWLI '� I I RFL11" 11UYF� I I . . YINFFN axsul�I Rao I �' 1.7-31 Still � STEM I MWATpX ROOY n Q I o I STAM o 197 2C Og ENLARGED RAELCORP HOTELPS SPA PLAN 1 I I u . !141,q �"� hnkq •. CH(.1?I CHl1P0 DESIGfIiui Nun Spring.,C 92262 ,m"'"'""'"'""""'" ARCHITECTS METAL AT GARAGE TO MATCH CHEMETAL #925 BRUSHED MEDIUM BRONZE !. l 'Lw ii .._ STOREFRONT KAWNEER -NO. 106 yyl —t Y LIGHT SATIN EXTERIOR WALL COLOR x BENJAMIN MOORE NO. 967 CLOUD WHITE I _ Ii ate. -... ..:. . .........>.. t _; . STONE VENEER STONE VENEER _ CORONADO STONE CORONADO STONE SMOOTH LIMESTONE - WHITE CHISELED LIMESTONE - WHITE 89 COLORS/ , ' ' RAELCORP . HOTEL MATERIALS w RAEL DE VELOPMENi CORPPlanned FR4%q p.uie ia)m<e.v DevelopmentDistrict Canyon414 N. Palm 41110 Palm Springs, � CH(1�1 ❑-�11P0 DESI['�fl ARCHITECTS 1 INDIAN� CANYON DRIVE VIPPROPERTY LIJ tt • TT � TTTT T1a — I o - - 1 PUBLIC PARKING STRUCTURE = oa�o HOTEL J E C HOTEL I - nay LOBE HOTEL — ` ' '• ENTRY O ' PARKING STRUCTURE Lu E 0 3 F RETAIL '' -- RETAILI r a z 0 0 © IIIIII� 0 0 I w n u: o LAI] -,� 7 c,I t GC i�C (J F• •, _- ' = TY LINE ., ,.. . u r<' Al 44 AMPW PALM CANYON DRIVE `4 SCALE 1"•20' �\ GRAPHIC SCALE NEM , so- 40' 20' 10' o � rti 9d AUGUST 11,2014 L RAELCORP PS HOTEL �/� a a.ei o=vFl oanervl :cuv Planned oaralovmam mamo�az4 STREET LEVEL 4t4l PaMGs,CA1Drive SITE PLAN CHAP CHAPID �ES� Palm almCa,CA92262 n, — ARCHITECTS TREES AND PALMS b SHRUBS AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES INDIAN CANYON DRIVE WASHINGTONIA PALMS 1 ; — .. URGE °rr �vM p DATE PAL�S � HOTEL ._ DESERT ACCENT PLANTSIff ' s PACKING STE 1' �Xag e-Pr—PATH LIGHT,TYP. - U T�A. " TREE UP LIGHT,TYP. SMALL/M_ ORNAMENTAL GR SSi3 ADA WALKWAY SMALL TREE 0 DESERT ACCENTS c RESTAURANT e� ENTRY yQ "LARGE SPECIMEN FREE WITH PEBBLES AND DATE PALMS =-�" WATER ELEMENT BELOW !TAUT COURT ' DATE PALMS, J i ❑ r, a SMALL TREE � _ �� j RETAIL UyA II 1 � f WATER JETS EFFECT - - N ts ti ._ ._ von COUR iNoinN cnN_ NE i _ WATER JETS INTO PEBBLES - LAYERED PLANTING i- �---- - -- WITH ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND DESERT ACCENT PLANTS e >ALM CANYON DRIVE '.o "NATIVE PLANTS WITH A GARDEN FEEL" LARGE SPECIMEN TREE `;. < AUTO COURT/ ELEVATION WITH PEBBLES BELOW o AL1TQ COURT/ PI AN VIEW _ - SCALE: r•.20' PALM Q3APHC SCALE N KEY MAP �1�T\ ZD' 10' A0G05T 11,2014 L-2 \\ /` , ' I RAELCORP PS HOTEL Voen RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORP Planned Development DieVic1324 AUTO COURT 414 N.Palm Carryon Drive PLAN ❑ rH � DESIG(1 Palm Springs,CA 92262 rive ARCHITECTS WASHINGTONIA PALM DESERT ACCENT PLANTS ORNAMENTAL GRASSES WASHINGTONIA PALMS-----`lam" rillillIM *w •°•°I'' - n / y ' INDIAN CANYON— r NATURAL STONE STONE TILE SEATING CUBES ORNAMENTAL GRASSES PLANTING POCKET WITH DESERT ACCENT PLANTS "NATIVE PLANTS WITH COMMERCIAL CHARACTER" PALM CANYON DRIVE AND ALEJO ROAD / ELEVATION KEY MAP f U LI P R IN R T E HOTEL OTEL PARKING STRUCTURE o o WASHINGTONIA PALMS RETAIL -Be' TO o RETAIL D a r.. , Q :� o OL• _ r qi= i! M O flIllI LU LAj I . Q ° ..:. �©-- PROP R1Y LIt UTO - ENTRY o • i- - � - AEPAL ,,; CANYON DRIVE SEATING CUBE ORNAMENTAL GRASSES L PLANTING POCKET WITH DESERT PLANTS WASHINGTONIA PALMS "NATIVE PLANTS WITH COMMERCIAL CHARACTER" - PALM CANYON DRIVE AND ALEJO ROAD / PLAN VIEW GSCALE 1CAL ^' RAPHIC SCALE 'V so 40• za' io' o - III���ppp/// 92 . .. AUGUST,,.2014 L-3 R A E L C O R P EL 'DEVELOPMENT CORP PS HOTEL PALM CANYON Plamretl14 N.Palm nyonDriw AND ALEJO 4�4 N.PaIm Canyon Driva CHAFI CHlAPO DEsun Palm Springs,CA 92161 STREETSCAPE , ARCHITECTS QWASHINGTONIAPALMS INDIAN CANYON DRIVE LARGE TREE o O j • • --Mar-) Lka • /� e f e➢ Ci Q (S O PROPERTY LINE Will o HOTEL J - DE$ERDAOCEIIITS I RGESHRIYBS SMALL TREE ` _ °vb° �$ 'b,�,d' PARKING STRUCTURE PUBLIC PARKING STRUCTURE NATIVE PLANTING STREETSCAPE GRAPHIC SCALE INDIAN CANYON DRIVE AND ALEJO ROAD / PLAN VIEW ,P N TREES AND PALMS � �— , -- ORNAMENTAL GRASSESvy • L_4 4 a - _ av / /,,,f OPAL CANYONC, .- WASHINGTONIA PALMS KEY MAP 71 i . 411 V, - — -- DESERT PLANTS ;?` p ORNAMENTAL GRASSES r e _ 1 r NATIVE PLANTING STREETSCAPE ORNAMEI\ _GRASSES !-- INDIAN CANYON AND ALEJO ROAD / ELEVATION is J-IQE . .._ ` 93 AUGUST 11,2014 L—4 �� R A E L C O R P PS HOTEL r »¢nau am RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORD INDIAN CANYON Planned Development rayon Drive AND ALEJO �C �^� �/ ill a P N.Palm Canyon Drive {..1��ru:1 6.HAPO DESM Palm Springs,CA 92262 STREETSCAPE M^^-^^�-'^�°'w° ARCHITECTS INDIAN CANYON DRIVE I PROPERTY LINE � t t I t PUBLIC PARKING STRUCTURE - mo � TTI� TT � TT � T � H iI cP � e PA U[ ttl I I PARKING T RE tttttit — I a ` •n P P c m _. ..�- I. r o 7 i ,11 _ U ARTIFICIAL TURF B �T a INATURAJST4NEISEA ]NG ClIBE ti a 1 m -- OPTION (A) I — ,-�. I � _ f :�. STONE TLE SEAT W3 CUBES �� �_ 1 .OP910N a O a _ 4•r� �- ' .� �11°�"� ' v DARK GRAY PEBBLES < W J � ® o Q - _ .. . _ _' " INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE I . . a -' COLOR (B) O Y� CONCRETE c COLOR (B) • en — c t• - ... CONCRETE RETAIL _ COLOR (A) RETAIL o tillll o 4L O ER L _. _ tAL"lip w q # PALM CANYON DRIVE - INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE COLOR (A) SCALE: 1".20' SEATING CUBES GRAPHIC SCALE 4g• do• M. 1w A AUGUST 11,2014 L_5 , ' ' RAELCORP PS HOTELPlanned �waort wncn RAEL DEVELOPMENT LDRR 14 N.Pal Canyon icl a HARDSCAPE M^, _ CHAM CHnPO DESIGn 414 N.Palm Canyon Drive '�,,,� Palm Springs,CA 9UW MATERIALS ARCHITECTS CONCEPT PLANT LEGEND CONCEPT LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PAUv15 WA511INGTONIA FIUFERA/CAUPORNIA FAN PALM 5TREET TREE ON PALM CANYON,ALEJO AND INDIAN CANYON TREE UP LIGHTS AND LARGE TREES(24-3G•BO)) PATH LIGHTS ACCENT PLANT LIGHTING • PALO VERDE SPECIES PR.0R050F150PI5 CHILEN515/CHILFAN MESQUITE THORNLESS 5MALL TRfE5(24'BOX) r CAE5ALPINIA CACALACO 'SMOOTHIE'!THORNLE55 CA5CALOTE CHILOP515 UNEARI5 'ARTS SEEDLESS'/DE5ERT WILLOW CORDIA 50I551ERI/TEXA5 OLIVE PALMS PHOENIX DACTYU FERA/DATE PALM AUTO COURT AREA ONLY UPRIGHT TREM24`13OX) ACACIA SAUCINA!WILLOW ACACIA ACACIA 5TENOPHYLLA/5HOE5TRING ACACIA O LARGE AND MEDIUM 5HRU5(5GAL—15GAL) CAE5ALPINIA SPECIES .............._...,.�. .:C CASSIA ARTEMISIOIDES/FEATHERY CA551A MUHUEN5ERGIA LINDHEIMERI 'AUTUMN GLOW' TM/UNDHEIMER'S MUHLY Z,= MUHL FNBERGIA RIGEN5/DEER GRA55 P(TTO5PORUM TOBIRA'WHEELER5 DWARF'/WHEI!LFK'5 DWARF MOCK ORANGE VRFX TRIFLOIA PURPUREA/ARABIAN ULAC am W 5MALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER50 GAL—SGAL) DALEA CAPITATA 'SIERRA GOLD' TM/SIERRA GOLD DALEA DALEA GREGGII/TRA LING INDIGO 5U5H EREMOPHILA GLABRA 'MINGENEW GOLD'/EMU BU511 EREMOPHILA MACULATA 'WINTER GOLD' /SPOTTED EMU 5U5H EUPHORBIA CANAPUEN515/CANDELABRA TREE NASSELLA TENU1551MA'PONY TAILS' /MEXICAN FFATHMRA55 ACCENT5(5GAL—I5GAQ ALLUAUDIA PR.00ERA/MADAGA5CAK OCOTILLO AGAVE ATTENUATA/AGAVE AGAVE DE5MMIANA/DWARF CENTURY PLANT AGAVE 5PECIE5 ALOE BARBADEN515!BAR 5AD05 ALOE ALOE DAWEI/ALOE ALOE X'BLUE ELF'/ALOE - ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA/RUSH MILKWEED DA5YURION QUADRANGULATUM DA5YURION 5PECIE5/DESERT 5POON DA5Y1URION TEXANUM/TEXAS 50TOL HE5FERALOE FUNIFERA/GIANT HE5PERALOE 95 z AUGUST 11,2014 L_6 RAELCORP PS HOTEL T .AE �E E o ,E N T 0 P !4%q rL , hnq EUIi MJR(6K PlanneA 14N.Palm Canish�cl326 PLANT LEGEND y,Y CHn�i cH(1�0 oEsi�n 4111111 41 Palm Spn gs�GA ym uu AND LIGHTING ^" ^ ARCHITECTS xuwu.i¢iss vrxvw srsa A�en�' cawsss.ioroxwuxova� l SOUTH ELEVATION ur=,u SOUTH RAELCORP • ELEVATION 1' I PnINT CDRo pwrl��M nwa 3" !4 M".%— CHl1?I CHl1r'O DESIGfI ARCHRECTS 96 r a 1 • _ li, I/ s.Pumr+s,zouSOUTHWEST . , RP PS HOTELCORNER 7FMENT CORP RENDERING HEN.Palm Gnyon Odve Palm Springs,CA 93M2 a � 6 { AJI� - _ » e � _ ILA , h TREES AND PALMS SHRUBS AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES •, , .F ., }f, � WASHINGTONIA PALMS w -----• .. LARGE T" AAX �} I rd DATE PALMS I ! .R p� f DESERT ACCENT PLANTS PATH LIGHT,TYP. TREE UP LIGHT,TYP. >v I; � "—SMALL/MEDIUM SHRUBS WITH ORNAMENTAL GRASSES l{ AT`( ADA WALKWAY — SMALL TREE ` I` 1 n DESERT ACCENTS ENTRYURANT 1 1 LARGE SPECIMEN TREE �\ r' DATE PALMS ram` WITH PEBBLES AND WATER ELEMENT BELOW AUTCCO III V UR ; PALMS n I �-Y� - yt a o yf���. r e ■ ■ SMALL TREE WATER JETS EFFECT INDIAN CANYON AUTO ------ COURT .- WATER JETS INTO PEBBLES ENTRY 6 _ LAYERED PLANTING WITH ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND DESERT ACCENT PLANTS WIRH PEBBLESS BELOW p 1... ` . �� "NATIVE PLANTS WITH A GARDEN FEEL" AUTO COURT/ ELEVATION AUTO COURT/ PLAN VIEW l SCALP: 1 20' GRAPHIC SCALE PALM CANYON KEY MAP SAGO PALM W20, 10. n AUGUST 112014 L-2 RAELCORP PS HOTEL GE VE LOFMENi :GRP Planned Development Dstnct 32< AUTO COURT 014 N.Palm Canyon Drive PH Palm Springs,CA 92262 PLANu`.�,•a� Q"II1rI i'••• ^A, a� + `-• ARCHITECTS .ram, : 4 •. - N*�.' _• Yt .. _:.,. �... Sxka'h- � • uy. Ild / m \ : t II f1 d �^— r > ANN Y � � r - -Z � •�r� 'Yud�� r September 15,2014 a • P S HOTEL Planned Development District 324 414 N.Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs,CA 92262 ■' 1 �2� 3 3 5.3; 6 ) 57: 9 2 12.3 26 14 15 159, 16 13817 u r� as as ua Eea a.r as � s w-r wv as as \se' ies ua ros as a.r imr vs na cr a br.r •s NORTH INDIAN CANYON ROAD - - . I � J e P ® • � - 'wiiu bIIA n 3%M+N POPE PETgTROW ���j Pww mxx,o � � Icr.¢racw — n B40.YMb r� � ErvCIGSLEE SIPEELIF�EL — BIGASLAE M MOO pp —0 —0 Ig1EL LOl�•IG[CCx ITNOESTEPS R p I I STORY PUBLIC O R P"W STRUCTURE u SOH. SiNR d 0 } 4 W 1 o— I TELLOBBY 'I S • q Q b 1 asNErosEcwmmu - /L0=55&FPMYW � I 3 n' rL— d s, Y/ 2 STORY HOo- R{TyµKit k tl f' 0 0 0 ❑ ! o a P MNGSTRUCTLRE [ouPR01T i ueacwcwams ' SELI0.ILµ Rp�M tF ti � : �: „� TTTTTTT b 8OH. zSTAJRA4T r, ____ e xr r wwcmPemc / II J J _.. .. i n .� e ❑ ❑ -a - ___-_ _. e O ❑ u ❑ ❑ RETNL p I I ¢asss,werrt>t, RETAL _ I RETNL 4 II p K _ o o o - ❑ v 0 0' n _— _ - - _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _—__—__=__—__—__ fin— _ — —_._ =_— _—__—_ _--_— __— IR2 9Ip y/d aP 4D 9i' as ll-1' ,p I6 d' 91 LC 174 r ,1 11'-r g9 Lb 1411 MP 3) 4 ! 5 �fi6.d 2 - - 159 1U. 16.817 ?1 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE ®N GROUND � RAELCORP • TEL FLOOR �'' RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORR L"j —q PS H ��g CHnPl cfinPo os sin ARCHITECTS 101 - w INDIAN CANYON DRIVE - a. . p / ---- PROPERTY LINE -- --- _ l/ . I H _ K PUBLIC PARKING STRUCTURE � " . � •` � \ � .-- r l _-' � I x b, "> <' HOTEL I PARKING STRUCTURE ❑ ` l l HOTEL LOBBY ' ENTRY _ _ ! 0 PROPERTY LINE ■ ■ �v l �� `�� i - , Q RETAIL -J RETAIL \ PROPERTY LINE - -�- -- r ----- _------- --- -- --- AUTO - `_? 1 — PALM CANYON DRIVE GRAPHIC pp•SC ,... GRAPHIC SCALE j N - 60' 40' 20' 10' O \ AUGUSTil RAELCORP PS ROTE c ,• �w� ��� RPEL DEVELOPMENT LDRP PWnnaJ DevalOpmenl Dis#iIX3 STREET LEVEL 414N.Palm canyon Dri SITE PLAN CWl?Ipo DESIGf-1 Palm Sprinpa,CA 92262 ` °^"' ARCHITECTS rh �u ■■QD.■ a G• w �, � — — -- FM �b� ��%V�. ,� � „ �R:C- �r^jy��:■.l�c�'.J1���I — :., . �. �..I ..L.re � •�.�`J�� I t1iWYn EAST \ • .� iiiniiii ii ����l■ �c��� � ����ilil�������. r:i �iiii� � � � 'i��1 E 1�11�!!�l�s!!l1��l�1111—WEST ELEVATIONJ2 IL 1 ■■- _- ■ ■ ■ nmmmm Imnrnn I ■■■■■■■■■■���■ _ P1NORTH- • SOUTH • • ■ ■ 1 i1 - - 7 MAIN ENTRANCE ELEVATION 14 Auguzi 11,361d - • EXTERIOR � d PS HOTELELEVATION Planned Derebpment Obtna 32d d10 N.Palm G.ryan Ohre !414 �Rn-4 CHAPIDESM Palm Sp�nigs,C0.9336z 1 •1 � ` I • i1 1 u II IIIII III111�1 — 11 11 1111 1 II1111 1 II 111 I II111 IIIII 11 IIIII it'll r u I 1 1.11 11114wpR _ �Hlr `. tl I IIIIIIIIHMI ; II� 111111111111 • � . r '� 111111111 1 1T , u. . j'7{y-al a yt ^.°�'+ r IF. .{� '• I ^ +; .'n r 'sfr 7Z ... kt 4•� , iFJ r+. .y Ira f `.ryx">r,,.w a ! i • s n' , t �. J 4 �' �� Na. >�}Z�j'* �. . . � ,`•1�'.' 't. .:fi�. e+�a . .J��. . p J;. ti. Q a.w • 9 Y• .li •.W �1 �� :: '�,�'r�' III �;; " �• '�! PS HOTEL 324 Pknnell D4 M Palm Ofshi Dnw HPl Palm Canyon Olive Palm Springs,CA 92262 -' is BREAK IN CONCRETE COLORS I , I I - I o ' I REPRESENTATIVE IMAGE FOR SCORE JOINT II o � • J� v �i II(r` CONCRETE SLAB Ii4'W x 9/4rD SAIUCUT SCORE JOINT I � I I *. TYPICAL SCORE JOINT LOCATION 1_ Nn W \\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\�\\i\\ice\i\ \ \\\i TYPICAL SCORE JOINT DETAIL SCALE: NTS _ I I �< INDIAN CANYO11 N \" BREAK IN CONCRETE COLORS I 0 O --------------- - - -- SCALE: -zo' N GRAPHIC SCALE - KEY MAP M• "1 10. p AUGUST L-2B III RAELCORP PS HOTEL RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORP Planned Development District 3]C �^� �''�,,�/�� AUTO COURT 414 N.Palm Ca,CAS ive ENLARGEMENT '�.�'7r•�1 �"' w n �" �S�i(•1 Palm Springs,CA 93Z62 .. ARCHITECTS - . � ! � � v:+ � �i• ; " sly: ,r yl 1, Cr r v.• �v R MMM Law I _ I � PS HOTEL September 4 , Plannetl Development Distritri ctt 32 324 414 N.Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs,CA 92262 ZSZZ6 yo's6u. Swied aniJa UOAUEO wied 'N 4LC /I� 4LE 3a!-0s!0 luawtlo�anap pauue�d � � �O � ` v\• • r' tiOZ'S1 iagwalda5 +ter r All FINE oil log 000, : _ 1414 4 . 1 R yA.V ry � a fµ y� V I i L • ' �1 F v d l t ��, rL r� •}�. Ih a � �c � a j.i 111IIIIl "••' `�1XIII I�I YYM� K � ®t, o A. PW i September 1S,2019 I PS HOTEL Planned Development District 329 4U N.Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs,CA 92262 r r ■ �� BSI . R 7' .,1 ..r.n.- September 15,2014 , P S HOTEL Planned Development District 324 414 N.Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs,CA 92262 - ' r r , , ht .`s r y IMF Y�.+ 1 Y .• MR"Pi FS�, adr yr 1 ti q y N, r{i r _ l r �Ilv t _ r A 55.3' = be 981101 11 12 123 126 13 14 -- 18i18-518719 19720 1211 AO L8 11'T 19S Y1.�' DP !J '68 H'P R{ atl U. 1 ---i= FFFTM F Ili NORTH-SOUTH SECTION t'-NU �A `8 i \C� EMI f it iJ K _ g irVFi NO I+ 9II + $11' ]YP tIX y6 � IB; Vfi FII y Y II �i b+ A m m Rb - b b R EAST-WEST SECTION 2 I'=20I • TEL SECTIIONS �` ` �'' RAELCORP FAEI DEVELOPMENT CORP !0, 1"� �q"44 PS H01l1P1 CHAF30 DESIM ARCHITECTS 4 f 1 II I - ____- - - - - - - - - r--- � cL mxR9: n+ I DD N T..N ON �CF INDIAN. CANYON DRIVE _ V- ]66IRI?I�C � )6.SI R oNL )s.OaC 7ae9R ]).ROIL )a9G E ]A'al 0.6 6R _l Oxra14C —_ NOTES: T ]9 D I U n m • - p y )p L — 1- TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING SOURCE. 1HE E%ISPNG TOPOCRAPITIC nI TO ^ '1 +' "I �-/� 4e 1� .I / MAPPING WAS PERFORMED BY INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS ON MARCH B, RD°)AFTER OEMOLInON AND CLEARING OF THE S1E. 9 ,.) t I I - ---- - -- - - — — Y_ AND CAPPED AT LITHE PROPERD LANE AT THE IMF DF SITE REu0K0 ry 1 �1--- _ i_ �` 69CFM DEMOUIICN IN 200]. 6�' / VAD ow 76.1 6'91)EMA SV. I I ]19]TC P9]TC DEBTC _ .-. 3 PROPOSED DRAINAGE THE PROPOSED pRNNACE PATTERNS ARE P11D:MG R.FMERF� 6 6 I I 6 CE a ]5.405 L SHOWN ON NIS CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN. PROPOSED STORM IT ].1' 6 CE )].KiS S'1I _ )491ES WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND HYDROLOGY ARE INCLUDED IN THE ( �F�f — -- F NPNi )]. " PLANNIINGS MITT REPORT THAT Is PPRT OF THE CURRENT —BULDING MIMEIFA LOADING I VVVggg www Wex E%ISTING PLANNING SUBMITTAL 0.P9 A CLi1FP I DOCK I L,L e y—-- R mFMAGOT NTaa wAll IANXNG.s-zx BU DOING A, MOPES: NO suesTAxnAL(3:1) sLCPEs ARE EXPECTED ON THIS x.Dx a sirzR�a(MURBvc I I (o6r DRUH) ls,r mm�� - PreD,acT. Ipcp gny ROCR BREAx� 59 I t 1 �'I \,/ 9 a Rom. I L — 5. ALL EXISTING DECORATrvE STREET IMPROVEMENTS,LANDSCAPING,AND / UGH➢NCO IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE,DCEPT ]9�0 p]990 1` ] I)_ REMOVAL APPROKO BY THE CITY. �I II jf F.F. 79.9b ___.• T95 •. PROPERTY UK 2Mi TLO UENE S OF HOTEL GUEST ROOMS OVER COSY,[F B OXE IE1EL OF PAA(MC 1 '( II n.e1Tc 74 nrs p — 11 eM I LLCAM BREAK-1 F€F=79.90 a r D n _ 11 U I n G I L UIIS E - - -T TLI Z z 1 w K� cp er ___ __ .e___ UNDERGROUND RETEN ONCe4 fines — v 1nT el.'nr I —J. alAMam I ° msnxG me9 a .. -------------- -- :- II I vxAr '1l' _J , ] mnrs Fj 1I yI enemtI, ) LA 0 eVa1c �-�--WTIfR-IEMAN I -'" nl6rs wm rl F.F=81.30 > F.F=77.20 0l (I I� (al Me F.F.82.30 I I 6 a 6 n I RF:BOJO� +.=79.90 Ran+eREAx RACK eREAx 1 �1 II I RCOa eaEAxJ Da°A0°Aw° °aL°i oup R00X�+-1 IL°°x THE --I F.F.=76.70 rtn I I °% EXI vans I 1 L4x 1r7 — MXRI BD aLIF ]]Lars- - 'PI ra° 7166rs 5 91 0 1aI9 4t � Jl I1 .1 RTC eD.a1c - I� ]9.eare _ ]a. _ 4]amryL ]e ]G.a4iL e )ef9s -:'-. x9m -. __ ulrc xe4n ex 13Te EYJST a"A WITIFRJ M9YL (]R e]R) ]60 76 4)G tee § ]5x1R• L ➢ 5 ( -MI, ENS,OFB d(AFTER T5191C 3- N11Yp(._ 4 S TO AN AN cL�xlEnicnd _ -3 _ ° fL PALM CANYON DRIVE I m I. _ - - _ ---r - - = I - --- - - - I - - - II r rLi Ii - - -� ,I� r T, — \ 1211' COP 30' 15 0LH e' 7 1' 1fr O' GRAPHIC SCALE INCH INCREMENTS SHOWN ARE AT FULL SCALEON THE SHEET 112 ANI 11,M14 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN AND STORM DRAIN 17848 Skypark Cir P S H ote I PLAN Irvine, CA 92614 !14%44 k"AhN Planned DevelopmentnyonDct rve 9w. ms-a h.c 240 414 Palm Canyon Drive www.sms-arch.com '.1m Springs,CA 9M2 AL p/�1.1���/� --_ t'IPYUI KMI Joel Silverman Box 61610, Santa Barbara, CA 93160 (805) 895-1795: (FAX) 967-6947 2014 OCT 16 AM I f: 18 SllvermanReaffstate@Gmakcom i -S lt;u, October 10, 2014 CITY CLERK] James Thompson City Clerk 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 RE: Appeal of 5.1091-PD324 Sir: I own a building on the 300 block of N. Palm Canyon Drive. For years now, the north end of the block has been vacant. This has resulted in a marked decrease of traffic on the block, since most people do not want to visit a vacant lot. (Go figure.) Please help get this project moving forward. I have no interest in the location, other than a need to see something there. The empty lot is killing my tenants, driving my rents lower, and costing the city money in lost tax revenue. And it is ugly. I know we have all sorts of laws, passed for obscure reasons, that, frankly make no sense to the average person, but at some point, it is time to pull the trigger and get projects moving forward. Please help to get it done. Thanks. Jnel Silverman