Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/5/2014 - STAFF REPORTS - 3.A. 3.A. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE: RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as appropriate. MATERIALS TO FOLLOW Item No. 39A9 ppLM SA ;O 9j Z c c4`'FOR11 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: November 5, 2014 LEGISLATIVE SUBJECT: PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: DEPARTMENT of AVIATION SUMMARY: An initial update to City Council on the Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan, for discussion only, no action is required at this time. Pending completion of the federal environmental process (NEPA) expected in a May, 2015 timeframe, the Master Plan will return to the City Council along with the state (CEQA) environmental review for a full Public Hearing. RECOMMENDATION: After an update presentation on the Airport Master Plan by HNTB Consulting Firm - receive and file the report and direct staff to schedule a City Council Public Hearing at the appropriate time to review the combined federal (NEPA) and state (CEQA) environmental reviews. STAFF ANALYSIS: The Federal Aviation Administration requires all airports receiving Airport Improvement Program Grant funding to maintain an Airport Master Plan with the appropriate environmental analysis and clearance in order to be eligible for funding of related future capital projects. As per the FAA Regulatory Guidance Advisory Circular No. 150/5070- 613: "An airport master plan is a comprehensive study of an airport and usually describes the short-medium, and long-term development plans to meet future aviation demand. The goal of a master plan is to provide the framework needed to guide the airport development that will cost-effectively satisfy aviation demand." Consistent with the Federal Aviation Administration's guidance, the Airport Master Plan Update for Palm Springs International Airport was prepared by a professional airport planning firm: HNTB Corporation of Los Angeles, California, under the approval, funding and oversight of the FAA Western Region Airport District Office. The elements of the 3'�` ITEM NO. ' City Council Staff Report November 5,2014 —Page 2 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE plan include six primary areas of emphasis as formulated by the FAA so that facility constraints are identified and addressed in accordance with airport design criteria: ✓ Inventory of Existing Conditions ✓ Aviation Activity Forecasts ✓ Facility Requirements ✓ Master Plan Alternatives ✓ Alternatives Evaluation ✓ Recommendations and Implementation Also, the Master Plan process included an update to the Airport Layout Plan (ALP), which is a scaled drawing of existing and proposed land and facilities necessary for the operation and development of the Airport. From the City staff perspective, Airport City Ordinance - 1693, was used as a core objective of this report, and reads in part as follows: PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT ORDINANCE (ORD. 1693 § 2, (PART), 2006) • Plan, Manage, Operate, Finance, and Develop the Airport in a manner consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the City Council; • Provide the residents of the city of Palm Springs and the Coachella Valley with access to the nation's aviation system; • Preserve and enhance the City's status as a premier tourist destination; • Ensure the Airport's long term financial health; • Protect and promote the health, safety, security, and general welfare of the public consistent with all applicable Regulatory Measures; • Encourage the development and operation of General Aviation businesses and the provision of quality aviation products, services, and facilities to the public at the Airport; and • Ensure that the Airport is operated for the use and benefit of the public and made available to all types, kinds, and classes of aeronautical activity on fair and reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination. City Council Staff Report November 5,2014 --Page 3 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE MASTER PLAN UPDATE — PROCESS AND FINDINGS The Master Plan process facilitates the goal of providing the framework needed to guide future airport development that will cost-effectively satisfy aviation demand, while considering potential environmental and socioeconomic impacts. Importantly, to make such a determination, an FAA-approved 20-year aviation activity forecast was prepared early in the process to project future passenger enplanements and total airport operations. PSP aviation activity forecasts indicate the potential for growth in the long term over the next 20 years. Total domestic and international enplanements for 2013 were 877,474 and are forecast to increase by an average annual 3.1 percent. It is this requisite activity derived from the forecast that is used to identify critical facility requirements that may be necessary to address future Airport demands while respecting existing constraints. Facility requirements were prepared for all functional Airport components (airside, terminal, landside, general aviation, support and maintenance). The facility requirements analyses indicated that accommodating PSP's growth requires key terminal and landside improvements, particularly in the areas including baggage claim and transfer areas, ticketing lobby, rental car facilities, and the employee parking lot. The facility requirements also identified that the airfield has adequate capacity to serve forecast operations beyond 2028, and therefore no runway, taxiway, or apron expansion is necessary. As part of the Master Plan process, several plans addressing the terminal and landside facilities were developed as follows: Terminal/Landside Alternative 1 — No-Build Alternative — No Action (See attachment for all figures) Under the No Action (or No-Build) Alternative, no additional terminal facilities are constructed. It is included as an alternative as a means to compare all project alternatives to a no-build alternative in subsequent environmental analysis. The no-build alternative does not address existing or forecasted terminal deficiencies. Under Alternative 1, the existing landside facilities and infrastructure remain in place and no physical alteration is made with the exception of closing the airport entrance at Baristo Road. The Master Plan identified that the on-Airport segment of Baristo Road east of El Cielo operated at a lower level of service (LOS), and would continue to deteriorate in LOS throughout the planning period. Alternative 1 does not meet any of the future landside facility requirements. City Council Staff Report November 5,2014 —Page 4 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE Terminal/Landside Alternative 2 - Immediate Action Plan Alternative Alternative 2 - Immediate Action Plan provides modest, near-term improvements to the rental car facilities and terminal ticketing and bag-claim lobbies. The alternative only meets the near-term facility requirements (5-10 years) and does not preclude the implementation of Alternatives 3 or 4 (long term alternatives) in later years. For the terminal, the Immediate Action Plan maintains the existing terminal symmetry and moderately expands both the baggage claim and ticketing areas in their current location. The Immediate Action Plan Alternative is intended to be a near-term alternative, but it meets some of the long-term requirements as well, and allows for a modular expansion process that is compatible with long term alternatives (3 and 4). Specifically, the Immediate Action Plan proposes the following terminal improvement changes: • Rental car reservation counters currently located inside the baggage claim would be relocated out of the terminal building to facilitate additional passenger circulation within the baggage claim area. • The existing baggage claim devices would be extended to provide an additional 450 linear feet of frontage, as a preferred option. • An additional baggage claim carousel would be constructed in a sprung structure adjacent to the existing baggage claim, as a secondary option. To address near-term landside deficiencies, the Immediate Action Plan includes the following components: • The terminal curb front would be realigned to the north to better serve the new baggage claim carousel proposed in the Immediate Action Plan terminal alternative. • The parking stalls in the short and long-term parking lots would be reallocated and expanded to better accommodate demand. • The rental car ready/return parking lot adjacent to the passenger terminal would be expanded in its current location. • The rental car support facilities, including wash and gas operations would be relocated south of the terminal area to the current site of the holiday economy parking lot. • The employee parking lot would be relocated and expanded along Kirk Douglas Way. City Council Staff Report November 5,2014 —Page 5 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE • The holiday economy parking lot would be relocated to the existing site of the rental car service facilities. • The commercial vehicle hold lot would be relocated further south east along Kirk Douglas Way. • The Baristo Road airport entrance would be reconfigured. • A new U.S. Customs and Border Protection facility would be constructed in the northwest corner of the baggage claim area. The Immediate Action Plan addresses several of the most critical near-term terminal area deficiencies. It would improve baggage claim capacity and level of service by relocating rental car customer service counters, add additional footage to baggage claim devices, and improve ticketing queuing and level of service by widening the existing ticketing area. Based on forecast activity, the alternative would not meet required long-term capacity needs. However, it is compatible with the two full-build alternatives, Alternatives 3 and 4, and would not preclude the eventual development of these alternatives. TerminallLandside Alternative 3 — Expand-in-Place Alternative 3 - Expand-in-Place expands the terminal facility primarily in its existing location and maintains the view corridor axis that extends up Tahquitz Canyon Way, through the terminal and Bono Concourse. It is designed to meet long-term facility requirements. Alternative 3 proposes the following terminal improvement changes: • The baggage claim area is expanded to the north by approximately 225 feet and replaces the three existing baggage claim belts with six carousels. This expansion will increase the walking distance of patrons to public parking facilities. • The baggage service office is expanded to better serve the high volume of oversized checked baggage. • The rental car reservation counters and associated offices are removed from the baggage claim area. • The ticketing lobby is expanded to the south by approximately 250 feet. The west fagade is reconstructed and pushed approximately 21 feet outwards, principally to enhance queue and circulation space. Ticket counter length is extended to accommodate a wider range of growth scenarios. • New facilities behind the ticketing counters house the inline Explosive Detection System (EDS) for baggage screening. City Council Staff Report November 5,2014 --Page 6 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE • Airline Ticket Offices (ATO) are reconfigured to accommodate the ticket lobby redesign. • The passenger security screening area is expanded to increase the number of checkpoint lanes to 8 and increase the queue area. Even with the expansion, this alternative is deficient by 1 security screening lane to meet the 2028 requirement. This terminal alternative increases the distance between the ends of the ticketing and baggage claim halls, but maintains the overall terminal symmetry along the view corridor axis of the terminal. It also maintains the flow pattern of passengers while increasing circulation space, and preserves opportunity for future expansion to the north or the south. This alternative would require a detailed analysis of the existing structure to validate the structural feasibility of ticketing expansion, and requires a change in the floor elevation in the middle of the ticketing lobby. The following landside improvements would also be included: • The main entrance would be realigned to the north. The terminal curbside would be realigned to better serve the expanded baggage claim area. • The Baristo Road airport entrance would be reconfigured. • A three-level structured parking garage for rental car ready/return would be constructed along North El Cielo Road north of East Tahquitz Canyon Way. • The rental car support facilities would be relocated south of the terminal area to the current site of the holiday economy parking lot on Kirk Douglas Way. • The employee parking lot would be relocated and expanded along Kirk Douglas Way. The employee parking lot may require shuttling services for employees. • The holiday economy lot would be relocated to the current site of the rental car service facilities. • The commercial vehicle hold lot would be relocated further southeast along Kirk Douglas Way. • The Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueling station would be relocated further south along Kirk Douglas Way. • A new U.S. Customs and Border Protection Facility would be relocated to the northwest corner of the baggage claim area. City Council Staff Report November 5,2014 --Page 7 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE Terminal/Landside Alternative 4— New Terminal Processor Alternative 4 - New Terminal Processor, would result in the construction of a new terminal processor immediately south of the existing ticketing wing while utilizing the existing ticketing lobby and baggage claim areas for other uses, and is designed to meet long-term needs. This alternative represents a significant departure from the existing terminal layout and flow pattern. Alternative 4 proposes the following terminal improvement changes: • The ticketing lobby is constructed south of the existing ticketing, ATO, and EDS areas to provide additional queuing and circulation area. This requires the demolition of the existing Allegiant/WestJet ticketing lobby and will allow for the resolution of the floor level change that is not dealt with in Alternatives 2 and 3. • The in-line EDS and ATO areas are consolidated to maximize their operational efficiency. • New inbound and outbound baggage make up areas are constructed. • A new six-carousel baggage claim area is constructed south of the expanded ticketing lobby. • The passenger security screening area is expanded. In addition, the number of checkpoint lanes is increased from 6 to 9 lanes. • The U.S. Customs and Border Protection facility is relocated and expanded and would replace the existing baggage claim area. • Three of the commuter terminal gates are realigned. • The existing vehicle inspection plaza may need to be relocated. Alternative 4 proposes the following landside improvements: • The main entrance would be realigned to the south to accommodate redesigned landside elements and the new processor. • A three-level structured parking garage would be constructed in front of the proposed baggage claim area to accommodate rental car ready/return parking. • Rental car vehicle service facilities would be relocated south of the proposed ready/return parking garage. • Rental car maintenance and storage facilities would be relocated along Kirk Douglas Way. City Council Staff Report November 5,2014 —Page 8 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE • The commercial vehicle hold lot and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) station would be relocated further southeast along 9 Y Kirk Douglas Way. • The employee parking lot would be relocated and expanded north of the terminal building. • The holiday economy parking lot would be relocated to the current site of the rental car service facilities. • Additional public parking would be provided on the site of the existing holiday economy parking lot as well as in a lot at the corner of South El Cielo Road and East Baristo Way. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION: The proposed Airport Master Plan Update and the associated improvements were deemed a `Project" under the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act. Pursuant to Section 15064.5, "Determining the Significance of Impacts on Historical and Unique Archeological Resources," the main terminal of the Palm Springs International Airport is a historic resource under CEQA as it is listed in the local register of historic resources. An Environmental Initial Study was prepared for the project and was mailed to state and local agencies and interested parties for review and comments. No action is required on the CEQA environmental evaluation at this time as determinations will be reviewed by City Council in conjunction with the Federal NEPA environmental process requirement which is currently underway and is expected to be completed by May, 2015. However, it is important to note that the following two mitigation measures with regard to the main terminal building will be included as part of the CEQA report: 1. The restoration should utilize historically accurate materials and be designed and constructed in a manner that is compatible with and sympathetic to the original design and remaining similar features. 2. Design the ticketing area expansion to incorporate the natural stone walls and 6- inch steel tube columns. If the services enclosed in the boxes around the columns prior to 2009 are being relocated as part of this project, the boxes shall be removed to reveal the original columns. The NEPA document will evaluate the Master Plan, including two sub-alternatives that address the configuration of rental car facilities. The Environmental Assessment will include an evaluation of potential environmental impacts, including an analysis of the locally-designated Terminal, updates to off-airport noise exposure, and the off-airport traffic analysis (including any potential changes in LOS due to the reconfiguration of the airport entrance at Baristo Road). City Council Staff Report November 5,2014 —Page 9 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE FISCAL IMPACT: With the exception of FAA regulatory design requirements for airport infrastructure that directly impacts the safety and functionality of aircraft operations (e.g. runway aprons, signage, boarding gates, taxiways, lighting systems, and navigational aids), the terminal expansion alternatives and landside concepts are not fiscal obligations of the FAA. Rather, they are projects identified and considered eligible for future FAA funding. Non-aeronautical projects, such as car rental and landside improvements, will require other non-FAA funding sources such as the Customer Facility Charge (CFC). Currently, the CFC Fund has accumulated approximately $11 million in anticipation of these upcoming projects. Thomas Nolan, Executive Director, Airport David H. Ready, Cit Attachments: Terminal Alternative 1 Terminal Alternative 2 Terminal Alternative 3 Terminal Alternative 4 Forecast Enplanement Data Legend ' AHre Tk et 011tes rv:.\ ® OTkkeI CCOU"wn'i«aeuely •• -_ • O T O C n.Clmula Areas p( o Pre Sewgy cgaaW, Amos • OPat Sewery Olrt bon Amos 0 0 _ p Rgrya rl Ca R ervetlan�Co°ntars �t Baggage WM 0. '�.• O Baggage S.M.OM. PSP oparatbns PSP AtlmMstretlon V V — ��:� W SSCP p WWles A Buking MakR nce W TSA pM es �, '� � o wmoune Baggage US0 Baggy �USO BDB CBP Sonny Bono Concourse-Second Level ,_ ; _ 1.;7 , '° v G `°""`" m h I i Processor- Mezzanine Level �" �.• i L. ru FF— asawc 0 f---PAaeaw�na P e ^ �— +w mAwEraerexcBrucuwiPnmai i`Ew�u�xii°°iotA��� (D Mainline Concourse-Ground Level Terminal Alternative 1 - No-Build (Existing Conditions) Figure 5-6 PALM$PIUN881NTEflNATIONAL AIRPORT z ~� Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan TwiW ... m TwywIQ - - -- - - JIIg / m At O If s Suurce:HHTUAIehsls on-Aiwa Fatally Using Commncial Vehicle Hold La a Us1in9T..iMl0.l0Pwo1 Us11ngCuNslde Landside Alternative 1 - No-Build (Existing Conditions) XUsling Rental Ca,Facility --- A1rya1P1apw I.JoR Figure 5-11 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Ustbg Public Mirci Upon Eciance'DiI M ASTERPLIINUPDATE Ustiod CNc STauan --+ Existing Vim Us Palm Springs International Airport Existing Emplotwaaalking Master Plan Legend Ma,1 ket ORIms © =T atCaaa,. 0T kCa waueueing o Tltlax Cam,ar Ci�Areas 0 Pre Seoaky C4wlatlon Areas p Poat Sa.,*y Ch Iahon Areas I=Restmsms 0 Caiwessbn 1 Cgnaessbn Storage - ®Rental Car Res aaan Counters Baggage Claim p PSP O a SaNce 011lce PSP Opealbns IIIIIIII PSPAdminisVMisn BSCP O G O Iltlllies&BUIHing MaiMerere'e IIIIIIII TSA OB- ♦ Oulba Ound B Baggage _ n• ♦ =InaowM Baggage =USO /�♦ o• v" M EBS K 0/BBgg3ge CorrveYor = l! Y M1l�=h.f o (V Gate W 6 a � EXTEND EXISTING BAG �`- r CLAIM DEVICES - (450 L.F.ADDITIONAL) 1k' 1•• $ -� a �O y. �—_wsrnc vewwse z PROPOSED OVERFLOW � BAG CLAIM DEVICE I"'naes �ier'�e�'t�0 0 SPRUNG STRUCTURE EXPAND EXISTING RAMP 8 CANOPY T.maceeeaa 8 @ SOUTH END rowaw.r 3 RELOCATE EXISTING RECONFIGURE EXISTING ROADWAY TO •wx Tnwva�gxTwca ca�cuAT®r�rn RENTAL CAR&USO ACHIEVE MIN.20'DEPARTURE CURB RELOCATE EXISTING FACADE TO or.Tenrro RaleasTnrawTcouarsa FACE OF EXISTING COLUMNS Fuaunxalas°"a T""'"0E `➢E°�"11X°I R Terminal Alternative 2 - Immediate Action Plan (NEW) Figure 5-10 �PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT =44— Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan �e m r�ry + o L `— _— TrryW TqW • ��/ �„`'` ��,� �`'�p� Ham' - �'�� �/� � el B Sour":HRTBArimbi r--� _ On-Airyal Facility [ustiq Empbyee Park"vq � Potential Gale Expansion + _ Usting Tennlml Devehmneenl ] Potential Emblem Padi Fount Development Landside Alternative 2 — IAP Potential TerminalD lopment - bdnKCNGGtaIbn Mt EAsNpCuftcle Figure5-12 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT i Poweal Rental Car Facility Potential Coutu.cial Vehicle Hold Lot —"— Arpot Pmpeq Line Palm Springs International Airport MASTER PLAN UPDATE ^ Nsnng Public Paring t Closetl EnrancewEat �� A6pon Emance/lEth Potential Public PaAung — _, EJstlngAwMs Master Plan N Legend �ama rkwn orcna: ® rmenwevnkw•aeox•snx �j \`a �Tkket Canon -RR[1(1 O Tks�C ,r ouaueinp o Tkket Coumer Ciaietlon Areas p P. M Ck Mess Pestt Sa SewMy C�Uatlon Anaa O Res,raams l�Cwce Car I arrrva Cswage maav cacam na,bn Couman E J. 9aB9a9e `a p PSPQpa ae s Ofike PSP M"rl one PSP AtlMmsbalYn Male UWltbe 8 BUWing Maln,enence T Ortx;es o oa t omoam e A r Uwwna 9ag,a,eaggage (f use EM CBP 1 � Po•FNR•LrU,VrE[u,EFW/.NBgy . �Baggapa Con"%o r • � • b ��.$, Q C•a4t o � u b 5 � � �y\• -- fF1nY1a Y7EW AV1a - �— • _ - C E---weeE�tln ura,w�+iver-nn, •sns*�iws�asw /J � =, � �exawxs�wawa.woaHcaiaanwnxa) Terminal Alternative 3 - Expand-in-Place Figure 5-8 PPALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT = ` r 0F%= M Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan I . L--- # -- - Tw w Twy H, ..' )Alp f AW— iN ♦ lea i ° ' � 1/ Source:HNIB Anaiysls r--� — On-Pimat FacilityExistlrp Employee Paring L--J Potential Gate ErpatNm Erlsting Tetmind Develepmml PoteNWl Emplveee Painq Former Derebpmert Landside Alternative 3 - EIP Potential Terminal Development PoImlWI CNG SWIbn Existing Curbode Figure 5-13 PALM SPRINU INTERNATIONAL AIRM S Potential Rental CarFacilily Potential CommertWl Vehicle HOW Lot —"— AupwiPmp"Urre Palm SpringslnternationalAirport IYi191 KU UPDATE Uning Put Parking Clash Entranchm �.� Airport Emrance/Eut Potential Pubic PaWng ——♦ wSwOVlewms - Master Plan d . � Legend— ti m.ra�et omrea .® wmxrw rrnv�cert aerweiox `� �/ �l C W`a O llckalCwnler Weuertg � O TYtM Cwntar gr�Aetlwi Nees O Pre SecuMy Gnulatlon Nam n `� �•� OPaet Sewrlty Ciwletlan Neee 0' O Ra aatre E O Caaal Car l Corse C Storage W Baggage eer Reaervalbn Counters Baggage gem Baggage Servke Once PSP OFerMbns `( �PSPMninbtrelun SSCP e., Al p UlNgbs 8 BuiMn9 Malnlerianw TM O nd Baggaga ( US0 Baggage 'kk 5 � �`. Vie' �EM ED3 3 t. ♦ CBP a ___vorennuruwre esr�wsae �>•. o I Bxigage Cam'%or ..,as �: oBoaa x € i ^• r ........................ I .ne .on t — `�� �\'� T T T T •'• v •r r• •r v � E-- r��a wu�mw.noennaa au U y U v F Terminal Alternative 4 - New Processor �/ Figure 5-9 ,PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT = ` Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan - -� _ v Tory Tay It a � .nw r +► o r, �`'e �/`; .�� ,��r N�a ' Vim`�'.' O ON y Some:HNT8 Analysis OrMiroorl Facility Potential Employee Parking Potential Roadway Edsling Terminal 0avelopment Potential CNG Station i Nsting Cureside Landside Alternative 4 - New Processor Poinntial Terminal Deelopment Potential Comr,mial VeNde Hob Ed --- Airport Property Line Figure 5-14 PALM SPRINSS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Potential Rental carFadllty E2Z ClosedEntravW AlrPWEWanpe/Fldl MAMR NM UPDATE JV1110— Falsling Puellc Parking - Potential Gate&yanslon --i Potential Pedestrian Connector Palm Springs International Airport — Master Plan t� Potential Poetic Parking -� PormerDevelopwre --i Existing View his L__ Forecast Enplanement Data Comparison with Actual Data 2010 2011 2012 2013 2018 2023 2028 Master Plan Forecast-Domestic(2.93%) 748851 770860 793516 826,057 982,031 1,114,254 1,260,098 Master Plan Forecast-International(4.4%) 73413 76643 80015 87�844 110,479 136,241 165,871 Master Plan-Total Enplanements 822,264 847,503 973,531 913,901 1,092,510 1,250,495 1,425,969 Actual 749,657 759,032 866,095 877,474 - - - Difference 10% 12% 11, 4% - - - Domestic enplanements are projected to increase from 0.7 million in 2008 to almost 1.3 million in 2028,an average annual increase of 2.93 percent. International passenger enplanements are projected to increase to 165,871 by 2028,an average annual increase of almost 4.4 percent. 2014 NOV -3 PM 5. 12 PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE -S ✓•.'v CITY CLERK June 30,2014 Amy Minteer Chatten-Brown&Carstens 2200 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 318 Hermosa Beach,CA 90254 Re:Historic Resource Impacts of Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan Update Dear Ms.Minteer, I am providing the following comments regarding the potential impacts to the historic Palm Springs Airport that would result from the proposed Airport Master Plan Update on behalf of the Palm Springs Modem Committee. As a full-time Architectural Historian with over ten years of experience with cultural resource issues who meets the Secretary of the Interior's professional qualification standards for Architectural History, I am qualified to provide experts analysis of this issue. My knowledge encompasses history, architectural history,and historic preservation. I have extensive experience in the preparation of historic resource assessment reports,CEQA-related and Section 106 documentation,historic resources surveys, landmark nominations, and Historic American Buildings Surveys(NABS). I am also a recognized expert in the history of twentieth century Modern architecture. My resume is attached. (Attachment 1.) These comments are based on my expertise and my familiarity with the Palm Springs Airport. My comments are limited to the impacts of the Airport Master Plan Update on the Airport terminal,where the facade of the Palm Springs Airport has been designated a Class 1 Historical Site. The proposed Airport Master Plan Update would include several alterations to the terminal area. The public ticketing area would be expanded by relocating the facade of the ticketing wing of the terminal toward the curb,thus enclosing the existing open-air canopy. The baggage claim area would also be expanded and the baggage claim handling units would be reconfigured. The City has prepared a mitigated negative declaration(MND)to analyze the impacts associated with the Airport Master Plan Update. It is my expert opinion that the enclosure of the open-air canopy along the ticketing area would result in a significant adverse impact to a character-defining feature of the historic Palm Springs Airport. The visual simulation of the altered ticketing area included in the cultural resource assessment demonstrates the dramatic difference the enclosure of the canopy within this area would have on the facade of the Airport terminal. (Attachment 2, Cultural Resources Assessment, Figure 17.) Enclosure of the entire length of the canopy Palm Springs Modern Committee, PO Box 4738, Palm Springs, CA 92263 within the ticketing area would substantially alter the original appearance of the building, destroying its casual character and architectural symmetry. The open-air entrance canopy was a character-defining feature of smaller regional airports in vacation destinations throughout the 1950s and 60s. At the Palm Springs Airport,the informal,welcoming feel of the open-air canopy allows visitors a final chance to embrace the Valley's marvelous views and warm desert air before departure. Architecturally,the open-air canopy complements the baggage claim arrival area—a mirror image of the ticketing area—that together form the stunning symmetry of architect Donald Wexler's design. The airport fagade's overall balance and symmetry is a key character-defining feature of the Palm Springs Airport and a significant factor in its designation as a Class One Historic Site. The Cultural Resource Assessment prepared as part of the MND acknowledges that the proposed alteration to the ticketing area would result in a substantial adverse change to the significance of the historic Palm Springs Airport. (Cultural Resources Assessment,p. 31.) However,the assessment incorrectly concludes that mitigation measures included in the MND would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. (Cultural Resources Assessment,p.32.) The MND includes two mitigation measures to address the impacts of the Airport Master Plan Update on historic resources. Mitigation measure MM CUL-2 is intended to address impacts of the expansion of the ticketing area,but fails to do so. This measure requires: "Design the ticketing area expansion to incorporate the natural stone walls and 6-inch steel tube columns. If the services enclosed in the boxes around the columns prior to 2009 are being relocated as part of this project,the boxes shall be removed to reveal the original columns." (MND p. 35.) This mitigation measure fails to address the significant alteration of the ticketing area that would change the current open-air canopy into an enclosed area. Thus, this impact remains significant and use of a mitigated negative declaration is inappropriate. Further,the MND has failed to provide facts that support the need for the proposed enclosure. The MND also includes mitigation measure MM CUL-1,which requires the use of historically accurate materials and compatible design for the baggage claim area expansion. (MND p. 35.) I agree that this mitigation measure adequately addresses the impacts associated with the expansion of the baggage claim area. I also agree that expansion of this area is necessary and should be included in the Airport Master Plan Update. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, Peter Moruzzi Architectural Historian Advocacy Chair,Palm Springs Modem Committee Palm Springs Modem Committee, PO Box 4738, Palm Springs, CA 92263 ATTACHMENT 1 ........ ... . Peter Moruzzi I Resume PETER MORUZZI Architectural Historian Peter Moruzzi, an Architectural Historian with over 10 years of Years of Experience experience with cultural resource issues, meets the Secretary of 0 Total: 10 the Interior's professional qualification standards for History. ■ ICF:5 Peter has significant experience in the preparation of historic resource assessment reports for governmental agencies and Education private parties,CEQA-related and Section 106 documentation, ■ BA, Economics,History historic resources surveys,and landmark nominations. He is subspecialty, University of also an expert in the history of twentieth century Modern California, Berkeley. 1983 architecture.As an Architectural Historian, utilizing Access Professional Memberships database technology, Peter has managed historic resources surveys in the California cities of Riverside,Santa Monica, Los • Board Member,Los Angeles Conservancy,1994-2000 Angeles, Beverly Hills, Long Beach, Rancho Mirage, Pasadena, ■ Chairman, Los Angeles South Pasadena,and Santa Ana.Tasks included fieldwork, Conservancy's Modem research,evaluation, documentation,and public presentation Committee,1992-1997 ■ Track Co-Chair,California of findings. He has written historic resources assessments and Preservation Foundation technical reports for clients throughout Southern California. For Conference,2009 the City of Santa Monica, Peter provides on-call historic • Member, Society of Architectural resources services including landmark assessments and design Historians, Southern California Chapter reviews.Additionally, he has authored several National Register ■ Founding President, Palm and California Register nominations. Peter has experience in Springs Modern Committee the application of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for • Member,National Trust for the Treatment of Historic Properties and its applicable Historic Preservation guidelines. Key Skills Environmental Compliance. Peter has been a contributor to and preparer of numerous documents for Environmental Impact Reports/Statements specific to cultural resources under CEQA and Section 106 guidelines.These tasks include defining the areas of potential effect (APE);identifying, researching,and evaluating cultural resources;and analyzing potential impacts/effects of proposed projects including the recommendation of mitigation measures for project implementation. Project locations include Los Angeles(numerous areas), Pasadena,and Santa Monica. ®Page 1 Peter Moruai I Resume Project Experience On-Call Historic Resources Consulting Services—City of Santa Monica Architectural Historian.ICF has been an on-call cultural resources consultant for the City of Santa Monica since 2009.As such, he conducts research and prepares evaluations for properties under consideration for designation by the City's Landmarks Commission, reviews discretionary applications submitted to the City Planning Division that may impact a potential or designated historic resource, and serves as a general consultant for cultural resource questions. Los Angeles County METRO Gold Line Eastside Extension Phase II—Los Angeles County Principal Investigator. Responsible for NHPA Section 106 historic properties surveys for the Metro East Side Transit Corridor Phase II project.Conducted and managed cultural surveys of buildings (1970 and older) along two alternative routes for a future light-rail extension.As a subconsultant, ICF's scope of work includes a database inventory of approximately 800 properties,as well as documentation of DPR 523 forms for each property. California High-Speed Rail Authority, Los Angeles County Segment of the California High Speed Train Project Principal Investigator. Under Section 106 requirements,conducted field surveys, researched,and documented 239 properties in the APE that required evaluation for National Register eligibility. Managed the Access database utilized for storing all property information and generating DPR forms. Page la Peter Moruui I Resume Citywide Historic Resources Survey—City of Santa Monica Principal Investigator.ICF has completed an intensive-level citywide historic survey of structures built through 1968.The project involved completing a reconnaissance-level survey of the entire City and Historical Context Statements for the city as a whole,as well as for specific areas.There are approximately 13,600 properties with structures constructed prior to 1968 within the City that were surveyed.The project included a more intensive survey of relevant properties following the initial reconnaissance, resulting in a DPR primary record and/or continuation sheet for each such property.In addition, 11 new historic districts were identified and documented. The project goal was to achieve a uniform level of evaluation for the entire City. Downtown Long Beach Cultural Resources Survey—City of Long Beach, Project Manager and Principal Investigator.Completed an intensive-level historic resources survey,which focused on newly identified properties in commercial and residential areas.A Historic Context Statement specifically targeted to the area was prepared under the project scope.Managed the entire project, including field survey team, property research, context report,writing of DPR records,and final assessments.Customized Access database and publicly presented findings to Landmarks Commission. California Adelante/Eastside Historic Resources Survey—CRA/LA, Los Angeles Principal Investigator.Completed an intensive level historic resources survey of the Adelante/Eastside(Boyle Heights) redevelopment area of the City of Los Angeles.The focus was on the area's important industrial areas and its primary commercial thoroughfares. Newly identified properties and potential historic districts were documented utilizing DPR forms.The preparation of a comprehensive Historical Context Statement was an integral part of the project. Exposition/University Park Historic Resources Survey—CRA/LA, Los Angeles Principal Investigator.Completed an intensive level historic resources survey of the Exposition/University Park Redevelopment Project Area (formerly Hoover Redevelopment Area) of the City of Los Angeles.The project—an update of a previous historic resources survey—also involved the documentation of numerous properties not previously identified. 13 Page 3 ATTACHMENT 2 a� _s is O11CNE7N8•W61N6 RIOIOGNPX �2.i�NiiING FEOSEOSTOREFROWCONOMN L 5^ FIGURE 17 MS)^T1Nrw'ha�1.V'WI C.VwIlmim�Aermvti Iw¢rru.u�.�u�. E++�U[•�d NawM uwr w. CHATTEN-BROWN&CARSTENSMNOV -3 PM 5: 19 2200 PACFIC COAST HIGHWAY TELEPHONE:(310)798-2400 SurrE 318 J A,i S I h'�'. i Erb ,k-, FACSA'M: (310)798-2402 j fERMOSA BEACH,CAL FORMA 90254 C IT Y H"1�F'KEARn W.CoM www,cbcearthiaw.com July 2, 2014 Via Email Original to follow Honorable City Council City of Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92263 Re: Proposed Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan Update Honorable Councilmembers: On behalf of the Palm Springs Modern Committee,please find the enclosed expert comments regarding the historic resource impacts of the proposed Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan Update ("Airport Master Plan Update")prepared by Peter Momzzi in his capacity as a professional architectural historian. Mr. Monizzi concludes that the expansion of the ticketing area included in the Airport Master Plan Update would have a significant adverse impact on the Class 1 Historic Site designated fagade of the Airport because it would enclose the existing open- air canopy where travelers enter the ticketing area. The enclosure of this area would alter a character-defining feature of the terminal building and result in a significant adverse impact. The mitigation measures included in the mitigated negative declaration(MNp) prepared for the Airport Master Plan Update fail to address this significant impact. (See attached comments from Peter Moruzzi.) The California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")requires preparation of an EIR whenever a project may have a significant adverse impact on the environment. (Public Resources Code section 21151.) We have submitted expert evidence that enclosure of the open-air canopy adjacent to the ticketing area would have a significant historic resources impact. If the enclosure of the open-air canopy is not eliminated from the Airport Master Plan Update, an environmental impact report("EIR") must be prepared before this project can be approved. Palm Springs City Council July 2,2014 Page 2 of 3 CEOA's Requirements An EIR must be prepared instead of a MND when there is substantial evidence to support a fair argument that the project may have significant adverse environmental impacts. "The fair argument standard is a "low threshold" test for requiring the preparation of an EIR." (Pocket Protectors v. City Of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.AppAth 903, 928.) "If there is substantial evidence of a significant environmental impact, evidence to the contrary does not dispense with the need for an EIR when it can still be `fairly argued' that the project may have a significant impact." (Friends of`B" Street v. City of Hayward(1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 988, 1001;see also CEQA Guidelines § 15064.) CEQA section 21084.1 mandates that"[a] project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment." A substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource means"physical demolition, destruction,relocation,or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired." (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(b)(1), emphasis added.) Material impairment includes altering those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance. (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(b)(2).) Expert Evidence of Significant Adverse Impact Mr. Moruzzi has found that the informal, welcoming feel provided by the open-air canopy at the entrance to the ticketing area is a character-defining feature of the Palm Springs Airport. In addition, he found that the mirror image open-air canopies of the ticket and baggage claim areas form the beautiful symmetry of architect Donald Wexler's original design. His expert opinion that enclosing this area would materially impair the historically significant Palm Springs Airport provides substantial evidence to support a fair argument that, as proposed,the Airport Master Plan Update would have a significant adverse impact on the historically significant Palm Springs Airport. Thus,reliance upon a MND is improper. Conclusion The Palm Springs Modern Committee urges you to reconsider the proposed alteration of the ticketing area. The enclosure of the open-air canopy in the ticketing area is the only portion of the Airport Master Plan Update to which we object. If the enclosure were eliminated from the Airport Master Plan Update,the Palm Springs Modem Palm Springs City Council July 2,2014 Page 3 of 3 Committee would have no objection with the project and use of an MND would be appropriate. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, god- Amy Minteer Attorney at Law Attachments: (1)Expert analysis of historic resource impacts by Peter Monizzi with resume attached cc: Palm Springs Modem Committee Margo Wheeler,AICP,Director of Planning James Thompson,City Clerk SUNmnR 1A14 Neighborhood Organization NOV -5 AM 9: 25 PO Box 1178 JAi Palm Springs, California 92263 i I.C E i -� �- CITY LEkK Palm Springs City Council Board of Directors 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Mark Butzko Palm Springs, California 92262 Chairman 2749 E.Livmor Avenue November 5, 2014 760-408-9727 Jeffrey Mondon To the members of the Palm Springs City Council: Vice-Chairman 2740 E.Livmor Avenue 415-225-4619 Re: 3.A. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE Jason Press neighborhood The members of the Board of Advisors of the Sunmor net treasurer g 205 Airlone Drive organization hereby unanimously supports the Terminal/Landside Alternative 2- 917-885-5178 Immediate Action Plan providing modest, near-term improvements to the rental Charlie tali car facilities. Secretary 234 Helena Circle We believe this address near-term landslide deficiencies, the Immediate Action 760-409-9496 Plan includes the following that have negatively impacted the Sunmor Alexandra Basko neighborhood over the many years and would serve to correct the 225 N.Sybil Road 646-789-8177 deficiencies: • The rental car support facilities, including wash and gas operations would Bill Hertel be relocated south of the terminal area to the current site of the holiday 226 760-32 -97 Drive economy parking lot. 760-325-9749 Y p g • The holiday economy parking lot would be relocated to the existing site Keith Zabel of the rental car service facilities. 669 Juanita Dnve 760-902-0070 The commercial vehicle hold lot would be relocated further south east along Kirk Douglas Way. We understand the CFC Fund has accumulated over$11 million in anticipation of these upcoming projects. Sunmor has participated in meetings with the airport director and staff over the many years and congratulates and supports the landslide improvements and car rental support facility relocation. Regards, Sunmor Neighborhood Organization Board Palm Springs International Airport Master Plan Update wee�w. �y City of Palm Springs City Council November 5th1 2014 ' Justin Bychek, PE, - - HNTB Corporation x 1 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Additional Materials 11-05-2014 MAM IMUPDATE ITEM 3.A. z Master Plan Overview Components Goals & Objectives �x Inventory PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE Forecast (FAA Approval) DECEMBE DRAFT Requirements Alternatives � Preferred Alternative •�- Implementation Plan -$ Finance -$ Phasing "M -$ FAA Approval PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 3 Facility Requirements Airside Requirements • Airfield capacity/Condition is sufficient through 2028 . Landside Requirements • Rental car facilities expansion and overhaul ; • Parking and road improvements. 1lt PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 4 Facility Requirements Terminal Requirements • Expanded , modernized ticketing ; • Baggage claim upgrades (near and long term); • Security screening expansion . GA/Support Requirements • Designate areas for potential FBO expansion ; • Aircraft maintenance expansion . row. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONALAIRPORT MASTER PLAN PLAN UPDATE 5 Master Plan Alternatives U-Ir '[ No-Build Immediate Action Plan Expand-(Terminal) New (Terminal) In-Place Processor ` ,r,i,., � PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT �QJ�v MASTER PLAN UPDATE -- 7 i i # Twyw TWY Ilk 1 — Y r _. ` ♦ F 1 ry ' i ,jug 11 WFF�y, ttf*J p� t i -- on-hirprKf PadRp Wra eoMWCW WKI@ Hold LEI Em%ing Terminal Developmed EtvinUCurNi& Landside Alternative 1 - No-Build (Existing Conditions) O Bosorp Reeal Car Facility Upw Property Line Figure 5-11 Boginp Public PgLnp AlrWn EntancsUl 0 Engrg CNGSntior _ _, EcMing*wAcle Palm Springs Intemational Airport Edging EmdoyeeParking Master Plan J:\46760—P$P\CADD\05—AL TER MATI%E51, �N?_Immed'nte drtta�Plan_09_1021.dwg Oct 2M, 2009 — 3:03rrn we C / � .o o •. .� a - '� `g� d�� iwyNR4 r4. r— r 1p Twy W-2 I I I j"X / y AfF 174, 11 If i3. n � 'lJ • }1� w 1 L 1 � cn v�i5 CIDK, - � 03 . � m c9 O cn L' N m Ln D r 1 FIT cm N d 1, J:\46760-PSP\CADO\95-ALTERt4A-nWS\ Alta-EgmodJn Plncc 09_I021.dwg Oct 21. 2009 - 3:06pm r 4 lka44 PM'W_3 . S�yyss i � r i JL LJ L { ja s B I l I 1 I i Li Li f I �� I���. � P`�' • ry 1 I ;._ML CD V --, �, , m CD , ly IQ `,D CD y• � ,' 1jS O F ybl�+f E No 01 yy ."'\, F 1 �• !� � �^♦'.Cam` �CV v w,19 :��n'9�y�F �\�� Mt ♦� � � ,� - /Lf �.`�� may\ �' ,% / �� /� ` \� \ C ' Fay�s��e ' ♦ ` �' - f .. �© </♦ / i ' � Cry \�: .`��♦♦ ko��ys V.�'�.�/ �I!// � qu OA n ~ -- - - - Dn-AirporlFacility LJ Potential EmployepParldng Potential Pmdway - Existing TerminalDonlopmeld Potential CINGSahan Existing Curbside Landside Alternative 4 - New Processor L__J Poter"Terminal Developmenl 17—_1 Potential Commercial Vehicle Hold Lot —'— Airport Prapvty Une Figure 5-14 —� ClosedEntrancelUt ''"'' AirportEntrance+Fidt Palm Springs International Airport L__J Potential Rental Car Facility �_, Existing Public Parking Potential Gate Expansion — = P*rrkal Peden Connecto' �--� Potential!Public Parking Former Development Fxi5linoVieaAids Master Plan L__J L--J 10 Master Plan Update Alternatives Evaluation Evaluation based on Goals & Objectives Costs & Financial Feasibility Assessment Technical Committee Comments (stakeholders) Public Comments (received during two public meetings) ` PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 11 Master Plan Alternatives Rough Order of Magnitude Costs Costs for each alternatives are developed based on an industry standard for estimating at this stage of development Includes: Construction Unit Costs ( Installed) Final Planning Program Management Design & Engineering Construction Management Additional Costs (permits etc. . . ) ` PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 12 Rough Order of Magnitude Costs New Expand (Terminal) (Terminal) Processor -in-Place $80 Immediate $63. 5 Million Action Plan Million $ 19. 5 No-Build Million 4 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT t MASTER PUN UPDATE 13 Master Plan Recommendation Alternative 2 — Immediate Action Plan Addresses existing facility needs PSP Rental Car Facilities: Expands rental car facility Relocates rental car facilities Consolidates some rental car facilities BALM SMIN(iS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTFA PLAN UPDATE 14 Alternative 2 Immediate Action Plan PSP Passenger Terminal $ Remodeled and expanded baggage claim area $ Remodeled and expanded ticketing area Does not conflict with long p term development opportunities ` PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 15 Immediate Action Plan - Terminal Remodeled and expanded baggage claim area $ Expanded structure to the north of the existing building . $ New permanent space would be designed specifically for the needs of the USo. ` PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 16 Immediate Action Plan - Terminal Remodeled and expanded ticketing area $ Expansion of circulation area through movement of the fagade. $ Design will be coordinated with the HSPB prior to approval . •mot' �` �—�?( PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE • • • � fig. • , I • I(( t=.vaAw.nIanAREA • � r t RELOCATEC use � •� #f ". R—=iOCATEC RE3tT&CAR ♦ ODLT'TER£L OLE.MlC AREA * ■ y'! E� ^� ?:N�LANIvG PAliSEMGER � � \� • ■ Kt ■ V 1 � ■ CE�LANItK.PASSENGER ' s ■ M1� A Clacu.A ■ • • • TICN 1 •* ■ .+ ` f • t 4% Expansion of •/! • CENT FtAL �'•� I , Baggage Claim \ ' • • 0 BY ��`. I Extension of Ticketing Circulation � �� � t • • t .` r r 1 • • � i,r � Area � o • + +' _ 'ILA S tit • tt `'t •t\1 �* � �I �-"`^�~JJ • T`� 4♦�` �� `\ '\ 1 • �� �'� ~ RELOCATEC Use RELOCATED ♦+ ♦�♦ '�'� t 1} �t P ♦ + Yf I" CHAR STORAGE ` \ ♦♦ JiMiREia t \ r+ - EIfTENC 5EST38ELTE COMoJNTLiJJ14 CIRCUEP/.CL ♦ ♦ IF:7�I(ET LCSBY t vl T, X Sc' 701NTLRISK CIMCUTArr'j.; T,` ♦� �•' i.r--_ -� INTCRM EPACE ,� • + SEI OOOr. A70 FAICEV IIE COLUMN ' '♦'�� l ' ELOGAT_c IEl Sl�J1R WALL (N)SKYCAP `1 �w I • • 1 R RESTORED ROCK WALL AT ♦ �— ------� tt „pA �t E)(TMOR i4TTr LANWCAFINC IEI SNEAR WALL TO RLMMN _ RE LOC RENT ATED CAN 1CL5 AL _____ 1*' Future USO ~� COUYTERS L OiT ' '\ �I� i NG GLASS WALL 10 ar VAN (9a L.P.Or COUNT1%) y� i' EXPANCEO CURB t �+ r_:gTERr7S CANCfF (e-:f.ANawY ROOT iJNE E]i15TING SCOPE 18 Master Plan Recommendation Implementation Plan Environmental Analysis (CEQA and NEPA) Advanced Planning/Programming Design Construction 'Ian] tion/ Ilk. Master P1 Programming � - • & Design Construction IF A;T Is FF M&;* PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 19 FAA Approval FAA Approvals $ One FAA approval process in the Master Plan : -$ Forecast: FAA accepted the forecast $ Development of the Immediate Action Plan and eligibility for funding can occur only after the completion of the NEPA process. ` PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE L a 9 I - . rf , � y d 4* IW 47 OL 1 � �I- 11 • J F h Y ii r J� • r�#� • T Al � . -• f - � - ._.-- is s 47 �SrJ