Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3/4/2015 - STAFF REPORTS - 2.H.
PALM SA �Op 4�y a u m City Council Staff Report DATE: March 4, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,320,405 FOR THE BICYCLE CORRIDORS, PHASE 1, CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Public Works & Engineering Department SUMMARY: Award of this contract will allow the City to proceed with construction of the Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1, City Project No. 13-32, (the "Project'), which includes new bicycle routes along the El Cielo Road, Alejo Road, Belardo Road, and Calle Encilia corridors. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt Resolution No. _ "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 891 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF GREEN BACKGROUND FOR SHARED LANE MARKINGS AND BIKE LANE MARKINGS;" and 2. Award a construction contract (Agreement No. ) to All American Asphalt, California corporation, for Bid Schedules A, B, C, and D, with the addition of Add Alternative Items No. 1 and No. 2 of the Alternative Bid Schedules A, B, C, and D, in the total contract amount of $1,320,405 for the Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1, City Project No. 13-32; 3. Approve a Construction Contract Change Order in the estimated amount of $50,000 to include Class 3 bicycle routes with green back (Type B) Sharrows and bike route signage on Mesquite Avenue (from Camino Real to Sunrise Way), and on Via Escuela (from Sunrise Way to Gene Autry Trail); 4. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute construction contract change orders up to an additional amount of $50,000; and 5. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. ITEM NO. JW City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015- Page 2 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) BACKGROUND: The City of Palm Springs adopted a Non-Motorized Transportation Plan in October 2011. In March 2014, Ryan Snyder prepared a 2014 Bicycle Route Plan that updated the City's bicycle routes, which was reviewed and supported by the City's Non- Motorized Transportation Committee ("NMTC"). The 2014 Bicycle Route Plan was submitted to City Council at its May 21, 2014, meeting for receipt and file with no action required by the City Council at that time. However, the 2014 Bicycle Route Plan identified recommended projects for the 2013-2014 fiscal year plus two consecutive years of Measure J funding commitments. Phase 1 of the Bicycle Corridor projects was presented to City Council on September 3, 2014, for direction and recommendation. At that time, with recommendation from the NMTC, staff identified the following first priority bicycle corridors as recommended by the 2014 Bicycle Route Plan: 1 . Escoba Dr. / El Cielo Rd. / Civic Dr. Corridor: • Install Class 2 buffered bike lanes while maintaining existing two-lane configuration and on-street parking on Escoba Drive from E. Palm Canyon Drive to El Cielo Road.' • Install Class 2 buffered bike lanes while maintaining existing two-lane configuration and on-street parking on El Cielo Road from Escoba Drive to Ramon Road.' • Install Class 2 buffered bike lanes by implementing a "road diet" by eliminating two travel lanes while maintaining existing on-street parking from Ramon Road to Tahquitz Canyon Way.' • Install Class 2 colored bike lanes by eliminating on-street parking on Civic Drive from Tahquitz Canyon Way to Alejo Road. 2. Alejo Road Corridor: • Install Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes between Belardo Road and N. Palm Canyon Dr. by eliminating on-street parking (north side adjacent to The Corridor commercial center), and by eliminating the eastbound left turn lane onto N. Palm Canyon Dr. • Install Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes between N. Palm Canyon Dr. and N. Indian Canyon Dr. by eliminating on-street parking (south side adjacent to the Port Lawrence site). • Install Class 3 route between N. Indian Canyon Dr. and Via Miraleste with Sharrows while maintaining 2-lane configuration.2 • Install Class 2 buffered bike lanes between Via Miraleste and Civic Drive while maintaining two-lane configuration and on-street parking.2 'Escoba Drive and El Cielo Road are designated as 4-lane Secondary Thoroughfare and 4-lane Major Arterial on the City's General Plan; maintaining a 2-lane configuration or implementing a "road diet" to convert from existing 4-lane configuration to 2-lane configuration will require a General Plan Amendment. AAlejo Road is designated as a 4-lane Secondary Thoroughfare on the City's General Plan, and maintaining a 2-1ane configuration with bike lanes will ultimately require a General Plan Amendment; implementing the proposed Class 2 bike lanes on the existing 2-lane configuration does not require a General Plan Amendment at this time. 02 City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015-Page 3 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) 3. Belardo Road / Museum Drive / Tahquitz Canyon Way Corridor: • Install Class 3 route on Belardo Road between Amado Road and Alejo Road with green-back Sharrows while maintaining 2-lane configuration and on-street parking. • Install Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes on Belardo Road / Museum Drive between Tahquitz Canyon Way and Amado Road by eliminating on-street parking (south and east sides of Museum Drive adjacent to the Desert Fashion Plaza), but maintaining on-street parking (north and west sides of Museum Drive adjacent to the Art Museum). • Install Class 2 colored bike lanes on Tahquitz Canyon Way between Museum Drive and Belardo Road while maintaining on-street parking. • Install Class 3 route on Belardo Road between Tahquitz Canyon Way and Baristo Road with green-back (Type B) Sharrows while maintaining on-street parking. • Install Class 2 colored bike lanes between Baristo Road and Ramon Road while maintaining on-street parking. • Install Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes between Ramon Road and Sunny Dunes Road while maintaining on-street parking. 4. Farrell Drive Corridor: • Install Class 2 colored / double buffered bike lanes between E. Palm Canyon Drive and Racquet Club Road by implementing a "road diet" by eliminating two travel lanes while maintaining existing on-street parking.3 5. Calle Encilia Corridor: • Install Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes between Ramon Road and Arenas Road while maintaining on-street parking • Install Class 2 buffered bike lanes from Arenas Road to Alejo Road while maintaining existing traffic 2-lane configuration and on-street parking. During consideration of implementing alternatives recommended by the City Engineer for the various bicycle routes at its September 7, 2014, meeting, the City Council discussed and approved the following: 1. Escoba Dr. / El Cielo Rd. / Civic Dr. Corridor: • The City Engineer did not recommend installation of Class 2 buffered bike lanes by implementing a "road diet" by eliminating two travel lanes while maintaining existing on-street parking from Ramon Road to Tahquitz Canyon Way, and recommended an alternative by installing a Class 3 route with Sharrows and maintaining the 4-lane configuration and on-street parking. The City Council considered eliminating on-street parking to allow for installation of Class 2 bike lanes; however, the consensus of the City Council was to maintain on-street parking and to proceed with installing a Class 3 route with Sharrows. 3Farrell Drive is designated a 4-lane Secondary Thoroughfare on the City's General Plan; implementing a "road diet" to convert from existing 4-lane configuration to 2-lane configuration will require a General Plan Amendment. 03 City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015- Page 4 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) • The City Engineer did not recommend installation of Class 2 colored bike lanes by eliminating on-street parking on Civic Drive from Tahquitz Canyon Way to Alejo Road, and recommended an alternative by installing a Class 3 route with Sharrows and maintaining on-street parking. The City Council considered and agreed with the City Engineer's alternative in order to maintain on-street parking. • The proposed Class 2 bike lanes on Escoba Drive (between E. Palm Canyon Drive and El Cielo Road) and El Cielo Road (between Escoba Drive and Ramon Road) were approved without discussion. 2. Alejo Road Corridor: • The City Engineer did not recommend installation of Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes between Belardo Road and N. Palm Canyon Dr. where on-street parking and the eastbound left turn lane onto N. Palm Canyon Dr. were eliminated, and recommended an alternative by beginning a Class 3 route mid- way between Belardo Road and N. Palm Canyon Dr. to preserve on-street parking and the separate eastbound left turn lane onto N. Palm Canyon Dr.; the City Council considered and agreed with the City Engineer's alternative. • The proposed Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes between N. Palm Canyon Dr. and N. Indian Canyon Dr., Class 3 route between N. Indian Canyon Dr. and Via Miraleste with Sharrows, and Class 2 buffered bike lanes between Via Miraleste and Civic Drive were approved without discussion. 3. Belardo Road Corridor: • The City Engineer did not recommend installation of Class 3 route on Belardo Road between Amado Road and Alejo Road with green-back Sharrows and suggested that the more appropriate bicycle route was to maintain the Class 1 bike path along the east side of Belaredo Road (the "Heritage Trail'); however, the consensus of the City Council was to proceed with installation of the Class 3 route with Sharrows to allow for joint use of the roadway by bicyclists. • The City Engineer recommended deferral of the proposed Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes on Belardo Road / Museum Drive between Tahquitz Canyon Way and Amado Road, and Class 2 colored bike lanes on Tahquitz Canyon Way between Museum Drive and Belardo Road, given these street segments will be reconstructed as part of the Desert Fashion Plaza project. The City Council agreed with the City Engineer's recommendation to defer these portions of the Belardo Road Corridor. • The City Engineer did not recommend installation of green-back (Type B) Sharrows as part of the proposed Class 3 route on Belardo Road between Tahquitz Canyon Way and Baristo Road given that requirements imposed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) require a formal experimental approval for use of Type B Sharrows prior to their installation; the City Council agreed with the City Engineer's recommendation. • Council Member Lewin proposed, and City Council agreed, that a consistent Class 2 bike lane with colored / buffered bike lanes be installed between Baristo Road and Sunny Dunes Road by narrowing the travel lanes and bike lanes. 04 City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015 - Page 5 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) 4. Farrell Drive Corridor: • The City Engineer did not recommend installation of Class 2 colored / double buffered bike lanes between E. Palm Canyon Drive and Racquet Club Road by implementing a "road diet" by eliminating two travel lanes in order to maintain on- street parking, and recommended an alternative where the four-lane configuration is maintained with Class 2 buffered bike lanes, but existing on- street parking is eliminated. Council Member Lewin suggested a hybrid approach, recognizing that there are certain residential sections where on-street parking should be maintained, with future consideration of alternatives for each segment described as: o Consideration of a "road diet" between Racquet Club Road and Vista Chino to eliminate two travels lanes and provide buffered bike lanes as a means of slowing traffic 4 o Consideration of the City Engineer's recommended alternative between Vista Chino and Tamarisk Road (by the Airport) to maintain the four-lane configuration with elimination of on-street parking to provide Class 2 buffered bike lanes. o Consideration of maintaining on-street parking for the residential sections along Farrell Drive The City Council agreed at that time to defer approval of the Farrell Drive Corridor until input was received from the neighborhoods and additional information on car counts was obtained. 5. Calle Encilia Corridor: • The proposed Class 2 colored / buffered bike lanes between Ramon Road and Arenas Road, and Class 2 buffered bike lanes from Arenas Road to Alejo Road were approved without discussion. On October 1, 2014, the City Council considered the various bicycle corridors previously reviewed at its September 7, 2014, meeting in authorizing the City's on-call traffic engineering consultant (Albert A. Webb Associates) to proceed with the final design of the project. At that time, the City Manager advised the City Council that staff had discussed the Farrell Drive Corridor with the various neighborhoods, and had confirmed that maintaining on-street parking was consistently important to the neighborhoods, with the neighborhoods not unanimously agreed on the "road diet" concept of transitioning Farrell Drive to a 2-lane configuration. The City Engineer recommended to the City Council that the City proceed with a Class 3 route with the use of Sharrows on Farrell Drive within residential sections, noting that Assembly Bill No. 1193 approved September 20, 2014, repealed requirements for cities to receive and be granted exceptions from the requirement to use design criteria and ° The City Engineer advised that considering the road-diet would require City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment, and that the four-lane configuration was warranted given existing traffic volumes. 05 City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015-Page 6 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) uniform specifications for purposes of research, experimentation, testing, and evaluation of modified design standards. It was the City Engineer's determination that this Bill would allow the City to avoid any formal approval from the state or FHWA for the use of Type B Sharrows, or for Sharrows on streets similar to Farrell Drive (with speeds in excess of 35 miles per hour [mph]), with specific findings made by the City Council. In accordance with the Bill, adoption of a Resolution by the City Council is required in order to install green back (Type B) Sharrows, and green background for bike lane markings. Staff has prepared a Resolution to facilitate the City Council's approval of the alternative criteria allowing for green back Sharrows and green background for bike lane markings, included as Attachment 1. It should be noted that staff does not currently recommend the installation of Sharrows on streets with posted speed limits in excess of 35 mph. The City Council heard from Sustainability Commissioner Vic Yepello regarding the proposed Farrell Drive Corridor. Mr. Yepello reported that the Committee was in favor of a Class 3 route through the use of Sharrows to maintain the 4-lane configuration and on-street parking, but suggested the City consider using green back (Type B) Sharrows and other signage to warn motorists regarding the shared travel lane, and requested that the City reduce the speed limit to 35 mph. Council Member Lewin proposed that the City proceed with the hybrid approach on Farrell Drive through the use of green back (Type B) Sharrows for a Class 3 route between Tamarisk Road and Tahquitz Canyon Way with enhanced signage; to study reduction of the speed limit to 35 mph; and to install Class 2 bike lanes through implementation of a "road-diet" to a 2-lane configuration on all other segments of Farrell Drive. Council Member Mills discussed concern for the Class 2 bike lane on Farrell Drive where it transitions into Racquet Club Road through the curved alignment, considering the high speed of traffic, and suggested further study was necessary prior to approving the concept of Class 2 bike lanes within that segment of Farrell Drive. The City Engineer recommended that a Class 2 bike lane not be extended on Farrell Drive north of Vista Chino, but that a Class 3 route with Sharrows be installed and extended around onto Racquet Club Road to Avenida Caballeros or N. Palm Canyon Dr. Council Member Lewin advised the City Council that the NMTC recommended for Class 2 bike lanes through implementation of a "road diet" eliminating two travels lanes and maintaining on-street parking for all segments along Farrell Drive from E. Palm Canyon Dr. to Racquet Club Road with the exception of the segment between Tahquitz Canyon Way and Tamarisk Road where a Class 3 route with Sharrows would be installed. This concept was generally supported by the City Council including the extension of Class 2 bike lanes along Racquet Club Road, subject to further study. The City's engineering consultant proceed to develop final plans for bidding based on the direction received by the City Council at its October 1, 2014, meeting, which were presented for the City Council's approval at its December 3, 2014, meeting to authorize 06 City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015- Page 7 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) bidding. At that time, staff recommended that the project exclude the Racquet Club Road and Farrell Drive bicycle corridors as those corridors include implementation of a "road diet" where the existing 4-lane configuration would be revised to a 2-lane configuration which is inconsistent with the current General Plan. On the basis that appropriate environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") must be completed to support an amendment to the General Plan to revise designations for Racquet Club Road and Farrell Drive from a 4-lane Secondary Thoroughfare to a modified 2-lane divided Collector roadway with Class 2 bike lanes, the City Council agreed to exclude the Racquet Club Road and Farrell Drive bicycle corridors as part of the final plans for bidding. However, staff has initiated a traffic study to evaluate existing and future traffic volumes to determine if the various 4-lane roadways designated for Class 2 bike lanes with "road-diets" on the 2014 Bicycle Route Plan will have the capacity with a 2-lane configuration to support existing or future traffic volumes, with the qualifying criteria being the maintenance of Level of Service "D" or better in accordance with the City's General Plan Goal CR2: Establish improved levels of service for efficient traffic flow and provide a safe circulation system, and General Plan Policy CR2.1: Maintain Level of Service D or better for the City's circulation network, as measured using "in season"peak hour conditions. Staff will present the findings of the traffic study at a future City Council meeting, including consideration of alternative street cross-sections for Farrell Drive and Racquet Club Road that may accommodate a 4-lane configuration with Class 2 bike lanes and on-street parking. Pavement Maintenance/Rehabilitation Improvements The prioritization of these four bicycle corridors has also required staff to re-prioritize pavement maintenance of these corridors, to ensure that the investment in traffic striping is not duplicated in the future when the City may have ultimately scheduled a pavement rehabilitation project on the same corridor. Therefore, staff reviewed the pavement condition of each corridor and determined that City Project No. 15-01 should also include pavement maintenance measures complementary to the traffic striping improvements, as follows: • Escoba Dr. (E. Palm Canyon Dr. to El Cielo Rd.): crack-fill/micro-mill/slurry seal • El Cielo Rd. (Escoba Dr. to Ramon Rd.): crack-fill/micro-mill/slurry seal • El Cielo Rd. (Ramon Rd. to Tahquitz Canyon Way): cold-mill / asphalt overlay • Alejo Rd. (Belardo Rd. to Civic Dr.): crack-fill/micro-mill/slurry seal • Calle Encilia (Ramon Rd. to Tahquitz Canyon Way): crack-fill/micro-mill/slurry seal Bid Process On January 10 and 17, 2015, the Project was advertised for bids, and at 3:00 p.m. on February 10, 2015, the Procurement and Contracting Division received four construction bids from the following contractors: 07 City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015- Page 8 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) Company Location Bid Amount All American Asphalt Covina, CA $1,160,100 Granite Construction Company Indio, CA $1,328,224 Tri-Star Contracting II, Inc. Desert Hot Springs, CA $1,341,295 Hardy and Harper, Inc. Santa Ana, CA $1,432,000 The Engineer's estimate was $1,321,148. The "base bid" amount is identified, as it was the basis of award of the contract. A full bid summary is included as Attachment 2. The bid documents allowed for separate costs for add alternatives to the original scope of each bicycle corridor project were three options: • Option 1: Installation of green background to bike lane markings • Option 2: Installation of green back (Type B) Sharrows • Option 3: Paint entire Class 2 bike lane with green background The total cost for the add alternatives Options 1 and 2 from the low bidder is $160,305 in addition to their low bid amount of $1,160,100. Alternatively, the total cost for add alternative Option 3 to paint the entire Class 2 bike lane with green background from the low bidder is $706,398 in addition to their low bid amount of $1,160,100. Given the high cost of Option 3, staff is recommending to only include add alternatives Options 1 and 2 at the additional cost of$160,305 for a total contract amount of$1,320,405. All American Asphalt of Covina, California submitted the lowest responsive bid. Staff reviewed the bid, references, and contractor's license, and found the Contractor to be properly licensed and qualified. A construction contract with All American Asphalt, for the Project is included as Attachment 3. On February 9, 2015, staff met with the NMTC to provide an update on status of the Bicycle Corridor Project. At the meeting, the NMTC recommended that staff complete the installation of a Class 3 bicycle route through installation of Sharrows on Mesquite Avenue from Camino Real to Sunrise Way, and on Via Escuela from Sunrise Way to Gene Autry Trail. The estimated cost to include this additional work to the scope of the contract is $50,000 as shown in Attachment 4. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve a construction contract change order to add these additional Class 3 bicycle routes as part of the Project. Local Business Preference Compliance Section 7.09.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code, "Local Business Preference Program," requires prime contractors to use good faith efforts to sub-contract the supply of materials and equipment to local business enterprises and to sub-contract services to businesses whose work force resides within the Coachella Valley. All American Asphalt is not considered a local business, and demonstrated sufficient evidence of good faith efforts to sub-contract the supply of materials and equipment to local business enterprises. n 08 City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015- Page 9 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) City Council Approval of Contingency Funds In addition to the pre-approved change order of $50,000 for the Mesquite Avenue and Via Escuela Class 3 bicycle routes, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve and execute construction contract change orders up to an additional amount of $50,000 (for a total cumulative amount of $100,000 above the awarded contract amount). Staff will carefully evaluate any additional or extra work claims presented by All American Asphalt, and if valid, submit to the City Manager for his approval. In this way, work can proceed uninterrupted as staff administratively process construction contract change orders up to the authority specifically authorized herein by the City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Section 21084 of the California Public Resources Code requires Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Guidelines are required to include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. In response to that mandate, the Secretary for Resources identified classes of projects that do not have a significant effect on the environment, and are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents. In accordance with Section 15301 "Existing Facilities," Class 1 projects consist of the maintenance of existing highways and streets and allows for implementation of traffic signal modifications and installation of facilities for health and safety reasons, therefore the Project is considered categorically exempt from CEQA. A copy of the CEQA Notice of Exemption is included as Attachment 5. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funding has been previously budgeted and approved for the project through the Measure J Capital Fund (Fund 260), and through the Special Gas Tax Fund (Fund 133). The cost of the bicycle route traffic striping and signage is $625,834.10 and will be funded from the Measure J Program for the Non Motorized Transportation Program, and the cost of the pavement rehabilitation improvements is $694,570.90 and will be funded from Gas Tax funds. Funds to encumber for award of the construction contract in the amount of $1,320,405 with All American Asphalt are available from the following accounts: • 260-4500-59445; $625,834.10 • 133-4298-50292; $694,570.90 Funds to encumber for approval of the estimated amount of a $50,000 change order for the completion of Class 3 bicycle routes on Mesquite Avenue and Via Escuela is available from Measure J Account 260-4500-59445. City Council Staff Report March 4, 2015- Page 10 Award Contract for Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1 (CP 13-32) Sufficient funds remain available in Measure J Accounts 260-4500-59445 and 260- 4493-50805 to facilitate the City Council's authorization to the City Manager to approve and execute construction contract change orders up to an additional amount of$50,000. SUBMITTED Prepared by: IA�ezen�, — Marcus L. Fuller, MPA, P.E., P.L.S. Assistant City Manager/City Engineer Approved by: David H. Ready, Es City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Bid Summary 3. Agreement with Performance and Payment Bond Forms 4. Engineers Estimate for Change Order 5. CEQA Clearance: Notice of Exemption s® Attachment 1 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 891 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF GREEN BACKGROUND FOR SHARED LANE MARKINGS AND BIKE LANE MARKINGS. WHEREAS, California Assembly Bill No. 1193 approved September 20, 2014, (the "Assembly Bill"), was enacted by the California Legislature in an effort to improve and promote the use of bicycle facilities throughout the state of California; and WHEREAS, prior to approval of the Assembly Bill, existing state law required the California Department of Transportation, (the "Department'), in cooperation with county and city governments, to establish and update minimum safety design criteria for the planning and construction of bikeways, and requires the Department to establish uniform specifications and symbols regarding bicycle travel and bicycle traffic related matters, (the "Caltrans Design Standards'); and WHEREAS, prior to approval of the Assembly Bill, existing state law required all city, county, regional, and other local agencies responsible for the development or operation of bikeways or roadways where bicycle travel is permitted to utilize the Caltrans Design Standards; and WHEREAS, Section 890.6 of the California Streets and Highways Code requires that: (a) the Department, in cooperation with county and city governments, shall establish minimum safety design criteria for the planning and construction of each type of bikeway identified in Section 890.4 and roadways where bicycle travel is permitted; (b) (b) the criteria shall include, but not be limited to, the design speed of the facility, minimum widths and clearances, grade, radius of curvature, pavement surface, actuation of automatic traffic control devices, drainage, and general safety, with consideration for the safety of vulnerable populations, such as children, seniors, persons with impaired vision, and persons of limited mobility, with the criteria to be published by January 1, 2016, and updated biennially, or more often, as needed; and (c) the criteria shall be established in consultation with the existing advisory committee of the Department dedicated to improving access for persons with disabilities; and WHEREAS, Section 890.8 of the California Streets and Highways Code requires that the Department shall establish uniform specifications and symbols for signs, markers, and traffic control devices to designate bikeways, regulate traffic, improve safety and convenience for bicyclists, and alert pedestrians and motorists of the presence of bicyclists on bikeways and on roadways where bicycle travel is permitted; and 12 WHEREAS, the Assembly Bill was enacted to revise existing state law to authorize a local agency to utilize other minimum safety criteria than those specified in Section 890.6 that meet specified conditions if adopted by resolution at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, the Assembly Bill amended Section 891 of the Streets and Highways Code to authorize an agency to utilize minimum safety design criteria other than those established by Section 890.6 of the California Streets and Highways Code if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the alternative criteria have been reviewed and approved by a qualified engineer with consideration for the unique characteristics and features of the proposed bikeway and surrounding environs; (2) the alternative criteria, or the description of the project with reference to the alternative criteria, are adopted by resolution at a public meeting, after having provided proper notice of the public meeting and opportunity for public comment; and (3) the alternative criteria adhere to guidelines established by a national association of public agency transportation officials. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings. SECTION 2: The City Council finds that given the nature of the tourism in the City of Palm Springs, and the growing popularity of the use of the City's bicycle routes by residents and tourists alike, that additional emphasis on the shared use of the City's roadways by vehicles and bicycles is important in improving the safety of both the motorist and the bicyclist. SECTION 3: The City Engineer has reviewed the Final Report dated December 21, 2010, for the City of Long Beach Experiment RTE 9-113E granted by the Federal Highway Administration for the placement shared lane markings, or "sharrows," augmented by green paint, for the purposes of emphasizing the shared use of the roadway by bicyclists, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A", (the "Long Beach Final Report'). SECTION 4: The City Engineer has recommended and the City Council has agreed that the installation of green paint as a background for bike lane markings and sharrows, for the purposes of emphasizing shared use of the roadway by bicyclists, will improve public safety as noted in the summary and conclusions from the Long Beach Final Report, in that the additional emphasis resulting from the green paint will create a heightened awareness by the motorists of bicycle usage in the lane, and that the additional emphasis has the potential to reduce the overall crash rate per bicyclist. SECTION 5: Pursuant to Section 891 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council approves alternative criteria allowing for the installation of green paint as a background for bike lane markings and sharrows. 13 ADOPTED this 4`h day of March, 2015 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA David H. Ready, City Manager ATTEST: James Thompson, City Clerk CERTIFICATION: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. is a full, true, and correct copy, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James Thompson, City Clerk City of Palm Springs, California 1 14 III EXHIBIT "A" FOLLOWS THIS PAGE 15 CITY OF LONG BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 333 WEST OCEAN BOULEVARD•LONG BEACH,CA 90802•(562)5704383•FAX(562)570-W12 December 21, 2010 Mr. Bruce Friedman Federal Highway Administration Office of Transportation Operations 400 Seventh Street. SW, HOTO Washington, DC 20590 FINAL REPORT: Second Street Sharrows and Green Lane In the City of Long Beach, California (RTE 9-113E) Dear Mr. Friedman: Enclosed is the final report for the City of Long Beach Experiment RTE 9-113E which was granted by the Federal Highway Administration for the placement of sharrows augmented by a six-foot strip of green paint down the center of the travel lane on Second Street in the Belmont Shore commercial district. The attached report summarizes the findings of before and after studies, including initial and subsequent counts and observations which serve as the City's final progress report based on twelve months of experience and observation. The following conclusions are made at this time: ■ The green lane facility has appeared to result in an approximate doubling of usage over the first 12 months of existence. Is The facility has been found to be popular with bicyclists. Bicyclists familiar with more traditional sharrows have noted that the additional emphasis resulting from the green pavement paint appears to be creating a heightened awareness by the motorists in the lane. • Crash experience Involving bicyclists is largely unchanged, while the crash rate per bicyclist is reduced from pre-project levels. • Crash rate not involving bicyclists was higher than in the previous year but does not appear to be related to the installation of the green painted sharrow lane. Continuing review of crash experience is suggested. BREC701rSOFFICE EIOSC£RRC ERVRDOMISAITM. FLEET SERVICES PUBLIC SERVICE RIBEET S PERSONNEL 330 W.Oc SM,S'Fbv SERVICES 26LSITVMPkAwn• 1601Sin Fn•�MSnR 303 W.Cbe• BM.,9'Ploor Long Sodh.G SOW ft lM29F m�.GSO �S BPWt GSa606 LP6. 662 .7 0063 Lam BYN.G WW2 l'+82)BTSaSSI Fa(M)5181612 FM(662)67040012 M.F.1662) Fu I562)5705/1� F.(5 )376 16 Mr. Bruce Friedman December 21, 2010 Page 2 Based upon the promising results, it is recommended that the experiment continue to be permitted for three additional years with the City reporting on an annual basis. Sincerely, MARK C RISTOFFELS Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer MC:SG:db PJce/markAetters/traffic/2ndstreetbikelanereportdec2010 17 1420 West La Van Arave.Sure"0 KOA CORPORATION °i�`' "" c7r+s>3wn e7us>3.ssir t PtANI:ING & ENGINEERING MwWg7j1p11,[91n Memorandum Date: December 21, 2010 Project# pun; Sumire Gant,Cfty of Long Beach From: Rock Miller, P.E.,KOA Corporation Subject Second Street Sharrows and Green Lane—Progress Report:October 2010 Comments: Second Street Sharrows and Green Lane PROGRESS REPORT: OCTOBER, 2010 PROJECT PURPOSE The City of Long Beach, California, received permission from the Federal Highway Administration to conduct an experiment along Second Street in the Belmont Shore commercial district. KOA Corporation assisted the City in securing the Request to Experiment (RTE) and by preparing the implementation design. The project provides for placement of Sharrow bicycle markings within the outer travel lanes of Second Street. Sharrows are approved for use by the State of California and they were recently approved by FHWA in the newly released 2009 edition of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. However, to augment these devices, a six-foot strip of green paint was provided under the RTE down the center of the outer travel lanes to further Indicate the appropriate position for bicyclists using the roadway and to emphasize the expected location for bicyclists to general traffic. PRE PROJECT CONDITIONS AND BICYCLE USAGE Second Street is a four-lane divided roadway passing through a commercial district of Long Beach known as Belmont Shore. The commercial district is approximately '/, mile long and features 13 traffic signals densely spaced. Daily traffic levels are about 35,000 vehicles per day, and the corridor is known for frequent vehicular traffic congestion. Second Street is the nearest through arterial to the beach area of Long Beach and is a desired route for bicyclists traveling along the Beach. Bicycle usage is visibly higher than in other areas of Long Beach and Los Angeles County, due to a variety of factors, including limited parking, pleasant weather, friendly terrain, and a major City commitment to improving bicycling. Upon FHWA approval of the demonstration, the City of Long Beach conducted a comprehensive analysis of bicycle usage of the roadway area prior to implementation of any changes. Bicycle traffic data was collected for three days from June 5-7, 2009, on Second Street at Corona Avenue with the assistance of the Long Beach Cyclists non-profit organization. The survey recorded 1200 cyclists over the 3-day period (Friday/Saturday/Sunday). The survey noted where each cyclist was riding, on the road LMAIR23 a.: CRtL111157. CIRA11119M. 18 The survey noted that 45% of cyclists were riding within the "door zone" where they could be struck by an opening door. I I% were riding within the right lane "taking the lane", the position that is unlikely to be involved in a crash with a vehicle door opening. This position may also provide better visibility for motorists on side streets and driveways of approaching cyclists. Most of the remaining cyclists were riding or walking on the sidewalk. This usage pattern is used as the benchmark for conditions prior to project implementation. INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION Second Street was resurfaced within the project limits immediately prior to installation of the special treatments. The sharrow markings and green paint were applied overnight on June 24 and June 25, 2009. The new shared lanes were officially opened to traffic on Saturday June 27 in a "ribbon cutting" ceremony. Approximately 200 persons attended the opening festivity and rode bicycles on the shared lanes. The event received local newspaper publicity (Long Beach Press Telegram) for several days prior to and following implementation. Portable changeable message signs were provided on each end of the project area to advise all travelers about the Shared Bicycle/Auto Lane Ahead. Poster-signs were also provided in the median of 2nd Street at various locations indicating to Ride the Shared Lane. FIGURE I -CYCLIST BEYOND DOOR ZONE City staff and KOA staff have monitored the facility since its opening on a regular basis to insure that any issues are addressed. Informal observations continued through the summer, and a formal 3-day usage survey was repeated in late summer. ISSAh13H:PS CR07iM-_CR1IiiY .:.• 19 _., t• 4t w R The installation did not generate any immediate concerns over safety to cyclists or improper usage by motorists. Over 3 million motorists and 50,000 cyclists used the facility in the first three months following implementation. Individual cyclists who use the lane appear to be very satisfied and comfortable. Many members of the project team have ridden bicycles within the lane and found the experience to be favorable. Generally no incidents of rage or concern have been observed, noted, or recorded. Motorists occasionally follow slower cyclists, but it appears evident that they are not falling behind the flow of traffic and end up queued at the next red light There is little net travel time loss from following cyclists. Motorists also sometimes change lanes to avoid slower cyclists, just as they do to avoid a car waiting for a parking space. The project visibly increased the number of cyclists that choose to use the shared lane, but many cyclists continue to ride in the door zone or on the sidewalk. Interviews with individual cyclists indicate that they do not know they can ride on the green lane, or they do not wish to use the lane. Some cyclists were observed to travel in the door zone to pass to the right of stopped vehicles in front of them, especially during peak flow periods when automobile traffic is extremely sluggish (similar to motorcycles on a freeway, except cyclists generally pass on the right). This activity probably also occurred before the lane was implemented. The project included the use of special custom Share the Road signs, modified from standard to show the bicycle in line in front of the vehicle. These signs were installed about 2 months after the lane was marked. After installation, it was hoped that the signs may help cyclists to understand that they may ride in the lanes. Spot surveys of usage of the lanes indicate that there appears to be a gradual trend toward less use of undesirable riding locations, but there was no substantial change in usage that is attributed to the signs alone. Public reaction has been generally positive. Most persons who have inquired about the project have reacted positively after they understand the goal and purpose. Some persons initially believed they could not drive their automobiles in the green lane. The number of these is not substantial enough to reduce overall equal use of both travel lanes, but it is the most frequent concern heard from motorists. When told that it is a shared lane, most persons have accepted and understood the purpose of the project The project has received a lot of discussion on internet websites and discussion boards. Videos of cyclists using the facility can be found on You Tube, and many references can be found on a web search for Long Beach Sharrows. The majority of this feedback has been positive among cyclist groups. Local cyclists have asked for more sharrows to be installed at more frequent intervals within the lanes. There was originally one sharrow on the green paint at the start of each 200-foot block. A second sharrow was added near the end of each block in April, 2010. LOSANGELES ON'LWD ORANGE SANO&GO SOUTHHAY 3 C. l: PrKOA CORPORATION NANNMG i ENGINEERING Figure 2—Modified Share the Road Signs The east end of the facility has also attracted attention in the area where the green lane begins. The green stripe begins in the second block while cyclists are intended to merge from a bike lane east of the project area toward the center of the lane in the first block. A request has been made to extend the green lane and sharrows so that it begins at the intersection where the bicycle lane ends. A treatment similar to a bike box is being considered so that bicyclists are positioned in front of vehicles at the entry point to the green lane. The paint used for the green lane does not have strong reflective properties. The paint utilizes a standard FAA specification for green paint used adjacent to airport runways. It has been requested that the paint be enhanced to show the green color more properly at night when the coloring is nearly undistinguishable. This has been countered by concern that the paint may be slippery when wet. Reflective glass beads used to create reflectivity also may increase slipperiness. A suggestion has also been made to modify the Share the Road signs to show the green stripe on the sign as background for the bicycle and vehicle. These types of changes are being considered. Most pending suggestions appear to be intended to improve public awareness of the proper usage of the green lane especially for bicyclists. Additional measures are being considered to improve awareness. UMANGELES CNIMUM CRAWIGE S&N DtEGO SOU TRAY_ 21 KQA Coxeo rc Figure 3 —Typical Block with Traffic and Land Use 'n r • R r - - The project was presented to the California Traffic Control Devices Committee in September, 2009. The State Committee voted to allow the experiment to continue and requested that monitoring reports be prepared and submitted to the committee. Committee members had concerns over a California Vehicle Code provision that requires bicyclists to ride as far to the right as is reasonably safe. The width of the green stripe may encourage cyclists to ride further to the left than the law intends. Committee members also expressed some concern over the need for proper or consistent usage of colored pavement. For this application, paint is being used in an area where motorists and bicyclists are expected to be joint users. In other California experiments under way colored pavement is being used in areas for long stretches within Class II bicycle lanes where motor vehicles should not be present. The Committee also requested that the project attempt to collect or obtain data regarding comparative use of Sharrows at similar locations where the lane has not been painted. The project team indicated that they would attempt to provide this information where it is reasonably available from other communities. LOSANM CRMM EMANGF SAN DWGO SOUTH SAY ` 2 % eN PRE-PROJECT CRASH HISTORY The crash history for Second Street was analyzed for the 12 months prior to implementation, with focus upon bicycle related crashes. Crash history is based upon Long Beach Police accident reports taken. The previous year found 34 accident reports, including 5 that were bicycle related. The actual written report for each bicycle related crash was closely analyzed to help establish a benchmark for the types of bicycle crashes chat were being reported. A summary of each bicycle related crash is presented below: DR#08-0056526 7/31/08 8:35 AM- Near Bay Shore Summary: Vehicle I NIB vehicle stopped in crosswalk to make Right Turn on Red to go E/B collided with a W/B (bicyclist, age 14) proceeding straight while riding on the sidewalk in wrong direction over the adjacent bridge. A pedestrian R/W violation was indicated on the report, but probably wrong way bicycle riding ma factor. Report clearly suggests bicyclist was riding, not walking the bicycle. The bicyclist was a minor injury, complaint of pain, cared by parents. DR#08-0059045 8l9/09. 14:47 PM at Santa Ana Ave: Summary: Vehicle I was stopped SIB and proceeded to make a Right Turn on Red to travel W/B and collided with V2, an E/B adult female bicyclist proceeding straight near the north curb in the street traveling in the wrong direction. Unknown Primary Collision Factor was noted in the police report. The bicyclist reported a minor scratch and complaint of pain DR#09-001 1287 2/13109 18:00 PM - 100' west of Park Ave: Summary: Vehicle I E/B adult male bicyclist proceeding straight collided with Vehicle 2, an E/B parked vehicle when its driver opened their door into the bicyclist. The report noted "Other hazardous movemeni'. No injuries DR#09-0031743 5/I/09 1138AM - Near Glendora: Summary: Report was coded to involve vehicle I E/B proceeding straight collided with W/B vehicle #2 backing. Unsafe starting or backing. One injury, complaint of pain. Report narrative does not match coding. Narrative indicates vehicle#2 (67 yr male) was riding bicycle near parked cars and moved left to pass a parked vehicle that was parked too far from the adjacent curb. V2 swerved into vehicle I while avoiding the parked vehicle. DR#09.0036132 5117109 1630 pm Near Park: Summary: vehicle I E/B stopped collided with vehicle 2 E/B stopped. Unsafe speed. No injuries. Narrative indicates car was stopped at green light in heavy traffic and was rear ended by bicyclist who was inattentive. Summary: ■ 2 wrong way bicyclists ■ One"door" ■ One swerve to avoid door ■ One rear end by bicycle. LCISAMELS CWZUWD QIWMW SkN Dti SOM BAY 6 G � v Four of the five crashes are of the type that appear to be unrelated to the use of the green painted bicycle lane. These include wrong way and door related accidents. It is also noted that the detailed narrative in the crash reports often conflicted with the check-box coding that would normally be used for aggregate analysis. The check-boxes do not appear to do a good job allowing information to be summarized precisely. PRIOR YEARS CRASH EXPERIENCE Crash experience was also compiled for prior years to determine typical annual experience for the roadway. Crashes were not analyzed in detail, but annual crashes and annual crashes involving bicycles were noted. The results are as follows: 2008-2009 34 5 2007-2008 41 5 2006-2007 35 2 2005-2006 n/a n/a 2004-2005 37 3 2003-2004 45 5 2002-2003 42 4 2001-2002 42 4 2000-2001 46 2 THREE MONTHS USAGE REPORT The bicycle counts and utilization study conducted before the green lanes were installed was repeated on 2^d Street thru Belmont Shore in mid-September (2010). A comparative analysis of the results is indicated below. Three Months Usage—Comparative Analysis Total Cyclists (Fri,Sat, Sun) 1252 1614 +364 On Sidewalk 533 415 -118 In Door Zone 612 667 +55 In Green Lane Area 160 561 +401 In left Lane I5 19 +4 Perhaps the most significant change is related to the total number of cyclists counted. While seasonal effects could apply, the after-green count showed nearly 400 more cyclists over the 3-day c !CIS]SAS : OBAEME SAN Dt£GO SOUPY BAY C. •) x,,ax , _01 , in total bicyclist usage. It should also be noted that the increase in the number of cyclists riding on the area occupied by the green lane was also approximately equal to the total increase. We believe it is reasonable to assume that the presence of the green lane has been responsible for most of the increase in net usage. One project goal was to reduce the number of cyclists on the sidewalk. The counts showed a 17% decrease in the number of cyclists using the sidewalk. They have evidently migrated to the street A secondary goal of this project is was to move cyclists out of the door zone. The number of cyclists riding in the door zone increased slightly on a numerical basis, but the proportion of all cyclists riding in the door zone decreased. It is probable that some new bicyclists attracted to the facility did not ride within the painted area of the lanes. Anecdotally, more car drivers seem to be using the left lane. Measurements of traffic prior to implementation indicated near equal use of both lanes. Some motorists are now observed to change to the left lane to pass slower cyclists. But others are observed to change back to the right lane after passing cyclists. There are other reasons for motorists to wish to avoid the curb lane, due to parallel parking, stopping buses, and cars waiting for pedestrians before turning right from the roadway. Due to overall capacity limitations and congestion, a significant shift in lane usage will not likely be measurable. Current bicycle usage is about one per 2-3 minutes, so few motorists will encounter a cyclist enough to produce a significant shift in lane use. The painted green lane appears to be very successful in attracting cyclists to the facility and encouraging attracted cyclists to use the green lanes. 34% of all cyclists counted were using the green lane as designed, up from 12% before it was painted. And while there was reported initial confusion and fear about right use of the shared lane by both motorists and cyclists, time has passed and both groups have learned to share the space safely. Interviews with selected restaurant and coffee shops have also indicated that they believe business generated by additional cyclists has improved. They are generally in favor of the experiment and have become more receptive to measures that would increase bicycle parking in the area. TWELVE MONTH USAGE REPORT The green lane facility was in place for one year at the start of summer of 2010. Bicycle usage counts were repeated during the mid summer to measure usage trends. The counts were also taken over a 3-day period (Friday/Saturday/Sunday). The results are indicated in the table below, however the results generally indicate that bicycle traffic has virtually doubled in the corridor over the past 12 months. There is no reason to explain the increase in usage other than the presence of the green lanes. a LrKjayraa.H. M IAM EM ' NCE, SOUTH$AY 8 r L •S KOA CORPORAMo.N �l�tlB+kl6&E11GIN6EM!IG Summer 2010 Usage Table-Friday I Saturday I Sunday Combined Total Cyclists (Fri, Sat, Sun) 1320 2428 +I 176(94%) On Sidewalk 533 513 -20 (-3%) In Door Zone 612 867 +255 (+42%) In Green Lane Area 160 937 +777 (485%) In Left Lane IS III +96 (680%) The trend in usage seems to be a general extension of the 3-month usage pattern. Numerical usage of the sidewalk has been largely unchanged, but the percentage of all bicyclists riding on the sidewalk has been reduced. Usage of the green lanes is much higher than the usage of this portion of the roadway prior to implementation of the green lanes. The number of cyclists riding in the "door zone" is higher than for the previous survey, but the percentage of bicyclists in the door zone is reduced. It is suggested that the green lanes have successfully attracted bicycle traffic to the facility, but the lanes have not been as effective in attracting existing bicycle traffic from the door zone to the green lane. Observations have also noted that bicyclists often travel in the door zone to pass to the right of queued vehicles due to traffic congestion. 12 MONTH CRASH COMPARISON A study of reported accidents was conducted for the 12 months following implementation of the Green Lanes. The "After Year"was defined as June I, 2009 to June I, 2010. There were a total of 50 accident reports, including 5 that were bicycle related for all collisions on Second Street from Bay Shore to Livingston. The total number of accidents was higher than in the prior year, but it is not apparent that the increase is due to the installation and use of the green painted bicycle lane. The total number of accidents involving bicycles was the same as the 12 months prior to implementation of the green lanes. Since usage of the green lanes has increased from the previous year,the accident rate per bicyclist has been reduced. Each of the bicycle-related accidents was analyzed further to understand the types of crashes that were occurring. Summaries of the five crashes are as follows: BICYCLE DETAIL DR#09-0062945 8/22109 15:45 PM - Near Pomona. Summary: Other. Vehicle I (bicycle) proceeding straight in collision with vehicle 2 stopping to back up for a parking maneuver, resulting in injury to the bicyclist Vehicle I was riding in the green lane per report. Minor injury, bike ride-able, refused treatment LCWJU9GEM_ . ORANC,f SAN DEW SOUtHBAY 9 (f Ij KaA CORPORA 10 DR#09-0064689 8124109 14:43 PM - Near Glendora. Summary. Vehicle I (bicycle) was E/B proceeding straight and collided with vehicle 2 who was making a westbound left turn. Brake failure was cited for the bicyclist. Brake failure was noted because bicycle was a fixed gear bicycle and had no traditional brakes. The report noted heavy congestion. The left turn vehicle may have turned across stopped vehicle traffic and struck the bicyclist who was passing to the right of stopped traffic and traveling in the door zone. Or may have just been poor visibility. Taken to hospital for treatment and released. DR#09-0076356 10/10/09 13:09 PM - Near Santa Ana. Summary: Vehicle I E/B was stopped to allow car in front to parallel-park in an empty space. Vehicle was struck by vehicle 2 (bicycle) proceeding straight at unsafe speed in rear. Bicyclist fled scene. VI driver said bicyclist admitted to being intoxicated and had no valid identification to present. No injuries noted. DR#10-0023646 4/6/10 10:46 AM - Near Granada. Summary Coded as Vehicle I E/B proceeding straight collided with vehicle 2 E/B straight, unknown PCF. Report narrative indicated that the bicyclist said a passing vehicle hit his handlebars while changing lanes to pass him. Driver said bicyclist suddenly drifted to the left and hit the car. Report was unable to assign fault. Bicyclist was 81 yrs and was transported to hospital as precaution. Visible injuries were scrape and pain in shoulder DR #10-0028162 4123110 20:20 pm --Near Park. Summary: Vehicle I W/B was proceeding straight and collided (rear end) with W/B bicycle, due to unsafe speed. Bicyclist was pushed forward into a stopped municipal bus. Vehicle I DUI and cited. Vehicle I was observed to be swerving in its lane before the collision. A brief summary is as follows: ■ Two rear End by bicycle ■ One left turn hit through bicyclist ■ One unsafe passing ■ One rear end by Automobile The types of accidents reported seem at a glance to be different than the types noted before the green lane was introduced. There have been no reported crashes on the sidewalks, no reported "doorings", and no crashes involving motorists overtaking bicyclists since the green lane was painted. The types of crashes are too widely varied to draw any more detailed conclusions from the reports. Since the annual total crash experience for the roadway in the past 12 months was higher than the annual average, it is appropriate to continue to monitor overall crash experience to determine if a trend is visible. COMMENTS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL The project area is a popular nightlife corridor, with many bars and restaurants along the route. A traffic enforcement officer assigned to the project area filed this general comment and report on the green sharrow lanes: iClSJ&JM M- CIRIMM AMARCE SfiN DEW SOUTH BAY f 0 G "This email is in regards to the Sharrow lane in Belmont Shore (2nd St). I have noticed since the inception that,for the most part the lane is used the way that its designer intended it to be used, that people ride in the lane at approximately 10-1 SMPH and not completely disrupt the flow of traffic." "I have noticed that on Friday and Saturday nights (between the hours of 2200-0300) a lot of the party goers on 2nd St are riding their bicycles to the bars. I have seen that bar patrons will ride their bicycles at a very slow pace in the lane and backing up traffic. I have seen bicycle riders pulling their friends on skateboards to their next destination. I don't think people are educated in the use of the lane because they are still riding their bikes on the sidewalk too" "These are just some of the issues that I have seen regarding the Sharrow lane" Other significant issues reported include an incident where an officer cited a bicyclist riding properly in the green lane for riding too far to the left of parked cars (as well as for riding with headphones on). Long Beach police have been advised that bicyclists riding in the green paint should not be cited for riding too far to the left. Also a transit vehicle did not realize the lane could be used by general traffic initially and stopped for passengers in the left lane (on the first day of implementation). SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions are made at this time: ■ The green lane facility has appeared to result in an approximate doubling of usage over the first 12 months of existence. ■ The facility has been found to be popular with bicyclists. Bicyclists familiar with more traditional sharrows have noted that the additional emphasis resulting from the green pavement paint appears to be creating a heightened awareness by the motorists of bicycle usage in the lane. ■ Crash experience involving bicyclists is largely unchanged, while the crash rate per bicyclist is reduced from pre-project levels. ■ Crash rate not involving bicyclists was higher than in the previous year but does not appear to be related to the installation of the green painted sharrow lane. Continuing review of crash experience is suggested. Based upon the promising results, it is recommended that the experiment continue to be permitted. FHWA may also wish to allow other agencies to experiment with similar or different sharrow treatments. 1CISAMMSd 014TAILO ORANt& SANDIEGO SOUTHBAY JJ KQ iiilw) RADON rW+Mgi�rrcEli�9 Figure 3 —Opening Day Ceremony (Pictured: Tony Cruz,City's Professional Cycling Ambassador;Andrea White-Kjoss,CEO BikeSation Long Beach; Suja Lowenthal, Member Long Beach City Council) i.- c C r NEXT STEPS The project remains a demonstration for FHWA and for California at this time. Based upon results to date, the project is considered a success in raising awareness and attracting cycling in the cooridor. There is a need to educate more bicyclists on proper use of the lanes, but their use has not been misunderstood by new bicyclists. Continued maintenance of the green paint has been a frequently asked question. If the treatment is ultimately approved for permanent usage,the City will consider a long life slurry treatment with green pigment, but the cost tCKATHR.ES CRWiYM SAWN DEG SOUTH BAYJ r2 29 XXV , RATION i 4 � r . v, .'.., r. of such a treatment was not found justifiable for a trial implementation, especially if it had to be removed at the end of the experiment. The City intends to continue to review the existing treatment and take actions that are advisable to improve the success of the experiment The City has also fielded numerous inquiries by other Cities and bicycle advocates about the experiment and has provided available information to inquiring parties. The Long Beach Press Telegram newspaper has run a few additional articles and USA Today has also reviewed the facility. The project has won an award from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for innovative design. A technical article about the lanes can be found at the following location that may require an ITE membership to view. hUJ/www.ite.org/councils/Ped Blke/newsletters/PBCfaI109.o0f Other relevant sites with press coverage or commentary include: http:llw .i3resstetegram.com/news/ci 12700564 httpJ/la.streets blog_o rg/2009/06/29/acl ists-pumped-about-long-beachs-green-sharrows! httpl/www.l bpgst.com/briaaLZ 156 ICJ/www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec aEo4o1eaE ks LOS ANGEIES CAGE O SOUTH BAY ..1 30 Attachment 2 31 BICYCLE CORMWRB,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT 1353 BID SUMMARY Dsa'mm 1e1uary10,2a15 BID SCHEDULE ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT GRANITE CONSTRUCTION Tail CONSTRUCTING HAM BHARPER BID ITEM ITEM OESCPoPTON WART. VXIi UNIT Prka EaVmap UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL 1 m;'MODissais. 1 L5 3dd.000.on $..000. $So Go.A5 f355000 .1 J.Do .1 GB3W "I.W0 a0 $d5,00000 2 TreTe Colo.I 1 LS 521000.Go $27.om $52 NO 00 $53000a E10,353CU 510,353,W EW.MO.m $d6.0000 3 Wet Em Pa Trent arfainrst9, I IS $3.150.00 53.150.0 53,000A0 S3000.11 S14,3 0a $td,33]. $1.112W $7.11245 Me ova am Pavement MS'do Lana Wtt WnN Lane Linea IRaia 4 hei Per Caltrana Standard 423d LF $0.32 Si N, Saw E1,270.2 Sam $2,540W $am $1,2703 Plan ANA.DIWil 13. C mlrol Doude YMlow Llne 5 IReised Mai Per Cellnn 6.825 LF 51.05 $7,166.3 St.m SO 825.00 61 SO 512185, 51.W 55.835. Somali Plan ANA.Debil 23. CO... Yal T-Wey Left 6 Turn tam(Reuetl Markeral Par amrit LF SO.m B4.639 K Sol E4.395.SO $2BE S14.OW EO.m 54,395.6 Calls SbMard Plan A20D. NAl 33. Car While Comm ivr0 Lim l Frosea Mmkxe) Par .11.M 2a. LF $1.31 f3R945 $125 $324315 $1 An SA 671.an $1 25 $3.2437 SlmWre Plan A2oo.Detail aEC. Aoi 6'W me TMrrmplaalc Blka 6 Lam Line Per Glares mend IB. LF mAs $40J0.32 $0 AD $1 GH.1 $053 $s 0B5.We $o 4a $3.WR4 IN.A300,Deres 39. Aptly 6'WniM Tlwrnpdaaie Bika 9 lam Impression Lino Per Call 10.739 LF Ea32 $S 4.Q SON $3221]0 SU 39 $4,1AS21 $a.30 $3,2211 Standard Plan AND.Oarrl 39A. 1a Appy V WNta TMrrefo cSd 210m LF 50.32 $6.]2256 E030 $8.30260 $032 $6.72256 $0.30 66.302.0 Aptly 4- WMte TromJgaetl 11 De9oml Buffer Meirpa lU 24 &.a LF $0.31 111.616.0 $0.20 $1]29 So $120 $103760 f0.20 $1.R9.6 AppIYn VYHile TMrmaFleatic mo 12 Lim' ns LepeM For e m Ca C CA SNMertl plan A a. 56 EA $,a500 $5..a DO $1.a. ES,BM. f$63]B Olfl6 ES$ran 00 fia.no MUTCD Fi urn spi 13 Pairs Curb RfO 2,.1 LF $137 $1 a1431 $1. $3,2018 $1.20 $28556 $1.30 333019 lintel Post arm Sign Per CAy O 14 Palm Wings Stardartl Owp 624. 66 EA $183 75 512,12I.50 S175.00 511BOO M S289.33 $19,0297 E175.00 $11.660.0 o Far Pon Apo,While Thrimpsealk SNre 15 Po onay BWyda Mnrkmp Per 51 EA $105.Oo 15.351 $100.00 E5.100.00 $53R6 $2,746 N S100.00 SO 100.0 Calbana HaVead StanWra Pon PSiC @ 250'mA Apgy emes Tranfermp i6 Familiant einM Pon A24 D Mmdnp Per..In.. SOMem 10 EA $t DSOo $1050. $10000 $1 coo ar $15i.39 $1.543. $10000 $1.000.00 Cebew . lWor ApplyPer Plen. Apply tY with TMno 17 Limit Lim Per City of Palm Wings 151 LF E210 E31 1.10 $20 E90200 E3.12 $4]1.1 V. $302.00 Sordartl 825. c0 (Rae Lam Di AI or U hmar 16 Llre(Reiaetl Mmkera)Pen CaNa Mo LF $131 as.CID $126 WS as $a Be f1980 $I. $3]5M RavilJ sleMara Plan ANC. Dlaa nc Aptly Anne Thermopolis rC...Tyye ry 18 (Lea)SAT-eared Px Coltrane Rev 54 EA E83a0 E3402a0 No on f3.2I00 EH.B1 R3.Bl]] f80.00 $3.2d0.O3 SUMna Ran A24A. Apdr TIngaar Type lv 30 (RyM1N ArrAnow mpl Px Capar¢Rev ] EA SS3W $4100 $8000 E420 0o E71 81 ES026 E6000 E42a.00 Standard Plan A24A Apply pi nomUser PeelWType 21 Raosirpn) Nand Per Cellren 1 EA $830] 59300 EBO O] $BO aO E11.81 $]1,81 ISO 00 "a as Rwiaetl Sta2- Win Timme Basen A24A Appl 12- Wnhe TMri Pa 22 CaW OrosaV- (pl WE01 Per 324 SF E2.10 Sam.40 S2.00 E646.0 53.12 E1,010. 52.00 SeW.Oa A24F ReVuea SUMara Ple Az4F 23 Aaryl TraXW Sgnal IN. 4 EA $1]25 a0 ",.On.0 E3.O3o o0 $12.000.0 $a 590.AS $14.%1.H1 E4.WO.m 616MOO Carl zones For oacn Abandon Easing lamas r Oleclo 24 Loop a. ImYll New Vefticl 19 EA $nlC 0o $irf.00 $2m00 54.]50.Go V.21 So B. f3]J.Oa E5,]W.W Dlxuon Loop MroraMJlly 0.25 inch.On Eswle 25 Or'ne ran E.Palm Canyon Or.W 86,10U 5F SO IS $13,]]80 $0.15 $12.15p W14 $12054.00 $0.16 $13]]6. El Cab Rd for Murry awl. Crarkaulin, rack Bury wrotrvgron l Proper polymer 26 Moaa1M Shirty (RIMS( erd al el SF So. $22.Wn $O 50 $.pro OC m.42 E36.16200 $037 E31,851.00 .PWrn nant wxk on Eamb Dri From E. Palm Carryon Or. in El Cab Fm MicruMilirpa sires ea on ElCyl 27 Rold(from Eaoom Drive W Rannor 29].]00 OF 5016 $41HU20 $a 15 g".me0 $a.1A $41678I $016 E4]632.0 Road)im&un to 1. Crank-Peeling, ck4Jling oAr lion of Ruaaer Polyma 26 MWarea Slurry(l. am al 29>.]00 SF $0.28 SBJ.3560 $OM E119090.0 E042 E135031.0 E0.37 5110.149.0 ePPJnesm-I on El Ciln Rnaa from EPwbe Drive b R.nnn Road Co.Mil L.Wl AC Pere a- 2B VolatileRTnickn (0'2'l on El CaRos s tl 53,000 SF W1. $&4m0 $0.20 $106000 so 18 E&5a0.m $O JO $10."on Car Te uRCan',noon RAW,to We Cook prou lag, verar cprewamnm, Ac.oaeaay,aM W else orrml am 0nro CHI 2.310 TON EB2Y2 E213.0282 E11000 E254,1m.0 f11000 E2A1a00 510500 524?5500 Roca (Iron anon ROM to larmal,cen Car noon) 31 Fro- Efrl Ron AM 5 EA $A 51r1r,74 532,888] $4800,00 $22,500.00 $2,649.AS $12]4T $6000.00 $25,m00 Coal TOM BPuema He m Upprade Efoorm Curb Ramp wit11 EA Smom $Twra $15a000 E16500.0 1,-7- -901 12000.00 E22NO.p Timms Camara 33 Fold pores 1 IS E35000.00 Eam0 S350m.00 f36.m0.0 $35,O.m 52CXO 525.00000 SNOOD CO TOTAL Wall TOTAL 1 $116.9140 TOTAL 5646,475. TOTAL 377000.0 ALTERNATIVE ADDITIVE BID SCHEDULE ITEMS ALLAYEMCANASPXALT GRANITE CONSTRUCTION TRISTARCONSTRUCTINO HARDY 6 HARPER BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION OUANT. VNIT VNIT Ptla Enlmeu UNIT PR. TOTgL UNIT PR. TOTAL VMT pR. TOTAL I Paim Green Beckproune To Bike m EA EAm D $3L3B0A fQ0a0 323520.0 $45a.N 325 i26. 5450.00 E25 Z0oD m Mark 3 Peil OrWn PaOWrouM To$o St EA E3]I1.at S16,B]aa $.a.. $1122.D $21286 Slo,0a5. S25o.o0 Et?IN Raedw Markings, 3 2 J Imr,Grmn Beck9r0uM TO Brill v$B]0 SF 3350 SINN5. 3330 $181,6]1. E4.02 '28..61].40 $3.50 E'W.. B&e late BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT 1132 BID SUMMARY 64 Opening.February 10.2015 BID SCHEDULE ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT GRANITE CONSTRUCTION TRI-STAR CONSTRUCTING HARDY B HARPER BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION WANT. UNIT UNIT Price Estimate UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL 1 Initial MpSllizmon 1 LS $8500,00 $9500.00 $3,000.60 $300D60 $3,152.00 $30,000.00 $30000.00 2 Traffic Contrd 1 LS $2 000.00 $2 000.00 $9.300.00 WWI)00 $4189.00 $4,189.00 $30 D00.00 $30 000.00 3 Remove ExidSng Tr Sloping Markings and is PavemententMarkers , 1 LS $10,500.00 $10,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 W.665.00 $6,865.00 $10.705.60 $10,705.60 Construct OouNe Yellow Lines 4 (Raised Markers) Per Caltrens 6.904 LF $1.05 $7,249.20 $1.00 $6,904.00 $1.80 $12,427,20 $1.00 S6.90400 Standard Plan A20A.D II2 . Construct White Channelbing Line 5 (Raised Markers) Per Caltrans 250 LF $1.31 $327.50 $1.25 $312.50 $1.80 $450.00 $1.25 $312.50 Standard Plan A20D.Detall 38C, Apply 6'White Thermoplastic Bike 6 Lane Line Per Caarans Standard 11,101 LF $0.42 $4,696.02 $OAO $4,472A0 $0.53 $5,925.93 $0.40 54.472.40 Pian A20D Daunt 39, Apply 6'White Thermoplastic Bike l Lane Intersection Line Per Caltrens 4.039 LF 50.32 $1.292.48 $0.30 $1.211 70 $0.39 $1,576.21 $T30 $1,21170 Standard Plan A20D,Dead 39A. 8 Apply 4'White Thermoplastic Solid 6,002 LF S0.32 $1,920.64 S0.30 $1,80060 $032 $1,92064 $Dw S1.800.60 Line Apply 4" White Thennoplasl' 9 Diagonal Buffer Markings Q 24' 6,311 LF $0.21 $1,325.3t $0,20 $1,262.20 $1.20 $7,573.20 $0.20 $1,262.20 Spachro Apply Mite Thermoplastic -Bike 10 Lane' Legend Per Caftans 43 EA $t05.00 $4,515.00 $100.00 $4,300.00 $83.78 $3,602.54 $100.00 $4,300.00 Standard Plan A24D and CA MIJTCDF 11 Paint Curt Red 460 LF $1.38 $u5.W S1.30 9800 $1,20 $552.00 130 $59800 Install Post And Sign Per City 01 12 Palm Springs Standard 624. Sign 31 EA $183.75 $5,696.25 $17500 $5.42500 $2T991 $B,677.21 $175.00 $5,425.00 Per Ran. Apply While Thermoplastic Shared 13 Roll Bicycle Marking Pe 22 EA $105.00 $2,310.00 $100.00 $2,200.00 $53.86 $1.184.92 $100.00 $2,200.00 Caltrans Revised Standard Plan A24C @ 250'Max. Apply White Thenooplastl 14 Pavement Word Marking Per Caltrans StandardordPlan A240. 12 EA $105.00 $1,260.00 $100.00 $1,20000 $15,1 39 $1.85268 $100,00 $1,200.00 Wording Per PI Apply 17 White Thermoplastic Limit 15 Line Per City of Palm Springs 184 LF $2.10 $366.40 S2.00 $W600 $3,12 $57408 $2.00 $368.00 Standard 625. Apply White 71tenmpias0c Type IV 16 (Leto Anpw Per Caltrans Revised 2 EA $63.00 $126.00 $60.00 $12000 $71.81 $143.62 $60.00 $120,00 Standard Plan A24A. Apply While Pnermoloss6c Type IV 17 (Right)Anow Per Caltrans Revised 2 EA $6360 $126.00 $6000 MUM $71.81 $143.62 $60.00 $12D.00 Standard Plan A24A, 18 Flell Orders 1 LS $10,000.00 $10.000.00 $10.000.00 1 $1000o.00 $10.0m.00 $10000.00 TOTAL $63,896.40 TOTAL S62,595.00 TOTAL I $70,11O1.95 TOTAL $111,000.00 BID SCHEDULE B ALTERNATIVE ADDITIVE BID SCHEDULE ITEMS I ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT GRAN ITS CONSTRUCTION TRI-STAR CONSTRUCTING HARDY&HARPER BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANT. UNIT UNITPrlce Estimate UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL 1 Paint Green Background To Bike 43 EA $560.00 $24,080.00 $420.00 $18,060.00 $549.03 S23,608.29 5450.00 $19.350,00 Lane Markin s 2 Paint Green Background To Shared 22 SF $490.00 $10,780.00 $220.00 $4,840.00 S254.13 $6,691 S250.00 $5,500.00 Roadivey Markin s. 3 Paint Green Background To Enure 40755 SF 1 $3.50 $142.642.50 S3,W $13TA9160 Sit N $1"SW 20 $3.30 $13,1.491.50 Bike Lane 33 BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT 13-32 BID SUMMARY Bid Opening:February 10,2015 BID SCHEDULE C ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT GRANITE CONSTRUCTION TRISTAR CONSTRUCTING HARDY 8 HARPER BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION OUANT. UNIT UNIT Price Seria a UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL 1 InHial MobiBration 1 LS $49,700.00 $49,700.00 $16,000.00 $18.000.00 $9.851.00 $9,654.00 $30.000.00 530,00000 2 Traffic Control 1 LS $2,400.00 $24,000.00 $15,00045 $15.000.45 $7,46100 $7,481.00 $30.872.45 $30.672.45 3 Cons M kWhiteaeiP r Lane ns Lines 98 LF $0,32 $31.36 $0.30 $29.40 $0.60 $58.80 $030 $29.40 (RaisedConstruct Doi Yellov Lines 4 (Raised! Markers) Per Calvans 7,162 LF $1.05 $7,520.10 $1.00 $1,162.00 $1.80 $12,891.60 $1.00 $1.162.00 Standard Plan A2 A Detail 23. Coni Yellow Median Island 5 (Raised Makers) Per Caltrans 237 LF $1.05 5248.85 $1.00 $237.00 $3.60 $853.20 $1.00 $237.00 Standard Plan A20A Detai130. ConsUUCt Mae Channelizing Line 6 (Raised Makers) Per Caltrans 1,296 LF $131 $1.697.76 $125 $1.64.00 $1.80 $2,33260 $1.25 $1,620.00 Standard Plan A D,detail 38C. Apply 6"White Thermoplastic Bike T Lane Line Per Caltrans Standard 11,016 LF $0.42 $4.626,72 $0.40 $4.406.40 $0.53 S5,B38.48 $0.40 54.406.40 Plan A2 0 Detal 39. Apply 6"White Thermoplastic Bike 8 Lane Intersection Line Per Caltrans 12,146 LF $0,32 $3,88672 $0.30 $3,643.80 50.39 54736.94 1 $3,643.80 Standard Plan A2013,Detall 39A. 9 Apply 4'White Thermop istic Solid 9,108 LF $a.m $2,914.56 $0.30 $2732A0 $0.32 $2,914.56 $0.30 $2,T32A0 Line Apply 4" White Thertnoplar 10 Diagonal Buffer Makings @ 24 9.396 LF $0.21 $1,973.16 $0.20 $1.879.20 $1.20 $11,275,20 $0.20 $1.579.20 Spacing Apply While Thermoplastic 'Bike 11 Lane' Legend Per Caltrans 67 EA $10500 $7.01 $1D0.00 $6.70000 1181 $5.613.26 $100.00 $6.70000 Standard Plan A24D and CA M T OFi 12 Pant Curb Red 3,577 LF $1.37 $4.90049 $1,30 $4.650.10 $1.20 $4.29240 $1,30 $4.650.10 Install Post And Sign Per City Of 13 Palm Springs Standard 624, Sign 101 EA $183.75 $18.558.75 $1 MOD $17.675.00 $292.04 $29.496.04 $175.00 $17,676.00 Par Ran. Apply White Thermoplastic Shared 14 Roadway Bicycle Making Par 13 EA $10500 $1,365.W $10000 $1.300,00 $5386 $700Aa $100.00 $1,3D0.00 Calvans Revised Standard Plan A24C Q 250'Mar. Apply White Themwplastl 15 Pavement Word Making Par 3 EA $105.00 $315.00 $100,00 $300.00 $154.39 $463.17 $10000 $30000 Calvans Standard Plan A24D. .Mankind Per Plan Apply IT White Themroplastic Limit 16 Line Per Cry of Palm Springs 19 LF $2.10 $39.90 $2.00 $38.00 $3,12 $59.28 $2.00 $38.00 Standard US. Consimd Lane Drop At Intersection 11 Line(Rasetl Makers)Per Caltrans 165 LF $1.31 $216.15 $1.25 $20625 $0.66 $106.90 $1,25 $206.25 Revised Standard Plan A20C, Detail 37C Apply White Thermoplastic Type IV 18 (Left)Anew Per Cakrans Revasel 11 EA $63.D0 $693.00 $6000 $660.00 $71,81 $789.91 $6000 $66000 Standard Plan A24A. Apply White Thermoplastic Type IV 19 (Right)Arrow Per Caltrans Revised 10 EA $6300 $630.00 $6000 $600.00 $71.81 $718,10 SUM $60000 Standard Plan A24A. 20 Adjust TfaRmc Signal Video 9 EA $1.670.00 $10,020.O0 $3,000.00 $18,000.00 $3,59DA6 $21,542.76 $4,000,00 $24,000.00 Detection Zones For Approach Abandon Existlng Vehicle Detection 21 Loop.Install New Vehicle Detention 6 EA $310.00 51,860.00 $650.00 $3,900.00 $777 94 54,667.64 S700.00 $4,200.00 Loop Miao-Milling 0.25 inches on Alej 22 Road horn Belaft Road to Civic 509,600 SF $0.16 $81.53600 WAS $76,440.00 $0.13 $66,248.00 $0.16 $81,536.00 Drive for slurry wall. Crack-sealing, crack-tilling, onstruction of Rubber Polymer 23 Modified Slurry (RPMS), and all 5D9,600 SF $0.26 $132,496.00 $0.35 $178,360.00 $0.42 $214.032.00 $0.37 $188,562.01) appudensnt wok on Alsip Road from Belando Road to Civic Di 24 Field Orders 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,00000 $15,000,00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15.000.00 $15,000.00 515.000.00 TOTAL $371.2W.52 TOTAL $378,510.00 TOTAL SQ1,968.221 TOTAL We,odB.oD BID SCHEDULE C ALTERNATIVE ADDITIVE BID SCHEDULE ITEMS I I ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT I GRANITE CONSTRUCTION TRISTAR coNgTRUC nNGT HARDY 8 HARPER BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION OUANT. UNIT UNITPrICe Satirists UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT Pft. TOTAL 1 Paint Green Background To Bike 67 EA $560.00 $37,52000 $420.00 $28,140.00 $477.37 $31,983.79 $450.00 $30,150.00 Marchos rc 2 Paint Green Background To Shared 13 SF $925.00 $12,025.00 5220.00 52.860.00 $220.96 $2,812.48 $250.00 $3,250.00 Roachyary Mal 3 Pairs Green Background To Entire 65,216 1 SF 1 $3,50 $228.256,00 $3.30 1 $215,212.81) $3.99 $260,211.84 $3.W E215212.60 Bike Lane 34 BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT 13 2 BID SUMMARY 10,ximing Febrear,10,205 BID SCHEDULED ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT GRANITE CONSTRUCTION TR14TAR CONSTRUCTING HARDY&HARPER BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION OUANT. UNIT UNIT Price E4DrrratB UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL i InBial McWhorter. 1 LS $16,200.00 $16,200.00 $11,000,00 $11,000.00 $5,18600 $5,186.D0 $24,00000 $24,OW 00 2 Traffic Control 1 LS $6,400.DO S6,401).DO $19,912.55 $19,912.55 $6,523.00 $6,US 00 $24.000.00 $24,00000 3 Remove Raises Traffic Striping, 1 LS $2,625.00 52.625.00 52.500.00 52,500.00 $6.55200 $6552.00 $8.577,55 $8.577.55 Markings,and Pavement Markers Construct Double YNbw Lines 4 (Rained Markers) Per Caleera 2415 LF $1,05 $2535.75 $1.00 $2,415.00 $1.80 $4,347.00 $1.00 $2,41500 Standard Plan A20A D.01123. Conalmcl Yellow Median Island 5 (Rased Markers) Per Caleara 593 LF 51.05 $622.65 $1.DO $593,00 $3.60 $2,13400 $1.DO $593.00 Standard Plan A20A Oetai130. Jalruct Yellow Twn-Way Left 6 Tom Lane (Rained Notes) Per 1586 LF $0.95 $1.506.70 5090 $1,427.40 $2.88 $4,56768 $0.91) $1.427,40 Callrans Standard Plan A200. Construct Mot Channellzirg Line ] (Raised Markers) Par Capra. 1,335 LF $1,31 $1748.85 $1.25 $1.668.75 $1.W $2,40300 5125 $1,66875 StaMeN Plan QOO,betel 38C Apply 6"Mae Thermoplastic Bike 8 Lana Line Per Coltrane Standard 9033 LF $042 $3.793.86 SO 40 $3,613.20 $0.53 $4,78749 $0.40 $3.513.4 Plan A20D DeMil 39. AWly 6-Mite Thermoplastic Bike 9 Lana mosseo$on Line Per Ca4rsra 6310 LF $0.32 52,01920 $0.30 51,89300 $0.39 $2.460.SO $0.30 $1,893.00 Standard Plan QOD,Oabal 39A. ID Apply 4"While 7118mgPlastic Solid ],90] LF $0.32 $2,530D4 $0,30 $2,372.10 $0.32 $2,530.24 $030 $2,37210 Line Apply 4' Mite Thermoplastic 11 Diagonal Buffer Markings @ 24 6,530 LF $021 $1,371.Do $020 $1.30600 $120 $7,836.00 $0.20 $1.306.00 IS pacing Apply Mile ThermoPlaetie 'Bike 12 Lane" Legend Per Cadence 37 EA $10500 $3,88500 $100.00 $3.70000 $8378 $3.0%as $100,00 $3.700.00 Standard Plan A24D and CA MU1CD Finum 9 - . 13 Paint Curb Red 450 LF $1.36 5612.00 $1.30 $585.00 $1.20 $Maw $1.30 $58500 Install Poet And Sign Per City Cf 14 Pelm Songs Standard 624. Sign 30 EA $183.75 $5.512.50 $175.00 $5,250.00 $288.83 58,664.90 $175.00 $5,25DD0 Per Plan. Apply Mite Thermoplastic Shared 15 Roadway Bicycle Marking Per 3 E4 8105.00 $31500 $100.00 530000 $53.86 $161 SO $100,00 $300.00 Catirens Reed Standard Plan A24 250'Max. Apply Mae Thermoplastic 16 Pavement Word Marking Per 13 EA $105.00 $1,365.0o $100.Do $1.300.00 $154.39 E2,007,07 $10000 $1,300DO Cetirans Standard Plan A24D. lWordso Per Pl n. Apply While TMrmoplaslc Type IV 17 (Left)Arrow Per Caft..Read 20 EA $6300 $1,260.00 560.00 $1,200.00 $71.81 $1436.20 WOO $1,20000 Standard Plan A24A. Apply PJMMe Tlkvmoplastk Type IV 18 (RION)Amaw Per Cehrans Rersed 6 EA $6300 $378.00 560.00 $360.DO $71.81 5430.66 WOOD $3900 Standard Plan A24A Abandon Existing Vehicle 19 Demcdon Loop and Iratall New ] EA $310,00 $2.1700O $6:511.00 E4,550.00 $7]].94 $5.445.58 $70000 as 900.Do Vehicle Detection Loop Miero-Milling 0.25 inch.on Celle 20 Endlia from Ramon Road to 146.300 SF $0.16 $23.4D8.00 $015 $21,945.DO $0.14 $20,482.00 $0.16 $23,408.00 Tatgui2 Canyon Way for slue, seal. Crackweing, crack-Ilmer construction OI Rubber Polymer 21 Modified Slurry (RPMS), and all 146300 5F 80.26 $38.038.00 $046 S70,224.00 $0.42 $61.446.00 $0,37 554,131.00 appurtenant work on Calle Emilia from Ramon Road to Tahqui2 22 FieMOrdem i LS $10,000.W $10,000.00 $1g000.D0 $t0.000.DD $10,0OD 00 $10.000.00 $10.000.DO $10,000.00 TOTAL $125297.05 TOTAL $168,115.001 TOTAL $162.042.16 TOTAL $1]]1000.00 Be BCHEDULE D ALTERNATIVE ADDITIVE BID SCHEDULE ITEMS ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT GRANITE CONSTRUCTION TRHSTAR CONSTRUCTING HARDY&HARPER BID ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION OUANT. UNIT UNIT Price EstimNa UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL UNIT PR. TOTAL 1 Pamt Green Badgmune To Bike 3] EA 1 $:i60.00 $20,]2000 $420.00 E15,540.00 $566.95 $2p,97715 E100 $3700 Lan¢Marimba 2 Paint Green background To 3 SF $1,650.00 $0.850.00 U20.DO $660.00 $26242 $787,26 $100 $3.00 Sharetl Roadwa Makin s. 3 Palm .an Background TO Entire 38,987 1 SF 1 $3.50 1 $136454.SO $3.30 $128.657.10 $4.13 $161,016.31 $1.00 $38.987.00 Bike Lena TOTAL OF BID SCHEDULES A THROUGH D: SLtao4ao.00 M,ase,224.aa 51,a41,2$5.00 M4a2,B0a.00 1 2 3 4 2111Y2015 THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE,RESPONSIBLE BIDDER IS ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT WITH TOTAL BID AMOUNT OF11.160.100.00 35 Attachment 3 36 AGREEMENT (CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT) THIS AGREEMENT made this 4th day of March, 2015, by and between the City of Palm Springs, a charter city, organized and existing in the County of Riverside, under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, hereinafter designated as the City, and All American Asphalt, Inc., a California corporation, hereinafter designated as the Contractor. The City and the Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 --THE WORK For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by City, Contractor agrees to furnish all materials and perform all work required to complete the Work as specified in the Contract Documents, and as generally indicated under the Bid Schedule(s) for the Project entitled: BICYCLE CORRIDORS, PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 The Work comprises the construction of bicycle lanes along the El Cielo Corridor from Escoba Drive to Tahquitz Canyon Way and portions of Escoba and Civic Drive; Alejo Road between Belardo Road and Civic Drive; the Belardo Corridor between Alejo and Sunny Dunes; and Calle Encilia between Ramon Road and Alejo Road. The work includes micro-milling, slurry seal, cold milling, asphalt concrete overlay, removal of existing traffic striping, pavement markings and markers, installation of thermoplastic bike lane lines, thermoplastic bike lane markings, thermoplastic crosswalks, curb painting, signs, and all appurtenant work. ARTICLE 2 -- COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION The Work to be performed under this Contract shall commence on the date specified in the Notice to Proceed by the City, and the Work shall be fully completed within the time specified in the Notice to Proceed. The City and the Contractor recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement, and that the City will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the time specified in Article 2, herein, plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with applicable provisions of the Standard Specifications, as modified herein. They also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by the City if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, the City and the Contractor agree that as liquidated damages or delay (but not as a penalty), the Contractor shall pay the City the sum specified in Section 6-9 of the Special Provisions for each calendar day that expires after the time specified in Article 2, herein. In executing the Agreement, the Contractor acknowledges it has reviewed the provisions of the Standard Specifications, as modified herein, related to liquidated damages, and has made itself aware of the actual loss incurred by the City due to the inability to complete the Work within the time specified in the Notice to Proceed. BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 AGREEMENT PAGE 1 37 ARTICLE 3 -- CONTRACT PRICE The City shall pay the Contractor for the completion of the Work, in accordance with the Contract Documents, in current funds the Contract Price(s) named in the Contractor's Bid Proposal and Bid Schedule(s), and any duly authorized Construction Contract Change Orders approved by the City. The amount of the initial contract award in accordance with the Contractors Bid Proposal is One Million Three Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred and Five Dollars ($1,320,405). Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth herein, as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the Work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the Work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the Contract Documents; and, also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the Work, suspension of discontinuance of the Work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the Work. ARTICLE 4--THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The Contract Documents consist of the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, the prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations, the accepted Bid and Bid Schedule(s), List of Subcontractors, Local Business Preference Program — Good Faith Efforts, Non-Discrimination Certification, Non-Collusion Declaration, Bidder's General Information, Bid Security or Bid Bond, this Agreement, Workers Compensation Certificate, Performance Bond, Payment Bond, Standard Specifications, Special Provisions, the Drawings, Addendum Number 1, and all Construction Contract Change Orders and Work Change Directives which may be delivered or issued after the Effective Date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto. ARTICLE 5 -- MUTUAL OBLIGATIONS For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by the City, the Contractor agrees to furnish all materials and perform all work required for the above stated project, and to fulfill all other obligations as set forth in the aforesaid Contract Documents. City hereby agrees to employ, and does hereby employ, Contractor to provide the materials, complete the Work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the Contract Price herein identified, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the Contract Documents. Contractor specifically acknowledges and agrees to be bound by the Wage Rates and Labor Code requirements specified in the Contract Documents, including the requirement to furnish electronic certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner (via the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement), and shall pay the general prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California. BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 AGREEMENT PAGE 2 38 ARTICLE 6 -- PAYMENT PROCEDURES The Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with the Standard Specifications as amended by the Special Provisions. Applications for Payment will be processed by the City Engineer as provided in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 7 -- NOTICES Whenever any provision of the Contract Documents requires the giving of a written Notice between the parties, it shall be deemed to have been validly given if delivered in person to the individual or to a member of the firm or to an officer of the corporation for whom it is intended, or if delivered at or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the last business address known to the giver of the Notice. ARTICLE 8 -- INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, and all of its officers and agents from any claims, demands, or causes of action, including related expenses, attorney's fees, and costs, based on, arising out of, or in any way related to the Work undertaken by the Contractor hereunder. This Article 8 incorporates the provisions of Section 7-15 `Indemnification," of the Special Provisions, which are hereby referenced and made a part hereof. ARTICLE 9 -- NON-DISCRIMINATION The Contractor represents and agrees that it does not and will not discriminate against any subcontractor, consultant, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin in any matter including without limitation employment upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment, recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay, or other forms of compensation and selection for training, including apprenticeship. ARTICLE 10 -- MISCELLANEOUS Terms used in this Agreement which are defined in the Standard Specifications and the Special Provisions will have the meanings indicated in said Standard Specifications and the Special Provisions. No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Contract Documents will be binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and specifically, but without limitation, monies that may become due and monies that are due may not be assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract Documents. The City and the Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives, to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives, in respect of all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 AGREEMENT PAGES 39 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Contractor have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CONTRACTOR CALIFORNIA By: All American Asphalt, Inc. By Firm/Company Name David H. Ready City Manager ATTEST: By: Signature (notarized) By Name: James Thompson City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Title: By By: Douglas Holland Signature (notarized) City Attorney RECOMMENDED: Name: By Title: Marcus L. Fuller, Assistant City Manager/City Engineer APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: Date Agreement No. BICYCLE CORRIDORS, PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 AGREEMENT PAGE 4 40 PERFORMANCE BOND—PUBLIC WORKS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs, a charter city, organized and existing in the County of Riverside, California, as Obligee, (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), has awarded to the undersigned Contractor, (hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor"), an agreement for the work described as follows: BICYCLE CORRIDORS, PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 (hereinafter referred to as the"Public Work"); and WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more particularly set forth in that certain Agreement (Construction Contract) for the said Public Work awarded to the Contractor and approved by the City for the Project hereinabove named, (hereinafter referred to as the "Contract"), which Contract is incorporated herein by this reference, and WHEREAS, the Contractor is required by said Contract to perform the terms thereof, and to provide a bond both for the performance and guaranty thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal, and: a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the sum of Dollars ($ ), said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the City under the terms to the said Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns,jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the bounden Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the said Contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or its parts, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill the one year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers and agents, as stipulated in said Contract, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration of addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the Public Work or to the Specifications. No final settlement between the City and the Contractor shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied. BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 PERFORMANCE BOND 1 JANUARY 7,2015 AGREEMENT AND BONDS-PAGE 7 PERFORMANCE BOND—PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) Contractor and Surety agree that if the City is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with enforcement of the bond, each shall pay City's reasonable attorney's fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum. SIGNED AND SEALED, this_day of , 20_ CONTRACTOR: All American Asphalt Check one: _individual,_ partnership, X corporation (This Performance Bond must be signed by representatives and/or officers having appropriate authority to bind the Contractor and Surety to the terms of the Performance Bond.) CONTRACTOR: SURETY: By: By signature signature (NOTARIZED) (NOTARIZED) Print Name and Title: Print Name and Title: By: signature (NOTARIZED) Print Name and Title: By submitting this Performance Bond, the Contractor and Surety acknowledge the provisions of the Contract Documents with regard to Section 64 "Default by the Contractor", as further amended by the Special Provisions. BICYCLE CORRIDORS, PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 PERFORMANCE BOND JANUARY 7,2015 AGREEMENT AND BONDS-PAGE 8 42 PERFORMANCE BOND—PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) The rate of premium on this bond is $ per thousand. The total amount of premium charged: $ (The above must be filled in by corporate surety). IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with Federal, grant, or loan funds, it must also appear on the Treasury Department's most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM. Any claims under this bond may be addressed to: (Name and Address of Surety) (Name and Address of Agent or Representative for service of process in California if different from above) (Telephone Number of Surety and Agent or Representative for service of process in California) BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 PERFORMANCE BOND JANUARY 7,2015 AGREEMENT AND BONDS-PAGE 9 43 PAYMENT BOND—PUBLIC WORKS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs, a charter city, organized and existing in the County of Riverside, California, as Obligee, (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), has awarded to the undersigned Contractor, (hereinafter referred to as the"Contractor"), an agreement for the work described as follows: BICYCLE CORRIDORS, PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 (hereinafter referred to as the `Public Work'); and WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more particularly set forth in that certain Agreement (Construction Contract) for the said Public Work awarded to the Contractor and approved by the City for the Project hereinabove named, (hereinafter referred to as the"Contract'), which Contract is incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, said Contractor is required to furnish a bond in connection with said Contract and pursuant to Section 9550 of the California Civil Code, NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal, and: , a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City, and to any and all persons, companies, or corporations entitled to file stop payment notices under Section 9100 of the California Civil Code, in the sum of Dollars ($ 1, said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the City under the terms to the said Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns,jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if said Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, or Subcontractor s, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions or other supplies, implements, machinery, or power used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the Public Work contracted to be done, or to pay any person for any work or labor of any kind, or for bestowing skills or other necessary services thereon, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work or labor, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of paid Contractor and his Subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work and labor as required by the provisions of Sections 9550 through 9560 of the Civil Code, the Surety or Sureties hereon will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In addition to the provisions herein above, it is agreed that this bond will inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to serve stop payment notices under Section 9100 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO.13-32 PAYMENT BOND JANUARY 7,2015 AGREEMENT AND BONDS-PAGE 10 44 PAYMENT BOND—PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or additions to the terms of the said Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work or to the Specifications. No final settlement between the City and the Contractor hereunder shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied. Contractor and Surety, an admitted surety insurer, further agree that if the City or any entity or person entitled to file stop payment notices is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with the enforcement of this bond, each shall be liable for the reasonable attorney's fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum. SIGNED AND SEALED, this_day of 20_ CONTRACTOR: All American Asphalt Check one:_individual, _partnership, X corporation (This Payment Bond must be signed by representatives and/or officers having appropriate authority to bind the Contractor and Surety to the terms of the Payment Bond.) EXECUTED FOR THE CONTRACTOR: EXECUTED FOR THE SURETY: By: By signature signature (NOTARIZED) (NOTARIZED) Print Name and Title: Print Name and Title: By: signature (NOTARIZED) Print Name and Title: BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 PAYMENT BOND JANUARY 7,2016 AGREEMENT AND BONDS-PAGE 11 45 PAYMENT BOND—PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) The rate of premium on this bond is $ per thousand. The total amount of premium charged. $ (The above must be filled in by corporate surety). IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with Federal, grant, or loan funds, it must also appear on the Treasury Department's most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM. Any claims under this bond may be addressed to: (Name and Address of Surety) (Name and Address of Agent or Representative for service of process in California if different from above) (Telephone Number of Surety and Agent or Representative for service of process in California) BICYCLE CORRIDORS,PHASE 1 CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 PAYMENT BOND JANUARY 7,2015 AGREEMENT AND BONDS-PAGE 12 46 Attachment 4 47 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Sharrows and Signage for Mesquite and Via Escuela Agency: City of Palm Springs Date of Estimate:February 20,2015 Prepared by: Savat Khamphou,P.E. Mesquite Avenue (from Camino Real to Sunrise) 0.6 mi. Via Escuela (from Sunrise to Gene Autry Trail) 1.3 mi. No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total 1 Initial Mobilization I LS $5,000 $5,000 2 Traffic Control 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 4 Bike lane markings(Sharrows) 82 EA $105 $8,610 5 Paint Green Background to Shared Lane Markings 82 EA $250 $20,500 6 Bike tane signs 40 EA $250 $10,000 Total Construction= $49,110 TOTAL= $50 000 48 Attachment 5 49 ', , t�rtpl�filrml' Notice of Exemption appendix E f Palm Springs To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency): City of P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 palm Springs, CA 92262 County Clerk ---•- County of: Riverside (Address) P.O, Box 751 Riverside,CA 92502-0751 Project Title: Bicycle Corridors, Phase I (Measure J), CP 13-32 Project Applicant, City of Palm Springs Project Location-Specific: Throughout the City of Palm Springs along the following Corridors: El Cielo(including Escoba&Civic);Belardo btw.Alejo&Sunny Dunes;Calle End lia btw.Alejo&Ramon;Alejo btw.Civic&Belardo;Farrell;&Racquet Club Project Location-City: Palm Springs Project Location-County: Riverside Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: The Work comprises the construction of bicycle lanes along the the various corridors throughout the City.The work includes removal and replacement of existing traffic striping,pavement markers,installatlon of thermoplastic lane lines,markings,crosswalks,signs,curb painting and resurfacing of needed roadways. Name of Public Agency Approving Project:City of Palm Springs Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:City of Palm Springs Exempt Status: (check one): ❑ Ministerial(Sec.21080(b)(1); 15268); ❑ Declared Emergency(Sec.21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); CI Emergency Project(Sec.21080(b)(4);15269(b)(c)); © Categorical Exem tlon.State 15301 (c)&(f)Existing Facilities j g p type and section number: ❑ Statutory Exemptions.State code number: Reasons why project is exempt: This is a project that will add safety enhancements by installing bicycle lane lines,markings,signs and resurfacing existing roadway in conjunction with existing facilities. Lead Agency Marcus L. Fuller Contact Person: Area Code/Telephone/Extension: (760)323-8253 If filed by applicant: 1.Attach certified document of a ption finding. 2. Has otice of Exemptionly&VAled by the public agency approving the project?. ❑Yes O No Signatur : Date: 1 212 2/2 01 4 Title: City Engineer I O Signed by Lead Agency❑ Signed by Applicant Authority cited:Sections 21083 and 21110,Public Resources Code. Dale Received for filing at OPR: Relerence;Sections 21108.21152,and 21152.1,Public Resources Code. � I i Revised 2011 5�