Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/1/2015 - STAFF REPORTS - 1.E. PALM SA N CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT w•..,.. C'fLI FOV% DATE: April 1, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2.06.030, 6.12.030, AND 94.10.00 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS AND SUSPENSION OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES (CASE 5.1341 ZTA). FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Douglas Holland, City Attorney SUMMARY An ordinance to preserve and reaffirm the City Council's ability to call up for review actions or decisions of any of the City's boards and commissions, including the City's Planning Commission and clarifies certain practices related to the suspension of regulatory ordinances. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony. 2. Waive the reading of the ordinance text in its entirety and read by title only; and 3. Adopt Ordinance No. , AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2.06.030, 6.12.030, AND 94.10.00 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS AND THE SUSPENSION OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES 6.12.030 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE. BACKGROUND & SETTING The City of Palm Springs has had a long-standing policy and practice of providing the City Council with the authority to review, approve, modify, or overturn decisions and actions of the City's boards and commissions. This authority includes decisions and actions of the City's Planning Commission. The basic premises of this authority is vested in the basic concept that the City Council is ultimately responsible for the governance of the City and that the City Council should have the authority to review the actions and decisions of its subordinate boards and commissions to ensure that the policies and goals of the City Council are maintained and preserved. ITEM NO. City Council Staff Report April 1,2015 Case 5.1341 ZTA Page 2 of 5 The proposed ordinance amends existing provisions of the City's municipal code that provide for the Council's ability to initiate review of any decision or action of a city board or commission. The amendments are necessary and desirable to ensure that the City's current practice of the "call-up" will be consistent with requirements of recent judicial developments. The City's practice is not considered an appeal of any decision but is rooted in the concept that the initiation of review by a councilmember is not by itself evidence of a bias against or for any decision or action but a declaration that at least one councilmember finds the matter is an issue of vital concern to the community and/or its residents and is an issue that warrants Council deliberation and consideration. The ordinance eliminates the reference to an appeal process and establishes a separate review process for Council call-ups. The ordinance also makes a modification to the City's suspension of regulatory ordinances by reaffirming the City Manager's authority to suspend such ordinances from time to time for city sponsored events. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance on March 11, 2015, and considered the proposed changes to Section 94.10.00. The commission recommended approval of the proposed ordinance by a vote of 6 to 0, with the following clarification: • Add language to clarify that Council call-up procedures are in reference to any final action of a board or commission. The original ordinance was not limited to "final" decisions and the amendment as introduced was intended to preserve the existing practice. Therefore staff recommends the Council adopt the ordinance as introduced. NOTIFICATION A public hearing notice was published; no inquiries have been received to date. kt� Dougla Holland Marcus L. Fuller, MPA, PE, PLS City A orney Assistant City Manager/City Engineer David H. Ready, Es ., mes Thompson City Manager City Clerk 02 City Council Staff Report April 1,2015 Case 5.1341 ZTA Page 3 of 5 Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. PC Minutes — March 11, 2015 3. Planning Commission Resolution 03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2.06.030, 6.12.030, AND 94.10.00 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS AND THE SUSPENSION OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES City Attorney Summary This Ordinance amends and reaffirms the legislative and adjudicatory authority of the City Council to call-up and initiate the review of actions or decisions of city boards and commissions. The Ordinance also reaffirms the ability of the City Manager to suspend from time to time regulatory ordinances for city sponsored events. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs finds: A. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs has retained to itself, as the final legislative and adjudicatory decision maker of the City, the ability to initiate the review of decisions and actions of the City's boards and Commissions, a practice that has is also referred to as a "Council call-up" or simply a "call-up." B. The City Council finds and declares that the practice of the Council call-up has allowed the City Council to review decisions and actions that could become final in the event such matters are not appealed to the City by an applicant or any interested person who, pursuant to the provisions of the Palm Springs Municipal Code, are "aggrieved" of the decision or action of the board or commission. The Council specifically declares that public policy on important community issues should not be decided or applied by default. The City finds that the ability of each member of the City Council to request City Council review and consideration of decisions and actions of City boards and commissions that could have important or significant effects on the City or its residents should be preserved. It is the intent of the City Council that it should retain the ability to call-up and review the decisions and actions of its subordinate boards and commissions in order to assist in the provision of consistent application of city policies and practices for the benefit on the City and to preserve, enhance, and protect the public health, safety, and welfare. C. The City Council further finds that the initiation of review by a councilmember is not by itself evidence of a bias against or for any decision or action but a declaration that at least one councilmember finds the matter is an issue of vital concern to the community and/or its residents and is an issue that warrants Council consideration. D. The City Council further declares that its long standing practice of Council review of board and commission decisions and actions shall not be deemed an appeal nor shall any councilmember who initiates a review be deemed a person aggrieved of a 04 Ordinance No. _ Page 2 decision or presumed to have a bias for or against such decision or action. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, ordains: SECTION 1. Section 2.06.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to read: 2.06.030 Councilmember Review of Decisions. (a) Any member of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs may initiate a review of any decision or action of a City Council appointed commission or board that is not otherwise before the City Council by giving notice thereof to the City Clerk. The Notice of Review shall be submitted to the City Clerk no later than fifteen days following the date of the action which is the subject of the review. The Notice of Review shall not be deemed an appeal of a commission or board decision or action and the hearing thereon shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of this Section. (b) The City Clerk, upon receipt of the Notice of Review, shall set a time and place for the hearing of the matter for which the review was requested. The hearing on the review shall be heard no more than forty-five days following the filing of the notice of review. (c) Notice of the time and place of the hearing on the review shall be mailed or otherwise delivered by the City Clerk to the applicant, if any, and all other persons, if any, to whom notice of the initial application or action was required, not less than ten days prior to hearing. If publication of the initial application or action being appealed was required, the notice of appeal shall be published in like manner. (c) The action of the council appointed commission or board shall be set aside and the City Council shall conduct a public hearing de novo on the review. All persons shall have the right to be heard by the City Council either in person, in writing, or by representative. Technical rules of evidence shall not apply in proceedings under this Section. No party shall have the right to cross-examine any other party or witness except for good cause shown to the satisfaction of the City Council. (d) The City Council shall render its decision within fifteen days following the conclusion of the hearing on review. Upon finding good cause to do so, the City Council may extend the time for rendering its decision up to ninety days. (e) No later than five days following the rendering of the council's decision the City Clerk shall mail or otherwise deliver a copy of said decision to each party or person who presented evidence during the proceedings, or who requested to be furnished a copy of the decision. Failure of the City Clerk to mail or deliver a copy of the decision to each such party or person shall not affect the finality or effectiveness of the decision. The City Council's decision shall be final. 05 Ordinance No. _ Page 3 SECTION 2. Section 6.12.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to read: 6.12.030 Authority to suspend regulatory ordinances. The City Manager may suspend the operation of any one or more regulatory ordinances to the extent that such ordinances would otherwise apply to one or more specifically designated special events conducted, sponsored, co-sponsored or sanctioned by the City. The ordinances which may be suspended include, without thereby limiting, the Noise Ordinance, the Sign Ordinance, and any other regulatory ordinances which in the judgment of the City Manager would interfere with or impede the conduct of such designated special events. Any decision of the City Manager may be appealed to the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 2.05 of this Code. SECTION 3. Section 94.10.00 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to read: 94.10.00 Review by Councilmember. Any member of the City Council may initiate a review of any planning or zoning decision of the planning commission not otherwise before the City Council by giving notice thereof to the City Clerk within the time for filing of a notice of review as prescribed by Section 2.06.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. City Council review of a planning or zoning decision of the planning commission shall follow the procedure provided by Chapter 2.06.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage and Ordinance No. 1873 shall thereafter no longer be in effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF 2015. STEPHEN P. POUGNET, MAYOR ATTEST: JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK 06 Ordinance No. _ Page 4 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Ordinance No. is a full, true and correct copy, and was introduced at a regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on the day of , 2015, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK City of Palm Springs, California 07 City of Palm Springs Planning Commission Minutes March 11,2015 Motion: Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissio unanimously carried 6-0-1 on a roll call vote. AYES: Commissi r ine, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Middleton, Commiss erts, Commissioner Weremiuk, Chair Hudson Vice-Chair Klatchko 2B. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FOR A ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND SECTION 94.10.00 OF THE PALM SPRINGS ZONING CODE (PSZC) RELATING TO CITY COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS (CASE NO. 5.1363 ZTA). (FF) Director Fagg presented the zone text amendment relating to Councilmember call up of Commission and Board actions. The Commission asked questions relating to: 1. A similar ordinance for Commission call-up on AAC actions. 2. The difference between an appeal- by an applicant and a review by a councilmember. 3. Add the verbiage,"a final action" instead of decision. Chair Hudson opened public comments and with no speakers coming forward the public hearing was closed. ACTION: Recommend approval to City Council, as amended: -Add verbiage: "City Council review of a planning or zoning final action of the planning commission shall follow the procedure provided . . ." Motion: Commissioner Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Weremiuk and unanimously carried 6-0-1 on-a roll call vote. AYES: Commissioner Calerdine, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Middleton, Commissioner Roberts, Commissioner Weremiuk, Chair Hudson ABSENT: Vice-Chair Klatchko LNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMEbcommittees h active in resolving issues for continued projects. waxwo 5 08 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND SECTION 94.10.00 OF THE PALM SPRINGS ZONING CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS. WHEREAS, the City Council has retained to itself, as the final legislative and adjudicatory decision maker of the City, the ability to initiate the review of decisions and actions of the City's boards and commissions, a practice that is also referred to as a "Council call-up" or simply a "call-up'; and WHEREAS, Section 94 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code establishes the procedures by which the City Council may initiate a "call-up" or review of the actions of the City's boards and commissions; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 2015, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on an amendment to Section 94 of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance to clarify the procedures by which City Council may initiate the review of board and commission actions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission hereby determines that the proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment is Categorically Exempt under Section 15305, "Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations," of the Guidelines for the Implement of the California Environmental Quality Act and that the proposed amendment does not result in any changes in land use or density; therefore THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds that adoption of the proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment would: a. Retain the ability of the City Council to review the decisions of City boards and commissions in order to preserve, enhance, and protect the public health, safety, and welfare. b. Clarify that initiation of a review by a councilmember is not by itself evidence of a bias against or for any decision or action but a declaration that the matter is an issue of vital concern to the community and/or its residents and is an issue that warrant Council consideration. C. Differentiate that the long-standing practice of Council review of board and commission actions shall not be deemed an appeal nor 09 Planning Commission Resolution No. Case No. 5.1363 ZTA Page 2 shall any councilmember who initiates a review be deemed a person aggrieved of a decision or presumed to have a bias for or against such decision or action. SECTION 2. The adoption of the proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment would be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the City's General Plan as it provides a clearly identified and timely process for review of board and commission decisions and actions and assists in maintaining public health, safety and welfare. SECTION 3. Section 94.10.00 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to read: 94.10.00 Review by Councilmember. Any member of the City Council may initiate a review of any final planning or zoning decision of the planning commission not otherwise before the City Council by giving notice thereof to the City Clerk within the time for filing of a notice of review as prescribed by Section 2.06.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. City Council review of a planning or zoning decision of the planning commission shall follow the procedure provided by Chapter 2.06.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves Case No. 5.1363 ZTA. ADOPTED this 11th day of March, 2015. AYES: 6, Commissioner Calerdine, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Roberts, Commissioner Weremiuk, Commissioner Middleton, Chair Hudson NOES: None ABSENT: Vice-Chair Klatchko ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Flinn Fagg, AICP Director of Planning Services 10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.1363 ZTA PROPOSED ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS AMENDING THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS AND THE SUSPENSION OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a public hearing at its meeting of April 1, 2015. The City Council meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. The purpose of the hearing is to consider an ordinance to amend Sections 2.06.030, 6.12.030, and 94,10.00 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code, to reaffirm the legislative and adjudicatory authority of the City Council to call-up and initiate the review of actions or decisions of city boards or commissions, and to clarify certain practices related to the suspension of regulatory ordinances. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Palm Springs, in its capacity as the Lead Agency, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has determined that the proposed zoning code text amendment is Categorically Exempt under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act since the proposed zone text amendment proposes only insignificant changes to entitlement proceedings. REVIEW OF INFORMATION: The staff report and other supporting documents regarding this matter are available for public review at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these documents. COMMENTS: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the Public Hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the City Council by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to: James Thompson, City Clerk 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]). An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. Questions regarding this case may be directed to Douglas Holland, City Attorney, at (760) 323-8201. Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, por favor Ilame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar con Felipe Primera telefono (760) 323-8253. mes Thompson, City Clerk 11 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION Date: April 1, 2015 Subject: Case 5.1363 ZTA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Desert Sun on March 21, 2015. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1 Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk I AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board, and in the Office of the City Clerk on March 19, 2015. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1` Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to each and every person on the attached list on March 19, 2015, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid, and depositing same in the U.S. Mail at Palm Springs, California. (308 notices) I1 �declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. l Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk 12 nC^l� The Desert Sun Certificate of Publication Q 750 N Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs, CA 92262 E(,',F}l .: 760-778-4578/Fax 760-778-4731 F' .. 1 r! ", 2015HAR 25 I"H 7: 59 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING State Of California ss: - - CITY COUNCIL County of Riverside Ci. '." CRY OF PALM 8PBM16S CASE 6.1383 ZTA PROPOSED ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Advertiser: AMENDING THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS AND CITY OF PALM SPRINGS/LEGALS THE SUSPENSION OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES. PO BOX 2743 NOTICE IS HUMP UM ghat tie City Council of the City of • PALM SPRINGS CA 922632 Palm Springs,Callfomfa,will hold a public hearing atilsmieft of April 1,2015.The City Council meeting begin at 6.00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City.Hill,3200 East Tahquhz Canyon 2000579025 Yam,Palm Sprite` The Purpose of the hearing Is to consider an adnence to emend Sections 2.06.030,6.12.030,and 94.10.00 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code, to reaffirm the leglslathe and adjulicafary authority of the City Council fo call-up and 100 the review I am over the age of 18 years old, a citizen of the United of actions or decisions o1 my boards or commisalau,and to States and not a party to, or have interest in this matter. I dully certain pm dkn related to the suspension of regulatory j hereby certify that the attached advertisement appeared ordinances' i in said newspaper (set in type not smaller than non panel) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMNlA710N:The City of Palm Springs, in each and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any In Inn CapacHy as the Leal Agency, Under the Celffenhte. supplement thereof on line following dates,to wit: Environmental quality Act (CEQA) Ihe$ determined that the Newspaper. .The Desert Sun proposed zoning code tent amendment is Categorically Exempt under Section 15MS(dinorAll eratlons in Land Use Umblilons) of the Guidelines for the California Embomhedal Quality 3/21/2ois Act since the proposed zone text amendment proposes only Imilphlfleant Changes to entitlement proceedings. REVIEW OF INFORMATION: The staff report and other supporting documents regarding this matter are available for pubk review at City Hell between the hours of 8:OO am.and 6:00 p.m,Monday through Thursday.Please contact the Office I acknowledge that I am a principal clerk of the printer of of to City Clerk at(780)323-SMI you would like toschedule The Desert Sun, printed and published weekly in the City an appdntment to retilew these documents. of Palm Springs, County of Riverside, State of California. COMMEtlTB:Response t0 this notice may be Atlanta verbally at The Desert Sun was adjudicated a newspaper of general the Public Hearing andlor In wdtig behae the hearng.Written circulation on March the Superior Court of the comments may be made to the City Council by letter(for mail or County of Riverside,, Sttateate off California Case No. Mend deliveM to-.191236. James Thompson,C2A!Clerk • 3200 E Tahqulh Canyon Way - I declare under per f perjury that the foregoing is true Patin Springs,CA 92262 and correct. cuted o this 21st day of March, 2015 in Any ChellmpB of the proposed prefect In Court may be limited to Palm Sprin , lifornia. raising only those Issues raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered In, the CRY Clerk at or prior to,the public heal(Government Code Section 65009(b)fA). An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested Dec rant's Signature persons to be heard. Questions regarding this ruse may be directed to Douglas Holland,Cly Attorney,at(700)323-8201. Sf necesita ayuda can este carts,por favor game a In Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar can Felpe Primem telefono (760)323-8253. 1� James Thompson,Cly CI The Desert Sun Certificate of Publication 750 N Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs, CA 92262 t^ I V ED 760-778-4578/Fax 760-778-4731 2015APR 14 PH I 29 State Of California ss: C'17 L e i County of Riverside Advertiser: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS/LEGALS PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 922632 2000598179 >�r A 1VI I am over the age of 18 years old, a citizen of the United 1� States and not a party to, or have interest in this matter. I VVVV hereby certify that the attached advertisement appeared in said newspaper (set in type not smaller than non panel) in each and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates,to wit: Newspaper: .The Desert Sun 4/10/2015 No 0515 ORDINANCE NO.1874 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING SEC- THE PALM SOPRINGS M6WICIIPA CODE EF LATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMIS- SION AND BOARD ACTSTHE SUS- ENSION OF REGULATORYA ORDINANCES 6.12.030 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL I acknowledge that I am a principal clerk of the printer of CODE. The Desert Sun, printed and published weekly in the City - City Attorney SN11 rY This Ordinance amends and reaf9rms the legisla- of Palm Springs, County of Riverside, State of California. tive and adjudicatory authority of the City Council The Desert Sun was adjudicated a newspaper of general store�ofPciityy b and oards a d commissions. The O dF circulation on March 24, 1988 by the Superior Court of the nance also readhnls she abNN of the Mana9- er to suspend from time to ti me regula cry or�i• County of Riverside. State of California Case No. nanoea for coy sponsored evema. 191236. CERTIFICATION - STATE OF CALIFORNIA I declare under of perjury that the foregoing is true CITY FP PALM SPRINGS and correc xecuted n this 10th day of April, 2015 in I DAMES THOMPSON,Ciry Clerk of the CM of helm SMn s,he=cem%that Ordinance e. Palm rigs, lifornia. 18rt774 is a fill,hue anrdecorregctwpy,and was Irmo- Liar a Palm Son ay Febru Codisadopted on the1st ular data M p' 2016 b�Ci e following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Hutcheson, Mills, Mayor Pro Tern Lewin,and Mayor Pougnet. NOES: Counclrnernber Foal. Clarant8 Signature JAMES THOMPSON.CITY CLERK g Cfry of Palm Springs.California Published:4nQ`16 14' CITY OF PALM SPRINGS NOTIFICATION City Council Meeting Date: April 1 , 2015 Subject: Ordinance No. 1874 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I, Kathie Hart, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Ordinance Summary was published in the Desert Sun on April 10, 2015. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. L�— Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Kathie Hart, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Ordinance Summary and Ordinance wes posted at City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board and in the Office of the City Clerk on April 6, 2015. 1 1declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. lL� Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 1874 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2.06.030, 6.12.030, AND 94.10.00 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS AND THE SUSPENSION OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES 6.12.030 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE. City Attorney Summary This Ordinance amends and reaffirms the legislative and adjudicatory authority of the City Council to call-up and initiate the review of actions or decisions of city boards and commissions. The Ordinance also reaffirms the ability of the City Manager to suspend from time to time regulatory ordinances for city sponsored events. CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1874 is a full, true and correct copy, and was introduced at a regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on the 18T" day of February, 2015, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 15S day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Hutcheson, Mills, Mayor Pro Tern Lewin, and Mayor Pougnet NOES: Councilmember Foat ABSTAIN: None MES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK City of Palm Springs, California ORDINANCE NO. 1874 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2.06.030, 6.12.030, AND 94.10.00 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL CALL UP OF COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTIONS AND THE SUSPENSION OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES 6.12.030 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE. City Attorney Summary This Ordinance amends and reaffirms the legislative and adjudicatory authority of the City Council to call-up and initiate the review of actions or decisions of city boards and commissions. The Ordinance also reaffirms the ability of the City Manager to suspend from time to time regulatory ordinances for city sponsored events. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs finds: A. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs has retained to itself, as the final legislative and adjudicatory decision maker of the City, the ability to initiate the review of decisions and actions of the City's boards and Commissions, a practice that has is also referred to as a "Council call-up" or simply a "call-up." B. The City Council finds and declares that the practice of the Council call-up has allowed the City Council to review decisions and actions that could become final in the event such matters are not appealed to the City by an applicant or any interested person who, pursuant to the provisions of the Palm Springs Municipal Code, are "aggrieved" of the decision or action of the board or commission. The Council specifically declares that public policy on important community issues should not be decided or applied by default. The City finds that the ability of each member of the City Council to request City Council review and consideration of decisions and actions of City boards and commissions that could have important or significant effects on the City or its residents should be preserved. It is the intent of the City Council that it should retain the ability to call-up and review the decisions and actions of its subordinate boards and commissions in order to assist in the provision of consistent application of city policies and practices for the benefit on the City and to preserve, enhance, and protect the public health, safety, and welfare. C. The City Council further finds that the initiation of review by a councilmember is not by itself evidence of a bias against or for any decision or action but a declaration that at least one councilmember finds the matter is an issue of vital concern to the community and/or its residents and is an issue that warrants Council consideration. D. The City Council further declares that its long standing practice of Council review Ordinance No. 1874 Page 2 of board and commission decisions and actions shall not be deemed an appeal nor shall any councilmember who initiates a review be deemed a person aggrieved of a decision or presumed to have a bias for or against such decision or action. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, ordains: SECTION 1. Section 2.06.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to read: 2.06.030 Councilmember Review of Decisions. (a) Any member of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs may initiate a review of any decision or action of a City Council appointed commission or board that is not otherwise before the City Council by giving notice thereof to the City Clerk. The Notice of Review shall be submitted to the City Clerk no later than fifteen days following the date of the action which is the subject of the review. The Notice of Review shall not be deemed an appeal of a commission or board decision or action and the hearing thereon shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of this Section. (b) The City Clerk, upon receipt of the Notice of Review, shall set a time and place for the hearing of the matter for which the review was requested. The hearing on the review shall be heard no more than forty-five days following the filing of the notice of review. (c) Notice of the time and place of the hearing on the review shall be mailed or otherwise delivered by the City Clerk to the applicant, if any, and all other persons, if any, to whom notice of the initial application or action was required, not less than ten days prior to hearing. If publication of the initial application or action being appealed was required, the notice of appeal shall be published in like manner. (c) The action of the council appointed commission or board shall be set aside and the City Council shall conduct a public hearing de novo on the review. All persons shall have the right to be heard by the City Council either in person, in writing, or by representative. Technical rules of evidence shall not apply in proceedings under this Section. No party shall have the right to cross-examine any other party or witness except for good cause shown to the satisfaction of the City Council. (d) The City Council shall render its decision within fifteen days following the conclusion of the hearing on review. Upon finding good cause to do so, the City Council may extend the time for rendering its decision up to ninety days. (e) No later than five days following the rendering of the council's decision the City Clerk shall mail or otherwise deliver a copy of said decision to each party or person who presented evidence during the proceedings, or who requested to be furnished a copy of the decision. Failure of the City Clerk to mail or deliver a copy of the decision to each such party or person shall not affect the finality or effectiveness of the decision. The City Council's decision shall be final. Ordinance No. 1874 Page 3 SECTION 2. Section 6.12.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to read: 6.12.030 Authority to suspend regulatory ordinances. The City Manager may suspend the operation of any one or more regulatory ordinances to the extent that such ordinances would otherwise apply to one or more specifically designated special events conducted, sponsored, co-sponsored or sanctioned by the City. The ordinances which may be suspended include, without thereby limiting, the Noise Ordinance, the Sign Ordinance, and any other regulatory ordinances which in the judgment of the City Manager would interfere with or impede the conduct of such designated special events. Any decision of the City Manager may be appealed to the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 2.05 of this Code. SECTION 3. Section 94.10.00 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code is amended to read: 94.10.00 Review by Councilmember. Any member of the City Council may initiate a review of any planning or zoning decision of the planning commission not otherwise before the City Council by giving notice thereof to the City Clerk within the time for filing of a notice of review as prescribed by Section 2.06.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. City Council review of a planning or zoning decision of the planning commission shall follow the procedure provided by Chapter 2.06.030 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL THIS 4T" DAY OF MARCH, 2015. STEPHEN P. POUGNET, MAYOR ATTEST: JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK Ordinance No. 1874 Page 4 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1874 is a full, true and correct copy, and was introduced at a regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on the 18T" day of February, 2015, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 151 day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Hutcheson, Mills, Mayor Pro Tem Lewin, and Mayor Pougnet. NOES: Councilmember Foat. JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK City of Palm Springs, California Kathie Hart From: Joanne Bruggemans Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:37 PM To: Andreas Hills;Araby Commons;Araby Cove; Baristo(nixonSF@aol.com); Canyon Corridor Qforn29 @gmail.com); Deepwell Estates; Demuth Park; Desert Highland Gateway Estates; Desert Park Estates; El Mirador; El Rancho Vista Estates; Four Seasons; Gene Autry; Historic Tennis Club; Indian Canyons; Little Beverly Hills; Little Beverly Hills; Little Tuscany; Little Tuscany; Los Compadres; Midtown; Midtown; Mountain Gate; Movie Colony East; Old Las Palmas; Parkview Mobile Estates; Racquet Club Estates; Racquet Club South; Racquet Club West;Sonora Sunrise;Sunmor;Sunrise Park;Sunrise Park;Sunrise Vista Chino;Tahquitz River Estates;The Mesa;The Movie Colony;Twin Palms;Vista Las Palmas;Vista Norte;Warm Sands Cc: Flinn Fagg; Kathie Hart Subject: Case 5.1363 ZTA-Relating to Council Call Up of Commision and Board Actions Attachments: 5.1363 ZTA PHN for CC 04 01 15.pdf Good afternoon— Please find the attached Public Hearing Notice of the City Council for April 1, 2015 of the proposed Zone Text Amendment. Thank you, J"4"c Joanne Bruggemans City of Palm Springs Planning Services Department 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Phone: (760) 323-8245 Fax: (760) 322-8360 Email: Joanne.bruggemansCapalmspringsca-gov t 13 'now MR PETE MORUZZI PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE P.O. BOX 4738 PALM SPRINGS,CA 92263-4738 „I CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.1363 ZTA PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT MRS.JOANNE BRUGGEMANS ATTN SECRETARY/5.1363 ZTA 506 W.SANTA CATALINA ROAD PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263-2743 MS PATRICIA GARCIA MS MARGARET PARK, DIRECTOR TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION AGUA ENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA OFFICER INDIANS A UA AL ENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEPT. INDIANS 5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE 5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92264 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92264 SOBOBA BAND OF LUISEF40 INDIANS MR FRANK TYSEN ATTN: JOSEPH ONTIVEROS CASA CODY INN CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGER 175 S. CAHUILLA ROAD P.O. BOX 487 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 SAN JACINTO,CA 92581 domm M. , 14