Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout23797 RESOLUTION NO. 23797 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE POMPEII DE LAS PALMAS CONDOMINIUMS LOCATED AT 221 THROUGH 231 WEST STEVENS ROAD AND 200 THROUGH 206 CAMINO NORTE AS HISTORIC DISTRICT #4, (CASE HSPB 91/HD 4). WHEREAS, Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code (PSMC) allows for the designation of historic sites and districts; and WHEREAS, the Pompeii De Las Palmas Homeowners Association in conjunction with the Palm Springs Preservation Foundation (PSPF) filed an application with the City for Historic District designation of the Pompeii De Las Palmas condominium complex pursuant to PSMC Chapter 8.05; and WHEREAS, a historic resources report ("the Report") dated January 2015 was prepared and presented to the Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) pursuant to PSMC 8.05.135, along with the application for designation of the Pompeii De Las Palmas complex as a historic district; and WHEREAS, in March 2015, members of the HSPB conducted guided site inspections of the proposed historic district; and WHEREAS, seven of the nine unit owners within the Pompeii De Las Palmas condominium complex have submitted letters in support of the proposed historic district designation; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2015, the HSPB conducted a public hearing in accordance with applicable law to consider designation of the Pompeii De Las Palmas complex as a historic district; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, the HSPB carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence in connection with the designation, including but not limited to the staff report, application and historical research, and all written and oral testimony presented and voted unanimously to recommend approval by the City Council of the Pompeii De Las Palmas complex as Historic District #4; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs to consider designation of the Pompeii De Las Palmas complex was issued in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2015, the City Council conducted a public hearing in accordance with applicable law to consider designation of the Pompeii De Las Palmas complex as a historic district; and Resolution No. 23797 Page 2 WHEREAS, the designation of the Pompeii De Las Palmas complex as a historic district will promote the sensitive preservation of said site; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed historic district designation has been determined to be exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents in accordance with California Public Resources Code Division 13, Section 15331, "Historical Resources Restoration/Rehabilitation," as the designation will result in the preservation of the resource; and WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence in connection with the designation, including but not limited to the staff report, application and historical research, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. CEQA. In accordance with the California Public Resources Code, Division 13, Section 15331, "Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation," the project has been determined to be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents, as the designation of the property will result in the preservation and restoration of the complex. The City Council independently reviewed and considered the criteria for the exemption, and finds, on the basis of the whole record before it, that the project is hereby exempt from the preparation of environmental documentation. SECTION 2. The presentation Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 8.05.160, the City Council, in evaluating a historic district application, must find that the designation of the site or district supports or furthers the purpose of the historic preservation ordinance. As stated in Section 8.05.010, "Purpose and Authority" the Historic Preservation ordinance is: "...For the purpose of preserving areas and specific buildings of the city which reflect elements of its cultural, social, economic, political, architectural and archaeological history. This chapter is intended to stabilize and improve buildings, structures or areas which are considered to be of historical, architectural, archaeological or ecological value, to foster civic beauty, to strengthen the local economy and to promote the use of specific buildings for the education and welfare of the citizens." The Pompeii De Las Palmas complex (PDLP) reflect elements of the City's cultural and architectural history as explained in the defining criteria outlined below including being representative of a particular period in local history and embodying distinctive characteristics of a building type and architectural style. The proposed Resolution No. 23797 Page 3 designation of the Pompeii De Las Palmas complex as a historic district is supported because it imbues aspects of the cultural, social, economic and architectural history and development of the City. It possesses a high-degree of integrity in terms of its ability to convey its historic significance in the context of the social and physical development of Palm Springs and the modern period of architecture for which Palm Springs is well known. Therefore the proposed historic district designation conforms to the required finding. SECTION 3. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 8.05.020 ('Definitions'), in order for an area within the City to be considered for possible historic district designation, it must contain a number of structures, natural features or sites that possess "...historic, architectural, archaeological, cultural or aesthetic significance.". The City Council finds that the Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District possesses a number of structures and features that possess historic, architectural, cultural and aesthetic significance as defined in the following criteria outlined in PSMC 8.05.020: Criteria 3 It reflects a particular period of national, state, or local history — that is, it reflects a significant period of local history in which the development of modern architecture has come to define Palm Springs' image and reputation. Criteria 4 It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a building type, period or method of construction — that is, the design of the complex is an excellent example of the small courtyard apartment complex, which was commonplace in Palm Springs between 1920 and 1965. SECTION 4. The complex, which began construction in 1964, reflects the mid- century modern architecture style for which Palm Springs has become internationally known. The complex was developed at a time when Palm Springs began to develop international acclaim as a world-class resort. The complex was constructed on 0.68 acres to the north of the historic Old Las Palmas neighborhood, and offered a "...most truly elegant group of one-story villas...[with) lavish surroundings, exquisite decor and deep-rooted comfort..." It features a total of nine units, including (7) two-bedroom units and (2) one-bedroom units. No major alternations have been made to the buildings that comprise the district. The construction of Pompeii De Las Palmas coincides with the building "boom" of single family tract homes and multi-family residential development that was transforming Palm Springs in the fifties and sixties from a secret get-away of the rich and famous to a second-home market for the growing upper middle class in Los Angeles and other nearby urban centers. Resolution No. 23797 Page 4 SECTION 5. Boundaries. The boundaries of the historic district are as noted in the legal description of the common area parcel (APN 505-330-010), totaling approximately 0.68 acres. The site is bounded by Camino Norte on the south and Stevens Road on the north; it shares a westerly property line with the parcel identified as APN 505-185-029, and shares an easterly property line with the parcels identified as APN 505-182-004 and 505-182-010. SECTION 6. Contributing Elements. A. All residential structures within the Pompeii De Las Palmas complex are recommended to be designated as Contributing Structures and individually treated as Class 1 historic structures pursuant to Section 8.05.125 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. B. The swimming pool and pool cabana structure are recommended for designation as Contributing Structures and treated as Class 1 historic structures. C. The carport structures and complex entryways and doors are recommended to be designated as Contributing Structures and treated as Class 1 historic structures. D. The defining historic characteristics or features on the various buildings and structures are as follows: 1) The strong horizontal roof planes of all buildings and structures on the site, emphasized by the thin fascia of the roof structure and deep patio overhangs. 2) Narrow aluminum-frame windows and eight-foot high sliding glass doors 3) Columns based on the Ionic order. 4) Open light wells in the patio roofs, and "swooping" curves of the patio roof structures. 5) Decorative raised "starburst" details on the Stevens Road courtyard entry doors. 6) "Framed" wall relief sculptures in the interior courtyard area. 7) Classical statuary as a decorative feature of the courtyard landscape. 8) Turf grass surrounding the pool area, with Italian cypress trees, olive trees, and bougainvillea vines featured as part of the courtyard landscaping. 9) The use of single mortar groove concrete block for perimeter and enclosure walls. 10) "Toothed" or notched fascia detail in the carport roofs. 11) Washed river stones set in concrete at the Stevens Road entrance to the complex. SECTION 7. Non-contributing Elements. A. The driveways and service areas along the Stevens Road and Camino Norte frontages are recommended to be designated as non-contributing elements. Resolution No. 23797 Page 5 B. The xeriscape planting areas in the interior courtyard are not original to the design, and are recommended to be designated as non-contributing elements. C. Any new or modified privacy walls are recommended to be designated as non- contributing elements. SECTION 8. Integrity. The factor of integrity, while not a requirement of the Municipal Code Findings, is a factor that is considered in applications made to the National Trust for Historic Places and in certain state historic designations. The report concludes that the buildings within the proposed Pompeii De Las Palmas historic district have undergone limited alterations and that virtually all of the character-defining features survive. Thus, the site retains a high degree of integrity and is qualified for designation as a historic district. SECTION 9. The following elements or alterations are ones that the homeowners association may wish to place on a long term capital improvement list for possible restoration to further strengthen the authenticity (integrity) of the district. Where applicable, these items may also be addressed through participation in Mills Act contracts for the restoration and maintenance of individual units. A. Camino Norte entrance doors: The Camino Norte doors lack the raised starburst detail of the Stevens Road doors, and are surrounded by a metal mesh screen. No documentation is currently available to suggest whether this configuration is original to the complex; if documentation can be located, the Camino Norte doors should be restored to their original configuration and condition. Should no documentation be available to substantiate the original condition of the Camino Norte doors, then no changes shall be required. B. Glass block wall (Stevens Road frontage): Glass block has been added to the perimeter wall at the northwest corner of the property along the Stevens Road frontage, and is assumed to be a later addition to the property. This front perimeter wall should be restored to its original configuration, or utilize single-mortar groove block similar to the original wall construction. C. Fences and gates: Any new fences and walls should closely match the existing construction. Avoid the use of fence materials and gate designs that are not compatible with the era of the complex. D. Replacement doorstwindows: One of the units has vinyl replacement windows and doors, instead of the narrow aluminum frames as were original to the complex. Any future window and door replacements should closely match the original aluminum frames. E. Window security shutters: One of the units has an external rolling security shutter affixed above a courtyard window; as this detracts from the simplicity and clean Resolution No. 23797 Page 6 lines of the wall surface, it is recommended that any similar security devices be mounted internally so as to not detract from the architecture of the complex. F. Screen doors: Establish a standard front screen door style and hardware that is sympathetic with the architecture of the district, for those unit owners who choose to have a screen door. Alternately, the HOA may choose to restrict the use of screen doors so as to maintain a consistent appearance throughout the complex. G. Exterior light fixtures: Verify the origin of exterior light fixtures, and make sure any replacement fixtures or new fixtures are compatible with any original light fixtures. H. Courtyard landscaping: The turf grass, Italian cypress trees, and olive trees are all essential elements of the courtyard landscaping. While xeriscape plantings have been instituted adjacent to the buildings, it is critical to maintain the turf and other original plantings as presently constituted. Replacement of landscape materials should closely match the original plantings and configuration. I. Original paint color: Consider scraping or other non-destructive method to determine the original paint color for the complex. J. Surface mounted conduit: Avoid the use of surface-mounted conduit in any future renovations to avoid marring the appearance of walls and fascia details; remove any existing surface-mounted conduit where possible. K. External gutters and downspouts: Replace existing `colonial' profile gutters and downspouts with a design that is more appropriate to the architecture of the buildings. SECTION 10. Conditions of Approval. Pursuant to the regulations of Municipal Code Section 8.05, including but not limited to the following: A. (8.05.125) Contributing structures/sites shall be subject to Class 1 regulations until such time that they may be reclassified. B. (8.05.125) Noncontributing structures/sites shall be subject to review by the HSPB before demolition or construction. C. (8.05.180) No person may undertake any of the following within or upon a Class 1 historic site without a certificate of approval from the historic site preservation board: 1) Construction of a new structure; 2) The moving, demolition or alteration of an existing structure in any manner which affects the exterior appearance of the structure; 3) A change in land use which affects the exterior appearance of a structure; 4) The erection, remodeling or replacing of a sign which affects the exterior appearance of a structure. Resolution No. 23797 Page 7 D. (8-05.185) A person who desires to construct (including new construction), alter, move or demolish a structure within or upon a Class 1 historic site or an historic district shall file an application upon a form prescribed by the city. E. (8.05.215) No application for the same or similar work may be filed within one year after the board has rejected it. F. The property owner shall permit the City to demark the complex as a historic district with a marker of the City's choosing. The historic marker shall be placed in a location visible from the public right-of-way. The home-owners association shall maintain the historic marker in the location installed and pay for the replacement cost if the marker is damaged, lost, stolen, or otherwise removed from the property. G. All future exterior modifications including but not limited to contributing structures, walls, and fences shall require Architectural Approval pursuant to Section 94.04.00 of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance and Historic Site Preservation Board review pursuant Municipal Code Ordinance 8.05.180. H. No permit for the alteration of the exterior, including any and all of the defining elements and characteristics shall be issued without prior approval by the Historic Site Preservation Board. 1. Upon action on the recommendation by the City Council, the City Clerk shall submit the Council Resolution to the County recorder for recordation within 90 days of the effective date of this resolution. J. Contributing structures may be eligible for execution of a Mills Act Historic Property Agreement, as approved by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the City Council designates the Pompeii De Las Palmas condominium complex located at 221 THROUGH 231 West Stevens Road and 200 THROUGH 206 Camino Norte, Palm Springs, California, as Historic District #4. ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2015. David H. Ready, Cit n er ATTEST: ames -Thompson, City Clerk Resolution No. 23797 Page 8 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution No. 23797 is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on 15t day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember Foat, Councilmember Hutcheson, Mayor Pro Tem Lewin, and Mayor Pougnet. NOES: Councilmember Mills. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. mes Thompson, City Clerk City of Palm Springs, California o.���41tOrs RESOLUTION NO. 23797 EXHIBIT A Case HSPB #91 — Historic District No. 4 Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District April 1, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of Case HSPB #91 as Historic District No. 4 is subject to the following conditions: Any agreements, easements or covenants required to be entered into shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONS ADM 1. Project Description. This approval is for the project described as Case HSPB #91 — Historic District (HD) 4 "The Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District" (PDLP). ADM 2. Indemnification. The owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Palm Springs, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City of Palm Springs, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or administrative officers concerning Case HSPB 91/HD-4. The City of Palm Springs will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs and the applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney. If the City of Palm Springs fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Palm Springs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the applicant's consent but should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except, the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein. ADM 3. Maintenance and Repair. The property owner(s) and successors and assignees in interest shall maintain and repair the improvements including and without limitation all structures, sidewalks, bikeways, parking areas, Case HSPB#91 —HD-4 Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District Nomination Page 2 of 6 Resolution 23797 Conditions of Approval landscape, irrigation, lighting, signs, walls, and fences between the curb and property line, including sidewalk or bikeway easement areas that extend onto private property, in a first class condition, free from waste and debris, and in accordance with all applicable law, rules, ordinances and regulations of all federal, state, and local bodies and agencies having jurisdiction at the property owner's sole expense. This condition shall be included in the recorded covenant agreement for the property if required by the City. ADM 4. Standards for modifications to historic structures within the proposed historic district. Any modifications to contributing structures or elements within the historic district shall be executed in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitation, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (1995 Weeks & Grimmer). ADM 5. Regulations set forth in Municipal Code Chapter 8.05 "Historic Preservation". All property within the Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District shall be subject to the regulations of Palm Springs Municipal Code Chapter 8.05. ADM 6. Contributing structures subject to Class 1 regulations Pursuant PSMC Chapter 8.05.125: All structures deemed "contributing" in the historic district shall be subject to regulations that apply to Class 1 historic sites until such time that they may be reclassified. Such structures or sites may be qualified for historic designation at the federal, state and/or county level. ADM 7. Non-contributing structures PSMC 8.05.125: All structures deemed "non- contributing" shall be subject to review by the HSPB before demolition or new construction is proposed. ADM 8. Specific Plan. PSMC 8.05.125: The City Council may, at its discretion, adopt a specific plan containing special regulations pertaining to the subject defined area of the historic district. ADM 9. National Register of Historic Places. PSMC 8.05.166: The City Council may initiate proceedings for the recommendation of a property for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places by motion, and shall then refer the matter to the HSPB for public hearing and recommendation. Article IV Rules and Regulations for Historic Sites and Historic Districts ADM 10. PSMC 8.05.170 Stay of demolition. At any time after the initiation of proceedings for designation of an historic site or district, the historic site preservation board may, upon its own motion or upon the application of any interested person, issue an order staying any proposed or threatened demolition or alteration of the exterior of any structure Case HSPB#91 —HD-4 Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District Nomination Page 3 of 6 Resolution 23797 Conditions of Approval within or upon such proposed site or district. Such stay order shall be effective for no longer than one hundred twenty days, and is intended to afford time for necessary studies, hearings and determination whether such site should be designated as an historic site. Such stay order may be extended once fora period not to exceed sixty days. (Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 11. 8.05.175 Effect of stay order—Exceptions Upon the issuance of a stay order, no permit shall be given for the demolition or exterior alteration of any structure or the interior arrangement of a public building described in such stay order, and any such permit previously issued shall forthwith be revoked; provided, however, that a stay order shall not prevent the performance of any repairs, demolition, or removal necessary for the protection of public health or safety, and ordered by the chief building official of the city to be performed by the owner or occupier of such structure. (Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 12. Certificate of Approval Required on alterations to Contributing Structures and Elements. 8.05.180 Approval required. No person may undertake any of the following within or upon a Class 1 historic site (or contributing structure or element) within a historic district without a certificate of approval from the historic site preservation board: (1) Construction of a new structure within the historic district; (2) The moving, demolition or alteration of an existing structure in any manner which affects the exterior appearance of a contributing structure within the district; (3) A change in land use which affects the exterior appearance of a contributing structure within the district; (4) The erection, remodeling or replacing of a sign which affects the exterior appearance of a contributing structure within the district. ADM 13. 8.05.185 Application for permit to construct or alter structures A person who desires to construct (including new construction), alter, move or demolish a structure within or upon a Class 1 historic site or an historic district shall file an application upon a form prescribed by the city. The application shall include all necessary information required by the rules of the historic site preservation board. When the application is filed, it shall be referred to the historic site preservation board for review at its next meeting. (Ord. 1320 § 9, 1991: Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 14. 8.05.190 Factors to be considered upon application. Case RSPB#91 —HD-4 Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District Nomination Page 4 of 6 Resolution 23797 Conditions of Approval In reviewing and acting upon each application, the historic site preservation board shall consider: (1) The historic value and significance, or the architectural value and significance or both, of the structure and its relation to the historic value of the surrounding area and district; (2) The relationship of the exterior architectural features of any structure to the rest of the structure itself and to the surrounding area or district; (3) The general compatibility of exterior design, arrangement, texture and material which is proposed by the applicant; (4) Archaeological or ecological significance of the area. ADM 15. 8.05.195 Board action restricted to exterior features—Exception The historic site preservation board shall consider and pass upon only the exterior features of a contributing structure within a historic district and may not consider the interior arrangement of the structure, except in the case of public buildings. The board may not disapprove applications except in regard to the considerations set forth in Chapter PSMC 8.05 and in rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to this chapter. ADM 16. Structures of historic or architectural value. It is the purpose and intent of this chapter that the board be strict in its judgment of plans for structures considered to have historic or architectural value according to its judgment after detailed studies of the historic and architectural history of the city. ADM 17. Structures which have little to no historic value. It is also the purpose of this chapter and the intent of the city council that the board be lenient in its judgment of plans for structures which have little or no historic value or plans for new construction except for plans which seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures or the archaeological or ecological value of surrounding area. ADM 18. 8.05.200 Procedure upon application for Certificate of Approval. (a) Upon the filing of an application, the secretary of the board shall set the matter for review and shall give notice in accordance with the rules of the board. The board shall make its decision within forty-five days from the date the application is filed. If the board fails to act within forty-five days, the application is considered approved unless the applicant and the board agree to an extension of time. (b) At the conclusion of its review, the board shall make its decision and shall file a certificate of approval or certificate of rejection with the building Case HSPB#91 —HD-4 Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District Nomination Page 5 of 6 Resolution 23797 Conditions of Approval official of the city. No person may do any work upon a structure which is a subject of an application until the board has filed its certificate of approval. If the board files a certificate of rejection, the building official may not issue a building permit for such work. (Ord. 1320 § 10, 1991: Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 19. 8.05.210 Special considerations. (a) If an application affects the exterior appearance of a contributing structure within a historic district or proposes to demolish a structure in a manner which the board considers to be detrimental to the city, the board shall attempt, in cooperation with the owner, to arrive at an economically feasible plan for the preservation of the structure. (b) If the board is satisfied that the proposed construction or alteration will not materially impair the historic or architectural value of the structure, it shall approve the application- (c) If the board finds that the retention of the structure constitutes a hazard to public safety and the hazard cannot be eliminated by economic means available to the owner, it shall approve the application. (d) The board may approve the application if any of the following circumstances exist: (1) The structure is a deterrent to a major improvement program which substantially benefits the city; (2) Retention of the structure causes an undue hardship to the owner; or (3) Retention of the structure is not in the interest of the majority of the inhabitants of the city. (e) The board may approve the moving of a structure of historical architectural value as an alternative to demolition. (Ord. 1320 § 11, 1991; Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 20. 8.05.215 Limit on applications No application for the same or similar work may be filed within one year after the board has rejected it. (Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 21. 8.05.220 Exceptions. The regulations contained in this chapter do not apply to routine maintenance or repair to restore a structure as near as possible to its original condition after decay, injury, dilapidation or partial destruction of a structure within an Case HSPB#91 —HD-4 Pompeii De Las Palmas Historic District Nomination Page 6 of 6 Resolution 23797 Conditions of Approval historic district or upon an historic site, provided said maintenance or repair does not exceed one thousand five hundred dollars in value. (Ord. 1320 § 12, 1991: Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 22. 8.05.230 Appeal. Any person aggrieved by an action of the historic site preservation board may appeal the decision to the city council in the manner provided by Chapter 2.05 of the municipal code. (Ord. 1226 § 14, 1984: Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 23. 8.05.235 Penalty for violation. Any person who violates a provision of this chapter is guilty of an infraction and shall be punished upon first conviction by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars for such offense. Any person who violates a provision of this chapter within five years of a prior conviction on the same grounds under this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the city jail or in the county jail for a period of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 24, 8.05.240 Injunctive relief. The board may seek relief from the appropriate court to restrain or enjoin any violation of this chapter and of the orders and decisions of the board, or to compel the reconstruction of any building, structure or object which is destroyed in violation of this chapter or the orders and decisions of the board. (Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) ADM 25. 8.05.245 Compliance with other laws. The provisions of this chapter are separate from and additional to all other requirements of law, including but not limited to compliance with other ordinances and codes of the city, conditions of approval of land use permits and architectural review and approval. Neither a certificate of approval nor any other provisions of this chapter shall be deemed to relieve the owner or applicant from full compliance with any such laws, ordinances, codes or conditions. (Ord. 1140 § 1, 1981) END OF CONDITIONS