HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/4/2015 - STAFF REPORTS - 1.A. �OFp PLM Sp4
.y
V N
ca``F°"`'�P CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: November 4, 2015 PUBLIC HEARING
Subject: AN APPEAL BY G & M CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF ACBCI
OWNERS OF ALLOTMENT 5A AND 35A OF THE HISTORIC SITE
PRESERVATION BOARD'S STAY OF DEMOLITION FOR THE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPRISE 436 THROUGH 454 SOUTH INDIAN
CANYON DRIVE "THE RAMON DRUG BUILDING" ZONE LSC (LOCAL
SERVING COMMERCIAL); CASE 3.1009 MAA (APN 508-094-016).
From: David H. Ready, City Manager
Initiated by: Department of Planning Services
SUMMARY
The City Council will consider an appeal requested by G&M Construction on behalf of
the Tribal owners of Allotment 5A and 35A, seeking to overturn the action of the Historic
Site Preservation Board (RSPB) in which it placed a 120-day stay of demolition on "The
Ramon Drug Building" (referred to herein as the "440 Building") and initiated study for
possible recommendation to the City Council of Class 1 historic designation for the
structure.
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Open the Public Hearing and take public testimony; and
2) Adopt Resolution No. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL BY G & M
CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF ACBCI OWNERS OF ALLOTMENTS 5A
AND 35A AND UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE HSPB REGARDING THE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPRISE 436 THORUGH 454 SOUTH INDIAN
CANYON DRIVE "THE RAMON DRUG BUILDING; AXA THE 440 BUILDING"
(CASE 3.1009 MAA)."
ITEM NO. �� ---
City Council Staff Report
November 4, 2015- Page 2
Case 3.1009 APPEAL—Appeal of HSPB Action "Ramon Drug Building'
BACKGROUND:
Related Relevant Actions`b Planning, Building, Fire, etc.
(various dates) A file record of past building permits back to 1946.
HSPB considered a request to demolish two Class 3 historic sites and voted 5-1-1
(Williamson opposed, Dixon absent) to initiate study for possible recommendation to
October 13, 2015 City Council to move to Class 1 historic designation for the 440 Building and voted 5-
1-1 (Williamson opposed, Dixon absent) to place a 120-day stay of demolition on the
440 Building.
The board took no action on the gas station at 490 South Indian Canyon Drive.
October 14, 2015 1 The City Clerk received the notice of appeal on the HSPB's actions.
Pursuant to Section 2.05.030 (Filing of appeal) of the Palm Springs Municipal Code, an
appeal may be filed as follows:
A person aggrieved by an action taken by an administrative officer or
administrative agency of the city may appeal the action to the city council,
if the action is made appealable by applicable provision of the Palm
Springs Municipal Code or other city ordinance, by filing with the city clerk
a written notice of appeal which sets forth the appellant's full name and
mailing address, the specific action appealed from, the grounds for the
appeal and the relief sought; and paying to the city clerk such fee as the
city council may establish by resolution.
OVERVIEW OF APPEAL AND STAFF RESPONSE:
On September 15, 2015, the Department of Planning Services received an application
to demolish all structures on a 1.81-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of South
Indian Canyon Drive and East Ramon Road. Two structures exist on the site: a former
automobile service station at 490 South Indian Canyon Drive (referred to as "the 490
Building") and the Ramon Drug Building (referred to as "the 440 Building"). The
application and accompanying staff report was distributed to the HSPB members and
discussed as Agenda Item #5.13 at the October 13, 2015 HSPB meeting. At the
meeting, the Board voted to initiate study of the 440 Building for possible
recommendation of the site to the City Council for Class 1 designation, and approved a
120-day Stay of Demolition pending the outcome of the- designation process. (The
HSPB took no action on the 490 Building and a building permit for its demolition was
issued and the building has been demolished.)
The applicant has appealed both actions of the HSPB. Below are the grounds for the
appeal as stated in the appellant's letter followed by staffs response:
02
City Council Staff Report
November 4, 2015- Page 3
Case 3.1009 APPEAL—Appeal of HSPB Action "Ramon Drug Building"
"The buildings that have been cobbled over the years together are not
only adequated (antiquated) but have lived their useful life; along with over
100 building permits given in the last 40 years."
As stated in the HSPB staff report dated October 13, 2015, the earliest building permit
records on file were from 1946 with numerous permits for various additions and
modifications over the past 60-plus years. The 440 building was occupied by a variety
of commercial tenants until earlier this year. The Building's Indian Canyon Drive fagade
was designed by architect Donald Wexler in about 1954. Wexler moved to Palm
Springs in about 1952 and was 28 years old when he designed the modern-styled
fagade, making it one of his earliest commissions. Wexler continued his architectural
practice for many years and has been recognized as a significant "master architect"
whose creative talent influenced the emergence and development of the unique style of
modern architecture found in Palm Springs which has been referred to as "Desert
Modern".
Upholding the HSPB's stay of demolition and initiation of further study will allow more in-
depth study of the building to better understand its relevance in the context of Mr.
Wexler's contribution to the mid-century modern architecture for which Palm Springs
has developed international recognition. Overall the building appears to be well-
maintained and in very good condition, despite its age, and was occupied until recently
by many commercial tenants.
`9t was brought out by the Board that some of the buildings were possibly
Army offices and/or barracks utilized in the second World War and
subsequently relocated to the present location."
As noted in the HSPB staff report, one building permit (undated) refers to a building
being "relocated from the hospital grounds". It is not known what part of the current
building was relocated from another part of the City where the Army had office or
barracks used during World War II. Upholding the HSPB's stay of demolition would
allow time for further study of the building to better understand its components and
overall historic significance.
"The Allottees are desirous of removing the buildings so that they can be
afforded the opportunity to redevelop the property for a more compatible
use for the downtown Palm Springs area."
The appellant / applicant's representative, Mr. Moriano Patencio, spoke on behalf of the
multiple owners of the property at the time of the HSPB hearing. He noted that the
owners are not developers, but that developers had approached the ownership with
proposals for residential development, which is not the type of development that the
ownership is currently contemplating for the site. Given that no development proposal
currently exists, the Board expressed concern that allowing demolition would leave a
vacant lot where presently a viable commercial building stands.
03
City Council Staff Report
November 4, 2015 - Page 4
Case 3.1009 APPEAL—Appeal of HSPB Action "Ramon Drug Building"
The HSPB members discussed the concept of retaining the Wexler-designed facade
and integrating it with some sort of new commercial development of the site, noting that
the building behind the facade was "of questionable merit". The Board suggested a
study should ensue to possibly integrate the Wexler-designed facade into a future new
development and that such adaptive reuse of the facade would likely yield a greater
return on the development investment because of its association with an architect of
significance and its importance in the context of the mid-century prominence of Palm
Springs. The building is listed in the City's 2004 Citywide Historic Resource Survey.
For these reasons, the stay of demolition and initiation of study should be upheld to
allow time for these opportunities to be explored.
CONCLUSION:
Upholding the HSPB's stay of demolition and initiation of study would provide an
opportunity to review and consider the historic or cultural significance of the 440
Building as well as to consider possible alternatives for adaptive reuse of the Wexler-
designed facade in a future economic redevelopment proposal of the site. Granting the
appeal would allow the demolition of the 440 Building to proceed without the ability of
the City Council to ultimately and completely resolve these questions in a timely
manner.
NOTIFICATION:
Issuance of a demolition permit for the 440 Building is a ministerial process; however,
given that the 440 Building was identified on the City's 2004 Citywide Historic Resource
Survey as a Class 3 structure, referral to the HSPB was required. Appeal of the Board's
action to stay issuance of a demolition permit requires a public hearing to afford the
property owner due process, and notice has been given to the property owner of the
opportunity to be heard at this public hearing. Additionally, although not required, a
public hearing notice was published to provide notice to the general public of the
proposed appeal. Public comment letters that were received are attached to this staff
report.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
Section 21084 of the California Public Resources Code requires Guidelines for
Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Guidelines
are required to include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to
have a significant effect on the environment and which are exempt from the provisions
of CEQA. In response to that mandate, the Secretary for Resources identified classes
of projects that do not have a significant effect on the environment, and are declared to
be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental
documents. In accordance with Section 15301 "Existing Facilities," Class 1(I) projects
consist of demolition and removal of individual small structures — limited to a store,
a 64
City Council Staff Report
November 4, 2015-Page 5
Case 3.1009 APPEAL —Appeal of HSPB Action"Ramon Drug Building"
motel, office, restaurant, or similar small commercial structure if design for an occupant
load of 30 persons or less, or for urbanized areas, demolition of up to three such
commercial buildings on sites zoned for such use. To the extent that the appeal is
granted, demolition of the 440 Building would be exempt from CEQA following staff's
confirmation of the qualification of the exemption given the occupancy load of the
building. However, given the HSPB action to consider the historic significance of the
building, denying the appeal will allow the additional study to determine this significance
and, if found deserving of and given a Class 1 designation, demolition of the 440
Building would no longer be considered exempt from complying with the requirements
of CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
SUBMITTED:
FlInn Fagg, AICP Ma/rccussLLL.. Fuller, MPA, PE, PLS
Director of Planning Services Assistant City Manager/City Engineer
Approved by:
David H. Ready, City anager
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Appeal Letter
3. Draft Resolution
4. HSPB staff report
5. Public comment letters
ful5
ATTACHMENT 1
` G6
CIJy •
l �
o p Q
i
A \ PALM CANYON DR
a
c �
N
0 c v
INDIAN CANYON DR -
(D O
Z3
-n _� ^�
0 O
CALLE AJO
Lam:
CALLE ENCILIA Fo
Z g CALLE ENCILIA �v (D
<
cn o n'
CALLE S NTA ROSA
L—LLL- L� L
CALLEABRONIAAURITA m z
a 1
ATTACHMENT 2
08
'- G & M CONSTRUCTION
Subsidiary of Happy Traveler
211 West Mesquite Avenue
Fed.ID#95-2417032 Palm Springs, California 92264 tic.HA-272619
(760) 322-6918
Fax (760) 778-6708
General Engineering Grading Pipeline • Hazardous Waste Asbestos Demolition
October 14. 2015 r"
n cam'' "rrn
N;r. lay Thompson Vrn
City Clerk e
City of Pahn Springs c
3200 E. Tzhquitz Canyon Ways a .
X
Palm. Springs, CA 92262 W
" t0
Rh: REQUEST FOR APPEAL TO C i7 V COUNCIL
DEMOLITION —BUILDINGS LOCATED AT
436-490 S. INDIAN CANYON
]. 111on-1-son:
+; < %1 ; onsiructio❑ is representing the ACHCI Tribal A!lotee Owners of Allotment
Patcck 5A
We :re herein requesting an appeal of the Abrententiooed buildings (exclud`ng 490 S.
Indian Canyon — which was approved for demolition by the I1SPH):
Appealing
7 Action of the Hoard to initiate a study ror Historic designation
and
J The 120 day stay of demolition
C. & N1 Construction personnel along with Moraino Patencio attended the Historic Site
Preservation Hoard meeting on Octr>bcr 13: v,,itich !'an about 3 '/ hours. The main
speaker was Moraino Patencio whom presented the case for the Allotees (which consist
of about 20 individwiis).
The buildings (there are more than 1 of them) that have been cobbled over the )ears
iogctber are not oai}' adequatcd but have rived their Use'ul !ife: along with over i00
building permits given in the last 40 years.
(A
Mr.Jay Thompson
October 14,2015
Page Two
It was brought out by the Board that some of the buildings were possibly Army offices
and/or barracks utilized by the Army in the 2nd World War and subsequently relocated to
the present location.
The Allotees are desirous of removing the buildings so that they can be afforded the
opportunity to redevelop the property for a more compatible use for the downtown Palm
Springs area.
The homeless encampments have become a real problem and there is some fear that
instead of demolishing the buildings, the Allotees will be forced to clean-up the fire
damage that may occur. The homeless are being removed on almost a daily basis.
We thank you in advance for putting on us the City Council Agenda for this appeal.
Sincerely,
�j
Geor arant
cc: Moriano Patencio
1.0
[ [5i
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
RECVD BY: CR 01000078003
PAYOR: G & M CONSTRUCTION
TODAY'S DATE: 10/14/15
REGISTER DATE: 10/14/15 TIME: 10:44
➢ESCRIPTION AMOUNT
OTHER CHARGES SVCS $520.00
CUST ID: APPEAL FEE
________________
TOTAL DUE: $520.00
CHECK PAID: $520.00
CHECK NO: 7154
TENDERED: $520.00
CHANGE: $.00
[[4i
F+
W
ATTACHMENT 3
12
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL BY G & M
CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF ACBCI ALLOTTEE OWNERS OF
ALLOTMENT 5A AND 35A, AND UPHOLDING THE ACTIONS OF THE
HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD TO INITIATE STUDY FOR
POSSIBLE CLASS 1 HISTORIC DESIGNATION AND TO IMPOSE A
120-DAY STAY OF DEMOLITION FOR THE BUILDING LOCATED AT
436 THROUGH 454 SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE, ZONE LSC
(CASE 3.1009 MAA).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FINDS AND DETERMINES AS
FOLLOWS:
A. On September 15, 2015, G & M Construction on behalf of ACBCI allottee owners of
allotments 5A and 35A submitted an application to the City of Palm Springs to demolish all
structures on the parcel at the northeast corner of South Indian Canyon Drive and East Ramon
Road (APN 508-084-016) which included the Ramon Drug Building, a multi-tenant commercial
building (referred to herein as the "440 Building") and a vacant automobile service station
(referred to herein as the "490 Building");
B. According to building permit records submitted with the application, the subject buildings
were constructed prior to 1969 and pursuant to Palm Springs Municipal Code (PSMC) Section
8.05.125 all structures built prior to 1969 are automatically designated as Class 3 historic
structures. Such structures are eligible for a six-month stay of demolition and recommendation
by the Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) to the City Council to consider reclassifying as
a Class 1 structure.
C. On October 13, 2015, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the HSPB considered the
demolition request for the 440 Building and the 490 Building.
D. At the October 13, 2015, meeting, the HSPB took no action on the 490 Building, thereby
allowing the applicant to proceed with obtaining a building permit for the demolition of that
structure.
E. At the October 13, 2015, meeting, the HSPB voted 5-1-1 (Williamson opposed, Dixon
absent) to initiate study pursuant to PSMC Section 8.05.135 and voted 5-1-1 (Williamson
opposed, Dixon absent) to initiate a 120-day stay of demolition pursuant to PSMC 8.05.170 to
allow time for necessary studies, hearings and determination whether the 440 Building should
be designated as an historic site.
F. On October 14, 2015, the City received a letter from G & M Construction on behalf of
ACBCI owners of allotments 5A and 35A appealing the action of the HSPB, in accordance with
PSMC Section 8.05.230, to initiate study and place a stay of demolition on the 440 Building.
G. A notice of public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs California was
published in accordance with applicable law.
13
Resolution No.
Page 2
H. At its meeting of November 4, 2015, the City Council considered all evidence presented
in connection with the appeal request, including but not limited to the staff report and all written
and oral testimony presented.
I. The Council specifically finds that completion of the hearings and deliberations by the
HSPB and the City Council on the question of Class 1 historic designation will provide full and
adequate opportunity to review and consider the historic or cultural significance of the 440
Building. Granting the appeal would allow the demolition of the 440 Building to proceed
without the ability of the City Council to ultimately and completely resolve these questions in a
timely manner.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above findings are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby denies the appeal submitted by G & M
Construction on behalf of ACBCI owners of allotments 5A and 35A, and upholds the HSPB's
actions related to the initiation of a study for Class 1 historic designation and a 120-day stay of
demolition for the 440 Building located at 436 to 454 South Indian Canyon Drive (APN 508-
084-016; Case 3.1009 MAA).
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 2015.
DAVID H. READY, CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK
14
Resolution No. _
Page 3
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS )
I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution
No. is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on November 4, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK
City of Palm Springs, California
15
ATTACHMENT 4
16
Historic Site Preservation Board Minutes
October 13,2015
Page 6 of 8
Member La Voie stated his support for the project and that he felt it was )W"
and sensitive solution. He recommended re-evaluation oft a suggesting it
be of a design that is more "period specific'.
M/S/C (La Voie / Plo ixon absent) to approve the project with the exception
of the Ian is was requested to be re-evaluated and resubmitted to the Board
val.
S.B. AN APPLICATION BY ACBCI TRIBAL ALLOTTEE OWNERS OF ALLOTMENT
PARCELS #5A AND 35A, TO DEMOLISH A CLASS;3;HISTORIC SITE LOCATED AT
436 THROUGH 490 SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE (ZONE LSC; SECTION 14
SPECIFIC PLAN; CASE 3.1009 MAA).
Staff member Lyon summarized the staff report noting two buildings on the site, one a
multi tenant commercial building (referred to as the "440 Building") and a former
automobile service station (referred to as`the "490 Building"). '
Moriano Patencio spoke on behalf of the .twenty or so owners and summarized the
background and characteristics Qf the buildings proposed for demolition. He noted that
the 440 Building was comprised of.several buildings built over time behind a facade
designed by Donald Wexler. ' He=summarized the, history of zoning regulations on
tribally-owned land and old 25-year limitations in land leases for tribal-allottee-owned
parcels.
Chair Johns asked Mr. Patencio if the:owners had`-any plans for the property. (Mr.
Patencio noted the owners are not developers but that developers had approached
them with proposals for various residential development concepts for the parcel, which
the owners rejected in favor of comMercial or mixed use options.)
Member Burkett asked Mr. Patencio if the owners had considered talking to developers
on possible salvage of the facade to integrate it with future development on the site.
(Mr. Patencio noted that no private developers had come forward with offers to salvage
the facade):
Member Hays opined thattearing down the building with no approved redevelopment
was akin to "trading a treasure for a dirt lot". He noted the collection of buildings behind
the Wexler facade were of questionable historic merit. He noted saving the Wexler
facade would add value to a potential future re-development and generate a greater
return on the investment. He noted the Board is interested in trying find a way to save
the facade referring to it as "a gem".
Mr. Patencio stated it was "very sad" that no one has come forward to the owners with a
plan to save or preserve the facade.
Member Williamson asked for clarification about the authority of the ACBCI Tribal
Council to override actions of the City Council.
17
Historic Site Preservation Board Minutes
October 13,2015
Page 7 of 8
Member Burkett asked why the building needed to be demolished when no new
development is planned?
Member Ploss inquired about who might come forward to buy the building fagade?
Member La Voie expressed concern that more could be potentially learned about the
'building and cited an example of this from another jurisdiction.
MIS/C: (La Voie / Ploss) (5-1-1; Williamson opposed,. Dixon absent). To take no action
on the 490 Building and allow its demolition and;hitia'te study on the 440 Building to
determine what portions are significant.
M/SIC: (La Voie / Ploss) (5,1,1; Willtamso�>opposed, Dixon absent) To place a 120-day
stay of demolition on the 440 Building "
5.C. CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL REQUEST BY LARS VICKLUND OF MARTI
MADNESS LLC, OWNER FOR TURF`:. REMOVAL AND INSTALLATION F
DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPE AT "THE )EL MARCOS HOTEL" A C S 1
HISTORIC SITE LOCATED AT 225T.WEST BARISTO ROAD, ZONE R-3 ( B #78,
CASE 3.1478 MAA)
� F
Staff member Lyon summarized the"'staff repoft:;
Member La Voie suggested that the-4 n was overly co cated and something
more period appropriate should be considered.
MemberPloss felt the`proposed landscape;'was to By — suggested to simplify the
design.'
M/S/C'r(La Voie / Ploss;6-0-1 Dixon absent continue requesting the applicant revise
the design, to be simpler and more in eping with the period of significance (late
1940's) of the building and that ber La Voie volunteered to consult with the
applicant on options
5.13 CONSIDERATION: OF:A' COMMENATION TO CITY COUNCIL BY THE HSPB
REGARDING THE MU M MARKET PLAZA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE TOWN &
COUNTRY CENTER.
S.E. APPLICATI BY THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FOR A CODE AMENDMENT TO
MUNICIP CODE SECTION 8.05.125 TO RE-DEFINE ELIGIBILITY FOR CLASS 3
HISTO STRUCTURES I SITES (CASE 5.1311-A)
ctor Fagg summarized the staff report.
ig
w O�QFIM SpR�y
HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD
wC4 IFOR��P STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 13, 2015 NEW BUSINESS
SUBJECT: AN APPLICATION BY ACBCI TRIBAL ALLOTTEE OWNERS OF ALLOTMENT
PARCELS #5A & 35A, TO DEMOLISH ALL STRUCTURES LOCATED AT 436
THROUGH 490 SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE, A CLASS 3 HISTORIC SITE, CASE
3.1009 MAA; ZONE LSC (SECTION 14 SPECIFIC PLAN), (KL)
FROM: Department of Planning Services
SUMMARY
The owners of the subject property have submitted an application to demolish all the existing
structures at the subject address including a multi-tenant commercial building (referred to
herein as the "440 Building") and a former automobile service station (referred to herein as the
490 Building"). From review of building permits, the commercial building is comprised of
several structures constructed from the 1940's and onward and the automobile service station
was constructed in 1947. By virtue of the pre-1969 dates of construction, both buildings are
automatically deemed Class 3 historic sites.
Demolition of Class 3 sites must be reviewed by the HSPB prior to issuance of a demolition
permit. Upon review of the application, the HSPB may take no action and allow the demolition
permits to be issued, or it may impose a 120-day stay of demolition and initiate study to inform
the board whether the site is eligible for possible recommendation to a higher classification of
historic designation.
The applicant has not submitted a proposal for new construction or redevelopment of the site.
The fagade of the 440 building was designed by notable architect Donald Wexler, FAIA in
1954. Wexler was 28 years old when he and his business partner Richard Harrison completed
the commission.
RECOMMENDATION:
Regarding the 440 Building:
1. Take no action and allow the applicant to proceed with demolition. OR,
2. Pursuant to PSMC 8.05.135, initiate study & proceedings for possible recommendation
to the City Council for Class 1 historic designation and pursuant to PSMC 8.05.170,
impose a 120-day stay of demolition (commencing Tuesday October 13, 2015 and
19'
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report October 13, 2015
Case 3.1009 MAA—Demolition Request of a Class 3 historic site—436—490 S. Indian Canyon Drive Page 2 of 9
concluding Wednesday, February 10, 2016) to afford time for necessary studies,
hearings and determination whether the site should be moved to a higher level of
historic designation.
Regarding the 490 Building:
Take no action and allow the applicant to proceed with complete demolition of the
structure.
BACKGROUND AND SETTING:
The buildings are located on a 1.81-acre parcel at the northeast corner of South Indian Canyon
Drive and Ramon Road. The site was also the location of the "Clara Bee" Lodge; a complex of
salvaged military barracks that were assembled on the site after World War II by developer
Zack Pitts to create affordable housing for women.
The applicant has submitted copies of building permit records for the subject addresses which
are attached to this staff report. A summary of the most notable permits outlined below:
Related Rele ntt Qity-Actions by HSPB, PjprMiag, Fire, Building, e:
Numerous building permits- (See attached record) tracking as early as the late 1940's.
January 1946 Building permit for a frame &stucco"Cleaning Plant" building (Laundry)
August 1948 Building permit issued to construct 1-room gasoline service station"
July 1952 "Commercial addition to Laundry&Glass Go.'
July 1953 Plumbing permit for 240-242 Ramon Rd and 440 to 490 Indian Canyon (14 toilets, 15
lavatories"; noted "(rear building only)" suggests may have been upgrades for the Clara Bee
Lodge; demolished in 2011 after arson fire).
July 1954 "Alteration to Commercial rooms, change windows& overhang 6 store fronts"
August 1957 "Addition to Laundry Bldg. and Drug Store"
October 1960 Modifications for dry cleaning facility "Palm Springs Cleaners'
Wghborhood Meeting
None
Ownership Status
For many decades the Pitts Family (Zack Pitts / Plaza Investments, Inc., etc.) has maintained a land
lease with the allottee owners of the parcel. In roughly 2010, the lease expired and was not
renewed. As such, there is no current land lease in place and ownership is still vested in numerous
ACBCI allottee members.
DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
Building 1: The 440 Building - Mult-tenant Commercial Building.
Over the past sixty-plus years, the 440 Building housed many retail and commercial tenants,
20
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report October 13,2015
Case 3.1009 MAA-Demolition Request of a Class 3 historic site-436-490 S. Indian Canyon Drive Page 3 of 9
among them Palm Springs Cleaners (a dry cleaning business appears to be the first occupant
listed in a 1947 building permit), Love's Barbeque, Flaherty's Bar & Grill, (later O'Leary's Bar &
Grill) and Finerman's Ramon Drug Store (which appears to have been the primary occupant
when the current fagade was constructed in 1954; see attached excerpt from a 1954 Desert
Sun article).
The 440 Building appears to have had several additions over time. One building permit
(undated) notes a "store building to be relocated from hospital grounds".' As seen from the
aerial photos below, the various additions appear as different roof surfaces.
The first photo below is a portion of a citywide aerial photo dated 1953. It shows the
commercial building as an "L" shaped structure and the gas station as a "Y" shaped structure.
Further to the east (right) one can see various other buildings which currently do not exist,
including the parallel rows of former military barracks relocated to the site to form the Clara
Bee Lodge.
tir
m.
PORTION OF 1953 AERIAL PHOTO SHOWING SUBJECT SITE WITH THE 440 INDIAN CANYON DRIVE BUILDING,GAS STATION,
AND RELOCATED MILTARY BARRACKS COMPRISING THE CLARA BEE LODGE(RIGHT SIDE OF PHOTO).
From review of the newspaper article from 1954 on Finerman's Drugs, it appears the 440
Building may have suffered a fire and was rebuilt. Apparently, it was at that time that the
' This would seem to corroborate verbal recollections and recent newspaper articles noting structure(s) on the
subject site were re-purposed military structures, since the El Mlrador Hotel was commissioned by the military
during World War II as a military hospital, and was later returned to civilian use as a hospital.
21
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report October 13,2015
Case 3.1009 MAA—Demolition Request of a Class 3 historic site—436—490 S. Indian Canyon Drive Page 4 of 9
current facade designed by architect Donald Wexler, FAIA, was added. In viewing the different
roof surfaces in the photo below, it can be surmised that the Wexler-designed facade appears
to comprise the front thirty feet or so of the commercial building.
6
`A
1•
7 rca _tx
�r-
4
CURRENT AERIAL PHOTO SHOWING NUMEROUS ADDITIONS TO THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING,SHOWING THE FRONT THIRTY FEET OR SO COMPRISING THE
WEXLER-DESIGNED FACADE,LATER ALTERATIONS TO THE GAS STATION AND REMOVAL OF THE MILITARY BARRACKS THAT COMPRISED THE CLARA
BEE LODGE.
f
/ Al� ;m
AERIAL VIEW OF THE 440 BUILDING LOOKING SOUTH SHOWING MANY DIFFERENT ROOF SURFACES
AND THE CONTINUOUS ROOF SURFACE OF THE WEXLER-DESIGNED STREET FRONT STRUCTURAL BAY AT THE RIGHT
The assumption that the Wexler-designed portion only comprises the front of the buildings also
appears consistent with the visual observation into the storefronts in which the dramatic
cantilevered and sloped stucco roof surface can be seen continuing past the plane of the glass
22
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report October 13,2015
Case 3.1009 MAA—Demolition Request of a Class 3 historic site—436—490 S. Indian Canyon Drive Page 5 of 9
curtainwall to the first structural column line (see photos below).
EDGE OF SLOPED SOFFIT
la,_
i
INTERIORTENANT SPACE SHOWING SLOPED STUCCO CEILING SOFFIT CONTINUING INTO THE INTERIOR SPACE.
� �,ac�eeruxw
14
r ria s
Y
VIEW FROM INTERIOR SHOWING FRAMELESS GLASS AT ROOF SOFFIT
AND CONTINUATION OF THE SLOPED ROOF SOFFIT INTO THE INTERIOR TENANT SPACE
23
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report October 13,2015
Case 3.1009 MAA—Demolition Request of a Class 3 historic site—436—490 S. Indian Canyon Drive Page 6 of 9
CAM
1201
N
DpU
1 rim q WOW
EARLY PHOTO SHOWING FACADE OF THE 440 BUILDING WITH ITS DEEP CANTILEVERED ROOF SHADING THE STOREFRONT GLAZING.
rBrluv t, tTt•=, rt.°d b� i'ahn StuiI'KS a€Chitevt , Wexler and
Harrison, the xtore'a exterior is an impreAsivie example of mod•
ern treatment. F"aeade Is brilliantly lit and full length frontal
glass affords view of entire store.
} � I
F
I
i
NEWSPAPER CLIPPING FROM 1954 SHOWING THE FRONT OF THE 440 BUILDING
24
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report October 13,2015
Case 3.1009 MAA—Demolition Request of a Class 3 historic site—436—490 S. Indian Canyon Drive Page 7 of 9
The building at 440 South Indian Canyon Drive was identified in the City's 2004 Citywide
Historic Resources Survey (DPR sheet attached). The building's street fagade is a dramatic
"upswept" cantilevered stucco clad steel frame canopy subdivided into eight structural bays.
The north and south "sides" of the building are skinned in arched panels of small rust-colored
river rock veneer. Green aluminum shade canopies that follow the pointed arch profile of the
stone veneer panels can be seen attached to the side wall toward the rear of the complex.
VIEW OF SOUTH AND WEST FACADE SHOWING SIDE ROCK VENEER AND FRONT CANTILIEVERED ROOFLINE.
<— Ii
'I•I s �:
(1
NORTH FACADE SHOWING RIVER ROCK VENEER PANELS
F
-
ii �lli liiil N
VIEW LOOKING NORTH,ALONG SIDEWALK SHOWING CANTILEVERED FRONTROOFLINE WITH STUCCO SOFFIT
The 490 Building is considered a significant early design by master architect Donald Wexler.
Many view the graceful upswept lines of the facade as a pre-cursor of Wexler's 1955 design of
25
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report October 13, 2015
Case 3.1009 MAA—Demolition Request of a Class 3 historic site—436—490 S. Indian Canyon Drive Page 8 of 9
the entry portico at the Palm Springs Spa (demolished in 2014). It's modern expressive
styling, clean lines, generous roof overhang, expansive use of glass and aluminum curtainwall,
lack of ornament and uniform structural grid place it in the context of the mid-century modern
era for which Palm Springs has become internationally recognized. It is an aesthetically
unique commercial building that has generally been well-maintained and enjoyed full tenancy
of its commercial spaces over most of the past sixty-plus years of its existence.
The 490 Building — Former Gas Station.
The second structure on the site, at 490 South Indian Canyon Drive, is a former automobile
service station. The station was occupied by Standard Oil / Chevron, but has been vacant for
many years. Most recently the building was occupied by a tour company.
STREET VIEW OF EXISTING AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION AT 490 SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE
,r
sin, ian -ainy6n Dr
10,
r
i
AERIAL VIEW SHOWING FORMER GAS STATION IN THE FOREGROUND,THE"0 BUILDING IN THE BACKGROUND
AND THE VACANT EASTERN PORTION OF THE LOT ON WHICH THE CLARA BEE LODGE STOOD
As noted in the building permits, the 490 Building was originally constructed in the late 1940's.
There is no background information that was found relative to this structure that would suggest
it possesses any historic significance, nor is there any known architect associated with its
design. It does not present a particularly unique design aesthetic and other than the single
column supporting the canopies, does not seem to demostrate a particularly unique method of
construction. The building was not recognized in any of the City's previous historic resource
surveys and staff is not aware of any historic significance associated with the building.
26
Historic Site Preservation Board Staff Report October 13, 2015
Case 3.1009 MAA—Demolition Request of a Class 3 historic site—436—490 S. Indian Canyon Drive Page 9 of 9
Given that the allottee owners are seeking demolition of both structures, it is unlikely owner
support of reclassification to Class 1 historic status would be likely. Furthermore, given the
appeal authority granted to the Tribal Council on actions concerning land use actions on
allottee-owned parcels under the 1977 City/Tribal land use agreement, Class 1 historic
designation may also be unlikely. A more successful outcome for preservation or adaptive
reuse of the 440 Building may be to allow time for negotiations with the building owners for
possible salvage of the Wexler-designed front structural bay and facade, or to explore possible
incorporation of the facade into a successful redevelopment of the site.
CONCLUSION
Of the two buildings associated with this demolition application, the 440 Building may be
considered to possess sufficient historic significance based upon a cursory review of criteria
for nomination and the 2004 Historic Resource Survey to warrant further study for possible
recommendation by the Board to the City Council for Class 1 historic designation.
The 490 Building, a former automobile service station, is not listed in the 2004 Historic
Resources Survey and does not appear to possess sufficient historic significance to warrant
further study.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Demolition permits are a ministerial action under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and as such are not subject to CEQA review.
NOTIFICATION
No notification is required for HSPB review of requests for demolition of Class 3 historic sites,
however the agenda for today's meeting has been provided to the City's Office of
Neighborhood Involvement and distributed to designated neighborhood organizations pursuant
to PSZC 94.04.00 and the agent for the applicant has been notified via e-mail and telephone.
Ken Lyon, RA, Flinn Fagg, AIC
Associate Planner Director of Planning Services
Attachments:
Vicinity Map
Application materials
Excerpt from 1954 Desert Sun article on Ramon Drug Store.
2004 and 2015 (Draft) Historic Resource Survey sheet on the Wexler Building.
Public Comment Letters.
27
4�
APPI,lCAT1Q►' FOR PERMIT '
BUIL i
1 . HUILDIMG DCrPARTMSftT, Cf �
to TY'Of PAt.M SPRINGS ,'n, t,..
IV
}
p
At lecl ti
Slue �!
G P
11ee 4M7
Ourpancy
fr. i G11 Sial lid
i� Fo oLQr.
(1 C747
' ' 1
At
F ra Zone -
yY fen! • / I I .,.. �fy:
! Slde I ir` +Fi
. Side Ileu y,t
So
Description of Work fo Be Done
/ yRcmarks and Re{erencef;
r.ext.ft. t a'"(r''f/..}i�� '"I-',,
� � J ✓ .
olal Value of Work I Labor; jj<Ivd+sq
1 elartat!Pl
Mealiap, .mt, �� . S G ���:6+•'^'
n4,W lit. u
n.MIT ��._,-tea•.•.
PERMIT FEE $
, er OR C ipfracfo
NO tE01^yipr r:•fp,( y d: Ir * � i rkl
i �. � if � q�..jw., iP r� .L�ItyhS�r•3y a ysY�.F.���.1
,,
+,'fir r c ;'•'
APPLICATION FORP
ERMtT 3 �.
CITY BUILOI
DEPA4iAiEkT �� - �}
+k
job lacnol'n OF "AIM SFAfMGS
Black
7rotl h%�r
�', - Con7rogor� Cr
ci
,. Zonhagor'• [lunw Aio, � Y. . �
liw and
OnuponCy "1wi�c./ �p���.a.
rpo1024
w� 1M
1 f. front
Q fd
►.�
,!?eSglpllan Of wor
•� a . - ..�1
k to Re e Dona-Remork Cf
and Refer
�tc<
W r
cl Yclue`of wor tabor( . lnclydl,.Q
k l Malrrlal, wht
Hsu Yr-Q, plumbln
i7 N0. Q. .ia �
ERMfT FEE
or�OR Conlr cP
q 4
u ' .
r f.
}
✓s, � � J sr �
. 29�` � , ,Jr"r•;•+� SM�fj t' dN i("`Y ' ��t,"Y7- ,rf.,
a
f � t1 r.
' APPLICATION FC'P, PERMIT t
BUILDING
EUIIDING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PALM SPRINGS r.
Job L"almn
.y�i`S f:Lr.rr
J
yniroc}oru
iL
Canlmme6 Memo ism Avc itct,
AR
•vty.Lao�Size Ud/. foalay. INIJpAf
'•xif..
..:Snot F" Ian* S�
lT4 ,
y tool isle Sid., Aaer :;ht
13
�uiv i4
Description of Work to Be done—Remarks and References
.�,x c.
�"` �/ �.'� �" <::. ,.,• ,�• P. +<�, is ,:`zi' .
!
x -
otol Volpe of Work{ t°i"°' aleatwb wt.tjr S c•
�r,K Neofinq, ilwn6fnp NG s, a dry,.+ •- �'� � �
RMIT NO. PER
jrvner OR.Controitorj �- - .-±���^ ✓ •
} fs;anl zt'rtj t. x'
0 tii �id •a ,Yrt ! t � � �p i! i
R a e
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT �y
BUILDIN
+ F:6UILDMNG DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PALM f<'tt_FNGS
Zd Job Iscalion
i
lti {
`1
stock 'rod "�
PF j` •, Cam..
OnulKlorr Licrnt. No, Ibot
btu
ctry
AM Sic, slaw. fowtww, NolpLcl�w "
' Zan. .. Fir, Lon, rn�
• fanl � r i , Rwr ,� •3.
Description of Work to Be Done--Romrirks and Refof,cos
1 4.
j -� nM
L. �� •a�
o tl) Yoluo of Worl,�-', 1gr. Mol ajoL YtNfns a a tyd 4
�l IT Na? '�:2. 11111 L2 fa.RFR N
ItA� OR Conlractor_r "s rY
t
By
t > }
.; y+r ,..' .y: '4�_iS;t•XA r} .t✓y j, rl� { •` 2nc 4 �r .�, E
i yy��gg
DUPLICATE
APPLICATION.FOR PERMIT .
BUILDING
BUILDING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
C Man"
Owner
•
Jr 4Mif d y
111111 ��ryi�1
-`
{ so
'R�.; aibcter'r (•n•» No, Au Iad � ,. •,.
M• Clf
r
1)K and • is o
OBCtpaurral�+
,J'... Let Stu Bldg. FWage
et ra n(
Slit
3tda ti(u r
� A r
CA f% � • ae , a1J ''�t
Description of Work to Be Don . --Remarks*and.Referenaes�
57
r
Total Value of Work { Labor, a. va^1Q5Mlr;np
1 -
�• 11caling, rlemb)ng, (IL
a t7 }
PERMIT NO. �
Owner.OR Contra or ' �
r
it
1
- B
aan�y c �/�
DAATE •"
f✓ t 1 P t C 'L.y
32 I d '` .rj '"r4�[� i t �°y.l.y, •r 'cG� Ur v I?` f V
" r-,�t*t�1+'nr,.Yr•`tY, i
ALA w����� �
zsY. APPLICATION FOR PERlY11 tf .
t .
: ,QUIi01Nd DIPARTMF"T .'CITY"'a pAL)MA:SIRIHGS'+, .
Job halloo 4
c�v<x
.}j� _ lia4 iron fi"
u.
'' Cantroebt , ,fir
onlrocbi, lk.naa No. A. tM pry ,
it� �SiSI.•'t�,/-t''��.F9y �+i �7i'
F,... Wt Sir. lidp, foarnp. FtsIBAf 'iz
n., r
Z" Nro 2ana fry
7'
Siam
tort
n
9eicriplion of Work to Ba Done—Remarks and ReferoncW,
glal Yatub of Work LAW"r'�itflal?
NtaUrq Plambiap, Uc J:',+y�r , ry"a cv:
I:RMIT NO
Gonfrn
ner,+:OR� ctorz "
� ! $:
33
�y
PL U M Al, ..
x, aY,q . ;
A+ BUlI.D2NG DEPARTt�EI/T;'9C17 Y OF P_ Ai}t gpI IGB
t onatl d r 4 act),
' t)trnrr
Pommber
y
Rear a karw J
Air Conditluaina. �hoaen :r-A�
AalhtuM Ncrytic7anka
t
dEx WaAhera
r•sLh ° - itw '
Ceiyno4 .___Remr?1tNb�
N'r4thrn ylnka
4nrinkkr8rt't Plra
�y tinitlnR Fountilna '`' ° �'"�' -
S/E•M�,lkatnR'_ '�,
T Yr : . —�ttater llNitaY a..
1 .��,� . t5nttrltptlr� ft„
a pinK ka�ii Rack,
, �W 'J dale►80,�f1rlp���
X
.igndry•� irn�i �� ;,y,.Y�ns.
MIPalntjees 'z: 7 , 7Vjr q'
xk
+`r""'k'`i• Ss+Y�7ia-YtlYr «r:,Wt,
+ s
P 34
+ s,
APPLICATION FQR PERMIT
BUILDING
BUILDING, DEPARTMENT CITY Of. IALM SERINGS
Job lotaiion
J�4 .m
+Llol 61«i ltoct
8 ccnttectot
r �
ontrnctot's tic u No.
AIdIUKt
t1t.and s., l
Plponq 1.:
Lot sir# lido ttwtop• ''`
:. .
,in lone ,
J r+f
trr Ftaot.• i it
Sidr R.or
H ,
QeAcrtp(t^io+t of Word to Be bD0one—Ree`inarks and References
ems,
o ' I Value of Work t"`I"at"° ,a; , ter.
lobar, Xj"U l t, Winnp 1@ i .
}',+•.�' ry.Ot.n�, Plumbinq .!C )ll
MIT NQ. � `f PERMIT FEE a
per OR Controclor F'
�' xi tsi if
PY
a �F J L r 35
:x'
a ` $�
Ofriplrii�lr �� a
r�r ApPL[CAVOTO"tb0'
MIL'DING DEPARTMEZIT.,C1TY"OIf `I�ALJA,BPRI11ti8;
C!V- Job
y Owned,
,t r
spXl . i,
Plumber. f
r �
t 3j y - Ft,.q�' Zip 'fYyr
:actor's License No' 5tute _.Cily
k Cnnditlonlng
Bethtube �ReplloTenka -' ��p+
"f Wholtx Wawhen - Senrr Tsjts J, �
�}SLIshlFnshent
Sprinkler83atem-.:Fltr � ,*
a1lal Unfts �
Drl>1klell Ftruntolntt
oorDratns _Tulleta;�� 7 r t
utleM Urinets} r 1� uk r
Y SYPrtfare# �1i ttte��flall! i"
�7 %'i'oHeaters naterlipinR�t*ri��:
tlratfe Tmp� 1l ater f{otlenrn
{`,,pUnCr`y 7ralt< `
•'hYR.�+tu LiflA�fa�i] �* .Vs 5 ! A �Sy�CY
tlVAt'llgetytnr`AratnU��� �fA1l" fC i �.. , 4.1' C
V3C+x';-�rin•�`.°Pr~1�&�1,t"c'Vt; 4!`��.S�rrM1�hr6`+,`�$ o-lt,f'�7ir'+��"! f4''r�]..t>.�!aff^ar7
�indt�G sf`(ot rk
tFFMAI,Voffik t�,
Wxml
4 �
36
5?
a APPLICATION FOR PERMIT ?:y
BUILDING
BUILDING DEPART
M[NT CITY Oi-iFALM SPRINGS
�.. CFI �.
_�S�rack trod
Ownn
C; n"Vor's Lic"" Na. A tbu
Lit
lof Sln ltdp. Poo • Mslphl ��
af
Z � 51d• . •el
escrlplfon of Work to Be
,,Uone—Remarks and Refarencft r
o V clue of Work{ 1�«. ++b+•+tat, wlri
Heel;np, riwnbMg, Nu '
+L W�
IrMtT NO. y PERMIT FEES
ner:.OR Contractor
Lq„
. y.
BY
i
f I:;
r.
S/
do Y .Y
37
"•Ij
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT
BUILDING
ek4
:• BUILDING DEPARTMENT1 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
1 _ lob lo{ntlon ,.
of
p,�.
Imes
Conbocror r ,,-.
Conrrscmr't lkmre No Ar iletl
clt +'
CY
Lol Site 341o. loatt+oe Neiai,t n'
Zone live Zan• rype
runt • Rwr -r'.;
.Descripilon of Work to Be Dona—Remarks and Referegces
I'`�,IVL,C�f.iL',K�iJ°� 11.P"' �ly`7'f+�''�i•Z,C I:!'+�.,e.l ..rZ
'JJ JJ r
�' fU
7
� ' !noludinq
alal Volvo of Work Labe,, Malarial, Wlrino, 1
PERMIT NO � PERMIT FEE $3i .._�;..
OWner OR Contr ctor
f f�
r . Y
'S'Z (Sign)7r S ir�x *r x fir'
4
38
Assessor Parcel Number Additional APNs HSPU No.
508094016
2015 Stamc lode
Address 440 Direction S Prefix Street Indian Canyon Suffix Dr 5S3
Location '440-460 S.Indian Canyon
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION Builder RFSOURCR INFORMATION
Date from Tax Assessor Original Use Commercial
Original Owner Zack Pitts
Date from Research 1956 Other Owner(s) Current Use!Commercial
Date Source Resource Attribute HP6.1-3 story commercial building
Steel&Shade:The Architecture of Donald Wexler Historic Name Stories 1
Architect Wexler&Harrison Common Name Tract/Neighbarhood
Architect Source KBC;Tri-Tone Tile;Palm Springs Cleaners; ❑Located in a District?
'Steel&Shade:The Architecture of Donald Wexler !Ramon Drug District
Architectural Style 'iMid-century`3adern Additional Style
FIELD PHOTO CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES
iOne-story configuration with simple geometric forms
'jHorizontal massing
k _
iExpressed construction
Flat roof with wide upswept cantilevered canopy over sidewalk
Unadorned wall surfaces with little decorative detailing
I I
I '.Stone used as exterior wall panels on seconday facade
.Mk
i
'.Rectangular plan around interior court;symmetrical organization;double flush doors
with transom panel and period hardware;secondary entrances from parking lot with
pointed arch awnings
ALTERATIONS
Storefronts may have been altered;one hay has flush doors and transom panel
39
P.VALUMM
Period of Significance'.1956 Criterion C/3/4,5
Context Architectural Styles&Local Practitioners
Theme Post-World War 11 Modernism
Sub-theme Mid-century Modern
Period of Significance Criterion
Context _.. .
Theme
Sub-theme
Period of Significance Criterion j
Context _....
Theme __.._.
Sub-theme _... . _.
Statement of Significance
This property is significant as an example of a Mid-century Modern,past-World War 11 commercial building designed by a prominent Palm Springs architectural
firm. The building exhibits quality of design with distinctive features including the eye-catching upswept canopy over the street frontage,expansive glass walls,and
decorative stone derailing.
Notes/Addifional Information
A post-World War 11 surge of visitors and seasonal residents coincided with Modernism's rise in popularity.As a result commercial architecture in Palm Springs from
:this period reflected the acceptance of Modernism and expressed a wide range of Modern interpretations as it increasingly served two purposes:the need for tourist-
oriented buildings for seasonal visitors,and the need for practical daily services,such as banks,shops,and gas stations,for the growing population of permanent
residents.Commercial development during this period consisted of both mill development in the original commercial core,and the continued northward and
'southward expansion of the commercial district along Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives.Many commercial buildings,ranging from small,single.or multi-
tenant office and retail buildings to large department stores,were designed by prominent local architects of the period. This building is referred to as a"barracks
remodel'in the project list of Steel&Shade:The Architecture of Donald Wexler,It is one of several projects undertaken by Wexler&Harrison for Zack Pitts,
'.Important local businessman,whose family managed La Plaza for generations.
40
.. ARC'l77FG'UtSAL DETAIIK Marc r.to
■■
w%= wac +� �J a TM141SpM
ld EJE4A'IDN W24T°LEWTON
r
' e - COLtlMN.
�--jen use w.
s rff
24GJTI+ L_:A,bN .tee
s -=
L � � UE.J.e JAMB GM.AIS '
L.
k 1 _ J-. e .�.�� _�� I ....<„. � �,�,..,,,�. _mow• -- e .IAMB _
a
cr.
! ..N 3LAST EL ✓� `�ol.rD �a www.awu
-ervw a
S '
> u
aF. — SILL .,.
I f a j
.
VM
r,
ml aa.
4
_ ��NGR-H t rATIDM1 p, o iLRSS �A - s 5cuw SOL _
_ t`OrvE YAAtclvc „L I
0
� � a
C
r
41
N
a
T� V. l
< J
24
Q U U �:
� II
4a J
LI I
° ep ° Le04 C '°
g .
I Ada OV
• ti '. r o Q'k aop -
a
0
t e
° p i
v qq+
s.6
1
°
u.p „
Bal?pa
049
W➢ 0 °,o of
W �
x,
Ito
h .1
r 44 o �
a
Ll
i
°
v' v 69°p0 v
ti
k
i �
ATTACHMENT 5
43
Hermosa Beach Office GK Amy Minteer
Phone: (310) 798-2400 Email Address:
Fax: (310)798-2402 Chatten-Brown & Carstens LLP acm@cbcearthlaw.com
San Diego Office 2200 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 318
Phone: (858) 999-0070 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Direct Phone:
Phone: (619) 940-4522 www,cbcearthlaw.com 310-798-2400 Ext. 3
October 6, 2015
Via Federal Express
James Thompson
City Clerk, City of Palm Springs
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Re: Architectural significance of Wexler & Harrison-designed Ramon Drug
Building at 440-460 South Indian Canyon Drive
Dear Mr. Thompson:
The Palm Springs Modern Committees believes there is substantial evidence to
conclude that the historic commercial building located at 440-460 South Indian Canyon
Drive (known as the Ramon Drug Building) qualifies for listing as a Class One Historic
Site.
The Ramon Drug Building was designed by noted master architects Donald
Wexler and Richard Harrison. Preliminary research suggests that the property originally
consisted of former barracks. Wexler & Harrison were commissioned to convert the
barracks into a contemporary commercial property with entirely new fagades. The result
is a superb example of Desert Modernism exemplified by the west elevation's upswept
canopy with its gracefully curved supports that rise towards the mountains. It is also a
highly visible commercial building located in downtown Palm Springs. The City's 2004
Historic Resources Survey found the building to be a "simple but sleek" example of the
Modern architectural style "in good condition." (Attached.) The Survey also identified
the date of construction for this Wexler building to be 1960.
As a Class 3 Historic Site, (Palm Springs Municipal Code § 8.05.125 [all
structures constructed before 1969 are classified as Class 3 Historic Sites]) the City's
Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) has the authority to issue a "six-month stay of
demolition" to allow the HSPB to make a recommendation regarding whether the site
should be reclassified as a Class 1 Historic Site or to provide other recommended actions.
The Palm Springs Modern Committee strongly urges the HSPB to issue such a stay for
those exact reasons.
44
City of Palm Springs
October 6, 2015
Page 2
In addition, the Palm Springs Modern Committee believes there is ample evidence
that 440-460 South Indian Canyon Drive should be classified as a Class 1 Historic Site.
As noted above, the Ramon Drug Building is an excellent and highly visible example of
Desert Modernism that is the work of the local architectural firm of Wexler & Harrison.
Indeed, the work of master architect Donald Wexler, who passed away this summer,
exemplified the Desert Modern style. Detailed obituaries in the New York Times and Los
Angeles Times idolized Donald Wexler for his pioneering work in Palm Springs.
According to his New York Times obituary, Mr. Wexler's innovative steel houses and
soaring glass-fronted terminal at the Palm Springs International Airport helped make
Palm Springs a showcase for midcentury modernism. (See, "Donald Wexler, Architect
Who Gave Shape to Palm Springs, Dies at 89,"New York Times online, July 1, 2015,
available at http:l/www.nytimes.coni/2015/07/02/arts/design/donald-wexler-architect-
who-gave-shape-to-palm-springs-dies-at-89.html? r-0.) The Palm Springs Art Museum
held an exhibition on Mr. Wexler's work in 2011 titled, "Steel and Shade: The
Architecture of Donald Wexler." The documentary, "Journeyman Architect: The Life
and Work of Donald Wexler" was made about Mr. Wexler in 2010. One of Wexler's
steel residences designed for the Alexander Construction Company is listed in the
National Register of Historic Places. The fagade of Palm Springs Airport was designed
by Donald Wexler, which is the basis for the airport's fagade's designation as a Class 1
Historic Site.
Thus, the Palm Springs Modern Committee strongly urges the HSPB to 1) issue a
six month stay of demolition for the Ramon Drug Building, and 2) continue the HSPB
hearing until such time that sufficient research on the property's significance has been
gathered in evaluating whether the building should be reclassified as a Class 1 Historic
Site.
Sincerely,
Amy Minteer
Attorney at Law
Enclosure: Citywide Historical Resource Survey Form
cc: Flinn Fagg, Planning Director (via email: Flinn.Fagg@palmsprings-ca.gov)
Douglas Holland, City Attorney (via email: DHolland@wss-law.com)
David Ready, Esq., Ph.D., City Manager (via email:
CityManager@palmspringsea.gov)
45
r lala Callomm—The R..omcua Agency --- - - Pon,s"I
l OFPARTMCNT OF PARKS AND RECn CATION RRII -
RI A p T mnmhl
y� ,y 11111P SI a On t E
�.- Olher Listings
Revlew Cade Reviewer OsIO
Page t of Resource Name or C IAss+gnM up rocemeo 440-4(A South ln_dlan Canyon D+we
P I.ONurldentaier. __-. _.. ..
P2.Loeetlpl: fiNWfor Publiaalbn (ti Unmalrlcled ---- a.County Roerside -_
entl IPA ant aP'JA.Ahed+a Locsmn Map as Dae
b.USp3].s'5'pueo PeM Spdnps Date f995 T R 1!4 W 1/4 01 lies B.M.
c Actress 440-4W South tMiian Canyon Offs CUY Farm SPnngs -- Zlp 92262
d.UTM.{ciw morn man one for la+eearwor xnoar resourrnvl Zone if 'EJ mN
u.Other Locatgfwl Data.la g.,parca Y,diroplam to+asa+nan,davaoan,ew.,m npprWrraloi
City of Pain Springs Section t5 Pamol No. 505 094 015
P30.Description:O Rorw ow.,W iWnr ele+nama.odWe design.mai.dw.,conailioa mtemmns,aitn,seWng cent munnanes)
Designed in a Modern architectural style,this sungle-story commimlel building Is simple but sleek.TM budding features a smple
lines plan we,a sbghlly sloping Hat root and an emended save an the front elevation that projects out to the stdawalk and is
supported by a series of metal 14onms. The building is symmetrical in design And Certain,eight storefronts facing the east side of
South Indian Canyon Drive. Each Mershon isci,,dy articulated and features metal-franod window wails with center set double
aniry doors. Emerior building materials consist of smodh stucco end cIXlCrel6 peinlad wh4o Ion IKB amefgr woos,with a series al
segmented archpanels an the sXfeelevabons in-filled wtlh masenry material and likely compositwn or Wrand gravel rooting An
aspha4 lol a bcated on the north side of the building,and selves as parking for the building acclgams and patrons. OveA4,the
building appears to be in good condtan.
�3 b.Resource Attributes: HP6 13 SIOly Cwlvnerolar SIPWIng
P4,Resources Present: 4V Buildny Slmoture I Oblect 1§110 0Oisirgt l l Element of Dlsbkt Olney dsdatesele.)
P5b.Description of Photo:
P5a. Fhalo of Dlawirg(%wpmywreC tar baildags,structures,and objects) j1daw,dap,accession Y)
View Southeast
Augu512003
Pa.Dale ConstruetedfAge and Sources:
DAHistoric i Prehistoric - Both
C.1950
Visual Survey
P7.Owner and Address:
PHIS Indian Avenue,Inc.
P.O.Box 7611
San Framsca,CA 94120
Pa.Recorded by:
MalayfPelnN(inslelpWaison
ArCbdectural Resources Group
Pier 9,The Embsrcadero
Son Francisco,CA 94117
P9.Date Recorded: August 2W3
P1D.Survey Type(Dscc,e,d ---
Reconnaissance Survey
pii Report Citation:(Cite wrvey raped and ameraowtsa,or emer'none.-)
Vcnitectural Resources Group,City or Palm Sprigs.Histone Resources Survey Bulbously Report,2004.-
tfachments.
.'.None l I Conflnuaoen Sheet ❑District Record []Rock Art Record ❑Other(List)
"LocabOn Map C7 Building.Structure,and Object Record CI LMeer Faalure Recod 0ArlHacl Record
Sketch Map 1 Archaeological Record killing Sallion Resnrd []Photograph Record
OPR 523A(IM)
46
111PALM SPRINGS a�cElr u
PRESERVATION " PALS, sr}
FOUNDATION 2015OCT 13 AM 7: 56
JAhtS 1hvfir �
CITY CLERK,
October 8, 2015
Mr. Flinn Fagg, AICP
Director of Planning Services
City of Palm Springs
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Subject: HSPB ITEM 5B - AN APPLICATION BY ABCDI TRIBAL ALLOTTEE
OWNERS TO DEMOLISH THE RAMON DRUG BUILDING
Dear Mr. Fagg,
Originally a military barracks, architect Don Wexler's 1956 modification to the original
structure transformed the Ramon Drug Building (440-454 South Indian Canyon Drive) into an
important piece of the city's modernist architecture. The building's most notable feature is the
concrete and ornamental plaster arcade which is a "fluid" form rarely used by Wexler who is
better known for his rectilinear work in steel.
The Ramon Drug Building has already appeared in the 2004 Citywide Historical Resources
Survey. Additionally, the building would appear to qualify for Class 1 Historic Site
designation under multiple criteria of Chapter 8.05 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code.
Accordingly, we strongly recommend that the city's Historic Site Preservation Board issue a
stay of demolition of this Class 3 property pending an investigation into the merits of its
potential Class 1 designation.
If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance please contact the foundation at
(760) 837-7117 or at info@pspreservationfoundation.org.
Sincerely,
Erik Rosenow
President
1775 East Palm Canyon Drive,Suite 110-195,Palm Springs,CA 92264
(760)837-7117 • info Cpspreservationfoundation.org • w .pspreservationfoundation.org
47
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Date: November 4, 2015
Subject: Ramon Drug Store — Case 3.1009
Appeal submitted by G & M Construction
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do
hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was published in the
Desert Sun on October 24, 2015.
1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
"Ck4tB-
Kathie Hart, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do
hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at City Hall,
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board, and in the Office
of the City Clerk on October 22, 2015.
1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Kathie Hart, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
1, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do
hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to each and
every person on the attached list on October 22, 2015, in a sealed envelope, with postage
prepaid, and depositing same in the U.S. Mail at Palm Springs, California.
(10 notices)
I declare
�� tunder penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Y. 0�t ��
Kathie Hart, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk 48
Kathie Hart
From: Joanne Bruggemans
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:45 AM
To: Baristo ; Historic Tennis Club;'Midtown';Warm Sands
Cc: Ken Lyon; Kathie Hart
Subject: Case 3.1009 MAA-Appeal by ACBCI Tribal Member Owners re: The Ramon Drug Store Building
Attachments: 3.1009 MAA Appeal PHN CC 1104 15.pdf
Morning-
Please find the attached Public Hearing Notice of the City Council for November 4, 2015 of the proposed project within a
mile of your neighborhood organization.
Thank you,
J
Joanne H Bruggemans
City of Palm Springs
Planning Services Department
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262
Tel: (760) 323-8245 Fax: (760) 322-8360
Email: Ioanne.bruggemans@palmspringsca-gov
4�
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
AN APPEAL BY G & M CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF ACBCI TRIBAL MEMBER
OWNERS OF ALLOTMENT PARCELS 5A AND 35A OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY'S
HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD (HSPB) REGARDING A DEMOLITION REQUEST
FOR CLASS 3 HISTORIC STRUCTURES
LOCATED AT 436 —454 AND 490 SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will
hold a Public Hearing at its meeting of November 4, 2015. The City Council meeting begins at
6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm
Springs.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider an appeal by ACBCI Tribal member owners of
allotment parcels 5A and 35A of the action of the HSPB taken on Tuesday, October 13, 2015,
initiating study pursuant to PSMC Section 8.05.135 and placing a 120-day stay of demolition
pursuant to PSMC 8.05.170 on the Class 3 historic structures located at
436 through 454 South Indian Canyon Drive (commonly known as "The Ramon Drug Store
Building"), Zone LSC; Section 14 Specific Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Demolition permits are a ministerial action under the
guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such are not subject to
review under CEQA.
REVIEW OF PROJECT INFORMATION: The staff report and other supporting documents
regarding this project are available for public review at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk at
(760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these documents.
COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the
Public Hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the
City Council by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to:
James Thompson, City Clerk
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues
raised at the Public Hearing described in this Notice or in written correspondence delivered to
the City Clerk at, or prior to, the City Council hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]).
An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. Questions
regarding this case may be directed to Ken Lyon, RA, Associate Planner, at (760) 323-8245.
Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, porfavor Ilame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar
con Felipe Primera telefono (760) 323-8253.
i
mes Thompson, City Clerk
50
C/lt
^� O
0® �
fp n 3
O
cp
ffl ? N i
A PALM CANYON DR
k
cD
I
v
INDIAN CANYON OR
3
D C rr
Cn � v:z )
:0 z
60
CALLE EN CILIA W
CALLE ENCILIA o (D
(A c _
n
(D
CALLE SANTA ROSA
I
CALLE ABRONIA AURITA
GI
h+
PALM SPRINGScivEl✓
rlT&TPRESERVATION CIF PALM SFiftj
�+►. F O U N D AT 10 N 2015NOV -2 PM I: 45
October 31, 2015 JAIIES 7'Ht)hrl,>;"'
CITY CLERK
Mayor Steve Pougnet
City of Palm Springs
3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Subject: ITEM I.A.AN APPEAL BY G&M CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF ACBCI
OWNERS OF ALLOTMENT 5A AND 35A OF THE HISTORIC SITE PRESER-
VATION BOARD'S STAY OF DEMOLITION FOR THE STRUCTURES THAT
COMPRISE 436 THROUGH 454 SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE THE RAMON
DRUG BUILDING
Dear Mayor Pougnet,
At its October 13, 2015 meeting the city's Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) heard
extensive testimony regarding the proposed demolition of the Ramon Drug Building (1960,
Wexler& Harrison). After thoughtful deliberation,the HSPB voted to "investigate"the
historic merits of the building. This decision was doubly warranted as the Ramon Drug
Building was identified as an important structure over a decade ago in the city's 2004
historical resources survey.
Accordingly, we strongly recommend that you support the city staff recommendation to deny
this appeal and allow for an investigation into the historic merits of all, or part of, the Ramon
Drug Building. As the appellant has offered no compelling reason to do otherwise, denying
this appeal is both proper and comports with the letter and intent of Chapter 8.05 of the Palm
Springs Municipal Code.
If you have any questions or require additional information,please contact the foundation at
(760)837-7117.
Sincerely,
Erik Rosenow
President
1775 East Palm Canyon Drive,Suite 110-195,Palm Springs, CA 92264
760-837-7117 - info@pspreservationfoundation.org - www,pspreservationfbundation.org
:,�_VW 1. A
CEi�' U
2015 OCT 26 W O N
}(:tcl- I CLERr.
CtT�`
April 28, 2015
Preservation Society
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 02262
RE: PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 436-460 SOUTH INDIAN CANYON
PALIM SPRINGS, CA
Preservation Society:
The buildings located at the above referenced addresses were. ittitialiy located elsewhere.
The buildings were utilized as office space during the Second World War for the United
States Army.
They were subsequently relocated to their present location, a::d rented out as retail space.
Since these buildings were nothing more than relocated office spaces. I perscrally do not
see any significance in die preservation efthese structtres. Ifeelthe property ,'Iould be
of much more value to the City of Palm Springs if these structures were razed and the
Indian owners were allowed to construct a fu.:°lity :hat would be in keeping with the
progressive revitaiization of the downtown area.
Sincerely,
L:n' /4A. .1,YI_
Ronald Wexler
1
u
No Si .
U.
Itt
"' (j rrs ■
o-
,171
u � �� u � u i
� „e u � d
, 1
r 1
The Desert Sun
750 N Gene Autry Trail Certificate of Publication
Palm Springs, CA 92262 R E£E(d E D
760-778-4578/Fax 760-778.4731 ., -� ,• or PALM S?rl i*•
State Of California 55: 2016 OCT 28 AM 9102
County of Riverside JAM�S lips U 1-4
Advertiser: CITY OF PALM SPRINGSILEGALS
PO BOX 2743
PALM SPRINGS CA 92263
Order# 0000817478
I am over the aae of 18 vears old,a citizen of
the United States and not a party to,or have
interest in this matter. I hereby certify that the
attached advertisement appeared in said
newspaper(set in type not smaller than non
pariel)in each and entire issue of said Ndlszs . , -..
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof ,NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNOL CITY OF PALM 9PRINGS
On the following dates,t0 wit: AN APPEAL BY G&M CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF ACBCI.TRIBAL MEMBER
'OWNERS OF ALLOTMENT PARCELS.SA AND 35A.OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY'S.
Newspaper HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD(HSPB)REGARDING A DE MOLITION RE:The Desert Sun QUEST FOR CLASS 3 HISTORIC STRUCTURES LOCATEDAT 436-.SOUTH INOIANYANYDN DRIVE - 454 AND 490
10/24/2015 ifnial5 I hold a PubNc that the City Council of the City of Pelm Son,ggs,.
The'G Councll meetln Hearing at its meeting of November 4, 2015.
ry g begins at 6 00 p.m,yin the Council Chambers at
-City Hall,3200 Eart Tahq I Canyon Way,Palm Springs
The purpose 7of the heanng rs to consider an appeal by q[BO Tribal member
owners of allotment parcels SA antl 35A of the anion of the HSPO taken on
Tuesday, October 13,2015, inrciating study pursuant to PSMC Section a 05135
1 acknowledge that I am a principal clerk of the Co plaang a 120-day ay o demolition pursuant to PSMC 8 05J70 on the
9 P P Clais 3 historic yfruc[ures located at 436 through 454.Sou[h in Can on Drive
printer of The Desert Sun, printed and ommonly known as"The Ramon Oru to Suit in Q any
on P Spe I is Plan 9 9`).Zone LS 5ection 14
published weekly in the City of Palm Springs,
County of Riverside, State of California. The
Desert Sun was adjudicated a Newspaper of
general circulation on March 24, 1988 by the
Superior Court of the County of Riverside, °:
State of California Case No. 191236.
1
I declare under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
this 24th da OCTOBER, 2015 in Palm
Springs, C ornia.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION DemolRion permits area ministeiial�
action under the guidehnei of the California Environmental Oua a AR(CE4A)
and as MCI-are not sublect to review under CEQA.
REVIEW.OF PROIECr. INFORMATION The staff re ort and other syp orting
documents regard(' 'this prga are available for public review at City Hall be-
tween:'tne hours dfkoo a m and 6 00��'p m.,Mohday through Thursday.,:Please
c e 11-- Office of the Gry Clerk'a['(760)323-8204.if,you would'like to ached-
ule an apppoolntnientto review these do'cdments
COMy1ENTI bpp IS APppSAnON Resyonse to jhs notice may be made
at the' c:HeariOy andfgr.iri wrung before the hearing.`Written
tomplent5 may 6>e ode to the CIry Council by letter y r mail.ar an delivery)
-., ' lames Thompson o clerk=}' -
arant 32g0 Ea 1 Tahqu tz•Ca you Way P mSpringt CA 92262
p^Y challenge of the prdposed,proledl m court may be limfted to raising only
those Issues Tarred .,the Public Hearing described in this Notice or m written
11 yt corr¢s onden1.ce delivered to the Ciry Clerk a4 or prior to,the Ciry CounEll hear-
ing (Govemment Code Seaton 65009[b][21) An o
ld hearin far all Interested persons to be heardP 'unity wJl be
given at
`rt ; e(nay b dlrre to Ran L on, 4uestions regarding this
resits uda ton esta fait-, elate Planner;at(760))3Z3-8z45
porfavor(lame a la Ciudad de Palm 5pHngs,y
rP a abtercn Fqalipe,Primera talefono 760 323-8253.
`lames 7h mW`n ury derk I )
Published:f0/;a15