Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/2/2016 - STAFF REPORTS - 1.A. �OF ?ALM S.. iy c u n s`o R e ,. r CQ</FOtN�P Citv Council Staff Report CvnSnhv� ko1 lho;rc 2o1b DATE: Feb as y 5,, 2Ctfi Public Hearing SUBJECT: ROBERT HERSCU OF SOUTH PALM CANYON, LLC, APPEALING THE DECEMBER 9, 2015, DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MIXED-USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD 311) CONSISTING OF 125 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND APPROXIMATELY 39,000-SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE ON A 2.67-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 440-490 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD/PDD 311. FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Department of Planning Services SUMMARY The City Council will consider an appeal by Robert Herscu, on behalf of South Palm Canyon LLC, seeking to overturn a decision of the Planning Commission of December 9, 2015 to grant a one-year extension of time for a previously-approved mixed-use Planned Development District (PDD 311) consisting of 125-condominium units and approximately 39,000-square feet of retail/commercial space on a 2.67-acre site, located at 440-490 South Palm Canyon Drive. The project has had seven (7) previous extension of time applications approved since 2008. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony. 2. Adopt Resolution No. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MIXED-USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD 311) CONSISTING OF 125 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND APPROXIMATELY 39,000-SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE ON A 2.67- ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 440-490 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD/PDD 311." ITEM NO..�_ City Council Staff Report February 3, 2016—Page 2 Case No.5.1042-PDD 311 Appeal BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 10.11.06 The Planning Commission considered the mixed-use project and by a vote of 7-0, certified the Final Environmental Impact Report; approved the project architecture and Planned Development District 311. 10.25.06 The City Council certified a final environmental impact report and approved Planned Development District 311 as recommended by the Planning Commission. 11.19.08 The Planning Commission granted a one-year time extension for PD 311 from October 25, 2008 to October 24, 2009. 01.27.10 The Planning Commission granted a one-year time extension for PD 311 from October 25, 2009 to October 24, 2010. 12.08.10 The Planning Commission approved a one-year time extension for PD 311 from October 24, 2010 to October 23, 2011. 11.22.11 The Planning Commission approved a one-year time extension for PD 311 from October 23, 2011 to October 22, 2012. 01.09.13 The Planning Commission approved a one-year time extension for PD 311 from October 24, 2012 to October 24, 2013. 10.23.13 The Planning Commission approved a one-year time extension for PD 311 from October 25, 2010 to October 24, 2014. 10.22.14 The Planning Commission approved a one-year extension of time by a vote of 5-1-1 for PD 311 from October 24, 2015 to October 23, 2015. 08.20.15 The property was cited for a public nuisance violation for lack of landscaping maintenance. Trees were removed and light poles were missing at the site. 12.09.15 The Planning Commission denied a request for a one-year extension of time. 0' `,Most Rece`nf Che Q"af,'¢.; §Islii " r 2006 South Palm Canyon, LLC BACKGROUND AND SETTING: The South Palm Canyon project is a mixed-use development consisting of residential, commercial and retail space originally approved by the City Council on October 25, 2006. As designed, the project consists of 125 condominium units and 39,000 square feet of retail/commercial space on a 2.67-acre site. The project will be located in a fully developed section of the downtown district of the City. The property is bounded by South Palm Canyon Drive to the west, Indian Canyon Drive to the east and Ramon Road to the south. The existing buildings on the site, totaling approximately 47,000 square feet in size, will be demolished to make room for the new project. The immediate areas surrounding the location are fully improved with streets, curbs, gutter, sidewalks and landscaping. The Council also approved a Tentative Tract Map application (TTM 33514) to create a condominium map for the approximately 2.67-parcel. A Final Map has not been submitted for the project. The tentative tract remains valid through October 24, 2016, because of the automatic extensions granted by the State of California during the recession beginning from 2008. There are existing commercial and retail uses at the site and within its immediate vicinity. To the north of the property, there is a two-story bank building along with other small retail stores; to the west along Palm Canyon Drive, there is an existing three-story commercial establishment with a subterranean parking structure. The site is identified as the southern gateway for the downtown area in the Downtown Design Guidelines. A Planned ' 02 City Council Staff Report February 3,2016-Page 3 Case No.5.1042-PDD 311 Appeal Development District granting relief from development concepts and standards of the Central Business District was part of the original entitlement. In this project, the City Council approved deviations from height limit requirements, setbacks and parking standards. The maximum height allowed in the Central Business District (CBD), is 30 feet; the PDD allows this project a maximum height of 57 feet. Required setback along Palm Canyon Drive is 50 feet from centerline of the street, PDD 311 allowed 48 feet. Required setback along Indian Canyon Drive is 20 feet, PDD 311 allows zero foot and finally required setback along Ramon Road is 10 feet, PDD 311 allows zero foot. The total number of required parking spaces for retail/restaurant use for the project is 104, PDD 311 allowed 97 spaces. ALA �. r R Aerial View of the South Palm Canyon Site ANALYSIS: Pursuant to Section 94.03.00(H) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code, If, within two (2) years after the date of approval by the city council of the preliminary development plan, the final development plan, as indicated in Section 94.03.00(1), has not been approved by the planning commission, the procedures and actions which have taken place up to that time shall be null and void and the planned development district shall expire. Extensions of time may be allowed for good cause. No specific findings or determinations are required to grant time extensions for previously approved Planned Development District projects. 03 City Council Staff Report February 3,2016—Page 4 Case No.5.1042-POD 311 Appeal Extensions of time are limited to a maximum of one year at a time. In the letter of time extension request dated October 6, 2015, the applicant noted that they "still intend to build the development, and remain very confident it will come to fruition". Having granted seven (7) previous extensions of time for the entitlement, on December 9, 2015, the Planning Commission made a determination that the appellant has not "demonstrated a good cause"or shown that the project will ever move forward and thus by a vote of 4-2, denied the request for extension of time. APPEAL AND STAFF ANALYSIS: On December 17, 2015, Robert Herscu appealed the action of the Planning Commission. The bases of the appeal and staff analysis are the following: Appellant: "Certainly the most important factor was the recession of 2008 to 2012 when major real estate lending was virtually non-existent. Even during the recession, we steadfastly continued to seek lending for our project without success. This one factor accounts for the majority of the time since the original approvals in 2006". Staff Response: The Planning Commission took the recession into consideration from the first extension of time request when the applicant indicated that efforts were being made to secure financing for a mixed-use project of the size and scope of the South Palm Canyon project. In the following years, the Commission continually asked the appellant to show specific steps taken over the past year to advance the project; the appellant has not met this request. Appellant: 'A second issue was the passing of one of the original partners two years ago which put the project on hold while the partners evaluated this project among other endeavors". Staff Response: The change in partnership was not included in the extension of time request letter from the appellant as a justification for the project not moving forward. Appellant: "The third major factor is the difficulty in being able to phase this development due to the particular design of the project. The matter of phasing was not seen as necessary at the onset as a residential project of 125 units was common prior to the recession. In today's market, new home development is now built in much smaller phases of 15 to 25 units per the requirements of lenders hence our current obstacle. We are exploring ways to allow phasing as well as evaluating the project mix as solutions while staying within the approved entitlement envelope': Staff Response: The appellant did not discuss the process or the possibility of phasing this project with staff from the Planning Services. A reference to a possible phasing plan was made at the Planning Commission hearing of December 9, 2015, but no formal request was ever made. 04 City Council Staff Report February 3,2016—Page 5 Case No.5.1042-PDD 311 Appeal CONCLUSION: On October 25, 2006, the City Council certified a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approved the South Palm Canyon mixed-use project. Since that time the Planning Commission has granted seven (7) one-year extensions for this entitlement. The Commission cited economic circumstances and hardship that impacted commercial development activities in the City over the last seven years as a reason for approving the previous extension of time applications. In 2014, the appellant informed the Commission that they are having discussions with CB Richard Ellis, Marcu & Millichap and Grubb & Ellis for a possible joint partnership. However, since that time, the Commission felt that the appellant has not shown efforts to commence construction nor has the property owner offered any evidence that the project will be developed or issued building permits in the near future and therefore, the entitlement has gone long enough. No building permits have been issued and no final development plans have been submitted for the project. If the appeal is denied, the tentative condominium map will remain valid; the applicant could submit a new project application and possibly amend the map. NOTIFICATION: A public hearing notice was published in accordance with the requirements of State law and local ordinance. As of the writing of this report, staff has not rece' d any comment on the appeal request. Flinn Fagg, AICP Marcus L. Fuller Director of Planning Services Assistant City Manager/City Engineer David H. Ready. Esq., Aff.t. City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Draft Resolution 3. Appeal Letter 4. Letter of extension request from the applicant dated October 6, 2015. 5. Planning Commission Minutes dated December 9, 2015. 6. Previously Approved Plans. 05 N ti OQ PPLM Spf Department of Planning Services w E 4.. .,,. Vicinity Map C4!lFORM�P RIA -_ i __. IN HR LSC NSP IN NSP 7SA RD i rc oI, a O o 0 R1A R1 � CBD a csomCHR 0 0 y _ z a U I Q I RAMON RD I4PD RS _R2_ � _.R2_._ . w — R2 R2 LegendSite _500-ft.Site Radius —Zoning Parcels PD R2 C2 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS 06 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MIXED-USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD 311) CONSISTING OF 125 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND APPROXIMATELY 39,000-SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE ON A 2.67-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 440-490 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD/PDD 311. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs finds: A. On December 17, 2015, Robert Herscu of South Palm Canyon, LLC, submitted an extension of time request to the City of Palm Springs for a previously approved mixed-use Planned Development District PDD 311 commonly called the "South Palm Canyon". B. The South Palm Canyon property is located at 440-490 South Palm Canyon Drive and is zoned CBD/PDD-311 (Planned Development District 311); the entitlement is valid for two years and had previously been granted seven (7) one-year extensions of time. C. The Planning Commission considered the extension of time request at its public hearing meeting of December 9, 2015, and determined that the appellant has not demonstrated a good cause for one more extension and denied the request. D. On December 17, 2015, Robert Herscu, pursuant to Chapter 2.05 and Section 8.05.230 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code, filed an appeal of the action of the Planning Commission to deny the extension of time request. E. On February 3, 2016, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the Applicant's appeal of the Planning Commission's action to deny the request by Robert Herscu for a one-year extension of time. F. At its public hearing conducted on February 3, 2016, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the appeal, including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs resolves: SECTION 1. The above findings are all true and correct. 7 Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 2. The City Council hereby denies the appeal submitted by Robert Herscu, regarding the denial of a one-year extension of time request by the Planning Commission for a previously approved Planned Development District 311 for the development of a mixed-use project. ADOPTED this 3rd day of February, 2016. DAVID H. READY, CITY MANAGER ATTEST: JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK 08 Resolution No. Page 3 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on February 3, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JAMES THOMPSON, CITY CLERK City of Palm Springs, California 09 South Palm Canyon LLC RECEIVED 1801 Century Park Suite 1560 ; _r OF PALM SPPV_ Los Angeles CA 90067 2015 DEC 17 PM 5: 11 Tel 310-280-2830 Fax 310-349-3435 J A H E S T H O H P�U_ i CITY CLERK December 16, 2015 Palm Springs City Council c/o James Thompson, City Clerk Palm Springs, California 92262 Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Time Extension for Case 5.1042 PD 311 Dear City Council: On December 9, 2015, the Planning Commission voted 4-2 to deny our request for an additional one year extension of the Planned Development District for the South Palm Canyon Development. We feel there have been compelling reasons that we have not been able to move this project forward but we are still committed to this important development and seek the Council's approval of the requested extension of time_ In explanation of what has complicated our efforts, certainly the most important factor was the recession of 2008 to 2012 when major real estate lending was virtually non-existent. Even during the recession, we steadfastly continued to seek lending for our project without success. This one factor accounts for the majority of the time since the original approvals in 2006. A second issue was the passing of one of the original partners, my father, two years ago which put the project on hold while the partners evaluated this project among other endeavors. The third major factor is the difficulty in being able to phase this development due to the particular design of the project. Originally we had engaged the firm of the late Jon Jerde who conceived the basics of the mixed use project and then turned to a local Palm Springs firm O'Donnell Escalante for a more appropriate and sensitive local architectural vision. The matter of phasing was not seen as necessary at the onset as a residential project of 125 units was common prior to the recession. In today's market, new home development is now built in much South Palm Canyon LLC 10 South Palm Canyon LLC 1801 Century Park Suite 1560 €,ECEPVEf 1 ° �w sph,:Los Angeles CA 90067 , ,_ Tel 310-280-2830 Fax 310-349-3435 2015 DEC 17 PO 5- 11 JAMES 'itiJt'iYJui: CITY CLERK smaller phases of 15 to 25 units per phase per the requirements of lenders hence our current obstacle. We are exploring ways to allow phasing as well as evaluating the project mix as solutions while staying within the approved project entitlement envelope. We ask the Council to allow us additional time to explore how best to bring this project to fruition within the overall framework of the approved Planned Development District. We have invested several million dollars in getting the project to this point and since the property is currently contributing to the downtown economy, the status quo is still a positive while we continue to bring to life the first major residential mixed use development in the downtown area—a perfect bookend to the Rae] development, now under construction at the north end of the downtown. When The South Palm Canyon was originally approved, it was not at all controversial and the Environmental Impact Report did not suffer a legal challenge. The project received unanimous votes of approval from the Architectural Advisory Committee, the Planning Commission and the City Council. The EIR along with the Tentative Tract Map remain valid and useable and could remain valid to support the approved Planned Development District if extended and as long as any project design changes fall within the framework of the two documents. In as much as the project remains totally consistent with the 2007 General Plan Update, we request an additional one (or preferably two) year extension from the City Council We thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly you's, Robert Herscu c: Flinn Fagg, AICP Marvin Roos, MSA Consulting, Inc. South Palm Canyon LLC 1 [[Si CITY OF PALM SPRINGS RECVD BY: CR 01000079515 PAYOR: 450 PALM CYN DR LLC TODAY'S DATE: 12/21/15 REGISTER DATE: 12/21/15 TIME: 11:45 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT OTHER CHARGES SVCS $881.00 COST I➢: APPEAL PC TO CITY COUNC ________________ TOTAL DUE: $881.00 CHECK PAID: $881.00 CHECK NO: 0132 TENDERED: $881.00 CHANGE: $.00 [[4i ' `J 0132 FARMERS&MERCHANTS BANK 450 PALM CANYON DRIVE LLC 9o-1191222 12/11/2015 PAY TO ORDER OF City of Palm Springs **881.00 Eight Hundred Eighty-One and 00/100......*.........*.*.*<....**.**..*.**.*..**.**.*..*«**. ..*.*..*.**..*... .. ._.,.. - DOLLARS City of Palm Springs Department of Planning Services 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way www Palm Springs, CA 92262 MSA 12/11/2015 REQUEST FOR TREASURER'S RECEIPT TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT, CASHIER DATE: 3 . n 5 FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE PLEASE ACCEPT $ %2 FROM: 1V;)0 FOR: ,1 fi� (L &66wn, MAPS & PUBLICATIONS - 001-34106 OTHER CHARGES - CURRENT SERVICE - 1-34110 CREDIT ACCOUNT NO. CIRCLED ABOVE BY ORDER OF ic6-- ] 3 Kathie Hart From: Flinn Fagg Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 1:09 PM To: Kathie Hart Cc: Marcus Fuller Subject: FW:Appeal Hearing The representative for the applicant has agreed to the February P City Council date for the appeal hearing (see below— the applicant was copied on the response). From: Edward Robertson Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 1:03 PM To: Flinn Fagg Subject: FW: Appeal Hearing Flinn, please see the email below. ,6dwatd From: Roos, Mary [mailto:MRoos(amsaconsultinginc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 11:59 AM To: Edward Robertson Cc: Robert Herscu (RHerscu@hgdevelopment.net) Subject: RE: Appeal Hearing Edward: That date is fine with our client. thx Marvin D. Roos Director of Design Development MSA Consulting, Inc. From: Edward Robertson [mailto:Edward.Robertsoncalpalmsprinos-ca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 10:08 AM To: Roos, Mary Subject: Appeal Hearing Good morning Marvin, I'm still waiting for your email confirming our discussion on the hearing date for the South Palm Canyon Appeal hearing date. I need to know by noon today for the agenda purposes. Let me know if I should go ahead and contact Robert Hescu directly for the February 3rd hearing date. Thanks..... � `w_a_,Zd 0.0%"tbm �d ejtg ofd6bn 8pttVe 32000C.daA?uuz e�wWon WYa# OF41.8p".i, Ifaq 92262 0#2ca: (760)3238246 I dfaz: (760)322-8360 FdwatdrRobettsM@palm�pttnFxa t 14 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Date: February 3, 2016 Subject: APPEAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Desert Sun on January 23, 2016. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. WdAa Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Drive, on the exterior legal notice posting board, and in the Office of the City Clerk on January 21, 2016. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. a�dA-& Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 1, Kathie Hart, MMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to each and every person on the attached list on January 21, 2016, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid, and depositing same in the U.S. Mail at Palm Springs, California. (100 notices) I`/d'ectlare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. L/r�dAa Kathie Hart, MMC Chief Deputy City Clerk 15 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM SPRINGS APPEAL OF CASE 5.1042 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 311 EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE SOUTH PALM CANYON MIXED-USE PROJECT LOCATED AT 450 - 490 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a public hearing at its meeting of February 3, 2016. The City Council meeting begins at 6:00 pm, in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. The purpose of this hearing is to consider an appeal by Robert Herscu of South Palm Canyon LLC, regarding the Planning Commission's decision on December 9, 2015, denying an extension of time request for a previously approved Planned Development District 311. The Planned Development District was for the development of up to 125 condominium units and approximately 39,000 square feet of commercial space on a 2.67-acre site bounded by South Palm Canyon Drive on the west, Indian Canyon Drive on the east, and Ramon Road on the south, zoned CBD. The project was originally approved in 2006. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) was previously certified for this project under the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Members of the public may view this document at the Planning Services Department, City Hall, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. REVIEW OF PROJECT INFORMATION: The staff report and other supporting documents regarding this project are also available for public review at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these documents. COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the Public Hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the City Council by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to: James Thompson, City Clerk 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior, to the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]). An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. Questions regarding this case may be directed to Edward O. Robertson, Principal Planner, at (760) 323-8245. Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, porfavor Ilame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar con Felipe Primera telefono (760) 323-8245. ames Thompson, City Clerk 16 N w OtPPLM 3p*'L Department of Planning Services W E �.a Vicinity Map C'P[IPORN�p• S R1A ._..._.. ,,................ INHR ----__._ NSP LSC §NS ............. ...... - —,.-._ SATURNINO RD TO .._ d_ O __. OR1A R3CBD z CBDLit SCHR ' cai ::Rl:A] Z RAMON RD _ 4 C1 00 6 ..JR2W . -._. zFR2 R3 C1 R2 wR2: Legend Site Q 500R,Site Radius - - Zoning --CA MINO PAROCELA ......... ....... Parcels P6 R2...... ca CITY OF PALM SPRINGS 17 Kathie Hart From: Joanne Bruggemans Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 9:27 AM To: Midtown; Historic Tennis Club; Baristo ;Warm Sands; Tahquitz River Estates Cc: Edward Robertson; Kathie Hart Subject: Appeal of Case 5.1042 PD 311-Extension of Time for the South Palm Canyon Mixed-Use Project Attachments: 5.1042 TE Appeal PHN CC 02 0316.pdf Morning- Please find the attached Public Hearing Notice of the City Council for February 3, 2016 of the proposed project within a 14 mile of your neighborhood organization. Thank you, d Joanne H Bruggemans City of Palm Springs Planning Services Department 3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Tel: (760) 323-8245 Fax: (760) 322-8360 Email: ioanne.bru��emans@palmsprinasca-Qov t SOUTH PALM CANYON, LLC 1801 Century Park East, Suite 1560, Los Angeles, CA 90067 October 6, 2015 Via E-Mail RECEIVED Mr. Glenn Mlaker, AICP 0 C T 0 7 2015 Assistant Planner City of Palm Springs PLANNING SERVICES Department of Planning Services 17EP.ARTn1ENT 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 RE: Case No. 5.1042 PD 311 & TTM 33514 —(The South Palm Canyon) 440-490 S. Palm Canyon Drive, 471 S. Indian Canyon Drive, et al, Palm Springs, CA APN: 513-214-004, 005 & 513-214-010, 011 Dear Mr. Mlaker: I am writing on behalf of South Palm Canyon, LLC to respectfully request an extension of the entitlements for the above-referenced property, which expire during October, 2015. For your information, I still intend to build this development, and remain very confident that it will come to fruition. In the meantime, as you may be aware, we continue striving to ensure the property is properly maintained during this interim period of time, including occupying the majority of the buildings with "temporary tenants' in an effort to aid in the synergy and success of all properties on South Palm Canyon Drive. It is my understanding the a fee of$881.00 is required for the extension, and I have included a check, in the amount of$881.00, payable to the City of Palm Springs. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at(310)280-2830. Sincerely, South Palm ATIFZ-1 LLC Robert Herseu Manager Member S'1 7 - 2- 1Li . 02 y IS: Planning commission MinAes City of Palm Springs December g.2015 ACTION: Approve as recommended. Motion: Commissioner Donenfeld, seconded by Commissioner Middleton and carried 5-1-0 on a roll call vote. AYES: Commissioner Calerdine, Commissioner Donenfeld, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Middleton, Chair Klatchko NOES: Commissioner Weremiuk 3B. SOUTH PALM CANYON, LLC, REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MIXED-USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CONSISTING OF 125 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND 39,000-SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE ON 2.67 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 440-490 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE (CASE 5.1042 PD 311). (ER) Principal Planner Robertson presented the proposed one-year time extension request. Commissioner Weremiuk commented that they asked in the past to include a letter from the applicant explaining why they have not moved forward in the past year and she does not see it. ACTION: Continue to a date certain of January 13, 2016. Motion: Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Lowe. Further discuss/on occurred: Chair Klatchko noted that the applicant has not complied with what the Commission has requested and does not see any efforts in moving forward with this project. Commissioner Lowe expressed concern about extending another time extension after seven years - for a project that may not be viable. He noted a significant amount of activity is going on surrounding this building. ROBERT HERSCU, applicant, said he is committed to this project and it is very important to the downtown area. He stated that they are planning to come back with a reconfigured project of half its size and have spent an inordinate amount of money to get approvals and requested more time to bring back a viable project. Commissioner Middleton noted that if this request is granted they would be coming back 9 months. She said lVs time to get this project off the ground and it will be a fundamentally different project. 6 1 P a g e 20 Planning Commission Minutes City of Patin Springs December 9,2015 Commissioner Weremiuk said she was the biggest proponent the last time the Commission reviewed this but with the lack of action this year she feels this has gone on long enough. She withdrew her motion. ACTION: To deny. Motion: Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Lowe and carried 4-2-0 on a roll call vote. AYES: Commissioner Donenfeld, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Weremiuk, Chair Klatchko NOES: Commissioner Calerdine, Commissioner Middleton 3C. CDI VENTURES, LLC, REQUESTING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD 333) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 200-ROOM HOTEL, 50 HIGH-END RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND A PARKING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENIDA CABALLEROS AND AMADO ROAD, (CASE 5.1132-PD 333) (ER). Commissioner Calerdine noted a property-related conflict of interest and would not be participating in the discussion or vote. Principal Planner Robertson presented the request for a one-year time extension. Commissioner Weremiuk noted that there has been delay because of the land transfer from the Redevelopment Agency and questioned if there is a reclaim provision for the City if this project does not move forward. Commissioner Lowe concurred that this is a valid reason and supports the time extension. ACTION: Approve the one-year time extension. Motion: Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld and carried 5-0-1 on a roll call vote. AYES: Commissloner Donenfeld, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Middleton, Commissioner Weremiuk, Chair Klatchko ABSTAIN: Commissioner Calerdine. 3D. RECOVERY INNOVATIONS, INC., REQUESTING A MODIFICATION TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR AN OUTPATIENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 71i' abe 21 City of Palm Springs Office of the City Clerk 3200 E. Tahquirz Canyon Way • Palm Springs,CA 92262 c"TM'D Tel: (760) 323-8204 • Fax: (760) 322-8332 • TDD:(760)864-9527 - Web: www.palmspringsca.gov NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Regular Meeting held on February 3, 2016, the City Council continued Public Hearing Item No. 1.A. to February 17, 2016: ROBERT HERSCU OF SOUTH PALM CANYON, LLC, APPEALING THE DECEMBER 9, 2015, DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MIXED-USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CONSISTING OF 125 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND APPROXIMATELY 39,000-SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE ON A 2.67-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 440-490 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE (PDD 311): ACTION: 1) The Public Testimony portion was closed on February 3, 2016; 2) Mayor and Councilmember deliberations will continue to February 17, 2016, and 3) Direct the City Clerk to post a Notice of Continued Public Hearing as required by law. Motion Mayor Pro Tern Mills, seconded by Councilmember Kors and unanimously carried on a roll call vote. I, James Thompson, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, certify this Notice of Continuance was posted at or before 6:00 p.m. on February 4, 2016, as required by established policies and procedures. .TAMES THOMPSON City Clerk /kd h zi Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 City of Palm Springs Office of the City Clerk d} 3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs,CA 92262 roxntea' Tel: (760)323-8204 • Fax: (760)322-8332 • TDD: (760)864-9527 • Web:www.palmspringsca.gov NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Regular Meeting held on February 17, 2016, the City Council continued Public Hearing Item No. 1.A. to March 2, 2016: 1.A. ROBERT HERSCU OF SOUTH PALM CANYON, LLC, APPEALING THE DECEMBER 9, 2015, DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MIXED-USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CONSISTING OF 125 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND APPROXIMATELY 39,000-SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE ON A 2.67-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 440-490 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE (PDD 311): ACTION: 1) The Public Testimony portion was closed on February 3, 2016; 2) Continue the Public Hearing to March 2, 2016; and 3) Direct the City Clerk to post a Notice of Continued Public Hearing as required by law. Motion Councilmember Foat, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Mills, and unanimously carried on a roll call vote. I, James Thompson, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, certify this Notice of Continuance was posted at or before 6:00 p.m. on February 18, 2016, as required by established policies and procedures. MES THOMPSON dy Clerk /kdh Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 z+ B i ABBREVIATIOFLS - LN;tP.WING SYMBOLS: e Xm Ro s+oa sg a voOR NMB� w �roa c5rrxre nRCD wx eTr 'bcr w I�A�rluw �.] in.c i K D:a KWS`�.YGbli41 eNNBIOi? v' ASYKiAi �b�a ]O S.GM]PNX o J r� _ naXWS w. �wwW Xe.MPoXwar ]oeae�waei O wlNvow N:NBER � I� � < • »mX.u.wnbbL-m Kr XbXbAreX` was wermlcrnr:rmriDDR xvare �31 ���'� wW M f.5 ^ ' RK]5^alEw[T4rY L1K %v ]wiM HYr R•YM14 W'' I0.�W NM lbM 1, gy Kca PAEi M rLM1@ �' O FI%TUfLE pE51(NATION � � � �ILV�JI"' %(_ A°JbU n1O �MPoRTL Yam✓'KXOT , F:. T S ILQ eu<I M x.We r¢. tl16! � n Pow.�FAWi TLPw _ Or�4 u N X!L'..Tnct i�r�' p PAST RMGN ROAD _ bn w ].raN R wiw c wu wA w� l O J NA1BE2 l �� W r obi wrrv.�orraya tXnm TtTV3lry INIETtILR ELEVATIdV KtYS i I O IASdfK A0. LNRRL M�l�l-ipo Kwr. ��.K.e w vn--woe e�www 1� � r[�mWs KARe m�iwAureme�rmurns ra•_ uorwmL � corm wrX�crs I I i ' riwc vvae:e �� - •`-"16E'•,�` Cb3Y `-�c.naN srrmaL - �re'..s,als *.+saw �.K. xeaArm ww rci�i.wXirw w ew uv.Rrwr n.visr R rsc7 ru.Ws or I PARTIALfl ATro O was, F0_ .aa cIS/+Vc:1!/rs.ecett Nur(f rv. Z cac.rc » wrLlLc�» ]SrvT wa (/-j�-� PARTIAL 52L'lON Q r pp cMtNctta ]wiw:r �/ 0 L c4RbnTLNIRFlNn.NX nw:n G 1 m Gc(g Q LL I CRr �. F6 .NANN 5G„OX C �J IVAMu.nWl ~ S..Wld SrR /-� L DETAIL ' S ¢%a�2wrti vnrwre K.w.J ry SSLr a �" _ I M oc.mw �a"•NI`ry rn ]swabs s_ b '� aPnoA /IGINITY MAP I WI brvnrrMNA.rn rr nvrr n� ]-e bro mNexn]S.n'eeaFX.mr ® �..�J V'T T09LldL JJI Q o � 02 W z THE SOUTH FALL BAN -rON a P/�LM C fANYON D�I \/�, F?-A1 ION ROAD a I ND I AN G/4N1'ON t PLA^ ( SPfzZ' I NC�S, C fAL I FORN I A j II GENERAL NOTES SCHEDULE OF DK4WINL-.5r E*EF E T INFORMATION OIXMLL.!]L!lAvrE AYM4GT r¢aa'[. .aE£RVE�UwK1T WvfUi0.d? prCIWC MS XG.M.IG.IB.L NnPnM NmGVKwM L 01i ' �GMeP.ufan bd.bN�0.nn5. MY=t.Mb,r� rvS Ne'w. -d. .rY.KiWHS prKgaY rtlrFp y-. w v1UTYSVR KR...@TIIMxAY'.dm M[rILH Rnb.[M/I¢TT1MTFwMMR.IXY >a7 nrm.`Rxw eiu.,lw.�wl�rm.ur'�`a«.-s e�D.s.w..e+.mm5nrr uo rcr�:r rns.eee�.u.+o+. - , ' woaxeLL•cc.wve A.eNRCR. Po�riorwwu5r.wrncwNxe c«wr x:xA I rX:Suw.n.croo 5au..w•a.�e.v.Lm]vraSLraee sea PomAia wm re.lo�NMw+Mra�X.wM ^e'ta uro �.euLnne.cmv.5 .v�.e]aN+s a.. I .o Xxwr eeueerm urr race. oI] eruw�vv.aw.ae.mi.m e.r-e ra..aK,w A�.w ...r]r'cu�srw•:,aLi"m'n �X �nwe...�o 5�r L M NGMB.FdLR ie M SrMf(i NSrbC-M z .u5 «RKrrwT .r rbLMr.-.Ro iK.RnIeE roar."_n'ow ry M uRwre r, uanl.rsMe.Aro f4FA@ M em-..eror -.-a c.Lrcrwr...mr wrx,xa.w]evv. bP"rt XeoXWsre<r,ca+uer ae wraSX ro - Ln..+N aea r.Ro oerAU AL Nszroxrm aw.]a,..e...wwX � An wv+nr � rm.iaac]X,-m IOMLF�iMn'Cf 6u]Xb.VD YICnY rMbetO R69�CL.W N4 PaAp.Kbbl1. ] XerfL.WN R4LaM+AOW.YR. wi - r .FMIprEr.BM�µTX N. GW'Ib.�MaGM6 FdYAw].29lLNJl.w N1 Wd19A.ttN rv' _ rcroMranox]R rwoarov�m.erne-rw`�r�reeea�.:w�.vr�rrrM.eo uw+z....ur�.nwvroeAnAm�ire�cau axA oA�R OA+re °Y�� _ ]�[VAS[*A'D RXANG M^RRAf ta Sm'eb]WLL RdY9!GlNeFw Ml Poe�r]iIJTrNe.�lx Pl[:14i!M I.YArL NNa..M riTCI fl9 ,�vaFA.fin.Cwrtv wM M el„nWS..r.LawS eNeR n b,�ew m [OI.Xm 10MIP.Pa b 9p.rAY]LF®[R6rXnW,GBALI.`L.SlMlA2wXLWZv /,6R M P9el.bb4[O.MXCr:wtMRXCSw.Y ror6 Y.LLI�nK T15 �15aLe%.ref11py 1.LO nF rmAT�• Y nbV55 LN8a.NRrNfanyie�r.w Me/ICeb WelE Mn:.ySPM1'e 0.PSrtK]XTAM ✓41lV aG r»cC..iwlrG reAfP.X.W 1 '. Mn:NiAXF9MAl1PIR CPp�DI.I.LL rKS. i'. �rr®M Y�dY.�i�G✓�K;�NFI'rP-.5/.WLf�M L6LS6 INM 9Xeu>u®a 1� ' LSb.REnPt 4LM nE.a/.Inre4.%Rv.M nrvl r0 RvibINO ' I n �roamro Murer®rrRXw ru Soa:Xs raw�AD omwre, corevo oxM UWerras.Ne,E Ytv wnarrn ws ravam. _ GTlM%LY S.'}]X,'� v '. RY.1@ emu¢ MMVNIGib VLL xXOTID Xd'A16T. �J< n� �1W�wIX1[JMef NG clb Srw XT.[R1.dL lO4 RRI"/-]Pl MQ19 mW+a��'��I u...�`KDV.V[X ArD]IKGnnwL oaww]rue x..vne.-�a.ro M.+r..necvAL M.vw:.ecri ay.rresw xLwAwa rdensr.ewe emr519iXaGta14 W?�a IIuQ rW r15W1SMalifl CA MfdrPKKRN4![KMMWRLVK 2M WROrLbdrw NPlLAr41 PI v.KMSMCW.a vX.r.IX a uMRewT rml �RecA�reaAwrx wW..r.w.L.er.c Rc.LD LerrvRmxert win¢ l s ]n.rM ru,aN.Sro M.acXlarrea a�me. ' .rMv WI. YwR.W NgVZ X6TAlA.YIrI If YW1Y SOJXrt.nM MGM1Kr3' WRYW MX[lM Lv0.ai0XNNiGrCxwn+rCLKS ApFR ������) y' / ' 'rMb:W.L GINnYJ.rIPL K.Re brMIIDMCWI�.NMM.iY�X�.WhoWrIMM Y8L0.g5y,�}try YR�� iXNLxraX�.mr Mseaw.oW+wK.w ArwcsueKex. eAb�ewXer]w'�va on5 se+ .SVLsn®5 Lmr scram nxL rA.a® E r wAu arecan]rrD mDnlae. ] nwa:5wre NOTICES mms.KS.nv jj O CSiWTCKn h. SGvwrm .w¢roi�wr6.pM. M.werXRe.w w'r.rar�lY.:d Rve,N CMCM.LAr '� 1 raw.wbm rx'«.v rrD wicos c. mna:v.rrnen.r5i»retie roXxm raLav+..wr wLwrr�ewn.xa '1 x.ina re Lrarwu..0 ww.crosrS Mcaa.w.ro�.o. - rXKroer.oM.Xr..�•.va..WDo+Sr.e.eXa WRNw+. T u ' obsXr�.ae�wa..ae rmWOMnL Snsuar S.aL.aX. Porm]c.Lew-.msa vnalnwcmn.�aeyawe.erwxR avm...�e c�vra.r.Xr.er.n..,.XmoMXa Koawx,rwmc.ub Xs rassran �.anewxMwlL a:Nmrawnnrwwa wee9 rorcw.eRM 6ENFa4 nrcQT V.(]PF wnSamm Me se.+reawm be cwe-rre oum+ce nr.<.rW>•n.e.rn• x owcr^wivi Nu inrwt ]e.utw>uL _ - xa ...vo <wneer.cxw:x ' _I nsry xraKattWwtaanapae rvsw - .a�ao+�9ersrwewew�: _ .un eTLL�2ro I xarFrM Wrwrz waSewW eLn, xv:r2 roM ewe�aTauu.ma..<we iwoart�rrWw I4A'06 eoMXYG.t?rNCG.raN Ca eKeef RM'Ns 4LESo•rdNY ro.O. o rurmatut'at,n'�stcc.�clsaYwmmNrm. _ •aamaeeanArwrv.nuuWMeSrrorMnwS,fcx I 1 Vi WL•r'.r�.r-v s'anx.eu:urtuen'rnan.Kurc. wnLmro.ry SLt an2rt ne.urarw Mum 1 i EXIT '`1 No- Ty F 2 M1 I <��n —---- ---- •� 3 3 5 b i , a 9 10 II 12 13- 14 IS 1 - I, 18 19 21 23 23 24 25 '?6 2, 2B 29 -—- < U�INyn� ..._.. ; 130 31 e 54'SS 1 IC 33 ,34 35 I ... 41 42 4532 5 , 60 61 62 5 b T ,O 46 1 4l 49 49 ��O SI 52 S3 pOp n 614 ,II T2 73 T4 l5 ,b 1, b W 80 216 . //�+ 5l9-WPLE LEVEiP 1N5 //���) _ o -- -_ 314 • • . (4 t 6ED(110) bSrl.Fi/1211�L14 BICYri�lUljb 41611EST 13U=216 (� I O -{II;I�- v-�Ip11 TIp'I� 313 ,E 61 H2 83 li 04 BSHfilm '90'! 41 1 9 3 94 1 95 96'; 4'i ' 95 99 100 IGI 102 103 IOl 1081 109 . 110 1 111 112 113 114 I I5 1 116; 11, 118 1 114 - - - - - i21 -111T- p Q � �YC I� �� 1 z aW _ i] x 1TII� W 1221 123 124.1,125 126 12l 12B 129 130 131 132 133 Lad 135 136 13l 138 139 1401� 141 142 143 144 145 w O b i _� 'I =2 153 Ix 185 '..156 I5, 158 159 160_L. - -- t- Ill IT2 146 14l1 - 161 162 163 164 I65 166 Ibl I68 1b9 I,O IliY_ _ _ i. �_ _ _ _ I 6 4 I � ' I I I I � I E%IS.NS PAlilDiNb SN' E.4NbN ROM 1 I • � OnWT,IBI IH2 184 85,4 i I "bST1BD 1 � _ Z"V NS-LCD V I 1 ' I I i' I � 1 11iI I I I I I I PP C a P CPN;GN N ' MIG I I 5 Li�T I I , Rn - — — - — PALM _GANYQN—RIVE_— I zw I a 1' � I:a PhM LhWCN 1 4T^KM LIB H � � HEIWr 35 LdYa � M� nj j + ORNE IXlivE iiU' SiOR1E5 I HEL_Hli-30' I � I Tw05iOR;ES III W�STOR''•FS ZOaIW-C!?I) Pc 5'GRY �. zw:1w-cm zc�lve-cBo I I � ezl5nw eu�LolNs � Zanw-�O .pq pµY LANYON 1E S - nNL TLR E5 A I.O UNDERGROUND ELOORPLAN -,. 1 _.� L3 - - - - GAN t ' Y¢N RIi E I-INDIA W U zt4 *4 WW APP$ Re 1 REkla R= m "T ENml I. I 2 3 4 5 6 l 8 9 1101 II j 12 13 14 IS I o I I' I I I I � �1 I I II j j 116 Il 18 19 20 21 22' z 23 24 25' 6 2l 6l I I � I 9pV[ri'"` I I 291� 30 3I j32 33 34 35 36131 50 39 41 i by I I-� --- O `• LEVB PhRK1N5 ry 95G PROVIDED IWmIGAP) � �, � I <'�'1 1 � n sP Ena 5P)3a�o�a•Ix � I yI -- _ L � � e Q 4 I 9 gI� xo j j 2 43 4 411115�,46141!48 1 4`1 �'' S1 521,53 94 55 56"51' _—__— 92 M1 ;III ! Q' I d Q6 1591160 61 62 63 64 � 65� 66 -15 0� � CVO � — I J �l0 112 3 l4 '15 lb ,ll ' l8 l9 80 ' 81°'.62b 184 85861. —_—_..— —___y 68 I69 I l ' I ------------- ' ' tl __---__ —'—_-�_• _,�'y�"""z'""i '�a'+Ys7.'�a' �` n tan xc 4:�.olw i I I 4E T-43' v ..._ 1 _ I I •TREE YIXS'6 { B� 3 isT�oM' 33f23T'.....z• Ye.. ( Cp5'b. I 'S:"4.. �'4't""" iil a '„ izaN'.N�ceo a- I I � - -- II ----PALM C�ANYC)N -RIVE----- I a I _ _ I x sv s w Hs EwSnib aILDIHS Y,i4 PKM GA4YLN I fT PKN GM'TLN r ir: -9'Imo' A1.1 DwrE wnx EC Tn eal-Dry ' eGROUND FLOORPLAN 11V(I50' FIRE HOSE RADIUS) SLA.E.p6•.I �y INDIAN CANYON ORIVE w I 1ma i I -- Hon � JL -cll n I'. t I. -- Ib ; - AN F - — _ .-- 7- uu _• 1 !• 1 _ j OBI I t. z FR YjF < 4 _ U I I c J i I iAl I ' o I I # I{I j iE16H'-43 T R-sib f zmuus-cao II ® Cm i i �rro srger z'A.IWS <ED I I I aEr v F s ° p�< _CANYON RIVE - --- -- -- ---- — — --- -- — — p�4 TO ff Lg}HiMlm � � � lFf9L f .1, YI W3RBR4L t1Yr5M{V!Y B � � I m — G aVa OWv:R MTJ] 3 CYO _ jI O�RNFIi.W'GN°irc.on —� 4VvH�Hc wa: � F 1£Is:n-L'� —1 rnml � �lw m iab' N WiNRrxw I j - I E1srIYz ate. Al-2 SECOND PLOORPLAN _ . .� - 15 r, I V z i I o - �— I ( I }Zoe z - Q - • „�„ ( - I U 9l TT J 1 z'am Tm I. a =d a - HFJGHI-93 - XREE 5(CRES ' _ I ZDW1Ya LB0 I' ' _ I J I — I y `I - 1 I 1 - I I 1 I I i jk=j : - — -- - Q -- -- PALM _CLANYO[�1 RL�L — — - -- -- a 24 I ¢0 I Lit" Y�4 P.4H If�p� 1 EA3TK 9A.D.115 E%5YIM6 ELIDING �� 1ti P/LY GN11'ON �i 1�16FY-3. LT(YE � � 1EIGff-]S � �IIG 9N:DIIG h£.6wT-35 TYb STGRIES , ZLllllli CBV TYO STGRffS I ZtMIN'r GED � 11£IEHT-]D' tRt� NE G1r-3]' ^� TI,D$TLRIP3 A I.✓ ZOIi145-I.BD 3RD FLOORPLAN s �� :1.-.11 i J � 3 � J 0 I W Tr — 0 _ _ IF ry c �o I i I a �___ _ Fl I '.. 5A 5 RA4G RO T� p Jill 111WH RIVE p 9 PM GAN1'LN V � 5iR-E 154r M68LCLK R i GPO�ALc _ F � 9J4 fa< _ 3 I %i5nI15911LOIWi u'.srlµS p;ILJIw'i E%IsnµS @IIIDI,G k r �\m� /J 939 PALM LNIYOI. PALM GAN{O`! `1J' eve ax,ve wlls -e Lc II T-n• na srowE; �iio srov�Es EaWn.Ss-�ce�o lEI6i" -?�' IL TWI11i-L9O 2�N NS-CEO UFE SiGRY } EXHiIN9 dlIL0145 � ZOYI�6-!3D I Vp PAL✓GAAYdI HEI6M-53' ' �? 4TH 6FLOORPLAN Z'f ,gin a ..®... .....�.. : I : i CFM; N J/I£U,8 II _ II o TT I II < Ir V I- 0a — y _ : n J i J z I 0! I � r— wm I F J Ti J IET Ell IX5T!'69.IV�N6 I STY EM S.iW�IGM POPD HE.SM-<3 TIRH STCR.E5 tl FXIS-LNG TL4J'W I� •. I I IGhIV5-GW � � 1� I _ Il I� I - i•! I 1.. 1� _ f .T��I � � L � T _ i SF£N G I Q P Y RdYA'WJC ----- ---- -- PALM _�RNYON _ RIVE — -- ----------------- -- — L 'dF�wT� -- - -- i---- — — 4a I f0 — �JF � a I 451 PlL Yp G,lSRol�GAIw R2VE LLCO1 II QQ IEGH' S• (NIVE '1EI3r-Za EXISTI.Ya B.ILJ'R r� rYb srLftlFs IG- ' I I I I iHJ STCR:ES - f r 5TH ♦=LOOR A .5PLAN �� - NOLLV^ 1-1 1 H12!4ON I'zv � s - — s a 0 Ifl �.C�Y:Yp o Wiz®it ol : m r� ,may - _.. I ,, N011y/\d-f3 (1b'5 �) A(1N�/\V NHIQNI �€J 9 I U iik. � T - - I > a.�. 9✓ 'max �: I NOIUV^2-1�3 (H-LnoG) c voa-4 NOW'd2i ' z — 'Ac ' �i ssirvrss T _ _ a Z 2 j i GI•.9✓131� _ i NOI-LV/\A-ID (153M) 3nl2ia NO.IMdO W1bd ° I d • sdB��Ir a `3{m 0 Ua _• I I 1, 1 - m W JI��gg� �t 3 f�31OEt.TIP1 ssr^,� E,�ATM RE^iIOEYnP` STA 4-0 eErao �'•� W I � � I I TIC I F pr 1 r =Flpl!EFv ALcgs� � n . swm PAln e.wra'� u �e RCSJ Eli_3T _ PAFVYS _ wear ee+'a.� I. --..._ .___. ,. r��cfunKis'•[_ � PEs;s.esr �Lz;a�r PESiG_A AI. I _ _s e �-'�'' yp�yyyyA FAitKINS MK.VS BE -LP G ry2LF rt M. S.1' �PG.r �T?1J ENRY �PK.K - E� R.S. _EV. O5EGTION A-A �. r�sloe�nAL an�mAL r�Pslo=,n.ti EIpJAr02 ^�=.o=_nnA_ rseslnw-'x car�zr rwm ee}"aro Auer eercwn 9 4k, Ev 511. i I V A .17 r ' - -- iv//r9 i. ,/ . i, 'U LEV.2o MgAN GAATON OC � RETA L RR L yyC ' RES.OENr AL p-ip9.T1AL . P/SdCPGK � �' 2"3GEN-.0. I / i>3G@l'1�—`. ...- i�3 AtLCIK � map 1 P SPACL� �L I O RES.�ti5. LEI/ -- A3.1 �5EGTION B-B I xxe.m•.ro 30 INDIAN CANYON DRIVE NA F F�n `FkP� EX - �er+�rvr° -T--:� 11 El El w O Qm 9 ® 0 � © II i - El 1 7- f f F 0 � i III _ 0 I �I z z L } Q -" Aff - © - --- xb QI I Q =a - a a O! iE � 0 Ell ev Y a umpol [Ell V C) 5 F �c iT� 5 r ® IIII I I l i I B4Os�.,T+Rcry -`-"A _ 1 TYRES 5'ortlES 1 9 f E,csnrG MIL.+s - 1 I .. 3]'lYC)SttMr � � '1� t �' y ZTtlVG-LBO i � 3 LL f © ® ® I '® © ® I r^rs EY I I _ _ AIIFI 0 a_ I wo-cR.oR I ��L _ IV - I — AN O _fi�ALM G----- — �— -- --- II IT I ----------------------- E% t' �Wm PIIM1➢INS- ,iB6FnnGLpIW _ 6f T"I LAWOh �..?AL'!LAYYEpI eF � � RO 9 �-OF-1h . PLAN 31 ._ M1jl Y .!e v r `� ■ Y Iwo r - ' ■ I C .j wr.■ , Ei,,—r � I� '� `III :( I 4 i 1T � Tt� I 1 , I .. L 1 !n P �� 'v►� �I�i• �� se ♦• i III, 411 +its. 1 �II• 1 .r '{ I_ -� ' i lY � 11 \ ,-- �a'•�.0`�. a,:t�`�_i�i�`r'`�� , 11% I ' 'f � i,1• tt����=iYww�E ,.-� � � �1. 1 i� Aw h;,.j!I ''Eyea. -7j it Pol NJ I + t I 1fl1 i. a1 - , ...mot - _ �Ef� i I�j�•'' Y ,9y; ra. �ti tc►V' .il4` �./a y IKI�x{i� +1{t VOWN 41 a .I .�=llw �� • yb _ ifs:: =�� ..�g�-,a[�. -;._ ,r;ii �. &awl �I Ka. lop PM i -s>•i%�r., ! T? 1 -... '/f0 :T1 7f: lil' � °�i I ��3_ �.''-,TTiI '�� 1 s _ • I , \ Y •A�M:f rf SAY. SA-it(.. 4bYj\Y•Iih •:n Y•Z 1^ Sig 1 �•ti �.a1�ra _ — s . r _ - jVOR �wWA t � z s _,oa , ae•. � ,cw sac i-..an .ate: _ t 'J 1_ _ �I � � - !' ._ _..a.. r._a. v.;+: <:�r�1_.._.re-v-...__..•rm - S" trr'{L:--c _� 1"= F.�G'����� �� �=�1 - �� I'H - �l .. sltr , nynl�j� Y 1 rM r�r7w tv ib. err 2FF!+i^l (�r!►�R.-'! i Gw ii �bR�r+Rl .isn.sril� ,„ r, -.ire k 1 `�.� c -•• 1�g:. �� - -- _.. ..O � •�r -rr•--, � 1r:t5.. ,,, fir. ri.•��-!'�.-. i '-$i*+'w� ��,� .yrII'1�LF�. - :. rlw.—■I� .A.`.-..r���.M� .: 1�.._.�w�„�--.. ,..fi..._ ./ fir � � � � .•l. rr _.. i■1 -.' AW li , ..,,.. �iw.� ,....r. .. �.e.. ., ..r,a 04,11M Fa ■ rrr c r. a — Mum ..F' r k / _ • �. f''"�:. 4 - r�.Y D{�]�I 1 -'.�'•'"T`.• ':�ei"� ' �■ 1 ' , Aix r� � ., j❑��( ! .Jr:` � . �. I,. .VIM -.:_ . - p .I•, .- �- +'r NEW 4�� �� �`� ,,;,1: �� - �� � Yri �. _ •y� 1�,. ,�..����M All" /lN, Y7�'4 - _P.- �a 1 °s+•.' `•y} k "' �• � _ mom[.- ri�_)rti-,a.' v iB0£ITIAL 5THA5 BEVAraR {�Ipg(}ytyyy. YAMMXNTLAL WAM 82fQO PtY010 �1'C1p RTL>1D I I i I 1 Air, { 1ta r 0 FF , [TMT T#F111113u kcry! ! Q O 1�5ViE]I lOi9Y _ rram�, I of&JMT i lnArn�isCn WtK- Som PAL/CAKYM • II « .PKl. LIM. SECTION A-A rS6iwRv�1 l�tlW. >LLVAA I05WVENrtLAL r¢BoetnH. cnrtT rArm -_.--_—__ � .L EL+!R 0, . .\ R00F -- - r Ei ,.a rw' Tj 7 T - T ^_ T ' i «n o AOWILNf}L'+N7R fStH'� PPiML 'JOVIN PAW VIfytm i rAmamA� PLSIOQRLLL : leemd+nti a>=avanni 1-6 EL -1'-O' Ru.F'Kb. L-FY. • SECTION B-B TH E P A L M 0 A N Y 0 NO DONNELL ESCALANTE ARCHI ; LC 5 ❑CTOBER 2005 SECTIONS I • - - - _ I N DIAN CAN YON OR I V E .. .. ._._ Ir I Q 1 z_ . ._ _ .. IF F I - -PALM CANYON O R 1 V Q • T H E P A L M C A N 1 0 N DNNELL gS7ALA NTE ARCHITECTS OCTOBER 2005 L -UNDERGROUND LEVEL PLAN • J - - - - INDIAN CANYON DRIVE .._.__._ •• r Y ((tt I z 01 Jam I I � N.fWMM1,1..4. ..pn,w<•en YN 3 — -� PALM CANYON DRIVE , O OONNELL ESCALANTE ARCNITE 11 •.� . "`^. . ,.h ,4 .:1_a.+:lli1iG17A[D4L}o/!'Ie�elal�.>. I � • ---- _ - I N C I A N C A N Y ❑ N D R I V E77 - UD V- i i sJ 0 w as •s �a .. t . Q � 1 z Mm7 . Ij I rl-tJ e ---- — — P A L M CANYON DRIVE -� er.eu aa.. • TH E P A L M C A N Y O N ❑ 0i: NNE L E8 Ca 6A N T E A5I CtiITECT9 duo"E 2006 t .pg PLAN •�1 e • i Re ee �ta 1p f4 tiA �' ■¢� aa¢SBa1�gHf__f/ ■ 11f [■O Y■ Y� i�_ IIIE■�� ■adeil��i"p-owl ib0 � ■■ IIJ���_ 6¢¢mi.�.a¢w���^„'N'I � �R�li /�I' �•,�I WE .1•'1 Iw{ ,pleYlUNSIs VY.r :. •11 u1 ' 1 �� �- r u ULM At Al_ � c j 1 1 4 ► f.. �. y07:� \... 1�1 1 >•�,..•11 IEry at—iitJJ111 11.f ....- ..a ... „S\ 1• 11! p,1 _ te'.1�,� �' W�■'� iE.talfia ... _ I.�,i--lip to I� fE ., MRr ■ � t all.•-_ r.�e �M1M1�■ �>.�.�_� • ��s'+h " ` �w�����■1 11 11111�1 !■ee■a e r AItA■1�1�11 11■1 !R!!�!� f1Et �:••w, L•• III PIIF e�®f�l_II� E■ _ E 1 �� 1 �1 ■ _ E�Erle _ Rn ■c� �ek. �Mr ]Im H 1 •Sc 1 it !G}S;' 1 1 II A Y Nif'YIYiYAl71/1!i 1VV IC VLI- 1 - 90139 N380100 .. 7 , IN � a � 31 N v , bu a ; 1 , 3 `4 N 07 DN O Jl N `d 0 i A l it O MCANWO W 1 V d AI 1 tI i U 31 L1 {�, u n m 1 ly 13 Z �p i 01 D o 1 it = 1 S r= lr �. 1" � � � o a o I I f HO NOANVm NY 1GN1 -- • • I N D I A N CANYON D R I V E i LEE M Q r w a w I w (o o � : 7 a # a 4 1 It F-1 iA'�IFjIF�IMF I a s- 1� r i P A L M CANYON D R I V E ISoo • rur unrt - III �� •.�ii.m�.u.urn . • F T H E P A L M C A N Y O NO N N E L L ESCA LA N T E A R G H I T E DTe OCTOBER 2005 � L -U5 PLAN • _ _ _ _, _ INOIAN CANYON CAIVE j — f � ® �j I tt m m to m � m m m m 1 M ° to m m _ m m i o R ;n a ® AA oam A¢ a 2i 12A meA mOlz �o 1 m a 177 e l m m F 1�e L mmm ® I - i . i fr_�• P A L M C ANYO N 0 R I V E • TH E P A L M C A N Y O N ONNELL ESCALANTE ARCHITE OO�q _ .... . .. Cindy Berardi From: Zyanya Soltanian <Zsoltanian@hqdevelopment.net> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:04 PM To: CityClerk Cc: Flinn Fagg; Robert Herscu Subject: Extesion request- Robert Herscu Attachments: City of Palm Springs.pdf Robert Herscu 1801 Century Park East Suite 1560 Los Angeles CA 90067 (310)280-2830 City of Palm Springs Council Chamber 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 February 29, 2016 RE: Robert Herscu of South Palm Canyon, LLC,Appealing the December 91" 2015 Decision, Dear City Council, I would like to postpone the Wednesday council hearing for several reasons: 1. The architect Ana Escalante is in Sweden and hopes to be back in the next 4 weeks. 2. Brian Linnekens, my partner, is traveling out of town for business. 3. 1 am still recovering from major surgery and I am home bound for the next 3 to 4 weeks I would like the opportunity to present the project when my whole team is available, that is why I am asking for the extension. Sincerely, Robert Herscu Zyanya Soltanian Executive Assistant to Robert Herscu 1 The HQ Group 1 1801 Century Park East Suite 1560 1 Los Angeles, CA 90067 P: 310.280.2830 1 F 310,349.34351G562.528.6428 E-mail: xsealtt+utnnl 'Itrldrvrlopment.net littp:,//hqcreitiveoffice.com/ Please consider the environment hefore prhitmg this email Confidentiality Notice ................................ The information contained in this electronic c-rnail and any accompanying attachmcnt(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be proprietary, confidential andior privileged. If any reader of this contnurnication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlaWtnl. If you have received this communication in error, please imtnediatcly notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the original message along_ with all attachments without reading, making copies or saving it in any manner. Thank you 2 Cindy Berardi From: Roos, Mary <MRoos@msaconsultinginc.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:41 PM To: CityClerk Cc: Robert Herscu (RHerscu@hgdevelopment.net), 'brian@gidevelopmentinc.com' (brian@gidevelopmentinc.com) Subject: Request for Continuance Public Hearing Item #1A--PDD 311 James: At the last City Council meeting my clients involved with the South Palm Canyon project(PDD 311) requested a 30 day continuance so they would be present and available to make a presentation to the City Council. The Council instead granted a 2 week continuance to March 2 as the Council would not have a quorum on the 16th. Unfortunately, Brian Linnekens is traveling this week and cannot be in attendance tonight thus we're requesting another 30 day continuance. We thank the Council for working with us on this important matter and hope the continuance is granted to the April 6th meeting. Thank you, Marvin D. Roos Senior Advisor mroosCobmsaconsultinginc com y�%, A It,i�h MSA CONS11ULT]NG, INC. PI MINI"I 4(IVII I`NOM I.MINO-I..ANII%1 NN'1'Vlafj 34200 Bob Hope Drive F(IN'IV MEAN% Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Office: 760.320.9811 000 Fax: 760.323.7893 msaconsultin®inc com t