Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/4/2016 - STAFF REPORTS - 2.J. ?ALM Sp �O R� Z c V N fX HC n� C oroxmco. P, 4<IF00.N� City Council Staff Report DATE: May 4, 2016 CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE A PURCHASE ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $187,900 WITH ALBERT A. WEBB & ASSOCIATES FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE MEASURE J COMMUNITY HOT SPOTS PROJECTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 15-31 FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Public Works & Engineering Department SUMMARY: Approval of this item will authorize a purchase order in the amount of $187,900 with Albert A. Webb & Associates for civil and traffic engineering design services associated with the Measure J Community Hot Spots Project, City Project No. 15-31. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $187,900 with the City's "on-call" engineering firm, Albert A. Webb & Associates, pursuant to Agreement No. 6443, for civil and traffic engineering design services associated with the Measure J Community Hot Spots Project, City Project No. 15-31 ; 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. BACKGROUND: On November 6 2013 the CityCouncil approved Agreement No. 6443 with Albert A. PP 9 Webb & Associates ("Webb") for on-call traffic engineering design services on an as needed basis. At its September 17, 2015 meeting, the Measure J Commission recommended to City Council a list of Community Projects under the theme of "Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Hot Spots' to be funded through the Measure J Capital Project Fund by the City Council over a three fiscal year period. The Measure J Commission's recommendation is the culmination of a lengthy evaluation process, resulting from their solicitation of community projects to all of the City's organized neighborhoods. ITEM NO. 1,71 City Council Staff Report May 4, 2016 - Page 2 Approval of Purchase Order for Albert A. Webb &Associates (CP 15-31) On October 21, 2015, the City Council reviewed the Measure J Commission's three- year list of recommended "Community Projects" for fiscal years 2015/2016 thru 2017/2018, and approved funding for the first year of the listed projects. A list of these projects and approved City Council action are summarized in the October 21, 2015, staff report included as Attachment 1. Although various projects were recommended and various funds were spread out through three fiscal years, Public Works & Engineering has consolidated these projects into three different categories: Community Enhancements, Community Traffic Studies/Projects, and Community Sidewalks. Although various projects were recommended and spread out into three fiscal years, staff is grouping projects into those that can be completed immediately, those projects that require a more extensive design, and those projects that will require traffic engineering analysis and studies in order to be justify the project (such as stop sign or traffic signal warrant studies). The first category of projects, Community Enhancements, were assigned to the City's Street Maintenance division which included red curb painting, various traffic sign installation, and construction of isolated ADA curb ramps. These items have been completed. The second category of projects, Community Traffic Studies/Projects, include requests for stop signs and traffic signals. In order for these projects to be constructed, warrant studies need to be performed to justify the installation of the stop signs or traffic signals. The third category of projects, Community Sidewalks, will require more extensive work to develop plans, specifications, and estimates for construction bidding as a capital improvement project. The City solicited proposals from its four on-call engineering firms to provide the City with various civil and traffic engineering services associated with the first year of Community Projects approved by the City Council. One firm (Harris & Associates) declined to submit a proposal, and a second firm (Albert Grover & Associates) submitted a proposal limited to the traffic engineering studies. A full summary of the engineering fees proposed by the on-call engineering firms is included in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, Albert A. Webb and Associates has provided the City with the most cost effective and comprehensive proposal to design the Community Sidewalks and provide the traffic studies at approved locations that had requested Stop Signs or Traffic Signals for a total amount not to exceed $155,900; a copy of Webb's proposal is included as Attachment 2. 02 City Council Staff Report May 4, 2016- Page 3 Approval of Purchase Order for Albert A. Webb &Associates (CP 15-31) Measure J Grover Webb MSA Proj Est A. Concrete Curbs, no proposal Sidewalks and PartA No. Street Between 1 Alejo Road Calle Encilia and Calle El Segundo 20,000 6,600.00 8,575.00 2 Amado Road Farrell Drive and Sunrise Way 213,760 9,100.00 17,265.00 3 Arenas Road Belardo Road and Tennis Club Road 33,760 9,100.00 8,735.00 4 Baristo Road Belardo Road and Tennis Club Road 96,250 9,100.00 14,790.00 5 Baristo Road Farrell Drive and Sunrise Way 96,250 9,100.00 7,650.00 6 Camino Real So. Riverside and Indian Trail 273,500 10,300.00 19,925,00 7 E. Palm Canyon Driftwood Drive and Calle Rolph 89.100 7,200.00 5,635.00 8 Farrell Drive Racquet Club and Vista Chino 50,000 9,100.00 7,755.00 9 Indian Canyon Drive Mel and Vista Chino 96,250 9,100.00 13,525.00 10 Indian Canyon Drive Racquet Club and Via Olivera 168.935 6,900.00 10,215.00 11 Indian Canyon Drive San Rafael Drive and Simms Road 157,045 6,900.00 10,865.00 12 Murray Canyon Dr. Kings Road and Toledo Ave. 173.750 9,100.00 9,485.00 13 Racquet Club Road Sunrise and Cerritos Drive 32,000 8,000.00 8,255.00 14 Racquet Club Road Cerritos Drive and Farrell Drive 32,000 8,000.00 6,135.00 15 Racquet Club Road Cardillo and North Palm Canyon 78,250 6,900.00 12,655.00 16 Sunny Dunes Road S. Palm Canyon and Calle Amigo 256.250 10,700.00 26,775.00 reimbursibles 1,000.00 Subtotal $ 1,867,100 0 $ 135,200 $ 189,240 est% 7.24% 10.14% B. Traffic Studies- Measure J Grover Webb MSA Warrant Analysis Proj Est No. Street Cross Street 17 Amado Road Calle Alvarado 2,500 3,200.00 2,200.00 1,450.00 18 Eastgate Road Rosa Parks Drive 4,000 3,200.00 2,200.00 1,450.00 19 Racquet Club Road Cerritos 375,500 5,200.00 2,500.00 2,260.00 20 La Verne Way So. Palm Canyon( Lilliana Drive 7,500 3,200.00 2,200.00 1,450.00 21 La Verne Way Twin Palms Dr. 20,000 5.200.00 2,500.00 2,260.00 22 Murray 1-anyon So. Palm Canyon 3,750 2,500.00 2,200.00 1,450.00 23 Sonora Road Calle Palo Pierro 3,750 3,200.00 2,200.00 1,450.00 24 Twin Palms Dr. Via Aguila 20,000 2,500.00 2,200.00 1,450.00 25 Via Escuela North Palm Canyon 3,000 5,200.00 2,500.00 2,250.00 traffic counts 4,895.00 memo 4,860.00 Subtotal 33,400.00 20,700.00 25,225.00 Totals 33,400.00 155,900.00 214,465.00 Table 1 The City also received grant funding from the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC) through the SB821 grant program for construction of new 03 City Council Staff Report May 4, 2016 - Page 4 Approval of Purchase Order for Albert A. Webb &Associates (CP 15-31) sidewalks on the east side of Indian Canyon Drive south of San Rafael Drive, and on the east side of Indian Canyon Drive south of Racquet Club Road. During the application process, the City identified the use of Measure J funds as the local match for the grant in order to be more competitive. These projects were not included as part of the Community Projects, but have been previously earmarked using Measure J funds to match the grant. The City was successful in receiving these grants as per the award letter from RCTC included as Attachment 3. Staff is recommending that the Measure J Funds be used to cover the $13,800 cost of the design services associated with these new sidewalks, with the construction funding provided through the SB821 grant funds. Street Lighting on Baristo and Arenas As part of the first year of approved Community Projects are new sidewalks and lighting proposed in the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood along Arenas Road and Baristo Road, on Baristo Road between Farrell Drive and Sunrise Way. Staff has obtained an additional proposal from Webb for development of electrical and lighting plans for the streets in the amount of$13,000 as per an e-mail included as Attachment 4. Application of Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Federal Grant Caltrans currently has a call for projects for cities to apply for federal funding through the Alternative Transportation Program. The various Community Sidewalk projects identified in the Measure J Community Projects qualify as eligible projects through the ATP Federal Grant. Staff recommends that the City prepare an ATP grant application to submit to Caltrans to request federal funding for these community sidewalks, which if awarded would offset the Measure J Capital Project Funds currently appropriated for construction of the sidewalks. Staff recommended, and the Measure J Commission agreed at its meeting of April 21, 2016, to utilize the Community Projects Measure J funding towards the cost to prepare and submit the ATP grant application. Staff solicited a proposal in the amount of $19,000 from Webb to compile the required information and prepare the ATP grant application. Webb's proposal is included with the email included as Attachment 4. As a matter of reference, in 2015 Webb prepare studies and a federal grant application for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), which was successful and awarded the City $3,325,000 in federal funding to perform improvements at various intersections throughout the City. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Section 21084 of the California Public Resources Code requires Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Guidelines are required to include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. In response to that mandate, the Secretary for Resources identified classes of projects that do not have a significant effect on the environment, and are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental 04 City Council Staff Report May 4, 2016 - Page 5 Approval of Purchase Order for Albert A. Webb &Associates (CP 15-31) documents. In accordance with Section 15301 "Existing Facilities," Class 1 projects consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities; therefore, the Measure J Community Hot Spots Project, City Project No. 15-31, is considered categorically exempt from CEQA, and a Notice of Exemption will be prepared and filed with the Riverside County Clerk. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in the Measure J Capital Project Fund to facilitate approval of a Purchase Order in the amount of $187,900 to Webb for the Measure J Community Hot Spots Project, City Project No. 15-31. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize funding for the Purchase Order from the following Measure J Accounts: 260-4494-58700; $3,125 260-4494-58701; $82,750 260-4494-58702; $102,025 SUBMITTED Prepared by: Approved by: Ar ' Marcus L. Fulle , MPA, P.E., P.L.S. David H. Ready, Es Assistant City Manager/City Engineer City Manager Attachment(s): 1. October 21, 2015, staff report 2. Albert A. Webb Proposal 3. SB821 Award Letter 4. Albert A. Webb Additional E-Mail Proposal 05 Attachment 1 lkLAS sP4 iy W V N a ,FOS CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2015 NEW BUSINESS SUBJECT: MEASURE J "COMMUNITY PROJECTS" RECOMMENDATIONS— APPROVAL OF THREE YEAR PLAN FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager SUMMARY At its September 17, 2015 meeting, the Measure J Commission recommended a list of Community Projects under the theme of "Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Hot Spots" to be funded by the City Council over a three fiscal year period. This recommendation is the culmination of a lengthy Measure J Commission evaluation process, resulting from their solicitation of community projects. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve Measure J recommended three year"Community Projects"plan: a) Fiscal Year 2015-16: Seventeen (17) projects estimated at$1,028,000; b) Fiscal Year 2016-17: Twenty (20) projects estimated at$965,000; c) Fiscal Year 2017-18: Nine (9) projects estimated at$1,202,000; 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all budget transfers and amendments necessary to effectuate the City Council actions, subject to annual budget appropriations. STAFF ANALYSIS: In Fiscal Year 2014.15, the City Council approved the Measure J Commission's concept of a $100,000 annual set-aside for Community Projects. As part of this process, the Commission voted to endorse the theme "Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Hot Spots" for the initial round of applications. Applications for these new projects were made available to the public and a total of 288 capital project suggestions were received from individuals, neighborhood organizations, and businesses. Additionally, for project ideas that met the theme, the Measure J Commission considered applications received during the previous round of funding in Item No. 5 .A . 07 City Council Staff Report October 21, 2015—Page 4 Measure J Funding FISCAL IMPACT: For the current Fiscal Year 2015-16, $1,000,000 is appropriated in the Measure J Community Projects account. The Commission recommends transferring an additional $28,000 from the Measure J Project Contingency Reserve to complete funding for projects this year. City Council approval of this three-year plan will also earmark approximately $2,167,000 over the next two fiscal years to complete eighteen (18) projects (estimated cost $965,000)for Fiscal Year 2016-17, and nine (9) projects (estimated cost$1,202,000)for Fiscal Year 2017-18. Actual project bid prices will likely differ depending upon the ultimate scope and timing of each project. Similarly, these "community projects," like other "mufti-year' projects approved by City Council (e.g. bike lanes, Buzz transportation), will be designated as an earmark and require formal City Council appropriation in each individual fiscal year. Geoffrey Kiefil, David H. Ready, City Director of Finance and Treasurer Attachment: Hot Spots 2015-2018 project worksheet 04 OR City Council Staff Report October 21. 2015--Page 2 Measure Funding 2013. Due to the amount of applications, the Commission decided to recommend that the City Council approve a three-year plan utilizing the same theme. It should be noted that several of the recommended projects still require additional review by Public Works; further, some projects may also require additional Engineering studies. Measure J Funding Recommendations to the City Council: 2015-2016 Recommendations: Project Project Recommended Title Notes for2015-2016 Alvarado/E Alejo Red curbs needed at intersection to Improve visibility/ afety 625 Amado I Alvarado Stop Signs 2,500 Arenas/Barlsto between Belardo&Tennis Club Hotel I Baristo Sidewalks and lgh Ing 33,750 Barlsto between Farrell&Sunrise Sidewalks and lighting 96.250 Baristo from Betardo t_oSpencer!_____Sidewalks and lighting 96,250 Extend red painted curbs: improve Camino Real I Twin Palms by ACE Hotel Intersection visibility/safety 625 Cahullfa Elementry, curbs sidewalks- Camino Real between S Riverside/Indian Trail W side of Camino Real 273,500 `Sldswalks:fig In this busy pedestrian E. Palm Canyon, N side, Deepwall to Marcos corridor 89,100 Indian C n Between Mel&Vista Chino Sidewalks-fill in a s 96,250 Traffic Calming Study for various Ryan Snyder Traffic CalmingStud fisted locations 60,000 Saturmino I Arenas Signage caution or slow chl�ren lerollo Sonora between Farrel/El Cielo _ SI rks/fimiting vehicle weight on street 1,250 Sunny Dunes between Palm Cyn I Calls Amigo Sidewalks&Bike Lanes consistency 1 traffic calming 256,250 Signage for dip as Tachevah enters Tachevah I Sunrise _ and exits Sunrise intersection 625 Red curbs at 4 corners of Tah uitz 1 Caballeros Intersections for visibility 625 Generous red curbs for Increased Tamarisk at Indian Canyon visibility 625 Via Escuela/N Palm Canyon Warrant analysis for potential signal 3,000 Total S 1,027,225 02 09 City Council Staff Report October 21, 2015-Page 3 Measure J Funding 2016-2017 Recommendations: Project Project Recommended Title Notes for 2016.2017 Amado between Farrell/Sunrise Sidewalks inorth side] $ 2.13.750 Andreas Hills Drive _ _— Replace Yield sl8na wither aims___ 2,500 E_Palm Canyon/LaVernslSunrise _- -- Right turn on red after stop _ 625 E. Palm Canyon/S Palm Canyon Crosswalk-mid-block with beacons. 43,750 East ate/Rosa Parks Traffic Calming and 4 Way stop sign 2,500 Farrell/Ramon Mesquite CC trail crossing _ 75,000 Yellow signs with black arrows Farrell/San,baquin - - (flashing beacon)---__-_----. 12,50D La Verne I Ullana Crosswalk and stop sin 7,500 La Verne/S.Palm Canyon 4-way stop 2,500 Traffic Signal to facilitate pedestrian La Verne/Twin Palms and 1 or bicycle crossirr 200,000 Mum Canyon/5. Palm Canyon ____LWi%r Stop Sign 3,750 Murray Can�lon/S�Palm Canyon - Sidewalk KI-gs to Toledo _ 17_3,760 Palo Flerro between Twin Palms/LaVerne Traffic Calming - 15,000 Racquet Club I Indian Cro_ssw_aDcs 5,000 Racquet Club betvwan Farrell I Cerritos Sidewalks-till ins 54,900 S Palm Canon Wive . Bike lanes,sidewalks - 28,200 Sonora/Sunrise _ Crosi;i i Ped_astrlan Croaa" Lt - - 68,7W Sonora/Palo Fierro 4-Way Stop — 3,750 - - Pedestrian lighting continuous along Tahg2 Cam I Indian to Renaissance Hotel aidewa0c_ - 51,7W Via Escuela!Sunrise Wad -- —_ ft!t Turn only — - 625 --- Totall 964,100 2017-2018 Recommendations: Project Project Recommended Title Notes for 2017-2018 Crosslay/34th_ Marked Crosswalk i 5,000 Crossley/Dinah Shore Sidewalks 327,700 Paseo El Mirador between Sunrise/ Sidewalks&bike lanes; traffic calming Caballeros business travel, no bike lanes 252,600 Roc ug_et Club/CQWtoa —_--- Tratfic Signal Y___ _ _--_- _� 375,000 Ra st t cquet Cluh N Palm Corn weo Cardillo Sidewalks 76,260 Rac ust Club to Sunrise Sidewalks 86,125 S Riverside Dr: Sunrise to S. Random Rd ITT calming- 20.000 Sonora/Capri Circle ADA Curb Cuts on sidewalks-_-__ _ _ 8,000 Sonora/Farrell Crosswalk-mid-block with beacons 41,250 Total 5 1,202,125 03 10 Attachment 2 A L 8 E R T A. MUMOU A 5 S O C t A T E 6 April 21, 2016 Corporate Headquarters 3788 McCray Street Mr. E. Joseph Shaw, P.E. Riverside,CA 92506 951.686.1070 Program Manager Palm Desert OMce Interwest Consulting Group 36,951 Cook Street#103 431 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Suite 200 Palm Desert,CA 92211 Palm Springs, CA, 92262 760.568.5005 Murrieta 41391 ania Street A320 RE: Proposal for Engineering Services with the Cityof Palm Springs for Murriela,CA 92552 the Measure J "Hot Spots" Community Projects 951.6861070 Dear Joseph: Albert A. WEBB Associates is submitting this proposal to provide engineering services for the design of municipal infrastructure facilities in the City of Palm Springs. Exhibit A contains our proposed scope of work. Exhibit B contains a summary of our fee proposal and billing rates for services described in Exhibit A. Exhibit C contains our preliminary project schedule. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (951) 685-1070. Sincerely, Albert A. Webb Associates o�"'� Dilesh R. Sheth, P.EJT.E. Vice President CC: Savat Khamphou, P.E. Attachments: Exhibit "A"— Scope of Work, Exhibit "B" —Compensation, Exhibit "C"— Project Schedule www.webbassociates.com 12 rAc,m eV rJlVPiaL,V__d Lfl_(aSALS`,C]t,of Pa S(,nng5,_1trh8..i.:aU ira..._Froow.,,...7 in!Spn.Rc,:.�n, r.,00 w nu e Yo t>usal 2016 Ji IS.c+cc. Exhibit "A" - Scope of Work A. Concrete Curbs Sidewalks and Curb Ramps (Sixteen 0 0)-Location : 1. WEBB will identify locations within each project area without sidewalks, curbs, gutters, concrete driveways, and/or ADA ramps. 2. WEBB will perform field surveys necessary for the design of each location. 3. WEBB will determine and design appropriate required improvements. a. New sidewalks to be per City and ADA standards. Sidewalk width to match existing or adjacent where possible. Sidewalk to directly tie in existing concrete driveways. b. Curb and Gutter to be per City standards. Design existing adjacent asphalt to match existing street grade. c. ADA Pedestrian Ramps to be per City and ADA standards. Design new or modify existing ramps as necessary for ADA compliance. d. Design new concrete driveways to replace existing asphalt and earthen driveways per City standards. Existing concrete driveways to remain in place. e. Identify utilities in sidewalk areas to be relocated and/or adjusted to grade. f. Identify trees, landscaping, grass areas, ornamental items, and sprinklers within proposed sidewalk areas to be protected in place, removed, and/or relocated. g. Identify mailboxes, signs, poles, street lights, fire hydrants, and guy lines within proposed sidewalk areas to be protected in place, removed, or relocated. h. Identify areas with significant grade differential between proposed sidewalk elevation and existing ground. If necessary, indicate location, type, length, and height of proposed wall or facility. 4. WEBB will request available as-built street improvement plans from the City as needed. 5. WEBB will prepare street improvement plans for the construction of new curbs, sidewalks, ramps, and driveways with appropriate notes, sections, and details. 6. WEBB will provide digital copies of all submittals to the City of Palm Springs compatible with AutoCAD 2015 (or other version upon request) and PDF format. B. Traffic St dies -Warrant Analy;irt (NiO (9) Locations): 1. Stop Sign Warrants (6) a. Conduct turning movement counts from Gam to 6pm at each intersection. Turning movement counts will include vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrian crossings. b. Review crash data for each intersection. c. Perform multi-way stop warrant analysis per 2014 California MUTCD. d. Prepare multi-way stop warrant recommendation report for each location. 2. Traffic Signal Warrants (3) a. Conduct turning movement counts from 6am to 6pm at each intersection. Turning movement counts will include vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrian crossings. b. Review crash data for each intersection. c. Perform traffic signal warrant analysis per 2014 California MUTCD. d. Prepare traffic signal warrant recommendation report for each location. 13 ti,Ji carois`.J2VI'.-aFocI ORMA;P<FQSAL3'­Atyaf. ,'rn 773E Co Call Traffic Propn.cs_ G.! ➢Icl% , Co;,ct1U11168400 Not 5po,s Pi up"a'_2iIIc 0) IHnacx Exhibit"9"-Com 119ation-Palm Springs Hot Spots Pral act D g Sfm aaaWwelon ,{ 9 $ 3 6 Mut Arms 240 SM SIM 145 120 S 90 1 fuh. MG9b aam 4 1 4 6 m ss u S UN S cm F 2 4 6 4 16 S 3220 S 2270 Pre are Plans for Concrtle Curbs 9dewalk5 and Curb Rama 4 20 / 5 3720 Utlll Researeh / 360 5 360 Csoate Cu aFla 4 1 It a D 12 K 94K 9100 Fiald Sune 2 12 a / 26 5 3840 S 3040 S 3800. Preare Plans ror Concrete Curbs Sidewalks and Curb Ramos 4 X 4 4680 200 S 4000 S 4B00 Utik Rexarch 4 360 S 360 S 4W LarsdAborr 3 Cqqm0ar CuftSM4w4M4aM 4 I 1 II a X II K 91w NOW Sury 2 12 a 4 X 3840 S 3840 3800 Propare Plans for Cors:rMe Curbs Sidewalks and Curb Rampas q 29 4 4680 2W 5 4880 S 4900 UURW Research 4 360 5 360 S 440 aas WA can,Ramos 4 2 II a X II K a Irm I s 200 s 9090 1W F.Od Sune 2 12 a 4 X S 3840 1 S 3840 Boo Pr re Plans for Concrete Curbs SldewalksaM Curb Rims 4 X • 4680 200 4880 4940 UtibN ResearN 4 3WS 360 S 900 lootbn5FUMMos, • 3 II a X II K a I00S SM S 91W AM Su 12 8 4 X 9840 3ag0 r3000 Pr are Plans far Cornt nd Curb Rams • X • d M 5 1880 S 4900 Unll Reseach a s 1w 360 S AM llrb MCurb Romp,; 4 2 12 10 1 M ss ]a neld5u 2 12 10 4 29 t 4130 S 4130 S 4100 PrOnsgre Plans for CPntrne Curbs 4ewalks and Curb Rams 4 M 4 s" 940 SW Util' Rexa¢I. a 360 360 OD Lmtbn Cu Sidewalks and!Curb 4 2 6 ■ M 32 51 ] ] rudd5u 2 6 B 4 20 2880 3X0 900 Preare Plans for Canrreu Curbs 9dewalks and 4 20 d 372D 200 Will Research I 60 160 400 aM Curb 4 2 II ■ 22 >2 K 90K %IW Field 5urm 3 12 B 4 26 840 3840 3000 Preare Plansfor Cnnneh Curbs&dew F,s and Curb Ram 4 2B 1 4690 200 4980 4900 UFlli Rexarch 4 360 360 R00 Loartlan9 SH4Wa1144M Gab ! 2 II 8 X 12 K Flood Surve 2 12 a 4 26 3840 4 Sa00 Pre are Plans for Con r 1 Curbs 9dewalks and Curb Rams 4 28 • 4,690 080 900 Utih Rexarrh • 3w 5 30 S R00 Loo,do,20aq Cu aM 4 9 4 2 M 11 50 5 GM S Is M. LORD S &M Field Survey 2 4 a 4 X S 2560 S 350 6 LM Pre are Plans for ConcrMl Curbs 9tlewalbs and Curb Ramos 4 20 4 5 3,720 S 200 5 3920 3B00 Uhli ar h 4 360 360 R00 Inn044 u 4 2 4 8 X ss. sD Field Surve 2 4 a 4 IS 2 W 2560 2600 Prem•e Plans fort—me Curbs Sidewalks aM CurbW 4 20 4 3720 200 3920 3900 Urllll Research 4 360 4W eC 4 1 31 a X 12 K 9 XO Field Surve 2 12 a 4 X 3840 3Rod 3 Pre re Pla f Concrete Curbs Sld,—Iks and Curb Rams / 28 4 1 4880 V06 Research 4 3 360 400 4 2 a a M II L Field 5urve 2 a a 4 II 3100 3200 200 Pre re Plans for Con t Curbs 51dawa0s and Curb Ram 4 24 4 420] 200 RAW 4401 arth 4 s 30 360 4W kooRtkT 34CRxrRnR Cunb,gdpftwW Curb DaRgod, 4 2 1 a X II L Fields 2 8 8 4 22 3200 200 S 3200 Pre re Plans for Com.ete Cuabs sklewalb and Curb Rams 4 24 4 S 4200 4400 S 4,400 Jubt,Rexarch 5 360 350 4 Ron L,Ralka,15 Cmaoe4e • 2 4 1 1 1 A 1 12 S4 s 6.640 s Field Surve 2 4 1 p 1 1 4 IS 5 3560 2560 5 z1a), Pre re Plansfor Concrete Cuabs Rboralks and Curb Rams 4 20 • S 3720 200 39 V1.11tv Rexarch q 5 360 350 S 400 kno is 4 2 26 B M 12 ]I XO Fie 5u 2 16 8 4 30 5 448D 4490 S00 % mPlans for C...1.CVM 5ldtwalks and!Curb Ramos 4 M 4 5640 2W 5840 $ S.M UUMV,ResearrlN • 1 5 360 5 360 S 400 a I 1 II I.M. Imersettbn Traf6 [un 638 M TI.ft Stu -Multi-Wa 5[ wan'r'Anaryr 2 p1 2 12 IS UM 1620 S 1600 ba,anionlzw M 2 • I 2 ss Is LM krtersectkn TraMit CounK 555 S 68 S ON TraMCStu -M.RRWe Str W.nra lArratror 21 2 12 S 1620 s 160 s 1M • 2 10 1 1 X Imer,mi,n TraffC Caunb 5 S 538 S M TFaflk5tutl -TraXIt S'nalW IiF 2 10 1 2 14 S 180 1B60 s 1900 0 imak •WaanMM 2 ■ 2 II1,M 5 555 2251 s 2 In sa Traffic lon Trac Ceunu 555 638 4 600 aNk 5tu -Muni War Sta Wamm Ma 2 2 II S 100 S 1610 S 1600 sous be-Warrant Assoldift 2 10 1 ]4 IMemetO4n T. is Counu 55 638 -Tr If n Anal si 2 ID 2 14 5 1860 5 1,960 5 19Uo Tnaft�-W..Amabbi, 1 2 U ID4 Int n nTr!( 3 fA0 Tr fF -Multi-Wa 510 2 8 2 12 S 1620 5 1620 1600 LOWUM 23 iraillo M 2 a 1 II 2 InteRMion Tralfr CPunb s s 555 638 S 6W Slode -Mulri-Wa 51 ne Went rui s n 2 1 a 2 12 1620 100 s aM X F41fl[ -WamM 2 a 1 21 2 t 555 A S L25811 IntlKagion Tral6 Coons S 555 5 638 s 600 T - Warrant A,Iy,r 2 a 2 II S 1,620 so ss Traflk5t 2 10 x u1AMM s5s Ism IMRSMI4n T.Ml C0ubu 63fl S60p off -Tr If ran,ars.w, 2 10 2 U 5 ] 1960 2 1900 Total 82 L3Z 1W 128 494 I S 4 of 141errvelWOSProposal[1FOPra1L PRpVpS(LLS.Caym Paun 6phg610[12BB onGYT PrrywekN O]-Xol6P%i RWetl'Ott]BWW.WMgp[elmele_A1b011rl,ena 4MOt6523PM ' Exhibit "C" - Project Schedule - Palm Springs Hot Spots Project Weeks Work Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Field Survey Traffic Counts Preliminary Design City Plan Check Warrant Analysis nal Desi n 6�"d Approval x _ L t G W - v cn Attachment 3 16 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor • Riverside, CA 92501 Mailing Address: P O. Box 12008 • Riverside, CA 92502.2208 (951) 787-7141 • Fox (951) 787-7920 • v .rctc.org I• Riverside(aunly Transportation Comm scion June 25, 2015 RECEIVED Mr.Savat Khamphou JUL ? 2015 Assistant Director of Public Works City of Palm Springs C"OF P�U e 3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way ""lftvawh Palm Springs, CA 92262 Subject: FY 2015/16 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Dear Mr. Khamphou: I am pleased to inform you that on June 10 the Riverside County Transportation Commission(Commission)approved the FY 2015/16 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program as recommended on the enclosed schedule, including your proposed project(s). Also enclosed is a copy of the FY 2015/16 S8 821 claim form for use when you are ready to submit your claim for the approved funds. Please note that the Commission's policies for the allocation of SB 821 funds are as follows: 1) The agency will be reimbursed in arrears only upon proof of satisfactory project completion; 2) Each recipient shall submit sufficient documentation to substantiate the request for reimbursement; 3) The Commission will reimburse the recipient within 45 days of receipt of claim materials that are judged sufficient and proper in the Commission's sole and absolute discretion; 4) Funding recipients must retain all records necessary for the compliance and fiscal audit that will be conducted at the end of each fiscal year;and 5) If funds for a project are not claimed prior to the end of the second fiscal year, June 30, 2017, the project will be deleted from the program and the funds will be reprogrammed in the next fiscal year's 5B 821 program. Please call me at(951)787-7141 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ji ' n Guizado S affAnalyst Enclosures: FY 2015/16 Recommended Funding FY 2015/16 SB 821 Claim Form 17 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FY 2015)16 RECOMMENDED FUNDING Total 58 821 Funds Recommended Cummuletive Bare Ped Coachaga Disadvantaged Agency Project Description Project Con Requested Allocation Funds Allocated Project Project Valley Project Community Beaumont 81h Street Bike lane and Sidewalk Improvement S 320.000 S 204,000 $ 204,000 $ 204,000 x x x Desert Not Springs Cabot Yena School Sidewalk S 145,000 5 145,000 5 145.000 5 349,000 x x x Eastvale Pedestrian Safety Improvements $ 277,OW 5 138,5W 5 138,500 5 487,500 x Hemet Pedestrian Pathway Connectivity Project $ 125,000 S 62,500 S 62,500 $ 550,000 x y Indian Wells Washington Street Sidewalk $ 40,000 5 20,000 S 20,000 S 570,000 x x Indio Highway III Pedestrian Improvements:Madison to Rubldoux $ 434,800 5 217,400 S 217,400 $ 787,400 x x z lumpa Valley C"Ide Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan S 107,100 $ 53,550 $ 53,550 5 840,950 x x x Lake Elsinore Elsinore Middle School Area Missing Link Sidewalk $ 595,1100 $ 297,SW $ 297,SW 5 1,138,450 x Lake Elsinore Rosetta Canyon Bicycle Lams $ 100,000 $ 50,000 5 S0,OW S 1,198,450 a x Mortro Valley Citywide Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Enhancements S 525,000 5 315,OW $ 315,000 $ 1,503,45D x Palm Springs Indian Canyon Drive Sidewalk:South of San Rafael 0rive $ 152,045 5 66,235 5 66,235 $ 1.569,685 x x Palm Springs Indian Canyon Drive Sidewalk:South of Racquet Club Road $ 168,935 $ 65,715 5 65,715 $ 1.635.40D x x Perris Perris Boulevard Pedestrian Improvements $ 100,000 5 50,000 $ 501000 5 1,685,40D . x Riverside Campbell and Babb Avenue Sidewalks 5 428,220 5 214,110 S 214.110 5 1.899,510 a x Riverside Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing Improvements 5 156,125 $ 121,505 $ 121.505 S 2,021,015 x x x Riverside County Alessandns Boulevard Bike Lana Project 5 217.0110 $ 108,500 5 108,500 5 2,129,515 . x Riverside County Grand Avenue Sidewalk Safety Improvement:Mo Lakeland Village School $ 270,000 $ 135.000 $ 135,OIlO 5 2,264.515 x x Riverside County Polk Street Sidewalk Improvement $ 280,000 $ 140,000 5 140,000 $ 2,404,515 x x x Riverside County Ramon Road Sidewalk Safety Improvement 5 163,000 5 91,500 5 81SOO $ 2,486,015 x x x Sanlacinto Lyon Avenue Pedestrian Path $ 80,000 5 4010W $ 40,000 $ 2,526,015 x x Wildomar Grand Avenue Bike Lane:Phase l S 949,500 5 109,000 $ 109,000 S 2,63S,DIS z Wildomar Grand Avenue Bike Lane:Phase ll $ 1.019,100 $ 117,000 $ 117,000 S 2,752.015 x Totals S 6.6R7 R75 < T7x2 o1c 5 7 7S201c Bof 22 180122 7 of 22 (32%) 16 of 22 173%1 CID Attachment 4 19 Savat Khamphou From: Dilesh Sheth <dilesh.sheth@webbassociates.com> Sent: Tuesday,April 26, 2016 4:51 PM To: Savat Khamphou Subject: FW Measure J Proposal,Amendment#1 Savat, Here is estimated budget for street light and ATP application: Street light Base map and street light plan - $5,000 Electrical Sub-consultant - $8,000 Total $13,000 ATP Application Ped and traffic counts $5,000 Application $14,000 Total $19,000 Thanks, Dilesh R.Sheth, PE I TE-Vice President Albert A. Webb Associates 3788 McCray Street, Riverside,CA 92506 t: 951.248.4237 e:dilesh.sheth@webbassociates.com w:www.webbassociates.com Linkedln I Twitter I Facebook I YouTube From: Joe Shaw [mailto:jshaw@interwestgrp.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 8:46 AM To: Dilesh Sheth Cc: Nicholas Lowe; Savat Khamphou Subject: RE: Measure J Proposal, Amendment #1 Dikesh Thank you for your reply. We would like you to provide for the electrical tasks as noted in Amendment#1. Please provide an additional cost forthe street lights on Arenas Road nan Baristo Road, Items#3 and 4, in accordance with the Amendment. Thank you Joe Shaw Interwest Consultant Group t 20