Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/15/2016 - STAFF REPORTS - 4.B. 4O�?N LM s'09 iy V N ryoai Cq�IFORN�P. City Council Staff Report DATE: June 15, 2016 UNFINISHED BUSINESS SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION ON THE INITIATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN TO REVISE THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND BIKEWAYS MAP FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Public Works & Engineering Department SUMMARY On October 5, 2011, the City Council held a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 23031 approving Case 5.1258 GPA, an amendment to the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan to incorporate the Coachella Valley Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan ("NMTMP"). The NMTMP is an important plan that established a Coachella Valley master plan of bikeways, trails, associated facilities and programs, interconnecting between the cities, and to educate and promote safe bicycle usage. Adoption of the NMTMP as part of the City's General Plan ensured the City would be eligible for applying for grants and funding opportunities for non-motorized transportation facilities. Included with the NMTMP was a Local Bicycle Plan for the City of Palm Springs, (the "Palm Springs Bikeways Map"), identifying existing bicycle facilities and proposed bicycle facilities. A certain number of proposed bicycle facilities identified on the Palm Springs Bikeways Map included Class II (striped bicycle lanes) on streets where implementing the Class II facility would require either: 1) elimination of all on-street parking, or 2) preserving on-street parking and eliminating existing travel lanes (a "road . diet" converting 4-lane roadways to 2-lane roadways). The purpose of this item is to review all of the City's proposed bicycle facilities as previously approved and adopted by the City Council in 2011 as the Palm Springs Bikeway Map, incorporated into the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan, and to provide direction to staff on the initiation of a new amendment to the General Plan to revise the Circulation Element and Bikeway Map accordingly. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Review the City of Palm Springs Bikeways Map approved and adopted October 5, 2011, and incorporated into the 2007 General Plan Amendment; 2) Provide direction to staff on reclassifying the designation of various City streets to accommodate Class II bike lanes and preserve on-street parking; ITEM NO. City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 2 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map 3) Review an amended Circulation Element and Bikeways Map as the basis for a proposed amendment to the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan; 4) Direct staff to initiate an amendment to the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan to revise the Circulation Element and Bikeways Map, and proceed with further public review in accordance with state law, including review by the Palm Springs Planning Commission and subsequent approval by the City Council; 5) On the basis that direction is given to reclassify Crossley Road, San Rafael Drive, and S. Palm Canyon Drive to accommodate proposed Class II bike lanes and preserve on-street parking, authorize issuance of a Purchase Order in the amount of $34,390 with the City's "on-call engineering firm, Albert A. Webb & Associates, pursuant to Agreement No. 6443, for civil and traffic engineering services associated with the CMAC/CVAG Bicycle Lane Project, City Project No. 14-14; and 6) Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. BACKGROUND: On October 5, 2011, the City Council held a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 23031 approving Case 5.1258 GPA, an amendment to the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan to incorporate the Coachella Valley Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan ("NMTMP"). Included with the NMTMP was a Local Bicycle Plan for the City of Palm Springs, (the 'Palm Springs Bikeways Map'), identifying existing bicycle facilities and proposed bicycle facilities. A copy of the October 5, 2011, staff report is included as Attachment 1. A copy of the Local Bicycle Plan for the City of Palm Springs adopted at that time is included as Attachment 2, and a copy of the current Palm Springs Bikeways Map is included as Attachment 3. As a matter of reference, bicycle facilities are identified by "Class", as follows: Class I (Bike Path), physically separated from traffic outside of the roadway for exclusive use by bicycles. i BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES 0R MOTORIZED BICYCLES 02 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 3 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map Class II (Bike Lanes), separated from traffic by traffic striping designating a separate bicycle lane within the roadway. ` BIKE LANE A. r' ' +.. Class III (Bike Route), designated routes sharing the roadway without any separation from traffic. M — loll �I AMOM The currently adopted Palm Springs Bikeway Map identifies Class II bike lanes on several 4-lane major arterials or secondary thoroughfares throughout the City, including: • Alejo Road • Arenas Road • Avenida Caballeros • Baristo Road • Crossley Road • El Cielo Road • N. Indian Canyon Drive (North of Racquet Club Road) • Gene Autry Trail (north of Vista Chino) • Mesquite Avenue • N. Palm Canyon Drive (North of Alejo Road) • S. Palm Canyon Drive (South of E. Palm Canyon Drive) 03 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 4 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map • Racquet Club Road • San Rafael Drive • Vista Chino (East of Gene Autry Trail) Implementing these Class II bike lanes on the City's 4-lane major arterial or secondary thoroughfare streets represents a challenge in that these 4-lane streets are generally 64 feet wide curb-to-curb, which provides sufficient space for on-street parking (8 feet each side) and four travel lanes. Designating bike lanes on these 64 feet wide streets would require elimination of the 8 feet wide on-street parking lanes, unless the City Council were to consider reclassifying these 4-lane major arterial or secondary thoroughfares as 2-lane roadways to allow for use of the other two travel lanes to accommodate Class II bike lanes and preserve on-street parking. The currently adopted Palm Springs Bikeway Map identifies Class II bike lanes on several 2-lane collector roadways throughout the City, including: • Araby Road • Barona Road • Compadre Road (Mesquite Avenue to Sonora Road) • Mesquite Avenue (west of Sunrise Way) • Paseo Dorotea • Sonora Road (Compadre Road to El Cielo Road) • Sunny Dunes Road • Via Escuela Implementing these Class II bike lanes on the City's 2-lane collector roadways represents a challenge in that these 2-lane streets are generally 40 feet wide curb-to- curb, which provides sufficient space for on-street parking (8 feet each side) and two travel lanes. Designating bike lanes on these 40 feet wide streets would require elimination of the 8 feet wide on-street parking lanes. On May 21, 2014, the City Council received a copy of a new Palm Springs On-Street Bikeway Plan, (the `Bicycle Route Plan" or "BRP"), which incorporated new bikeway facilities identified in the NMTMP, including 2-way cycle tracks (for 1-way streets), colored bike lanes, buffered bike lanes, shared lane markings (or "sharrows") for certain Class III routes, and certain design guidelines. A copy of the May 21, 2014, staff report with the BRP is included as Attachment 4. As noted in the BRP, the choice of a bikeway type should based on the following: The type of treatment depends on the street or right-of-way, width, adjacent land uses, traffic volumes, and traffic speeds. When exclusive right-of-way exists, bike paths are planned. Bike lanes are planned on streets that have enough width to accommodate them. Road diets are planned to create space for bike lanes on multi-lane streets where traffic volumes allow. Improvements to bike lanes are planned where enough space exists to widen bike lanes or to stripe buffers. Bike 04 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016-- Page 5 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map routes are planned on streets where network connectivity is needed, but insufficient space exists for bike lanes, or where traffic volumes do not call for bike lanes. The BRP first introduced the concept of a "road diet', defining a road diet as follows: Road diets are recommended to provide space for attractive bike lanes on where needed on four-lane streets with less than 20,000 Average Daily Traffic (ADT). This is the threshold that national studies have determined to have sufficient capacity with two lanes or two lanes and a center-turn lane. On six-lane streets, 40,000 ADT was used as the threshold for reducing the number of lanes to four. On the basis of the general guideline stated above, the BRP recommended proposed Class II bike lanes through implementation of a "road diet' on the following streets: • Arenas Road (Call El Segundo to Avenida Caballeros) • Barona Road (E. Palm Canyon Dr. to Sandcliff Road) • Calle El Segundo (Amado Road to Ramon Road) • Crossley Road (Ramon Road to Sunny Dunes Road) • Crossley Road (Fairway Circle to 34th Avenue) • El Cielo Road (Tahquitz Canyon Way to Ramon Road) • Farrell Drive (Racquet Club Road to E. Palm Canyon Drive) • Gene Autry Trail (Vista Chino to Ramon Road) • Indian Canyon Drive (San Rafael Drive to Camino Parocela) • Mesquite Avenue (El Cielo Road to Vella Road) • Palm Canyon Drive (North City Limit to Ramon Road) • Palm Canyon Drive (E. Palm Canyon Drive to Acanto Drive) • Racquet Club Road (N. Palm Canyon Drive to Farrell Drive) • San Rafael Drive (N. Palm Canyon Drive to Sunrise Way) • Sunrise Way (San Rafael Drive to Vista Chino) • Tachevah Drive (N. Palm Canyon Drive to N. Indian Canyon Drive) The BRP submitted to the City Council in May 2014 was not officially adopted, and has not been incorporated into the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan; the 2011 Palm Springs Bikeways Map remains the officially adopted map designating bicycle facilities throughout the City. However, the BRP was used as the basis for recommendations adopted by the Sustainability Commission and Measure J Commission for identifying priority NMTP bicycle facility projects to be constructed with $3 Million in funding appropriated by the City Council through the Measure J Capital Fund over three fiscal years. As noted in the May 21, 2014, staff report, there were three priority projects for Fiscal Years 2013/2014, 2014/2015, and 2015/2016 as follows: 05 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016-- Page 6 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map Priority 1 (FY 2013/2014) • Alejo Road (Class II and Class III) • Belardo Road (Class ll) • Calle Encilia (Class ll) • Civic Drive (Class III) • El Cielo Road (Class II with road diet) • Farrell Drive (Class ll) The Priority 1 bicycle facility project was completed in 2015, however, it excluded the proposed Class II bike lanes on Farrell Drive as a result of the need to either: 1) eliminate on-street parking, or 2) reclassify the designation of Farrell Drive (via General Plan Amendment) and implement a 'road diet' to convert Farrell Drive from a 4-lane to a 2-lane roadway. The Class II bike lanes on El Cielo Road between Tahquitz Canyon Way and Ramon Road were implemented without a `road diet' by eliminating on-street parking. Priority 2 (FY 2014/2015) • N. Palm Canyon Drive (Class ll) • Racquet Club Road (Class II) Priority 3 (FY 2015/2016) • Indian Canyon Drive (2 Way Cycle Track) Proceeding with the Priority 2 projects has been delayed as City Council has not generally supported eliminating on-street parking, and as staff has evaluated whether conversion of these 4-lane roadways to 2-lane roadways via "road diets" could be supported by a General Plan Amendment. The Priority 3 project is deferred until a determination is made on the final configuration of Indian Canyon Drive (1-way vs. 2- way traffic). STAFF ANALYSIS: Installing Class II bike lanes on 4-lane roadways generally requires the City Council to consider either eliminating on-street parking, or reclassifiying the 4-lane roadway designations on the Circulation Element of the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan to allow for conversion to 2-lane roadways through implementation of a "road diet'. Reclassifying roadway designations on the Circulation Element requires the City to review the potential environmental impacts associated with the changes, and formal public review of a General Plan Amendment. These factors were previously reported to the City Council at the time the City proceeded with construction of the Priority 1 bicycle facility project in 2014/2015, and the City Council established a subcommittee (Korn/Roberts) to review and consider NMTP-related issues, including designation of bicycle facilities. Staff met with the Council subcommittee on February 9, 2016, to provide a general review of the traffic analysis identified in this report. 06 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 7 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment- Circulation Element and Bikeways Map On November 6, 2013, the City Council approved Agreement No. 6443 with Albert A. Webb & Associates, ("Webb"), for on-call traffic engineering design services on an as needed basis. Subsequently, on April 1, 2015, the City Council authorized a Purchase Order in the amount of $47,900 with Webb to complete traffic engineering analysis of the City's Bikeways Map, to evaluate which roadways may be considered for reclassification on the Circulation Element to accommodate conversion via "road diet" to implement Class II bike lanes while preserving on-street parking. A copy of the April 1, 2015, staff report is included as Attachment 5. On March 11, 2016, Webb completed a final traffic analysis for the City, identifying which roadways have sufficient excess capacity to accommodate elimination of travel lanes for implementation of a "road diet" to install Class II bike lanes. The traffic analysis reviewed the existing roadway cross-section width, existing traffic volumes, future year 2035 traffic volumes, the existing and future Level of Service, and provides recommendations for City Council's consideration of roadway classification changes to the Circulation Element. A copy of the final traffic analysis is included as Attachment 6. Traffic Analysis The traffic analysis completed by Webb used existing 2013 traffic volumes, and obtained March 2016 traffic volumes collected for Farrell Drive and other selected street segments throughout the City identified in the report. An estimated projection of traffic volumes for year 2035 were produced by using a 1.5% per year growth factor applied to the existing traffic volumes. The Level of Service (or "LOS") of a roadway is a way to measure travel speed, maneuverability, and safety on a street segment. The LOS is designated by a letter grade ranging from A (excellent, free flow) to F (failure, gridlock). In this case, LOS is determined by a volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) for each street segment. The LOS was calculated by dividing the average daily traffic volume by the theoretical capacity of the roadway segment. Each street segment has a theoretical vehicle capacity that is defined by its number of through lanes, as shown in Table 1: Maximum Two-Way Traffic Volume(AD7)*** of Lanes Characteristic 2 Undivided' 7,800 9,100 10,400 11,700 13,000 2 Divided" 10,800 12,600 14,400 16,200 18,000 2 One-Way 10,800 12,600 14,400 16,200 18,000 3 One-Way 16,200 18,900 21,600 24,300 27,000 4 Undivided' 15,500 18,100 20,700 23,300 25,900 4 Divided- 21,500 25,100 28,700 32,300 35,900 4 One-Way 21,500 25,100 28,700 32,300 35,900 6 Divided" 32,300 37,700 43,100 48,500 53,900 'Undivided roadways are divided by double yellow stripe or striped two-way left-turn lane. "Divided roadways have a raised median between opposing traffic directions. "'All ADT volumes are rounded to the nearest 100. Table 1 07 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016-- Page 8 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment- Circulation Element and Bikeways Map The City's General Plan identifies 4 and 6 lane Major Arterial and Secondary Thoroughfare roadways to carry existing and future volumes to meet the City's minimum LOS of "D", and in compliance with the Riverside County Congestion Management Program (the "CMP"). The Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, Policy CR2.1, regulates how the City's streets should operate to ensure against traffic congestion and the associated environmental impacts related to such congestion, and states: CR2.1 Maintain Level of Service D or better for the City's circulation network, as measured using `in season"peak hour conditions. The traffic volume identified for LOS D is the maximum volume capacity allowed for each roadway classification. The existing LOS of each roadway identified for a "road diet" was reviewed by comparing the current and future traffic volumes to the theoretical roadway capacity. Table 2 identifies various street segments that will operate at LOS D or better with reduced roadway capacity, and where the City Council may consider reclassification of the roadway to accommodate a "road diet" to implement Class II bike lanes while preserving on-street parking. Roadway From To Ale o Road (see Note 1) Indian Canyon Drive Civic Drive Amado Road Indian Canyon Drive Sunrise Way Arenas Road S. Tah uitz Drive Hermosa Drive Avenida Caballeros (see Note 2) San Rafael Drive Ramon Road Baristo Road (see Note 2) Avenida Caballeros El Cielo Road Calle El Segundo Amado Road Ramon Road Camino Real E. Palm Canyon Drive La Verne Way Crossley Road Ramon Road 34th Avenue El Cielo Road (see Note 3) Ramon Road Escoba Drive Escoba Drive (see Note 3) E. Palm Canyon Drive El Cielo Road Farrell Drive (see Note 4) Ramon Road E. Palm Canyon Drive La Verne Way S. Palm Canyon Drive E. Palm Canyon Drive Mesquite Avenue Sunrise Way El Cielo Road Mesquite Avenue Vella Road Gene Autry Trail MurrayCanyon Drive (see Note®) S. Palm Canyon Drive Toledo Avenue Racq uet Club Road (see Note 6) N. Palm Canyon Drive Farrell Drive S. Palm Canyon Drive (see Note 7) E. Palm Canyon Drive Acanto Drive San Rafael Drive N. Palm Canyon Drive Sunrise Way Saturnino Road Calle El Segundo Avenida Caballeros Tachevah Drive N. Palm Canyon Drive N. Indian Canyon Drive Toledo Avenue (see Note a) La Verne Way MurrayCanyon Drive Table 2 08 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 9 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map Note 1: Class II bike lanes have been installed on Alejo Road with traffic striping that 1 P 9 maintained the previous 2-lane configuration. Although Alejo Road is currently designated as a 4-lane secondary thoroughfare, it had not previously been striped with 4-lanes and a General Plan Amendment was not necessary to implement revised striping with Class II bike lanes while maintaining 2 travel lanes. However, initiation of a General Plan Amendment is recommended to officially reclassify the designation to a 2- lane roadway consistent with its current operation. Note 2: Class II bike lanes have previously been installed on segments of Avenida Caballeros and Baristo Road through implementation of a "road diet' converting the 4- lane roadway to a 2-lane roadway. Staff recommends initiation of a General Plan Amendment to officially reclassify the designation of these 4-lane roadways (as identified on the current General Plan) to 2-lane roadways consistent with their current operation, and to allow for completion of Class II bike lanes on the remaining segments of the street. Note 3: Class II bike lanes have been installed on El Cielo Road (south of Ramon Road) and Escoba Drive, with traffic striping that maintained the previous 2-lane configuration. Although El Cielo Road (south of Ramon Road) and Escoba Drive are currently designated as a 4-lane secondary thoroughfare, each had not previously been striped with 4-lanes and a General Plan Amendment was not necessary to implement revised striping with Class II bike lanes while maintaining 2 travel lanes. However, initiation of a General Plan Amendment is recommended to officially reclassify the designation to a 2- lane roadway consistent with its current operation. Note 4: On April 20, 2016, the City Council considered implementation of revised traffic striping on Farrell Drive south of Ramon Road to preserve on-street parking and install Class II bike lanes. The Los Compadres and Sonora-Sunrise neighborhood organizations have communicated support of the proposed reclassification of Farrell Drive. However, the City Council requested that staff solicit comments from the Mesquite Country Club Homeowners Association prior to giving formal approval. As of June 6, 2016, staff has received comments from 18 Mesquite Country Club residents, with 3 supporting and 15 rejecting the concept. Note 5: On April 6, 2016, the City Council approved implementation of revised traffic striping on Murray Canyon Drive to install Class II bike lanes. Staff recommends initiation of a General Plan Amendment to officially reclassify the designation to a 2-lane roadway consistent with its proposed operation. Note 6: The traffic analysis has determined that Racquet Club Road has sufficient roadway capacity to allow for consideration of its reclassification to a 2-lane roadway. It is identified in Table 2 merely to identify it as a roadway segment that warrants its consideration. However, staff does not recommend Class II bike lanes be installed on Racquet Club Road east of Sunrise Way as the bike lanes would not connect with any bike lanes on Farrell Drive, and terminating bike lanes at the curved alignment at Farrell 09 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 10 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map Drive is not recommended. Therefore, City Council may consider reclassification of Racquet Club Road to a 2-lane roadway to preserve on-street parking and accommodate installation of Class II bike lanes extending from N. Palm Canyon Drive to Avenida Caballeros or Sunrise Way, to connect with other bikeway facilities on either of those streets. Note, the City's current 2011 Bikeways Map identifies a Class 11 bike lane on Racquet Club Road, this bikeway facility may have to be eliminated from the Circulation Element as it cannot be accommodated in the existing 4-lane roadway without reclassification to a 2-lane roadway or by eliminating all of the on-street parking available to the adjacent properties. Note 7: The traffic analysis has determined that S. Palm Canyon Drive has sufficient roadway capacity to allow for consideration of its reclassification to a 2-lane roadway. It is identified in Table 2 merely to identify it as a roadway segment that warrants its consideration. However, the City has received a $402,000 federal CMAQ grant from CVAG to install various bike lanes, including on S. Palm Canyon Drive. Note, the City's current 2011 Bikeways Map identifies a Class H bike lane on S. Palm Canyon Drive; this bikeway facility may have to be eliminated from the Circulation Element as it cannot be accommodated in the existing 4-lane roadway without reclassification to a 2-lane roadway or by eliminating all of the on-street parking available to the adjacent properties. Note 8: Many years ago Class II bike lanes were installed on Toledo Avenue through implementation of a "road diet" converting the 4-lane roadway to a 2-lane roadway. Staff recommends initiation of a General Plan Amendment to officially reclassify the designation to a 2-lane roadway consistent with its current operation. Staff recommends the City Council consider initiating a General Plan Amendment of the Circulation Element to reclassify these roadways where sufficient capacity exists to convert the roadways from 4-lanes to 2-lane divided (with painted center turn lane) roadways preserving on-street parking and accommodating buffered bike lanes. The proposed roadway classification is identified as a 2-lane divided "Minor Mobility Corridor" that would accommodate 2 travel lanes, a two-way left-turn lane ("TWLTL"), buffered bicycle lanes, and on-street parking. The proposed roadway cross-section is shown in Figure 1 : Raw 80'-88' 64' 8' 5' 2 12' 10' 12' 2' 5' 8' CD TRAVEL TWLTL TRAVEL LAVE LANE LLm � z LL g Y a a MINOR MOBILITY CORRIDOR — 2 LANES DIVIDED' Figure 1 iO City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016-- Page 11 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment- Circulation Element and Bikeways Map Traffic Calming Effects The further potential benefit of converting 4-lane roadways to the "Minor Mobility Corridor' cross-section is with traffic calming. The psychology of the driver dictates the safe and prevailing speed at which a majority of drivers will operate their vehicle on a particular street segment. Many of the City's 4-lane roadways have speed limits established at 40 miles per hour or higher, given their consistent cross-section with little factors causing disruption to the driver's attention, and particularly with a certain sense of safety with lower traffic volumes and excess capacity on these streets. Converting the excess capacity by revising the roadway cross-section to add striped parking lanes and buffered bike lanes, and eliminating travel lanes, may cause drivers' attention to become more focused on the travel way, limiting their sense of safety at driving higher speeds, and ultimately causing a traffic calming effect. It is possible after conversion of these 4-lane roadways to "Minor Mobility Corridors" that vehicle speed surveys may identify lower prevailing speeds allowing for reduction of the posted speed limit, in accordance with the process established in the California Vehicle Code by which the City must comply in establishing speed limits. It is important to note that the law does not allow the City to arbitrarily set speed limits. Table 3 identifies various street segments that will operate at LOS E or worse with reduced roadway capacity, and where the City Council should not consider reclassification of the roadway to accommodate a "road diet" to implement Class II bike lanes. Roadway From To Farrell Drive (see Note 9) Racquet Club Road Ramon Road Gene Autry Trail Vista Chino Ramon Road Indian Canyon Drive (See Note 10) San Rafael Drive Camino Parocela Palm Canyon Drive (See Note 11) Tram Way Ramon Road Sunrise Way(see Note 12) San Rafael Drive Vista Chino Table 3 Note 9: The traffic analysis has determined that the northerly segment of Farrell Drive between Racquet Club Road and Via Escuela has sufficient roadway capacity to allow for consideration of its reclassification to a 2-lane roadway. However, staff recommends that the Farrell Drive corridor from Racquet Club Road to Ramon Road remain a 4-lane roadway; (the segment of Farrell Drive south of Ramon Road is eligible for consideration of a reclassification to a 2-lane "Minor Mobility Corridor'). Note 10: The traffic analysis has determined that the southerly segment of Indian Canyon Drive south of Alejo Road (where the roadway is currently 4-lanes with one-way traffic circulation) has sufficient roadway capacity to allow for consideration of its reclassification to a 3-lane one-way roadway. However, staff recommends that Indian Canyon Drive remain as currently classified, deferring any change in classification on 11 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 12 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map the segment south of Alejo Road until such time as the City Council considers and approves changes to the one-way vs. two-way traffic circulation. Note 11: The traffic analysis has determined that the segment of N. Palm Canyon Drive north of Alejo Road does not have sufficient roadway capacity to allow for consideration of its reclassification to a 2-lane roadway, and a "road diet" is not justified. Note, the City's current 2011 Bikeways Map identifies a Class H bike lane on N. Palm Canyon Dr. from Tram Way to Alejo Road; this bikeway facility may have to be eliminated from the Circulation Element as it cannot be accommodated in the existing 4-lane roadway without eliminating all of the on-street parking available to the adjacent properties. Note 12: The traffic analysis has determined that certain segments of Sunrise Way between San Rafael Drive and Vista Chino have sufficient roadway capacity to allow for consideration of its reclassification to a 2-lane divided roadway. However, staff recommends that Sunrise Way remain a 4-lane roadway. RECOMMENDATIONS: On the basis of the traffic analysis that has been completed, there are various 4-lane roadways that have excess capacity that may be used for other purposes, through reclassification of the 4-lane roadway to a 2-lane roadway proposed as a "Minor Mobility Corridor". The currently adopted 2011 Bikeways Map identifies Class II bike lanes on certain streets where installing those Class II bike lanes would require eliminating on- street parking or eliminating travel lanes. The BRP submitted in 2014 proposed a further expansion of bikeway facilities on the 2011 Bikeways Map through implementation of "road diets" on many City streets, however, accommodating some of these "road diets" are not supported by the traffic analysis. The City Council may consider approval of initiating a General Plan Amendment to reclassify some or all of the individual roadway segments identified in Table 2. All of these 4-lane roadway segments (as identified on the 2007 General Plan) are anticipated to operate at or better than LOS "D" in the future after reclassification to a 2-lane "Minor Mobility Corridor". Staff suggests the City Council given particular consideration to approving reclassification of the following roadway segments such that Class II bike lanes may be installed to complete bicycle routes in those areas: • Alejo Road (to ratify the current roadway operation as a "Minor Mobility Corridor') • Amado Road (consistent with approved classification in Section 14 Specific Plan as a Section 14 "Mobility Corridor') • Arenas Road (consistent with approved classification in Section 14 Specific Plan as a Section 14 "Mobility Corridor') • Avenida Caballeros (to ratify the current roadway operation as a "Minor Mobility Corridor') 12 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 13 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map Baristo Road (to ratify the current roadway operation as a "Minor Mobility Corridor") • Calle El Segundo (consistent with current classification on the 2007 General Plan and Section 14 Specific Plan as a 2-lane Collector, however, the street was previously constructed to 4-lane width and striped with 4-lanes between Amado Road and Arenas Road) • Camino Real (the current classification of Camino Real between E. Palm Canyon Drive and La Verne Way is a 4-lane Secondary Thoroughfare, and the street was previously constructed to 4-lane width, but has only been striped with 2-lanes) • Crossley Road (the current classification of Crossley Road between Ramon Road and 34th Avenue is a 4-lane Secondary Thoroughfare, however, most of this segment has only been striped with 2-lanes; reclassifying this roadway would allow completion of bike lanes extending north from Golf Club Drive to Ramon Road, with striping funded in part by a federal CMAQ grant awarded to the City by CVAG) • El Cielo Road (to ratify the current roadway operation as a "Minor Mobility Corridor" south of Ramon Road only) Escoba Drive (to ratify the current roadway operation as a "Minor Mobility Corridor') Farrell Drive (the segment south of Ramon Road is scheduled for slurry seal repairs, and will have the traffic striping replaced as a 4-lane roadway unless City Council provides direction to reclassify this segment as a "Minor Mobility Corridor') La Verne Way (reclassifying this roadway would allow completion of a Class II bike lane loop within the area) • Mesquite Avenue (reclassifying the segment between Sunrise Way and El Cielo Road [which physically ends at Compadre Road] accommodates the proposed alignment for one portion of the CV Link route) Murray Canyon Drive (to ratify the previously approved restriping as a "Minor Mobility Corridor") S. Palm Canyon Drive (reclassifying this roadway would allow completion of a Class 11 bike lane loop within the area, with striping funded in part by a federal CMAQ grant awarded to the City by CVAG) • San Rafael Drive (reclassifying this roadway would allow completion of an east-west Class II bike lane as an alternative to Racquet Club Road, and would connect with the potential extension of a portion of the CV Link through the proposed Serena Park development at Sunrise Way/San Rafael Drive) • Saturnino Road (consistent with approved classification in Section 14 Specific Plan as a Section 14 "Mobility Corridor') • Toledo Avenue (to ratify the current roadway operation as a "Minor Mobility Corridor") Webb has prepared a revised Circulation Plan and Bikeways Plan (which would replace the 2011 Bikeways Map via General Plan Amendment) showing all of the revised bikeway facilities (Class 1, Class 11 or Class Ill) recommended throughout the City, consistent with the traffic analysis. A copy of the revised Circulation Plan is included as Attachment 7, and the revised Bikeways Plan is included as Attachment 8. 13 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016-- Page 14 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map Staff also suggests the City Council give particular consideration to reclassifying Class II bike lanes currently identified on the following streets, to Class III bike routes, as implementing these bike lanes would require eliminating on-street parking: • Araby Road • Barona Road • Compadre Road (Mesquite Avenue to Sonora Road) • Mesquite Avenue (west of Sunrise Way) • Paseo Dorotea • Sonora Road (Compadre Road to El Cielo Road) • Sunny Dunes Road • Via Escuela CMAC/CVAG Bicycle Lane Project, City Project No. 14-14 In April 2014, the City responded to CVAG's call for projects funded through the federal CMAQ grant program, and requested $402,000 in federal CMAQ funds for implementation of Class II bike lanes on Crossley Road, Indian Canyon Drive, S. Palm Canyon Drive, and San Rafael Drive. The request for grant funding for these Class II bike lanes was consistent with the 2011 Bikeways Map (showing Class II bike lanes on these streets). CVAG awarded the City the requested $402,000 in federal CMAQ funds, and staff has solicited a proposal in the amount of $34,390 from Webb to provide civil and traffic engineering services to prepare plans and specifications for implementing the proposed Class II bike lanes on these streets. A copy of Webb's proposal is included as Attachment 9. However, implementing Class II bike lanes on these streets requires consideration to reclassify these streets to preserve on-street parking while providing for the room to install Class II bike lanes (excluding Indian Canyon Drive, which can accommodate Class II bike lanes given existing restrictions for on-street parking). Staff recommends that the City Council authorize issuance of a Purchase Order to Webb in an amount inclusive of the cost associated with those streets the City Council considers to be reclassified to 2-lane Minor Mobility Corridors. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Consideration to initiate a General Plan Amendment is not itself a "Project" as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Pursuant to Section 15378(a), a "Project" means the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. According to Section 15378(b), a Project does not include: (5) Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. 14 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016 -- Page 15 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map However, to the extent direction is given by the City Council to initiate a General Plan Amendment to revise the Circulation Element to reclassify certain roadways, the future action to be considered by the City's Planning Commission and City Council associated with the General Plan Amendment is subject to environmental review pursuant to CEQA. Section 21084 of the California Public Resources Code requires Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA. In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, the City will act as "Lead Agency' pursuant to CEQA, and will be required to prepare a draft Initial Study for a potential General Plan Circulation Element Amendment. Following the City Council's direction to initiate a General Plan Amendment, the procedure for amending the City's General Plan is outlined in the State of California Government Code Section 65350. The City is required to consult with Native American tribes that requested consultation in accordance with Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 (Assembly Bill 52) and California Government Code Section 65352.3 (Senate Bill 18). Public review of the General Plan Amendment, including the 90-day review by Native American Tribes, is required prior to public review of a draft Initial Study, which is also subject to a separate 30-day public review period. During this period, agencies and members of the public will be allowed to submit written comments to the City regarding its environmental analysis and the proposed General Plan Amendment. At the conclusion of the public review period the Planning Commission will review the proposed General Plan Amendment and draft Initial Study, and make appropriate recommendations to the City Council. Ultimately, upon recommendations by the Planning Commission, the City Council will consider the proposed General Plan Amendment, the draft Initial Study, and any public comments received in determining whether to adopt the General Plan Amendment. Those actions are not being considered or taken now. 15 City Council Staff Report June 15, 2016-- Page 16 Consideration on Initiating General Plan Amendment— Circulation Element and Bikeways Map FISCAL IMPACT: The City Council previously budgeted and appropriated $3 Million from the Measure J Capital Improvement Fund for improvements related to the NMTMP; currently a balance of approximately $2.4 Million is available for completion of bikeway and related facilities. Implementing many of the remaining Class II bike lanes throughout the City has been deferred until direction is given to staff on reclassifying 4-lane roadways to implement a new 2-lane "Minor Mobility Corridor" cross-section to preserve on-street parking and accommodate Class II bike lanes. The City has also received a $402,000 federal CMAQ grant from CVAG which supplements the Measure J funding appropriated to implement Class II bike lanes on certain streets. SUBMITTED: �o Marcus L. Fuller, MPA, P.E., P.L.S. David H. Ready, Esq., Ph Assistant City Manager/City Engineer City Manager Attachments: 1. October 5, 2011, staff report 2. Local Bicycle Plan for the City of Palm Springs 3. 2011 Palm Springs Bikeways Map 4. 2014 Palm Springs On-Street Bikeway Plan, (the 'Bicycle Route Plan") 5. April 1, 2015, staff report 6. Traffic Analysis 7. Revised Circulation Plan 8. Revised Bikeways Plan 9. Webb Proposal 16 ATTACHMENT 1 17 �OtpAlMSA4 iy e V N cot+FORa�P CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 2011 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: CASE 5.1258, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO INCORPORATE THE COACHELLA VALLEY NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN INTO THE 2007 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN, WHICH WAS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION 22077. FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Department of Planning Services SUMMARY The City Council will consider an amendment to incorporate the Coachella Valley Non- motorized Transportation Master Plan (NMTMP) into the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan. An Amendment to the General Plan requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission (which occurred on June 22, 2011) for its recommendation to City Council RECOMMENDATION: 1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony. 2. Adopt Resolution No. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE 5.1258 GPA, AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2007 PALM SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION 22077, TO INCORPORATE THE COACHELLA VALLEY NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN." PRIOR ACTIONS: On September 27, 2010, the CVAG Executive Committee approved the 2010 update to the NMTMP. On November 30, 2010, the City's Sustainability Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council incorporate the NMTMP into the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan. On December 1, 2010, the Palm Springs City Council initiated a General Plan Amendment ITEM NO.1_ 18 City Council Staff Report October 5,2011 Page 2 of 6 $.1258 GPA—General Plan Amendment for Coachella valley Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan to incorporate the NMTMP into the City's 2007 General Plan. On June 22, 2011, the Planning Commission voted 6-0-1 (Hudson absent) to recommend approval of Case 5.1258 GPA by the City Council. BACKGROUND AND SETTING: In October, 2001, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) Commissioned Alta Transportation Consulting to prepare the Coachella Valley Non-motorized Transportation Master Plan ("NMTMP"). The purpose of this document was to establish a valley-wide master plan of bikeways, trails, associated facilities and programs. This master plan can be a planning tool to assure that Palm Springs' bikeways and trails foster interconnectivity between other valley cities, and to educate and promote safe bicycle usage. Fostering this interconnectivity is envisioned as a way to enhance aftemative modes of valley-wide transportation; reduce dependence on the automobile; and reduce traffic congestion, vehicle emissions and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). It can also increase recreational opportunities for tourists and residents. The NMTMP includes educational programs on bicycle safety, as well as information on infrastructure maintenance and funding. Promoting physical activity through biking and walking is seen as a means of improving the health and wellness of the community. Finally, by adopting a non-motorized master plan, Palm Springs is eligible for numerous grants and funding opportunities from CalTrans and other sources for the construction and implementation of non-motorized transportation initiatives. In 2008, CVAG commissioned Ryan Snyder Associates to produce an update of the NMTMP. The result of this work included revised maps, prioritization of Plan initiatives for each jurisdiction, updated community input and budgeting information to make it compliant with most grant application requirements. This update was completed in 2010. Through 2011, City staff in both Planning and Public Works collaborated with members of the City's Sustainability Commission and the Coachella Valley Community Trails Alliance (CVCTA) in reviewing and finalizing the Palm Springs maps and list of existing and proposed bikeways and trails in the NMTMP. The procedure for amending the City's General Plan is outlined in State of California Governmental Code Section 65350. A public hearing for review and recommendation by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council (the legislative body) is required. ANALYSIS: Transportation master planning is an integral part of the City's General Plan. In 2007, the City adopted a comprehensive update of its General Plan, including Chapter 4, the Circulation Element. The General Plan Circulation Element addresses not only vehicular circulation, but also various other forms of "circulation" including mass transit, vehicular parking, aviation and utility circulation through the community as well as bikeways, trails and other non-motorized means of circulation. 19 City Council Staff Report October 5,2011 Page 3 of 6 5,1258 GPA—General Plan Amendment for Coachella Valley Non-Motorized Transportatbn Master Plan Non-motorized transportation planning in Palm Springs encompasses everything from dedicated bicycle lanes on public streets to hiking and equestrian trails in the surrounding mountains and canyons. A well developed non-motorized transportation system not only provides residents and visitors with aftemative choices of "how to get from Point A to Point B", but also provides an important tourist amenity and recreational resource within the City and to attractions and amenities throughout the valley. The 2007 General Plan acknowledged the 2001 Coachella Valley Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan as an important policy document to aid in the development of the complete circulation system for the City. Integration of the 2010 NMTMP into the City's General Plan, fulfills certain policies and action items from the General Plan as follows: Policy CR6.1 Adopt a program of non-motorized transportation facilities including those for bicycles and pedestrians. Policy CR6.15 Coordinate with CVAG, adjacent cities, and affected agencies while planning for new trails, especially in areas adjacent to the Whitewater Wash and Cathedral City. Action Item CR6.2: Resolve any inconsistencies between the City's Master Plan of Bikeways and the CVAG Non-motorized Transportation Plan and adopt the CVAG Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan. In 2007, the California Legislature adopted AB 1351 "Complete Streets". This bill, which went into effect January 1, 2011 directs cities that "...Commencing January 1, 2011, upon any substantive revision of the circulation element, the legislative body shall modify the circulation element to plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan." Although the integration of the NMTMP into the City's General Plan contributes to the multi- modal nature of our General Plan, it does not constitute a full revision of the Circulation Element. Since our General Plan is only four years old, the Circulation Element remains current and does not need a wholesale revision at this time. The NMTMP is proposed to be incorporated as an appendix in the General Plan. In a few years when City growth necessitates a full scale revision of the Circulation Element, this appendix can be easily folded into such revision of the Circulation Element that would satisfy AB 1351 compliance requirements'. 1 There is no time constraint dictated by AB 1351 that necessitates when this major revision must be completed. 20 City CouWl Staff Report Page 4 of 6 October 5,2011 5.1258 GPA—General Plan Amendment for Coachella Valley NorfMotofted Transportation Master Plan Funding/Grants Tight budgetary conditions and competing demands on limited general fund resources requires Palm Springs to look to grants and other external sources to fund non-motorized facilities construction, maintenance, and educational and safety programs. Most competitive grants require that the City have an adopted non-motorized transportation master plan in place. The CVAG Plan which was initiated in 2001 and updated in 2010 provides Palm Springs with a comprehensive non-motorized master plan that meets most grant application requirements and thereby broadens the City's opportunities and eligibility to pursue external funding sources to improve its non-motorized transportation facilities and programming_ Integration of the NMTMP provides the city the opportunity to update the bicycle routes map in the General Plan and resolve inconsistencies in that map, which is instrumental in the grant application process. Organization of the Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan The CVNMTMP is comprised of six basic parts: Chapter 2— Goals and Objectives — These are reiterated from the 2001 Non- motorized Transportation Plan. Chapter 3 — Valley-wide bikeway, hiking and equestrian trails and an outline of safety, education and promotional programming. Chapter 4— Non-motorized master plans for each Coachella Valley City. Chapter 5— Identification of external funding sources and opportunities Chapter 6 — Strategy for phasing and implementation Chapter 7— Design and maintenance guidelines. Relationship of the Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan to the General Plan, Circulation Element. The goals and objectives of the MNTMP complement and add to the goals, policies and actions of the 2007 General Plan. As noted above, incorporation of the CVNMTMP fulfills several policies and action items listed in the 2007 General Plan. The non-motorized transportation master plan does not supersede, or cause the deletion or replacement of the current Circulation Element. The only changes to the existing Circulation Element are corrections and improvements to Figure 4-5 the Bikeways Map which has been updated and enhanced to provide more concise detail on various bikeway segments. Specifically the following information has been added to Figure 4-5, the bikeways map: • Bikeways have been given segment numbers to better identify them for maintenance and future funding and Improvement initiatives. • Existing bikeways that were incorrectly shown on the 2007 map have been corrected. • Future bikeways are grouped into three"priority lists"that aid in grant-writing efforts. • Certain designated bikeways have been relocated to less busy streets to provide safer alternative routes for bicyclists. (For example; the segment previously shown on Ramon Road from El Cielo to Crossley was moved to Sunny Dunes. Similarly the route previously shown on Vista Chino/ Highway 111 was moved to Via Escuela). zi city council Staff Report October 5,2011 Page 5 of 6 5.1258 GPA—General Plan Amendment for GoachetLa Valley Non-Motodzed Transportation Master Ran Portions of the old bikeway map and the proposed map are shown below which provide an example of the enhancements made by the addition of segment markings and delineation of existing bikeways (solid line) and future bikeways (dotted lines). These segment markings provide much greater clarity for the City to make future grant applications, as well as to reference segments for ongoing maintenance and upkeep. am Rd Rwroon Rd. � V PORTION OF EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP WITH SEGMENT MARKERS These same changes are reflected correctly on Figure 4-4, the Recreational Trails Map. (Bikeways shown on Figure 4-5 are also shown on Figure 4-4) Otherwise there are no other changes or updates proposed to the Circulation Element or other elements of the 2007 General Plan. The Non-motorized Transportation Master Plan is proposed to be integrated into the 2007 General Plan as "Appendix F". It is particularly notable that the NMTMP takes a comprehensive approach to planning of non-motorized transportation facilities and programming. Not only does it outline existing and proposed bikeways, it also addresses inter-connections with other trails and between Palm Springs and other desert cities. There are also sections that discuss trail heads, maintenance and design standards, signage and pavement markings, and programs to promote increased bicycle use and bicycle safety. CONCLUSION: Amending the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan to incorporate the Non-motorized Transportation Master Plan provides a comprehensive set of tools that augment and enhance the basic information in the Circulation Element relating to bikeways, hiking, and equestrian trails. The goals, policies and maps in the Non-motorized Transportation Master Plan provide greater detail and refinement for planning and maintaining bikeways and trails in Palen Springs, as well as for developing programs related to bicycle safety. It also serves to foster integration with adjacent municipalities in the future development of non-motorized circulation throughout the Coachella Valley that contributes to cleaner air, less vehicular congestion, and greater recreational opportunities for residents and visitors. 22 City Council Staff Report October 5,2011 Page 6 of 6 5.1258 GPA—General Plan Amendment for Coachella Valley Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan ENVIRONMENTAL: This proposed amendment of the Palm Springs General Plan has been determined to be a "Project" as defined by Section 21066 of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An initial study was conducted in which the project was evaluated to determine whether it may cause any potentially significant impacts to the environment. The environmental analysis and notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration was made available for public comment for a 30-day period commencing on May 10, 2011 and ending on June 9, 2011. No comments were received and there was no new information or facts presented that would require recirculation of the documents or change any of the conclusions made within the analysis. A Negative Declaration is recommended to the City Council. NOTICE: In accordance with applicable law, public notice was provided citywide by posting in the Desert Sun. Pursuant to State Governmental Code Section 65352(a), written notification of the proposed General Plan Amendment was also provided to the following entities: Adjacent cities and agencies, LAFCO, The Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM), The Coachella Valley Association of Governments, (CVAG), and Native American tribes pursuant to SB 18, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians responded to the SB 18 noticing and City Staff communicated the scope of the proposed GPA to Tribal Staff. To date, no other comments have been received on the proposed General Plan Amendment. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The Non-Motorized Transportation Master Plan provides proposed priorities for capital improvement projects related to non-motorized transportation facilities and programs, but makes no fiscal commitment or obligation of any kind to such programs or projects, i ing, P Thomas Wilso Assistant ity Manager Director of Pla ning ervices David H. Ready, City er 23 ATTACHMENT 2 24 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Palm Springs Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 47,601 (California Department of Finance), Palm Springs is a major tourist destination city with resorts and golf communities as well as an established residential base. The City has a developed grid network of arterial streets that connects to Cathedral City as well as to the surrounding unincorporated areas. Some of the main arterial streets in the network include Vista Chino, Ramon Road, North, South, and East Palm Canyon Drives, Sunrise Way, Farrell Drive, Racquet Club Road, and Indian Canyon Drive. Most of Palm Springs' destinations are located along the arterial street network, especially along Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives in the downtown retail district. Land Use The map on page 100 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Palm Springs. The City consists primarily of medium- and low-density residential with many resort uses near the downtown area. Commercial office and retail uses are primarily located along Ramon Road and North and East Palm Canyon Drives, especially in the downtown area. The City is home to Palm Springs International Airport, and many industrial uses are located near the airport site. The far northern part of the City contains utility uses, which includes a wind farm for renewable energy. Future residential development is planned in the northern part of the existing developed area of the City. The College of the Desert plans to open a new campus near the Whitewater River and Indian Canyon Drive. Outlying areas are planned for very low density residential, such as on Indian reservation land, and undeveloped land. Bikeways Existing Palm Springs currently has numerous bikeways. The City has designated several loop routes in the central portion of the City primarily geared toward the tourist visitor. These loop routes consist of Class I, II, and III facilities. They total 28.2 miles in length. Existing bicycle and trail facilities are listed below. CVAG Non-Motorized Transportation Plan Update 92 25 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN- NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Table A: City of Palm Springs Existing Bikeways (Note: The following tables supersede the prioritization tables in the 2010 update of the Coachella Valley Non-motorized Transportation Master Plan as adopted into the City of Palm Springs General Plan; September 2011. These tables may be updated from time to time as projects are completed and new projects are identified and approved) I.D. Class Street/Path From To Mileage 1 I Tahquit7 Creek Camino ReaL pedestrian bridge Sunrise Way 0.7 2 MU-W TahquitzSunny Dunes @Desert 0.1 Creek Sunrise Way Tahquitz Creek Chapel Way 3 111 Tahquitz Creek Sunny Dunes @.Desert Chapel Wood Bridge @ Tahquitz 0.16 Way Creek 4 1 Taliquitz Creek Wood Bridge @ Tahquitz Creek Farrell Dr. @ MU-W >0.2 5 MU-W Tahquitz Creek Farrell Dr. @ MU-W Farrell Dr. @ MU-E 0.15 6 1 Tahqultz Creek Farrell Dr. @ MU-E Compadre Rd. 0.15 7 MU-W Tahquitz Creek Compadre Rd. Sunny Dunes Rd. 0.15 8 MU-5 ITahquitz Creek Sunny Dunes Rd. El Clelo Rd. @ MU-W 0.25 9 MU-W Tahquitz Creek El Cielo Rd. Mesquite Ave. 0.2 10 III Tahquitz Creek Mesquite Ave. Demuth Park Entrance 0.2 11 III Tahquitz Creek Demuth Park Entrance Pe Corner of Demuth 0.2 12 1 Tahquitz Creek SE Corner of Demuth Park tf Club Drive 1.15 13 II Taliquitz Creek Golf Club Drive/Fairway Circle Golf Club Drive/340 0.2 Ave. 14 11 Tahquitz Creek Golf Club Drive/34"Ave. Golf Club Drive/South 0.3 Bank of Tahquitz Creek 15 1 Tahquitz Creek South Bank of Tahquitz Whitewater Wash/City 0.4 Creek/Golf Club Drive Limits 16 i1 Golf Club Drive-Tahquitz South Bank of Tahquitz E. Palm Canyon Drive 0.5 Creek Loop Creek/Golf Club Drive 17 1 E. Palm Canyon Drive- Golf Club Drive Farrell Dr. 2.0 Tahquitz Creek Loop 18 111 E. Palm Canyon Drive Farrell Dr. Sunrise Way 0.5 (Service Roads) 19 II Sunny Dunes Rd. Camino Real uprise Way 0.6 20 111 Belardo Rd-CWL 13 HT Sunny Dunes Rd. Ramon Rd. 0.25 (CWL = Citywide Loop, HT = Heritage Trail, OLP - Old Las Palmas Loop, CCC = Canyon Country Club Loop, DWL=Deepwetl Loop,TQL-Tahquitz Creek Loop, 93 26 Table A: City of Palm Springs Existing Bikeways ID Class Street/Path From TO Mileage 21 III Cahuilla Rd. -CWL E HT Ramon Rd. Tahquitz Canyon Way 0.5 22 11 Belardo Rd./Museum Way ahquitz Canyon Way Amado Rd. 0.4 -CWL Et HT 23 MU Belardo Rd./Museum Way ado Rd. Alejo Rd. 0.25 - CWL Et HT 24 III E. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Palm Canyon Dr. Camino Real 0.35 25 III Indian Canyon Dr. -OLP Racquet Club Road ahquitz Canyon Way 2.0 27 III TachCWL evah Dr. -OLP 8 N. Palm Canyon Dr. Farrell Dr. 1.5 28 III Alejo Rd. Calhuffla Rd. Sunrise Way 1.1 29 III OLP Canyon Way Cahuilla Rd. Calle El Segundo 0.4 30 II CWL uitz Canyon Way- CaUe El Segundo Civic Dr. 1.6 31 III Ramon Rd. Cahuilla Rd. El Cielo Rd. 2.2 32 III W quite Ave. - DWL& Camino Real Compadre Rd. 1.4 33 111 La Verne Way-CCC S. Palm Canyon Dr. Sunrise Way 1.1 34 III Toledo Ave. -CWL B CCC La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr. 0.9 35 III Murray Canyon Dr. -CWL Toledo Ave. Camino Real 0.6 &CCC 36 111 CamCWL Riverside Real- DWL>i Riverside Dr. Murray Canyon Dr. 2.2 37 III Calle Encilia jAlejo Dr. Ramon Rd. 1.0 38 III Celle Palo Fierro IMesquite Ave. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 0.6 39 1 Gene Autry Trail-CVB lVista Chino Ramon Rd. 2.2 40 111 IGene Autry Trail- CVB lRamon Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 0.2 41 ill Sunrise Way- CWL JE. Palm Canyon Dr. La Verne Way 0.1 42 1 Sunrise Way-DWL/TQL JE. Palm Canyon Dr. ista Chino 3.0 43 II Belardo Rd. - HT ahquitz Canyon Way lRamon Rd. 0.5 achevah Dr./Via Rose Ave./Crescent Old Las Palmas Loop Lola/Camino del DOPatencio Rd./Chino 44 III (OLP) Corto/Camino Sur/Camino Norte/Vine Dr./Belardo Rd./Atejo 2.4 Centro/Camino Norte/Vine Dr. Ave./Stevens Rd. 45 111 Farrell Dr. Racquet Club Road Atejo Road 1.5 46 III San Rafael Dr. Highway 111 N Indian Canyon Drive 0.7 i i 93a 2 t CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN- NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Table B: City of Palm Springs Top Priority Projects I.D. Class Previous Street/Path From TO Length Priority (Miles) P1.1 II 2 Baristo Rd. Avenida Caballeros El Cielo Rd. 1.5 P1.2 II NC Avenida Caballeros San Rafael Rd. Ramon Rd. 3.0 P1.3 1 NC Whitewater Wash Ramon Rd. Ave. 34 1.0 P1.4 I NC Whitewater Wash Vista Chino Ramon Rd. 0.8 Pi.5 III 3 Ave. 34 Ralf Club Dr.lCrossley Whitewater Wash 0.5 P1.6 II New' Mesquite Ave. Calle Palo Fierro Sunrise Way 1.5 P1.7 III New Palm Canyon Dr. Alejo Rd. Camino Parocela 1.1 Pi. III Existing-no signs Indian Canyon Dr. Camino Parocela Alejo Rd. 1.1 131.9 11 New S. Palm Canyon Dr. E. Palm Canyon Dr. Murray Canyon Dr. 1.5 P1.10 III New JCompadre Rd. Baristo Rd. Tahquitz Creek 0.6 P1.11 II New Escoba Dr. El Cielo Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 0.3 P1.12 11 NC San Rafael Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. Sunrise Way 1.0 P1.13 III New ado Rd. Betardo Rd. Sunrise Way 1.1 P1.14 111 New Farrell Dr. Mesquite Ave. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 1.3 P1.15 II New Arenas Rd. IHermosa Dr. ICahuitla Rd. 1.0 P1.16 II New S.Compadre Rd. Mesquite Ave. Sonora Rd. 0.25 P1.17 II New Sonora Rd. IS. Compadre Rd. IS. El Cielo Rd. 0.25 P1.18 If NC Racquet Club Rd, N. Palm Canyon Dr. IFarretl Dr. 1.8 Mesquite Ave./Dinah City Limits @ P1.19 MU/il NC El Cielo Rd Shore . Whitewater Wash 2.3 P1.20 II NC Crossley Rd. Ramon Rd. Dinah Shore 0.8 P1.21 III NC Farrell Dr. Alejo Rd. Baristo Rd. 0.75 P1.22 1 3 Tahquitz Creek Path Calle Palo Fierro Tahquitz Canyon 0 7 Vistor's Center P1.23 II New Via Escuela Palm Canyon Dr. Gene Autry Trail 2.4 P1.24 II New Hermosa Drive Arenas Road Way uitz Canyon 0.1 P1.25 II New Vista Ch1n0 Gene Autry Cathedral City 0 7 Limits 'Funded by Safe Routes to School Program 94 28 r CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN-NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Table C:City of Palm Springs Second Priority Projects Prevf0' Length M.D. Class Priority Street/Path From To (Mlles) P2.1 II Existing Belardo Rd. Ramon Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. 1.0 P2.2 II Exilstiing Camino Real S. Riverside Dr. Calle Palo Fierro 0.2 P2.3 II NC Gene Autry Trail 1-10 Freeway Vista Chino 2.4 P2.4 II NC Indian Canyon Dr. Ave. 20 Racquet Club 3.7 Road P2.5 III NC Tamarisk Rd. Avenida Caballeros Farrell Dr. 1.1 Palm Spring North City P2.6 II NC N. Palm Canyon Dr. Limit iWhitewater Rd) Alejo Rd. 8.1 P2.7 II Existing EL Clelo Rd. Tahquitz Canyon Dr. Escoba Dr. 1.5 P2.8 I 1 Palm Canyon Wash S. Palm Canyon Dr. Gene Autry Trail 3.4 P2.9 III Existing' Atejo Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. El Segundo Rd. 0.2 jP2.10j III j I Calle El Segundo ejo Rd. jRamon Rd. 1.0 P2.11 II Tejo Rd. El Segundo Rd. Farrell Dr. 1.4 95 29 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN-NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Table D: City of Palm Springs Third Priority Projects I.D. Class Previous Street/Path From To Length Priority (Miles) P3.1 II Ext111'ng Tachevah Dr. Indian Canyon Dr. Avenida Caballeros 0.5 P3.2 II NC Sunny Dunes Rd. El Cielo Rd. Crossley Rd. 1.5 P3.3 III 2 Sunrise Way Whitewater Wash Vista Chino 1.6 P3.4 II 2 20'Ave. Diablo Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. 2.1 P3.5 II 2 Dillon Rd. Diablo Rd. Eastern City Limit 1.5 P3.6 II NC Araby Dr. E. Palm Canyon Dr. Palm Canyon Wash 0.4 P3.7 II NC Barona Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. Palm Canyon Wash 0.7 P3.8 III 2 GGdarnet Ave./Salvia Western City Limit Eastern City Limit 6.0 P3.9 III NC CaLle Palo Fierro Ramon Rd. N. Riverside Dr. 0.3 P3.10 III NC Highway 111 Snow Creek Rd. Palm Springs City 1 6 Limit P3.11 II 2 Tipton Rd. 1-10 Freeway just west Road End just 1.8 of Whitewater Cyn Rd. north of SR 111 P3.12 I NC Whitewater Wash HWY 111 Cathedral City 4 7 Limit P3.13 11 NC Paseo Dorotea" Ramon Rd. Airport 1.0 P3.14 III New Ramon Rd. Crossley Rd. East City Limit 0.5 P3.15 II New Murray Canyon Dr. South Palm Canyon Toledo Road 1.9 Drive P3.16 II New South Palm Canyon Murray Canyon Dr. South Indian 1.0 Drive Canyons P3.17 II New Sunny Dunes Belardo Road Camino Real 0.5 P 3.18 11 New Chino Canyon Road Hwy 111 Lower Tram 3.9 Station P 3.19 III 1 New Camino Real Ramon R. N. Riverside Dr. 0.4 *Poorly Signed •'Funded by Safe Routes to School Program 95a 30 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS The map on page 99 shows existing and proposed bikeways and parking facilities, schools, and attractions, which primarily include shopping centers, government buildings, and other retail districts. Bicycle Parking Existing Palm Springs has identified several locations where bicycle parking facilities exist. They are listed below. • Sunrise Park • Demuth Park • Many locations Downtown Ruth Hardy Park • Sunrise Marketplace Shopping Center • Smoke Tree Village Center Shopping Center • City Hall and other City buildings • Desert Hospital • Leisure Center • Police Department • Palm Springs Mall • Riverside County Administrative Center • Palm Springs International Airport • Main Branch Library • Amado Park • Desert Inn Fashion Plaza Mall • Starbucks Cafe • Plaza Parking Lot • Department of Motor Vehicles • Lower Tram Station • Office building on the southeast corner of Ramon Road and Paseo Dorotea Proposed The City proposed to add new bicycle parking to the following locations: • The new College of the Desert campus (just southwest of where Indian Ave. crosses the Whitewater River) • Rimrock Shopping Center • Springs Shopping Center CVAG Non-Motorized Transportation Plan Update 96 31 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS • The Plaza at Sunrise • Gene Autry Plaza • At shopping plaza at northeast corner of Vista Chino and Indian Canyon • Palm Springs Convention Center • Shopping area along Arenas Road just east of Indian Canyon Dr. The City currently has no requirements or plans for bicycle parking in new buildings. Links to Other Transportation Modes Palm Springs is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. These state-of-the-art bike racks can carry up to two bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. An Amtrak station near Indian Canyon Drive in the northern part of the City currently exists, as does a Greyhound bus station near the downtown area. Bicycle parking is planned at these locations. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop# Direction Position` Facility Type 111 E. Palm Cyn. Dr. Gene Autry Tr. 15 EB FS Bike Rack 24 Tahquitz Cyn.Way Civic Dr. 29 WB FS Bike Rack 14/30 Palm Cyn. Dr. Baristo Rd. 128 SB FS Bike Locker 111 24 Tahquitz Cyn. Way Farrell Dr. 182 WB FS Bike Rack 14 Gene Autry Tr. E. Vista Chino 490 SB INS Bike Locker 24 Avenida Vista Chino 496 NB FS Bike Rack Caballeros 24 Vista Chino Avenida 609 EB FS Bike Rack Caballeros 14 Gene Autry Tr. I Vista Chino 614 NB FS Bike Locker 111 Palm Cyn. Dr. Gene Autry Tr. 667 WB FS Bike Rack 14130 Baristo Rd. Farrell Dr. 780 WB MB Bike Locker 14 3 0/24 Baristo Rd. Farrell Rd. 889 EB INS Bike Locker 'Position refers to the near side(NS)or far side(FS)of the intersection Bicycle Amenities Shower and clothing lockers exist at Sunrise Park. The new College of the Desert Campus will have bicycle amenities. The City currently has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new buildings. CVAG Non-Motorized Transportation Plan Update 97 32 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement Palm Springs has not had a bicycle safety education program. However, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, partnering with the Riverside County Department of Public Health and the Palm Springs Unified School District, has won a Federal Safe Routes to School grant to provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education at public schools in Palm Springs. The program will likely start in Federal Fiscal Year 2010-2011. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities Palm Springs had one project funded with SB-821 funds in 1996. This project was for a Bike Lane and Signage Project for all City bikeways in the amount of $79,000. In the early 1990s Palm Springs received $383,000 from Measure A and SB-821 funds for a bicycle bridge over the Palm Canyon Wash. Future Financial Needs The City of Palm Springs has the following future financial needs: • Top Priority Bikeways: 25.8 miles, $14,166,000 • 2nd Priority Bikeways: 33.4, $7,568,000 • 3rd Priority Bikeways: 21.9, $3,012,000 • Total: 81 miles, $24,746,000 • Bicycle Parking Program: $25,000 Total Capital Financial Need: $24,771,000 • Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 22.7 miles, $71,914 CVAG Non-Motorized Transportation Plan Update 98 33 ATTACHMENT 3 34 .A�a AA CITY 0,FPALM SPRINGS pIORM AOOFIEl7 OY 1 HE f?.t fit'fR.rJG II OCHOI_O^1OCI=•>; .'t 20,1 Bl' 'P,n . .. `- Legend Existing Bikeways - a,..,,, = .r Class I, Bike Path _ _ _ `\\ 4►"\`A Class II, Bike Lane ♦ Class III, Bike Route r Mixed Use Bike Route —r ; Top Priority Projects H'a / Class I, Bike Path rrt- - - 's♦ rrrr Class II, Bike Lane San Rafael Dr. Class III, Bike Route Mixed Use II �+ 2nd Priority Projects -- Racquet Club Rd. Class I, Bike Path L --r -� - vl r,e� ���� Class II, Bike Lane , Class III, Bike Route 3rd Priority Projects Class I, Bike Path `tea - — _- Gass II, Bike Lane 6 l Gass III, Bike Route '�' _ �ro,.araeR_.i� `� ��♦ � Streets Palm lwal A® Regional City and Sphere Limits �,J 11 -_ , ® LL U7 I . W f� a — l U w e u.,Drives Ra. I Sunry0 rcs Rd. ® N:RMa"00r. 4 . „ .. ,-..m s a• Rt V k aw.^ .l. .. r � O �,. rylrn 4 -h--t' .4 EL F Palm Camycl,Or F UTU&r Dr. ...+•••M'r Mt!Ave lal- �y aJoo _ Mao Prepared 6: E C ITY1.0 N .XF1F PALNA SGP FURSRA ANY N R DR OTHER E IENFEMTIOX,OR1.FFREc Or i1FY R:Xe RF60.PF FUS.XER l I .7HERR OTHER NrtJRNAE TITY.1 PA N FIFIN OP E 60YR1E1 US 6NCM W REPRESENTATIONS fP fl TIE[ YAW E 3RIel +, PRLXNLLLPWITWDUA L16 ATHE0PWAPPPNTESMFR<XANTABIIT All Inrormatlon aINESS DRAPkEETCUNT o Eo wARwlr Es or AX PURPOSE systems Feet � ',�':m P,.m 0 2,250 4,500 6.750 un.o�n.e..m.R. General Plan Figure 4-6 Revised October6,2011 35 ATTACHMENT 4 36 °�ppEM apP 1 W V N CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: May 21, 2014 CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN AND RECOMMENDED PRIORITIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 MEASURE J FROM: David H. Ready, Executive Director BY: Office of Sustainability SUMMARY The City contracted with Ryan Snyder Associates to create a Bicycle Route Plan and based on that plan the Non-Motorized Transportation Committee has recommended a schedule and priority of projects to be considered for construction using the Measure J funding allocated for bicycle infrastructure and improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Bicycle Route Plan (BRP). STAFF ANALYSIS: The City of Palm Springs adopted a Non-Motorized Transportation Plan (NMTP) in October 2011. The Sustainability Commission formed a Non-Motorized Transportation Committee (NMTC) that has spearheaded many projects to improve bicycle infrastructure and safety. This includes working to add bicycle parking, update bicycle routes and maps, increase education and outreach and review areas for potential bicycle transportation improvements. The NMTC has reviewed the final BRP document from Mr. Snyder, and the NMTC supports the recommendations of Mr. Snyder. Ryan Snyder and Associates conducted several meetings with stakeholders and thus the Bicycle Route Plan includes collective efforts, research and edits of the NMTC, Mr. Snyder, City staff and community members including merchants, business leaders and neighborhoods. The Measure J Commission recommended and the City Council approved $1 million in funding for fiscal year 2013-14. The NMTC has recommended a prioritization of projects as outlined below. 37 ITEM NO. � City Council Staff Report May 21, 2014--Page 2 Bicycle Route Plan Additionally, the NMTC recommends the City Council fully fund the complete BRP with for three consecutive fiscal year's through 2015-16. The NMTC has proposed a schedule and priorities for funding of projects based on the plan presented by Ryan Snyder Associates. The completion of these projects will create a network of Class II and Class III bike routes and paths that will define Palm Springs as a bike-able city. In addition, the proposed schedule of projects aids in the connectivity that will be necessary for the new CV Link project. Based on the cost estimates included in the BRP, the NMTC has recommended that the following projects be prioritized for funding for the first year that Measure J funds are allocated. 2013-14 recommended projects ($1,055.850.00 estimated costs): (2013-14 $1 million Measure J funds appropriated) 1. El Cielo corridor (Escoba to El Cielo, El Cielo to DOHC and Civic Dr. to Alejo - Class II and III with road diet). Approx. 2.5 miles; $122,500 2. Alejo E-W (Civic to Belardo - Class II and III with road diet). Approx. 2.0 miles; $130,000 3. Belardo N-S (South End to E. Palm Canyon). Approx. 1.61 miles; $112,750 4. Farrell (E. Palm Canyon Way to Racquet Club - dbl. col. buff.). Approx. 3.53 miles; $494,200 5. Calle Encilia (Ramon to Alejo - Class II). Approx. 1.0 miles; $89,000 6. Shared lane marking streets (10.64 miles approx.), Approx. $106,400 7. Araby Wash 'wooden' bike bridge north side railing extension. Approx. $1,000 For the next two fiscal years the NMTC has identified the following priority projects and recommends fully funding them for the 2014-15 and 2015-16 fiscal years. 2014-15 recommended projects ($1,511.300.00 estimated costs): 1. N. Palm Canyon (Tram Way to Alejo - col. buffered). Approx. 2.19 miles; $328,500+ 2. Racquet Club (N. Palm Canyon to Farrell - buff lane). Approx. 1.52 miles; $98,800+ 3. Class III/Sharrows. Approx. 27.39 miles; $773,000 4. Shared lane marking streets (31.1 miles approx.). Approx. $311,000+ 39 City Council Staff Report May 21. 2014--Page 3 Bicycle Route Plan 2016-16 recommended projects ($1,003,000.00 estimated costs): 1. Lighted cross walk installation with cutouts (Farrell off of Mesquite CC bike path). Unless funding is to come from other sources. $75,000+ approx. 2. Indian Canyon (Alejo to Camino Parocela - 2-way Cycletrack). Approx. 1.16 miles; $928,000 All specified projects and estimated costs are per the BRP plan as outlined by Mr. Snyder. The NMTC also recommends that the following be considered when implementing bicycle infrastructure projects: • Any new paving or slurry on streets will be incorporated and match up to the BRP document for prioritization as warranted and feasible. • Where a section of roadway will be paved or slurried along a designated bike route, but does not extend the full length of the route, then lane striping will be laid down for the entirety of the bike route. • Signage will be incorporated into all bike lane infrastructure work as it is implemented. • Street pedestrian and bicycle lighted crossings are included, but funding may be available from other sources. • Section 14 matching funding may be available. FISCAL IMPACT: The total funding of the BRP for three consecutive fiscal years is $3,570,150.00. The Measure J Commission recommended and the City Council approved the appropriation of$1 million for fiscal year 2013-14. The NMTC recommends the 2014-15 projects be funded for $1,511,300.00 and the 2015--16 projects be funded for $1,003,000.00. City staff is in the process of several grant applications that may supplement and offer additional funding for even more bicycle infrastructure improvements as recommended by the NMTC. This includes applications to the CAL Trans Active Transportation Program and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program. Michele Mician, David ... Ready, Sustainability Manager City Manager Attachments: 1. Bicycle Route Plan 39 0 04 T W • �Tf C4 r.; • O r 4 1 „ Y Wy, ' � • 1 �' f�Y ` 4 z k* � w Apr 'Ilk. i 1�a 1 � . "a DESIGNOVERVIEW........................................................ ......_..........,..........,..............,.....,....,...... .................................. ..................3 BIKEWAYGUIDELINES....................... ............. .................................. ............................................,............................... ...... . ........... 4 DefinTons.................. .... - .....................,..............,...................,.... ........ .. .............................. .......,................................. .......... 4 CLASSI .................... ..................... ............................ ....... ..... ............ ..............,............... ...... ................. 4 CLASSII ...... ....... ............................................................................ ....._............................................................................,..,.. 4 CLASSIII .............. ........... ........................................................... ...... .......... ............................................................................ 4 COLOREDBIKE LANES ............................................... .................................. ................................... .,,...........,........,.. ......,.,.. 4 BUFFEREDBIKE LANES ......................................... ...... .... ......,......,.....,,.............,................,,........................... .. ..............._.. 4 CYCLETRACKS ... ....................................................................... ..................,....................,..,..................,.........,......,............... 4 TYPEB SHARROWS......................... ....... ............. ..................... .................. ............... ..... ........................... ....................... 5 SHAREDLANE MARKING STREETS ........................................... ........................................._.... ................................... .......... 5 DesignGuidelines ............... .... ..................................... .........................................,..............,....,,.,.....,......,......,............,................ 5 CLASS I BIKE PATH FACILITIES DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ..........._................................................ ........ ... .. .......... 5 CYCLETRACKS ........ ............................................................................................. ................................................................... 6 CLASS II BIKE LANE FACILITIES DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... ................................... ............... 8 COLOREDBICYCLE LANES .......................... .............. ............................. ........... .. .............,................................,..,......,...... 9 BUFFEREDBIKE LANES ..................................................................... .............. ................................................. ..................... 9 CLASSIII BIKE ROUTES ............_............ ..................... ..................... ........... ........ ....................................................... . ..... 10 SHARROWS........................ ................................................................ ............ . ..................................................................... 10 TYPEB SHARROWS......................................... .... ............. .............. ......,.......................,...................................................... 11 Signageand Markings ............... ...... .... .......................................................................... .......... .................................................. 12 WAYFINDINGSIGNAGE ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 CHOICEOF BIKEWAY TYPE........................_. ....... ......................................... ...... ..........................., ....,............., ............... ....,..... 14 41 2 IN u m S s ON - STREET BIKEWAY PLAN DESIGN OVERVIEW The Palm Springs City Council has decided that every street in Palm Springs should be a bikeway. This is likely unprecedented in the United States and may set the stage for others to follow. The purpose of this Bikeway Plan is to recommend what type of bikeway each street should become. In order to prepare these recommendations, bikeway types were defined, the streets were surveyed and data reviewed. The following text describes the bikeway definitions, results of fieldwork and recommendations. This text describes general design guidelines for the facilities identified in this Bikeway Plan. The City of Palm Springs will need to follow standard manuals such as the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM). Additional guidance can be found in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" and the National Association of City Transportation Officials' (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide. The City may need to amend its own street design guidelines in order to implement certain facilities. Palm Springs should take precaution and research the newest bikeway design guidelines and engineering treatments prior to constructing a facility. 4Z Palm Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN 3 BIKEWAY GUIDELINES Definitions FIGURE 1 Class I (top), class II (middle), and CLASS Class III (bottom) bikeways. Referred to as a bike path, shared-use path, or multi-purpose trail. Provides for bicycle travel on a paved right-of-way completely separated from any street or highway. Other users may also be found on this type of facility (see Design Guidelines on page 6). CLASS II M Referred to as a bike lane. Provides a striped lane for one-way bicycle travel on a street or highway (see Design Guidelines on page 9). CLASS III Referred to as a bike route. Provides for shared use with pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic (see Design Guidelines on page 11). COLORED BIKE LANES Colored bike lanes are simply bike lanes with an approved color (see Design Guidelines on page 10). BUFFERED BIKE LANES Buffered bike lanes provide a painted area between the bike lane and either the travel lane or parking lane. Double-buffered bike lanes provide a painted buffer on both the travel lane and parking lane. These bike lanes may also be colored (see Design Guidelines on page 10). CYCLE TRACKS Cycle tracks, also called protected bike lanes, provide a physical barrier between the bike lane and other lanes. If there is on-street parking they are placed between the sidewalk and parking. Cycle tracks may be one-way or two-way. They may also be at the level of the street, at the level of the sidewalk, or between the two (see Design Guidelines on page 7). 43 Palm Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN d TYPE B SHARROWS Type B sharrows provide a more prominent shared lane marking than the standard shared lane marking. This may be achieved through augmentation of the shared lane marking with side lines, a larger stencil, more frequent placement, and/or paint underneath (see Design Guidelines on page 11). SHARED LANE MARKING STREETS Shared lane marking streets are simply streets with standard shared lane markings or "sharrows" to make motorists alert for bicyclists, to train cyclists where to ride in the lane and to educate motorists of bicyclists' rights to ride in the lane. These shared lane-marking streets will not have bikeway signs (see Design Guidelines on page 11). Vesign kidelim The following guidelines present the recommended minimum design standards and other recommended ancillary support items for bike paths, bike lanes, bike routes, cycle tracks, colored bike lanes. buffered bike lanes and sharrows. Where possible, it may be desirable to exceed the minimum standards. These guidelines cover basic concepts. The HDM Chapter 1000 contains more detailed standards and guidance and should be followed. The City may also reference the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities where the HEM is silent. CLASS I BIKE PATH FACILITIES DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 1 All Class I bike paths should conform to the design guidelines set forth by Caltrans. 2, Class I bike paths should generally be designed as separated facilities away from parallel streets. They are commonly planned along rights-of-way such as waterways, utility corridors, railroads, and the like that offer continuous separated riding opportunities. 3 Both AASHTO and Caltrans recommend against using most sidewalks for bike paths. This is due to conflicts with driveways and intersections. Where sidewalks are used as bike paths, they should be placed along routes with few driveways and intersections, be properly separated from the roadway, not contain obstructions (bus stops, signs, trees, trash receptacles, etc.) and have carefully designed intersection crossings. 4, Bike paths should have a minimum of eight feet of pavement, with at least two feet of unpaved shoulders for pedestrians/runners, or a separate pathway for pedestrians/runners where feasible. A pavement width of 12 feet is preferred. 5 Sidewalk paths and unpaved facilities that are not funded with federal transportation dollars and that are not designated as Class I bike paths do not need to be designed to Caltrans standards. 5. Class I bike path roadway crossings should be carefully engineered to accommodate safe and visible crossing for users. The design needs to consider the width of the roadway, whether it has a median, and the roadway's average daily and peak-hour traffic volumes. Crossings of low-volume streets may require simple stop signs. Crossings of streets with Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of over 15,000 vehicles per hour should be assessed for signalized crossing, flashing LED beacons, crossing islands, or other devices. Roundabouts may be a desirable treatment for a bike path intersecting with roadways where the bike path is not 44 5 next to a parallel street. 7. Lighting should be provided where bicyclists will likely use the bike path in the late evening, such as along commuter routes. 8. Barriers at path entrances to prevent motorized vehicles from entering, such as obstacle posts and gates, can obstruct bicyclists and should be avoided when possible. Typically, barriers should not be considered until after it has been determined that other measures to prevent motor vehicles from entering have failed, and where the safety and other issues posed by unauthorized vehicles are more serious than the safety and access issues posed to path users. Signs and other design solutions are preferred. FIGURE 2 Cycle track intersection treatment. 9. Bike path construction should take into account vertical requirements and the impacts of maintenance and emergency vehicles on shoulders. CYCLE TRACKS Cycle tracks, also known as protected bike lanes, are Class I bikeways located on or adjacent to streets where bicycle traffic is separated from motor vehicle traffic by physical barriers. These barriers provide a sense of comfort and safety over and above that provided by typical bike lanes. Where on-street parking exists, cycle tracks are installed between the parking and the curb. Where no on-street parking exists they are located between the curb and travel lanes. They can be well suited to downtown areas where there are many people bicycling and walking, and where it is beneficial to get bicyclists off the sidewalk. They may also be used along some suburban streets with high-speed traffic. Streets selected for cycle tracks should have minimal pedestrian crossings and driveways. They should also have minimal loading/unloading activity and other street activity. The cycle tracks should be designed to minimize conflicts with these activities as well as with pedestrians and driveways. Cycle tracks are best suited for existing streets where surplus width is available; the combined width of the cycle track and the barrier is more or less the width of a travel lane. The area to be used by bicycles should be of adequate width for street sweeping to ensure that debris will not accumulate. Cycle tracks tend to work most effectively where there are few uncontrolled crossing points with unexpected traffic conflicts. Cycle track concerns include treatment at intersections, uncontrolled midblock driveways and crossings, wrong-way bicycle traffic, and difficulty accessing or exiting the facility at midblock locations. Left-turns also present challenges. Early research shows that well-designed cycle tracks attract many new cyclists and can be safer. Overall Design Considerations for Cycle Tracks • The protective area should generally be a minimum of 3 feet wide. Where space is limited 2 feet may be considered acceptable. Protective barriers may include posts/bollards/pylons, curbing, parking stops and landscaped islands. • Parking near driveways and intersections should be prohibited to allow for good visibility. • Where motorists cross the cycle track to enter driveways, the opening should be constrained so that they have to slow down and turn at a right angle. • Coloring, yield markings and "Yield to Bikes" signs should be used in areas where motorists cross cycle tracks. • Cycle tracks at intersections require deliberate design solutions (see Figure 2). Typically, this entails adding a separate signal phase that corresponds with motor vehicles travelling the same direction. The cycle tracks should have a red phase when 45 Palm Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN 6 v green n vice versa. conflicting turning movements of vehicles In the travel lanes have a g ee phase, and c • Cycle tracks should be colored and stenciled through both signalized and unsignalized intersections to notify motorists that they are crossing a bikeway. FIGURE 3 One-way cycle track. • Gaps should be installed in protective barriers to allow people in wheelchairs to cross them. These gaps should be placed where curb ramps allow passage to sidewalks. • When cycle tracks are to be implemented on existing roadway surfaces, it is important to identify and remediate any longitudinal cracking greater than 112" wide, utility covers that are not flush, vertical deformations, and other conditions that may affect rideability. • Cycle tracks need to be carefully designed at bus stops. Passengers will need to cross the cycle tracks. The bus stop may be located in the protected area so buses and bicyclists don't cross. This requires that the protected area be as wide as a bus stop (minimum of 8 feet). The protected area can be widened at the bus stops in parallel with on-street parking. Raising the cycle tracks at the bus stop to sidewalk and bus stop level allow passengers waiting on the sidewalk to cross the cycle track and enter the bus easily, and cues the cyclists to yield. Raised cycle tracks also accommodate people in wheelchairs without the need for curb ramps. en a.: One-Way Cycle Tracks In most circumstances, one-way cycle tracks work best because they are much simpler to design at intersections (see Figure 3). FIGURE a Two-way cycle track. They are designed similar to bike lanes, although they may be located between parked cars and the curb. On streets where no on- street parking exists, one-way cycle tracks are situated between the curb and travel lanes with physical protection between the cycle tracks and travel lanes. On streets with no on-street parking, one-way cycle tracks and buffered bike lanes have very similar design and function. Buffered bike lanes have a painted barrier, whereas cycle tracks have a physical barrier. Thus, cycle tracks and buffered bike lanes can be combined along a street, adding the physical protection where it is feasible, and reverting to the buffered bike lane in other sections. The bike lanes should be at least 5 feet wide, and a minimum of 6 feet is preferred. Where bicycle volumes are high, T allows cyclists to pass one another comfortably. Intersections can be designed like typical bike lanes: the physical protection is dropped, and on-street parking is prohibited on the intersection approach. Intersections may also be designed such that cyclists stay on the curbside and cross the intersection on the right of the travel lanes and turning vehicles. This design requires separate signal phasing. Using street sweepers that fit into one-way cycle tracks presents one of the primary challenges. Most street sweepers are too wide but smaller ones can be purchased. Two-Way Cycle Tracks Two-way cycle tracks take up less space on the street cross section than two one-way cycle tracks since they require only one protective barrier. They are also wide enough for most street sweepers. These are the primary advantages. The riding space of two- way cycle tracks should generally be at least 12 feet wide. Where they lead directly into a bike path or an intersecting cycle track, transitioning from two-way cycle tracks is seamless. However, where cycle tracks terminate into bike lanes or common travel lanes, the transition requires cyclists to enter and exit from crosswalks if they are travelling opposite traffic. Two-way cycle tracks present more potential conflict points at intersections than one-way cycle tracks and must be designed with more care. They require separate signal phases at intersections. Figure 4 shows a two-way cycle track. 46 Nlrn Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN 7 FIGURE 5 Raised cycle tra- � \ Raised Cycle Tracks �r Cycle tracks that have curbs and are raised above the street level provide greater protection from midblock traffic (see Figure 5), At intersections they have the same issues, challenges and design solutions as one-way or two-way cycle tracks. CLASS II BIKE LANE FACILITIES DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The following guidelines should be used when designing Class II bikeway facilities. The HDM Chapter 1000, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), the CAMUTCD, and the Caltrans Traffic Manual provide these guidelines. 1. Class II Bike Lane facilities should conform to the minimum design standard of 5 feet in width in the direction of vehicle travel adjacent to the curb lane. Where space is available, a width of 6 to 8 feet is preferred, especially on busy arterial streets, on FIGURE 6 Bike lane schematic. grades, and adjacent to parallel parking. 2. Under certain circumstances, bike lanes may be 4 feet in width. Situations where this is permitted include: a. Bike lanes located between through traffic lanes and right turn pockets at intersection approaches (see Figure 6) b. Where there is no parking, the gutter pan is no more than 12" wide, and the pavement is smooth and flush with the gutter y pan R37R c. Where there is no curb and the pavement is smooth to the edge 3. "Bike Lane" (R81) and "Bike Route" (D11-1) Signage, as shown in Figure 7, shall be posted after every significant intersection along the route of the bike lane facility. "Begin" and "End" plaques (R81A or R81B) should accompany the "Bike Lane" sign awhen appropriate. The route number shown on the Bike Route Identification sign should correspond to the latest City Bicycle �` Routes and Facilities Map. The Bike Route Identification sign can also be used in conjunction with an arrow plaque (MIS series) R�b�MiW of in advance of another approaching bike lane or route to direct bicyclists. If a bike lane exists where parking is prohibited, "no parking" signage may accompany bike lane signage. 4. Bike lanes should be striped with a 6-inch wide solid white stripe of (CAMUTCD Detail 39) and should be dashed (Detail 39A) at an intersection approach. The length of Detail 39A shall be 100 feet when the block is short (less than 400') and 200 feet where the block is longer or vehicle speeds are high (greater than 35 mph). The dashed bike lane stripe allows for use of the FIGURE 7 Bike Lane (W) and Bike Route (Dt 1-1) signs. bike lane as a right-turn pocket for motor vehicles. 5. At the beginning of each and end of each block and at approximately 150' to 250' intervals, pavement stencils of a bicycle and arrow shall be used to show the direction of travel (see Figure 8). The stencils at the end of the block should be placed just before the dashed bike lane stripe (Detail 39B). 0% 6. Bike lanes with two stripes are more visible than those with one and are preferred. The second inside stripe (4 inch solid white) BIKELANE would differentiate the bike lane from the parking lane where appropriate. 7. Where space permits, intersection treatments should include bike lane 'pockets' as shown in Figure 6. 8. At signalized intersections, loops or other means of bicycle detection should be installed near the limit line in the bike lane and all vehicle lanes that have detection. Signal timing and phasing should be set to accommodate bicycle acceleration speeds. Painted bicycle detector stencils may be placed at detection zones located within the bike lane to notify bicyclists where they 47 Palm Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN 8 FIGURE 8 Bike lane striping and stencil. can actuate the signal. 9. Where bike lanes terminate, they typically should transition to a Class III bike route when possible. Cyclists should be notified through a sign that includes the Bike Lane sign (R81) with End plaque (R81 B). Shared lane markings (sharrows) should be placed in the transition zone to help guide cyclists to the proper place to ride in the lane. Class III bike route time, distance and destination signs should help provide continuity. 10. When bike lanes are to be implemented on existing roadway surfaces, it is important to identify and remediate any longitudinal cracking greater than ''/z" wide, vertical deformations such as utility covers that are not flush, and other conditions that may affect rideability. 11. Traffic signals can be timed and coordinated for cyclists (where appropriate). COLORED BICYCLE LANES FIGURE 9 Gro,:- Green bicycle lanes increase visibility for cyclists. The Federal Highway Administration (FHA) and the California Traffic Control Device Committee have approved green bike lanes (shown in Figure 9) on an interim basis per CAMUTCD IA-14; Interim Approval for Optional Use of Green Colored Pavement for Bike Lanes. The State of California has requested and received approval from the FHA to implement CAMUTCD IA-14 statewide. Consequently, the City may implement green bike lanes without need to notify the State or FHA, provided the CAMUTCD guidelines are followed. Green bicycle lanes are sometimes used as "conflict zone" treatments. They are short lanes that are used at right-turn pockets or driveways to alert right-turning motorists of the bike lane. Green bicycle lanes can also be used as a continuous treatment spanning (r the extended length of a bike lane corridor. f BUFFERED BIKE LANES Buffered bike lanes provide a painted divider between the bike lane and the adjacent travel lane (see Figures 10 and 11). This additional space can improve the comfort of cyclists, as they don't have to ride as close to motor vehicles. Buffered bike lanes can also be used to narrow travel lanes, which slows traffic. An additional buffer may be used between parked cars and bike lanes to FIGURE ffered bicyc E, direct cyclists to ride outside of the door zone of the parked cars. These are most important with significant parking turnover. Buffered bike lanes are most appropriate on wide, busy streets. They can be used on streets where physically separating the bike lanes with cycle tracks is undesirable for cost, operational, or maintenance reasons. 48 Palm Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN 9 CLASS III BIKE ROUTES FIGURE 11 Buffered bicycle lane schematic. Class III bike routes are typically simple signed routes along street corridors, usually local streets and collectors. With proper route signage, design, and maintenance, bike routes can be effective in guiding bicyclists along a route suited for bicycling that does not have enough roadway space for a dedicated Class II bike lane. Class III bike routes can be designed in a manner that encourages s _ bicycle usage, convenience, and safety. Bike routes can become more useful when coupled with the following techniques: • Route, directional, and distance signage • Wide curb lanes • Shared lane marking stencils painted in the traffic lane along the appropriate path of where a bicyclist would ride in the lane (see Figures 13 and 14 and discussion below) • Accelerated pavement maintenance schedules • Traffic signals timed and coordinated for cyclists (where appropriate) • At signalized intersections, loop detectors or other means of bicycle detection should be installed near the limit lane in all vehicle lanes that have vehicle detection. • Traffic signals can be timed and coordinated for cyclists (where appropriate). Signal timing and phasing should be set to accommodate bicycle acceleration speeds. FIGURE 12 Sharrow stencil. • Traffic calming measures • Remediation of longitudinal cracking greater than 1/2" wide, utility covers that are not flush, vertical deformations, and other $ conditions that may affect rideability. i - 3� "Bike Route" (D11-1) signage, as shown in Figure 7, should be posted after every intersection along the route to inform ' bicyclists that the bikeway facility continues and alert motorists to the presence of bicyclists. "Begin" and "End" plaques (M4-14 �z wG and M4-6) should accompany the Bike Route sign when appropriate. The route number shown on the Bike Route Identification sign should correspond to the latest City Bicycle Routes and Facilities Map. The Bike Route sign can also be used in _ { conjunction with an arrow plaque (M6 series) in advance of another approaching bike route or lane to direct bicyclists. If a bike route exists where parking is prohibited, "no parking" signage may accompany bike lane signage. i SHARROWS Sharrow stencils (Figure 12) are recommended as a way to enhance the visibility and safety of Class III bike routes. Sharrows (officially known as "shared lane markings") indicate to cyclists the proper position to ride within the travel lane and assist with a= wayfinding. They also alert motorists that the travel lane is to be shared with bicyclists. California MUTCD, Section 9C.103(CA) Shared Roadway Bicycle Markings states: "The shared roadway bicycle marking shall only 36 mm�1 F�reBu �B F x 91n� be used on a roadway (Class III Bikeway (Bike Route) or Shared Roadway (No Bikeway Designation))." When used on streets with on-street parking, sharrows are to be placed such that the centers of the markings are a minimum of 11 feet from the curb face or edge of paved shoulder on streets with on-street parallel parking. On streets without on-street parking that have an outside travel lane that is less than 14 feet wide, the centers of the sharrows should be at least 4 feet from the face of the curb. 49 Patin Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN 10 FIGURE 14 Long Beach green sharrow lane. FIGURE 13 Shared lane marking placement graphic (left) and photo (right). On two-lane roadways, these minimum distances allow vehicles to pass bicyclists on the left within the same lane without FIGURE 15 Brookline, MA Sharrow markings. encroaching into the opposite lane of traffic. (On multi-lane roadways, motorists must change lanes to pass a cyclist.) On streets with on-street parking, installing sharrows more than 11 feet from the curb will also move the bicyclist farther from the "door zone" (see Figure 13 [top)) (approximately 4'). Sharrows should be placed in straight lines to encourage the bicyclist to travel in a straight line. This often means the sharrows are in the center of the lane, greater than the minimum guideline of 4 or 11 feet from the curb. Sharrows should always be placed w outside the "door zone" where on-street parking is provided. Ideally, sharrows should be placed immediately after an intersection and spaced no more than 150 feet apart on Class III bike routes. On shared lane marking streets they may be spaced up to 250 feet apart. Sharrows should also be placed at the end of each block approximately 50' in advance of the limit line. Placing the sharrows between tire tracks increases the life of the markings and decreases long-term maintenance costs. TYPE B SHARROWS FIGURE 16 UCLA campus Type 8 Sharrows. The Cities of Long Beach and San Francisco are presently experimenting with green coloring of travel lanes with sharrows, which Ryan Snyder Associates has termed Type B sharrows (see Figure 14, 15, and 16). The wide green stripe used in Long Beach and green-backed sharrows in San Francisco send a strong signal to cyclists as to where they should ride. They also communicate to motorists that bicyclists are legitimate users of the entire travel lane. Although no standards are established, multi-lane streets with narrow curb lanes are likely the most appropriate for Type B sharrows. This treatment has not yet been approved as part of the CAMUTCD. Until it is approved, the City would have to use this treatment under the sanctioned experimental process defined in section 1A.10 of the CAMUTCD. FHWA recently cancelled further experimentation with the Long Beach-style green stripe sharrows and the greenback sharrows. Brookline, Massachusetts uses another form of Type B sharrows, which consists of large sharrows placed close together with an additional outer marking (see Figure 15). Some cities highlight sharrows with a square of green paint to make them more visible. These are called green-back sharrows (see Figure 16). 50 Palm Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN 1 1 Signage and Markings Bikeway signage should conform to the signage standards identified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD, 2009) and the California MUTCD 2010. These documents give specific information on the type and location of signage for the primary bikeway system. Table 1 on the next page provides guidance on some of the most important signs. FIGURE 17 Bikes may Use the Full Lane (R4-11) WAYFINDING SIGNAGE Palm Springs should launch a wayfinding system to guide bicyclists to their destinations. Glendale, CA recently began installing wayfinding signs along their network, as Figure 18 shows. Signs will be typically placed at decision points along routes within the City's bicycle network, which may include the intersection of two or more bikeways and at key locations leading to and along bikeways. Similarly, Los Angeles recently began marking street signs with bicycles if the street is a bicycle friendly street (see Figure 19). Ideally, wayfinding signs should indicate direction, time and distance. db Figure 17 shows a supplemental "Bikes May Use the Full Lane" sign to alert motorists of cyclists right to the lane. These supplement MAYUS E wayfinding. This sign is being used as a potentially more effective sign than "Share the Road Signs". Figure 7 illustrates a sign the City currently uses and can be used for wayfinding. FULLLANE It is important to provide information to cyclists where bike routes turn, or where bikeways intersect. This can be done with both asigns and pavement markings as shown in Figure 20. Palm Springs can enhance typical Class III routes with directional signage and pavement markings. These markings allow the cyclist to understand how the route continues, especially if it is one that may be R less direct. 0.6 iv Mites Glendaleo.2 [7; . . Maple Pain J lity Center COMMUI 1.4h� 1 ucca St Carr Park [..6 2 0 0 W. .�: .` FIGURE 20 Examples of paving markings (top two images) and FIGURE 18 Glendale wayfinding sign. FIGURE 19 Los Angeles Bicycle Friendly Street sign. directional signage (bottom two images). 51 Palm Springs BICYCLE ROUTE PLAN 12 TABLE 1 RECOMMENDED BIKEWAY SIGNAGE AND MARKINGS Signage Location Color CA MUTCD MUTCD Designation Designation Bicycle Crossing For motorists at a bikeway B on Y N/A W11-15 with W11- crossing 15P (optional) At the far side of Bike Lane significant arterial B on W R81 R3-17 intersections Begin (bike lane) Where a bike lane begins B on W R81A End (bike lane) Where a bike lane ends B on W R81 B Stop Ahead Where a stop sign is B R on Y W3-1 W3-1 obscured Signal Ahead Where signal is obscured B, R, G W3-3 W3-3 Where a pedestrian Pedestrian Crossing walkway crosses a B on Y W1 1-2 W11-2 bikeway At intersections where D1-1b, D1-21b, D1- Directional Signs access to major W on G G7, G8 3b, D1-1c, D1-2c, destinations is available D1-3c Right Lane Must Turn Right; Begin Right Where a bike lane ends B on W N/A.. R4-4 R3-7, R4-4 Turn Here, Yield to before an intersection Bikes Where there is need to Share the Road warn motorists to watch B on Y W16-1 with W16-1 P with W11-1 for bicyclists along the W11-1 highway Where travel lanes are too Bicycles May Use narrow for bicyclists and B on W R4-11 R4-11 Full Lane motor vehicles to travel side by side 52 13 CHOICE OF BIKEWAY TYPE The type of treatment depends on the street or right-of-way, width, adjacent land uses, traffic volumes, and traffic speeds. When exclusive right-of-way exists, bike paths are planned. Bike lanes are planned on streets that have enough width to accommodate them. Road diets are planned to create space for bike lanes on multi-lane streets where traffic volumes allow. Improvements to bike lanes are planned where enough space exists to widen bike lanes or to stripe buffers. Bike routes are planned on streets where network connectivity is needed, but insufficient space exists for bike lanes, or where traffic volumes do not call for bike lanes. The following factors should be considered guidelines, and will be modified and interpreted as necessary for a given situation. The City will use its judgment if it chooses to plan additional bikeways in the future or modify the proposed bikeways due to engineering constraints. The City will also use appropriate experimental processes and guidelines when implementing devices such as wayfinding markings, Type B sharrows, colored bike lanes, etc. Lane Width Any road with 45 MPH speed limit: 11' lanes preferred, minimum of 10 allowable All other roads: Minimum 10' lanes Parking lane. Minimum width of 7', 8' where bike lanes can be accommodated with wider parking lanes Road Diets Road diets are recommended to provide space for attractive bike lanes on where needed on four-lane streets with less than 20,000 Average Daily Traffic (ADT). This is the threshold that national studies have determined to have sufficient capacity with two lanes or two lanes and a center-turn lane. On six-lane streets, 40,000 ADT was used as the threshold for reducing the number of lanes to four. Bikeway Type Minimum width of a bike lane is 5', but it is recommended to use 8' to T as the standard wherever possible. Where bike lanes do not fit, but network connectivity is necessary, bike routes with sharrows will be planned. Type B sharrows are recommended along streets with high traffic volumes and where a high quality of bikeway is needed in central areas, near schools, and other key locations Colored bike lanes are recommended in central areas, along commercial streets, along streets with high traffic volumes and where a high quality of bikeway is needed near schools and other key locations. Buffers are painted between the travel lanes and bike lane and/or between on-street parking and striped bike lanes to provide extra comfort to the cyclist where roadway width permits (see note on buffer design and MUTCD compliance below). 53 14 Double buffered bike lanes are recommended where adequate space exists, where traffic volumes are high and in commercial areas where significant parking turnover is likely. Cycle tracks are recommended along one-way portions of Palm Canyon Drive and Indian Canyon Drive where they would offer protection in a busy area, and where merchants may benefit from the traffic calming that would result (see Design Guidelines on page 7), Where average daily traffic (ADT) is high, in central areas of the city, or where traffic moves fast, this Plan recommends coloring bike lanes to ensure the bikeway is prominent to motorists. Consider traffic circles to replace stop-controlled intersections to improve bikeways where appropriate Painted buffers greater than 2' in width are legal in California if they are placed outside of a bicycle lane where there is no on-street parking. If there is on-street parking, the City may want to go through an experimental process with the California Traffic Control Device Committee (CTCDC) to install buffers wider than 2'. Some jurisdiction&. such as the City of Los Angeles, have developed striping plans that they believe comply with the California MUTCD and California Vehicle Code, allowing them to install wide painted buffers without going through an experimental process. The striping plans include breaks in the buffers. Type B sharrows will also have to go through the experimental process with the CTCDC. Field Work results Existing Bikeways TABLE 2 LENGTH BY BIKEWAY TYPE WITH PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES Proposed Bikeways All streets not listed in the Proposed Bikeways table will be Shared Lane Marking streets. Bikeway Type Total(mi.) Cost/Mile Estimoted Tables follow the maps to show Existing and Proposed Bikeways. Cst Buffered Bike Lanes 28,11 $65,000 $1.827,150 The City has 11.5 miles of existing Class II bike lanes, 15,57 miles of existing Class III bike routes and 8,04 miles of existing Class II Bike Lane 0.84 $50,000 $42,000 sidewalk bike paths next to streets. Class III Bike Route 23.86 $25,000 $596,500 Table 2 shows the total proposed mileage for all types of bikeways along with planning level cost estimates. Class III Bike Route with Type B Sharrows 3.53 $50,000 $176,500 Colored Buffered Bike Lanes 20.26 $150,000 $3,039,000 Colored Bike Lanes 8,54 $130,000 $1,110,200 One-way Cycletracks 1.13 $750,000 $847,500 Two-way Cycletracks 1.16 $800,000 $928,000 Double Colored Buffered Bike Lanes 8.72 $120,000 $1,046,400 Widen Existing Bike Lanes 0,79 $35,000 $27,650 Shared Lane Marking Streets 248.87 $10,000 $2,488,700 Grand Total 339.94 $12,129,600 Cycle tracks on Palm Canyon-10 signal modifications,curb extension reconstruction.Requires more in depth cost analysis. Cycle tracks on Indian Canyon-7 signal modifications,curb extension reconstruction.Requires more in depth cost analysis. j j 15 Existing Bikeways City of Palm Springs 20TH A r y� LEGEND City Boundary Existing Bikeways Class II Bike Lane Class III Bike Route Sidewalk Path � I I 111 : SI INRISE PKWY i AFAEL �9r r rZ ¢ Z Q C Z Y W 3y _ Li Li LLJJ L-LLJ 4 a :.Q . Ri AW O V d — > ¢ Q CHI' CQ F PASFO FI MIRA D OR AiVit -'�D 4 SUR ' TACHEV DR 71":�, n MARIV p •tir t M p ..HJ�-,AV ION WAYz � p 10 Ul z J L _ w RAMON RD 1l Ore ¢ O U s r MESQUITE E E E,AVE wF_ m E AL M d�ESCOBA DR VE cl O1- _�_~ ¢ z r U p U . K O ¢ ¢ n _ m MATTHFW N W , IA IESTREYC. yO-71 LT � U � 1 0 0.5 1 m n n c N Miles c M m � I r D Z cm Proposed Bikeways City of Palm Springs 2QTIiA�`. LEGEND w :yror Shared-Lane Marking Streets VSi City Boundary °a. Proposed Blkewoys Buffered Bike Lane ...... Class II Bike lane • Class III Bike Route •••••• Class It Bike Route-Type B Sharrows -- Colored Bike Lane Colored Buffered Bike Lane •• Double Colored Buttered Bike Lane •••••• One-way Cycletracks ....•• Two-way Cycletracks •• Widen Existing Bike Lane a S R WY i RA T Li >� SUR , DR rL r . m ti to .AA#IpITION WAY =I it OGI .- E TAJO I SR r _ j } 3QM8N,RQ %.... O } •• I R I i � P T'i : m 3 I 111••��� t -...r � MAIL `n 0 0.5 1 _---- p m c N Miles M m 'a D Z 1 CA 5� Existing and Proposed Bikeways City of Palm Springs LEGEND EzlsMng Bikeways Class II Bike Lane —Class III Bike Route Sidewolk Path \\ Proposed Bikeways \ 1.,'•• Buffered Bike Lane •• Class II Bike Lone 1,:^• Class III Bike Route •••• Class III Bike Route-Type B Sharrows \ •• Colored Bike Lane .. Colored Buffered Bike Lane •• Double Colored Buffered Bike Lane ...... One-way Cycletracks _ •.• Two-way Cycletracks �—L - - Widen ExistingBike lane III �SlZNR6E WY ••,• City Boundary i LEA \\ LTF CFLA_ 1 A(ANION WAY U MESCj4111� .: EO i ., 'V .pax.. ........... 41 0 J i a �r AIEStHi-: - t '. N I U e p N FR 0 0.5 1 o N Miles c —t m Z f .57 TABLE 3 FIELD WORK To Center Tum Parking Width (Ft) Median #of Lanes Lane/Median (X1 Comments 34th Ave. Crossley Rd. Whitewater Wash 32 2 x Alejo Rd. Belardo Rd. N. Palm Canyon Dr. 38 -42 2 x 38' with no parking; 42' with parking and 2 turn lanes Alejo Rd. N. Palm Canyon Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. 68 4 C Alejo Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. Calle El Segundo 32 2 x Alejo Rd. N. Calle El Segundo N. Sunrise Way 64 2 x Alejo Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. 51 2 x Alejo Rd. N. Farrell Dr. N. Civic Dr. 51 2 x Amado Rd. N. Belardo Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. 44 2 x Amado Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Hermosa Dr. 48-60 2 x Small stretch is narrower with soft shoulder Amado Rd. N. Hermosa Dr. N. Sunrise Way 66 2 x Amado Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. 36-38 2 x Araby Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. Murray Canyon Dr. 40 2 x Arenas Rd. S. Cahuilla Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. 38 2 x Arenas Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Canyon Dr. 48-50 2 C x Arenas Rd. S. Indian Canyon Dr. S. Calle Encilia 26 2 x Arenas Rd. S. Calle Encilia S. Calle El Segundo 33 2 x Arenas Rd. S. Calle El Segundo S. Avenida Caballeros 64 2 x Arenas Rd. S. Avenida Caballeros N. Hermosa Dr. 58 2 x Avenida Caballeros W. Ramon Rd, E. Tamarisk Rd. 64 2 x 6' wide bike lanes Avenida Caballeros E. Tamarisk Rd. E. Tachevah Dr. 64 2 x Avenida Caballeros E. Tachevah Dr. E. Pasco El Mirador 50 4 Avenida Caballeros E. Paseo El Mirador E. Vista Chino 64 4 x Avenida Caballeros E. Vista Chino E. San Rafael Dr. 64 2 x Avenida Granada S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Camino Real 64 2 x Baristo Rd. El Cielo Rd. S. Avenida Caballeros 64 2 x 5' Bike lanes Barona Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. Sandcliff Rd. 64 4 x Parking not used much at the time of survey; Just S/O Ramon Rd. - no parking + center-turn lane Barona Rd. Sandcliff Rd. South end Narrow 2 Undeveloped Belardo Rd. W. Alejo Rd. W. Amado Rd. 36-46 2 x Multipurpose path on east side Belardo Rd. W. Amado Rd. W. Tahquitz Canyon Way 48-58 2 x Belardo Rd. W. Ta quitz Canyon W Arenas Rd. 40 2 x Belardo Rd. W. Arenas Rd. W. Baristo Rd. 40-48 2 x Variable widths Belardo Rd. W. Baristo Rd. W. Ramon Rd. 50 2 x Belardo Rd. W. Ramon Rd. E. Sunny Dunes Rd. 64 2 x 58 19 To Center Turn Parking Street From To Width (Ft.) Median #of Lanes Lane/Median (X) Comments (X) (CIM) Belardo Rd. E. Sunny Dunes Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. 36-38 Bogert Trail S. Palm Canyon Dr. City limit 36 x Cahuilla Rd. W yahquitz Canyon E. Ramon Rd. Narrow 2 x Calle El Segundo E. Alejo Rd. E. Amado Rd. 64 2 x Calle El Segundo E. Amado Rd. E. Ramon Rd. 64 4 x Calle Encilia E. Alejo Rd. E. Arenas Rd. 64 2 C x Calle Encilia E. Arenas Rd, Ramon Rd. 47 2 x Signed as one short bike route/30' section Calle Palo Fierro E. Ramon Rd. N. Riverside Dr. 32-34 2 x Calle Palo Fierro E. Mesquite Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 38-40 2 x Calle Palo Fierro E. Palm Canyon Dr. Twin Palms Dr. 40 2 x Calle Palo Fierro Twin Palms Dr. E. La Verne Way 24 2 Calle Palo Fierro E. La Verne Way Ave Granada 40 2 x Camino Parocela El Cielo Rd. Gene Autry Trail 36-40 2 x Camino Parocela Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd. 50 2 x Camino Real S. Riverside Dr. Calle Palo Fierro 62 3 x School Camino Real Calle Palo Fierro E. Palm Canyon Dr, 30-51 2 x Variable width Camino Real E. Palm Canyon Dr. E. La Verne Way 64 2 x Camino Real E. La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr. 38-40 2 x Cerritos Dr. Joyce Dr. Amado Rd. 20-40 x Civic Dr. E. Alejo Rd. E. Tahquitz Canyon Way 36-44 2 x 36' where parking probibited, 44' where permitted, Good route - signed bike route now Civic Dr. 1E.. yahquitz Canyon E. Baristo Rd. 40 2 x Compadre Rd. E. Mesquite Ave. Sonora Rd. 40 2 x Crossley Rd. E. Ramon Rd. Sunny Dunes Rd. 64 4 C Crossley Rd. Sunny Dunes Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 64 2 Crossley Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. Entrance to Fairway Cir. 56 2 Crossley Rd. Entrance to Fairway 34th Ave. 60-80 4 C No bike lane Circle Dinah Shore Dr. Gene Autry Trail Golf Club Dr./Crossley Rd. 32 x 4 M Dinah Shore Dr. Crossley Rd. City Limit 31 x 4 M E. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Trail 64 4 C E. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Trail Anguilla Rd. 70 4 C E. Palm Canyon Dr. Arguilla Rd. S. Sunrise Way 76 4 C E. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Sunrise Way Smoke Tree Ln. 68 4 C E. Palm Canyon Dr. Smoke Tree Ln. Farrell Dr./Barona Rd. 32 x 4 M 59 20 To Center Turn Parking Street From To Width (Ft.) Median #of Lanes Lane/Median (X) Comments (X) (CAM) E. Palm Canyon Dr. Farrell Dr./Barona Rd. Mu rayr Creek Bridge 65 4 E. Palm Canyon Dr." Murray Creek Bridge Golf Club Dr. 65-70 4 C E. Palm Canyon Dr." Farrell Dr. Golf Club Dr. Sidewalk bike path on north side. El Cielo Rd. W yahquitz Canyon E. Ramon Rd. 64 4 C x El Cielo Rd. E. Ramon Rd, Escoba Dr. 64 2 C x Escoba Dr. E. Palm Canyon Dr. El Cielo Rd. 64 2 C Escoba Dr. El Cielo Rd. End 40 2 x To River Farrell Dr. E. Joyce Rd. E. Racquet Club Dr. 36 2 x Farrell Dr. E. Racquet Club Dr. E. Vista Chino 64 4 C Farrell Dr. E. Vista Chino E. Ramon Rd. 64 4 C x Bike route signs on east side only from Vista Chino to Ramon Rd. Farrell Dr. E. Ramon Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 64 4 Francis Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Farrell Dr. 36 2 x Gene Autry Trail 1-10 E. Via Escuela 69 4 8' shoulders Gene Autry Trail E. Via Escuela E. Vista Chino 27 x 4 M Gene Autry Trail' E. Vista Chino E. Ramon Rd. 34-35 x 6 M Gene Autry Trail" E. Ramon Rd. E. Mesquite Ave. 35 x 4 M Parking not used (at time of survey); narrows @ Mesquite Ave. Gene Autry Trail' E. Mesquite Ave. S/O E. Mesquite Ave. 76 4 C No bike route signs Gene Autry Trail" S/O E. Mesquite Ave. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 60-76 3 C Protected bike lane/ped path exist over bridge Golf Club Dr. 34th Ave. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 33 x 4 M 8' bike lane Hermosa Dr. E. Tachevah Dr. E. Amado Rd. 40 2 x Hermosa Dr, E. Amado Rd. E. Arenas Rd. 22 2 x Hermosa Dr. stops at Arenas Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. I-10 Sunrise Pkwy. 69 4 8' painted shoulders; narrows near Amtrak Station; bike lanes north of Amtrak Station Indian Canyon Dr. Sunrise Pkwy, San Rafael Dr. 31 x 4 M Indian Canyon Dr. San Rafael Dr. E. Francis Dr. 55-60 4 C Indian Canyon Dr. E. Francis Dr. Racquet Club Dr. 76 4 C x Indian Canyon Dr. Racquet Club Dr. Vista Chino 70-76 4 C x Indian Canyon Dr. Vista Chino E. Camino Monte Vista 60 4 C x Indian Canyon Dr. E. Camino Monte Vista E. Tachevah Dr. 76 4 C x Indian Canyon Dr. E. Tachevah Dr. E. Alejo Rd. 61 4 C Becomes two-way N/O Alejo Rd, Indian Canyon Dr. E. Alejo Rd. E. Arenas Rd. 64 4 x Curb extension; one way Indian Canyon Dr. E. Arenas Rd. E. Camino Parocela 64 4 x One-way Joyce Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. 36 2 x Kirk Douglas Way/Airport E. yahquitz Canyon E. Ramon Rd. 28, 43, 51 2,3,4 28' with 2 lanes, 43' with 3 lanes, 51' with 4 lanes s� I 21 To Center Tum Parking Street From ToWidth {Ft) Median #of Lanes Lane/Median (x) Comments La Verne Way S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Sunrise Way 62-64 4 x Bike route signs only at intersections of Camino Real and Toledo Ave. Las Palmas Trail, Via Lola, Camino del Corte, Camino Sur, Camino Cerrito, Camino Varies, 2 x Norte, Vine Ave., Stevens Narrow Rd., Rose Ave., Crescent Dr., Belardo Rd., Alejo Rd, Mesquite Ave. West End S. Belardo Rd. 20-29-36 2 Variable width Mesquite Ave. S. Belardo Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. 64 2 x Mesquite Ave. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Camino Real 40 2 x Mesquite Ave. S. Camino Real S. Sunrise Way 40-50 2 x Variable width, sloped parking Mesquite Ave. S. Sunrise Way S. Farrell Dr. 64 2 x Existing bike route signs Mesquite Ave. El Cielo Rd. Vella Rd. Varies 2 x Too narrow for bike lanes to Vella Rd.; bike route to Vella Rd. Mesquite Ave. Vella Rd. S. Gene Autry Trail 64 4 C x Check ADT, maybe don't need 4 lanes Murray Canyon Dr. S. Palm Canyon Dr. Toledo Ave. 64 4 x Parking not used at the time of survey N. Palm Canyon Dr.` North City Limit Tram Way 34 x 4 Wide shoulder N. Palm Canyon Dr.` Tram Way W. San Rafael Dr. 64 4 x N. Palm Canyon Dr.` W. San Rafael Dr. Vista Chino 64 4 x N. Palm Canyon Dr. Vista Chino Alejo Rd. 64 4 x N./S. Palm Canyon Dr. Alejo Rd. Ramon Rd. 50-55 3 x One-way Paseo El Mirador N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros 40 2 x Paseo El Mirador N. Avenida Caballeros Linda Vista Rd. 21 2 x Pasco El Mirador Linda Vista Rd. N. Sunrise Way 40 2 x Racquet Club Rd. N. Palm Canyon Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. 64 4 C Racquet Club Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Farrell Dr. 62-64 4 x Racquet Club Rd., Cardillo Ave., Via Via Norte, Vistato Chino, Via N.N Indian Canyon Dr. Crescent Dr. 20-40 x Chi � Monte Vista Ramon Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Canyon Dr. 62 4 C x Parking side bike route Ramon Rd. S. Indian Canyon Dr. S. Calle Encilia 64 4 C Ramon Rd. S. Calle Encilia Calle Palo Fierro 61 4 C Ramon Rd. Calle Palo Fierro S. Avenida Caballeros 70 4 C x Parking allowed but not used at the time of the survey Ramon Rd. S. Avenida Caballeros S. Sunrise Way 76 4 C x Ramon Rd. S. Sunrise Way S. Farrell Dr. 64 4 C No bike route signs Ramon Rd. S. Farrell Dr, El Cielo Rd. 70 4 C 61 22 To Center Turn Parking Street From ToWidth (Ft.) Median #of Lanes Lane/Median (x) Comments (x) (C,M) Ramon Rd. El Cielo Rd. Kirk Douglas Way 86 6 C Ramon Rd. Kirk Douglas Way Gene Autry Trail 46 and 35 x 7 M 4 lanes WB, 3 lanes EB Ramon Rd. Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd. 35 x 6 M No bike route signs Ramon Rd. San Luis Rey Rd. Crossley Rd. 35 x 4 M No bike route signs S. Palm Canyon Dr. W. Ramon Rd. E. Camino Parocela 64 3 One-way S. Palm Canyon Dr. E. Camino Parocela Morongo Rd. 62-64 4 C Cross section varies; 2 bike route signs NB< 1 SB S. Palm Canyon Dr. Morongo Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 72 4 C S. Palm Canyon Dr. E. Palm Canyon Dr. El Portal 56 4 x S. Palm Canyon Dr. El Portal Ave Granada 64 4 x S. Palm Canyon Dr. Ave Granada South City Limit 64 4 x San Luis Rey Rd. Mission Dr. E. Ramon Rd, 68 3 C x Tapers down north San Luis Rey Rd. E. Ramon Rd. Sunny Dunes Rd. 50 2 C San Rafael Dr. N. Palm Canyon Rd. N. Virginia Rd. 64 4 C x San Rafael Dr, N. Virginia Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. 24 2 Soft shoulders San Rafael Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Avenida Caballeros 64 4 C San Rafael Dr. N. Avenida Caballeros N. Sunrise Way 64 4 x Sunny Dunes Rd, West End S. Palm Canyon Dr, 40 2 x Signed bike route Sunny Dunes Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. Calle Palo Fierro 64 2 x Signed bike route Sunny Dunes Rd. Calle Palo Fierro S. Camino Real 40 2 x Sunny Dunes Rd. S. Camino Real S. Sunrise Way 40 2 x Parking on south side Sunny Dunes Rd. El Cielo Rd. Crossley Rd. 40 2 x Parking not used at the time of the survey Sunrise Way Whitewater Wash E. San Rafael Dr. 35 x 4 M Sunrise Way E. San Rafael Dr. E. Vista Chino 64 4 C Sunrise Way E. Vista Chino E. Tamarisk Rd. 70 4 C Sunrise Way E. Tamarisk Rd. E. Alejo Rd. 66 4 C Sunrise Way E. Alejo Rd. E. Ramon Rd, 70 4 C Sunrise Way E. Ramon Rd. E. Sunny Dunes Rd. 72 4 C No parking Sunrise Way E. Sunny Dunes Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. 70 4 C Parking on west side - not used at time of survey Sunrise Way Vista Chino E. Palm Canyon Dr. Sidewalk bike path whole way - 8' Tachevah Dr. N. Palm Canyon Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr, 52 4 x Parking south side only Tachevah Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. 1/2 way to N. Via Miraleste 46 2 C x 1/2 way between N. Bike lane on north side only; Parking on south side Tachevah Dr. Indian Canyon Dr. and N. Via Miraleste 56 2 C x only N. Via Miraleste Tachevah Dr. N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros 51-52 2 C x Bike lane on north side only; Parking on south side only Tachevah Dr. N. Avenida Caballeros N. Pasco de Anza 24-32 2 x Tachevah Dr. N. Pasco de Anza N. Sunrise Way 48-52 2 x 62 23 To Center Tum Parking Width (Ft.) Median #of Lanes Lane/Median (x) Comments Tachevah Dr. N. Sunrise Way Cerritos Dr. 64 2 x Tachevah Dr. Cerritos Dr. N. Farrell Dr. 33 2 x Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Museum Dr. N. Palm Canyon Dr. 50 2 x Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Palm Canyon Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. 47 2 x Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Calle El Segundo 31-33 x 4 M x Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Calle El Segundo El Cielo Rd. 31 x 4 M 5-6' bike lane Tamarisk Rd. N. Palm Canyon Dr. N. Via Miraleste 30 2 x Tamarisk Rd. N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros 41 2 x No pavement for parking, north side Tamarisk Rd. N. Avenida Caballeros N. Sunrise Way 30 2 x Tamarisk Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. 40 2 x Toledo Ave. S. La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr. 64 2 x 6' bike lane; 14' parking Twin Palms Dr. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. La Verne Way 39 2 x Via Escuela N. Palm Canyon Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. 40 2 x Via Escuela N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Sunrise Way 40 2 x Via Escuela N. Sunrise Way N. Volturno Rd. 36 2 x Via Escuela N. Volturno Rd. N. Gene Autry Trail 40 2 x Via Miraleste E. Francis Dr. E. Vista Chino 32-40 2 x Via Miraleste E. Vista Chino E. Tachevah Dr. 51-52 2 x Via Miraleste E. Tachevah Dr. E. Tamarisk Rd. 45 4 x Via Miraleste E. Tamarisk Rd. E. Alejo Rd. 35 Soft shoulders Vista Chino" N. Palm Canyon Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. 51 4 Vista Chino` N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Sunrise Way 76 4 x Vista Chino` N. Sunrise Way Cerritos Dr. 24, 36 x 5 M 3 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB Vista Chino" Cerritos Dr. N. Gene Autry Trail 64 4 C Vista Chino N. Gene Autry Trail East City Limit 60 4 Wide paved shoulders 'State Highways. Modifications to these streets will require cooperation with Caltrans. 63 24 TABLE 4 EXISTING BIKEWAYS Street From ToSidewalk PathsM.M. Class III Bike Route Alejo Rd. Belardo Rd. N. Palm Canyon Dr. x Alejo Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. x Alejo Rd. N. Farrell Dr. N. Civic Dr. x Avenida Caballeros W. Ramon Rd. E. Tamarisk Rd. x Avenida Caballeros E. Vista Chino E. San Rafael Dr. x Baristo Rd. El Cielo Rd, S. Avenida Caballeros x Belardo Rd. W. Alejo Rd. W. Amado Rd. x Belardo Rd. W. Arenas Rd. W. Baristo Rd. x Belardo Rd. E. Sunny Dunes Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. x Cahuilla Rd. E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Ramon Rd. x Calle Encilia E. Arenas Rd. Ramon Rd. x Camino Real S. Riverside Dr. Calle Palo Ferro x Camino Real Calle Palo Fierro E. Palm Canyon Dr. x Camino Real E. Palm Canyon Dr. E. La Verne Way x Camino Real E. La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr. x Civic Dr. E. Alejo Rd. E. Tahquitz Canyon Way x E. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Sunrise Way Smoke Tree Ln. x E. Palm Canyon Dr. Smoke Tree Ln. Farrell Dr./Barona Rd. x E. Palm Canyon Dr. Farrell Dr. Golf Club Dr. x Farrell Dr. E. Vista Chino E. Ramon Rd. x Gene Autry Trail E. Vista Chino E. Ramon Rd. x Golf Club Dr. 34th Ave. E. Palm Canyon Dr. x Indian Canyon Dr. E. Tachevah Dr. E. Alejo Rd. x Indian Canyon Dr. E. Alejo Rd. E. Arenas Rd. x Indian Canyon Dr. E. Arenas Rd, E. Camino Parocela x Las Palmas Trail: Via Lola, Camino del Corte, Camino Sur, Camino Cerrito, Camino Norte, x Vine Ave., Stevens Rd., Rose Ave., Crescent Dr., Belardo Rd., Alejo Rd, Mesquite Ave. S. Sunrise Way S. Farrell Dr. x 64 25 Street From ToSidewalk Paths Class it Bike Lane Class III Bike Route (BL) Mesquite Ave. El Cielo Rd. Vella Rd. x Ramon Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Canyon Dr. x Sunny Dunes Rd. West End S. Palm Canyon Dr. x Sunny Dunes Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. Calle Palo Fierro x Sunny Dunes Rd. Calle Palo Fierro S. Camino Real x Sunny Dunes Rd. S. Camino Real S. Sunrise Way x Sunrise Way Vista Chino E. Palm Canyon Dr. x Tachevah Dr. N. Palm Canyon Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. x 112 way between N. Tachevah Dr. Indian Canyon Dr. and N. Via Miraleste x N. Via Miraleste Tachevah Dr. N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros x Tachevah Dr. N. Avenida Caballeros N. Paseo de Anza x Tachevah Dr. N. Paseo de Anza N. Sunrise Way x Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Calle El Segundo El Cielo Rd. x Toledo Ave. S. La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr. x Via Escuela N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Sunrise Way x Vista Chino N. Avenida Caballeros N. Sunrise Way x Vista Chino N. Sunrise Way Cerritos Dr. x Vista Chino Cerritos Dr. N. Gene Autry Trail x 65 26 TABLE 5 PROPOSED BIKEWAYS Double Class III Widen Colored Bike Length of Colored Buffered Colored Class III Class II Existing Buffered Bike Buffered Route One-way Two-way Proposed Bike Lane Bike Bike Bike Bike with Type Cycletracks Cycletracks Bikeways Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Bike Route (mi.) B ( Lanes Sharrows 34th Ave. Crossley Rd. Whitewater Wash x 0.46 x Alejo Rd. Belardo Rd. N. Palm Canyon Dr. (remove 0.07 left-turn lane) Alejo Rd. N. Palm Canyon Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. x 0.07 Alejo Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. Calle El Segundo x 0.22 Alejo Rd. N. Calle El Segundo N. Sunrise Way x 0.78 Alejo Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. x 0.57 Alejo Rd. N. Farrell Dr. N. Civic Dr. x 0.16 Amado Rd. N. Belardo Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. x 0.14 Amado Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Hermosa Dr. x 0.75 Amado Rd. N. Hermosa Dr. N. Sunrise Way x 0.25 Amado Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. x 0.57 Araby Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. Murray Canyon Dr. x 0.4 Arenas Rd. S. Cahuilla Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. x 0.12 Arenas Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Canyon Dr. x 0.07 Arenas Rd. S. Indian Canyon Dr. S. Calle Encilia x 0.1 Arenas Rd. S. Calle Encilia S. Calle El Segundo x 0.11 x w Arenas Rd. S. Calle El Segundo S. Avenida Caballeros road diet) 0.28 Arenas Rd. S. Avenida Caballeros N. Hermosa Dr. x 0.25 Avenida Granada S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Camino Real x (8') Q.4 Avenida Caballeros W. Ramon Rd. E. Tamarisk Rd. x 1.25 Avenida Caballeros E. Tamarisk Rd. E. Tachevah Dr. x 0.25 Avenida Caballeros E. Tachevah Dr. E. Paseo El Mirador x 0.16 Avenida Caballeros E. Paseo El Mirador E. Vista Chino x 0.34 Avenida Caballeros E. Vista Chino E. San Rafael Dr. x 1.01 66 27 Double Class III Widen Colored Buffered Colored Colored Class III Bike Length of Class II Existing Buffered Bike Buffered Route One-way Two-way Proposed Bike Lane Bike Bike Bike Bike with Type Cycletracks Cycletracks Bikeways Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Bike Route B (mi.) Lanes Sharrows Baristo Rd. El Cielo Rd. S. Avenida Caballeros x 1.51 x w Barona Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. Sandcliff Rd. road diet) 0.12 Barona Rd. Sandcliff Rd. South end x 0.53 Belardo Rd. W. Alejo Rd. W. Amado Rd. x 0.25 Belardo Rd. W. Amado Rd. W. Tahquitz Canyon x ay 0.33 Belardo Rd. W. ahquitz Canyon W. Arenas Rd. x 0.13 Belardo Rd. W. Arenas Rd. W. Baristo Rd. x 0.12 Belardo Rd. W. Baristo Rd. W. Ramon Rd. x (7) 0.25 Belardo Rd. W. Ramon Rd. E. Sunny Dunes Rd. x 0.25 Belardo Rd. E. Sunny Dunes Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. x 0.79 Bogert Trail S. Palm Canyon Dr. City limit x Calle El Segundo E. Alejo Rd. E. Amado Rd. x 0.25 x w Calle El Segundo E. Amado Rd. E. Ramon Rd. road diet) 0.75 Calle Encilia E. Alejo Rd. E. Arenas Rd. x 0.63 Calle Encilia E. Arenas Rd. Ramon Rd. x 0.37 Calle Palo Fierro E. Ramon Rd. N. Riverside Dr. x 0.34 Calle Palo Fierro E. Mesquite Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. x 0.63 Calle Palo Fierro E. Palm Canyon Dr. Twin Palms Dr. x 0.09 Calle Palo Fierro Twin Palms Dr. E. La Verne Way x 0.41 Calle Palo Fierro E. La Verne Way Ave Granada x 0.5 Camino Parocela El Cielo Rd. Gene Autry Trail x 0.51 Camino Parocela Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd. x 0.26 Camino Real Ramon Rd. N. Riverside Dr. x 0.35' Camino Real S. Riverside Dr. San Lorenzo Rd. x 005 Camino Real San Lorenzo Rd. E. Mesquite Ave. x 0.05 Camino Real E. Mesquite Ave. Calle Palo Fierro x 0.14 Camino Real Calle Palo Fierro E. Palm Canyon Dr. x 0.38 Camino Real E. Palm Canyon Dr. E. La Verne Way x 0.53 Camino Real E. La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr. x 0.95 Cerritos Dr. Joyce Dr. Amado Rd. x 67 28 Double Class III Colored Bike Length of Street From To MIN_ Colored Buffered Buffered Colored Class III Route One-way Two-way Proposed Bike Bike Bike Buffered Bike with Type Cycletracks Cycletracks Bikeways Lanes Lanes Lanes Bike Route B (mi.) Lanes Sharrows Civic Dr. E. Alejo Rd. E.Way ahquitz Canyon x 0.66 Civic Dr. E.Way Canyon E. Baristo Rd. x 0.25 Compadre Rd. E. Mesquite Ave. Sonora Rd. x 0.25 x w Crossley Rd. E. Ramon Rd. Sunny Dunes Rd. road diet) 0.25 Crossley Rd. Sunny Dunes Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. x 0.25 Crossley Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. Entrance to Fairway x 0.31 Entrance to Fairway x w Crossley Rd. Circle 34th Ave. road diet) 0.22 Dinah Shore Dr. Gene Autry Trail RGdolf Club Dr./Crossley x 0.5' Dinah Shore Dr. Crossley Rd. City Limit x 0.5 E. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Trail x 0.35 E. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Trail Arguilla Rd. x 0.33 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Arguilla Rd. S. Sunrise Way x 0.37 E. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Sunrise Way Smoke Tree Ln. x 0.26 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Smoke Tree Ln. Farrell Dr./Barona Rd. x 0.26 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Farrell Dr./Barona Rd. Murray Creek Bridge - x 0.53 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Murray Creek Bridge Golf Club Dr. x 1.55 E. Tahquitz Canyon x w El Cielo Rd. Way E. Ramon Rd. road diet) 0.5 El Cielo Rd. E. Ramon Rd. Escoba Dr. x 1 Escoba Dr. E. Palm Canyon Dr. El Cielo Rd. x 0.26 Escoba Dr. El Cielo Rd. End x 0.32 ' Farrell Dr. E. Joyce Rd. E. Racquet Club Dr. x 0.5. x w Farrell Dr. E. Racquet Club Dr. E. Vista Chino road diet) 0.48 x w Farrell Dr. E. Vista Chino E. Ramon Rd. road diet 2..02 x w Farrell Dr. E. Ramon Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. road diet) 1.03 F � 29 Double Class III Widen Colored Bike Length of Colored Buffered Colored Class III Class II Existing Buffered Route One-way Two-way Proposed Bike Lane Bike Bike Bike Bike Buffered Bike with Type Cycletracks Cycletracks Bikeways Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Bike Route B (mi.) Lanes Sharrows Francis Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Farrell Dr. x 1.48 Gene Autry Trail 1-10 E. Via Escuela x (add 4' buffer) 2.1 Gene Autry Trail E. Via Escuela E. Vista Chino x 0.25 x w Gene Autry Trail E. Vista Chino E. Ramon Rd. road diet to 4 lanes) 2.22 Gene Autry Trail E. Ramon Rd. E. Mesquite Ave. x 0.5 Gene Autry Trail E. Mesquite Ave. S/O E. Mesquite Ave. x 0.16 Gene Autry Trail S/O E. Mesquite Ave. E. Palm Canyon Dr. x 0.93 Hermosa Dr. E. Tachevah Dr. E. Amado Rd. x 0.75 Hermosa Dr. E. Amado Rd. E. Arenas Rd. x 0.37 Indian Canyon Dr. 1-10 Sunrise Pkwy. x (add 4' buffer) 2.3 Indian Canyon Dr. Sunrise Pkwy. San Rafael Dr. x 0.73 x w Indian Canyon Dr. San Rafael Dr. E. Francis Dr. road diet) 0.26 Optionl Indian Canyon Dr. E. Francis Dr. Racquet Club Dr. (w/ road Option 2 diet) 0.25 Optionl Indian Canyon Dr. Racquet Club Dr. Vista Chino (w/ road Option 2 diet) 0.5 Optionl Indian Canyon Dr. Vista Chino E. Camino Monte Vista (w/ road Option 2 diet) 0.22 Optionl Indian Canyon Dr. E. Camino Monte Vista E. Tachevah Dr. (w/ road Option 2 diet) 0.28 Optionl Indian Canyon Dr. E. Tachevah Dr. E. Alejo Rd. (w/ road Option 2 diet) 0.5 ption 3 Option 1 (road (road diet Option 2 Indian Canyon Dr. E. Alejo Rd. E. Arenas Rd. diet to 3 to 3 lanes (road diet lanes on on west to 3 lanes west side) west side) side) 0.63 69 30 Double Class III Widen Colored Bike Length of Street From To Colored Buffered Colored Class III Class II Existing Buffered Bike Buffered Route One-way Two-way Proposed Bike Lane Bike Bike Bike Bike with Type Cycletracks Cycletracks Bikeways Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Bike Route B (mi.) Lanes 5harrows Option 3 Option 1 Option 2 (road (road diet (road diet Indian Canyon Dr. E. Arenas Rd. E. Camino Parocela diet to 3 t to 3 lanes to 3 lanes laneswes on west on west side) side) side) 0.5 Joyce Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. x 0.48 Kirk Douglas E. Tahquitz Canyon E. Ramon Rd. x (T) Way/Airport Way 1.56 La Verne Way S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Sunrise Way x 1.11 Mesquite Ave. West End S. Belardo Rd. x 0.25 Mesquite Ave. S. Belardo Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. x 0.12 Mesquite Ave. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Camino Real x 0.38. Mesquite Ave. S. Camino Real S. Sunrise Way x 0.62 Mesquite Ave. S. Sunrise Way S. Farrell Dr. x 059 Mesquite Ave. El Cielo Rd. Vella Rd. x 0.81 x (w Mesquite Ave. Vella Rd. S. Gene Autry Trail road diet) 0.26 Murray Canyon Dr. S. Palm Canyon Dr. Toledo Ave. x 1.09 N. Palm Canyon Dr. North City Limit Tram Way x (add 4' buffer) 1.81 Option 1 N. Palm Canyon Dr. Tram Way W. San Rafael Dr. (w/ road Option 2 diet) 0.06 Option 1 N. Palm Canyon Rd. W. San Rafael Dr. Vista Chino (w/ road Option 2 diet) 1.13 Option 1 N. Palm Canyon Rd. Vista Chino Alejo Rd. (w/ road Option 2 diet) 1 N./S. Palm Canyon Option 3 Option 2 Option 1 Rd. Alejo Rd. Ramon Rd. (w/ road (w/ road (w/ road diet) diet) diet) 1.16 Paseo El Mirador N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros x 0.25 Paseo El Mirador N. Avenida Caballeros Linda Vista Rd. x 0.3 Paseo El Mirador Linda Vista Rd. N. Sunrise Way x 0.2 x (w Racquet Club Dr. N. Palm Canyon Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. road diet) 0.34 70 31 Double Class III Colored Bike Length of Street From ToBuffered Colored Class IIIman Buffered Route One-way Two-way Proposed Bike Bike Buffered Bike with Type Cycletracks Cycletracks Bikeways Lanes Lanes Bike Route B (mi.) Lanes Sharrows x w Racquet Club Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Farrell Dr. road diet) 1.48 Racquet Club Rd., Cardillo Ave., Via Escuela, Via Norte, N. Indian Canyon Dr. Crescent Dr. x Vista Chino, Via Monte Vista Ramon Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. Indian Canyon Dr. x 0.07 Ramon Rd. S. Indian Canyon Dr. S. Calle Encilia x 0.1 Ramon Rd. S. Calle Encilia Calle Palo Fierro x 0.14 Ramon Rd. Calle Palo Fierro S. Avenida Caballeros x 0.25 Ramon Rd. S. Avenida Caballeros S. Sunrise Way x 0.5 Ramon Rd. S. Sunrise Way S. Farrell Dr. x 0.59. Ramon Rd. S. Farrell Dr. El Cielo Rd. x 0.42 Ramon Rd. El Cielo Rd. Kirk Douglas Way x 0.76 Ramon Rd. Kirk Douglas Way Gene Autry Trail Option 1 . Option 2 0.25 Ramon Rd. Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd. Option Option 2 026 Ramon Rd. San Luis Rey Rd. Crossley Rd. x 0.24 S. Palm Canyon Dr. W. Ramon Rd. E. Camino Parocela x 0.15 S. Palm Canyon Dr. E. Camino Parocela Morongo Rd. x 0.59 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Morongo Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. x 0.2 x w S. Palm Canyon Dr. E. Palm Canyon Dr. El Portal road diet) 0.4 x w S. Palm Canyon Dr. El Portal Ave Granada road diet) 0.72 x w S. Palm Canyon Dr. Ave Granada South City Limit road diet) 1.02 San Luis Rey Rd. Mission Dr. E. Ramon Rd. x 0,31 San Luis Rey Rd. E. Ramon Rd. Sunny Dunes Rd. x 0.25 x w San Rafael Dr. N. Palm Canyon Rd. N. Virginia Rd. road diet) 0.39 San Rafael Dr. N. Virginia Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. x 0.32 , x w San Rafael Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Avenida Caballeros road diet) 0.5 71 32 Class III Colored Double Bike Length of mu� Colored Buffered Buffered Colored Class III Route One-way Two-way Proposed Street From ToBike Bike Bike Buffered Bike with Type Cycletracks Cycletracks Bikeways Lanes Lanes Lanes Bike Route B (mi.) Lanes Sharrows x w San Rafael Dr. N. Avenida Caballeros N. Sunrise Way road diet) 0.5 Sunny Dunes Rd. S. Palm Canyon Dr. Calle Palo Fierro x 0.19 Sunny Dunes Rd. El Cielo Rd. Crossley Rd. x 1.52 Sunrise Way Whitewater Wash E. San Rafael Dr. x 0.61 x w Sunrise Way E. San Rafael Dr. E. Vista Chino road diet) 1.01 Sunrise Way E. Vista Chino E. Tamarisk Rd. x 0.75 Sunrise Way E. Tamarisk Rd. E. Alejo Rd. x (7) 0.25 Sunrise Way E. Alejo Rd. E. Ramon Rd. x 0.99 Sunrise Way E. Ramon Rd. E. Sunny Dunes Rd. x 0.25 x Sunrise Way E. Sunny Dunes Rd. E. Palm Canyon Dr. (remove parking) 0.75 x w Tachevah Dr. N. Palm Canyon Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. road 0.07 diet) x Via (remove to N. Tachevah Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. 112 way center- 0.12 Miraleste turn lane) x 1/2 way between N. (remove Tachevah Dr. Indian Canyon Dr. and N. Via Miraleste center 0.12 N. Via Miraleste turn lane) x (remove Tachevah Dr. N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros center- turn lane) 0.25 Tachevah Dr. N. Avenida Caballeros N. Paseo de Anza x 0.37. Tachevah Dr. N. Paseo de Anza N. Sunrise Way x (6'-7') 0.13 Tachevah Dr. N. Sunrise Way Cerritos Dr. x 0.25 Tachevah Dr. Cerritos Dr. N. Farrell Dr. x 0.25 Ta cuitz Canyon N. Museum Dr. N. Palm Canyon Dr. x 0.15 Y Tao cuitz Canyon N. Palm Canyon Dr. N. Indian Canyon Dr. x 0.07 Y 72 33 Double Class III Colored Bike Length of Buffered Colored Class IIIMMUNK- Buffered Route One-way Twa-way Proposed Street From To Bike Bike Buffered Bike with Type Cycletracks Cycletracks Bikeways Lanes Lanes Bike Route B (mi.) Lanes Sharrows Waquitz Canyon N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Calle El Segundo x 0.21 Y 1 aaquitz Canyon N. Calle El Segundo El Cielo Rd. x 1 79 Y Tamarisk Rd. N. Palm Canyon Dr. N. Via Miraleste x 0.32 Tamarisk Rd. N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros x 0.25 Tamarisk Rd. N. Avenida Caballeros N. Sunrise Way x 0.5 Tamarisk Rd. N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr. x 0.57 Toledo Ave. S. La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr. x 0.89 Twin Palms Dr. S. Palm Canyon Dr. S. La Verne Way x 1 Via Escuela N. Sunrise Way N. Gene Autry Trail x 0.54 Via Miraleste E. Francis Dr. E. Vista Chino x 0.76 Via Miraleste E. Vista Chino E. Tachevah Dr. x 0.5 Via Miraleste E. Tachevah Dr. E. Tamarisk Rd. x 0.25 Via Miraleste E. Tamarisk Rd. E. Alejo Rd. x 0.25 Vista Chino N. Palm Canyon Rd. N. Indian Canyon Dr. x 0.07 Vista Chino N. Indian Canyon Dr. N. Sunrise Way x 1 Vista Chino N. Sunrise Way Cerritos Dr. x 0.25 Vista Chino Cerritos Dr. N. Gene Autry Trail x 1.03 Vista Chino N. Gene Autry Trail East City Limit x 0.72 73 34 ATTACHMENT 5 74 O�fl.lM si09 iy O i V N 4 °Nw„no' Cq�fFOR Cify Council Staff Report DATE: April 1, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE A PURCHASE ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,900 WITH ALBERT A. WEBB & ASSOCIATES FOR ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE BICYCLE CORRIDORS, PHASE 1, CITY PROJECT NO. 13-32 FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager i BY: Public Works & Engineering Department SUMMARY: Approval of this item will authorize a purchase order in the amount of $47,900 with Albert A. Webb & Associates for additional traffic engineering design services, and associated environmental analysis in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), for the Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1, City Project No. 13-32. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $47,900 with Albert A Webb & Associates for additional traffic engineering design services, and associated environmental analysis in accordance with the CEQA, for the Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1, City Project No. 13-32; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. BACKGROUND: On November 6, 2013, the City Council approved Agreement No. 6444 with Albert A. Webb & Associates ("Webb') for on-call traffic engineering design services on an as needed basis. In accordance with the on-call agreement, Webb was selected to provide traffic engineering design services for the preparation of traffic striping plans for the Bicycle Corridors, Phase 1, City Project No. 13-32 (the "Project"). At its December 3, 2014, meeting the City Council approved plans and authorized bidding of the Project, but at the request of staff deferred action on approving plans for the "road diets" proposed on the Racquet Club Road and Farrell Drive corridors until further traffic engineering and environmental analysis had been completed to verify if 75 ITEM NO. City Council Staff Report April 1, 2015- Page 2 Approval of Purchase Order with Albert A.Webb&Associates the "road diets" proposed on the Racquet Club Road and Farrell Drive corridors until further traffic engineering and environmental analysis had been completed to verify if conversion of these corridors from 4-lane Secondary Thoroughfares on the City's General Plan to a modified 2-lane divided Collector with buffered bike lanes could be approved. Ultimately, amendment of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan will be required to convert existing 4-lane roadways to 2-lane roadways. Webb has provided the City with a proposal to complete the additional traffic engineering services for Racquet Club Road and Farrell Drive bicycle corridors to include: revisions to bicycle route construction plans, traffic analysis, CEQA services, Habitat Suitability Assessment/CVMSHCP Compliance Report and Air Quality Assessment, for a total amount not to exceed $47,900; a copy of Webb's proposal is included as Attachment 1. With the City Council's authorization, staff will complete the required analyses to determine if the proposed "road diets" can be supported for the Racquet Club Road and Farrell Drive corridors, as well as the other corridors where the 2014 Bicycle Plan proposed "road diets" in an effort to provide separate Class 2 bike lanes. On the basis of the appropriate CEQA analysis, staff will return to the City Council with a report of the findings, and request direction on proceeding with an amendment of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan to convert existing 4-lane roadways to 2-lane roadways with Class 2 bike lanes. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds remain available in Measure J Account No. 260-4500-59445 and Sustainability Account No. 138-1270-58033. SUBMITTED Prepared by: Approved by: Marcus L. Fuller, MPA, P.E., P.L.S. David H. Ready, h.D Assistant City Manager/City Engineer City Manager Attachments: 1. Webb Proposal 76 Attachment 1 77 A L a E N T A. AS50CIAT9S March 19, 2015 CKPOnb 11"14lerfre 3733MOGmshd Mr. Savat Khamphou 116e16e'CA Assistant Director of Public Works/AssistantCi Engineer s51.5es.lma City g� Palm goad Offte City of Palm Springs 36-NI CookSeet#103 3200 E. Tahquttz Canyon Way Perm Desert CA 92211 Palm Springs, CA, 92262-2743 7M.55a.5005 AM, DI&e 41M HE:Additional Traffic Engineering ineerin and CEQA Services Related to 391 Kdmk Street 1320 Amurrleta,CA92552 Revisions to Bicycle Route Plans 951.595.1070 Dear Savat: Albert A. Webb Associates Is submitting this proposal for additional traffic engineering services related to revisions to bicycle route plans, level of service analysis for road diet roadways proposed In the Palm Springs Bicycle Route Plan, and for an initial study/negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration for a General Plan Amendment and widening of San Rafael Avenue between N.Virginia Road and N. Indian Canyon Drive. Exhibit A contains our proposed scope of work. Exhibit B contains a summary of our fee proposal for services described in Exhibit A. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to hearing from you. In the meantime, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (951) 686-1070. Sincerely, Albert A. Webb Associates PC7rr' A.0077.1, Dilesh R. Sheth, P.E./T.E. Vice President Attachments: Exhibit "A"—Scope of Work Exhibit "B"—Compensation vrxmwehba ssacktirs mm G:\ZR34U4-0247\Proposals,ASre4meA1sbddt1wal Serv'jces Proposal.docc 78 Exhibit "A" —Scope of Work Revisions to Bicycle Route Construction Plans During design and approval of bicycle route plans, we made the following revisions to construction plans: 1. Revise Farrell Drive and Racquet Club Road corridor plans from four lanes with bicycles lanes to two lanes with center turn lane, parking and bicycle lanes. Draft entire corridor existing curbs and proposed striping. 2. Revise Farrell Drive and Racquet Club Road corridor plans from two lanes with center turn lane, parking and bicycle lanes to four 10' lanes with parking and bicycle lanes. Draft entire corridor proposed striping. 3. Conduct additional research Into 10' lane safety for Farrell Drive and Racquet Club Road from federal, state, local, and professional association resources. 4. Revise Alejo Road plans to accommodate left turn lanes at Farrell Drive.AutcTum analysis for right tums to check lane widths. Additional Traffic Analysis The City added the following corridors to traffic analysis: 1. Alejo Road from Indian Canyon Drive to Civic Drive. 2. Avenida Caballeros existing bike lane segments in addition to two Avenida Caballeros unimproved segments. 3. Murray Canyon Drive from South Palm Canyon Drive to Toledo Avenue. 4. Revise several segments from Palm Springs General Plan to Section 14 Specific Plan. 5. Prepare circulation exhibits. 6. Prepare six typical street sections for road diet segments depending on available width. CEQA Services WEBB will prepare a single Initial Study document leading to the adoption of a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration(IS/ND or MND)to assess the environmental impacts associated with: O a General Plan Amendment(GPA)to the City's Circulation Element to c:l2014114d241\ProposaK Agmmentsb+dditional services Proposat.d= 79 reflect the proposed changes in roadway designations and cross sections to accommodate the road diet segments and (i)the widening of San Rafael Avenue between N. Virginia Road and N. Indian Canyon Drive, 1. Initial Study 1.1. Prepare a Screencheck IS/ND or MND using the City's CEQA Checklist.The ISMD or MND will be informed by the technical studies completed in item 2(below). WEBB will transmit electronic copies of the Screenchack IS/MND to the City (in PDF and MS Word 2010 format)for review and comment. 1.2. After review by the City,WEBB will Incorporate one round of comments and prepare a "proof copy"of the public review Draft IS/ND or MND. 1.3. Transmit a PDF file of the "proof copy" of the public review IS/MND to the City for review and approval to circulation for public review, 1.4. Prepare final public review IS/MND and circulate for public distribution. 2. Technical Studies 2.1. Habitat Suitability Assessment/CVMSHCP Compliance Report: Because construction of San Rafael Drive will entail work on vacant property with the potential to support biological resources, AMEC Foster Wheeler Environment&Infrastructure(AMEC Foster Wheeler)will perform a habitat suitability assessment (including a field survey) and prepare a Habitat Assessment Report according to the standards of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). This scope of work does not include preparation of focused surveys for burrowing owl, which will be required If suitable habitat is present. 2.2. Air Quality Analysis: Because there are residences in proximity to the segment of San Rafael Road that will be widened,WEBB will prepare an Air Quality Analysis (AQIA) that includes an assessment of the impacts to air quality from the construction of the proposed facilities. This analysis will be included in the IS/MND in the form of a technical memorandum with a summary of modeling assumptions and results with associated modeling output.Typical sources of project construction will be identified and described. Project related emissions will be calculated using the CaIEEMod (version 2011.1.1)modeling program and mitigation measures will be identified as appropriate and necessary. 3. If the IS identifies any mitigation measures that are required to reduce the level of potential impacts to less than significant, a draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)will be prepared In accordance with CEQA Guidelines. WEBB will submit the Screencheck MMRP to the City for review and Incorporate one round of comments to G:\201e\14-0247NPmP0WS,Agreements\Addt ional Services Pmpool.docz 80 produce the public review document for the City to transmit to the State Clearinghouse and other interested parties. 4. WEBB will collect comments received by the City and the State Clearinghouse at the end of the 30-day public comment period and prepare draft responses to comments If the comments result in the need to revise the text of the IS, WEBB will make the needed revisions and produce the final IS/MND.WEBB will transmit the draft responses to comments to City staff and incorporate one round of comments to prepare the final documents. G:\2018\I4-D247\Proposals Agreem uts\Additioaal Services Proposaldocx i Exhibit "SO- Compensation Services described in our Scope of Work(Exhibit "A'�shall be provided on a time and material basis not to exceed$47,900. Revisions to Bicycle Route Construction Plans $16,400 Additional Traffic Analysis $ 7,800 CEQA Services(kems 1, 3, and 4) $18,500 Habitat Suitability Assessment/CVMSHCP Compliance Report $ 4,000 Air Quality Assessment $ 2,200 Total $47,900 I G.�20IQ4-0247%Pmpmals,Agreem 05\AdMi"81 Services Proposel.doca 82 ATTACHMENT 6 83 A L B E R T A. pillim A S S O C I A T E S era,u...-� .. .rJ� '•�� ' �� p� n GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT REPORT Prepared for March 2016 VIm93m w,vv.,.:vebbassodatcs.con, A L a E R T A. A S S 0 C I A T E S March 11, 2016 Corporate Headquarters 3788 McCray Street Riverside,CA 92506 951.686.1070 Palm Oesert0ffice Savat Khamphou 36-951 Cook Street 103 Assistant Director of Public Works/Assistant City En ineer Palm Desert,CA 9221 Y 91 760.568.5005 City of Palm Springs MurrietaOtfice 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way 41391 Kalmia Street#320 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Murrieta,CA 92562 951.686.1070 Re: Traffic Analysis to Support General Plan Circulation Element Amendment Dear Savat: We have prepared the Traffic Analysis to support the Palm Springs General Plan Circulation Element Amendment Report for your review. The report provides a plan to outfit many of Palm Springs' streets with bicycle facilities recommended in the City of Palm Springs Bicycle Route Plan. The goal of this report is to determine if General Plan roadways can still function at an acceptable LOS after a reduction of through lanes by General Plan horizon year 2035. The report provides proposed changes to the General Plan Circulation Map and the General Plan Typical Street Cross Sections. Results from the analysis and recommendations for the General Plan Amendment are also enclosed in the report. If you have any questions regarding this report, please call me for clarification. Sincerely, ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES115) ' oy No.2112 5 "'' >a ,k Dilesh Sheth, P.E., T.E. sT TRAFF%C �p Vice President 9�OF CAt+FO�a V ImE9A www.webbassociates.com G:A2J14\14 0217\Intersect)on Analysis\Palm Springs GPA Cover 1 85 1 - Introduction The Palm Springs General Plan Circulation Element was last adopted in 2007. Since then a need for alternative travel methods, specifically bicycle facilities, has risen. The City of Palm Springs (City) prepared and approved the Palm Springs Bicycle Route Plan in March 2014. The report provides a plan to outfit many of Palm Springs' streets with bicycle facilities ranging from Class I bike paths to shared lane markings. Included in the report is a list of street segments that will undergo lane reconfigurations in order to implement bicycle facilities within the General Plan roadway and right-of-way widths. The addition of bicycle facilities within the existing General Plan curb-to-curb width often requires the elimination of vehicle travel lanes. The reduction in the number of vehicle through lanes can decrease roadway level of service (LOS)when dealing with higher vehicle volumes. The goal of this report is to determine if General Plan roadways can still function at acceptable LOS after a reduction of through lanes by General Plan horizon year 2035. This report analyzes the existing roadways in the General Plan, existing traffic volumes, year 2035 traffic volumes, the LOS for each street segment, and provides recommendations for lane configurations. This report also provides technical information to support the City's Circulation Plan Amendment and revisions or additions to roadway classifications and typical sections. 2 - Current General Plan Cross Sections Figure 4-2 of the existing Palm Springs General Plan Circulation Element contains five street cross sections: • Major Thoroughfare (6 Lanes Divided) • 110' Right of Way, 86' Curb-to-Curb Width • Major Thoroughfare (4 Lanes Divided) • 100' Right of Way, 76' Curb-to-Curb Width • Secondary Thoroughfare • 80'-88' Right of Way, 64' Curb-to-Curb Width • Collector Street • 60'-66' Right of Way, 40' Curb-to-Curb Width • Local Street • 50'-60' Right of Way, 36' Curb-to-Curb Width Figure 4-1 in the existing General Plan Circulation Element includes more detail for the Secondary Thoroughfare and the Collector Street cross sections: • Secondary Thoroughfare (4 Lanes Divided) • Secondary Thoroughfare (4 Lanes Undivided) • Collector Street (2 Lanes Divided) • Collector Street (2 Lanes Undivided) Figure 4-1 and 4-2 of the existing Palm Springs General Plan Circulation Element are in the Appendix A. A L 8 E F T A. � � 1 A 5 5 0 C I A T ,5 C 3 - Data Collection • Roadway Segments This report analyzes existing General Plan roadway segments that were designated to undergo a "road diet' by the Palm Springs Bicycle Route Plan. Per discussion with City staff, several additional roadway segments were added to the analysis. This limits the scope of the analysis to larger streets that are slated for vehicle lane reductions. Also included in the analysis are modified street segments that are found in the Section 14 Specific Plan. This specific plan was adopted by the City in July 2014. A list of the studied street segments are in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 General Plan Roadway Segments to Analyze Street From A Alejo Road Indian Canyon Drive Civic Drive Amado Road Indian Canyon Drive Sunrise Way Arenas Road S. Tahquitz Drive Hermosa Drive Avenida Caballeros San Rafael Drive Ramon Road Baristo Road Avenida Caballeros El Cielo Road Barona Road E. Palm Canyon Drive Sandcliff Road Calle El Segundo Amado Road Ramon Road Camino Real E. Palm Canyon Drive La Verne Way Crossley Road Ramon Road 3411 Avenue El Cielo Road Tahquitz Canyon Way Ramon Road Farrell Drive Racquet Club Road E. Palm Canyon Drive Gene Autry Trail Vista Chino Ramon Road Indian Canyon Drive San Rafael Drive Camino Parocela La Verne Way S. Palm Canyon Drive E. Palm Canyon Drive Mesquite Avenue Sunrise Way El Cielo Road Mesquite Avenue Vella Road Gene Autry Trail Murray Canyon Drive S. Palm Canyon Drive Toledo Avenue N. Palm Canyon Drive Tram Way Ramon Road Racquet Club Road N. Palm Canyon Drive Farrell Drive S. Palm Canyon Drive E. Palm Canyon Drive Acanto Drive San Rafael Drive N. Palm Canyon Drive Sunrise Way Saturnino Road Calle El Segundo Avenida Caballeros Sunrise Way San Rafael Drive Vista Chino Tachevah Drive N. Palm Canyon Drive N. Indian Canyon Drive Toledo Avenue La Verne Way Murray Canyon Drive A L B E B T A. 2 A 5 5 0 C I ,T ,B � • Existing Traffic Volumes Recent average daily traffic (ADT) data for the selected street segments were provided by the City. The provided counts were conducted in March and April of 2013. ADT counts are 24-hour bi-directional counts to measure vehicle demand on existing street segments. Upon request by the City, additional ADT counts were collected in March 2016 on the entire Farrell Drive segment and on 11 additional roadway segments throughout the city. Amado Road within the Section 14 Specific Plan area did not have any 2013 ADT counts. The analysis was done using the existing ADT volumes from the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan. • Year 2035 Traffic Volumes The year 2035 was chosen as the year of General Plan roadway network build out completion. In order to analyze traffic performance in 2035 a 1.5% per year growth factor was applied to the existing ADT volumes. The 1.5% growth per year over 22 years amounts to a 33% increase for all existing ADT volumes. The segment of Amado Road in Section 14 was analyzed using the 2025 forecasted ADT volumes from the 2007 Palm Springs General Plan. A 1.5% growth factor was applied to the 2025 ADT volumes for a 15% total growth. • Level of Service (LOS) The level of service (LOS) of a roadway is a way to measure travel speed, maneuverability, and safety on a street segment. LOS is designated by a letter grade ranging from A(excellent, free flow) to F (failure, gridlock). In this case, LOS is determined by volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) for each street segment. The LOS was calculated by dividing the ADT volume by the theoretical capacity of the roadway segment. Each street segment has a theoretical vehicle capacity that is defined by its number of through lanes and the presence of a physical center divider. As the WC ratio approaches 1.0, the LOS approaches F. Table 3-2 describes the LOS and WC ratios for each. Table 3-3 provides the volume capacities and LOS for each type of roadway. It is based on the County of Riverside General Plan Circulation Element effective December 9, 2014. LOS A and LOS B capacities, while not included in the Riverside County General Plan, are included for clarity. Roadway types not used in this analysis are not included in Table 3-3. The City has a minimum roadway LOS of D to maintain a smoothly functioning circulation system that is consistent with the Riverside County Congestion Management Program (CMP). The goal of the CMP is to better connect land use, transportation, and air quality to promote growth management programs that will better utilize transportation funds, relieve traffic congestion, and improve air quality. A L B E R T A. 3 88 A S S 0 C $ A i E S Table 3-2 Level of Service Definitions for Roadway Seqments Level of Volume-to-Capacity Definition Service • A 0.00 - 0.60 Excellent. Free flow, light volumes. B 0.61 - 0.70 Very Good. Free to stable flow, light to moderate volumes. C 0.71 -0.80 Good. Stable flow, moderate volumes, freedom to maneuver noticeably restricted. D 0.81 -0.90 Fair.Approaches unstable flow, moderate to heav volumes, limited freedom to maneuver. Poor. Extremely unstable flow, heavy volumes, E 0.91 -0.99 maneuverability and psychological comfort extreme) oor. Failure. Forced or breakdown conditions, slow F >- 1.00 speeds, tremendous delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. Table 3-3 Roadway Capacity by Characteristics RoadwayMaximum Two-Way Traffic Volume (ADT)*** Number of Lanes Characteristic 2 Undivided' 7,800 9,100 10,400 11,700 13,000 2 Divided" 10,800 12,600 14,400 16,200 18,000 2 One-Way 10,800 12,600 14,400 16,200 18,000 3 One-Way 16,200 18,900 21,600 24,300 27,000 4 Undivided' 15,500 18,100 20,700 23,300 25,900 4 Divided" 21,500 25,100 28,700 32,300 35,900 4 One-Way 21,500 25,100 28,700 32,300 35,900 6 Divided" 32,300 37,700 43,100 48,500 53,900 `Undivided roadways are divided by double yellow stripe or striped two-way left-turn lane. 'Divided roadways have a raised median between opposing traffic directions. ""`All ADT volumes are rounded to the nearest 100. A L R E R T A. 4 A S S O C I A T E S • Roadway Characteristics Many different roadway characteristics play a factor in the analysis. General Plan curb-to curb width, number of vehicle through lanes, width of vehicle through lanes, type of center divider, presence of on-street parking, and type of proposed bicycle facility serve as constraints on possible future street segments. For this analysis the General Plan curb-to-curb width was not changed. The number of vehicle through lanes was generally decreased by two on all segments for future analysis. Through lane standard width is considered to be 12 feet. The type and presence of a center divider has an effect on roadway capacity and future street design. The City wants to preserve all existing on-street parking locations to maintain resident and business parking facilities in the future. The preservation of on-street parking reduces the available curb- to-curb width for travel by 16 feet when there is parking on both sides of the street. Finally, the various types of bicycle facilities have different minimum widths which affect the available curb-to-curb width. A l B E N T A. 5 i i 50 A S S 0 C I A i E S 4 - Analysis First, General Plan curb-to-curb widths were gathered from the existing General Plan Circulation Element to determine the final build out width of each street segment. Since the curb-to-curb widths are not being modified, the existing final build out widths are essential in determining how space for lanes are allocated under future conditions. The General Plan number of through lanes, type of center divider, and existing ADT volumes analyzed to determine LOS for existing volumes under General Plan build out conditions. The same build out roadway conditions were also analyzed for year 2035 using the increased ADT volumes to determine future LOS under the existing General Plan. Refer to the Roadway Level of Service Analysis Table in Appendix B for existing and year 2035 LOS analysis. Next, the location of existing on-street parking was found by field review and Google Street View. Most of the Google Street View data that is used in the analysis is from the first half of 2015. It is assumed that no major changes to on-street parking locations have occurred since then. The on-street parking locations can be found in the Roadway Level of Service Analysis Table in Appendix B. The studied street segments consist of 40 foot, 64-foot, 76-foot, and 86 foot curb-to-curb widths. Six new proposed street cross sections were created using the known curb-to-curb widths, center divider type, and on-street parking locations. These three factors stayed constant and the new roadway classifications and street cross sections were created around them. For example, a 64-foot wide, four lane, Secondary Thoroughfare with a raised median was modified and analyzed as a 64-foot wide, two lane roadway with a raised median. See the Roadway Level of Service Analysis Table in Appendix B for the year 2035 proposed street sections LOS analysis. The new proposed cross sections are located in the Typical Street Cross Sections figure in Appendix C and are listed below. • Minor Mobility Corridor(2 Lanes Undivided) • Minor Mobility Corridor(2 Lanes Divided-Two-Way Left-Turn Lane) • Minor Mobility Corridor(2 Lanes Divided) • Major Mobility Corridor (2 Lanes Divided) • Section 14 Shared Mobility Corridor • Section 14 Mobility Corridor The modified street segments located within the Section 14 Specific Plan were all analyzed using their respective Section 14 cross sections as the existing General plan roadway sections. All of the Section 14 modified street segments qualified as Minor Mobility Corridor(2 Lanes Divided -Two-Way Left-Turn Lane) under this proposed amendment. This classification was used throughout the analysis for these segments. A L 9 E R T A. Elm 6 A S S O C I A T E S S � 5 - Results The existing ADT volumes and the year 2035 ADT volumes were placed into a table and compared against the capacity of the existing General Plan build out street segments. Nearly all street segments experienced LOS A when analyzing existing ADT volumes against General Plan capacities. Satisfactory LOS was also attained when analyzing year 2035 ADT volumes against General Plan capacities. Most street segments maintained LOS A while several segments operated at LOS B or LOS C. The existing General Plan's street segments appear to adequately handle the forecasted year 2035 ADT volumes. The results for the street segments after undergoing a "road diet" are mostly satisfactory with several exceptions. The street segments that do not meet the minimum LOS D are as follows: • Farrell Drive • Via Escuela to Ramon Road • Gene Autry Trail • Vista Chino to Ramon Road • Indian Canyon Drive • San Rafael Drive to Alejo Road • N. Palm Canyon Drive • Tram Way to Alejo Road • Sunrise Way • San Rafael Drive to Vista Chino These five street segments experience LOS E and LOS F in the year 2035 condition while under a "road diet". The failing street segments experience LOS F due to expected volume exceeding roadway capacity. The year 2035 results are located in the Roadway Level of Service Analysis Table in Appendix B. The only segment in the analysis with a General Plan curb-to-curb width of 40 feet is S. Palm Canyon Drive from Bogert Trail to Acanto Drive. This segment was analyzed with increased future ADT volumes, but no lane reductions. It is not feasible to apply lane reductions to this segment as the curb-to-curb width cannot support more than two vehicle through lanes. A L 9 E N T A. 1 / 7 A 5 5 0 C I A T E 5 92 5 - Recommendations It is recommended to continue with the six new proposed street cross sections on all analyzed street segments with satisfactory LOS in the year 2035. These street segments will allow for acceptable vehicle LOS while providing bicycle facilities and maintaining curb-to-curb widths and on-street parking. The proposed Circulation Plan map with the modified segment lengths is in Appendix C. It should be noted that, although the Farrell Drive segment between Racquet Club Road and Via Escuela experienced LOS C in the year 2035 under 'road diet' conditions, it is not recommended to undergo lane reductions there under direction of the City. The quick transitions between roadway types can be confusing and would not be conducive to smooth roadway operations. Gene Autry Trail, Indian Canyon Drive, North Palm Canyon Drive, Sunrise Way, and parts of Farrell Drive did not meet minimum LOS requirements in the future condition. The streets could not fit bicycle lane facilities, preserve existing parking, and reduce the number of vehicle lanes without exhibiting failing vehicle travel performance. The City of Palm Springs should adopt the General Plan Amendment to add six new street cross sections to the General Plan to encourage the safe use of bicycle transportation within the city. The six new sections provide service to all road users without the need for further roadway widening or right-of-way acquisitions. A L B E X T A. t 8 ASSOCIATES 93 APPENDIX A ®®®® ®®® ®®®®® ® ®®®®®®® ® ®®®®® mom ® ®® ®®® ®®®®®®®®® ®® ®®®®®® A L B E R T A. 94 A S S 0 C I A 7 E S 1 - L I One. d a 6 3 — 0.Q I r ' I ./en • •I— i. I 4 ���I .,..,yo R5n >qna `:� � m. � ar.• p'r 1 ' _ �y� III IT- jE af a •c..m c..�a �- - • pN Yn t I I S_ �Freewey S Warr Thorouhtare(4-lam undrvidWj J onv Swndary , —EVP..y CO11eG 2-lane d,qW) --- ShereNlnMence Major Th.roWhhre(6-lane d'Mi ) —C 11ec (2-Wne undwdN ) • Cnhcel lntw a iW Major Thor.,Ware(4-lane&,ded) L.1 �merunim hmrwe�enie rea•.4 sewna meime�n.xepaue arrTnorougnfare(4.�a�e.�aed) �o Los. Circulation Plan attaaurl� `GENERAL PUN oe�Eleea4 Fpum4.1 CIRCULATION ELEMENT Major Thoroughfare R/W (6 Lane Divided) R/W 110' 86' Major Thoroughfare R/W (4 Lane Divided) R/W 100' 76' �+- , Secondary Thoroughfare R/W R/W 80'-88' �c 64'� Collector Street R/W R/W 60'-66' �c 40'� Local Street R/W R/W 50'-60' 36'� Figure 4-2 Typical Street Cross Sections �t Palm Springs 2007 General Plan Page 4-9 APPENDIX B ®®®®® ®® ®®®®®®®®® ®®®® ME A L B E R T A. HIM 97 A 5 5 0 C I A T E 5 I I Existing ACT Volume on General Plan Roadways 2035 ACT Volume on General Plan Roadways 2035 ADT Volume on Road Diet Roadways General Plan i Curb Recommended Mobil) 'Parking f,LM= Type �Volumre Capacifyi VIC LOS Late, Type I Street Segment CW"cftyj, I Indian Canyon Drive to Avenida Caballeros 64 X 4 Undivided 5400 25900 0,21 A 4 Undivided 2200 0.28 A 2 Divided 7200 18D00 0.40 A Yes 2 Avenida Caballeros to Sunrise Way 64 X 4 Undivided 5DOO 25900 0.19 A 4 Undivided 6700 0,26 A 2 Divitletl' 6700 18000 0.32 A Yes 3 Sunrise Way to Ferrell Drive 64 X 4 Undivided 4000 25WO 0.15 A 4 Undivided 53W 0.20 A 2 Divided 53D0 18000 0.29 A Yes 4 Fanell Drive to Civic Drive 64 X 4 Undivided 2D00 25900 008 A 4 Undivided 2200 OAS A 2 Divided 27DO 18000 0.15 A Yes -:Atneee rse.e 5 Indian Canyon Ems to Avenida Caballeros 64 % 2 Divided' 4200 MOO 036 A 2 Divided• 62W 0.34 A 2 Divided' 6200 18000 0.34 A Yes 6 Avenida Caballeros to Sunrise Way ' 64 X 2 Divided' 2600 18000 0.14 A 2 Divided` 35W OAS A 2 Divided' 3500 18000 0,19 A Yes Meta s Reed S.Tahpuila Drive to Indian Canyon Drive 64 X 4 Undivided 1400 25900 0,05 A 4 Undivided 19W 0.07 A 2 Undivided 1900 13000 0.15 A Yes 0 Indian Canyon Drive to Avenida Caballeros • 64 X 2 Divided' 1100 18000 0DO A 2 Divided' 14M 0.08 A 2 Divided` 14D0 18000 0.08 A Yes 9 Avenida Caballeros to Hermosa Drive • 64 X 2 Divided 500 18000 0,03 A 2 Divided' 700 004 A 2 D'middd• 700 18000 0.04 A Yes ilXfeapbelivae 10 San Rafael Drive to Francis Drive 64 X- 4 Undivided 34DO 25W0 0,13 A 4 Undivided 45M 0.12 A 2 divided' 4500 18000 0.25 A Yes 11 Francis Gov.to Racquet Club Road 64 X 4 Undivided 34D0 25W0 0.13 A 4 Undivided 45W 0,17 A 2 Dvidsdv 4500 18000 0,25 A Yes 12 Racquet Club Road to Via Eswela 64 X 4 Undivided! 34D0 25W0 0.13 A 4 Undivided 45M 0.17 A 2 Divided` 45D0 18000 0,25 A Yes 13 Via Eacuela to Vale Chino 64 X 4 Undivided 3400 25900 0,13 A 4 Undivided 45M 0.17 A 2 Divided' 4500 18000 0.25 A Yes 19 Vista Chino to Paseo El Minster 64 X 4 Undivided 43D0 25900 0.17 A 4 Undivided I 57W 0.22 A 2 Dividedv 57D0 I ie000 O.32 A Yes 15 cased El Mirador to Tadtevah Cove 64 4 Undivided 4300 25W0 0.42 A 4 Undivicard 5200 0.22 A 2 Divided' 57D0 180M 0,32 A Yes 16 Tachevah give to Tamarisk Road 64 X 4 Undivided 41 D0 25W0 0.16 A 4 Undivided 5500 0.21 A 2 Divided' 5500 18OW 0,31 A Yes 17 Tamarsk Road I0 Absto Road 64 X 4 Undivided 42D0 25900 0,16 A 4 Undivided 5600 0.22 A 2 Divided` 5600 18000 031 A Yes 18 Alga Road to Amado Road 64 X 2 Dvided 4300 1SOW 0.24 A 2 Divided v SOW 0.32 A 2 Divided' 5800 18000 0.32 A Yes 19 Amado Road to T.id,ilz Canyon Way ` 64 X 2 Dlvided ' 4300 1SOW 0,24 A 2 Divided ` 5800 0,32 A 2 Divided v 5800 18000 OX A Yes 20 Tahquitz Canyon Way to Arenas Road' 64 X 2 Divided • 4200 18000 0,23 A 2 Divided ' 5600 0.31 A 2 Divided' 5600 18000 031 A Yes 21 Arenas Road to genets Road ' 64 X 2 Divitletl 4200 10000 0.23 A 2 Divided v 5600 0.31 A 2 Divitletl 5600 180M 031 A yes 22 Billion Road to Saturnine Road ' 64 X 2 Divided ' 4200 18000 0,23 A 2 Divided ' 5600 0.31 A 2 Divided' 5600 18000 031 A yes 23 Salumino Road!to Ramon Road • 64 X 2 Divided v 4200 1B000 023 A 2 Divided v 5600 0.31 A 2 Divided' 5600 18000 0.31 A Yes 24 Avenida Caballeros to Sunrise Way ' 64 X 2 Divided' 3300 10000 D.18 A 2 Divided' 4400 0.24 A 2 Divided' 4400 18000 0.24 A Yes 25 Sunrise Way to Farrell Ones 64 X 4 Undivided moo 25900 0.22 A 4 Undivided 7500 D.29 A 2 Divided' 7500 18000 0.42 A Yes 26 Fanell Drive to El CielO Road 64 X 4 Undivided 5000 259M 0.19 A 4 Undivided 6200 026 A 2 Divided' 67DO 18000 0.37 A Yes Jif W10MROW - _ 27 E.Palm Canyon Drive to Sand iX Road 64 4 Undivided 700 259M 0.03 A 4 Undivided IDOO 0.04 A 2 Divided' 1000 18000 0.06 A Yes e. CeIN EI 9e0uiral 28 Anat Road to Tahcuitz Canyon Way 64 X 4 Undivitled DODD 25900 0.15 A 4 Undivided 5200 0,20 A 2 Divided' 5200 18000 0.29 A Yes 29 TahRuiia Canyon Way to Arenas Road 64 West 4 Undivided 2800 1 25900 1 0.11 1 A 4 Undivided 3800 0.15 A 2 Divided' 3800 18DOO 0.21 1 A I Yes 30 Arenas Road to Selumin0 Road 64 X 4 Undividetl 2800 25900 O.tt A 4 Undivided 3800 0.15 A 2 Divitled v 3800 18000 0.21 A yes 31 Satumino Rcadto Ramon Roatl 64 X 4 Undivided 2800 259OD 011 A 4 Untlivitletl 38W 015 A 2 Divided' 3800 i8D00 0.21 A Yes .'h behind,WY 32 1 E.Palm Canyon Dove to lea Verne Way 64 X 4 Undivided 1300 25900 045 A 4 Undivided 1700 0.07 A 2 Divided` 1700 18000 0.09 A Yez 'Roadway has Iwo-way le0-turn lane,but no median. a xr s a do a;r ; Roadway modified from City of Palm Springs,General Plan to Section 14 Specific Plan a a Existing ADT Volume on General Plan Roadways 20M ADT Volume on Gemnal Plan Rmisliel 2035 ADT Volume on Road Diet Raddevolys, ES,Zn SEE plan curm,to-Curd Number I Type Volume Capacity Vic LOS Number 0"1 T... I Volume Vic LOS Numb IT I Tinos Volume CAlpithark V, ... 1, i Street Segment Width(h) ofl-ames Lane. of L..:a Amendment CreeeNy Road 33 Ramon Road to Sunny Dunes Road 64 4 Undivided 8400 259W 0.32 A 4 Undivided 111W 0.43 A 2 Divitled 11100 18000 0,62 B Yes 34 Sunny Dunes Roedto DmEmShare Dive 64 X 4 UMHided 8400 25900 0.32 A 4 Undivided 111M 0.43 A 2 Divided' 11100 IBM 0.62 B Yes 35 D1aah$hdfe Ddve1034dTAvenue 84 X 4 Undivided 8400 25900 0.32 A 4 Undivided iiiw 0.43 A 2 Divided' 1110D 18000 0,62 B Yes El Chem Rand 36 Tahquhn Canyon Way to Bansto Road 76 X 4 Divided 11700 359M 0.33 A 4 Divided 156N 0,43 A 2 Divided 15600 18000 0.8] D Yes 37 Bansto Road to Ramon Road 76 % 4 Divided 11700 359M 0 33 A 4 Divided 15600 DA3 A 2 Divided 15600 18000 0,87 D Yes parrnll Ddve 38 Racquet Club Road to Via Eswela 64 X 4 Undivided 1 9700 25900 D.37 A 4 Undivided 129M 0.50 A 2 Divided' 12900 18000T0.72NOo39 Vie Eauala to Vista Chino B4 X 4 Undivided 152M 25900 0.59 A 4 Undivided 202M 0.98 C 2 Divided 20200 18000o40 Vista Chino to TaCavah Di 64 4 Undmded 152M 25900 0.59 A 4 Undivided 202M on c 2 Divided 20200 18000o41 Tachevah Dtive to Tudd rs9 Road 64 4 Undivided 152M 25M 059 A 4 Undivided 202M D.TB C 2 Divided' 2020D 18000o42 Tamedsk Roatl to Alga Road 64 X 4 UMMdel 165M 25900 ON A 4 Undivided 20600 0.80 c 2 Divided 20600 IBMo43 Am Roatl to Amado Roatl H X 4 Undivided 15)00 25M 0.61 B 4 Undivided 208M 0.80 c 2 Divided 20800 IBMo44 Amado Road to Tahquita Canyon Wry B4 X 4 Undivided 15)00 259W 0.61 B 4 Undivided 20800 080 C 2 Divided' 20800 lamo45 Tsm iia Canyon Way to Bu to Roatl W 4 Chided 12200 35900 0.34 A 4 Divided 16300 0.45 A 2 Divitled 16300 18" o46 Barino Road to Ramon Road 64 4 Divided 12200 35900 D.34 A 4 Divided 16300 0..45 A 2 Uvided 16300 lamNo 47 Ramon Road to MedoBs Avenue B4 % 4 VrMMded am 1 25900 1 834 I A A 4 1 Undivided 11700 D.45 A 2 Uvided' 11700 IBM 0.65 B Yes 48 Mesquite Avenue to Sonars Road 64 % 4 Undivided 8200 25800 0.32 A 4 undivided IM(I DA2 A 2 Divided' 10900 180W 0.61 B Yez 49 Sonora Road td E Palm Canyon Drive 64 X 4 Undivided 8200 25900 032 A 4 Undivided 10900 0.43 A 2 Divided' 10900 3591%1 061 B Yes Gene Autry hail 50 Vista Chino to Chia Road 66 6 Divided 29000 53900 0,54 A 6 Divided 3B600 0]2 C 4 Divitled 38600 35900 1p8 Na 51 Chia Road to Ramon Road IS 6 Divitled 25300 53900 D.Q A 8 Divided 3W00 0.83 B 4 Uvitled 33]00 35900 0.94 No B 'Raadwy has two-.Yay left-tun lane.but no metlien. 'Roedvely modified from Uty of Pahn Springs,General Plan to Section 14 Specific PM ASSOCIATES Indian Canyon Drive 52 San Sahel Drive to Frei Drive ]8 4 Divided i6000 359W 045 A 4 Divided 21300 0.59 A 2 Divitletl 21300 18000 1.18 No 53 Frnos Orwe k Rai Club Read ]6 % 4 pivlded 16000 35900 0.95 A / Dividad 21300 0.59 A 2 Divided 21NO IWOKI 1.18 No 54 Racquet Club Road to Via EswePa ]6 % / Oividetl 18100 35900 0.48 A 0 Divitletl 21900 0.81 B 2 Divitletl NNo 11NOW 1.22 No 55 Via E..e In Vii CNno ]8 % 4 D'tvidetl 16400 35900 0.46 A 4 plvNen 21900 0.61 B 2 Divided 21No 180N0 122 No 56 Vista Chino to Slavers Road ]6 4 Divided 18]00 35900 0.52 A 1 Divided 2/800 0.88 B 2 Divided 24800 18000 1.311 No 57 Steven Road k Tachavah Drive ]5 % 4 Divides 187M 35900 0.52 A 4 Divided 248M 0.59 B 2 Divided 24800 18M 1 38 No 56 Ta travah Drive to Tammisk Road 76 4 Divided 16900 35900 0.47 A 4 Divided 225M 0.63 B 2 Divided 22500 18000 115 No 59 Tamansk Reatl to Alele Road 75 4 Divided! 169M 35" 0.47 A 4 Divided 225M 0.63 8 2 Divided 22500 18NOD 1.25 No 60 Akio Road to Amedo Road 54 X 4 One-way 99M 35900 0.28 A 4 Orto-way 132M D.37 A 3 Cnarway 1320D 27000 0.49 A No 61 Arrado Road to Andreas Road 84 X 4 One-way 9900 35900 0.28 A 4 Oneway 132M 0.37 A 3 One-way 13200 27000 0.49 A No 62 Andras Roatl to Tatquits Canyon Way 54 x 4 omai 9WO 35M 0.28 A 4 One-way 132M 0.37 A 3 One-way 13200 VOOo 0.49 A No 63 Tidquila Canyon Way to Arenas Road 84 x 4 One-way 137W 35900 0.38 A 4 Ortmvsyy, 152M 0.51 A 3 One-way 18200 27000 0.68 B No H Arenas Road 10 Barker Road N x 4 one.way 137M 35M 0.30 A 4 Orsway 182M 0.51 A 3 One-way 18200 27000 a." B NO 65 Bansk Road to Saturnine Road 64 X 4 One-way 13700 35900 0.38 A 4 One-way 182M 0.51 A 3 One-way 18200 27WO 068 B NO 66 Selumine Road to Ramon Road 64 N 4 One-way 13700 35900 038 A 4 One-way 18200 0.51 A 3 One-way 18200 27000 0.68 B No 67 Ramon Road to Camino Parecela 64 x 4 One-way 13500 35WO 038 A 4 Oro-way 18000 0.50 A 3 One-way 18000 27000 067 B No u Wma W4Y 66 S.Palm Canyon Drive to Camino Real 64 % 4 Undivided 49DO 25900 019 A 4 Undvided 6500 025 A 2 Divided 6500 18000 0.36 A Yes 69 Camino Real to Toledo Avenue 64 x 4 Undivided 5900 25900 0.23 A 4 Undivided 7800 0,30 A 2 Divided' 2000 18000 0,43 A Yea 70 Toledo Avenue to E.Palm Canyon Dme 64 X 4 Undivided 11300 25900 044 A 4 Undvided 15000 0.58 A 2 Divided' 11600 18000 0.64 B Yes Maagafta Ause. 71 Sunrise Way to El Clelo Road 6a x 4 Undivided 41DO 25900 OA6 A 4 Undivided 5500 021 A 2 Divided' 5500 18000 031 A Yes 72 Vella Road to Gene Autry Trail 64 x 4 Divided 8200 25900 0.24 A 4 Divided 11600 0.32 A 2 Divided 116M 1Bow 0.64 B Yes Murray Canyon Of. 73 S.Palm Canyon Drive to Camino Real 64 x 4 Undivided 3500 1 25900 1 0.14 A 4 Untlividetl 4700 0.16 A 2 Darned' 4700 18000J1.42 Yes 74 Cammo Real tr Toledo Avenue 64 x 4 Undivided 3300 25900 10.49A 4 Undivided 4300 0.17 A 2 Divided' 4300 18000 Yes '� N.Pelm Canyon Ddw 75 Tram Way to Yorba Road 64 X 4 Divided 19200 35900 4 Divided 25500 0.71 C 2 Divided 25500 18000No Te Ymbe Roatl to Rarquat Club Road 6/ x 4 Divided 192W 35900 4 Divided 25500 0.]t C 2 D sided 25WO llsiNo 'n Racquet Club Road to Me Esuek 64 X 4 Divided i]]OO 35900 4 Diyieed 23600 0." B 2 CMdad 23WO 1800NNo ]8 Via Mai to V ote Chino G X 4 Divitletl 1]T00 35900 4 Divided 23600 ON B 2 Dhidetl 23600 18000No ]9 Ysk Chino to Stevens Road 64 X 4 Divided 165W 35900 4 Divided 22000 0.61 B 2 Divitletl 22000 lay00No W Stevens Road k Va Les Palmas 64 X 4 Divided 165M 359N0 4 Divided 22000 0.61 B 2 Dvded 2200O 18000No 81 Via Las Palmas to Tachevah Dnve N X 4 Divided 166W 35900 4 Divided 22000 0.61 B 2 Divided 22WO 18000 112 NO 02 Teohavah Diva to Ale.Road 04 X 4 Divided 157W 35800 0.44 A 4 Divided 20900 0.58 A 2 Craned 20900 18000 1.16 NO 83 Adele Road to Amado Road 50 X 3 One-way 118M 27000 0.44 A 3 One-way 15700 0.56 A 2 One-way 15700 1 INN 0.8] UAN. 0 Amado Read to Aare rea3 Road 5O x 3 One-way 11800 VON 0." A 3 One-way, 15]00 0.58 A 2 One-way 15]00 18000 0.8] 85 Andreas Read to Tahqulla Comm Way W X 3 Ono-vary 118M 2]000 0." A 3 Ono-vwy 15T00 0.59 A 2 One-way 15700 180N0 O.6] 06 Tahquita Canyon Way k Armor,Road 50 X 3 One-way 9900 VON 0.37 A 3 One-way 13200 0.49 A 2 Oneway 1=0 18000 0.73 e] Arras Read to Badsin Read 50 x 3 One-way 9D00 2]000 0.33 A 3 One-way 12000 OA5 A 2 One-way 1200D islow 0.67 00 Bansk Road to Ramon Roan 50 X 9 One-way 8100 2]000 0.30 A 3 One-way tWW 0.40 A 2 Oni INN 18000 O60 I Roadway has two-way left-hum Pane,but no median. Roadvny moment ham Cory of Pekn Sari General Fan t0 Seetidn 14 Specific Plan f� iscry.safecorri- Is, 2035 ADT Volume an General Fla.Roy.di 2035 ACT Volume on Road Diet Roadways Recommended Pae9oae Club Road 89 N.Palm Canyon Drive to Zanlero Road 64 4 Divitled 4600 35900 0.13 A 4 Dividetl 6100 0.17 A 2 Divitletl Sim 18000 0.34 A Yes 90 Zanjero Road to N.Indian Canyon Oove 64 0 Divitled 4E00 ]5900 0.1J A 0 OHideO 8100 0.1] A 2 OiAtled 6100 1800 0.34 A Yes 91 N.Indian Canyon Dove to YU Minlese 8/ X 4 Undivided 2000 25900 0.2➢ A 6 Untlivided 94W 0.36 A 2 Divided 9400 18000 0.52 A Yes 92 Via Miabne to Avenida Caballeros 61 X 4 Untlivketl lW0 25900 0.2] A 4 Undivided 91W 0.36 A 2 Dhitletl' 9400 18000 0.52 A Yes uma 93 AveNtla Cabalerosto Hemtosa Drive 64 X 4 Undivided 700 25900 0.2T A 4 Undivided 93W 0.w A 2 Divitled' 91 15000 0.52 A Yes W Hemwsa Dnreb Suaiae Wey 81 X 4 Undivided 1000 25900 0.2i A 4 Undivided 93W 0.36 A 2 Divitled' 93110 18mg, 0.52 A Yes 95 Sukss Wayto Carries Dove 64 X 4 Undivided 91 25900 0.35 A 4 Undivided 119M O.4i1 A 2 Divided!• 11WO 18000 066 8 Yes 96 Cemtos Drrveto Fanellpdve 64 X 4 Undivided 900o 25900 035 A 4 Undivided 11900 0.46 A 2 Divided 11WO 18WO 066 B Yes IS.Pedro Canyon Drove 97 E.Palm Canyon Drive to T-in Palms Drive 64 4 Undivided 11000 25900 0.42 A 4 Undivided 14600 0.56 A 2 Divided' 14600 1Scpe 081 O Yes 98 Twn Palms Ones to Us Veme Wey 64 X 4 Undivided 9200 25900 0.36 A 4 Undivided 122M 0.47 A 2 Divided 12NO 18000 0.68 a Yes 99 La Veme Wry,ro Canyon Vets Dove 64 X 4 Undivided 1400 259M 0.29 A 4 Undivided 9900 038 A 2 Divitled• 9900 18000 0.55 A Yes 100 Canyon Vista dive to AveNtla Grenada 64 X 4 Undivided SIM 259M 0.22 A 4 Undivided 75M 0.29 A 2 Divided 7500 180p0 0.42 A Yes 101 Avenida Granada d Money Canyon dive 64 X 4 Undivided 3900 25900 0.15 A 4 Undivided Sim 0.20 A 2 Divided! 51M 18000 0.28 A Yes 102 Munay Canyon Dnye 0 Bogen Tail 64 X 4 Untlivketl 3900 1 25900 015 A 4 Undivided 5100 020 A 2 Divided' Sim 1erwa 02a A Yes 103 Bogen Trail to Acanto Drive 40 2 Undivided 2500 13000 019 A 2 Undivided 3300 0.25 A 2 Undivided 3300 13000 025 A Yes 11MI N.Palm Canyon Dnve to McCarty Road 64 4 Undivided 3700 25900 0.14 A 4 Undivided 4900 0.19 A 2 Divided' 4900 18000 027 A Yes 105 McCarthy Road to N.Indian Canyon Dove 64 4 Undivided 3600 25900 0.14 A 4 Undivided 4800 0.19 A 2 Divided' 4800 18000 0.27 A Yes 108 N.Indian Canyon dive to Avenida Caballeros 64 X 4 Undivided 64M 25900 025 A 4 Undlvlded 8500 0.33 A 2 Divided' 1 18000 0.47 A Yes 1W Avenida Caballeros to Sunrise Way 84 X 4 Undivided 66W 25900 015 A 4 Undivided 8700 0.34 A 2 Divided` 8700 MOO 04B A Yes Y4umloa Road 108 Celle El Segundo to Avenida Caballeros 64 X 2 Divided ' am 18000 0.04 A 2 Divided' 1000 0.06 A 2 Divided' 1000 18000 0.06 A Yes BtaldN Wey 109 San Rafael Drive to Francis Drive 76 West 4 Divided 9700 35900 927 A 4 Divided 12900 036 q 2 Divided 1290D 18000 0.72 C No 110 Francis Oriveto RacquetGWRoatl 76 4 Divided 13800 35900 0.38 A 4 Divided 18400 0.51 A 2 Divided 18400 18000 1.02 No 111 Rescued C146 Road to Via E.ela T6 4 Divided ID000 35M 0.20 A 4 Divided 133M 0.37 A 2 Divitletl 13J00 18000 0.74 C No 112 Via Escuela to Vista Chino 76 4 Divided 202M 35900 0.56 A 4 Divided 26800 025 C 2 Divided 26800 18000 149 No TaehaveNOriva 113 N.Palm Canyon Drive to N.Indian Canyon Drive 64 South 4 Undivided 40W 25900 0.15 A 4 Undivided 5300 0.20 A 2 Divided' 5300 18000 0.29 A Yes TObtlo Avenue 114 La Veme Way to Sierra Way 64 % 4 Undivitled 4000 25900 0.15 A q Undivided 5300 020 A 2 Undivitletl 5300 13000 0.41 A Yes 115 Siena Way to Munay Canyon Drive 64 % 4 Undivided 33W 25900 O.t3 A 4 Untlivketl 4400 012 A 2 Undivitletl MW 13000 0.34 A Yes lB [ ROadyvey has t.e=.oay left-tum lane.but no median. RoaQary modified from City of Palm Springs,General Plan to Senbn 14 Specific Plain •s a• 4c I I I r C APPENDIX C ®®®®®® N ®N®®N N®N N NN NNN N®NN®N N®®N®®NNN ®® NNN®NN A L R E R T A. A S S O C I A T E S lU4 a i :w..»w _.._ _.. .o�( ��......1. T� S j I ai { m � a M I q ram, rn- X`— SPdn9s ( Inlema�ional � $ a l �] .azc..va,'nv v I i � 4 a I i x t f I� e 1 ✓q I o n e I I ry y r� I � [._-ddy Boundary — Secondary Thoroughfare(4-lane undivided) _Minor Mobility Corridor(2-lane undivided!) Freeway —Collector(2-lane divided) �Minor Mobility Cortitlor(2-lane divided-TwLTy —Epreaaway —CollemrJ2-lane undivided) Minor Mobility Cortidor(2-lane divided) Major ThwougMare(6-lane divided) ----- Leta Major Mobility 4y Cortkor(2-lane divided) —Major Thoroughfare(4-lane divided) /////Batson tq Moblldy Corridor Secondary Thoroughfare(4-lane divided) Q♦♦\\\\Seoson 14 Shared Mobility Comdor Circulation Plan e 0 0.5 11 15Miles •r,a 103 TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTIONS R/W 110' R/W R/W 60'-66' R/W 86' 40' 10' MAJOR THOROUGHFARE (6 LANE DIVIDED) COLLECTOR STREET R/W 100' R/W R/W 50'-60' R/W 76' f 36' ■ MAJOR THOROUGHFARE (4 LANE DIVIDED) LOCAL STREET R/W 80'-68' R/W 64' SECONDARY THOROUGHFARE ilimilm C A TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTIONS 60'-66' R/W 100' R/W R W 40 R W 76 6' 2' 12' 12' 2' 6 8' 6' 4' 14' 1 12' 1 14' 14' 6' 8' w w TRAVEL TRAVEL w w FLN L MEDIAN TRAVEL w w Y z LANE LANE 4 Y z z r z w LANE w Y z z m5 4 3 m LLLL-5 Y P mm a I ■ I ■ MINOR MOBILITY CORRIDOR - 2 LANES UNDIVIDED MAJOR MOBILITY CORRIDOR - 2 LANES DIVIDED R/W 80,-88' R/W R/W 80P-88' R/W 64' 1 64' 8' 5' 121' 12' 11 10' 12' 2' 5' 8' 20' 12' 12' 20' z w w� TRAVEL TWLTL TRAVEL ww w PARKING TRAVEL TRAVEL PARKING y z z LANE LANE Y zg x LANE LANE msm b f a b P I I I I I I I I ■ � I I I MINOR MOBILITY CORRIDOR - 2 LANES DIVIDED SECTION 14 SHARED MOBILITY CORRIDOR R/W 80'-88' R/W R/W 80,_88' R/W 64' 64' 8' 4' 2' 1 12' 12' 2' 4' 8' 9' S' 12' 12' 12' S' 9' z w w 722' MEDIAN TRAVEL w w z z w w TRAVEL TWLTL TRAVEL yz� LANE Yz LANE LA4NEmg q ems a ms b mg f 1 I I I I I ■ � I I I I I I ■ MINOR MOBILITY CORRIDOR - 2 LANES DIVIDED SECTION 14 MOBILITY CORRIDOR p�, 'TWO-WAY LEFT-TURN LANE IS PROVIDED INSTEAD OF A RAISED MEDIAN r C 0 T 9 5 3 1 Y I ] 0 5 5 V J I ` v 1 L 3 0 l V ® ®®®® ®® ®®®® ® ®ON ®®®® ®® ® a XIaN3dd`d Counts Unlimited, Inc. Pagel City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Via Escuela Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS005 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 29-Feb-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Mon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Mommo Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Morning_ Afternoon 12:00 9 86 6 66 12:15 8 60 8 62 12:30 7 94 5 80 12:45 5 88 29 328 5 63 24 271 53 599 01:00 5 99 3 62 01:15 3 81 0 95 01:30 5 97 2 72 01:45 6 87 19 364 5 57 10 286 29 650 02:00 6 82 0 67 02:15 1 91 5 66 02:30 2 99 2 87 02:45 7 80 16 352 4 85 11 305 27 657 03:00 5 93 3 88 03:15 5 97 4 67 0330 2 105 10 67 03:45 2 86 14 381 3 76 20 298 34 679 0400 4 105 3 69 04:15 0 100 12 64 04:30 4 109 8 66 04:45 6 109 14 423 16 65 39 264 53 687 05:00 8 120 12 66 05:15 7 123 21 79 05:30 12 103 30 70 0545 13 100 40 446 53 69 116 284 156 730 06:00 22 101 39 60 0615 21 99 45 49 06:30 38 81 72 53 0645 52 70 133 351 86 52 242 214 375 565 0700 44 60 80 32 0715 31 51 124 33 07:30 49 52 170 28 0745 73 59 197 222 130 26 504 119 701 341 08:00 85 57 77 21 0815 67 50 93 21 08:30 68 51 119 18 08:45 64 43 284 201 111 15 400 75 684 276 09:00 69 36 89 18 09:15 62 48 75 16 0930 76 33 68 22 09:45 48 23 255 140 93 18 325 74 580 214 1000 70 30 74 11 10:15 76 34 75 12 1030 64 33 83 19 1045 95 15 305 112 76 15 308 57 613 169 11:00 76 17 79 7 11 15 75 24 72 9 11 30 78 24 67 6 11:45 69 13 298 78 73 9 291 31 589 109 Total 1604 3398 1604 3398 2290 2278 2290 2278 3894 5676 Combined 5002 5002 4568 4568 9570 Total AM Peak - 10:45 - - - 07:00 - - - - - Vol. - 324 - - - 504 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.853 0.741 PM Peak - - 04:30 - - - 0230 - - - - Vol. - - 461 - - - 327 - - - - P.H.F. 0.937 0.929 Percentag 32.1% 67.9% 50.1% 49.9% e 107 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Paget City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 NI Via Escuela Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS005 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 01-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Momin -Afternoon Morning _Afternoon — 1200 17 71 6 64 12:15 10 69 3 77 1230 8 83 3 56 12:45 8 103 43 326 2 65 14 262 57 588 01:00 5 98 2 55 01:15 6 67 2 95 01:30 3 92 4 87 01:45 7 85 21 342 2 67 10 304 31 646 02:00 2 73 3 73 02:15 5 89 2 71 02:30 0 76 2 64 02:45 1 86 8 324 5 98 12 306 20 630 03:00 3 99 2 93 03:15 3 109 3 74 03:30 4 120 5 87 0345 4 110 14 438 6 71 16 325 30 763 04:00 1 123 7 77 04:15 4 116 9 70 04:30 3 100 15 67 04:45 5 121 13 460 15 68 46 282 59 742 05:00 9 134 17 83 05:15 7 119 19 61 05:30 14 116 32 74 05:45 16 122 46 491 48 58 116 276 162 767 0600 21 107 41 60 06:15 20 76 54 57 0630 34 76 81 67 06:45 45 60 120 319 79 49 255 233 375 552 07:00 43 68 86 41 07:15 45 63 125 41 07:30 56 67 162 30 07:45 68 58 212 256 131 29 504 141 716 397 08:00 83 63 86 29 08:15 72 52 104 22 0830 91 56 103 23 08:45 60 47 306 218 123 20 416 94 722 312 09:00 55 49 94 21 09:15 73 45 76 15 0930 76 26 80 14 09:45 66 39 270 159 91 12 341 fit 611 221 1000 56 38 81 12 10:15 76 36 65 13 10:30 78 22 70 14 10:45 77 24 287 120 80 7 296 46 583 166 11:00 58 17 65 11 11:15 69 15 53 7 11:30 64 14 77 8 11:45 68 12 259 58 78 7 273 33 532 91 Total 1599 3511 1599 3511 2299 2364 2299 2364 3898 5875 Combined 5110 5110 4663 4663 9773 Total AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 07:00 - - - - - Vol. - 314 - - - 504 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.863 0.778 PM Peak - - 05:00 - - - 02:45 - - - - Vol. - - 491 - - - 352 - - - - P.H.F. 0.916 0.898 Percentag 31.3% 68.7% 49.3% 50.7% e 108 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N(Via Escuela Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS005 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 02-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals __Time wed Morning Afternoon Momina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon 1200 10 82 8 71 12:15 10 70 4 66 12:30 3 77 0 75 1245 7 95 30 324 2 79 14 291 44 615 01:00 5 103 1 65 01:15 6 91 1 84 01:30 7 75 1 63 01:45 2 87 20 356 4 79 7 291 27 647 0200 4 70 2 80 0215 5 72 4 76 0230 2 100 2 80 0245 2 100 13 342 2 82 10 318 23 660 03:00 2 120 4 68 0315 1 97 6 81 03:30 3 97 5 76 0345 5 115 11 429 10 72 25 297 36 726 04:00 1 123 4 71 0415 2 115 8 70 04:30 4 108 9 68 0445 2 110 9 456 16 74 37 283 46 739 05:00 5 117 12 57 0515 8 133 16 71 0530 9 114 27 69 05:46 17 104 39 468 46 78 101 275 140 743 0600 19 104 45 49 06:15 25 100 64 55 0630 39 73 75 48 06:45 62 71 145 348 94 35 278 187 423 535 07:00 42 69 83 24 07:15 52 69 113 33 07:30 49 50 142 30 07:45 65 51 208 239 119 34 457 121 665 360 0800 83 48 101 23 08:15 66 57 105 21 0830 58 55 115 24 0845 69 40 276 200 117 28 438 96 714 296 09:00 92 51 105 25 09:15 62 35 85 17 09:30 64 36 69 19 0945 86 37 304 159 78 22 337 83 641 242 10:00 62 41 65 15 10:15 60 32 77 22 1D:30 52 36 87 12 10:45 64 27 238 136 73 8 302 57 540 193 11:00 58 37 72 12 11:15 66 28 79 11 11:30 59 13 85 7 11:45 78 10 261 88 95 5 331 35 592 123 Total 1554 3545 1554 3545 2337 2334 2337 2334 3891 5879 Combined 5099 5099 4671 4671 9770 Total AM Peak - 09:00 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 304 - - - 475 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.826 0.836 PM Peak - - 04:45 - - - 02:00 - - - - Vol. - - 474 - - - 318 - - - - P.H.F. 0.891 0.970 Percentag 30.5% 69.5% 50.0% 50.0% e 109 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Via Escuela Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS005 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 03-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Morning Afternoon _.Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 1200 9 68 6 60 12:15 10 78 6 58 12:30 10 80 4 75 12:45 7 87 36 313 5 69 21 262 57 575 01:00 6 84 5 81 01:15 1 93 2 80 01:30 4 75 5 82 01:45 6 92 17 344 4 67 16 310 33 654 0200 5 88 2 69 02:15 0 87 1 72 02:30 6 95 1 99 02:45 1 98 12 368 2 88 6 328 18 696 03:00 2 107 4 75 03:15 6 106 3 84 0330 3 92 7 72 0345 1 110 12 416 8 60 22 291 34 706 0400 3 129 7 49 04:15 2 96 6 70 04:30 6 115 12 85 04:45 1 102 12 442 14 85 39 289 51 731 05:00 6 122 12 63 0515 7 143 26 67 05:30 10 98 27 83 0545 18 101 41 464 48 80 113 293 154 757 06:00 21 108 37 84 06:15 18 93 57 59 06:30 35 95 74 43 0645 43 55 117 351 96 36 264 222 381 573 07:00 46 64 82 34 07:15 42 61 107 29 07:30 64 66 151 31 07:45 79 54 231 245 130 37 470 131 701 376 08:00 80 59 96 42 08:15 72 44 94 18 08:30 73 38 103 20 08:45 60 54 285 195 94 20 387 100 672 295 09:00 80 37 71 20 09:15 52 54 72 25 09:30 62 36 89 29 09:45 59 43 253 170 79 19 311 93 564 263 1000 58 38 69 17 10:15 55 26 74 8 1030 56 24 84 14 10:45 61 15 230 103 64 10 291 49 521 152 11:00 71 16 59 7 11:15 74 20 63 7 11:30 74 21 73 9 11:45 89 18 308 75 66 5 261 28 569 103 Total 1554 3485 1554 3485 2201 2396 2201 2396 3755 5881 Combined 5039 5039 4597 4597 9636 Total AM Peak - 11:00 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 308 - - - 484 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.865 0.801 PM Peak - - 0430 - - - 02:30 - - - - Vol. - - 482 - - - 346 - - - - P.H.F. 0.843 0.874 Percentag 30.8 h 69.2% 47.9% 52.1 e 110 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Carona, CA 92878 N!Via Escuela Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS005 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts entail: Counts@Countsunlimited.Com Site Code:067-16119 Start 04-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals _ Time Fri Mommo Afternoon Mominci Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon MomingAftemoon_ 12:00 16 61 5 83 12:15 16 86 6 61 12:30 9 76 5 72 1245 7 79 48 302 2 75 18 291 66 593 01:00 6 104 1 63 01:15 4 87 4 95 01:30 6 75 3 72 01:45 1 85 17 351 2 63 10 293 27 644 02:00 4 93 1 81 02:15 4 79 1 72 02:30 5 99 2 80 02:45 3 110 16 381 3 99 7 332 23 713 03:00 3 109 2 75 03:15 2 111 6 84 03:30 2 116 6 86 0345 3 94 10 430 3 70 17 315 27 745 04:00 6 126 7 87 04:15 1 97 9 94 04:30 4 110 13 86 04:45 4 92 15 425 8 69 37 336 52 761 05:00 10 123 12 69 05:15 9 116 15 78 05:30 12 113 33 58 05:45 17 110 48 462 42 75 102 280 150 742 06:00 19 95 42 78 06:15 19 68 58 49 06:30 35 99 68 55 06:45 60 69 133 331 78 61 246 243 379 574 07:00 35 65 86 31 07:15 50 64 102 39 07:30 58 68 137 33 07:45 so 51 223 248 132 28 457 131 680 379 0800 101 57 116 22 08:15 77 49 92 20 08:30 59 48 114 16 0845 71 28 308 182 101 24 423 82 731 264 09:00 67 45 68 24 0915 58 34 89 33 09:30 66 48 73 28 0945 53 47 244 174 78 27 308 112 552 286 10:00 78 36 69 27 1015 74 40 67 22 10:30 62 35 87 20 1045 57 32 271 143 78 20 301 89 572 232 11:00 57 31 68 12 11:15 56 28 83 15 11:30 74 23 82 9 11:45 88 20 275 102 78 6 311 42 586 144 Total 1608 3531 1608 3531 2237 2546 2237 2546 3845 6077 Combined 5139 5139 4783 4783 9922 Total AM Peak - 0745 - - - 0715 - - - - - Vol. - 317 - - - 487 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.785 0.889 PM Peak - - 05:00 - - - 02:45 - - - - Vol. - - 462 - - - 344 - - - - P.H.F. 0.917 0.869 Percentag 31.3% 68.7% 46.8% 53.2% e ADT/AADT ADT 9,734 AADT9,734 111 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page 1 City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 Nl Tamarisk Road Phone: (951) 268-6268 PLS001 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 29-Feb-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Mon Morning Afternoon Mornino Afternoon Momin _Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 1200 4 142 4 101 12:15 6 130 7 112 1230 10 153 1 128 12:45 7 132 27 557 1 123 13 464 40 1021 01:00 7 140 2 126 01:15 6 159 3 134 01:30 4 123 3 131 01:45 1 119 18 541 4 96 12 487 30 1028 0200 3 144 4 98 02:15 2 122 4 101 02:30 5 141 1 129 02:45 7 136 17 543 6 184 15 512 32 1055 0300 4 207 19 137 0315 4 185 13 124 0330 5 181 8 113 0345 8 148 21 721 7 141 47 515 68 1236 04:00 3 170 12 119 0415 8 146 7 112 04:30 6 169 18 99 0445 12 142 29 627 41 120 78 450 107 1077 05:00 17 231 19 114 0515 16 173 31 127 05:30 26 158 34 121 0545 28 132 87 694 54 122 138 484 225 1178 0600 24 118 57 99 06:15 37 114 75 89 0630 51 108 128 71 06:45 72 87 184 427 144 59 404 318 588 745 0700 75 51 112 44 07:15 95 55 176 47 07:30 106 72 291 60 07:45 156 63 432 241 303 28 882 179 1314 420 08:00 121 60 132 39 08:15 88 64 184 17 08:30 121 57 160 31 08:45 124 56 454 237 195 30 671 117 1125 354 09:00 114 61 145 37 09:15 101 80 101 22 09:30 110 40 129 26 0945 91 45 416 226 154 33 529 118 945 344 1000 107 41 140 14 10:15 111 44 114 19 10:30 120 34 144 16 1045 103 18 441 137 124 19 522 68 963 205 11:00 138 21 123 9 11:15 130 16 132 6 11:30 125 20 120 4 11:45 129 8 522 65 113 12 488 31 1010 96 Total 2648 5016 2648 5016 3799 3743 3799 3743 6447 8759 Combined 7664 7664 7542 7542 15206 Total AM Peak - 11:00 - - - 07:30 - - - - - Vol. - 522 - - - 910 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.946 0.751 PM Peak - - 0300 - - - 0230 - - - - Vol. - - 721 - - - 574 - - - - P.H.F. 0.871 0.780 Percentag 34.6% 65.4% 50.4% 49.6% e 112 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO BOX 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 Nl Tamarisk Road Phone: (951) 268-6268 PLS001 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 01-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Aftemoon Mominq Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Mornino Afternoon 12:00 15 153 10 115 12:15 14 123 4 121 12:30 11 118 2 115 1245 5 145 45 539 3 103 19 454 64 993 01:00 4 132 3 95 01:15 0 108 1 104 01:30 6 125 4 118 01:45 3 110 13 475 3 112 11 429 24 904 02:00 2 124 1 101 02:15 3 143 3 112 02:30 2 143 3 119 02:45 3 131 10 541 6 185 13 517 23 1058 03:00 3 237 7 130 03:15 3 202 3 148 03:30 4 182 22 135 03:45 2 127 12 748 24 138 56 551 68 1299 0400 1 186 14 100 04:15 8 140 5 93 04:30 9 165 22 95 04:45 13 180 31 671 30 132 71 420 102 1091 0500 11 260 25 135 05:15 21 161 25 104 0530 16 148 34 115 05:45 21 137 69 706 51 109 135 463 204 1169 06:00 31 148 45 83 06:15 51 91 85 81 0630 52 105 109 77 06:45 74 79 208 423 129 72 368 313 576 736 07:00 73 76 120 61 07:15 98 67 174 31 07:30 116 73 260 41 07:46 159 57 446 273 317 31 871 164 1317 437 08:00 102 65 146 45 08:15 90 58 145 39 08:30 116 70 143 27 08:45 68 65 376 258 188 27 622 138 998 396 09:00 101 33 136 33 09:15 154 36 129 18 09:30 115 38 139 14 09:45 107 40 477 147 180 27 584 92 1061 239 10:00 127 44 124 12 10:15 102 36 138 18 1030 130 37 129 13 10:45 113 17 472 134 125 13 516 56 988 190 11:00 124 22 132 5 11:15 125 17 126 12 11:30 120 21 147 9 11 45 133 131 502 73 137 13 542 39 1044 112 Total 2661 4988 2661 4988 3808 3636 3808 3636 6469 8624 Combined 7649 7649 7444 7444 15093 Total AM Peak - 09:15 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 503 - - - 897 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.817 0.707 PM Peak - - 0430 - - - 02:45 - - - - Vol. - - 766 - - - 598 - - - - P.H.F. 0,737 0.808 Percentag 34.8% 65.2% 51.2% 48.8% e 113 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO BOX 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 Nl Tamarisk Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS001 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 02-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Momino Afternoon Momina Afternoon Morninq Afternoon 12:00 8 - 140 13 128 12:15 4 126 9 130 1230 8 136 5 112 1245 27 149 47 551 1 136 28 506 75 1057 01:00 9 161 1 135 01:15 1 131 2 122 01:30 9 114 4 100 01:45 5 104 24 510 3 133 10 490 34 1000 0200 3 122 1 100 02:15 4 127 4 120 0230 7 125 1 127 0245 4 128 18 502 9 175 15 522 33 1024 03:00 3 241 3 148 03:15 4 151 3 118 0330 4 179 6 132 03:45 6 150 17 721 38 140 50 538 67 1259 04:00 3 172 12 103 04,15 8 158 5 108 0430 12 189 19 126 04:45 12 159 35 678 21 118 57 455 92 1133 0500 8 220 7 109 05:15 17 194 42 130 05:30 16 156 19 120 05:45 19 148 60 718 43 127 111 486 171 1204 06:00 26 130 53 88 06:15 33 103 69 84 06:30 43 99 83 75 06:45 74 108 176 440 110 67 315 314 491 754 0700 53 100 105 49 07:15 84 91 171 38 07:30 79 68 231 74 07:45 103 62 319 321 235 37 742 198 1061 519 08:00 117 58 195 26 08:15 82 73 192 31 08:30 133 69 179 30 08:45 104 41 436 241 220 34 786 121 1222 362 09:00 143 41 216 25 09:15 156 37 111 26 0930 100 46 128 28 09:45 119 48 518 172 159 29 614 108 1132 280 10:00 87 50 146 17 1015 105 46 122 26 10:30 88 43 151 17 1045 106 25 386 164 126 8 545 68 931 232 11:00 109 22 138 10 11:15 111 21 123 9 11:30 111 15 140 10 11:45 139 17 470 75 119 7 520 36 990 111 Total 2506 5093 2506 5093 3793 3842 3793 3842 6299 8935 Combined 7599 7599 7635 7635 15234 Total AM Peak - 08:30 - - - 0730 - - - - - Vol. - 536 - - - 853 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.859 0.907 PM Peak - - 04:30 - - - 02:45 - - - - Vol. - - 762 - - - 573 - - - - P.H.F. 0.866 0.819 Percenlag 33.0% 67.0% 49.7% 50.3% e 119 1 4 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Tamarisk Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS001 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 03-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning_. Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Mornino Afternoon 12:00 13 136 7 107 12:15 8 143 8 95 1230 7 105 2 114 12:45 4 130 32 514 1 115 18 431 50 945 01:00 9 154 4 121 01:15 3 128 2 104 01:30 6 131 5 128 01:45 4 120 22 533 3 113 14 466 36 999 0200 1 150 3 98 02:15 5 126 1 127 0230 7 161 2 141 0245 2 142 15 579 8 161 14 527 29 1106 0300 2 226 9 145 03:15 4 175 8 126 0330 3 147 7 108 03:45 2 145 1t 693 31 140 55 519 66 1212 04:00 4 164 14 119 0415 10 131 10 124 0430 12 166 20 134 0445 11 159 37 620 24 144 68 521 105 1141 0500 13 262 23 137 05:15 11 173 36 143 0530 15 142 28 139 0545 23 153 62 730 48 138 135 557 197 1287 06:00 23 133 50 96 06:15 41 124 76 83 06:30 61 128 127 56 06:45 65 88 190 473 135 67 388 302 578 775 07:00 69 100 118 57 07:15 81 81 181 56 0730 118 75 253 54 07:45 150 63 418 319 297 44 849 211 1267 530 08:00 116 52 161 35 08:15 94 57 157 41 08:30 94 58 156 31 0845 102 73 406 240 191 31 665 138 1071 378 0900 126 54 121 25 0915 139 44 115 34 0930 95 50 122 26 0945 95 55 455 203 145 21 503 106 958 309 10:00 106 42 122 20 10:15 104 49 108 26 10:30 108 31 116 27 10:45 107 15 425 137 109 16 455 89 880 226 11:00 111 22 123 9 11:15 103 23 119 7 11:30 128 15 119 10 11:45 133 17 475 77 1 108 12 1 469 381 944 115 Total 2548 5118 2548 5118 3633 3905 3633 3905 6181 9023 Combined 7666 7666 7538 7538 15204 Total AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 478 - - - 892 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.797 0.751 PM Peak - - 0430 - - - 02:15 - - - - Vol. - - 760 - - - 574 - - - - P.H.F. 0.725 0.891 Percentag 33.2% 66.8% 48.2% 51.8% e 115 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Pages City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Tamarisk Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS001 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 04-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Fri Morning Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Morninq Afternoon 12:00 16 131 3 121 1215 13 168 4 109 12:30 10 119 1 107 1245 9 127 48 545 2 119 10 456 58 1001 01:00 5 170 3 102 01:15 2 124 5 122 01:30 6 107 6 114 01:45 5 118 18 519 2 123 16 461 34 980 02:00 0 135 1 127 02:15 3 133 1 116 02:30 6 143 1 133 02:45 3 135 12 546 4 178 7 554 19 1100 0300 1 227 10 122 03:15 1 191 5 138 03:30 5 172 6 1" 03:45 4 146 11 736 25 133 46 537 57 1273 04:00 3 161 20 133 0415 6 158 14 126 04:30 12 199 13 140 04:45 11 132 32 650 19 122 66 521 98 1171 05:00 11 206 8 124 05:15 11 177 39 118 05:30 14 164 32 114 05:45 16 124 52 671 43 102 122 458 174 1129 06:00 24 128 49 70 06:15 34 96 72 86 06:30 50 96 109 80 0645 71 89 179 409 125 57 355 293 534 702 07:00 60 76 123 60 07:15 88 63 182 54 07:30 112 74 263 49 0745 157 65 417 278 305 58 873 221 1290 499 0800 131 60 184 33 08:15 101 39 156 35 08:30 108 60 141 35 08:45 111 41 451 200 190 36 671 139 1122 339 09:00 116 49 134 35 09:15 128 57 125 33 09:30 114 59 155 37 09:45 92 52 450 217 142 39 556 144 1006 361 10:00 120 43 116 37 10:15 121 51 114 23 1030 96 37 112 17 10:45 95 41 432 172 135 30 477 107 909 279 11:00 118 41 120 19 11:15 119 19 122 19 11:30 131 33 123 17 1145 120 20 488 113 153 6 518 61 1006 174 Total 2590 5056 2590 5056 3717 3952 3717 3952 6307 9008 Combined 7646 7646 7669 7669 15315 Total AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 501 - - - 934 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.798 0.766 PM Peak - - 0300 - - - 02:45 - - - - Vol. - - 736 - - - 582 - - - - P.H.F. 0.811 0.817 Percentag 33.9% 66.1°% 48.5% 51.5% e ADT/AADT ADT 15,210 AADT 15,210 116 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page 1 City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Tamarisk Road Phone: (951) 268-6268 PLS002 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 29-Feb-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time _Mon Morning Afternoon Mornino Afternoon Momina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon _Morning Afternoon__ 1200 6 144 6 104 12:15 4 141 8 123 1230 10 142 2 136 12:45 7 131 27 558 1 133 17 496 44 1054 01:00 8 137 3 135 01:15 5 152 5 138 01:30 4 113 4 139 01:45 2 133 19 535 5 109 17 521 36 1056 02:00 2 145 4 115 02:15 3 133 6 119 02:30 5 145 2 136 0245 7 138 17 561 7 192 19 562 36 1123 03:00 3 216 20 151 03:15 4 190 15 140 0330 5 186 10 122 0345 8 150 20 742 9 151 54 564 74 1306 04:00 3 165 14 129 04:15 7 149 9 128 04:30 7 168 20 110 04:45 12 152 29 634 43 133 86 500 115 1134 05:00 21 228 19 131 05:15 16 172 31 123 05:30 24 138 31 128 05:45 31 124 92 662 56 116 137 498 229 1160 0600 25 119 51 96 06:15 40 119 72 88 0630 52 98 120 79 06:45 71 84 188 420 155 63 398 326 586 746 0700 78 53 118 44 0715 94 58 176 49 07:30 104 63 297 64 07:45 164 65 440 239 294 31 885 188 1325 427 08:00 119 50 140 42 08:15 91 66 175 22 08:30 126 50 174 31 08:45 121 54 457 220 192 34 681 129 1138 349 09:00 122 63 146 39 0915 102 76 115 21 09:30 127 43 139 28 09:45 95 41 446 223 158 32 558 120 1004 343 10:00 112 43 151 16 1015 128 41 127 21 10:30 118 35 142 18 1045 108 18 466 137 139 19 559 74 1025 211 11:00 141 20 129 11 11:15 122 15 137 10 11:30 115 19 129 4 11:45 127 8 505 62 125 13 520 38 1025 100 Total 2706 4993 2706 4993 3931 4016 3931 4016 6637 9009 Combined 7699 7699 7947 7947 15646 Total AM Peak - 11:00 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 505 - - - 907 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.895 0.763 PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 02:30 - - - - VoL - - 742 - - - 619 - - - - P.H.F. 0.859 0.806 Percenlag 35.1% 64.9% 49.5% 50.5% e 117 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 Sl Tamarisk Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS002 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code: 067-16119 Start 01-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Morning Afternoon _Morning Afternoon 12:00 14 152 12 - 121- -- 12:15 12 131 7 141 12:30 11 116 4 112 1245 6 139 43 538 5 123 28 497 71 1035 01:00 4 133 3 106 01:15 0 111 2 119 01:30 7 128 5 127 01:45 3 111 14 483 3 114 13 466 27 949 0200 2 128 2 114 02:15 3 134 2 125 02:30 2 141 5 134 02:45 4 132 11 535 8 195 17 568 28 1103 03:00 3 229 7 152 03:15 2 190 5 166 03:30 4 180 22 132 0345 2 128 11 727 25 155 59 605 70 1332 04:00 1 187 13 118 0415 9 135 8 106 04:30 10 164 23 107 04:45 14 177 34 663 32 135 76 466 110 1129 05:00 11 233 22 157 05:15 23 155 28 121 05:30 14 151 33 125 05:45 22 126 70 665 49 113 132 516 202 1181 0600 33 131 44 80 06:15 49 87 76 87 0630 55 103 102 72 06:45 75 82 212 403 129 77 351 316 563 719 0700 77 72 129 67 0715 94 61 167 37 0730 120 67 259 47 0745 153 60 444 260 312 37 867 188 1311 448 0800 100 65 155 46 08:15 94 58 141 38 08:30 111 70 156 29 0845 75 53 380 246 180 31 632 144 1012 390 09:00 92 32 140 36 09:15 149 35 136 23 09:30 107 38 146 17 0945 109 37 457 142 180 29 602 105 1059 247 10:00 125 44 142 14 10:15 103 33 144 19 10:30 126 40 131 14 1045 112 15 466 132 131 14 548 61 1014 193 11:00 133 20 138 8 11:15 129 17 138 12 11:30 121 21 150 10 11:45 132 13 515 71 154 13 580 43 1095 114 Total 2657 4865 2657 4865 3905 3975 3905 3975 6562 8840 Combined 7522 7522 7880 7880 15402 Total AM Peak - 11:00 - - - 07,15 - - - - - Vol. - 515 - - - 893 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.968 0.716 PM Peak - - 02:45 - - - 02:30 - - - - Vol. - - 731 - - - 647 - - - - P.H.F. 0.798 0.829 Percentag 35.3% 64.7% 49.6% 50.4% e 118 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 St Tamarisk Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS002 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 62-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals _ Time _ _ Wed Morning Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Morning Aftemoa_n_ 1200 8 133 15 132 12:15 3 132 10 140 12:30 8 130 7 128 1245 26 150 45 545 1 149 33 549 78 1094 01:00 9 165 1 139 01:15 1 122 2 141 01:30 10 117 6 103 0145 6 107 26 511 4 134 13 517 39 1028 02:00 4 124 2 112 02:15 4 131 5 136 02:30 7 123 2 135 02:45 4 125 19 503 10 183 19 566 38 1069 03:00 3 241 5 158 03:15 4 152 5 131 03:30 4 163 7 144 0345 6 146 17 702 35 151 52 584 69 1286 04:00 3 161 15 112 0415 8 150 5 121 0430 12 191 21 135 04:45 13 158 36 660 23 135 64 503 100 1163 05:00 8 214 8 115 05:15 17 181 42 135 05:30 16 153 19 125 05:45 19 148 60 696 38 138 107 513 167 1209 0600 26 128 51 91 06:15 37 107 56 84 0630 44 88 77 82 0645 77 104 184 427 113 66 297 323 481 750 07:00 49 92 114 56 07:15 80 93 163 41 07:30 76 67 240 72 07:45 103 57 308 309 237 44 754 213 1062 522 0800 117 65 193 32 08:15 86 74 185 31 0830 130 66 189 36 0845 104 43 437 248 218 37 785 136 1222 384 09:00 133 40 224 28 0915 149 38 119 28 0930 95 47 140 31 09:45 118 47 495 172 162 29 645 116 1140 288 10:00 82 46 161 21 10:15 104 47 136 23 10:30 91 42 150 20 10:45 108 23 385 158 147 10 594 74 979 232 11:00 114 22 147 16 11:15 98 21 133 12 11:30 103 15 153 11 11:45 141 18 456 76 137 8 570 47 1026 123 Total 2468 5007 2468 5007 3933 4141 3933 4141 6401 9148 Combined 7475 7475 8074 8074 15549 Total AM Peak - 08:30 - - - 07:30 - - - - - Vol. - 516 - - - 855 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.866 0.891 PM Peak - - 04:30 - - - 02:45 - - - - Vol. - - 744 - - - 616 - - - - P.H.F. 0.869 0.842 Percentag 33.0% 67.0% 48.7% 51.3°% e 119 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Tamarisk Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS002 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 03-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time _ Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Morning Afternoon _ 1200 13 129 9 121 12:15 8 144 9 101 1230 8 109 2 128 12:45 4 139 33 521 3 145 23 495 56 1016 01:00 13 150 5 125 01:15 3 127 3 116 01:30 6 125 7 129 01:45 4 121 26 523 5 128 20 498 46 1021 02:00 1 140 4 107 02:16 5 131 2 137 0230 7 155 3 144 0245 2 132 15 558 9 179 18 567 33 1125 0300 2 215 10 143 03:15 4 185 10 138 03:30 3 140 8 122 0345 2 141 11 681 30 142 58 545 69 1226 04:00 2 163 17 126 04:15 10 131 12 134 04:30 12 163 20 135 0445 11 157 35 614 26 146 75 541 110 1155 0500 15 245 25 148 05:15 12 177 36 154 05:30 15 153 27 144 05:45 25 151 67 726 49 137 137 583 204 1309 0600 25 128 48 106 06:15 44 121 60 82 0630 63 127 119 68 06:45 67 85 199 461 141 70 368 326 567 787 0700 68 89 117 61 0715 77 79 186 67 0730 115 73 251 55 0745 146 59 406 300 286 45 840 228 1246 528 0800 116 54 183 37 08:15 89 57 170 42 08:30 96 56 166 32 08:45 97 72 398 239 182 37 701 148 1099 387 0900 123 55 134 29 0915 135 42 116 36 09:30 96 49 132 32 0945 100 56 454 202 152 20 534 117 988 319 1000 108 41 131 23 1015 101 51 123 26 10:30 110 30 114 26 1045 100 16 419 138 131 20 499 95 918 233 11:00 115 22 127 11 11 15 95 23 129 9 11:30 129 16 127 10 11:45 132 _ 18 471 78 128 14 511 44 982 122 Total 2534 5041 2534 5041 3784 4187 3784 4187 6318 9228 Combined 7575 7575 7971 7971 15546 Total AM Peak - 11:00 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 471 - - - 906 - - - -P.H.F. 0.807 0.792 PM Peak - - 04:30 - - - 02:30 - - - - Vol. - - 742 - - - 604 - - - - P.H.F. 0.757 0,844 Percentag 33.5% 66.6% 47.5% 52.5% e 120 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Pages City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Tamarisk Road Phone: (951) 268-6268 PLS002 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 04-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Fri Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon 12:00 16 140 4 129 12 15 12 169 5 127 12:30 8 116 2 121 12:45 9 126 45 551 3 132 14 509 59 1060 01:00 6 155 4 116 01:15 2 129 7 127 01:30 5 112 7 122 01:45 5 127 18 523 3 119 21 484 39 1007 0200 0 136 2 139 02:15 3 133 1 142 02:30 5 133 3 134 0245 3 142 11 544 6 185 12 600 23 1144 03:00 1 236 9 134 03:15 1 194 8 144 0330 5 165 8 165 0345 4 147 11 742 25 145 50 588 61 1330 04:00 3 155 19 148 04:15 6 158 15 126 04:30 11 194 16 146 04:45 14 133 34 640 20 140 70 560 104 1200 05:00 10 192 12 129 05:15 12 171 38 123 05:30 15 143 32 117 05:45 17 122 54 628 43 119 125 488 179 1116 0600 24 125 43 77 06:15 39 98 64 89 0630 51 91 109 88 06:45 77 88 191 402 112 65 328 319 519 721 0700 57 83 126 61 0715 83 64 187 53 0730 108 71 271 57 07:45 154 72 402 290 299 58 883 229 1285 519 08:00 124 58 182 38 08:15 96 44 156 39 0830 103 63 146 33 08:45 109 39 432 204 187 35 671 145 1103 349 0900 109 49 135 36 09:15 119 58 131 38 09:30 103 55 153 36 09:45 102 54 433 216 147 41 566 151 999 367 10:00 112 45 127 39 1015 116 51 114 24 10:30 99 39 129 18 1045 98 41 425 176 134 29 504 110 929 286 11:00 116 42 129 19 11 15 121 19 125 23 11:30 126 34 132 17 11:45 _ 120 22 483 117 164 10 550 69 1033 186 Total 2539 5033 2539 5033 3794 4252 3794 4252 6333 9285 Combined 7572 7572 8046 8046 15618 Total AM Peak - 11:00 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 483 - - - 939 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.784 0.785 PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 0245 - - - - Vol. - - 742 - - - 628 - - - - P.H.F. 0.786 0.849 Percentag 33.5% 66.5% 47.2% 52.8% e ADT/AADT ADT 15,552 AADT 15,552 1`L1 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page 1 City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Alejo Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS003 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code: 067-16119 Start 29-Feb-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Mon Morning Afternoon Momina Afternoon Mornino Afternoon Momina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon 12:00 11 137 7 111 1215 2 147 6 133 12:30 8 144 3 166 1245 8 137 29 565 4 139 20 549 49 1114 01:00 7 160 1 146 01:15 2 158 4 143 01:30 3 134 4 152 01:45 2 119 14 571 1 118 10 559 24 1130 02:00 1 148 3 111 0215 2 135 4 123 02:30 3 137 3 143 02:45 9 139 15 559 5 200 15 577 30 1136 03:00 3 233 4 164 03:15 8 189 4 140 03:30 3 175 8 152 03:45 4 143 18 740 10 149 26 605 44 1345 0400 3 158 9 138 0415 6 134 5 138 04:30 7 169 12 129 0445 12 140 28 601 38 135 64 540 92 1141 05:00 23 195 14 148 0515 17 160 19 142 05:30 22 140 26 140 0545 31 145 93 640 39 126 98 556 191 1196 06:00 24 107 39 102 0615 35 107 57 83 06:30 62 97 100 87 06:45 73 80 194 391 123 72 319 344 513 735 07:00 81 54 103 51 07:15 94 60 144 48 07:30 106 64 267 80 07:45 182 64 463 242 229 43 743 222 1206 464 0800 117 53 131 41 08:15 101 58 150 28 08:30 141 53 158 32 08:45 106 51 465 215 196 41 635 142 1100 357 0900 115 75 151 47 09:15 113 68 120 23 09:30 122 34 142 24 09:45 99 33 449 210 173 34 586 128 1035 338 10:00 119 39 158 19 10:15 117 34 139 21 10:30 119 39 163 20 10:45 135 17 490 129 168 25 628 85 1118 214 11:00 148 22 148 13 11:15 112 11 144 9 11:30 121 18 137 4 11:45 128 4 509 55 137 15 566 41 1075 96 Total 2767 4918 2767 4918 3710 4348 3710 4348 6477 9266 Combined 7685 7685 8058 8058 15743 Total AM Peak - 0745 - - - 07:30 - - - - - Vol. - 541 - - - 777 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.743 0.728 PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 02:45 - - - - Vol. - - 740 - - - 656 - - - - P.H.F. 0.794 0.820 Percentag 36.0% 64.0% 46.0°% 54.0% e 122 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO BOX 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Alejo Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS003 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 01-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Moming Afternoon Morning Afternoon Momina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Morninq Afternoon 12:00 18 151 13 140 12:15 15 136 7 156 1230 9 125 3 111 1245 3 141 45 553 5 128 28 535 73 1088 01:00 5 125 3 122 01:15 1 116 4 127 01:30 4 117 4 134 01:45 3 130 13 488 3 135 14 518 27 1006 0200 2 131 1 121 02:15 1 145 1 131 02:30 0 150 4 145 02:45 5 143 8 569 4 216 10 613 18 1182 03:00 4 222 3 153 03:15 3 206 1 176 03:30 3 170 7 129 0345 4 129 14 727 6 167 17 625 31 1352 04:00 1 161 9 126 04:15 7 121 4 128 0430 11 157 15 125 04:45 10 167 29 606 24 147 52 526 81 1132 0500 17 197 16 170 0515 18 153 15 130 0530 16 152 35 123 05:45 23 146 74 648 36 133 102 556 176 1204 0600 32 135 38 88 06:15 44 82 59 83 06:30 66 95 87 82 06:45 85 84 227 396 102 87 286 340 513 736 0700 69 73 102 68 07:15 93 72 142 53 07:30 120 75 237 58 07:45 177 58 459 278 240 41 721 220 1180 498 08:00 122 66 145 40 0815 110 58 143 39 0830 126 64 127 29 08:45 90 51 448 239 171 29 586 137 1034 376 0900 106 27 138 41 09:15 119 33 162 26 0930 110 31 153 22 0945 111 34 446 125 176 26 629 115 1075 240 1000 141 46 138 24 10:15 106 29 131 22 10:30 113 34 144 19 10:45 115 14 475 123 136 19 549 84 1024 207 11:00 143 20 143 8 11:15 106 13 143 8 11:30 131 18 142 10 11:45 141 13 521 64 163 13 591 39 1112 103 Total 2759 4816 2759 4816 3585 4308 3585 4308 6344 9124 Combined 7575 7575 7893 7893 15468 Total AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 07:30 - - - - - Vol. - 535 - - - 765 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.756 0.797 PM Peak - - 0245 - - - 02:30 - - - - Vol. - - 741 - - - 690 - - - - P.H.F. 0.834 0.799 Percentag 36.4% 63.6% 45.4% 54.6% e 123 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/AlejoRoad Phone: (951) 268-6268 PLS003 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 02-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Moming Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Mominq _Afternoon Moming Afternoon __Morning Afternoon 12:00 8 133 15 144 12:15 5 141 9 163 12:30 4 144 6 135 1245 26 161 43 579 2 147 32 589 75 1168 01:00 6 155 3 150 01:15 2 137 2 143 01:30 7 125 8 115 01:45 4 108 19 525 4 128 17 536 36 1061 02:00 5 133 2 124 02:15 2 134 1 158 02:30 2 133 1 153 02:45 6 134 15 534 5 182 9 617 24 1151 03:00 1 231 3 178 03:15 5 157 4 149 0330 6 162 5 142 0345 6 172 18 722 6 138 18 607 36 1329 04:00 3 150 4 137 0415 7 157 5 126 04:30 9 163 11 144 0445 11 159 30 629 18 135 38 542 68 1171 05:00 11 197 6 128 0515 15 167 27 135 05:30 19 142 15 129 0545 15 135 60 641 23 145 71 537 131 1178 0600 21 115 49 102 06:15 38 112 39 92 0630 43 76 64 81 06:45 83 91 185 394 75 67 227 342 412 736 0700 52 97 96 64 07:15 88 95 133 50 0730 90 66 197 92 07:45 120 63 350 321 194 53 620 259 970 580 0800 118 67 159 34 0815 109 74 177 34 0830 130 64 179 37 0845 118 38 475 243 209 36 724 141 1199 384 09:00 142 36 243 32 09:15 118 43 126 35 0930 1'll 46 141 38 09:45 132 52 503 177 156 30 666 135 1169 312 1000 93 41 152 26 10:15 105 46 149 36 1030 110 40 142 23 10:45 123 21 431 148 170 18 613 103 1044 251 11:00 114 19 157 21 11:15 110 15 146 13 11:30 122 12 166 8 11:45 145 161 491 62 1 135 7 1 604 49 1 1095 111 Total 2620 4975 2620 4975 3639 4457 3639 4457 6259 9432 Combined 7595 7595 8096 8096 15691 Total AM Peak - 08:30 - - - 08:15 - - - - - Vol. - 508 - - - 808 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.894 0.831 PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 0215 - - - - Vol. - - 722 - - - 671 - - - - P.H.F. 0.781 0.922 Percentag 34.5% 65.5% 44.9% 55A e 124 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO BOX 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Alejo Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS003 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code: 067-16119 Start 03-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Souhbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu_ _ Morning Afternoon_ Morning Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Momino Afternoon 1200 10 145 9 129 1215 7 145 10 113 1230 7 119 2 139 12:45 2 147 26 556 4 151 25 532 51 1088 01:00 6 164 4 138 01:15 3 137 4 128 01:30 3 123 6 147 01:45 4 130 16 554 7 150 21 563 37 1117 02:00 2 134 5 123 02:15 4 141 2 161 02:30 6 164 4 157 02:45 4 145 16 584 3 197 14 638 30 1222 03:00 2 215 2 159 03:15 7 184 4 147 0330 0 123 6 129 03:45 4 160 13 682 6 151 18 586 31 1268 0400 2 150 5 135 04:15 5 126 10 143 0430 10 155 13 159 04:45 10 144 27 575 18 162 46 599 73 1174 0500 15 214 19 158 05:15 16 170 25 149 0530 15 155 18 152 05:45 20 153 66 692 33 149 95 608 161 1300 06:00 22 135 35 123 06:15 46 130 47 82 06:30 61 121 105 69 06:45 76 89 205 475 116 71 303 345 508 820 07:00 71 87 104 65 07:15 95 72 156 73 07:30 120 84 226 67 07:45 155 63 441 306 244 60 730 265 1171 571 08:00 137 55 153 51 08:15 114 41 148 44 0830 102 56 151 39 08:45 115 66 468 218 177 44 629 178 1097 396 0900 86 46 151 40 09:15 102 45 132 41 09:30 97 46 136 45 09:45 105 41 390 178 143 33 562 159 952 337 10:00 111 33 141 27 1015 106 46 135 41 1030 111 29 129 32 1045 114 17 442 125 139 28 544 128 986 253 11:00 115 18 139 20 11:15 102 25 136 11 11:30 133 17 149 12 11:45 139 20 489 80 135 16 559 59 1048 139 Total 2599 5025 2599 5025 3546 4660 3546 4660 6145 9685 Combined 7624 7624 8206 8206 15830 Total AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 526 - - - 779 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.848 0.798 PM Peak - - 0230 - - - 02:15 - - - - V01. - - 708 - - - 674 - - - - P.H.F. 0.823 0,855 Percenlag 34.1% 65.9% 43.2% 56.8% e 125 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Pages City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 St Alejo Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS003 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 04-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Fri Morning Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Momino Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Morninq Afternoon 1200 16 146 5 147 12:15 10 163 7 142 12:30 6 134 2 147 1245 9 140 41 583 3 138 17 574 58 1157 01:00 2 161 3 132 01:15 5 123 8 131 01:30 3 132 7 135 01,45 2 122 12 538 3 117 21 515 33 1053 02:00 0 133 2 138 02:15 3 164 1 146 02:30 4 133 2 142 02:45 3 154 10 584 3 198 8 624 18 1208 03:00 2 240 3 144 03:15 1 189 2 156 0330 4 145 4 160 03:45 4 158 11 732 6 149 15 609 26 1341 0400 3 147 2 165 04:15 3 151 10 131 0430 11 173 11 169 0445 14 140 31 611 17 144 40 609 71 1220 05:00 10 186 10 148 0515 10 160 28 130 05:30 18 150 25 123 0545 17 139 55 635 38 121 101 522 156 1157 0600 25 122 40 82 0615 35 107 49 90 06:30 55 90 99 90 0645 78 94 193 413 94 63 282 325 475 738 07:00 64 78 106 60 07:15 82 70 156 65 07:30 113 74 240 62 07:45 181 72 440 294 243 66 745 253 1185 547 08:00 146 50 153 45 0815 98 33 135 43 0830 120 65 139 38 0845 119 37 483 185 180 38 607 164 1090 349 0900 102 49 138 45 09:15 102 52 148 48 0930 123 66 152 46 09:45 109 49 436 216 167 43 605 182 1041 398 1000 120 51 133 43 10:15 126 49 120 32 10:30 104 40 133 32 10:45 89 35 439 175 144 41 530 148 969 323 11:00 118 38 146 24 11:15 123 16 142 34 11:30 142 33 141 21 11:45 127 22 510 109 168 12 597 91 1 1107 200 Total 2661 5075 2661 5075 3568 4616 3568 4616 6229 9691 Combined 7736 7736 8184 8184 15920 Total AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 545 - - - 792 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.753 0,815 PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 02:45 - - - - Vol. - - 732 - - - 658 - - - - P.H.F. 0.763 0.831 Percentag 34.4% 65.6% 43.6% 56.4% e ADTfAADT ADT 15,730 AADT 15,730 126 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page 1 City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Tahquitz Canyon Way Phone: (951) 268-6268 PLS004 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-1 61 1 9 Start 29-Feb-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Mon Morning Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Momina Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 5 102 4 113 12:15 2 104 7 130 12:30 6 105 3 125 12:45 0 99 13 410 3 116 17 484 30 894 01:00 2 100 1 131 01:15 1 114 4 117 01:30 1 101 6 135 01:45 2 96 6 411 0 111 11 494 17 905 02:00 1 108 2 99 02:15 3 103 5 111 02:30 2 114 0 111 0245 6 113 12 438 1 178 8 499 20 937 03:00 0 187 1 128 03:15 7 132 3 138 03:30 2 136 0 121 03:45 2 115 11 570 5 111 9 498 20 1068 04:00 2 123 6 98 04:15 7 100 1 109 04:30 6 119 6 109 04:45 7 97 22 439 13 100 26 416 48 855 0500 7 127 6 133 05:15 9 119 14 102 05:30 8 101 15 117 05:45 15 102 39 449 24 109 59 461 98 910 0600 14 79 25 92 06:15 18 79 30 82 0630 54 71 85 70 06:45 59 50 145 279 91 75 231 319 376 598 0700 57 44 71 55 0715 64 42 124 39 0730 89 44 165 47 07:45 162 56 372 186 207 40 567 181 939 367 08:00 95 39 104 35 08:15 74 30 100 29 08:30 99 40 118 24 0845 93 37 361 146 136 31 458 119 819 265 0900 111 65 111 30 0915 72 48 102 22 09:30 92 23 115 20 09:45 93 27 368 163 129 25 457 97 825 260 10:00 85 28 125 17 1015 104 26 108 21 10:30 101 20 110 16 1045 111 12 401 86 137 13 480 67 881 153 11:00 112 12 112 8 11:15 84 9 131 7 11 30 100 7 132 6 11:45 111 3 407 31 98 13 473 341 880 65 Total 2157 3608 2157 3608 2796 3669 2796 3669 4953 7277 Combined 5765 5765 6465 6465 12230 Total AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 430 - - - 600 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.664 0.725 PM Peak - - 0300 - - - 0245 - - - - Vol. - - 570 - - - 565 - - - - P.H.F. 0.762 0.794 Percentag 37.4% 62.6°% 43.2% 56.8°% e 127 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Tahquitz Canyon way Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS004 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 01-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Souhbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Momina Afternoon Momina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon 12:00 19 111 - 8 115 12:15 6 128 5 146 12:30 4 110 3 107 12:45 3 117 32 466 5 117 21 485 53 951 01:00 3 104 1 119 01:15 1 99 2 113 01:30 3 107 2 114 01:45 3 112 10 422 3 104 8 450 18 872 0200 3 125 2 114 02:15 0 99 2 108 02:30 1 119 3 109 02:45 3 116 7 459 5 174 12 505 19 964 03:00 2 169 1 155 03:15 2 150 3 132 03:30 5 133 2 107 0345 3 105 12 557 5 111 11 505 23 1062 04:00 0 127 5 105 04:15 4 93 2 109 04:30 9 119 10 112 04:45 6 120 19 459 10 126 27 452 46 911 0500 7 119 3 129 0515 8 103 12 130 0530 8 101 23 100 05:45 9 100 32 423 23 121 61 480 93 903 0600 19 85 22 78 06:15 24 71 31 82 0630 47 65 69 73 06:45 64 63 154 284 89 70 211 303 365 587 07:00 61 59 85 51 07:15 70 54 106 43 07:30 94 63 185 39 07:45 157 46 382 222 219 28 595 161 977 383 08:00 103 45 84 37 08:15 92 45 107 26 08:30 91 34 107 33 0845 93 33 379 157 123 22 421 118 800 275 09:00 79 27 105 30 09:15 95 21 129 22 09:30 85 29 96 19 0945 82 25 341 102 129 19 459 90 800 192 1000 89 33 111 19 1015 81 14 108 20 10:30 90 22 103 18 1045 87 9 347 78 95 10 417 67 764 145 11:00 104 10 100 8 11:15 102 13 116 6 11:30 93 15 127 6 11:45 98 4 397 42 131 4 474 241 871 66 Total 2112 3671 2112 3671 2717 3540 2717 3640 4829 7311 Combined 5783 5783 6357 6357 12140 Total AM Peak - 0730 - - - 07:00 - - - - - Vol. - 446 - - - 595 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.710 0.679 PM Peak - - 0245 - - - 0230 - - - - Vol. - - 568 - - - 570 - - - - P.H.F. 0.840 0.819 Percentag 36.5% 63.5% 42.7% 57.3% e 128 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO BOX 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Tahquitz Canyon Way Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS004 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 02-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Momino Afternoon Mornina Afternoon 12:00 4 94 8 111 12:15 6 98 8 146 12:30 8 102 8 127 1245 19 128 37 422 1 132 25 516 62 938 01:00 5 97 5 147 01:15 1 88 1 106 01:30 4 99 3 92 01:45 3 111 13 395 2 124 11 469 24 864 0200 3 111 1 103 02:15 0 95 1 119 02:30 0 106 2 118 02:45 5 118 8 430 3 169 7 509 15 939 03:00 1 193 0 159 03:15 3 104 1 141 03:30 3 116 2 118 03:45 2 124 9 537 2 123 5 541 14 1078 04:00 4 111 5 114 04:15 3 117 1 100 04:30 2 127 3 112 0445 8 124 17 479 7 115 16 441 33 920 05:00 3 123 2 97 0515 10 112 23 102 05:30 7 94 10 118 0545 12 97 32 426 15 108 50 425 82 851 06:00 16 72 29 103 0615 24 89 21 77 06:30 27 57 33 67 06:45 48 59 115 277 57 60 140 307 255 584 07:00 40 78 76 60 07:15 51 82 107 50 07:30 77 53 121 58 07:45 93 51 261 264 138 32 442 200 703 464 08:00 95 54 134 33 0815 94 40 133 25 0830 92 47 115 29 08:45 96 32 377 173 159 29 541 116 918 289 09:00 119 23 198 17 09:15 113 26 133 18 09:30 95 41 111 25 09:45 94 37 421 127 105 19 547 79 968 206 10:00 77 33 102 25 10:15 80 27 117 24 10:30 87 21 107 24 10:45 92 16 336 97 125 12 451 85 787 182 11:00 91 12 113 14 11:15 80 8 104 10 11:30 89 9 118 10 11:45 106 14 366 43 115 9 450 43 816 86 Total 1992 3670 1992 3670 2685 3731 2685 3731 4677 7401 Combined 5662 5662 6416 6416 12078 Total AM Peak - 08:45 - - - 08:15 - - - - - Vol. - 423 - - - 605 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.889 0.764 PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 02:30 - - - - Vol. - - 537 - - - 587 - - - - P.H.F. 0.696 0.868 Percentag 35.2% 64.8% 41.8% 58.2% e 129 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 St Tahquitz Canyon Way Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS004 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: Counts@Countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 03-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning_ Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Momina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon_ 1200 8 114 9 117 1215 2 126 11 108 1230 7 93 1 113 12:45 3 115 20 448 2 125 23 463 43 911 01:00 0 121 4 120 01:15 2 110 3 92 01:30 3 96 0 117 01:45 1 98 6 425 7 123 14 452 20 877 0200 1 117 4 115 02:15 4 117 1 132 02:30 2 117 3 135 02:45 3 110 10 461 2 164 10 546 20 1007 0300 0 164 1 148 03:15 2 133 1 114 03:30 0 120 2 115 03:45 2 125 4 542 5 123 9 500 13 1042 0400 0 122 1 111 04:15 5 112 7 111 0430 4 102 9 130 04:45 6 109 15 445 10 133 27 485 42 930 0500 2 132 7 126 05:15 9 119 12 101 0530 7 115 11 120 05:45 13 123 31 489 20 121 50 468 81 957 06:00 14 99 29 97 06:15 27 103 41 82 06:30 46 88 84 67 06:45 63 71 150 361 86 53 240 299 390 660 07:00 43 60 87 44 07:15 68 50 121 56 07:30 107 55 166 60 07:45 163 50 381 215 216 58 590 218 971 433 08:00 102 35 122 40 08:15 91 37 115 37 0830 93 45 95 31 08:45 88 49 374 166 123 36 455 144 829 310 0900 78 25 114 28 09:15 81 32 96 43 09:30 72 32 118 39 09:45 91 39 322 128 123 22 451 132 773 260 10:00 79 13 118 27 10:15 79 25 104 35 10:30 99 13 118 25 1045 107 6 364 57 132 18 472 105 836 162 11:00 86 7 119 18 11 IS 86 14 119 10 11:30 93 8 131 6 11:45 91 9 356 38 111 11 480 45 836 83 Total 2033 3775 2033 3775 2821 3857 2821 3857 4854 7632 Combined 5808 5808 6678 6678 12486 Total AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 0715 - - - - - Vol. - 463 - - - 625 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.710 0.723 PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 02:15 - - - - Vol. - - 542 - - - 579 - - - - P.H.F. 0,826 0.883 Percentag 35.0% 65.0% 42.2% 57.8% e 130 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Pages City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 St Tahquitz Canyon Way Phone: (951) 268-6268 PLS004 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 04-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Fri Morning Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon 12:00 9 132 1 134 12:15 7 129 4 118 12:30 7 111 3 131 1245 5 120 28 492 7 119 15 502 43 994 01:00 3 123 3 109 01:15 3 103 5 127 01:30 2 90 4 123 01:45 1 106 9 422 4 118 16 477 25 899 0200 2 124 2 124 02:15 1 104 1 127 0230 2 124 2 128 02:45 2 120 7 472 4 160 9 539 16 1011 0300 0 177 1 113 0315 1 125 1 125 0330 3 115 1 139 03:45 3 113 7 530 3 117 6 494 13 1024 04:00 4 127 3 123 04:15 2 119 3 108 04:30 3 110 4 138 0445 8 105 17 461 10 134 20 503 37 964 05:00 3 122 6 128 0515 6 125 17 110 0530 9 98 16 100 0545 8 113 26 458 19 85 58 423 84 881 06:00 14 88 25 78 0615 23 83 38 72 06:30 41 58 69 60 0645 51 63 129 292 78 58 210 268 339 560 07:00 51 67 70 56 07:15 62 67 111 45 07:30 104 49 188 47 0745 149 46 366 229 213 50 582 198 948 427 0800 111 38 108 45 0815 90 32 103 31 08:30 86 38 103 36 08:45 96 30 383 138 133 30 447 142 830 280 09:00 85 49 119 41 09:15 83 32 121 41 09:30 101 46 119 37 0945 79 34 348 161 138 24 497 143 845 304 10:00 79 43 109 26 1015 115 32 98 18 10:30 84 23 108 30 10:45 80 17 358 115 110 23 425 97 783 212 11:00 90 18 109 19 11:15 105 15 121 27 11:30 104 19 131 15 11:45 96 19 395 71 124 15 485 76 880 147 Total 2073 3841 2073 3841 2770 3862 2770 3862 4843 7703 Combined 5914 5914 6632 6632 12546 Total AM Peak - 0730 - - - 07:15 - - - - - Vol. - 454 - - - 620 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.762 0.728 PM Peak - - 02:30 - - - 02:00 - - -VOL - - 546 - - - 539 - - - - P.H.F. 0.771 0.842 Percenlag 35.1% 64.9% 41.8% 58.2% e ADT/AADT ADT 12,296 AADT 12,296 131 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page 1 City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 Sl Ramon Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS006 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: Counts@countsunlimited.Com Site Code:067-16119 Start 29-Feb-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Mon Morning. Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Mornino Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 74 3 84 12 15 3 73 6 105 12:30 3 98 2 98 1245 3 86 13 331 1 99 12 386 25 717 01:00 0 71 0 88 01:15 3 81 5 85 01:30 1 99 3 84 01:45 1 85 5 336 2 103 10 360 15 696 0200 1 82 2 78 0215 1 81 3 68 02:30 1 79 0 76 0245 2 114 5 356 0 85 5 307 10 663 0300 0 100 0 118 0315 2 82 0 105 03:30 3 95 1 78 03:45 1 83 6 360 4 80 5 381 11 741 04:00 2 71 0 63 0415 4 81 0 84 04:30 4 91 4 88 0445 5 78 15 321 5 70 9 305 24 626 05:00 6 95 5 98 05:15 6 84 6 76 0530 5 81 14 72 05:45 17 90 34 350 12 63 37 309 71 659 06:00 12 65 15 71 0615 13 56 15 68 06:30 34 48 32 43 06:45 55 48 114 217 51 43 113 225 227 442 07:00 37 30 42 34 07:15 56 38 50 34 07:30 84 35 64 29 0745 114 26 291 129 85 31 241 128 532 257 08:00 65 25 97 21 0815 67 16 70 25 0830 100 26 78 15 08:45 104 18 336 85 66 18 311 79 647 164 0900 70 22 78 30 09:15 65 20 70 37 0930 73 20 69 23 09:45 93 14 301 76 86 16 303 106 604 182 10:00 76 19 101 14 10:15 83 17 70 22 10:30 72 11 97 11 1045 97 9 328 56 89 10 357 57 685 113 11:00 77 13 80 8 11 15 70 4 94 7 11 30 66 5 95 2 11:45 91 3 304 25 103 9 372 26 676 51 Total 1752 2642 1752 2642 1775 2669 1775 2669 3527 5311 Combined 4394 4394 4444 4444 8838 Total AM Peak - 0745 - - - 11:00 - - - - - Vol. - 346 - - - 372 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.759 0.903 PM Peak - - 02:45 - - - 00:15 - - - - Vol. - - 391 - - - 390 - - - - P.H.F. 0.857 0.929 Percentag 39.9% 60.1% 39.9% 60.1% e 132 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Paget City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Ramon Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS006 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 01-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon 12:00 2 79 4 71 12:15 2 78 6 110 12:30 3 93 2 92 1245 2 77 9 327 5 89 17 362 26 689 01:00 3 77 3 104 01:15 0 76 1 76 01:30 0 89 2 89 01:45 1 98 4 340 3 88 9 357 13 697 02:00 3 90 4 86 02:15 0 88 0 78 0230 0 88 3 70 02:45 1 90 4 356 3 62 10 296 14 652 0300 2 83 0 110 03:15 0 89 1 83 0330 2 92 1 82 03:45 1 73 5 337 7 81 9 356 14 693 04:00 0 76 3 82 04:15 4 66 3 84 0430 4 72 4 77 04:45 7 86 15 300 9 89 19 332 34 632 05:00 7 62 6 88 05:15 12 82 5 88 05:30 10 96 14 78 0545 10 83 39 323 12 77 37 331 76 654 06:00 20 57 7 59 06:15 26 52 21 54 06:30 29 61 27 64 0645 43 49 118 219 48 38 103 215 221 434 07:00 67 50 52 43 0715 57 20 53 31 07:30 90 32 79 34 0745 127 38 341 140 93 22 277 130 618 270 08:00 70 36 78 36 08:15 92 22 77 29 08:30 87 17 91 28 08:45 92 17 341 92 76 25 322 118 663 210 09:00 80 24 61 26 09:15 63 17 75 13 0930 68 24 74 13 09:45 78 18 289 83 83 13 293 65 582 148 1000 76 23 91 16 10:15 65 12 83 19 1030 91 14 73 14 10:45 75 5 307 54 73 7 320 56 627 110 11:00 79 9 70 8 11:15 70 5 71 6 11:30 80 8 103 5 11:45 72 8 301 30 100 4 344 23 645 53 Total 1773 2601 1773 2601 1760 2641 1760 2641 3533 5242 Combined 4374 4374 4401 4401 8775 Total AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 11:00 - - - - - Vol. - 379 - - - 344 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.746 0.835 PM Peak - - 01:30 - - - 00:15 - - - - Vol. - - 365 - - - 395 - - - - P.H.F. 0.931 0.898 Percentag 40.5% 59.5% 40.0% 60.0% e 133 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Ramon Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS006 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 02-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Mannino Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morninq Afternoon 1200 4 51 6 73 12:15 3 75 3 101 12:30 3 85 0 75 12:45 1 83 11 294 4 83 13 332 24 626 01:00 0 76 4 111 01:15 2 70 0 96 01:30 1 95 0 74 01:45 2 83 5 324 5 73 9 354 14 678 02:00 2 74 2 96 0215 0 75 2 79 02:30 1 82 0 83 0245 1 95 4 326 3 80 7 338 11 664 03:00 2 73 0 105 0315 0 66 1 84 03:30 2 86 1 90 0345 0 87 4 312 2 90 4 369 8 681 04:00 2 70 5 74 04:15 2 73 0 68 04:30 1 73 1 70 04:45 7 82 12 298 5 89 11 301 23 599 05:00 7 76 3 91 05:15 6 83 11 74 05:30 8 81 4 56 05:45 10 68 31 308 6 77 24 328 55 636 0600 17 69 14 s0 06:15 21 72 16 58 06:30 20 55 26 39 06:45 49 51 107 247 38 51 94 228 201 475 0700 50 53 50 54 07:15 54 40 50 40 0730 67 31 61 41 07:45 84 35 255 159 68 36 229 171 484 330 0800 63 39 79 30 0815 83 27 84 32 08:30 92 34 104 23 08:45 95 15 333 115 70 27 337 112 670 227 09:00 99 16 97 19 0915 78 17 88 15 09:30 75 28 78 25 09:45 87 33 339 94 82 18 345 77 684 171 10:00 85 11 83 19 10:15 65 17 90 20 10:30 73 11 76 24 1045 79 8 302 47 74 7 323 70 625 117 11:00 82 12 88 15 11 15 67 7 87 6 11:30 81 9 92 8 11:45 68 3 298 31 94 11 361 40 659 71 Total 1701 2555 1701 2555 1757 2720 1757 2720 3458 5275 Combined 4256 4256 4477 4477 8733 Total AM Peak - 0815 - - - 11:00 - - - - - Vol. - 369 - - - 361 - - - - P.H.F. 0.932 0.930 PM Peak - - 01:30 - - - 00:15 - - - - Vol. - - 327 - - - 370 - - -P.H.P. 0.861 0.833 Peroentag 40.0°% 60.0% 39.2% 60.8% e 134 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Ramon Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS006 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 03-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Mominc Afternoon_ Morning _ Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 6 81 10 98 1215 1 74 4 96 12:30 6 73 5 80 1245 2 85 15 313 0 91 19 365 34 678 01:00 1 98 0 88 01:15 0 82 2 81 01:30 2 89 2 86 01:45 0 87 3 356 2 92 6 347 9 703 02:00 1 78 5 79 02:15 1 88 0 71 02:30 1 94 3 75 02:45 1 92 4 352 1 79 9 304 13 656 03:00 0 89 0 131 03:15 1 82 0 81 03:30 4 94 5 66 03:45 1 95 6 360 0 85 5 363 11 723 04:00 0 77 1 80 0415 3 88 4 71 04:30 4 80 10 81 0445 6 85 13 330 3 87 18 319 31 649 05:00 2 89 5 100 05:15 6 81 5 87 05:30 7 96 10 73 05:45 15 85 30 351 12 66 32 326 62 677 06:00 19 86 14 77 0615 19 69 19 54 06:30 39 57 31 56 06:45 44 34 121 246 45 33 109 220 230 466 07:00 46 32 60 43 07:15 52 49 52 46 07:30 73 33 74 49 0745 129 28 300 142 79 33 265 171 565 313 08:00 62 28 93 41 0815 98 31 71 25 0830 88 23 79 20 08:45 98 36 346 118 62 39 305 125 651 243 0900 58 17 85 25 09:15 92 21 85 26 09:30 60 20 70 34 0945 70 25 280 83 73 19 313 104 593 187 1000 82 15 78 21 10:15 60 16 70 22 1030 77 4 86 21 10:45 85 6 304 41 85 19 319 83 623 124 11:00 87 11 87 7 11 15 60 12 84 12 11:30 65 8 97 6 11:45 80 6 292 37 102 6 _ 370 _31 662 68 Total 1714 2729 1714 2729 1770 2758 1770 2758 3484 5487 Combined 4443 4443 4528 4528 8971 Total AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 11:00 - - - - - Vol. - 377 - - - 370 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.731 0.907 PM Peak - - 02:15 - - - 0230 - - - - Vol. - - 363 - - - 366 - - - - P.H.F. 0.965 0.698 Percentag 38.6% 61.4% 39.1% 60.9% e 135 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 S/Ramon Road Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS006 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code: 067-16119 Start 04-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Fri Morning Afternoon Mornino Afternoon Mornina Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Morning Afternoon 1200 3 89 3 117 12:15 2 72 3 92 12:30 2 73 3 91 1245 3 87 10 321 1 80 10 380 20 701 01:00 0 82 1 105 01:15 2 83 4 90 01:30 0 91 2 93 01:45 0 81 2 337 4 101 11 389 13 726 02:00 3 77 3 89 0215 2 86 0 80 02:30 1 85 2 89 02:45 1 96 7 344 2 75 7 333 14 677 03:00 0 97 1 82 0315 0 73 0 96 0330 1 88 1 80 03:45 2 75 3 333 2 94 4 352 7 685 04:00 1 87 3 95 04:15 2 73 3 80 04:30 4 108 2 92 0445 8 88 15 356 6 95 14 362 29 718 0500 7 115 3 93 05:15 6 85 9 98 0530 8 78 10 73 05:45 11 78 32 356 5 69 27 333 59 689 0600 12 74 9 57 06:15 22 59 17 53 0630 21 55 27 57 06:45 37 41 92 229 38 45 91 212 183 441 07:00 43 47 47 49 07:15 50 46 64 29 0730 83 23 76 36 0745 92 33 268 149 75 41 262 155 530 304 0800 68 26 83 38 0815 87 20 75 25 08:30 76 35 75 35 0845 85 18 316 99 70 25 303 123 619 222 09:00 68 41 70 34 09:15 78 29 94 40 09:30 75 20 81 26 09:45 86 26 307 116 89 22 334 122 641 238 10:00 67 31 76 26 10:15 76 22 68 19 10:30 81 16 69 34 1045 75 8 299 77 90 18 303 97 602 174 11:00 72 8 87 14 11:15 74 9 67 15 11:30 77 11 89 12 11:45 76 10 299 38 1 89 81 332 491 631 87 Total 1650 2755 1650 2755 1698 2907 1698 2907 3348 5662 Combined 4405 4405 4605 4605 9010 Total AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 09:15 - - - - - Vol. - 330 - - - 340 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.897 0.904 PM Peak - - 0430 - - - 01:00 - - - - Vol. - - 396 - - - 389 - - - - P.H.F. 0.861 0.926 Percentag 37.5% 62.5% 36.9% 63.1 e ADT/AADT ADT 8,865 AADT 8,865 136 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page 1 City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Palm Canyon Drive Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS007 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 29-Feb-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Mon Morning Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Mominq Afternoon Morning Afternoon 1200 4 82 3 93 1215 3 81 3 85 1230 3 92 1 100 1245 1 89 11 344 2 87 9 365 20 709 01:00 0 78 2 75 01:15 1 87 5 72 01:30 1 84 2 78 01:45 2 80 4 329 2 86 11 311 15 640 02:00 1 74 2 79 02:15 1 80 2 58 0230 1 88 0 63 02:45 3 100 6 342 0 65 4 265 10 607 0300 0 86 0 105 03:15 3 84 2 100 0330 2 91 3 67 03:45 2 88 7 349 4 71 9 343 16 692 0400 2 77 0 65 0415 5 88 0 72 0430 1 74 4 75 04:45 7 75 15 314 6 74 10 286 25 600 0500 3 85 5 80 05:15 4 92 5 71 05:30 3 74 11 67 0545 13 92 23 343 11 47 32 265 55 608 06:00 12 65 12 66 06:15 11 58 11 51 06:30 28 49 25 43 06:45 39 47 90 219 49 39 97 199 187 418 07:00 28 39 42 26 0715 55 37 36 33 07:30 65 36 67 29 0745 86 32 234 144 81 22 226 110 460 254 08:00 57 35 75 21 0815 47 21 56 25 08:30 57 31 54 14 08:45 55 22 216 109 47 20 232 80 448 189 09:00 52 29 67 20 09:15 56 26 76 23 09:30 77 17 63 13 09:45 77 15 262 87 77 18 283 74 545 161 1000 73 20 85 10 1015 71 19 71 15 1030 70 14 72 9 1045 77 6 291 59 85 7 313 41 604 100 11,00 84 9 90 4 11:15 63 6 66 6 11:30 64 7 80 2 11:45 77 2 288 24 89 5 325 17 613 41 Total 1447 2663 1447 2663 1551 2356 1551 2356 2998 5019 Combined 4110 4110 3907 3907 8017 Total AM Peak - 1015 - - - 11:00 - - - - - Vol. - 302 - - - 325 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.899 0.903 PM Peak - - 02:45 - - - 12:00 - - - - Vol. - - 361 - - - 365 - - - - P.H.F. 0.903 0.913 Penmmtag 35.2% 64.8% 39.7% 60.3% e 137 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO BOX 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Palm Canyon Drive Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS007 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 01-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Mominu Afternoon Momina Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning_ Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 92 7 73 12 15 3 83 5 92 1230 1 88 0 80 1245 3 72 11 335 3 89 15 334 26 669 01:00 4 82 2 97 01:15 0 78 0 63 01:30 1 92 2 82 01:45 1 83 6 335 2 79 6 321 12 656 02:00 3 89 5 80 02:15 0 97 0 76 0230 0 85 4 69 02:45 2 89 5 360 3 57 12 282 17 642 0300 1 88 0 77 03:15 1 86 1 83 03:30 2 87 3 76 03:45 1 80 5 341 8 64 12 300 17 641 04:00 0 64 3 80 0415 5 68 4 64 04:30 2 83 3 73 0445 4 94 11 309 8 82 18 299 29 608 05:00 7 64 5 82 05:15 5 79 5 75 05:30 8 99 14 63 05:45 4 94 24 336 8 66 32 286 56 622 06:00 13 60 6 58 06:15 20 56 15 52 06:30 24 65 33 59 0645 30 59 87 230 39 39 93 208 180 438 07:00 41 49 50 43 0715 51 41 48 28 07:30 72 42 73 24 07:45 100 35 264 167 61 18 232 113 496 280 08:00 56 34 70 25 08:15 75 29 60 20 0830 66 26 78 21 08:45 58 24 255 113 70 18 278 84 533 197 0900 53 28 58 22 09:15 55 24 77 13 0930 56 32 78 14 09:45 69 30 233 114 65 16 278 65 511 179 1000 68 19 80 10 10:15 55 17 74 15 10:30 74 11 71 8 1045 66 10 263 57 69 8 294 41 557 98 11:00 77 9 73 5 11 15 73 9 64 3 11 30 72 8 82 4 11:45 68 7 290 33 93 5 312 17 602 50 Total 1454 2730 1454 2730 1582 2350 1582 2350 3036 5080 Combined 4184 4184 3932 3932 8116 Total AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 11:00 - - - - - Vol. - 303 - - - 312 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.758 0.839 PM Peak - - 01:30 - - - 00:15 - - - Vol. - - 361 - - - 358 - - - - P.H.F. 0.930 0.923 Peroentag 34.8% 65.2% 40.2% 59.8% e 138 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Palm Canyon Drive Phone: (951)268-6268 PL5007 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 02-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Souhbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Momino Afternoon Mornino Afternoon Momino Afternoon Momino ARemoon 12:00 3 60 4 77 12:15 3 85 2 93 12:30 2 84 1 78 12:45 1 85 9 314 2 81 9 329 18 643 01:00 0 82 2 95 01:15 0 73 1 77 01:30 2 78 0 67 01:45 1 77 3 310 1 68 4 307 7 617 02:00 0 77 1 85 02:15 1 90 1 83 02:30 2 88 1 56 02:45 3 97 6 352 3 74 6 298 12 650 0300 2 73 0 90 03:15 1 79 1 80 0330 2 78 2 77 03:45 1 88 6 318 2 82 5 329 11 647 0400 2 77 4 77 04:15 2 76 0 57 0430 4 69 1 71 0445 5 77 13 299 4 75 9 280 22 579 05:00 4 96 4 82 0515 6 84 9 73 05:30 6 86 4 73 0545 2 72 18 338 5 76 22 304 40 642 06:00 13 70 13 62 06 15 18 66 11 49 06:30 20 63 26 39 0645 37 48 88 247 36 43 86 193 174 440 07:00 33 56 43 43 07:15 36 47 47 32 07:30 53 42 54 38 0745 62 44 184 189 61 31 205 144 389 333 08:00 46 43 67 28 08:15 54 38 64 24 08:30 68 36 69 25 08:45 69 29 237 146 71 23 271 100 508 246 09:00 68 16 88 18 09:15 73 25 82 13 0930 62 37 74 22 09:45 62 29 265 107 66 20 310 73 575 180 10:00 75 14 72 17 10:15 75 21 84 21 10:30 74 14 75 20 10:45 80 10 304 59 67 8 298 66 602 125 11:00 74 12 91 11 11:15 59 11 76 6 11:30 75 10 82 6 11:45 66 4 274 37 74 11 323 34 597 71 Total 1407 2716 1407 2716 1548 2457 1548 2457 2955 5173 Combined 4123 4123 4005 4005 8128 Total AM Peak - 10:00 - - - 11:00 - - - - - Vol. - 304 - - - 323 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.950 0.887 PM Peak - - 0200 - - - 00:15 - - - - Vol. - - 352 - - - 347 - - - - P.H.F. 0.907 0.913 Percentag 34.1% 65.9% 38.7% 61.3% e 139 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Palm Canyon Drive Phone: (951)268-6268 PLS007 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:067-16119 Start 03-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Momina Afternoon Momino Afternoon Mominq Afternoon 1200 9 77 4 83 12 15 2 85 5 97 1230 7 92 1 76 12:45 3 72 21 326 0 71 10 327 31 653 01:00 1 90 0 89 01:15 0 78 1 69 01:30 3 91 0 87 01:45 0 77 4 336 0 73 1 318 5 654 02:00 0 84 3 84 02:15 0 78 0 70 0230 1 91 2 66 0245 1 88 2 341 1 81 6 301 8 642 03:00 0 103 0 109 03:15 1 93 1 81 03:30 1 99 2 66 03:45 1 78 3 373 3 73 6 329 9 702 04:00 1 82 1 75 04:15 5 90 4 53 04:30 1 96 10 71 0445 5 82 12 350 3 66 18 265 30 615 05:00 4 91 8 81 05:15 4 88 2 76 0530 2 97 11 57 05:45 9 80 19 356 13 64 34 278 53 634 06:00 14 75 11 60 06:15 17 76 20 52 06:30 34 57 30 57 06:45 38 49 103 257 40 30 101 199 204 456 07:00 35 36 42 35 07:15 45 48 47 41 07:30 58 39 65 40 0745 107 40 245 163 71 31 225 147 470 310 0800 56 33 91 37 0815 70 37 61 25 08:30 61 39 52 15 08:45 64 39 251 148 57 25 261 102 512 250 09:00 44 19 71 18 09:15 67 25 66 17 09:30 57 24 67 20 0945 65 23 233 91 76 20 280 75 513 166 10:00 71 20 68 14 1015 57 15 73 25 10:30 75 6 85 19 1045 74 8 277 49 74 19 300 77 577 126 11:00 73 8 82 3 11 15 67 10 85 11 11 30 68 12 84 3 11:45 68 9 276 39 97 4 348 21 624 60 Total 1446 2829 1446 2829 1590 2439 1590 2439 3036 5268 Combined 4275 4275 4029 4029 8304 Total AM Peak - 0745 - - - 11:00 - - - - - Vol. - 294 - - - 348 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.687 0.897 PM Peak - - 02:45 - - - 02:30 - - - - VOI. - - 383 - - - 337 - - - - P.H.F. 0.930 0.773 Percenlag 33.8% 66.2% 39.5% 60.5% e 140 Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page City of Palm Springs PO Box 1178 Farrell Drive Corona, CA 92878 N/Palm Canyon Drive Phone: (951)268-6268 PL5007 24 Hour Directional Volume Counts email: counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code: 067-16119 Start 04-Mar-16 Northbound Hour Totals Soulhbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Fri Morning Afternoon Momina Afternoon Morninq Afternoon Morning Afternoon Mominq Afternoon 1200 6 76 3 99 1215 5 78 2 90 1230 1 86 1 77 12:45 5 82 17 322 1 84 7 350 24 672 01:00 4 97 2 81 01:15 0 99 3 89 01:30 1 75 2 82 01:45 1 90 6 361 1 92 8 344 14 705 02:00 2 76 2 75 02:15 2 105 1 72 02:30 3 83 2 91 02:45 1 101 8 365 3 67 8 305 16 670 03:00 0 89 2 75 03:15 2 86 1 74 03:30 1 67 3 72 0345 2 86 5 328 3 94 9 315 14 643 0400 2 98 3 80 04:15 3 71 3 68 0430 1 98 2 82 04:45 7 88 13 355 6 93 14 323 27 678 0500 5 100 5 79 05:15 4 81 5 88 0530 5 77 11 61 05:45 4 78 18 336 3 62 24 290 42 626 0600 10 67 10 55 06:15 20 58 16 39 0630 17 66 30 53 06:45 31 55 78 246 35 42 91 189 169 435 07:00 33 53 35 34 07:15 38 51 52 32 07:30 63 33 64 30 0745 84 51 218 188 70 27 221 123 439 311 08:00 55 35 82 40 0815 54 29 69 29 08:30 51 34 66 22 08:45 56 28 216 126 66 25 283 116 499 242 09:00 53 45 78 25 0915 73 32 77 26 09:30 69 26 87 23 0945 79 31 274 134 79 21 321 95 595 229 10:00 66 31 70 23 10:15 70 23 69 16 1030 70 16 69 19 1045 77 15 283 85 78 19 286 77 569 162 11:00 64 16 100 12 11:15 79 17 60 13 11 30 85 13 94 9 11:45 76 11 304 57 83 9 337 43 641 100 Total 1440 2903 1440 2903 1609 2570 1609 2570 3049 5473 Combined 4343 4343 4179 4179 8522 Total AM Peak - 1045 - - - 11,00 - - - - - Vol. - 305 - - - 337 - - - - - P.H.F. 0.897 0.843 PM Peak - - 02:15 - - - 1200 - - - - Vol. - - 378 - - - 350 - - - - P.H.F. 0,900 0.884 Percentag 33.2% 66.8% 38.5% 61.5% e ADTlAADT ADT 8,217 AADT 8,217 141 ATTACHMENT 7 142 0 U \ sunrise Pkwp \ I I I I I I F n u z j r 4 M L4i a I Re , Tff [� I Ve e r r Vista Chi H j m . ' Tachwa Dr J I 9 kd U Yi r a —a- Palm j tr 41"'' o _ Springs i International _ Airport I � T ui a y Wy Areoas Rd I - U Swan Rd w.r. un e C s Rd i 't1.J) I rc rb a Dinah Sh re Dr j rz I O . .. i sanardaRG Of r ! - I E Pal mare or j 9 j NI ,r Or 40 - jI..— E I 1 m j i j a j�I a eoge if , o City Boundary Major Arterial (4-lane divided) Proposed Designations Existing Designations Secondary Thoroughfare(4-lane divided) Section 14 Mobility Corridor Freeway Secondary Thoroughfare(4-lane undivided) \\\�\\\�\�\ Section 14 Shared Mobility Corridor - — Expressway Augmented Collector(2-lane divided) Minor Mobility Corridor(2-lane undivided) Major Arterial(6-lane divided) Local Collector(2-lane undivided) Minor Mobility Corridor(2-lane divided-TWLTL) Minor Mobility Corridor(2-lane divided) 0Major Mobility Corridor(2-lane divided) a L e E R R A. Circulation Plan 0 0i5 1 1lMiles R e 5 0 C 1 A 4 i E 5 ATTACHMENT 8 144 � I � o F L — -- ---- " ....... ♦` 1 � F n Frr S Q 4 w e Ra .•L w. i I I Tim,"0or Tg IT- / I f Air S m c Palm Ell 6 Springs International Airport BY G IL ae Rcmon Rd Ri�rs,dd Dr r • a , , r Sunny Dunes Ra • � � r --E • �I - 1A."0b XeA DImn En nG o , I /♦ Sa ( I I f Eft rryan br R o ait 1 ( xSin69 (�G"`� I• ..„fir iu.' � � � � � / 9 City Boundary Proposed Bikeways Existing Bikeways •-------• Class I, Bike Path Class I, Bike Path ........ Class II, Bike Lane Class II, Bike Lane ------ Class III, Bike Route Class III, Bike Route — Other Roads Mixed Use Bike Route e Bikeways Plan °�s Miles . . ASSOCIATES Y1 ATTACHMENT 9 146 A L B E R T A. A S S O C I A T E S Corporate Headquarters February 5, 2016 3788 McCray Street Riverside,CA92506 Mr. Gianfranco Laurie, P.E.,T.E. 951,686.1070 Senior Civil Engineer Palm Desert Office City of Palm Springs 36-951 Cook Street#103 3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Desert,CA 92211 Palm Springs, CA, 92262-2743 760.568.5005 RE: Proposal to Prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates for City Project(CP14-14) Murrieta Office 41391 Kalmia Street#320 Dear Franco: Murrieta,CA 92562 951.686.1070 Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide Traffic Engineering Services in the preparation of signing and striping plans related to implementation of the City's Bicycle Route Plan. Our proposal covers services related to preparing signing and striping plans, specifications, and estimates for four corridors within the City. Four corridors are described in the City Project 14-14 are listed below. Location .. . Length Crossley Road Ramon Road to 3411 Avenue 5,400 FT S. Palm Canyon Drive East Palm Canyon to Murray Canyon Or 8,100 FT San Rafael Drive Indian Canyon Drive to Sunrise Way 5,300 FT Indian Canyon Drive Sunrise Parkway to Racquet Club Road 6,600 FT Exhibit A contains our proposed scope of work. Exhibit B contains a summary of our fee proposal for services described in Exhibit A. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the City and look forward to working with you on this project. In the meantime, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely, Albert A. Webb Associates `g; Al Dilesh R.Sheth, P.E./T.E. Bruce A. Davis, P.E. Vice President Senior Vice President Attachments: Exhibit "A"—Scope of Work Exhibit "B"— Personnel and Compensation Fee Schedule www.webbaswciates.com 147 Exhibit "A" - Scope of Work A. Crossley Road-from Ramon Road to 3411 Avenue 5,400 FT Classification-Minor Mobility Corridor(2-lane TWLTL) Signalized intersections- Ramon Road/Crossley Road, Dinah Shore Drive/Crossley Road 1. Preliminary Design a. Review each corridor using photographic base (photo source is March 2014 from Eagle Aerial), Google Maps, and field visit. b. Inventory signage along corridors by field review and Google Maps Street View. c. Review side streets to determine need for signs. d. Field-verify curb-to-curb dimensions in critical locations and existing signage. Prepare base map for the project area using photographic base. e. Prepare signing and striping plans at 1"=40' scale. f. Show replacement of detection loops or adjustment of video detection on signing&striping plans. g. Prepare preliminary estimate of probable cost. h. Meet with City staff to review preliminary design, intersection layouts, and preliminary cost estimate. Deliverables: Preliminary signing&striping plans, preliminary cost estimate. 2. 90 Percent Complete Bid Package a. Revise signing and striping plans per City comments. b. Prepare specifications in accordance with City requirements. c. Update cost estimate. d. Submit bid package to City for review and comment. e. Meet with staff to obtain comments and discuss any remaining issues. Deliverables:Two (2) sets of 90 percent plans, specifications and cost estimate. 3. Final Bid Package a. Plot mylars of signing and striping plans. b. Prepare final specifications in accordance with City requirements. c. Prepare final cost estimate. d. Submit final bid package to City for approval. e. Project management and coordination with City throughout project duration. Deliverables:one (1)set signed Mylars, digital files of specifications and final estimate of probable cost. 4. Bid Support and Construction Support a. Assist City as Requested with Responding to Questions from Bidders B. S. Palm Canyon Drive-from East Palm Canyon Drive to Murray Canyon Drive 8,100 FT Classification- Minor Mobility Corridor(2-lane TWLTL) Signalized intersection -East Palm Canyon Dr./South Palm Canyon Dr, 1. Preliminary Design a. Review each corridor using photographic base (photo source is March 2014 from Eagle Aerial), Google Maps, and field visit. b. Inventory signage along corridors by field review and Google Maps Street View. c. Review side streets to determine need for signs. d. Field verify curb-to-curb dimensions in critical locations and existing signage. Prepare base map for the project area using photographic base. e. Prepare signing and striping plans at 1"=40' scale. f. Show replacement of detection loops or adjustment of video detection on signing&striping plans. 10 g. Prepare preliminary estimate of probable cost. h. Meet with City staff to review preliminary design, intersection layouts, and preliminary cost estimate. Deliverables: Preliminary signing &striping plans, preliminary cost estimate. 2. 90 Percent Complete Bid Package a. Revise signing and striping plans per City comments. b. Prepare specifications in accordance with City requirements. c. Update cost estimate. d. Submit bid package to City for review and comment. e. Meet with staff to obtain comments and discuss any remaining issues. Deliverables:Two (2) sets of 90 percent plans, specifications and cost estimate. 3. Final Bid Package a. Plot mylars of signing and striping plans. b. Prepare final specifications in accordance with City requirements. c. Prepare final cost estimate. d. Submit final bid package to City for approval. e. Project management and coordination with City throughout project duration. Deliverables:one(1)set signed Mylars, digital files of specifications and final estimate of probable cost. 4. Bid Support and Construction Support a. Assist City as Requested with Responding to Questions from Bidders C. San Rafael Drive-from Indian Canyon Drive to Sunrise Way 5,300 FT Classification- Minor Mobility Corridor(2-lane TWLTL) Signalized intersection-San Rafael Drive/Indian Canyon Drive, San Rafael Drive/Sunrise Way 1. Preliminary Design a. Review each corridor using photographic base (photo source is March 2014 from Eagle Aerial), Google Maps, and field visit. b. Inventory signage along corridors by field review and Google Maps Street View. c. Review side streets to determine need for signs. d. Field verify curb-to-curb dimensions in critical locations and existing signage. Prepare base map for the project area using photographic base. e. Prepare signing and striping plans at 1"=40' scale. f. Show replacement of detection loops or adjustment of video detection on signing &striping plans. g. Prepare preliminary estimate of probable cost. h. Meet with City staff to review preliminary design, intersection layouts, and preliminary cost estimate. Deliverables: Preliminary signing &striping plans, preliminary cost estimate. 2. 90 Percent Complete Bid Package a. Revise signing and striping plans per City comments. b. Prepare specifications in accordance with City requirements. c. Update cost estimate. d. Submit bid package to City for review and comment. e. Meet with staff to obtain comments and discuss any remaining issues. Deliverables:Two (2)sets of 90 percent plans, specifications and cost estimate. 3. Final Bid Package a. Plot mylars of signing and striping plans. b. Prepare final specifications in accordance with City requirements. c. Prepare final cost estimate. d. Submit final bid package to City for approval. 149 e. Project management and coordination with City throughout project duration. Deliverables: one(1)set signed Mylars, digital files of specifications and final estimate of probable cost. 4. Bid Support and Construction Support a. Assist City as Requested with Responding to Questions from Bidders D. Indian Canyon Drive-from Sunrise Parkway to Racquet Club Road 6,600 FT Classification— Major Thoroughfare (4-lanes divided)with bike lanes Signalized intersection—Racquet Club Road/Indian Canyon Drive, San Rafael Drive/Indian Canyon Drive, 1. Preliminary Design a. Review each corridor using photographic base (photo source is March 2014 from Eagle Aerial), Google Maps, and field visit. b. Inventory signage along corridors by field review and Google Maps Street View. c. Review side streets to determine need for signs. d. Field verify curb-to-curb dimensions in critical locations and existing signage. Prepare base map for the project area using photographic base. e. Prepare signing and striping plans at 1"=40' scale. f. Show replacement of detection loops or adjustment of video detection on signing&striping plans. g. Prepare preliminary estimate of probable cost. h. Meet with City staff to review preliminary design, intersection layouts, and preliminary cost estimate. Deliverables: Preliminary signing &striping plans, preliminary cost estimate. 2. 90 Percent Complete Bid Package a. Revise signing and striping plans per City comments. b. Prepare specifications in accordance with City requirements. c. Update cost estimate. d. Submit bid package to City for review and comment. e. Meet with staff to obtain comments and discuss any remaining issues. Deliverables:Two (2) sets of 90 percent plans, specifications and cost estimate. 3. Final Bid Package a. Plot mylars of signing and striping plans. b. Prepare final specifications in accordance with City requirements. c. Prepare final cost estimate. d. Submit final bid package to City for approval. e. Project management and coordination with City throughout project duration. Deliverables: one(1)set signed Mylars, digital files of specifications and final estimate of probable cost. 4. Bid Support and Construction Support a. Assist City as Requested with Responding to Questions from Bidders Exhibit "B" - Personnel and Compensation tin Services described in our Scope of Work (Exhibit "A") shall be provided on a time and material basis not to exceed the combine amount of$34,390. Charges for services will be billed monthly in accordance with the attached fee schedule. A breakdown of our fees is provided below: m w `a O e 4 J N S N a7 n g C Classification g H A Crowley Road 8 46 10 8,030 50 8,080 Prellminary Design 3 24 4 3,810 50 3,860 90%Complete Bid Package 2 12 4 $ 2,200 $ 2,200 Final Bid Package 2 8 2 1,560 $ 1,560 Bid Support 1 2 $ 460 460 B S.Palm CanVon Draw 9 62 10 10,201) 50 10150 PreliminarV Design 3 40 4 5,650 50 $ 5,700 90%Complete Bid Package 2 1 12 1 4 2,2D0 1 2,200 Final Bid Package 2 8 2 1560 1560 Bid Support 2 2 690 $ 690 $ $ - C San Rafael Drive 21 46 28 8,030 50 8,080 Preliminary Design 3 24 4 $ 3,810 50 $ 3,860 90%Complete Bid Package 2 12 4 2,200 2,200 Final Bid Package 2 8 2 1,560 1 $ 1,560 Bid Support 1 2 $ 460 460 D Indian Canyon Drive 8 46 10 9,030 50 8,080 Preliminary Design 3 24 4 3,810 50 3,860 90%Complete Bid Package 2 12 4 2,200 2,200 Final Bid Package 2 8 2 1,560 $ 1,560 Bid Support 1 2 460 460 $ $ - Total 40 200 49 $4190 200 34,390 151 Cindy Berardi From: Jennifer Nelson Sent: Wednesday,June 15, 2016 3:23 PM To: Cindy Berardi; Kathie Hart Cc: Jay Thompson Subject: FW:Tonight Council Meeting Additional materials I believe...Thank you. Jennifer Nelson Executive Assistant to Mayor and Council City of Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 760-323-8200 Jennifer.nelson(a palmspringsca.eov City Hall is open Monday - Thursday from 8am to 6pm Closed Fridays From: Mr K. 'Buck' Catterlin [mailto:kenncatterlin(&hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:14 PM To: Robert Moon Subject: Tonight Council Meeting Mayor Moon, There are two items of special interest to me on this evening's Council agenda that I had hoped to speak to but unfortunately will be unable to due to illness. They are: 1. The Circulation Plan Revision: In looking at the treatment of N. Farrell Drive from Tamarisk to Tahquitz, traffic calming needs to be made. While it may not be possible to implement separated bike lanes, added stripping for the parking, lower speed limits and stricter enforcement of the vehicle code would all go to help. 2. Dog Park Repair/Improvements: The Palm Springs Dog Park is in desperate need of renovation. This small park is used by many full and part time residents and contributed to both the physical and emotional health of both the people and dogs alike. The current state of disrepair is not only an embarrassment to the City and to the citizens of Palm Springs, but presents a health hazard to some of the users who, like myself, are immuuocompromised and/or immuuosuppresed. Thank you for your consideration and support on both of these issues tonight Kenneth Catterlin 601 N Farrell Dr Palm Springs, CA 92262 Jay Thompson From: John McCoy <john@thebankps.com> Sent: Tuesday,June 14, 2016 10:43 PM To: David Ready;Jay Thompson Subject: Andreas Hills/South Palm Canyon Dear David and Jay, The below was sent to council members but may not have had the correct email address for each of you. I would like to have it in the record. Thank you. Sincerely, John McCoy Dear Council Members, I am writing to you on behalf of myself and as the neighborhood representative for Andreas Hills. Since learning of your proposed general plan revision in regards to South Palm Canyon, numerous discussions have been held in our neighborhood and the consensus of opinion is that our quality of life and safety will be negatively impacted. We do not feel we have had any representation in the planning process and would hope at the very least,a conversation would be sought to understand our concerns. We are happy to share our thoughts and concerns should you so desire. We are also opposed to a proposed additional stop signs at at the intersection of Murray Canyon and South Palm Canyon. This proposed stop only affects Andreas Hills residents and is not a so called "hot spot'. Again we feel we have not been part of the decision making process and instead of reading to the voices of the few you should be polling the many. Sincerely, John McCoy (415)307-8521 cell (760)856-5252 john@thebankps.com www.TheBankPS.com John McCoy (760)856-5252 john@thebankps.com www.TheBankPS.com � (Q 901ta - > v G S `d INITIATE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REVISE CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND BIKEWAYS MAP DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & ENGINEERING JUNE 15, 2016 • • 1 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS BIKEWAYS MAP Implementing Class II bike lanes on the City's 4-lane streets requires consideration of the following issues: 1 ) These 4-lane streets are 64 feet wide curb-to-curb 2) 64 feet provides sufficient space for on-street parking and 4 travel lanes. 3) Designating bike lanes on 64 feet wide streets requires elimination of on-street parking lanes OR Reclassifying 4-lane streets to 2-lane streets and using the "extra" 2 traffic lanes for Class II bike lanes. • •2 TYPICAL6 . FEET WIDE STREET Lam^ Figure 1 — Plan View 03 y f M. ^ Yt � ^ TYPICAL 4-LANE 6 . FEET WIDE STREET t, Figure 2 — Section View 04 4 CLASS II BIKE LANES ON 2-LANE COLLECTORS Implementing Class II bike lanes on the City's 2-lane streets requires consideration of the following issues: 1 ) These 2-lane streets are 40 feet wide curb-to-curb 2) 40 feet provides sufficient space for on-street parking and 2 travel lanes. 3) Designating bike lanes on 40 feet wide streets requires elimination of on-street parking lanes. • 05 Y r er a "ROAD DIET" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The following General Plan designated 4-lane streets are candidates for reclassification via "road diet": • Alejo Road ** • Farrell Drive • Amado Road • La Verne Way • Arenas Road • Mesquite Avenue • Avenida Caballeros ** • Murray Canyon Drive ** • Baristo Road ** • Racquet Club Road • Calle El Segundo • S. Palm Canyon Drive • Camino Real • San Rafael Drive j • Crossley Road • Saturnino Road • El Cielo Road ** • Tachevah Drive • Escoba Drive ** • Toledo Avenue ** • • 7 "ROAD DIET" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The following General Plan designated 4-lane streets are NOT candidates for reclassification via "road diet": • Farrell Drive — Racquet Club Road to Ramon Road • Gene Autry Trail — Vista Chino to Ramon Road • Indian Canyon Drive — San Rafael Drive to Camino Parocela • Palm Canyon Drive — Tram Way to Ramon Road • Sunrise Way — San Rafael Drive to Vista Chino .g RECOMMENDATIONS Initiate a General Plan Amendment to reclassify the following 4- lane streets to formalize previously approved Class II bike lanes: • Alejo Road • El Cielo Road • Amado Road • Escoba Drive • Arenas Road • Murray Canyon Drive • Avenida Caballeros • Toledo Avenue • Baristo Road • Calle El Segundo • •9 RECOMMENDATIONS Initiate a General Plan Amendment to revise Class II bike lanes to Class III bike routes on the following 2-lane streets to maintain on-street parking: • Araby Road • Barona Road • Compadre Road (Mesquite Avenue to Sonora Road) • Mesquite Avenue (west of Sunrise Way) • N. Palm Canyon Drive (Tram Way to Alejo Road) • Paseo Dorotea • Sonora Road (Compadre Road to El Cielo Road) • Sunny Dunes Road • Via Escuela • • 10 RECOMMENDATIONS Consider and provide direction on the initiation of a General Plan Amendment to reclassify the following 4-lane streets to 2-lane streets to accommodate Class II bike lanes and maintain on- street parking: • Camino Real (E. Palm Canyon Dr. to La Verne Way) • Crossley Road • Farrell Drive (Ramon Road to E. Palm Canyon Dr.) • La Verne Way • Mesquite Avenue (Sunrise Way to Compadre Road) • Racquet Club Road • S. Palm Canyon Drive • San Rafael Drive . 11 NEXT STEPS The City Council's direction given to reclassify designated 4-lane roadways and bicycle facilities is the first step on a process to amend the City's General Plan. The direction given at this time is only to initiate a General Plan Amendment. A General Plan Amendment will require: • 90-day review and consultation with Native American Tribes • Preparation of Initial Study per CEQA and 30-day public review • Review by Planning Commission at a Public Hearing • Review by City Council at a Public Hearing • . 12