The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5/1/2013 - AGREEMENTS (10)P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker nternational Air rhoff rport Terminal A PA TERM AT PAL Apron Area and AVEMENT IN MINAL APRO LM SPRINGS PALM pr Parson 451 E. Vand San Bern Janu d Taxiway G NVESTIGATION FOR ON AREA AND INTERNATIO M SPRINGS, C repared for ns Brinckerho erbilt Way, S ardino, CA 9 uary 23, 2013 12-872-01 GEO N REPORT D TAXIWAY G ONAL AIRPOR CA off Suite 200 92408 OTECHNICA G RT AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 121 J P 4 S A S M I r t T c W p R R S V G 130 Santa Mar January 23, 20 Parsons Brinc 451 E. Vander San Bernardin Attention: Mr Subject: P T P P Mr. McCorm In accordance report address the existing as The results of conditions, re We appreciate please do not Respectfully s RMA Group Slawek Dyme Vice President GE 2764 garita Court R 013 ckerhoff rbilt Way, Su no, CA 92408 r. Chuck McC avement Inve Terminal Apro alm Springs I alm Springs, ick: e with your re ses the geotec sphalt at the t f the investig sults of our fi e this opportu hesitate to co submitted, erski, PE|GE t Rancho Cucamo ite 200 Cormick estigation Rep on Area and T International CA equest, a pave chnical condit erminal apron gation are pre ield exploratio unity to be of ontact us at yo onga, CA 9173 port Taxiway G Airport ement investig tions at the sit n area and at esented in the on and labora f continued se our convenien 30 | T: 909.989 gation has bee te and present Taxiway G. e accompany atory testing, ervice to you. nce. GEO 9.1751 | F: 909. en completed nts design reco ying report, w conclusions a If you have OTECHNICA .989.4287 | ww RMA Gro d for the abov ommendation which include and recomme any question AL CONSU ww.rmacompan oup Job No.: ve-referenced ns for reconstr es a descripti endations. ns regarding th LTANTS nies.com 12-872-01 site. This ruction of ion of site his report, P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker SECTION 1.00 IN 1.01 P 1.02 Sc 1.03 Si 1.04 P 1.05 In 2.00 F 2.01 P 2.02 Su 2.03 E 3.00 C 3.01 G 3.02 R 3.03 R 4.00 C FIGURES Figure 1 APPEND Appendix Appendix Appendix nternational Air rhoff N NTRODUCTIO urpose cope of Invest ite Location a revious Repo nvestigation M FINDINGS avement and urface and Gr Existing Pavem CONCLUSION General Concl Recommended Recommended CLOSURE S AND TABLE Boring DICES x A Fiel x B Lab x C Refe rport Terminal A T ON tigation and Descriptio orts Methods Earth Materi roundwater C ment Sections NS AND RECO lusion d Pavement Se d Vehicular P ES Location Ma d Investigatio oratory Tests erences Apron Area and TABLE OF C on ials Conditions OMMENDATIO ection Design avement Sect ap on s d Taxiway G CONTENTS ONS n Criteria tion GEO S OTECHNICAAL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. Pa PAGE 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 A1 B1 C1 LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 age i of 34 P P 1 A a i p 1 T O m 1 T a t B e a 1 A f i f c a i i Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker 1.01 Purpo A pavement e and Taxiway nvestigation w pavement reco 1.02 Scope The general sc • Recon • Loggi differe • Samp analys • Labor • Geote • Prepa Our scope of materials onsi 1.03 Site L The site is loc and surround terminal and t Boring Locati existing comm asphalt pavem 1.04 Previ As part of the for Palm Spr ndicate that s from 41 to 5 condition wit area is classifie n that report ncluding: cra nternational Air rhoff ose evaluation has y G at Palm was to summ onstruction, a e of the Inves cope of this in nnaissance of ing, sampling ent locations ling of 4 asp sis of existing ratory testing echnical evalu aration of this f work did n ite. Location and cated in the C ds the main t the air traffic ion Map (Fig mercial runw ment on aggreg ious Reports e preparation ings Internat sections of Ta 5. This repo h PCI’s rangi ed as either p t it was recom ack sealing, p rport Terminal A s been compl m Springs Int arize geotech and to develop stigation nvestigation in the site and n and backfilli on the termin phalt cores on g pavement co g of representa uation of the c s report presen not include a Description City of Palm terminal and control towe gure 1). Palm way and one gate base, wh of this repor ional Airpor axiway G wer ort also indic ing from 26 t oor or very p mmended tha patching, slab Apron Area and 1.00 INTRO leted for the p ternational A nical conditio p geotechnica ncluded the fo nearby vicinit ing of 10 expl nal apron area n the termin onditions. ative soil samp compiled data nting our find a Phase I en Springs, Calif d adjoining co er. The appro m Springs Inte existing gene ile Taxiway G rt, we were fu t prepared by re identified a cated that th to 85. Howe poor with PC at the pavem b repair/joint d Taxiway G ODUCTION proposed pav Airport in P ons at the site al design para ollowing: ty. loratory borin a and 4 additi al apron area ples. a. dings, conclus vironmental fornia. The t oncrete slab. oximate locat ernational Ai eral aviation G consists of a urnished the P y RS and H s having a po e terminal ap ever, the vast CI’s ranging fr ment for both t sealing, fog GEO vement recons Palm Springs, e, to assess the ameters and re ngs drilled w ional explorat a and 2 asph sions and reco site assessme terminal apro Taxiway G ion of the site irport is a com runway. Th asphalt pavem Pavement M H and dated O oor pavement pron area pa majority of t rom 26 to 55. h areas underg g seals, slurry OTECHNICA struction of t , California. eir potential im ecommended with an 8-inch tory borings o halt cores on ommendation ent for the p on area is sou is located n e is illustrated mmercial avi he terminal ment on alluv anagement P October, 2009 condition ind avement was the pavement . Based on th go routine an y seals, and r AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. he terminal a The purpos mpact on the pavement th flight auger d on Taxiway G Taxiway G ns. potential of h uthwest of the northwest of d on the accom ation airport apron area c vial soil. rogram – Fin 9. In the re dex with PCI in very poor t in the termi he conditions nd global ma rejuvenators LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page 1 apron area se of this e proposed hicknesses. drill rig at G. for visual hazardous e runways the main mpanying with one consists of nal Report eport they I’s ranging r to good inal apron identified aintenance to extend P P p n a o je a 1 O a T a D T m A A 2 O g p T i t l w a T S n 1 I l T i T Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker pavement life not given for association fo of asphalt for et traffic area aggregate base 1.05 Inves Our investiga and preparatio This report ha and has incor Definitions of Technical sup methods and Appendix B c Appendix C. 2.01 Pavem Our subsurfa generally und poorly graded The artificial f n thickness a the apron are ongitudinal c weathering. alligator and b The alluvial so SP-SM in acco negligible amo 14 borings, wi In general, the ikely due to Taxiway G w nvestigation. The soils enco nternational Air rhoff . Specific rec r the individ r rehabilitatio overlay in jet as as 9 inches e for general a stigation Met ation consisted on of this rep as been prepa rporated code f technical ter pporting data equipment contains a de ment and Ear ce investigati derlain by arti d sands with s fill soils encou nd the aggreg ea appeared cracking, cra The asphalt e block crackin oils encounter ordance with ounts of sulfa ith the except e upper 3 to compaction were general ountered in o rport Terminal A ommendation dual sections on of the sect t traffic areas, s of asphalt o aviation areas. thods d of office re ort. ared in a mann es, ordinance rms and symb a are presente used in perf escription of rth Materials ion and revie ificial fill and ilt and silty sa untered consi gate base rang to be in fair acking along encountered g, rutting and red during ou h the Unified ates and are n tion that som 5 feet of the of the soil du lly medium our investigat Apron Area and ns for overlay of pavemen tions of pavem , 2 inches of a over 10 inche . It does not a esearch, field ner consistent s, regulations bols used in th ed in the atta forming the our laborato 2.00 s ew of previou alluvium. Lo ands with trac isted of aspha ged from 3 to r to poor co utility trenc at Taxiway G d weathering. ur investigatio Soils Classifi non-expansive me locations ha alluvial soils uring constru dense. No tion were tes d Taxiway G y and/or rem t. General ment. Gener asphalt for gen es of aggregat appear that th exploration, t with genera s and laws th his report incl ached append field explora ory testing an 0 FINDINGS us geotechnic ocally the soi ces of gravel. alt and aggreg o 8 inches in t ondition with ches, rutting, G was genera on were relati ication System in nature. Th ad traces of gr around the t uction of the oversized m sted to determ GEO move and repla recommenda ral recommen neral aviation te base and 2 he sections ut laboratory te ally accepted e hat, in our p lude those of dices. Append ation and log nd the test re cal reports re ils encountere gate base. The thickness. In h low to me , erosion, ex ally in poor ively coarse-gr m. These soil he soils appea ravel while ot erminal apro terminal apr materials wer mine the Cali OTECHNICA acement of th ations were g ndations utiliz n areas. Full d 2 inches of as tilized soil CB esting, review engineering p professional o the ASTM In dix A contain gs of our su esults. Refer evealed that t ed in our inve e asphalt rang general, the edium severit xposed aggreg condition wi rained and we ls are not cor ared to be co thers did not. on appear den ron. The nea re encounter ifornia Bearin AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. he existing asp given for gen zed sections o depth section sphalt over 6 BR values. w of the comp principles and opinion, are a nternational. ns a descripti ubsurface exp rences are pre the airport pr estigations co ged from 4 to asphalt encou y alligator, b gate and rav ith moderate ere classified a rrosive to me nsistent throu nse to very de ar surface soil red in our s ng Ratio (CB LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page 2 phalt were neral cost of 3 inches s were for inches of piled data, d practices, applicable. ion of the plorations. esented in roperty is onsisted of 12 inches untered in block and veling and to severe as SM and etals, have ughout all ense, most ls beneath subsurface BR) in our P P l p c o 2 N n 2 E T T 3 B g o Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker aboratory at pavement. S classification, on ASTM D2 2.02 Surfa No areas of p natural seepag 2.03 Exist Existing pave Table below: THICKNESS (Test B 3.01 Gene Based on site- general experi overlay opera nternational Air rhoff remolded d Samples of th grain size and 2937. ace and Grou ponding or st ge were found ting Pavemen ment section S OF COMPA Method: AS Boring No. B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10 B-11 B-12 B-13 B-14 eral Conclusi -specific data ience in geote ation will rem rport Terminal A densities to re he materials d sand equiva undwater Con tanding water d and no grou nt Sections encountered ACTED BIT STM D3549) Asphalt C Thickn (inche 5” AC 10” AC 10” AC 10” AC 10” AC 9” AC 4” AC 11” AC 10” AC 9” AC 9” AC 10” AC 9” AC 12” AC 3.00 CO on and informa echnical engin medy the pave Apron Area and epresent the most likely alent value. T nditions r were presen undwater was d in our borin UMINOUS Core ness s) A C C C C C C C C C C C C C C ONCLUSIONS ation contain neering, it is o ement withou d Taxiway G compacted s to yield the The samples w nt at the time encountered ng and core l PAVING MI Aggregate Bas Thickness (inches) 6” AB 6” AB 7” AB 6” AB 3” AB 7” AB 8” AB 5” AB 5” AB 0” AB 0” AB 0” AB 0” AB 0” AB S AND RECOM ed in this rep our profession ut having to r GEO subgrade for lowest stren were then rem e of our stud during our su locations are IXTURES SP se MMENDATIO port, our un nal judgment remove and r OTECHNICA the propose ngth were sel molded to the dy. Further, ubsurface exp located in A PECIMENS ONS nderstanding o that an aspha replace the en AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. ed apron and lected based e selected den no springs o ploration. Appendix A a of the projec alt pavement ntire existing LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page 3 d taxiway on visual nsity based or areas of and in the t and our grind and structural P P s s u 3 O a d 1 T a m u a A r P P S F 3 A w S i u p l l D h d p i Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker section. Based subgrade failu usage of the p 3.02 Recom Our recomme and testing, la determined ut 150/5320-6E a The structura are designed a must be of su utilizes the C asphalt overla Advisory Cir recommend th Pavement des Pavement De Subgrade com Flexible Pavem 3.03 Vehic As part of our which is not s Sand equivale nformation o using the pro procedure use oad from the oads do not e Development however, our delivery vehic pavement stru nvestigation. nternational Air rhoff d on the blow ure or weakne avements. mmended Pa endation for aboratory tes tilizing the F and the FAAR l adequacy of and construct uch quality an CBR and equiv ay course, sur rcular 150/53 he following Condition Remove and Grind and ov Grind and ov sign and const esign and Ev mpaction shou ments in FAA cular Paveme r investigatio subject to airc ent and R-val on their soil p cedures outlin es the princip e design traffi exceed the stre of the desig experience in cle traffic. W uctural sectio Recommend rport Terminal A w counts ob ess. In our op avement Sect pavement de sting and gen AA Guidelin RFIELD - Ai f runways and ted to provide nd thickness t valency ratio rfacing course 320-6E as one CBR’s for the replace of Ap verlay of Apr verlay of Taxi truction meth valuation, and uld be comple A Advisory C ent Sections n we were as craft traffic. lue tests were properties for ned in Chapt ple that the pa ic index (TI) ength of the s gn traffic ind ndicates that a We have provid on should be ded structural Apron Area and served and th pinion the ob tion Design C sign CBR is nerally accept nes for the Fl rport Paveme d taxiways at e adequate su that it will no os for the var e, and base c e standard de e various pave pron and Tax on asphalt pa iway G aspha hods should b d 150/5370-1 eted in accord Circular 150/5 sked to provid e performed r design of pav ter 630 of the avement struc to the subgra soil (R-value). dexes on the a traffic index ded alternate based on ec l sections are a d Taxiway G he results of served distres Criteria based on our ted engineerin exible Pavem ent Design (V airports are b upport for the ot fail under t ious material ourse. Our eviation belo ement repair xiway G asph avement alt pavement be based on F 0F on Stand dance with Ta 5320-6E. de vehicular p on anticipate vement struc e California H ctural section ade soils in su basis of a tr x of 5 is typica structural sec conomic cons as follows: GEO our laborato ss is likely du r analysis of t ng principals ment Design c Version 1.305, based on the p e loads impos the load imp ls utilized in recommende ow the mean conditions: halt pavement FAA Advisor dards for Spe able 3-4 Subg pavement sec ed subgrade s ctural sections Highway Des n must be of uch a manne raffic study is al for light au ctions for each siderations w OTECHNICA ory testing th ue to general f the results of s. The recom contained wit dated Septem principle that sed by the air osed by the a the structura ed design CBR of all CBR Desig t 2 1 1 ry Circular 15 ecifying Con grade Compac ctions for the soils at the si s. Structural sign Manual adequate thic er that the str s beyond the uto traffic and h traffic index which are bey AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. here is no ev fatigue throug our field inv mmended secti thin Advisory mber 28, 2009 t the airport p rcrafts. The aircrafts. Thi al section to d Rs were calcu values obtai gn CBR 27 19 10 50/5320-6E o nstruction of ction Require baggage hand te in order t sections were (Caltrans, 20 ckness to dist resses from th e scope of th d 6 is typical fo x. Selection o yond the scop LTANTS ry 24, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page 4 vidence of gh normal vestigation ions were y Circular 9). pavements pavement is method design the ulated per ined. We n Airport Airports. ements for dling area, o provide e designed 012). This ribute the he applied his report; or heavier of the final pe of this P P L H I c P m a T a T r s T c n i Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker Light auto tra 3.0 4.0 Heavy deliver 3.5 4.0 In areas with cement concre Prior to pavin moisture cont aggregate base The findings, accepted engin This report h report for any subsurface con The geotechn compliance w needed. Shou n this report, nternational Air rhoff affic (TI=5.0, 0 inches of asp 0 inches of cru ry truck traffi 5 inches of asp 0 inches of cru traffic loads, ete on 4.0 inc ng, the subgr tent. The su e courses shou , conclusions neering and g as been prepa y other purp nditions. nical consulta with the desi uld subsurface this office sh rport Terminal A R-Value=64) phaltic concre ushed aggrega ic (TI=6.0, R- phaltic concre ushed aggrega PCC paveme ches of crushe rade soils sho ubgrade soils uld be compac s and recomm geologic princ ared for Parso ose must dra ant should b gn concepts e conditions b hould be notif Apron Area and ): ete over ate base -Value=64): ete over ate base ents should be d aggregate b uld be scarifi should be c cted to a mini 4.0 mendations i ciples and pra ons Brinkerh aw their own be retained d and recomm be encountere fied immediat d Taxiway G e designed for ase. ied and the m ompacted to imum of 95% 0 CLOSURE in this repor actices. No oth hoff, to be use conclusions during the c mendations, a ed during con tely so that ou GEO r a minimum moisture adju a minimum % relative com rt were prepa her warranty ed solely for regarding req construction and to provi nstruction tha ur recommen OTECHNICA m thickness of usted to withi m of 90% rela mpaction. ared in acco y, either expre design purpo quired constr phase of th ide additiona at are differen ndations may AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. f 6.0 inches of in 2% of the ative compact ordance with ess or implied oses. Anyone ruction proce he project to l recommend nt from those be re-evaluate LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page 5 f Portland optimum tion. All generally d, is made. using this edures and o monitor dations as described ed. F FIGURE GEOOTECHNICAAL CONSU LTANTS F APPEN FIELD INVE NDIX A ESTIGATION GEO N OTECHNICAAL CONSULTANTS P P A O A E c w c A A L i r s a I p d c w t A T D Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker A-1.01 Numb Our subsurfac A-1.02 Locati Exploratory b characteristics with cracked considered acc A Boring Loc A-1.03 Loggin Logs of borin nformation a represent the subsurface con at other locati Identification procedure of definitions us compaction, c were obtained the exploratio A-1.04 Thickn The measurem D3549 test me nternational Air rhoff ber of Boring ce investigatio ion of Boring borings were s. Borings w pavement an curate only to ation Map sh ng of Boring ngs were prep and interpret approximate nditions at th ions and time of the soils e the Unified sed in this cl consistency or d for laborato on was determ ness Measure ments of the ethod and are rport Terminal A gs on consisted o gs located by vi ere performe nd at location o the scale and howing the ap gs pared by one tation of sub e boundary b he dates and lo s. encountered d Soils Classi lassification s r firmness of ory inspection mined. ements thickness of e presented he Apron Area and AP FIELD I A-1.00 FIE of 14 borings isually exami ed at intervals ns with pave d detail of the pproximate lo e of our staff bsurface cond between earth ocations indic during the su fication Syste system and a the soil are at n and testing, the existing erein. d Taxiway G PPENDIX A INVESTIGATI ELD EXPLORA as shown on ining the asph s on the term ement that ap e plan utilized cations of the and are atta ditions betwee h units and cated, and ma ubsurface exp em (ASTM a legend defi ttached in thi , and the in-p asphalt and c GEO ION ATION Figure 1. halt pavemen minal apron a ppeared to be d. e borings and ached in this en samples. the transition ay not be rep ploration was D2488). A l ining the term s appendix. B place density o concrete pave OTECHNICA nt for areas w area and on T e sound. Ea cores are pre appendix. Th The strata in n may be gr presentative of s made using legend indica ms used in d Bag samples o of the variou ements were AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. with different Taxiway G at ach location s esented as Figu he logs conta ndicated on t radual. The l f subsurface c the field iden ating the sym describing th of the major e s strata encou made utilizin LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page A1 pavement t locations should be ure 1. ain factual these logs logs show conditions ntification mbols and he relative earth units untered in ng ASTM P P T Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker THICKNESS (Test B nternational Air rhoff S OF COMPA Method: AS Boring No. B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10 B-11 B-12 B-13 B-14 rport Terminal A ACTED BIT STM D3549) Asphalt C Thickn (inche 5” AC 10” AC 10” AC 10” AC 10” AC 9” AC 4” AC 11” AC 10” AC 9” AC 9” AC 10” AC 9” AC 12” AC Apron Area and UMINOUS Core ness s) A C C C C C C C C C C C C C C d Taxiway G PAVING MI Aggregate Bas Thickness (inches) 6” AB 6” AB 7” AB 6” AB 3” AB 7” AB 8” AB 5” AB 5” AB 0” AB 0” AB 0” AB 0” AB 0” AB GEO IXTURES SP se OTECHNICA PECIMENS AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page A2 P P PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS Palm Springs In Parsons BrinkerP A R T I C L E S I Z E L I M I T SSILT OR CLAYSAND GRAVELCOBBLES BOULDERSU. S. S T A N D A R D S I E V E S I Z EFINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSENo. 200 No. 40 No. 10 No. 4 3/4 in. 3 in. 12 in. nternational Air rhoff BOU M COARSE GRAINED SOILS FINE GRAINE SOILS (More than 50% of material is LARGER than No. 200 sieve size) (More than 50% of material is SMALLER than No. 200 sieve size) rport Terminal A UNDARY CLASSIFICATIO MAJOR DIVISION GRAVEL D SANDS SILTS SILTS ED S HIGHLY OR (More than 50% of coarse fraction is LARGER than the No. 4 sieve size. (More than 50% of coarse fraction is SMALLER than the No. 4 sieve size) R (Liquid limit L (Liquid limit G UN Apron Area and ONS: Soils possessing cha NS CLEAN GRAVE GRAVEL WITH FIN LS CLEAN SANDS SANDS WITH FIN AND CLAYS AND CLAYS RGANIC SOILS f (Appreciable amount of fines) (Little or no fines) (Appreciable amt. of fines) (Little or no fines) LESS than 50) GREATER than 50) NIFIED SOIL C d Taxiway G aracteristics of two groups P O C M O C M S S S S G G G G GROUP SYMBOLS N ELS LS ES NES . CLASSIFICATI GEO Well graded grave Poorly graded gra Silty gravels, grav Clayey gravels, gr Well graded sand Poorly graded san Inorganic silts and silty or clayey fine Inorganic clays of gravelly clays, sa Organic silts and Inorganic silts, mi fine sandy or silty Inorganic clays of Organic clays of m s are designated by combi Pt OH CH MH OL CL ML SC SM SP SW GC GM GP GW S TYP little or no fines. little or no fines. no fines. or no fines. Silty sands, sand- Clayey sands, san with slight plastici clays. plasticity. organic silts. Peat and other hig ION SYSTEM OTECHNICA el, gravel-sand mixtures. avel or gravel-sand mixtures, vel-sand-silt mixtures. ravel-sand-clay mixtures. ds, gravelly sands, little or nds or gravelly sands, little d very fine sands, rock flour e sands or clayey silts f low to medium plasticity, andy clays, silty clays, lean organic silty clays of low icaceous or diatamaceous y soils, elastic silts. f high plasticity, fat clays. medium to high plasticity, inations of group symbols. PICAL NAMES -silt mixtures. nd-clay mixtures. city ghly organic soils. AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. . LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page A3 P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker I. SOIL Penet N = Nu B % II. SOI nternational Air rhoff L STRENGT BASED ON Comp tration Resista (blows/F 0-4 4-10 10-30 30-50 >50 umber of blow BASED ON Comp % Compactio <75 75-83 83-90 >90 L MOISTUR Mois % Moisture <5% 5-12% >12% rport Terminal A TH/DENSIT N STANDAR actness of san ance N Ft) C V L M D V ws of 140 lb. w N RELATIVE actness of san on C L M D V RE sture of sands e D D M V Apron Area and Y RD PENETR nd Compactness Very Loose Loose Medium Den Dense Very Dense weight falling E COMPACT nd Compactness Loose Medium Den Dense Very Dense s Description Dry Moist Very Moist SOIL DESC d Taxiway G RATION TE Pene se g 30 in. to dri TION se CRIPTION LE GEO ESTS Con etration Resis (blow <2 2-4 4-8 8-15 15-30 >30 ive 2-in OD s Con % Compact <80 80-85 85-90 >90 Mo % Moistur <12% 12-20% >20% EGEND OTECHNICA nsistency of cl stance N ws/ft) sampler 1 ft. nsistency of cl tion oisture of clay re AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. ay Consistency Very Soft Soft Medium Stif Stiff Very Stiff Hard ay Consistency Soft Medium Stif Stiff Very Stiff ys Description Dry Moist Very Moist, wet LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page A4 y ff y ff , Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R R 58 20 26 26 B-1 SM Total depth 16.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Gray-brown silty sand with occasional gravel, moist then dry, de nse. Page A-5 R 24 5" AC / 6" AB 5.3 119.8 2.1 105.7 2.3 110.3 1.5 114.8 3.4 109.4 Medium dense Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 69 41 B-2 SM Total depth 10' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Gray-brown silty sand with occasional gravel, dry, very d ense. Page A-6 23 10" AC / 6" AB 2.7 117.6 1.8 117.1 1.4 104.2 Medium dense Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 59 29 B-3 SP-SM Total depth 10.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand with occasional gr avel, dry, medium dense to dense. Page A-7 27 10" AC / 7" AB 3.9 108.7 2.2 103.7 2.4 101.4 Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R 47 18 B-4 SP-SM Total depth 11.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand with occasional gr avel, dry, dense. Page A-8 23 10" AC / 6" AB 1.3 113.2 2.4 102.1 Nr Medium dense Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 63 34 B-5 SP-SM Total depth 11.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand with occassional gr avel, moist, dense. Page A-9 25 10" AC / 3" AB R 22 3.2 112.8 2.1 115.6 1.9 107.8 1.5 112.1 Medium dense Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 59 24 B-6 Total depth 13.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-10 21 9" AC / 7" AB R 23 SP-SM Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand with occassional gr avel, moist, dense to very dense. 4.1 119.1 2.0 109.6 2.1 103.3 2.4 100.3 Medium dense Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 12 15 B-7 Total depth 11.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-11 4" AC / 8" AB 29 SM Gray-brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel, slightly moist medium dense. 3.1 104.7 1.9 109.6 1.4 117.9 Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 70 52 B-8 Total depth 9.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-12 11" AC / 5" AB 21 SP-SM Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand, moist, medium de nse to dense. 4.4 114.4 3.3 113.6 2.9 106.1 Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-19-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 42 21 B-9 Total depth 10.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-13 10" AC / 5" AB 17 SP-SM Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand, moist, medium de nse to dense.3.4 112.8 2.5 106.3 7.8 98.1 Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-20-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 11 19 B-10 Total depth 10.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-14 9" AC / 0" AB 26/6" SP-SM Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand, moist, medium de nse to dense. 3.8 103.2 1.8 115.4 1.8 110.0 Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-20-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 16 15 B-11 Total depth 16.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-15 9" AC / 0" AB 42 SP-SM Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand, moist, medium de nse to dense. R 44 2.1 105.3 6.0 101.5 2.0 127.6 2.4 114.0 Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-20-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 20 15 B-12 Total depth 9.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-16 10" AC / 0" AB 23 SP-SM Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand, moist, medium de nse to dense. 1.4 108.0 2.2 106.8 201 108.2 Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-20-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 16 15 B-13 Total depth 10.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-17 9" AC / 0" AB 20 SP-SM Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand, moist, medium de nse to dense.1.5 105.5 2.0 106.8 1.8 120.4 Palm Springs International Airport RMA Job No.:12-872-01 Parsons Brinckerhoff Date Drilled: Logged By: Location: Drilling Equipment: Boring Hole Diameter: Drive Weights: Boring No.Exploratory Boring Log Material DescriptionSamples Depth(ft)SampleTypeBlows(blows/ft)BulkSampleMoistureContent(%)Dry Density(pcf)USCSGraphicSymbolThis log contains factual information and interpretation of the subsurface conditions between the samples. The stratum indicated on this log represent the approximate boundary between earth units and the transition may be gradual. The log show subsurface conditions at the date and location indicated, and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. R T - Ring Sample - Tube Sample - Bulk Sample Sample Types: - SPT SampleS Sheet 1 of 1 11-20-12 510WSC CME-55 8" 140 lbs.See Boring Location Map 5 10 15 20 25 Drop:30" - Groundwater - End of Boring R R R 16 38 B-14 Total depth 11.5' No ground water encountered Hole backfilled with cuttings and patched with rapid setting grout Page A-18 12" AC / 0" AB 24 SP-SM Gray-brown poorly graded sand with silt to silty sand, moist, medium dense to dense. 1.7 105.0 0.9 113.0 2.8 102.5 AP LABOR PPENDIX B RATORY TE GEO ESTS OTECHNICAAL CONSULTANTS P P B P h p B M e B I w B S C B E m B T 4 B T s B R t B T Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker B-1.01 Particl Particle size a holes in acco procedure was B-1.02 Maxim Maximum de exploration w B-1.03 In-plac In-place densi with ASTM D B-1.04 Sand E San equivalen California Bea B-1.05 Expan Expansion ind methods outli B-1.06 Solubl Testing was p 4327 (Standard B-1.07 Califo Test specimen soaked for fou B-1.08 R-Valu Resistance V test methods B-1.09 Test R Test results fo nternational Air rhoff le Size Analy analysis was p ordance to th s not perform mum Density ensity - optim were performe ce Density, D ties were dete D2937. Equivalent nts were dete aring Ratio te nsion Tests dex tests were ined in ASTM le Sulfates an performed on d Test Metho rnia Bearing ns were remo ur days after m ue Value tests we outlined in C Results or all laborato rport Terminal A ysis performed on he standard te med and the m y mum moistu ed in the labor Drive Cylind ermined usin ermined for a esting. Sand e e performed M D4829. nd Chlorides n representativ od for Anions g Ratio (CBR olded to the in molding and b ere performe California 30 ory tests perfo Apron Area and AP B-1.00 LA n representati est methods material retain ure relationsh ratory using t der g drive cylind all samples to equivalent test on representa ve samples en s in Water by R) n-place densit before testing ed on represe 01. ormed on the d Taxiway G PPENDIX B ABORATORY T ive samples o of ASTM D ned on the #20 hips for the the standard p der samples t o identify wh ts were perfor ative samples ncountered du Suppressed Io ty as determin g. entative samp subject projec GEO TESTS of the major D422. The hy 00 screen was major soil ty procedures of taken from ea hich samples rmed using te s of the major during the inv on Chromato ned by ASTM ples of the m ct are present OTECHNICA soils types e ydrometer po washed. ypes encount f ASTM D155 ach boring an s would be th est method A r soil types en vestigation us ography). M D2937. Th major soil type ted in this app AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. encountered i ortion of the tered during 57. nd tested in a he most ben STM D2419. ncountered b sing the test m he test specim es encounter pendix. LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B1 in the test e standard the field ccordance neficial for by the test method D mens were red by the P P S M Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker SAMPLE INF Sa Nu MAXIMUM (Test Sa Nu nternational Air rhoff FORMATIO ample umber Sam De 1 Gra 2 Gra 3 Gra 4 Gra 5 Gra 6 Gra 7 Gra 8 Gra 9 Gra 10 Gra 11 Gra 12 Gra 13 Gra 14 Gra DENSITY - O Method: AST ample umber 1 2 3 6 7 8 10 12 13 14 rport Terminal A ON mple scription ay-brown silt ay-brown silt ay-brown silt ay-brown silt ay-brown poo ay-brown silt ay-brown silt ay-brown poo ay-brown poo ay-brown poo ay-brown poo ay-brown poo ay-brown poo ay-brown poo OPTIMUM M TM D1557) Optimum M (Percen 9.0 11.5 6.0 8.5 11.1 8.7 10.2 10.2 10.5 11.0 Apron Area and ty sand (SM) ty sand (SM) ty sand (SM) ty sand (SM) orly graded sa ty sand (SM) ty sand (SM) orly graded sa orly graded sa orly graded sa orly graded sa orly graded sa orly graded sa orly graded sa MOISTURE Moisture nt) d Taxiway G and with silt ( and with silt ( and with silt ( and with silt ( and with silt ( and with silt ( and with silt ( and with silt ( RELATION Maximu Density (lbs/ft3) 116.5 116.5 118.0 120.5 113.6 120.1 113.0 114.0 116.0 112.0 GEO B (SP-SM) (SP-SM) (SP-SM) (SP-SM) (SP-SM) (SP-SM) (SP-SM) (SP-SM) NSHIPS um y 3) OTECHNICA Sample Lo Boring No. B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10 B-11 B-12 B-13 B-14 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. ocation Depth (ft) 1-4 1-4 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B2 P P E S Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker EXPANSION (Test Sam Num 1 1 1 SAND EQUI (Test S N nternational Air rhoff N TEST Method: AST mple mber M Mo Co (Pe 1 2 8 10 12 14 IVALENT Method: AS Sample Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 rport Terminal A TM D4829) Molding oisture ontent ercent) 9.1 9.7 8.8 10.4 9.4 9.1 TM D2419) Sand Apron Area and Final Moisture Content (Percent) 15.9 15.5 14.1 15.9 15.3 16.7 d Equivalent 47 42 43 59 60 59 59 55 62 63 64 59 53 62 d Taxiway G Initial Dry Density (lbs/ft3) 108.0 107.9 109.5 105.4 107.5 106.2 GEO Expan Inde 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTECHNICA nsion ex E Cl V V V V V V AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. Expansion lassification Very Low Very Low Very Low Very Low Very Low Very Low LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B3 P P S Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker SOLUBLE SU (Test S N nternational Air rhoff ULFATES AN Method: AS Sample Number 1 6 8 12 rport Terminal A ND CHLOR TM D4327) Solu Apron Area and RIDES uble Sulfate (ppm) 7.4 35 5.6 15 d Taxiway G GEO Chloride (ppm) 0.9 5.1 1.4 1.4 OTECHNICAAL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B4 P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker PARTIC ASTM D4 Sample nternational Air rhoff CLE SIZE 422 e ID: 1 Fraction Fraction Frac Frac 100 rport Terminal A ANALYS n A: Dry Net W n B: Dry Net W Scre ction A: 1- 3 3 Scre ction B: # # # # # 10 Apron Area and SIS Weight (g): 432 Weight (g): 501 N een Size W 3" -1/2" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 N een Size W #8 #16 #30 #50 100 200 Grain d Taxiway G 2.5 .9 Net Retained Weight (g) 0 0 0 0 0 16 Net Retained Weight (g) 21.6 27.9 82.1 182.0 321.3 425.3 1 Size (mm) GEO Net Passing Weight (g) 432.5 432.5 432.5 432.5 432.5 416.5 Net Passing Weight (g) 480.3 474.0 419.8 319.9 180.6 76.6 0.1 OTECHNICA % Passing 100 100 100 100 100 96 % Passing 92 91 81 61 35 15 0 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. g g 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .01 % PassingLTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B5 P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker PARTIC ASTM D4 Sampl nternational Air rhoff CLE SIZE 422 le ID: 3 Fraction Fraction Frac Frac 100 rport Terminal A ANALYS n A: Dry Net W n B: Dry Net W Scre ction A: 1- 3 3 Scre ction B: # # # # # 10 Apron Area and SIS Weight (g): 445 Weight (g): 503 N een Size W 3" -1/2" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 N een Size W #8 #16 #30 #50 #100 #200 Grain S d Taxiway G .7 .5 Net Retained Weight (g) 0 0 0 0 0 21.9 Net Retained Weight (g) 27.3 34.0 92.4 199.4 341.0 439.0 1 Size (mm) GEO Net Passing Weight (g) 445.7 445.7 445.7 445.7 445.7 423.8 Net Passing Weight (g) 476.2 469.5 411.1 304.1 162.5 64.5 0.1 OTECHNICA % Passing 100 100 100 100 100 95 % Passing 90 89 78 57 31 12 0.0 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 % PassingLTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B6 P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker PARTIC ASTM D4 Sampl nternational Air rhoff CLE SIZE 422 le ID: 6 Fraction Fraction Frac Frac 100 rport Terminal A ANALYS n A: Dry Net W n B: Dry Net W Scre ction A: 1- 3 3 Scre ction B: # # # # # 10 Apron Area and SIS Weight (g): 5482 Weight (g): 524. Ne een Size W 3" -1/2" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 Ne een Size W #8 #16 #30 #50 100 200 Grain S d Taxiway G 2 .5 et Retained Weight (g) 0 0 29 147 238 428 et Retained Weight (g) 13.4 29.1 68.1 191.7 343.7 449.8 1 Size (mm) GEO Net Passing Weight (g) 5482 5482 5453 5335 5244 5054 Net Passing Weight (g) 511.1 495.4 456.4 332.8 180.8 74.7 0.1 OTECHNICA % Passing 100 100 99 97 96 92 % Passing 90 87 80 58 32 13 0.01 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 % PassingLTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B7 P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker PARTIC ASTM D4 Sample nternational Air rhoff CLE SIZE 422 e ID: 10 Fraction Fraction Frac Frac 100 rport Terminal A ANALYSI n A: Dry Net We n B: Dry Net We Scre ction A: 1- 3 1 3 Scre ction B: # # # #1 #2 10 Apron Area and IS eight (g): 1138 eight (g): 1138 Ne en Size W 3" 1/2" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 Ne en Size W #8 #16 #30 #50 100 200 Grain S d Taxiway G 8.1 8.1 et Retained Weight (g) 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 et Retained Weight (g) 7.6 16.2 92.2 352.5 742.7 1019.6 1 Size (mm) GEO Net Passing Weight (g) 1138.1 1138.1 1138.1 1138.1 1138.1 1135 Net Passing Weight (g) 1130.5 1121.9 1045.9 785.6 395.4 118.5 0.1 OTECHNICA % Passing 100 100 100 100 100 100 % Passing 99 98 92 69 35 10 0.01 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % PassingLTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B8 P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker PARTIC ASTM D4 Sampl nternational Air rhoff CLE SIZE 422 e ID: 12 Fraction Fraction Frac Frac 100 rport Terminal A ANALYS n A: Dry Net W n B: Dry Net W Scre ction A: 1- 3 1 3 Scre ction B: # # # # #2 10 Apron Area and IS Weight (g): 1089 Weight (g): 1089 Ne een Size W 3" 1/2" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 Ne een Size W #8 #16 #30 #50 100 200 Grain S d Taxiway G 9.6 9.6 et Retained Weight (g) 0 0 0 0 8.1 16.9 et Retained Weight (g) 28.7 44.4 157.1 428.5 757.0 986.7 1 Size (mm) GEO Net Passing Weight (g) 1089.6 1089.6 1089.6 1089.6 1081.5 1072.7 Net Passing Weight (g) 1060.9 1045.2 932.5 661.1 332.6 102.9 0.1 OTECHNICA % Passing 100 100 100 100 99 98 % Passing 96 94 84 60 30 9 0.01 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 % PassingLTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B9 P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker PARTIC ASTM D4 Sample nternational Air rhoff CLE SIZE 422 e ID: 14 Fraction Fraction Fract Frac 100 rport Terminal A ANALYSI A: Dry Net We B: Dry Net We Scree tion A: 1-1 3 1 3 # Scree tion B: # # # # #1 #2 10 Apron Area and IS eight (g): 5394 eight (g): 523.5 Ne en Size W 3" 1/2" 3/4" /2" 3/8" #4 Ne en Size W #8 #16 #30 #50 100 200 Grain S d Taxiway G 4 5 et Retained Weight (g) 0 0 0 35 55 118 et Retained Weight (g) 5.0 11.4 43.6 189.3 362.6 477.2 1 ize (mm) GEO Net Passing Weight (g) 5394 5394 5394 5359 5339 5276 Net Passing Weight (g) 518.5 512.1 479.9 334.2 160.9 46.3 0.1 OTECHNICA % Passing 100 100 100 99 99 98 % Passing 97 96 90 62 30 9 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0.01 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % PassingLTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B10 P P C A Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker CALIFORN ASTM D188 Specimen No. A B 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 0.000Stress (PSI)nternational Air rhoff NIA BEARIN 83 Sample ID: No. of Blows 25 12 Corrected Penetration (inches) 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.050 Specim Correc Specim Correc rport Terminal A NG RATIO 2 Remolded Dry Density (pcf) 114.3 110.4 Load (lbs) 0 120 320 560 750 1550 2200 3100 3690 Specim 0.100 0.150 Lo men A cted A men B cted B Apron Area and TEST Initial Moisture (%) 11.1 10.4 Stress (psi) 0 40 107 187 250 517 734 1034 1231 men A 0 0.200 Penetra oad Penetra d Taxiway G P Final Moisture (%) 14.3 15.9 Load (lbs) 0 90 230 330 440 920 1400 1840 2270 Speci 0.250 0.30 ation (in) ation Curve GEO Maximum Optimum M Penetration Pis Surcharge L CBR 0.1 inch Penetration 30 17 Stress (psi) 0 30 77 110 147 307 467 614 757 imen B 00 0.350 e OTECHNICA Density (pcf): Moisture (%): ston Area (in2) Load (pounds) CBR 0.2 inch Penetration 37 22 0.400 0.4 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 116.5 11.5 : 2.997 :70 Percent Compaction 98% 94% 450 0.500 LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B11 n P P C A Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker CALIFORN ASTM D188 Specimen No. A B 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 0.000Stress (PSI)nternational Air rhoff NIA BEARIN 83 Sample ID: No. of Blows 25 60 Corrected Penetration (inches) 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.050 Specim Correc Specim Correc rport Terminal A NG RATIO 3 Remolded Dry Density (pcf) 112.1 115.8 Load (lbs) 0 130 270 430 590 1260 1840 2360 2780 Specim 0.100 0.150 Lo men A cted A men B cted B Apron Area and TEST Initial Moisture (%) 6.6 6.8 Stress (psi) 0 43 89 143 196 418 610 782 921 men A 0 0.200 Penetra oad Penetra d Taxiway G P Final Moisture (%) 14.9 13.8 Load (lbs) 0 310 570 870 1170 2330 2760 3760 3780 Speci 0.250 0.30 ation (in) ation Curve GEO Maximum Optimum M Penetration Pis Surcharge L CBR 0.1 inch Penetration 22 40 Stress (psi) 0 103 189 288 388 772 915 1246 1253 imen B 00 0.350 e OTECHNICA Density (pcf): Moisture (%): ston Area (in2) Load (pounds) CBR 0.2 inch Penetration 29 52 0.400 0.4 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 118.0 6.0 : 3.017 :70 Percent Compaction 94% 97% 450 0.500 LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B12 n P P C A Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker CALIFORN ASTM D188 Specimen No. A B 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 0.000Stress (PSI)nternational Air rhoff NIA BEARIN 83 Sample ID: No. of Blows 25 56 Corrected Penetration (inches) 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.050 0 Specim Correc Specim Correc rport Terminal A NG RATIO T 7 Remolded Dry Density (pcf) 106.8 108.1 Load (lbs) 0 170 310 460 610 1050 1420 1790 2100 Specim 0.100 0.150 Lo men A cted A men B cted B Apron Area and TEST Initial Moisture (%) 12.5 14.4 Stress (psi) 0 56 103 152 202 348 471 593 696 men A 0 0.200 Penetra oad Penetra d Taxiway G Pe Final Moisture (%) 17.0 16.4 Load (lbs) 0 210 470 600 760 1400 1980 2500 2910 Specim 0.250 0.30 tion (in) ation Curve GEO Maximum D Optimum M enetration Pist Surcharge L CBR 0.1 inch Penetration 21 28 Stress (psi) 0 70 156 199 252 464 656 829 965 men B 00 0.350 e OTECHNICA Density (pcf): Moisture (%): ton Area (in2): Load (pounds): CBR 0.2 inch Penetration 23 33 0.400 0.4 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 113.6 11.1 : 3.017 :70 Percent Compaction 93% 94% 450 0.500 LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B13 n P P C A Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker CALIFORN ASTM D188 Specimen No. A B 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 0.000Stress (PSI)nternational Air rhoff NIA BEARIN 83 Sample ID: No. of Blows 25 56 Corrected Penetration (inches) 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.050 0 Specim Correc Specim Correc rport Terminal A NG RATIO T 8 Remolded Dry Density (pcf) 115.1 120.3 Load (lbs) 0 100 260 440 640 1450 2170 2880 3530 Specim 0.100 0.150 Lo men A ted A men B ted B Apron Area and TEST Initial Moisture (%) 8.7 8.6 Stress (psi) 0 33 86 146 212 481 719 955 1170 men A 0 0.200 Penetrat oad Penetra d Taxiway G Pe Final Moisture (%) 14.3 12.7 Load (lbs) 0 100 390 700 980 2230 3280 4280 4780 Specim 0.250 0.30 tion (in) ation Curve GEO Maximum D Optimum M enetration Pist Surcharge L CBR 0.1 inch Penetration 27 41 Stress (psi) 0 33 129 232 325 739 1087 1419 1584 men B 00 0.350 e OTECHNICA Density (pcf): Moisture (%): ton Area (in2): Load (pounds): CBR 0.2 inch Penetration 35 54 0.400 0.4 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 120.1 8.7 3.017 70 Percent Compaction 94% 98% 50 0.500 LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B14 P P C A Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker CALIFORN ASTM D188 Specimen No. A B 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 0.000Stress (PSI)nternational Air rhoff NIA BEARIN 83 Sample ID: No. of Blows 25 56 Corrected Penetration (inches) 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.050 0 Specim Correc Specim Correc rport Terminal A NG RATIO T 10 Remolded Dry Density (pcf) 107.7 110.8 Load (lbs) 0 80 220 350 500 1090 1580 1960 2240 Specim 0.100 0.150 Lo men A cted A men B cted B Apron Area and TEST Initial Moisture (%) 8.5 10.8 Stress (psi) 0 27 73 116 166 361 524 650 742 men A 0 0.200 Penetra oad Penetra d Taxiway G Pe Final Moisture (%) 17.1 14.9 Load (lbs) 0 100 240 420 630 1600 2510 3220 3820 Specim 0.250 0.30 tion (in) ation Curve GEO Maximum D Optimum M enetration Pist Surcharge L CBR 0.1 inch Penetration 19 32 Stress (psi) 0 33 80 139 209 530 832 1067 1266 men B 00 0.350 e OTECHNICA Density (pcf): Moisture (%): ton Area (in2): Load (pounds): CBR 0.2 inch Penetration 26 42 0.400 0.4 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 113.0 10.2 : 3.017 :40 Percent Compaction 95% 98% 450 0.500 LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B15 n P P C A Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker CALIFORN ASTM D188 Specimen No. A B P 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 0.000Stress (PSI)nternational Air rhoff NIA BEARIN 83 Sample ID: No. of Blows 25 56 Corrected Penetration (inches) 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.050 0 Specim Correct Specim Correct rport Terminal A NG RATIO T 13 Remolded Dry Density (pcf) 110.6 112.3 Load (lbs) 0 180 320 480 650 1340 1880 2300 2580 Specim 0.100 0.150 Lo men A ted A men B ted B Apron Area and TEST Initial Moisture (%) 10.3 10.8 Stress (psi) 0 60 106 159 215 444 623 762 855 men A 0 0.200 Penetrat oad Penetra d Taxiway G Pe Final Moisture (%) 15.7 15.0 Load (lbs) 0 130 260 430 640 1550 2330 2860 3400 Specim 0.250 0.300 tion (in) ation Curve GEO Maximum D Optimum M enetration Pisto Surcharge Lo CBR 0.1 inch Penetration 23 30 Stress (psi) 0 43 86 143 212 514 772 948 1127 men B 0 0.350 e OTECHNICA Density (pcf): Moisture (%): on Area (in2): oad (pounds): CBR 0.2 inch Penetration 30 39 0.400 0.45 AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. 116.0 10.5 3.017 40 Percent Compaction 95% 96% 500.500 LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B16 P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker CT M Samp Speci Mois Dry D Exud Stabi Expa Use: Thic k Thic k Equil Equil Exud Expa Thic k Thic kCover Thickness by Stabilometer (ft)nternational Air rhoff M 301 - DETE R SUBB A ple ID: imen No ture Content (% Density (pcf) dation Pressure ( ilometer R Value ansion Pressure D Traffic Index kness by Expans kness by Stabilo librium Thick (f librium Pressure dation Pressure R ansion Pressur kness of AC (ft)= kness of Aggregate 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 0.00 0 Cover Thic E rport Terminal A RMINATION ASES, AND BA 4 %) (psi) e Dial = 5.0 Gravel sion (ft) meter (ft) ft) e R Value R Value @ 300 re R-Value is ba e Base (ft)= 0.50 1.00 ckness by Expa Expansion Pre Apron Area and OF RESISTAN ASEMENT SO A 16.9 107.2 656 76 55 Factor = 1.00 1.83 0.38 psi ased on the fol 0.25 0.33 1.50 nsion Pressure essures d Taxiway G NCE " R" VAL OILS BY THE B 17.9 105.1 317 64 38 1.27 0.58 - n/a 64 llowing structu Gf(ac) = Gf(base) = Gf(avg) = U 2.00 e (ft)Stabilometer R ValueGEO LUE OF TRE A STABILOME C 18.5 106.8 112 58 27 0.90 0.67 ural section: 2.50 W 1.10 W 1.70 W Use Exudation R 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0100 OTECHNICA ATED AND U TER W(ac) = 145 W(base) =130 W(avg) = 136 R Value 200 300 400 Exudation Pre Exudation P AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. UNTREATED 5 0 6 0 500 600 70 essure (psi) Pressures LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page B17 BASES, 00800 AP REF PENDIX C FERENCES GEO OTECHNICAAL CONSULTANTS P P Palm Springs In Parsons Brinker 1. Feder Evalu 2. Feder Const 3. Feder 4. RS&H Repor nternational Air rhoff ral Aviation uation, date of ral Aviation truction of A ral Aviation A H California rt, October 2 rport Terminal A Administrat f publication n Administra Airports, date Administratio , Inc., Pavem 2009 Apron Area and APPEN REFER tion, Adviso September 30 ation, Advis of publication on, FAARFIE ment Manage d Taxiway G NDIX C RENCES ry Circular 0, 2009. sory Circul n September ELD compute ement Progra GEO 150/5320-6E lar 150/5370 30, 2011. er program, v am: Palm Sp OTECHNICA E, Airport P 0-10F, Stand version 1.305, prings Intern AL CONSU Januar RMA Job No. Pavement De dards for S , September 2 ational Airpo LTANTS ry 23, 2013 : 12-872-01 Page C1 esign and Specifying 28, 2010. ort, Final