Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/5/2016 - STAFF REPORTS - 00John R. Crapo 9/z8/zot6 Dear Mayor Robert Moon, Members of the City Council (The Hon. Ginny Foat, Chris Mills, Jeff Kors, J.R. Roberts) and City Staff cc: Jennifer Nelson I am writing on behalf of a group of local dog park users here in Palm Springs who have met with you in the past and sought, successfully, a sensible solution to renovations and upgrades to the Palm Springs Dog Park this past year. First, we are all delighted and wish to extend a gracious thank you to all involved in the renovations and progress to date. In a few short weeks, we look forward to the reopening of the park the daily use for our dogs and the social interaction this will afford many of us. It cannot be said enough, thank you, thank you indeed! Remember, dog parks are still people parks, and over half of the regular resident users are retired and many not working due to disability. The park affords many of us one of our few daily social outings for community and friendship. While we know work is still in progress, a number of us have noticed one aspect of the renovation which is, well, a tad troubling, but can be easily remedied while renovations are still ongoing. We are delighted with the new trees, improved pathways (though the circular walk is more than many expected and will require a bit more regular maintenance to keep clean and slipping hazard free (wink wink) for our older residents, the new seating that will be installed and other improvements as the lush new turf takes hold and matures. All lovely. But, we did notice a rather pronounced increase in the use of smoothed pebbles in the treed areas, at the entrances and towards the back of the large dog park field. Here are our concerns. 1) The Small Dog park field has lost between 1/6 to 1/5"of the open grass area on which they can play. The entire entrance way is now rock. Remember, the small field users K)iol _L C� ,�, V+ (VI51ju actually petitioned to see if their area could somehow be increased by extending the fence closer to the curb on the western edge of the park. Now they face a substantial loss of play area —due to the pebbles. These pebbles and stones retain and radiate heat and will actually cause a dog paw pad burn hazard in summer months as they enter the park. Now, while the work is still underway, we would ask the entrance way cover in pebbles, well intentioned, be scaled back considerably and a few more rolls of turf be used to greet visitors at or near the entrance. A simple fix!!! (And fair warning... the folks on the small dog field are getting VERY UPSET as news is spreading) z) The same issue confronts the larger dog field area of the park. Towards the eastern back area (fronting Cielo Road) this area was one of the few areas where grass survived when maintenance and watering seemed to cease the past two years. It is now almost entirely covered in stone. ???? An area that in the heavy use months with seasonal visitors has a higher propensity to retain grass... exactly what we asked for... is now covered in stone. Again, the same issues of additional summer radiated heat and threats to dogs' paws are a REAL CONCERN. We ask that this back area be raked up of stone and recovered with additional turf, with perhaps a small border area along the fence. Again, a simple, EASY solution that should be enacted now while renovations are still underway and the park is closed. A final concern. The downfall of the park in the past was the lack of adequate, regular maintenance. The current schedule of z hours on Friday is not adequate given the volume of use. This is the most heavily used dog park in the Coachella Valley! (And one of the loveliest, when maintained.) Moving to a z or 3 day a week, for one -hour closure, comparable to the schedule at the Palm Desert Dog park would be much more effective. I am collecting comments and suggestions from many and will distill these to have at the ready which we will submit as citizen testimony to the committee that oversaw the park renovation. At several city held hearings numerous park users made it very clear.: we wanted and expected a grass park, not gravel or crushed stone due to heat and sanitary issues. The initial concept of a crushed stone park was thought up by city staff without consultation of a reasonable sampling of city residents and actual park users. The local resident dog park users thought we finally got that message across. I suspect many of you members of city council did as well too as you responded respectfully and favorably to our rather vocal objections and ability to start mobilizing a large number of resident part users to hearings and meetings. Let's make this renovation a $300 K +success story in Palm s Springs that uses PROP 1 money in a way that everyone can be proud of and not something that's going to invite immediate public criticism on opening day. As it stands, that WILL happen unless we make these corrections now. Again... they strike us all as simple but important fixes. I would STRONGLY urge you to invite a few of us to serve as an informal volunteer advisory group with the City agency in charge and the contractor. I certainly would be willing to meeting with any staff or contractor on short notice at City Hall or the park and can easily get a small ad hoc group of use to grab leashes and coffee mugs to meet with contractors and city staff at the park site within a 24to 48 hour notice. I live Just two blocks from the park, by design, at the Mojave Blue apartments. As a person living with AIDS I rely on well trained, socialized and happy service dog(s) to keep me going. Let's make this renovation a $30o K +success story in Palm s Springs that uses PROP J money in a way that everyone can be proud of and not something that's going to invite immediate public criticism on opening day. As it stands, that WILL happen unless we make these corrections now. Again... they strike us all as simple fixes. Finally, a group of us are looking to reconstitute the 501 C 3 Friends of the Dog Park nonprofit. This will assure the city will have a responsible working partner with direct access to citizens and dog park users to help with maintenance, other future capital improvements (we need secure public restrooms other than city hall) and seasonal major clean ups with a brigade of volunteers to lessen the load on stretched city resources. We are requesting a short meeting with you and staff to discuss these final suggested changes and to chart out a future of possible collaboration and to be sure that these corrections are made now during the park renovation. A dog friendly city, with a sterling dog park, should also be featured on the city's web page for prospective new home buyers and visitors, and something we can all point to as an asset. We look forward to a happy and supportive partnership between residents and the city with this great park. And again, thank you for listening and appropriate the necessary funds to support the dog park!!! ,W��arrmm/regards, V' John R Crapo