Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/19/2016 - STAFF REPORTS - 5.C.e&LM City Council Staff Report DATE: October 19, 2016 NEW BUSINESS SUBJECT: REVIEW OF N. PALM CANYON DRIVE CORRIDOR ANALYSIS, APPROVAL OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AT VIA LAS PALMAS AND STEVENS ROAD, AND AUTHORIZATION OF A PURCHASE ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,130 WITH ALBERT A. WEBB & ASSOCIATES FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE N. PALM CANYON DRIVE AT STEVENS ROAD AND VIA LAS PALMAS CROSSWALK INSTALLATIONS, CITY PROJECT NO. 16-13 FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Engineering Services Department SUMMARY: At the prior request of City Council, staff requested a traffic analysis of the N. Palm Canyon Dr. corridor between Tachevah Drive and Vista Chino by the City's on -call traffic engineering firm, Albert A. Webb & Associates, ("Webb"), to consider where pedestrian crosswalks may be appropriate and installed along this 0.5 mile long segment. The traffic analysis completed by Webb recommends the City consider providing protected pedestrian crosswalks at Via Las Palmas and Stevens Road. This action item would direct staff to proceed with the design of improvements to install new pedestrian crosswalks with curb pop -outs, rectangular flashing beacons, and in -ground illuminated crosswalk systems, at these two locations, and authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $31,130 with Webb for traffic engineering design services associated with the N. Palm Canyon Drive at Stevens Road and Via Las Palmas Crosswalk Installations, City Project No. 16-13. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize the City Engineer to install a protected pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive and Via Las Palmas in accordance with Chapter 12.68 "Pedestrians' of the Palm Springs Municipal Code; 2. Authorize the City Engineer to install a protected pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road in accordance with Chapter 12.68 'Pedestrians" of the Palm Springs Municipal Code; ITEM NO. � L City Council Staff Report October 19, 2016 - Page 2 N. Palm Canyon Dr. Crosswalks 3. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $31,130 with Albert A. Webb & Associates, pursuant to the City's "on -call' traffic engineering services agreement, (A6443), for traffic engineering design services for the N. Palm Canyon Drive at Stevens Road and Via Las Palmas Crosswalk Installations, City Project No. 16-13; 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. BACKGROUND: The segment of N. Palm Canyon Drive between Tachevah Drive and Vista Chino is one-half mile long, with five non -signalized intersections at: • Vereda Sur • Via Las Palmas • Vereda Norte • Camino Monte Vista • Stevens Road Figure 1 on the next page identifies the half mile corridor. Each of these five intersections do not have traffic signals, and do not have marked pedestrian crosswalks. In the past, staff has been questioned on the safety of pedestrian crossings along this segment of N. Palm Canyon Drive, and whether any of these intersections met warrants for installation of traffic signals, or could be improved with marked crosswalks, with flashing beacon systems and signage similar to other pedestrian crosswalks recently installed on N. Palm Canyon Drive at W. Chino Drive, Merito Place, and El Alameda, and on N. Indian Canyon Drive at Granvia Valmonte. On November 6, 2013, the City Council approved Agreement No. 6443 with Albert A. Webb & Associates, ("Webb"), for "on -call' traffic engineering services on an as needed basis. Utilizing this on -call agreement, staff requested a proposal from Webb to prepare a traffic analysis for the N. Palm Canyon Drive corridor between Tachevah Drive and Vista Chino, and determine whether warrants for traffic signals or marked pedestrian crosswalks are satisfied. The decision to install a traffic signal at any intersection should be determined on the basis of a traffic engineering study, in accordance with guidelines identified in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ("MUTCD"). Generally, the MUTCD provides guidance on the installation of traffic signals, and identifies eight "warrants" related to traffic volumes, pedestrian volumes, school crossings, crash experience, interconnected corridor "roadway network", or railroad crossings. 02 City Council Staff Report October 19, 2016 - Page 3 N. Palm Canyon Dr. Crosswalks NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE Existing Conditions & Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volume _ 215' P R itr � ORTH PALM`ANYON DRIVE-�; II - R1.1 s 'sm s r . 44 ,a 22� �4,55 � U,1 [ s - ir � 6lIN ISTNGSTREf IIG41 Y� r 2.600 N. Palm Canyon Drive Corridor Tachevah Drive to Vista Chino Figure 1 City Council Staff Report October 19, 2016 - Page 4 N. Palm Canyon Dr. Crosswalks On September 27, 2016, Webb submitted its traffic analysis for the N. Palm Canyon Drive corridor, and determined the following conclusions: • Based on traffic counts taken June 23, 2016, the Average Daily Traffic ("ADT) on this segment of N. Palm Canyon Drive was 16,524 vehicles • None of the five intersections meet warrants established by the MUTCD for traffic signal installations due to the low traffic volumes on the side streets • Pedestrian crosswalk analysis based on existing pedestrian crossing data and the MUTCD guidance criteria identified two new recommended protected pedestrian crosswalks at Via Las Palmas and Stevens Road Painting crosswalks on City streets should only occur when recommended through a traffic analysis following MUTCD guidance criteria. The traffic analysis completed by Webb was prepared in accordance with Section 3B.18 Crosswalk Markings of the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) provided below. 08 Crosswalk lines should not be used indiscriminately. An engineering study should be performed before a marked crosswalk is installed at a location away from a traffic control signal or an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign. The engineering study should consider the number of lanes, the presence of a median, the distance from adjacent signalized intersections, the pedestrian volumes and delays, the average daily traffic (ADT), the posted or statutory speed limit or 85th-percentile speed, the geometry of the location, the possible consolidation of multiple crossing points, the availability of street lighting, and other appropriate factors. 09 New marked crosswalks across uncontrolled roadways should include alone, without other measures designed to reduce traffic speeds, shorten crossing distances, enhance driver awareness of the crossing, and/or provide active warning of pedestrian presence, should not be installed across uncontrolled roadways where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph and either. - A. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel without a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an of 12, 000 vehicles per day or greater; or B. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel with a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of 15,000 vehicles per day or greater. 09a If a marked crosswalk exists across an uncontrolled roadway where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph and the roadway has four or more lanes of travel and an ADT of 12,000 vehicles per day or greater, advanced yield lines with associated Yield Here to Pedestrians (R1-5, RI-5a) signs should be placed 20 to 50 ft in advance of the crosswalk, adequate visibility should be provided by parking prohibitions, pedestrian crossing (W11-2) warning signs with diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16- 7p) plaques should be installed at the crosswalk, and a high -visibility crosswalk marking pattern should be used (See Figure 3B- 17(CA)). 0d City Council Staff Report October 19, 2016 - Page 5 N. Palm Canyon Dr. Crosswalks On the basis that the 85th percentile speed on N. Palm Canyon Drive exceeds 40 mph (it was determined at 48 mph in the 2013 Citywide traffic speed survey), and has an ADT of 16,524 exceeding 12,000 recommended by MUTCD, Webb has determined and recommends that protected crosswalks with advance yield markings and flashing beacon systems be installed at Via Las Palmas and Stevens Road. Conceptual exhibits showing how these protected crosswalks would be installed are identified in Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 ALM CANYON DRIVE Figure 3 In addition to the flashing beacon systems and advance traffic striping and signage associated with marked pedestrian crosswalks, staff would recommend installation of in - ground illuminated crosswalk systems to further enhance the safety of pedestrians crossing at these locations. A copy of Webb's traffic analysis is included as Attachment 1. 45 City Council Staff Report October 19, 2016 - Page 6 N. Palm Canyon Dr. Crosswalks ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Section 21084 of the California Public Resources Code requires Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Guidelines are required to include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. In response to that mandate, the Secretary for Resources identified classes of projects that do not have a significant effect on the environment, and are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents. In accordance with Section 15301 "Existing Facilities," Class 1 projects consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public structures, facilities, mechanical equipment or topographical features involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15301(c), staff has determined that installation of protected pedestrian crosswalks on an existing City street is considered categorically exempt from CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: On January 2, 2014, the City conducted a bid opening for the Uptown Crosswalks, City Project No. 13-10, which was a capital project to construct and install four new protected crosswalks on N. Palm Canyon Drive at W. Chino Drive, Merito Place, and El Alameda, and on N. Indian Canyon Drive at Granvia Valmonte. The total cost of this prior project was $184,849 for four protected crosswalks. On the basis of this total cost, each protected crosswalk had a cost of $46,212 in January 2014; however, this cost excluded prevailing wages and in -ground illuminated crosswalk systems. Staff would increase the estimated cost for each crosswalk by 30% to account for prevailing wages, and generally increasing cost of labor and materials over the last 3 years, and add $40,000 as the cost of the in -ground illuminated crosswalk system at each location. Therefore, staff estimates the total construction cost for each protected crosswalk is $100,000 — or a total cost of $200,000. Webb has provided the City with a proposal to prepare plans, specifications and estimates for construction drawings to install the two recommended protected crosswalks, for a total not to exceed fee of $31,130; a copy of Webb's proposal is included as Attachment 2. Staff is recommending that this project be funded with budget appropriated in the Measure J Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 260) in two ways: 1) the design costs of $31,130 to be funded from the Non -Motorized Transportation Program ("NMTP") funding in Account No. 260-4500-59445; and 2) the construction costs of $200,000 from funding allocated to the Measure J Community Projects. 0S City Council Staff Report October 19, 2016 - Page 7 N. Palm Canyon Dr. Crosswalks On October 21, 2015, the City Council approved the Measure J "Community Projects" recommendations and three-year plan, and has subsequently appropriated Measure J funding for the first two years of the listed Community Projects; a copy of the October 21, 2015, staff report is included as Attachment 3. Identified as a project listed for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 is a proposed project to install a traffic signal at La Verne Way and Twin Palms Drive with a budget allocated of $200,000. Staff requested that Webb perform a traffic analysis to determine if traffic signal warrants were satisfied for a new traffic signal at La Verne Way and Twin Palms Drive, and Webb has confirmed that warrants are not satisfied. Therefore, the budget of $200,000 allocated from the Measure J Community Projects list is available to be reallocated to installation of the two new protected crosswalks on N. Palm Canyon Drive. Sufficient funds are budgeted and available in Account No. 260-4500-59445 to facilitate approval of a Purchase Order in the amount of $31,130 to Albert A, Webb & Associates for the N. Palm Canyon Drive at Stevens Road and Via Las Palmas Crosswalk Installations, City Project No. 16-13. SUBMITTED Marcus L. Fuller, MPA, P.E., P.L.S. Assistant City Manager/City Engineer Attachment: 1. N. Palm Canyon Drive Crosswalk Analysis 2. Albert A. Webb & Associates Proposal 3. October 21, 2015, staff report David H. Ready, Esq., &: 7`� City Manager 07 Attachment 1 08 A L 6 E R T A. MAY Y 1 0 A 5 S 0 C I A T E S Corporate Headquarters 3788 McCray Street Riverside, CA 92506 951.686,1070 Palm Desert Office 36-951 Cook Street #103 Palm Desert, CA 92211 760.568.5005 Murrieta Office 41391 Kalmia Street 4320 Murrieta, CA 92562 951.686 1070 September 27, 2016 Gianfranco Laurie P.E., T.E. City of Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 RE: N. Palm Canyon Drive Corridor Analysis Mr. Laurie, The purpose of this letter is to conduct an analysis at the N. Palm Canyon Drive corridor from Vista Chino to Tachevah Drive in the City of Palm Springs. Residents have raised safety concerns regarding pedestrians crossing N. Palm Canyon Drive at uncontrolled intersections. The analysis focuses on preventing pedestrian accidents while crossing this busy corridor. The segment analyzed is approximately 0.5 miles long and has no intermediate crosswalks for pedestrians to cross N. Palm Canyon Drive. Intermediate intersections have been identified between Vista Chino and Tachevah Drive to conduct signal warrant analysis. Five signal warrant analysis were conducted at the intersections of N. Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road, N. Palm Canyon Drive and Camino Monte Vista, N. Palm Canyon Drive and Vereda Norte, N. Palm Canyon Drive and Via Las Palmas and N. Palm Canyon Drive and Vereda Sur. In addition, a pedestrian crossing warrant analysis along N. Palm Canyon Drive was conducted. ■ Existing Roadway Conditions N. Palm Canyon Drive N. Palm Canyon Drive is classified as a Major Thoroughfare in the City of Palm Springs General Plan as approved in 2007. It is an undivided 4 lane roadway. N. Palm Canyon Drive has a posted speed limit of 40 mph and an 85th-percentile speed of 48 mph based on the approved 2013 City -Wide Speed Zone Surveys dated October 8, 2013 (Speed Survey). N. Palm Canyon Drive at Stevens Road The first intersecting street is Stevens Road. It is a 2 lane roadway classified as a 48' wide local road in the City of Palm Springs General Plan. The posted speed limit on Stevens Road is 25 mph. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the south is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Tachevah Drive approximately 1,900' south of Stevens Road. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the north is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vista Chino approximately 650' north of Stevens Road. *®It� www.webbassociates.com 09 The existing intersection is two-way stop controlled with traffic on Stevens Road yielding to traffic on N. Palm Canyon Drive. There are no existing turn movement restrictions at the intersection. A bus stop for the Sun Line servicing route 24 and route 111 is located near the south-west corner of the N. Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road intersection. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Camino Monte Vista The second intersecting street is Camino Monte Vista. It is a 2 lane roadway classified as a 48' wide local road in the City of Palm Springs General Plan. The posted speed limit on Camino Monte Vista is 25 mph. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the south is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Tachevah Drive approximately 1,450' south of Camino Monte Vista. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the north is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vista Chino approximately 1,110' north of Camino Monte Vista. The existing intersection is one-way stop controlled with traffic on Camino Monte Vista yielding to traffic on N. Palm Canyon Drive. There are no existing turn movement restrictions at the intersection. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vereda Norte The third intersecting street is Vereda Norte. It is a 2 lane roadway classified as a 48' wide local road in the City of Palm Springs General Plan. The posted speed limit on Vereda Norte is 25 mph. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the south is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Tachevah Drive approximately 1,110' south of Vereda Norte. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the north is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vista Chino approximately 1,440' north of Vereda Norte. The existing intersection is one-way stop controlled with traffic on Vereda Norte yielding to traffic on N. Palm Canyon Drive. There are no existing turn movement restrictions at the intersection. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Via Las Palmas The fourth intersecting street is Via Las Palmas. It is a 2 lane roadway classified as a 48' wide local road in the City of Palm Springs General Plan. The posted speed limit on Via Las Palmas is 25 mph. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the south is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Tachevah Drive approximately 850' south of Via Las Palmas. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the north is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vista Chino approximately 1,700' north of Via Las Palmas. The existing intersection is one-way stop controlled with traffic on Via Las Palmas yielding to traffic on N. Palm Canyon Drive. There are no existing turn movement restrictions at the intersection. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vereda Sur The fifth intersecting street is Vereda Sur. It is a 2 lane roadway classified as a 48' wide local road in the City of Palm Springs General Plan. The posted speed limit on Vereda Sur is 25 mph. The nearest signalized intersection with accessible pedestrian crossings to the south is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Tachevah Drive approximately 625' south of Vereda Sur. The nearest signalized intersection with G \2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc 10 accessible pedestrian crossings to the north is N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vista Chino approximately 1,950' north of Vereda Sur. The existing intersection is one-way stop controlled with traffic on Vereda Sur yielding to traffic on N. Palm Canyon Drive. There are no existing turn movement restrictions at the intersection. A bus stop for the Sun Line servicing route 24 and route 111 is located on the north-west corner of the N. Palm Canyon Drive and Vereda Sur intersection. ■ Data Collection Counts for the intersections of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Stevens Road, N. Palm Canyon Drive/Camino Monte Vista, N. Palm Canyon Drive/Vereda Norte, N. Palm Canyon Drive/Via Las Palmas and N. Palm Canyon Drive/Vereda Sur were collected on June 23, 2016. Vehicle turning movement counts were collected from 6:00 AM through 6:00 PM. In addition, pedestrian crossings and bicycle crossings were collected for the same time frame. The 2014 California MUTCD allows for bicycles to be counted as pedestrians or vehicles. Since there are no existing bicycle facilities at the intersection, the bicycle counts were added to the pedestrian counts as through movements. ■ Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis 2014 California MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets were completed using the collected traffic data for the intersections of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Stevens Road, N. Palm Canyon Drive/Camino Monte Vista, N. Palm Canyon Drive/Vereda Norte, N. Palm Canyon Drive/Via Las Palmas and N. Palm Canyon Drive/Vereda Sur. Only count data from June 23, 2016 was used in the traffic signal warrant analysis. N. Palm Canyon Drive N. Palm Canyon Drive has an 85th percentile speed of 48 mph. The 2014 California MUTCD allows the use of the 85th percentile speed in place of the posted speed limit when performing signal warrant analysis. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Stevens Road Stevens Road is considered to have one approach lane in each direction in the warrant analysis. None of the nine traffic signal warrants were satisfied. Warrant 1 (Eight Hour Vehicular Volume), Warrant 2 (Four Hour Vehicular Volume) and Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) were not satisfied as the traffic volume on Stevens Road was insufficient to satisfy the warrants. Similarly, the crossing pedestrian volumes (pedestrians crossing the major street) were low and did not satisfy Warrant 4. Warrant 5 was not analyzed as the intersection is not close to a school. Warrant 6 was not satisfied due to N. Palm Canyon Drive not having a prime direction of traffic flow that requires providing additional vehicular platooning adjustments. Collision history for Warrant 7 was reviewed to identify if five or more collisions have occurred at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Stevens Road within a 12 month period; however, only three collisions occurred during that timeframe, which are not enough to satisfy the warrant. Warrant 8 was not satisfied as Stevens Road is not a major route and is not expected to contribute significant traffic volume in the future. Warrant 9 was not analyzed because the intersection is not near a grade crossing. G:\2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc 1 1 N. Palm Canyon Drive at Camino Monte Vista Westbound traffic on Camino Monte Vista is considered to have one approach lane in the warrant analysis. None of the nine traffic signal warrants were satisfied. Warrant 1 (Eight Hour Vehicular Volume), Warrant 2 (Four Hour Vehicular Volume) and Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) were not satisfied as the traffic volume on Camino Monte Vista was insufficient to satisfy the warrants. Similarly, the crossing pedestrian volumes (pedestrians crossing the major street) were low and did not satisfy Warrant 4. Warrant 5 was not analyzed as the intersection is not close to a school. Warrant 6 was not satisfied due to N. Palm Canyon Drive not having a prime direction of traffic flow that requires providing additional vehicular platooning adjustments. Collision history for Warrant 7 was reviewed to identify if five or more collisions have occurred at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Camino Monte Vista within a 12 month period; however, only two collisions occurred at the intersection, which are not enough to satisfy the warrant. Warrant 8 was not satisfied as Camino Monte Vista is not a major route and is not expected to contribute significant traffic volume in the future. Warrant 9 was not analyzed because the intersection is not near a grade crossing. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vereda Norte The eastbound traffic on Vereda Norte is considered to have one approach lane in the warrant analysis. None of the nine traffic signal warrants were satisfied. Warrant 1 (Eight Hour Vehicular Volume), Warrant 2 (Four Hour Vehicular Volume) and Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) were not satisfied as the traffic volume on Vereda Norte was insufficient to satisfy the warrants. Similarly, the crossing pedestrian volumes (pedestrians crossing the major street) were low and did not satisfy Warrant 4. Warrant 5 was not analyzed as the intersection is not close to a school. Warrant 6 was not satisfied due to N. Palm Canyon Drive not having a prime direction of traffic flow that requires providing additional vehicular platooning adjustments. Collision history for Warrant 7 was reviewed to identify if five or more collisions have occurred at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Vereda Norte within a 12 month period; however, only one collision occurred during that timeframe, which is not enough to satisfy the warrant. Warrant 8 was not satisfied as Vereda Norte is not a major route and is not expected to contribute significant traffic volume in the future. Warrant 9 was not analyzed because the intersection is not near a grade crossing. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Via Las Palmas The eastbound traffic on Via Las Palmas is considered to have one approach lane in the warrant analysis. None of the nine traffic signal warrants were satisfied. Warrant 1 (Eight Hour Vehicular Volume), Warrant 2 (Four Hour Vehicular Volume) and Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) were not satisfied as the traffic volume on Via Las Palmas was insufficient to satisfy the warrants. Similarly, the crossing pedestrian volumes (pedestrians crossing the major street) were low and did not satisfy Warrant 4. Warrant 5 was not analyzed as the intersection is not close to a school. Warrant 6 was not satisfied due to N. Palm Canyon Drive not having a prime direction of traffic flow that requires providing additional vehicular platooning adjustments. Collision history for Warrant 7 was reviewed to identify if five or more collisions have occurred at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Via Las Palmas within a 12 month period; however, only one collision occurred during that timeframe, which is not enough to satisfy the warrant. Warrant 8 was not satisfied as Via Las Palmas is not a major route and is not expected to contribute significant traffic volume in the future. Warrant 9 was not analyzed because the intersection is not near a grade crossing. G\2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc 12 N. Palm Canyon Drive at Vereda Sur Eastbound traffic on Vereda Sur is considered to have one approach lane in the warrant analysis. None of the nine traffic signal warrants were satisfied. Warrant 1 (Eight Hour Vehicular Volume), Warrant 2 (Four Hour Vehicular Volume) and Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) were not satisfied as the traffic volume on Vereda Sur was insufficient to satisfy the warrants. Similarly, the crossing pedestrian volumes (pedestrians crossing the major street) were low and did not satisfy Warrant 4. Warrant 5 was not analyzed as the intersection is not close to a school. Warrant 6 was not satisfied due to N. Palm Canyon Drive not having a prime direction of traffic flow that requires providing additional vehicular platooning adjustments. Collision history for Warrant 7 was reviewed to identify if five or more collisions have occurred at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon DriveNereda Sur within a 12 month period; however, only three collisions occurred during that timeframe, which are not enough to satisfy the warrant. Warrant 8 was not satisfied as Vereda Sur is not a major route and is not expected to contribute significant traffic volume in the future. Warrant 9 was not analyzed because the intersection is not near a grade crossing. ■ Pedestrian Crossing Warrant N. Palm Canyon Drive between Vista Chino and Tachevah Drive There are no protected pedestrian crossings in an approximate 0.5 mile distance between the intersections of N. Palm Canyon DriverVista Chino and N. Palm Canyon Drive/Tachevah Drive. Consequently, the need for one or more pedestrian crossings has been evaluated to reduce the risk of pedestrian casualties due to the lack of protected crosswalks and appropriate facilities. This pedestrian crossing analysis was prepared in accordance with Section 3B.18 Crosswalk Markings of the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) provided below Guidance: 08 Crosswalk lines should not be used indiscriminately An engineering study should be performed before a marked crosswalk is installed at a location away from a traffic control signal or an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign. The engineering study should consider the number of lanes, the presence of a median, the distance from adjacent signalized intersections, the pedestrian volumes and delays, the average daily traffic (AD7), the posted or statutory speed limit or 85th-percentile speed, the geometry of the location, the possible consolidation of multiple crossing points, the availability of street lighting, and other appropriate factors. 09 New marked crosswalks across uncontrolled roadways should include alone, without other measures designed to reduce traffic speeds, shorten crossing distances. enhance driver awareness of the crossing, and/or provide active warning of pedestrian presence, should not be installed across uncontrolled roadways where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph and either: A. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel without a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an of 12,000 vehicles per day or greater; or B. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel with a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of 15,000 vehicles per day or greater. 09a If a marked crosswalk exists across an uncontrolled roadway where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph and the roadway has four or more lanes of travel and an ADT of 12,000 vehicles per day or greater, advanced yield lines with associated Yield Here to Pedestrians (Rl-5, RI-5a) signs should be placed 20 to 50 ft in advance of the crosswalk, adequate visibility should be provided by parking prohibitions, pedestrian crossing (W11-2) warning signs with diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16- 7p) plaques should be installed at the crosswalk, and a high -visibility crosswalk marking pattern should be used (See Figure 3B-17(CA)). b� G\2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc Upon review of the pedestrian crossing counts it was determined that the roadway's 85th percentile speed exceeds 40 mph. N. Palm Canyon Drive has an approximate ADT of 16, 500 vehicles exceeding the 12,000 vehicles per day recommended by the MUTCD guidance as shown in Exhibit 1. In addition, exhibit 1 shows the location of existing street lighting, red curb areas, bus stops, establishments and the geometry of the intersections. One street light is located on the north east corner of N. Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road and one on the south east corner of N. Palm Canyon Drive and Camino Monte Vista. No lighting presence is observed south of Camino Monte Vista or west of N. Palm Canyon Drive. ■ Findings Vehicle Peak Hour Counts are illustrated in Exhibit 2. Peak hour counts at the five intersections show similar traffic patterns. Pedestrian volumes during the peak hour are highest at the intersections where the two bus stops are located. The observed twelve hour pedestrian volumes continue to show that pedestrian crossings are highest at bus stop locations as shown in Exhibit 3. Additionally, two local restaurants are located within the proposed location for new intersection crossings (Denny's north west of Vereda Sur and Chada Thai Cuisine south east of Camino Monte Vista). Exhibit 4 shows collision data used for the traffic signal warrants sorted by accident type at the five intersections analyzed. Ten collisions were recorded in total. One correctable pedestrian collision was recorded at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive and Vereda Sur. Police records state that the incident occurred after 8:00 pm and there was poor street lighting in the area. Seven out of ten recorded collisions occurred due to unsafe lane changes, left -turn violations, and unsafe speed changes. ■ Recommendations The traffic signal warrant analysis at the intersections of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Stevens Road, N. Palm Canyon Drive/Camino Monte Vista, N. Palm Canyon DriveNereda Norte, N. Palm Canyon Drive/Via Las Palmas and N. Palm Canyon DriveNereda Sur indicate that none of the intersections meet the traffic signal warrant due to the low volumes observed at the minor streets. The pedestrian crosswalk analysis is based on existing pedestrian crossing data and the MUTCD guidance criteria. Section 38.18 Crosswalk Markings recommended that the engineering study consider the number of travel lanes, distance to the closest signalized intersection, pedestrian volumes and delays, average daily traffic (ADT), and speed limit to determine crosswalk placement at uncontrolled intersections. As stated under the MUTCD section 9a all roadways where the speed limit exceeds 40mph at a four lane roadway with an ADT greater than 12,000 shall provide advanced yield lines. In addition, adequate visibility and proper signage were recommended to be installed per the MUTCD guidance criteria. Pedestrian delay is observed at N. Palm Canyon as it is classified as a Major thoroughfare. In addition the MUTCD recommends enhancing driver awareness of the pedestrian crossings; therefore this analysis provides specific sign placement recommendations and installation of flashing beacons to enhance pedestrian safety. As a result, recommended locations for two new protected pedestrian crosswalks are provided at the intersections of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Stevens Road and N. Palm Canyon Drive/ Via Las Palmas. Both proposed pedestrian crossings are located within 250 feet from their respective bus stops where the peak hour and ADT crossings were recorded to be the highest. Existing driveways, proper lighting and intersection curb features at the intersections of N. Palm Canyon Drive/Camino Monte Vista, N. Palm Canyon DriveNereda Norte and N. Palm Canyon DriveNereda Sur made it unsuitable to install bulb -outs. Bulb -outs were 1. 3 G \2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc necessary to help reduce the speed along N. Palm Canyon Drive due to the high 85'h-percentile speed of 48 mph. If the recommendations are implemented at least one crosswalk would be accessible for pedestrians every 1,050 feet or less from E Vista Chino to Tachevah Drive as shown in Exhibit 5. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Stevens Road The installation of a pedestrian crosswalk and bulb -outs are recommended at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road. Rectangular rapid -flashing beacons are recommended. Pavement markings and the recommended location of advance placement signs are shown in Exhibit 6. N. Palm Canyon Drive at Via Las Palmas The installation of a pedestrian crosswalk and bulb -outs are recommended at the intersection of N. Palm Canyon Drive and Via Las Palmas. Rectangular rapid -flashing beacons are recommended as well as the installation of a street light at the intersection's north-west corner. Pavement markings and the recommended location of advance placement signs are shown in Exhibit 7. Should you have any questions, please contact us at (951) 686-1070. Sincerely, ALBERTA. WEBB ASSOCIATES Nancy Velgara, EIT Assistant Engineer w , i Dilesh Sheth, P.E., T.E. Vice President No. 2112 G 120M16-01621Tmfr \ReportW. Palm Canyon Analysis.Coc 15 Attachments: Exhibit 1 - Existing Conditions & ADT Volume Exhibit 2 - Vehicle and Pedestrian Peak Hour Counts Exhibit 3 -12 Hour Pedestrian Volumes Exhibit 4 - Collision Data (2012-2015) Exhibit 5 - N. Palm Canyon Drive Proposed Improvements Exhibit 6 - N. Palm Canyon Drive & Stevens Road Proposed Improvements Exhibit 7 - N. Palm Canyon Drive & Via Las Palmas Proposed Improvements Sunline - Bus Stop Locations G \2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc ! G Exhibits G:\2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc 1 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE Existing Conditions & Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volume INTERSECTION No. EXISTING SIGNAL (1) NO PARKING! RED CURB EXISTING SIGN 1 STREET LIGHT N. PALM CANYON 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 48 MPH Fes` co 1" = 200' 20 1 60 o 2M 400 600 >: z m W.O. 16-0182 A L 9 E R T A. ENGMEUM MMLTAKM SHEEP RIVERSIOECA 92508 PH. (951) 686-1070 I A S S 0 C I A T E S FAX (951) 708-1256 OF 7 SHEEIs 4-- - xe•,,11�r It NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE Vehicle and Pedestrian Peak Hour Counts s� a� cUN ON DRIVE, 2 ' -x 3 vi 4 -s x { INTERSECTION No. /O EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING STREET LIGHT XS PEAK HOUR PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES -> PEAK HOUR VEHICLE VOLUMES -► N. PALM CANYON 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 48 MPH 225' 250' ,- . J. 3 — „ U 2 SY 2 " 4 1 C ,EXISTING STFEET LIGHT ice' 4_ �O jj xI 600' ff Fi a 5 5'N BUS w - 2 Ii4�h : 1 a8 �: 7 m o0 0 �vo.16-0182 A L R E R T A. E"EERW WMLTARTS SHEET 3788 MCCW STREET 'o 1" = 200' RNERSIDE CA 92506 o 200 100 0 200 400 600 A 5 5 9 c I A T E 5 PH. (951) 686-107 FAX (951) 788-1256 OF 7 SHEETS NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE 12 Hour Pedestrian Volumes 215' M1�,ii v, s3 - "!Weeusury 0 al 7e�O5 4 Iy.�.�..a5 3 INTERSECTION No. EXISTING SIGNAL 0 EXISTING SIGN 1 EXISTING STREET LIGHT PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES (12 HOUR)—� N. PALM CANYON 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 48 MPH 425' G00' 1 xlsnnC STRFFT IIOMT I.'.I WIF A L e E R T A. ENGINEERING CDMI.TAN6 3788 AcCRAY STREET 1" = 200' ; : RIVERSIDE CA ON PH. (951) 686-1070 200 10 200 4DD 6001ASS G C IATES FM (951) 788-1258 w.o. 16-0182 SHEET 3 OF 7 SHEETS INTERSECTION No. Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGN t �p\ REAR -END COLLISION,'/ LEFT TURN VIOLATION UNSAFE LANE CHANGE COLLISION INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN e DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE 8 N. PALM CANYON 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 48 MPH H NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE Collision Data (2012 -2015) A L B E R T A. 1- - 200- 2 2 0 400 6001 ASSOC] AT EA F Iw.o.16-0182 ENOWEERINO CONSULTAN75 SHEET ]]68 MCCRAY STREET I RNERSIDE CA 92506 PH. (951' 666-1070 FAX (951) 118 12" OF 7 SHEE7S NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE Proposed Improvements ii\2 SIGN LEGEND INTERSECTION No. i EXISTING SIGNAL © xtxt_ STOP ® ® AHEAD }�� r W16-7P(LT) W16-7P RT) W16-9P NO PARKING 1 RED CURB TOG5 (24"x12') (24"xl�") (24"x12") PROPOSEDSIGN 1 RI .9 Rt-i R1-6 EXISTING SIGN 1 (36"x36") (36"x36") W11-2 (12"x36") (36"x36") PROPOSED STREET LIGHT XX EXISTING STREET LIGHT * N. PALM CANYON 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED:48 MPH RRFB - RECTANGULAR RAPID -FLASH BEACON N N Iw.o. 16-0182 A L• E N T A. ENMEERW CONSULTANTS SHEET 1" = 200 'I Del RNER5EET 1 E C 9250fi PH. (951) 68A�ly6-1070 2 1 0 20 0 0 A E E o C i A T E S FAX (951) 788-1256 OF 7 SHEETS t- NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE & STEVENS ROAD Proposed Improvements 'Ia - qw Rl-1 � W11-2x2 SUN � W1G7P (RT)x2 RUS h K _AL � PROPOSED RRFB PROPOSED yxy CROSSWALK ROPOSED YIELD PAVEMENT MARKINGS JR1-5Z M / m 215' D O INTERSECTION No. NO PARKING / RED CURB R110 5 PROPOSED SIGN l (36"x36") EXISTING SIGN 1 EXISTING STREET LIGHT 3 C N. PALM CANYON 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 48 MPH RRFB - RECTANGULAR RAPID -FLASH BEACON N (40 2s' S' ,,, W16-9 P PROPOSED BULB-OUTI I PROPOSED YIELD PAVEMENT MARKINGS NORTH PALM CANYON DR STOP ® ® AHEAD W16-7P(LT) W16-7P(RT) W16-9P (24"xi2") (24"xl2") (24"x12") R1-1 (36"x36") W11-2 (36"x36") ALBERT A. 1" = 40 9 40 20 0 40 80 120 1 A sac I ATE s m Z l w.o. 16-0182 EKNEERIM CONWLTAH15 SHEEP 3788 MCCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) ]86-1]58 OF 7 SHEErS INTERSECTION No. 4) NO PARKING I RED CURB PROPOSED SIGN y EXISTING SIGN 1 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE & VIA LAS PALMAS Proposed Improvements SIGN LEGEND AHEAD El �tf W16-7P(LT) W16-7P(RT) W16-9P (24"x12") (24"x12") (24"x12") R1-5 Ri-1 (36"x36") (36"x36") W11-2 (36"x36") PROPOSED STREET LIGHT EXISTING STREET LIGHTi N. PALM CANYON 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 48 MPH RRFB - RECTANGULAR RAPID -FLASH BEACON w T` ,p 0 / Imo, m / ,wJ f R1-6 (12"x36") _{W W.O. 16-0182 A L 6 E• T A. FN6NFFRNG WMLTAHTS SHEET / 3788 MCCRAV STREET '0 RNERSIDE CA. 92506 ry A S S 0 C I A T E S FAX (951) ]88-1256 o OF 7 SHEETS I • � �1 n f �� �p � � w i �r .:�. E•Sievens-I ... .., _ _ o��� A'41 N 3 � • • � (l Y? m a'Si 0 I - �. _ o �!1 W .r a 11 g, one ..: ail r .. >,. , ., (; �, o .�r� :, ��` �� y S �! p Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheets G.\2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc 26 California N UTCD 2014 Edition (1HWA's MUTC'D 2009 Edition. including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 1 of 5) COUNT DATE 6/23/2016 8 Riv N/A CALC NV DATE 7/18/2016 DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE Major St North Palm Canyon Drive (N/S) Critical Approach Speed 48 mph Minor St Stevens Road (E/W) Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic, 40 mph m or 1 RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of c 10,000 population ❑ ❑ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED YES ® No (Condition A or Condition B or combination of A and B must be satisfied) Condition A - Minimum Vehicle Volume MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R I U I R APPROACH 1 LANES Both Approaches 500 350 Major Street (400) (280) Highest Approach 150 105 Minor Street (1201 (84) 2 or More 600 420 (4801 (336) 200 140 (160) (112) 100% SATISFIED YES ® NOD 80% SATISFIED YES ® NO EJ Page 841 F'4P eF o mF o QF o Fim• Q F• F. g F. Doom• o0 0 0 0 .. o p%°ooQ' o e' o� ° ado°• n° ° r;^ry°• �ti �; ° tiAo Py Hour 858 831 821 859 866 I803 837 800 38 44 48 41 25 I33 31 23 Ij Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES ® NO 121 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES ® NO ❑ (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R U I R om'm. mom o°oro . oQ QQ' oQ Q. oQQ. °Q QF APPROACH LANES 1 2or More °o° •. °�•o .o 000 0,0° oo° Hour Both ��• ^O' r.^r�• n^R'' nryw• ry �1•iy Pq• BOMajjor Soachet Street S (600) (4520) I (720) (504) 858 831 821 859 866 803 837 800 HIM nor Streetch (50) (42) I (80) 56) 38 44 48 41 25 33 31 23 Combination of Conditions A & B I REQUIREMENT TWO CONDITIONS SATISFIED 80% CONDITION A MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME AND, B INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC SATISFIED YES ® NO ♦ l FULFILLED I Yes ® No ❑ AND, AN ADEQUATE TRIAL OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT COULD CAUSE LESS DELAYAND INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC HAS FAILED Yes ® No TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS The satisfaction of a traffic Signal warrant or warrants Shall not In itself require the Installation of a traffic control signal Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 27 California NWTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTC'U 2009 Edition. including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 of 5) WARRANT 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED` YES ® NO 0 Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an2 or ave;r4l� day FFo R cF F/ APPROACH LANES One More �o;�ti ^rye rytiti��� Hour Both Approaches - Major Street ✓ 858 866 837 Higher Approach - Minor Street 38 25 31 'All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 (URBAN AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 OR, All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-2 (RURALAREAS) I Yes ® No 0 WARRANT 3 - Peak Hour SATISFIED YES ® NO El (Part A or Part B must be satisfied) PARTA SATISFIED YES ® NO f� (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods) 1 The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle -hours for a one -lane Yes ® No approach, or five vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach; AND ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2 The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds Yes ® No 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes, ACID ---------------------------------------------------------------- 3 The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph Yes ® No for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 2 or QF APPROACH LANES One More NIZ. our Both Approaches - Major Street I I -If 866 Higher Approach - Minor Street ✓ 1�25 The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (URBAN AREAS) I Yes ® No OR, The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4 (RURAL AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 Page 842 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal_ Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 23 California MUTCD 2014 Edition iPHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition. including Revisions I K 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 3 of 5) WARRANT 4 - Pedestrian Volume SATISFIED YES ® NO p (Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisfied) I , o FF 34 F. Part 1 (Parts A or B must be satisfi �000/oo' Q F. oosS Hours - - -> o' ^wA' ^�° A'-- A IVehicles per hour for 858 859 866 837 Figure 4C-5 or Figure 4C-6 any 4 hours SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Pedestrians per hour for 17 15 13 6 any 4 hours oQr Hours - - v g IVehicles per hour for S66 r r I Figure 4C-7 or Figure 4C-8 any 1 hour SATISFIED YES ® NO El Pedestnans per hour for 13 any 1 hour Part 2 SATISFIED YES El NO 13 AND, The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street Is greater yes No than 300 f 13 OR, The proposed traffic signal will not restnct progressive tragic flow along the major street. Yes ® No 0 WARRANT 5 - School Crossing Not Applicable SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ (Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PartA SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ Gap/Minutes and # of Children Hour Gaps I Minutes Children Using Crossing vs Minutes I Number of Adequate Gaps I Gaps <Minutes YES ❑ NO ❑ School Age Pedestrians Crossing SlreeU fir I AND Children � 20/hr YES ❑ NO ❑ AND, Consideration has been given to less restrictive remedial measures I Yes ❑ No ❑ Part B SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater I Yes El No ❑ than 300 It OR, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Yes ❑ No ❑ The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the Installation of a traffic control signal Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals Page 843 November 7, 2014 23 California MUTCD 2014 Edition f FHW'A's MUTC'D 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5) WARRANT 6 - Coordinated Signal System SATISFIED YES ® NO (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS I DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL > 1000 ft I N 650 ft, S 1,900 ft. E N/A ft, W NIA ft Yes ® NOE] On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platoomng — — . Yes ® No ER, On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation WARRANT 7 - Crash Experience Warrant SATISFIED YES ® NO M (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to Yes® NOE] reduce the crash frequency. REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period susceptible to correction by a traffic signal and involving injury Yes ® NOE] or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash - - _ 5 OR MORE REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS / Warrant 1, Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume ONE CONDITION 2, Warrant 1, Condition B- Yes® NoM SATISFIED 80% I Interruption of Continuous Traffic OR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition Ped Vol > 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8 WARRANT 8 - Roadway Network SATISFIED YES ® NO El (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES -ALL APPROACHES FULFILLED REQUIREMENTS During Typical Weekday Peak Hour 940 Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more 1000 Veh/Hr of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday — — — - - Yes[3 NoG OR During Each of Any 5 Hrs of a Sat or Sun Veh/Hr CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR ROUTEA ROUTER Hwy System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic ✓ ------------------------ Rural or Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City — Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan ✓ Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets Yes ® NOE] Page 844 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C—Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 —Highway Traffic Signals 30 California MUTCD 2014 Edition IFfIWA's MU FCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5) WARRANT 9 - Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Not Applicable YES ❑ NO ❑ (Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PART A Agrade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes ❑ No❑ center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach Track Center Line to Limit Line ft PART B There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing • During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 Major Street - Total of both approaches- VPH Minor Street - Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = VPH --—————————— ————————————————— — — — — — — Yes❑No❑ OR, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10 Major Street - Total of both approaches : VPH Minor Street - Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF) = VPH The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustment factors (AF) as described in Section 4C.10 1- Number of Rail Traffic per Dav Adjustment factor from table 4C-2 2- Percentage of High -Occupancy Buses on Minor Street Approach_ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3_ 3- Percentage of Tractor -Trailer Trucks on Minor Street Approach Adjustment factor from table 4C-4 NOTE: If no data is availale or known, then use AF = 1 (no adjustment) Page 845 Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 31 California WTCD 2014 Edition Page 841 (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 1 of 5) COUNT DAT" 6/23/2016 _ 8 Riv N/A CALC NV DATE 7/18/2016 DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE Major St North Palm Canyon Drive (N/S) Cntical Approach Speed 48 mph Minor St Camino Monte Vista (E/W1 Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 40 mph _ to or RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population . _ . ❑ ❑ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED YES ® NO El (Condition A or Condition B or combination of A and B must be satisfied) Condition A - Minimum Vehicle Volume 100% SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES ® NO EJ (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U R U R F' FtF• F�. �oy/. F' F' F' FF/ APPROACH 1 2 or More �o%���� d�a �� j •�o� F�000Q �ooQ� '46 Duo' w� wwry• wry o w' • ry• • a. o Hour LANES Both Approaches 500 350 600 420 839 804 807 866 870 785 822 787 ''tI Major Street (4500) (280) 1480) (336) I Highest so Mno AStreet ch f1201 (84) 60) (112) 24 33 27 39 �26 31 31 42 Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES ® NO M (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R U I R a F aF o mF o FF Q F e F FF' F�c. APPROACH 000'�' 0 0 0 0 .o oQ 000Q o�oQ oQQ• oQ LANES 1 2 or More �• g /o, o� w°' I(wo/wwti w ti e A w w ry 0 wti p'n�Io Hour Both Approaches 750 525 900 630 839 804 807 866 11170 785 822 17117Major Street (6001 (420)(720) (504)11I1 Highest Approach 75 53 100 70 24 33 27 39 26 31 31 42 Minor Street (60) (42) (80) 1 (56) Combination of Conditions A & B SATISFIED YES ® NO fl REQUIREMENT CONDITION / FULFILLED I A MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME TWO CONDITIONS Yes ® No SATISFIED 80% AND, B INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC AND, AN ADEQUATE TRIAL OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT COULD CAUSE LESS DELAY AND INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC HAS FAILED Yes ® No TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic Control signal Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals 3 V California NfUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 of 5) WARRANT 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED' YES ® NO 0 Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an av d F• F 2 oro000eF o°Q oQQ APPROACH LANES One More �%' ^.;ram ^�: �°ur Both Approaches - Major Street Lr 839 866 870 822 Higher Approach - Minor Street 24 39 26 31 `AII plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1. (URBAN AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 OR. All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-2 (RURAL AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 WARRANT 3 - Peak Hour SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (Part A or Part B must be satisfied) PART SATISFIED YES NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods) 1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle -hours for a one -lane Yes ® No approach, or five vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach, &UD ------------------------------------------------------------ 2 The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds Yes ® No 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes, = --------------------------------------------------------------- 3 The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph Yes ® No for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. PART B ccr SATISFIED YES ® NO oQ.F. 2 or oe APPROACH LANES One More ^K' Hour Both Approaches - Major Street 870 Higher Approach -Minor Street MV1*1 26 The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (URBAN AREAS) Yes ® No OR, The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4. (RURAL AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 Page 842 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal_ Chapter 4C —Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 33 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FI IWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 3 of 5) WARRANT 4 - Pedestrian Volume SATISFIED YES ® NO p (Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisfied) Part 1 (Parts A or B must be satisfi�a• 000Q .o Q 000C/ Hours - - -> moo° awn'• ^ry A� ry^i A Vehicles per hour for 866 870 822 Figure 4C-5 or Figure 4C-6 any 4 hours 1839 SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Pedestrians per hour for 8 1 6 1 any 4 hours QF' 0 / Hours --- > ^� B Ivehicles per hour for 870 I Figure 4C-7 or Figure 4C-8 any t hour SATISFIED YES 0 NO ll Pedestnans per hour for 6 any 1 hour Part 2 SATISFIED YES 0 NO AND, The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater Yes No than 300 ft OR, The proposed traffic signal will not restrict progressive traffic flow along the major street Yes i3 No 0 WARRANT 5 - School Crossing Not Applicable SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ (Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PartA SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ Gap/Minutes and # of Children Hour Gaps I Minutes Children Using Crossing vs Minutes I Number of Adequate Gaps Gaps < Minutes YES ❑ NO ❑ School Age Pedestrians Crossing Street! hr AND Children > 20/hr YES ❑ NO ❑ AND, Consideration has been given to less restrictive remedial measures I Yes ❑ No ❑ Part B SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater Yes El No Elthan 300 ft OR, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Yes ❑ No ❑ The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrantor warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Page 843 Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals 34 California MUTCD_'014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I d 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5) WARRANT 6 - Coordinated Signal System SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL >1000ft I N 1,110 It, S 1,450 ft E N/A ft, W N/A ft YesEJ No® On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predommantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning. — Yes ® Nod �, On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation. WARRANT 7 - Crash Experience Warrant (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to Yes® NoM reduce the crash frequency REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury Yes ® Nori _ _ --------------------------------------------------- or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash. 5 OR MORE i REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS / Warrant 1, Condition A - Mmimum Vehicular Volume ONE CONDITION Q& Warrant 1, Condition B - I Yes® NOE] SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic _QR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition Ped Vol ? 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8 WARRANT 8 - Roadway Network SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES -ALL APPROACHES REQUIREMENTS �/ FULFILLED During Typical Weekday Peak Hour 940 Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more 1000 Veh/Hr of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday — — — - - Yes® NoEJ OR During Each of Any 5 Hrs of a Sat or Sun Veh/Hr CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR ROUTE A ROUTE 6 Hwy System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic ----------------------- Rural or Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City — Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan ✓ Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets Yes[] NoE] The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Page 844 Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals 35 California MUPCD 2014 Edition (FI IWA's MU FCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I R 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5) WARRANT 9 - Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Not Applicable YES ❑ NO ❑ (Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PART A A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes ❑ NO[] center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach Track Center Line to Limit Line ft PART B There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 Major Street - Total of both approaches VPH Minor Street- Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection). VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = VPH ___________________________________ Yes❑ Non OR, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10. Major Street - Total of both approaches : VPH Minor Street - Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF) = VPH The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustment factors (AF) as described in Section 4C 10. 1- Number of Rail Traffic per Dav Adjustment factor from table 4C-2 2- Percentage of High -Occupancy Buses on Minor Street Approach_ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 3- Percentage of Tractor -Trailer Trucks on Minor Street Approach Adjustment factor from table 4C-4 NOTE If no data is availale or known, then use AF = 1 (no adjustment) Page 845 Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 39 California N4LITCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition. including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 1 of 5) COUNT DATF 6/23/2016 8 Riv N/A CALL NV DATE 7/1812016 DIST CO RTE PM CHK DAT9 Major St North Palm Canyon Drive (N/S) Critical Approach Speed 48 mph Minor St Vereda Norte (E[W) Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic , 40 mph m or RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of < 10 000 population _. _ ❑ ❑ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (Condition A or Condition B or combination of A and B must be satisfied) Page 841 Condition A - Minimum Vehicle Volume 100% SATISFIED YES ® NO E3 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS)I U I R U I R li r22 r4O r36 °QF.APPROACH o�1 2or More °. Hour LANES ohBoth Approaches 5003506004320829 861788819 790 Major Street (400)(280)(480)(336)Highest Approach 150 105 200 140 24 31 39 28 21 Minor Street (1201 (84) (160) (112) Condition B -interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES ® NO El MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES ® NO ®' (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R U I R �'P, . APPROACH 1 2or More o°o�° o�ooa °oo°° °o°Q oZ 4 0004, oQQ 000Q o��o www o w;y ° Hour LANES °�o• wok. wry Both Approaches MajorStreet 750 525 900630 (600) (420) (720) (504)Highest 829 795 814 878 861 788 819 0 [21 Approach 75 53 100 70 24 22 40 36 31 39 28 Minor Street (60) (42) (80) (56) Combination of Conditions A & B SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 REQUIREMENT CONDITION FULFILLED TWO CONDITIONS A MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% Yes [I No ElAND, B INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC AND, AN ADEQUATE TRIAL OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT COULD CAUSELESS DELAY AND INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC HAS FAILED Yes ® No ❑ TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4—Highway Traffic Signals 37 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (PHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions t & 2, an amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 of 5) WARRANT 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED* YES ® NO 0 Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an average day ic' r28 2 or�o°� ^wo°°,�ryHour APPROACH LANES One Mare o w`t' wBoth Approaches - Major Street I1129 878 861 HigherApproach - Minor Street ✓24 36 31 Page 842 "AII plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 (URBAN AREAS) I Yes 0 No 0 I OR, All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-2. (RURAL AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 WARRANT 3 - Peak Hour SATISFIED YES 0 NO 0 (Part A or Part 13 must be satisfied) PART A SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods) 1, The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle -hours for a one -lane Yes 0 No approach, or five vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach, AND -------------------- _ .___----------------------------------- 2 The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds yes ® No 100 vph for one moving Zane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes, ANQ 3 The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph Yes ® No for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches PART B F SATISFIED YES 0 NO El FoQ' 2 or 'sK" Hour APPROACH LANES Fv, One M36 MoreBoth Approaches - Malor Street 878 Higher Approach -Minor Street The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 ;URBAN AREAS) I Yes ® No OR, The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4. (RURAL AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 33 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 3 of 5) WARRANT 4 - Pedestrian Volume SATISFIED YES ® NO p (Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisfied) I f , FF. � F. �• Part 1 (Parts A or B must be satisfi@,y�m .000Q co Q' F�. Hours _ _ _> ��: wwry w`ti;oo w h •okF ry• o 9 A Vehicles per hour for 829 878 861 819 Figure 4C-5 or Figure 4C-6 any hours I) SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Pedestrians per hour for 6 2 3 2 any 4 hours o Q• Hours - --> my B Vehicles per hour for 878 Figure 4C-7 or Figure 4C-8 any 1 hour SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Pedestrians per hour for 2 any 1 hour Part 2 SATISFIED YES p NO AUQ, The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater Yes No than 300 ff QR, The proposed traffic signal will not restnct progressive traffic Flow along the major street Yes ® No 0 WARRANT 5 - School Crossing Not Applicable SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ (Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) Part A SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ Gap/Minutes and # of Children Hour Gaps I Minutes Children Using Crossing vs Minutes I Number of Adequate Gaps Gaps <Minutes YES ❑ NO ❑ School Age Pedestrians Crossing Street / hr AND Children > 20/hr YES ❑ NO ❑ AND, Consideration has been given to less restrictive remedial measures I Yes ❑ No ❑ Wrii_1 The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 it SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ OR, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Page 843 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal, Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 39 California NfUTCD 2014 Edition I FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5) WARRANT 6 - Coordinated Signal System SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS I DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL >1000ft I N 1,440 ft, S 1,110 fit, E NIA It, W N/A ft Yes No® On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of _vehicular platooning — — Yes ® NoEJ OR, On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of plalooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation WARRANT 7 - Crash Experience Warrant (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to Yes ® Noe reduce the crash frequency REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury Yes® Noe or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash --------------------------------------------------- 5 OR MORE REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS Warrant 1, Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume J ONE CONDITION QR, Warrant 1, Condition B- Yes® Noe SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic OR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition Ped Vol? 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8 WARRANT 8 - Roadway Network SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES REQUIREMENTS v' FULFILLED During Typical Weekday Peak Hour 940 Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more 1000 Veh/Hr _of Warrants 1, 2. and 3 during an average weekday — — — — _ — Yes® Noe OR During Each of Any 5 Hrs of a Sat or Sun Veh/Hr CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR ROUTE ROUTE Hwy System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic _ ✓ Rural or Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City ------------------------ Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan ✓ Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets Yes® NOE] Page 844 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals 40 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA-s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use to California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5) WARRANT 9 - Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Not Applicable YES ❑ NO ❑ (Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PART A A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes ❑ No[] center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach. Track Center Line to Limit Line ft PART B There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 Major Street - Total of both approaches VPH Minor Street - Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = VPH ----------------------------------- Yes ❑No❑ OR, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10 Major Street - Total of both approaches : VPH Minor Street - Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF) = VPH The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustment factors (AF) as described in Section 4C 10 1- Number of Rail Traffic per Dav Adjustment factor from table 4C-2 2- Percentage of High -Occupancy Buses on Minor Street Approach_ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 3- Percentage of TractorTrailerTrucks on Minor Street Approach Adjustment factor from table 4C -4 NOTE: If no data is availale or known, then use AF - 1 (no adjustment) Page 845 Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals 41 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (PHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 1 of 5) COUNT DATE 6/23/2016 8 Riv N/A CALc NV DATE 7/18/2016 DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE Major St North Palm Canyon Drive (N/S) Critical Approach Speed 48 mph Minor St Via Las Palmas (ENV) Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 40 mph . m or RURAL (R) In built up area of Isolated community of, 10,000 population._. ._ ❑ ❑ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (Condition A or Condition B or combination of A and B must be satisfied) Condition A - Minimum Vehicle Volume APPROACH LANES Both Approaches Major Street Highest Approach Minor Street MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R U I R F °o 1 2 or More .o°o o�w°. 100 (400) 350 (280) 600 (480) 420 (336) g15 808 83 150 105 200 140 27 I32 28 (120) (84) (160) (112) 100%SATISFIED YES ® NOW 80% SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Page S41 F' FF' F F�c• °� oF�P' Ft o% . °� I°h �/ wry '4 .° o...o Hour 1 1878 1860 1810 1813 1760 138 145 135 132 134 I Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES ® NO EJ 80% SATISFIED YES 13 NO El MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R U I R F F.F. FF. FF f; mQ. F• F' Ft • Fr F' F F' APPROACH °ma. oQ Q• Q. o°o o° p• o w• o oQ o°oQ o Q• oQQ' 0 0°0 0 0 LANES 1 2 or More 0 off• A^o• www• wwry .,'4� w;ti. rye, Oy Hour BoMajjorpStreete5 (600) (420) (720) (504) 815 808 831 878 1160 1110 1113 760 HIghest AStrreetch 27 32 28 38 45 35 32 34 Minor 160) (42) (80) (56) Combination of Conditions A & B SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 REQUIREMENT CONDITION J FULFILLED TWO CONDITIONS A MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME Yes ® No El SATISFIED 80% AND, B INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC AND, AN ADEQUATE TRIAL OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT COULD CAUSELESS DELAY AND INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC HAS FAILED Yes ® No f� TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrantor warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals A AO L. California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 of 5) WARRANT 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED" YES ® NO 0 Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an avegaige d�¢F a F F' pm•,�. pppa• oopQ Q. 'N, ^,ti ^�°p/our APPROACH LANES One More ^�^o Both Approaches - Major Street }' L 1815 831 878 1160 Higher Approach -Minor Street —111 27 28 38 45 "AII plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 (URBAN AREAS) Yes ® No 0 QE, All plotted points fall above the applicable curve In Figure 4C-2. (RURAL AREAS) Yes ® No EJ WARRANT 3 - Peak Hour SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (Part A or Part B must be satisfied) PART A SATISFIED YES ® NO El (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods) 1 The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle -hours for a one -lane Yes ® No approach, or five vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach, AND -------------------------------------------------- -___--.-- _ 2 The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds Yes ® No 0 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes, AND 3 The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph yes ® No for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. PART B APPROACH LANES Both Approaches - Major Street Higher Approach -Minor Street F' o QF 2 or One More ^oop Hour ^ti Lfl4f1388 SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3. (URBAN AREAS) Yes ® No 0 OR, The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4 (RURAL AREAS) Yes ® No 0 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Page 842 Chapter 4C-Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7. 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 43 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FIIWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 R 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 3 of 5) WARRANT 4 - Pedestrian Volume SATISFIED YES ® NO El (Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisfied) FF• oFF' ,F F Part 1 (Parts A or B must be satisfie' o p° oppQ F' pQ.F. opQ/ p• p woo w •.p Hours - - wry;p A Vehicles per hour for 831 878 860 Figure 4C-5 or Figure 4C-6 any4hours 1815 SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Pedestrians per hour for 7 2 3 4 any 4 hours 4P. p / Hours ---> ^ti B per hour for 878 ( Figure 4C-7 or Figure 4C-8 (Vehicles any 1 hour I SATISFIED YES ® NO El Pedestrians per hour for 3 any 1 hour Part 2 SATISFIED YES El NO 13 ANp, The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater I Yes NO than 300 f CLR, The proposed traffic signal will not restrict progressive traffic Flow along the major street 1 Yes ® NO 0 WARRANT 5 - School Crossing Not Applicable SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ (Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) Part A Gap/Minutes and # of Children SATISFIED YES El NO ❑ Hour Gaps I Minutes Children Using Crossing VS Minutes I Number of Adequate Gaps Gaps <Minutes YES NOD School Age Pedestnans Crossing Street 7 hr AND Children > 201hr YES ❑ NO ❑ AND, Consideration has been given to less restrictive remedial measures I Yes ❑ NO ❑ Part B SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater (yes El No ❑ than 300 f OR, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic Yes ❑ No ❑ The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrantor warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Page 843 Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals 44 California MUTCD 2014 Edition IFHWA's MI TTCD 2009 Edition. including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5) WARRANT 6 - Coordinated Signal System SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL > 1000 ft N 1,700 ft S 850 ft, E N/A ft, W N/A It Yes D Noo On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning — —. Yes ® NoD �, On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation WARRANT 7 - Crash Experience Warrant (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES D NO 0 Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to YesD NoD reduce the crash frequency. REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury Yes ® Nom _____________ _ _ or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash _ 5 OR MORE .---------------------------------, REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS J Warrant 1, Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume ONE CONDITION 10. Warrant 1, Condition 8 - YesD Noo SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic OR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition Ped Vol > 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8 WARRANT 8 - Roadway Network SATISFIED YES D NO D (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES FULFILLED REQUIREMENTS During Typical Weekday Peak Hour 1382 Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more 1000 Veh/Hr _of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday. — — — — — — YesD NoD OR During Each of Any 5 Hrs of a Sat or Sun Veh/Hr CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR ROUTEA ROUTEa Hwy System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic ✓ ------- Rural or Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City ----------------------- Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan ✓ Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets Yes D NoD Page 844 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 20 14 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals 45 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 845 (FHWA-s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5) WARRANT 9 - Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Not Applicable YES ❑ NO ❑ (Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PART A Agrade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes ❑ No[] center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the slop line or yield line on the approach Track Center Line to Limit Line If There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 Major Street - Total of both approaches VPH Minor Street - Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = VPH -----------------------------------Yes❑No❑ gB, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10 Major Street -Total of both approaches VPH Minor Street- Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection): VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF) = VPH The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustment factors (AF) as described in Section 4C 10 1- Number of Rail Traffic per Dav Adjustment factor from table 4C-2_ 2- Percentage of High -Occupancy Buses on Minor Street Approach_ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 3- Percentage of TractorTrailerTrucks on Minor StreetApproach Adjustment factor from table 4C4 NOTE If no data is availale or known, then use AF = 1 (no adjustment) Chapter 4C—Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 46 California NMTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 1 of 5) COUNT DATG 6/23/2016 8 Riv N/A CALc NV DATE 7/18/2016 DIST CO RTE PM CHK DATE Major St North Palm Canyon Drive (N/S) Cnucal Approach Speed 48 mph Minor St Vereda Sur (E/W) Critical Approach Speed 25 mph Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 40 mph m Of RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population.. .. ❑ ❑ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED YES ® NO ❑ (Condition A or Condition B or combination of A and B must be satisfied) Condition A - Minimum Vehicle Volume 100% SATISFIED YES ® NO El 80°/ SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Page 841 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ° (80%SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U R U R F ova•'°o'°• .SS 0APPROACH .o 0 o cLANES 1 2 or More ovo o^o. ^o^ ^ry O ,sti ,�.�6o po Hour Both Approaches 500 350 600420816 797 837 r25 851 806 798 757 Major SUeet (400) (28D)(480) (336)HighestApproach 15o 105 200 14020 25 39 21 32 23 16 Minor Street (120) (84) (160) 0121 Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES ® NO EJ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 (80%SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U I R U I R FF• F�F' ,� d' �e F. FF. FF, FF• F: APPROACH 1 2or More o'Dm oaoa• .coca• 000e oQQ• oQ Q• oQ Q oQ•e o o .o 0 0 o v/ o �� o•p �•p o o poo 00 Hour 0�, o�^o• wAry• wti. .t LANES .,A.�• wryer, a;y Both Approaches Major Street 750 525 900 630 (600) (420) (720) I (504) 816 797 837 878 851 806 7 798 57 HI hest�preroaet ch 20 25 39 25 21 32 23 16 M no (60) (42) (80J (56) I+ Combination of Conditions A & B SATISFIED YES ® NO M REQUIREMENT CONDITION FULFILLED A MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME TWO CONDITIONS80 Yes ® No El SATISFIED °k AND, B INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC AND, AN ADEQUATE TRIAL OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT COULD CAUSE LESS DELAYAND INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC HAS FAILED Yes ® No TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 47 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 of 5) WARRANT 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an aver" a' 2 or o�os APPROACH LANES One More e9 Both Approaches - Major Street 816 837 Higher Approach -Minor Street I20 39 SATISFIED` YES ® NO ID 878 1851 I25 I21 I `AII plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 (URBAN AREAS) I Yes 0 No 0 OR, All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-2 (RURALAREAS) I Yes ® No WARRANT 3 - Peak Hour SATISFIED YES ® NO (Part A or Part B must be satisfied) PART SATISFIED YES ® NO (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods) 1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle -hours for a one -lane Yes ® No approach, or five vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach; AND ---------------------------------------- 2 The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds yes ElNo 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes, AND 3 The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph Yes ® No for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches PART B F. SATISFIED YES ® NO 2 or n'D:o� APPROACH LANES One More N,'* Hour Both Approaches - Major Street I ✓ 1�25 878 Minor Higher Approach - Street The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3. (URBAN AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 OR, The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4. (RURAL AREAS) I Yes ® No 0 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Page 842 Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 43 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FIINA's MU 1C'D 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 3 of 5) WARRANT 4 - Pedestrian Volume (Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisfied) Part 1 (Parts A or B must he Hours - --> A I Vehicles per hour for I`I any 4 hours Pedestrians per hour for any 4 hours Hours - - -> B IVehicles per hour for any 1 hour Pedestrians per hour for any 1 hour aF o QF oo F � �Do wry.OpQ 816 837 878 851 8 5 7 3 wti 878 7 SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Figure 4C-5 or Figure 4C-6 SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Figure 4C-7 or Figure 4C-8 SATISFIED YES ® NO 0 Part 2 SATISFIED YES 0 NO 13 AND, The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street Is greater Yes No than 300 ff OR, The proposed traffic signal will not restrict progressive tragic flow along the major street Yes ® No ®' WARRANT 5 - School Crossing Not Applicable SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ (Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PartA SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ Gap/Minutes and # of Children Hour Gaps I Minutes Children Using Crossing I s Minutes Number of Adequate Gaps Gaps <minutes YES El NO [I School Age Pedestrians Crossing Street 1 hr AND Children > 201hr YES ❑ NO ❑ AND, Consideration has been given to less restrictive remedial measures Part B The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 it Page 843 Yes ❑ No ❑ I SATISFIED YES ❑ NO ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ QE, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic I Yes ❑ No ❑ The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal Chapter 4C—Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7. 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals 49 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-10I (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5) WARRANT 6 - Coordinated Signal System SATISFIED YES D NO 0 (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS I DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL > 1000 ft I N 1,950 ft, S 625 R, E N/A ft, W N/A ft Yes [3 No E] On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular P12tooning _ -- YesD Noo OR, On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation WARRANT 7 - Crash Experience Warrant SATISFIED YES D NO EJ (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to Yes ® NOE] reduce the crash frequency. REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury Yes ® NGO - - or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash -------------------------------------------------- 5 OR MORE REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS Warrant 1, Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume ONE CONDITION I OR, Warrant 1, Condition B- Yes® No El SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic OR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition Ped Vol? 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8 WARRANT 8 - Roadway Network SATISFIED YES D NO D (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES FULFILLED REQUIREMENTS During Typical Weekday Peak Hour 935 Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more 1000 Veh/Hr _of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday. - - - - - — YesD Noo OR During Each of Any 5 Hrs of a Sat or Sun Veh/Hr CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR ROUTE A ROUTE B Hwy System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic ✓ ------------ Rural or _Suburban_ Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a_Cry- Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan ✓ Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets Yes[] NOO Page 844 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals November 7. 2014 50 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUfCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5) WARRANT 9 - Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Not Applicable YES ❑ NO ❑ (Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) PART A A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes ❑ No ❑ center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach Track Center Line to Limit Line It There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 Major Street - Total of both approaches. VPH Minor Street - Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = VPH — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Yes[] No❑ 211, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10 Major Street - Total of both approaches : VPH Minor Street - Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2. 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF) = VPH The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustment factors (AF) as described in Section 4C 10. 1- Number of Rail Traffic per Dav Adjustment factor from table 4C-2_ 2- Percentage of High -Occupancy Buses on Minor Street Approach_ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 3- Percentage of Tractor -Trailer Trucks on Minor StreetApproach Adjustment factor from table 4C-4 NOTE If no data is availale or known, then use AF = 1 (no adjustmentj Page 845 Chapter 4C — Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7, 2014 Part 4 — Highway Traffic Signals J q Existing Traffic Counts June 23, 2016 G \2016\16-0182\Traffic\Report\N. Palm Canyon Analysis.doc 52 Exhibit 1 - 12 Hour Intersection Volume Counts --lours Vehicle Pe.. Bike Total Counts CountIIpr •Volum- 1:00 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 7:00 443 19 1 463 8:00 800 14 2 816 9:00 858 16 1 875 10:00 831 6 0 837 11:00 821 7 0 828 12:00 859 15 0 874 13:00 866 11 2 879 14:00 803 14 0 817 15:00 837 5 1 843 16:00 753 20 0 773 17:00 800 18 1 819 18:00 795 14 0 809 19:00 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 44 44 22:00 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0:00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 9466 159 52 9677 Vehicle • . Bike Total Counts Count Count Volume� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 7 3 31 37 4 10 51 46 7 7 60 40 12 2 54 52 8 2 62 43 6 1 50 35 2 3 40 42 6 2 50 52 1 2 55 59 4 1 64 39 1 3 43 41 1 4 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 507 59 40 606 53 Exhibit 2 - 12 Hour Intersection Volume Counts Hours.. Count Count V+P+B VolumeCounts 1:00 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 7:00 417 4 3 424 8:00 784 13 5 802 9:00 839 7 6 852 10:00 804 3 0 807 11:00 807 3 1 811 12:00 866 3 0 869 13:00 870 3 1 874 14:00 785 3 0 788 15:00 822 1 1 824 16:00 739 2 1 742 17:00 787 0 0 787 18:00 777 0 2 779 19:00 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0:00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 9297 42 20 9359 Vehicle Bike Total Counts .. V- � Volu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 1 16 22 1 1 24 16 8 2 26 25 9 2 36 24 3 0 27 38 1 1 40 20 6 2 28 27 4 2 33 30 1 1 32 33 1 1 35 42 0 0 42 32 2 1 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 319 41 14 374 54 Exhibit 3 - 12 Hour Intersection Volume Counts Hours..Total Counts Count Count V+P+B Counts Count Count V+P+B Volume Volume 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 395 14 0 409 3 4 4 11 8:00 751 19 0 770 14 4 8 26 9:00 829 19 0 848 24 2 8 34 10:00 795 8 1 804 25 1 0 26 11:00 814 12 0 826 43 0 3 46 12:00 878 13 0 891 35 4 0 39 13:00 861 11 1 873 32 1 4 37 14:00 788 21 1 810 38 1 3 42 15:00 819 9 0 828 27 0 3 30 16:00 745 11 0 756 26 0 0 26 17:00 790 7 0 797 24 0 2 26 18:00 774 10 0 784 14 0 3 17 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 9239 154 3 9396 305 17 38 360 55 Exhibit 4 - 12 Hour Intersection Volume Counts Hours Vehicle • . Bike Total Counts Count Count V+P+B Volume 1:00 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 7:00 386 15 0 401 8:00 728 16 1 745 9:00 815 23 0 838 10:00 808 8 0 816 11:00 831 10 0 841 12:00 878 12 0 890 13:00 860 8 0 868 14:00 810 15 0 825 15:00 813 8 1 822 16:00 745 5 0 750 17:00 760 6 0 766 18:00 755 9 1 765 19:00 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 _ 0 0 0 0:00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 9189 135 3 9327 Vehicle Ped. Bike Total Counts .. V - Volume- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 6 17 18 1 7 26 25 2 8 35 29 6 1 36 28 1 3 32 38 3 1 42 47 3 3 53 29 8 3 40 35 0 3 38 15 0 0 15 36 1 2 39 13 3 4 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 320 32 41 393 56 Exhibit 5 - 12 Hour Intersection Volume Counts Hours Vehicle -. Bike Total Counts Count Count V+P+B Volume 1:00 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 7:00 372 8 0 380 8:00 718 12 0 730 9:00 816 13 0 829 10:00 797 9 0 806 11:00 837 4 1 842 12:00 878 3 0 881 13:00 851 5 0 856 14:00 806 4 2 812 15:00 798 9 0 807 16:00 746 5 0 751 17:00 757 2 0 759 18:00 738 5 0 743 19:00 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0:00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 9114 79 3 9196 Vehicle Ped. Bike Total Count Count Volu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 6 17 20 2 8 30 23 2 8 33 32 0 2 34 50 8 2 60 34 7 1 42 39 2 2 43 44 2 2 48 42 3 2 47 35 5 1 41 22 0 2 24 31 5 14 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 382 37 50 469 57 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 26M268 City of Palm Springs NIS: N Palm Springs Canyon Road EM Stevens Road Weather: Clear File Name : PLSPAST 12 Site Code Start Date 6/2312016 Page No 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume _ N Palm Springs Canyon Stevens Road N Palm Springs Canyon Stevens Road Roadhbo Westbound ad Eastbound So d NoR bound Start Time Left Thru Right ADO Tmai Left Thru I Right I ADO Tmai Left', Thru Right ADD T.01 Left � Thru I Right I AID Total Int Total 06 00 AM 3 58 0 61 0 0 1 1 2 17 1 20 1 0 3 4 86 06 15 AM 3 56 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 77 06 30 AM 5 81 1 87 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 19 i 0 1 4 5 111 06.45 AM 14 140 3 157 0 3 2 5 1 21 0 22 1 1 4 6 190 Total i 25 335 4 364 0 3 3 6 4 74 1 79 2 2 11 15 464 07.00 AM 6 111 2 119 0 1 3 4 2 39 2 43 2 0 3 5 171 07:15 AM 6 135 3 144 0 1 1 2 3 33 0 36 3 0 2 5 187 07:30 AM 8 145 3 156 0 0 2 2 3 48 0 51 0 1 5 6 215 07*45 AM 11 184 3 198 1 0 2 3 6 46 1 _ _ 53 - _ _ 0 _ 1 9 10 264 Total 31 575 11 617 1 2 8 111 14 166 3 183 5 2 19 26 837 08 00 AM 10 155 3 168 0 1 3 4 1 6 36 0 42 3 1 2 6 220 08 15 AM 7 122 5 134 0 3 0 3 4 67 0 71 2 0 10 12 220 08 30 AM 6 153 1 160 0 3 0 3 5 52 1 58 0 0 6 6 227 08 45 AM 10 143 3 156 0 0 3 3 3 66 0 69 1 1 7 9 237 Total 33 573 12 618 0 7 6 13 18 221 1 240 6 2 25 33 904 09 00 AM 4 151 2 157 0 2 0 2 5 78 1 84 0 2 4 6 249 09.15 AM 5 120 2 127 0 1 2 3 4 69 2 75 2 2 4 8 213 09 30 AM 2 131 4 137 0 0 3 3 2 56 0 58 0 0 8 8 206 09:45 AM 6 119 4 129 0 0 1 1 6 58 0 64 2 0 7 9 203 Totals 17 521 12 550 0 3 6 9, 17 261 3 281 4 4 23 31 871 10:00 AM 2 110 5 117 1 0 2 3 3 81 1 85 5 4 6 15 220 10:15 AM 3 115 3 121 0 2 2 4 5 84 1 90 3 0 6 9 224 10 30 AM 3 117 6 126 0 1 1 2 0 74 0 74 3 2 1 6 208 10 45 AM 6 126 0 132 1 0 2 3 7 68 1 76 1 1 8 10 221 Total 14 468 14 496 2 3 7 12 15 307 3 325 12 7 21 40 873 11'00 AM 0 124 3 127 1 0 1 2 8 62 0 70 3 0 5 8 207 11 15 AM 6 127 4 137 0 0 1 1 2 92 2 96 2 1 3 6 240 11 30 AM 5 115 1 121 0 1 3 4 1 91 0 92 3 1 4 8 225 11:45 AM 4 112 2 118 1 0 0 1 6 92 0 98 1 0 12 13 230 Total 15 478 10 503 2 1 5 8 17 337 2 356 9 2 24 35 902 12.00 PM 3 115 0 118 1 0 7 8 3 113 1 117 1 0 1 2 245 12 15 PM 1 104 2 107 0 0 0 0 3 91 1 95 0 2 7 9 211 12 30 PM 4 135 2 141 0 0 1 1 3 65 1 69 1 2 3 6 217 12 45 PM 1 132 2 135 0 2 2 4 4 79 1 84 1 1 3 _5_ 228 Total 9 486 6 501 1 2 10 13 13 348 4 365 3 5 14 22 901 01.00 PM 1 3 129 3 135 0 1 3 4 5 77 0 82 2 1 4 7 228 01.15 PM 3 109 2 114 0 1 2 3 1 68 0 69 2 0 7 9 195 01:30 PM 6 118 3 127 0 0 4 4 4 72 1 77 3 0 1 4 212 01:45 PM 5 117 5 127 0 1 4 5 3 68 1 72 1 2 3 6 210 Total 17 473 13 503 0 3 13 16 I 13 285 2 300 8 3 15 26 845 02 00 PM 4 115 5 124 0 2 2 4 5 92 0 97 1 0 4 5 1 230 02.15 PM 3 109 2 114 1 0 3 4 1 0 80 0 80 0 0 2 2 200 02 30 PM 3 109 2 114 0 3 7 10 3 85 0 88 4 2 7 13 225 02 45 PM 6 116 0 122 0 1 4 5 3 95 0 98 4 3 2 9 234 Total 16 449 9 474 1 6 16 23 11 352 0 363 9 5 15 29 889 03:00 PM 6 115 6 127 2 2 3 7 4 86 0 90 1 2 5 8 232 03:15 PM 3 87 1 91 2 1 2 5 2 80 1 83 1 2 5 8 187 03:30 PM 2 91 1 94 0 0 1 1 3 82 1 86 4 2 4 10 191 03 45 PM 3 102 1 106 1 3 10 14 4 71 1 76 0 0 6 6 202 Total 14 395 9 418 5 6 16 27 13 319 3 335I 6 6 20 32 812 53 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Palm Springs N/SN Palm Springs Canyon Road ENV: Stevens Road Weather: Clear File Name . PLSPAST 12 Site Code Start Date : 6/23/2016 Page No : 2 —_ _ Groups Printed- Total Volume N Palm Springs Canyon Stevens Road N Palm Springs Canyon Stevens Road Road ad Soh bound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Riohl ADD Tmai Left Thru Right ADD Total Left Thru Roht ADD Tani Left Thru Rioht ADD Taxi Int Total 04'00 PM 3 94 2 99 2 1 3 6 4 106 0 110 3 0 4 7 222 04.15 PM 1 96 1 98 3 0 1 4 5 86 0 91 0 1 1 2 195 04.30 PM 2 102 1 105 0 1 5 6 3 96 1 100 1 1 2 4 215 04'45 PM 5 98 2 105 0 1 3 4 3 89 0 92 1 2 3 6 207 Total 11 390 6 407 5 3 12 20 15 377 1 393 5 4 10 19 i 839 05:00 PM 3 108 2 113 1 0 6 7 6 114 1 121 1 2 1 4 245 05 15 PM 2 110 1 113 1 2 3 6 1 110 0 111 1 0 4 5 235 05:30 PM 1 96 3 100 1 2 5 8 5 74 0 79 0 0 4 4 191 05 45 PM 2 87 1 90 1 0 0 1 5 63 0 68 1 1 4 6 165 Total 8 401 7 416 4 4 14 22 17 361 1 379 3 3 13 19 836 Grand Total 210 5544 113 5867 21 43 ll6 1110 167 3408 24 3599 72 45 210 321 9973 Apprch°/ 36 94.5 19 11.7 23.9 54.4 4.6 94.7 0.7 22 13.8 64.2 Total % 2.1 55.6 1 1 588 02 0.4 1.2 1.8 1 7 342 0.2 361 0 7 0.5 21 3.3 N Palm Springs Canyon Stevens Road N Palm Springs Canyon Stevens Road Road Westbound Road Eastbound Souhbound Northbound _ _ Start Time Left_I Thru', Right I ApLeft Thru [ Rioht ADD Total Left Thru I Right ADD Taai Left Thru I rtiaht I ADD T.1 Int Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:15 AM 11 15 AM 6 127 4 137 0 0 1 1 2 92 2 96 2 1 3 6 240 11 30 AM 5 115 1 121 0 1 3 4 1 91 0 92 3 1 4 8 225 11 45 AM 4 112 2 118 1 0 0 1 6 92 0 98 1 0 12 13 230 12 00 PM 3 115 0 118 1 0 7 8 3 113 1 117 1 0 1 2 245 Total Volume 18 469 7 494 2 1 11 14 12 388 3 403 7 2 20 29 940 D/ Apo Total 36 94.9 1 4 143 7.1 78.6 3 96.3 07 i 24.1 6.9 69 PHF__.750 .923 438 901 .500 .250 .393 .438 500 .858 375 8611 .583 500 .417 .558 959 59 City of Palm Springs NIS: N Palm Springs Canyon Road E/W: Stevens Road Weather: Clear Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268£268 N Palm Springs Canyon Road Out - in _Total 6800 I 4691 181 Right Thru Lelft T L-. Peak Hour Data AQ r mJ r~ � North a n N 2—� Peak Hour Begins at 11 15 Al of Total Volume ✓I� O tt + T r' Left Thal Riah1 1 121 3881 1 31 4gi-I 8941 Out In Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06.00 AM to 05.45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for_Each Approach -Begins at: File Name : PLSPAST 12 Site Code Start Date : 6/2312016 Page No :3 0715 AM 0345 PM 0430 PM 0930 AM +0 mins 6 135 3 144 1 3 10 14 : 3 96 1 10D 0 0 8 8 +15 mins 8 145 3 156 2 1 3 6 3 89 0 1 92 1 2 0 7 9 +30 mins. 11 184 3 198 3 0 1 4' 6 114 1 121 5 4 6 15 +45 mins. 10 155 3 168 0 1 5 6 1 1111 0 111 3 0 6 9 Total Volume 35 619 12 666 6 5 19 30 13 409 2 424 10 4 27 41 % Alto Total 5.3 929 1.8 20 167 63.3 31 965 05 24.4 9.8 65.9 PHF 795 841 1.000 .841 500 .417 475 536 .542 897 .500 .876 .500 .250 .844 .683 Location Palm Springs N/5 N Palm Canyon Road E/W Stevens Road PEDESTRIANS Data 718/2015 Weather n4a, North Leg East Leg somh Leg West Leg Time N Palm Canyon Road Stevens Road IN Canyon Road Stevens Road TOTAL 600 AM 0 2 1 5 B 615 AM 0 1 3 1 5 630 AM 0 1 0 1 645 AM 0 1 3 2 11 J 00 AM 0 1 0 4 5 J 15 AM 0 1 0 U 1 I 730 AM 0 5 4 1 10 I J 45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 I 800 AM 2 3 1 5 11 I 815 AM 2 2 1 2 J I 830 AM n 1 i 3 5 I 845 AM 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 I 900 AM 0 I _ I 2 0 4 I 915 AM 0 I 0 I J I 3 10 I 930 AM 0 I 1 I 2 I 0 3 I 945 AM 0 I 0 I 1 I 0 1 I 1000 AM 0 I 1 I 1 I 0 2 1015 AM 0 0 I 1 I 2 3 30 30 AM 0 1 1 I 0 I 1 2 1045 AM 0 I 1 I 6 I 1 I 8 1100 AM 0 I 2' I 1 I J 1115 AM 0 I 1 I 1 I 4 I 6 1130 AM 0 I 0 I 1 I2 3 1145 AM 0 I 2 I 0 I 3 I 5 I 1200 PM 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1215 PM 0 1 L I 0 I 4 1 4 I 1230 PM 0 I C I 1 I _ 1 3 I 1245 PM I 0 1 0 I 1 1 4 I 5 I 100 PM I 0 I U I 2 I 3 I 5 I 115 PM I 0 I 2 I 2 I 1 I 5 I 130 PM I 0 I 0 0 I 4 I 4 I 145 PM I 0 I 0 2 I 4 I 6 I 200 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 215 PM I 0 I 0 I C I 1 I 1 I 230 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I _ I 3 1 245 PM I U I 1 I 1 1 C 300PM I 0 I 4 I 4 I 10 18 315 PM 1 0 , 0 I 0 I 2 I 330 PM 1 0 I 1 I 0 I 2 I 3 345 PM I 0 I 0 1 0 I 1 I 1 400 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 5 I 5 415 PM I 0 I1.I 1 I 5 I J I 430 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 I 445 PM I 0 I 1 I 0 I 5 I 6 I 500 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 3 I 3 I 515 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 4 I 4 I 530 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 5 I 5 I 545 PM I 0 I 0 I 1 I 2 I 3 TOTAL VOLUMES I 4 I 42 55 I 117 I 219 I Counts unLmned. Ina PO Box 1178 Corona. CA 92828 951-268 6268 Location Palm Springs N/SN Palm Canyon Road E/W Stevens Road Time 60DAM 615 AM 6 30 AM 6'45 AM 2:00 AM 215 AM 230 AM 2.45 AM 800 AM 8 15 AM 8 30 AM 845 AM 900AM 915 AM 930 AM 945 AM 1000 AM 10 15 AM 10 30 AM 1045 AM 1100 AM 1115 AM 1130 AM 1145 AM 12.00 PM 1215 PM 12 30 PM 12 45 PM 100 PM 1'15 PM 1 30 PM 145 PM 2 00 PM 2 15 PM 2 30 PM 2 4S PM 300 PM 315 PM 330 PM 3 45 PM 400 PM 415 PM 430 PM 445 PM 500 PM 515 PM 530 PM 545 PM TOTAL VOLUMES North Leg N Palm Canyon Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 L 0 J n C a 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 1 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 1 0 BICYCLES East Leg Stevens Road 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 b 0 0 2 0 D 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 n 1 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 10 South Leg N Palm Canyon Road 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 J 0 1 C 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 c J a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 n 0 West Leg Stevens Road 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 1 0 z 30 Date 6/23/2016 Weather Clear TOTAL 0 1 1 2 5 2 4 1 1 1 3 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 0 D 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 48 Courts Jrhmrted, Inc PC Be. 1128 Corona, CA 92878 951-26B 6268 q Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Palm Springs File Name : PLSPAEL 12 N/S: N Palm Springs Canyon Road Site Code : E1W: E Camino Monte Vista Start Date : 6/23/2016 Weather: Clear Page No :1 Grouos Printed- Total Volume N Palm Springs Canyon Road E Camino Monte Vista N Palm Springs Canyon Road Southbound _ _ Westbound Northbound Start Time LeftI Thru Aoo Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right Aoo. Total Int. Total 06:00 AM 6 52 58 0 3 3 19 0 19 80 06:15 AM 8 48 56 0 1 1 15 0 15 72 06:30 AM 8 76 84 0 2 2 17 0 17: 103 O6'45 AM 17 131 146 _ 1 3 4 19 1 20 172 Total 39 307 346 1 9 10 70 1 71 427 07.00 AM 6 109 115 1 3 4 43 2 45 164 07:15 AM 6 129 135 3 1 4 34 1 35 174 0730 AM 10 145 155 0 7 7 47 2 49 211 0745 AM 12 191 _ _ 203 1 3 4 7 44 3 47 257 Totals 34 574 608 7 _ 15 22 168 8 176 806 08:00 AM 7 152 159 1 2 3 39 2 41 203 08:15 AM 6 132 1311 2 4 6 67 1 68 212 08:30 AM 6 150 156 1 3 4 54 0 54 214 08:45 AM 1 150 151 1 2 3 69 3 72 226 Total 20 584 604 5 11 16' 229 6 235 855 09:00 AM 5 143 148 4 3 7 78 0 78 233 09:15 AM 1 123 124 4 2 6 66 0 68 196 09:30 AM 5 138 143 2 2 4 53 1 541 201 09:46 AM 6 119 125 6 2 8 62 2 64 197 Total) 17 523 540 16 9 25 261 3 264 829 10.00 AM 3 114 117 3 3 6 75 4 79 202 10.15 AM 3 119 122 2 4 6 84 1 85 213 10:30 AM 5 111 116 5 1 6 75 1 76 198 10,45 AM _ 3 135 138 2 4 6 73 1 74 218 Total 14 479 493 12 12 24 307 7 314 _ 831 11:00 AM 5 132 137 1 4 5 61 3 64 206 11:15 AM 4 130 134 14 9 23 85 5 90 247 11:30 AM 1 122 123 7 3 10 95 2 97 230 11:45 AM 0 119 _ 119 I 0 0 0 102 0 102 221 Total 10 503 513 22 16 38 343 10 353, 904 12:00 PM 1 117 118 4 2 6 111 6 117 241 12:15 PM 4 112 116 3 4 7 87 0 87 210 12:30 PM 2 139 141 2 2 4 66 2 68 213 12:46 PM 2 138 140 3 0 3_ 83 0 83 226 Total 9 506 515 12 8 _ 20 347 8 355 890 01:00 PM 5 133 136 2 6 8 77 1 78 224 01:15 PM 3 114 117 3 3 6 67 3 70 193 0130 PM 1 115 116 2 3 5 73 2 75 196 01'45 PM 1 115 116 5 3_ 8 72 3 75 199 Total 10 477 487 12 _ 15 271 289 9 298 812 02'00 PM 0 119 119 1 3 3 6 93 2 95 220 02 15 PM 2 116 118 2 2 4 77 3 80 202 02:30 PM 2 115 117 5 5 10 83 1 84 211 02:45 PM 3 116 119 2 8 10 90 0 90 219 Total 7 466 473 12 18 30 343 6 349 852 03:00 PM 1 123 124 4 6 10 81 4 85 219 03:15 PM 2 91 93 0 6 6 77 3 80 179 03:30 PM 0 106 106 3 4 7 88 2 90 203 03:45 PM 1 1 98 99 3 7 10 60 2 62 171 Total 1 4 418 4221 10 23 33 306 11 317 772 63 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Palm Springs File Name : PLSPAEL 12 N/SN Palm Springs Canyon Road Site Code : EM- E Camino Monte Vista Start Date : 6/23/2016 Weather, Clear Page No :2 3rouos Printed- Total Volume N Palm Springs Canyon Road E Camino Monte Vista N Palm Springs Canyon Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Left I Thru I ADD. Total Left Riahl ADD. Total Thru Right ADD. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 1 100 101 4 10 14 97 3 100 215 04'15 PM 1 0 103 103 3 4 7 87 3 90 200 04'30 PM 2 105 107 0 12 12 88 1 89 208 04.45 PM 1 105 106 0 9 9 90 1 91 206 Total 4 413 417 7 35 42 362 8 370 829 05'00 PM 3 120 123 0 13 13 109 0 109 245 05'15 PM 0 117 117 0 9 9 100 0 100 226 05.30 PM 2 99 101 1 7 8 70 0 70 179 05:4.5 PM 1 91 92 0 2 2 63 2 65 159 Totals 6 427 433 1 31 32 342 2 344 809 Grand Total 174 5677 5851 117 202 319 3367 79 3446 9616 Apprch °% 3 97 36.7 63.3 97.7 2.3 Total % 1.8 59 60.8 1.2 2 1 3.3 35 0.8 35.8 N Palm Springs Canyon Road E Camino Monte Vista N Palm Springs Canyon Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Left I Left I Right I ADD. Total Thru Right I ADD. Total Int. Total 1 Peak Hour Analysis From 06.00 AM to 05.45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:15 AM 11:15 AM 4 130 134 14 9 23 85 5 90 247 11.30 AM 1 122 123 7 3 10 95 2 97 230 11'45 AM 0 119 119 0 0 0 102 0 102 221 12.00 PM 1 117 118 4 2 6 111 6 117 241 Total Volume 6 488 494 25 14 39 393 13 406 939 %ADo. Total 12 988 641 35.9 96.8 3.2 PHF .375 .938 .922 .446 389 .424 .885 .542 .868 .950 64 City of Palm Springs N/S: N Palm Springs Canyon Road ENV: E Camino Monte Vista Weather: Clear Peak Hour Analysis From 06 00 AM to 05 45 PM Peak Hour for Each ADDroach Beains at: 07.45 AM +0 mins. 12 191 +15 mins. 7 152 +30 mins. 6 132 +45 mins. 6 150 Total Volume 31 625 % ADD Total 47 953 PHF 646 818 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 N Palm Spnngs Canyon Road Out In Total 1 407494 488 Thru Left Peak Hour Data o North Peak Hour Begins at 11 15 AM Total Volume Thou Right 393 13 F1 4061 �� 9 Out In Total Peak 1 of 1 File Name . PLSPAEL 12 Site Code Start Date : 6/23/2016 Page No : 3 10:45 AM 11.15 AM 203 2 4 6 85 5 90 159 1 4 5 95 2 97 138 14 9 23 102 0 102 156 7 3 10 111 6 117 656 24 20 44 393 13 406 545 45.5 96.8 3.2 .808 .429 556 478 885 542 .8681 65 Location Palm Springs N/5 N Palm Canyon Road E/W El Camino Monte Vista Date 6/23/2016 Weather Clear PEDESTRIANS North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Time N Palm Canyon Road El Cammo Monte Vista N Palm Canyon Road El Camino Monte Vista TOTAL 600 AM 1 1 0 0 2 615 AM 2 1 0 0 3 630 AM 0 1 0 0 1 645AM 2 1 0 0 3 200 AM 0 2 0 0 2 215 AM 0 _ 0 0 3 730AM 1 5 0 0 6 745 AM 0 3 0 0 3 800 AM 0 C 0 0 0 815 AM 0 3 0 0 3 830 AM 1 _ 0 0 3 845 AM J 2 0 1 9 900 AM 4 0 0 0 4 915 AM 0 u 0 0 0 930 AM 4 1 0 0 5 945 AM 0 _ 1 0 3 1000 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1015 AM Ii 2 0 0 3 1030 AM I L 0 0 0 0 1045 AM I _ I 1 0 0 3 1100 AM I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 1115 AM I 1 I 2 I 0 I 0 3 1130 AM I 0 I 1 1 0 1 0 1 1145 AM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 1200 PM I 3 I 1 I 0 I 0 4 1215 PM I 1 I 2 I n I 0 3 1230 PM I u I 0 I 0 I 0 0 12 AS PM I I 0 I 0 I 0 I 2 100PM 1 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 115 PM I 1 I 1 I 0 0 I 2 130 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 145 PM I 3 I 2 I 0 I 0 I 5 200 PM I 1 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 215 PM 1 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 230 PM I 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 245 PM I 0 I 1 0 1 0 1 1 300 PM I 1 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 2 315 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 330 PM 1 0 1 1 I 0 1 0 1 1 345 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 400 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 415 PM 1 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 430 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 445 PM 1 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 500 PM I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 515 PM I 1 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 530 PM 1 1 1 0 0 I 0 I 1 545 PM I L I 0 0 I 0 I 0 TOTAL VOLUMES I 40 I 42 1 0 1 83 41 6 Counts Jollmri Inc PO Boa 1128 Corona, CA 92828 951-268-6268 Loca0on Palm Springs N/5 N Palm Canyon Road E/W El Camino Monte Vista Time 600 AM 615 AM 630 AM 645 AM 200 AM J 15 AM 30 AM 745 AM 800 AM 8 15 AM B 30 AM 8 45 AM 900 AM 915 AM 930 AM 945 AM 1000 AM 10'15 AM 1030 AM 1045 AM 1100 AM 1115 AM 11.30 AM 1145 AM 1200 PM 1215 PM 1230 PM 12 45 PM 100 PM 115 PM 130 PM 145 PM 200 PM 2 15 PM 2 30 PM 2 45 PM 300 PM 315 PM 330 PM 3 45 PM 400 PM 4'15 PM 430 PM 4 45 PM 5'00 PM 515 PM 5'30 PM 5 45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES Date 6/23/2016 Weather Clear BICYCLES North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg N Palm Canyon Road El Camino Monte Vista N Palm Canyon Road El Camino Monte Vista 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 D 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 D _ 0 0 D 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 P 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 Counts Unlimited, Inc PO Box 1128 Corona, CA 92828 951-268-6268 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 D 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 34 U 7 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 City of Palm Springs File Name : PLSPAVE 12 N/S: N Palm Springs Canyon Road Site Code E/W: Vereda Norte Start Date : 6/23/2016 Weather: Clear Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume N Palm Springs Canyon N Palm Springs Canyon Vereda Norte Road IDriveway Westbound Road Eastbound Southbound Northbound Start Time Left Thru Right Apo Totai Left Thru Riaht Apo Toni Left Thru Riaht AOD TOW _ Left _� Thru Right _ADO Toiai Mt Total 06 00 AM 0 58 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 21 0 0 0 0 79 06.15 AM 0 50 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 1 1 68 06 30 AM 0 75 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 1 1 93 06.45 AM 0 134 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 23 0 0 1 1 158 Total 0 317 0 317 0 0 0 0 0 76 2 78 0 0 3 3 398 07'00 AM ��, 0 109 1 110 0 0 0 0 2 41 2 45 2 0 1 3 1511 07'15 AM 1 135 1 137 0 0 2 2 2 31 0 33 3 0 i 4 176 0730 AM 1 135 4 140 0 0 0 0 1 46 0 47 1 0 3 4 1 191 07'45 AM _ _1 _ 180 7 188 0 0 0 0 2 49 0 51 1 0 0 1 240 Total' 3 559 13 575 0 0 2 2 7 167 2 176 7 0 5 12 765 08.00 AM D 148 6 154 0 0 0 0 1 41 0 42 0 0 2 2 198 08:15 AM 0 129 5 134 1 0 1 2 2 63 1 66 3 0 3 6 2011 08:30 AM 0 147 4 151 0 0 2 2 2 53 0 55 0 0 5 5 213 08:45 AM 0 149 4 153 _ 0 0 0 0 2 72 0 74 3 0 4 7 234 Total 0 573 19 592 1 0 3 4 7 229 1 237 6 0 14 20 853 09 00 AM 0 139 0 139 0 0 1 1 3 74 2 79 1 0 3 4 223 09 15 AM 2 119 6 127 1 0 1 2 1 2 63 1 66 2 0 7 9 204 09.30 AM 0 128 7 135 0 0 0 0 2 52 0 54 1 0 3 4 193 09.45 AM 0 123 3 126 1 0 0 1 3 65 1 69 2 0 2 4 200 Total 2 509 16 527 2 0 2 4 10 254 4 268 6 0 15 21 820 10 00 AM 0 113 4 117 1 0 0 1 8 81 0 89 1 0 6 7 214 10 15 AM 0 118 2 120 0 0 1 1 3 79 0 82 4 0 5 9 212 10 30 AM 0 110 6 116 0 0 0 0 8 70 0 78 4 0 2 6 20D 10.45 AM 1 125 8 134 0 0 1 1 4 74 0 78 3 0 15 18 231 Total 1 466 20 487 1 0 2 3 23 304 0 327 12 0 28 401 857 11 00 AM 1 134 2 137 0 0 0 0 2 64 0 66 3 0 5 8 211 11.15 AM 0 139 4 143 0 0 0 0 6 91 0 97 1 3 0 8 11 251 1130 AM 0 115 3 118 1 0 0 1 3 85 1 89 1 0 4 5 213 11:45 AM 0 127 6 133 0 0 0 0 2 93 0 95 3 0 7 10 238 Total 1 515 15 531 1 0 0 1 13 333 1 3471 10 0 24 34 913 12:00 PM 0 109 0 109 1 0 1 2 3 108 0 111 7 0 7 14 236 12:15 PM 0 116 2 118 0 0 0 0 3 87 0 90 1 0 5 6 214 12:30 PM 0 135 4 139 1 0 0 1 0 66 0 66 2 0 2 4 210 12 45 PM 0 136 _ 6 142 0 0 0 0 2 84 0 86 2 0 3 5_ 233 Total 0 446 12 508 2 0 1 3 8 345 0 353 12 0 17 29 893 01:00 PM 1 129 5 135 0 0 0 0 3 74 1 78 1 0 6 7 220 01:15 PM 0 113 2 115 0 0 1 1 6 69 0 75 1 0 5 6 197 01:30 PM 0 116 6 122 0 0 0 0 6 73 0 79 5 0 6 11 212 01:45 PM 0 109 3 112 0 0 0 0 6 66 0 _ 72 3 0 10 13 197 Total 1 467 16 484 0 0 1 1 21 282 1 304 10 0 27 37 826 02.00 PM 0 120 1 121 0 0 0 0 2 91 0 93 4 0 2 6 220 02'15 PM 1 113 1 115 0 0 0 0 4 77 0 81 1 0 1 2 198 02 30 PM 0 108 3 111 0 0 0 0 5 83 0 88 1 0 5 6 205 02'45 PM 1 0 122 4 126 0 0 0 0 4 80 0 84 6 0 7 13 223 Total 1 463 9 473 0 0 0 0 I 15 331 0 346 12 0 15 27 846 03 00 PM 0 121 3 124 0 0 1 1 1 87 0 88 1 0 5 6 219 03 15 PM 0 92 1 93 0 0 0 0 4 78 0 82 2 0 3 5 180 03 30 PM 0 99 2 101 0 0 1 1 4 75 1 80 5 0 3 8 190 03 45 PM 0 108 1 109 0 0 0 0 2 65 1 68 3 0 2 5 182 Total 0 420 7 427 0 0 2 21 11 305 2 318 11 0 13 24 771 63 City of Palm Springs N/S: N Palm Springs Canyon Road E/W: Vereda Norte Weather: Clear N Palm Springs Canyon Road Souhbound Start Time Left I Thru I Rioht 1 Aao Total 04.00 PM 0 104 2 106 04:15 PM 0 97 7 104 04:30 PM 1 107 1 109 04:45 PM 0 106 1 107 Total 1 414 11 426 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 Grouos Printed- Total Volume Driveway N Palm Springs Canyon Road Westbound Northbound Left I Thru I Riaht 1 Aao Total Left Thru I Right I Arp Total 0 0 1 1 1 100 0 101 0 0 0 0 2 86 1 89 0 0 0 0 1 86 1 88 0 0 2 2 0 86 0 86 0 0 3 3 4 358 2 364 File Name : PLSPAVE 12 Site Code Start Date . 6/2312016 Page No .2 Vereda Norte Eastbound Left I Thru I Riqht I Apo Total Int Total 1 0 6 7 215 5 0 3 8i 201 4 0 1 5 202 1 0 0 1 196 814 11 0 10 21 05 00 PM 0 118 0 118 0 0 0 0 2 105 0 107 3 0 1 4 229 05.15 PM 0 118 1 119 1 0 1 2 3 97 0 100 2 0 1 3 224 O5 30 PM 0 98 1 99 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 69 1 0 2 3 171 05.45 PM 0 94 1 95 0 0 0 0 1 66 0 67 1 0 1 2 164 Total 0 428 3 431 1 0 1 2 6 337 0 343 7 0 5 12 788 Grand Total 10 5627 141 57781 8 0 17 25 125 3321 15 3461 104 0 176 280 9544 A 9 3 6 Total % 0.1 59 1 5 60 5, 0 1 0 0.2 0 3 1.3 34 8 0.2 36 3 1 1 0 1.8 2.9 N Palm Springs Canyon DrivewaRoad y N Palm Springs Canyon Vereda Node Westbound Eastbound So t bound Nodhb and Start Time Left I Thru [ Right I Aao Total Left Thru I Ric ht Aar, Total Left Thru I R_ ight I ADD Totai Left Thru Right ADD Total Int Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06 00 AM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:15 AM 11 15 AM 0 139 4 143 0 0 0 0 6 91 0 97 3 0 8 11 251 11.30 AM I 0 115 3 118 1 0 0 1 3 85 1 89 1 0 4 5 213 11:45 AM 0 127 6 133 0 0 0 0 2 93 0 95 3 0 7 10 238 12 00 PM 0 109 0 109 1 0 1 2 3 108 0 111 7 0 7 14 236 Total Volume 0 490 13 503 2 0 1 3 14 377 1 392 14 0 26 40 938 is Aoo Total 0 974 26 66.7 0 33.3 3.6 962 0.3 35 0 _ 65 PHF 000 .881 542 879 .500 .000 .250 375 .583 873 250 .883 .500 .000 813 714 934 69 City of Palm Springs N/S: N Palm Springs Canyon Road EM: Vereda Norte Weather Clear Counts Unlimited PC Box 117E Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 N Palm Spnngs Canyon Road Out In ® �` Total-895 13311 4901—I, 01 41 I , Peak Hour Data North FPeak Hour Begins at 11 15 A'^1I�' Total_Volume_ 4-1 T F0 Left Thru Rioht L-_ 141_ 377t 1 3 2 Out In Total N Paim cn,.... r,n ,,Bp,n Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Aooroach Beams at: File Name : PLSPAVE 12 Site Code Start Date : 6/23/2016 Page No :3 07.45 AM 0815 AM 1115 AM 1030 AM +0 mins 1 180 7 188 1 0 1 2 6 91 0 97 4 0 2 6 +15 mins 0 148 6 154 0 0 2 2 3 85 1 89 3 0 15 18 +30 mins. 0 129 5 134 0 0 0 0 2 93 0 95 3 0 5 8 +45 mins. 0 147 4 151 0 0 1 1 3 108 0 111 3 0 8 11 Total Volume 1 604 22 627 1 0 4 5 14 377 1 392 13 0 30 43 %ADD Total 02 963 35 20 0 80 3.6 96.2 03 30.2 0 698 PHF 250 839 786 834 .250 .000 .500 .625 .583 .873 .250 883 813 000 500 597 �O locanon Palm SPrmgs N/5 N Palm Canyon Road E/W Vereda Norte DateWeather Clear 016 Weather Clear PEDESTRIANS North Leg East Leg South Leg Wes" Leg Tme N Palm Canyon Read Driveway N Palm Canyon Road Vereda Norte TOTAL 600AM 3 1 0 1 5 615 AM 0 1 0 2 3 530 AM 1 3 0 1 5 645 AM 0 2 0 3 5 ]00 AM 2 2 0 1 5 ]15 AM 0 2 0 3 5 730 AM 2 4 0 3 9 745 AM 0 2 0 2 4 800 AM 0 1 0 2 3 815 AM 0 1 0 _ 3 830 AM 0 8 2 0 10 845 AM 0 4 1 0 1 5 900 AM 0 0 0 2 2 915 AM 0 1 1 1 3 930AM 0 1 I 0 0 1 945AM 0 2 0 1 3 1000 AM a I _ I 0 0 2 1015 AM C I 3 I 0 I 1 4 1030 AM 0 I _ I 0 I 1 _ 1045 AM 0 I 1 I 0 I 2 3 1100 AM 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 1115 AM 0 I I I n I 0 1 1130 AM _ I ] I 2 I 3 14 1145 AM 0 I 1 I 0 I 1 2 1200 PM 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 1215 PM 0 1 6 I 0 2 8 1230 PM 1 1 1 I 0 0 I 2 1245 PM 0 I 0 I 0 I _ I 2 100 PM 0 I 3 I 0 I 5 I 8 115 PM 1 I 1 I 0 I 3 I 5 130 PM 0 I _ I 0 I 0 I 3 145 PM 0 I 5 I 0 I 1 I 6 200 PM I 0 I 4 I 0 I 0 I 4 215 PM I 0 I 1 I 0 I 1 I 2 230 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 245 PM I 0 I 2 I 0 I 1 I 3 3 no PM I 0 I 1 I 0 I 4 I 5 315 PM I 0 I 3 ' 0 I 0 I 3 330 PM I 0 I 3 I 0 I 0 I 3 345 PM I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 400 PM I 0 I 0 0 I 2 I 2 415 PM I 0 I 2 0 0 I 2 430 PM I 0 I 2 0 0 I 2 445 PM I 0 I 1 0 I 0 I 1 5'no PM I 0 I 1 0 I1 3 515 PM I 0 I 2 I 0 I 0 I 2 530 PM I n I 1 I 0 I 1 I 2 545PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I _ I 3 TOTAL VOLUMES I 12 94 5 60 I 171 counr: unhmrted. me o Sax 928 [om92W na CA 8 951 268 6268 tncatmn Palm Springs N/5. N Palm Canyon Road E/W Vereda Norte Time 600 AM 615 AM 6.30 AM 6 45 AM 7.00 AM 7 15 AM J 30 AM 7 45 AM 8 00 AM 8 15 AM 8 30 AM 845 AM 900AM 915 AM 930 AM 945 AM 1000 AM 10'15 AM 1030 AM 1045 AM 1100 AM 11'15 AM 1130 AM 1145 AM 12 00 PM 12 15 PM 1230 PM 12:45 PM 100 PM 115 PM 130 PM 145 PM 200 PM 2'15 PM 230 PM 2.45 PM 300 PM 3 15 PM 330 PM 3 45 PM 4 C0 PM 415 PM 430 PM 445 PM 5 00 PM 5 15 PM 5 30 PM 5 45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES Narth Leg N Palm Canyon Road 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Leg Onveway BICYCLES Corms U.Inn ,Inc PO Box 1128 Canaria, CA 92828 951-268-6268 South Leg N Palm Canyon Road Date 6/23/2016 Weather Clear West Leg Vereda None TOTAL 0 0 1 1 1 2 3 5 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 a C 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 1 I 1 0 I 0 0 I 0 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 0 u I 1 30 44 72 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Palm Springs N/S: N Palm Springs Canyon Road ENV: N Via Las Palmas Weather: Clear File Name : PLSPAVL 12 Site Code Start Date : 6/23/2016 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume N Palm Springs Canyon Driveway N Palm Springs Canyon N Via Las Palmas Road Westbound ad Eastbound So hboStart d NoR bound Time Left Thru 1 Rioht I App Toni Left Thru Right Apo Total Left Thru I Riqht I Auo Tptai Left Thru Right Apo Taal Int Total 06.00 AM 0 55 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 74 06'15 AM 0 47 1 48 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 4 0 0 4 65 06'30 AM 0 76 3 79 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 95 06.45 AM 0 128 8 136 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 0 3 3 159 Total 0 306 12 318 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 68 4 0 3 7 393 07'00 AM 0 102 7 109 0 0 0 0 2 42 0 44 2 0 3 5 158 07.15 AM 0 122 4 126 0 0 0 0 5 32 0 37 1 0 4 5 1 168 0730 AM 0 131 4 135 0 0 0 0 2 47 0 49 1 0 1 2 186 07 45 AM 1 171 10 182 0 0 0 0 2 44 0 46 3 0 3 6 234 Total 1 526 25 552 0 0 0 0 11 165 0 176 7 0 11 18 746 08 00 AM 1 138 4 143 0 0 0 0 2 37 1 40 4 0 4 8 191 08 15 AM 0 129 3 132 0 0 0 0 0 64 1 65 4 0 2 6 203 0830 AM 2 140 6 148 1 0 0 1 6 55 1 62 1 0 3 4 215 08:45 AM 0 148 2 150 0 0 0 0 3 72 0 75_0_ 0 6 6 231 Total 3 555 15 573 1 0 0 1 11 228 3 242 9 0 15 24 840 09:00 AM 0 142 5 147 0 1 0 1 2 80 1 83 3 0 7 10 241 09:15 AM 1 119 2 122 1 0 0 1 3 64 0 67 2 0 1 3 193 09.30 AM D 131 4 735 1 0 0 1 4 53 0 57 3 0 6 9 202 09 45 AM 0 121 8 129 0 0 0 0 2 66 0 68 0 0 4 4 201 Total 1 513 19 533 2 1 0 3 11 263 1 275 8 0 18 26 837 10 00 AM 0 107 6 113 0 0 0 0 9 87 2 98 2 0 3 5 216 10 15 AM 0 121 2 123 0 0 0 0 6 79 0 85 3 0 4 7 215 10.30 AM 0 116 1 117 0 0 0 0 1 4 74 0 78 4 0 4 8 203 10:45 AM 0 136 3 139 1 0 1 2 4 74 0 78 0 0 6 6 225 Total 0 480 12 492 1 0 1 2 23 314 2 339 9 0 17 26 859 11:00 AM 0 136 3 139 0 0 0 0 4 58 1 63 4 0 7 11 213 11:15 AM 0 139 2 141 0 0 0 0 4 9-1 0 97 5 0 4 9 247 11:30 AM 0 115 1 116 0 0 0 0 2 91 0 93 2 0 4 6 215 11.45 AM 0 131 2 133 1 0 0 1 1 95 0 96 4 0 7 11 241 Total 0 521 8 529 1 0 0 1 11 337 1 349 15 0 22 371 916 12 00 PM 0 116 1 117 0 0 0 0 7 104 0 111 8 0 3 11 239 12.15 PM 0 116 3 119 1 0 D 1 4 85 0 89 5 D 4 9 218 12 30 PM 0 134 6 140 0 0 0 0 5 64 0 69 6 0 5 11 220 12 45 PM 0 132 6 138 3 0 0 3 1 75 1 77 6 0 6 12 230 Total 0 498 16 514 4 0 0 4 17 328 1 346 25 0 18 43 907 01'00 PM 1 130 3 134 0 0 1 1 3 80 0 83 2 0 3 5 223 01 15 PM 0 114 4 118 1 0 0 1 3 73 0 76 5 0 4 9 204 01.30 PM 0 123 0 123 0 0 0 0 6 72 0 78 4 1 4 9 210 01'45 PM 0 121 2 123 0 0 0 0 1 74 0 75 2 0 2 4 202 Total 1 488 9 498 1 0 1 2 13 299 0 312 13 1 13 27 839 02:00 PM 0 122 5 127 0 0 0 0 1 88 0 89 7 0 3 10 226 02 15 PM 0 111 1 112 1 0 1 2 1 80 1 82 4 0 2 6 202 02:30 PM 0 115 3 118 1 0 0 1 2 82 2 86 9 0 7 16 221 _ 02:45 PM 0 116 0 ii6 0 _ 0_ 0 0 _ 0 83 0 83 0 0 0 0 199 Total I4 0 464 9 473 2 0 1 3 4 333 3 340 20 0 12 32 848 03 00 PM 0 118 4 122 1 0 0 1 1 4 83 0 87 2 0 3 5 215 03 15 PM 0 94 1 95 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 83 2 0 2 4 182 03.30 PM 0 99 1 100 0 0 0 0 3 75 0 78 1 0 0 1 179 03:45 PM 0 111 1 112 1 0 0 1 1 67 0 68 1 0 2 3 184 Total 0 422 7 429 2 0 0 2 8 308 0 316 6 0 7 13 760 73 City of Palm Springs N/S: N Palm Springs Canyon Road ENV: N Via Las Palmas Weather: Clear N Palm Springs Canyon Road _ ___ _ Southbound StartTime Left Thru I Riaht I no rrna 04.00 PM 0 104 2 106 04'15 PM 0 101 0 101 04:30 PM 0 100 2 102 04:45 PM 0 102 1 103 Total 0 407 5 412 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 Grouos Printed- Total Volume Driveway N Palm Springs Canyon Westbound Road Northbound Left I Thru I Riaht I Apo Torsi Left I Thru I Riaht I Aoo Total 0 1 0 1 1 96 0 97 0 0 0 0 1 80 2 83 1 0 0 1 1 83 0 84 0 0 0 0 2 82 0 84 1 1 0 2 5 341 2 348 File Name . PLSPAVL 12 Site Code Start Date : 6/23/2016 Page No :2 N Via Las Palmas Eastbound Left I Thru I Riaht I Ann Total Int Total 6 0 3 9 213 2 0 3 5 189 5 0 5 10 197 6 0 4 10 197 19 0 15 34 796 05 00 PM 0 110 1 111 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 113 1 0 4 5 229 05' 15 PM 0 115 0 115 1 1 0 2 1 85 1 87 1 0 2 3 207 05.30 PM 0 100 2 102 1 0 0 1 1 70 0 71 1 0 0 1 175 05:45 PM 0 89 1 90 0 0 0 _ 0 1 64 1 66 1 0 0 1 157 Total 0 414 4 418 2 1 0 3 3 332 2 337 4 0 6 10 768 Grand Total 6 5594 141 5741 17 3 3 23 117 3316 15 34411 139 1 157 297 9509 Apprch % 0.1 97.4 2.5 73 9 13 13 34 96.2 0.4 468 03 52.9 Total % 1 0.1 588 1 5 60.4 0.2 0 0 02 1.2 34.9 02 36.3 1.5 0 1.7 31 1 N Palm Springs Canyon Driveway Road Southbound Westbound Start Time Left Thru I Riaht I Aoo Totai Left I Thru I Riaht Apo Torsi Peak Hour Analysis From 06 00 AM to 05.45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for -nfire Intersection Begins at 11 15 AM 11:15 AM 0 139 2 141 0 0 0 0 11:30AM 0 115 1 116 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 131 2 133 1 0 0 1 12.00 PM 0 116 1 117 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 501 6 507 1 0 0 1 ADo. Total 0 98.8 1.2 100 0 0 PHF 000 901 750 .899 250 000_ 000 .250 N Palm Springs Canyon N Via Las Palmas Road Northbound Eastbound Left I Thru I Riaht I A.. Total Left I Thru I Riaht I Ann Tout rot Total 4 93 0 97 5 0 4 9 247 2 91 0 93 2 0 4 6 215 1 95 0 96 4 0 7 11 241 7 104 0 111 8 0 3 11 239 14 383 0 397 19 0 18 371 942 35 96.5 0 51.4 0 48.6 .500 .921 .000 894 594 000 643 841 .953_ 74 City of Palm Springs N/S. N Palm Springs Canyon Road ENV: N Via Las Palmas Weather: Clear Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 N Palm Springs Canyon Road Out In Total 402 ER 90 51 5011 01 Right Thru Left � 1 4 Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 11 15 AAA Total Volume Lett Thm Right 1 1141Y3831 01 Ouutt In Total 97 r tal Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 05.45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Beoins at: File Name : PLSPAVL 12 Site Code : Start Date : 6/23/2016 Page No :3 07.45 AM 1215 PM 1115 AM 1200 PM +0 mins 1 171 10 182 1 0 0 1 4 93 D 97 8 0 3 11 +15 mins. 1 138 4 143 0 0 0 0 2 91 0 93 1, 5 0 4 9 +30 mins. 0 129 3 132 3 0 0 3 1 95 0 96 6 0 5 11 +45 mins. 2 140 6 148 0 0 1 1 7 104 0 111 6 0 6 12 Volume 4 578 23 605 4 0 1 5 14 383 0 397 25 0 18 43 -Total %App. Total 0.7 955 3.8 80 0 20 35 965 0 58.1 0 41.9 PHF 600 .845 .575 .831 333 000 .250 .417 500 921 .000 894 .781 .000 .750 .896 1 '7 5 LoN/5 Palm rm Cars Date Clear 016 N/5 NPalm Canyon Road Wearhe, Clear E/W NVia Las Ps l mas PEDESTRIANS North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Tme N Palm Canyon Road Driveway N Palm Canyon Road N Via Las Palmas TOTAL 600 AM 0 1 0 1 615 AM 0 1 0 3 630 AM 0 3 2 1 6 645 AM 0 3 z 3 8 700 AM 0 0 0 1 1 J 15 AM 1 1 0 2 4 130 AM 0 4 0 1 5 745 AM 0 2 0 5 800 AM 0 4 0 5 9 315 AM 0 1 0 3 4 830 AM 1 4 0 2 J 845AM 1 1 0 3 5 900 nM 0 0 2 2 4 915 AM 0 1 - 0 3 930 AM 0 1 2 0 3 945 AM L _ 0 I z 4 1000 AM 0 0 C I 0 0 1015 AM 0 1 0 I 3 4 1030 AM 0 2 1 I 1 4 1045 AM 0 1 0 I 3 1100 AM n 4 1 I 1 6 1115 AM 0 2 0 I 0 2 1130 AM 1 3 0 I 0 4 1145 AM 1 0 n I2 3 1200 PM 0 1 1 I 0 I 2 1215 PM t , 1 0 I 3 I 4 12 30 PM 0 I C 0 I 1 I 1 1245 PM 2 I 2 0 I 0 I 4 1 o0 PM 1 I 0 2I 5 I 8 115 PM 0 I 0 4 I 4 I 8 130 PM 0 I 0 0 I 2 I 2 145 PM 1 I 2 1 0 I 2 I 5 200 PM 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 215 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 2 I 2 230 PM I 0 I 1 I 0 I 5 I 6 245 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 300 PM I 0 I 1 I 0 I 1 I 2 315 PM I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 1 330 PM I 0 I 2 I 0 I 0 I 2 345PM I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 400 PM I 0 I 1 0 I _ I 3 415 PM I 0 I 0 0 I 1 I 1 430 PM I 1 I 0 0 I 2 I 3 445 PM ( 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 500 PM I 1 I 0 I C I3 4 515 PM I 1 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 530 PM I 1 I 0 I 0 I 4 I 5 545PM I a I 0 I 0 I 2 I 2 TOTALVOLUMES I 13 54 19 81 I 167 Cuomo Unlmn@a Mn e/ C Pri go. 1178 ( j Corona, CA 12.78 951-268-6268 Location Palm SPn ngs N/S N Palm Canyon Road E/W N Via Las Palma: Date 6/23/2016 Weather Clear BICYCLES North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Time N Palm Canyon Road Dnyeway N Palm Canyon Road N Via Las Palmas TOTAL 600 AM 0 C 0 0 0 615AM rl C C 1 1 6.30 AM 0 0 0 1 1 645 AM 0 2 a _ 4 7.00 AM 0 2 0 1 3 715 AM 0 0 a 2 2 J 30 AM 0 0 1 2 3 7.4S AM a 0 0 D 0 800 AM 0 1 0 0 1 8.15 AM 0 0 0 1 1 830 AM 0 0 0 3 3 845AM 0 2 0 1 3 900 AM 0 0 0 0 0 915 AM 0 0 0 0 a 930 AM 0 0 0 0 0 945 AM 0 I 0 0 1 1 1000 AM 0 I 0 0 2 2 1015 AM 0 I 0 0 0 0 1030 AM 0 I 0 0 0 0 1045 AM 0 Ii 0 0 1 1100 AM 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 1115 AM 0 I 0 D I 1 1 1130 AM D I 0 0 I 0 0 1145 AM 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 1200 PM D I C I 0 I 2 2 1215 PM 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 1 1230 PM 0 I 0 I C I 0 0 1245 PM 0 I 0 I I 0 0 100 PM 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 11S PM 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 1 130 PM 0 I 2 I 0 I 0 2 145 PM I 0 I D I I 0 0 200 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 215 PM I 1 I 0 I 0 I 2 I 3 230 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 245 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I L I 0 300 PM I 0 1 0 I 0 I1 0 315 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I D I 0 330 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 345 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 4 W PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 415 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 430 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 445 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 500 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 515 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 S 30 PM I 0 I D I 0 0 I 0 545 PM I 0 I 2 I I 0 I 3 TOTAL VOLUMES I 1 13 2 28 I 44 Counts Unlimited, Inc PO Bon 1178 i Corona, CA 92878 951-268-6268 Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 City of Palm Springs File Name PLSPAVD 12 NIS: N Palm Springs Canyon Road Site Code . ENV: W Vereda Sur Start Date : 612312016 Weather: Clear Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Total Volume N Palm Springs Canyon Palm Springs Liquor N Palm Springs Canyon Road Driveway Road W Vereda Sur Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time 'I Left Thru Rioht Aoe Tmal Left I Thru Right Aoo Trn i Left Thru Rwht Pao Toni 1 Left Thru Right Aca Taal Int Total 06:00 AM 0 43 2 45 0 0 0 0 1 18 1 20 1 0 1 2 67 06' 15 AM 0 50 1 51 1 0 0 1 1 11 0 12 0 0 1 1 65 06 30 AM 2 74 1 77 0 0 0 0 2 15 0 17 0 0 1 1 95 06 45 AM 1 117 8 126 1 0 0 1 2 22 0 241 2 1 1 4 155 Total 3 284 12 299 2 0 0 2 6 66 1 73 3 1 4 8 382 07:00 AM 0 98 3 101 0 0 0 0 2 36 0 38 2 0 2 4 143 07:15 AM 2 130 9 141 1 0 0 1 1 37 0 38 2 0 2 4 184 07:30 AM 0 130 3 133 1 0 1 2 0 48 1 49 2 0 0 2 186 07:45 AM 0 170 6 176 0 0 0 0 2 40 0 42 5 0 2 7 225 Total 2 528 21 551 2 0 1 3 5 161 1 167 11 0 6 17 738 08 00 AM 0 139 2 141 1 0 0 1 1 43 0 44 2 0 6 8 194 08, 15 AM 0 132 1 1331 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 57 1 0 2 3 193 08 30 AM 0 141 6 147 I 1 0 0 1 6 65 1 72 2 0 0 2 222 08 45 AM 2 140 5 147 1 0 2 3 1 74 0 75 1 0 4 5 230 Total 2 552 14 568 3 0 2 5 8 239 1 248 6 0 12 18 839 09 00 AM 0 137 3 140 1 1 0 2 4 77 1 82 2 0 7 9 233 09.15 AM 0 116 3 119 1 0 1 2 2 65 1 68 2 0 2 4 193 09 30 AM 1 138 2 141 2 0 0 2 2 58 0 60 4 0 2 6 209 09 45 AM 1 117 1 119 0 0 1 1 2 65 1 68 4 0 2 6' 194 Total 2 08 509 519 4 1 2 7 10 265 3 278 12 0 13 25 829 10.00 AM 3 109 5 117 0 0 5 5 3 91 0 94 3 0 4 7 223 10 15 AM 2 114 1 117 3 0 3 6 3 90 1 94 3 0 2 5 222 10 30 AM 0 108 3 111 1 0 1 2 10 74 0 84 6 0 8 14 211 10 45 AM 5 140 3 148 2 0 1 3 4 68 0 72 4 0 4 8 231 Total) 10 471 12 493 6 0 10 16 20 323 1 344 16 0 18 34 887 11 00 AM 11 1 135 4 140 0 1 2 3 1 63 0 64 2 1 2 5 212 11.15 AM 2 132 2 136 2 0 2 4 2 94 1 97 3 0 2 5 242 11:30 AM 0 107 6 113 1 0 1 2 3 75 2 80 1 0 0 1 196 11 45 AM 0 145 1 146 0 0 1 1 4 97 _ 1__ 102_ 7 0 6 13 262 Total 3 519 13 535 3 1 6 10 10 329 4 343 13 1 10 24 912 12 00 PM 1 111 4 116 2 0 7 9 1 3 99 1 103 2 0 5 7 235 12 15 PM 2 113 2 117 4 1 0 5 4 83 3 90 1 0 5 6 218 12 30 PM 1 134 3 138 2 0 0 2 0 73 1 74 0 0 1 1 215 12 45 PM 2 134 2 138 2 0 1 3 2 72 1 75 2 0 4 6 222 Total 6 492 11 509 10 1 8 19 9 327 6 342 5 0 15 20 890 01:00 PM 1 128 2 131 0 0 2 2 4 78 1 2 0 5 7 223 01:15 PM 0 111 2 113 1 0 2 3 4 73 0 7 77 5 1 4 10 203 DI 30 PM 0 122 1 123 1 0 3 4 3 65 1 69 2 0 1 3 199 01 45 PM 0 130 2 132 3 0 2 5 6 72 0 78 4 0 6 10 225 Total 1 491 7 499 5 0 9 14 17 288 2 307 13 1 16 30 850 02 00 PM 1 115 1 117 3 0 5 8 2 83 1 116 4 0 1 5 216 02.15 PM 1 109 1 111 3 0 2 5 6 72 1 79 2 0 4 6 201 02 30 PM 1 115 6 122 2 0 1 3 5 83 0 88 5 0 1 6 219 02.45 PM 1 113 2 116 0 0 3 3 2 77 0 79 5 0 1 6 204 Total 4 452 10 466 8 0 11 19 15 315 2 332I 16 0 7 23 840 03.00 PM 2 122 2 126 1 1 0 2 0 82 2 84 5 0 1 6 218 0315 PM 0 92 1 93 1 1 1 3 3 80 0 83' 4 1 3 8 187 03 30 PM 1 101 2 104 0 0 1 1 4 74 1 79 5 0 3 8 192 03 45 PM 0 108 1 109 4 _ 0_ 0 _ 4 2 66 0 68 1 0 2 3 184 Total 3 423 6 432 6 2 2 10 9 302 3 314 15 1 9 25 781 Ir g Counts Unlimited PO BOX 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 City of Palm Springs File Name PLSPAVD 12 NIS: N Palm Springs Canyon Road Site Code E/W: W Vereda Sur Start Date : 6/23/2016 Weather: Clear Page No : 2 Grouos Printed- Total Volume N Palm Springs Canyon Palm Springs Liquor N Palm Springs Canyon W Vereda Sur Road Driveway Road Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Left Thru I Right LApp Total Left I _Thru I Right_, Alp Total Left Thru Right App Total Left Thru Right App Total lint Total_ 04:00 PM 0 101 3 104 1 0 0 1 2 94 0 96 1 0 1 2 203 04:15 PM 0 97 3 100 0 0 1 1 1 1 72 1 74 7 0 1 8 183 04:30 PM 2 108 4 114 0 0 1 1 2 79 0 81 3 1 1 5 2111 04:45 PM 0 104 2 106 1 1 1 3 1 80 1 82 1 0 0 1 192 _ Total 2 410 12 424 2 1 3 6 6 325 2 333 12 1 3 16 779 05'00 PM 2 117 1 120 I 0 1 1 2 1 1 111 1 113 5 0 2 7 242 05 15 PM 1 115 3 119 3 0 1 4 1 79 1 81 5 0 1 6 210 O5'30 PM 0 90 1 91 1 0 2 3 1 64 0 65 2 0 1 3 162 05'45 PM 0 86 0 86 1 0 0 1 2 60 1 _ 63 _ _4 _ 0 _ 1 5 155 Total 3 408 5 416 5 1 4 10 5 314 3 322 16 0 5 21 769 Grand Total 41 5538 132 5711 56 7 58 121 120 3254 29 341131 138 5 118 261 9496 Apprch % 07 97 23 463 5.8 479 3.5 956 09 529 1 9 452 Total % 0.4 58.3 1.4 60.1 06 0 1 0.6 1.3 1.3 343 03 358 1 1 5 0 1 1 2 27 N Palm Springs Canyon Palm Springs Liquor Road Driveway Southbound Westbound Start Time Left I Thru [ Right I Apo Total Left I Thru I Right Ano Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 oft Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:15 AM 11'15 AM 2 132 2 136 2 0 2 4 1130 AM 0 107 6 113 1 0 1 2 11.45 AM 0 145 1 146 0 0 1 1 12:00 PM 1 111 4 116 2 0 7 9 Total Volume 3 495 13 511 5 0 11 16 %Aoo. Total 0 6 96.9 2 5 31 2 0 68.8 PHF .375 853 .542 .875 .625 .000 .393 .444 N Palm Springs Canyon W Vereda Sur Road Northbound Eastbound Left Thru I Rioht I All Tolai Left I Thru I Rioht I Ano Total lint Total 2 94 1 97 3 0 2 5 242 3 75 2 80 1 0 0 1 196 4 97 1 102 7 0 6 13 262 3 99 1 103 2 0 5_ _ 7 235 12 365 5 382 13 0 13 26 935 31 95.5 13 50 0 50 750 .922 .625 .9271 .464 .000 .542 500 892 79 City of Palm Springs N/S. N Palm Springs Canyon Road ENV: W Vereda Sur Weather: Clear Counts Unlimited PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 N Palm Springs Canyon Road Out In Total 38e 511 I-1 pp 71 495 3 RR ht Thru Left Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 11 15 AAA Total Vnl ,.c ~- Lett Thru Ririht 1 1121Y3651 51 51_aj382 a5 Out In Total N Palm Cr.--- r-- a —a Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Beams at: File Name : PLSPAVD 12 Site Code Start Date : 6/23/2016 Page No :3 �= —J a O Aid F 07.45 AM 0130 PM 1115 AM 1000 AM +0 mins. 0 170 6 176 1 0 3 4 2 94 1 973 0 4 7 +15 mins. 0 139 2 141 3 0 2 5 3 75 2 80 3 0 2 5 +30 mins. 0 132 1 133 3 0 5 8 4 97 1 102 6 0 8 14 +45 mins 0 141 6 147 3 0 2 5 3 99 1 103 4 0 4 8 Total Volume 0 582 15 597 10 0 12 22 12 365 5 382 16 0 18 34 ADD. Total 0 97.5 2.5 455 0 54.5 31 95.5 1 3 47.1 0 52.9 PHF 000 .856 _ 625 .848 833 000 .600 .688 .750 922 625 927 667 .000 .563 .6071 80 L.c.,An Palm 3pnngz N/5 N Palm Canyon Road E/W W Vereds Sur Date 6/23/2016 Weather Clear PEDESTRIANS North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Tme N Palm Canyon Road Palm Springs L19upr OW N Palm Canyon Road WVaned. Sur TOTAL 600 AM 0 1 0 2 615 AM 0 1 1 1 2 630 AM 0 1 0 1 2 645 AM 1 2 0 0 3 700 AM _ 0 0 3 4 715 AM 0 2 0 0 2 23DAM 3 0 1 5 745 AM 0 2 0 1 3 800 AM 1 0 0 2 3 815 AM 1 1 0 3 5 830 AM 0 3 0 1 4 845AM 0 1 1 0 _ 3 900 AM 0 0 1 0 3 3 915 AM 0 1 O 0 1 930 AM 0 1 0 1 2 945 AM n 1 0 I 2 3 1000 AM 1 0 I 0 I 0 1 1015 AM 1 1 I 0 I 0 2 1030 AM 2 2 I 4 I 0 8 1045 AM 0 0 I 0 I 1 1 1100 AM 1 0 I c I D 1 1115 AM 1 1 0 I 1 I 1 3 1130 AM 3 I 0 I 0 I 0 3 1145 AM 1 I 0 I 0 I 2 3 1200 PM 1 I 1 I 1 I i 4 1215 PM 0 I 1 1 U I 2 1230 PM 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 1 1245 PM 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I a 100 PM I 0 I 0 I U I 0 I a 115 PM I - I 2 I 0 I 2 I 6 130 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 145 PM I 0 I r, I 0 I U I 0 200 PM I _ 1 1 I 0 I 0 I 4 215 PM I 0 1 0 I a I 0 I 0 230 PM 1 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 1 245 PM 1 0 I 1 I 0 I 6 I 300 PM I 1 I 1 I 0 I 0 I 2 315 PM I 1 I a 0 I 0 I 1 330 PM I 3 I 3 0 I 0 I 6 345PM I 0 I 0 0 1 I 1 400 PM I U I a I 0 I 0 I 0 4.15 PM I 0 I 1 I 0 I 0 I l 430 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 4.45 PM 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 500 PM I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 I 2 515 PM I 2 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 2 530 PM I I 0 I 0 I 4 I 6 545 PM I 0 I 0 I U I 0 I 0 TOTAL VOLUMES I 30 1 35 J 44 I 116 mums Unbm4ed, Ino PO Boa 1178 Corona, CA 92828 951268 6268 ISM Location Palm Springs N/S N Palm Canyon Road E/W W Vereda Sur 03te 6/23/2016 Weather Clear BICYCLES North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Time N Palm Canyon Road Palm Springs Liquor DW N Palm Canyon Road WVereda Sur TOTAL 600 AM 0 0 0 C 0 615 AM 0 0 0 1 1 630 AM 0 0 0 1 1 645 AM 0 2 0 2 4 200 AM 0 2 0 1 3 715 AM 0 0 0 2 2 130 AM 0 1 0 1 2 I 245 AM 0 0 0 1 1 I 800 AM 0 0 0 1 1 I 815AM 1 0 0 2 3 830AM 0 0 0 2 2 845 AM 0 2 0 1 3 9.00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 SAS AM 0 0 0 0 0 930 AM 0 0 0 0 0 945 AM 0 0 0 2 2 1000 AM 0 0 0 1 1 I 10.15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 I 1030 AM 1 0 0 0 1 I 1045 AM 0 1 0 0 1 I 1100 AM 0 D 0 0 D I 1115 AM 0 C C 1 1 I 1130 AM 0 0 0 0 0 I 1145 AM 0 0 C 0 0 I 1200 PM 0 C 0 2 2 I 1215 PM 0 I 0 D 0 0 I 1230 PM 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 1245 PM 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 I 100 PM 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 115 PM 1 I 0 0 0 I 1 I 130 PM 0 I 1 I 1 0 I 2 I 145 PM 0 I 1 I 0 D I 1 I 200 PM C I 0 I 0 C I 0 I 215 PM 0 I 0 I 0 2 I 2 I 2 30 PM 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 245 PM a I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 3.00 PM 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 315 PM 0 I 0 I 0 C I 0 I 330 PM 0 I 1 I 0 0 I 1 I 345 PM 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 400 PM 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 415 PM 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 430 PM 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 445 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 500 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 5 15 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 1 I 1 530 PM I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 545 PM I 0 I 1 I 0 I 1 I 2 TOTALVOLUMES I 3 12 i 1 28 44 Counts Unlimited, Inc 2 PO Box 1128 Corona, CA 92878 951-268-6268 24 HOUR VOLUMES STREET : PALM CANYON PS LOCATION S/O VISTA CHINO DATE 04-01-13 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL 12:00 58 89 147 1:00 35 59 94 2:00 29 26 55 3:00 29 28 57 4:00 37 70 107 5:00 — f 77 133 210 6:00 - 12B 397 525 7:00 ` 213 608 821 8:00 339 637 976 9:00 441 574 1,015 10:00 473 688 1,161 11:00 AM 506 827 1,333 12:00 � PH i 538 850 1,388 1:00 IlI 503 820 1,323 2:00 476 741 1,217 3:00 504 690 1,194 4:00 471 657 1,128 5:00 405 571 976 6:00 347 535 882 7:00 252 423 675 JII 8:00 217 280 497 9,00 + 180 181 361 10:00 95 110 205 11:00 �'t 82 95 177 12:00 I 6,435 10,089 16,524 Prepared by NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES o 3 Attachment 2 W. A L It E R T A. 1 III A S S O C I A T E S October 4, 2016 Corporate Headquarters 3788 McCray Street Mr. Gianfranco Laurie, PE, TE Riverside, CA 92506 951.686.1070 Senior Civil Engineer City of Palm Springs Palm Desert Office 36-951 Cook Street#103 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Desert, CA 92211 Palm Springs, CA, 92262-2743 760.568.5005 Office 41391 falmiaS RE: Proposal for CP16-13 N. Palm Canyon Drive Crosswalks at Stevens 41391 Kalmia Street p320 p y Murrieta, CA 92562 and Via Las Palmas in the City of Palm Springs 951,686.1070 Dear Franco Albert A. WEBB Associates is submitting this proposal for CP16-13 N. Palm Canyon Drive Crosswalk at Stevens and Via Las Palmas for plans, cost estimate, and specifications. Exhibit "A" contains our proposed scope of work. Exhibit "B" contains a summary of our fee proposal for services described in Exhibit "A". We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to hearing from you. In the meantime, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (951) 686-1070. Sincerely, Albert A. Webb Associates 4�&40A Dilesh R. Sheth, P.E.lT.E. Vice President Attachments: Exhibit "A" — Scope of Work Exhibit "B" — Compensation *®93® www,webbassociates.com i,'P,.M FCPNIA1PrOrCOSA-\ut,,.t�b,,N,m��\OL17P5„�_��fnrtr F'�opr-,r';h:;n:P_E A r, P31mi'i4enD I _i;;vn Il Gasc. ., II 701 iOv 2f d.,. 'Ci 5 Exhibit "A" - Scope of Work CP16-13 N. Palm Canyon Drive Crosswalks at Stevens and Via Las Palmas in the City of Palm Springs Our scope of services is as follows: A. Topographic Survey: 1. WEBB will perform field surveys necessary for Via Las Palmas/South Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road/South Palm Canyon Drive intersections. 2. Topography will include, but not be limited to, all features within the existing right-of-way and width of 20 feet beyond or further if necessary. 3. The topography will extend 100' beyond intersections. 4. Topography will include curb & gutter, sidewalk, ADA ramps, cross gutter, pavement, driveways, utilities, sewer manholes, signing & striping, and trees. B. Street Improvement Plans: 5. WEBB will prepare street improvement plans for Via Las Palmas/South Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road/South Palm Canyon Drive intersections. 6. Street improvement plans will include removal of existing curb & gutter, sidewalk, ADA Ramps, roadway, and other obstructions. 7. Street improvement plans will show adjustment or relocation of existing utilities. 8. Street improvement plans will include construction of curb extension, sidewalk, ADA ramps, cross gutter, and roadway. 9. Curb and Gutter to be designed per City standards. Design existing adjacent asphalt to match existing street grade. 10.ADA Pedestrian Ramps to be designed per City and ADA standards. Design new or modify existing ramps as necessary for ADA compliance. 11.Identify trees, landscaping, grass areas, ornamental items, and sprinklers within proposed improvement areas to be protected in place, removed, and/or relocated. C. Flashing Warning System Plans (Electrical Plans): 12. Flashing Warning System Plans will include installation of Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon System (RRFB) at Via Las Palmas/South Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road/South Palm Canyon Drive intersections. 86 r �F•�,. -..; �<C., FI;JVOb: Acm, rI aIni �pnnt-';J I -ISS CI CAI Far"pVG -,P 'ans:,., F.i in•.. 11k�O11 .4:;_O'L i3 Nn'm D. Signing and Striping Plans: 13. WEBB will prepare signing & striping plans for South Palm Canyon Drive from Tacheva to Vista Chino. 14.Singing & striping plans will show existing street striping, pavement markers, street legends, crosswalks, sign legends, and all other ancillary street markings and signing that may exist or be required to complete the project. E. Street Light Plan: 15. WEBB will prepare street light plan for the proposed street light at the northwest corner of South Palm Canyon Drive and Via Las Palmas intersection. F. Specification and Cost Estimate: 16. WEBB will prepare quantity breakdown and cost estimate for the project. 17. WEBB will prepare bid summary and technical specification for the project. G. Utility Coordination: 18. WEBB will obtain as -built plans from utility companies. 19. WEBB will submit proposed improvement plans to utility companies. 20. WEBB will provide coordination with utilities companies regarding potential relocation. 21. WEBB will provide coordination with SCE for proposed electrical services. WEBB will prepare Improvement plans for Palm Canyon Drive Crosswalks at Stevens and Via Las Palmas; similar to the improvement plans provided by the City for 2013 Uptown Crosswalk Improvements Project — City Project 13-10. Ai MA PP RIi. i>l•G:v;'} P, I n')V r 11 i a 30,-Ca1 fie'hr ri _q r,2\±Pb-CI'14.-13 1 1 Fla m C nv/o n Urim•(r,:ay.:.l \U-I,E, CF In- IP�1n - � y✓� Ui Cioss��alV ?li_G Oti ?� ivo Exhibit "B" - Compensation Classification Billout Rate IA [Topographic Sumay, I ITopographic Survey I IB I IStreet Improvement Plans I IStreet Improvement Plans C I ]Flashing Warning System Plans IFlashing Warning System Plans D I ISigning and Striping Plans ISigning and Striping Plans E I IStreet Light Plan IStreet Light Plan I IF ISpeciflcation and Cost Estimate I ISpecd,cahon and Cost Estimate I IG I 1UUlity Coordination 1Utility Coordination I ITotal I N O N N M U V O O O $230 $210 $195 $165 $150 2 4 12 2 4 1 12 2 1 I 1 40 1 2 1 I 1 I 40 1 I I 2 1 12 I I 2 1 12 I I z1 I I I 121 I 2 1 12 I I 2 1 I I I I I 1 1 2 1 I I I I I 4 1 I I I 16 I 4 1 I 16 I I 2 I I I I I I 21 I I I 14 1 4 I I 1 4 1 I 46 1 12 3 a U T Z O N w L m O L N p O L V A!c L e a a` S 1401$ 1161E 160$ 90 1 16 [ 4 16 1 4 I 28 I 1 I I 4 28 I I 4 I 1 1 6 I 1 I 1 2 t161 12 I 1 1 6 I 1 I 1 2 1161 12 I ] e I I 2 181 12 I 116 I I I I 4 I 16 I I 4 I 112 I I I I 6 1 1 12 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 64 I 16 I 16 a r m b p 1O 2 �y9 a K e 0 f N o a W F I N 1 38 $ 6,020 I $ - 1 $ 38 $ 6.020 I $ 74 I $ I 10,640 I $ - I ] $ 74 1 $ 10,640 1 $ 13 I 1 $ I 1,660 1 $ - I [ $ 13 1 $ 1,860I ] 13 I 1 $ I 1,0601 S - I 1 $ 13 1 $ 1,8601 [ 12 I 1 $ I 1,5601 I 1 $ 12 1 $ 1 560 I 1 30 I 1$ I 4,1101$ - I 1$ 30 1 $ 4110I 1 $ 20 I 1 $ I I 2,380 1 $ 2,300 ( $ 20 1 $ 2,380 I $ 2,3001 180 I I I 1 $ 26,050 $ 2,300 1 $ I 200 $ 6,220 [ 200 $ 6,2201 I 100 $ 10,740 1 100 $ 10,740 1 I I $ ts661 1 $ 1,8601 I I 1 $ 1,860 I $ 1,860 I s 1,560 $ 1,560 100 1 $ 4,210 1 1001 $ 4,2101 I I 1 $ 4,8801 1 $ 4,660 1 400 1 $ 31,130 1 Services described in our Scope of Work (Exhibit "A") shall be provided on a time and material basis as shown below: CP16-13 N. Palm Canyon Drive Crosswalks at Stevens and $31 ,1 30-00 Via Las Palmas 2 �, 'q 1„r0 f.^r.i .3rP N \ui, . VaIni lrrirm \01:738 On 6 z's P,oP YP, L''! ^l. iaii,,, L r „ rc. �ea'N;'ill-r 3F _CFlSq '. P.din Attachment 3 89 iy a V M �+e •p c4`�foaN`p CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2015 NEW BUSINESS SUBJECT: MEASURE J "COMMUNITY PROJECTS" RECOMMENDATIONS — APPROVAL OF THREE YEAR PLAN FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager At its September 17, 2015 meeting, the Measure J Commission recommended a list of Community Projects under the theme of "Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Hot Spots" to be funded by the City Council over a three fiscal year period. This recommendation is the culmination of a lengthy Measure J Commission evaluation process, resulting from their solicitation of community projects. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Measure J recommended three year "Community Projects" plan: a) Fiscal Year 2015-16: Seventeen (17) projects estimated at $1,028,000; b) Fiscal Year 2016-17: Twenty (20) projects estimated at $965,000; c) Fiscal Year 2017-18: Nine (9) projects estimated at $1,202,000; 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all budget transfers and amendments necessary to effectuate the City Council actions, subject to annual budget appropriations. STAFF ANALYSIS: In Fiscal Year 2014-15, the City Council approved the Measure J Commission's concept of a $1,000,000 annual set -aside for Community Projects. As part of this process, the Commission voted to endorse the theme "Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Hot Spots" for the initial round of applications. Applications for these new projects were made available to the public and a total of 288 capital project suggestions were received from individuals, neighborhood organizations, and businesses. Additionally, for project ideas that met the theme, the Measure J Commission considered applications received during the previous round of funding in Item No. S.A. 90 City Council Staff Report October 21.2015 — Page 4 Measure J Funding FISCAL IMPACT: For the current Fiscal Year Community Projects account. $28,000 from the Measure projects this year. 00 2015-16, $1,0,000 is appropriated in the Measure J The Commission recommends transferring an additional J Project Contingency Reserve to complete funding for City Council approval of this three-year plan will also earmark approximately $2,167,000 over the next two fiscal years to complete eighteen (18) projects (estimated cost $965,000) for Fiscal Year 2016-17, and nine (9) projects (estimated cost $1,202,000) for Fiscal Year 2017-18. Actual project bid prices will likely differ depending upon the ultimate scope and timing of each project. Similarly, these "community projects," like other "multi -year" projects approved by City Council (e.g. bike lanes, Buzz transportation), will be designated as an earmark and require formal City Council appropriation in each individual fiscal year. Geoffrey Kiefil, Director of Finance and Treasurer Attachment. Hot Spots 2015-2018 project worksheet David H. Ready, City 91 City Council Staff Report October 21, 2015 — Page 2 Measure J Funding 2013. Due to the amount of applications, the Commission decided to recommend that the City Council approve a three-year plan utilizing the same theme. It should be noted that several of the recommended projects still require additional review by Public Works; further, some projects may also require additional Engineering studies. Measure J Funding Recommendations to the City Council: 2015-2016 Recommendations: Project Title Alvarado I E Akio lAmado I Alvarado Arenas I Bariato between Belerdo & Tennis Club Hotel i Barlsto IBarlsto between Farrell & Sunrise IBaristo from Belardo to Spencers ICamino Real i Twin Palms by ACE Hotel Camino Real between S Riverside Indian Trail IE. Palm Canyon, N side, Deejmell to Marcos Ilndlan Cyn Between Mel & Vista Chino IRyan Snyder Traffic Calming Study ISaturmino i Arenas ISonora between Farrell EI Clelo JSunny Dunes between Palm Cyn i Cage Amigo Tachavah I Sunrise ITahqultz I Caballeros (Tamarisk at Indian Canyon Me Eseuela i N Pakn Canyon Project Notes Red curbs needed at Intersection to knprove visibility I safety Stop Signs Recommended for 2015.2016 Sktawalks and lighting Skfeml s and lighting Sidewalks and fighting Extend red painted curbs: improve Intersection vislb0itif I safety ICahulua Elamentry, curbs skfewalics - W side of Camino Real ISldemlks: fill In this busy pedestrian corridor I Sidswaks - fill in paps Traffic Calming Study for various 0sted locations ISipnap caution or slow children ISIgns/0miting vehicle weight on street Sidswalks & Bike Lanes consistency I traffic calming Signage for dip as Tachevah enters and exits Sunrise intersection Red curbs at 4 corners of intersections for visibility Generous red curbs for increased I vislbi0ty Warrant analysis for potential signal Totall $ 625 2,500 33,750 96,250 96,250 625 273,500 69,100 96.250 60,000 16,000 1,250 256.2501 625 625 625 3.000 1,027,225 �4 City Council Staff Report October 21. 2015 -Page 3 Measure J Funding 2016.2017 Recommendations: Project Tillie IAmado between Farrell I Sunrise M HllsDrhre_anyon I LaVernelsunrlsearryon 15 Palm Canyon IEastmate i Ross Parka Farrell I Ramon Farrell I San Joaquin ILe Verne I Ulkne ILa Verne I S. Palm Canyon ILa Verne I Twin Palms IMurray Canyon IS. Palm Carryon Walla Fierro between Twin Palms I LaVerns Racks Club f Indian Racquet Club between Farrell I Cerritos 3 Palm Canyon Drive Sonora I Sunrise ISonore I Palo Fderro Tahqults Cyn I Indian to Renaissance Hotel Via Escuela I Sunrise Wav 2017-2018 Recommendations: Project Recommended i Notes for2016.2017 i Sidewalks (north side) S 213,750 Replace Yield aiyns with Stoeslgns 2,500 Right turn on red after stop 825 Crosswalk - mid -block with beacons. 43,7501 Traffic Calming and 4 Way stop sign Z500 J Mesquite CC tra0 crossinp 75,0001 Yellow signs with black arrows (fhashue7-beacon)-------_ _ _- -- _ . 12,5o0 Crosswalk and stop sign 7,500 4-way stop I $500 I Traffic Signal to faclitate pedestrian an_d / or bkrck crossir - - 200,000 - -- 3 Way Stop Sign 3.750 Sidewalk Itln-gs to Toledo - _- 173,750 Traffic Calming 15.000 Crosswalks -__ _ 5,000 jCrossrralk 8 Padestran Crossing Lt- — 58,750 4-Way Stop 3,750 Pedestrian lighting continuous along sidewalk 51,750 I-RlphtTurn onlY_ 525 Totell S 954,100 Project Project Recommended Title Notes for 2017-2018 (Crossley 134th Marked Crosswalk S 51000 Crossley I Dinah Shore Sidewalks 327,700 FA Mkador between Sunrise I Sidewalks 3 bike lanes; traffic calming lPasso Caballeros business travel, no bike lanes ----252,600 Racquet Club I Cerritos Traffic Sytnal 375,000 Racquet Club N Palm Cyn west to Cardillo Sidewalks 76,250 Racquet Club to Sunrise Sidewalks 9%125 1 S Riverside Or Sunrise to S. Random Rd Traffic calming- 20,000 I 8onora I Cap►i Circle ADA Curb Cuts on sidawal ks 8,000 Crosswalk - mid -block with beacons _ -----�-- 41,250 total S 1,202,t25 93 RECEIVED CiT'Y OF PALM SPRINC) - STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISHAND GAME 2111 MAY -3 AM 1' 41 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT UFF ICE OF SHE C11Y CLUE" Receipt#: 17-89204 State Clearinghouse # (if applicable): Lead Agency CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Date: 03122/2017 CoumyAgencyofFihng: RIVERSIDE E-201700320 Project Title: N, PALM CANYON DRIVE AT STEVENS ROAD & VIA LAS PALMAS CROSSWALK INSTALLATIONS Projeci.4pphcam Name CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PrvwASan . (760) 322-8380 Project Applicant Address: 3200 E. TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 Project Apphcnnt LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY CHECKAPPLICABLE FEES: ❑ Environmental Impact Repon ❑ Negatnw Declaration ❑Application Fee H'aterDnrrsion (State WaterResourcesControl BoardOnly) ❑ Project Subject to Cerufied RegulatorvPrograms ® CountyAdmin+stranonFee $50.00 ❑ Project that is eeempt from fees (DFGNo Effect Determination (Form Attached)) ® Pmject that isexemptfromfees (NoticeofEremption) Total Received $50.00 Signature and title ofperson receiving payment Notes: Deputy ACR 533 (Est. 12/2013) I NOTICE OF EXEMPTION To: ❑ Office of Planning and Research From City of Palm Springs 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 3200 E Tahquitz Canyon Way Sacramento, CA 95814 Palm Springs, CA 92262 ® Clerk of the Board County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92502-0751 Project Title: N. Palm Canyon Drive at Stevens Road and Via Las Palmas Crosswalk Installations. City Proiect No. 16-13 Project Applicant: City of Palm Somas. Project Location (Specific): 1). N. Palm Canyon Drive and Stevens Road 2). N. Palm Canyon Drive and Via Las Palmas Project Location (City): City of Palm SDrinas Project Location (County): Riverside Project Description: The scope of work includes the installation of two (2) pedestrian marked crosswalks including minor asphalt concrete pavement, concrete curb extensions (bulb -outs), curb and gutter, curb outlets, sidewalk, curb ramps, in - roadway warning lights, roadside flashing yellow beacons, street lighting, pavement markings and roadside signage. The two pedestrian marked crosswalks across N Palm Canyon Drive will be positioned along the north side of Stevens Road and along the south side of Via Las Palmas intersections. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Palm Springs Name of Person or Agency Carrying Our Project: City of Palm Springs, Public Works & Engineering Department 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Exempt Status: (check one) ❑ Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b) (1); 15268), ❑ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b) (3); 15269(a)); ❑ Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b) (4); 15269 (b)(c)); ® Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15301 Class 1 (c) — Existing Facilities ❑ Statutory Exemptions State code number: Reasons why project is exempt: Class 1 consists of operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographic features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities. Therefore, the N. Palm Canyon Drive at Stevens Road and Via Las Palmas Crosswalk Installations, City Project No. 16-13, is considered categorically exempt from CEQA. Lead Agency Contact Person: Marcus L. Fuller Area Codefrelephone/Extension: f7601 322-8380 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? ❑ Yes ❑ No Signature: Date: 2/28/2017 Title: Asst. Citv Manaaer/City Enaineer ® Signed by Lead Agency []Signed by Applicant F I L E D /POSTE D County of Riverside Peter Aldana Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code D+ Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder Reference. Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. E_201700320 03/22/2017 09:09 AM Fee: J 50.00 Page 1 of APR Removed APR 8 Deputy 1111 N; �r&NOW11offi i