Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12/7/2016 - STAFF REPORTS - 5.C.
4�*F P L M S,. �y a Y N .t+ �onwnm` a F°"`'�P City Council Staff Report DATE: December 7, 2016 NEW BUSINESS SUBJECT: APPROVE THE SECOND OF FOUR ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OPTIONS TO THE TROLLEY SERVICES OPERATOR AGREEMENT WITH MV TRANSPORTATION INC. RENEWING THE BUZZ TROLLEY SERVICE FOR ONE YEAR EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 19, 2016, THROUGH DECEMBER 18, 2017 FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Community and Economic Development Department SUMMARY This action will extend the Buzz Trolley service by approving the second of four one- year extension options to the Trolley Services Operator Agreement with MV Transportation, Inc., effective December 19, 2016, through December 18, 2017. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Extend the Buzz Trolley service for another year, and approve the second of four one-year extension options to the Trolley Services Operator Agreement with MV Transportation, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $863,592 for the third year of service, effective December 19, 2016, through December 18, 2017; (A6564) and 2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute all necessary documents. STAFF ANALYSIS: On June 18, 2014, the City Council approved a Trolley Services Operator Agreement with MV Transportation, Inc., (Agreement No. 6564) for a one-year pilot program for the "Buzz Trolley" in the amount of $918,874 for the first year of service. The agreement includes four additional one-year extension options at the mutual written consent of the parties. This action approves the extension of the Buzz Trolley service into the third year, effective December 19, 2016, through December 18, 2017. ITEM NO. _ f City Council Staff Report December 7, 2016-- Page 2 Extension of Buzz Trolley Service through 2017 The Buzz Trolley service has been very successful since the service commenced, with total ridership of: First Year (2015): 241,141 Second Year (2016): 225,246' 'Ridership to date, total ridership through end of 2016 is estimated at 240,000 There have been some additional minor changes in trolley stop locations and new stops added on the route. Two new northbound stops, as shown on Figure 1, were added including Stop #28a on the north side of Tamarisk Road west of Indian Canyon Drive and Stop #30a at the east side of North Palm Canyon Drive south of Camino Monte Vista. O = o = a -73 LAJ J = Q Q Q W �► W Lal ti I W l en Figure 1: New Northbound trolley Stops #28a and #30a These stops were added for passenger convenience, to reduce the distance between stops within the Uptown Design District, and decrease wait times at Trolley stops. 02 City Council Staff Report December 7, 2016 -- Page 3 Extension of Buzz Trolley Service through 2017 There is a planned relocation of Stop #16a, currently located at East Palm Canyon Drive and William Krisel Way in front of the former Twin Palms Bistro & Lounge at 1201 East Palm Canyon. That trolley stop will be moved approximately 350 feet to the east to the front entrance of the Quality Inn at 1269 East Palm Canyon as shown on Figure 2. The new location will offer better lighting and a more populated area for Buzz passengers to wait for the trolley. Deep Well Rd Deep Well Rd o E Suntan Ln � ro M m -a Cr M to current =r Aa location• j C- Ocotillo Lodge proposed location Palm Springs Quality Inn MW Oceo C+r`' E Twin Palms Dr Figure 2: Planned Relocation of Stop #16a 03 City Council Staff Report December 7, 2016 -- Page 4 Extension of Buzz Trolley Service through 2017 One other new stop change proposed is installation of a new southbound stop at the Arrive Hotel (Stop 1a). The proposed new stop at Arrive Hotel will be installed just south of the hotel's valet drop off lane. The general location is shown on Figure 3. a a Ivy Palm Resort Spa Rick's Restau t ,•., 8 Bak iys Inn Palm Springs The Monroe Olm Springs lrf Billy Reeds staurant t Bakery 8 8 Mojave River A mey Cant 7 Eleven es m Las Palmas Liquor Stores 8 Markets Proposed 1RRIV Stop Ala J J; Desert Figure 3: Planned new southbound Stop #1a at Arrive Hotel Service improvements are continuously being made as a result of what was learned during the first and second years of the Buzz Trolley program. As a result, there have been less delays in service, fewer complaints, better detour routes for parades and special events, strategic use of the spare fifth trolley during peak season or VillageFest on an as-needed basis, more proactive maintenance and repair during the slow season to keep trolleys operational during the busy season, development and release of the Buzz app providing real-time location of trolleys when in service, and finally, general improvements in our communications and in the brand identity. The Buzz Trolley program has been beneficial in providing a new and exciting "visitor experience" for our tourism brand, connecting businesses, visitors, and residents along the Palm Canyon Drive corridor, enhanced economic development, helped reduce downtown parking congestion, bridged the long walking distances within the Central Business District and between outlying major hotels and the Convention Center, 04 City Council Staff Report December 7, 2016-- Page 5 Extension of Buzz Trolley Service through 2017 provided a safer alternative to drinking and driving, and potentially reduced the number of cars on City streets. The cost for the third year of operation is $863,592, a reduction from the first year of the pilot program due to savings in start-up costs associated with the launch of the program, training of drivers, and procurement and branding of the vehicles. The third year operation costs are slightly higher than the second year cost of $856,985 due to expected increased maintenance and servicing of the aging vehicles. In accordance with the contract with MV Transportation, should the City elect not to extend the trolley program at any time beyond the first year of the program, the City is obligated to pay the difference in the depreciated value and the market value of the trolley buses, not to exceed $24,334 per trolley (a maximum termination fee cost of $121,670 for the five trolley buses). Upon conclusion of the third year of the program, this contract may be extended for two additional one-year options at the mutual written consent of the City and MV Transportation, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Implementation of the Buzz Trolley service as a permanent operation is considered a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Pursuant to Section 15378(a) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, (the "CEQA Guidelines"), a "Project" means the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and that is considered an activity undertaken by a person which is supported in whole or in part through public agency contracts from one or more public agencies; or an activity involving the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies. In March of 2015, the City considered making the Buzz Trolley service a permanent operation and, therefore, initiated an environmental review to analyze the project pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, an Initial Study was completed which analyzed all required CEQA issues, including but not limited to noise, air quality, greenhouse gas emission, traffic, and land use compatibility. The Initial Study concluded that the Buzz Trolley service would not have a significant effect on the environment, and on that basis, a Negative Declaration was prepared. A Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration was circulated for a public review period from April 27, 2015, to June 18, 2015. On November 4, 2015, the City Council held a public hearing to consider all of the evidence and public testimony relating to the Initial Study and Negative Declaration prepared for the Buzz Trolley service, and adopted Resolution No. 23928 determining that the Buzz Trolley service will not have a significant effect on the environment. 05 City Council Staff Report December 7, 2016-- Page 6 Extension of Buzz Trolley Service through 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: The 2016/2017 Fiscal Year budget appropriated a total of $975,562 for the Buzz Trolley program from the following funding sources: • $847,962 — Measure J Fund • $100,000 — Special Projects Fund (PS Resorts Contribution) • $27,500 — General Fund (Community Development Department) $975,462 Budgeted expenditures include: • $863,592 for operations of the third year of the Buzz Trolley program • $38,830 for additional operational hours of the Buzz Trolley program (holidays, etc.) • $47,040 for marketing, branding, and promotions provided by Symblaze • $6,000 for printing, perk cards, advertisements, etc. • $20,000 for trolley stop improvements, signage, special events, parades, etc. $975,462 Sufficient funds to authorize extension of the Buzz Trolley service for its third year are currently budgeted and available in the Measure J Capital Improvement Fund in Account No. 260-4500-59462 and the Special Projects Fund in Account No. 160-4523- 59462. SUBMITTED: 7 : rcus L. Fuller, MPA, P.E., P.L.S. David H. Ready, Assistant City Manager/City Engineer City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter from MV Transportation, Inc. 06 ATTACHMENT 1 07 I MV TRANSPORTATION, INC. November 15, 2016 Ms. Diana Shay Redevelopment Coordinator City of Palm Springs P.O. Box 2743 Palm Springs, CA 92263-2743 Dear Diana, Please accept this letter as evidence of our intent to extend our Contract with the City of Palm Springs for the operation and maintenance of the Trolley Service pursuant to section 3.4 of our Contract. As discussed, the extension will be submitted to City Council for final approval and all rates are outlined in the Cost Proposal Detail submitted by MV on 4/25/14. We look forward to another successful year of the operation of the service and should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, 7 iJx1 dIe L Sm Area Vice President MV Transportation, Inc. n 5910 N Central Expressway I Suite 1145 1 Dallas,TX 76206 P 972.391.4600 1 F 214.265.1214 THE HISTORIC TENNIS CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION 611 S. Palm Canyon Dr., Box No. 7244 v 0 F P;L h S P F i N 0` Palm Springs, CA 92262 htcno.communicationC?gmail.com2♦116 DEC -5 AM 8* 10 Hand Delivered CITY CLERK December 5, 2016 Mayor and Councilmembers City of Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Re: December 7,2016 City Council Agenda Item 5.C.-BUZZ Trolley - Comments on the BUZZ Trolley Route Into the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood Dear Mayor Moon, Mayor Pro Tern Mills and Councilmembers Foat, Kors and Roberts: As you know on December 19,2014, the City of Palm Springs began running the Buzz Trolley buses in the commercial core of Palm Springs on Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives. However, the Buzz buses were also routed on a westerly loop into the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood. The Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood is the only neighborhood in Palm Springs that the Buzz buses detour through. By letter dated July 1, 2015 the HTCNO Board of Directors asked the City to discontinue the BUZZ buses running into the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood. The basis of the request was the results of a neighborhood email survey opposing the BUZZ buses running in the HTCN(60 against,20 for),numerous complaints about the buses sent to the City by residents in the HTCN and numerous conversations about the buses with HTCNO members. By letter dated October 20, 2015 to the former Mayor and City Council,the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood Organization(HTCNO)Board of Directors noted that: "We have been informed that City Councilwoman, Ginny Foat, is stating that the members of the Historic Tennis Neighborhood were all informed in advance that the Buzz would be traveling through our Neighborhood...." Our October 20th letter further requested"a copy of the Buzz Trolley notification that Miss Foat stated was sent to the HTCNO members..." The HTCNO Board never received any reply to our October 20,2015 letter nor were any documents produced by the City in response to our request. Mayor and City Council December 5, 2016 Page 2 of 2 Thereafter,by letter dated June 23, 2016,the HTCNO Board made a Public Records Act request for documents "...supporting that the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood residents were provided written notification before the buses began running, including any Buzz Trolley notification sent to HTCNO members and/or Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood residents." None of the documents produced by the City in response supported in any way that any notification was given to HTCN residents, HTCNO members or the HTCNO Board prior to the buses starting to run into our neighborhood. By letter dated July 20,2016 the HTCNO Board responded to documents produced by the City in response to the June 23,2016 PRA request. The July 20,2016 stated in part that based on the documents produced by the City: "The residents and property owners in the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood were not afforded an opportunity to voice their objections to the BUZZ route and buses running in our neighborhood before the BUZZ buses started running on December 19,2014." By letter dated September 14, 2016 the HTCNO made a PRA request for documents in an effort to determine why the City started running the BUZZ buses into the neighborhood"... without the City staff or the BUZZ Trolley Subcommittee holding a neighborhood meeting in the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood, without giving timely and proper notice to the residents and property owners in the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood and 'without giving timely and proper notice to the the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood Organization (HTCNO)Board of Directors and the HTCNO members. [emphasis in original]" The City produced no documents that would explain why there was a lack of notice and why no neighborhood meeting for the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood was held.Accordingly, by letter dated October 25, 2016 addressed to David Ready, the City Manager, the HTCNO Board requested an explanation of why,when City internal documents show the City had decided on October 28,2014 not to run the BUZZ route into the Tennis Club Neighborhood the City did run the route into the neighborhood without first holding a neighborhood meeting or giving notice to the residents and property owners in the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood. As of the date of this current letter the HTCNO Board has received no response from Mr. Ready to our October 25th letter. We look forward to your response. Sincerely, The Board of Directors of the Historic Tennis Club Neighborhood Organization ya�p ,LMspRc CITY OF PALM SPRINGS " DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES nORPRO\n'O * Cq��FORN�P MEMORANDUM Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor Robert Moon Mayor Pro Tem Chris Mills Councilmember Ginny Foat Councilmember Geoff Kors Councilmember J.R. Roberts David Ready, City Manager From: Flinn Fagg, Director of Planning Services Subject: Agenda Item #5C — BUZZ Trolley Attached is an unsolicited noise assessment of the BUZZ Trolley operations, submitted by Harold Matzner (Attachment A). The study was performed by Urban Crossroads, a consulting firm from Irvine, CA, that specializes in transportation, noise, and air quality issues. The study concludes that the noise generated by the trolley service will have a negligible impact to interior noise levels. For comparison purposes, a copy of the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared by the City in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is also included as Attachment B. The Initial Study was adopted by City Council on November 4, 2015, and included an assessment of the potential noise impacts of the BUZZ Trolley. The Initial Study concluded that the trolley service would have a less than significant impact. ATTACHMENT A * URBAN 41 Corporate Park I Suite 300 1 Irvine, CA 92606 1 (949) 660-1994 CROSSROADS www.urbanXroads.com December 18, 2015 Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club 181 S. Civic Drive, Suite 1 Palm Springs, CA 92262 SUBJECT: Buzz TROLLEY ROUTE NOISE ASSESSMENT LETTER Dear Ms. Cynthia Allyn: Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Buzz Trolley Route Noise Assessment Letter. The purpose of this work effort is to assess the potential noise levels associated with the City of Palm Springs Buzz Trolley Route on the residential community near the Palm Springs Tennis Club and San Jacinto Drive. The study area is shown on Exhibit A. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Based on the noise level measurement data, the noise level increases associated with Buzz Trolley pass- by events will not increase the interior noise levels enough to be considered noticeable. It is expected that the Buzz Trolley pass-by events occurring every 15 minutes will likely not be perceived in the nearby interior rooms of the multi-family residential and hotel rooms located on the Buzz Trolley Route. Since standard building construction provides an exterior to interior noise reduction of 25 dBA the Buzz Trolley pass-by events noise events are considered less than significant. The potential noise impacts from the Buzz Trolley Route were analyzed based on field observations and noise level measurements taken in the study area shown on Exhibit A. The noise level measurements were collected in exterior and interior areas of the multi-family residential homes and hotel land uses on San Jacinto Drive to describe the potential worst-case noise levels during a Buzz Trolley pass-by event. The worst-case noise levels measured during a Buzz Trolley pass-by event on San Jacinto Drive are consistent with those of a typical quiet urban environment during the evening and nighttime hours ranging from 30 to 50 dBA Leq. Further, the observed Buzz Trolley noise levels are lower than typical traffic noise levels which can range from 60 to 80 dBA Leq on higher speed roadways with larger buses and heavy truck traffic. In addition, field observations made on San Jacinto Drive indicate that the Buzz Trolley pass-by events are not audible from the interior rooms at 555 Arenas Road and the Palm Springs Tennis Club. The Buzz Trolley pass-by event noise levels are consistent with typical traffic noise levels observed on San Jacinto Drive. While some audible noise level increases can be perceived from a Buzz Trolley pass-by event in exterior areas on San Jacinto Drive, the noise levels are less than those from other normal transportation-related noise sources such as buses,trucks, or older cars with a loud exhaust. 10047-07 Noise Letter Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 2 of 9 BACKGROUND The free City of Palm Springs Buzz Trolley Route currently operates every 15 minutes between 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. on Thursday through Sunday. The portion of the Buzz Trolley Route within the study area begins on Baristo Road heading west, then turns right to go north on San Jacinto Drive, turns left on Arenas Road to go west,and then follows Tahquitz Drive south to return to Baristo Road. The existing land uses on the study area of the Buzz Trolley route include multi-family residential homes, the 4 Seasons Flats hotel on the east site of San Jacinto Drive, the Palm Springs Tennis Club and Desert Hills Hotel located on the west side of San Jacinto Drive. Multi-family residential homes are also located to the north on Arenas Road and to the south on Baristo Road. COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO NOISE Community responses to noise may range from registering a complaint by telephone or letter, to initiating court action, depending upon each individual's susceptibility to noise and personal attitudes about noise. Several factors are related to the level of community annoyance including: • Fear associated with noise producing activities; • Socio-economic status and educational level; • Perception that those affected are being unfairly treated; • Attitudes regarding the usefulness of the noise-producing activity; • Belief that the noise source can be controlled. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Noise Effects Handbook (July 1981) approximately ten percent of the population has a very low tolerance for noise and will object to any noise not of their making. Consequently, even in the quietest environment, some complaints will occur. Another twenty-five percent of the population will not complain even in very severe noise environments. Thus, a variety of reactions can be expected from people exposed to any given noise environment. Surveys have shown that about ten percent of the people exposed to traffic noise of 60 dBA will report being highly annoyed with the noise, and each increase of one dBA is associated with approximately two percent more people being highly annoyed. When traffic noise exceeds 60 dBA or aircraft noise exceeds 55 dBA, people may begin to complain. Despite this variability in behavior on an individual level, the population as a whole can be expected to exhibit the following responses to changes in noise levels as shown on Exhibit B. An increase or decrease of 1 dBA cannot be perceived except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 3 dBA are considered barely perceptible, and changes of 5 dBA are considered readily perceptible. For the purposes of this Noise Assessment Letter, a readily perceptible interior noise level increase of 5 dBA or more would be considered a potentially significant noise level increase in interior areas (e.g. bedrooms, living rooms, etc.) of the multi-family residential and hotel land uses on San Jacinto Drive. 10047-07 Noise Letter t#URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 3 of 9 EXHIBITA: BUZZ TROLLEY ROUTE STUDY AREA e � a V � W 4MA00 E AMAOO TAHQUITZ E TAHQUITZ CANYON CANYON s W RENAS ati 4 � F ti Ao W BARISTD STUDY AREA WRAMON ERAMON LEGEND © ALL TIMES ONOT DN THURSDAY THURSDAY ONLY W MESQUITE E MESQUITE Source:City of Palm Springs,Buzz Trolley(http://new.buzzps.comlroute.htmi). 10047-07 Noise letter URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 3 of 9 EXHIBIT A: BUZZ TROLLEY ROUTE STUDY AREA 0 0 V W 00. - E AMA00 z TAHQUITZ 2 E TAHQUITZ co CANYON CANYON s WARENAS 8 a as .c a� W BARISTO STUDY AREA W RAMON E RAMON LEGEND © ALL TIMES ONOT ON THURSDAY ® THURSDAY ONLY W MESQUITE E MESQUITE Source:City of Palm Springs,Buzz Trolley(http://new,buzzps.comlroute.htmi). 10047-07 Noise Letter `FP URBAN crtossnoADS Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 4 of 9 EXHIBIT B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION Twice as Loud Readily Perceptible Barely Perceptible Just Perceptible 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Noise Level Increase(dBA) BUZZ TROLLEY NOISE LEVELS To describe the noise levels without and with a Buzz Trolley pass-by event, Urban Crossroads, Inc. collected four short-term noise level measurements on Sunday, December 6th, 2015 over a one-hour period from 7:10 p.m.to 8:10 p.m.at the Palm Springs Tennis Club and 555 Arenas Road. The noise level measurements were collected within the interior rooms of a multi-family residential home (555 Arenas Road, Unit#4)and a hotel room (Palm Springs Tennis Club, Room#340)on San Jacinto Drive. Additional exterior noise level measurements were taken outside of each interior room. Exhibit C provides the short-term noise level measurement locations in relation to the Buzz Trolley Route. Appendix A includes study area photos. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA The short-term interior noise level measurements were collected using a Mezzo Type 1 precision microphone with a %" prepolarized MPA 231 microphone from BSWA Technology, Inc. (Serial Number 490731) at measurement location S2,and Piccolo Type 2 integrating sound level meters and dataloggers at measurement locations S1, S3, and S4. The Mezzo sound level meter was calibrated using a Larson- Davis calibrator, Model CAL 200. The Piccolo sound level meters were calibrated using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 150. All noise meters were programmed in "slow" mode to record noise levels in "A" weighted form. The sound level meters and microphones were equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. All noise level measurement equipment satisfies the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard specifications for sound level meters ANSI S1.4-2014/IEC 61672-1:2013. MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS Since the Buzz Trolley operates every 15 minutes,the noise level measurements were taken over a one- hour period to collect multiple Buzz Trolley pass-by event noise levels. While approximately one-hour of data was collected at each measurement location, only the worst-case Buzz Trolley pass-by event is presented in this analysis to assess the potential noise impacts at the nearby sensitive multi-family residential homes and hotel rooms. In addition, the noise level measurements were collected during the evening hours when the ambient noise levels are generally lower than the typical daytime hours to 10047-07 Noise letter ��URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 5 of 9 determine the potential Buzz Trolley pass-by event noise level impacts when sensitive land uses are more susceptible to noise level increases. The noise level measurements reflect Buzz Trolley pass-by events but do not account for any additional noise sources generated by Buzz Trolley patrons, such as loud talking or audio devices used when boarding or exiting the Buzz Trolley. However,these additional noise sources do not likely represent a perceptible noise level increase on the sensitive residential or hotel land uses on San Jacinto Drive, since the closest Buzz Trolley pick-up / drop-off location is roughly 500 feet away on Tahquitz Drive. Based on the observed characteristics of the Buzz Trolley during the noise level measurements, it is estimated that the Buzz Trolley takes up to one minute to travel from Baristo Road to Arenas Road on San Jacinto Drive. Therefore,for the purposes of this analysis,a one-minute average ambient noise level (dBA Leq) is presented on Tables 1 and 2 for each measurement location prior to the Buzz Trolley pass- by event in the exterior and interior areas, respectively. The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. Appendix B provides a summary of the existing noise levels described below: Sl Location S1 represents the exterior background ambient noise conditions at the right-of-way of San Jacinto Drive, south of Arenas Road, near the multi-family residential homes at 555 Arenas Road. The background ambient noise level measurement,without the Buzz Trolley noise source, resulted in an energy-average noise level of 44.4 dBA Leq. S2 Location S2 represents the interior background ambient noise conditions within Unit 4 of 555 Arenas Road. The background ambient noise level measurement, without the Buzz Trolley noise source, resulted in an energy-average noise level of 39.8 dBA Leq. S3 Location S3 represents the exterior background ambient noise conditions at the outdoor patio of the Palm Springs Tennis Club Room #340. The background ambient noise level measurement, without the Buzz Trolley noise source, resulted in an energy-average noise level of 44.7 dBA Leq. S4 Location S4 represents the interior background ambient noise conditions within the living room area of the Palm Springs Tennis Club Room #340. The background ambient noise level measurement, without the Buzz Trolley noise source, resulted in an energy-average noise level of 44.7 dBA Leq. 10047-07 Noise Letter &URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 6 of 9 EXHIBIT C: NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMEEENNNTf LOCATIONS p Mod I ,h rt u 2anb�lfi Y", IDa�6ttlb _ n ae F � •f y e t LEGEND: ♦ Exterior Noise Measurement Locations 0i1 Buzz Trolley Route E1 Interior Noise Measurement Locations 10047-07 Noise Letter (7'►URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 7 of 9 MEASUREMENT RESULTS The noise levels presented on Tables 1 and 2 show the exterior and interior noise level measurements, respectively, without and with a Buzz Trolley pass-by event. In addition, the noise levels measured during the Buzz Trolley pass-by event on San Jacinto Drive represent a typical quiet urban environment during the evening and nighttime hours with lower noise levels than those from typical traffic on urban roadways. Exterior Noise Levels As shown on Table 1, the worst-case with Buzz Trolley pass-by event noise levels at each measurement location ranged from 40.0 to 53.7 dBA Leq. To describe the Buzz Trolley-related noise level contributions, the difference between the ambient without the Buzz Trolley and with the Buzz Trolley pass-by event noise levels were calculated on Table 1. The Buzz Trolley noise level contributions are shown to range from 1.9 to 9.3 dBA Leq in the exterior noise level measurement locations. The 9.3 dBA Leq increase at location S1 represents the worst-case exterior noise level increase at a distance of roughly 10 feet from the Buzz Trolley near the stop sign at San Jacinto Drive and Arenas Road, and includes the noise due to the Buzz Trolley braking, stopping, and accelerating. The 1.9 dBA Leq noise level increase at the outdoor patio area of Room #340 of the Palm Springs Tennis Club represents a barely perceptible noise level increase, based on the typical human levels of perception previously shown on Exhibit B. Interior Noise Levels The interior noise level increases due to the Buzz Trolley are shown on Table 2. At Unit 4 of 555 Arenas Road, the interior noise level increase with the Buzz Trolley approached 0.2 dBA Leq, and no noise level increase was measured in Room 340 of the Palm Springs Tennis Club. Based on the noise level measurement data,the interior noise level increases due to the Buzz Trolley will likely not be perceived within the interiorareas. While some noise associated with the Buzz Trolley may be heard in the exterior areas on San Jacinto Drive, the noise level contributions with the Buzz Trolley Route for interior rooms do not represent a significant increase on the existing noise environment for nearby residential and hotel land uses. Further, the Buzz Trolley noise levels are consistent with the typical traffic noise levels observed on San Jacinto Drive. 10047-07 Nolse letter URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 8 of 9 TABLE 1: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS 8t Buzz TROLLEY CONTRIBUTIONS Noise Level Without Buzz Trolley' With.BuzzTrolley3 "Increase ID1 Location Address From Buzz Duration Noise Level Duration Noise Level Trolley Pass- (miss) (dBA Leq) (m:ss) (dBA Leq) BY° Sl Exterior San Jacinto 1:00 44.4 0:50 53.7 9.3 Drive Tennis Club S3 Exterior Room 4340 1:00 44.7 0:50 46.6 1.9 Patio 'See Exhibit for the noise level measurement locations. 'Ambient noise levels prior to the Buzz Trolley passing on San Jacinto Drive at 8:01 p.m.on 12/6/2015. 'Highest observed noise levels during one pass-by of the Buzz Trolley on San Jacinto Drive at 8:03 p.m.on 12/6/2015. Noise level increase due to the Buzz Trolley pass-by an San Jacinto Drive based on the difference between the without and with measured noise levels.The 9.3 dBA increase at location 51 represents the worst-case exterior noise level increase at a distance of roughly 10 feet from the Buzz Trolley near the stop sign at San Jacinto Drive and Arenas Road,and includes the noise due to the Buzz Trolley braking,stopping,and accelerating. TABLE 2: INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS&Buzz TROLLEY CONTRIBUTIONS Noise Level Without Buzz TrolleyZ9 WithBuzz Trolley' Increase' iD' Location :Address - From Buzz Duration -Noise Level Duration Noise Level Trolley Pass- '(m:ss) (dBA Leq). (m[se) (dBA Leq) BY°. S2 Interior 555 Arenas Rd. 1:00 39.8 0:50 40.0 0.2 Unit#4 S4 Interior Tennis Club 1:00 44.7 0:50 44.7 0.0 Room#340 'See Exhibit C for the noise level measurement locations. 3 Ambient noise levels prior to the Buzz Trolley passing on San Jacinto Drive at 8:01 p.m.on 12/6/2015. 'Highest observed noise levels during one pass-by of the Buzz Trolley on San Jacinto Drive at 8:03 p.m.on 12/6/2015. -Noise level increase due to the Buzz Trolley pass-by on San Jacinto Drive based on the difference between the without and with measured noise levels. 10047-07 Noise Letter URBAN CROSSROADS Ms. Cynthia Allyn Palm Springs Tennis Club December 18, 2015 Page 9 of 9 CONCLUSIONS This Noise Assessment Letter shows that the Buzz Trolley pass-by events do not generate an interior noise level increase high enough to be considered noticeable. Based on the interior noise level measurement data, the noise level increase of up to 0.2 dBA Leq due to the Buzz Trolley will likely not be perceived within the interior areas of 555 Arenas Road and Room 340 of the Palm Springs Tennis Club. While some noise associated with the Buzz Trolley may be heard in the exterior areas, the noise level contributions with the Buzz Trolley Route for interior rooms do not represent a significant increase on the existing noise environment for nearby residential and hotel land uses. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 660-1994 x203. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Bill Lawson, P.E., INCE Alex Wolfe Principal Assistant Analyst 10047-07 Noise Letter URBAN CROSSROADS This page intentionally left blank 10047-07 Noise Letter URBAN CROSSROADS APPENDIX A: STUDY AREA PHOTOS 10047-07 Noise Letter URBAN CROSSROADS This page intentionally left blank 10047-07 Noise Letter URBAN CROSSROADS JN:10047 Buzz Trolley Route r 17 : y S1 S3 33,49' 15.720500", 116,33'7.921100" 33,49' 12.438300", 116. 33'8.937300" _ a ..ram S3+S4 S4 33,49' 12.630600", 116,33'8.882400" 33,49'12.438300", 116,33'8.937300" Trolley_1 Trolley_2 33,49'10.515700", 116, 33' 12.343100" 33, 49' 10.515700", 116,33' 12.343100" This page intentionally left blank 10047-07Noise Letter *URBAN CROSSROADS APPENDIX B: NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT SUMMARY WORKSHEETS 10047-07 Noise Letter URBANI CROSSROADS This page intentionally left blank 10047-07Noise Letter URBAN CROSSROADS Short-Term Noise Level Measurement Summary Project Nome: Buzz Trolley Route IN: _C�47 Energy Average Leq Difference Measurement ID: S1 Analyst: A.Wolfe Ambient With Trolley Measurement Location: 555 Arenas Road at San Jacinto Drive Dote: 12/6/2015 44.4 53.7 9.3 Sound Level Meter: SoftdB Piccolo Type 2 Response: Slow Noise Source: Exterior ambient noise conditions without and with the Buzz Trolley passing by on San Jacinto Road. —Ambient —With Buzz Trolley 60 - m 55 v w 50 J 9 0 45 V d c 40 rl 35 10 20 30 40 50 60 Seconds Lam►URBAN Short-Term Noise Level Measurement Summary Project Name: Buzz Trolley Route JN: 10047 Energy Average Leg Difference MeasurementlD: S2 Analyst: A.Wolfe Ambient With Trolley Measurement Location: 555 Arenas Road,Unit#4 Date: 12/6/2015 39.8 40.0 0.2 Sound Level Meter: SoftclB Mezzo Type 1 Response: Slow Noise Source: Interior ambient noise conditions without and with the Buzz Trolley passing by on San Jacinto Road. —Ambient —With Buzz Trolley 60 m 55 v a 50 J 0 45 V d 0 40 r'1 35 10 20 30 40 50 60 Seconds O URBAN Short-Term Noise Level Measurement Summary Project Nome: Buzz Trolley Route JN: 10047 Energy Averoge Leq Difference Measurement ID: S3 Analyst: A.Wolfe Ambient With Trolley Measurement Location: Palm Springs Tennis Club,Room 340 Outdoor Patio Date: 12/6/2015 44.7 46.6 1.9 Sound Level Meter: SoftdB Piccolo Type 2 Response: Slow Noise Source: Exterior ambient noise conditions without and with the Buzz Trolley passing by on San Jacinto Road. —Ambient —With Buzz Trolley 60 m 55 v acr 50 J 9 g 45 W a 40 35 10 20 30 40 50 60 Seconds (0►URBAN Short-Term Noise Level Measurement Summary Project Name: Buzz Trolley Route JN: 10047 Energy Average Leq Difference Measurement ID: 54 Analyst: A.Walfe Ambient With Trolley Measurement Location: Palm Springs Tennis Club,Room 340 Outdoor Patio Date: 12/6/2015 44.7 44.7 0.0 Sound Level Meter: SoftdB Piccolo Type 2 Response: Slow Noise Source: Interior ambient noise conditions without and with the Buzz Trolley passing by on San Jacinto Road. 60 Ambient —With Buzz Trolley m 55 a m 50 J 0 45 Y N V 40 O YV rl 35 30 20 30 40 50 60 Seconds O URBAN ATTACHMENT B , f • • OF PALM S A� U u INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION x x e l4� W Ro0lATt0 CQZ I FO RN�P Project Title: BUZZ Trolley Case No. 5.1370-BUZZ Assessor's Parcel No. Not applicable Lead Agency Name and City of Palm Springs Address: 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 92262 Project Location: Generally along Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives between Via Escuela on the north and Smoketree Lane on the south,with a loop on West Baristo, West Arenas and Belardo Road. Project Sponsor's Name and City of Palm Springs 3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way Address: Palm Sprincls, CA 92262 General Plan Desi nations : Not applicable Zoning: Not applicable Contact Person: Edward Robertson, Principal Planner City of Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 92262 Phone Number: 760 323-8245 Date Prepared April 16, 2015 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION Description of the Project The BUZZ Trolley project is a fare-free City-operated Trolley service. Its 10.5-mile route generally extends along Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives, from Via Escuela on the north to Smoketree Lane/Cerritos Road on the south, with a westerly loop along W. Arenas Road, W. Baristo Road, and S. Tahquitz Drive. The project's four (4) Trolleys are fueled by compressed natural gas (CNG). Fueling takes place at a commercial CNG station on Kirk Douglas Way. Maintenance is provided by private contractors. Each Trolley is approximately 30 feet in length and has a seating capacity of 22 plus 2 wheelchairs, and standing room for another 10 to 15 passengers. Trolley service is provided Thursday through Sunday, from 11 a.m. to 1 a.m. (no service Monday through Wednesday). The route includes 30 stops, and a Trolley arrives at each stop every 15 minutes. Approximately one- third of stops are shared with existing SunLine Transit Agency bus stops. The remaining stops use existing street right-of-way, and no new construction or ground disturbance is required. When out of service, Trolleys are parked in a leased space at the Palm Springs International Airport. Based on the 15 minute headway for each Trolley, the maximum number of stops generated by the BUZZ service is 4 stops per hour over a 14 hour period, for a total of 56 stops at each BUZZ stop per day. The maximum number of potential stops per day roughly translates to average daily trips, insofar as each Trolley travels on the same segment of roadway along the route 56 times in one day. In total, the four Trolleys travel approximately 588 miles in total in one day. Environmental Setting and Surrounding Land Uses The Trolley route generally extends along Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives through the downtown core. Surrounding land uses include a variety of commercial, hotel, residential, and institutional uses. The westerly loop in the Tennis Club neighborhood consists of commercial development east of Belardo Road, and a mix of single and multiple family residential units, and resort development, including the Tennis Club Resort. Terrain consists of paved and improved urban roadways on the relatively flat valley floor. North: the northernmost portion of the route is Via Escuela, between N. Palm Canyon and N. Indian Canyon Drives South: the southernmost portion of the route is E. Palm Canyon Drive, between S. Palm Canyon Drive and Smoke Tree Lane/Cerritos Road East: the easternmost portion of the route is Smoke Tree Lane/Cerritos Road at E. Palm Canyon Drive. West: the westernmost portion is S.Tahquitz Drive between W. Arenas and W. Baristo Roads Other public agencies whose approval is required None City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negafive Declaration 2 f f(Mb YpFl.n TROLLEY ROUTE: JAN 2015 } SW • W � R T W ~ W Z r N MOWN CANYON _ "' S PALLY CAMYBN a � i EC ! a 4f LEGEND me A G W C � 1 3 ONR WNEElYr EMtlaAr liar s 65 0NI RNTA CWM 0PCIMEA peW.M/UVW C)FOCICMM TELL C)SPE/WSW1f QKM Awaxv ©MW 0 0CM111A NMW OW/fWN OWt/IIA D () WaKUKE C Suaaxremw Mwnu Qxliaarx/AWua VIA ESCUELA TOR SMDKETAEE O NLI'M EWAsx/TAWun ®crExNW C)crcrauNWSEsuNxu/1AUW QxIiwAN/vuuaxu TT•x11-Isnn l)w-fun Eva,YTfmfnuE.f FREE! 0W[/EE funU 0SK/aaNO ©YCMNMA NAa QS NOAN11AWf10 gMC,IfF104,rE O NK/M mi ®I y~T1M 0 WCAW V STCIMOOKa t3 SPa EN/ASMA1 NCI WC/TA VAN WL-N HFMH CANYON IFC•SW HFUMEANNW ETC-uSErAWENWUN h Source:City of Palm Springs c Exhibit r 1 Buzz Trolley Route Map a L J TERRA NOVA® Palm Springs,California 1 Planninf&Rmwk Inc. DRAFT INITIAL SO/NEGATIVE DECLARATION Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, as indicated by the checklist and corresponding discussion on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agricultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils Hazards & Hazardous ❑ Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality El Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/ Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance City o/Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 4 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION DETERMINATION: The City of Palm Springs Planning Department On the basis of this initial evaluation: ® I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ i find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is.required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 4 . 1 CQ tdOward O. Robertson Date Principal Planner Coy of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 InHfal Study/Negaflve DecfaaHon 5 • DRAFT INITIAL SWNEGATIVE DECLARATION PURPOSE OF THIS INITIAL STUDY This Initial Study has been prepared consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, to determine if the project, as proposed, may have a significant effect upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained within this report, the Initial Study will be used in support of the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take into account the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. 'Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 6 • DRAFT INITIAL S*/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impacts to less than significance. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 7 • DRAFT INITIAL STIPY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. AESTHETICS Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ❑ El ® ❑ vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock El ❑ ® ❑ outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its ❑ ❑ ® ❑ surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ nighttime views in the area? Discussion of Impacts a-c) Less Than Significant Impact. Throughout most of the City, including along the BUZZ Trolley route, scenic vistas of the high elevations of the San Jacinto Mountains are visible to the west, southwest, and south. Given the urban setting of the project area, views of lower elevations are blocked by intervening development in many locations. The distance between the Trolley route and foothills ranges from as close as 200±ft. along the westerly loop at S. Tahquitz Drive, to 2 or more miles along the southerly portion of E. Palm Canyon Drive. Street level views generally consist of moderately dense urban development, including buildings, parking lots, street improvements, and urban landscaping. Palm Canyon, Indian Canyon, and East Palm Canyon Drives are designated as "Citywide Scenic Corridors" and "Master Streetscape Streets" in the General Plan. At the state level, the routes are classified as "Eligible State Scenic Highways — Not Officially Designated." The BUZZ Trolley project will have a less than significant impact on scenic resources and will not degrade the existing visual character of the project area. The project area is developed with a full range of commercial, hotel, residential, and institutional buildings and improvements. The Trolley route will use the existing urban roadway network, primarily Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives, which form the backbone of the City's circulation system and are 4-lane divided Major Thoroughfares that accommodate up to 27,000 vehicle trips per day (General Plan Update Traffic Analysis, 2007). The project will be consistent with the existing vehicle mix, including SunLine Transit buses 40 feet in length (10 feet longer than BUZZ Trolleys), tour buses, commercial vehicles making deliveries, and passenger cars. Minimal bus stop signoge is required. No new bus stop pull-off lanes, shelters, depots, or other structures or construction projects are proposed. Trolleys will use an existing CNG City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 8 • DRAFT INITIAL SIP/NEGATIVE DECLARATION fueling station and be stored at an existing parking lot at the Palm Springs International Airport when out of service. No significant adverse aesthetic impacts will occur. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The project will result in the addition of 4 Trolleys to the existing roadway network. Trolleys will generate minimal light and glare from windows and lights that is consistent with existing traffic in the project area. Impacts will be less than significant. (Sources: California Scenic Highway Mapping System, accessed March 2015; Palm Springs General Plan, 2007; "Transit Facilities Design Manual," SunLine Transit Agency, December 2006.) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 9 SDRAFT INITIAL STTDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and El El Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, 11 El ID to non-agricultural use? Discussion of Impacts a-c) No Impact. Neither the City nor the project area contains land suitable for agricultural uses. The project area is within the City's downtown core and does not include Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or land that is subject to a Williamson Act contract. The project will utilize the existing roadway network and will not result in the direct or indirect conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. (Sources: "Riverside County Important Farmland 2010 Map," sheet 2 of 3, California Department of Conservation, published January 2012.) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley Apri12015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 10 DRAFT INITIAL STUPINEGATIVE DECLARATION III. AIR QUALITY Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ❑ ❑ ❑ the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air ❑ ❑ ® ❑ quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air ❑ ❑ ® ❑ quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a ❑ ❑ ❑ substantial number of people? Setting The Coachella Valley, including the City of Palm Springs and BUZZ Trolley route, is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). All development within the SSAB is subject to SCAQMD's 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (2012 AQMP) and the 2003 Coachella Valley PMIo State Implementation Plan (2003 CV PM10 SIP). The SCAQMD operates and maintains regional air quality monitoring stations at numerous locations throughout its jurisdiction. The Trolley route is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 30, which includes monitoring stations in Palm Springs and Indio.The Indio site has been operational since 1985 and the Palm Springs site since 1987. Criteria air pollutants are contaminants for which the state and federal air quality standards have been established. Currently, the Coachella Valley is classified as being in non-attainment for both ozone (03) and PMIo. Discussion of Impacts a) No Impact. Operation of the BUZZ Trolley will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of SCAQMD's 2012 Air Quality Management Plan or 2003 Coachella Valley PMIa State Implementation Plan. The BUZZ Trolley service supports such management plans by encouraging the use of alternative fueled engines and clean-air transit vehicles, as well as the reduction of passenger vehicle trips. The Trolley service does not require the construction of new infrastructure (roadways, facilities etc.) and will not affect regional or local compliance with applicable management plans. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2013 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 11 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION b, c) Less Than Significant Impact. Construction Emissions The BUZZ Trolley service is limited to operation of CNG buses. Development of additional infrastructure, including roadways or transit facilities, is not required. There are no air emission impacts related to construction. Operational Emissions Operational emissions for the BUZZ Trolley are limited to mobile source (vehicle) emissions. Operational emissions were calculated using the emission factor tables provided by the California Air Resources Board'. The following provides the methodology and natural gas converted emissions standards used in quantifying the BUZZ Trolley's operational emissions. Methodology • 4 Trolleys per hour • One route loop is 10.5 miles long • The Trolley service runs 14 hours per day, 4 days per week, 52 weeks per year Therefore: • 4 loops/hour X 10.5 miles/loop = 42 miles/hour • 42 miles/hour X 14 hours/day = 588 miles/day 588 miles/day x 4 days/week= 2,352 miles/week • 2,352 miles/week x 52 weeks/year= 122,304 miles per year Table III-1 Natural Gas Converted Emission Standards (daily emissions EO Certification Standards NOx ROG PMs.s g/bhp-hr g/mile 1.8 NOx+ 0.02 PMio 5.76 1.82 0.07 NMHC1 Miles/Da 588 ' 3,386.88 g 1,070.16 g 41.16 Hours/Day 562 1.12 ' Conversion 0.002lbs. 7.45lbs. 2.35lbs. 0.09lbs. to Ibs/day3 Source: Table 5-F: Natural Gas Converted Emission Standards, Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects: Emission Factor Tables, prepared by California Air Resources Board, May 2013. 1. A majority of the natural gas urban buses have been certified to the optional standards. Therefore, these values are based on the optional standards. Many natural gas urban buses have ben certified to optional standards below this level, thus making for a conservative estimate. 2. 14 hour days,4 Trolleys= 14 x 4= 56 3. Conversion: 1 gram =0.0022 pounds "Table 5-F: Natural Gas Converted Emission Standards,"Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects: Emission Factor Tables, prepared by California Air Resources Board,May 2013. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley Apr112015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 12 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION As shown in the table below, operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance for operational criteria pollutants. Impacts will be less than significant. Table III-2 Operational Emissions Summary (pounds per day) CO NOx ROG S02 PM10 PMzs Operation Emissions' NA 7.45 2.35 NA 0.00 0.09 SCAQMD Thresholds 550.00 100.00 75.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Exceeds Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: Table 5-F: Natural Gas Converted Emission Standards, Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects: Emission Factor Tables, prepared by California Air Resources Board, May 2013. d) No Impact. Operational emissions generated by the BUZZ Trolley are transient in nature and will not have significant adverse impacts on sensitive receptors. The Trolleys are powered by compressed natural gas (CNG), which when burned expels lower amounts of carcinogenic particles, CO, CO2 and nitrogen oxide when compared to gasoline/diesel powered vehicles. Impacts to sensitive receptors are negligible. e) No Impact. Operation of the BUZZ Trolleys will not generate objectionable odors. Emissions associated with the Trolley are transient in nature, and associated odors would be quickly dispersed below detectable thresholds. Impacts related to odors are considered negligible. (Sources: "Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan," prepared by South Coast Air Quality Management District, December 2012; "Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology," prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Revised, July 2008: "2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan," August 1, 2003; SEEC ClearPath California; Table 5-F: Natural Gas Converted Emission Standards, Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects: Emission Factor Tables, prepared by California Air Resources Board,May 2013. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 13 • DRAFT INITIAL A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or ❑ ❑ ❑ regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional El El ❑ plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not El ❑ Ellimited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or ❑ ❑ ❑ migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a ❑ ❑ ❑ tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other ❑ ❑ ❑ approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? City of Palm Springs BUZZ Tolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 14 DRAFT INITIAL STIPY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION Discussion of Impacts a-e) No Impact. The Trolley route is entirely within the City's developed urban core and outside of any biological sensitivity area or conservation areas (General Plan Figure 5-2). Trolleys will operate on the existing roadway network and be stored at the Palm Springs International Airport, neither of which contains riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, wetlands, marshes, or other features protected by local or regional plans or regulations. The project area does not contain migratory wildlife corridors or nursery sites. No adverse impacts will occur. f) No Impact. The Trolley route is located within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CV MSHCP) and the Tribal Habitat Conservation Plan. The Trolley route does not involve any new construction, and as such will not have an impact on the physical environment. The Trolley route occurs exclusively in developed, urbanized areas. The Trolleys are fueled by compressed natural gas, and therefore emit less criteria pollutants than traditional vehicle engines. The Trolleys will not be subject to fees associated with the CV MSHCP. Portions of the Trolley route pass through Sections 2, 14, 22, 24, and 26, which are within reservation land of the Aguo Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCQ. As such, they are part of the Valley Floor Planning Area (VFPA) of the Tribal Habitat Conservation Plan. The project is considered a public facility operation and, therefore, is a Covered Activity under the Plan. No mitigation is necessary. (Sources: Y P P"Coachella Valle Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan," 2007; "Tribal Habitat Conservation Plan," Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, August 2010.) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 15 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: incorporated a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined ❑ ❑ ❑ in 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource ❑ ❑ ❑ pursuant to 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique ❑ ❑ ❑ geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those El El ❑ interred outside of formal cemeteries? Discussion of Impacts a-d) No Impact. The Trolley route will operate within the existing roadway network and Trolleys will be stored at existing parking facilities at the Palm Springs International Airport, all of which have been previously graded, paved, and improved. No new ground disturbance or construction is proposed that could cause adverse impacts to historical, archaeological, or paleontological resources. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley Apra 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 16 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area ❑ ❑ ❑ or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including El ❑ Elliquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ ❑ ❑ topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in ❑ ❑ ❑ on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code ❑ ❑ ❑ (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative ❑ ❑ ❑ wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Discussion of Impacts 0.1) No Impact. The project area does not contain an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The nearest Fault Zone is located along the Banning Pass Fault, approximately 5 miles north of Via Escuela, the northernmost portion of the Trolley route. a.11) No Impact. The Coachella Valley is a seismically active region, and seismic events on local or regional faults have the potential to generate strong ground shaking in the project area. Trolleys could be exposed to ground shaking while in service or storage. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 17 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION However, no habitable structures are proposed, and the project will not expose people to substantial adverse hazards. a.iii) No Impact. The valley floor, on which the project area is located, is composed of fine- grain granular sediments that could be susceptible to liquefaction. However, groundwater depths are greater than 50 feet below the ground surface within the City as a whole, and along the Trolley route. Therefore, the area has a low liquefaction susceptibility (General Plan Figure 6-1). a.iv) No Impact. The majority of the Trolley route is sufficiently distant from the foothills and slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains that there is no landslide/rockfall risk (General Plan Figure 6-2). However, the westerly loop along W. Baristo and W. Arenas Roads is within '/4 mile of the foothills, which has a moderate risk. The portion of the route along S. Tahquitz Drive is within 200±feet of the foothills and has a high risk. Buildings on the west side of S. Tahquitz Drive function as a barrier and protect S. Tahquitz Drive from immediate slope instability hazards. Should a major landslide occur, Trolley service in impacted areas could be re-routed or terminated. The likelihood of an impact on the Trolleys from a landslide is negligible. b) No Impact. The project will use existing roads, bus stops, fueling station, maintenance facilities, and parking facilities. No ground excavation or construction is proposed, and the project will not result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. c) No Impact. As described in a.iii, above, the project area has a low susceptibility to liquefaction. The area also has a low susceptibility to lateral spreading, which requires a shallow water table or proximity to a water source that could cause inundation of onsite soils. As noted in a.iv, portions of the westerly loop could be susceptible to landslide and/or rockfall. However, Trolley service in impacted areas could be re-routed or terminated if necessary, and the likelihood of impact on a Trolley is negligible. Subsidence has been documented in the eastern Coachella Valley, but is not known to occur in the western valley in which the project area is located. Impacts associated with unstable soils will be less than significant. d) No Impact. Expansive soils typically contain large amounts of clay that expand when water is absorbed and shrink when they dry. Soils in the northerly portion of the project area consist of Myoma fine sand (0 to 5 percent slope)(MaB). Soils in the central, westerly, and southerly portion of the project area are composed of Carsitas gravelly sand (0 to 9 percent slopes)(CdC). Both soil types have a low shrink/swell potential ("Soil Survey of Riverside County, California, Coachella Valley Area," U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, 1980). The project will utilize existing roads and fueling and maintenance facilities, and no new ground disturbances are proposed. No project- related impacts associated with expansive soils will occur. e) No Impact. The project does not propose or require the construction or use of any wastewater disposal systems. No adverse impacts associated with soils will occur. (Sources: Palm Springs General Plan, 2007; "Soil Survey of Riverside County, California, Coachella Valley Area," U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, 1980) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley Apr112013 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 18 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1111111111111111110 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant Unless Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have significant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Source:SEEC ClearPath California a, b) Less than Significant Impact. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with the project are limited to operation of CNG buses. The SEEC ClearPath California online modeling software was used to quantify greenhouse gas emissions based on the following assumptions: • 4 loops/hour X 10.5 miles/loop = 42 miles/hour • 42 miles/hour X 14 hours/day =588 miles/day • 588 miles/day x 4 days/week= 2,352 miles/week • 2,352 miles/week x 52 weeks/year= 122,304 miles per year • The fuel efficiency is rated at 6 mpg (according to MV Transportation, the operator) • There are 7.4805 gallons per cubic foot (fluid) Therefore: • 122,304 miles/year at 6mpg = 20,348 gallons/year • 20,348 gallons / 7.4805 cubic foot (fluid) =2,725 cubic feet of CNG For modeling purposes, it was assumed that operation of the BUZZ Trolley consumes 2,800 cubic feet of compressed natural gas annually. According to SEEC ClearPath CA, a CNG transit bus that consumes 2,800 cubic feet of fuel with an annual VMT of 122,500 miles will emit 13 metric tons of CO2e annually. There are currently no adopted thresholds of significance for GHG emissions for the operation of CNG buses. It is recognized that GHG impacts are intrinsically cumulative, however the proposed project will have a less than significant impact on the environment from the emission of GHG's and will not conflict with any applicable GHG plans, policies or regulations.The Trolleys will result in a reduction in private vehicle trips in the downtown area, and therefore represent a reduction in the total GHG emissions that could otherwise be expected from these trips. Further, since the Trolleys are CNG- fueled, rather than diesel-fueled, their emissions will be less than would otherwise be expected. The implementation of the Trolley system is consistent with the City's adopted Climate Action Plan, insofar as the proposed Trolleys will encourage reduced trips in the downtown. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negaffve Declaration 19 • DRAFT INITIAL ST�Y/NEGATIVE DECLARATION VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or El ❑ ❑ waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as ❑ ❑ ® ❑ a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or El ® ❑ public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety ❑ ❑ ❑ hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to ❑ ❑ ❑ urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 20tS Initial Study/Negative Declaration 20 0 DRAFT INITIAL STU•INEGATIVE DECLARATION Discussion of Impacts a-b) less Than Significant Impact. The project involves the ongoing operation, maintenance, fueling, and storage of 4 Trolleys fueled by compressed natural gas (CNG). CNG is a flammable gas and, as such, the potential exists for project-related accidents or upsets to occur. However, when properly handled, CNG is considered safe, and no significant project-related impacts are anticipated. The project will be required to operate according to all applicable safety standards and protocols for operation, fueling, maintenance, and storage of CNG-fueled vehicles. Trolleys will use an existing commercial CNG fueling station on Kirk Douglas Way, and maintenance will be done by private contractors who are required to follow stringent safety measures. The Palm Springs Fire Department operates 4 fire stations, all of which are in close proximity to the Trolley route and the Palm Springs International Airport, and should an accident occur, emergency personnel will be able to respond within acceptable response times (see Section Xlll.a). c) No Impact. Neither the Trolley route nor the airport parking area is located within 114 mile of a school. No impacts to schools are anticipated. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The Trolley route is not adjacent to any sites listed as it r hazardous waste facilities. The Palm Springs hazardous materials sites, cleanup sites, o International Airport, on which out-of-service Trolleys will be parked, operated as the Palm Springs Army Airfield during World War II. It is identified on the California Envirostor database due to past use of lead, petroleum, metals, and explosives at the airfield (Envirostor ID 80000417). Its cleanup status is identified as "Open - Inactive as of 8/20/2009." However, the database indicates that no cleanup actions exist. The airport is also identified in a separate listing for the potential presence of lead, but its current cleanup status is described as "No Further Action as of 4/25/2011 (Envirostor ID 33970005). No project-related impacts associated with hazardous materials cleanup sites are anticipated. e) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is not expected to create an airport safety hazard for people working or residing in the area. Out-of-service Trolleys will be parked at the Palm Springs International Airport, and the CNG fueling station is located on Kirk Douglas Way in close proximity to the airport. These facilities are within the Palm Springs Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan boundaries. Trolley operators will spend limited time at the airport for parking and fueling purposes, but will not be in close proximity to aircraft or aircraft operations such that they would be exposed to a foreseeable safety hazard. The northernmost portion of the Trolley route, between Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives on the west and east, and Via Escuela and Vista Chino on the north and south, is within Zone E of the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Zone E represents 'other airport environs" in which development projects are subject to some restrictions. However, the proposed Trolley project does not propose new development in this area and will be restricted to existing roadways. No airport safety hazards will occur. f) No Impact. The project site is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip and, therefore, will not result in a safety hazard for people working or residing in the project area. g) Less Than Significant Impact. The project will utilize existing roads that may be used during emergencies or evacuations, but will be required to adhere to all traffic safety laws and City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 21 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION law enforcement requirements so as not to conflict with emergency operations. No adverse impacts are anticipated. h) No Impact. The Trolley route is located in an urban area and surrounded on all sides by development. The nearest wildlands are within the foothills of the San Jacinto Mountains near the westerly Trolley route in the vicinity of S. Tahquitz Drive. Should a wildfire occur, Trolley service can be re-routed or terminated. No adverse impacts will occur. (Sources: Envirostor Map Database, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov; "Riverside County (West) Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Areas, as Recommended by CAL FIRE," California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, December 24, 2009; 'Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Volume 1, Policy Document," adopted by Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, October 14, 2004. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 22 DRAFT INITIAL STUY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project. Incorporated a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ❑ ❑ ❑ discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the ❑ ❑ ❑ production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or ❑ ❑ ❑ river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or ❑ ❑ ❑ river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or ❑ ❑ ❑ provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water ❑ ❑ ❑ quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard ❑ ❑ ❑ R Ma Boundary or Flood Insurance to a p or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect ❑ ❑ ® ❑ flood flows? City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 23 DRAFT INITIAL SAMEGATIVE DECLARATION Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, El ❑ Elincluding flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudfiow? ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion of Impacts a) No Impact. The project will not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project will not generate wastewater or require connection to wastewater disposal or treatment systems. Limited amounts of water runoff will be generated during routine washing of Trolleys at the Palm Springs International Airport. The airport is responsible for properly managing onsite runoff and minimizing pollutant loads. No adverse impacts are expected. b) No Impact. The project will use limited amounts of water for routine vehicle washing. It will not deplete groundwater resources or interfere with groundwater recharge. No new or expanded water infrastructure will be required. No adverse impacts are expected. c-d) No Impact. The project will not alter existing drainage patterns along the Trolley route or at airport parking facilities. Travel and parking surfaces are paved and designed to accommodate storm water drainage, and the project will have no impact on them. e) No Impact. As described in Vlll.a, above, the project will generate limited runoff from routine vehicle washing. Roads and airport parking lots are paved and designed to manage storm water runoff. No adverse impacts are expected. f) No Impact. Other than generating minimal runoff from vehicle washing (described in Vlll.a and e, above) the project will not adversely impact water quality. g) No Impact. The project does not propose any housing and will not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area. h) No Impact. The following portions of the Trolley route are within the 100-year flood hazard zone (Zone AO), as mapped on a Federal Flood Insurance Rate Map: 1) 0.2± mile segment of S. Palm Canyon Drive between Sonora Road and S. Belardo Road, and 2) 0.2± mile segment of E. Palm Canyon Drive generally between Via Salida and S. Camino Real. These street segments contain flood discharge estimated at average depths of 1 foot. The project does not propose permanent structures that will impede or redirect flood flows. Should flooding occur, Trolleys service can be re-routed or terminated as necessary. 1) No Impact. The following portion of the Trolley route is located within the Dam Failure Inundation Pathway of the Tachevah Creek Detention Reservoir: Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives, generally between E. Tamarisk Road on the north and W. Baristo City of Palm Springs BUZZ Tolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 24 • DRAFT INITIAL SWNEGATIVE DECLARATION Road on the south. The reservoir is located approximately 1,200 feet downstream from the mouth of Tachevah Canyon in the San Jacinto Mountains west of the project site. It controls storm runoff and debris from a 3.2 square mile drainage area and protects the central part of the City from flooding. It is required by the California State Water Code to be monitored for structural safety. Potential risks and planned responses are addressed in the Palm Springs Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. The operation of the Trolley route will not impact the dam's operation or function, as no new construction will occur. No adverse impacts are expected. D No Impact. No other hazards associated with seiche, tsunami, or mudflow will occur. The project area is not located near any other bodies of water which could be subject to seiche. Due to distance from the Pacific Ocean, the project area is not subject to tsunamis. (Sources: Figure 6-5, Palm Springs General Plan, 2007; Flood Insurance Rate Maps #06065C1556G, #06065C1558G, #06065C1559G, #06065C1556G, and #06065C1567G, Federal Emergency Management Agency, August 28, 2008; "City of Palm Springs Local Hazard Mitigation Plan," August 2012.) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negaffve Declaration 25 • DRAFT INITIAL STPY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local ❑ ❑ ❑ coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community ❑ ❑ ❑ conservation plan? Discussion of Impacts a) No Impact. The project will not physically divide an established community. The Trolley route covers 10± linear miles and includes the downtown core and a wide range of land uses within several neighborhoods. Trolleys will use the existing street network to transport passengers to locations throughout the project area. b) No Impact. The project will not interfere with any land use plans or policies. It is consistent with General Plan policies, particularly those that support the delivery of improved regional transit services and the reduction of single-user vehicle traffic. Trolley parking facilities are consistent with industrial land use designations at the Palm Springs International Airport. c) No Impact. As described in IV.f, the project area is located within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CV MSHCP) and the ACBCI Tribal Habitat Conservation Plan. No construction will occur, and the Trolley route will operate entirely within existing roadways; as a public facility operation, the project is a Covered Activity, and no mitigation is required. (Sources: Palm Desert General Plan, 2007; Palm Springs Municipal Code) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 26 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION X. MINERAL RESOURCES Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project. Incorporated a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to ❑ ❑ ❑ the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site ❑ El Eldelineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Discussion of Impacts a-b) No Impact. The project will not impact mineral resources. The project area occurs in an urban setting where no mineral land use designations are assigned. As shown on the Mineral Land Classification Map for the project area, the project area is designated as Mineral Zone MRZ-3, which indicates an area containing mineral deposits where the significance of deposits cannot be evaluated from available data. (Sources: Figure 5-3, Palm Springs General Plan, 2007; "Mineral Land Classification Map, Aggregate Resources Only, Palm Springs Production-Consumption Region," California Division of Mines and Geology, 1987) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 27 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION XI. NOISE Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project result in: Incorporated a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the El ❑ ® El general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels ❑ ❑ ® ❑ existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity ❑ ❑ ® ❑ above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport El ❑ ® ❑ or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people El ❑ ❑ residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion of Impacts a-d) Less Than Significant Impact. The existing noise environment in the project area is typical of a developed urban area, and the principal noise source is vehicular traffic on area roadways. The project will add four (4) CNG-fueled, 30-foot long Trolleys to the existing roadway network, which will result in limited permanent increases in the ambient noise environment. Vehicle noise and vibration will be emitted during idling, acceleration, constant speeds, and braking as Trolleys travel along the route. However, when considered as part of the existing noise environment in the project area, impacts will be limited and, in some locations, negligible. Operational noise levels will not exceed acceptable noise standards, and project-generated noise is expected to have less than significant impacts on the surrounding noise environment. Trolley service will be limited to four days per week (Thursday through Sunday), and no impacts will occur Monday through Wednesday. Trolleys are mobile sources, and as such, their noise will be temporary and intermittent, but will occur in 15-minute intervals during operating hours. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 ini fal Study/Negative Declaration 28 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION Trolleys will be required to be properly maintained and adequately muff lered to minimize operational noise. Typical idling noise levels for buses are approximately 65 to 69 dBA, and 75 to 76 dBA when accelerating. Noise levels are reduced by distance and solid surfaces, particularly walls,which have the effect of reducing noise by about 10 dB. Trolley-generated noise on Palm Canyon, North Palm Canyon, and East Palm Canyon Drives will be consistent with existing vehicle noise, including that generated by SunLine Transit Agency buses already operating on these roads (Sunline Transit Lines 111, 14, and 24). Trolley noise may be more noticeable along the westerly Trolley loop that extends along W. Baristo, S. Tahquitz, and W. Arenas as no regular transit bus service currently serves this area. However, these roads support a wide range of commercial, hotel, and residential development, and a broad mix of vehicles, including delivery trucks, service vehicles, and private vehicles. In the General Plan, W. Arenas Road is designated as a "Secondary Thoroughfare" (4-lane, serves through and local traffic), and S. Belardo Road is designated as a "Collector" (2-lane, carries traffic from secondary and major thoroughfares). The number of Trolley bus stops on this loop is limited to two (Stops #10 and #11). Stop #10 occurs on Belardo Road at Arenas Road. This area is impacted by vehicle noise and commercial activities on the east side of Belardo. Stop #11 occurs at the western terminus of Baristo Road. Trolleys accelerating from stop #1 1 could generate noise levels of approximately 75 dBA for short periods. With the setbacks created by sidewalks, parking areas and similar street-side improvements, and the walls that generally occur at property lines of developments along the route, the noise level on developed properties would be reduced to 65 dBA or less. This noise level is consistent with both the City's General Plan noise standards, and its noise ordinance requirements. Impacts associated with noise along the route of the Trolley are expected to be less than significant. e) Less Than Significant Impact. Trolley parking and fueling facilities are within the planning area boundaries and noise contours of the Palm Springs Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Out-of-service Trolleys will be stored/parked at a leased facility at the Palm Springs International Airport, and Trolleys will be fueled at a CNG station located on Kirk Douglas Way. However, no project staff will work in close proximity to aircraft or be exposed to excessive noise levels generated at the airport. Airport-related noise impacts will be less than significant. f) No Impact. The project area is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip and, therefore, no project-related impacts will occur. (Sources: "Riverside County Land Use Compatibility Plan, Volume 1, October 14, 2004; SunLine Transit Agency Route Maps, www.suline.org/schedules, accessed March 2015.) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 29 • DRAFT INITIAL STORY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or ❑ ❑ ❑ CK indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ replacement housing elsewhere? Discussion of Impacts a) No Impact. The project is expected to serve the existing population of residents and visitors and is not expected to attract new people to the area. It will use existing roads, parking, fueling, and maintenance facilities and will not require the construction or extension of roadways or other infrastructure. b) No Impact. The project will be physically confined to existing roadways and parking facilities. No demolition or construction of structures is proposed. It will not displace existing housing or people, and will not require the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 30 • DRAFT INITIAL$TIt/NEGATIVE DECLARATION XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project result in: Incorporated Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion of Impacts a•b) Less Than Significant Impact. The project includes 4 Trolleys, each with a seating capacity of 22 plus 2 wheelchairs, and standing room for another 10 to 15 passengers The potential for traffic accidents and/or other emergency incidents exists, although they are not expected to occur at a higher rate than other vehicle uses in the project area. Fire Protection The Palm Springs Fire Department is responsible for providing local fire protection, and the City's 4 fire stations are welt-situated to serve the Trolley project area. • Station 1 (441): 277 N. Indian Canyon Drive, located in the central portion of the project area on the Trolley route • Station 2 (442): 300 N. El Cielo Road, adjacent to the Palm Springs International Airport where Trolleys are stored • Station 3 (443): 590 E. Racquet Club, 1/3 mile northeast of the intersection of Via Escuela and N. Indian Canyon Drive at the northernmost portion of the Trolley route • Station 4 (444): 1300 Laverne Way, 1/3 mile south of E. Palm Canyon Drive on the southernmost portion of the Trolley route Fire personnel will be able to reach Trolleys within the target five-minute response time. Trolleys and the CNG fueling station will be required to meet applicable fire codes and safety protocols. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 31 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION Police Protection The Palm Springs Police Department provides local police protection. It is headquartered at 200 S. Civic Drive, and its distance from the Trolley route ranges from approximately 1.5 to 2.5 miles. Police will be able to reach Trolleys within acceptable response times. c-e) No Impact. Schools The project does not include bus stops at any schools and will not directly serve a student population. No impacts to schools are anticipated. Parks The project does not include bus stops at any parks and is not expected to directly increase usage of park facilities. No impacts to parks are anticipated. Other Public Facilities The project will use the existing roadway network and fueling facilities. It will not require the construction or expansion of additional public facilities. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley Apd12015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 32 • DRAFT INITIAL SAINEGATIVE DECLARATION XIV. RECREATION Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion of Impacts a-b) No Impact. The project will enhance access within the downtown, which includes cultural and institutional facilities, such as museums, pedestrian plazas, and public art. However, it does not include bus stops at, or in immediate proximity to, parks or recreational facilities, and will not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. No impacts will occur. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley Apd1201S Initial Study/NegoNve Declara0on 33 • 1 • DRAFT INITIAL SIPY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the ❑ El ® ❑ county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a ❑ El ❑ change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous ❑ El Elintersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation ❑ ❑ ❑ (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Discussion of Impacts a-b) Less Than Significant Impact. As described above, the Trolleys will operate Thursday through Sunday, from 11 AM to 1 AM. Four Trolleys will have 15 minute headways, resulting in 56 daily trips along any segment of the route. In order to determine whether the addition of these trips would represent a significant impact along the designated route, an analysis was conducted of the General Plan EIR's traffic analysis. The General Plan was used in order to analyze worst case conditions at build out of the General Plan. A total of 8 segments were considered in this analysis, based on location and current and build out levels of service (LOS). Each segment and the potential impacts of the addition of 56 daily trips is described individually below. Via Escuela between Indian Canyon and Palm Canyon Drives: Via Escuela's capacity is 13,000 trips per day. Its current volume is between 700 and 1,000 trips per day. Its build out volume is predicted to be 2,100 trips per day, which results in a LOS B condition. The addition of 56 daily trips will represent an increase of 0.26%, and will not reduce LOS to unacceptable levels. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley Apr112015 Initial Study/Negative DeclaraHon 34 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION North Palm Canyon Drive between Via Escuela and Vista Chino: At buildout of the General Plan, with the improvements required in the General Plan EIR, this segment of Palm Canyon Drive will have a capacity of 53,900 trips per day, and a volume of 36,600 vehicles per day, which represents a LOS of B. The addition of 56 daily trips will represent an increase of 0.015% over buildout conditions, and will not reduce LOS to unacceptable levels. South Palm Canyon Drive between Tahquitz Canyon Way and Ramon Road: The anticipated volume of traffic on this segment of Palm Canyon Drive is projected to have a volume of 17,900 vehicles per day, on a segment with a capacity of 26,925 vehicles per day. This segment will operate at LOS B. The addition of 56 trips will increase the number of daily trips by 0.031%, and will not reduce LOS to unacceptable levels. East Palm Canyon Drive between South Palm Canyon Drive and Camino Real: This segment will have a capacity of 35,900 vehicles per day, and a volume of 17,100 vehicles per day, resulting in a LOS A condition. The addition of 56 trips will represent an increase of 0.033%,which will have no impact on LOS. Indian Canyon Drive south of Ramon Road: In this segment, Indian Canyon has a capacity of 35,900 vehicles per day, and is predicted to have buildout volumes of 15,000 vehicles per day. This will result in LOS A conditions. The addition of 56 trips will represent an increase of 0.037%,which will not change the LOS and will not impact the roadway. Indian Canyon Drive between Alejo Road and Tahquitz Canyon Way: This segment of Indian Canyon will have a capacity of 35,900 vehicles per day, and a volume of 18,200 vehicles per day at General Plan buildout. This will result in a LOS A condition. The addition of 56 daily trips will represent an increase of 0.030%, which will not change the LOS and have no impact on the roadway. Arenas Road west of Belardo Road: This segment of roadway was studied between Belardo Road and Palm Canyon Drive. At this location, the roadway has a capacity of 25,900 vehicles per day, and a buildout volume of 1,400 vehicle trips per day, resulting in a LOS A condition. Although most of the 1,400 trips that will be carried on Arenas between Palm Canyon and Belardo are likely to turn north or south onto Belardo, for purposes of this analysis, it has been assumed that they would continue westbound on Arenas (resulting in a conservative analysis). This volume of traffic on Arenas will result in a LOS A condition. The addition of 56 trips on this segment will increase daily trips by 0.4%, and will neither impact the street nor change the level of service. Baristo Road west of Palm Canyon Drive: This segment of roadway was studied between Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives. The General Plan buildout volume at this location is predicted to be 2,300 vehicles per day on a segment whose capacity is 25,900 vehicles per day, resulting in a LOS A condition. West of this location, it is likely that volumes will be reduced, particularly west of Belardo Road. However, for purposes of this analysis, and to assure a conservative assessment, it has been assumed that all 2,300 daily vehicles would travel westbound on Baristo past Belardo. On this basis, the addition of 56 trips per day would result in an increase of 0.24%, and would not affect level of service. As demonstrated above, the addition of the Trolleys to the City's roadway system will not significantly impact traffic flow, or affect levels of service. Furthermore, although it cannot be quantified, it is likely that the Trolleys will reduce traffic on City streets, since City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 20 IS Initial Study/Negative Declaration 35 • , • DRAFT INITIAL ST•/NEGATIVE DECLARATION those persons using the Trolleys would otherwise likely use private vehicles. Since the Trolleys each carry 30 to 35 people (with standing room), at capacity, the Trolleys could result in a reduction of 2,000 to 6,700 trips per day during operating hours (assuming full Trolleys, and a range of single occupancy to four occupants per private vehicle). Overall impacts associated with traffic flow and levels of service are expected to be less than significant. c) The Trolleys will not result in any new construction, and will operate entirely within the City's existing roadway system. The proposed project will therefore have no impact on air traffic from the Palm Springs Airport, which is located approximately 2 miles east of the Trolley route. d) The Trolleys are proposed to operate on the existing roadway system, where private vehicles, transit buses and commercial trucks already currently operate. There will be no new construction as part of the Trolley system. The Trolleys operate in a loop that uses City streets. There will be no additional road hazards or incompatible uses resulting from the implementation of the Trolleys. No impact is expected. e) The Trolleys will operate on the existing roadway system, and will have no impact on emergency access. 1) The Trolleys are a new form of alternative transportation actively encouraged and supported in the City's General Plan. The project is also consistent with Sustainable Community Strategies developed for the City under SB 375, insofar as the Trolleys will reduce vehicle miles travelled in private vehicles. No impact to alternative transportation is expected. (Sources: City of Palm Springs General Plan Update EIR, March 2007; Terra Nova Planning & Research analysis) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 36 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION , XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporated a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control ❑ ❑ ❑ Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction ❑ ❑ ❑ of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of ❑ ❑ ❑ existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to ❑ ❑ ❑ serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid ❑ ❑ ® ❑ waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and regulations related to solid waste? Discussion of Impacts a-c) No Impact. Wastewater Treatment The project will not generate wastewater or require the construction or expansion of wastewater facilities. It will not impact the City's wastewater treatment plant or its ability to meet applicable wastewater requirements. Stormwater Management The project will not require the construction of new or expanded stormwater management facilities. Trolleys will operate on existing roadways and be stored at City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negotive Declaration 37 • 1 • DRAFT INITIAL SA/NEGATIVE DECLARATION existing airport facilities, which are required to maintain adequate stormwater drainage. No impacts will occur. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The Desert Water Agency (DWA) provides domestic water services to the project area. DWA is part of the Coachella Valley Regional Water Management Group, which prepared a draft Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) in 2013. The Plan analyzes the region's water needs and indicates that the long-term demand for domestic water will increase throughout the region, but conservation measures and replenishment programs will make it possible for DWA to meet increasing demand. Very limited quantities of water will be required for routine Trolley washing and cleaning. The project will not impact local or regional water supplies. No new or expanded water facilities will be required. No impacts to water entitlements will occur. e) No Impact. As described in XVI.b., above, the project will not generate wastewater or connect to a wastewater treatment system. No impacts to the local wastewater treatment provider will occur. f-g) Less Than Significant Impact. Solid waste generated by the project will be extremely limited and may include small quantities of passenger-generated trash that accumulates on Trolleys, and automotive supplies/parts discarded during Trolley maintenance or repair. Palm Springs Disposal Services (PSDS) provides solid waste collection and disposal services to the City. Solid waste is transported to Edom Hill Transfer Station in northern Cathedral City and disposed at one of three regional landfills: 1) Lamb Canyon Landfill in Beaumont, 2) Badlands Landfill in Moreno Valley, and 3) El Sobrante Landfill in Corona. Each has adequate capacity to serve the project. Facility operators, including PSDS and Burrtec, are required to meet all local, regional, state, and federal standards for solid waste disposal. Hazardous waste generated by vehicle maintenance or fueling will be disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. (Sources: "Facility/Site Summary Details for Edam Hill Transfer Station (33-AA-0296), www.calrecyc le.ca.gov) City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley AprJ12015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 38 • DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE NOTE: If there are significant environmental impacts which cannot be mitigated and no feasible project alternatives are available, then complete the mandatory findings of significance and attach to this initial study as an appendix. This is the first step for starting the environmental impact report (EIR) process. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Does the project: Incorporated a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a ❑ ❑ El ED plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when ❑ ❑ ® ❑ viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ either directly or indirectly? a) No Impact. The project will not threaten or substantially reduce the population of a fish or ni r eliminate important examples of California history or wildlife population or community, o p p ry prehistory. The project area is within the City's urban core and outside of any biological sensitivity or conservation areas. The project will operate entirely on improved public streets (and airport parking facilities) that have been developed for many years. No new or expanded construction is proposed, and no grading or ground disturbances will occur. No historic or prehistoric resources will be impacted. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Cumulative impacts of the project will be less than significant. The project will use existing street right-of-way, parking facilities, and fueling station, and its hours of operation will be limited to 4 days per week. Trolleys will be consistent with the existing mix of vehicles already using the roadway network, and additional traffic volumes generated by the project will not result in exceedances of street capacities or reductions in levels-of-service. Although the project will contribute marginally to increased air pollutant emissions, they will be limited by the use of compressed natural gas and ongoing vehicle maintenance. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 39 + DRAFT INITIAL STVY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION c) Less Than Significant Impact. Trolleys will operate on compressed natural gas which is flammable, and there is a potential for accidents or upset to occur. Proper handling and adherence to applicable safety standards and protocol will reduce potential hazards to less than significant levels. Impacts to people, including air quality and noise, will be less than significant. City of Palm Springs BUZZ Trolley April 2015 Initial Study/Negative Declaration 40 APPENDIX A OPERATIONAL AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS FOR THE BUZZ TROLLEY Palm Springs, California SEEC C1earPath California Emissions from Public Transit Prepared by: Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. April 2, 2015 Inputs trrue .. unft _ u ryPB. Annual Fuel Use 2800. ... . Standard Cubic Feet 'J' Vetkie Type TransR bus :j VMT . -. 122500 Percent Bintuel Blend Passenger Boerting4 _. -.... ... Passenger acardings/ .. SerAce Population(Residents and WonQ _... People -..O _..... _.._.. .. _ Outputs Wetoe !.Value Transit VMT © 1225M Transit Energy EQuivelent(MMBtu).Q _. _. 3 Blogenk CO21M0 Q1 ..... 0 CO2 W 0.15120 CH4(MT) 0.24083 _.. .._... N20(MT). _... _.... . . ._ _. 0.021438_.. CO2e(Mr) - 13 Source: Statewide Energy Efficiency Collaborative (SEEC) C1earPath California. April 2, 2015. TOP TEN REASONS WHY THE BUZZ DOES NOT BELONG IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ROUTE: The Buzz was originally proposed to be a free trolley operating in the commercial corridor from Vista Chino on the North to Smoke Tree on the east. It was never proposed to enter residential neighborhoods. ROUTE: Many commercial businesses are deprived of coverage because the Buzz has been rerouted to a residential area. More businesses could be covered if the residential route was eliminated. ROUTE: The route was arbitrarily changed twice from the approved downtown core, inserted into a neighborhood without notice, nor consideration to the residents on either new route. UNSAFE: Residential streets are too narrow and have driveways that enter narrow streets. UNSAFE: Residential neighborhoods have minimal street lighting or none at all. As the seasons change lack of light is a major safety issue. UNSAFE: Residential streets do not have adequate sidewalks and residents use the streets to walk on. UNSAFE: Due to commercial street parking in the residential area now being used by the BUZZ Trolley,the route is too narrow for cars to pass safely. HOURS OF OPERATION: Being in a residential neighborhood until 1:00 a.m. is an intrusion on the residents—destroying the expected quiet enjoyment of their homes. USAGE: The existing vehicle usage in the residential area has been minimal since inception. LEGAL: The current route was not included in the original negative declaration previously prepared for adjacent streets and may be illegal. Therefore the City could be breaking its own laws. -rTti� 5, U 1�ars IVjATt_i !w