HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/5/2017 - STAFF REPORTS - 5.F. iy
V N
A
POP4iE0
City Council Staff Report
Date: April 5, 2017 NEW BUSINESS
Subject: COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CV LINK MULTI-
MODAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT
From: David H. Ready, City Manager
Initiated by: Engineering Services Department
SUMMARY
This action allows for the City Council to discuss the proposed CV Link Multi-Modal
Transportation Project to be constructed by the Coachella Valley Association of
Governments (CVAG). The CV Link is a 49-mile non-motorized, multi-modal
transportation path that passes through the Coachella Valley, including the City of Palm
Springs. CVAG prepared a Draft Environment Impact Report (DEIR) to assess potential
environmental impacts of the CV Link. Three potentially feasible path alignments are
analyzed based on assessment of characteristics such as physical conditions, land
ownership, and regulatory conditions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive report from the City Council Ad-Hoc Subcommittee (Coachella Valley CV Link)
— Mayor Pro-Tem Foat / Councilmember Mills.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The CV Link Multi-Modal Transportation Project (CV Link) is a proposed 49 mile multi-
modal path that would provide access and connectivity between residential,
commercial, recreational, and institutional uses throughout eight cities in the region from
Palm Springs to Coachella. The project is anticipated to result in a reduction of traffic
and air pollutants in the region. The DEIR was prepared by the CVAG pursuant to
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate potential impacts associated
with the near-term construction and operation of CV Link's route, from Palm Springs to
Coachella.
The CV Link route does not include the City of Rancho Mirage. The CV Link will also
incorporate and expand the Tahquitz Creek Trail in Palm Springs, between South Palm
ITEM NO. 5' F
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017- Page 2
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
Canyon Drive and the Whitewater Channel. The western termini are at Highway 111
(North Palm Canyon Drive) in northern Palm Springs (the Palm Springs Visitor Center at
Tramway Road — access point for the Aerial Tram) and at South Palm Canyon Drive in
central Palm Springs providing access to adjacent commercial services and to
Downtown Palm Springs, as well as the Tahquitz Canyon Visitor Center.
The CV Link route largely follows, and is to be built upon, the levees of the region's
principal watercourses, including Chino Wash, Tahquitz Creek, and the Whitewater
River Stormwater Channel. In some locations, the pathway shares right-of-way with
roads and provides direct access to key commercial districts and recreational and
institutional venues.
The CV Link route extends through 15.3 miles within the City of Palm Springs, along
two routes: 1) Whitewater River levee (with alternative alignments adjacent to the Four
Seasons community; and 2) Tahquitz Creek trail. The Exhibits shown on the following
pages from the DEIR identify the alignments analyzed within Palm Springs. The main
alignment of CV Link begins at the Palm Springs Visitor's Center on N. Palm Canyon
Dr. at Tram Way, with two alternatives extending north along either the east or west
sides of N. Palm Canyon Dr. to the Chino Creek / Whitewater River levee, with a
proposed overcrossing bridge structure at Chino Creek (for the westerly alignment
crossover). A visual simulation of the proposed overcrossing on N. Palm Canyon Dr. is
shown here.
_ 14
r` A 3a
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 3
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
The CV Link alignment extends further east and south along the Chino Creek levee,
with three alternative routes identified for the segment adjacent to the Four Seasons
community, and an additional alignment along the easterly extension of San Rafael Dr.
and along the northerly extension of Sunrise Way as shown here.
Proposed future
Sunrise Way park
Four Seasons: three route variations
N
Bridge or at-grade
ZAFAEL DR crossing alternatives
The DEIR describes the alternative alignments along the Chino Creek / Whitewater
River levee adjacent to the Four Seasons community in Section 4.2, and states:
At its location adjacent to the Four Seasons community, three alignment
variations are proposed: one on the top of the levee, one in the 10 to 15 foot area
between the top of the levee and the Four Seasons property line, and one at the
base of the levee in the channel bottom. The first alignment variation on top of
the levee would result in CV Link users having views into the rear yards of the
residents, because the elevation of the levee is above the elevation of the
homes. The residents' views of the mountains to the north could be partially
obstructed by screening that would be installed on the levee top to assure
privacy, but the peaks of the range would remain visible due to the angle of the
view at this location, as it relates to the levee top (also see Section 4.10, Land
Use). The second alignment variation in the intervening land between the levee
and the Four Seasons property line would occur at the same elevation as the
homes, and existing perimeter walls would remain. Under this alignment
variation, the views of the mountains to the north from residents'properties would
remain as they currently occur, since the Proposed Project would not change the
visual condition. The third alignment variation on the channel bottom would be on
the north side of the levee, and would not be proximate to, or visible to Four
l?
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017- Page 4
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
Seasons residents. The location of the path in the floodplain will also assure that
the views from the Four Seasons community of the surrounding mountains will
remain as they are currently. As shown in Exhibit 4.2-3, at this location there are
sweeping views of the mountains and foothills. The addition of CV Link, as
shown in the Exhibit, will not impact the scenic vista at this location. Rather, it will
create an opportunity for a wider range of the local population to have access to
this scenic vista.
The third alignment variation adjacent to the Four Seasons community could be
identified by the City Council as the preferred alternative, as it places the CV Link in a
location separated from the adjacent residential properties by the existing Whitewater
River levee. A visual simulation of the third alignment variation with CV Link extending
along the north side (wash side) of the Whitewater River levee is shown here.
ML=11
IL
•- 4
IL
Wherever possible, CV Link will be a dual path system that includes a path for faster
modes of travel, such as bicycles and low-speed electric vehicles (LSEVs), and a
separate path for slower modes, including pedestrians. Path widths will vary depending
upon right-of-way availability and terrain. A range of surface materials have been
evaluated for their durability, cost, aesthetics, and functionality, and materials may vary
with location and purpose. Pathway cross-sections are illustrated in the following
figures. Shade structures, restrooms, drinking fountains, signage, street furniture,
electric vehicle charging stations, and other accessory features will be built to support
the needs of travelers. Landscaping and security measures, including fencing, barriers,
lighting, and emergency access, will be integrated into project design. The pathway will
also incorporate informational kiosks and public art at appropriate locations, particularly
at important access and intersection points to assist users with way-finding. Drainage
improvements will be installed, and access for emergency, utility, and channel
maintenance vehicles will be provided, where necessary. (04
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 5
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
om"&
` LEGEND
\ vwbLxr V"�'
aia:"u+- ..
........ Lrn.w:w
.YR}STLI ® eY1M+Itl
Cy,u MIXt .�Yl1M
9.M ¢HbH ¢ubv p1.0 r WLLd6b16 ®ILL',"
�� • .,...,.tl 7t = 1 ...
14YbH \��J
VbMFL Y1M �� ®1 O, Nlt
N .zMne cmw � � uli
P � A� l M
VIOVLy1
AUGNMENTS
ulL
LYIF` ub..b lfwooW w,`CYI¢I , lIL Ml \ Gr oa . - I I
nuLw�auttvifercwl
6fY f..YKYi YW�Y� W1w6�T•�� I � •••O•
5 P R I N G 5 a
nY .. ,..w.w. KEY MAP
YM VW ®.IOLNIbL
YY.Ii ilWAld YWBv¢ YL� XX I
M b4Y iwW �.R `IY s !� YW11ln
NN twblliw M YXYrY m i, I_ ,
YYnYb .nWlbbY.L
Yibe�.. uYi.w
_ I I
b Ynebwe.< .blb YluT \
a1L.w wr �a.f o �
SEGMENT I. _
PROJECT PLAN
Source:Alta Planning+Oesi n,2016
0
G
Cts
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 6
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
MATGHL$NE-SEE LEFT
9 ¢ LEGEND
r.d >Of99 RMl o e
C A T H E D R A L
wu9 '=IO Qb
C 1 T V p
P A L M I I I 9
9 '
2` G9RW IDES W 1 S4r
esVA eRt9xr EN1,1T
vaa
rFwrier'ni. un ; P A L M
� uam
M!,
S
I I
KEY MAP
' ALIGN►ff TS /
' b1` xwe enMa eo �'� `M 0Q R A N C H O
E.+.«.. ..«..% . a..
r �
M I R A
-----J----- n..
MATCNLINE-SEE RIGNT
SEGMENT2
PROJECT PLAN µam R g
Source:Alta Planning+Design,2D16
C
M
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017- Page 7
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
Z
qq a P A L M vi®
a o f
- •. ttn.N ualml. `
I U
\V Q IVt rl+ IMYM � Q
, J
a
cn.r. yr rain t7 F.
.. _._. •.•cIT uwnSwY.iM _
Q 11�YW C� MN n•.
5 F Y:MM .l4M rG.M (.!
yyq 1 �� Q
U
a nnn.,
n
e rtiuuwr�umr t ..,.... CREEK »t. •• _
d
ALIGNMENTS
iw[ enM r ®onnn Lb Yrt �"O,rh.ne ;' •
«MW N.IW9 • AYIB'rAOPO ! OIM1 I— � ® � \\
4rWYrtw Y.KM W11 n! nrvor.p •M ae I�r
KEY MAP
1
�.... ..�.. rr.w mlK,u m � -r► LEGENO — I rws
i.I.Y« ..r`.0 1NB.M .fIF6FHYF.! !• IM Qf" ¢msm .vyr
«. « vwrl.r IiMWfMVY1 �.. UMERCR0.iuIN0 ,� 'r `1 __ •.':•'lu
sr IV.F b. irf.V NA .il{1.O/PW ptl Kpi fNY:VIV -
_
� ,u •Ye.+o. w Y r ue rmm.r d . r .ome 1 � r
o.ouu .r. .amr as SEGMENT 7A xnlro 1
PROJECT PLANOW
ao>•unli. mwl..,m.o rr® orY . r.. nrr..rwr •Y••n ��� ID
0
Source:Atra Planning n,2016
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017- Page 8
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
1 la' 3'Ir
�MWIMDEMTAMI �� MEMO—P0.11Y11R1FlW WN67M �l llwlfLNOwiWQ.01MLMlMIWYf
— MIYlwElgl �J� EYYCIIILNTWI#
zl ° � �' Iz ww aIANNEL +r •� TYa .
I
xr Tv
YA'vEDEOINNN MtN
°'MIN PEGfETRI.PATH 510P M( TO INS T,w"MOW T'IFEN PATHS YRBI LEVQE
TDv MORE TlYl 19MDE
Cu) IMpplplyPYNlr.pgly�IW® /C' fM23T1MgXA llY!l SINDLl MTN fCb A@dlAYD1YD lEYlE BMGlE M1N
!T ° of••
MMIOMwlL 5
IS'
AT VMI`ll SONS!OVEN�MDNT 014T4iDP90NtV
ALL USIIRS TJII bY10.ETI6AD
• ZCYES DKPFilM14.TlO EV MWID YATFRMl9 �^� DDWIELlYQ•WAl Mlles
��} colurrt°lNED wwww
T N' 3' I B IY M4 ` �, piIEw OROiEi
P 1YYY T'I.EIIIg rY
fOR VATM'IIV CONIiiT0g3,61yIf1 BOTiW
�1 wmlOII�B
E Tl,2,*30.YDOINER CCNEtM14N� • KMaPEOEETRUW MTN
18
je� CpIML�Tp MTI IN M@lTµ GN13 L 1!.8114 L IATI
0
Source_Alta Planning+Design,2016 c
Cd
o�
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 9
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
er
J x.
Iz• r
r 1
r f 5 ! IYI'
K'
• J I&LC/S 40OfE W"TO W UNDOCAPM 1r�•
�Z.u>r.raJrliNQ•o®nlrrsol (, 10M091rILV!l-Ye,Ye�erTOnarwrE-WYWIdTWM1N ipMfanzeYH.YDbIGR
uboYEnerlo LJzni®JolaaslluwWruweltslnr! °i YJu ellen lreeNeJurms.sare '..
1 e Ir
1
!1'r
Jwnac
or
r it
ev J'
�llnrisJr lrl�-EJmJrlreaol wal I( r r 1.' s r IN �'i
Owrrruer
• yt&y1F/pyE MTM JOi
�/W dWADENIIE'NEE•IEW OOROMOlttOK-dMLArlWFlr NAIM y �1�pYCfXIlY1.IIgWM
s I 1I �!; \,/ RlLL rptlleCYlJR4Ei0VMYll1l.OH i
IINV lr1iM YMOg1ETMINW 21 Ypt
�,MNmzJJlR!•�1rY1�1�1
�' !lolauJdr waJl�nW
. a
rr
rr
�r{ %' �r �Z Ir z rr s�• - �r %' r er
a sr-r
yr 1/
AGMCBRYY9.YDlYHr
MAI®fILEVEE-YIE�pE Q. 10YCOR lrY!l.�lLr[ � OMIIMLlO1ME OOIW.GaNINM1lD�A•6L012
IMl1RYCN CEMITI.!®J:1 lIM „_ N11V lbICM CdWN0.%W J:fYp!
O
r-
Source:Alta Planning+Design,2016
S's
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 10
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
B 1 B I tB I S I NOADwnv
TT TT II••" F �\r s�� 4--� I ` f
nc
• rGLEFEItE LOW YQI.IIBMMw\NBa LfpMQllGi•
SmGNuoawnrT.w.EcnLD Gurrex�YYX� . vYnT,Qa MYwfIEEaMiPOR LEN9k�
/\ LffiYICVCLE♦R•[it AilgMHVAY MbE /�
t.✓ �� 1WD.WAY ONE BIDE RpIR 4/
^M1
u B �� rti,vran.
x. 1-=-1 1P•Y` PfLBw{Y B Ye B
• 9111EABR5AHEIC HAI(11EDnIFEERI2 WINS S*
• BRBWw • LGGWLYf:IL11V0(Ai14�0OWAY lRna
f.1�� w.u•fGnNrtGowmonasnraea+BEEnN .
/1 wnwEpurvw{aLuw I
l l rwerrr eE�ma-L{sr
/� BuoBnE
GOEwf1fY0BY1BBBB1IVNY �.
11O,\GNMY l 1 B B 3 r
I 1L I R I T 6' B
r' 'r
a�•vExfrx rEvwanon{emscn vAlNs rmvrwwvmneEulENBn oral
• SGna'ED GuvvEN
� IGBSSB earwlN"wGe-wart /"\ BYHGBB WGiuGSEiLwGt Arswoe � � � m
�_--__... oNeruLrfueEEESB I,,
.Le ABDYE-uarEoroEurNwa BEar a � �
�-- faawnG 3
a 7,,=r4n
ut Mb[LNMO Y Y
FiR UGM5Af#LYS Y Y Y
LfP INESEflM15.ADDEENYE ♦ ♦ Y Y _
)J'YEfBI(X 6EPMUEiGN GEiWF-EN PN116 11 1 aDUlSO6131\M MaIGO
Y SINBED{VEEER I B FBA T ( v I n 1 iL I B r 6' I E I t-IEW 011wifl Y ♦ t Y
1 IE" � FINS S�GIML Y Y Y
CAP
"1 NMp Ww CONO1N\1Ep.LEFT
-- ef{� �nrraGBeawaaBfffwEOYeiwr
/� I,tEYiLYGE1BG(:Ia,DNe.wAr EAG GiD£
T
Source:Alta Planning+Design,2016
r.,
C7
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 11
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
Section 21084 of the California Public Resources Code requires Guidelines for
Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with
the CEQA Guidelines, CVAG acting as "Lead Agency" pursuant to CEQA, completed an
environmental analysis of the potential impacts resulting from construction of the CV
Link. CVAG issued a Notice of Availability of the DEIR for the CV Link Project, identified
as State Clearinghouse Project No. 2013111050, and solicited public comments from
January 5 through February 21, 2017.
The Project is funded, in part, by federal funds, requiring local oversight by the State of
California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans). As a federally funded project, the
Project is subject to environmental review pursuant to the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA). Caltrans, as assigned by the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA), is
the lead agency for the project under the NEPA. A separate Environmental Assessment
(EA) document is being prepared to evaluate the project's potential environmental
effects in accordance with NEPA. The EA document will serve as the principal
informational document for project analysis by Caltrans and federal agencies with an
interest in the CV Link Project, including the US Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the
US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE).
The DEIR has analyzed various project alternatives, as identified below.
Proposed Project— Project without Rancho Mirage:
The project begins with a western terminus at Highway 111 in Northern Palm Springs
and an eastern terminus at Airport Boulevard at the Coachella Valley Stormwater
Channel. CV Link segments in Rancho Mirage along the storm channel would be
deleted. The CV Link segments in the City of Palm Springs will also incorporate and
expand the Tahquitz Creek Trail in Palm Springs between South Palm Canyon Drive
and the Whitewater Channel. The western termini are at Highway 111 (North Palm
Canyon Drive) in northern Palm Springs (the Palm Springs Visitor Center at Tramway
Road — access point for the Aerial Tram) and at South Palm Canyon Drive in central
Palm Springs providing access to adjacent commercial services and to Downtown Palm
Springs, as well as the Tahquitz Canyon Visitor Center.
Alternative 1 — Project without Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells:
The primary difference between Alternative 1 and the proposed project is removal of CV
Link improvements in Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells. Termini for CV Link would be
accommodated in the vicinity of their city limits. This alternative assumes CV Link users
will be able to continue to pass through Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells on existing
sidewalks, bike paths, and streets. The eastern Indian Wells terminus is proposed to
begin at the western boundary of the City of La Quinta on the Southside of Highway 111
near Plaza La Quinta, continues north through a proposed at-grade crossing and
extends through the western edge of the Point Happy commercial development to the
Whitewater River Stormwater Channel. The City traffic engineer has expressed traffic
safety concerns with the proposed at-grade crossing for the project across Highway
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 12
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
111. CVAG staff is considering a trailhead at Point Happy as an alternative to the
crossing of Highway 111 .
Alternative 2 — Project with all eight cities:
This project alternative evaluates the route through all of the incorporated cities,
unincorporated county and Native American lands from Palm Springs to Coachella.
Alternative 3 — No Build/No Project:
This project alternative includes continuing with the existing multi-modal network in the
vicinity of the CV Link route.
The DER evaluated environmental issues associated with the project implementation
and includes mitigation measures to mitigate project impacts.
The DER evaluated impacts associated with Land Use and Planning, and identified a
"Potentially Significant" impact (Section 4.10(b)): The Proposed Project could conflict
with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect as they relate to privacy of adjacent property owners."
In order to mitigate this potentially significant impact, CVAG has identified Mitigation
Measure LU-1:
LU-1 Where CV Link alignments abut residential land uses, and has the potential to
affect their privacy, structural and landscape screening as provided in the Conceptual
Master Plan standards and guidelines shall be applied.
The DER evaluated environmental impacts associated with Noise, and identified a
'Potentially Significant' impact (Section 4.12(b)): The Proposed Project will result in
exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels."
In order to mitigate this potentially significant impact, CVAG has identified the following
Mitigation Measures N-1, N-4, N-6, and MMN-7:
N-1 Project construction activities shall only occur between the permitted hours of each
local jurisdiction's Municipal Code. The project construction supervisor shall ensure
compliance.
N-4 The use of large bulldozers within 100 feet of nearby sensitive land uses (e.g.
residential, school, etc.) shall be minimized and avoided if possible.
N-6 Alternative piling methods shall be used to reduce the potential impacts at nearby
sensitive receiver locations as follows:
a. No impact pile driving devices and CIDH piling methods shall be used within 76 feet
of sensitive receiver locations near the Thunderbird Channel and Deep Canyon
e �
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 13
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
Channel Bridge (as indicated on Table 4). Alternative piling methods are required to
reduce the vibration levels at these locations. Based on an evaluation by Caltrans an
alternative method, such as Tubex piles, which can produce lower vibration levels of
0.05 in/sec PPV at 25 feet during installation shall be used. Other pile driving
alternatives capable of producing equal or lower vibration levels are acceptable.
b. Cast-In-Drilled-Hole (C1DH) piling methods, or alternatives capable of producing
equal or lower vibration levels, shall be used for the following bridge locations as an
alternative to impact pile driving activities planned within 400 feet of sensitive receiver
locations (as indicated on Table 4.12-13, below):
Highway 111 Overcrossing
West Magnesia Canyon Channel Bridge at Highway 111
West Magnesia Canyon Channel Bridge at Library
Cook Street Overcrossing
La Quinta Channel Bridge
MMN-7 Residences and other sensitive land uses within 400 feet of the planned pile
locations shall be notified of the construction in writing. The notification shall describe
the activities anticipated, provide dates and hours, and provide contact information with
a description of a noise and vibration complaint and response procedure.
The DEIR evaluated environmental impacts associated with Noise, and identified a
'Potentially Significant' impact (Section 4.12(c)): The Proposed Project will result in a
substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project.
In order to mitigate this potentially significant impact, CVAG has identified the following
Mitigation Measures N-1, N-2, N-3, N-4, and N-5:
N-1 Project construction activities shall only occur between the permitted hours of each
local jurisdiction's Municipal Code. The project construction supervisor shall ensure
compliance.
N-2 During all project site construction, all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall
be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with
manufacturers' standards. The construction supervisor shall place all stationary
construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise-sensitive
receivers nearest the Project site.
N-3 The construction supervisor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create
the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive
receivers nearest the project site (i.e., at the planned staging areas or farther from
nearby sensitive receiver locations if possible) during all Project construction. 61 staging
areas have been determined along the Route, please see Appendix B (Alignments Map
Book). The closest distance between a sensitive receptor to a staging area will be 30
feet.
13
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017- Page 14
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
N-4 The use of large bulldozers within 100 feet of nearby sensitive land uses (e.g.
residential, school, etc.) shall be minimized and avoided if possible.
N-5 The construction supervisor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours
specified for construction equipment by each local jurisdiction's Municipal Code.
The DEIR has determined that the potentially significant environmental impacts
associated with Noise, identified in Sections 4-12(b) and 4-12(c) cannot be mitigated to
a level of less than significant, and has identified these as "Significant and Unavoidable"
impacts, which will require CVAG to prepare a Statement of Overriding Considerations
as part of its adoption of the DEIR.
CVAG is completing the environmental review process, has accepted previously
submitted public comments, and is scheduled to review the DEIR for potential approval
and adoption at the April 24, 2017, CVAG Executive Committee meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Construction Costs
CVAG has developed an estimate for the initial construction costs for the CV Link,
which is identified in Table 12 of Appendix C (Master Plan Volumes 1 & 2) of the DEIR:
Table 12: Proposed Initial Implementation Cost Estimate
Summary
Underaossings and ramps 1.7 $5,i14.800
13ri,Jge crossings of channels and roadways 0.2 $8.463,300
Crossings of roadways at-grade 06 $1,373,200
Existing routes with minor changes 2.5 $6.500
Street sepMents to he upgraded 77 $5,758.700
OH Street pathway 34.8 $43.479.300
Support Elements $4.187,100
Landscaping $6,13 57d0o
Access Points $2,6r)0.800
Subtotal $78.008.800
t"'ohiliration $5?,W7.600
pip,,hl.of-Way Acquisition $963.100
Art $780,100
Contingency(10-2;,%.varies by element) $14.267.700
Total $99,997.300
14-
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017 - Page 15
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
At the time of the release for public review of the DEIR, CVAG had secured over $75
Million towards CV Link Project costs, as identified in Table 14 of Appendix C (Master
Plan Volumes 1 & 2) of the DEIR:
Table 14: CV Link Development Funding
CVAG Transportation Program V0.000.000 ✓ ✓
Sor,thern(California Air r.luelity $17.400,000 ✓
Msnagen¢"•' Dis'ri:.�
$ 6 el A, uAty M&,7 ion r os _
Federal C o, esho n M, pa!ior, d Air $i,=Wo,000 ✓ / ✓
C:uality(C "%A:2)Imr rov Tent nr)ds
Calfon,io Active Transportahor, $10V00.000 - ✓
Pronram(ATP)
U,,sert Heahhcara[>istrio $10.000,000 ✓
Sta _Tra,ispo,taHon lmprovem ni $s000.000 ✓ ✓ ✓
Proprrmr(STIP)I„nds AlocataJ i y tha
Callon,o T,.,nspo,t iiion Cornrr,w,,,
(CTQ
Cali(o:nla Str,;tanic Growih Council twoo,000 ✓
Piverside County P,�g,onal Park ti $750.000 ✓ ✓
Open Spare District'
Ca!Fr-9n1 ty(8TA) $Ina„oo ✓
Caltrans Envrtonrnental Jastice Gn1r $1y1,000 ✓
TOTAL $75 6a9r5oo
Most recently, the California Transportation Commission at its March 2017 meeting
awarded CVAG an additional $5,520,537 in funding through the Active Transportation
Program, bringing the total funding secured for construction to over $81 Million. All
construction costs associated with the CV Link Project will be paid by CVAG.
Long-Term Operational & Maintenance (O&M) Costs
CVAG has developed estimates for long-term O&M costs for the CV Link, which were
reviewed by the CVAG Executive Committee at its June 1, 2015, meeting. As part of the
CVAG staff report presented to the Executive Committee at that time, CVAG stated:
A lot of clamor has been made about how much each jurisdiction will be required
to contribute to O&M expenses over time. As early as August 2014, CVAG
addressed the long-term costs associated with CV Link's operations and
maintenance. (Refer to Attachment 2 — Section 7.8: Operational Funding, from
the August 2014 Draft CV Link Master Plan.) The latest CV Link Master Plan
states on page 153 that "construction and operations of the CV Link will not
require local funding." This is a phrase that has been repeated many times. Note
that the same document outlined 22 different ideas to cover the costs, including
several local ones, as was noted in the Desert Sun article from May 16, 2015,
and there is no "requirement" for local funding. Staffs intent has always been to
rely on regional, state, federal, and private sources of funding. If there is to be
local funding, it would voluntary and at the discretion of each local jurisdiction.
.ter
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017- Page 16
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
Further reference regarding long-term O&M costs and sources of funding is stated in
Section 8 of Appendix C (Master Plan Volumes 1 & 2):
Maintenance workers employed or contracted by a single agency would permit the
establishment of a consistent maintenance standard for the entire CV Link. Given that
CV Link is regional in nature, transportation focused, and there is a need for a steady
revenue stream, it is recommended that CVAG lead O&M as well as plan and construct
it.
Table 17 of Appendix C identifies the range of estimates for long-term O&M costs:
Table 17: Annual Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates
MAINTENANCE
Sand and dehris removal, $51,g00 $t10,000 iS0 000
swee mp,
Signs af,d rravemerrt mrkin¢,s $56,400 $56,400 $46,400
Fences, hollas,,ls and Fates $21.000 $21.000 $I11).000
Clearing of drainage cnannels a-d W"000 $4,000 $15,000
culverts
Restrooms $20.000 $40.000 $`<0.000
site fu:nlshings $30,000 $44.000 $3o.000
Graffiti removal $30,000 1 V%'.000 $30,000
Li&ir. . maintenance $30,000 $30,000 $1-0,000
Lan Jsca irtt, $150.400 $300,400 $i00,400
Subtotal Maintenance $504.700 1 $699,800 $427.800
OPERATIONS
NEV leases $36.000 $36,000 $o
Utilities(electric and wate•) $28.9Oo $33,400 $23.900
Events. promot(ons and website W,=i00 $6?,SOO $32,500
mairrenarlce
Manaparrtent,aclmirristra6orr and $�)1,200 $176,Ooo $bi,200
dis ,atch _
Rangers $O $553,100 $O
Subtotal Operations $163,600 $561,500 $107,600
TOTAL MAINTENANCE AND $668,300 $1,561,300 $53S.400
OPERATIONS
As stated in Appendix P (Community Impact Assessment) of the DEIR, the CV Link
Project will impose long-term operational and maintenance costs on CVAG and affected
local agencies. Specifically, the DER (Section 3.4 of Appendix P), states the following:
The project will also require long-term capital replacement costs, including costs
associated with minor and major repair, replacement, and/or restoration of
project components, such as bridges, surfaces, railings, and signage. These
costs are typically funded through annual reserve fund contributions. The project
will generate long-term maintenance costs, including those associated with
debris removal, routine inspections, trash disposal, and landscape and lighting
16
City Council Staff Report
April 5, 2017- Page 17
CV Link Draft Environmental Impact Report
maintenance. Long-term operational costs will include utilities (electric and
water), events and promotions, dispatch and administration. Annual operational
and maintenance costs are estimated to be between approximately $535,000
and $1.56 million. Operational and maintenance costs are expected to be funded
through a variety of sources, such as public transportation funds, grants, taxes,
and private foundations. Donations, volunteer programs, and in-kind services
may also be used. The project will also require long-term police protection, costs
of which will be absorbed by local police departments and may be supplemented
by rangers and community volunteers.
Any local commitment by the City of Palm Springs to absorb long-term O&M costs will
require specific review and approval by the City Council, which would likely be through a
Cooperative Agreement with CVAG and the other local agencies through which the CV
Link extends.
SUBMITTED:
Marcus L. Fuller, MPA, PE, PLS David H. Ready, Esq., DS15
Assistant City Manager/City Engineer City Manager
�n
I
Statement to the Palm Springs City Council
Monday, April 3, 2017
By John Muzdakis
Resident of Four Seasons
2647 Windmill Way,
Palm Springs, CA 92262
The C V Link is like a lot of other "do-good" concepts that attract
attention at first glance as worthwhile projects and thereby gather some
popular support. Until they are fully scrutinized.
There are several fundamental and fatal flaws with the C V Link that
can be briefly summarized as follows:
FIRST- The Concept and Access
How will people get to the C V Link? Not very many citizens live
adjacent to it as we do in Four Seasons. Almost all other citizens must
somehow get to the C V Link by either walking, biking or by car. In
other words, to use the C V Link means you have to get to it. How far
away are you ? Probably very few are within a few hundred yards.
The vast majority of people will be 2 miles away, maybe 5 or more
miles away. For cyclists, that means "bike lanes" on busy city streets
for safety. For walkers, that means a long distance and most likely
requiring a car ride to drive several miles to reach the nearest entrance.
That's traffic over and above the CV Link itself. And for bikers to do
this safely that means more "bike lanes". That is in itself is a
redundancy. With more "bike lanes", who needs a C V Link ?
Furthermore, the C V Link is not a destination route in itself. People
will use it only for a limited recreational purpose, not to go from one
point to another. Its value to the community should be assessed as a
recreational area, not as a linked route and an access route.
SECOND - Funding
The CVAG has not been able to fund the C V Link from a single
source or allocation. So, the promoters of this project are scratching
from various sources to cobble together the necessary money. They
have proposed to divert some Measure A funds originally intended for
maintenance of highways and busy roads to support a recreational
project only to be used by a handful of people. This is an
extraordinary diversion of public money. It's more than a
"boondoggle"; it a waste of public money.
THIRD - Maintenance
Once the CV Link is built, how will we pay to maintain it?The
promoters don't know. No plan has been developed and approved by
the cities of the Valley to provide for upkeep,repair and management
of the CV Link.
CVAG has estimated that initial maintenance cost will be just under
one million dollars per year ...approximately $20,000 PER MILE
annually... and will increase every year. The projected lifespan of the
CV Link is 75 years. More than seven decades of maintenance funds
will be needed. How will that be paid?
In Summary
The C V Link would an (1) under-utilized nuisance attraction, (2) a
wasteful diversion of public funds and (3) a maintenance nightmare.
CV LINK MULTI - MODAL
TRANSPORTATION PROJECT
April 5, 2017
?ALM so
V tQp
ATE
c'Q41FOI
huh 5. 1=,
a 4-OS- 2-D/7
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
OI
I `
I
E,
I
F.WnJ iaxmnndag.,.d
z
u,gT WN.rtd
E TR CwpD Prepordi@un u
AlG9fxiw AlLiGyro¢ua drYJN IIS S—r Way far✓; ¢y
� fe ai.�wJh pYlx¢aYad¢ p
,^ .v.5mmmNrm routo rortlrw rjr
O
I :" 0� AY/CWo^O'R:nvm�v9 of e�W�rg¢jTnd �y
�. vlh elrm�¢djbilwgbmonan$9opi^'a+.5 A �yQyr
&dp ntl9^d° J (t
WSAN RAFAELVR ESAN RAFAELDp �u.ug¢xuroeAa 2
Ihllvn"Y pdmIIng jndad C Q SM
4¢6n bn4 wuq wrtM n¢.OaLh/netsbWw q s Y nnm ems••
:r k cd.,ay n a
>� Z C u peek
�.�f to V Ys�Atl Nvm Emu�lary V � Fyn �
►1'i Q z
hp� i
,e z i ERACOUET CLUB RD n'
a
1
I VIA ESCUELA °f
.rr -------------------------------------------------- -_- •
(NORTH Rp LM SaRIH651
Lug tun
Y �h.0 any n.tA lutu¢btl,
VISTA CHINO YISTACNINO
NM loirt.pg
a r
C sgmlord vntp
r..ap
n
V
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
VISTA CHINO SAvr wrmw9=ra �^'31""""'�11°""5 I YI
ryrdrwnvav nN+'NM'
� I
1
i
TACHSYAN DP x,..
A
Y � I
v 09
p 1
_ hurt in>h,
'x� s•. 1
oe.1�
� Cel[JO PD al ovuOMOP
-�w c
v~�wf R/x ;fit
r aMADO PD
c TeupulTxwar :�rw� ♦ j ^'""`nb•
• 1 n>xn sr...,p a.,,.Ia.,v q
1 IwnaraMa„[an I N
Ibn m.. .pt 1 irmn� 1 <bm+m rtv �mnGN
$ U J
CAPRTO PD a1M_ 1
-� jyx M1F.sy�y la� iA IJ i
uy.5amd
I �S,r a Bmat yy 1r IS 9m_ LL - r.wnr
1..33 I—Q MlCurrm.GeM4u
T,rl,le [N,un
1+_14 T, V„v lel fum l
W,m E4L>•• 1 ._. SUNNY DUNCS PD
HIV
cri
g cr
MSSOURC 4v6 � NesQWTe eve u k O edil�p
P a F W
d S�AF `IV
x 0
a
i
C Pa .CANYON OP Mom DP .r. ---- ,.
F I
°a r
� 1
0 O
FPAx�CehYglf
°q
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
0
a �P...Ms. s
Z FALEID RD 61C ' SPTNd VE
V Z V
E AMADO RD
Z _ t Y N 9��.R�:1'CI (yw Cilanc < NY%cnm
v...seny s,nam.+ ET4NOUIiZ CANYON WAY cN>MFI � I
Akeen
D
n..cmmcnccen.,,a °f 1 T"•e I YD
iCe.ne.- laQ6T0 RD a A i
f NYeSm+P YI¢O , _, i
'^ Pen,sv.np aw Rn as`- DALN SPRNGS1 ydknm 1— 1— tl
P.ronhhavfaeF.nfn N 1 tl
RAMONRD RAMON RD
1 1?r 1 A9 om GOX4.h 'I
` 1 1 UI y Ce:o Y.n Fw+vn�ry Srn I
IYYn'anPCWM1 �r rMP'�CM1T. 1 1 �1 SUNNY DUNES RD
> Q IT
SUNNY DUN RD w;
K j
L xbdp wdnT Aa. 6acr S'rp� N N � NIF
rvwyi auM9 wuwd! � O ZI j
MESQUITE AVE MESQUITE AVE V h p
TJ .Cans+ 6 / �(:NHFh n.nuY`x m4 Y Jpgei yrcl Q R Dzn�ehM JI
Fmk.+.ea,e
E PALM CANYON DR ESCOBA DR SATN AVE
sneensra..ar eves G
pruhpef brrt�c aWr N.
O a Y ^1
QO < Fub,K.cufM9c'evatl _ �1 C.r�Xwrc.
U _
j 0 Y
n W vFRNF WAY O
o �
0
40
w I
v- 1
i 1 I I
Z
N 1 1 XNKINSiRAIt
I
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
FOUR SEASONS COMMUNITY
N . Palm Canvon Dr. Cross-Over Simulation :
Myµ (y
v Sir
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
FOUR SEASONS COMMUNITY
O
Proposed future
Sunrise Way park
our Seasons: three route variations
N
Bridge or at-grade
E SAN RAFAEL DR crossing alternatives
4
>- Proposed future
Q Serena Park
3
W
Z
D
V) �.
L
(O
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
FOUR SEASONS COMMUNITY
Draft EIR analyzed three alternative alignments :
• # 1 — Top of Levee — would allow views from CV
Link into adjacent properties, mitigated by
new privacy screening wall
• #2 — Bottom of Levee ( land side ) — located
between Four Seasons and Levee, existing
perimeter walls would provide privacy
screening
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
FOUR SEASONS COMMUNITY
Draft EIR analyzed three alternative alignments :
• #3 — Bottom of Levee ( wash side ) — located on
outside of Levee, using Levee as a form of
privacy screening and separation for security
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
FOUR SEASONS COMMUNITY
Alternative #3 Simulation :
IFF
J,.411 '
lima
r.
IL
CO ICIM on(f!R/OSSrI �
xf p
$hwf term upgrade n4 9 .�.* a
with future i aore lr
signab and instnlf j � �' n
cross..dk
1
N I rn n
Esc Relaurant
1 17 rn r
� Z
Z
Desert Sun office I (�
RaM�rng3 Ar Museum O
saI DI ONDR
% r
% =f-
.9\\y `rE`�, 3 H
CO. 3�ti 3 G)
�("o--------I e� Z
PSUSpI 4gua Cd e me leN m entary S hod
o3
Z
rn
'dm Springs Dream Names Q z
.terrwtiand Aiport I CanmuniN Cima rrond(G O
ermind Resort Q
I J
ILOw v fen
`LAMON�D���� undeeccrDum
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
ESCENA COMMUNITY
Segment 2 of CV Link alignment from Vista
Chino to Ramon Road will be constructed
separately by Cathedral City as part of the
Whitewater Bike Path funded with state Bicycle
Transportation Account grant funds .
Whitewater Bike Path aligned on top of levee,
consistent with Palm Springs General Plan .
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
TAHQUITZ CREEK CHANNEL
tt�c2 - Elite Land To s
t . . 1 U t y `, Clelo Vista Elementary Schi D,
Palm Springs Cyclery w `` �°hqu'=Creek Tr : Wt m
SUNNYDUNESRD Decert � ` r � �1 � SUNNY DUNESRD
L
hapel
ew Erldge in design phase
N.RP/E RSID ,. Whence existing crosswalk
Tahquitz Canyon rr//
Visitor Center / Historic church O MESQUITE AVE
/J/ MESQUITE AVI
r
n p w Cahuilla Elementary School Upgradesgn¢h n R Demuth Park
a
Exish'ng C W s
0 chamet W
a bridge sn u _ G��A- New iake hrd
a T ¢terrwfive
m D Ou K.
N
Rea4gn east r
E PALM CANYON DR ESCOBA DR
J
C a
� h'
Z p �� ' }
O a .. _� �
CV LINK ALIGNMENT
TAHQUITZ CREEK CHANNEL
Alignment incorporates :
• Existing bike path along north side of Tahquitz Creek
channel (S. Palm Canyon Dr. to Sunrise Way) with interim
alignment along south side from pedestrian bridge to
Belardo Rd .
• Proposed on-street bike lane ( Mesquite Ave . — Sunrise
Way to Compadre Rd . )
• Proposed bike path through Mesquite Country Club
• Existing bike path along levee adjacent to Demuth Park
and Wastewater Treatment Plant
• Proposed on-street bike lane (34t" Ave. — Golf Club Dr. to
east end at Whitewater River)