Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout24283 RESOLUTION NO. 24283 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR AMENDMENTS TO THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD) 314, AS PROPOSED BY WOODBRIDGE PACIFIC, LLC, ON BEHALF OF RREF DC CAMERON, TO ALLOW MINOR CHANGES TO DESIGN, COLOR, MATERIALS, REDUCTION OF MASSING AND HEIGHTS IN CERTAIN UNITS OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FINAL PDD PLANS FOR THE CAMERON PROJECT LOCATED AT 850-990 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE. THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: A. Woodbridge Pacific, LLC, (the "Applicant') has filed an application with the City to amend the previously approved final development plans of Planned Development District 314 pursuant to the provisions of Section 94.02.00 (B) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code. B. The City Council of the City of Palm Springs originally approved Planned Development District 314 (PDD 314), on July 12, 2006, for a mixed-use development consisting of residential and commercial / retail. C. The project applicant timely submitted a request for an extension of the Initial Project and applied for amendments to the PDD 314 and Tentative Tract Map 33575. D. On June 19, 2017, the proposed minor amendment to PDD 314, was reviewed by the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC), and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with a unanimous vote. E. On June 28, 2017, a public hearing on the proposed minor amendment was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law. F. On July 26, 2017, a public hearing on the proposed minor amendment was held by City Council in accordance with applicable law. The City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the meeting on the proposed minor amendment, including but not limited to the staff report, the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and all written and oral testimony presented. G. The proposed minor amendment is considered a "project' pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was previously adopted by the City Council on July 6, 2006, for the project. Pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, further environmental documentation is not necessary because the proposed minor amendment to the project will not result in any new significant Resolution No. 24283 Page 2 environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. H. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council has considered the effect of the proposed project on the housing needs of the region, and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. I. A notice of public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California to consider the above-mentioned applications was given in accordance with applicable law and on June 7, 2017, the City Council held a public hearing in accordance with applicable law. J. The City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the Project, including but not limited to the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented and finds that the Project complies with the requirements of Section 94.03.00 of the City's Zoning Code. The City Council makes the following findings based on specific evidence as described after each finding: a. That the use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Zoning Code. The Planned Development Districts is a residential and commercial development, the previously approved project is consistent in terms of density with the General Plan requirements and the site is compatible with the existing or potential development of the surrounding neighborhoods. The proposed minor amendment will enhance the design of the project. b. That the use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; The previously approved Planned Development District will add to the housing stock available in the City. Thereby the Planned Development District is desirable for the community and is in harmony with various elements of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The proposed minor amendment will not affect the previously approved uses, size and scope of the project. C. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate such use, including yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping and other features required in order to adjust such use to those existing or permitted future uses of land in the neighborhood; Resolution No. 24283 Page 3 The minor amendment to the Planned Development District modifies building materials, colors, massing and heights in certain units of the project while maintaining the original intent and purposed envisioned for the site. The project site is 11.61 acres and large enough to accommodate the mixed-use development. All development standards such as setbacks, sidewalks, walls and fences are consistent with the development standards established by PDD 314. d. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use; The project fronts South Palm Canyon Drive, Mesquite Avenue and Random Road. South Palm Canyon Drive is a major thoroughfare that is fully developed and Mesquite Avenue is a Collector Street. Both South Palm Canyon Drive and Mesquite Avenue have the capacity to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use. All the previously adopted mitigation measures in the MND, relative to traffic and circulation within and around the development are still applicable to the project. e. That the conditions to be imposed and shown on the approved site plan are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include minor modification of the zone's property development standards; The City Council previously approved a set of conditions of approval for the Planned Development District; these conditions from different departments of the City which include Planning, Building, Fire and Public Works are still applicable to the project. All previously adopted Mitigation Measures from the MND will apply to this project. Therefore, staff believes that the conditions imposed are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS RESOLVES: SECTION 1. That the findings and determinations reflected above are true and correct, and are incorporated by this reference herein as the cause and foundation for the action taken by and through this resolution. SECTION 2. CEQA. The Project is considered a "project" pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was previously adopted by the City Council on July 6, 2006, for the project. Pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, further environmental documentation is not necessary because the proposed minor amendment to the project will not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Resolution No. 24283 Page 4 SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the proposed minor amendment to Planned Development District 314 to allow minor revisions to the height, massing, materials, and color palette to some units within the previously approved mixed-use development located at 850-990 South Palm Canyon Drive, and such approvals shall be valid for two years, unless otherwise extended in a manner authorized under applicable provisions of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. ADOPTED THIS 26T" DAY OF JULY 2017. David H. Ready, Esq., h.D. City Manager ATTEST: v-1—�rzz Kathleen D. Hart, MMC Interim City Clark CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, KATHLEEN D. HART, Interim City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution No. 24283 is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on July 26, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Kors, Mills, Roberts, Mayor Pro Tern Foat, and Mayor Moon NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None RECUSED: None Kathleen D. Hart, MMC Interim City Clerk