HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979 ORDINANCE NO. 1979
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PALM SPRINGS ZONING
CODE TO ADOPT THE R-1-E ZONE DISTRICT AND
ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (CASE
5.1398 ZTA).
City Attorney's Summary
This Ordinance adopts a new single-family zone district called the R-1-E
district, and is intended to implement the recommendations of the Ad Hoc
PDD Committee. The Ordinance establishes a minimum lot size of 5,000
square feet for the R-1-E zone district, establishes minimum lot dimensions,
minimum setbacks, maximum lot coverage, and other development
standards. The Ordinance is consistent with the density limitations of the
Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential land use
designations of the City of Palm Springs General Plan.
THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:
A. The Ad Hoc PDD Committee, as established by the City of Palm Springs
through a settlement agreement, recommended that the zoning code be amended to
include a small-lot single-family zoning district as an alternative to the use of the Planned
Development District (PDD) process.
B. Notice of a public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm
Springs to consider Case 5.1398 ZTA was given in accordance with applicable law.
C. On October 24, 2018, a public hearing on the proposed Zone Text
Amendment was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law, at
which meeting the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the
proposed amendment.
D. On February 6, 2019, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on the
proposed Zone Text Amendment in accordance with applicable law.
E. The project is categorically exempt from further review per the State CEQA
Guidelines (California Code Regulations § 15000 et seq.). The whole of the Ordinance
is exempt, because the code amendment is an administrative activity which will not result
in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment [§
15060(c)(2)]. The whole of the Ordinance is exempt because the code amendment is not
a "project" as defined by Section 15378, since it has no potential for resulting in a direct
or indirect physical change to the environment [§ 15060(c)(3)].
F. The City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence
presented in connection with the hearing on the Zone Text Amendment, including, but not
limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented.
Ordinance No. 1979
Page 2
G. The City Council finds that approval of the proposed Zone Text Amendment
would:
1. Implement Recommendations #52 and #53 of the Ad Hoc PDD
Committee, recommending the creation of a small-lot district with a
minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet to be used in place of the
Planned Development District (PDD) process;
2. Provide consistency with the LDR (Low Density Residential) and
MDR (Medium Density Residential) land use designations of the City
of Palm Springs General Plan, which encourages a range of single-
family housing types at various densities;
3. Implements Goal HS1 of the Housing Element of the City of Palm
Springs General Plan, which encourages a broad range of housing
types to address current and future housing needs; and
4. Implements Policy HS1.2 of the Housing Element of the City of Palm
Springs General Plan, which dictates the need to maintain a range
of housing densities through General Plan land use designations and
zoning.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the findings and determinations reflected above are true and
correct, and are incorporated by this reference herein as the cause and foundation for the
action taken by and through this Ordinance.
SECTION 2. Amend Section 92.01.03(A) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code to add
the R-1-E zone district as follows:
A. Minimum Lot Standards.
R-1-AH R-1-A 13-1-13 R-1-C R-1-D R-1-E
1. Lot area
(in square feet) 20,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 7,500 5,000
(fairway lots only) - - - 12,500 - -
2. Minimum width (in feet):
Interior lots 130 130 120 100 75 50
Corner lots:
a. Siding local/collector street 140 140 130 110 82 55
b. Reverse 140 140 130 110 92 55
c. Siding major thoroughfare 165 165 150 140 117 NP'
d. Siding secondary thoroughfare F 155 155 140 130 107 65
Ordinance No. 1979
Page 3
R-1-AH R-1-A R-1-B R-1-C R-1-D R-1-E
e. Cul-de-sac/curve lots(average 130 130 120 100 75 50
widths)
3. Minimum depth(in feet):
Backing on:
a. Interior lot/Local/Collector street 120 120 120 100 100 90
b. Major thoroughfare/State hwy. 160 160 160 140 140 100
c. Secondary thoroughfare 150 150 150 130 130 100
d. Fairway 120 120 120 100 100 90
Facing on:
a. Major thoroughfare 145 145 145 125 125 NP1
b. Secondary thoroughfare 135 135 135 115 115 100
'Not permitted.
SECTION 3. Amend Section 92.01.03(B) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code to add
development standards for the R-1-E zone district as follows:
B. Yards and Building Standards.
R-1-AH R-1-A R-1-B R-1-C R-1-D R-1-E
1. Front yards:
a. Local/Collector street 25 25 25 25 25 15
b. Major thoroughfare 50 50 50 50 50 NP'
c. Secondary thoroughfare 25 25 25 25 25 20
d. Service road 25 25 25 25 25 15
e. Curve lot/Cul-de-sac 20 20 20 20 20 15
f. Special conditions(See Section 93.01.00)
2. Side yards:
a. Interior 10 10 10 10 7.5 6
b. Corner
(1) Local/Collector street 20 20 20 20 15 15
(2) Reverse on local street 25 25 25 25 25 15
(3) Major thoroughfare 50 50 50 50 50 NP'
(4)Secondary thoroughfare 25 25 25 25 25 25
(5) Service road 25 25 25 25 25 15
(6) Special conditions
(See Section 93.01.00)
3. Rear yards:
a. Backing on interior lot/local/collector street 15 15 15 15 1 15 15
b. Backing on major thoroughfare 25 25 25 25 25 25
c. Backing on secondary thoroughfare 25 25 25 25 25 25
d. Backing on fairway 20 20 20 20 20 15
e. Special conditions
(See Section 93.01.00)
4. Lot coverage(max.) 35% 35% 35% 35% 350% 45%
Ordinance No. 1979
Page 4
R-1-AH R-1-A R-1-13 R-1-C R-1-D R-1-E
5. Minimum dwelling size 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,100 1,100 N/A
(excluding garage/carport)
6. Building Envelope. Buildings shall not exceed
one(1)story and twelve(12)feet in height at
the minimum setback. From the minimum
setback,the height may be allowed to increase
along a plane which has a slope of 4:12, until a
building height of eighteen (18)feet is attained.
Gable ends, dormers and front entrance
treatments, not exceeding fifteen (15)feet in
height, may encroach past the building
envelope limits. Garage structures which
encroach into a rear yard setback area as
permissible under subsection (C)(3)shall be
limited to a maximum of ten(10)feet in height.
These regulations may be modified by the
planning commission for hillside lots pursuant
to Section 94.06.01(A)(8).
7. Garages/Carports. Garages shall be located
not less than twenty-five(25)feet from the
property line abutting the street from which
such garage has vehicular access and twenty-
five(25)feet from the opposite side of the alley
from which such garage has vehicular access.
In the R-1-E zone, garages shall be located not
less than twenty(20)feet from the front and
corner side property lines. Garages may be
detached from the main building in the R-1-A,
R-1-AH, R-1-E and hillside areas only.
'Not permitted.
SECTION 4. Amend Section 92.01.03(C)(3) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code to
add subsection (b) as follows:
b. Garage or Carport Structures (R-1-E Zone only). Garage or carport
structures may be located within the rear yard setback area where the
structure takes direct access from an alleyway at the rear of the lot, or
takes access from a driveway extending along the side property line to the
rear of the lot. The garage or carport structure shall be located a minimum
of five (5) feet from the rear property line, and shall conform to the
minimum side yard setback. The garage or carport structure may be
located at the side property line when approved as part of a zero-lot line
development under section (E)(12).
SECTION 5. Amend Section 92.01.03 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code to add a
new subsection (D) as follows and renumber all following subsections accordingly:
Ordinance No. 1979
Page 5
D. Exceptions — Lot Coverage (R-1-E Zone only).
1. Covered Porches. Non-habitable covered porches, which are open
on at least one side, may be excluded from lot coverage
requirements in accordance with the definition listed in Section
91.00.10. Non-habitable covered porches shall be subject to all
setback requirements.
2. Increased Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage in the R-1-E
zone may be increased to fifty percent (50%) under either of the
following conditions:
a. An accessory dwelling unit is permitted and constructed in
conformance to the requirements of Section 93.23.14; and/or
b. A garage or carport structure is constructed at the rear of the
lot in the rear yard setback area in conformance to the
requirements of subsection (3)(b).
SECTION 6. Amend Section 92.01.03 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code to
renumber subsection (D) and to add a new paragraph as follows:
E. General Provisions.
12. Zero-Lot Line Development.
a. Districts where permitted. Zero-lot line development may be
permitted in the R-1-E zoning district.
b. Permitted Development Types. Zero-lot line developments
may include the following configurations:
i. The structure is situated on a parcel so that one or
more portions of the structure is located on the side
property line;
ii. The structure is situated on a parcel so that one or
more portions of the structure is located on the side
property line and attached to the dwelling unit on the
abutting parcel; or
iii. Side yard setback for the structure is reduced, and an
exclusive use easement is provided on the abutting
parcel.
C. Development Standards.
i. Lot size. The minimum lot size shall comply with the
requirements for the R-1-E zone.
ii. Lot coverage. The lot coverage shall comply with the
requirements for the R-1-E zone.
iii. Setbacks. Front and rear yard setbacks shall comply
with the requirements for the R-1-E zone. Side yard
setbacks may be reduced along one property line,
provided the opposite side yard setback is increased
by the corresponding setback reduction; in no case
shall the aggregate side yard setbacks be less than
Ordinance No. 1979
Page 6
twelve (12) feet. Accessory buildings and structures
shall conform to the setbacks established for the
primary dwelling unit. This setback reduction shall not
apply to side yard setbacks adjacent to parcels that
are not part of the zero lot-line development.
V. Height limitation. The maximum building height shall
comply with the requirements for the R-1-E zone.
vi. Mechanical equipment. Mechanical equipment may
be permitted in side yard areas, subject to the
requirements of Section 93.01.00.
d. Application Procedures. Zero-lot line developments shall be
processed and reviewed via a Tentative Map application.
The map shall identify the zero-lot line configuration on each
parcel, the setbacks for each parcel, and the area for any
exclusive use easement.
SECTION 7. Amend Section 93.06.00(C)(6) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code as
follows:
6. Tandem Parking.
Automobile parking so arranged as to require the moving of any vehicle in
order to enter or leave any other stall shall be prohibited in any zone
unless specifically approved by the Director. Tandem parking spaces may
be permitted in the R-1-E zone, subject to all other applicable
development standards.
SECTION 8. Amend Section 9.60.030(2) of the Palm Springs Municipal Code as
follows:
(2) Alleys shall be avoided where possible, except as otherwise permissible
under this Code. Alleys may be provided in commercial or industrial zones if other
definite and assured provision cannot be made for service access, such as off-
street loading, unloading and parking consistent with and adequate for the uses
proposed. Alleys may be provided in the R-1-E residential zone, where the alley is
designed to provide access to garage or carport structures at the rear of each
residential lot abutting the alley. If approved, an alley shall:
(A) Be not less than twenty feet wide;
(B) Be improved to full width.
SECTION 9. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction or contravened by
reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this
Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or
contravened via legislation.
Ordinance No. 1979
Page 7
SECTION 10. The proposed text amendment will implement General Plan
densities and standards that were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for
the 2007 General Plan. The EIR was certified by City Council Resolution No. 22077 and
remains the controlling environmental document for implementing changes to the Palm
Springs Zoning Code. Because the proposed text amendments implement the 2007
General Plan, no further environmental documentation is required pursuant to Section
15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act.
SECTION 11. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be
published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take
effect thirty (30) days after passage.
ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019.
"—�a4 �
ROBERT MOON
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Ar4TWONY J. M JIA,
CITY CLERK
Ordinance No. 1979
Page 8
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS )
I, ANTHONY J. MEJIA, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby
certify that Ordinance No. 1979 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was introduced at a
regular meeting of the Palm Springs City Council on Wednesday, February 6, 2019, and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20t" day of February, 2019,
by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Holstege, Middleton, Mayor Pro Tem Kors, and
Mayor Moon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Roberts
ABSTAIN: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of Palm Springs, California, this day of r 20 f`7
0 THONY J/ NWJJA?AMC-
CITY CLERik