HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/19/2007 - STAFF REPORTS - 2.J. °�ppLM SpR
ry
U N
.S 4^
oy"onnle�
°4``F°Ra,P CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT: REQUEST BY FRANCIS LABRANCHE FOR A ONE-YEAR TIME
EXTENSION FROM JULY 21, 2007 TO JULY 20, 2008 FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 31230 FOR THE UPTOWN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT
(ASSOCIATED CASE NO. 5.0999 PDD 296) LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF ZANJERO ROAD AND VIA OLIVERA
ROAD_
FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager
BY: Planning Department
SUMMARY
Francis LaBranche has requested a one-year time extension for Tentative Tract Map
(TTM) 31230 located at the northwest corner of Zanjero Road and Via Olivera Road,
Zone PDD-296, Section 3. This time extension is one of two requests by the applicant
and is from July 21, 2007 to July 20, 2008 (see previous staff report for extension
ending in 2007).
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt Resolution No. , "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ONE-YEAR
TIME EXTENSION FROM JULY 21, 2007 TO JULY 20, 2008 FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 31230 FOR THE UPTOWN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT
(ASSOCIATED CASE NO. 5.0999 PDD 296) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF ZANJERO ROAD AND VIA OLIVERA ROAD, ZONE PDD-296,
SECTION 3."
PRIOR ACTIONS TAKEN ON THE PROJECT
On July 14, 2004, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the project to
the City Council. On July 21, 2004, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map
31230 and PD-296.
ITEM NO.
City Council Staff Report
September 19, 2007
TTM 31230 Time Extension
On August 9, 2006, the Planning Commission approved a one year time extension for
PO-296 and recommended approval of a one-year time extension to the City Council for
TTM 31230. The extension is from July 21, 2006 to July 20, 2007.
On July 25, 2007, the Planning Commission approved another one year time extension
for PD-296 and recommended approval of a one-year time extension to the City Council
for TTM 31230. The extension is from July 21, 2007 to July 20, 2008.
BACKGROUND
The entitled project, Uptown Village, consists of a Planned Development District to
construct a cluster residential development consisting of seven (7) single-family
attached residences within two clusters; one of three units and another of four units on
approximately 0.79 acres. The Tentative Tract Map is proposed to allow the sale of
each unit. The project will include a common pool recreation area with each unit having
a private spa.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
The City Council may extend the map a maximum of one year pursuant to Section
9.63.110 of the Municipal Code. Therefore, staff has kept the two requests as separate
actions with separate staff reports and resolutions.
According to the applicant, the reason for the time extension request is to allow time to
resolve impacts that include street improvements, street access, and street vacations
that are being worked out between the City and the proponents of an adjacent project,
the Palm Springs Art Colony.
There are no specific findings for extension of the map. In reviewing the request, staff
considered if the following circumstances have changed such that the map's approval
might need reconsideration:
• The project's overall plan and lot configuration,
• The uses and development of the surrounding area, and
• The applicable policies of the General Plan, zoning ordinance and other
regulations.
The applicant has not requested any Changes to the originally entitled plans. The uses
and development in the surrounding areas have not had significant change. The Art
Colony project was recently approved, but the adjacent proposed uses will be similar to
this project. No significant changes have occurred in the above-mentioned factors to
warrant reconsideration of the map's approval and staff recommends approval of the
extension request. Further, no new conditions are recommended to be added and no
existing conditions are recommended for revision or amendment.
000002
City Council Staff Report
September 19, 2007
TTM 31230 Time Extension
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact.
ing, AICP Thomas J. Wilso
Dire r of Plannin rvices Assistant City Manager
. � l
David H. Ready
City Manager
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map
2. Draft Resolution
3. Planning Commission Staff Report
4. Planning Commission Minutes (Excerpt)
5. Letter of Request
000003
i.pF QPLM SA�,'Y � F
N Department of Planning and Zoning,,
Vicinity Map S
cVL/FORN`P-
RACQUET CLUB RD
- ROCHELLE RD
z
O
z
_ Q
U
Z
Proposed Q
Site Q
2
VIA OLIVERA
Y
z
m
0
v
1
CITY CP PALM SPRINGS
CASE NO.: 5.0999, PD —296, TTM 31230 DESCRIPTION: Application by Desert Builders to
construct 7 cluster residential units on .79 acres
APPLICANT: Desert Builders located at the NW corner of Via Olivera and
Zanjero Roads, Zone R2, Sec. 3.
oaaoo�
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ONE-YEAR TIME
EXTENSION FROM JULY 21, 2007 TO JULY 20, 2008 FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31230 FOR THE UPTOWN
VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT (ASSOCIATED CASE NO.
5.0999 PDD 296) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF ZANJERO ROAD AND VIA OLIVERA ROAD,
ZONE PDD-296, SECTION 3.
WHEREAS, Francis LaBranche ("Applicant") has filed an application with the City
pursuant to Chapter 9.63.110 of the Palm Springs Municipal Code for a one-year time
extension to Tentative Tract Map 31230 to allow a subdivision of the following APNs
504-260-004 8; 504-260-005; and
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2007 the Planning Commission held a public meeting and voted
to recommend that the City Council approve a one-year time extension of Tentative
Tract Map 31230; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2007, the City Council held a public meeting to consider
the applicant's request for a one-year time extension of Tentative Tract Map 31230; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence
presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including but not limited to the
staff report and all written and oral testimony presented.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: A notice of exemption was previously prepared for this project in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). There is no new information or any change in circumstance
that would change the status of the exemption and, as a result, no further
environmental review is necessary for the requested extension.
Section 2: Approve a one year time extension from July 21, 2007 to July 20, 2008 for
Tentative Tract Map 31230.
ADOPTED THIS 19th day of September, 2007.
David H. Ready, City Manager
ATTEST:
James Thompson, City Clerk
008005
Resolution No.
Page 2
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS )
I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that
Resolution No- is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
James Thompson, City Clerk
City of Palm Springs, California
r ,
OE PALMY Sp
• w
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
C4C I FP4tta�P
Date: July 25, 2007
Case No.: 5.0999, PD —296/TfM 31230
Type: Tentative Tract Map/PDD—Time Extension
Location: Northwest comer of Zanjero Road &Via Olivera Road
APN: 504-260-004 & 005
Applicant Francis LaBranche (Uptown Village)
General Plan: Residential
Zone: PD-296
From: Craig A. Ewing, AICP, Director of Planning Services
Project Planner: David A. Newell, Assistant Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The applicant, Francis LaBranche has submitted a request for a one-year time
extension for Case No. 5.0996, Planned Development District 296 and Tentative Tract
Map 31230 that was previously approved on July 21, 2004.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of a one-year
time extension for TTM 31230 and approve a one-year time extension for Case No.
5.0999-PD-296 until July 21, 2008.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract Map 31230 and PD-296 were approved on July 21, 2004 by the City
Council. The PD was approved in-lieu of a change of zone from R-2 to PD to allow the
development of a multi-family residential project at the location.
600007
Planning commission SM Repoli July 25,2007
case TTM 31230/5.0999 PD•290 Page 2 of 2
According to the applicant, the reason for the time extension request is to allow time to
resolve impacts that include street improvements, street access, and street vacations
that are being worked out between the City and the proponents of an adjacent project,
the Palm Springs Art Colony. The applicant has stated that these issues will have an
impact on their property and that they will need additional time to walk through those
issues to move forward with their development.
Based on these reasons, staff has determined that the extension request dated July 13,
2007, can be considered as applying to both the Planned Development and the
Tentative Tract Map.
ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Section 94.03.00(H) of the City of Palm Springs Zoning Code, extensions of
time for a Planned Development District may be allowed by demonstration of good
cause. And according to Chapter 9.63.110 of the Municipal Code, there are no specific
findings or determinations that need to be made to grant the time extension for the map.
The Municipal Code does limit all time extensions to one-year and that requirement is
being carried forward in staff's recommendation.
Staff has reviewed the project, surrounding area and underlying zoning regulations and
determined that no significant changes have occurred that would suggest that the
project is no longer in keeping with the City's development policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This project is categorically exempt from CEQA review as an in-fill development project
per California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15332.
David A. Newell r ig A. g,'ICP
Assistant Planner Di ector of Planng Services
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Draft Resolution
3. Letter of Request
City of Palm Springs
Planning Commission Minutes of
July 25, 2007
Commissioner Scott requested Item 2D pulled from the Consent Calendar for further
discussion.
M/S/C (Ringlein/Cohen, 7-0) To approve, Items 2A, 2B, 2C and 2E, as part of the
Consent Calendar. (Noting Commissioner Hutcheson's abstention on Item 2B.)
2A. Draft Minutes of June 21, 2007, June 27, 2007 and July 11, 2007.
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
2B. Case IOA60 DET - An application by Frank J. De Lelys for a Planning
Commission Determination for vacating lot "B" and a portion of lot "A" of
Parcel Map 7254, as recorded in parcel map book 30, page 65, of maps,
records of Riverside County, State of California, Zone R-1-C, Section 11.
(Project Planner. David A. Newell, Assistant Planner)
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar. (Noting Commissioner Hutcheson's
abstention.)
2C. Case 5.0999 PD 296 / TTM 31230 - An application by Francis LaBranche
(Uptown Village) requesting a one-year time extension for
Planned Development District 296 and the associated Tentative Tract Map
31230 located on the northwest corner of Via blivera and Zanjero Road,
Zone PD 296, Section 3. APN 504-260-004 & 005. (Project Planner. David A.
Newell, Assistant Planner)
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar_
2D. Case 3.3078 SFR - An application by Hubert Routt to construct a 4,693
square foot single family residence located at 2932 North Sunrise Way,
Zone R-1-C, Section 1, APN: 501-203-022. (Project Planner. Bryan
Fernandez, Assistant Planner)
Commissioner Scott requested clarification on the type of roofing tile.
Jack Halloway, HIPS Associated Builders Inc., responded the roofing file is consistent
with the neighborhood. Staff was in agreement.
2
ul-I . 290i(FRi) 09: 50 BEAU; E F_CUiI',ES _P GUIrITA (F9%)760 771 9190 P .I0,•: it
Judy 13, 2007
Franks LaBranche
25 Bay Street
Northfield, Nf-I 0327
Aw Edward Robertson
Principal Planner
City of Palm Springs, CA
ltiu: RegiAost or a-a extensiou for.
Via Jlivert, Parcels 1#50 42b0004-1 And 504260005-2
Deor Ed,
1 our u7itiug,this letter to request an extension of nn approved
t`cvclopmcnt oa the parcels referenced above, for the foilnwLip reasons.
This past year the project kno' n as T'he Art Colony has i,;:ii scvc!-a!
iropa.c.ts as to the development of our propert-
1. :street impro veryent
access
_ VacarloiT of same
The approval ofthe Art Colony is gettiag closer to Anallaauon, but
severl issues benveen the City and the Developer arc still in r,
a egotiatior, ;utd
are not yet _r'rnalized. The final approval oftht�se issues vil! Ii ive an impact
an our property.
We are prepared x move ahead to develop this propeity bast nci ra wal� CO
this consider this extension for us to bo i3laic to walk throu;;lt }laese issues.
(fyou have any questions, please contact my representative,
lim Waztord, at 7,50-272-8105• Thaa-d< you for your Wtteadoni to this yr,ry
iripoAaat m tiler.
1tiespec;ttt�lly, ;
Francis La:innciie.
111L i