Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/25/2007 - STAFF REPORTS - 1.E. 'D r o�pALMgp� -y a u` m Z k °L Z 4`'�°"`'� CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT M DATE. July 25, 2007 PUBLIC HEARING v SUBJECT: CASE NO. 5.1127 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-CLASSIFY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM M-15 (MEDIUM DENSITY m RESIDETIAL) TO GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND PLANNED C DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 332 TO ESTABLISH NEW DESIGN m STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR A RETAIL COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE COMPLEX LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF r WEST SAN RAFAEL ROAD AND NORTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE, BY 0 KHALIL AILABOUNI. FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager m BY: Department of Planning Services Z SUMMARY v The City Council will consider a proposal for a General Plan Amendment to reclassify _ the subject site from M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial); a Planned Development District for the construction of a mixed-use development of 14,151 square feet of retail commercial at the ground level and 6,089 square feet of -I office space above, associated off-street parking, landscaping; and a Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: C7 1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony. 2. Adopt Resolution No. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NUMBER 5.1127 — ITEM NO._�/ City Council Staff Report July 25,2007 Case 5.1127—PD 332 Page 2 of 3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-CLASSIFY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM M-15 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDETIAL) TO GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) and CASE NO. 5.1127 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 332, APN 504-121- h 005; 504-121-006 & 504-121-010, SECTION 3. a ANALYSIS Z General Plan Amendment Z M The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment from M15 (Medium Density 0 Residential) to GC (General Commercial). The objective of the GC (General Commercial) land use is for the development of service commercial uses, related to the City's primary retail commercial and tourist related uses and to service the needs of the residents. General Commercial designation is needed in order to approve the PDD for retail sales and general office use. C7 The site under consideration is currently vacant and virtually flat consisting of three lots m with frontage onto North Indian Canyon Drive, which is a Major Thoroughfare. The C traffic noises from this major thoroughfare make residential uses inappropriate and M having three additional residential driveway cuts onto this busy thoroughfare could be a potential hazard. Associated with this General Plan Amendment is a Planned h Development that combines the three lots into one and proposes access to the site from 0 West San Rafael Road and West Santa Catalina Road which eliminates the potential hazard of additional driveways onto North Indian Canyon Drive, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT rn The proposed PDD-332 uses, development concepts and standards are similar to those Z of the C-1 (Retail business) zone. The C-1 zone provides an opportunity for service commercial and tourist uses to be oriented directly to the residential neighborhood they serve by means of a planned commercial complex. The Planned Development District proposes yard setbacks of 15 feet along North Indian Canyon Drive after a dedication of 10 feet; 20 feet along West San Rafael Road after a dedication of 14 feet and 25 feet along West Santa Catalina Road. 0 The off-street parking will be located to the rear of the buildings and will be landscaped Cn with shade trees. The proposed structures will be setback approximately 75 feet from the residential zoned property to the west. The proposed structures will be separated by large useable court yards which break up the mass of the building. The structures will be connected at the second floor level by a breezeway and an architectural feature. A more detailed analysis can be seen in the attached Planning Commission Staff 0 Report dated April 11, 2007. f�0 �fl� City Council Staff Report July 25,2007 Case.5.1127—PD 332 Page 3 of 3 f ing, AlThomas Wilson ssistant City Manager a Dire r of Plann g ervices Z Z M David H. Ready, y a ger 0 Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map v 2. Draft Resolution and Conditions of Approval m 3. Planning Commission Staff Report 4. Planning Commission Resolution C 5. Planning Commission minutes M 6. Reduced Site Plan and Elevations r 7. Copy of Initial Study and Negative Declaration 0 m Z v 0 I " I I k Department of Planning Services wE Vicinity p Ma 5! - I i III I I i i I SM R EL OR 3:. RAFAEL RD li I I MO LI + 1 N I Ro ----- I .. J _ ... .7 It .,MMS R f .nSNTi�CA 6LINq Rp I I w o D I � 51.4.15R 1rG I I J _ q L LINOSEV RO Legend SANCM1RLC Rp _...__._. Project Site I _ ® 1 40O'Radius Sgrv'raCv:r":iWr I Surrounding Parcels CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO: 5-1127 GPA/ CZ DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this hearing is to consider an application by Khalil Ailabouni, for a proposed APPLICANT: Khalil Ailabouni General Plan Amendment to reclassify existing land use of L-6 (Low Density Residential) and M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and a change of zone from R-G-A(6) (Cluster Residential ,Zone) to Planned Development District (PD-332) to establish new design standards, and guidelines for the development of a retail commercial and office complex to be located at 3201 North Indian Canyon Drive. APN: 504-121-005, 504-121-006, 504-121-010. ooago= RESOLUTION NO. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL_ OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NUMBER 5.1127 — PD-332 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE- DESIGNATE THE SITE FROM M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial), APN 504-121- 005; 504-121-006 & 504-121-010, SECTION 3. WHEREAS, Khalil Ailabouni (the "Applicant") has filed an application with the City pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (E) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code, Case No. 5.1127- PD - 332 for the construction of a mixed-use development consisting of two 2-story structures and one 1-story structure containing a total of 14,151 square feet of retail commercial on the ground level and 6,089 square feet of office use above and a General Plan Amendment to re-designate the site from M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial)_ WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider Case Number 5.1127 — PD — 332 Planned Development District, and General Plan Amendment to re-designate the subject site from M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial), was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2007 a public hearing on the application for project was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and has been distributed for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the meeting on the project, including but not limited to the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs to consider said Case Number 5.1127-PD 332 and General Plan Amendment was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, The City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the meeting on the project, including but not limited to the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. 6Jd9 ()J THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared and a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration was sent to applicable agencies and published in the Desert Sun for a 20-day review period. Section 2: Pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (E) of the Zoning Code, a Planned Development District (PDD) may be approved a The PDD is needed to allow the mixed-use development of retail commercial and office uses, the development concept and standards for the proposed project are similar to the C-1 (Retail Commercial) zone. Section 3: Pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (E) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code, the City Council makes the following findings: a. The proposed planned development is consistent and in conformity with the general plan pursuant to Sections 94.07.00 (A)(1) and 94,02.00 (A)(4) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code. The proposed request is consistent with the General Plan, specifically Objectives 3.10 and 3.13 as they relate to intermixing commercial, office and residential uses- b. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed planned development district, in terms of access, size of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses, and other relevant considerations. The project is relatively flat and of sufficient size for the proposed mixed use development. This site is located at the intersection of a secondary road and a major thoroughfare. Therefore, the subject property is suitable for the uses in the proposed Planned Development. c. The proposed establishment of the planned development district is necessary and proper, and is not likely to be detrimental to adjacent property or residents. The establishment of the proposed planned development district is necessary to provide commercial and office uses, design concepts and development standards_ This project is a continuation of the existing commercial uses to the north and is to serve the everyday needs of the adjacent residential area. d. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use; The subject site is located on North Indian Canyon Drive (Major Thoroughfare) between West San Rafael Road and Santa Catalina Road. The existing road net work is designed for commercial development. Section 3:. The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment from M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial). The objective of the GC (General Commercial) land use is for the development of service commercial uses, related to the City's primary retail commercial and tourist related uses and to service the needs of the residents. This General Plan designation is needed in order to approve the PDD for retail sales and general office use. Objective 3.10 of the General plan states "the continuation of existing and development of new commercial uses which serve the everyday needs of the City's residents and visitors and provide employment for the city's residents and the greater region". The project proposes retail commercial at the ground level and offices on the second floor that will serve the residents of the area as well as visitors. This proposal is a continuation of commercial uses which serves the everyday needs of the City's residents and visitors and will provide employment for the City's residents. Objective 3.13 of the General Plan states "The development of sites which intermix commercial uses with housing, office, resort or recreational uses" The subject request is proposing retail commercial and office uses to serve the adjacent residential area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves Case Number 5.1127 — Planned Development 332 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval hereto as Exhibit A. ADOPTED this 251h day of July, 2007. ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA James Thompson, City Clerk David H. Ready, City Manager 000097 EXHIBIT A Case No. 5.1127— PD-332 and General Plan Amendment 3201 North Indian Canyon Drive CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 25, 2007 Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the Director of Planning Services, the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief or their designee, depending on which department recommended the condition. Any agreements, easements or covenants required to be entered into shall be in a Form approved by the City Attorney. PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS ADMINISTRATION: 1. The proposed development of the premises shall conform to all applicable regulations of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, or any other City Codes, ordinances and resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations. The owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Palm Springs, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City of Palm Springs, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or administrative officers concerning Case 5,1127 — PD - 332 The City of Palm Springs will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs and the applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney. If the City of Palm Springs fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Palm Springs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the applicant's consent but should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except, the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter 2. Following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein- 3- That the property owner(s) and successors and assignees in interest shall maintain and repair the improvements including and without limitation sidewalks, 0 0 a 0 0 Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127- PD-332, GPA Page 2 July 25, 2007 bikeways, parking areas, landscape, irrigation, lighting, signs, walls, and fences between the curb and property line, including sidewalk or bikeway easement areas that extend onto private property, in a first class condition, free from waste and debris, and in accordance with all applicable law, rules, ordinances and regulations of all federal, state, and local bodies and agencies having jurisdiction at the property owners sole expense. This condition shall be included in the recorded covenant agreement for the property if required by the City. 4. Pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 a filing fee of $1,864.00 is required. This application shall not be final until such fee is paid and the Certificate of Fee Exemption is filed. Fee shall be in the form of a money order or cashier's check payable to Riverside County. 5. This project shall be subject to Chapters 2.24 and 3.37 of the Municipal Code regarding public art. The project shall either provide public art or payment of an in lieu fee. In the case of the in-lieu fee, the fee shall be based upon the total building permit valuation as calculated pursuant to the valuation table in the Uniform Building Code, the fee being 1/2% for commercial projects or 1/4% for residential projects with first $100,000 of total building permit valuation for individual single-family units exempt. Should the public art be located on the project site, said location shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and ,Zoning and Lhe Public Arts Commission, and the property owner shall enter into a recorded agreement to maintain the art work and protect the public rights of access and viewing. CULTURAL RESOURCES 6. Prior to any ground disturbing activity, including clearing and grubbing, installation of utilities, and/or any construction related excavation, an Archaeologist qualified according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines, shall be employed to survey the area for the presence of cultural resources identifiable on the ground surface. 7. Given that portions of the project area are within an alluvial formation, [he possibility of buried resources is increased. A Native American Monitor shall be present during all ground-disturbing activities. a). Experience has shown that there is always a possibility of buried cultural resources in a project area. Given that, a Native American Monitor(s) shall be present during all ground disturbing activities including clearing and grubbing, excavation, burial of utilities, planting of rooted plants, etc. Contact the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indian Cultural Office for additional information on the use and availability of Cultural Resource Monitors. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor shall 060003 Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332, GPA Page 3 July 25, 2007 contact the Director of Planning and Zoning and after the consultation the Director shall have the authority to halt destructive construction and shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, the Qualified Archaeologist shall prepare a treatment plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and Agua Caliente Cultural Resource Coordinator for approval. b). Two copies of any cultural resource documentation generated in connection with this project, including reports of investigations, record search results and site records/updates shall be forwarded to the Tribal Planning, Building, and Engineering Department and one copy to the City Planning and Zoning Department prior to final inspection. FINAL DESIGN 8. Final landscaping, irrigation, exterior lighting, and fencing plans shall be submitted for approval by the Department of Planning Services, prior to issuance of a building permit. Landscape plans shall be approved by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's Office prior to submittal. All landscaping located within the public right of way or within community facilities districts must be approved by the Public Works Director and the Director of Parks and Recreati 9. An exterior lighting plan in accordance landscaping shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. If lights are proposed to be mounted on buildings, down-lights shall be utilized. No lighting of the hillside is permitted. GENERAL CONDITIONS / CODE REQUIREMENTS I I I Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 4 July 25, 2007 10.Architectural approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years. Extensions of time may be granted by the Planning Commission upon demonstration of good cause. 11.The appeal period for a Major Architectural application is 15 calendar days from the date of project approval. Permits will not be issued until the appeal period has concluded. 12.5eparate architectural approval and permits shall be required for all signs. A detailed sign program shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of final occupancy permits. 13.Architectural approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years. Extensions of time may be granted by the Planning Commission upon demonstration of good cause. 14.The appeal period for a Major Architectural application is 15 calendar days from the date of project approval. Permits will not be issued until the appeal period has concluded. 15-Separate architectural approval and permits shall be required for all signs. A detailed sign program shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of final occupancy permits. 16.Ail materials on the flat portions of the roof shall be earth tone in color. 17.AII roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from all possible vantage points both existing and future per Section 93.03.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. The screening shall be considered as an element of the overall design and must blend with the architectural design of the building(s). The exterior elevations and roof plans of the buildings shall indicate any fixtures or equipment to be located on the roof of the building, the equipment heights, and type of screening. Parapets shall be at least 6" above the equipment for the purpose of screening. 18.No exterior downspouts shall be permitted on any facade on the proposed building(s) which are visible from adjacent streets or residential and commercial areas. 19.The design, height, texture and color of building(s), fences and walls shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 20.The street address numbering/lettering shall not exceed eight inches in height. 21.Submit plans meeting City standard for approval on the proposed trash and recyclable materials enclosure prior to issuance of a building permit. Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 5 July 25, 2007 22.No sirens, outside paging or any type of signalization will be permitted, except approved alarm systems. 23.No outside storage of any kind shall be permitted except as approved as a part of the proposed plan. 24.Vehicles associated with the operation of the proposed development including company vehicles or employees vehicles shall not be permitted to park off the proposed building site unless a parking management plan has been approved. 25.Prior to the issuance of building permits, locations of all telephone and electrical boxes must be indicated on the building plans and must be completely screened and located in the interior of the building. Electrical transformers must be located toward the interior of the project maintaining a sufficient distance from the frontage(s) of the project. Said transformer(s) must be adequately and decoratively screened. 26.The applicant shall provide all tenants with Conditions of Approval of this project. 27.Standard parking spaces shall be 17 feet deep by 9 feet wide; compact sized spaces shall be 15 feet deep by 8 feet wide. Handicap parking spaces shall be 18 feet deep by 9 feet wide plus a 5 foot walkway at the right side of the parking space; two (2) handicap spaces can share a common walkway. One in every eight (8) handicap accessible spaces, but not less than one (1), shall be served by an 8 foot walkway on the right side and shall be designated as "van accessible". 28.Handicapped accessibility shall be indicated on the site plan to include the location of handicapped parking spaces, the main entrance to the proposed structure and the path of travel to the main entrance. Consideration shall be given to potential difficulties with the handicapped accessibility to the building due to the future grading plans for the property. 29.Compact and handicapped spaces shall be appropriately marked per Section 93.06.00 C.10. 30.Curbs shall be installed at a minimum of five (5) feet from face of walls, fences, buildings, or other structures. Areas that are not part of the maneuvering area shall have curbs placed at a minimum of two (2) feet from the face of walls, fences or buildings adjoining driveways. 31.Parking lot light fixtures shall align with stall striping and shall be located two to three feet from curb face. 32.Islands of not less than 9 feet in width with a minimum of 6 feet of planter shall be provided every 10 parking spaces. Additional islands may be necessary to comply with shading requirements. 6000.12 i Conditions of Approval Case No, 5.1127-PD-332. GPA Page 6 July 25, 2007 33.Shading requirements for parking lot areas as set forth in Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be met. Details to be provided with final landscape plan. 34.Tree wells shall be provided within the parking lot and shall have a planting area of six feet in diameter/width. ENGINEERING: The Engineering Division recommends that if this application is approved, such approval is subject to the fallowing conditions being completed in compliance with City standards and ordinances. Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. STREETS 1. Any improvements within the public right-of-way require a City of Palm Springs Encroachment Permit. 2. Submit street improvement plans prepared by a registered California civil engineer to the Engineering Division. The plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to construct asphalt concrete paving in two separate lifts. The final lift of asphalt concrete pavement shall be postponed until such time that on-site construction activities are complete, as may be determined by the City Engineer. Paving of the parking lot in one lift prior to completion of on- site construction will not be allowed, unless prior authorization has been obtained from the City Engineer. Completion of asphalt concrete paving of the parking lot prior to completion of on-site construction activities, if authorized by the City Engineer, will require additional paving requirements prior to acceptance of the paving improvements, including, but not limited to: removal and replacement of damaged asphalt concrete pavement, overlay, slurry seal, or other repairs, as required by the City Engineer. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE 4. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide the ultimate half street right-of-way width of 50 feet along the entire frontage, together with a property line - corner cut- back at the northwest corner of the intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Santa Catalina Road in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 105. 060013 Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127- PD-332; GPA Page 7 July 25, 2007 5. Dedicate an easement for sidewalk purposes for those portions of meandering sidewalk that leave the public right-of-way. 6. Remove the existing street improvements and construct an 8 inch curb and gutter, 38 feet west of centerline along the entire frontage, with a 35 feet radius curb return and spandrel at the northwest corner of the intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Santa Catalina Road in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 200 and 206. 7. Remove the existing street improvements and construct the north half of an 8 feet wide cross gutter at the northwest corner of the intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Santa Catalina Road with a flow line parallel with and located 38 feet west of the centerline of Indian Canyon Drive in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 200 and 206. 8. Construct an 8 feet wide sidewalk behind the curb along the entire frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No, 210. 9. Construct a Type A curb ramp meeting current California State Accessibility standards at the northwest corner of the intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Santa Catalina Road in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 212. 10. Construct a 14-feet wide landscaped median island along the entire frontage. Provide a 100 feet long northbound left turn pocket at San Rafael Drive with a 90 feet long bay taper. The left turn pocket shall be designed in accordance with Section 405 of the current edition of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, as approved by the City Engineer. 11. Submit median island landscaping and irrigation system improvement plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Director of Planning Services. The irrigation system shall be separately metered from the parkway landscaping irrigation, for future use by the City upon acceptance of the landscaping by the City_ The plans shall be approved in conjunction with the street improvement plans for the median and prior to issuance of a building permit. 12. Construct pavement with a minimum pavement section of 5 inches asphalt concrete pavement over 4 inches crushed miscellaneous base with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal, from edge of proposed gutter to clean sawcut edge of pavement along the entire Indian Canyon Drive frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 110 and 340. Additional pavement removal and replacement may be required upon review of existing pavement cross-sections, and to ensure grade breaks of the pavement cross-section do not occur within a travel lane. If an alternative pavement section is proposed, the proposed pavement section shall be designed 0G00 � Conditions of Approval Case No, 5.1127- PD-332; GPA Page 8 July 25, 2007 by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the CiLy Engineer for approval. SAN RAFAEL DRIVE 13. Construct a 6 inch curb and gutter, 32 feet south of centerline along the entire frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 200. 14. Construct a 24 feet wide driveway approach in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 201. The centerline of the driveway approach shall be located 35 feet east of the west property line. 15. Construct an 8 feel wide sidewalk behind the curb along the entire frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 210. 16. Construct pavement with a minimum pavement section of 3 inches asphalt concrete pavement over 6 inches crushed miscellaneous base with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal, from edge of proposed gutter to centerline along the entire frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 110 and 330. Additional pavement removal and replacement may be required upon review of existing pavement condition and cross-sections, and to ensure grade breaks of the pavement cross-section do not occur within a travel lane. If an alternative pavement section is proposed, the proposed pavement section shall be designed by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the City Engineer For approval. SANTA CATALINA ROAD 17. Remove existing street improvements and construct a 6 inch curb and gutter, 18 feet north of centerline along the entire Frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 200. 18. Construct a 24 feet wide driveway approach in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 201. The centerline of the driveway approach shall be located 35 feet east of the west property line. 19. Construct a 5 feet wide sidewalk behind the curb along the entire frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 210. 20. Construct pavement with a minimum pavement section of 2'/2 inches asphalt concrete pavement over 4 inches crushed miscellaneous base with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal, from edge of proposed gutter to centerline along the entire frontage in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 110. Additional pavement removal and M015 Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127- PD-332, GPA Page 9 July 25, 2007 replacement may be required upon review of existing pavement condition and cross-sections. If an alternative pavement section is proposed, the proposed pavement section shall be designed by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the City Engineer for approval- ON-SITE 21. The minimum pavement section for all on-site pavement shall be 2Y: inches asphalt concrete pavement over 4 inches crushed miscellaneous base with a minimum subgrade of 24 inches at 95% relative compaction, or equal. If an alternative pavement section is proposed, the proposed pavement section shall be designed by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer using "R" values from the project site and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. SANITARY SEWER 22. All sanitary facilities shall be connected to the public sewer system. The existing sewer services to the property may be used For new sanitary facilities. New laterals shall not be connected at manholes. GRADING 23. Submit a Precise Grading and Paving Plan prepared by a California registered civil engineer to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The Precise Grading and Paving Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permit. a. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall be prepared by the applicant and/or its grading contractor and submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The applicant and/or its grading contractor shall be required to comply with Chapter 8.50 of the City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, and shall be required to utilize one or more "Coachella Valley Best Available Control Measures" as identified in the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook for each fugitive dust source such that the applicable performance standards are met. The applicant's or its contractor's Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall be prepared by staff that has completed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Class. The applicant and/or its grading contractor shall provide the Engineering Division with current and valid Certificate(s) of Completion from AQMD for staff that has completed the required training. For information on attending a Fugitive Dust Control Class and information on the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook and related "PM10" Dust Control issues, please contact AQMD at (909) 396-3752, or at www.AQMD.gov. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan, in conformance with the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook, shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division prior to approval of the Precise Grading and Paving Plan. �U001 Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 10 July 25, 2007 b. The first submittal of the Precise Grading and Paving Plan shall include the following information: a copy of final approved conformed copy of Conditions of Approval; a copy of a final approved conformed copy of the Site Plan; a copy of current Title Report; a copy of Sails Report; and a copy of the associated Hydrology Study/Report, 24. Contact Whitewater Mutual Water Company to determine impacts to any existing water lines and other facilities that may be located within the property. Make appropriate arrangements to protect in place or relocate any existing Whitewater Mutual Water Company facilities that are impacted by the development. A letter of approval for relocated or adjusted facilities from Whitewater Mutual Water Company shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to approval of the Precise Grading and Paving Plan. 25. Prior to approval of a Grading Plan, the applicant shall obtain written approval to proceed with construction from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer or Tribal Archaeologist. The applicant shall contact the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Richard Begay (760-883-1940), or the Tribal Archaeologist, Patty Tuck (760-883-1926), to determine their requirements, if any, associated with grading or other construction. The applicant is advised to contact the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer or Tribal Archaeologist as early as passible. If required, it is the responsibility of the applicant to coordinate scheduling of Tribal monitors during grading or other construction, and to arrange payment of any required fees associated with Tribal monitoring. 26. Drainage swales shall be provided adjacent to all curbs and sidewalks to keep nuisance water from entering the public streets, roadways, or gutters. 27. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit, issued from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Phone No. 760- 346-7491) is required for the proposed development. A copy of the executed permit shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 28. In accordance with City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, Section 8.50.025 (c), the applicant shall post with the City a cash bond of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) per disturbed acre for mitigation measures for erosion/blowsand relating to this property and development. 29. A Geotechnical/Soils Report prepared by a California registered Geotechnical Engineer shall be required for and incorporated as an integral part of the grading plan for the proposed development. A copy of the Geotechnical/Soils Report shall be submitted to the Engineering Division with the first submittal of a grading plan. 30. In cooperation with the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner and the California Department of Food and Agriculture Red Imported Fire Ant Project, 6010H7 I I I I I Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PI]-332; GPA Page 11 July 25, 2007 applicants for grading permits involving a grading plan and involving the export of soil will be required to present a clearance document from a Department of Food and Agriculture representative in the form of an approved "Notification of Intent To Move Soil From or Within Quarantined Areas of Orange, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties" (RIFA Form CA-1) prior to approval of the Grading Plan (if required). The California Department of Food and Agriculture office is located at 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert (Phone: 760-776-8208). DRAINAGE 31. All stormwater runoff passing through the site shall be accepted and conveyed across the property in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. For all stormwater runoff falling on the site, on-site retention or other facilities approved by the City Engineer shall be required to contain the increased stormwater runoff generated by the development of the property. Provide a hydrology study to determine the volume of increased stormwater runoff due to development of the site, and to determine required stormwater runoff mitigation measures for the proposed development. Final retention system sizing and other stormwater runoff mitigation measures shall be determined upon review and approval of the hydrology study by the City Engineer and may require redesign or changes to site configuration or layout consistent with the Endings of the final hydrology study. No more than 40-50% of the street frontage parkway/setback areas should be designed as retention basins. On-site open space, in conjunction with dry wells and other subsurface solutions should be considered as alternatives to using landscaped parkways for on-site retention. 32. Direct release of on-site nuisance water shall not be permitted to Indian Canyon Drive, San Rafael Drive, or Santa Catalina Road. Provisions for the interception of nuisance water from entering adjacent public streets from the project site shall be provided through the use of a minor storm drain system that collects and conveys nuisance water to landscape or parkway areas, and in only a stormwater runoff condition, pass runoff directly to the streets through parkway or under sidewalk drains. 33. The project is subject to flood control and drainage implementation fees. The acreage drainage fee at the present time is $6,511.00 per acre per Resolution No. 15189. Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 34. This project may be required to install measures in accordance with applicable National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Best Management Practices (BMP's) included as part of the NPDES Permit issued for the Whitewater River Region from the Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The applicant is advised that installation of BMP's, including mechanical or other means for pre-treating stormwater runoff, may be required by regulations imposed by the RWQCB. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to 0U00 13) Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 12 July 25, 2007 design and install appropriate BMP's, in accordance with the NPDES Permit, that effectively intercept and pre-treat stormwater runoff from the project site, prior to release to the City's municipal separate storm sewer system ("MS4"), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the RWQCB. If required, such measures shall be designed and installed on-site; and provisions for perpetual maintenance of the measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including provisions in Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) required for the development. GENERAL 35. Any utility trenches or other excavations within existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets required by the proposed development shall be backfilled and repaired in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 115. The applicant shall be responsible for removing, grinding, paving and/or overlaying existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets as required by and at the discretion of the City Engineer, including additional pavement repairs to pavement repairs made by utility companies for utilities installed for the benefit of the proposed development (i.e. Desert Water Agency, Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, Time Warner, Verizon, etc.). Multiple excavations, trenches, and other street cuts within existing asphalt concrete pavement of off-site streets required by the proposed development may require complete grinding and asphalt concrete overlay of the affected off-site streets, at the discretion of the City Engineer. The pavement condition of the existing off-site streets shall be returned to a condition equal to or better than existed prior to construction of the proposed development. 36, On phases or elements of construction following initial site grading (e.g., sewer, storm drain, or other utility work requiring trenching) associated with this project, the applicant shall be responsible for coordinating the scheduled construction with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer or Tribal Arachaeologist. Unless the project site has previously been waived from any requirements for Tribal monitoring, it is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Richard Begay (760-883-1940), or the Tribal Archaeologist, Patty Tuck (760-883-1926) for any subsequent phases or elements of construction that might require Tribal monitoring. If required, it is the responsibility of the applicant to coordinate scheduling of Tribal monitors during construction, and to arrange payment of any required fees associated with Tribal monitoring. Tribal monitoring requirements may extend to off-site construction performed by utility companies on behalf of the applicant (e.g. utility line extensions in off-site streets), which shall be the responsibility of the applicant to coordinate and arrange payment of any required fees for the utility companies. 37. All proposed utility lines shall be installed underground. rnc, nfll 11 Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 13 July 25, 2007 38. In accordance with Chapter 8.04.401 of the City of Palm Springs Municipal Code, all existing and proposed electrical lines of thirty-five thousand volts or less and overhead service drop conductors, and all gas, telephone, television cable service, and similar service wires or lines, which are on-site, abutting, and/or transecting, shall be installed underground unless specific restrictions are shown in General Orders 95 and 128 of the California Public Utilities Commission, and service requirements published by the utilities. The existing overhead utilities across the north property line and within the site meet the requirement to be installed underground. Overhead utility lines shall be installed underground to the nearest off-site power pole. A letter from the owners of the affected utilities shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to approval of a grading plan, informing the City that they have been notified of the City's utility undergrounding requirement and their intent to commence design of utility undergrounding plans. When available, the utility undergrounding plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Division identifying all above ground Facilities in the area of the project to be undergrounded. Undergrounding of existing overhead utility lines shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 39. All existing utilities shall be shown on the improvement plans required for the project. The existing and proposed service laterals shall be shown from the main line to the property line. 40. Upon approval of any improvement plan by the City Engineer, the improvement plan shall be provided to the City in digital format, consisting of a DWG (AutoCAD 2004 drawing file), DXF (AutoCAD ASCII drawing exchange file), and PDF (Adobe Acrobat 6.0 or greater) formats. Variation of the type and format of the digital data to be submitted to the City may be authorized, upon prior approval of the City Engineer. 41. The original improvement plans prepared for the proposed development and approved by the City Engineer shall be documented with record drawing "as-built' information and returned to the Engineering Division prior to issuance or a final certificate of occupancy. Any modifications or changes to approved improvement plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to construction. 42. Nothing shall be constructed or planted in the corner cut-off area of any intersection or driveway which does or will exceed the height required to maintain an appropriate sight distance per City of Palm Springs Zoning Code Section 93.02.00, D. 43. All proposed trees within the public right-of-way and within 10 feet of the public sidewalk and/or curb shall have City approved deep root barriers installed per City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 904. MAP Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-P❑-332; GPA Page 14 July 25, 2007 44. The existing parcels identified as Lots 10, 11 and 12 of the Vista Del Monte map, Map Book 18, Page 77, shall be merged. An application for a parcel merger shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. A copy of a current title report and copies of record documents shall be submitted with the application for the parcel merger. The application shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. TRAFFIC 45. Install stop bar, and "STOP" legend for traffic exiting the development at the proposed driveway approach on San Rafael Drive, in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing Nos. 620-625. 46. Submit traffic striping plans for Indian Canyon Drive and San Rafael Drive prepared by a California registered Civil Engineer, for review and approval by the City Engineer. All required traffic striping and signage improvements shall be completed in conjunction with required street improvements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 47. A minimum of 48 inches of clearance for handicap accessibility shall be provided on public sidewalks or pedestrian paths of travel within the development. Minimum clearance on public sidewalks shall be provided by either an additional dedication of a sidewalk easement (if necessary) and widening of the sidewalk, or by the relocation of any obstructions within the public sidewalk along the Indian Canyon Drive, San Rafael Drive, and Santa Catalina Road frontages of the subject property. 48. All damaged, destroyed, or modified pavement legends, traffic control devices, signing, striping, and street lights, associated with the proposed development shall be replaced as required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 49. Construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be provided for on all projects as required by City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. As a minimum, all construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be in accordance with State of California, Department of Transportation, "Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones" dated 1996, or subsequent additions in force at the time of construction. 50. This property is subject to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee which shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. FIRE DEPARTMENT: nflon2 a Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 15 July 25, 2007 1. Plot Plan: Prior to completion of the project, a 8.5"x11" plot plan and an electronic CAD version shall be provided to the fire department. This shall clearly show all access points, fire hydrants, knox box locations, fire department connections, unit identifiers, main electrical panel locations, sprinkler riser and fire alarm locations. Large projects may require more than one page. 2. Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. (901.4.4 CFC) Show location of address on plan elevation view. Show requirement and dimensions of numbers in plan notes. Numbers shall be a minimum 4 inches, and of contrasting color to the background. 3. Fire Sprinklers Required: An automatic fire sprinkler system is required by local ordinance. Only a C-16 licensed fire sprinkler contractor shall perform system design and installation. System to be designed and installed in accordance with NFPA standard 13D, 1999 edition, as modified by local ordinance. The contractor should submit fire sprinkler plans as soon as possible. No portion of the fire sprinkler system, including water meters and underground water supply, may be installed prior to plan approval. 4. High Piled Storage: If materials to be stored are anticipated to exceed 12 feet in height, additional requirements will be required. Contact the fire department plans examiner for more detailed requirements. 5. Valve and water-flow monitoring: All valves controlling the fire sprinkler system water supply, and all water-flow switches, shall be electrically monitored where the number of sprinklers is one hundred or more. (Twenty or more in Group I, Divisions 1.1 and 1.2 occupancies.) (904.3.1 CBC) All control valves must be locked in the open position. 6. Fire Alarm System- Fire Alarm System is required and installation shall comply with the requirements of NFPA 72. 7. Audible Water Flow Alarms: An approved audible sprinkler flow alarm (Wheelock horn/strobe # MT4-115-WH-VFR with WBB back box or equal) shall be provided on the exterior of the building in an approved location. An approved audible sprinkler flow alarm (Wheelock horn/strobe # MT4-115-WH-VFR with WBB back box or equal)to alert the occupants shall be provided in the interior of the building in a normally occupied location. (004.32 CBC) 8. Required Signs: All fire sprinkler valves shall have a permanently affixed sign indicating the valve function and area served. The address of the building served shall be clearly indicated on the Fire Department Connection (FDC). Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 16 July 25, 2007 9. Emergency Key Box: Knox key box(es) are required. Box(es) shall be mounted at 6 feet above grade. Show location of box(es) on plan elevation views. Show requirement in plan notes. Contact the Fire Department at 760-323-8186 for a Knox application farm. (902.4 CFC) 10.Emergency Key Box: A Knox key box is required for access to the fire sprinkler riser. Box shall be mounted at 6 feet above grade, adjacent to the main entrance. Contact the Fire Department at 760-323-8186 for a Knox application form. (902.4 CFC) 11.Key Box Contents: The Knox key box shall contain keys to all areas of ingress/egress, alarm rooms, fire sprinkler riser/equipment rooms, mechanical rooms, elevator rooms, elevator controls, plus a card containing the emergency contact people and phone numbers for the building/complex. 12.Road/Parking Lot Design: Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and constructed as all weather capable and able to support a fire truck weighing 73,000 pounds GVW. (902.2.2.2 CFC) 13.Access: Fire department access roads shall be provided so that no portion of the exterior wall of the first floor of any building will be more than 150 feet from such roads. CFC 902.2.1 14.Vertical Fire Apparatus Clearances: Palm Springs fire apparatus require an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (902.2.2.1 CFC) 15_Minimum Access Road Dimensions: Private streets shall have a minimum width of at least 20 feet, pursuant to California Fire Cade 902.1 however, a greater width for private streels may be required by the City engineer to address traffic engineering, parking, and other issues. The Palm Springs Fire Department requirements for two-way private streets, is a minimum width of 24 feet, unless otherwise allowed by the City engineer. No parking shall be allowed in either side of the roadway. 16.Fire Hydrant & FDC Location: A public commercial fire hydrant is required within 30 feet of the Fire Department Connection (FDC). Fire Hose must be protected from vehicular traffic and shall not crass roadways, streets, railroad tracks or driveways or areas subject to flooding or hazardous material or liquid releases. 17.Fire Department Connections: Fire Department connections shall be visible and accessible, have two 2.5 inch NST female inlets, and have an approved check valve located as close to the FDC as possible. All FDC's shall have KNOX locking Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127- PD-332; GPA Page 17 July 25, 2007 protective caps. Contact the fire prevention secretary at 760-323-8186 for a KNOX application form. 18.Fire Extinguisher Requirements: Provide one 2-A:10-B:C portable fire extinguisher for every 75 feet of floor or grade travel distance for normal hazards. Show proposed extinguisher locations on the plans. (1002.1 CFC) Extinguishers shall be mounted in a visible, accessible location no more than 5 feet above floor level. Preferred location is in the path of exit travel near an exit door. 19.Fire Hydrant Flow: The required fire hydrant flow for this project is 1,500 GPM. 20.Water Supply: The water supply and location/s of fire hydrants must be approved prior to any work being performed on the job site. (903.1 CFC) Operational Fire H drant s : Operational fire hydrant(s) shall be installed within 250 feet of all combustible construction. No landscape planting,walls, or fencing is permitted within 3 feet of fire hydrants, except groundcover plantings. (1001.7.2 CFC) • Water Systems and Hydrants: Underground water mains and fire hydrants shall be installed, completed, tested and in service prior to the lime when combustible materials are delivered to the construction site. (903 CFC). Installation, testing, and inspection will meet the requirements of NFPA 24 1995 edition. Prior to final approval of the installation, contractor shall submit a completed Contractor's Material and Test Certificate to the Fire Department. (9- 2.1 NFPA 24 1905 edition) 21. Construction Requirements: • Access During Construction: Access for firefighting equipment shall be provided to the immediate job site at the start of construction and maintained until all construction is complete. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13'6"_ Fire Department access roads shall have an all weather driving surface and support a minimum weight of 73,000 lbs. (Sec. 902 CFC) nflnn? z Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 18 July 25, 2007 22. Fencing Required: Construction site fencing with 20 foot wide access gates is required for all combustible construction over 5,000 square feet. Fencing shall remain intact until buildings are stuccoed or covered and secured with lockable doors and windows. (8.04.260 PSMC) 23. Gates: • Fire Apparatus Access Gates: Entrance gates shall have a clear width of at least 15 feet and be equipped with a frangible chain and padlock. (8.04.260 PSMC) • Access Gate Obstructions: Entrances to roads, trails or other access ways, which have been closed with gates and barriers, shall be maintained clear at all times. (902.2.4.1 CFC). ADA: SITE PLAN ITEMS: 1. The site plan indicated an 8 foot wide sidewalk around the perimeter of the development which complies with disabled access requirements in terms of minimum width. It must also comply with CBC 1133B.7 which requires a continuous common surface that is not interrupted by abrupt changes. If there is a change in level, it must be beveled at a 1:2 ratio and be between '/4 and ''/z half inch. The slope in the direction of travel shall not exceed 5.0 % gradient. The cross slope shall not exceed 2.0% gradient. The four disabled parking spaces indicated on the plan comply with CBC 112913.1 in terms of arrangement. Two of the disabled parking spaces are served by a "van accessible" 8 foot wide access aisle which complies with CBC 1129134.2. What is needed however are the words "NO PARKING" to be painted in each of the access aisles so that the disabled parking will comply with CBC 1129B.5 -1 U. 2 The route of travel to the entrances of each of the buildings on the plan complies with CBC 1114131.2. 3 In order to comply with CBC 112713.1 disabled access signs indicating the location of the elevator will need to be placed near the disabled parking so as to guide people with mobility impairments to that access feature. 4. The plan does show an elevator but it lacks sufficient detail for comment. The plans I reviewed did not provide any interior detail and therefore no comments can be provided. ��1� 25 Conditions of Approval Case No. 5.1127-PD-332; GPA Page 19 July 25, 2007 END OF CONDITIONS �d 010126, r ;O pALM Spy a iZ ~ c Zu' u. • Z :R �ee.ocmia� Cg11po %V Planninq Commission Staff Report m v Date: April 11, 2007 Case No.: 5.1127—MAJ, PDD-332 and GPA O Application Type: Major Architectural Approval, Planned Development r17 District and General Plan Amendment C Location: Southwest corner of West San Rafael Road and m North Indian Canyon Drive r Applicant: Khalil Ailabouni O Zone: RGA-6 and R-2 General Plan: M15 (Medium Density Residential) M APNs: 504-121-005,504-121-006 and 504-121-010 Z From: Craig Ewing, AICP, Director of Planning Services —I Project Planner: Fred Lowndes, Associate Planner O PROJECT DESCRIPTION — The project consists of a Major Architectural approval, Case No. 5.1127, Planned ca Development District 332 to establish new design standards and guidelines for a retail _q commercial and office complex. The applicant has also submitted a General Plan Amendment application to reclassify the existing designation of M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial). The proposed project is to construct two 2- story structures consisting of approximately 10,263 square feet of retail commercial uses on the first floor and approximately 6,089 square feet of office space on the ,..� second floor. The southern building is a one-story structure and contains approximately 3,888 square feet of retail commercial space. There are a total of 14,151 square feet of retail commercial area and 6,089 square feet of office space for this project. DDDD`�~ Planning Commission Staff Report April 11,2007 Case'5,1127—MAJ;PO 332 and GPA Page 2 of 9 RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the proposed r application by Ailabouni for a General Plan Amendment and PD — 332 to develop a new retail commercial and office complex on approximately 1.36 acre parcel according to Planned Development Standards by: Z 1. Considering and adopting a Negative Declaration for Case 5.1127 PD-332 and Z approving Planned Development District— 332 and M 2. Recommending that the City Council approve Case Number 5.1127, General Plan amendment to change the Land Use designation from M-15 to GC_ PRIOR ACTIONS v On September 25, 2006, the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) reviewed the M project and recommended approval of the proposed development to the Planning Commission by a vote of 7-0. < m BACKGROUND AND SETTING r The proposed project is located at the southwest corner of West San Rafael Road and Q North Indian Canyon Drive. The property which is currently vacant measures approximately 400 feet by 150 feet and is generally flat. North Indian Canyon Drive is designated as a Major Thoroughfare in the General Plan Circulation Element. The subject property also has frontage on West San Rafael Road and West Santa Catalina rn Road. The subject site is made up of three separate parcels that would not be suitable for Z residential development since they front North Indian Canyon Drive, which is a Major Thoroughfare. The noise factor would be difficult to mitigate and it would pose a potential hazard to have three driveway cuts onto a Major Thoroughfare, The proposed project would act as a buffer of the road noise from North Indian Canyon Drive to the residential area to the west. ❑ The properties within the vicinity of the subject site are developed to the north with N commercial uses; to the east undeveloped parcels; to the south are undeveloped parcels and to the west are undeveloped parcels and single-family homes. The surrounding land uses, General Plan designations and Zoning are summarized in Table 1. 0 Planning Commission Staff Report April 11,2007 Case:5.1127—MAJ;PO 332 and GPA Page 3 of g Table 1: Surrounding land uses, General Plan, Zoning Land Use General Plan Zoningr North Commercial GC (Commercial) CM n commercial/manufactu ri n East North Indian Canyon CDL6 (controlled low- 05(open land) and R- Z Drive and density residential) and 2(limited multi-family Z undeveloped M15(medium-density residential) residential) rn South West Santa Catalina L6(low-density RGA6(garden apartment Road and residential) and cluster residential) undeveloped West Undeveloped and M15(medium-density R-2(limited multi-family single-family dwelling residential) and residential) and R1A(single- v L2(very-low density family residential) residential) m ANALYSIS C Im General Plan Amendment r The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment from M15 (Medium Density 0 Residential) to GC (General Commercial). The objective of the GC (General .� Commercial) land use is for the development of service commercial uses, related to the City's primary retail commercial and tourist related uses and to service the needs of the residents. This General Plan designation is needed in order to approve the PDD for m retail sales and general office use. Z The site under consideration is currently vacant and virtually flat consisting of three lots with frontage onto North Indian Canyon Drive, which is a Major Thoroughfare_ The traffic noises from this major thoroughfare make residential uses unreasonable and having three additional driveway cuts onto this busy thoroughfare would be a potential hazard. v Objective 3.10 of the General plan states "the continuation of existing and development of new commercial uses which serve the everyday needs of the City's residents and Cn visitors and provide employment for the cty's residents and the greater region". The project proposes retail commercial at the ground level and offices on the second floor that will serve the residents of the area as well as visitors. This proposal is a _ continuation of commercial uses along North Indian Canyon Drive. Objective 3.13 of the General Plan states "The development of sites which intermix commercial uses with housing, office, resort or recreational uses" 060022, Planning Commission staff Report April 11 2007 case,5.1127—MAJ;PD M and GPA Page 4 of 9 The applicant is proposing retail commercial and office uses to serve the adjacent residential area. To the northeast of the subject site is a new housing development currently under construction. While the project tenants are not known at this time, it is r expected that they will include businesses that will serve future residents. a Pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (E) of the Zoning Code, a Planned Development District Z (PDD) may be approved as a change of zone as specified in Section 94.07.00. The Z PDD is needed to allow the retail commercial and office uses, the development concepts and standards for the proposed project. m The proposed PDD-332 uses, development concepts and standards are similar to those of the C-1 (Retail business) zone. The C-1 zone provides an opportunity for service commercial and tourist uses to be oriented directly to the residential neighborhood they serve by means of a planned commercial complex. The Planned Development District proposes front yard setbacks of 15 feet along North Indian Canyon Drive after a dedication of 10 feet; 20 feet along West San Rafael Road after a dedication of 14 feet m and 25 feet along West Santa Catalina Road. C Table 2: Comparison of Existing General Plan and Zoning and Proposed General Plan M desi nation and PD-321 Standards Existing General Proposed Existing Zoning Proposed r Plan designation General Plan R-G-6 and R-2 Planned Q M15 designation Development GC _ District Uses Residential(medium Service 's/f,m/f& hotels Service density) Commercial ".s/f, rn/f& hotels commercial and general m offices(non- medical) Z Density 12 to 15 du's /acre n/a "622 du's/acre n/a '*14.52du's/acre Open Space Min. 50% Min. 40% Min. 50% 38% + ** Min. 30% Setbacks n/a n/a "25ft. front, side & 25ft. on Santa rear 20 ft. Catalina,15ft. on 0 Indian Canyon and 20ft.on San Rafael Bldg Separations n/a n/a 15ft.for both Varies from zones loft. to 28ft. 6 inches Height 24 feet 30 Feet *15 ft. `"24ft. 34 ft, + to the top of the n parapet Ht Exception n/a n/a * 24 Feet n/a �I Parkin n/a n/a n/a 79 Per R-G-A(6) " Per R-2 Planning Commission Staff Report April 11,2007 Case,5.1127—MAJ;PD 332 and GPA Page 5 of 9 The proposed buildings will be setback 15 feet from the new right-of-way of North Indian Canyon Drive after the 10 foot dedication; 25 feet from West Santa Catalina Road and r 20 feet from West San Rafael Road, after road dedication. The off-street parking will be a located to the rear of the buildings and will be landscaped with shade trees. The proposed structures will be setback approximately 74 feet from the residential zoned Z property to the west. Z Access m Access to the site will be from West San Rafael Road via a 24 foot wide driveway located approximately 119 feet west of North Indian Canyon Drive and West Santa Catalina Road via a 24 foot wide driveway located approximately 119 feet west of North Indian Canyon Drive. a Parking m As shown on the site plan tabulations, the project has been designed to meet the C requirements of the ,Zoning Ordinance regarding overall parking. The ground level retail M space was calculated using one space for each 300 square feet of area devoted to retail r use, which equates to 48 spaces. The second floor office space was calculated using one space for each 200 square feet of area devoted to office use, which equates to 31 0 spaces for a total of 79 spaces. The site plan indicates 79 spaces and eighteen shade trees. Architecture m The architecture is modernistic in style and the color pallet consists of using brown, Z peach, amber and gray. The steel canopy will be amber, the steel guardrail will be light gray, the metal screen will be light bronze and the metal cladding will be copper_ The landscape is informal in character with emphasis on shade_ The northern building adjacent to West San Rafael Road is a two-story structure with 2,555 square feet of retail commercial space on the ground level and 2,064 square feet of general office (non-medical) space on the second floor. The middle building is a two- story building with 7,708 square feet of retail commercial space on the ground level and 4,025 square feet of general office (non-medical) space on the second floor. These two buildings are connected by a second floor breezeway and walkway. The southern building adjacent to West Santa Catalina Road contains approximately 3,888 square feet of retail commercial. This building is connected to the middle building with an architectural feature, which leaves a 28'- 6" open court yard between the buildings. 0 00003? Planning Commission Staff Report April 11,2007 Case,5.1127--MAJ:PD 332 and GPA Page 6 of 9 REQUIRED FINDINGS MU Architectural Approval r Although there are no required findings for applications for architectural approval which n require environmental assessments, the Zoning Ordinance Section 94.04.00(D)(1-9) Z provides guidelines for the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) to review Z development projects. Specific aspects of design shall be examined to determine whether the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its M occupants as well as being compatible with the character of adjacent and surrounding developments, and whether aesthetically it is of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Conformance will be evaluated, based on consideration of the following: 1. Site layout, orientation, location of structures and relationship to one another and to open spaces and topography. Definition of pedestrian and vehicular areas,- i.e., v sidewalks as distinct from parking lot areas, m Access throughout the proposed project is designed according to the requirements of < the Uniform Building Code and ADA rules, including accessible pathways, handicapped M parking spaces and vehicular access. r 2. Harmonious relationship with existing and proposed adjoining developments and in 0 the context of the immediate neighborhood/community, avoiding both excessive variety and monotonous repetition, but allowing similarity of style if warranted, The area contains a variety of several architectural styles. The modern style of the E project is harmonious in the sense that it does not stand out as a strong architectural m style, but blends in with the mix. The clean lines of the building, similar landscape plant Z material and setback area creates harmony with the existing neighborhood. 3. Maximum height, area, setbacks and overall mass, as well as parts of any structure (buildings, walls, screens, towers or signs) and effective concealment of all mechanical equipment,- The proposed height of the building is 30 feet. The proposed buildings will be setback — 15 feet from the new right-of-way of North Indian Canyon Drive after the 10 foot CA dedication; 25 feet from West Santa Catalina Road and 20 feet from West San Rafael Road, after road dedication. The off-street parking will be located to the rear of the buildings and will be landscaped with shade trees. The proposed structures will be setback approximately 74 feet from the residential zoned property to the west. 0 -'I 00003 ' Planning Commission Staff Report April 11,2007 Case:5.1127—MAJ;Pb 332 and GPA Page 7 of 9 4. Building design, materials and colors to be sympathetic with desert surroundings; MU AND 5. Harmony of materials, colors and composition of those elements of a structure, including overhangs, roofs, and substructures, which are visible simultaneously,- r a The proposed buildings are modernistic in design using architectural features and an 'Z elevated walkway to create a unified effect. The color palette consists of a primary base Z color of light brown with a secondary base color of brushed peach. The accents will be m light grays, copper and light bronze. v 6. Consistency of composition and treatment; The proposed buildings are one and two story structures that are joined together by an elevated walkway at the second story level and an architectural feature to give a 0 consistency of composition and treatment. 7. Location and type of planting, with regard for desert climate conditions. Preservation m of specimen and landmark trees upon a site, with proper irrigation to insure < maintenance of all plant materials, m The vacant site contains a scattering of indigenous insignificant shrubbery. r There are no specimen trees to preserve. The landscape design proposes 0 drought tolerant trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Emitters will deliver water to each individual plant, therefore practicing water efficient irrigation methods. ic General Plan Amendment ITI Objective 3.10 of the General plan states "the continuation of existing and development Z of new commercial uses which serve the everyday needs of the City's residents and visitors and provide employment for the city's residents and the greater region". The project proposes retail commercial at the ground level and offices on the second floor that will serve the residents of the area as well as visitors. This proposal is a continuation of commercial uses along North Indian Canyon Drive. Objective 3.13 of the General Plan states "The development of sites which intermix CO) commercial uses with housing, office, resort or recreational uses" -q The applicant is proposing retail commercial and office uses to serve the adjacent X residential area. To the northeast of the subject site is a new housing development — currently under construction. While the project tenants are not known at this time, it is 0 expected that they will include businesses that will serve future residents. d��173 �3 Planning Commission Staff Report April 11,2007 Case:5.1127—MAJ;PD 332 and GPA Page 8 of 9 Planned Development District Ma Findings can be made in support of establishing the proposed Planned Development r District as follows: a a. The proposed planned development is consistent and in conformity with the Z general plan pursuant to Sections 94.07.00 (A)(1) and 94.02.00 (A)(4) of the Z Palm Springs Zoning Code. m The proposed request is consistent with the General Plan, specifically Objectives 3.10 and 3.13 as they relate to intermixing commercial, office and residential uses. b. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed planned development district, in terms of access, size of parcel, relationship to similar or 0 related uses, and other relevant considerations. M The project site is suitable for the development of a mixed use development It is < relatively flat and located at the intersection of a secondary road and a major m thoroughfare, r C. The proposed establishment of the planned development district is necessary Q and proper, and is not likely to be detrimental to adjacent property or residents. The establishment of the proposed planned development district is necessary to provide commercial and office uses, design concepts and development standards. This project is a continuation of the existing commercial uses to the M north and is to serve the everyday needs of the adjacent residential area. Z d. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use; The subject site is located along North Indian Canyon Drive (Major Thoroughfare) between West San Rafael Road and Santa Catalina Road The existing road net — work is designed for commercial development_ N ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT —q Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) X Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared and a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration was sent to applicable agencies and published in the Desert Sun for a 20- day review period. ..r i I � Planning Commission Staff Report April 11,2007 Case:5.1127—MAJ;Pr)332 and GPA Page 9 of 9 I I NOTIFICATION A public hearing notice was advertised and was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject property/adjacent property owners. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received any comment. z z red I1dVvndes Cr ' w' g, AIC Associate Planner irect Plannin 5Seices v ATTACHMENTS: m C 1. Vicinity Map m 2. Draft Resolution / Conditions of Approval r 3. Initial Study/ Negative Declaration 4. Site Plans & Elevations O m z v CO n 000035 RESOLUTION NO. 6088 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE CASE NUMBER 5.1127— PD-332 for a change of zone from R-G-A-6 and R-2 to PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND General Plan Amendment to re-designate the site from M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial), APN 604-121-005; 504-121-006 & 504-121- 010, SECTION 3. WHEREAS, Khalil Ailabouni (the "Applicant') has filed an application with the City pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (E) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code, Case No. 5.1127- PD - 332 for a change of zone from R-G-A-6 and R-2 to Planned Development District; and WHEREAS, Khalil Ailabouni (the "Applicant') has file an application for a General Plan Amendment to re-designate the site from M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial). WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider Case Number 5.1127— PD — 332 for a change of zone from R-G-A- 6 and R-2 to Planned Development District, and General Plan Amendment to re- designate the subject site from M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial), was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2007 a public hearing on the application for project was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is considered a "project' pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and has been distributed for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the meeting on the project, including but not limited to the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines), the Planning Commission finds that the current environmental assessment for Case No. 5.1127 — PDD-332 and General Plan Amendment adequately addresses the general environmental setting of the proposed 060033 project. The Planning commission further finds that there are no reasonably foreseeable potentially significant environmental impacts resulting from this project and therefore recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration for the project. Section 2: Pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (E) of the Zoning Code, a Planned Development District (PDD) may be approved a change of zone as specked in Section 94.07.00. The PDD is needed to allow the retail commercial and office uses, the development concept and standards for the proposed project. The proposed PD-332 uses, development concepts and standards are similar to those of the C-1(Retail business) zone. The C-1 zone provides an opportunity for service commercial and tourist uses to be oriented directly to the residential neighborhood they serve by means of a planned commercial complex. Pursuant to Section 94.03.00 (E) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: a. The proposed planned development is consistent and in conformity with the general plan pursuant to Sections 94.07,00 (A)(1) and 94.02,00 (A)(4) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code. The proposed request is consistent with the General Plan, specifically Objectives 3.10 and 3.13 as they relate to intermixing commercial, office and residential uses. b. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed planned development district, in terms of access, size of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses, and other relevant considerations. The project site is suitable for the development of a mixed use development It is relatively flat and located at the intersection of a secondary road and a major thoroughfare. c. The proposed establishment of the planned development district is necessary and proper, and is not likely to be detrimental to adjacent property or residents. The establishment of the proposed planned development district is necessary to provide commercial and office uses, design concepts and development standards. This project is a continuation of the existing commercial uses to the north and is to serve the everyday needs of the adjacent residential area. d. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use; The subject site is located on North Indian Canyon Drive (Major Thoroughfare) between West San Rafael Road and Santa Catalina Road. The existing road net work is designed for commercial development. Section 3:. The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment from M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial). The objective of the GC (General Commercial) land use is for the development of service commercial uses, related to the City's primary retail commercial and tourist related uses and to service the needs of the residents. This General Plan designation is needed in order to approve the PDD for retail sales and general office use. Objective 3.10 of the General plan states "the continuation of existing and development of new commercial uses which serve the everyday needs of the City's residents and visitors and provide employment for the city's residents and the greater region". The project proposes retail commercial at the ground level and offices on the second floor that will serve the residents of the area as well as visitors. This proposal is a continuation of commercial uses which serves the everyday needs of the City's residents and visitors and will provide employment for the City's residents. Objective 3.13 of the General Plan states "The development of sites which intermix commercial uses with housing, office, resort or recreational uses" The subject request is proposing retail commercial and office uses to serve the adjacent residential area. 000033 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Case Number 5.1127, PD-332 for a change of zone from R-G-A-6 and R-2 to and General Plan Amendment to re- designate the subject property from M15(Medium Density Residential) to GC(Commercial). ADOPTED this 11 m day of April, 2007. AYES: 7 / Hochanadel/Cohen/Marantz/Ringlein/Hutcheson/Caffery/Scott NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Cr . E ing, AIC Director of Plannin S rvices 000030 City of Palm Springs Planning Commission Mnutes of 1 April 11,2007 ig A. Ewing stated if there is an area of uncertainty on the Commissions part relating to an aced Tenant Impact Report (TIR) this may be an issue to explore at a future meeting. j Commissioner Hutcheso ated he prefers further clarification regarding the easement rather than adding a ion. WS/C (Caffery/Scott, 7-0)To continue, to an finite date, as amended; *The City Attorney to be present. 'The City Attorney to advise the Commission on the submitta an updated Tenant Impact Report- •Clarification on the easement location, i r ss was a en at :32 p.m. The meeting resumed at 3:43 p.m. fI S. Case 5.1127 MAJ /GPA / PDD 332 - An application by Khalil Ailabouni for a 1 proposed General Plan Amendment to reclassify existing land use of L-6 and M15 to GC (General Commercial) and a Change of Zane from R-G-A(6) and R-2 to Planned Development District (PD-332) to establish new design standards and guidelines for the development of a retail commercial and .office complex to be located at 3201 North Indian Canyon Drive, Zoned R-G- A-6 and R-2, Section 3, APN's: 504-121-005, 006 and 010. (Project Planner. Fred Lowndes,Associate Planner) Fred Lowndes, Associate Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated April 11, 200T Chair Marantz requested staff address the surrounding areas and questioned the area toward the west of this property and the setbacks. Staff responded that the property towards the west is a single family residence and the remaining parcels are vacant. Chair Marantz opened the Public Hearing- -William Kleindienst, VW1/CQT/Mills Architects, provided details pertaining to the distance from the residential area, landscaping, height, the elevator shaft, the meandering bike path and setbacks. He summarized a request for modification and/or deletion of conditions. -Khris Benz, spoke in support of this project; stating this project will revitalize this area of the city- -Phillip Trail, Palm Springs, spoke in support of this project, and stated this area is in need of commercial services. There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed- 7 City of Palm Springs Planning Commission Minules of April 11,24D7 Commissioner Hutcheson requested the applicant address any solar features incorporated into the project. William Kleindienst responded this building is not LEED certified however they will be meet or exceed Title 24 requirements_ The Commission discussed storefront windows blocked with storage, the height and mechanical screening for the elevator. M/SIC (Vice Chair Hochanadel/Cohen, 7-0)To adopt the draft Negative Declaration and approve Case 5.1127 MAJ / GPA PD 332 and recommend approval to the City Council, as amended: *Condition#12- ". . . prior to issuance of final occupancy." "Condition#14-delete *Condition#25-delete *Condition#27, #29 and#31 -to remain in effect. *Condition#45-delete"30 inch stop sign"wording and stop bar and stop legend to remain. Commissioner Hutcheson left the meeting and exited the Council Chamber at 4:18 p.m_ ase - +5 + _t"4# amendment to modify Chapter 94.06.01, to allow front and side yard etbacks on Major and Secondary thoroughfares to be reduced up to the sa amount as front and side yard setbacks on Local/Collector streets throu the as Minor Modification (AMM) process. (Project Planner. an Fernandez,Assistant Planner) Bryan Fernandez, Ass nt Planner, reported a correction on Exhibit 'A', 1.a, the 2nd sentence should read "Sin family dwellings on Major and Secondary thoroughfares may be allowed a reduction o nt and side yard up to the amount allowed for single- %mily dwellings . . ." He provided ckground information as outlined in the staff report dated April 11, 2007. Chair Marantz opened the Public Hearing there being no comments the Public Hearing was closed. MIS/C (Ringlein/Cohen, 6-0, 1 absent/Hutcheson)To re mend approval to the City Council. 10, Case 5.1147 SNC - An application by Century Vintage He s to change the name of North Indian Avenue to North Indian Canyon Drive inning from the 1-10 corridor to the end of the city limits of the City of P Springs, which is approximately 0,88 miles to the north; General Plan - ajor Thoroughfare. (Project Planner: David Newell,Assistant Planner) I I 8 I C l., L7 S,-.1 JA4= =,.,'T 7.- .JI A.-r''15 ?ry C,r, LAl -,I, AT O`G. czzu Par r; x i-- } lass' r} �.•< I } � < m"'' � AWL r u r j moo I U - s I k tf 6 h = s I � � i INDIAN CA OV DR PI-ANT LIST SJeili[c M1e'L LonrnTl Nu�m F1e'w35s SC2M1'tt 1Lm6 CO"l�mn Ham2 _ R8C' SSi _ Sa-.LSc rla a �mn6'a,� FllIY➢=.'rE e^'5in.:'i' 1y IJ LabssJ.:anba 5{..I aotl _4,a.e[p=�,.Ls= p�_�� SLaI CTaSgirlame[vav pa'�la'Ia 6G.J[weds 6'Cwrl Nsrv�A Hf:rtJ Yla rend SE'3o<N.Mx Cauona Wsr.me O.nTaorraaw Seel 1-n��.0 llv..liii _ Hew f.Nfla+l�.0 f-0,I P xP_2J:rsa CnTarn mezr � ]6�3odA.h l'. Cuzarearphi O¢m G•.a 5.(�p Lr:ananxrdaeWrcw Ha3+131e-rem - - ILaI ' .Pam M1 ,F N p^T'one. LSn R elfi,n,. SFl.0 Vemevg� SzeeaY+r vemav t-0c Hun e n..ma mofams Stal ]'CePs.0 _p �3p`mFd'ed0 Ie 3Y Cess 11 haASPP'l _ Hwrl rl S:J 2s'ou" e�irS'¢r.B llq Rrcker.dSo - Y - Ftv�e lelpaL•emwi -Aer�lxm'nd]la3 'i'i•J J'6•da P.r,�Gmr3n By CmSeR Fb.�andcuPJf]' SITE PLAN A 0.0 C-n AILABOIJNI RETAIL ANO OFFICE BUILDING ,Hd=,'p - bNamber a Pram , C-" PMIA!CANYM DR AT SAH RAFAEL 'IAad dcOS F-.hll Onm.S.,I.FM Pelm SWlnpe.G:922fiY1iW32]52!'J TM' fa _ q _ (inert = I/ VVESTELEVAT[ON i� SOUTH ELEVATION WESTELEVAT[ON =ar�z=rm ELEVATION r r r A 0.0 AILABOUNI RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING ❑� a7z-0a lh'DWS CANYON Dd.RS SRN RAFAEL 4B8 S.Feirel�nx.5mle Fitt+.AJm Sri3�.G1YTiFd TCU32l�Jr FF �h AIL BOUNI RE IAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING IN I IAL S I UDY/NEGATIVF DIECLARAIION A Negative Declaration For Ailabouni Retail and Office Building Prepared by: 4 PALM 9p The City of Palm Springs, CA V N March, 2007 Ailabouni Retail and Office Buildings, Initial Study/Negative Declaration March, 2007 r r 4 AII.AfiOUM RFfAIL AND OFFICE BVII DING, IN I TIAL STU DY/NEGA I IVF DECLARATION „r r' d r fp A f ` ,f \ 6 , F/I V 1 Ailabovni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration prints^ March, 2007 2 DESERT OASIS IN DU TRIAI- LC1FIs, INITIAL STU DYINEGATIVE DFCLARAII()N uT S0T] Y�I.irP¢e hlsatn n�a Hargtol� � 0rap"W F.Ills Skirr bat Glc¢r �Motr nq❑Ualley i rr.,�• I Cherry Valley , Yar.Jenn¢ pe3eH Hot Sp>°iklgs PnrB r �gy HIghVllrl+d S,nting:: •_� - — -- �� V �n1 'ISnndio'�f�r:lf 4T�, �QeanrAlorYk' 'Harrt¢Inq L11Nhlla{I•dai+:r Caya�n¢l -.tio,. ,o., lJdr¢hl9alr 5 ¢Ih r, :4s, I`ll�i E Gilrnnh Nef sprang: Palm s,pring'3„• ndrn Hilt. 110,rnprd.'17a Noliarad Palmw n '„z>.ianrri ;Ft I:,S,n^a,dnri,rm - - Fnrcar 6'Mr.Yr,�rnk - p4 hf:��oitllset Palms San.ladinla Cathedral C ".. Saddr Jaegr:'llcaq a "' ^rakr;l ly:Y7r1� Hemet Vadle Vela 'e4alldyll4'aild Panch❑hllrag�e� l5Palm.Desert Indio Mowltaill Center Indian 1^lell .'I „"W_ url- TY¢e mal Tlaaualan R1alanh:a6m Piny,anCYcs¢ , Sage �} FlnyanPims ¢; "FtIyIPt ' '� - PibkraYl¢unnd fR dgt5 6rfapQyes#,Ipn IQ 7TGN Tile Atlas ti gr¢chur4dred P,11m:;A nlmllmm; ,q rM, Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration February, 2007 3 AI LABOUNI RE I A]LAND UI:fICE BUILDING, INITIAL STuIDY/NEGATNE DECLARAIIVN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Projectfftle: Ailabouni Retail and Office Building 2. Lead agency name and address: City of Palm Springs 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92263 3. Contact person and phone number: Fred Lowndes Associate Planner (760)323-8245 4. Project location: 3201 Norlh Indian Canyon Drive. 5. Project sponsor's name and address: Khalil Ailabouni 3395 Indian Canyon Drive Palm Springs , Co. 92262 6. General plan designation: M15 7. Zoning: RGA6 and R-2 8. Description of project: The project proposal is for the conslruclion of one one-slory reloil commercial building and Iwo two-story commercial/office buildings, off-slreei parking and associalcd landscaping 9. surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: North- West San Rafael Road and developed commercial C-M Commercial/Manufacturing Zone South- West San Catalina Road and undeveloped RGA-6 Garden Aparlmeni and Clusler Residenliol Zone. East- Norlh Indian Canyon Drive and undeveloped R-2 Limiled Multi-Family Residenliol Zone Ailabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration O aPW Tn March,2007 �y 4 �� Q[ICOnHP r DESERT OASIS INDUSTRIAI I OF I S, INI FIAL STUDY/NECATIVF DFCI ARA TION West- Single family dwelling RI Single Family Residential Zone and undeveloped R-2 Limiled Multi-Family Residential Zone 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement. Regional Waler quality Control Board. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED, The environmental factors checked below would be polenlially affected by this project, involving at least one impact Thal is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ CUltUral Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/I-lousirig ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transporialion/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Sludy/Negative Declaration February, 2007 2 .7 5 w.' AILABOUNI Rk IAl I.AND OFFICE BUILDING, IN ITIAL STU DY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION DETERMINATION: (To be Completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of This inilial evaluation: ® I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect an the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequalely analyzed in on earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find Thal although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures ihat are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Project Planner Date Craig A Ewing, AICP Date Director or Planning Services Adabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration vats, d; March,2007 9[¢°RNY DESERT OASIS IN I]IJSrRIAI- LOI-IS, INITIAL STUDY/N ECATIvE DECLARATION EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impacl" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show Ihol the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls oulside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where tl is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will nol expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action Involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether [he impacl is potentially significant, less than significanl- with mitigation, or less than significant. Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence Ihot on effect may be significant. If there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impocl" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significanl Impact" The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less Ihon significant Ievel (mitigation measures "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or alher CEQA process, an effect has been adequatcly analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In [his case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Idenlify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Idenlify which effects from the above checklisl were within the scope of and adequately anolyzcd in on earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and slake whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Miligciion Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporaled," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address silt-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporoic into the checklist references to informalion sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the sla[cment is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source Iisl should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, aun s� Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration .y February,2007 7 AILABOUNI RETAIL AND omcI BUILDING, INITIAL STUDY/NEGATivi DECLARATION lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a projecl's environmental effects in whatever formal is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance crileria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure idenlified, if any, to reduce the impact to less Ihon significance Less Than Significant potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact tncolporated Impact No Impact I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) 1-1ave a Substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, Including, but not limited to, trees, rock El Eloulcroppings, and historic buildings within a El M state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the exisling visual character or quality of the site and its ❑ ❑ ❑ IR surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime ❑ ❑ ❑ views in the areal a) No Impact — The proposed project Iles within the alluvial sail designation. The project has carefully considered the surrounding area by providing wide landscaped areas at the corners of Wesl San Rafael Drive and North Indian Canyon Drive and West Santa Catalina Road and Norlh Indian Canyon Drive, North Indian Canyon Drive is heavily landscaped with a meandering sidewalk. b) No Impact - The subject parcel is relatively flat. Aerial photographs indicate little existing vegetation on the site. Therefore, there would be no impact on Scenic Iesources. (:) No Impact - Surrounding developmenl is Commercial and single-family. The proposed building is consistent with the character of the area. The building has been recommended for approval by the City's Architectural Advisory Committee which has ensured that the building is of quality design and will not have an adverse effect on the site. d) No Impact - The City's outdoor lighting standards in Seclion 93.21.00 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code ensures there will not be substantial amounts of glare radiating from the subject property. Ailabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration March,2007 N DFSI[RI OASIS INUUSi RIAL LOFTS, INITIAL STU DY/NEGATIVE DFCLARATI ON Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Si[e Assessment Model (1997), prepared by the California Deparlmen[ of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of 5t4tewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑ use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to [heir location of ❑ ❑ ❑ nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? a) No Impact: The proposed silo is located in an area that does not contain prime, unique, or farmland of slaiewide importance. Therefore, no impact would occur b) No Impact: Currently Williamson Act Contracts are not located on the parcel comprising the project site. Furthermore, no Williamson Act Contracts are. located in the immediate vicinity of the project site (Williamson Acts Contracts) of the Palm 5pring5 General Plan EIR (Palm Springs, 1992). 1-he proposed project will not cause any impact with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act Contract. c) No Impact: The proposed project site is Ioca[ed within an area approved for Commercial/Manufacturing uses and Residential. Implementation of the proposed projecl would Therefore not result in conversion of farmland to non-agrirullural uses, which causes no impact on agricultural land. .w,. Desert Oasis industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration <y February, 2007 a 9 I I I I I AILABOLINI RFTAII ANL)OFFICE BUILDING, IN IIAL STUDY/NFGATIVL DECLARATIgN I I I Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impael Incorporated Impact No Impact III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute El El ❑ substantially to an existing or projected air EJ quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an El Elapplicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑ ❑ 11 ❑ number of people? a) No Impact - -rhe project is within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCQAMD Governing Board adopted the 2003 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) on August 1, 2003. The 2003 AQMP updates the attainment demonstration for federal standards for ozone and PM10; repldces the 1997 attainment demonstration for the federal carbon monoxide (CO) standard and provides a basis for the maintenance plan for CO for the future; and updates the maintenance plan for the federal nitrogen dioxide (NO2) standard that the South Coast Air Basin has mel since 1992. The revision of the AQMP points to the urgent need for additional emissions reductions (beyond Ihose incorporated in the 1997/99 Plan) from all sources, specifically those under the jurisdiction of the California Air Resources Board and the US EPA which account for approximately 80 percent of the ozone precursor emissions in the Basin (www.agmdgov/agn)p/). The pro)ect is not anticipated to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2003 AQMP. There will he no impact. The Federal and California State Ambient Air Quality Standards for important pollutants are summarized in I'dble 1 and described in detail below: Aflabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration �eaw March^2007 10 DESERT OASIS INDUbI RIAL LOFTS, INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION Table 1 Federal and State Ambient Air ualit Standards Pollutant Averaging Time Federal Primary Standard State Standard Ozone(03) 1-Hour 0.12 ppm 0.09 ppm 8-Hour 0.08 ppm Carbon-Monoxide (CO) 8-hour 9.0 ppm 9.0 ppm 1-hour 35.0 ppm 20.0 ppm Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Annual 0.05 ppm — 1-hour — 0.25 ppm Sulfur Dioxide (S02) Annual 0.03 ppm — 24-hour 0.14 ppm 0.05 ppm 1-hour — 0.5 ppm PM10 Annual SO,ugm 30pg/m 2-1-hour 150po1m' 50p�Vm' PM2.5 Annual 15,ughin — 24-hour 65 pg/m} — Lead 30-day Avg. — 15 pg/m ----- Month Avg. 1.5 pg/m' - Source:Cali iorria Art Resources Boar , "Am ient Air Quality Sldn ar s."January 25, 1999 ppm = parts per million pglm,— micrograms'per cubic meter Ozone(03) is the most prevalent class of photochemical oxidants formed in the urban atmosphere, the creation of ozone is a result of complex chemical reactions between hydror_drbons and oxides of nitrogen in the presence of sunshine. Unlike usher pollutants,ozone is not released dveLlly info the atmosphere from any euurUes'. The major sources of oxides of nitrogen and reactive hydrocarbons, known as ozone piecui.ors, Are e-umbobbon 5CUICes such as factories and automobiles, and evaf�Oralton of solvents and fuels. The hLdllh effects of ozone ate eye iiritatiun And damage to lung tissues. Carbon Monoxide (CO) is n colorless, odorless, toxic g.n, former) by incomplete cornbuOon of fossil fuels. CO concentrations are generally higher in the winter when meteorological conditions favor the build-up of directly emitter] contaminants CO health warning and emergency episodes occur llmnsl entirely during the winter. The most significant source of carbon monoxide is gasoline-powered autnmobde5, as a result of inefficient fuel usage in internal combustion engines. Various industrial processes also emit carbon monoxide Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) the primary tecopturs of ultraviolet hghl initiating the photochemical reactions to produce gmng. Nitric oxide combines with oxygen in the presence of reactive hydrocarbons and sunlight to form nitrogen dioxide and ozone. Oxides of nitroggen are contributors to other air pullulant problems tnduding: high levels of fine particulate matter, poor visibility and acid c sposuton. Sulfur Dioxide(SO2) results from the combustion ul high 4uhur content fuels. Fuel combustion is a major source of SO2, while chemical plants, sulfur recover plants, and metal processing are rmmOr contributors Sulfates result from a relation of sulfur dioxide and oxygen in the presence of sunlight. Sue Ievpli,are generally higher in the winter than in the summer (when sunlight is plentiful ind sulfate is more readily forrnVd). Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2 S) consists of panicles in the dtrnogphere as a by-product of fuel cumbusbon, through abrasion such as tire wear, and through sod orogron by wind Farriculates can also be formed through photochemical reactions in the atmosphere. PM10 refers to finely divided solids or liquids such as soot, dust, and aerosols which are ID microns or less in diameter and can enter the lungs. Free pdrh6es are those less than 2.5 miCrci In diameter and are also referred to as PM2,5, Lead is found in old paints dnd r-oatings, plumbing and a variety of other materials. Once in the blood stream, lead can cause damage to the brain, nervous system,and other body systems. Children are most susLephble to the effects of lead. The South County Air Basin and Riverside County portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin are in attainment lot Federal and Slate standards for lead. The SCAQMD has established significance thresholds for operational and construction-related emissions. Daily and quarterly thresholds are established. Since a project's quarterly emissions are determined by averaging over a 3-month period (including only actual working days), it is possible to not exceed the quarterly thresholds while exceeding the daily thresholds shown in Table 2. Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, initial Study/Negative Declaration February,2007 GutQ vU AII.AriOUNI RETAIL AND OFFICE BUII-UING, IN TIAL STU DY/NFC.A I IVE DECLARATION Table 2 Emissions Significance Threshold Crileria (Pounds/Day) Pollutant _ CO ROG NOx S02 PM70 Operational Emissions 2.22 0.24 0.92 0.00 0.09 Pounds Da 550 55 100 150 150 Construction Emissions 65.53 8.89 55.02 0.01 2.30 Pounds/Da 550 75 1 00 150 1 S0 Table 3 Sum of Area and Operational Emission Estimates For Shook Building from Drbemis Model Pollutant CO ROG NOx S02 PM10 Operational and Area 222 0.24 0,92 0.00 0.09 Emissions Estimates Construction Emissions 63.53 8.89 55.02 0.01 2.30 Estimates Saurce SCQAMD,CEQA Air ua ily Han oo ,Navem Der 1993 Projects in the Coachella Valley with peal< (highest rlady) operation-rolated emiwons that exceed any of these emission thresholds shoulcl bo considered significant The project 5i[e is also located within the Salton Sea Air Basin. This basin has been designated as a 11severe-17" Ozone non-attainment area due to the violations of the federal ambient air quality standards for ozone primarily due to pollutant transport from the South Coast Air Basin. This designation indicates that the al.Ldinment date for Federal ozone standards is November 2007 (17 years after the enactment of the Federal Clean Air Act) The project's proposed land use is consistent with the Proposed Amendment to the Cily'S General Plan and Planned Development District. When adopted in 1993, the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Consideration regarding air quality. This statement acknowledges that it is not feasible to reduce City-growth impacts to air quality to a level of significance al [his time. The project will also be consistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Construction of the proposed project will result in disturbance of [he site that could generate dust. ['he project developer will be required to complete a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 5WPPP/PM10 Plan that must be prepared and implemented to the satisfaclion of the City Building and Safety Department. The Plan must be consistent with the approved AQMD standards intended to minimize health hazards. Sensitive Receptors are generally defined as people that are of the highest risk of respiratory problems from emissions. Sensitive receptors are often times associated with schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, etc. The site is located within an a commercial/Industrial zone and the nearest potential sensitive receptors would be the single-family residentidl dwellingto the west of the subject property As discussed above, the proposed project is not anticipated to generate substantial pollutant concentrations and will not create objectionable odors beyond those associated with common construction activities and approved warehouse uses (diesel fumes, etc.) The proposed project will have no significant air quality impacts. Ailabouni Retail and Office Building„ Initial Study/Negative Declaration nA�March,2007 12 DESERT OASIS INDUSTRIAL LOFTS, INITIAL STUDY/N EGA IIVE DECLARATION Less Than Significant Potentially with Less rhan Signiticant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL. RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies ❑ ❑ ❑ IR or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive nalural community Identified in local or regional plans, policies or ❑ ❑ ❑ El regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands, as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited El ❑ Elto, marsh, vernal pool, coastal wetlands, etc.), EJ through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or ❑ ❑ migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree ❑ ❑ ❑ preservation policy of ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community ❑ ❑ El ❑ Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? a) No Impact - The project will not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The proposed project site is located in a commercial/Manufacturing and nat Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Dec/aralion February,20V1. Y3 All AROUNI RE IAIL AND OFFICE BIJILDING, INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION Residential area of Palm Springs, and no sensitive habitats occur onsite. Therefore, the project would not result in Impacts to endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats. b) No impact-The site is not identified as having any natural community that could be affected by the project. Therefore, the project would not have an adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. c) No Impact - Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the dredge and/or fill of waters and wetlands in the United States, specifically relating to how these activities may cause an adverse effect to, or loss of, federal wetland/water resources. Regulatory responsibility falls under the jurisdictional authority of the U.S. Army Corps of L-ngineers (ACOE). Under Section 404, any development or activity which may result in temporary or permanent impacts to these federally- protected resources must prepare a Pre-Construction Notification for review, and potential permitting, by the ACOE. The site does not contain any wetland areas or waters. Therefore, no impact to federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 would occur. d) No Impact - The project site is located within an area with existing infrastructure. It is logical to assume that wildlife would use areas with less existing infrastructure as corridors. No impact is anticipated. a) No Impact-The project does not propose to remove or disturb any sensitive biological resources or landmark trees. Therefore, no conflicts with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources would occur, causing no impact. f) No Impact-The City of Palm Springs does not have an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or stale habitat conservation plan. Therefore, the project would have no significant irnpacl on these types of plans. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the El El Elsignificance of a historical resource as defined in " 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ ❑ El 21 significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to " 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique El Elpaleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those [] ❑ ❑ 2 interred outside of formal cemeteries? (a-d) No Impact - The General Plan for the City of Palm Springs indicates Ihere should be no impact to prehistoric archeological resources as a result of this project. Ailabouni Retail and Office Building,Initial Sl'udy/Negative Declaration ` Pva q March,2007 14N /YORN�� DESERT OASIS IND)USTRIAI I-OH5, INITIAL STLI DY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Agua C21hente Band of Cahullla Indians utilized a vast territory beyond the bounds of the existing reservation. The possibility of finding human remains does exist in this area. In accordance with Public Resources Code 5.097,94, if human remains are Found, the Riverside County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. If the coroner determines that the remains are not recent, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento to determine the most likely descendants for the area. The designated Native American representative then determines in consultation with the property owner the disposition of the human remains. Due to the proximity of Tribal lands, there is the potential for previously undiscovered cultural resources to be discovered during the project construction and site grading activities. Tribal interests in such previously undiscovered resources prescribe the following Conditions of Approval: t. An Archeologist qualified according to the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines shall perform a record search of the proposed project are, to be conducted prior to the initiation of construction 2. A Cultural Resource Monitor, designated by the Agua Caliente Cultural Resource Office, shall be present during all ground-disturbing activities. Should burled deposits be encountered, the Cultural Resources Monitor shall have the authority Lo halt construction and notify a Qualified Archeologist (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines) to prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the City, State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Cultural Resource coordinator for approval and any repatriation of cultural materials to be done in cooperation with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. Adherence to the Conditions of Approval identified above will ensure potential impacts to cultural resources are not significant. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential Substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death, involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquisl-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ ❑ substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including El © Elliquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ b) Result In substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑ o.rM.., Desert oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration k 1y February,2007 r is P AILAIjOIJM RETAIL AND OFFIci BUILDING, INITIALS ruL)Y/NI:CAI ivF DFCIARATION Less"than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off- ❑ ❑ © 10 site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), ❑ ❑ 0 creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater El Eldisposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? a) i) No Impact - The majority of Riverside County lies within areas subject to seismic hazards. The subject site lies south of the Banning Fault Mission Creek Strand. The site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo earthquake hazard zone and there are no known faults crossing the project site. However, the project site, as with virtually all sites within the state, would be vulnerable to ground shaking in the event of an earthquake. The project site and surrounding vicinity are relatively flat, eliminaling the potential for landslides. The City of Palm Springs General Plan requires that the project be designed and constructed in accordance withy the requirements of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Adherence to the provisions of the UBC would reduce the, potential for structural damage in the evens of an earthquake. Therefore, no impact would occur. ii) Less Than Significant Impact-Any major earthquake damage in the City of Palm Springs is likely to occur from ground shaking and seismically related ground and structural failures. Local soil conditions, such as topography, soil strength, thickness, density, water content, and firmness of underlying bedrock affect seismic response. Seismically induced shaking and some damage should be expected to occur but damage should be no more severe in the project area than elsewhere in the region. Therefore, no Impact would occur. hi) There are no known geologiral hazards Caused by ground failure or liquefartion which would prevent use of the site. Therefore, no impact would occur. iv) The ground is level and approval of the project would not expose people or structures to potential landslides. Therefore, no impact would Occur. b) No Impact - Existing codes regulate land grading and erosion control if and when construction occurs during winter months (November-March). Therefore, no impact would occur. c-d) No Impact-See items a and b, above. e) No Impact- The proposed project will require a soils report to be submitted to the Departments of Building and Safety and Engineering to ensure the integrity of required sewer connections. Due to the analysis of the study, no impact would occur. Aflahouni Retail and Office Building, Initial 5fudy/Negative Declaration of MSe March,2007 16 DESERT OASIS INDUS I RIAL LOFTS, INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION \� r r 1. \ \ �«s Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration y February, 2007 17 AILABOUNI RETAIL ANL]OFFICE BUILDING, INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DFCI ARATION Less Than Significant Polenlially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or 0 ❑ ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset © El 0 and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, Substances or waste El ❑ ❑ within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, ❑ © ❑ would It create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within Iwo miles of a public airport or a ❑ El ❑ public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for ❑ ❑ ❑ people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ emergency evacuation plan? h) L-xpose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wikdland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent Io ❑ ❑ ❑ ZJ urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? a-lb) No Impact- No hazardous material uses are proposed as part of the project. Therefore, there would be no significant impact. c-d) No Impact -The project site is not included an a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. No impact would occur. The commercial/office use will not emit hazardous emissions. There is little likelihood of an emission impact given the storage an emission restrictions on the property. e-f) No Impact-The nearest airport Is the Palm Springs International Airport located at Gene Aulry Trail, The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77. The aeronautical study concluded that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation. The proposed project is not listed within the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and would have no impact on the airport. Ailabouni Retail and Office Building Initial Study/Negative Declaration oe varm r March,2007 z 18 �TlryoaN�P DESFRI OASIS INDUSTRIAL LOFTS, INITIAL STU DY/NEGAIWE DECLARA LION g) No Impact-The City of Palm Springs Emergency Plan was established to address planned response to extraordinary emergency situations associated with natural disasters and technological accidents. The Plan focuses on operational concepts relative to large-scale disasters, which can pose major threats to life and personal property requiring unusual emergency response The proposed project will have no impact on the City's ability to implement the Plan h) No Impact - Based on the site's location, which is within an area of industrial, commercial and residential development, it would not be subject Lo wild land fire. No impact would occur. >.n . Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration February, 2007 19 AILABOUNIRE TAIL AND OFFICE Bull DING, IN IIAL STU DYMF.GATIVL DECLARATION Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALIFY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater tahle ❑ El ❑ level (e.g., the production rate of pre-exisling nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which ❑ ❑ would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or Substantially ❑ ❑ ❑ increase the rate or imount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of exisling of planned ❑ ❑ Elstormwater drainage systems of provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Otherwise substantially degrade water quality"? ❑ ❑ ❑ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or El ❑ El Insurance Rate Map or other Flood hazard delineation map? h) Place wilhin a I00-year flood hazard area structures El El that would impede or redirect flood flows? t) Lxpose people or structures Ia a significant risk of loss, injury or dealh involving flooding, including ❑ ❑ ❑ flooding as a result of a failure of a levee of dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a,c) No Impact - The project would be. required to meet all applicable water quality standards or waste discharge requirements thereby avoiding violation of such standards or requirements. The project site is within a tract with approved storm-water run-off facilities. 'Therefore, no changes to approved drainage patterns are anticipated. b) No Impact - The proposed project does not require significant quantities of potable water. The landscape design proposed is a minimal naturalized desertscape requiring lower quantities of water than traditional landscape design schemes. Primary water consumption on site will be for employees' drinking water and sanitation purposes. A net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table is not anticipated and therefore, no Impact would occur. Ailabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Sludy/Negative Declaration March,2007 20 DFSFRT OASIS INI]USIRIAL LOFTS, INITIAL STU DY/NFGATIVF DFCI_ARA I ION c-d ) No Impact-The project would not alter the course of any Stream or river, as none are located on-site or in the Immediate vicinity of the rile. Therefore, no impact would occur. f) No Impact- No additional impacts to water quality are anticipated. g-h) No Impact- The Federal Emergency Management Agency (1-LMA) indicates in the Flood Insurance Rate Map for the project site area, that the site is not within the 100-year floodplain. Because the project is not located within the 100-year floodplain flooding Impacts associated with the proposed project are not considered significant. i) No Impact-The Palm Springs General Plan Environmental Impact Report does not identify flooding as a result of levee or dam failure as having a potential to expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death in the City of Palm Springs. Therefore, no impact would occur. j) No Impact - The City of Palm Springs is not located in an area subject to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Therefore, no impart would occur. T` Less Than �- significarnl Potentially with Less Than Significant Miligation significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy of regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general El ❑ El ❑ plan, specific plan, local coastal program or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation ❑ Elplan or natural community conservalion plan? a) No Impact - The proposed project is located on a site that is adjacent to a major thoroughfare and does not propose any further subdivision of land. 1 he. land to the west is already established with lots That are currently vacant and there is no established community to divide. b) No Impact-The proposed project would be consistent with the allowable uses within the proposed General Plan Amendment desugnation of GC (General Commercial), which allows for retail commercial and office uses. The proposed Planned Development District specifically list the allowable uses. No other land use plans or regulations are applicable to the proposed project site. Therefore, no impact would occur. c) No Impact- The project would not conflict with an applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would occur. Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration Ma February,2007 , 2I 0 �i0�fi AILABOUNI RLTAIL AND Cii:n: BUILDING, INITIAL STUDY/NFCJATIVI[ Df-CIARAIION Less Than Significant potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the El F-1 El residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local 171 El general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? a-b) No Impact- No significant mineral resources have been identified In the project area. The Palm Springs General Plan EIR (Palm Springs, 1992) has not identified any mineral resources In the planning area. Therefore, no impact on mineral resources would occur. Ailabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration o4 on M,e March,2007 22 db(oM1MP Significant Potenlially With Less Than Significant Miligation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels In excess of standards established in the ❑ ❑ El local general plan or noise ordinance or of applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise ❑ ❑ ❑ levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing ❑ ❑ ❑ without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above ❑ ❑ ❑ levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport and use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a El El use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? LJ ❑ a,b,d) No Impact -All land uses to the north are zoned C-M (Commercial/Manufacturing). There are R-2 and R-1-A Residential Districts on the west side of the propeily. The R-2 Residential District is vacant and the R-1-A District is developed with a single family dwelling. The property to the east is vacant. Construction and site grading activities associated with the proposed project will produce temporary increases in the ambient noise level in the immediate vinnily of the project site. Construction activities are regulated by City Ordinance 1551, which limits construction aclrvilies to 7 AM-7PM Monday through Friday, RAM-5PM Saturdays, and prohibits construction activities on Sundays and major holidays. Adherence to this ordinance will ensure Thai no impact would occur_ The M-1-P Zone, Section 92.16.04 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code requires that all provisions of the City Noise Ordinance apply to the site. Since the project is consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code, the use will not exceed the parameters of the noise ordinance. c) No Impact - No increase in noise over the approved hrnits of the Palm Springs Noise Ordinance is anticipated. The proposed project would not be exposed to excessive noise from neighboring uses. Therefore, the impact is not considered significant. e-f) No Impact-The proposed project has not been listed in the airport noise overlay within the City of Palm Springs Zoning Map. Therefore, the impact is not considered significant. Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, initial Study/Negative Declaration �y February, 2007 S 23 ( PMn AILABOUNI RE Al I.ANU OFFICE BUILDING, INITIAL S FUDY/NECATIyi DFCI ARA I ION Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XII, POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and El ❑ El or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? a-c) No Impact - No housing exists on the proposed project site. No existing residents or housing would be. displaced to accommodate the proposed project. The proposed project will not have a direct or indirect impact on regional population growth. There is no impact to population and housing. Less Than Significant Polentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XIIL PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project resull In substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental Facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could Cause slgnificanl environmental impacts, In order to mainlain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ 10 d) Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ Allabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration pnia➢+ March,2007 24 U Y i3 CQ,o iMP DfSERT OASIS INDUSTRIAL LOFTS, INITIAL 51uuy/NEGATIVE DECLARATION a) No Impact-The Palm Springs Fire Department has established conditions of approval to ensure that there is no significant impact on the Fire Departments ability to service the community to their standard level of service. Therefore,the project will have no significant impact. b) No Impact - The project site is located within the service area of the City of Palm 5prings Police Department (PSPD). P5PD currently has adequate staff resources to provide police protection services as needed to the proposed project. Therefore, Impacts to police protection would not be significant. c) No Impact - The proposed project does not propose any new residences or other facilities that would affect schools. Therefore, no impact would occur. d) No Impact-The proposed project does not include any development or uses that would lead to an increase in demand for parks and recreation services. Therefore, no impact would occur. e) No Impact - The proposed project would not create any significant impact to the service levels of other public facilities The property will be. required to contribute to a Community Funds District, if the area is designated as a district that requires additional public services, therefore, no impact would occur. Less Than significant Polentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XIV_ RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical ❑ ❑ ❑ deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities, or require the construction or expansion of ❑ El ❑ recreational facilities, which might have an El adverse physical effect on the environment? a-b) No Impact-The proposed project does not include any development or features that would increase the use of existing recreational facilities or increase demand for additional recreational facilities. The project proposal does not include any new recreational facilities and would not induce population growth either directly or indirectly. Therefore, no impact would occur. Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration nmizwo,� February,2007 25 ss© as7 All.At3OUNI RETAIL AND OFFICL 6UIl DING, IN r1AL STU DYiNLGATIVF DFOARATION Less Than Significant potentially with Less Than Significant Miligation 5ignificant Impact Incorporated Impa(f No Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing IraffiC load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result In a substantial El Elincrease in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume-lo-CdpaCily ratio on roads, or congestion at interse(.tions)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county ❑ El El management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change In ❑ ❑ ❑ location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous ❑ intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ Ej Ailabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration ��ntMsa March,2007 t N c a 26 ° tJ DESERI OASIS INDUSTRIAL LOFTS, INITIAL SIUI]Y/N EGATIVE DECLARATION Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significanl Impael Incorporated Impact No Impact f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus ❑ ❑ ❑ turnouts, bicycle racks)? a-b) No Impact - Impacts to traffic resulting from the proposed project will be consistent with the levels of service anticipated for the infr3SLrudure of the approved Tract. The proposed project is consistent with the City of Palm Springs General Plan Circulation Llerrieni. There will be no significant impact on the levels of service (LOS) for the area. c) No Impact - The proposed project does not include any components that could Impact air traffic operations. The proposed project is located further than two miles from the Palm Springs International Airport and is not within the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. d-e) No Impact - The proposed project will not subsianirally increase hazards due to a design feature. Emergency access to the project site will comply with the requirements identified by the City Fire Department. f-g) No Impact - The project is consistent with the requirements within the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance for off-street parking. Therefore, no significant impact will occur. Less Than Significant Potentially With LL4%'than Signifirint Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ El ❑ ❑ applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of ❑ Elexisting facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effe(t,? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion Of existing El ❑ ❑ facilities, the construction Of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or ❑ 0 ® ❑ are new or expanded entitlements needed? r� • Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, Initial Study/Negative Declaration •y February,2007fp �I 27 AILABOUNi Ri:rAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING, INITIAL STUDY/N EGA FIVE DECLARATION Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorpora'led Impact No Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater lre2tment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity 10 serve the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project's projected demand, in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, slate and local statutes and ❑ ❑ ❑ regulations related to solid waste? a,b,e) No Impact - The proposed project is consistent wllh development in the proposed GC (General Commercial) General Plan designation. The proposed project will generate less wastewater then the existing M-15, Which; allows a range of density from 12 to 15 units per acre. Therefore no significant impact would occur. c) No Impact- The proposed project would not result in a need for additional storm-water facilities or expansion of existing facilities. d) No Impact- the proposed project will not require expanded enullements to ensure adequate water capacity. I herefore, the project will have a less than stgnificant impact. f-g) No Impact- The City of Palm Springs contracts with Palm Springs Disposal Services (PSDS) for solid waste collection services. Solid waste generated in the area is disposed of at the Edom Hill landfill or the Coachella landfill. As of the 1993 General Plan, these landfills were anticipated to have a remaining life of 30 years and 26 years respectively. The proposed project would not generate a significant quantity of solid waste. Therefore, no significant impact would occur, Less Than Significant With Potentially Mitigation Less Than Significant Incorporate Significant Impact d Impact No Impacl XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OFSIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habilal of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild-life population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or ❑ ❑ ❑ animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Ailabouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negalive Declaration ONMarch,2007 28 & QV nfh, l! U FJ DESERT OASIS INDUSTRIAL I,OFIS, INITIAL STU DY/NFCATIVF DFCLARATION Lesb Than Significant with Potentially Mitigation Less Than Significant Incorporate Significant Impact d Impact No Impact b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? "Cumulatively considerable" means that the Incremental effects of a project are ❑ ❑ ❑ considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human ❑ ❑ 0 21 beings, either directly or indirectly? a) No Impact - The proposed project would not degrade the quality of the environment; result in an adverse Impact on fish, wildlife, or plant species including special status species, or prehistoric or historic cultural resources because the project components do not include any construction or development on areas that are identified as sensitive. Prehistoric or historic cultural resources would not be adversely affected because no archeological or historic resources are known to exisi in the proposed project areas. The project does no[ propose any construction, development or grading activities in which cultural or historic resources would be anticipated to be discovered. Further, project implementation includes compliance with appropriate procedures for avoiding or preserving artifacts or human remains if they are discovered. b) No Impact - All project impacts would be. reduced by adhering to basic regulatory requirements and/or conditions of approval. c) No Impact - The proposed project would not have any direct or indirect adverse Impacts on humans. REFERENCES 1) City of Palm Springs. City of Palm Springs Draft Environmental Impact Report, December 1992. 2) City of Palm Springs. City of Palm Springs Ceneral Plan, 1992. 3) City of Palm Springs. City of Palm Springs Zoning Code, 2004. 4) South Co2sl Air Quality Management Dislria CFQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Deserl Oasis Industrial Coles ,Initial Sludy/Negative Declaration '^q February,2007 29 00007 ± �OR1[�P AILABOUNI RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING, INITIALS I UDYNEGATIyi DECI AKA I ION 5) U.S- Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Chapter 26, Subchapter IV. "Clean Water Act", 1994. 6) Government Code Section 65962.5(f). "Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement". Ailahouni Retail and Office Building, Initial Study/Negative Declaration >~prAM s March,2007 30 0 0 72) <uoaMP O� PALM Sp City of Palml. Springs Y y ' Office of the City Cleric c°°P°wn+ra'q 3200 L Ttliquirz Canyon Way • Palm Springy, CaliFornia �2262 CglI FORN�P Tel: (760) 323-S20=1 • Cax. (i60)322-SD32 • Web. www.P.drmprmgh-r i gov AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, California, do hereby certify that a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing, to consider an application by Khalil Ailabouni, for a proposed General Plan Amendment to reclassify existing land use of M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and a change of zone from R-G-A(6) and R-2 to Planned Development District (PD- 332) to establish new design standards, and guidelines for the development of a retail commercial and office complex to be located at 3201 North Indian Canyon Drive, was mailed to each and every person set forth on the attached list on or before the 131h day of July, 2007, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid, and depositing same in the U.S. Mail at Palm Springs, California. (47 notices mailed) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Palm Springs, California, this 17th day of July 2007. - . MES THOMPSON City Clerk /kdh Affidavit Ailabouni 07-25.07.doe Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION REPS MR PETE MORU771 Case 5.1127 GPA,5.1127 PD 332 PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE KHALIL AILABOUNI MODCOM AND PO BOX 4738 PHN for CC Meeting 07.25.07 HISTORIC SITE REP I I I PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-4738 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.1127 PD 332/GPA PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT MRS.JOANNE BRUGGEMANS ATTN SECRETARY 506 W. SANTA CATALINA ROAD VERIFICATION NOTICE 1 I I PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263-2743 MS MARGARET PARK AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS I I 1 I I I INDIANS 5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 MR KHALIL AILABOUNI MR CHRIS MILLS,AIA 3395 N. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE WWCOTIMILLS ARCHITECTS PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 490 S. FARRELL STREET, STE. C-203 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 r^ V J % ccr Jam and Smudge Free Printing 7' www.averycom " j a AVERY® 5960mo Use Avery®TEMPLATE 59601- S 11,)7 1-800-GO-AVERY -�'r 07 S01-041-004 669-330-038 301-031-016 Villa Sunnyview Scott C Whitney Jaime Laurella PO flex 4305 1551 Chamber:' Rd 1501 Nolden GL silver spring, MD 20514-4308 Aurora, CO 80011-5905 Los Angeles, CA 90042-1130 SOa-12Z-005 504-122-015 669-452-040 Scott D Griffin Scott D Griffin shto 3518 MulLiview ➢r 9000 W Sunset Blvd 006 PO Box 18037 Los Angolcs, CA 9006e-1222 W Hollywood, CA 90069-SBOB Beverly Hills, CA 90209-4037 504-122-010 504-122-011 504-122-005 terOn A KaLtan Shlomy Kattan Budget Rent A Car Of Southern Ca 168 N Hamel Dr 168 N Hamel Dr 1SO S Doheny Beverly Hills, CA 90211-2102 Beverly Hills, CA 90211-2102 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 501-031-015 304-122-019 504-121-001 Douglas Keeve Gregory M Schroeder Covington Dev 112C 4112 Jasmine Ave 9035 Cord Ave 10555 Bloomfield St Culver City, CA 90232-1407 Downey, CA 90240-2432 Los Alamitos, CA 90720-2501 504-122-002 S01-031-013 SO4-122-009 Lena W Weinstcin Brian W Mcguire Sack Pascinato PO Box 570402 PO Box 1613 22S36 Styles St Tarzana, CA 913S7.0402 Thousand Oaks, CA 91358-0913 Woodland Hill, CA P1397-1725 501-031-014 SO4-122.013 504-122-014 Oren S & Mai Cohen Barry T Anstett Rafael Gonzalez 14746 Raymef St 9S82 Shadowgrove Dr 976 Singing Ridge Ad Vim Nuys, CA 91405-1219 Rancho Cucamo, CA 91730-5742 E1 Calon, CA 9201P-2764 504-121-002 504-122-003 501-031-026 Vincent & Amalia PiZCCpC Jose 0 & Maria POrtillu Community Redev Agency Palm Sp 22210 Cathedral Canyon Cr 496 w Santa Catalina Rd 3200 E Tallquitz Canyon Way Cathedral Ctit, CA 92234-4513 Palm Springs, CA 92262-1938 Palm Spring, CA 92262-69S9 $01-031-002 501-031-012 504-121-007 Oert sendtsen Allen M Canarutto Dennis M Zuvicll 295 E San Rafael Dr 290 8 Simms Rd 154 w Santa Catalina Rd Palm springs, CA 92262-1649 Palm Springs, CA 92262-2040 Palm Springs, CA 92262-1932 504-121-008 SO4-122-001 SO4-122-004 Archibald Mcleish Lena Weinstein *M* Richard L Sullivan 174 W Santa Catalina Rd 18S W Santa Catalina Rd 153 W Santa Catalina Rd Palm Springs, CA 92262-1932 Palm Springs, CA 92262-1931 Palm Springs, CA 92262-1921 504-122-007 504-122-017 669-4$2-062 Rafael. Gonzalez Azul At Palm Springs Homeowners Khalil Ailabouni 126 W San Carlos Rd 122 W San Carlos Rd 2105 N Roberuo Dr Palm Springs, CA 92262-19?8 Palm Springs, CA 92262-1928 Palm Springs, CA 92262-31S7 Jam and Smudge Free Printing /I ���.� www.avery.com a � - AVERY® 5960T� Use Avery TEMPLATE s960 LAA, 1-800-GO-AVERY "y,.,�}i -/ L„�J 669-452-063 669-452-036 669-452-037 Khalil Ailahauni Ahdon F1gueroa Abdon Figuaroa 2105 N Aohert0 or 20 Box 2487 PC Box 2467 Palm Springs, CA 92262-3157 Palm Springs, CA 92263-2487 Palm Springs, CA 92263-2467 669-452-065 669-452-03B + 669-452-041 Mario Bernardi Greg P arrie Murphy (./� Samuel Hinkle PC Box 2487 PO B 9694 �l PC Box 4005 Palm Springs, CA 92263-2487 m Springs, CA 92263-6694 Blue day, CA 92317-4005 $04-121-002, 504-121-009 304-122-006 Frank M Hone:, Inc James A .7ennings Brandon Burg 2G062 Brldlewood Dr 25 Brush P1 1129 Carolina St Laguna Hills, CA 92653-7572 san Francisco, CA 94103-3905 SaR FranCiSCO, CA 94107-3321 669-452-054 40 Printed **' Bonnic Slottedahl 10510 Notthup Way 150 Kirkland, WA 98033-7948 RETURNED MAIL 669-452.038 GREG&CARRIE MURPHY P.O. BOX 1651 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263-1651 NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION REPS Hank Gordon for Laurich Properties MODCOM AND MR PETE MORU=[ Case 5.1104 GPA HISTORIC SITE REP I I 1 PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE PHN for CC Meeting 07.25.07 PO BOX 4738 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-4738 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.1104 GPA VERIFICATION NOTICE I I I PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT MRS.JOANNE BRUGGEMANS ATTN SECRETARY 506 W. SANTA CATALINA ROAD PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263-2743 MS MARGARET PARK AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS 1 I I 1 1 1 INDIANS 2401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 MR HANK GORDON LAURICH PROPERTIES, INC. 1770 N. BUFFALO DRIVE, STE. 101 SPONSORS 1 1 1 LAS VEGAS, NV 89128 r� IG , / 4 (� C O' 502062001 502062002 502D62003 MICHELLE MIKE ANGELO FIGONE 208 N. LURING DRIVE 366 ROOSEVELT WAY BLAKE GOETZ PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94114 246 N. LURING DRIVE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 5020O6200 7 502062009 502063012OWING DOUGLASOGDEN PETER MC ALEARLD 2 INOD P O BOX 69427 P R ASPRINGS 92262 WEST HOLLYWOOD CA 90069 0 502063013 502063014 502063022 WAYNE BISWURM RANDALL KOOPS BARBARA FREY 30349 KEITH AVE 227 N. LURING DRIVE 1525 SELBY AVE NO 104 CATHEDRAL CY CA 92234 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 LOS ANGELES CA 90024 502063024 LIBERTY ESCROW INC 502064008 502064009 653 COMMERCIAL RD NO 12 LURING PROP ELVIRA J DAGOSTINO PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 140 N. LURING DRIVE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 180 N. LURING DRIVE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 502064011 502064012 502065005 AMIR FAYATRAD RICHARD MAGARY PALM SPRINGS OIL CO INC 160 N. LURING DRIVE 4077 SEVENTEENTH ST 3410 E FOOTHILL BLV PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 SAN FRANCISCO CA 941114 PASADENA CA 91107 502065008 502065014 502065018 JOHN WESSMAN FRANCISCO URRUTIA JOHN WESSMAN 300 S PALM CANYON RD 1950 DESERT PALMS DR 300 S PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 502065019 502161002 502161003 HOSEA BROWN ANGELO AGUANNO WOLFGANG URBAT 940 N AVENIDA OLIVOS 3674 BOGERT TR 2320 W CANTINA WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 502161004 502163005 502163019 SOUTHWESTERN INV LLC JEROME SCHNEIDER JOHN STROUD 23586 CALABASAS RD NO 104 1848 N KIRSTEN LEE DR 365 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR CALABASAS CA 91302 WESTLAKE VILLAGE CA 91361 FOLSOM CA 95630 502163021 507195005 507195006 CNL RETIREMENT MA3 NANCY HOLLIDAY DAVID DOYLE 7900 WESTPARK DR NO T900 401 E.VIA COLUSA 403 E.VIA COLUSA MCLEAN VA 22102 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 507195007 507195008 507195009 DAVID FILLET CHARLES DEPOIAN BARBARA HENNE 13205 W WASHINGTON BLVD P 0 BOX 1952 509 E.VIA COLUSA LOS ANGELES CA 90066 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 507195011 507195014 507195015 SUSAN HESS DAVID MILOT RONALD BANSEMER P 0 BOX 2434 11555 SE 8TH ST STE 200 100 PALO ALTO AVE RIVERSIDE CA 92516 BELLEVUE WA 98004 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94114 507195017 507211007 508021001 CYNTHIA BERARDI HILLERY JOHNSON AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF 343 E.VIA COLUSA 500 N.VIA MIRALESTE CAHUILLA INDIANS PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021002 508021003 508021004 TREBOL INTERNATIONAL DEV DOROTHY SEGUNDO AGUA CALIENTE, BAND OF CORP 401 BURTON WAY CAHUILLA INDIANS 695 N CAMINO REAL PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021005 508021006 508021007 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021011 508021012 508021013 CALIENTE BAND OF ROBERT MCMILLAN AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS 1311 CORONA AVE CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY NORCO CA 92860 650 TAHQUITZ CANYON A101 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021014 508021016 508021018 AGUA CALIENTE BAND CAHUILLA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WY 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021019 508021020 508021021 MURUSICH PETRICIA LIVING TRUST JERRY GALICH AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF 627 W 13TH ST NO A 939 10TH ST CAHUILLA INDIANS SAN PEDRO CA 90731 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021023 508021024 5 USA 508 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF D 50802102 802102 MEDINA UNKNOWN CAHUILLA INDIANS 495 N. CALLE SANTA ROSA 0 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 508021026 508022090 508031001 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF USA BIA ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDRENS CAHUILLA INDIANS UNKNOWN 08-01-1999 FOUNDATION 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY .0 12379 MIRACLE HILL RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 DESERT HOT SPRINGS CA 92240 508031002 508031014 RICHARD GROMAN 508031011 USA BIA 12165 SUMMIT PL ALBRIGHTS AUTO PARTS UNKNOWN 01-01-97 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 0 508031015 -A 508031016 508031017 PLAZA MOTO (J" USA 508 USA 508 290CANYON DRIVE UNKNOWN UNKNOWN PALM INGS, CA 92262 0 0 508031018 508031020 508031021 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 04.13-81 UNKNOWN 04-13-81 D 0 0 508032003 508032004 508034012 USA 508 USA 508 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS UNKNOWN UNKNOWN P O BOX 2743 0 D PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 508034013 508034014 508035073 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS USA BIA P 0 BOX 2743 P O BOX 2743 UNKNOWN 05-04-98 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 0 508036049 508036051 508037049 USA BIA USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-04-98 UNKNOWN 05.04-98 UNKNOWN 05-04-98 0 0 0 508037050 508037051 508041001 USA BIA USA BIA PALM SPRINGS AUCTIONS INC UNKNOWN 05-04.98 UNKNOWN 05-04-98 244 N. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE 0 0 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 508041002 508041003 508041007 YVONNE ROODBERG YVONNE ROODBERG YVONNE ROODBERG 3416 AKRON ST 3416 AKRON ST 3416 AKRON ST DENVER CO80231 DENVER CO80231 DENVER CO80231 508041008 508041009 508041011 PLAZA MOTORS WALT OBERLY USA 508 290 N. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE 593 ARKET ST UNKNOWN PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 N FRANCISCO CA 94105 0 508041012 508041013 508042006 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 P O BOX 2245 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 08-23-85 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 0 0 508042008 508042010 USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF 508042009 USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS USA BIA USA AGLA ICALIEN 600 E TAHQUITZ CYN WAY ADDRESS UNKNOWN CAHUILP O BOX A IN DIANS PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 05 31-2006 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 508051051 508051055 508051088 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 0 508053003 508054003 508055003 USA 508 USA 508 USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF UILLA UNKNOWN 07-02.81 400 E TAHQUITZ WAY P 0 BOX 2 INDIANS BOX 2245 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 508055006 508055007 508055008 LOIS ANDERSON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY 700 E TAHQUITZ NOG PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 3200 TAHQUITZ MCCALLUM 3200 TAHQUITZ MCCALLUM PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508055009 508056010 508056017 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY USA BIA USA BIA PALM SPRINGS UNKNOWN 09-11-97 UNKNOWN 11-09-1998 3200 TAHQUITZ MCCALLUM 0 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508066018 508057025 508060033 USA 508 USA 508 USA BIA UNKNOWN 070285 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 0 0 0 508060034 508060035 508064040 USA BIA USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 0 0 0 508070015 508070016 508070020 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO USA 508 CALIF 101 ASH ST UNKNOWN P O BOX 152206 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 0 IRVING TX 75015 508070026 508070028 508070030 ESSEX HOUSE CONDOMINIUM O&M TAHQUITZ BRE ESA PROP CORP 1 MACARTHUR PL STE 300 345 PARK AVE 1 MARRIOTT DR SANTA ANA CA 92707 NEW YORK NY 10154 WASHINGTON DC 20058 508070034 508070035 508070038 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 070285 ADDRESS UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 070285 0 05-31-2006 0 0 508070039 508070040 508070042 USA 508 PELE TAHQUITZ 5 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF UNKNOWN 1 MACARTHUR PL NO 300 PALM SPRINGS 3200 E TAHQUITZ CYN WAY 0 SANTA ANA CA 92707 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 iA 508070047 508070048 508070049 USA BIA USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 UNKNOWN 02-19.2002 UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 0 0 0 508070050 508071041 508071087 USA BIA USA BIA USA 508 UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-09-2002 UNKNOWN 0 0 0 508081002 508081003 508081008 PLAZA WELMAS INC PLAZA INDIAN AVENUE INC USA BIA 115 S INDIAN CANYON DR UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 03-31-2004 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 *0 508082003 508082006 508082007 USA 508 USA BIA USA 508 NONE UNKNOWN 06-22-2005 UNKNOWN 0 *0 0 508082074 508084002 508084004 USA BIA ST LOUIS INVESTMENT CORP USA 508 UNKNOWN 05-21-2001 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 07-13-79 0 0 0 508084007 508084008 508085002 USA 508 USA 508 PLAZA INDIAN AVENUE INC UNKNOWN 07-13-79 UNKNOWN 07-13-79 UNKNOWN 0 0 0 508085004 508085005 508086002 USA 508 ROBRAY HOTEL PARTNERSHIP USA BIA UNKNOWN 1150 BALLENA BLV STE 220 UNKNOWN 09-12-97 0 ALAMEDA CA 94501 0 508086003 508087001 508087007 USA 508 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SB USA 508 UNKNOWN 1201 E HIGHLAND AVE UNKNOWN 0 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92404 0 508088066 508088091 508100007 PALM SPRINGS MODERN HOMES I PALM SPRINGS MODERN HOMES I USA BIA 74140 EL PASEO NO 4 74140 EL PASEO NO 4 UNKNOWN 10-07-98 PALM DESERT CA92260 PALM DESERT CA92260 0 508100019 508100024 508100032 USA 508 PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL USA BIA UNKNOWN DIST UNKNOWN 06-30-1999 0 980 E,TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY *0 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 508100034 508100035 508100038 USA 508 USA 508 USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF UNKNOWN UNKNOWN CAHUILLA 0 0 P 0 BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 508100039 508100040 508103013 USA 508 USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF P 0 BO 2 X 2245 PALM SPRINGS MODERN HOMES IJ 0 P 0 BO UNKNOWN 10-17.88 74140 EL PASEO NO 4 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM DESERT CA 92260 508/03026 508103039 508103052 PALM SPRINGS MODERN HOMES If PALM SPRINGS MODERN HOMES 11 PALM SPRINGS MODERN HOMES 11 74140 EL PASEO NO 4 74140 EL PASEO NO 4 74140 EL PASEO NO 4 PALM DESERT CA92260 PALM DESERT CA92260 PALM DESERT CA92260 508531067 508540015 508540016 COMMON LOT USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN P 0 BOX 2245 P O BOX 2245 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508540017 508540018 508540019 USA 508 USA BIA USA BIA P 0 BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 01-05-1999 UNKNOWN 12-27-96 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 0 508540020 508540021 508560001 USA BIA USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 01-05-2004 P 0 BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 508570009 508580044 508580045 SOUTH PARK DEV USA 508 USA 508 1919 GRAND AVE NO 2A P 0 BOX 2245 P O BOX 2245 SAN DIEGO CA 92109 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508580046 508580047 508580050 USA 508 USA BIA USA 508 P O BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 04-28-2006 P 0 BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 `0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508580051 508580052 508530053 USA BIA USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 05-02-2006 P 0 BOX 2245 P O BOX 2245 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508580054 508580067 508580069 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 P O BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 08.06.2004 UNKNOWN 08-06-2004 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 0 l nos- 14 d `1 P61 508580071 508580074 508580075 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 P 0 BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 08-06-2004 P O BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508581041 508581075 508582041 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 P 0 BOX 2245 P 0 BOX 2245 UNKNOWN PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 508582090 513081009 513081010 USA 508 CARMINE T PRENESTI G &W PARTNERS UNKNOWN 360 N. PALM CANYON DRIVE 73612 HIGHWAY 111 0 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM DESERT CA 92260 513081011 513081012 513081013 HARRY MOSCATEL PROJECT 92 CHARLOTTE DEATRICK 1704 ALLISON WAY 303 N. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE 38256 PLACER CREEK ST REDLANDS CA 92373 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 MURRIETA CA 92562 513081014 513081015 513081016 JOEL SILVERMAN ALI MOLAZADEH HARRY MOSCATEL 4589 VIA VISTOSA 310 N PALM CANYON DR 1704 ALLISON WAY SANTA BARBARA CA 93100 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 REDLANDS CA 92373 513081018 513081019 513091001 G &W PARTNERS G &W PARTNERS ALBERT SIMAY 73612 HWY 111 73612 HWY 111 2445 BRANT UNIT 502 PALM DESERT CA 92260 PALM DESERT CA 92260 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 513091002 513091003 513091004 PROJECT 92 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF 303 N INDIAN CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 3200 E TAHQUITZ CYN WAY P 0 BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 513091005 513091008 513091010 WHITE BROTHERS INV CO SCOTT SIMMONS ADASS ROLAND REVOCABLE 71905 HWY 111 STE E 202 N PALM CANYON DR TRUST WICH AVE VAN NU6639 NORR RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 YS CA 91405 513091011 513091012 513091016 CHARLES GRONE FERDINAND ROSE RALPH GAYTAN 1454 E GEM CIR P O BOX 1003 850 AVENIDA ACAPULCO PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 513091017 513091018 513091020 ALFRED MCBRIDE WHITE BROTHERS INV HENRY FRANK 292 N. PALM CANYON DRIVE 71905 HIGHWAY 111 STE E 550 N CAHUILLA RD PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 513091021 513091022 513091023 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS P O BOX 2743 P O BOX 2743 P O BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 513091024 513091025 513091026 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON P 0 BOX 2743 P 0 BOX 2743 CO PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 P 0 BOX 800 ROSEMEAD CA 91770 513092003 513092004 513092005 WESSMAN HOLDINGS HENRY FRANK FRANK PROP 300 S PALM CANYON DR 121 S PALM CANYON STE 216 550 N CAHUILLA RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 513092006 513092007 513092009 EARL STAHL PLAZA INVESTMENT INC WESSMAN HOLDINGS 808 E HIGHLAND AVE 115 S INDIAN AVE 300 S PALM CANYON DR REDLANDS CA 92374 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 5/3092010 513094009 513143005 WESSMAN HOLDINGS JOEL RETTEW CHARL CDONALD 300 S PALM CANYON DR 10424 BROOKSHIRE AVE 826 ALHAMBRA UNIT N PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 DOWNEY CA 90241 UNA WOODS CA 92653 513143006 513143008 513143009 EDWIN KRIKORIAN BRANDENBURG OASIS PLAZA BRANDENBURG OASIS PLAZA 149 STOCKBRIDGE AVE 1122 WILLOW ST STE 200 1122 WILLOW ST STE 200 ATHERTON CA 94027 SAN JOSE CA 95125 SAN JOSE CA 95125 513143019 51314400/ 513144002 PLAZA MERCADO PLAZA LAS FLORES PLAZA LAS FLORES 300 S PALM CANYON DR 300 S PALM CANYON DR 300 S PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 513144005 513144006 513144007 MITCHELL$LAYMAN CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS P O BOX 3190 P O BOX 2743 P O BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 513144010 513144011 513144009 COMMUNITY REDEV AGENCY CITY WESSMAN HOLDINGS PLAZA INVESTMENT CO OF PALM SPRINGS 300 S PALM CANYON DR 0 P O BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 513144012 513144013 513153001 WESSMAN HOLDINGS WESSMAN HOLDINGS CURT TAUCHER 300 S PALM CANYON DR 300 S PALM CANYON DR 5335 E BROADWAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 LONG BEACH CA 90803 (L.e.. 'c� ,ld"yL der 502062001 502063014 MICHELLE MIKE 502062003 RANpALL KOOPS 208 N. LURING DRIVE SLAKE GOETZ 227 N. LURING DRIVE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 246 N. LURING DRIVE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 J 502064008 502064009 502064011 LURING PROP ELVIRA J DAGOSTINO AMIR FAYAZRAD 140 N. LURING DRIVE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 160 N. LURING DRIVE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 180 N. LURING DRIVE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 507195005 507195006 507195009 NANCY HOLLIDAY DAVID DOYLE BARBARA HENNE 401 E.VIA COLUSA 403 E.VIA COLUSA 509 E.VIA COLUSA PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 507195017 507211007 508021025 CYNTHIA BERARDI HILLERY JOHNSON DOLORES MEDINA 343 E.VIA COLUSA 500 N.VIA MIRALESTE 495 N. CALLE SANTA ROSA PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 508031015 508041008 508041001 PLAZA MOTORS MLM TORS Zt4 PALM SPRINGS AUCTIONS INC 290 N. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE IAN CANYON DRIVE 244 N. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 INGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 508100024 513081009 513081012 PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL CARMINE T PRENESTI PROJECT 92 DIST 360 N. PALM CANYON DRIVE 303 N. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE 980 E.TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 513091017 513154030 ALFRED MCBRIDE MARY DELGADO 292 N. PALM CANYON DRIVE 222 S. PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 LPL. S. /(o `/- V 4 /0 513153015 513154017 f M 513154018 COM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY iERTLAND FRANKS M JGD ASSOC CITY PALM SPRINGS SALTZMAN RD 794 2679 15TH AVE P O BOX 1 86 OR 97229 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94127 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 513154027 513154028 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS 513154030 P 0 BOX 2743 P 0 BOX 2743 MARY DELGADO PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 222 S. PALM CANYON DR PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 513154035 513154036 513154037 RICHARD SERVICE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS 222 S PALM CANYON DR P O BOX 2743 P O BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 513154038 513154039 513154042 RICHARD SERVICE BERNARD LEWIN THOMAS ADAMO 222 S PALM CANYON DR 16 SUMMER SKY CIRCLE 67627 S LAGUNA DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 CATHEDRAL CITY CA 92234 513154044 513154045 513154046 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS P O BOX 2743 3200 E TAHQUITZ CANYON 3200 TAHQUITZ CANYON WY PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 513/54049 513154050 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS THOMAS ADAMO 3200 TAHQUITZ CANYON WY 67627 S LAGUNA DR PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 CATHEDRAL CY CA 92234 n 508021001 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021004 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021005 508021006 508021007 AQUA CALIENTE BAND OF AGUA CALIENTE BAND DF AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021011 508021013 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY 650 TAHQUITZ CANYON A101 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021014 508021016 508021018 AGUA CALIENTE BAND CAHUILLA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WY 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021021 F AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021023 508021024 USA 508 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF UNKNOWN CAHUILLA INDIANS 0 650 E TAQUITZ CYN WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508021026 508022090 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF USA BIA CAHUILLA INDIANS UNKNOWN DS-01-1999 650 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY ,0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508031014 USA BIA UNKNOWN 01-01-97 0 508031015 508031016 508031017 PLAZA MOTORS USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 0 508031018 508031020 508031021 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 04-13-81 UNKNOWN 04-13-81 0 0 0 508032003 508032004 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 508035073 USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-04-98 0 508036049 508036051 508037049 USA BIA USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-04-98 UNKNOWN 05-04-98 UNKNOWN 05-04-98 0 0 0 508037050 508037051 USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-04-98 UNKNOWN 05-04-98 0 0 508041011 USA 508 UNKNOWN 0 508041012 508041013 508042006 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 P 0 BOX 2245 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 08-23-85 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 0 0 508042008 2009 508042010 USA BIA USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS USA BIA CAHUILLA INDIANS 600 E TAHQUITZ CYN WAY ADDRESS UNKNOWN P 0 BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 05.31 2006 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 <5( 508051051 508051055 508051088 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 0 508053003 508054003 508055003 USA 508 USA 508 USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF UNKNOWN 07-02-81 400 E TAHQUITZ WAY CAHUILLA INDIANS 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 P O BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 508056010 508056017 USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 09-11-97 UNKNOWN 11-09-1998 0 0 508056018 608057025 508060033 USA 508 USA 508 USA BIA UNKNOWN 070285 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 04.19-2002 0 0 0 508060034 508060035 508054040 USA BIA USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 0 0 0 508070020 USA 508 UNKNOWN 0 508070034 508070035 508070038 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 070285 ADDRESS UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 070285 0 05-31-2006 0 0 508070039 USA 508 UNKNOWN 0 �J 508070047 508070048 508070049 USA BIA USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 02.19.2002 UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 0 0 0 508070050 508071041 508071087 USA BIA USA BIA USA 508 UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-09-2002 UNKNOWN 0 0 0 508081008 USA BIA UNKNOWN 03-31.2004 "0 508082003 508082005 508082007 USA 508 USA BIA USA 508 NONE UNKNOWN 06-22.2005 UNKNOWN 0 .0 0 508082074 508084004 USA BIA USA 508 UNKNOWN 05-21-2001 UNKNOWN 07-13-79 0 0 508084007 508084008 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 07-13-79 UNKNOWN 07-13-79 0 0 508085004 508086002 USA 508 USA BIA UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 09-12-97 0 0 508086003 508087007 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 508100007 USA BIA UNKNOWN 1M7-98 0 508100019 508100032 USA 508 USA BIA UNKNOWN UNKNOWN O6.30-1999 0 '0 508100034 508100035 508100038 USA 508 USA 508 USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF UILLA UNKNOWN UNKNOWN P0 BOX 2 2245 0 0 P O BOX PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 508100039 508100040 USA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF USA 508 CAHUILLA UNKNOWN 10-17-88 0 P O BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263 508540015 508540016 USA 508 USA 508 P O BOX 2245 P O BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508540017 608540018 508540019 USA 508 USA BIA USA BIA P 0 BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 01-05-1999 UNKNOWN 12.27.96 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 0 508540020 508540021 508560001 USA BIA USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 01-05-2004 P 0 BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 508580044 508580045 USA 508 USA 508 P 0 BOX 2245 P O BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508580046 508580047 508580050 USA 508 USA BIA USA 508 P O BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 04-28-2006 P 0 BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 "0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508580051 508580052 508580053 USA BIA USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 05-02-2006 P 0 BOX 2245 P O BOX 2245 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508580054 508580067 508580069 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 P 0 BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 08.06.2004 UNKNOWN 08-06-2004 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 0 rz 508580071 508580074 508580075 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 P O BOX 2245 UNKNOWN 08-06-2004 P O BOX 2245 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 508581041 508581075 508582041 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 P O BOX 2245 P O BOX 2245 UNKNOWN PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 508582090 USA 508 UNKNOWN 0 PROOF OF PUBLICATION This is space for CoSrity Clack's Filing.Stamp (2015.5.C.C.P) u? !;1_ ` Cl a,l I I F: ?? No. 2238 NOTICE OF PUBLIC REARING CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.112i - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO RE-CLASSIFY THE PROPERTY FROM M-15 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)TO County of Riverside GC (GE ERAL COMMERCIAL)AND CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-G-AIR) AND R•2 TO PUNNED DEVELOPMENNTT DISTRICT 332' 3201 NORTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council_ of the City of Palm Uririgc, C,ddornia will hold a pWIIC 11caring at its meetin of Julyy 25 2007 The City Council meetingg beggins at 6.00 pm, in the I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of Canyon Chamber 11 city Hcll, 3200 East Tahquiss Canyon Way,tier Film Springs. the County aforesaid;I am over the age of eighteen The p aidar urpose of this hearing I:to con an ap- years,and got a party to or interested in the plies Ion by Khalil Adabouni for a proposed Gen- eral Plan Amendment to reclassify existingg IInd above-entitled matter.I am the principal Clerk of a use of M I5.(Medlum DerI Rwidcnbal) to GC. (General Commercial) and a change of zone from printer of the,DESERT SUN PUBLISHING R•G-A(6) and R-2 to and Development oi..- trict (P❑-332)to c;lnti now design standards COMPANY a newspaper of general circulation, and guidelines for the development of a retail printed and published in the city of Palm Springs, commerclal and office coin let to 1located at. County of Riverside,and which newspaper has been 3201 North Indian canyon rive adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside,State of California under the date of March 24,1988.Case Number 191236;that the notice,of which the annexed is a printed copy(set in type not smallerthan non pariel,has been published in each regular 'I --- and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates,to wit: July 14`h,2007 .._.......—............... --^ All in the year 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL DFTERMINATION.• A Draft No ahvc Declaration was prepared for this project I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the un.�er.the guidelines of the Call ern a Enuironmon- tat Cualiry Act(CERA)and will be reviewed by the foregoing is true and correct. City Council at the hearing.Members of the pub- Ile mayy view this doopment at the ploy Ser- vices o pvtmenl City Hall, 3200 East Tahqultz Dated at Palm Springs,California this--17", --day Canyon ay, Palm Springs, and submit written Y comments at, or prior to, the Cly Cnuncil huar- Ing, Of------ July ,2007 REVIEW OF PROJECT INFORMATION:The•daft report and Omer supperlmg documents regarding thi^protect arc also available for public Ievlew aT the iry Hell between the hours of 5•00 a m.and 5.00 p m.Monday uIrougn Frldayyy Plcasc contact [IlC Ific� Of the city Clerk(760)323-8209 If you r would liks to schedule an appointment to review ........-W- - --_-----_�-- -- - -��-T these documents, Sig turf COMMENT ON THIS rIAPPLICATION'Rea on.^•e m min notice may be i'q be verbally at the Public to Sting and/or in writing before the hearing. nin ten comments may bf made, r the Pfann�n19 Commission by letter (icr mail or hand delivery) to James Thompson City Clerk 3200 E Tahquitz 6-myan Way Palm Springs CA 82262 Any challenge of the proposed project in court' mayy 7e limited to raising only those project ralsetl at tho public hearing described In this ne4Ce or in written correspondenee m;livured la the pity Clerk at, or pnor, to the public hearing (Govern- mcnt Code Section 6600�(b)(2)). An opporlurllly will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard.Ouesngns regard- Ing mL case may nu directed to Fred Lawhdes Planning Scmccs Department,at(760)323-8245. raj/) SI Ciudad ayuda con ring carl;y edepurfavor Marne a (J� la dine Fl ge Palm Springs 3 p-824 hablar con Nadine Fleger telefono ry6o) 323-3245. -James Thompson City Clerk 1 Published-7/14/2007 4ALM F Sp koxo A Office of Elie City Clerk OGAiF�♦4� J'_00 I, T.Ih tI LIICL Canyon %X41y ° Palm Springs, California 9226' C"941po?' 0 ' Tkl. (760) 32a-8 204 • bas. (760) 322-8332 ° Web: www.palm.prin Y-[.t.oul July 13, 2007 Ms, Claudia Salgado Bureau of Indian Affairs P. 0. Box 2245 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Dear Ms. Salgado: RE: City Council Meeting --July 25, 2007 Case 5.1104 - General Plan Amendment- Section 14 Specific Plan The City Council of the City of Palm Springs will be conducting a public hearing relating to the above referenced on July 25, 2007. Enclosed are 10 copies of the public hearing notice to be forwarded to the appropriate Indian landowner(s) within the 400 ft. radius of the project location, and copies of labels identifying each parcel. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions or concerns, 323-8204. Sincerely, t4 Kathie Hart, CIVIC Chief Deputy City Clerk lkdh PHN to SIA-GPA Section 14 01-25.07 doc Encl: Public Hearing Notice (10 copies) Mailing Labels Post: Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 e ' e ' � r ' r ' � r r s 508021023 USA 508 UNKNOWN 0 508022090 USA BIA UNKNOWN 08-01-1999 * 0 508031014 USA BIA UNKNOWN 01-01-97 0 ,cRAR- -r. //d 4- 5�^ [ J 508051051 508051055 508051088 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 0 508053003 USA 508 UNKNOWN 07-02-81 0 508056010 508056017 USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 09-11-97 UNKNOWN 11-09-1998 0 0 508056018 508057025 508060033 USA 508 USA 508 - USA BIA UNKNOWN 070285 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 0 0 0 508060034 508060035 508064040 USA BIA USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-19-2002 0 0 0 ^^ ^^ 508070020 USA 508 UNKNOWN 0 508070034 508070035 508070038 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 070285 ADDRESS UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 070285 0 05-31-2006 0 0 508070039 ISA 508 UNKNOWN 0 508100034 508100035 ✓ USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 508100039 USA 508 UNKNOWN 10-17-88 0 508531067 COMMON LOT UNKNOWN 0 508540018 508540019 USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 01-05-1999 UNKNOWN 12-27-96 0 0 508540020 508560001 USA BIA USA 508 UNKNOWN 01.05-2004 UNKNOWN 0 0 508580047 USA BIA UNKNOWN 04-28-2006 * 0 508580051 USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-02-2006 0 508580067 508580069 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN 08-06-2004 UNKNOWN 08�06-2004 0 0 4 I6 o "ice V-PA cz) 508580074 USA 508 UNKNOWN 08-06-2004 0 508581075 508582041 USA 508 USA 508 P O BOX 2245 UNKNOWN PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 0 508582090 USA 508 UNKNOWN 0 508070047 508070048 508070049 USA BIA USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 0 0 0 508070050 508071041 508071087 USA BIA USA BIA USA 508 UNKNOWN 02-19-2002 UNKNOWN 04-09-2002 UNKNOWN a 0 0 508081003 508081008 PLAZA INDIAN AVENUE INC USA BIA UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 03-31.2004 0 *0 508082003 508082005 508082007 USA 508 USA BIA USA 508 NONE UNKNOWN 06-22-2005 UNKNOWN 0 *0 0 508082074 508084002 508084004 USA BIA ST LOUIS INVESTMENT CORP USA 508 UNKNOWN 05-21-2001 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 07-13-79 0 0 0 508034007 508084008 508085002 USA 508 USA 508 PLAZA INDIAN AVENUE INC UNKNOWN 07-13-79 UNKNOWN 07-13-79 UNKNOWN 0 0 0 508085004 508086002 USA 508 USA BIA UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 09-12-97 0 0 508086003 508087007 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 508100007 USA BIA UNKNOWN 10-07-98 0 508100019 508100032 USA 508 USA BIA UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 06.30-1999 0 0 61 �L pr n 508031015 O 508031016 508031017 PLAZA M RS ko USA 508 USA 508 29D N. IAN CANYON DRIVE UNKNOWN UNKNOWN PA SPRINGS, CA 92262 0 0 508031018 508031020 508031021 USA 508 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 04-13-81 UNKNOWN 04-13-81 0 0 0 508032003 508032004 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0 0 508035073 USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-04-98 0 508036049 508036051 USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-04-98 UNKNOWN 05-04-98 0 0 508037050 508037051 USA BIA USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-04-98 UNKNOWN 05-04.98 0 0 508037049 USA BIA UNKNOWN 05-04-98 0 508041009 508041011 WALTE COBERLY ('I USA 508 593 CC ST UNKNOWN S FRANCISCO CA 94105 0 508041013 508042006 USA 508 USA 508 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 08-23-85 0 0 508042009 USA BIA ADDRESS UNKNOWN 05-31-2006 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.1127 — GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-CLASSIFY THE PROPERTY FROM M -15 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-G-A(6) AND R-2 TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 332 3201 NORTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a public hearing at its meeting of July 25, 2007. The City Council meeting begins at 6:00 pm, in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. The purpose of this hearing is to consider an application by Khalil Ailabouni, for a proposed General Plan Amendment to reclassify existing land use of M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and a change of zone from R-G-A(6) and R-2 to Planned Development District (PD-332) to establish new design standards, and guidelines for the development of a retail commercial and office complex to be located at 3201 North Indian Canyon Drive. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A Draft Negative Declaration was prepared for this project under the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and will be reviewed by the City Council at the hearing. Members of the public may view this document at the Planning Services Department, City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, and submit written comments at, or prior to, the City Council hearing. REVIEW OF PROJECT INFORMATION: The staff report and other supporting documents regarding this project are also available for public review at the City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk (760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these documents. COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the Public Hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the Planning Commission by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to.- James Thompson, City Clerk 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, OF prior, to the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009(b)(2)). An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. Questions regarding this case may be directed to Fred Lowndes, Planning Services Department, at (760) 323- 8245. _ Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, parfavor [lame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs_y puede hablar-.C:On Nadine Mager telefono (760) 323-8245. F / ames Thompson, City Clerk 000074 N " Department of Planning Services w+E Vicinity Map s 7 rl �i w - ------------ I LPNRic:.c Ro I I Y - ------ MOWNO RD W . NTACA LINARO SMUSIRD o ....�.--.w..... ..,. T SUMS R w5 --__---_ L INOSEY R❑ __— . Legend yHCARLPs Ro 1 a Project Site =�...I•._-_.I ....„. .Q - --r------ s 400'Radus ` tANTA,CURAWV S ------------- --- - nSurrounding Parcels ------- - 1 I CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO. 5.1127 GPA/ CZ DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this hearing is to consider an application by Khalil Ailabouni, for a proposed APPLICANT: Khalil Ailabouni General Plan Amendment to reclassify existing land use of M15 (Medium Density Residential) to GC (General Commercial) and a change of zone from R-G-A(6) and R-2 to Planned Development District (PD-332) to establish new design standards, and guidelines for the development of a retail commercial and office complex to be located at 3201 North Indian Canyon Drive- APN: 504-121-005, 504-121- 006, 504-121-010. 060075