The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6/13/2007 - STAFF REPORTS - 1.B. L. f Date: June 12, 2007 To: City Cleric of Palm Springs, Ca FROM: Margaret Gordinier CII RE: Case No 5,1157 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT THE WELL IN THE DESERT 188-304 WEST SAN RAFAEL ROAD Dear Sirs: I am opposed to the conditional use permit for THE WELL IN THE DESERT. My opposition is based on the following: 1. SAFETY ISSUE; a. EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC on a minor street linking to Palm Canyon and the 10 Freeway. This area has become a high density area with new condo development already begun on Indian Canyon and San Rafael plus a proposal for additional condos on San Rafael and Puerta del Sol. The existing San Rafael industrial area has had an expansion of new industrial building that further contributes to the excessive traffic in this area. San Rafael Road was not built to accommodate the added stress of people corning to pick up their food at this location. i. NO ADEQUATE PARKING AVAILABLE for the excessive traffic created by vehicles congregating at this location. al'r' S� - le4le- HIGH CRIME AREA already exists in this location. Loitering, break-ins and trespass onto private property could be accelereated_ SANITATION could be an issue of an already on- going problem of the homeless camping on the empty lots and using the bushes as a public restroom. LITTERING is a problem in this area with beer cans, food wrappers, trash thrown on the side of the road on San Rafael and in the residential property on Santa Catalina. FIRE is a concern with people smoking in these areas and throwing cigarettes in the bushes along the south side of San Rafael. PROPERTY VALUES would deteriorate if this problem is allowed to develop. BURDEN TO THE POLICE. More police surveillance would be needed to make the area safe. I am sensitive to the needs of the needy. I have provided legal assistance , helped them obtain shelter, clothing, food and jobs and have represented many of them in court hearings for additional governmental help. 202 San Rafael Road is not the proper location to establish this needed assistance. Sincerely, Margaret Gordinier 202 Wes a to to in �9 r 1 L` ,.%jNll��•��•;/"-c.r:f.:r �L E=' . :(; ��i�..��v:.� ��,.-y�L a,.,cyj" i Jay Thompson From: Craig Ewing Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10:58 AM To: David Ready; Tom Wilson; Edward Robertson, David Newell; Bill Scott (SCOTT]NPS@aol.com); Dianne Marantz, drracer@aol.com; Jon Caffery (jon@firstprioritymortgage.com); Leo Cohen (ps4leo@aol.com); Rick Hutcheson (rick@vacationpalmsprings.com); Toni Ringlein (tringlein@ earth Iink.net); Chris Mills; Ginny Foat; Jay Thompson; Martha Edgmon; Michael McCulloch; Ron Oden; Steve Pougnet Subject: Well in the Desert To Al I, In response to a couple of questions I've received, staff contacted the local office of the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health about any County Health permits required for the food distribution facility. They reported that there is a case opened on the Well's proposal, however, the case worker was not available and there is no specific status they could report today. Nevertheless, it does appear that the Well's application will be evaluated by the County, and if they determine that it falls under their jurisdiction they will regulate it accordingly. I hope this information is helpful. - Craig A. Ewing, AICP - Director of Planning Services - City of Palm Springs ozoa ��/'T/On�A4 N/A7�rAL5 6/13/2007 i Z q-tu� .i0, ZOO", , W✓. L ll( stems s-. MkQ� X s uue aA-L C/ft klc 4-c& - �. ka- u-.eu 4e e O..-v &Y, 44uu-e (9�-a-�StL' h s 4U. �t�Sf 0C�Le , 50PU&J -L &J04C Jr'yL"� I�uS h.G d'.5 tri c tiC . .�L a .io'� AL AL O�C�Jtf<to�5 - _L)'-V_ly_GL�1� 7 vi p 1 �i Lt o, Y44. .u G i-A un s (�U). -b%6v, .h b ft' Q LJ17 t�5 5 `tie Sfhe , eA 2A' - vr�-�Ir-e�-+'� �- �M v) 61, &i,u_ u.qj-L- F L . Ll Nl (ICI UfJJI S Lnl-p& -e LNzi u�d �� r� ?�c�rx� 5 a rl c� pu J t ,4 mv) Pc C�1 ��► �� a ct r c * LA O-n {,,i'i-C°1.�'C K UIINU '.. '.,:275'r1 /.,•�"� L[vi3r4--- J 7bomasA Barbara Hi!! `Y 550'W. Pico Road palm. CA 92262 5P�. ��D4r11 � phu Page 1 of 2 Cindy Berardi From: Michelle LaPrise [mlapnse@pacbell.net] P 1 Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:40 PM L[ILA. I, ➢ ' i"k1 1: Vy' To; CraigEwing@palmsprings-ca.gov iJ 0 Cc: CityClerk@palmsprings-ca.gov - •• Subject; URGENT! Pls- include this letter in pekg distrib. to council members/public at June 13 Mtg.for"Well in the Desert" Mr. Chris LaFornara, an individual Avalon Property Development, Inc. P.O. Box 40345 San Diego, CA 92164 Tel: 619-283-6611 Fax: 619-283 2373 June 12, 2007 Ms. Ginny Foat, Councilmember Mr. Mike McCulloch, Councilmember Mr. Chris Mills, Councilmember City of Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92263-2743 RE: Well in the Desert proposal near our property at 400 E San Rafael Rd. (Case 0.2826-MAJ) Dear City of Palm Springs Council Members and Plamung Dept: We were very alarmed to learn From a neighboring business on E. San Rafael Road that the City is considering allowing the non-profit organization, 'GVell in the Desert"to establish a "feed the homeless"operation in close proximity to our approved development site at the above-captioned address- We did not receive a notice about a public hearing on this proposed use. Upon completing a lengthy and costly process, we received approval from the Planning Commission in March, 2007 to build a 53-unit business park on our 6.5 acre parcel. We have been diligently moving forward with this major development project. It will provide jobs and additional tax revenue to the City of Palm Springs, and enhance the North Palm Springs neighborhood. This letter stands as formal notice to all relevant City departments that while we support the efforts of helping disadvantaged populations, we do not support the establishment of this non-profit enterprise near our property for reasons of safety, trash, and the potential for crime that accompanies the transient population that seeks such services- Although these types of enterprises provide a valuable service to disadvantaged populations, experience has also shown they attract crowds that come early and linger long after they have been fed. Often they engage in illicit activity, panhandle, drink, urinate, sleep, etc. in public view, and pose an uncom£ortable, threatening presence to neighbors. We have already witnessed a great amount of suspicious (drug?) activity at the adjacent parcel, "Manna Ole's Soul Food", over the past year. The addition of this feed-the-homeless program will only increase the questionable traffic at this property. This type of activity near our site will negatively impact the value oFproperty in the area, the desirability among Aoa 1 7 aV,44 Mf7 77�P4/JL 6/12/2007 &/,.3/0_,� Page 2 of 2 potential buyers to purchase our industrial condo units, and the level of security among everyone in this newly- emerging business and residential community. We are baffled that,throughout our many conversations with Planning Dept. employees and the Board approval, no mention was ever made to us of this proposed use near our site which clearly impacts the viability of our project. As impending members of the Palm Springs business community, we look forward to being active financial supporters of many charitable causes—including programs that feed indigent populations—but we do not support the installation of such services within shouting distance of our recently approved business development site. If you have any questions or need additional information,please do not hesitate to contact me at 619-990-4711. Sincerely, MICHELLE LaPRISE Managing Member Desert Oasis Industrial Lofts, LLC for Chris LaPornara, an individual Avalon Property Development, Inc. Cc: Mr. Craig Ewing, AICP Director of Planning Services Mr. David H. Ready, Esq., Ph.D. 6/12/2007 ".,Ma.," Department of Planning Services WN E ` ' Vicinity Map s 4 enH`� a OASIS F. 1� w / a v c� U SAN RAFAEL R� I 0 x l 0 r a JA V z• 0 a z Legend sa® _ R odiu e CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO: 5.1157 CUP DESCRIPTION: The purpose of both hearings is to consider an application by Well in the Desert for a APPLICANT: The Well in the Desert Conditional Use Permit to operate a philanthropic/charitable use. The proposal is a food distribution facility to economically challenged families on Saturdays only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., Zane M1, Section 34. SUN-12-07 14:45 FROM:CLAIM ATTORNEY iGIS7156306 T0:7603220360 PAGE.02 nr Azul at Palm Springs Homeowners Association V: 12 124 W. San Carlos Rd. Palm Springs, CA 92262 i-, 760 327-4573 dune 12, 2007 VIA FAX City of Palm Springs Planning Com.tzussion 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Attn: Craig Ewing,Director of Planning Services 1'te: Case No.: 5.1157—CUP Meeting June 13, 2007 - Agenda item#6 Dear Mr. Ewing: 1 am writing this letter on behalf of the Azul at Palm Springs Homeowners Association, to oppose the conditional use permit under discussion for the Well in the Desert to relocate to 202 San:ILafael. We are a small development of four homes on the corner of Indian and San Carlos built in 7004. All of us purchased our homes here as opposed to other neighborhoods in the City because of the uniqueness of the area. Indeed, when my partner and myself first began looking for a home in Palm Spriggs some six years ago, we saw much potential for the neighborhood. The old Alexanders on the other side of Indian were beginniag to be rediscovered and restored. The 7 famous Wexler steel frame houses were getting attention and being refurbished. h1 the three short years since we've located to this neighborhood we have seen a genuine rebirth in the area.We've had new,quality developments such as Palermo, The Towers,43 c@Racquet Club, and a little further down the street,Murano. W e have the old mini-estates and old Spanish style homes being restored and rebuilt alongside the newer modern style homes such as outs. The Racquet Club itself is being redeveloped and the historic Bamboo room restored. The entire area is undergoing a revitalization that stands to be derailed if this conditional use permit is granted. We all applaud the noble cause that the Well in the Desert serves. We have the utmost compassion,for their clients. However,the location does not appear well thought out to benefit either the clients of the Well in the Desert or the neighborhood it will be located in. It is difficult to believe the Staff report was authored by anyone familiar with San Rafael Road. San Rafael is a small two lane street with no curbs or sidewalks and building with little setback from the street. With the new development in the area the traffic has ,40VI7701JAL SUN-12-07 14:46 FROM:CLAIM ATTORNEY 18167156366 TO:7603226360 PAGE:03 increased dramatically. With the addition of Palermo, Murano and the planned expansion of Four Seasons down on Sunrise,traffic will continue to increase and create an extreme danger to both the clients walking to the Well as well as the vehicular traffic, As soon as someone is maimed or killed the City will be the first to be sued. Aside from the traffic safety issue there is the inevitable issue of neighborhood safety and appearance.While we are told the clients are families in need, our understanding is that food is also distributed to transient people, some of whom have severe mental problems and difficulty functioning in a rational manner. I note from the Commission report there is a recommendation to require the site be locked and secured when not in use and loitering prohibited, Where do you think the loiterers will go if they are run offsite? I can hazard a guess it will be tho vacant lot behind out homes, the stretch of our property on Indian or perhaps even in our back yards. Where will the homeless consume their meals7 Again, my guess would be in the vacant lots behind our homes or in our yards. Where will the refuse wind up?Again,behind our homes our in our yards. The final concern is that there is absolutely nothing in the Plant-ling Commission report that addresses the effect this will have on our neighborhood or proposes any conditions that would alleviate our fears. A few blocks down from us we have a family shelter. Another block over is a drug rehab house. This isn't an issue of`hot in our backyard"but an issue of"not everything in our backyard'. While we believe in the importance and legitimacy of these social service organizations, do not kill the rebirth of our neighborhood by locating in our neighborhood every social agency that other areas refuse, Indeed,I can't believe your recommendation would be the same should this conditional use permit be requested for Las Palmas or even Aeepwell. Sincerely, i'�J Greg Schroeder President, Azul at palm Springs Homeowners Association Jun 11 07 08:48p Richard R Squibb 760 325 4808 p 1 RICHARD R. SQM13B 2, 640 CAMELLIA STREET PALM SPRINGS. CA 92262 (T)760 325 8081 (F) 760 325 4808 June 11,2007 Honorable Ron Oden, Mayor Members, City Council City of Palm Springs,CA Faxed to: Office of City Clerk, Fax#322 3332 RE: PROPOSED WELL 1N T14E DESERT LOCATION ON SAN RAFAEL Mr. Mayor and City Council Members: As a property owner near the proposed location requiring a conditional use permit, 1 am r-.7iting to strongly recommend a vote against the operation of a food di_tribution facility on West San Rafael Road. My reasons are as follows: 1) we have enough problems with some of the activities in Desert Highlands,and adding this element will simply multiply those problems creating more issues for the neighborhood and the law enforcement agencies already dealing with them 2) the entire neighborhood is being redeveloped with such developments as Murano, Palermo, Avalon, Racquet Ciub,Riviera,eta and allowing the operation of a thrift shop and food distribution center will bave a negative impact on the current residents along with the future residents the developers are looking to invest in some very nice new communities 3) developers who have not broken ground may be tinned off by having this operation in such a high pmfile location which means the current momentum fur redevelopment may be thwarted with some developers walking away 4) the north end location is not centrally located for the economically challenged families to pick up their supplies, which could mean walking long distances to pick up the food- I know the Well in the Desert provides some wonderful l services,but there must he a more appmpriate location for this facility that would better serve their clientele and not be a step backwards for a neighborhood that will be rapidly increasing its contributions to the tax base of the City of palm Springs through its redevelopment efforts in the near future- Please do not allow this facility to relocate;to West San Rafael Road. Sincere) r V Jun 11 07 08'50p Richard R Squibb 760 325 4808 p.1 ROY W- CODY 640 CAMELLIA STPX- T PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 (T)760 325 0081 (IF)760 325 4809 June 11, 2007 Honorable Ron Oden, Mayor Membcrs, City Council City of Palm Springs, CA Faxed to: Office of City Clerk,Fax�322 8332 RE: PROPOSED WELL IN THE DESERT LOCATION ON SAN RAFAI;L Mr.Mayor and City Council Members: As a property owner new the proposed location requiring a conditional use permit,I am writing to strongly recommend a vote against the operation of a food distribution facility on West San Rafael Road. My reasons are as follows: 1) we have enough problems with some of the activities in Desert Highlands,and adding this element will simply multiply Those problems creating more issues for the neighborhood and the law enforcement agencies already dealing with them 2) the entire neighborhood is being redeveloped with such developments as Murano, Palermo,Avalon,Raoquet Club,Riviera,etc.and allowing the operation of a tbrift shop and food distribution center will have a negative impact on the current residents along with the future residents the developers are looking to invest in some very nice new communities 3) developers who have not broken ground may be turned off by having this operation in such a high profile location which means the current momentum for redevelopment may be thwarted with some developers walking away 4) the north end location is not centrally located for the economically challenged families to pick up their supplies,which could mean walking long distances to pick up the food. 1 know the Well in the Desert provides some wonderful services, but there must be a more appropriate location for this facility that would better serve their clientele and not be a step backwards for a neighborhood that will be rapidly increasing its contributions to the tax base of the City of Palm Springs through its redevelopment efforts in the near future. Please do not allow this facility to relocate to West San Rafael Road. S incerely, ��i�/ 7 06/11/2007 00: 09 7608662505 GORDINIER PAGE 02/02 1 1 Juve 2007 2C27 i CITY CT.-- City Clerk Sir; I am responding to the notice of public planning commission slated for June 13. I am the executor and possibly new owner of property located a 202 W Santa Catalina in Pahn Springs adjacent to property where the Well in the Desert Lease is being considered. I wish to voice my objection to this use of that property. It is an area where upscale homes are being developed and which has been subject to property invasions and breakins. Use of the adjoining property as homeless use including using property as a bathroom and dumping ground for miscellaneous trash. Limited parking is available due narrow streets and much parking is being done on private property adjoining the street_ The area is zoned for single family private homes and further use of businesses of any type is an invasion of private property and will result in decreasing the property value of any existing structures as well as any additional building in the future_ Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Richard H. Gordinier, M.D., J.D. 3222452 202 W Santa Catalina �-PDi7pv�t. HIf��rf�. 06/11/2007 00:09 7608632505 GORDINIER PAGE 01/02 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION & CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM SPPINGS CASE NO. 5.1157 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT THE WELL IN THE DESERT 188-304 WEST SAN RAFAEL ROAD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a public hearing at its meeting of June 13, 2007. The planning Commission meeting begins at 1:30 p.m., in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. and NOTICE I5 HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a public hearing at its meEti rofdure 1.9; 2007: The City Council meeting begi L 6:-00 p.m., in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. The purpose of both hearings is to consider an application by Well in the Desert for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a philanthropic/charitable use. The proposal is a food distribution facility to economically challenged families on Saturdays only between the hours of 7:00 a-m_ to 10:30 a.m., Zone M1, Section 34. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(a) (Class 1 - Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REVIEW OF PROJECT INFORMATION: The proposed application, site plan and related documents are available for public review at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these documents. COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the Public Hearing andlor in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the Planning Commission andlor City Council by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to-- James Thompson, City Clerk �, K 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Cc J-1 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clark at, or prior, to the public hearing, (Government Code Section 65009[b][2j)_ An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. Questions regarding this case may be directed to David Newell, Department of Planning Services at (760) 323-8245. Si neceslta ayuda con esta carta, porfavor (lame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs y puede hablar con Nadine Fieger telefono (760) 323-8245. es Thompson, City Clerk �pF FALM SpR iy U rn s# ryCOej ;W Cq4lFORa,P CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: June 13, 2007 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: CASE NO. 5.1157, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION BY WELL IN THE DESERT TO OPERATE A FOOD DISTRIBUTION FACILITY LOCATED AT 202 WEST SAN RAFAEL DRIVE. FROM: David H. Ready, City Manager BY: Department of Planning Services SUMMARY Well in the Desert, lessee, has requested a Conditional Use Permit (Type II), to operate an institution of philanthropic or charitable nature. The use would be operated by Well in the Desert which would distribute food baskets to economically challenged families on Saturdays only between 7:00 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. The proposed location is an existing 1,125 square foot tenant space within a multi-tenant commercial / industrial building located at 202 San Rafael Drive Drive. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony. 2. Staff will report the Planning Commission recommendation following their public hearing of June 13, 2007. PRIOR ACTIONS: On June 13, 2007, the Planning Commission will be reviewing the project prior to the City Council meeting. STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant has proposed a food distribution center to the economically challenged families at 202 San Rafael Drive. Pursuant to Section 94.02.00(A)(2)(j) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code (PSZC), institutions of a philanthropic or charitable nature require a Type II Conditional Use Permit and are permitted with the necessary findings. ITEM NO. City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 2 5.1157 CUP June 13,2007 A more detailed analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 13, 2007. A notice was mailed to all property owners within four hundred feet of the subject site as required by the law. Staff has received letters of opposition from the public, which are attached for the Council's review. FISCAL IMPACT: IFinance Director Review.- There is no cost to the City associated with the construction of the proposed wireless communications facility. ai ing, AIC I Thomas Wilson,/Assistant City Manager Dir&tofof Planninices 4 David H. Ready, City r Attachment: 1. Planning Commission staff report and attachments (dated 6113/07) L_ �0 ` Of ?ALht S` V N k F C °`"" „ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ��1F4R��A Date: June 13, 2007 Case No.: 5.1157— CUP Type: Conditional Use Permit Location: 202 West San Rafael Drive APN: 669-452-040 Applicant: The Well in the Desert General Plan: M-1 (Service / Manufacturing Zone) Zone: IND (Industrial) From: Craig A. Ewing, AICP, Director of Planning Services Project Planner: David A. Newell, Assistant Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested a Type II Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the distribution of food baskets containing groceries to economically challenged families on Saturdays only between 7:00 A.M. and 10:30 A.M. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission recommends approval of Case 5.1157 — CUP, a Conditional Use Permit to allow food distribution to economically challenged families at 202 West San Rafael Drive. . _ u[2( 2, Planning Commission Staff Report June 13, 2007 Case 5.1157- CUP Page 2 of 5 BACKGROUND: The Well in the Desert has been occupying a temporary location at 181 North Indian Canyon Drive for approximately one year and now wishes to relocate to an existing mixed-use complex located on San Rafael Drive. The project will occupy approximately 1,125 square feet and will be located in unit#202-F. Table 1: The surrounding Land Uses are tabled below: General Plan Zone Land Use North GC M-1 Industrial / Commercial South M15 R-2 Vacant East GC M-1 Industrial / Commercial West GC M-1 Industrial / Commercial ANALYSIS: The General Plan designation of the subject site is IND (Industrial). Objective 3.30.6 of the IND designation states, "allow for the development of storage, distribution, assembly, service commercial and research and office facilities." The proposed use is the distribution of food baskets to economically challenged families. The site is located within the M-1 zone. Pursuant to Section 94.02.00(A)(2)0) of the Palm Springs Zoning Code (PSZC), institutions of a philanthropic or charitable nature are allowed in any zone except where expressly prohibited. Pursuant to Section 92.17.03 of the PSZC, this use is not prohibited within the M-1 zone. The subject location is within a mixed-use commercial industrial building and the applicant has reported that the center has approximately 33,000 square feet overall. The tenant space to be used by the Well in the Desert is approximately 1,125 square feet or twenty-eight feet by forty feet. Currently, there is a vacant unit to the west and a metal welding and polishing business occupying the unit to the east. The site consists of two rectangular-shaped buildings that are parallel with San Rafael Drive. There is pedestrian and vehicular access to the rear of the site by two driveways, one in the center and the other at the eastern end of the site. There is no sidewalk between San Rafael Drive and the existing buildings. There is paving between the buildings and San Rafael Drive which is not part of the street and appears to be used as parking. However, the entire mixed-use center does not currently have any parking stalls delineated. Pursuant to Section 94.02.00(B)(6)(e) of the PSZC, the proposed use gives the Planning Commission the opportunity to impose conditions and minor site modifications which are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. The proposed use and other current and future uses may pose safety concerns for Planning Commission Staff Report June 13, 2007 Case 5 1157—CUP Page 3 or 5 pedestrian access to the front entrances of the buildings. Parking in these areas may have to be adjusted for a pedestrian access path along the front of the building. The proposed center should have approximately one parking space for each five hundred square feet of floor area for manufacturing and industrial uses pursuant to Section 93.06.00(D)(17) of the PSZC. With this calculation, the center should have a total of sixty-six parking stalls, including three handicap parking stalls. Staff has recommended Condition of Approval No. 1, which requires the owner to submit a parking plan that will bring the parking areas (including pedestrian access) within or near conformance as determined by the Director of Planning and re-stripe all parking areas. Pursuant to Section 93.06.00(3)(a) regarding non-conforming parking lots, the center was parking compliant at the time of its establishment, and therefore, the existing number of parking spaces provided is sufficient. Staff determines that the existing number of parking spaces is sufficient for the use as it does not represent an intensification of use and the location will be operable to the public for three and one- half hours on Saturday mornings only. REQUIRED FINDINGS: The Conditional Use Permit process outlined in Section 94.02.00 of the Zoning Code requires the Planning Commission to make a number of findings for approval of the permit. Those findings are analyzed by staff in order below: 1) That the use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Zoning Code. Pursuant to Section 94.02.00(A)(2)(f) of the Palm Springs zoning Ordinance, an institution of charitable nature is authorized within the CBD zone with the approval of a Type II Conditional Use Permit_ Pursuant to Section 92.17.03 of the PSZC, this use is not prohibited within the M-1 zone. 2) That the use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Objective 3.30.6 of the IND designation states, "allow for the development of storage, distribution, assembly, service commercial and research and office facilities." The proposed use is the distribution of food baskets. It is necessary for the community because it serves economically challenged families and may help prevent homelessness. 3) That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate such use, including yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, and other kA_ �nr Planning Commission Staff Report June 13, 2007 Case 5.1167 CUP Page 4 of 5 features required in order to adjust such use to those existing or permitted future uses of land in the neighborhood. The project does not propose any exterior changes to the site. However, the proposed center should have approximately one parking space for each five hundred square feet of floor area for manufacturing and industrial uses pursuant to Section 93.06.00(D)(17) of the PSZC. With this calculation, the center should have a total of sixty-six parking stalls, including three handicap parking stalls. Staff has recommended Condition of Approval No. 1, which requires the owner to submit a parking plan that will bring the parking lot within or near conformance as determined by the Director of Planning and re-stripe all parking areas. This will adjust the property for the proposed use and enable existing uses to adequately utilize all parking areas. 4) That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use. The project site is located on San Rafael which is designated as Secondary Thoroughfare on the General Plan. The site is also located between two Major Thoroughfares as designated by the General Plan, North Indian Canyon Drive and North Palm Canyon Drive. The parking areas will be re-striped as part of this approval and the proposed use will generate minimal traffic due operation of three and one-half hours on Saturdays only. 5) That the conditions to be imposed and shown on the approved site plan are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include minor modification of the zone's property development standards. Such conditions may include: a. Regulation of use b. Special yards, space and buffers c. Fences and walls d. Surfacing of parking areas subject to city specifications e. Requiring street, service road, or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress g. Regulation of signs h. Requiring landscaping and maintenance thereof I. Requiring maintenance of grounds j. Regulation of noise, vibrations, odors, etc. k. Regulation of time for certain activities I. Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed m. Duration of use n. Dedication of property for public use C F-.F�D Planning Commission Staff Report June 13, 2007 Case 5.1157—CUP Page 5 of 5 o. Any such other conditions as will make possible the development of the city in an orderly and efficient manner and in conformity with the intent and purposes set forth in this Zoning Code, including but not limited to mitigation measures outlined in an environmental assessment. There is no change to the existing site plan- Staff has included Conditions of Approval such as restricting hours and days of operation, prohibiting outdoor storage, requiring property maintenance by owner/tenant and others to insure the proposed use will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. CONCLUSION: The proposed project is consistent with the use on the site and is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance land uses. Staff recommends the required findings necessary for the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and is therefore recommending approval of Case 5.1157 — CUP- ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the project is Categorically Exempt as a Class I exemption per Section 15301(Existing Facilities)- NOTIFICATION: A notice was mailed to all property owners within a four hundred foot radius in accordance with state law. -- David A- Newell Assistant Planner al Di r of Pla nin Services Attachments: - 500' Radius Map - Draft Resolution & Conditions of Approval _ � �� hu : N M Department of Planning Services W E ..j" Vicinity Map s [! OnH`� -M GI w C a LL1- SAN FA5L O Y a L-tK% 4 V c z a 0 a Legend ® Srte �500 Radius CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO: 5.1157 CUP DESCRIPTION: The purpose of both hearings is to consider an application by Well in the Desert for a APPLICANT! The Well in the Desert Conditional Use Permit to operate a philanthropic/charitable use. The proposal is a food distribution facility to economically challenged families on Saturdays only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., Zone M1, Section 34. L ��, RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN INSTITUTION OF CHARITABLE NATURE LOCATED AT 202 SAN RAFAEL DRIVE, ZONE M-1, SECTION 34. WHEREAS, Well in the Desert ("Applicant") has filed an application with the City pursuant to Section 94.02.00 of the Zoning Ordinance to distribute food baskets of groceries to economically challenged families located at 202 San Rafael Drive, Zone M- 1, Section 34; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider Case No. 5.1157 — CUP was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2007, a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit No. 5.1157 application was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is considered a "project' pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and has been determined to be Categorically Exempt as a Class 1 exemption (Existing Facilities) pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the requirements of Section 94.02.00(13)(6), the Planning Commission finds: 1) That the use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Zoning Code. Pursuant to Section 94.02.00(A)(2)(f) of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, an institution of charitable nature is authorized within the CBD zone with the approval of a Type II Conditional Use Permit. Pursuant to Section 92.17.03 of the PSZC, this use is not prohibited within the M-1 zone. 2) That the use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements of objectives of the general plan, and is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the general plan, and is not Planning Commission Draft Resolution June 13, 2007 Case No. 5.1157_CUP Page 2 of 3 detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Objective 3.30.6 of the IND designation states, "allow for the development of storage, distribution, assembly, service commercial and research and office facilities." The proposed use is the distribution of food baskets. It is necessary for the community because it serves economically challenged families and may help prevent homelessness. 3) That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate such use, including yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, and other features required in order to adjust such use to those existing or permitted future uses of land in the neighborhood. The project does not propose any exterior changes to the site. However, the proposed center should have approximately one parking space for each five hundred square feet of floor area for manufacturing and industrial uses pursuant to Section 93.06.00(D)(17) of the PSZC. With this calculation, the center should have a total of sixty-six parking stalls, including three handicap parking stalls. Staff has recommended Condition of Approval No. 1, which requires the owner to submit a parking plan that will bring the parking lot within or near conformance as determined by the Director of Planning and re-stripe all parking areas. This will adjust the property for the proposed use and enable existing uses to adequately utilize all parking areas. 4) That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use. The project site is located on San Rafael which is designated as Secondary Thoroughfare on the General Plan. The site is also located between two Major Thoroughfares as designated by the General Plan, North Indian Canyon Drive and North Palm Canyon Drive. The parking areas will be re-striped as part of this approval and the proposed use will generate minimal traffic due operation of three and one-half hours on Saturdays only. 5) That the conditions to be imposed and shown on the approved site plan are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include minor modification of the zone's property development standards. Such conditions may include: a. Regulation of use b. Special yards, space and buffers c. Fences and walls d. Surfacing of parking areas subject to city specifications Planning Commission Draft Resolution June 13, 2007 Case No. 5.1157—CUP Page 3 of 3 e. Requiring street, service road, or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress g_ Regulation of signs h. Requiring landscaping and maintenance thereof i. Requiring maintenance of grounds j. Regulation of noise, vibrations, odors, etc. k. Regulation of time for certain activities I. Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed m. Duration of use n. Dedication of property for public use o. Any such other conditions as will make possible the development of the city in an orderly and efficient manner and in conformity with the intent and purposes set forth in this Zoning Code, including but not limited to mitigation measures outlined in an environmental assessment. There is no change to the existing site plan. Staff has included Conditions of Approval such as restricting hours and days of operation, prohibiting outdoor storage, requiring property maintenance by owner/tenant and others to insure the proposed use will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves Case No. 5.1157 — CUP, subject to those conditions set forth in Exhibit A. ADOPTED this day of , 2007. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Craig A. Ewing, AICP Director of Planning Services RESOLUTION NO. Case No. 5.1157— CUP WELL IN THE DESERT 202 SAN RAFAEL DRIVE Planning Commission June 13, 2007 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the Director of Planning, the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief or their designee, depending on which department recommended the condition. Any agreements, easements or covenants required to be entered into shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. The owner shall submit a parking plan to the Department of Planning Services that will bring the parking lot within or near conformance as determined by the Director of Planning. 2. The owner shall be required to re-stripe all parking areas within thirty days of occupancy as required by Condition of Approval No. 1 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT: 3. The proposed development of the premises shall conform to all applicable regulations of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, or any other City Codes, ordinances and resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations. 3a. The owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Palm Springs, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City of Palm Springs, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or administrative officers concerning Case 5.1157 — CUP. The City of Palm Springs will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs and the applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney. If the Planning Commission Draft COAs June 13, 2007 Case 5.1157—CUP Page 2 of 3 City of Palm Springs fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Palm Springs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the applicant's consent but should it do so, the City shall waive further indemnification hereunder, except, the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein. 4. Non-compliance with any of the conditions of this approval, or with City codes and ordinances, State laws; any valid citizen complaints or policing and safety problems (not limited to excessive alcohol consumption, noise, disturbances, signs, etc) regarding the operation of the establishment; as determined by the Chief of Police or the Director of Planning and Building, may result in commencement of proceedings to revoke the Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 9402.001 of the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, violations of City Codes and Ordinances will result in enforcement actions which may include citations, arrest, temporary business closure, or revocation of this permit in accordance with law. 5. Commencement of the Conditional Use Permit approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years. Extensions of time may be granted by the Planning Commission upon demonstration of good cause. 6. The appeal period for a Conditional Use Permit application is 15 calendar days from the date of project approval. Permits will not be issued until the appeal period has concluded. 7. Separate architectural approval and permits shall be required for all signs. 8. The street address numbering/lettering shall not exceed eight inches in height. 9. No sirens, outside paging, music speaker system or any type of signalization will be permitted, except approved alarm systems. 10. No outside storage of any kind shall be permitted except as approved as a part of the proposed plan. 11. This use shall comply with the provisions of Section 11.74 Noise Ordinance of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. Violations may result in revocation of this Conditional Use Permit. 12. The applicant shall be required to maintain the opening hours as stated on the Conditional Use Permit application. Hours of operation will be from 7:00 ii 1. ...•.:� Planning Commission Draft COAs June 13. 2007 Case 5.1157—CUP Page 3 of 3 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on Saturdays only. Any future modifications to the hours of operation shall require prior approval by the Planning Commission and the City reserves the right to modify or restrict the business hours based upon documented operational circumstances. 13. The applicant/owner shall notify the Director of Planning and Building in writing 30 days in advance of any changes in the operation of business. Any transference of this Conditional Use Permit upon change of ownership is subject to review and approval by the City. 14. The owner and/or tenant shall monitor outdoor parking areas, walkways, and adjoining properties and shall take all necessary measures to ensure that customers do not loiter, create noise, litter, or cause any disturbances while on- site. The owner and operator shall ensure that at closing time all customers leave the property promptly and that the property is clean and secure before the owner/operator leaves the premises. The Police Chief, based upon complaints and/or other cause, may require on-site security officers to ensure compliance with all City State, and Federal laws and conditions of approval. Failure to comply with these conditions may result in revocation of this permit, temporary business closure or criminal prosecution. 15. The applicant will provide all buyers with a copy of this Conditional Use Permit. FIRE 16. The applicant will comply with all requirements of the Palm Springs Fire Department. BUILDING 17. The applicant will obtain permits for all construction involved with the site. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION & CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO. 5.1157 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT THE WELL IN THE DESERT 188-304 WEST SAN RAFAEL ROAD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a public hearing at its meeting of June 13, 2007. The Planning Commission meeting begins at 1:30 p.m., in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. and NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, will hold a public hearing at its meeting of June 13, 2007. The City Council meeting begins at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs. The purpose of both hearings is to consider an application by Well in the Desert for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a philanthropic/charitable use. The proposal is a food distribution facility to economically challenged families on Saturdays only between the hours of 7,00 a.m- to 10.30 a.m., Zone M1, Section 34. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301(e) (Class 1 - Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REVIEW OF PROJECT INFORMATION: The proposed application, site plan and related documents are available for public review at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5-00 p-m. Monday through Friday. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204 if you would like to schedule an appointment to review these documents. COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION: Response to this notice may be made verbally at the Public Hearing and/or in writing before the hearing. Written comments may be made to the Planning Commission and/or City Council by letter (for mail or hand delivery) to: James Thompson, City Clerk 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior, to the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]). An opportunity will be given at said hearing for all interested persons to be heard. _ Questions regarding this case may be directed to David Newell, Department of Planning Services-at 760) 323-8245. Si necesita ayuda con esta carta, porfavor flame a la Ciudad de Palm Springs-y puede hablar con Nadine Fieger telefono (760) 323-8245. _ es Thompson, City Clerk _,,,. t��,-,,-, J Department of Planning Services W M E Vicinity Map s �urzc-cxx oq 515 R w Ea a R a 4 0 a SAN Iiq pq�L R� I a 0 D r AR rd e CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE NO: 5.1157 CUP DESCRIPTION: The purpose of both hearings is to consider an application by Well in the Desert for a APPLICANT: The Well in the Desert Conditional Use Permit to operate a philanthropic/charitable use. The proposal is a food distribution facility to economically challenged families on Saturdays only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., ,Zone M1, Section 34. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) I, the undersigned, say: I am and was at all times herein mentioned, a citizen of the United States and employed in the County of Riverside, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action or proceeding; that my business address is 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, California; that on the Ist day of June 2007, 1 served the within NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING for PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NO. 5.1157 Conditional Use Permit. This Notice was served on persons contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto in said action or proceeding by depositing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in a mailbox, sub-post office, substation or mail chute, or other like facility, regularly maintained by the Government of the United States in the City of Palm Springs, California, addressed to the list of persons or firms indicated on the report received from Stewart Title Company dated May 30, 2007 and confirmed by the City's Project Planner, and attached hereto as Exhibit"A". I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Joc~ ann�e�Br�ugAger a , Secretary Dated at Palm Springs, California, this Ist day of June 2007 Public Hearing Notices Notification Information Planning Commission & City Council Hearing on June 13, 2007 Case No. 5.1157 CUP Applicant Name: The Well in the Desert Address P.O. Box 5312 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Project Location & 188-304 West San Rafael Road Description: The purpose of both hearings is to consider an application by Well in the Desert for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a philanthropic/ charitable use. The proposal is a food distribution facility to economically challenged families on Saturdays only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., Zone M1, Section 34. Assigned Planner: David Newell Labels Prepared by: Stewart Title of California, Inc. Property Owners / Groups / Date Notices Number of Notices Organizations Mailed Mailed To Desert Sun for publication on: 06.02.07 06.01.07 1 Applicant/Sponsors 06.01.07 1 Property Owners: Land Owner (master lessor) 06.01,07 54 Master Lessor (sub-lessor) Sub-lessee (unit owner) Indian Land Owners - to BIA 06.01.07 N/A Neighborhood Coalition 06.01.07 73 (Email) Homeowners Association ONIPP Agua Caliente Band/Cahuilla Indians Rep 06.01.07 1 City Rep for Verification (office & home 06.01.07 2 address) Public Agencies & City Staff- IS or EA Other Interested Parties - ModComRep 06.01.07 1 Public Notice Binder & Case File 06.01.07 2 TOTAL. NUMBER MAILED: 135 'V,�4 �e C'c d, ram. 67 n 504-103-003 504-103-004 501-103-005 Covington Dev Inc Covington Dev Inc Covington Dev Inc 10585 Bloomfield St 10585 Bloomfield St 10585 Bloomfield St Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Las Alamitos, CA 90720 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 304-103-006 504-103-007 504-103-008 Covington Dev Inc David Parry Arnold & Azucena Galvan 10585 Bloomfield St 202 W Santa Catalina Rd 232 W Santa Catalina Rd Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 504-103-009 504-103-010 504-121-001 Richard Squibb Ann & Lois Allen Covington Dev Inc PC Box 2447 2449 Via Sonoma 10535 Bloomfield St Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palos Verdes , CA 90274 Las Alamitos, CA 90720 504-1.21-002 504-121-003 504-121-005 Frank M Homes Inc Vincent & Amalia Piscopo Khalil Ailabouni 26862 Bridlewood ❑r 33210 Cathedral Canyon ❑r 2105 N Roberto Dr Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs, CA 92262 509-121-006 504-121-007 504-121-008 Khalil Ailabouni Dennis M Zuvich Archibald Mcl�ish 2105 N Roberto Dr 154 W Santa Catalina Rd 174 W Santa Catalina Rd Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 504-121-009 504-121-010 669-451-005 James R Jennings *M* Khalil Ailabouni Michael. & Cindy Arcaro 25 Brush 21 2105 N Roberto Dr 2277 N Milo Dr San Francisco, CA 91103 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 669-452-005 669-452-006 669-452-009 Michael & Cindy Arcaro Kenneth P. Hoffmann Robert Woods 2277 N Milo Dr PO Box 4488 301 Del Sol Rd Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Sprin<ls, CA 92263 Palm Springs, CA 92262 669-452-012 669-452-013 669-452-016 Eric Piza Gary A & James Jacobs Linda Dalessio 697 W Las Vegas Rd 49494 Elm St 180 W oasis Rd Palm Springs, CA 92262 Morongo Valley, CA 92256 Palm Springs, CA 92262 669-452-017 669-452-024 669-452-026 Linda Dalessio Marlon E Woods Robert Woods 180 W Oasis Rd 490 N Orchid Tree Ln 301 Del Sol Rd Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 669-452-027 669-452-028 669--452-029 Oarah Emmons Shto Mario Berardi PO Box 381 PO Box 18037 PO Box 2487 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Beverly Hills, CA 90209 Palm Springs, CA 92263 669-452-030 669-452-031 669-452-032 Mar;-o Berardi John J & Florence Miller Maria G Berardi PO Box 2487 4111 E Sunny Dunes Rd PO Box 2487 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs, CA 92263 669-452-033 G69-452-034 669-452-035 Genaro & Gloria Delarosa Sean Gerber Genaro & Gloria Dela.rosa 2388 N Sandra Rd 699 N Plaza Amigo 2388 N Sandra Rd Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 669-452-036 669-452-037 669-452-038 A.bdon Figueroa Abdon Figueroa Carrie L Murphy PO Box 2487 PO Box 2487 166 W San Rafael P1 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Springs, CA 92262 669-452-040 669-452-041 669-452-048 Shto Samuel D Hinkle Desert Water Agency PO Box 16037 PC Box 4005 PO Box 1710 Beverly Hills, CA 90209 Blue Jay, CA 92317 Palm Springs, CA 92263 669-452-052 669-452-053 669-452-054 Donald R & Charles Hetrick Bratts Bratts 145 W Oasis Rd 9750 Kent St 9750 Kent St Palm Springs, CA 922G2 Elk Grove, CA 95624 Ellc Grove, CA 95624 669-452-055 669-452-057 669-452-058 Gilmond ConSt Inc Mario G Berardi Mario G Berardi 1065 P San Jacinto Way PO Box 2487 PO Box 2487 Palm Springs, C.D. 92262 Pdlm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Springs, CA 92263 669-452-061 669-452-062 669-452-063 Robert & Barbara Woods Khalil Ai,l.abcuni Khalil Ailabouni le211 Riviera Or 2105 N Roberto Dr 2105 N Roberto Dr Blythe, CA 92225 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92262 669-452-064 669-452-065 669-452-066 Nevrig Mazmanian Mario Bernardi ❑avid E Bell Enterprises 333 Del Sol Rd PO Box 2487 2320 N Sunrise Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Springs, CA 92262 *** 54 Printed °k* Joanne Sruggemans From: Lee A. Husfeldt Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 3:54 PM To: Andy Linsky;April Hildner; Bill and Trish Davis; Bill Scott; Bob Dickinson; Bob Evans; Bob Mahlowitz; Christine Hammond; Colin Sprang; Dana Stewart; David Stratton; Debbie Harris; Diane Ahlstom; Diane Ross; Dick Mandell; Dorothy Bowens; Ed Dietrich ; Frank Gaydos; Frank Tysen; Ginny Foat; Greg Day; Janice Kaminsky; Jim Franklin;Jim Jones; John Goodrich, John Hansen; John Williams; Joy Meredith; Kent Chamberlin; Lauri Aylaian; Lea Goodsell; Lee Husfeldt; Maillika Albert; Margot for Paula; Matilde Jones; Michael Kennedy,- Michael Moret; Nickie Mclaughlin; Patricia Myers; Paul Crippan; Paula Auburn; Peter Moruzzi; Ray Worthington; Robert Hazucha; Ron Siegel; Roxanne Ploss; Scott Kennedy; Thomas Van Etten; Toni Ringlein;Trisha Sanders; Vic Gainer;Warren Weber;Abby Solomon; Catherine Marcy; Cynthia Hilland; Dean Carlson; Doug Wylie; Gene Dippel, Jim Lundin; Mike Marler; Mike Rimmer; Nick Chicola; Rick Boen; Rick Hutcheson; Selma Moloi; Sheila Cobrin; Sven Holm; Ted Telford Cc: Joanne Bruggemans Subject: Upcoming public hearings J +` L'J 1535 001.pdf(122 1536_OOl.pdf(83 1537_001.pdf(118 1538_001.pdf(82 1539_001.pdf(115 KL3) K8) K8) K8) KB) For the next Planning Commission meeting on June 13,2007. 1535-- Case 5.1145 GPA, ZC&TTM 34938- Palm Ridge 1536 -- HSPB-52- Bank of America /City of Palm Springs 1537--TPM 35507 - Destination Ramon West 1538 --TPM 34771 - Gregg Rapp 1539-- Case 5.1157 CUP-The Well in the Desert NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: Lee.Husfeldt@palmspnngs-ce.gov 1 NEIGHBORHOOOCOALITION REPS ';C lseZ,1°157'CUP'�'-Bahk`of"A'merica MODOOM"AND MR PETE MORU=I PON for PC,,Hearing, HISTORIC SITE REP I I I PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE on 06.13.07 PO BOX 4738 PALM SPRINGS CA 92263-4738 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE 5.1129 CUP PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT MRS.JOANNE BRUGGEMANS V,ERIFICATION'NOTICE I '1 1 ATTN SECRETARY 506 W. SANTA CATALINA ROAD PO BOX 2743 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263.2743 MS MARGARET PARK A'GUA CALIENTE'BAND'OF CAHUILLA AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS'I 1 I' 1 '1 '1 INDIANS 777 E TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, STE.3 PALM SPRINGS CA 92262 MR VIC GAINER THE WELL IN THE DESERT P.O. BOX 5312 SyP,ONSORS�I',;LLI","lV, ', PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263