Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002 - MINUTES - 5/1/2002 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ' MAY 1, 2002 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, was called to order by Mayor Kleindienst, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 5:00 p.m., at which time, the City Attorney announced items to be discussed in Closed Session, and at 7:00 p.m., the meeting was convened in open session. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Hodges, Mills, Reller-Spurgin, and Mayor Kleindienst Absent: Councilmember Oden The meeting was opened with the Salute to the Flag, and an invocation by Reverend Andrew Green - Church of St. Paul in the Desert REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in accordance with Council procedures on April 26, 2002. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY ON MATTERS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION (All Entities) - See items on Page 8 of agenda this date. ' PRESENTATIONS: Nancy Fritzel, Librarian 1966-2002. HOUSING AUTHORITY: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: FINANCING AUTHORITY: - No Business COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting adjourned for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelopment Agency; after which, members reconvened as the City Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Marilou Rogers, 1725 N. Via Miraleste, stated as a member of the Board of Hospitality Association, the expansion of the Convention Center is highly approved; that it is further urged to move forward to the downtown parking project; that the hoteliers and retailers are looking forward to increased economic benefits from the project and expressed appreciation to the Council for commitment to attend the Best of the Best Awards dinner. David Lynch, 1111 Tahquitz Canyon Way, stated that when Council approves the contracts concerning the parking garage, it should include bonus and penalty fees; and that the City should hire a deputy city manager to oversee the project. Dean Stephen-Kaufman, Human Rights Commission, stated that the public is invited to a forum to be held on Monday, May 06, 2002 at 6 - 8 p.m., at the Convention Center concerning the "Aftermath of 9-11". Robert Lyons, HNTB, stated availability for any questions regarding item 14. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 2 Dwayne Dorbow, expressed appreciation for voter support of Measure E regarding the Convention Center, and added the Council 'does need to act quickly; that there have ' been conventions lost due to the size of the Center; and the Wyndam Hotel will be renovating its facilities also. Tom Huff, item 19, stated that with the changing of times of the meetings, there will be many that cannot attend and recommended that the item be continued until Mr. Oden is present. Joy Meredith, Crystal Fantasy, stated that Main Street does support the building of the parking structure and recommended approval. Thomas Adamo, 225 S. Indian Canyon, stated that the Council has worked hard to save the taxpayers money on the parking structure, but it should be remembered that he himself has pledged his property and given up $1,500 a month for the rest of his life as a contribution to the structure. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: Items, 1 thru 9. It was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Hodges and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that Items 1 thru 9 be adopted. Review by City Manager of Consent Items to',be clarified. 1. MO 7061 authorizing the City Manager to accept a Federal Grant for up to I $831,756 to reimburse the airport for post 9/11 added security costs. 2. MO 7062 approving Amendment 2 to A4317 with the Coachella Valley Association Governments (CVAG) for the construction of the Indian Canyon Drive/Interstate 10 Interchange in the amount of $15,300,000 in Federal STIP Grant funds. CP00-14. 3. MO 7063 approving Supplement 009-M to A1459 with CalTrans for flashing beacons installed for school crossing safety at Racquet Club Drive and Via Miraleste funded by Federal Hazard Elimination Safety grant for $24,500. Mills Abstain. �I. Res 20316 declaring the intent to vacate right, title and interest in a portion of the right-of-way dedicated for the public street named East Palm Canyon Drive; and setting hearing for June 5, 2002. Section 25 T4S, R4E. R02-013. Mills Abstain. 5. Res 20317 approving Final Map 29987, Spartan Villa Hermosa, LLC for condominium purposes for property located at 155 Hermosa Place. Section 10 T4S, R4E. APN 505-264-001. A4489. 6. MO 7064 approving agreement with Applied Planning for preparation of an environmental impact report for a retail center located south of Ramon Road and north of Sunny Dunes Road, between San Luis Rey Drive and Crossly Road, for a total amount of $94,444, costs to be paid by American Realty. Zone M-1, ' Section 20. A4490. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 3 7. MO 7065 approving the purchase and installation from Door Service Company for the replacement of apparatus doors at Fire Stations 3, 4 and 5 for $28.650. 8. MO 7066 approving agreement with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for passenger screening functions by the Palm Springs Police Department at the Palm Springs International Airport, estimated costs $589,860 for a term of May 1, 2002 to December 1, 2003, all costs will be reimbursed by TSA. A4491. 9. Res 20318 and 20319 approving Payroll Warrants and Claims & Demands. Note abstentions, if any: Councilmember Warrant# Payee Particular Nature of Conflict Mills 975314 Tenet Business Related EXTENDED CONSENT AGENDA- PUBLIC HEARINGS: 10. APPEAL - RON DALE - 253 E. MESQUITE AVENUE Recommendation: That the Council consider an appeal of the Planning Commission denial of a Variance application, Case 6.457 to allow an existing 10 foot tall shade structure on the property line of property located at 253 E. ' Mesquite Avenue. Zone R-1-C, Section 23. Director of Planning & Building reviewed the staff report and visual aids on display in the chamber. Mayor declared the Hearing open Philip Klatcho, attorney representing James Henderson, stated his client is the neighbor to the south; that it is requested that the Council uphold the Planning Commission decision; that this process has been going on for two years; that Mr. Dale was given a stop order by the City, which was not followed; that the statutory grounds to permit the variance are not present; that the construction is current; that it is a violation; that the appellant was duly informed during the construction phase that the building was in violation, but chose to proceed anyway, and requested denial of the appeal. Sandra Hoppy, 271 E. Mesquite, stated that her property was purchased in 1963 and that she is a neighbor to Mr. Dale; that the structure in question was there in 1963; that Mr. Dale does keep a good yard and that the structure should be approved. Bill Hoppy, 271 E. Mesquite, stated that the family has owned his property since 1963; that Mr. Dale has improved his property; that tamarisk trees have been removed; that the structure does fit in with the house and the neighborhood; that ' it is an improvement to the residence; and that there are many illegal structures on Mesquite Avenue. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 4 Cypress ?, 277 E. Mesquite, stated she lives one door down from Mr. Dale; that the structure in question has no electricity, water or gas; that it is just a shade ' structure and that there are a lot of illegal structures in the neighborhood. Mr. Ron Dale, appellant, stated that when the inspectors noticed the shade structure it was thought to be new construction; that in fact, it is a rebuilt, that the structure did not show until the tamarisk trees were torn down; that the building inspectors have indicated it is a good structure; that the surrounding properties all have structures built with the property setback lines; that there is no other place to place the cabana; that in previous conversations with Mr. Evans, it was indicated that there would be no problem getting a variance; that there was no work done on the cabana for a couple of years, due to other projects; that in September of last year a friend wanted a wedding in the cabana so repairs were finished against the stop order; that,application was made for a variance; that a hearing was held; that the variance was denied; that it is clear the structure has been there for many years; that there are photos that indicate the structure and that the Council should overrule the Planning Commission decision based on the age of the structure. There being no further appearances, the Hearing was closed. Councilmember Hodges questioned the construction phase of the structure when the Notice was issued. Director of Planning & Building stated that the roof deck was on an exposed , wood frame. Councilmember Mills questioned if examination of the aerial photos indicated the structure in place prior to 1961. Director of Planning & Building stated that in the 1939 photo the structure was not there; that in the photos examined from 1947, 1958 and 1979, it did not appear to be present; that the later photos do have some shading from the Mesquite Trees and that it may be difficult to be absolutely certain, but that professionals had examined the photos and did conclude it was not likely; that materials of the building were inspected; that the materials do not look to be of the 1960's; that there are four points to grant a variance; that none were found to be applicable by the Planning Commission; that what is before the Council is not a review of the style, but rather whether the structure may be granted a variance, solely based on the four points permitted by law. COuncilmember Hodges questioned where the four points to allow a variance were obtained. City Attorney stated that the points are a part of the Government Code on variances; that any other City would,have the same criteria; that the main reason for a variance is that the property itself is unique, and that the variance should not be granted or used as a special 'privilege. Councilmember Hodges questioned if there are allowances when a repair is ' needed. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 5 City Attorney stated that there is not economic hardship to grant a variance; that ' it is tied to topography only. Director of Planning & Building stated that the Planning Commission did seek somewhat to justify the variance; that the issue is that it could not find any way to legally permit it; that if it were that the building were just damaged, the only requirement would be to repair to Code. Councilmember Hodges stated that whether one agrees or not, that facts are that the Planning Commission decision must be upheld due to the reasons to grant a variance. City Attorney stated that the issue would be raised if others came forward for variances that were not based on the allowances; that all must be treated the same and that is the reason the criteria is established; that the Council does have the ability to change the standards, but typically that results in policy problems. Councilmember Mills stated that it is an unfortunate situation; that if there were some proof that the building existed previously, a grandfather act could be applied; that this is a difficult matter, but that the law and the ordinances are clear. Motion to uphold the Planning Commission decision with Resolution to come ' forward at the next meeting was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller- Spurgin, seconded by Mills, and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that the Motion be adopted. 11. DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE - PD 275, GENERAL PLAN POLICY AMENDMENT, SECTION 7.1.5 - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Recommendation: That the Council approve amending the Zoning Map by approving a change of zone from C-B-D (Central Business District) to PD 275; amend General Plan Policy 7.1.5, by adding a special street section in the Central Business District; and approve a preliminary and final planned development district (PD 275) for a four level, 390 parking space, public parking structure, located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Baristo Road, C-B-D zone, Section 15. Director of Planning & Building reviewed the staff report and the visual plans on display in the Chamber. In answer to questions by Council, Director of Planning & Building stated that the design team has questioned whether the plants on the side of the structure would be viable; that there would be a problem with water supply and that it was found not to have the amenity; that the shade structure located on the top floor would the same as that at the airport; and that the color would be white. ' Executive Director -Airports stated that the product is from Bird Air; that the team did analyze using a multi-colored product, but that it would need replacement every 3 - 5 years; that the proposed structure is the same as the airport structure with a 15 - 20 year life. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 6 In answer to questions by Council, Director of Planning stated that Baristo will not have any major improvements; that the street is deemed wide enough; that there , would not be a stacking problem; that the ingress and egress was approved by the design team; that originally an entry was located on Indian Avenue, but that it was felt that it would create more problems than the alternative entry on Baristo; but that there is an exit on Indian. Mayor declared the Hearing open. James Cioffi, Walker Parking Consultant, stated that the original design did have entry and exit on Indian; that the City Engineer recommended that the entry be removed; that it was determined that stacking and accidents would occur more frequently on Indian if the entry were permitted; that there will be a focal point on the Corner of Baristo and Indian to direct vehicular traffic; that the structure on the roof will be white and is a Bird Product; that there have been considerations of support columns being painted a darker color; that up lights will be added to the columns; that landscaping in urns of cascading plants located on the side of the structure were determined to be too difficult to maintain; and that at the ground level, there will be landscaping that will be planted with the intent of climbing the sides of the building with the greenery. Tom Lanham, Palm Springs, stated that there is concern with the entry on Baristo; that there is only room for two cars at a time and that it would be better to have the entry on Indian Avenue.' David Lynch, Palm Springs, stated that the entry should be on Indian; that there ' is more room to accommodate cars to get in the structure; that Indian Avenue is easier to find and directions easier to give; and that the stacking of vehicles would slow traffic down to help prevent accidents. Tom Adamo, Palm Springs, stated that there are various entryways to the structure; and that the opportunity, to examine the structure from all sides is during the design stage. There being no further appearances, the Hearing was closed. City Manager stated that discussion has been held regarding ingress/egress in the alleyway; that the structure does not have a toll to enter and that it may be that the Indian Avenue entry should,be permitted. James Cioffi, stated that as a proponent of the Indian Avenue entry it is agreeable, but that the City staff recommended not to have any ingress off Indian Avenue; that studies were conducted for the safest way for vehicles to access the building; that there are, in fact, various entryways into the structure; that once the structure is used, people will ';find that entry is easy; and that if the City Engineer changed his position on the extreme safety hazard on Indian, the entry could be placed. City Manager stated that the desiign of entry from Indian Avenue would be ' reviewed and readdressed. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 7 Director of Planning & Building stated that Walker did perform a traffic study; that ' it was determined that off the Baristo side, it is designed that 800 vehicles per hour could access or leave the structure; that it is estimated there will be 1340 trips of usage; that if gates were added to a toll booth, the capacity would be cut to 400 vehicles per hour; that the City Engineer was comfortable with Baristo stacking; that most structures only have one ingress and egress; that the Indian Avenue entry could be reviewed; that there is a traffic light near the location that would slow traffic; and that the documents could be bid with alternates in place. Councilmember Mills stated that it is somewhat incredible that the hearing is already being done and commented on the timeliness of the project; that the only comments on the building have been the ingress and egress on Indian Avenue, which indicates a good structure design is going on; that it is a concern if the ingress and egress on Indian Avenue would have traffic turning in front of other traffic and lengthy stacking occurring; that the backup in the structure would also cause problems; that there may also be a problem of a vehicle leaving a dark structure into a bright street and then turning into traffic; that the awning fabric is of concern, that there are materials available that are other colors rather than white; that the fabrics are guaranteed 10 - 15 years; that the cost would be substantially lowered and that it may be that alternatives should be examined. Mayor stated that staff should continue to work in addressing parking problems in the City; that with this structure the design standard has set the bar; that the product is quality and that the aesthetics are good; that the access on Indian is arguable, but that consideration should be given to the City Engineer's determination; that the flow is easiest off Baristo; that landscaping should be added on the Baristo side; that adequate signage to use the left lane to enter on Baristo will need to be provided; that it may be that the building appenditures may need to be brought out further; that a clear visual statement of where the entry is does need to be made; that more exits than entries should be provided; that overall, the recommendation of the structure is pleasing; that deadlines are being met; that the City Manager has assembled a team that will get the job done and that the penalty and bonus clauses in the contracts should be clear. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that since staff is recommending an exit only on Indian, that it is agreed that is what should be put in place and added that staff are the experts on the traffic studies and mitigation measures, City Clerk read Title of Ordinance as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM C-B-D (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) TO PD275 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF INDIAN CANYON DRIVE AND BARISTO ROAD, C-B-D ZONE, SECTION 15, after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Mills, and unanimously ' carried, Oden absent, that further reading be waived and the Ordinance be introduced for first reading. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 8 Resolution 20320 as recommended, 'to include the City Engineer to relook at entry and exit on Indian Avenue was presented; after which, it was moved by ' Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Mills, and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that R20320 be adopted. Resolution 20321 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Mills, and unanimously carried. Oden absent, that R20321 be adopted. 12. TTM 28495 - SIMEON AND LORRAINE GREY Recommendation: That the Council approve Tentative Tract Map 28495 to subdivide 7.8 acres into fifteen single family residential lots and one common area detention basin lot, located south'of Racquet Club Road, west of Milo Drive, Zone R-1-13, Section 3. Applicant: Simeon and Lorraine Grey. Director of Planning & Building reviewed the staff report and visual site plans located in the Chamber. Mayor declared the Hearing open. Bill Warner, Warner Engineering, stated that all conditions have been complied with, and requested consideration of the Council to allow the project to be gated. Dan Signofollar, project architect, stated that the project is environmentally friendly; that it is proposed for the project to be gated; that by allowing the gates, the project will offer more security, reduce traffic speed and eliminate unwanted solicitors; that the property owners' will maintain the streets; that the Fire Department has reviewed the plans with no offered changes; and requested approval of the project as gated. Kurt Bible, Palm Springs, requested approval of the project. Ted Rohle, Palm Springs, stated that the project is exciting and that the gate does fit in the project aesthetically. Michael Thorton, Palm Springs requested approval of the project with gates. Lorraine Grey, developer, stated that the Planning Commission has approved the project; that the gate issue is not one of financial, but of security; that homes around the project are individually gated; that most people do want a gated community due to the crime deterrent.) Simeon Grey, developer, requested approval of the project as gated. There being no further appearances, the Hearing was closed. Councilmember Mills stated the proposed is an excellent project; that the development will increase housing stock; that the project is a cul-de-sac and ' would not pose any problems with being gated. Councilmember Hodges concurred. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 9 Mayor stated that high end to modest housing is needed in Palm Springs; that the gated option does offer a good opportunity for the buyer; and that the project is good. Director of Planning & Building stated that the requested Council consideration of deleting condition 6 of the Conditions of Approval. Resolution 20322 as revised, to delete Condition #6 on Racquet Club Road West, was presented; after which, it was moved by Mills, seconded by Reller- Spurgin, and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that R20322 be adopted. 13. PDD 273 - CS 5.0898 - TTM 30454 - CANYON GATE LLC Recommendation: That the Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Case 5.0898 - Planned Development District 273, a gated 32 lot single family development and Tentative Tract Map 30454 to subdivide 10 acres into 32 single family residential lots and a number of common area lots, located at the northwest corner of Belardo Road and W. Sunny Dunes Road, R-1-A and R-2 Zones, Section 22, Director of Planning & Building reviewed the staff report and visual site plans on display in the Chamber. Mayor declared the Hearing open. ' Mark Temple, stated that the project will offer quality homes and that if approved, it is anticipated that construction will start in mid-summer. There being no further appearances, the Hearing was closed. Councilmember Hodges commented that the project is beautiful with wonderful amenities. Councilmember Mills questioned if parking would be one side only; and added that the 32 foot wide street is less than normal; that use of red curbs is not encouraged; that the potential on both sides of the street being parked on is somewhat minor; and that it would be better to include the no parking issue in the CC & R's rather than enforce by signage and red curbing. Mayor questioned any liability with placement of the condition in the CC & R's. City Attorney stated that the issue is that the streets are private; that the streets could be vacated and the homeowners association be responsible for any enforcement measures; that without the signs, the City can not do enforcement; that the reality is that the City has none or little access through a guard gated community, but if the condition is placed, the homeowners are able to turn to the City for enforcement measures. Councilmember Hodges stated that the condition should be deleted and added to the CC & R's. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 10 Resolution 20323 as revised, to delete Condition #10 on Private Streets and add to CCR's was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller-Spurgin, and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that R20323 be adopted. COUNCIL COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/INTERAGENCY REPORTS: Councilmembers reported on various civic and community organizational meetings and events which they attended, subsequent to the last regular meeting, and announced upcoming events of community interest. LEGISLATIVE ACTION: 14. CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION MASTER PLAN - CONCEPT DESIGN Recommendation: That the Council approve entering into an agreement with Howard Needle Tammen & Bergendoff (HNTB) for master plan and conceptual design services for the proposed, 114,000 square foot expansion of the Convention Center; Phase I design of kitchen expansion; conversion of the Springs Theater and sales offices into meeting space, plus reimbursable; for a total of $295,500. A4492. (Subject to City Attorney final language approval.) Convention Center Director reviewed the staff report and gave background concerning the need of expansion. Councilmember Mills stated that it is proposed that the architect will complete the Master Plan in a 45 day period; that included in the study should be the open space around the facility; that the potential is now for the City to determine uses of the surrounding land and possible future expansion needs; that the Master Plan should address how the entire area is going to shape out and added that his services would be available as a Member of the City Council to team with the design team if it is Council desire. Mayor stated that it is clear that a fix needs to made for things that are not working; that meeting space is a priority of conventions; that TOT is increasing; that with the increases, the Council',could consider paying cash as each Phase develops; that ultimately the Bond Issue will need to be done, but that there is an ability to pay cash for the first phase should the Council desire; and questioned the procedure for full expansion in relation to the Bond Issue. City Manager stated that if all goes to plan, the larger project should get underway in one year, and that the bonding would occur at that time. Mayor stated that it is clear that the City has lost business due to the size of the Convention Center; that conventions will continue to outgrow any facility, but that with this expansion, the Center should be able to pick up more conventions than in the past; and questioned what thel ideal customer criteria would be. Convention Center Director stated ',that the mission is to book business that generates TOT; that corporate groups, with or without trades shows, seem best. ' Mayor questioned the status of the AOPA convention. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page I I Convention Center Director stated that the convention should be in town on ' October 25 with an estimate of 25,000 attendees; but that the Center has been put on notice that if there is no expansion the last convention at this site will be 2005. Minute Order 7067 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Mills, and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that MO7067 be adopted. 15, EAST PALM CANYON DRIVE FRONTAGE ROAD Recommendation: That the Council approve establishment of a no parking area on East Palm Canyon Drive, south frontage road. City Manager reviewed the staff report. Councilmember Hodges stated it is surprising that enforcement has already started and the matter is presently before the Council for actual action; and questioned where the illegal car sales will be moving. City Manager stated that those that have already moved to vacant sites are illegal and will be cited. City Attorney stated that the Courts have determined that "For Sale" signs in vehicles is a 1st Amendment right; and that a uniform standard does need to be set for the City. Resolution 20324 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Mills, and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that R20324 be adopted. 16. DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Recommendation: That the Council appoint the administrative team for oversight of the downtown parking structure; and grant authority to the project administrator (Executive Director - Airports) for signatory change order authority up to 7.5% of total construction costs (total of $307,500). Executive Director - Airports reviewed the staff reports for items 16, 17 and 18 and added that the Team is in high gear with anticipation of a November completion date. Mayor stated that there have been major changes in how the City does business based on the newly adopted Procurement Ordinance; that this is a major test of what staff has asked for; that there will need to be checks and balances; that all links should be checked; that additional levels of expenditure limits are being given; that it is important for staff to keep the Council updated; that the project is exciting, but that the procedures should be followed to stay on track. Resolution 20325 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller-Spurgin, and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that R20325 be adopted. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 12 17. DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE PROJECT - UTILITY PAYMENTS Recommendation: That the Council authorize the Downtown Parking Structure ' project administrator to execute utility company payments for utility relocations for $120.009. $150,000. See item 16. Minute Order 7068, as revised to $150,000, was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller-Spurgin, and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that M07068 be adopted. 18. DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE PROJECT Recommendation: That the Council approve and adopt the plans, specifications and working details for the downtown parking structure; authorize solicitation for construction quotes for the downtown parking structure trade contracts for earthwork, demolition and site utilities; and authorize the City Manager to award said trade contracts up to $100,000 per contract. CP01-27. See item 16. Minute Orders 7069 and 7070 as recommended were presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller-Spurgin, and unanimously carried. Oden absent, that M07069 and 7070 be adopted. ' 19 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT On January 16, 2002, Council continued this issue to this date to discuss establishing times for study sessions (1:30 p.m.); closed sessions (4 p.m.) and regular meetings (6 p.m.); all meetings to be held on the first and third Wednesdays of each month. Motion to continue the matter to May 15 to allow for full Council attendance was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Hodges and unanimously carried, Oden absent, that the matter be continued. 20. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT (Intro 4-24-02) City Clerk read Title of Ordinance 1609 as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY' OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO THE DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY SUSPENDING THE NOISE ORDINANCE AND CONSTRUCTION HOURS ORDINANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION after which; it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Mills, and unanimously ' carried, Oden absent, that further reading be waived and that Ordinance 1609 be adopted. Council Minutes 05-01-02, Page 13 21. ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS: None. ADDED STARTERS: None. REPORTS & REQUESTS: DEPARTMENT report or requests - Received and Filed 22. Treasurer Investment Report as of March 31, 2002. CITY COUNCIL reports or requests 23. Appointment CVAG Exec Committee - Councilmember Hodges designee. Councilmember Hodges: 1. Request City Attorney to draft Charter Amendment concerning Council vacancy appointments. 2. Request consideration of Tribal Council pictures being displayed in City Hall Lobby. 3. Request all workshops be videotaped and televised. ' PUBLIC reports or requests STAFF reports or requests ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. PATRICIA A. SA DERS City Clerk