Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 - MINUTES - 6/6/2001 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 6, 2001 D A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, was called to order by Mayor Kleindienst, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, June 6, 2001, at 5:30 p.m., at which time, the City Attorney announced items to be discussed in Closed Session, and at 7:00 p.m., the meeting was convened in open session. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Jones, Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin, and Mayor Kleindienst Absent: None The meeting was opened with the Salute to the Flag, and an invocation by Reverend LaVeta Dillman, Chapel on the Way. REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in accordance with Council procedures on June 1, 2001, REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY ON MATTERS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION (All Entities) - See items on Page 8 of agenda this date. PRESENTATIONS: Fire Dept. for Life-Saving Rescue Award. HOUSING AUTHORITY: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: FINANCING AUTHORITY: - No Business COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting adjourned for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelopment Agency; after which, members reconvened as the City Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (3-minute limit per person on matters within the jurisdiction of the Council). Gale Boulton, 304 Juniper Dr., stated that there are measures to conserve electricity; that changing out spot lights from incandescent to fluorescent', does save money; that digital thermostats also can save up to 30% of electrical costs; and presented a handout for further reading. Thesesa Howell, The Desert Charities, stated that Council support of item 9 will help the poor and needy; that the issue on dumping and leaving of trash at the site is being addressed; that there will be 24 hour surveillance cameras installed; that the inside of the store will likewise be under surveillance; that signs will be posted stating the surveillance and the possibility of fines; that there has never been the intent to prepare food at the site; and that the group will continue to work with the City to address all concerns. Wendy Busig-Kohn, no address given; stated that cameras acre nothing new in Europe; A that the comments in the Desert Sun against the program are minuscule compared to the need for safety of the citizens; that the neighborhood groups should be involved in the program; and stated support of the program. Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 2 F. James McArthur II, Pedicabs, stated that the matter is simple; that his business does have a license to operate; that low season is coming and support of the Council is needed; that the pedicabs are not trying to clash with the ambience downtown, but rather compliment it; that the signage on the pedicabs is useful to the merchants; that help is requested from the Council to assist the business. Todd Wilson, Pedicab, stated that he is the manager and a rider for the company; that there is nothing in the Ordinances of Palm Springs that prohibit the signage; that the hassle the company is getting is a detriment to its welfare; that the business has only been operating for six months; that the merchants support the business; that the operation has been safe; that many use the operation; that the employees downtown use the pedicabs to acquire a safe return late at night to their vehicles; that the signage on the bikes is a major form of revenue to the service; and requested Council support regarding the issue. CONSENT AGENDA: Review by City Manager of Consent Items to be clarified. Councilmember Oden stated that on item 3, it is good to see grants being obtained especially during the energy crisis. Councilmember Oden questioned if item 7 would be the last installment. City Engineer stated it would. Councilmember Hodges questioned if the sidewalk on item 8 was for both sides of Gene Autry. City Engineer stated west side only. Mayor questioned if the east side would be covered under the CODA project. City Engineer stated it would. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL: It was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden, and unanimously carried, that Items 1 thru 10, excluding item 2, 5, 6 and 9, be adopted. 1. Minutes of May 16, 2001. 2. MO ----- approving Amendment #1 to A4244 with DuPont Flooring Systems for carpet maintenance services at the airport for one year, total annual expense $31,836. Item withdrawn. 3. Res 20056 approving the application of a grant from California Energy Commission for modification to the airport central plant for up to $100,000 and authorize the City Manager to execute any and all necessary documentation. ' 4. MO 6855 approving the consent to assignment of FMC Airport Services, a division of FMC Corporation to FMC Technologies, Inc. relating to the maintenance services for eight passenger loading bridges. A4316. Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 3 5. MO ----- approving the consent to assignment of Maritime Trust/Foreign Trade Zone Solutions to Ernst & Young relating to the foreign trade zone major modification application for$15,000. A4350. Item withdrawn. 6. MO ----- approving the consent to assignment of Maritime Trust/Foreign Trade Zone Solutions to Ernst & Young relating to the foreign trade activation for $12,500. A4342. Item withdrawn. 7. MO 6856 approving an agreement with E. L. Yeager Construction Company for the installation of Phase 4 street and drainage improvements in the Crossley Tract for$225,775, a 2000-01 CDBG funded project, CP00-31. A4368. 8. MO 6857 approving Supplement 007-M1 for preliminary engineering, construction engineering and construction phases of the Gene Autry Trail Sidewalk and Bikeway Project for$309,336. A1459. 9. See Extended Consent Agenda below. 10, Res 20058, 20059 and 20060 approving Payroll Warrants and Claims & Demands. Note abstentions, if any: Councilmember Warrant# Payee Particular Nature of Conflict Hodges 964602 DWA Client of Employer 964631 G & M Construction 964691 Lifetime Plumbing 964740 Preferred Plumbing Reller-Spurgin 964799 Spurgin Spouse 965254 Spurgin EXTENDED CONSENT AGENDA: 9. CUP 5.0868 — DESERT CHARITIES On May 16, 2001 Council directed staff to prepare a resolution overruling the Planning Commission decision concerning Cs 5.0869 and issuing a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Thrift Shop operated by a charitable organization at 425 South Sunrise Way, C-1 zone, Section 14. Mayor stated that this use in this location is not appropriate. Councilmember Oden questioned the uses permitted in the zone. Director of Planning & Building stated that the use is permitted by Conditional Use Permit; that the item did come to Council on appeal; that the Council did hold a public hearing on the matter and directed staff to come back this date with a resolution of approval. Resolution 20057 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Oden, seconded by Jones and carried by the following, vote that R20057 be adopted. AYES: Hodges, Jones, Oden and Reller-Spurgin NO: Kleindienst ABSENT: None Council Minutes 6-6-01,Page 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 11. FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Recommendation: That the Council adopt a resolution electing to have sewer service charges for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002, collected on the Riverside County property tax rolls, in accordance with Ordinance 1111. Director of Finance & Treasurer reviewed the staff report. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that this action is atypical of each year. Mayor declared the hearing open, there being no appearances, the hearing was closed. Resolution 20061 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden, and unanimously carried, that R20061 be adopted. 12. FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 BUDGET Recommendation: That the Council approve the City of Palm Springs Fiscal Year 2001-02 budget. ' City Manager stated that this is the final piece of the process; that the biggest question that still remains to be answered is the impact of the Utility User Tax; that it is not clear how conservation will impact the budget; that it does not appear the UUT will be a windfall to the budget; that the deficit is $2.2 million; that it should be covered with this years current surplus; that if the revenues do not come in as anticipated and if expenditures rise, then next year could be a problem; that adjustments will be made throughout the year to try to offset any problems; that the Council will continue to be informed; that the budget will be monitored and action taken quickly regarding the given circumstances; that the situation is controllable; that there have been some changes with personnel; that the changes include two, new firefighter interns, a new dispatcher, a new Information Technology technician, a secretary to assist with contractual services; that the James O. Jesse Desert Highland Center personnel positions have been modified to allow full time access; that the Center will have Saturday hours starting July 1,'2001; that an advisory board is being put together to help with the Saturday process; that the generator at the convention center will be utilized to have a "cool spot' for the residents to go if electrical power is blacked out; that the budget includes customer service training; that the Foreign Trade Zones needs are addressed; and that per Council direction, funds are included in the budget for the digitizing of the General Plan Map and the updating of noise and undergrounding ordinances. Director of Finance & Treasurer stated that the request is being revised to add $95,000 for parks maintenance; that the current contractor has given notice; that the bids were opened yesterday; that the cost will be higher in the proposed budget; that there were some minor typographical changes that appear on the last page of the resolution and recommended approval. Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 5 City Manager stated that on page 10 of the proposed budget there are items that were funded in the past, but are not a part of this budget and requested Council direction regarding the items. Councilmember Jones questioned if there were eleven new positions being added to the budget. City Manager stated that there are new positions, but that most are offset by temporary positions such as in the James O. Jessie Desert Highland Center and the secretary for procurement. Councilmember Jones questioned the Tennis Center operating budget. City Manager stated that the contract that was operating the Center has been terminated; that the choice is to give the Center to the Palm Springs Unified School District or for the City to run the Center as a park; and that at this time all scenarios are being reviewed. Councilmember Jones questioned if someone has come forward with a proposal. City Manager stated that two proposals have been received and will be reviewed by the City Council at a later date. Councilmember Jones stated that if an operator is found the $46,000 will not be needed. City Manager stated that the City may need some level of participation. Mayor stated that the discussion is moving towards Closed Session issues; that the item before the Council is funding to keep personnel on the site to protect the City's investment. Councilmember Jones stated that the City's budget deficit is $4.6 million if funds are not taken out of the Community Redevelopment Agency budget to offset the amount. City Manager stated that the deficit is $2.6 million. Councilmember Hodges questioned if the request for an additional $95,000 for maintenance of the parks will be offset by any of the districts the City has. Director of Finance & Treasurer stated that the areas are City property and not separately maintained. Mayor declared the hearing open. Howard Lapham, read a prepared statement, copy on file in Office of the City Clerk, and added that the capital improvement of a parking structure for the downtown should be added to the budget; that the structure is needed; that there is funding available through the refinancing of bonds and urged the Council to add the matter for funding. There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed. Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 6 Mayor referred to the proposed fiscal year budget, page 10 and questioned if the Council had any issues with the unfunded portions; that there is question regarding the Festival of Lights budget; that last year the Council directed the event be taken to a new level; that an increase is not reflected in this years budget. Councilmember Hodges questioned if the funding allocated last year regarding the event was expended. Mayor stated that it is not clear what was spent; that the $12,000 was the base for the event; that the Council increased the level to $25,000; that the budget does not show what the carryover is; that while not advocating to increase the allotment, it should be noted by the Council that there is no increase to the event. Councilmember Hodges stated that the budget does show $12,000 and questioned if, in fact, those funds are available for the event. Director of Finance & Treasurer stated that the allocation shown is a baseline; that the Council did a mid-year budget last year for the event; that most of the funds were expended; and that this is the allocation for the upcoming year. Mayor questioned the base for the Film Festival. Director of Finance & Treasurer stated $150,000. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that last year the City also funded the ' Palm Springs Senior Center and the Youth Center. Councilmember Hodges stated that due to the circumstances the City is facing, adjustments should not be made; that it would be best to wait and see what the revenue is and make any necessary mid-year adjustments. Councilmember Oden questioned when the issues will be discussed; that the Council could prioritize what it wants funded as revenue becomes available. Mayor stated that is what was done in the past; that the items are prioritized and discussed and brought forward when the revenue becomes available; that the Council does have upcoming sessions where the matter could be discussed; and that many of the items were funded last year, but are not indicated in this years budget. Director of Finance & Treasurer stated that a mid-year budget adjustment was approved last fiscal year; that not all the funds were expended and will be continued to the new budget; and that it is anticipated that programs like the downtown street cleaning will be continued at the same level of service. Councilmember Oden questioned if item 15 is in the proposed budget. Director of Finance & Treasurer verified it was at $40,000. ' Councilmember Jones concurred with Councilmember Hodges and added that the Council should not be looking at additional expenditures, but at possible areas to cut back; that there is a $2.6 million deficit and the Council should try to trim $500,000 out of the proposed budget. Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 7 Mayor questioned if the budget is at $2.6 million deficit. Director of Finance & Treasurer stated that the budget: was projected at a $2.2 million; that with the addition of the $95,000 for the maintenance of the parks, one could say the deficit is at $2.3 million; that if the Council chose to transfer $400,000 to the Community Redevelopment Agency budget the amount would end up at approximately $2.6 million Councilmember Jones stated that the Council is just switching funds from one pocket to the other and that if the money is not transferred, the Community Redevelopment Agency does not have the money to spend. Mayor stated that the budgets are separate. Councilmember Jones stated that normally we transfer the funds from the General Fund to the Community Redevelopment Agency; that the Council is not doing so this year; and that the situation must be grave, otherwise the transfer would be made. Mayor stated that the figures on the budget should not be misrepresented to the public; and questioned the project budget deficit. Director of Finance & Treasurer stated that the deficit was at $2.2 million, until the Council approved the addition of the the $95,000 for the parks maintenance; and that now the deficit is a projected $2.3 million. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that none on the Council is in e disagreement with Councilmember Jones regarding the issue of trying to save money; that it may be that the City Manager should be directed to find $500,000 by the next quarter. Councilmember Jones stated that the transfer of funds from General to Community Redevelopment does not have to be done, but that the Council does need to look in the direction of saving; and that there is reason for great concern; that in all his years of doing business he has not laid off people and that he does not want to start laying off people in two months due to the actions taken by the Council. Councilmember Hodges stated that if the budget could) be approved by line item, there are things that would be vetoed; but that assurances have been given by the City Manager; that he will be monitoring the budget and bringing updates to the Council; that it is the City Manager job to keep check on the budget; that there are items that each one of the members of the Council may not agree with, but the budget is a package and is being recommended by the City Manager. Councilmember Oden stated that all members of the Council have concerns, that there have been assurances by the City Manager; that he has stated he will keep the pulse of the budget; that the answer to this dilemma is to raise revenue, not cutting, and that there are a lot of positions that the Council needs to endorse and encourage. Mayor stated that the process has been gone through until this point has been reached; that there have been many discussions and opportunities for discussion; that to now start to review the direction and the position of the Council does not make sense; that the Council has directed staff, based on Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 8 Council's desires; that staff has reacted to those directions through the steps of the process and this is the result; that amendments can be made to the budget and have in the past been made; that the ability to amend the budget is available ' at anytime; that we are at the place where the Council has designated and to start reversing decisions now is somewhat confusing. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated the truth is that this is not all our budget, but that we did all work together to get it; that part of the feeling at budget time when casting the vote is whether one is doing the right thing; that now with the energy issues, reality is unknown and that the Council is unaware of repercussions of that issue. City Manager stated that comments of Councilmember Jones regarding layoffs is noted and are serious; that the question is are we doing the best we can, with what we have; that the truth is to keep the service levels what is presented is needed; that in six month there will not be a request for layoffs and that any changes made will be transparent to the citizens. Councilmember Oden stated that the process was the Council's; that all contributed to the process; that the clarifying comments regarding layoffs is appreciated; that it is difficult for people to go to work not knowing if they will have a job; and that it is not his intent to move in that direction. Resolution 20062 as revised was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Oden and carried by the following vote that R20062 be adopted. ' AYES: Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Kleindienst NO: Jones ABSENT: None. 13. STREET VACATION — SOUTH CAMINO REAL Recommendation: That the Council approve vacating a portion of the right-of- way dedicated for the public street named South Camino Real, Section 23, T4S, R4E, File 01-008. City Engineer reviewed staff report. Mayor declared hearing open, there being no appearances, the hearing was closed. Resolution 20063 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Oden, and unanimously carried, that R20063 be adopted. 14. CUP 5.0865 — NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC. Recommendation: That the Council approve issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, with conditions, to Nextel Communications for the installation of a ' commercial communications antenna on a 60 foot monopole and a 200 square foot equipment building located near the 18th hole of the Canyon Country Club Golf Course, 1100 Murray Canyon Road, RGA-8 zone, Section 35. Director of Planning & Building reviewed the staff report. Council Minutes 6-6-01,Page 9 Mayor declared the hearing open. Don Fluke, 2495 Yosemite, stated there is no existing poly: in the location; that he a is voicing opposition to the installation; that the tower will be 200 feet from his property line; that it is in a residential area; that the Council in the past has only approved this type of tower in commercial zones; that in the pictures, copies on file in Office of the City Clerk, one can see how intrusive the tower will be on his view; that the home was purchased seven years ago; that it was purchased based on the view; that what is being proposed is a sixty foot tower right in the middle of the view from the backyard; that the installation will depreciate his property values; that there are many places this tower could be placed without it being in his backyard view; that the Council should deny the request; that not only will a tower be there, but a maintenance building; that the entire situation is depressing and requested Council denial of the project. Jan Hart, General Manager Canyon Country Club, stated that the project is supported by the Club; that work has been done with Nextel to coordinate the use; that the tower will be placed between the 18'" and 19rh fairway; that the City is requiring five palm trees to surround the tower; that: ascetics of the tower have been addressed; that the Planning Commission did review the matter and recommended approval and requested Council support of the conditional use permit. Kim Berry, Nextel, stated that the Planning Commission did approve the use on a 6/0 vote; that the maintenance building is surrounded by palm trees and oleanders; that the type of monopole is fashioned to hook like a palm tree; that it is requested that the Council consider reducing the number of trees required from five to two; that the building will be of aggregate stone and mix in with the area and requests approval of the item. Coleen Fluke, 2495 Yosemite, stated that she is not opposed with Nextel placing towers for cell use, but that it should not be in this location; that the installation will ruin property values; that her home should not be the brunt of having a tower placed in its backyard; that the pictures minimize the effect the tower has on ones view; that the fixture will be in a residential area; that approval would be a departure of past Council approvals; and that if approved, a precedence will be set for the citizens. There being no further appearances the hearing was closed. Councilmember Jones stated that sympathy is given to the Flukes; that other towers that have come before the Council have been for commercial or industrial zones; that this tower will be 60 feet tall located only 200 feet away; that personally he would not want this in his backyard; that the applicant should find somewhere else to locate the tower; that the only reason the Club is supporting the tower is for revenue; that the Club is not showing a neighborly attitude; and recommended Council denial. Councilmember Hodges questioned if there were an-y other locations where the towers were disguised as palm trees: Director of Planning & Building stated that other locations would be provided to the Council. Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 10 Councilmember Hodges stated that the building is of more concern; that the towers are likewise located on the lights at the stadium and are ugly, but at least they are located at the stadium and not in a residential area. ' Councilmember Oden questioned if there was any information of the impact the placement of the monopole would have on property values. Director of Planning & Building stated that there was no information available and it would be difficult, if not impossible, to quantify. Councilmember Oden stated that it seems that Nextel did spend a lot of time researching the best location; that negioations had been done between the company and the Club; that the Club must feel there in no problem; and that all members at the Club do have ownership. Councilmember Hodges stated that some people may not know what is being proposed; that there is a fire station located nearby and questioned if that location could be used as an alternative. Fire Chief stated that there is space at the facility for the tower; and that there is a similar type of monopole located at Palm Springs Ford in Cathedral City. Mayor stated there is also one located on 1-10 going into Redlands and that people drive by and never notice it. Councilmember Oden questioned if this one would have other live palm trees surrounding it. Mayor stated that there would be trees planted around the monopole; that there is one located on the Mid-Valley Parkway that is placed in a cluster of trees; that typically when dealing with homeowner associations the majority of the members makes a determination and that is followed; that this is being presented by the homeowners association; that the mass must desire the tower; and questioned if in the place of oleanders if fichus could be used and if the Council desires time to view similar sites. Councilmember Hodges stated that she would like to see a similar monopole. Councilmember Jones questioned if the fire station site could be reviewed for suitability and added that the City would then receive the revenue from the site. Councilmember Oden stated that this is a business that has made an offer to the homeowners association; that it has been embraced by the homeowners association and that the Council should not be trying to find other locations for the monopole. Motion to approve the conditional use permit was presented; after which, it was moved by Oden, seconded by Kleindienst and failed to carry. ' Motion to deny the conditional use permit was presented by Hodges. Councilmember Oden questioned if all requirements were met before the item came to Council. Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 11 Director of Planning & Building stated that the conditional use permit process is the most rigorous process and added that if the motion is to deny, staff will prepare a resolution to come back at the next meeting for Council approval. 8 Motion for staff to prepare a resolution of denial to be presented at the next meeting was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Jones and carried by the following vote. AYES: Hodges, Jones and Reller-Spurgin NO: Oden and Kleindienst ABSENT: None COUNCIL COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/INTERAGENCY REPORTS: Councilmembers reported on various civic and community organizational meetings and events which they attended, subsequent to the last regular meeting, and announced upcoming events of community interest. LEGISLATIVE ACTION: 15. 2001 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Recommendation: That the Council call and give Notice to the General Municipal Election to be held Tuesday, November 6, 2001; adopt regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to materials to be submitted to the electorate and the costs thereof, and request the Registrar of Voters to render specific services; and consider options to resolving tie-votes for candidates in the City election. City Clerk reviewed the staff report. Councilmember Hodges stated that a special election should be called to resolve any tie votes. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin concurred and added that while it is thought it could never happen, it has. Mayor stated that in order to call a special election to resolve a tie vote, it would cost approximately $60,000 and recommended the matter be resolved by Council appointment. Resolution 20064, calling the election and Resolution 20065 pertaining to candidate regulations, were presented; after which, it was moved by Oden, seconded by Hodges, and unanimously carried, that R20064 and R20065 be adopted. Motion to continue tie-vote selection by Special Election was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Jones and carried by the following vote that the Motion be adopted. A AYES: Hodges, Jones, Oden and Reller-Spurgin NO: Kleindienst ABSENT: None. Council Minutes 6-6-01,Page 12 16. PERS AMENDMENT— POLICE SAFETY EMPLOYEES ' Recommendation: On May 16, 2001 Council continued this matter to give notice of its intention to approve an Amendment to the contract with the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System. A37. City Manager reviewed the staff report. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that negotiations were in good faith by both parties. Councilmember Hodges stated that last year her vote was "no" on the contracts; that this matter was misrepresented in the dollar amount, and on principle will be voting against the item. Mayor stated that in the staff report, it is cited that the amendment will cost $182,079, but that the budget reflects an increase of a different amount. Director of Finance &Treasurer stated that the final cost will be $177,000. Councilmember Jones stated he would likewise vote "no" and added that these arrangements are a part of why the City is operating in a deficit. Resolution 20066 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden and carried by the following vote that R20066 be adopted. AYES: Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Kleindienst NO: Hodges and Jones ABSENT: None. Motion to read Title of Ordinance for introduction was presented; after which it was unanimously carried that full , reading be waived and the Title of the Ordinance be introduced for first reading. City Clerk read Title of Ordinance as follows;_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden, and carried by the following vote that the Ordinance be introduced. AYES: Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Kleindienst NO: Hodges and Jones ' ABSENT: None Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 13 17. ALLOCATED POSITIONS AND COMPENSATION PLAN --AMENDMENT#5 Recommendation: That the Council approve Amendment #5 to the Allocated Positions and Compensation Plan to establish an allowance for the overfill of one Police Officer position. City Manager stated that the recommendation is due to an officer being on extended disability. Councilmember Hodges stated this is an overfill, not the addition of a new position, and added that during her tenure this is the first time the police department has not had vacancies. Resolution 20067 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden and unanimously carried that R20067 be adopted. 18. ORDINANCE FOR SECOND READING & ADOPTION (Intro 5-16-01) City Clerk read Title of Ordinance 1596 as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM "R-MHP" RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME PARK ZONE TO "R-3" MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND HOTEL ZONE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE WEST END OF MESQUITE ROAD, SECTION 22 after which; it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden, and a unanimously carried that further reading be waived and Ordinance 1596 be adopted. 19. AIRPORT FIRE STATION EXPANSION On May 16, 2001, Council continued this matter to award a contract to Palm Valley Construction for the expansion of the airport rescue and fire fighting station, including Alternates 1 and 3, for $877,000; and establish contract administration parameters. CP2000-32. A-----. City Manager withdrew the item. 20. 2000-01 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET AMENDMENT Recommendation: That the Council amend the 2000-01 fiscal year budget to add the Line 23 Storm Drain in El Cielo Road from Tahquitz Canyon Wash to Escoba Drive for $400,000. City Engineer reviewed the staff report and added that the funds are committed for the project. Mayor questioned if the funds are allocated to Line 23 could the Council later change the allocation to another area. City Engineer stated that priorities are difficult to change with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; that most are a part of a large Council Minutes 6-6-01,Page 14 project and takes a year or more before starting the project; and that many projects are in development stages for years. ' Mayor questioned if the funds could be used for street widening or in a different project to install drains. City Engineer stated that funds are committed to drains on the Master Plan; that we previously committed funds to projects and only pay for work that is done. Mayor stated that$400,000 does not build a lot of street drains; and questioned if the Council desired to hold the designation to determine if the economic opportunity for use of the funds arose in the future. Councilmember Oden stated that it does not sound like the Council can move the funding or designation. City Engineer stated that not only storm drains are on the list buy there are drainage issues on East Palm Canyon, west of the shopping center that will be addressed. Mayor questioned if projects can be added to the master list. City Engineer stated that each year the list is reviewed and modified. Resolution 20068 amending the budget was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Oden and unanimously carried, that R20068 be ' adopted. 21. ELECTRICAL LOAD/COST REDUCTION Recommendation: That the Council approve an electric load/cost reduction program to provide complementary energy audits to 200 businesses to determine load reduction, retrofit and behavioral changes to reduce energy usage for a cost of$12,000. City Manager reviewed the staff report, no further report was given. Minute Order 6858 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Oden, and unanimously carried, that MO6858 be adopted. 22. ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS: None. ADDED STARTERS: None REPORTS & REQUESTS: DEPARTMENT reports or requests—received and filed. ' 23. Treasurer's Investment Report as of April 30, 2001 Council Minutes 6-6-01, Page 15 CITY COUNCIL reports or requests a) Commission Appointments: Terms ending 6-30-2004. Cont'd to 6-13-01. Administrative Appeals Board 2 Airport Commission 3 Historic Site Preservation 4 Human Rights Commission 3 Library Board 3 (1-term ends 6-30-03) Parks & Recreation 4 (1-term ends 6-30-03) Personnel Board 1 Planning Commission 2 Public Arts Commission 2 Rent Control Commission 3 Villagefest Board 3 (2-retail; 1-jeweler) Mayor read nominations from a handout, copy on file in Office: of the City Clerk. Councilmember Hodges stated that there are two Commissions that she does not endorse the nominations; and that they are the Historic Site Preservation Board and the Planning Commission. Councilmember Oden stated that the nominations are up to the Mayor; that the Council recommends a short list; that the short list applicants are interviewed by the Council; that the recommendations are then made to the Mayor and the nominations made; that there is a lot of time spent on the process; that it is recognized that the Council recommendations are only advisory, but that what was presented to the Mayor and voted on by the Council is not what is happening with some of the nominations. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin questioned the tally on the Historic Site Preservation Board applicants. Mayor stated that five names were in the tally; that Councilmember Hodges stated after the interview process that the Mayor could decide and that the could make the decision on the nomination. Councilmember Hodges stated that her recollection of the event is not the same. Councilmember Jones stated that the Council could approve the Boards and Commissions it has concurrence on and leave the other two for another time. Councilmember Oden stated that the nominations are presented as a slate; and that he would not vote against the slate. Councilmember Hodges stated that she would vote against the slate; that there are problems with two of the Commissions and that those should be separate. Concurrence of Council to continue the matter to June 13, 2001. Council Minutes 6-6-01,Page 16 Councilmember Hodges requested the matter of pedicab signage be placed on an ' upcoming study session. PUBLIC reports or requests STAFF reports or requests City Manager requested a subcommittee for review of proposals submitted by lobbyists. Mayor and Councilmember Oden volunteered. ADJOURN: There being no further business, Mayor declared the meeting adjo rued. C ;k-tl_ PATRICIA A. SANDERS City Clerk 1