Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 - MINUTES - 7/21/1999 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 21, 1999 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Barnes, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, July 21, 1999, at 5:30 p.m., at which time, the City Attorney announced items to be discussed in Closed Session, and at 7:00 p.m., the meeting was convened in open session. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Barnes, Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin ' Absent: Mayor Kleindienst The meeting was opened with the Salute to the Flag, and an invocation by Rev. Jerry Johnson, Lily of the Valley Church in Christ. REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in accordance with Council procedures on July 16, 1999. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY ON MATTERS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION (All Entities) - See items on Page 6 of agenda this date. PRESENTATIONS: Wendy Busig-Koenig played a song by Michael Jackson in memory of the death of John F. Kennedy Jr. Mayor Pro Tent Barnes acknowledged the tribute to Mr. Kennedy, and added that the untimely death transcended any political fr:elings. HOUSING AUTHORITY: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: FINANCING AUTHORITY: - No Business COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting; adjourned for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelopment Agency. ' Convene as City Council, remain in session as the Community Redevelopment Agency for purposes of Joint Hearing. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING: 1. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECT AREA CONSOLIDATION Recommendation: That the Council adopt an ordinance consolidating the ten (124- redevelopment projects in Palm Springs into a single Project, called the "Merged 038) Redevelopment Project," for reporting and accounting efficiencies. Manager, Economic Programs, reviewed the staff report. Mayor declared the hearing open. Tom Davis, Tribal Planning Director, stated that the Tribal Council was opposed to the action being considered; that currently the Tribe is focusing on the Tahquitz-Andreas and Canyon Project Areas; that the Tribe is investing money in the areas; that there is a concern how this action may impact future development; that the tribe: would like to preserve the areas; and requested Council consideration to continue the matter to the next scheduled Joint Meeting with the Tribal Council in October, 1999. Darrell Meeks, Morongo Valley, stated that he concurred with Mr. Davis; that there is ' no reason to consolidate the areas except to allow the individual project area money to be cross spent; and that consolidation is only in the best interest of 2 or 3 project areas in Palm Springs. There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 2 City Attorney stated that a letter had been received from the Tribe; that there are several issues raised that should be researched; that there will be a hiatus in August and the matter could be delayed to September; and requested Council consideration of continuation. ' Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated in all fairness a continuation should be considered. Councilmember Hodges stated that a letter from Riverside County Flood Control District had also been received. Motion to continue to item to September 15, 1999, was presented, after which; it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden, and unanimously carried, that the matter be continued. Adjourn as Community Redevelopment Agency, remain in session as City Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Comments concerning item 3: Tom Kieley, President of DWA, stated that the Council and Agency needed to have dialogue about the proposed water purity measure; that the measure is not necessary; (083- that the issue will confuse the voters; that DWA is currently contracted with to perform 017) the services; that DWA has honored the contract, and spent $16 Million in doing so since inception; that DWA has reliance on the contract with the City; that it does not seem possible for the City to default a contract, then ask the voters to approve the action; that Section 1503 and 1505 of the Public Facilities Code may be in violation; ' and that at the last meeting between the City Manager and DWA this issue was not raised. Fred Ebeling, Palm Springs, stated that he agreed with Mr. Kieley; that the community has concerns about the way the WWTP is used as a banking institute for the City; that the City should be as well run as DWA; and requested that the Council not confuse the voters with so many advisory votes. Comments concerning item 4 & 5: Peter McKenzie, 11940 Whitewater Canyon Road; stated that as a representative of friends living in the pass area, approval of both items are requested. (123- Jim McKenzie, Whitewater resident, requested approval of both items, and added that 034) there is alot of scenic highway, and the area is of environmental concern; that there have been many years of struggling to keep the turbines off the ridgelines; that the turbines are noisy and an eyesore; and that the residents just request peace and quiet enjoyment of their homes. Marcus Winhues, Whitewater Canyon, stated that requests have been made to the BLM and the County Supervisors regarding this matter; that the residents request that Council approve the resolutions before them; and added that the whitewater ranch area is an ancient canyon and should be protected. Jim Ferguson, attorney and Palm Desert councilmember, stated 4 and 5 are two different matters; that item 5 does in fact offer visual relief for the residents in Painted Hills; that 88 turbines will come out and 19 will be put in their place; that an environmental assessment was performed; and stated that the area is not in City's jurisdiction. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 3 Comments concerning item 6: MareeElana Arenas, Chevron representative, stated that she is available for any questions regarding the item. Comments concerning item 7, 8, &9: , Karyn Barnes, stated that Parades of Palm Springs will be responsible for coordination of the parade and requested approval. Dick Sroda, stated that Villagefest should not be canceled; that regarding item 8, this is concerning motorcycles, that there has been no public input concerning the item; that last year the event was held at the Spa Casino, and why not this year; that the event chases away tourism for the City; that there will be 6,000 motorcycles tearing the street tip and requested Council deny the matter; that item 9 only subsidizes everyone who goes to Cathedral City and added that he did review the costs for the tournament. Darrell Meeks, stated that item 6 should be denied, that alcohol is not a necessity; that item 7 should be turned down; that item 8 calls for suspending the noise ordinance, with no time limit; that two-thirds of the games for the senior softball item are held out of town, and questioned why should we subsidize the event; and added that item 17 had come up about two or three years ago and should be given a RFP. John Lee, President of 80th Promenade, stated that the event will bring a national convention, with about 5,000 room nights being used; that it is unfortunate that the street fair is presenting a problem; that the parade is only one night, and will benefit the City; and that a good turnout is anticipated. Eric Meeks, stated that he can not support anything that would curtail his income; that , Rancho Mirage is moving ahead with internet services; that Palm Springs is losing ground without a web page; that a committee could be formed to review the benefits and savings for the City; that he is not pushing the item due to an interest in running for Council, nor to get a job, but rather to get internet access and reduce costs for the City. Linda Sroda, 2114 Calle Felcita, stated that the bike relocation is not acceptable; that the stadium only seats 5,046; that this is a residential neighborhood, surrounded by nursing homes, and churches; and requested Council denial. COUNCIL COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/INTERAGENCY REPORTS: Mayor pro tem extended the invitation for the Tribal Council to use City facilities for teleconferencing. Mayor entered at this point LEGISLATIVE ACTION: 2. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA TIME EXTENSIONS AB1342 Recommendation: That the Council adopt an ordinance extending the period of time the Community Redevelopment Agency is allowed to collect tax increment out to the (124- statutory maximum, as allowed by AB1342, for eight of the Agency's ten areas. 038) ' Manager, Economic Programs, reviewed the staff report and added that PA9 and the Canyon Project Area are not affected. Councilmember Hodges stated that earlier the Agency continued to the matter due to concerns expressed by RCFCD that the time extensions would invalidate the pass-thru agreements and added that an opinion is needed by the City Attorney. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 4 Motion to continue the matter to September 15, 1999, was presented, after which; it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden, and unanimously carried that the matter be continued. 3. 1999 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ' Recommendation: That the Council consider calling a Special Election to be consolidated with the General Municipal Election to be held Tuesday, November 2, 1999, to place one advisory vote only measure and two Charter Amendments on the ballot, all concerning the (083- Wastewatcr Treatment Plant. 017) City Attorney stated that there are three more measures for consideration; that Mr. Kieley spoke on one item;that there is a series of programs that need to be conducted at the plant; that while Mr. Kieley indicated that no dialogue had taken place, the City Manager and City Attorney had met personally 4 months ago with the Agency to discuss the issues; that staff has tried to keep the communication lines open;that with respect to the two measures for Charter Amendment, both prohibit borrowing from the sewer plant; that the City measures also prohibits from borrowing from any enterprise fund; that both provide charging fees that exceed the cost of services; that the City measure also prohibits using any moneys other than what is collected; that the City Measure permits privatization; that the City must retain ownership; that the rates setting authority is retained; that the argument that the Citizens would be gouged does not hold up; that privatization would only be based on a secure decrease; that currently projects show 18-30% decrease could be achieved through privatization; that some members of the Council have indicated concern about adding a competing measure to one that the citizens wrote; that the Council must remember that someone wrote the measure and the petition was circulated; that how much of the petition was read can not be guaranteed; that the City Measure is more comprehensive; that if the citizens were asked if it were ok to privatize and reduce rates, ' they would think that is a better choice; and that the measure just allows the citizens to choose which way to go. The third measure to be advisory is used for third stage treatment;that if the plant is privatized then the complete treatment of sewage will need to be reviewed; that there are different programs, such as recycling and composting, that need to be reviewed; that approval would not be a breach of contract; that if the voters decide to move ahead on the issue, the Council will need to review existing contracts at that time; and added that it appears DWA has made a proposal, but that staff had not received it as of yet. Mayor stated that there are three measures and three opportunities for written argument for consideration. Councilmember Hodges stated that she is against placing the measures on the ballot. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin concurred with Councilmember Hodges. Councilmember Barnes stated that the City measures are more comprehensive and he would be willing to serve on a committee to help write arguments in favor of the City measures. Mayor indicated he would also support the arguments. Councilmember Oden questioned if the City put a measure on the ballot, would it be prudent to also write arguments against the citizen measure. City Attorney stated that this is a statewide election; that primary arguments are written first, then rebuttals to those arguments; that the entire Council can author, or just a few members. Councilmember Oden stated he would likewise serve on the Committee. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 5 Resolution 19611 concerning the placement of the Citizen Initiative on the ballot, was presented, after which; it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller.-Spurgin, and unanimously carried, that R19611 be adopted. Resolution 19612 authorizing Councilmembers Barnes, Oden and Mayor Kleindienst to , file arguments against the measure was presented; after which, it was moved by Barnes, seconded by Oden, and carried by the following vote that R19612 be adopted. AYES: Barnes, Oden and Kleindienst NO: Reller-Spurgin and Hodges Councilmember Hodges stated that she is not in favor of adding the Council Measure to the ballot; that it will only serve to confuse the voters; that the City Attorney did not persuade her nor convince her that the measure serves any.purpose other than muddling up the issue. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that the measure will confuse people; and hoped that the people will be educated to understand what the whole issue is about. Councilmember Hodges clarified that her yes or no vote does not necessarily establish a position on the issue, but the process. Councilmember Oden stated that had the Citizen Initiative not come forward, a good opportunity would have passed by to improve the services the City offers and that the City Measure redefines those benefits and broadens them for the whole community. Resolution 19613 placing the Council Measure on the ballot was presented, after which; it was moved by Oden, seconded by Barnes, and carried by the following vote that R19613 be adopted. , AYES: Barnes, Oden and Kleindienst NO: Hodges and Reller-Spurgin Resolution 19614 authorizing Councilmembers Barnes, Oden and Mayor Kleindienst to file written arguments for the measure was presented, after which; it was moved by Barnes, seconded by Oden and carried by the following vote that R19614 be adopted. AYES: Barnes, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Kleindienst NO: Hodges Councilmember Barnes questioned the need for an advisory vote for water purity measures and the fiscal impact on the City. City Attorney stated that staff was directed to start the process of investigating programs due to the privatization process; that if the matter was passed, the costs would then be determined and that this action is merely direction to pursue the matter. Councilmember Barnes stated that this matter is a policy issue and one that the Council should determine. City Attorney stated the current lease with DWA does not include the reclamation of solids; and that the years remaining on the contract are subject to debate. ' Councilmember Oden stated that he did visit the plant last evening; that the plant is exceptional; that since the Council is examining the plant, the whole process should be reviewed; and that after the personal visit, he is better equipped and informed as a result. Mayor stated that the WWTP is ahead of its time; that it has been an award winning; facility for years;.that the facility now needs to be looked at globally; and that the future: demands expansion of the facility. � _- Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 6 Councilmember Hodges requested the City Attorney read the measure language and requested a straw vote of those present that actually understand the measure. ' City Attorney read Title of Resolution. Councilmember Hodges stated that the vote indicates the matter is confusing. Councilmember Barnes stated that it is possible to clear the confusion; that this measure includes third stage treatment; and questioned why staff would recommend trying to move away from DWA performing the duties. City Attorney stated that U.S. Filter could deal with the issue at the plant; that if the Council decides to move ahead, it would be an economic issue; that the measure just attains citizen opinion; and added that if the privatization is voted down the item does not matter. Councilmember Barnes stated that the item does seem to create a barrier; that if the City is allowed to privatize, we would still need to consult with DWA due to contracts; that the courtesy should be extended; and that approval of this matter creates a single interest and a single issue argument. City Attorney stated that staff was requested to prepare this matter for Council consideration several months ago. Councilmember Oden stated that while maintaining the relationship is important, Couccil is reviewing privatizing first; and that this is all a part of the issue. ' Councilmember Hodges stated that this is not true; that the only reason any of these matters are on the ballot is that the Council did not communicate with the Community as to what and why privatization was being reviewed; that if the Council had communicated there probably would not have been any opposition. Councilmember Oden stated that Ms. Hodges is correct; that in fact that is why the Council is elected, to guide the City and make decision for the benefit of its citizens. Councilmember Hodges stated that she is not sure how many of the Councilmembers understand this particular issue. Mayor stated that the reason for the advisory vote is a number of issues have gone sideways; that placing the matter on the ballot gives the voters the opportunity to have a first glance at the direction Council is moving; and that the ballot argument process is an opportunity to educate the voters. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that the unfortunate that next week the Council will be considering the issues regarding the WWTP, and it is the first opportunity for the public to hear the issues; that then the Council will be dark in August; that no one had the opportunity to hear the matter last week; and now, at the eleventh hour it is presented to the voters as an election issue, not a learning issue. Councilmember Barnes stated that after reasoning the privatization route and listening to ' other professionals he would not recommend this action; that the measure would jeopardize the relationship with DWA. Motion to deny the measure for treatment for water purity at the WWTP was presented, after which; it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller-Spurgin and carried by the following vote that motion be denied. - AYES: Barnes, Hodges and Reller-Spurgin NO: Oden and Kleindienst Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 7 4. CASE NO.20-146 - VENTURE PACIFIC INC. Recommendation: That the Council provide recommendations to the County of Riverside regarding Cs 20.146, Venture Pacific Inc., for the installation of 43 900-1000 (123- KW wind turbines OR 65 600 KW wind turbines on approximately 526.2 acres of land 034) (WECS 103) located in unincorporated Riverside County, south of Interstate 10, directly north of Windy Point and directly south of Whitewater Hill, Section 13, T3S, , R3E, SBBM. Director of Planning & Building reviewed the staff report and compared the City and Council Ordinances regarding setback, issues; and gave a visual presentation regarding site issues. Mayor questions if the turbines were new or replacements. Director of Planning & Buildings stated that all are new, there would be no tradeouts. Councilmember Hodges stated that the Resolution is somewhat confusing; that it seems the Council would be recommending approval of the turbines. Councilmember Oden questioned if the Council decision was a courtesy decision. Director of Planning & Building stated that while the area is not in the City's jurisdiction, the BLM, County and City have worked together on these issues; acid added that the City is close to the corridor. Councilmember Oden stated that this was an area of no turbine construction and questioned the benefits to the City. Director of Planning & Building stated that there are no direct; that in general there will ' be a reduction of air pollution; due to energy cost reduction; and added that the area was studied for annexation to the City. Councilmember Hodges questioned if the City has the right to say no more turbines at all in the area, and that by adding turbines, the scenic beauty is being destroyed. Mayor stated that the Council can make that statement; that the area is in the City sphere of influence; that in the County, LAFCO reviewed land issues; that in our interest this may be part of our future City; that the Council has indicated that turbines should be kept away to allow unrestricted view; that if the direction of turbines is continued, the entryway to Palm Springs will be saturated; that the anitude is to develop the ridgelines; that enough is enough; that the height is getting taller; and that Council needs to make sure its direction and desire is clear. Motion to continue the matter to July 28, 1999, to direct staff G:? prepare action to recommend denial of application indicating the concerns of the Council was presented, after which; it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Oden, and unanimously carried that the matter be continued. 5. EA NO.CA-066-99-27 - ENERGY UNLIMITED INC. Recommendation: That the Council consider forwarding comments that due to the visual impacts created by the installation of the wind turbines on residents of the Bonnie Bell community, the applicant explore alternative location for the new turbines to ' mitigate any further landform alterations and the further deterioration of the aesthetic quality of ridgelines east of Whitewater Canyon, consistent with the objective of the (123_ Open Space Land Use within the City's General Plan. 034) Director of Planning & Building added that the property is riot in the sphere of influence; that the Council has no baring on the issue; but that this is an area not yet opened up for turbines. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 8 Councilmember Hodges recommended denial of the application. Councilmember Barnes stated that there is validity to wind energy; but that there are some places that are appropriate and some that are not. Resolution 19615 as recommended, revised to indicate Council opposition of right of way grant for the turbines, and reduction of turbines to three, was presented, after which; it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Oden and unanimously carried that R19615 be adopted. 6. RESOLUTION OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY-CHEVRON Recommendation: That the Council adopt a Resolution of Convenience and Necessity to allow the sale of beer and wine at the mini-mart located at 6600 N. Indian Canyon (078_ Drive. The owner of the property is Palm Springs Partners, LLC, principal-J. Harvey. 076) Director of Planning & Building reviewed the staff report and added that the conditions of approval are consistent with the CUP. Mayor questioned if the matter was approved would the concentration of liquor stores be exceeded. Director of Planning & Building stated that whenever a Resolution of Convenience and Necessity is presented to the Council, the area is saturated with alcohol establishments; and that it is the opportunity for the Council to deny the application for additional sites. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that it is not in her beliefs to add her name to the endorsement of opportunity to purchase alcohol. Resolution 19616 as recommended was presented, after which; it was moved by Oden, seconded by Hodges and carried by the following vote that R19616 be adopted. AYES: Barnes, Hodges, Oden and Kleindienst NO: Reller-Spurgin. 7. 80TH PROMENADE NATIONALE PARADE Recommendation: That the Council approve expenditure of up to $8,000 to fund the cost of City support services for the 1999-80th Promenade Nationale Parade, and amend the budget thereto. (050- Director of Facilities reviewed the staff report and added that the parade is required to 007) be one mile long; that the Villagefest Board is aware of the issue; and that the matter was unanimously endorsed by the Parks and Recreation Board. In answer to questions by Council, Director of Facilities stated that the parade is scheduled to start at 7 p.m. Councilmember Reller-Spurgin questioned if the parade could be earlier. Karyn Barnes, Parades of Palm Springs, stated that the time of the parade is set in the bylaws and that the general meeting would not be over; that other routes were looked at, that none were workable; that the route must be one mile long; that if the parade started at Stevens and went to Alejo, it would continue on to the Legion; that it was her understanding that all the concerned parties did endorse the parade; that the matter was brought to the City in March; and that now the parade is only 5-6 weeks away. Councilmember Hodges questioned why it took 3 months to come to Council and why the event was left out of the budget. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 9 Director of Facilities stated that the matter did come before the Commission on April 21; that it was to be a part of the budget process, and was in fact in the staff proposed budget. Councilmember Hodges stated alternative sites could be considered such as Indian, , Tahquiuz or Sunrise; that both events should take place; that Villagefest cannot be closed; an acceptable alternative site could be found for the parade; that people could attend both events. Councilmember Barnes stated that parades have been held on Palm Canyon; that staff is knowledgeable about the timing and other necessary steps that need to take place for the parades to be coordinated; that a routine is set for Palm Canyon Drive; and questioned if the Special Events Task Force had met about the event. Director of Facilities stated that the meeting was held previously. Councilmember Barnes stated that regarding Villagefest, this request will only close the event one night; that the Villagefest runs in the red for revenue for the months of August and September anyway; and that by closing the event the City may actually save money. Councilmember Oden stated that with the two events being held on the same night, one event will suffer; and requested the Traffic Engineer report regarding the possible closure of an alternative street and the impact on safety. Police Chief stated that the Police Department would not recommend closure of another main artery; and suggested the parade could move down the center of Villagefest. Councilmember Hodges stated if that would work all problems would be solved. ' In answer to questions by Council, Director of Facilities stated that Villagefest does start at 6 p.m.; that the street closures do occur first; that pre-staging could occur north of Villagefest; that the parade is one mile long and should take 45 minutes; that vendors could be notified in advance; that the street closures could occur earlier to accommodate the parade; and that the funding would come from reserves in the Community Promotion Fund. Councilmember Barnes stated that all involved parties should meet al the next SEP meeting. Consensus of Council for the parade to move through the center of Villagefest. Minute Order 6448 as recommended and Res 19617 amending the budget were: presented, after which; it was moved by Oden, seconded by Reller-Spurgin, and unanimously carried that MO6448 and R19617 be adopted. S. PALM SPRINGS BIKE WEEKEND Recommendation: That the Council sponsor the Palm Springs Bike Weekend by waiving rental fees of City facilities, not to exceed $5,350, and adopt a Resolution (050- temporarily suspending certain regulatory ordinances during the 1999 event. 007) Director of Facilities reviewed the staff report and added that the original request was ' for around $10,000 and a request for waiver of fees; that the event can not be downtown this year due to the Palm Canyon Drive renovation; that Sunrise Park was recommended; and that the entertainment in the Stadium shall be over by 8 p.m. Councilmember Hodges stated that the event will only be located at Sunrise Park this year due to Palm Canyon Drive renovation; and that even though it may be a small hassle, the event is alot of fun and does boost tourism. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 10 In answer to questions by staff, the promoter stated that the event will be the same as last year, except the location; that the event will host the ride and shine breakfast at 6 a.m.; that the same types of vendor booths will be set up; that initially on Saturday the vendors will start opening the booths; that the grand kickoff will be at 9 a.m.; and that ' entertainment will start at 11 a.m. or noon. Mayor stated that not many people will accept bikes starting up at 6 a.m.; and questioned where the bike activities would take place. Director of Facilities stated that the Pavilion Field may be used; that access to the parking lot would be available; that the bike games consist of bikes racing 20 or so yards as slow as the bike can move and other challenging skill rides. Mayor stated that there is concern regarding the intensity and timing of the activities due to proximity of the neighborhoods. Minute Order 6449 as recommended and Resolution 19618 suspending regulatory ordinances were presented, after which; it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Oden and carried by the following vote that MO6449 and R19618 be adopted. AYES: Barnes, Hodges, Oden and Reller-Spurgin NO: Kleindienst. 9. SENIOR SOFTBALL WORLD SERIES BID On July 7, 1999, Council continued this matter to consider the Recreation Division submitting a bid to host the 2000 Senior Softball World Series from September 29 (050- ' through October 8. 007) Director of Facilities reviewed the staff report and added that at the July 7, 1999, meeting, Council requested the calculations of revenue; that based on the CVB numbers, estimates would run somewhere around $101,000 in direct revenue; that would exclude airfare, or additional people traveling with the teams; that people are attracted to Palm Springs; that there is a potential of 200 teams; that many have discretionary incomes; and recommended Council approval. City Attorney commented that the revenue figures were reviewed by counsel; that the figures are based on number of room nights; that negotiations did include language that would guarantee room nights, but that it was not agreed to; and that some of the language does need to be changed in the proposed contract to reflect California law rather than Michigan. Director of Facilities stated that this event would be typical of any event hosted by the City; that a Palm Springs Hotel will be designated as the Host Hotel; that in 1998 the event generated about 500 down valley rooms; that a stronger presence is felt downtown; and that although it can not be required to stay in Palm Springs, most do want to stay at the host hotel. City Manager stated that the event does make an investment in the Community; that the gross revenue last year for the event was over $101,000; and that the economic factor is trickled down to be felt throughout the City. Councilmember Barnes stated the event does stand up to the test; that it would be good to support the event another year; that it may be advisable to start the dialogue with Palm Desert and Cathedral City to host the event as a joint venture next year. Mayor stated that out of 13 fields used, 9 are located in other cities; that there are personnel that must be on site during the event and questioned whether Palm Springs personnel are used in other Cities. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 11 Director of Facilities stated that the off-duty personnel are used in other cities. Mayor stated that one of the concerns of the Council has been the use of clean facilities during AYSO and other youth activities; that we are paying for that to happen; that this event would cause even higher usage and responsibility for other cities; that it is ' questionable if the City does break even; and that no other City is contributing to Palm Springs to help offset the costs, even though room nights are being generated for their City. Councilmember Barnes clarified that last year the City bid $72,000 in cash and $54,484 for in-kind expenses; and that this year the bid is for $130,000 cash and no in-kind expenses. Director of Facilities stated that this year's bid is different; that there are no in-kind expenses; that all bids are paid upfront; that regarding the upkeep of the restrooms, all costs are figured in and that if the tournament requests additional services, they must be paid for separately. Mayor questioned why staff would recommend the event. City Manager stated that Office of Management and Budget determined the revenue would balance. Motion not to submit bid was presented, after which; it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Oden, and carried by the following vote, that no action be taken. AYES: Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Kleindienst NO: Barnes. 10. ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS: None ' CONSENT AGENDA: Review by City Manager of Consent Items to be clarified. 11. MO 6456 rescinding Minute Order 6423A for contract services with Jerry Ogburn dba (133- Redac2 for fiscal year 1999-2000 for $135,000 for the continuation of the Village of Palm 005) Springs Development Center. See #11 below. 12. MO 6450 approving first amendment to Overland Resources, Inc., for right-oF-way (123- acquisition for the Mid-Valley Parkway Phase 2 for $2,890, total contract amount $6,740, 020) CP96-34, A3977. 13. MO 6451 approving a contract change for the payroll/human resource system with High (117- Line Corporation for $66,520. A3909. 048) 14. MO 6452 ratifying the emergency purchase of a remanufactured engine for the 1992 Beck (087- Fire Truck, with Trans West Ford Truck Sales for $20,474.55. 003) 15. MO 6453 approving a preventive maintenance purchase order for printing equipment from (084- A.M. Multigraphics for a 1-year period for $18,831, plus applicable taxes. 018) 16. MO 6454 approving an agreement with Cement Unlimited for creation of an architecturally (117- designed base and seating area and installation of the Charlie Farrell Memorial bronze statue 037) for $16,000 located at the NE corner of Tahquitz Canyon Way and El Cielo Road. A4121. 17. MO 6455 approving the option for extension of Conrad and Associates LLP, for two years (058- for audit services of city finances of fiscal years 1998-99 and 1999-00, for $51,000 per 001) year. Council Minutes 7-21-99, Page 12 18. Res 19619 approving guidelines for participation in the Pacific Housing & Finance Agency (123- for the "Lease to Own" program for residential home purchases. 032) ' 19. Res 19620 adopting an appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2000. (061- 027) 20. Res 19623 declaring intent to vacate its right, title and interests in a portion of the right-of- (045- way dedicated for that street known as South Palm Canyon Drive lying south of Arenas 001) Road in Section 15, T4S, R4E. See#20 below. 21. Res 19621 and 19622 approving Payroll Warrants and Claims & Demands. (086- 018) Note abstentions, if any: Councilmember Warrant# - Payee Particular Nature of Conflict Hodges 943627 DWA Client of Employer 943628 943665 Granite 943785 Prfd Plumbing Reller-Spurgin 943843 Spurgin Spouse Resolutions 19619 through 19623 and Minute Orders 6450 through 6456 were presented, after which; it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Barnes, and unanimously carried that R19619-19623 and MO6450-6456 be adopted. 11. REDAC 2 DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT (133- City Manager stated that this item was previously approved under City Council action 005) and should have Community Redevelopment Agency action; that the Agency has approved the action and this would rescind the previous approval. Minute Order 6456 was presented, after which; it was moved by Barnes, seconded by Hodges, and unanimously carried that MO6456 be adopted. 20. STREET VACATION-PORTION OF SOUTH PALM CANYON Planning Direction stated that the location is in front of Muriel's on Palm Canyon and action would set the hearing date for September 1, 1999. (145- 001) Resolution 19623 was presented, after which; it was moved by Kleindienst, seconded by Reller-Spurgin and unanimously carried, that R19623 be adopted. ADDED STARTERS: None REPORTS & REQUESTS: CITY COUNCIL reports or requests PUBLIC reports or requests STAFF reports or requests ' ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m. PATRICIA A. SANDERS City Clerk