HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 - MINUTES - 5/5/1999 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 5, 1999
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, was called to order
by Mayor Kleindienst, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, May
5, 1999, at 5:30 p.m., at which time, the City Attorney announced items to be discussed in Closed
Session, and at 7:00 p.m., the meeting was convened in open session.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Barnes, Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin, and '
Mayor Kleindienst
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the Salute to the Flag, and an invocation by LaVeta Dillman,
Chapel on the Way.
PRESENTATIONS: PSHS Student Body - No show
Plaque to former Commissioner Jim Ferguson
PS Tourism Week
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in
accordance with Council procedures on April 30, 1999.
REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY ON MATTERS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION (All
Entities) - See items on Page 5 of agenda this date.
HOUSING AUTHORITY: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: FINANCING
AUTHORITY: - No Business
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting; adjourned for
the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelopment Agency; after which, members
reconvened as the City Council, and business resumed. '
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Oden, seconded by Barnes, and unanimously carried, Hodges abstaining, that
the Minutes of April 7, 1999 be approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. C.U.P. 5.0800 - PSUSD
Recommendation: That the Council approve a Type II Conditional Use Permit to install
two microwave tower antenna structures on the top of the School District
Administration Building at 980 Tahquitz Canyon Way, C-1-AA, Sec 14. (078-
Director of Planning & Building reported that the originally requested height was 80
feet and would serve all schools from the one location; that the Commission asked for a
re-evaluation, which resulted in two antenna to be on top of the building, rather than
one free-standing unit; that the two would be 15-11 and 25-feet, for a total of the heights
to be 55 ft from the ground; that the School District considers the amenua an interim
solution, with permanent solution in 5-10 years depending on changes in technology;
that the Tribal Council and its Planning Commission had concerns regarding the antenna
on Indian leased land, and it met with the District and the proposed resolution has been
revised, i.e., the fifth Whereas clause has been revised concerning removal within 3 '
years or after certain lots have approved building permits issued for them; and on Page
5 of the conditions, in that No. 3 repeats that criteria with provision to allow mutual
extension of time between the Tribal Council and the District. He displayed visual)
exhibits, noting that the towers will be seen mainly on Avenida Caballeros south from
the Convention Center and through the trees.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Gary Boyce, P.S. U.S. D. representative, indicating availability to answer questions.
Council Minutes
5-5-99,Page 2
There being no further appearances,the hearing was closed.
Mayor expressed concern as to setting precedent to place the towers on two story buildings,
for others who might have the same need.
Councihnember Oden stated that the use is temporary and addresses a need relative to
children in schools,and that might not be optimum,but it is one that must be done.
Director of Planning & Building stated that shielding through strategic placement of plants
was considered; that it is a public facility and an interim measure; that the District may
have been ahead in its plan and he agreed it may not be the best solution , and that it is a
severe recommendation that it may have to be removed in three years.
In response to question by Council, Mr. Boyce explained the need for the tower,which was
the result of professional consultation and studies by the District,which looked at different
approaches and costs;that cost is a major concern and education for kids is an even bigger
concern; that the towers will allow communication between the schools and the universe;
and that new technology as it becomes available and at cheaper costs will mean that the
towers will come down. He noted that if the tower were on a school site, City approval
would not be required.
Council consensus that the three year condition was acceptable.
Resolution 19509 as revised, was presented; after which, it was moved by Oden, seconded
by Reller-Spurgin,and unanimously carried,that R19509 be adopted.
2. AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM-PROPERTY ACQUISITION
Recommendation: That the Council adopt a Resolution of Necessity to acquire three
parcels (Sungold Development) inside the future runway protection zones and within the (051-
CNEL 65 contours (Palm Springs). Hearing continued from March 17, 1999. 046)
Director, Dept. of Transportation Asst. City Manager-Operations reviewed his
memorandum in detail, along with a,supplemental report, copies of which were provided to
the Councilm,and are on file.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Diane Dykema, property owner, stated that there is no necessity to take the property, and
asked that the Resolution not be adopted. She stated that the FAA informed her that this is
solely a City decision; that no condemnation proceedings have been started on any of the
properties; that she has received inconsistent information as to the City intended use of the
property; that she has been told that the City was dealing with a local Realtor to offer the
property to Burger King or Carl's Jr.;that the City has not made any contact, nor has there
been any contact by the City attorney,nor an appraisal made on the easement;that she has
acquired the 7th lot, and is willing to proceed with the easement,and would like commercial
use of the property; that there is no desire to lure away any existing Airport business, but
there are others who do not have car rental space at the Airport; that she would like the
zoning at it highest and best use; that the FAA will not do anything contrary to the City's
decision, and she did not believe rejecting the Res. of Necessary would in any way
jeopardize the relationship between the City and the FAA, because there is no need to take
the property; that she would like to believe that the effort is being made in good faith, but
' the City has not followed through in what it prescribed in its last letter.
Fred Noble, 120 E. Tahquitz Canyon,stated that the City made a low-ball effort to buy the
property; that a broker was offering it to at least two commercial users; that the Dykema
family is acquainted with the Karcher's who own Carl's Jr.; that he believed events may
have been happening simultaneously; that this is not a runway safety issue, but a
condemnation to buy low and resale high, and to make money for the Airport; that it is not
an acceptable thing to do by using governmental power; that the legalities may be resolved
in court, but the evidence will show what the City did; that the Ramon corridor, in the
meantime, is developing; that the owners have been approached with a view toward
Council Minutes
5-5-99,Page 3
developing an entire block; that Sungold is prepared to develop in a proper fashion, and
would like to have the Council instruct the staff to zone the property commercial and to
accept the safety easement of the nature proposed and see the property developed to it
highest and best commercial use. He stated that one element of City staff is trying to get e
economic development to occur, and another portion is trying to slow it down; and that the
condemnation is not appropriation and the resolution should not be adopted. '
Dick Sroda, resident, stated that this is supply a condemnation of private property; that he
was surprised that the matter has been carried forward this many times on the flimsy basis
of"necessity"that there is no public interest in this; that it is a prime piece., of commercial
land; that if the City wants to voluntarily discus buying it, that would be acceptable, but it
should not be using public condemnation to get it; and that the FAA letter said"ideally we
want the airport to acquire property"and he considered such language wishy-washy and felt
the City would lose in court,and he did not understand how it could justify its position.
Darrell Meeks, Morongo Valley, stated that the Council should adopt a resolution ordering
the Airport not to purchase the property; that the FAA letters does not stated that it is a
necessity, rather that it would be "nice" but not that it must be purchased; that there are
other properties nearer the Airport for which nothing has been planned; and that he
questioned if the Mayor could participate in the decision.
Fred Ebeling,resident, stated that he felt the staff has what appears to be a private interest,
and the decision would pervert federal legislation locally.
There were no further appearances,and the hearing was closed.
Councilmember Barnes stated that the bottom line question is whether there must be a
taking of the property, and the answer is that ultimate the City is not required to do so, but
due to past record and consistency of action and what the FAA expects, it is something that '
should be done; that one option is to take the easement and compensation the owners for it,
which is inconsistent with the owners fight against he condemnation, only to be happy to be
compensated for the easement;and he questioned what the City would get W it took only the
easement.
Assistant City Manager-Operations stated that the easement would allow only minimum use
on the property, basically, a parking lot or agricultural use; that the mauln objective is to
keep the property in a compatible use-e.g.,at LAX such area is used for parking lots -
that the City does not build parking lots; that efforts are in process to acquire all vacant
properties and residential property at both ends of the runway, but the City does not have
the resources to do them all at one time; that the Airport service station is not within the:
Runway Protection Zone(RPZ), and a large portion on the corner must remain vacant;that
the Airport does not have any Realtor working on this matter; that there have been some;
talks about the Airport property,but not others;that the Airport does not zone the property„
and it was R and increased to P, which was not a down-zoning; and thatt once acquired,
there is not intent to sell it.
Councilmember Oden noted that in other instances, grant funds are obtained and the;
recipients did not follow the expectations of the grant, only to find that the next time they
filed for a grant, one was not given;that the project would be funded by an FAA grant, and
the Council should not take lightly what the Council has done with the noise and RPZ
elements, in that it established consistency, and the proposed action is what has been dons:
thus far, and it should be continued;that there had to be a reason for the FAA to have made;
the recommendation, and ignoring it could potentially jeopardize the entire valley airport, ,
and he was not willing to take that risk.
Councilmember Hodges requested that the City Manager follow-up on the allegation
concerning a Realtor representing the City, regardless of what action occurs; and she,
questioned if a restriction could be added to provide that the property would not be used for
anything other than agriculture or parking lot, and whether the City could then lease the
properly back to Sungold to be used for parking associated with development on its adjacent
property.
Council Minutes
5-5-99,Page 4
Assistant City Manager-Operations stated that there may be compatible uses which include
parking, but a drive-through fast food could not be placed on the site by anyone, and there
would be nothing to stop the City from leasing the site for parking.
City Attorney noted that even if the condemnation proceeding is authorized, there is the
opportunity to work out settlement with the owner, including a parking lease; and that the
City is not trying to acquire the lot in order to sell it at a high price. He stated that he
discussed the Mayor's standing in this matter with him to clarify the conflict situation,
because he abstained on it the last time it was discussed; that the FPPC dealt with the very
specific facts at the time it looked at the conflict issue,which was the whole Airport Master
Plan, and said that decision was unique to those facts;that there are many issues concerning
the Airport, and the material effect must be looked at on a case by case basis; that the
Mayor was leery if any item simply referred to the Airport,and if he should abstain;that the
issue is whether he has any economic interest in the vicinity of this property(300 feet) and
the answer was No;that this is merely a implementation of one step in the master plan, and
his understanding was that the Mayor checked on this date and found that he has no
economic gain,and none exists, and therefore he has no conflict.
Mayor stated that he did not want to see the property left baron, and questioned if it would
be landscaped in any manner.
Councilmember Hodges stated that she previously stated she did not know if the property
was needed, and there is not a clear answer to that question; that she understood that there
is the master plan and this is only a part of it; that the goal was to acquire property as part
of the plan, and she had not considered the consistency issue in terms of other properties
until it was raised in this meeting; that other properties were taken by condemnation, and
this is not much different; and that she would like to see some type of resolve worked out
with the developer,however,the properties at both ends of the runway are needed.
' Res 19510 of necessity, as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by
Oden,seconded by Barnes,and unanimously carried,that R19510 be adopted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) Comments on matters not related to an agenda item:
Roberta Dyer,resident,complimented the success of the Dog Park on behalf of dog
owners and their dogs.
Eric Meeks, resident, stated that the Council should be the "employee" who
provides information and helps overcome hurdles in communication, and not hire a
new city employee; that funds for a new employee should be used to develop an
interactive internet site,through which the citizens could buy a dog license, obtain
permits,and other information.
Fred Ebeling, resident, expressed his opinion concerning public employees,
elections and government in general, and that public employees should not have the
right to vote.
Don Frank, resident, reiterated comments he has made in the past concerning the
disappearance of Jeremy Crocker and his opinion as to the lack of interest by the
local police,council,and media in finding him.
' b) Comments on Items 3-6:
Art Bunce, Tribal Council Attorney, stated that Items 3-4-5 all deal with the same
subject, regarding the opening of Tahquitz Canyon, but they are not related in
terms of action; that he understood concerns regarding wording on Item 3, but felt
that the other subjects could be moved forward;that Item 5 is necessary,because of
bids and that the Tribal Council has a contractor ready to proceed, however, the
bids expired on May 4, and a short extension might be possible, and the Tribal
Council was requesting that the Council proceed with its action.
'.' '1 'J
Council Minutes
5-5-99,Page 5
Tom Davis, Tribal Planning Consultant, stated that there might be some conflict
regarding the working on Item 3, but if the item is continued, there could be an
adverse economic impact on the Tribe; that if the matter is continued to another
meeting, it be at a time when the Council can take official action; that the visitor
center needs to be underway. '
c) Comments concerning Items 13 & 16:
Darrell Meeks, Morongo Valley, stated that the Council promised to place the
utility tax on the ballot in 1999, and it should reject the action in Item 16, and not (051-
authorize staff to approve change orders which should come to the Council. He 095)
added that he disagreed with the City Attorney's opinion concerning the Airport
Master Plan and the Mayor's conflict of interest, and that it is merely the City
Attorney's opinion, and not that of the FPPC, and reflects arguments which he
made at the hearing before the FPPC, which did not prevail. He stated that he
thought another ruling was needed.
Dick Sroda,resident,stated that the rail station parking lot was just completed, and
questioned why money needed to be spent to slurry seal it. He stated that (143-
concerning Item 16, it is not right to have nearly $400,000 in change orders 006)
approved by the staff,without coming to the Council for approval;that they should
be itemized and discussed; and he did not trust city employees to prove the need for
them.
d) Comments concerning Item 2:
Diane Dykema stated that she would provide the name of the Realtor to the City (051-
staff. 046)
COUNCIL COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/INTERAGENCY REPORTS: '
a) Mayor and Councilmembers reported on various civic and community
organizational meetings and events which they attended, subsequent to the last
regular meeting, and announced upcoming events of community interest.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
3. BELARDO ROAD BRIDGE-MOU
Recommendation: That the Council approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the
Tribal Council,defining issues relative to the Belardo Bridge.
4. TAHQUITZ CANYON VISITOR CENTER
Recommendation: That the Council approve the proposed Tahquitz Canyon Visitors
Center,subject to recommendation to the Tribal Council.
5. TAHQUITZ REGIONAL PARK-REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER
Recommendation: That the Council authorize transfer of certain properly in Tahquitz
Regional Park, pursuant to the provisions of Agr 2435, to the Agua Caliente Band of
Cahuilla Indians,and a grant of right-of-way and easement for road purposes. '
6. AGUA CALIENTE TRIBAL BILLBOARD ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 8
Recommendation: That the Council review and consider proposed amendments to the
Tribal Billboard Ordinance.
Concerning Items 3 through 6,the City Manager reported that these matters(along with that
of the Community Redevelopment Agency) would be withdrawn in order to discuss a joint
meeting, looking at possibly May 26 or June 9; and that regarding the time of the
Council Minutes
5-5-99,Page 6
construction bid, it may be possible to gain a 45-day extension, and that sometimes a
reduced bid is received when matters are rebid.
7. AA 3.1474(RSPB 33)-ADDITION 600 PANORAMA ROAD(MARMOL)
Recommendation: That the Council approve a 98-square foot addition to the Class I
Historic Residence(Loewy)at 600 Panorama Road,R-1-B, Section 3. (076-
001)
Director of Planning&Building reviewed his report,noting that the changes are minor; that
most Class I residences have been resident occupied; that the original house did not have
hallways, and the proposal would add a hallway of compatible building materials,but with
a slightly different appearance; and that both the Planning Commission and HSPB
recommend approval.
Councilmember Barnes stated that the key is that the character of the house will not be
affected,and it will appear as if it had been designed that way from the beginning.
Councihnember Oden added that it also shows that properties do not lose their value,and
that owners can continue to make improvements.
Resolution 19511 as recommended,was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges,
seconded by Reller-Spurgin, and unanimously carried,that R19511 be adopted.
8. AA 3.1724 (HSPB 33)-MT. SAN JACINTO WINTER PARK AUTHORITY-
RENOVATION
Recommendation: Concerning application for Phase I, Renovation of the Tramway Valley
Station, including enclosure around existing outdoor equipment area, new retaining walls (142-
' and screening of ground mounted mechanical appurtenances on 20-ac site at west end of 001)
Tramway Road,U-R zone,Section 7(HSPB 33).
Director of Planning & Building reviewed his report, and stated that the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the site and grading for the expansion of the base
station;that some of the base station.building will be remodeled; and the fact there has been
recent controversy over historic sites, the HSPB was asked for a recommendation, and it
has endorsed the application. He displayed visual exhibits, noting the distinction for added
areas.
Resolution 19512 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Barnes,
seconded by Reller-Spurgin, and unanimously carried,that R19512 be adopted.
9. GENE AUTRY TRAIL CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Recommendation: That the Council approve the"Gene Autry Trail Corridor Improvement
Program," dated April 26, 1999, as an economic development enhancement for affected (136-
departments,attainable by December 31,2000. 006)
Assistant City Manager-Operations reviewed his report,noting that the corridor from Vista
Chino to E. Palm Canyon has a variety of needs,e.g.,signals,bridges, landscaping,and the
plan is a listing of those items, many of which are in process, and are grant funded; that
grants will be pursued; and that the plan is not a replacement for the normal process for
projects,rather a goal-setting statement.
Minute Order 6397 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-
Spurgin, seconded by Oden,and unanimously carried,that MO6397 be adopted.
Council Minutes
5-5-99,Page 7
10. ORDINANCES FOR SECOND READING&ADOPTION(Intro. 4-21-99)
City Clerk read titles of the following ordinances:
Ord 1568 amending the Municipal Code relative to Job Creation Incentive Program;and (103- '
048)
Ord 1569 amending the Zoning Map re General Plan conformity NW corner N Palm (149-
Canyon and Tramway Road, Section 3; 016)
after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin, seconded by Oden, and unanimously carried,
that further readings be waived, and that Ordinances 1568 and 1569 be adopted.
11. TRAM ROAD CHALLENGE SPONSORSHIP
Consideration of request for $10,000 sponsorship contribution to the Positive Alternatives
for Youth Council from the P.S. Energy Services Community Resources Program, (050-
established by Portland General/Enron, to help fund the 1999 P.S. Tram Road Challenge 007)
6K Run/Walk.
City Manager highlighted the memorandum of the Director of Facilities.
Councilmember Barnes noted that the Youth Council and Positive Alternatives for Youth
will try to replace the funds next year, and not rely on them; and that funds raised are
distributed through local youth charities.
Minute Order 6398 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Oden,
seconded by Barnes,and unanimously carried,that MO6398 be adopted.
ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS: -none ,
CONSENT AGENDA:
12. MO 6399 approving agreement with the State Dept. of Corrections to continue to allow the (113-
State Parole and Community Services Division to use the police range to conduct firearms 006)
training for parole agents,A4102.
13. See Item 24.
14. Res 19513 authorizing City Manager to execute change orders with G&M Construction,
City's current fuel containment contractor; and authorize the Procurement Manager to acquire (117-
necessary equipment to allow the W WTP staff to complete a mandatory conversion of the gas 008)
chlorine system to a liquid system,total project estimate$125,000,A3902. Hodges abstained
due to a Client of Employer relationship.
15. MO 6400 approving Amendment No. 8 to A3138 with Isbill Associates Raytheon
Infrastructure,Inc.,for design and field engineering services related to additional concrete apron (0 51-
recently funded by the FAA. Kleindienst abstained due to prior FPPC ruling concerning the 021)
Airport Master Plan.
16. See Item 25..
17. MO 6401 awarding contract to E.L. Yeager Construction Co.,Inc.for concrete apron fill-in, (051- '
CP99-06,AIP-026,for$1,422,945,A4103. Kleindienst abstained due to prior 17PPC ruling 010)
concerning the Airport Master Plan.
18. MO 6402 approving sole source purchase of eight passenger bridge baggage chutes from J&B (051-
Aviation Services,Inc.;not to exceed$26,536.Kleindienst abstained due to prior FPPC ruling 095)
concerning the Airport Master Plan.
19. MO 6403 authorizing City Manager to accept federal grants up to$5 million related to the (051-
rehabilitation and reconstruction of Taxiway"W'in accordance with the Airport Master Plan 020)
Council Minutes
5-5-99,Page 8
and FAA Airport Capital Improvement Program. Mcindienst abstained due to prior FPPC ruling
concerning the Airport Master Plan.
20. MO 6404 approving purchase and installation of an automatic vehicle identification system for (051-
the Airport loop road,not to exceed$238,000.Kleindienst abstained due to prior FPPC ruling 074)
' concerning the Airport Master Plan.
21. MO 6405 awarding bid to furnish patio furniture for the Phase IIA Terminal Expansion to (051-
Landscape Forms,Inc.,not to exceed$36,964.15.Kleindienst abstained due to prior FPPC 095)
ruling. Kleindienst abstained due to prior FPPC ruling concerning the Airport Master Plan.
22. MO 6406 approving purchase and installation of baggage conveyor system components (051-
necessary to expand the existing baggage claim devices with American Baggage Handling Inc., 095)
not to exceed$225,000.Kleindienst abstained due to prior FPPC ruling concerning the Airport
Master Plan.
23. Res 19514 and 19515 approving Payroll Warrants and Claims&Demands.
Note abstentions,if any: (086-
Councilmember Warrant# Payee Particular Nature of Conflict 018)
Hodges 941632 Bldrs Supply Client of Employer
941687 DWA Client of Employer
941712 C. Fosters Client of Employer
941714 G&M Client of Employer
941720 Granite Client of Employer
941766 Landau Client of Employer
941826 Pref Plmbg Client of Employer
' It was moved by Oden,seconded by Barnes, and unanimously carried,that Minute Orders 6399
through 6406 and Resolutions 19513 through 19515 be adopted;with the following abstentions:
Mcindienst abstained on Resolution 19516 and Minute Orders 6400 through 6406;and Hodges
on Resolution 19513, and warrants,for the reasons as noted.
24. SLURRY SEAL CHANGE ORDER
Recommendation: That the Council approve Change Order No. 1 to increase contract with
Bond Blacktop by $16,250 for the 1998-99 annual slurry seal program, to add roads and
parking areas of the railway station as part of the program,CP98-29,A4063. (136-
City Engineer stated that at the time of completion of the contract,staff felt it would be wise
to slurry the older portion of the parking lot, to extend the life of the lot and to have a
homogenous appearance; that the contract bid price was very favorable this year, and by
eliminating the striping portion of the rail station improvement, and completing it under the
slurry project, as well,the net cost would be$11,000 (increase one contract and decrease of
the other by $4,000-$5,000);that the slurry contractor completed its work, and in order to
take advantage of the price, the work was completed after completion of the agenda
memorandum, but before the Council meeting; and the proposed action, in effect, is a
ratification of the change order.
City Attorney stated that in the amendment to the Purchasing Ordinance, it may be possible
to create a more flexible means of dealing with the change orders of this nature.
Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated she would not vote in favor of the minute order, in
order for staff to realize that perhaps these matters will not slip by.
Minute Order 6407 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Barnes,
seconded by Oden,and carried by the following vote that MO6407 be adopted.:
AYES: Barnes,Hodges,Oden,&Mcindienst
NO: Reller-Spurgin
ABSENT: None
Council Minutes
5-5-99,Page 9
25. AIRPORT TRADE CONTRACTS -CHANGE ORDER AUTHORIZATION
Recommendation: That the Council approve an increase in authorizations granted to the
Director, Dept. of Transportation (now Asst. City Manager-Operations) wider Res 19221 (051-
to approve change orders for trade contracts for the Airport Phase IIA Terminal Building 095) '
]Expansion from 2.5%to 5%,subject to City Manager approval.
Mayor stated that he would abstain due to prior FPPC ruling concerning the Airport Master
Plan.
Assistant City Manager-Operations stated that 2.5% of the contract amount is $271,000;
that the prior authorization amount is almost exhausted; that any amount in excess of the
2.5% comes to the Council, and that several single large change order amounts have
already been approved by the Council;that the authorization enables him,with the approval
of the City Manager, to make daily decisions to keep the expansion project on target; and
that there is $800,000 identified in the bond issue for change orders, which is not unusual
for a project of this size; and that the authorization is for an aggregate amount, not a per
change order amount.
Resolution 19516 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Oden,
seconded by Reller-Spurgin, and unanimously carried, Kleindienst abstainirg, that R19516
be adopted.
ADDED STARTERS: None
REPORTS&REQUESTS:
CITY COUNCIL reports or requests ,
a) Boards & Commissions: Appointments and/or reappointments, if any, concerning
annual recruitment and existing vacancies. Interview schedule set as follows: May
18 from 5:00-7:30 p.m., May 20 from 4:00- 6 P.M., and May 25 from 5 -7:30
p.m.
PUBLIC reports or requests
a) Jim Barrial, Parks & Recreation Commission Chair, announced the "collectibles"
sale at City Hall on May 15,to raise funds for the Dog Park.
STAFF reports or requests-None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at 9:40 p.m.,Mayor declared the meeting adjourned.
/JUDITH SUMICH--
City Clerk
1