HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 - MINUTES - 5/18/1994 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 18, 1994
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, was called to order by
Mayor Mayanov, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Talnquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, May 18,
1994, at 6:30 p.m., at which time, the City Attorney announced items to be discussed in Closed
Session, and at 7:30 p.m., the meeting was convened in open session.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Hodges, Lyons, Reller-Spurgin, Schlendorf and Mayor
Maryanov
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the Salute to the Flag, led by Boy Scout Troop 199 and an invocation
by Reverend Jack Morrow, Desert Chapel.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in accordance
with Council procedures on May 13, 1994.
REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY ON MATTERS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION(All Entities)-
See items on Page 5 of agenda this date. Matter concerning Jeremy Crocker under Redevelopment
Agency Existing Litigation to be resumed in Closed Session at the conclusion of the meeting.
PRESENTATIONS: The following presentations were made: United Way to the City of Palm Springs,
accepted by John Toile; Financial Reporting Award, 93-94, to the City accepted by the Director of
Finance, Accountant and Accounting Manager; California Municipal Finance Officers Association
Certificate of Appreciation to Tom Kanarr Director of Finance. Natalie Nelson, Commissioner of
Community Relations, gave the May PSHS Student Body Report. Mayor presented proclamation to
Dr. Lundquist, Desert Mental Health Association, declaring May, 1994, as Mental Health month.
COMMUNITYREDEVELOPMENTAGENCY:HOUSINGAUTHORITY:FINANCEAUTHORITY:
- No business
' APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Schlendorf, seconded by Hodges, and unanimously carried, that the Minutes
of April 6 and 20, 1994, be approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1994-95 CDBG ALLOCATION
Recommendation: That the Council approve budget of CDBG allocation for 1994-95, as
recommended by the citizens advisory committee - total allocation $587,582.
CDBG Coordinator reviewed the Memorandum-of the Director of Economic Development,
detailing the recommendations of the Citizens committee for the 94-95 allocation, and
including$26,582 in reprogramable funds from 93-94. She noted that four new members were
added to the committee.
Rev. Andrew Green, Chairman of the Committee, stated that in the future, the committee (085-
hoped to see less City projects in the requests, and that such needs would be filled either 001)
through regular city funding, or the private sector.
Mayor stated that he would abstain on matters related the Boys/Girls Club and to the Desert
Aids Project. He declared the hearing opened.
' Ted Regans, President of the C.V. Afro-American Chamber of Commerce, also a cotmmittee
member, spoke regarding the incubator program, asked that a slot in the program be
designated for each an Afro-American and Hispanic business, and that a committee be
established to include those communities to help in targeting such minority businesses.
Brad Mix, Inland Empire Small Business Development Center, stated that the center will not
have an ownership in the program, but will provide support mechanism to the business in the
program.
There being no further appearances, the Mayor declared the hearing closed.
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 2
1. 1994-95 CDBG ALLOCATION
Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that she felt because of the increase in crime and gangs
and substance abuse, the City must provide good programs for its youth, and she supported
positive deterrents; that the society has a responsibility to Desert Aids project; that she favored
providing for the Senior Center van, and a reduction in the COD Child Care program.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that she thought The Armory (in Indio) also applied for
funding; that the community has homelessness and many people go the Armory for food; that
she feels a responsibility to provide for that need, and that use of the CDBG may be the only
funding the City makes towards homelessness; that she did not think the incubator program
targeted the economically disadvantaged; that she strongly disagreed with any policy to
supplant the city's budget with CDBG funds, especially with regard to neighborhoods that are
already vulnerable and economically disadvantaged.
Councilmember Hodges stated that last year a request for code enforcement was rejected
because it was not felt to be appropriate; that for many years various programs at Desert
Highland Park have been funded through CDBG, and is a way to benefit the entire community;
that the funds provide a means of expanding services at a particular park; that Iasi year one
assistance program was funded at $1,000 and was unable to proceed because insurance
requirements resulted in higher costs to qualify, and she questioned if perhaps these small
allocations were more costly than beneficial to the recipient, and if only one or two
organizations should be supported.
Rev. Green responded to a number of questions, explaining the Committee's rationale, the
criteria used, i.e., a preference to more long-term benefits such as capital; that the COD Child
Care program is serving 14 Palm Springs residents this year, compared to last year; that the
Aids Assistance program will proceed because insurance qualifications in other funding sources
makes it beneficial to do so, and those $1,000 CDBG funds will be used; that other agencies
with small allocations also have other sources with which those funds can be combined; that
in some cases, a "per head" basis may have resulted in less allocation, but it did not affect the ,
ability to produce the program; that service to the "economically disadvantaged" does not
necessarily mean that the person who provides the job (in the case of the incubator program)
must be economically disadvantaged, and that those issues will he addressed as part of the
development of the program.
Mr. Regan stated that the Afro-American Chamber of Commerce endorsed the Committee's
recommendation on the contingency that a committee oversee the incubator program to address
targeting the disadvantaged individual, or business, i.e., the Hispanic and Afro-American,
otherwise it did not endorse it; and that a minimum of two slots in the program be so
designated, as well as representation on the committee from each community.
Councilmember Schlendorf favored the committee to oversee the program, as well as diversity
on it; that if a business is in the incubator program, it means that business cannot get SBA
money; that CDBG funds are not general economic development funds, rasher are to target the
disadvantaged; that she did not agree that the entire spectrum of diversity was needed; that
those should be addressed through regular economic development programs; and she wanted
the Council to be clear in its policy direction.
Mayor stated he felt more definition was needed on targeting the disadvantaged, and he
favored allocating the funds, with approval of guidelines and the program as it is developed.
Councihnember Reller-Spurgin expressed concern about using CDBG funds for this purpose,
which could have been obtained through regular economic development processes.
Director of Economic Development stated that the incubator program is expected to be funded ,
from other sources as well., e.g., sponsorships; that funds will go to the disadvantaged
business; that the two minority chambers of commerce are knowledgeable about [he needs in
those communities; that small businesses are disadvantaged today, and banks do not give start-
up funds; that lie hoped the program would develop as a part of the entire economic
development program, with the ability to start a dozen incubator businesses, two specifically
set aside for minorities; that all CDBG rules will be followed; that a lot of expertise is still
needed, and as the plan is formulated, to come back to the Council with specifics, which will
include a 501C group (non-profit); and the a funding commitment of the Council is needed in
order to get going.
Council Minutes ( -�
5-18-94, Page 3
1. 1994-95 CDBG ALLOCATION
Councilmember Lyons stated that he supported spending money to help people get on their feet
and with dignity, and to do for themselves, than to just give it away.
Councilmember Hodges stated that she thought the incubator program was a great idea,
although there is not enough information as to how it will work; that she did not think it was
a city purpose to set up the program, although she was willing to go along with it for one year
with a review committee; that she did not feel the city staff was equipped to handle the
program, in that they are not business people; that she would like to see the program fully
developed before funds are allocated.
In response to questions by Council, staff stated that both Desert Highland Park and Baristo
Park are within the targeted neighborhoods required under the grant, and no other parks in the
community fall into that category; and that no CDBG funds were spent on DeMuth Park; that
the San Bernardino Development Center is a technical assistance organization and will help in
launching the incubator program; that the CDBG money will also help in launching the
program and be used to buy equipment and training, and there will be loans to businesses after
that.
Councilmember Schlendorf staled that she agreed the Desert Highland Park improvements need
to be done, and that she will watch that the neighborhood gets the same equity and does not
get put down because it gets CDBG funds, when it is time to look at the City's overall budget.
She suggested that if the incubator program needs to be refined, that the CDBG allocation be
distributed this year to Desert Aids and the Senior Center and Youth Center. She also stated
that the city has a legal obligation to fund ADA access, and the use of CDBG funds for that
purpose is a misuse, since it is money set aside for the economically disadvantaged
community.
Councilmember Reller-Spurgin stated that if the utility tax does not pass, there will not be any
money for parks anywhere.
Mayor stated that the program cannot develop in a vacuum, and without the finding, it will
not proceed; that if it is not funded, and goes away, the City will lose the opportunity to create
jobs and minority businesses; that expenditure of the allocation does not have to be authorized
at this time; that Desert Highland Park falls within the guidelines, and [Ile improvements need
to be done, and would not otherwise be done, because there are no finds; that the utility lax
is needed, and even with it, there are cuts that will be made.
Councilmember Lyons stated he did not think it inappropriate to allocate the funds for the
disabled community.
As a result of discussion, the following motions were adopted:
Motion by Schlendorf, seconded by Lyons, and unanimously carried, Maryanov abstaining
concerning the Desert Aids Project, to allocate Public Services, as follows:
Public Services
Alternatives to Domestic Violence $ 1,000.
Desert Aids Project 12,000.
Desert Highland.lob Training Operation
Pushout/Palm Springs Adult School 14,000.
Mizell Senior Center/Van 7,000.
Desert Highland Literacy Program
Palm Springs Library 3,650.
F.I.N.D. 2,000.
Desert Highland Summer Tutorial C.V.
African/American Chamber of Cornnerce 9,000.
College of the Desert C.A.R.E. Program 1,000.
Nightingale Manor Emergency Shelter 8,500.
Palm Springs Youth Center Homework Room Operations 5,000.
Fair Housing Council 20,000.
Motion by Hodges, seconded by Schlendorf, and unanimously carried, Maryanov abstaining
concerning the Boys/Girls Club, to allocate Capital/Other Projects, as follows:
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 4
1. 1994-95 CDBG ALLOCATION
Capital/Other Projects
Coachella Valley Housing Coalition/
Coyote Run Childcare Center 30,000.
Desert AIDS Project/Office Expansion 25,000.
Senior Center/Improvements 15,232.
Boys and Girls Club/Pool Locker Room Remodel 58,000.
Nightingale Manor Emergency Shelter/
Shelter Improvements 32,000.
Desert Highland Park/Unity Center Improvements 79,000.
Palm Springs Youth Center Upgrades and
Improvements 45,000.
Operation Pushout/Apartment Rehab. 40,000.
(Desert Highland Community)
Motion by Hodges,seconded by Lyons,and carried, Schlendorf voting No,to allocate$12,000
for ADA accessibility improvements restrooms at Pavilion and Leisure Center.
It was the consensus of the Council that the remainder of the allocation be deferred uintil June
15, a which time, more information and details regarding the incubator program are to be
presented.
Mayor declared a brief recess.
2. CUP 5.0665 - CICCHI - APPEAL
Consideration of Councilmenber Lyons' appeal from Planning Commission approval or
conditional use permit to John Cicchi to allow an indoor family recreation center at 555 S.
Sunrise Way (PD183).
City Manager stated that the appeal by Councilmetnber Lyons was based on a review of '
security measures for the project.
Mayor declared the hearing opened.
Karen Aguilar, President of the P.S. Youth Center, stated that approval of the project is an (078_
expression of addressing the needs of youth in the community; that the application has been
on file since December; that youths are already standing outside of the shopping center; and
that previously there was a billiards business at the location.
The following persons spoke in favor of the project, based on serving needs of families and
youth, and testifying as to the good character of the applicants and a similar business they
operated in Yucca Valley, including security at it-, and the family altitude of it:
Kathy Lorch (?), Yucca Valley, owner of White Sheet, and business person adjacent to the
applicant's Yucca Valley store.
Steve Musser, Yucca Valley
Elliot Jenkins, Via Olivera, parent of the applicant, noted the poor economy after the Yucca
Valley earthquake affected the business, resulting in closing it.
Robert Anderson, Yucca Valley
Jim Colton, resident, noted that there are problems which already exist with youth at the
shopping center, and those have not been resolved.
Dennis Sperun(?), noted that applicant has addressed all of the Planning Commission requests
regarding loitering, graffiti, security and parking. ,
Robert Miller, resident
The following persons spoke in opposition to the application:
Steve Ogle, Mesquite Really, noting that the billiard operation was also a problem; that there
were no arcades in Palm Springs when he was young; and irr winl4s they promote loitering.
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 5
2. CUP 5.0665 - CICCHI - APPEAL
Dick Sroda, read from and submitted several articles from the High Desert Star concerning
a number of incidents in Yucca Valley, copies of which are on file with the City Clerk. He
felt these were not brought up in the Commission meeting, and that they show that the location
is not appropriate for this center, nor did the neighbors favor it. He urged disapproval.
' Jay Horn, Star Canyon Salon, adjacent to the proposed location, commented that the Cinema
10 in Cathedral City has problems in relation to having arcade type games, and he felt similar
problems will arise at the subject site, including traffic and graffiti.
Mitch Wallace, El Alameda, stated that the location is prime for youth to get into trouble,
because it cannot be seen, and is the furthest property from the corner.
Edward Miller, Dutch Florist, stated that there is already loitering, and the use will attract
more of it; that ther6 have been break-in attempts already; that there is a parking problem in
the center; and that youths have already been arrested in the center.
Bob Hutt, Manager of the Nature Express, stated that the Camelot Park has two officers all
of the time, and is not in a center; that businesses adjoining the site will have problems; that
older people will be apprehensive with a lot of youth "hanging" around; that graffiti will
increase; that crime will escalate; and he questioned what proponents considered an arcade
"better than" when that terminology is used, and stated his opinion (hat he did not consider
them to be educative.
The applicants Rene & John Cicchi each spoke, commenting that closure of their store in
Yucca Valley was related to after effects of the earthquake, and not a problem of youth; that
the store was family oriented; that Patin Springs is ready for this type of center; that a few
youths should not spoil it for the remaining 80-90%; that security will be continuous when the
store opens, with the intent of working with the City to determine if it is needed at all hours,
or only during certain times, including outside of the store; that the business is their source
' of income, and they do not intend to allow loitering and disruption; that they have in the past,
and expect in the future to be involved in other community activities for youth; that they would
like to work with the merchants in the center, recognizing there are some merchants in the
center who favor their store; that they do not have just video games; that the back fence has
a 15-foot drop off into the wash; that they will install panic gates at each end of the back of
the center; that young people are present in the center now; and that it took 8 months for them
to get out of their lease in Yucca Valley, before being able to relocate.
There were no further appearances, and the hearing was closed.
In response to question by Council, Director of Planning & Zoning stated that (he intent of
Condition No. 6 of the Planning Commission, is that the applicant shall provide additional
security as required by the City; and that the Police Department's contact with the Sheriff
indicated that there was no problem with the use in Yucca Valley, and they had no special
concerns about it.
Council member Schlendmf stated that the public comments indicated an unwarranted fear of
youths; that the site is in(Ire vicinity of the High School, and businesses should expect youths
to be present, and (he public should not be fearful; that security will be provided both inside
and outside until it is known what the exact security needs are; and that this is a legal business.
Counciltnetnber Hodges agreed that the community lacks activity for youth; and that the
questions of concern regarding the appeal have been addressed.
Resolution 18387, with "additional" added to condition No. 6, was presented; after which,
it was moved by (lodges, seconded by Scltlendorl', and unanimously carried, Maryanov
abstaining, that R18387 be adopted.
3. DELINQUENT RESIDENTIAL WASTE DISPOSAL CHARGES
Recommendation: That the Council authorize collecting delinquent residential waste disposal (148-
charges on the tax roll, for the period ending June 30, 1994. City Manager highlighted the 005)
memorandum of the Director of Finance.
Mayor declared the hearing opened; there were no appearances, and the hearing was closed.
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 6
3. DELINQUENT RESIDENTIAL WASTE DISPOSAL CHARGES (Continued)
R18388 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller-Spurgin,
seconded by Schlendorf, and unanimously carried, that R18388 be adopted.
Mayor asked for a recotmnendation regarding a lifeline credit for waste disposal charges.
4. TEFRA HEARING RE: REFINANCING OF BOND ISSUES ,
On May 4, 1994, the Redevelopment Agency, and the Financing Authority acted to approve
the issuance of its tax allocation bonds, 1994 Series A, and related actions; this is time and
place set for TEFRA hearing by the City Council,which is required to effectuate said actions.
Director of Finance reviewed his memorandum, dated May 4, 1994, which was presented at
the Redevelopment Agency and Financing Authority meetings of May 4, 1994, and slated that
the issue probably will be$26 million, or less depending on the interest rate and a surety bond
for insurance; that repayment will be secured by future property tax increment from the
Tahquitz Andreas Project Area, which are funds that can only be spent for these projects; that
the targeted bond closing date is June 28; and that the sale will be by competitive bid.
In answer to question by Council, Assistant City Attorney Marticore;na stated that if the bond
market conditions were such that it was felt the City would not get a favorable rate, the sale
would be continued, and if there is not a savings, the City Manager has the discretion to not
award based on those facts, and then alternative financing would be brought back to the
Council.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that she would not want the savings to be less than what is
expected.
Mayor declared the hearing opened.
Howard Laphatn, Vista Oro, stated that he felt redevelopment funds have been mismanaged '
for twenty years by fragmenting funds into projects which never materialized; that the
increment money is from the project areas and from property taxes paid by the property
owners, and other than block grant money, funds to the redevelopment agency are from
property taxpayers; that the proposed issue will add $3.5 million to the Agency's long-term
debt,plus costs, and he felt there are other, less-costly,less-complex, and less-lime-consuming
means available, i.e., a 3-5 year term bank loan, repaid from some or all of the project areas,
except the CBD; that the bond issue is 20 times more than the bank costs; and that he
submitted a report previously to a local banker who agreed that there are alternatives available.
In answer to question by Don Frank, Desert Rail General Manager, the City Attorney stated
that the proposal does not relate to conversion of city property, and if such property were
disposed of it would be at a later, separate hearing; that the proposal does not commit to the
disposal of the site; that the only bearing on [lie property is that the city would raise money
that could be used to release it from other commitments of financing the Convention Center;
and that there is no hearing scheduled at this time regarding the property, and he expected that
scheduling of such would not occur for 2-6 weeks.
Fred Ebeling, stated that the City should not unnecessarily build up a bond debt, when other
means are available; that the new council takes office in July, and perhaps the issue should
be deferred until then; and that if the City disposed of its other property holdings, those would
be on the tax roll, and there would not be a budget problem.
There were no further appearances, and the hearing was closed.
In answer to questions by Council, City Attorney stated that the tax increment stream is '
pledged to repayment of the debt; that a banker would have to stand behind the current bond
issue, and if Mr. Lapham knows of a local banker interested in discussing a $5 million loan
and standing behind the current financing at 1/20% of these costs, he would be happy to
discuss it.
Mayor likened the transactions to the difference between purchasing a home on an equity loan,
vs. purchasing it on general credit.
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 7
4. TEFRA HEARING RE: REFINANCING OF BOND ISSUES (Continued)
City Attorney explained that without the redevelopment agency, lax increment money would
be passed to the various taxing agencies in the same manner as other property taxes, and
would not all flow to the Agency; and with the Agency, only a proportionate amount is passed
through to the taxing agencies, and the redevelopment agency retains the remainder for
' financing its debts - making funds available for projects such as these; that the interest rate
differential (old debt vs. new debt)will cover the cost of the issuance; and that the City could
reduce its payments, or utilize the savings and extend the repayment period of time.
Councilmember Hodges stated that in 14 years, the bond issue would have been repaid, and
a new issue could be made and additional revenue derived for other projects; that the proposal
commits another 30 years, and does not return much - $2.5-$3.5 million out of$26 million-
-aid she had a problem with the way the item was written on the agenda, and she also objected
to the process followed, in that the redevelopment and financing authority actions preceded the
public(rearing, and for those reasons she would oppose the action.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that she would agree if the Council had not gone through
this process this date, which involved a lot of opportunity for discussion and hearing citizen
concern; and that the Council could stop the process if it wished to do so.
Resolution 18389 approving issuance of bonds, as recommended, was presented; after which,
it was moved by Schlendorf, seconded by Lyons, and carried by the following vote, that
R18389 be adopted:
AYES: Lyons, Reller-Spurgin, Schlendorf&Maryanov
NO: Hodges
ABSENT: None
NOTE: Councilmerxiber Reller-Spurgin was excused from the remainder of the meeting,due to illness.
INTERAGENCY REPORTS:
a) Councilmember Schlendorf reported that she will serve on a SCAG Air Quality Task
Force, working with the Director of Aviation.
b) Councilmember Hodges reported on special meeting of the Executive Committee of
CVAG, concerning representation on the Riverside County Transportation
Commission, and that the issue will come back next year, and the cities will have to
take an active stand to protect its representation/interest on the Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) The following persons spoke on matters-not related to an item on the agenda:
Eric Meeks stated that they will commence selling books published after 1984 at the
Villagefest.
Darrell Meeks stated that the legality of Villagefest rule will be tested, and he asked
the "censorship" be repealed.
John Booth, President of the P.S. Police Officers Association stated that police
officers do not make $70,000 per year, rather about$40,000, and anything over that
is overtime paid at 1 1/2 times the rate per hour; that the budget was reduced by five
officers this year; and that the city has contract overtime arrangements with those
' requiring additional security, which covers the full cost of the officer's time and the
city's overhead.
Fred Ebeling read a statement prepared by Gary Bosworth and provided copies to the
Council concerning access for the disabled, and 1995 completion deadline under the
ADA.
Councilmember Lyons stated that he made comments at the last meeting concerning
salary figures, and that he was in error and they did in fact include overtime; and he
felt, however, his point was still valid that simply restructuring vis-a-vis living
department heads, does not mean that the Council could gel where it wants to go
0119
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 8
financially because an overtime situation would be created, resulting in added costs;
and that those who make the most income are not necessarily department heads.
b) The following persons spoke concerning Item 13:
John Stillman, resident, stated his transit experience, and commented concerning the
proposed railway station, and positive value of the proposed monorail '
Don Frank, Desert Rail, stated that it has offered $2.5 million for air right-of-way,
and asked if the bus company pays for the right-of-way; that the bus company gets (143--
preferential treatment, and he asked when the Council will deal with Desert Rail. He 007,)
stated that the AEG Transportation Co., a division of Daimler Benz, is prepared to
move forward with them. He submitted a letter from Desert Rail, objecting to the
transfer of the Prairie Schooner property, which is on file with the City Clerk.
c) The following persons spoke concerning Item 5:
William Myers, Jr., A-Valley Cabosine, commented on agreement by the cab drivers
and owners of the need for a valleywide agency to regular: the business, and to be
expanded to include all types of fares for hire services; that it should be a new
agency, with a single responsibility to regulate transportation in the Valley; that the
surcharge should be restructured to a flat permit fee, rather than a per fare fee.
Rob Hilton, Carriage & JJ Taxicab Services, thinks Suntine has failed, and the (143-
residents and tourist have suffered because of it. 002)
Tim Thurtle, Hotel Taxi, stated 8 of 18 companies agree on removing the, taxicab
regulation from Suntine; that he would like to see a taxicab and liimousine
commission, to regulate taxicabs, buses and vans, and he was willing to volunteer his
time.
Richard Hilton, former owner Carriage &JJ Taxicab Service, stated that the Suntine
dial-a-ride business in Desert Hot Springs forced him out of business; that lie
considers Sunline to have a conflict of interest, and its staff its not competent; and that
although it has stopped dial-a-ride because of budget constraints, it could be resumed.
Mat Yoman, independent taxi owner, agreed with a single agency, with single
responsibility for regulation, as well as a flat fee per vehicle, not per trip; and that
he felt 1/3 of the Sunline costs are diverted to collecting the per trip fee.
Ron Cole, R&C Express Cab, stated that Mr. Myers statement was a result of the
operator having met and agreed on a separate, single agency to regulate ground
transportation; that the term "transportation company" is being used to avoid the
taxicab regulations under Sardine; that he feels the City is the appropriate agency,
other than the Airport, and it should be a full-time job.
Bob Errington, taxicab driver, reiterated similar continents as noted, adding that
Suntine produces a pamphlet which is good as to what taxicab rides cost, however,
they are either hidden or do not exist at the Airport, and he felt there should be signs
indicating approximate fares.
Carol Cole, R & C Express Cab, questioned why they were being billed for fees at
the Airport, when they paid the fees to Sunline, and if in has not paid them, the
companies should not be charged by the Airport, and she felt Palm Springs should
take over all of the ground transportation, and set up a new agency.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION: '
5. TAXICAB REGULATION
Recormnendation: That the Council consider, and provide direction to staff, concerning
various options for taxicab regulations. (143-
002)
Councilmember Schlcndorf stated that the agency could work under the police powers of the
city, within the JPA type environment, and she would be willing to look at that.
01
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 9
5. TAXICAB REGULATION (Continued)
Mayor stated that all parties agree a change is needed; that a task force could come back with
recommendations now that the Peer Review Group has come up with definitive changes.
City Manager stated that financial representatives from Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Indian
' Wells and taxi operators and owners would be a part of that task force, and that there are both
regulatory and financial issues involved, which ultimately would come back to the
policymakers for final decision.
Councilmember Hodges stated that she agreed someone needs to look at it,but was not certain
the makeup of the group was appropriate.
Consensus, City Manager to come back on May 25 with recommendation for review as to the
makeup of the cormiuttee.
6. MUNICIPAL CODE - AIRPORT COMMISSION
Recommendation: That the Council provide direction on possible reconfiguration of the
Airport Commission, in response to the La Quints request for regular status. (060
a) Memorandum of Director of Aviation 001)
b) Council action - No discussion, matter to be reschedule.
7. CBD GUIDELINES FOR OUTDOOR DINING IN THE R/W
Planning Commission Recommendation: That the Council approve guidelines for outdoor food
and beverage services in the public right-of-way in the central business district; to provide
guidelines to staff and merchants in the consideration of the required land use permits for (114-
' outdoor dining. 00 4)
a) Memorandum of Director of Planning& Zoning
b) If desired, Res as recommended. No discussion, matter to be reschedule.
8. SCE RULE 20A UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT
Recommendation: That the Council call hearing to consider resolution of necessity regarding
the formation of an underground utility district on a portion of E. Palm Canyon, Escoba, El
Cielo and Sonora Road, under Rule 20A of SCE and the Public Utilities Commission
guidelines, for July 6, 1994. Director of Public Works briefly reviewed his report. (147-
Resolution 18390 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Schlendorf,
seconded by Hodges,and unanimously carried, Reller-Spurgin absent, that R18390 be adopted.
9. MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE - UPGRADING EFFLUENT WATER SERVICE
Recommendation: That the Council approve payment to DWA for upgrading effluent water
service at the golf course, for $49,486. City Manager briefly reviewed the memorandum of
Director of Public Works. (092-
010)
Minute Order 5357 as recommended, was presented;after which,it was moved by Schlendorf,
seconded by Lyons,and unanimously carried, Reller-Spurgin absent, that M05357 be adopted.
' 10. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS - TERM LIMITS
Consideration of reducing initial terms of appointees to city boards and commissions from four
years to three years, with option for a second 3-year term.
(103-
a) Memorandum of City Clerk 001)
b) Council action. No discussion, matter to be reschedule.
I h
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 10
11. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS FOR SECOND READING&c ADOPTION(Intro.5-4-
94)
City Clerk read title of Ordinance 1474 regarding the title of "Director of Public Works", to (10 3'-
conform to requirements of FEMA; after which, it was moved by Schlendorf, seconded by 001
Lyons, and unanimously carried, Reller-Spurgin absent, that further reading be waived, and
that the 01474 be adopted.
12. INTERCITY RAIL STATION - ACCESS
Recommendation: That the Council authorize the City Manger to execute necessary documents
with the Bureau of Land Management to obtain authority to use the Garnet Station Road,
which encroaches on BLM managed lands. City Manager briefly reviewed the memorandum
of Director of Planning& Zoning. (143-
Resolution 18391 as recormnended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, 006)
seconded by Schlendorf, and unanimously carried, Reller-Spurgin absent, that R18391 be
adopted.
13. DESERT RAIL AUTHORITY
Discussion and possible direction concerning Desert Rail Authority
a) City Manager, City Attorney, Council Discussion
b) Council action, if any. No discussion, matter to be reschedule. 007)
14. P.S.T.V. - REQUEST FOR FUNDS
Recommendation: That the Council consider request from PSTV fir the disbursement of the
balance of the City's government access broadcasting account to be used for the purchase and
installation of equipment ($14,568.62). City Manager briefly reviewed the memorandum of ,
Director of Finance.
Minute Order 5359 approving disbursement as recommended, was presented; after which, it (089-
was moved by Hodges, seconded by Schlendorf and unanimously carried, Reller-Spurgin 0m)
absent, that M05358 be adopted.
Councilmember Hodges requested that P.S.T.V. rebroadcast Council meetings during
weekends and evening hours, in order for other segments of the community to view the
meetings.
15. CS 5.0637-MISC - ANNEXATION 26
On May 4, Council continued for two weeks consideration of resolution ordering annexation,
and approval of required agreement with the County, in order to finalize said agreement.
a) Comments by Director of Planning & Zoning
b) Council action. No discussion, matter to be reschedule.
ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS: (Satisfies agenda posting requirements; materials at meeting)
None
A16. GOLF COURSE EXPANSION - TRA.NSMISSION TOWERS
Recommendation: That the Council authorize of $230,000 payment to SCE, for raising ,
transmission towers located in the area between the first and last hole on the new golf course,
CP93-34. City Manager briefly reviewed the memorandum of Director of Public Works.
(092-
Minute Order 5359 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, 010)
seconded by Lyons,and unanimously carried, Reller-Spurgin absent, that M05359 be adopted.
Council Minutes
5-18-94, Page 11
CONSENT AGENDA:
17. MO 5360 rejecting bids for removal of asphalt debris on the north end of Sunrise Way, due (137-
to budget limitation. 037)
18. MO 5361 approving Amendment 2 to agreement with Isbill Associates, Airport Engineer, for (0 51-
design and inspection related to the airport safety area project, AIP-17, for$1,696,360, which 021)
is 90% grant funded, and 10% Airport Fund, A3138.
19. MO 5362 approving Amendment 2 to contract with Desert Janitor Service, to extend contract (117-
to April 1, 1995,and waiving escalation/de-escalation provisions,resulting in no costs, A2963. 005)
20. MO Pulled -agreement not prepared approving agreement with Helen Oster dba The Paper
Chase, for billing, collection and accounting services for the fire department's fee schedule,
on the basis of$18 per hour for actual hours worked, estimated annually at $25,000.
21. MO 5363 ratifying emergency repairs to the digital management central processing unit the (117-
Municipal Cogeneration plant, as a result of a lightning strike, and authorize final payment to 006)
Robert Shaw Controls Company for $2,317.01, for a total of$12,317.
22. Res 18392 and 18393 approving Payroll Warrants and Claims & Demands. (086)
23. MO 5364 approving Change Order 3 to increase contract with Granite Construction for airfield (051-
project work by $7,580.46, related to the control tower, CP93-18, A3252. 010)
It was moved by Hodges, seconded by Schlendorf, and unanimously carried, that R18392 and
18393 and MO5360 through 5364 be adopted.
ADDED STARTERS: None
REPORTS OR REQUESTS:
' CITY COUNCIL reports or requests
a) Mayor requested that a "citizens on patrol" program be brought back to the Council
for future study.
b) Councilmember Hodges questioned why police cars were being taken to Indio for
apparent servicing-City Manager explained that the vehicles are under warranty, and
no work is being performed that would otherwise be done by the City shop.
PUBLIC reports or requests - None
STAFF reports or requests - None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at 11:40 p.m., Mayor declared the meeting adjourned to
Closed Session to complete Item CRA Existing Litigation#2 shown on Page 5 of agenda of
this date; after which the Council reconvened at 12 a.m., and City Attorney reported that no
action was taken; and thereafter the meeting was adjourned to Wednesday, May 25, 1994, at
6:30 p.m.
~JUDITH UMICH
City Clerk