HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 - MINUTES - 10/7/1992CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 7, 1992
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs,
California, was called to order by Mayor Maryanov, in the Council
Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, October 7, 1992,
at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Hodges, Lyons, Reller,
Schlendorf, and Mayor Maryanov
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the salute to the Flag and an invocation
by Reverend LaVeta Dillman, Chapel on the Way.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in accordance
with Council procedures on October 2, 1992.
PRESENTATIONS:
Mayor read and presented a Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting, from the Governmental Finance
Officer Associations; and Certificate of Award in Financial
Reporting, from the California Society of Municipal Finance
Officers Association, which was accepted on behalf of the City
by Nancy Klukan, Accountant and Ronald Everett, Accounting
Manager.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: No business
HOUSING AUTHORITY, FINANCE AUTHORITY, AND IDA - No Business
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Lyons, seconded by Schlendorf, and
unanimously carried, that the Minutes of August 12,
September 2, 16, 22 and 25, 1992, be approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. DBID ANNUAL LEVY, 1992-93
On September 25, the Council declared intent to levy annual
assessments for 1992-93 in the DBID, and set this as time
for hearing; staff recommends that action be continued
to October 27, in order to tabulate protests.
Director of Finance recommended that the Council continue
action to October 27, in order to compute protests. In
response to question by Council, he stated that a 50%
plus $1 protest would result in precluding any levy for
the current fiscal year, otherwise it is discretionary
with the Council to either proceed with the levy, or to
not levy.
NCouncilmember. Lyons stated that he considered unpaid
assessments test is
filed or not, and roasked that whetheran
be afactored ctual r� into any
q� protests for the proposed assessment.
" dLih�uz
(074-
001)
(133-
Ov)
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 2
1. DBID (Continued)
Director of Finance stated that some factor could be
accommodated; that a listing of the assessments, and
identification of who protested, and be developed; and
that the basis for the protests is calculated on the amount
of the assessment, not the number of businesses, which
is required by State Law.
Mayor declared the hearing opened.
The following persons spoke in favor of the DBID:
Dan Johnson, 801 E. Tahquitz Canyon, noting that it provides
a vehicle to raise funds for promotion which could not
otherwise be raised; that with Main Street restructuring
proposal, it is an opportunity for the City, DBID, and
the merchants to coordinate efforts in a way that has
not been done in the past; and that the coming year offers
promotional opportunities greater than ever.
Glenn Dennis, member of the D13ID Board„ presented letters
withdrawing protests.
Ralph Rhea, member of the DBID Board, stated that opposition
to the district was foregone conclusion when the district
was first formed; that many feel it has not achieved what
it was originally intended to achieve; that he still
believes in the concept, however, the district is too
large and needs to be scaled back to something smaller,
and a reevaluation of its purpose, with a new agenda for
the new year.
John Connell, 270 N. Palm Canyon, stated that he did not
see the protests as divisive, rather an opportunity to
create change; that the assessment is only 24t per day
for his business, which he could riot otherwise buy
advertising; that he has not heard any alternative
suggestions; that if the district is dissolved, there
will not be anyone to speak for him to the Council, since
he has a small business and cannot attend meetings; and
that perhaps it needs to be restructured, but it should
not be dissolved.
Doug Keith, 300 Block North Palm Canyon, stated that he
would like the protest energy directed toward helping
downtown; that he favors the concept, but opposes the
economics of it, in that it is very costly to run; that
he would like someone to come up with ideas of how to
help downtown; that there needs to be a vehicle to get
positive action moving forward, and it is up to the Council
to give direction.
Fred Ebeling, 2460 Tuscan, stated that there should be
a 2/3 vote to levy the assessment; that people who are
not raising the money should not be the ones to decide
how to spent it; that cooperative groups should be formed;
and that businesses should run their own affairs.
The following persons spoke in opposition to the DBID:
Sheldon Bell, P.S. Retirement Investment Corporation,
particularly, the category of his business, its removed
location from downtown, and lack of advertising that would
be beneficial to his type of business.
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 3
9391
1. DBID (Continued)
Marsha Craig, 22 The Plaza, submitted a listing of persons
who filed a protest, and read some of the comments contained
therein, opposing the district blaming the DBID itself
for many problems, wasting funds, using assessment revenue
to "protest the protests", expenditure of other business
funds for advertising in addition to the assessment, and
dividing of the business community.
Patrick Duffy, 302 E. Arenas, stated that he considered
it ill-conceived, that he has not paid it for four years,
and that the Council is in control of the City and can
override the formula to calculate the protests.
Betty Kemp, Consultant, 210 Amado Center, agreed with
some of Mr. Duffy's comments, and added that the DBID
does not have the support of the majority of the businesses,
regardless of the amount of the assessment; that protestors
have been maligned as to their reason for protesting;
that the program as constructed and administered has a
high overhead, duplicates other efforts; and that many
areas should be covered by the tourist bureaus, chamber
of commerce, or other autonomous merchant: groups; and
urged that the protests and needs of the businesses be
honored.
Esther Youngerman, 444 S. Indian Canyon, stated that the
DBID used assessment funds to send out a letter "protesting
the protests" and crediting the DBID with successes that
the City actually sponsored; that the resolution of intent
cites reasons for the district which she considered too
depressing to ever consider; that the area is not deprived,
but felt it will be if the DBID continues.
Bill Short, 123 N. Palm Canyon, stated that the DBID lacks
an action or marketing plan with key result areas; that
there are 489 businesses in the DBID of which 298 have
filed protests, equalling about 54% of the amount of the
assessment; that P.S. Life Magazine shows that the sales
tax has consistently decreased over the past four years;
and that he accused the Mayor of sending a letter to the
major hotels asking them to withdraw their protests.
Mel Haber, 200 W. Ramon Road, stated opinion that nothing
positive has come out of the DBID; that it is being forced
on the merchants; that it should be a decision of the
community, and not the Council; that he considered the
DBID inefficient and ineffective; and that it was given
an opportunity, but has not been proven successful.
Becky Molatora, new restaurateur, 356 S. Indian Canyon,
stated that she has made her business a success without
the City or the DBID; and that she did not think it has
helped at all.
Joan Gattuso, 119 S. Indian Canyon, stated that a letter
has circulated regarding a meeting between the large hotels
and the Mayor; that Mr. Roulette of the Marquis implied
that the Mayor is looking to do away with the DBID in
the next year; that his withdrawal equals $2,000; that
Mr. Schmidt withdrew his appeal equalling another $2,000,
and stated that it was at the request of the Mayor. She
asked that the Mayor abstain because he is within the
District, a landowner, and has many clients in the district;
that 260 merchants opposed the District six months ago;
that although the number of businesses has decreased since
1989, the protests have not faltered; that the protesters
0.i r
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 4
1. DBID (Continued)
have only two weeks to collect protests; that the DBID
uses its money to protest the protests; that all retractions
should be verified; that using figures of several months
ago, it takes 239 protests of $90 each to equal that of
14 of the large assessments, i.e., major hotels, who are
represented by salaried employees.
Pauline Smith, 278 N. Palm Canyon, stated that: $90 is
not a lot of money, but she preferred to choose how to
spend it.
Charles Roulette, Marquis Hotel, stated that he has been
very outspoken against the DBID; that he has changed his
viewpoint; that he spoke with each candidate running for
office in April, that reforms were promised; that he hoped
that everyone would recognize that solutions will come;
and that he believed those new solutions would surface
with the new Council leadership.
In answer to question by the Mayor, City Attorney stated
that the question was posed to the Fair Political Practices
Commission whether the Mayor had a conflict of interest,
which it analyzed on the basis of location of the business,
subject to the assessment, and concluded that there was
not a violation of any of the provisions of the Political
Reform Act, and that he has a letter from the FPPC which
anyone may get a copy.
Councilmember Lyons stated that the DBID issue has divided
the business community at a time when it particularly
needed to come together; that if ithad demonstrated
verifiable result, there would not have been this big
of a protest; that the list of successes for the DBID
is dubious; that the concept of a district is not bad,
and it works in other places; that large-scale marketing
and advertising is in place, which also covers the downtown;
that there should be a group which covers downtown and
deals with events and promotions, in a way different from
the VPB or the CVB; that absent landowners with vacant
stores should also be assessed; and that until all of
the issues are clear,, the assessments should stop.
In answer to question by Council, City Attorney stated
that the Council can determine not to levy the assessments,
without tabulating the protests; and that further review
of the statute is needed to determine if an affirmative
action is required to dissolve the district, or if not
levying the assessment is tantamount to dissolution.
Discussion followed whether the protests should be
tabulated, in which Mrs. Gattuso affirmed that a basis
for determining the base for protests had been agreed
upon; and it was the consensus that the protests should
be tabulated, however, the Mayor felt the tabulation should
occur prior to taking action to either not impose the
assessment, or dissolve the district.
Councilmember Hodges stated that each year the protest
has always been very close; that there has not been any
progress, and she felt it was time to move forward, and
reassess what is being done, and suggested that if a formal
vote is required to dissolve the district, that it be
considered after six months, during which, any efforts
to work out a resolution to the issues could be addressed.
0393
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 5
1. DBID (Continued)
Mayor stated that he would not vote until the tabulation
is completed; that he felt there was very little doubt
that if action were continued for two weeks to calculate
the protest, that the vote would be against the district
regardless of the protest, however, the Council has not
heard from the entire district, only a few businesses
represented in the audience; that he would be out of the
country and not available for the next meeting, and it
was not his intent to campaign for the assessment during
the interim; and that the Council could further continue
action at that time to October 27, when he would return;
that once it is voted down, it will not be revisited,
at least for many years; and that he believed the structure
needs to change.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that there has been nothing
but controversy over this issue; that the district tried
hard to make it work, but it has not succeeded; that many
businesses are saying that it is not good for them; that
the system is not working; that she would like to give
an opportunity to change it; and that those who have wanted
it are frustrated in trying to make it work.
It was moved by Hodges, seconded by Schlendorf, and carried
by the following vote, that no assessment be levied for
1992-93, and that the Director of Finance proceed with
tabulation of the results, with report back as to its
affect on continuation and/or dissolution of the district:
AYES: Hodges, Lyons, Reller & Schlendorf
NO: Maryanov
ABSENT: None
2. LAND USE PERMIT - ART AUCTION
Consideration of appeal to review Planning Commission
action of September 9, to allow art auction at the Marquis
Hotel on November 19 and 20, 1992.
Director of Planning & Zoning reviewed his report, noting
that the art is original work, and very different from
the "truckload" sales that have been of concern recently; (III -
and that if this type is not allowed, it may be difficult 002-)
to allow the vintage auto auction associated with the
road races; and that the staff recommended approval, along
with the Planning Commission.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that she appreciated the
sales tax that the City will receive, and asked if a mutual
arrangement could be worked out through the Gallery
Association President, to avoid work of artists carried
by local galleries, i.e., she noted from the auction
catalogue that it would be Chagall.
Councilmember Lyons stated that he did not think there
would be undue competition, since artists have multiple
works, and people's preferences are different.
Councilmember Reller stated that she was riot in favor
of jewelers or furriers, for example, renting rooms in
hotels for weekend sales, competing with merchants who
remain in business here all year, however, the Code allows
onetime events every three months, and if the Council
does not favor this idea, the ordinance should be changed.
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 6
2. LAND USE PERMIT (Continued)
Mayor declared the hearing open; there were no appearances,
and the hearing was closed.
Councilmember Hodges staled that she called for the appeal
based on the Planning Commission minutes which did not
discern whether• this was an auction or a "pirate sale";
that she did not have a problem with the type of auction
proposed; and asked that staff pursue the possibility
of establishing a land use permit fee for such applications.
Mayor stated that he would also like to review the "pirate"
sales, including the bringing in for quick sale "brand
name copy" merchandise sold at deep discounts.
Resolution 17956 approving Planning Commission action,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Reller, seconded
by Lyons, and unanimously carried, that R17956 be adopted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
3. ZONE CHANGE - DOWNTOWN PARKING COMBINING ZONE
Recommendation: That the Council approve a change of
zone to add a new Downtown Parking Combining Zone (D-Zone)
to properties 'in the downtown currently zoned CBD, C-1,
C-1AA, C-2, R-2, R-3 and 0.
Director of Planning & Zoning reviewed his report, and
noted that the zoning is consistent with recent action
to amend the Zoning Text, making it easier for new
businesses to open; and that there were no objections
raised at the Planning Commission by anyone within the
district boundary. In answer to question by Council,
he stated that the revised standards have virtually
eliminated any need for in -lieu parking for any existing
storefronts.
Mayor declared the hearing open; there being no appearances,
the hearing was closed.
Councilmember Schlendorf pointed out that the changes
along with the zone designation, a.re steps toward
recognition by the City and the community to meeting
requirements to reduce air pollution, and noted that people
may be doing more walking.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CASE 5.0616-CZ, A CHANGE OF ZONE TO ADD THE
"D" DOWNTOWN PARKING COMBINING ZONE TO THE EXISTING
ZONES IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA.
It was moved by Reller, seconded by Lyons, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and that the
Ordinance be introduced for first reading.
4. TRACT 27507 - TENTATIVE MAP
Recommendation: That the Council approve tentative tract
map for apartment conversion to condominiums on the NW
corner of Vista Chino and Avenida Caballeros, James Slatton,
R-2, Section 2.
039-
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 7
TM 27507 (Continued)
Director of Planning & Zoning reviewed his report, noting
that the condition of covered parking for 46 spaces will
be pursued through Architectural Review, and is required
prior to approval of the final map; that a variety of
incentives are being explored to retain housing
affordability; and that the applicant will deal with one
purchaser who acquired a unit after the 60-day required rfy
notice.
d93)
Mayor declared the hearing open; there being no appearances,
the hearing was closed.
In answer to question by Council, Acting Director of
Economic Development reported that the eleven units
committed to affordable housing will remain so for the
life of the use of the property, or until the structure
is demolished.
City Attorney suggested that approval be conditioned upon
language developed in the CCRs relating to the affordable
housing units.
Resolution 17957 as recommended, was presented; after
which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller, and
unanimously carried, that R17957 be adopted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) Comments Concerning Item 5.
Gary Bosworth, Box 3066, Palm Springs, provided copies
of the human rights ordinance in Chicago, to illustrate
his point that "source of income" should be included
in the "discrimination" definition of the ordinance.
He stated that the task force had included in the
category in its recommendation. He stated that without (060-
it, discrimination will be allowed against disabled 027)
who typically are unemployed or have low incomes.
He expressed opinion that the Chicago ordinance
addresses any concern related to illegal income.
Tony Aguilar, 1975 Mark Leslie, stated that he is
not an applicant for the commission, however, strongly
supported the task force recommendation for the
commission to have subpena power in order to deal
with the more difficult situations; and hoped that
as the Commission convenes, it will become apparent
that it will work better if it has that authority.
b) Comments re Item 8:
Miles Barrett, 1725 Tuscan Road, Education Chair for
the Chamber of Commerce and member of the Citizens
Committee for Schools, urged that the Council support (098-
passage of Prop. P on the November ballot, noting 001)
that the District is growing at the rate of two
elementary schools per year, that some of the facilities
have buildings dating back to World War II, and that
funds raised through the measure remain in this area.
.0 V
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 8
c) Comments re Item 9A:
Rick Cadigan, Palm Springs, resident and firefighter,
spoke in favor of the Council imposing a utility tax,
and expressed his opinion that only people who benefited
from Prop. 13 would complain; that he estimated his (061
cost of a 3% tax would mean $100 per year; and that 014
as a single -income family of four making $30,000 per
year, he felt it was easily affordable. He stated
that he did not think such a tax would pass if placed
on a ballot, because he did not think the public
generally understood the problems associated with
the current level, 2-man engine company, of the Fire
Department, and the demand for mutual assistance for
standby whenever an emergency is responded to.
d) The following persons spoke on other matters not related
to an agenda item:
Sue Cote, 2820 Tahquitz Canyon, stated that she did
not see where the curb cut was located at Indian and
Arenas, fell off the curb in her wheelchair, and was
insulted by the responding police officer who referred
to her as a child; and that the City needs to start
fixing its sidewalks, and training police that the
disabled are not children who need permission to go
outside. Mayor asked City Manager to follow-up.
George Goldberg, expressed opinion that the meeting
with the Rent Review Commission, which was riot held
due to a lack of quorum, was not: posted correctly
and was a Brown Act violation; that the Council should
not hold meetings at the Airport, because there is
no public parking; that if the City wished to balance
its budget, it should layoff police officers, and
train firefighters to respond to traffic and calls
for police service not requiring a firearm.
Karen Aguilar, 1975 Mark Leslie, asked that the Council
give a high priority to the need of the P.S. Youth
Center air conditioning, and in its celebration of
its 50th anniversary. Mayor noted that the City Manager
has been asked to follow-up.
Linda Cooper Lee read a portion of a statement she
previously read concerning the good works of an unnamed
local citizen.
Fred Ebeling asked about the Mayor's campaign promise
for an ombudsman; and urged no utility tax. Mayor
noted that since taking office, all calls have been
responded to the same day, some necessitating additional
follow-up; and that there may have been some confusion
as to what an ombudsman can do, i.e., limited to
answering concerns about city government.
Council Minuts
10-7-92 Page 9
5. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Recommendation: That the Council amend the Municipal
Code to add Chapter 2.45 to establish a 9-member Human
Rights Commission.
City Manager noted that the proposed ordinance is a result
of the task forte's efforts, and the City Attorney
finalizing the draft; and that the Personnel Director
was available to respond to questions.
In answer to question by Council whether "legal source
of income" could be added to the Ordinance, Personnel
Director reported that the task force intent was to protect
welfare recipients from discrimination.
City Attorney stated that the source of income provision
was not included in the draft at the point he became
involved, and he was not aware of the Chicago ordinance
provisions; that the desire to prohibit discrimination
because a person receives support or welfare may be
addressed, however, there are times when credit references
or economic researches are relevant to some types of
employment; that he was concerned the category may be
overly broad, without some review on his part; that the
Council could introduce the ordinance and direct him to
review the matter, with possibility that the ordinance
be revised and reintroduced, or it could revise the
ordinance to include such language at this time, with
direction that if necessary it be revised and reintroduced
at the next meeting.
Councilmember Hodges stated that she did not have a problem
with adding source of income, and if it needed to be
deleted, a revised ordinance could be introduced on second
reading.
Mayor concurred, and added that the City Attorney should
complete his review before the second reading.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that the ordinance is
a positive step forward, and it is up to the commission
to make recommendations as to how it might be made better;
that she was a little concerned that the Commission maybe
frustrated in attempting to deal with situations where
disagreements were involved, but did not go to the justice
system, and would like a firm commitment that the Council
will support the Commission if it feels changes are needed.
Mayor stated that he would like to move forward slowly
as this is a fragile area, and he would be willing to
listen to any changes that the Commission might recommend.
Councilmember Hodges suggested that the Council meet with
the Commission after it is established for six months,
and perhaps on a regular basis until any procedural issues
are worked through.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING TITLE 2 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE
BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 2.45 TO ESTABLISH A HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMISSION.
It was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, that the ordinance
be revised to include "source of income", and that the
Ordinance, as revised, be introduced for first reading;
City Attorney to review implications, and provide
recommendation if necessary to revise the ordinance.
(06r.
021)
l 1 . b •11,,0
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 10
GOLF COURSE EXPANSION - ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT
Recommendation: That the Council approve agreement with
John M. Tettemer and Associates, Ltd.,for engineering u�y
services in the amount of $240,000 to prepare and process
documents for necessary permits from the, U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers; Dept. of Fish and Game; and development
of plans and specs for the golf course expansion; and
to terminate prior agreements (#2936 and 3056) - A3157.
(Discussion combined with Item 7)
GOLF COURSE EXPANSION - PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT AMENDMENT
Recommendation: That the Council approve amendment to
agreement with Community Golf Development, Inc. for an
increase of $103;,360 for an amended scope of work, A3015.
David Shey, consultant, stated that both matters relate
to the golf course expansion; that the Tettemer proposal
would result in cancellation of the previous agreements,
and provides for engineering and redevelopment of documents (091,
for the revised plans for the Corps of Engineers and the ei�)
U.S. Fish & Game Department permits; and that amendment
to his contract accommodates the redesign and reworking
of the project to the point of beginning the construction;
which is expected to occur in April, 1993. In answer
to questions by Council, he stated that the proposal will
result in a construction cost savings in the overall project
of between $900,000 and $1 million; and that wherever
possible, work has been sublet to local providers., i.e.,
some of the civil engineering work has been done by local
civil engineers; that the travel allowance under the
Tettemer contract has been built for instances outside
of the Southern California area, and he did not. think
there would be any objection to revising the agreement
to clarify that,
Minute Order 5092, approving the agreement with Tettemer,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Lyons, seconded
by Reller, and unanimously carried, that M05092 be adopted,
subject to revision to stipulate that travel expenses
relate to outside of the Southern California area.
Minute Order 5093 as recommended, was presented; after
which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Lyons, and
unanimously carried, that M05093 be adopted.
NOVEMBER 3, 1992 BALLOT MEASURES
Council requested that summaries of various measures on
the November 3 ballot be presented, to allow consideration
of taking positions on any or all of the initiatives. (09d-
City Manager noted that the summaries were outlined by 001)
the City Librarian.
Councilmember Lyons recommended that 'the Council take
a position of opposition on Prop. 166 (mandates employer
provide basic health care insurance to employees who work
in excess of 17.5 hours per week, including their families,
and pay 75% of lowest premium available).
s ; 039Y
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 11
8. BALLOT MEASURES (Continued
Councilmember Hodges stated that she did not have a problem
taking a position on local issues, however, felt that
the voters did not need to have Council's opinion concerning
state-wide issues. In answer to her question, City Attorney
stated that there was no legal requirement to state why
a person abstained. City Clerk noted that the rules of
procedure provide that abstention is allowed based on
conflict of interest, with nature of the interest disclosed,
or on the appearance of conflict. Mayor noted that he
felt Councilmember Hodges' reason would fall under the
appearance of conflict category.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that she has participation
through other areas in which she expresses her views,
and felt that the Council should only act on those measures
which effect the local area; and that she felt she had
a conflict on this measure because, as a business person,
she opposes the measure, but as a Councilmember, she
represents aspects of the public who would benefit by
such a measure.
Mayor stated that that he felt it was important to take
a position on Prop. 166, in that he considered it
detrimental to everyone living here; that he felt a
universal health insurance was needed, but not through
this way; that he considered it bad legislation for
everyone, and it would lead to the loss of jobs and not
increase universal coverage, which needs to be addressed
on both a state and federal level.
It was moved by Lyons, seconded by Reller, and carried
by the following vote, that the Council appose Prop.
166:
AYES: Lyons,
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Hodges
Proposition P:
Reller & Maryanov
and Schlendorf
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that she firmly supports
the measure, and noted that one of the major factors in
attracting new business, is the local school system, and
the community needs to make that as attractive as possible
from that standpoint.
It was moved by Lyons, seconded by Reller, and unanimously
carried, that the Council support Measure P.
ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ACTION (Satisfied agenda posting requirements)
9A. 1992-93 BUDGET
Consideration of proposals to balance the current city
budget, e.g., use of a utility user tax, and use of P.E.R.S. (061-
(Retirement) Fund reserves; including possible discussion 014)
relating to alternative taxes.
City Manager reviewed his report, a copy of which is on
file with the City Clerk.
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 12
9A. 1992-93 BUDGET (Continued)
Utility User Tax Option:
Mayor stated that he was opposed to imposing such a tax,
although he would not preclude its possibility, and wanted
to first try other resolutions to the problem.
No other interest or discussion occurred.
PERS Fund Reserves:
City Manager noted that use of $1.025 million in unplanned
retirement reserves as a result of the State's budget
balancing action, will still require an additional $500,000
in cuts to achieve a balanced budget, some of which would
be those items identified in his report which will be
pursued, but which are at this time uncertain.
Mayor recommended that there be a 2.9% cut in all programs,
including reducing the film Festival, and pointing out
to the festival promoters why the action is necessary,
with realization that litigation is possible. He stated
that any fire consolidation would not yield any savings
this year, and such should not be included in balancing
the budget for 1992-93, particularly :since it has not
been presented 'to the city councils involved.
Councilmember Reller noted that a fire consolidation would
also take about three years to implement.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that she felt a utility
tax would balance the budget, however, felt it would be
too hard of a burden on the community, particularly, local
businesses which are struggling now, and which could be
faced with $20,000 through a utility tax; that she accepted
the possibility of using some of the PERS funds, but felt
the Council should explore some of the concepts learned
at the Reinventing Government workshop in looking toward
entrepreneurial efforts, and suggested that two standing
committees be considered: one to address expenditure
reductions, and one to explore revenue generators; that
each committee could have members of the City Council,
within limits of the Brown Act, staff who would volunteer,
and possibly community members; that the Council could
set parameters or guidelines for them to follow, which
would address balancing the budget and the vehicle to
go forward over the next several years, and with a
completion date of March, 1993; that some department heads
have already generated ideas which could produce significant
savings by the end of the year; and that the worst thing
that could happen is that the Council would still have
to use the retirement funds.
Mayor stated agreement that
at the final solutions; that
have been used to make up for
very slim; that he felt a
reserves; and that it will be
up with a balanced budget.
the Council needs to look
$2 million of reserves will
lost revenue, making reserves
program is needed to build
an on -going program to come
Councilmember Hodges supported the recommendation of
Councilmember Schlendorf, and questioned what the legal
responsibility is for the City to have a balanced budget
at this moment°, that use of the PERS funds remains an
alternative, but in the meantime the two committees could
be set up with a deadline of March, and if it is not
successful, the retirement funds can be used as a fallback
position; and that perhaps there are other ideas that
can be generated.
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 13
9A. 92-93 BUDGET (Continued)
0Aa 1
City Attorney stated that the Council must have a balanced
budget by the end of the fiscal year; and that if it is
not balanced intermittently, it needs to be within some
period of time.
Councilmember Lyons agreed that the budget must be an
on -going effort and the Council should move as rapidly
as possible to address the issues; that he favors
eliminating "civil service;" that he feels a.n affirmative
step needs to be taken immediately; and that he favors
using the retirement reserves.
City Manager acknowledged that when expenses exceed
revenues, a deficit occurs; that in this case, the City
received a return of funds that were not expected; and
that he would like to solve the problem, and move forward.
Mayor agreed with the premise of the City Manager causing
the staff and citizens to come up with ways of cutting
expenses and raising revenues.
Councilmember Hodges stated that the Council balanced
the budget originally, and because of State decisions,
-it is out of balance, and may be out of balance again
during the year; that the door should not be closed on
the idea under discussion, as there may be people in the
community and the staff who have not been heard from,
and who have ideas to offer; that she questioned why the
Council should wait until next year to address the deficit;
that using the retirement funds only takes the money from
one city source to another city source, and does not create
anything that will generate additional revenue; and that
perhaps such committees could achieve results that would
not require use of the retirement funds.
Mayor stated that creative ways to raise revenues have
been sought; and that he did not have confidence that
cuts would be possible this year of substance to achieve
the needed amount.
Councilmember Lyons stated that he approves of the concepts
in general, and feels it could be made more firm and
considered in study session; that he favors creativity
as a permanent and on -going tool.
Councilmember Schlendorf stated that allegations were
made during the election campaign that the Council had V}
balanced the budget with "smoke and mirrors" and she felt
that the same could be said about the current situation.
�
n �vC � Ln�'i1G
Motion by Schlendorf, seconded by Hodges, to create two
standing committees, as above described, failed to carry ,ci
by the following vote: &6 w'jcl
AYES: Hodges & Schlendorf 0 r�l
NOES: Lyons, Reller & Maryanov
ABSENT: None
It was moved by Lyons, seconded by Reller, and carried
by the following vote, that Resolution 17958 amending
the budget to transfer $1.025 million from the Retirement
Fund to the General Fund, be adopted, and that the City
Manager provide recommendations as to cutting an additional
$500,000:
AYES: Lyons, Reller & Maryanov
NOES: Hodges & Schlendorf
ABSENT: None
0,102
I.,.i.�
Council'Minutes :i
10-7-92 Page 14
9A. 92-93 BUDGET (Continued)
Mayor stated that he endorsed the basin: intent of the
proposal to tackle the budget in detail!, in particular
for the 1993-94 budget, and to develop a process for
exploring alternatives and creative ideas.
CONSENT AGENDA:
10. Res 17959 and 17960 temporarily suspending regulatory (050-
ordinances; and closing certain streets in conjunction with 016)
the 1992 P.S. Road Races, October 21 - November 22, 1992.
11. MO 5094 approving subrecipient agreement in the amount of (085-
$41,887 with the Riverside County Housing Authority/ for 001)
providing a Fair Housing Program, CDBG 92-93 - A3158.
12. See Item 20.
13. Res 17961 approving destruction of specified records currently (151-
in the custody of the City Clerk. 001)
14, MO 5095 awarding contract to Steiny and Company, Inc., for
$313,210 for powder paint coating for traffic signals and (130-
related equipment in the CBD, CP92-28, funds appropriated 001)
via the 1991 Tax Allocation Bond Issues, A3159.
15. See Item 21.
16. MO 5096 approving Change Order 3 to contract with Matich (056-
Corporation for a decrease of $11,605.01, as a result of street O11)
work added and deleted in Assessment District 157, A3096.
17. Res 17962 amending Comprehensive Fee Schedule, Footnote 8,
to provide credit toward drainage fees paid by a developer
for construction of on -site or off -site drainage improvements, (114-
directly reducing the cost for the construction of storm 006)
drainage facilities contained within the Master Plan for which
the fee is collected„
18. MO 5097 rejecting all bids for extension of an existing masonry
wall on the east property line of the Sunrise Village Mobile (085-
Home Park on San Rafael, CP92-04. 006)
19. Res 17963 and 17964 approving Payroll Warrants; and 17965
and 17966 approving Claims & Demands.
It was moved by Reller, seconded by Lyons, and unanimously
carried, that Resolutions 17959 through :17965, and Minute
Orders 5094 through 5097, be adopted.
20. P.S. HIGH SCHOOL - POLICE RESOURCE OFFICER
Recommendation: That the Council approve agreement with
the School District to provide a full-time police officer
on the P.S. High School campus for the 1992-93 school
year, at a cost to the District of $52,547„92 A----.
City Attorney stated that the District Office was unable
to obtain a response from its attorney, and recommended
that the agreement be modified to provide for joint and
several liability, which in has the effect of assigning
percentage of liability should a case come to a court
decision, rather than left to a 50-50 split payment for
any damages assessed.
It was moved by Hodges, seconded by Reller, and unanimously
carried, that this matter be continued for two weeks,
in order to allow time for a response by the District's
attorney.
(086-
011)
(126-
005)
A A
Council Minutes
10-7-92 Page 15
21. GOLF COURSE FOOD CONCESSION EQUIPMENT
Recommendation: That the Council award bids for the
purchase of refurbished and or new restaurant furnishings
and equipment for the Municipal Golf Course restaurant
to Air Con, Palm Springs, for $22,500.
Purchasing Manager Highlighted his report. (092
002)
Councilmember Lyons stated that he would abstain to a
a family relationship.
MO 5098 awarding bid as recommended, was presented; after
which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Schlendorf,
and unanimously carried, Lyons abstaining, that M05098
be adopted.
ADDED STARTERS: None
REPORTS & REQUESTS:
22. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS - Received & Ordered Filed
a) Treasurer's Monthly - July, 1992
CITY COUNCIL reports or requests
a) Councilmember Hodges stated that the Council previously
endorsed a league split in divisions which would result
in the eastern half of the Inland Division of League
as a separate division; and that the proposal before (104-
the League Conference this year is to separate Riverside 001)
County, Councilmember Schlendorf stated that while
the endorsed split would have been preferable, the
separation of Riverside County is at least a positive
step. There were no other comments.
b) Mayor requested that the appointment to the Planning
Commission vacancy be scheduled for November 4 agenda;
and requested input from the Council regarding vacancy
on Public Arts. In response to question by City
Clerk, he suggested that the applicants for the Human
Rights Commission be interviewed in two groups, and
the time scheduled at a future study session.
PUBLIC reports or requests - None
STAFF reports or requests
a) City Manager noted that three members of the Council
will be attending the League of California Cities
meeting in Los Angeles, October 10-13, 1992.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned.
�- s
CJUDITH SUMICH
City Clerk