Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991 - MINUTES - 7/17/1991 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 17, 1991 A Regular Meeting of the City Council , of the City of Palm Springs, California, was called to order by Mayor pro tem Broich, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, July 17, 1991, at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Broich, Hodges, Murawski and Neel Absent: Mayor Bono The meeting was opened with the Flag Salute and a moment of silence. REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: Report of City Clerk: Agenda posted in accordance with Council procedures on July 12, 1991. PRESENTATION: Guy Patterson, immediate past President of the Maintenance Supervisors Association presented the Association's Supervisor of the Year Award to Jim Berryhill REMAIN IN SESSION AS THE CITY COUNCIL, AND CONVENE AS THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC COMMENTS: (3-minute limit per person on matters relating to the Redevelopment Agency) LEGISLATIVE ACTION: a) CANYON DEVELOPMENT On July 9, the Council introduced the ordinance adopting the redevelopment plan, and the Council/Agency directed that conclusion of matters related to the public hearing on June 19, on the EIR, General Plan Amendment, Canyon Resort & Spa Specific Plan, and Redevelopment Plan for the Canyon Project, be continued to an adjournment of this meeting to July 19, 4:30 p.m. In order to satisfy agenda posting requirements.; staff (12� ) recommended, that the Council/Agency adopt a motion continuing the following items to July 19, 1991, at 4:30 p.m. , Large Conference Room, City Hall . (133- a) Council Res ----- re EIR 006) b) Council Res ----- re General Plan Amendment c) Council Res ----- re Specific Plan d) Agency Res ----- re Relocation Method e) Agency Res ----- re Housing Funds f) Agency Res ----- re Redevelopment Plan 9) Council Res ----- re Housing Funds h) Council Res ----- re receiving Property Taxes i ) Council Res ----- approving responses Lo objections j) Council Ord ----- adopting redevelopment plan (intro: 7-9-91-)— It was moved by Murawski , seconded by Neel , and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that '[:his matter be continued to July 19, 1991, at 4:30 p.m. , in the Large Conference Room, City Hall . Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 2 Following adjournment of the Agency, the City Council reconvened, and business resumed. HOUSING AUTHORITY, IDA, & FINANCING AUTHORITY: No business APPROVAL OF MINUTES: In answer to request for clarification concerning comment by Jeremy Crocker, who took exception to the Minutes of June 19, in that he did not feel the minutes accurately reflected his statements concerning sale of property adjacent to North Beverly Park, and Mr. Solomon' s rebuttal thereto, the City Clerk reported that the minutes summarized the proceedings of the Canyon Project, and a. full , detailed transcript is referenced therein, which reflects the full text of comments made by all persons who spoke on the matter, and is on file and is a part of the proceedings. It was moved by [lodges, seconded by Neel , and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that the minutes of June 18„ 19 and 25, 1991, be approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS - 1991-92 ANNUAL LEVIES On June 19, 1991, the Council adopted resolutions of intention to order levy of annual assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4, and Parkways Maintenance Districts 6A, 6B and 6C, 7 a.nd 8, and set this as time and place for hearings thereon. Recommend (056) that Council overrule protests, and confirm proceedings and assessments. City Manager highlighted the memorandum of Director of (138) Community Development, in particular supplement related thereto, detailing the formation and background of each district. Mayor pro tem declared the hearings open; there were no appearances, and the hearings were closed. Resolutions 17578 through Res 17584 as recommended, overruling protests and confirming assessments, as recommended, for SLMD1, SLMD2, `iLMD3, SLMD4, and PMD6A, 6B, and 6C, PMD7, and PMD8, respectively, were presented; after which, it was moved by Neel , seconded by Murawski , and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that R17578 through 17584 be adopted. 2. SUNRISE/TACHEVAH TRAFFIC SIGNAL R/W ACQUISITION In June, Council l continued hearing on resolution of necessity for the acquisition of right-of--way on the NW and SW corners of Sunrise and Tachevah for traffic signal installation, pending further negotiations with property owners. City Manager reported that negotiations with the property owners resulted in amicable settlement, and he recommended (136) that the Council authorize the acquisition of the rights-of-way for a total of $23,890, and recordation of the documents by the City Clerk. Mayor pro tem declared the hearing open, there being no appearances, the hearing was closed. Resolution 17585 as alternatively recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Neel , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously carried, Bono, absent, that R17585. Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 3 A2. ZTA 5.0400 (MISC) - PUBLIC ART A REAL ESTATE SIGNS Hearing on recommendation concerning Zoning Text Amendments, Case 5.0400, continued from July 3, 1991. Mayor pro tem declared the hearing opened. Tina Van Lizzen, on behalf of the Palm Springs Board of Realtors, requested support of the amendments concerning real estate signs, stating that the Board worked closely with the staff and attorney in writing the language, which will remove obsolete, unfair, and now illegal provisions. (103- Rod Dow, Secretary of the Board of Realtors, stated that 039) the amendments will help local sellers to market properties in a better way, and to clear up language that was confusing. There were no further appearances, and the hearing was closed. Council commended staff and the Board of Realtors for working together to arrive at mutually understood and agreed upon solution. City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE PUBLIC ARTS FEE AND REAL ESTATE SIGNS. It was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that further reading be waived, and that the Ordinance be introduced for first reading. PUBLIC COMMENTS: a) Jeremy Crocker stated that he told Mr. Solomon he would make his comments in public; in general , he does not have much disagreement; that a review of his performa does not show a line For the costs of hotel operation, and he wondered if it had been provided to the City to add to the performa submitted on the signature of John . . . . . earlier this year; without (124) that cost, it is difficult to evaluate the profitability of the entire project, because only revenue is shown, and in the hotel business in this climate, it may (136- be in fact ill balanced; that the tax must be accessed 006) before it can be rebated, but there is no provision excluding taxes originated by the investment of others in the project area from being rebated to the developers; and that $500 million over 40 years is an average of $12.5 million. Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 4 b) Joseph Solomon repeated that he invited Mr. Crocker many other people in town into his offices to review their information; that his "numbers" were never submitted to the City staff; that the numbers in the redevelopment plan were developed by American Development Consultants, in the employ of the City; that the numbers submitted to the staff were as part of their explanation of why they felt they needed (124) assistance, and had nothing to do with the City' s determination of what the redevelopment: plan, or what it would be worth; that the flyer referred to by Mr. Crocker represents as fact that the Canyon Development (136- will get $12. 5 million dollars a year, which is a 006) deal he would sign on the line for right now; that he wished to invite anybody in the audience to contact Canyon Development, for any information about their projects, figures, numbers, what they wish to build, or what they hope to accomplish; and that while the Council may have to take attacks from the public in regards to things that are untrue, as an individual he did not, and any more slanderous comments in regard to lot sales that have nothing to do with this deal , he would advise such individuals to have legal assistance. c) Edward Perry, 218 Orchid Tree Lane, stated that. he read from the EIRs, concluded that the projections were calculated based on an averaging of city taxes over a ten year period; that the property value appreciation 'included new and existing construction, and if the new construction is removed the increase (124) is closer to 3% per year over the 40 year period, assuming a straight line appreciation of the property over the total 40 years; and that based on a 95% (136- incremental tax a lot less would be generated, 006) therefore, in his opinion, the numbers that are protected are very optimistic. d) Diane Marantz, #6 Palomino, stated that Item 21, shown on the Consent Agenda, was not reviewed in detail at the study session; that the minutes of June 19 reflect that Councilmember Murawski indicated the City should, rather than should not, compete with (114- private business; and that the purpose of the City 006) is to govern, not compete with enterprise. (Note: While Ms. Marantz was technically correct, the minutes were incomplete. ) e) Marjorie Howley, past President of the Village Center for the Arts, stated that the Center has indicated that it asked for a 5-year lease, with an agreeable clause to forfeit relocation benefits after three years; that the Center's Board is comprised of (117- volunteers, and they have concerns about a continuous 023) renegotiating of the lease, if it is limited to one-year time periods. f) Peter Shapiro, 344 San Domingo, stated that the DPA asked for two amendments, and one clarification to Measure H, i .e. , that an owner should only receive one increase per year - either a hardship increase, ( "s or the CPI, whichever is greater, figured from the c2 v last increase;; that the Commission studied the matter for eight months, but made no recommendation; that he feels there are times when an owner may receive the CPI, and several hardship increases in one year; that the hardship increase should only apply to the extent that the cost of the hardship is recovered, and should riot be on-going, or serve as the basis for computing CPI. Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 5 g) Paul Kamins, Village Center for the Arts, stated that the Center has served the community for 20 years, and offers many classes, not otherwise offered in the community; that it needs to operate at the lowest cost possible; that he understood the City may have (117- other intentions for the use of the building, and 023) may not want to have to move, or buy-out a tenant; however, the Center is willing to forego that protection in order to get the 5 year lease, so it can balance its budget and continue its operation; that it is not interested in tying up the City, rather in knowing where it is going, so that it does not have to keep coming back each year. h) George Goldberg. Box 4056, stated that RV parking at the Pavilion would be a mistake; that he has suggested on other occasion that the City develop an RV park at the foot of the Tramway. Ile commented on the cost of a joint cities dinner meeting at the Convention Center; and that he has degrees and experience, yet was ruled unqualified for the Planning Commission. i ) Dee Dee Stone, 142 Eastlake, suggested that developers be encouraged to provide covered parking for the convenience of customers. LEGISLATIVE ACTION: 3. A.D. 157 - RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS, 3 SUB-AREAS Recommendation: That the Council adopt actions providing for the formation and other procedural steps for an assessment district to provide street improvements in three residential sub-areas, generally described as Area A (Ramon/Evelita), Area B (Los Nietos Road) , and Area C (Calle Alvarado/Alejo); and approve the filing of a (056- negative declaration of environmental impact. 011) City Manager highlighted the memorandum of Director of Community Development, and the proposed schedule of actions. Resolution 17586 approving negative declaration, and Resolutions 17587 through 17590 making appointments, including Stone & Youngberg as underwriter; adopting final boundary map; declaring intention to order improvements, prepare Engineer's Report (Sanborn/Webb) , and levying annual administrative assessment; and directing call for construction bids, respectively, were presented; after which, it was moved by Neel , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that Resolutions 17586 through 17590 be adopted. 4. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - RENT CONTROL Recommendation: That the Council amend the Rent Control Ordinance to allow a pass-through to tenants of 30% of the annual registration/renewal fees. City Manager reviewed the memorandum of Assistant City Manager (103-- City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows: 001) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SUBSECTION 4.08.110 (H) TO THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE, AUTHORIZING LANDLORDS TO PASS THROUGH 30% OF THE ANNUAL REGISTRATION/RENEWAL FEE TO TENANTS THROUGH A RENT INCREASE. Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 6 4. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT (Continued) It was moved by Hodges, seconded by Murawski , and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that further reading be waived, and that the Ordinance be introduced for first reading 5. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT' - RENT CONTROL Recommendation: That the Council amend the Municipal Code to clarify costs to be expensed or capitalized in connection with hardship increases. City Manager highlighted the background heading to the recommendation, as detailed in the memorandum of Assistant City Manager. Councilmember Hodges stated that she appreciated the recommendation of the Commission, and the extensive study it was given, however, she did not agree on part of the recommendation; that she felt the DPA recommendations presented last year should be approved; that it is possible for an owner to receive more than one increase in one year, and she did not feel that was fair; that the Commission's contention that the ordinance addresses the other DPA issue has missed the issue, in that DPA is not asking for an either/or situation, rather that once the (103- hardship has been granted and and the investment recovered, 001) the rent should be rolled back; and that she was aware of situations where hardship increases were given several years ago, and the items for which they were granted have long since been paid for. City Attorney stated that the Commission is free to go back and deal with those situations, and he did not have a problem if the Council wished to strengthen that language in the ordinance; that in terms of the first request, he did not want to get into a legal problem with due process, and not allow a fair and reasonable rate of return; that he had concerns about a CPI increase that would not be based on the increase that was given the year before; that the manner in which the CPI is calculated creates the base for the following year.; that the ordinance is consistent with the way in which the CPI is calculated in various applications throughout the country; and that perhaps there should be further information provided by the Commission why it did not recommend that particular change. City , Attorney suggested that the Council proceed with introduction of the ordinance as recommended, instruct staff to prepare an ordinance to address the duration of a hardship increase, and the staff/commission to give further study to the remaining issue. City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 4.08.60 BY REPEALING SUBSECTION 4.08.060 (d) (3) AND ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 4.08.060 (d) (3) , TO CLARIFY COSTS TO BE EXPENSED OR CAPITALIZED IN CONNECTION WITH HARDSHIP INCREASES. It was moved by Hodges, seconded by Murawski , and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that further reading be waived, that the Ordinance be introduced for first reading, and that staff proceed as suggested by City Attorney. Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 7 6. CONVENTION CENTER - COMPUTERIZED HOTEL RESERVATIONS PROGRAM Recommendation: That the Council approve a contract with Integrated Systems Support for $6,750 to develop a computerized hotel reservations program for the Convention Center A3010. Councilmember Murawski stated he would abstain from discussion and voting. (139- City Manager highlighted the memorandum of Director of 002) Convention Center. Minute Order 4805 approving agreement, as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Neel , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously carried, Bono absent, and Murawski abstaining, that M04805 be adopted. 7. FRANCIS STEVENS - VILLAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS LEASE Recommendation: That the Council approve a one-year lease of the Francis Stevens Park property known as 538 N. Palm Canyon Drive, commencing August 1, 1991, at $916 per month. A3011. City Manager highlighted the memorandum of Director of Economic Development. Councilmember Murawski stated that the Council should not go against what has been its policy of not granting long term leases; that he was not opposed to granting annual extensions of the same contract; and did not feel it was necessary to renegotiate each year. Councilmember Neel stated that he did not have a problem with a five-year lease, considering that Lhe Center is (117_ willing to move out on short notice, and without liability 023) to the City. He moved to approve the lease for five years. Councilmember Hodges stated that the Center is a good part of the community and it would be helpful to it to not have to spend a lot of time or money in worrying about renegotiating each year; that its Board has been agreeable and cooperative and is willing to give up the site upon demand in less than five years, without penalty to the City. Minute Order 4806, approving a 5-year lease, subject to early termination without penalty to the City, in language approved by the City Attorney, was presented; after which, it was moved by Neel , seconded by Hodges, and carried by the following vote, that M04806 be adopted: AYES: Broich, Hodges, Neel NO: Murawski ABSENT: Bono Councilmember Murawski stated that he voted against the motion to be consistent with previous actions. e y All Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 8 8. VILLAGEFEST HEALTH CODE ENFORCEMENT Recommendation: That the Council approve agreement with the County to subcontract to the City the enforcement of State Health Code regulations at the VillageFest A3012. Mayor pro tem stated that he would abstain from discussion and voting on this matter, and turned the meeting over to Councilmember Murawski . (050- City Manager reviewed the memorandum of Director of 018) Community Service & Promotion. Minute Order 4807, as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Hodges, seconded by Murawski , and unanimously carried, Bono absent, and Broich abstaining, that MO 4807 be adopted. 9. NOT USED 10. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION (Intro 7-3-91) a) City Clerk read title of Ordinance 1.387 re mobile source air pollution reduction; after which, it was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously (103- carried, Bono absent, that further reading be waived, 001) and that 01387 be adopted. ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS: (Satisfied agenda posting requirement) 11A. CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION - WORK DIRECTIVES Recommendation: That the Council authorize the staff to issue or deny issuance of work directives to Walsh Pacific for work related to construction bulletins 1, 2, partial 3 and 4, plus other changes as requested by the contractor through July 12, 1991, in order to avoid unnecessary time extensions regarding the Convention Center expansion contract with Walsh Pacific. City Manager reported that the action is recommended to (139- avoid work stopping, or slowing down during August, when 004) the Council will not be meeting, and that this matter was reviewed in detail at the study session. Minute Order 4808 as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Murawski , seconded) by Neel , and unanimously carried, Bono absent, and Hodges abstaining, that M04808 be adopted. CONSENT AGENDA: 12. MO 4809 approving an allocation to Isbill Associates Inc. , of $50,000 for on-call engineering services related to the (051 Airport - A2547. 021) 13. MO 4810 approving amendment to A2782 with Thompson Consultants International , for continuation of Airport financial consulting services related to the implementation of a Passenger Facility (051- Charge at the Airport. 056) 14. Res 17591 prequalifying contractors to bid on the Airport Access Control System as the first step in a two-step bid (051- process. 015) Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 9 15. MO 4811, 4812, 4813, 4814, awarding purchases of office furniture and public seating to Eastman ($7,182.75), United (051- Business Systems ($15,431.41), Office Pavilion Interiors 055) ($8,427.11) , and Total Plan ($17,016.57) , for an aggregate of $48,057.84 for the Airport expansion project. 16. MO 4815 approving purchase of a police unit from Marshall (084 Motor Cars, for $14,492.81, including tax and delivery. ) 17. Res 17592 approving participation in the California Arbitrage (086- Management Program for the investment and tracking of proceeds 001) from the issuance of bonds - a joint exercise of powers authority. 18. Res 17593 appropriating into reserves the unappropriated fund (061- balances in designated City operating and capital project 010) funds for future operations, or projects. 19. Res 17594 authorizing continuing appropriations from 1990-91 (061- into the 1991-92 fiscal year budget for projects noi: completed. 010) 20. Res 17595 establishing an appropriations limit for the 1991-92 (061- fiscal year. 010) 21. Item handled separately, see Item 25. 2. MO 4816 approving actual invoiced costs totaling $397,899.72 (139- for six vendors previously authorized by Council , to reflect 001) actual final contract costs for the Convention Center air conditioning leaking coil project. 23. MO 4817 awarding contract to E.L. Yeager Construction Co. > (136 for $66,294 for street widening on Mesquite Avenue and Vella 041) Road, CP90-25 - A3013. 24. Res 17596 approving Payroll Warrants. (086- It was moved by Neel , seconded by Murawski , and unanimously 010) carried, that Resolutions 17591 through 17596, and Minute Order 4809 through 4817 be adopted. 25. COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE - RECREATION DIVISION Recommendation. That the Council amend the Comprehensive Fee Schedule to revise fees charged by the Recreation & Special Events Division, relating to the Swim Center and RV parking. Councilmember Murawski stated that he did not believe the City should be in competition with business of any kind, in any way; that he recognized what it was the staff was recommending, however, he wanted to add $25 to whatever (114- the going rate is for parking RVs in the private sector, 006) which would be a discouragement to potential parkers at the Leisure Center. Councilmember Neel stated that he did not think the parking should be permitted at all , and that the City should not butt into private business in any manner. City Manager stated that parking in the private sector is encouraged, and the higher rate the City would charge would do that; hom,,,ever, if the individual roeeds to be adjacent to the Pavilion, it will be expensive; and that he was concerned that the budget was predicated upon certain revenue streams, of which the proposal was a part, and which was discussed during the budget process. He stated that the number of nights is limited to seven consecutive, if a person is not registered as a participant in an event. . ;d,trCr Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 10 25. FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT (Continued) Mayor pro tem stated that the policy should remain, however, the rate of pay for parking in connection with an event should be raised. Councilmember Murawski stated that if people are invited to participate in events, to compete with local businesses, they should not be given a special rate for doing so, and the rate should be $30 per night associated with the event, otherwise no parking permitted. Motion by Neel , seconded by Murawski , to prohibit overnight parking of RVs at the Leisure Center, failed to carry by the following vote: AYES: Murawski & Neel NOES: Broich & Hodges ABSENT: Bono It was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, and carried by the following vote, that Resolution 1.7597, amending the fee schedule to provide a $30 per night during special events at the Leisure Center for overnight parking of RVs, be adopted: AYES: Broich, Hodges & Murawski NO: Neel ABSENT: Bono ADDED STARTERS: None COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS: 26. COUNCIL LIAISONS OR OTHER REPRESENTATIONS - None 27. BOARD/COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS Councilmember Neel requested that, out of common courtesy and respect to the elected Mayor, only the two appointments for the Rent Control Commission be considered, and postpone the Planning Commission until the next Council Meeting. Mayor pro tem stated that he did not think that was the direction of the Council a couple weeks ago, when the entire Council agreed to do the interviews, so that (061- appointments could be made at this time to the Rent Control 015) Commission, and to the Planning Commission; that the Mayor stayed over that night to do the interviews, and the Council in subcommittee interviewed the morning of this date, (060- and he did not think it was necessary to defer action. 016) Councilmember Neel stated that the Mayor was not present this date, and he did not think he interviewed everyone, and felt strongly that out of respect to the Mayor, it should be delayed. He stated that there was urgency only for the Rent Control , which he felt the Council agreed to do, but that he did not feel there was the same urgency for the Planning Commission, since it was not going to meet until after the next week, and in view of its importance, the Mayor should be considered. Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 11 27. BOARDS/COMMISSION (Continued) City Attorney stated that a letter was delivered to his office this date, and a request from the Mayor that it be read regarding this issue. The following is a verbatim of the statement as read: "It has been brought to my attention that members of the Council , specifically the Mayor pro tem Broich, Councilman Hodges and Councilman Murawski , intend to have the Mayor Pro Tem make certain commission and board appointments during my absence, despite my request to delay appointments until Friday, July 190 I 'm very disturbed by this news and have requested the City Attorney read my statement regarding this proposed action. The residents of Palm Springs chose me to represent them as Mayor, I am honored that our citizens have placed their trust in me to carry out this duty. One of my most important responsibilities is to appoint commission and board members who can best serve the needs of the community. I am outraged that members of this Council will not respect the will of the people, and allow me to carry out my Mayoral duties. I understand the need for making immediate appointments to the Rent Control Board due to a lack of quorum and the urgency of resolving that situation. In the public interests, it was clear that these appointments should be made as soon as possible. The Rent Control situation is unique, however, other commissions are not facing the same deadlines. I find it despicable that my Council colleagues would not extend this courtesy to me and delay appointment of commissioners and board members for only two days. Every member of this Council knew in advance of my intention to be out of town for tonight' s meeting to decide at the eleventh hour that a new protocol should be established is reprehensible and unfair to the public. In the interest of fair play, I demand that my fellow Councilmembers refrain from this flagrant abuse of the appointment process. Our agenda includes a scheduled meeting for Friday, July 19, I request that the Council delay action on any commission appointments other than Rent Control until that time. Signed, Sonny Bono, Mayor. " Mayor pro tem stated that he felt the Council decided a couple weeks ago to make the appointments at this time to the Planning Commission and Rent Control , and that at that time, the Mayor stayed late and interviewed all the candidates for Planning and all the candidates for Rent Control , that Mary Martin (Council Affairs Administrator) also stayed and interviewed along with him; that the City business must go on, whether the Mayor, or others are present; that the appointments are needed; that the Council received a letter from the Planning Commission requesting that appointments be made as soon as possible and it is on the agenda to do so at this time; that the Council knew in advance that the Mayor would be absent, which is why the Mayor interviewed that evening; that the Mayor also knew, and agreed to do that; that it is not the eleventh hour, and the Council was not changing any plans; that the appointing was decided two weeks ago, and he felt it was a political move by the Mayor for press coverage. Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 12 27. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS (Continued) Councilmember Murawski stated that he arrived at 7:30 a.m. this date to complete interviews because the whole plan was discussed with the entire Council at a study session, and that he would not have wasted his time doing so if it had not been deemed by the entire Counci'I to be necessary; that he was tired of the bickering and political nonsense, and the juggling back and forth on these political appointments; that although the Mayor makes the actual appointment, it cannot be effective unless it is verified and ratified by the entire Council ; that the Mayor alone cannot appoint someone to a commission, because the Council could withhold approval , and the that person would not be appointed; that the Council has a right to do that, and the Mayor has no more power than other members of the Council ; and that he would like the staff to bring back to a study session for discussion the idea of making appointments by majority vote of the entire Council . Mayor pro tem stated that he was in complete agreement. Councilmember Hodges stated that she agreed with the interpretation, and according to her notes, it was she who brought up the subject of the commissions in reference to the Rent Review Commission at the study session on July 2, because it was imperative that those appointments be made since a Commission hearing was being held up because of a lack of a quorum; that at that point in time, it was also mentioned that the Planning Commission was also urgent because it, too, was in a position, or a possibility at this point, of also not having a quorum due to an illness, and it was agreed at that time, that the full Council would do everything that it could so that by the next Council meeting, which was the 17th, the appointments could be made for at least those two commissions. She stated that she and Member Neel spent all morning July 5 interviewing; that Members Murawski and Broich spent all morning July 16 interviewing, and that both subcommittees spent the morning this date interviewing, in order to get through all of those people who had appilied for the Rent Review Commission and the Planning Commission; which she felt was because it was understood that this was the time that these appointments would be made; that she did not consider it to be an eleventh hour decision nor something being pulled out of the hat because the Mayor is away, nor was it ever with that: intention but it just happens that he is away; and that she did not have a problem proceeding with the appointments. Mayor pro tem asked for recommendations from each Councilmember for appointments to the Rent Review Commission; Counciimembers Hodges and Murawski each recommended the same individuals, and Councilmember Neel declined to participate; after which, he moved for approval of his appointment of Emile Duvernay and Abraham Zakar for terms ending June 30, 1995, said motion carried, Neel voting No. Mayor pro tem asked for recommendations on appointments to the Planning Commission, and the following persons were recommended: Frank Tysen, Bill Drury, Joe Weitheimer„ Chris Foster, and Tony Aguilar. Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 13 27. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS (Continued) Councilmember Neel declined to participate, and stated that he felt it was wrong to make the appointment to the Planning Commission, that he wanted to wait until the matter could be discussed with the Mayor, and the Council should be cooperatively working together, and talk it over sensibly; and that he did not feel there was an urgency to make the appointments at this time. Councilmember Hodges stated that there was an exceptionally great group of candidates for this commission, many of whom were very well qualified, and it was a Lough decision to make. In response to Councilmember Neel , Mayor pro tem stated that to him, he feels that he and the other members feel they are acting as a Council . He stated that in considering the names recommended, and his own recommendation, and what he heard the Mayor feels through Mary Martin, he asked for approval of the reappointment of Frank Tysen, and the appointment of Bill Drury, and Chris Foster to the Planning Commission each for a full four-year term ending June 30, 1995; it was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, and carried, Neel voting No, to approve said appointments. REPORTS & REQUESTS: CITY COUNCIL reports or requests a) Councilmember Murawski requested that the possibility (06U- of a tri-cities joint committee be added to a future agenda. 010) b) RACEWAY Councilmember Murawski requested that the staff bring back materials to considering adding a ballot measure regarding the raceway. City Attorney stated that a public hearing has been noticed for July 30, and a ballot consideration could be given on the July 31 agenda. Councilmember Murawski stated that he originally felt (083 that decision was that of the Council ; that the 010_T community is divided on the subject, and regardless of the decision, 'it appears litigation will follow; and he suggested that the hearing be postponed. City Attorney stated that matter should be added to the agenda, and direction provided as to the July 30 hearing, and ballot measures. It was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, to add this matter to the agenda, for the purpose of giving notice of the continuance of the hearing, and instructing staff to prepare materials For the July 31 agenda to consider a ballot measure; said motion failed to carry by the following vote (4/5 required): AYES: Broich, Hodges & Murawski NO: Neel ABSENT: Bono It was the consensus of the Council to add this item to the agenda for the July 23 adjourned meeting, for a discussion concerning the ballot possibility. U Council Minutes 7-17-91 Page 14 PUBLIC reports or requests a) Tony Aguilar, 1975 Mark Leslie, staged that during his commission appointment 'interview, he shared his thoughts about: where he thought he community was going; that he did not think it was an organized effort to make the appointments without the Mayor; that he felt it was wrong for the Council to have made the appointments, because five elected officials represent (060- the City, that there was no urgency to making the 015) appointments; that the citizens, and those who present themselves in interviews, have a right to being considered by the full body of elected officials; that he shared his feelings about the demographics in the City, i .e. , that Hispanics represent 19% of the population, but there are no Hispanics at the appointment or city level ; that as a broker and banker, he could not agree that out of the twenty candidates, the three selected were better qualified that he. He expressed his opinion as to Councilmember Murawski ' s motivation in making the appointments. b) John Wyser, Avenida Fey Norte, took exception to comments by Mr. Aguilar, and stated that he felt the City Attorney would clarify that the action was legally (060- taken; and that the Mayor's letter did not imply 015) wrongdoing on the part of the Council . c) Alan Bayrak ,and Shirley Barker each commended the Council on 'its courage in making the appointments, (060- and expressed their opinions concerning the Mayor' s 015) absence. d) Anne Livieri , 2135 Del Lago, stated that she was invited to attend the Planning Commission study session this date, and was confronted with confusion as to who (060- was able to sit as a commissioner, resulting in time 015) loss, and directing her elsewhere; and her opinion that had the appointments been made, there would have been better organization and less confusion. STAFF reports or requests ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor declared the meeting adjourned to Friday, July 19, 1991, at 4:30 p.m. , in the Large Conference Room, City_Hall . JUDITH SUMTCH - 'City Clerk