HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990 - MINUTES - 12/5/1990 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS '-'�A
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
DECEMBER 5, 1990
A Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor
pro tem Broich, in the Council Chamber, City Hall , 3200
Tahquitz-McCallum Way, on Wednesday, December 5, 1990, at 7:30
p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Broich, Hodges, Murawski
and Neel
Absent: Mayor Bono
The meeting was opened with the Flag Salute and an invocation by
Reverend Andrew Green, Church of St. Paul in the Desert, Episcopal .
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
Report of Assistant City Clerk: Agenda posted in accordance
with Council procedures November 30, 1990.
PRESENTATIONS:
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION AWARDS: Nadine Fieger, Personnel & (074-
Steven Vinci , General Operations 001)
CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL (074-
REPORTING, Ron Everett, Finance Department. 001)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Hodges, seconded by Neel , and unanimously
carried, that the Minutes of October 23, and 30, 1990 be
approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. A.D. 159 - FIESTA RD, ET AL CUL-DE-SAC CLOSURE
On November 7, 1990 the Council adopted actions and set
this as time and place for hearing on Resolution of Intention
to close cul-de-sacs on certain streets, generally located
southerly from Chuckwalla (Fiesta, Optunia, Vaquero) .
Contract Administrator reviewed the staff report given in
detail at the last study session, and added that 56-
representatives from Sanborn & Webb, and Macenzie Brown 013
waere present to answer any questions regarding the process
of the formation of the district; that the cul-de-sacs were
narrowed from the original design to fit within existing
right-of-way which greatly reduced property owners ' concerns
about encroachment problems; that the design for the masonry
wall and iron gates to be built north of the four cul-de-sacs
has been upgraded; that the 14-foot wide gates can be unlocked
by the fire department for emergency access, and the
cul-de-sacs and gates meet Fire Department requirements;
and that there are programs available for low income, and
seniors to assist in payment of the assessment fee.
- - r) Council Minutes
12-5-90, Page 2
1. A.D. 159 (Cont'd)
Mayor pro tem declared the hearing open.
Sally Sonja, 1430 Opunta Road, expressed appreciation is
to City staff for assistance in the formation of the district;
that from the beginning of the formation of it, the majority
of the homeowners favored the district; that the formation
is a united effort of the homeowners; and requested Council
approval .
Debra Young, 1428 Rodeo, stated that the main purpose of
the district is to separate single family residences from
the multi-family dwellings.
Willie Detrich, 1486 Vaquero Road, stater,) opposition to
the district; that the cul-de-sac will damage his property;
that his property is located at the end of the cul-de-sac
which removes the majority of his front yard and increases
noise from vehicles turning in front of his property; that
the closing of the streets will force his trips to various
shops to increase by one mile; that he does not drive, and
the walking will cause a hardship; that the assessment is
beyond his financial means; that an agreement was made
between the homeowners and himself when the district was
first discussed, and it was agreed that the rest of the
property owners would cover his assessment, and now the
property owners will not cover the costs; and requested
Council consideration of his plight, should the Council
approve the district.
Mrs. Gus Kalantis, 1493 Vaquero Road, questioned whether
an Environmental Impact Report had been done regarding the
assessment; she also questioned using a fence, rather, than
a block wall .
Contractor Administrator stated that a Notice of Exemption
is filed, due to no signiciant changes to the streets.
Mrs. Kalantis, stated that there are significant changes;
that only one correspondence had been received from the
City since March; and that questions needed to be answered.
Contract Administrator stated that a normal setback for
a cul-de-sac is 43 feet from the center line to the edge
of the curb, that it is now 11 feet from the existing curb
to the far edge of the proposed cul-de-sac; that concern
was expressed by the property owners about the property
reduction, that a compromise was reached; that the Fire
Department needs access to the neighborhood; and that the
Desert Water Agency does not want a block fence built over
its water main; and that it is considering updating the
water main within the next 5 years.
Lisa Bellows, 1439 Opunti , stated that crime, garbage and
racing cars are promident in the area; that the cul-de-sac
will create a clean, safe environment; that Mr. Dietrick' s,
property is for sale, and that one of the selling points
is that the property will be on a cul-de-sac,.
Karen Peterson, 1465 Vaquero, stated that Mrs. Kalantis
is not a full-time resident; and it is the wish of the
majority of the residents to have the district formed.
Council Minutes - - �
12-5-90, Page 3
1. A.D. 159 (Cont'd)
Mrs. Dietrick, Vaquero Road, stated opposition to the
district; that the poor people lose with the district; and
that in her opinion the houses (in the neighborhood) are
not that nice.
I=rank McMillian, 1481 Fiesta Road, stated that his property
is at the end of the street where the impact of the cul-de-sac
is the greatest; that work between the City and the homeowners
scaled down the cul-de-sac; that existing guidelines are
being meet; that the cul-de-sac will provide for a safer
neighborhood; that the steps resolving the problems with
the fire department have been completed; that the costs
of the assessment will increase the property value's; and
he encouraged Council approval .
There being no further appearances, Mayor pro tem declared
the hearing closed.
Resolution 17346 through 17349 approving the final engineer's
report; overruling protests and confirming the assessments;
and authorizing request for proposal for sale of bonds for
construction of improvements was presented; after which,
it was moved by Neel , seconded by Murawski , and unanimously
carried, Bono absent, that R17346 - 17349 be adopted.
2. AA CASE 3.0769 - KRZYWON APPEAL
Consideration of appeal by neighboring residents concerning
Planning Commission action for addition to residence at
2495 Palermo, relating to a two-story element. (Continued
from November 27)
Planning Director reviewed the staff report given in detail
at the last study session and no further report was added.
Mayor pro tem declared the hearing open.
Scott Harlow, attorney from the office of Leonard Bock, 111-
representing the Kryzwons, stated that there are three 001
concerns regarding the addition: a) the view, which has
been complied with by the lowering of the home; b) a
concern for setting a precedent for two-story homes, however,
variances are site specific; and the Council should consider
this situation on its own merits, i .e. , that the addition
is for only 18 feet, most two story homes are much higher;
and c) the Kryzwons have tried to please the Council ,
Planning Commission, and the neighbors; and the main objectors
view of the area (the Kanya 's) is not substantially impacted.
He requested denial of the appeal .
Council Minutes
12-5-90, Page 4
2. AA CASE 3.0769 (Cont'd)
Joe Kanya, 2494 Vista Drive, spoke in opposition to the
addition; and stated that if it is built it will cause a
severe obstruction to his view; that Council has been lienient
in the time spent on the project; that a petition has been
presented to the Council against the addition; that
consideration should be given to the majority of the
homeowners; that property improvement is always desired
in the neighborhood, but not additions detrimental to hillside
properties.
Lois Kanya, 2494 Vista Drive, expressed appreciation to
Councilmember Neel for his visit to her home to see how
the view would beimpacted; that the property in question
has been a depressed piece of property for ,years; that: the
improvements to the property are greatly appreciated; that
recent improvements made to the Kryzwon' s property were
deliberate in that now an addition to the home can only
go up; that objections from the neighbors are that the
addition has a negative asthetic and economic impact on
the surrounding properties; that the neighborhood has been
placed in a fight or flee position, with the only regress
to appeal to the Council ; that if the Council approves the
project, the Council will condone view obstruction, a certain
amount of encroaching into one' s privacy, a form of esthetic
and economic loss of property, and setting a precedent: for
building on hillside properties; that the objecting neighbors
are not dictating what should be built, rather allowance
for the houses which were built in the area; and requested
favorable Council consideration of the apepal .
Fred Ebling, 2460 Tuscan Road, stated that his home was
purchased because of the view; that if approved, a precedent
will be set; and that the entire neighborhood should be
considered.
Mary Drasow, stated that in this case, a small home was
purchased to acommidate a seven-member family; that instead
of an addition adjacent to the home, a pool was added; that
now the neighbors are being asked to sacrafic their view,
and property value, to allow the building of the two-story;
and if approved, the action will set a precedent for two-story
buildings on hillside.
Mr. Harlow, stated that the case has gone, on for a long
time; that most of the neighbors are thrilled that the
Krzywons have cleaned up the property; that there are only
a few dissenters to the addition; that a petition had included
23 signatures in favor of the addition.
Council Minutes - �
12-5-90, Page 5
2. AA CASE 3.0769 (Cont'd)
Ramona Hortner Case, 2424 Vista Drive, stated that the people
who signed the petition are not the immediate neighbors;
but that if the Krzywons would consider paying
the adjacent neighbors for the view loss, perhaps then the
neighbors could also build two stories to regain the view
loss; and the continuation of building could go on and on.
Mr. Ted Krzywzon, 2495 Palermo Drive, stated that the addition
is only for 18 feet; that the view will not be affected
very much; that the zone allows for 30 feet in height; that
the building cannot be layered because of rocky terrain;
that all improvements have been encouraged by the neighbors;
and that after approval had been given by the Planning
Commission, the appeal had been filed.
There being no further appearances, Mayor pro tem declared
the hearing closed.
Councilmember Murawski questioned the site lines of the
property, and illustrated the view that he saw on the
property.
Councilmember Neel stated that a view is a precious thing
and should never be destroyed; and that once a view is taken
away, it can never be restored.
Councilmember Hodges stated that she viewed the area; that
the appeal is actually an ordinance that needs to be changed;
that the area is unique; that the homeowners are fortunate
in the views that they have; that respect should given to
the properties; that two-story residents do not belong on
hillside areas; and moved approval of the appeal .
Councilmember Neel seconded the motion.
City Attorney stated that the appropriate height could be
established at this time to prevent the appeal from coming
back to Council again.
Planning Director stated that Council could direct a point
of reference for the staff to work with; that hillside
building judgement is placed with the Planning Commission;
that the Commission has lowered heights felt appropriate
to the project; that 18-foot is the normal height for flatland
building, but that hillside is total judgement of the Planning
Commission.
Councilmember Neel stated that the project has to be
asthetically right.
Councilmember Murawski questioned whether the project was
on bedrock; and whether the project could be lowered to
meet the existing roofline; and stated that consideration
should be given to the Krzywons due to the fact they have
gone through the processes, and were granted approval by
the Planning Commission
Planning Director stated that the land is strewn with
boulders; and that it would be possible to lower the addition.
[�`1
Council Minutes
12-5-90, Page 6
2. AA CASE 3.0769 (Cont'd)
Terry Rouch, 45190 Club Drive, Indian Wells, architect for
the project, stated that the project could be lowered; the
roof level would be dropped 3 to 4 feet; that basically
the roof line would be extended; that the view will not
be unpleasant.
Councilmember Murawski recommended that the project be
approved on the condition that the roof line not exceed
the existing roof line, and that the Zoning Ordinance be
reconsidered by City Council concerning hillside development.
Terry Rouch, architect, stated that concern has been addressed
for the view; and that consideration needs to be given to
the project.
City Attorney stated that the motion on the floor is to
deny the appeal , and requested the Council consider denial
of the appeal , with the condition that the Krzywons can
resubmit the plans with the two story roof line not to exceed
the existing roof line; or that the Council continue the
matter, and refer it back to the Planning Commission for
restudy.
Councilmember Hodges stated that if the addition is the
same as the existing roof line she would concur.
Councilmember Neel stated that the view must be preserved.
Motion by Hodges, seconded by Neel , was amended to deny
the appeal , and approve the project with the condition that
the two-story roof line not exceed the existing roof line
on the site; after which, it was unanimously carried.
3. ANNEXATIONS 24 & 25 - PREZONING
On November 21, the Council continued consideration of
prezoning for Annexation Areas 24 and 25.
Director of Community Development stated that the annexations( 54-
had been split into two annexations due to unihabited and 003 )
habited areas; that meeting was held with the Tribal Council
Planning Consultant concerning zoning of the areas; that (54-
the area concerning the raceway has been removed from the 004 )
annexations, and it will come back to the Council at a later
date; and that a Full Environmental Impact Report will be
done concerning that. area.
City Attorney stated that the raceway was removed from
consideration of the annexations; that a full EIR would
be done concerning same; that meetings had been held between
city staff and Friends of the Environment.; and that their
concerns have been alleviated.
Mayor pro tem declared the hearing open.
Steve Grasha, 520 Murray Canyon, stated annexation is not
in the best interest of the citizens; and that the raceway
will need to be considered by the County.
- - �?0t
Council Minutes
12-5-90, Page 7
3. ANNEXATIONS 24 & 25 (Cont'd)
Earl Johnson, 3683 Andreas Hills, expressed appreciation
for the time staff has taken to explain the annexations;
that if the annexation excludes the raceway, most of the
citizens would favor same; and requested notification should
any other annexations be considered by the Council .
Bill Byrne, 301 Overlook Road, stated that the meeting between
the staff and the Friends of the Environment was fruitful ;
and some fears have been alleviated; that Item 7 on the
agenda refers to the same group who performed the EIR for
the Annexation; and that if the raceway is reconstitued
the group will pursue the matter.
Jim Guthrie, 5519 Inspiration Drive, Riverside, stated that
14 months ago, an application had been filed for the raceway;
that now negiotations are being made as to what will happen;
that the annexation has always been supported in the past;
and that the treatment of the case has not been fair.
There being no further appearances, Mayor pro tem declared
the hearing closed.
Councilmember Murwski questioned whether the issue would
go back to the County.
City Attorney stated that approval of the matter does not
prevent the Council from future consideration of the raceway;
that annexation 24 and 25 excludes the raceway portion,
and that the raceway area would be considered separately
by the Council .
Director of Community Development stated that the proposed
zoning has been amended to include the recommendations of
the Tribal Council .
Resolution 17350 amending the General Plan Land Use, as
amended, was presented; after which, it was moved by Murawski ,
seconded by Neel , and unanimously carried, Bono absent,
that R17350 be adopted.
Assistant City Clerk read title of Ordinance (excludes
raceway area) as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY APPROVING A PREZONING PLAN
FOR LANDS INCLUDED IN ANNEXATIONS 24 & 25, GENERALLY BOUNDED
BY THE NORTHERLY CITY LIMIT OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
INDIAN AVENUE, INTERSTATE ROUTE 10, AND THE CITY LIMIT
OF THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, SECTIONS OR PORTIONS THEREOF,
6, T4S, R5E; 23, 25, 26 & 36, T3S, R4E; and 30 & 31, T3s,
R5E.
after which, it was moved by Murawski , seconded by Neel ,
and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that further reading
be waived, and the Ordinance be introduced for First reading.
l�
n Council Minutes
12-5-90, Page 8
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) George Goldberg, no address given, stated that the Plaza
de las Flores was in building violation; that certain
business owners within the community are given
preferential treatment by the Council ; and that various
expenses by city staff should be investigated.
b) Jim Shaw, Mira Loma Hotel , stated that the City had
painted the white loading zone outside his business
to a red zone; that the North Palm Project Committee
had suggested same, but that he could not obtain copies
of the minutes of the meeting; that the Redevelopment
Department had promised that someone would come to his
business and assess the situation; but that with the
continuance of the red zone, his business will be shut
down.
c) John Weiser, 3395 Avenida del Norte, stated that recently
newspaper has indicated displeasure at recent Council
actions; however, that there are residents who do not
take part in the quest for increased tourism, nor do
they not want the raceway; that the Palm Springs area
has always been viewed as a clean environment, with
a layed-back attitude; that the Resolution for the
approval of SENCA' s agreement does not provide
clarification of the benefits, and he stated opposition
to it.
d) Steve Grasha, 520 Murray Canyon, stated) that a lighted
golf course would illuminate the sky and ruin the views
of the city.
e) Alan Bayrak, Palm Springs, stated that consideration
for a new consultant should be given regarding the EIR
for the racetrack area.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
4. P.S. CLASSIC PROJECT FINANCING ANALYSIS & ASSISTANCE
Recommendation: That the Council approve a structure for
the financing of the Classic Project golf course project,
and select certain members of the financing team.
Director of Economic Development reviewed the staff report t133-
given in detail at the last study session, and added) that 003 )
the approval would provide a vehicle to authorize the issuance
of the Certificates to assist in the acquisition of the
land from, and the development of the project thereon;, Palm
Springs Inter-Continental Golf Center Joint Venture; that
Rutan & Tucker would be appointed as bond cousel , and Bear
Sterns & Co. , as underwriter; that authorization would be
given to staff to solicit proposals from financial advisors
to evaluate the City' s obligations relating to the planning,
construction and operation of the project:, and repayment
of the debt; that authorization would be granted to the
City Manager to authorize various contracts and agreements;
that all the deal points have not been worked out with the
developer, but that $200,000 would be paid by the developer
as soon as the agreement is signed; that monies will not
be coming from city funds; that housing mitigations are
being discussed; that a night-lighted 9-hole golf course
is being discussed, but would come back to the Council for
public input; that a letter of credit would be set into
place by the developer to guarantee any short falls to be
Council Minutes
12-5-90, Page 9
4. P.S. CLASSIC PROJECT (Cont'd)
drawn on by the City; that negotiations between Rutan &
Tucker for bond counsel has resulted in a lowering of its
original proposal ; and that in order to meet deadlines,
the process needs to be started now.
Resolution 17351 as recommended, was presented; after which,
it was moved by Neel seconded by Murawski , and unanimously
carried, Bono absent, that R17351 be adopted.
5. COB - P.S. VISION PROJECT - REVISED PREDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Recommendation: That the Council approve revised
predevelopment agreement with PS Vision Consortium/SENCA,
relative to prior directions of the Council . (133-
City Manager stated that the item was not ready for 005)
consideration, and requested that the item be continued.
6. CONVENTION CENTER ADVERTISING
Recommendation: That the Council approve expenditure of
budgeted Convention Center advertising funds -sor the purchase
of advertising in the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Advertising 1139-
insert for $17,375. 001)
Convention Center Administrative Assistant reviewed the
staff report given in detail at the last study session,
and no further report was given.
Councilmember Murawski stated that there are some concerns
regarding the expenditure; and that the advertising is an
issue Council needs to further study.
Minute Order 4680, as recomended, was presented; after which;
it was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously
carried, Bono absent, that M04680 be adopted.
7. P.S. INTERNATIONAL RACEWAY EIR CONSULTANT
On November 21, 1990, the Council continued consideration
of agreement with Cotton-Beland Associates for EIR for the
P.S. International Raceway project. (116-
074)
Director of Community Development requested continuation
of the item to December 19, 1990 to al@ow alternative
suggestions of consultants.
It was moved by Neel , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously
carried, that the item be continued to December 19, 1990.
Council Minutes
1.2-5-90, Page 10
LEGISLATIVE ACTION (Cont'd)
B. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - RV PARKING/STORAGE
Recommendation: That the Council amend the Municipal Code
to allow some flexibility in the regulations concerning
parking Recreational Vehicles (RV's) in front yards.
Planning Director reviewed the staff report given in detail
at the last study :session, and added that there are some
conditions suggested to allow a permit to be issued; that
only one permit be issued per residential parcel ; that: the
permit must identify the RV by license number; that the
permit must identify where on the parcel the RV would be
parked; that the RV must be screened from view from
surrounding properties; that the RV must be maintained in
a clean and usable appearance; that the permit would expire
upon the applicant' s termination of residency at that address;
that the parcel must be maintained in accordance with Section
9319.00 of the Zoning Ordinance; that the applicant for
the permit shall pay a fee as established by the City Council ,
which may be amended from time to time.
Councilmember Broich questioned why the property maintenance
should be mentioned, since it is covered specifically in
the Zoning Ordinance.
Planning Director stated that it creates a parallel between
the property and RV parking, that the issues are for review; r1
that the Council could choose to amend the, proposal ; 03-
that (101)
the proposal grants an exemption for persons loading and
unloading the vehicles, however if the use is excessive,
the vehicle could be cited; that costs have not been discussed
in great deal , but staff is recommending a $75 fee; that
the proposed ordinance will not aleviate all of the problems
concerning RV' s; that changes have been made in the community
necessitating a change in the ordinance.
Councilmember Neel questioned the costs of enforcement.
Planning Director stated that the costs are difficult to
calculate; but once the ordinance is established, costs
should be minimal .
Councilmember Murawski expressed appreciation for the time
staff has devoted to the ordinance, but that a permit is
questionable; that there will be a cost to the City; and
suggested the approach be on a complaint basis, and establish
a fine for persons that violate the code.
Mayor pro tem concurred; and added that a $75 fee is
questionable.
Planning Director stated that staff could deal with setting
fine violations.
Councilmember Hodges stated she was not opposed to a fee
being enacted for violations, nor to the $75 amount.
Councilmember Neel stated the ordinance is a ino win situation;
that violations will occur; that the issue has come before
Council in the past; that the ordinance should remain as
it's now.
Council Minutes
12-5-90, Page 11
8. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT (Cont'd)
Acting City Manager stated that under the proposed ordinance,
a violation is an infraction; that the enabling provision
for the fee could remain in the ordinance, but that a no
fee be set at this time.
City Attorney stated that Council has indicated that costs
should be recovered; and that the item should be referred
back to staff for restudy.
George Goldberg, stated that views needed to be expressed,
at which point he was ruled out of order and Mayor pro tem
requested that he be removed from the Chamber.
It was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously
carried, Bono absent, that no action be taken, and the item
be further studied by staff.
9. ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS: None
CONSENT AGENDA:
10. MO 4681 approving agreement with KWL Associates, Inc. , for
$36,000 for construction engineering and survey staking for (p6P )
A.D. 158 Andreas Hills Tract 18087 improvements (cost covered
by the assessment district) - Agr #2920.
11. MO 4682 approving Change Order 3 to A2854 with Massey Sand (51-
& Rock Company for AIP-12, to install new drive access to 020)
rental car ready return lot, for an increase of $12,134.25.
12. MO 4683 approving Milton Levinson for membership on the Public �060-
Facilities Corporation Board of Directors. 018)
13. Res 17353 approving Riverside County Transportation Commission( 123-
as the agency responsible for the County Congestion Management 011 )
Program (required by AB471) .
14. Res 17354 approving FTM 25112 for condominium purposes on( 137-
the NW corner of Avenida Caballeros and Saturnino Road , Section 067 )
14 - Barcon Development.
15. MO 4684 consenting to an encumbrance to lease agreements #2528 (51-
and #2529 for $3,300,000 and authorizing the City Manager 050)
to execute all necessary documents.
16. Res 17355 and 17356 approving Payroll Warrants and Claims (86-
& Demands.
17. Res 17357 approving FTM 25551 for single residential on Tamarisk ( 137-
Road between Farrell Drive and Cerritos Road, Section 12 - 072)
Irving Green.
18. MO 4685 authorizing sole source purchase of playground equipment(84-.
from Walt Rankin and Associates for $22,050.28. 007)
19. Res 17358 opposing County of Riverside imposition of fees ( 123-
for booking prisoners. 003)
It was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously
carried, Bono absent, that Resolutions 17353 through 17358
and Minute Orders 4681 through 4685 be adopted.
Council Minutes
12-5-90, Page 12
ADDED STARTERS:
20. STUDY SESSIONS
It was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, and unanimously
carried, Bono absent, that item concerning study sessions
be added to the agenda.
Assistant City Clerk read title of Ordinance as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SECTION 2.04.015 TO THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL_ CODE, STUDY ( 103-
SESSIONS. OO1)
after which, Resolution 17359 amending the Council ' s rules
of procedures re. establish study session meeting time, (114-
was presented, it was moved by Murawski , seconded by Hodges, 002d
and unanimously carried, Bono absent, that R17359 be adopted,
and that further reading be waived, and the Ordinance introduced
for first reading.
REPORTS & REQUESTS:
CITY COUNCIL reports or requests
Councilmember Hodges requested staff investiclate the red
curbing and relationship to increased prostitution activity
in the North Indian Avenue area; and that a brochure had
been produced from the Redevelopment Agency, and that discretion
should be used.
PUBLIC reports or requests - None
STAFF reports or requests None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor pro tem declared
the meeting adjourned to December 11, 1990, 7:30 p.m. for
a Personnel Hearing, Large Conference Room, City Hall and
thereby further adjourned to December 18, 1990, 5:30 p.m.
for Goal/Communication Session, Corporation 'Vard, General
Operations Building.
JUDITH SUMICH
City-Qlerk �� C,
By: PATRICIA A. SANDERS
Assistant City Clerk
On December 11, 1990, the City Attorney requested that the matter be
postponed; appellant was notified by Personnel , and there was no quorum
of the Council ; meeting futher adjourned by the City Clerk to date and
place above noted for goal/communication workshop.
ADITH SUTHIL f-
`- City Clerk