Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21650 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/19/2006 RESOLUTION NO. 21650 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND/OR APPROVING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT REGARDING THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT INCREASE FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 FOR THE PALM SPRINGS PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6B. WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, beginning with §22500 (hereafter referred to as the "Act"), did by previous Resolution order the City Engineer to prepare and file an Engineer's Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the "Engineer's Report") in accordance with the Act, in connection with the proposed increase of the levy and collection of assessments for the Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No. 66 (hereafter referred to as "District No. 6B") for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2006, and ending June 30, 2007; and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared and filed the Engineer's Report with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council the Engineer's Report; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and finds that the levy has been spread in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed, as set forth in the Engineer's Report. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. The Engineer's Report as presented consists of the following: a) A Description of District No. 6B and Improvements. b) The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Services, Operations and Maintenance) c) A Description of the Method of Apportionment resulting in an Assessment Rate per Levy Unit within District No. 613 for fiscal year 2006-07. Section 3. The Engineer's Report as presented, is hereby approved (as amended), and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation and final approval of the Engineer's Report. Resolution No. 21650 Page 2 ADOPTED this 19'h day of July, 2006. , David H. Ready, City I ger ATTEST: es Thompson, City Clerk CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ) I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that Resolution No. 21650 is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on July 19, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmember McCulloch, Councilmember Mills, Councilmember Pougnet, Mayor Pro Tern Foat and Mayor Oden NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 14es Thomps on, City Clerk //City of Palm Springs, California City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 68, Parkside Estates CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ENGINEER'S REPORT PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6B "PARKSIDE ESTATES" FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 O� PALM S A� i a U cn m 'tS yC0 NA Rp�AAY@p FORvl�� Intent Meeting: May 24, 2006 Public Hearing: July 19, 2006 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 6B, Parkside Estates Engineer's Report Affidavit Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No. 613, "Parkside Estates" This Report describes the District including the improvements, budget, parcels and assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2006-2007, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 24th day of May, 2006. B y: J' L David J. Barakian, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Palm Springs Civil Engineer C 28931 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 60, Parkside Estates CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ENGINEER'S REPORT PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6S PARKSIDE ESTATES Fiscal Year 2006.2007 The Undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional istered in the State of California. David J. Barakian, P.E. 4 2gg31 Director of Public Works/City Engineer U dl 07 k City of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the 24th day of May, 2006. es Thompson, City Gler< ity of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, on the 19th day of July, 2006. aiiI rises Thompson, Gity Cle ty of Palm Springs County of Riverside, California r City of Palm Springs- Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 0B. ParksideEstates TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....... .................................. ................... .............................................1 ��� °= A. Introduction................. ................................ .............. ...................................1 B_ Overview .............................. ............................................... ------ .................1 DESCRIPTION (JF THE DISTRICT............................... ....................... ...................................2 A. Description of the District................................................................................2 B. Description of Improvements and Services....... .................. ..........................2 METHOD OF/\PP[)R7^ C}NMENT.................... .................... ..................................................4 A. General ...... ................... ....................-~.......... .................................4 B_ Benefit Analysis............................... . ----- ........ .................... .............. ------4 C. Assessment Methodology......'--......--..,..--......-......5 O_ Assessment Formula............ .................................................................. ------5 DISTRICT0UDGET ------ ..................................... ...................................................................6 A. Description of Budget Items....... ....................................................................O B, District Budget~~ rincm| Year 2D06/2UU7...... .................................................7 APPENDIX /\'District Diagrams.......... ----- ..................................... ........................................8 APPENDIX B -Assessment Roll................. ........................................ ...................................12 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 68, Parkside Estates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Engineer's Report (hereinafter referred to as the "Report) is to set forth the engineering analysis and findings for the levy of assessments in the City of Palm Springs (hereinafter referred to as the "City") Parkway Maintenance District No. 66 ("Parkside Estates"), (hereinafter referred to as the "District"), for fiscal year 2006-2007, in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 3, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") which is part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code and as provided by Article XIII D of the California Constitution (hereinafter referred to as "Article XIII D"). This District was formed to supplement certain City revenues and help finance the costs of providing for parkway landscape maintenance within the District's boundaries. This report is prepared for the levy and collection of annual assessments for District for fiscal year 2006-2007. The City initiates proceedings for annual levying of assessments within the District by passing a resolution, which states that the District was established under the Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the name and location of the District, and preliminarily approves the Engineer's Report. The report prepared by the engineer must include an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram, i.e., map of the District showing the boundary of the District and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements against the parcels or lots which benefit from the improvements. Once the report is completed it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After the report is approved, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy and collect assessments, describes the improvements, and refers to the report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the proposed assessments. In 2004, the City initiated proceedings to increase the existing maximum annual assessments within the District, such that additional improvements to the street lighting system could occur, and that funds collected for this District could equal the current costs to operate and maintain the improvements. At the July 21, 2004, City Council meeting, a Public Hearing was conducted and a property owner protest ballot proceeding concluded, with the failure of the proposed increase to the existing maximum annual assessments within the District. This Engineer's Report continues to disclose the fact that the District is operating with a deficit, and continues to require the supplement of General Fund revenues from the City to operate and maintain the improvements within this District. In 2005, upon adoptlon of the confirmed Engineer's Report for this District for the 2005/2006 fiscal year, the City Council dlrected the City Engineer to schedule property owner protest ballot proceedings on the matter of approving an increase to the maximum annual assessment, as necessary to increase assessments to cover estimated annual expenses ' and to implement a Consumer Price Index ("CPI") annual inflator. At the July 19, 2006, City Council meeting, a Public Hearing was conducted and a property owner protest ballot proceeding concluded, with the failure of the proposed increase to the existing maximum annual assessments within the District. This Engineer's Report continues to disclose the fact that the District is operating with a deficit, and continues to require the supplement of City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 68, Parkside Estates General Fund revenues from the City to operate and maintain the improvements within this District. City Council direction as a result of the failure to increase the existing maximum annual assessment within the District included reduction of services to the level afforded by the revenues collected by the existing maximum annual assessment, as may be practical. B. OVERVIEW The District described in this report includes all lots and parcels within the residential area identified as the "Parkside Estates", consisting of Tract 7290-1 and Tract 7290. The City proposes to annually levy and collect special assessments to continue the maintenance of the improvements within the proposed District. Assessments within the District are proposed to be levied annually, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "1972 Act") and in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution Article XIIIC and XIIID ("Proposition 218"). The assessments described in this Engineer's Report (hereinafter referred to as the "Report") shall be levied upon each parcel within the boundaries of the District and assessments shall be proportional to the special benefit received from the maintenance of the improvements. For the District, a benefit assessment rate per Parcel is established based upon estimated and actual operations and maintenance costs for the year. This Report describes the District and the proposed assessments for fiscal year 2006-2007_ The annual budget for the maintenance and operation of the improvements is based on estimated expenses for the upcoming fiscal year. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Parcel Number by the Riverside County ("County") Assessor's Office_ The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify on the tax roll properties assessed for special district benefit assessments. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT A. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT The Parkway Maintenance District No. 6B ("Parkside Estates"), includes all lots and parcels within the residential area identified as the "Parkside Estates", consisting of Tract 7290-1 and Tract 7290. The District includes 96 residential parcels. The purpose of the District is to ensure the ongoing maintenance and servicing of parkway landscape improvements installed in connection with development of properties within the District. This District will provide the financial mechanism (annual assessments) by which the ongoing operation and maintenance of these improvements will be funded. The District structure, proposed improvements, method of apportionment and assessments described in this Report are based on current development and improvement plans including all estimated direct expenditures, incidental expenses, and reserves associated with the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. B. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES The purpose of the District is to ensure the ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of ' parkway landscape improvements within the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, palm trees, turf areas with mowing strips, desert indigenous trees and ground cover, annual flowers, a sprinkler irrigation and emitter drip system, landscape drainage system, walkways and associated appurtenant facilities located in the dedicated landscaped parkway (street right-of-way) within the District, and all materials, equipment, City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 6B, Parkside Estates utilities, labor and appurtenant facilities related to the operation and maintenance of the parkway landscape improvements. The estimated annual cost to provide and maintain the improvements within the District shall be allocated to each property in proportion to the special benefits received. The Method of Apportionment described in this Report utilizes commonly accepted assessment engineering practices and has been established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the provisions of Proposition 218. Improvements and Services Permitted Pursuant to the 1972 Act As generally defined by the 1972 Act and applicable to this District, improvements and the associated assessments may include one or more of the following: 1) The installation or planting of landscaping; 2) The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities; 3) The installation or construction of public lighting facilities including, but not limited to, street lights and traffic signals; 4) The installation of park or recreational improvements including, but not limited to, all of the following: a) Land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, and drainage; b) Lights, playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms; c) The acquisition of land for park, recreational, or open-space purposes; 5) The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof; 6) The acquisition of any associated existing improvement; 7) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing including the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement including, but not limited to: a) Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvements; b) Grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities; c) Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; d) The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; e) The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti; f) Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements; g) Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements; 8) Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to: a) The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 6B, Parkside Estates b) The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices; c) Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; d) Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; ' e) Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and, f) Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment. Landscaping Improvements The parkway improvements may include, but are not limited to, all landscaping material and facilities within the District. These improvements include ground cover, shrubs, trees, plants, irrigation and drainage systems, ornamental lighting structures, and associated appurtenant facilities located within the District_ METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT A. GENERAL The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, parks, open space areas and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district or District ' may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided within the District to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, Article XIII D requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Article XIII D provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS All improvements associated with this District have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the properties within the District to their full potential, consistent with the development plans. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties, and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be [lie rinancial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of maintenance and operation of the improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties. The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each assessed parcel within the District receives benefit from the improvements. The special benefits associated with all parkway improvements are specifically: Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements; City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 68, Parkside Estates • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area; • Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space, open space areas and landscaping; • Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention; • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well- maintained improvements associated with the properties; and • Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise. All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District. Although the improvements may include landscaping improvements and other amenities available or visible to the public at large, the maintenance of these improvements is only necessary for the properties within the District and are not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the District boundary. Therefore, any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large- C. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The method of apportionment for the District calculates the receipt of special benefit from the respective improvements based on the actual land use of the parcels within the District. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is equated to the overall land use of the parcel based on the parcel's actual land use or proposed planned development, and is reliant upon the special benefit received from the improvements planned within the District. To identify and determine the special benefit to be received by each parcel, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the District improvements as well as individual property development within the District. The costs associated with the improvements shall be fairly distributed among the parcels based upon the special benefit received by each parcel. The maintenance and operation of the landscaping improvements provides special benefit to all parcels within the District adjacent to the improvements. Therefore, 100% of the costs will be apportioned to each parcel on a per lot unit basis. All lots are assessed the same amount as each is a single-family lot and receives equivalent benefit. D. ASSESSMENT FORMULA Any new or increased assessment requires certain noticing and meeting requirements by law. Prior to the passage of Proposition 218 (California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID), legislative changes in the Brown Act defined a "new or increased assessment" to exclude certain conditions- These conditions included "any assessment that does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed." This definition and conditions were later confirmed through Senate Bill 919 (Proposition 218 implementing legislation). The Assessment Formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment for the current fiscal year is less than or equal to the Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year. The Maximum Assessment is equal to the previous historical maximum assessment, assessed to the District prior to passage of Proposition 218. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the Maximum Assessment, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 68, Parkside Estates subject to property owner protest balloting in accordance with Proposition 218 (California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID). DISTRICT BUDGET , A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS For the purpose of estimating costs for the maintenance and servicing, actual costs are used where possible. But where actual maintenance experience is lacking, cost estimates will be used to determine costs, as follows: Parkway Landscape Maintenance: Includes maintenance labor, materials and equipment required to properly maintain the authorized improvements and services within the District_ Water costs: The cost of irrigation water for the parkway landscaping to be maintained is based upon actual Desert Water Agency billings on publicly landscaped areas being maintained within the District. Electrical energy costs: Energy costs included are those necessary for the operation of irrigation controls. Incidental costs: These are costs for special items, such as costs of levying the assessments with the County Tax Collector, anticipated utility rate increases, or other such costs, and are determined individually. Another Incidental Cost is the expense of Assessment Engineering services. This includes costs of performing annual assessment engineering, determining existing or estimated costs, retaining of consultants, preparation of the Engineer's Report, and other related costs, such as publication of notices, mailings, etc. Another Incidental Cost is the County Assessor-Tax Collector's charge of $25 per County assessment account plus $0.20 per levied parcel, to place the assessments on the tax rolls. This charge will be distributed between the benefit Districts. Miscellaneous: All cost estimates shall be rounded to the nearest dollar, except where specified differently above. The total amount to be levied on any parcel will be rounded to an even number to accommodate collection on the property tax bill in two equal installments- B. DISTRICT BUDGET This report has been prepared pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code) and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). See next page. City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 6B, Parkside Estates B. DISTRICT BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007 PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6B ("PARKSIDE ESTATES") Formed in 1980 A. PARKWAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST 2006/2007 1. Maintenance Costs (Merchant Landscape Services, Inc.) $1,750 2. Desert Water Agency(irrigation costs) $124 3. Incidentals $250 4. Administration $1,150 TOTAL COSTS: $3,274 Note: Maximum approved assessment was in Fiscal Year 1992/1993, established at $1,818, B. Actual Costs vs. Assessments Summary: ,Account(Deficit) as of 6/30104 = ($5,582) ,Assessment in 2004/2005 = $1,818 Actual Costs in 2004/2005 = 6 047 Account (Deficit) as of 6/30/05 = ($9,811) Assessment in 2005/2006 = $1,818 Estimated Costs in 2005/2006 = 4 797 Estimated Account(Deficit) as of 6/30/06 = ($12,790) C. 2006/2007 ASSESSMENT Estimated cost for 2006/2007 ($3,274) Estimated Account (Deficit) as of 6/30/06 = ( 12 790 Total = ($16,054) Maximum Allowable Assessment = $1,818 D. Number of parcels = 96 E. Average Cost in 2006/2007 per parcel ($1,818 divided by 96 parcels) _ $18.94 F. Actual Costs vs. Assessments History (Previous Closed Out 5 Years): Actual Costs: 00/01=$3,775; 01/02=$2,070; 02/03=$2,451; 03/04=$2,750; 04/05=$6,047 Assessments: $1,818 $1,818 $1,818 $1,818 $1,818 G. Budget (Expenditure Detail), see Account No. 001-2451-43540 City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 6S, Parkside Estates APPENDIX A - DISTRICT DIAGRAM The parcels within the Palm Springs Parkway Maintenance District No.6B, are shown on the , current Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Map Book 680 Pages 51 and 52. The County Assessor's Parcel Map along with the Assessment Roll constitutes the District Assessment Diagram. A copy of the Parkway Maintenance District No.6B boundary is shown on the following pages. City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 68, Parkside Estates v VISTA CMINp 25 PROPERY10 F.ORME0 iB80 (Note;P16. I Rau usacsmmt Nppt+ovcd attSj, l A01a I99Tl93) M _ FIAMOU ROAD • � e !Ltan A • ��1MMMMMM111NN � �• = ,.y 03 PWRER nM rORMED 1 60 I �..� �sRk•Arr�( YRMY di� ......r 1 1 so PnOPER71m FOAMED 1080'• 'Landscaping and LlghUng Aot of IQ72 K, PAEKWAYS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT. NO-6 A,13,& C WY OF PALM SPnINC9,C0UNiY CIF 41VEASWE,97ATE OF CALIF0nHIA City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No- 68, Parkside Estates 0 0 a{ .Q � L ,y.'1���_ +�4 ate•3 a s �, 5. SFn S ap •4- • r LJ m 4- �' a.• 9 c� e y ®'..Q Op •lf � r FJ 8 Y JAS -n + � ry 'R✓ rr ` a r J= yF O• .sty � �S n •- r: x+. IO r Q o _ City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No, 68, Parkside Estates g ,ti t1OfC O 4 ' • x v M y } O n � � gO a N z IE f �1$ W •1 4 r�i M .v .i P PPP"'',rV 4 M1t �� �'• / City of Palm Springs—Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 68, Parkside Estates APPENDIX B - ASSESSMENT ROLL Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on ' the Riverside County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor's Parcel Map(s) associated with the Secured Roll. A listing of parcels proposed to be assessed within this District, along with the assessment amounts, is shown on the following table. City of Palm Springs-Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No, 6B, Parksidc Estates RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSMENT ROLL PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6B ("PARKSIDE ESTATES') FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 FUND NO. 68-2620 ASSESSOR'S ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR'S ASSESSMENT PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER 680-511-001-0 $18.94 680-512-016-7 $18.94 680-511-002-1 $18.94 680-512-017-8 $18.94 680-511-003-2 $18.94 680-512-018-9 $18.94 680-511-004-3 $18.94 680-512-019-0 $18.94 680-511-005-4 $18.94 680-521-001-1 $18-94 680-511-006-5 $18.94 680-521-002-2 $18.94 680-511-007-6 $18.94 680-521-003-3 $18.94 680-511-008-7 $18.94 680-522-001-4 $18.94 680-511-009-8 $18.94 680-522-002-5 $18,94 680-512-001-3 $18.94 680-522-003-6 $18,94 680-512-002-4 $18.94 680-522-004-7 $18.94 680-512-003-5 $18.94 680-522-005-8 $18.94 680-512-004-6 $18.94 680-522-006-9 $18.94 680-512-005-7 $18.94 680-522-007-0 $18.94 680-512-006-8 $18.94 680-523-001-7 $18.94 680-512-007-9 $18.94 680-523-002-8 $18.94 680-512-008-0 $18.94 680-523-003-9 $18.94 680-512-009-1 $18.94 680-523-004-0 $18.94 680-512-010-1 $18.94 680-523-005-1 $18.94 680-512-011-2 $18.94 680-523-006-2 $18.94 680-512-012-3 $18.94 680-523-007-3 $18.94 680-512-013-4 $18.94 680-523-008.4 $18.94 680-512-014-5 $18.94 680-523-009-5 $18.94 680-512-015-6 $18.94 680-523-010-5 $18.94 City of Palm Springs-Engineer's Report Parkway Maintenance District No. 68, Parkside Estates ASSESSOR'S ASSESSMENT ASSESSOR'S ASSESSMENT PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER 680-523-011-6 $18.94 680-524-017-5 $18.94 680-523-012-7 $18.94 680-524-018-6 $18.94 680-523-013-8 $18.94 680-524-019-7 $18.94 680-523-014-9 $18.94 680-524-020-7 $18.94 680-523-015-0 $18.94 680-525-001-3 $18.94 680-523-016-1 $18.94 680-525-002-4 $18.94 680-523-017-2 $18.94 680-525-003-5 $18.94 680-523-018-3 $18.94 680-525-004-6 $18.94 680-524-001-0 $18.94 680-525-005-7 $18.94 680-524-002-1 $18.94 680-525-006-8 $18.94 680-524-003-2 $18.94 680-525-007-9 $18.94 680-524-004-3 $18.94 680-525-008-0 $18.94 680-524-005-4 $18.94 680-525-009-1 $18.94 680-524-006-5 $18.94 680-525-010-1 $18.94 ' 680-524-007-6 $18.94 680-525-011-2 $18.94 680-524-008-7 $18.94 680-525-012-3 $18.94 680-524-009-8 $18.94 680-525-013-4 $18.94 680-524-010-8 $18.94 680-525-014-5 $18.94 680-524-011-9 $18.94 680-525-015-6 $18.94 680-524-012-0 $18.94 680-525-016-7 $18.94 680-524-013-1 $18.94 680-525-017-8 $18.94 680-524-014-2 $18.94 680-525-018-9 $18.94 680-524-015-3 $18.94 680-525-019-0 $18.94 680-524-016-4 $18.94 680-525-020-0 $18.94 $1,818.24