Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/21/2001 - STAFF REPORTS (20) DATE: March 21, 2001 TO: City Council FROM: Director of Planning & Building CASE NO. 5.0853 - APPEAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN APPLICATION BY DESERT SHADOWS 3 LP FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED BY COMMISSION ON JANUARY 24, 2001 (PD 264) TO INCLUDE A PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SPANNING INDIAN CANYON DRIVE NORTH(TO BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 341 FEET SOUTH OF VISTA CHINO)FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONNECTING THE PROPOSED 17- UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AND RECREATION BUILDING ON A VACANT 1.85 ACRE PARCELATTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF INDIAN CANYON DRIVE NORTH AND STEVENS ROAD(100 EAST STEVENS ROAD), R-3/C-1 ZONE, SECTION 10,TO THE EXISTING DESERT SHADOWS RESORT. APPEAL: The applicant, Desert Shadows 3 LP, has appealed the Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council not approve an amendment to an application for a Planned Development by Desert Shadows 3 LP to include a private pedestrian bridge spanning Indian Canyon Drive North (to be located approximately 341 feet south of Vista Chino) for the purpose of connecting the proposed 17-unit condominium project and recreation building on a vacant 1.85 acre parcel at the northwest corner of Indian Canyon Drive and Stevens Road (100 East Stevens Road), R-3/C-1 Zone, Section 10 to the existing Desert Shadows resort. The applicant is Desert Shadows 3 LP, and the officers/owners are Mr. Ray Lovato and Mr. Stephen Payne. The City Council can approve, modify or overrule the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Based upon City Council direction, staff will prepare the necessary appeal resolution for City Council consideration at its next meeting. SUMMARY: On February 28, 2001, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the proposal and received correspondence and oral testimony both in support of and in opposition to the project (copies of correspondence attached). The Planning Commission voted 5-1-1 (Raya dissenting, Mills abstaining), to recommend that the City Council not approve an amendment to an application to include a private pedestrian bridge spanning Indian Canyon Drive North citing concerns regarding the need for such a structure, visual impact, compatibility of an urban type use in a village environment and suggesting that a tunnel may be a more appropriate connection between the private properties. BACKGROUND: On January 24, 2001, the Planning Commission voted 6-0-1 (Mills abstaining)to recommend that the City Council approve Case No. 5.0853(Planned Development District 264 and Tentative Tract Map 29988) for the development of a 17-unit condominium project and recreation building on a vacant 1.85 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Indian Canyon Drive North and Stevens Road (100 East Stevens Road), R-3/C-1 zone, Section 10, through adoption of a Resolution of Approval with Conditions. The applicant is Desert Shadows 3 LP, and the officers/owners are Mr. irh Case 5.0853 - PD 264 & TTM 2998 Amendment March 2, 2001 Page 2 of 4 On February 28, 2001, the Planning Commission voted 5-1-1 (Raya dissenting, Mills abstaining) to recommend that the City Council not approve an amendment to the application to include a private pedestrian bridge spanning Indian Canyon Drive North (to be located approximately 341 feet south of Vista Chino)forthe purpose of connecting the proposed 17-unit condominium project and recreation building to the existing Desert Shadows Resort. The applicant emphasizes that the bridge will be designed to serve as a decorative gateway to the community and serve as a promotional tool for the City and businesses in the Uptown area, as well as serving as a connection between the two private properties to provide guests at 100 East Stevens Road with access to the various amenities at the existing resort. The applicant has submitted a conceptual site plan which depicts stairways on either side of Indian Canyon Drive North, both located entirely within the applicant's private property. On the west side of the street, the stairwell will be located behind the proposed eight-foot high masonry walls which are included as part of the application for the 100 East Stevens Road project,thus restricting public view. On the east side of Indian Canyon Drive North, the stairway would be located inside the existing resort parking lot immediately north of the driveway. To restrict public view, the applicant proposes to convert the existing parking spaces on the west side of the lot to compact parking spaces in order to provide space to extend the existing eight-foot high masonry wall further to the south. A solid eight-foot high security gate would extend across the parking lot and connect to another proposed eight-foot high masonry wall which would then connect to the existing private entry onto the resort grounds. The gate would be set back far enough to allow misdirected vehicles to turn around. The applicant indicates that the parking lot on the east side of Indian Canyon Drive North serves as overflow parking for resort patrons only, and parking counts conducted by staff confirm that the lot is not fully utilized. The addition of the proposed stairway on the east side of North Indian Canyon Drive would create a net loss of three parking spaces. It should be noted that the Planned Development District for the existing resort (PD 240) included approval of a 10% reduction in the number of required parking spaces. The applicant notes that the stairways will be partially enclosed and will be ADA compliant via utilization of an inclined wheelchair lift which has the ability to turn corners as it maneuvers up a staircase. The lift has also has a pull down seat which provides the added function of accommodating ambulatory persons who have difficulty climbing stairs. The City's ADA Coordinator has reviewed the proposed chairlift and deemed it acceptable. The conceptual site plan depicts a 100-foot clear span structure. The applicant indicates that the bridge will have a minimum 16-foot clearance from the crown of the street, and the maximum height will be approximately 22 feet. The bridge will be symmetrical in that the stairwells will be approximately equidistant from the centerline of Indian Canyon Drive North. The columns will be cast in place concrete. The applicant has submitted a conceptual design depicting a steel truss design with awning-type fabric panels stretched between the steel frames. The Public Works Department recommends that the bridge have a 17-foot clearance from the crown of the street. fJrA 2 Case 5,0853 - PD 264 & TTM 2998 Amendment March 2, 2001 Page 3 of 4 The walkway would have a minimum width of three feet and a maximum width of four feet. The City's ADA advises that a minimum four-foot width would be required. The side walls would be approximately 54"high, although the applicant points out that the walls can be higher if necessary. Although the stairwells will be built on site, the bridge will be built off site, and it is anticipated that installation can be accomplished within a matter of hours, thereby requiring street closure for a limited period of time. At the Planning Commission's February 7,2001 study session,the applicant was questioned about the choice of a bridge as opposed to a tunnel. The applicant explained that a tunnel was initially considered, but deemed difficult due to existing underground utilities, particularly the sewer. The applicant notes that the costs associated with a tunnel would be approximately the same as those for a bridge, and the applicant chose to pursue the bridge concept due to the added benefit of providing a gateway statement and promotional tool for the City and businesses in the Uptown area. The Planning Commission expressed concern regarding visibility of the traffic signal at the intersection of Indian Canyon Drive and Vista Chino. Planning staff visited the site with the applicant and determined that visibility of the signal would not be impaired. The Commission was also concerned about the concept of a private bridge for the limited use of 17 units. The applicant emphasizes that the bridge will be designed to serve as a gateway to the Uptown area in addition to providing guests at 100 East Stevens Road with access to the vast array of amenities at the existing resort which include the check-in lobby with gift shop, full service restaurant and bar, disco, three pools, two spas, tennis court, outdoor BBQs, work out room, full service spa and beauty salon, sculpture garden with meandering creeks and waterfalls and administrative offices. Although only conceptual designs are being presented at this time, the applicant emphasizes that the structure will be designed as a gateway to the Uptown area and incorporate design elements and spaces for promotion of the City and Uptown area events. As such, the Uptown Business Association is supportive of the proposal and believes it will serve as a catalyst to further improvement to the Uptown area. A meeting was held on February 26, 2001 for the purpose of obtaining resident input. The meeting was attended byseveral members of the various neighborhood groups,the applicant and Planning staff. Concerns expressed by the residents included: whether or not a private bridge should be allowed in the public right-of-way(airspace)and related concerns about setting a precedent in that regard; whether or not the structure would benefit the community; whether such a structure is appropriate for a village environment; whether or not the structure would create visual blight; how the structure could be designed to ensure safety, i.e., prevent users from throwing objects off; and whether or not a tunnel would be a more appropriate connection between the private properties. 1g049 Case 5.0853 - PD 264 & TTM 2998 Amendment March 2, 2001 Page 4 of 4 On February 28, 2001 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the proposal and received correspondence and oral testimony both in support of and in opposition to, the project (copies of correspondence attached). The Planning Commission voted 5-1-1 (Raya dissenting, Mills abstaining), to recommend that the City Council not approve an amendment to an application to include a private pedestrian bridge spanning Indian Canyon Drive North citing concerns regarding the need for such a structure, visual impact, compatibility of an urban type use in a village environment and suggesting that a tunnel may be a more appropriate connection between the private properties (see attached resolution). Due to the fact that the applicant is seeking conceptual approval only of the proposed use, the project would be required to go before the Planning Commission for final approval. at which time staff would recommend additional conditions of approval based on fully dimensioned plans. At this time, the Planning and Engineering Departments have prepared conditions of approval based on the conceptual site plan submitted (attached). CONCLUSION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council not approve an amendment to an application for a Planned Development by Desert Shadows 3 LP to include a private pedestrian bridge spanning Indian Canyon Drive North (to be located approximately 341 feet south of Vista Chino) for the purpose of connecting the proposed 17-unit condominium project and recreation building on a vacant 1.85 acre parcel at the northwest corner of Indian Canyon Drive and Stevens Road (100 East Stevens Road), R-3/C-1 Zone, Section 10 to the existing Desert Shadows resort Director of EMnning and Building 1 City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Planning Commission 2-28-01 Minutes 3. Correspondence regarding proposed project 4. Draft Conditions t�� y 03/21/01 16:01 $7604165573 HYATT PALM SPRGS f0001 Llyatt Regency Suites Print Springs HYATT J.RS Norrh palm Gnyon Drive palm Springs CA 92262 USA ® 'Telephone:760-322-9000 FAX,760.322.6009 Snlcc FAX:760-;25-4027 March 21, 2001 To Whom It May Concern; I want to take this opportunity to express my support for Desert Shadows' continued endeavor to redevelop the uptown area. of Palm Springs. This unique and eclectic area has seen a tremendous facelift since the development of Desert Shadows Inn. Hirst and foremost, as a citizen of Palm Springs, it is my belief that the redevelopment of this area has only enhanced the charm and beauty of the city. Secondly, as a business person, I believe that this development has played a vital role in the recent success of the hospitality industry as it has added another unique niche market, one of the most important factors that differentiates our resort destination from others. I believe it is in the best interests of all citizens of the city to endorse this redevelopment project and to approve the bridge, as long as the city has final approvals on all design and architectural plans, 1 am sorry that I cannot attend this evening's meeting, as 1 have a previous commitment. I am there in spirit, however. 1 reiterate my support of this project and believe the real winners will be the citizens of Palm Springs. Yours lndy, Kurt olbrook General Manager Hyatt Regency Suites Palm Springs KH/dc 0 The Lathom Group Lathom Hotel Management February 28, 2001 Members of City of Palm Springs Planning Commission CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Dear Members, I want to show my support for the petitioner of the proposed Desert Shadows Development that you are reviewing today. Specifically, I want to lend my support to the building of the entranceway bridge to Uptown Palm Springs. As some of you may know, back in the early 1990s I was General Manager of the Riviera Resort. The corner of Vista Chino and Indian was the worst looking corner of undeveloped land in the city of Palm Springs. The vision of the Desert Shadows developer has transformed this corner into an attractive piece of property, which has led the way for the recovery of this part of town. The bridge is certainly a unique solution to what the developer needs to solve the tying together of his properties. What Uptown Palm Springs gets is an entranceway bridge that could be a spectacular feature if designed carefully and thoughtfully. As a property owner in Uptown Palm Springs, I completely support this development and the entranceway bridge. I have heard continents that this could set a precedent for another developer wishing to build another bridge in another part of the city. I am hard pushed to think of a developer who would invest over$400,000 on a bridge linking two sites. If such a development exists now or in the future, it should come under separate review apart from this proposed bridge today. I urge you to 4R�pye this gateway bridgg qq� ply fpr this petitioner but also for Uptown Palm Spljng�. Sincerely, c t� Tim Ell s 777 North Palm Canyon Drive Suite 101 Palm Springs,CA 92262 Phone: 760-323-7575 Fax: 7%323-7155 507-030-002 Lantana Lodge Apartment Unknown 10-30-81 Palm Springs CA 92262 UfJDF�_l�ir.n ,L7_, 507-030-002 ppAS AfIii'1� ';;:�j Lantana Lodge Apartment Unknown 10-30-81 Palm Springs CA 92262 UPJDFLIV,"-) h! i. .,, 505-185 011 7.3'5 g rMic She I Ir 53081 5 -18 -011 Mich 1 re ' ing 735' / ' way r S ygan W 5 .081 - CY the: : .. - �����fLr�;,P Iaf. d � :'J Hill%s C 94024 ' I 505-185-027 Hubert A Leonard 4927 SW Downs w Ct e `Portland OR 97 V221 i T0 - - --•- —��� 927 97� AS ALG'?y,_'�_�-=„J_` T RETURN T TO O S YN NO R4JA ENI)ER UNABLEFp OROER ON RETURN To FO RETURN SENDEr �'�bo3fi..RlZ ._ `�,�a II OFA� N \9 02g p O '} �FRK 507-021-o50 Alonzo J Stevens 5101 Monterey Hwy 252 San Jose CA 95111 7 i.k-,,, dFSSiD may - �� +1 E_nFl6'rp SOS r j,J qpQ LJh 330 yp10 &e O2 ngs Rq 'WR10ft OS,3 na 30, CLEF aZ� W St ato 7 , S+ et,. I1 _i t S Rc C4 �. s a26D rP ' 505-185-012 David Luke 351 Buena Vista Ave E 7 San Francisco CA - ---- 94117 N Ln N ri x'-I Ln PALM > ��OF $o . i = _ CD 5 ua Ln m u R o�,03 p �INR20 ichard p RECEryED Co N o 0 Ste rhs CLEQ� N � LI O o ori ,i ro vi ry' to co f Jy a.� 9� is gaYa0X �/- VA j iun 507-030-003 � �E• o goaT E1 Camino Apartments SENDEF '� 315 E Stevens Rd Palm Springs CA 92262 �Ei.lf'ir6 NC)r wW�i' u HAS iopw- L'LES'L—QT.4—q z ,43 � � y 507-03o_003 El Camino G�Lc 315 E SteVns Apartments �ilCfld e Palm Springs CAd 9Z26 J h o; ---- -- - / p �rN►� ) 012 50` ' d yuk Vises CA 9 9 02 30 2 Dave$uena is°o _ 01 - SO�eY an Wa 9p2 9a �zanc 9U o03 Y 9 1 geY C 4 1 Ma Yina ca YAR 1 6 2001 CLI �yOFP,q` 505-184-002 Paul D & Murray Pacera q B r -' - 103.9,0 Us Highway 111 10 53. 6jL if CA 92270 k�, v Rancho .Mirage JERK Ho e 185_019 4900 Sav aldwRn ergradC RderiCa r" S 4�UREER4i,i.c CA -91706, f ?fIUFiN ! FD i��DCR �� D S- : �' �t(Y OFp� y !y x 7,91 ` L & lee 4 F� 1 41 2 . 2 OF Pql 19 507-021-024• Susan Haje r 14003 Palawan Way 90292 02 Spy-18 Y CA 092 Bu mal -003 Marina Del Re ---- sa Palm N Palm Canfield �' ✓-� Springs Ca. Dr / VICINITY MAP RACQUET CLUB ROAD m a 0 a VISTA CHINO m Wol c-r N.T.S. LOCK ION c TACHEVAH DRIVE ALEJO ROAD s o a z_ TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY SL fl [3plbGr 511-F V15fA CHINO I?P z O z jE uCl-IUCKWPJ,LA I;n 51�V�N5 pOGJ� Fp p�OJ�C1� 511� / Q z 5" z CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CASE N0. 5,085-5 FP264 ruNlfGOWO/PHlUMllWfcf&nMNIONi�ulrnl%onVACANfIe5I\rl:- PhUL Ar IFIF NSA cn Nrp Or iW141 cr+rvON POW N &W&15 PIP &rPOr05F19 r?IVAfr Y'&I'7r5fkIAN bklr%ir 5PANNIN6 INPIM CAWON FFIV:N fO Nr LOCATF) APPLICANT P55FPvf 5HAPOVV51vFllOrwv\-eLv�.41U'500d01-V15TAcrllNar.N FOP mrruhrO5:or , ca mcri%Mr reoro5w I7 umr coNvO"TAldM ppoTef&ff"TWON[g IILrl[vU �� fo TH-rxlSrlNc 17rV Ff 5iAPOM,2r501:'1 '0 n;E FW AU05511t)I N CANYON. r-3%r I zONr OGIION 10 h ip- 5_-.Jq0 nr -2 Asm)snc ntt nn 100 South Sunrise 4lti'acy, k VAM 227 Pai a SpF nqs, California 92262 February 23, 2001 D U D To: The Palm Springs City Council FEB 2 3 2001 David Ready, City Manager PLANNING DIVISION Doug Evans, Planning Department I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Palm Springs Hotel& Hospitality Association to express our support for the expansion project of the Desert Shadows Inn Resort &Villas. We applaud their dedication to our commtmity,their continuing efforts to change the face of their neighborhood and positive contributions over the past eight years to the City of Palm Springs. Their proposed pedestrian archway, dedicated to Uptown Pahn Springs, will become an instant landmark and continue to beautify a section of Pahn Springs that has been ignored for too long. This well thought out project will further enhance the vacation experience and the ambiance of north Pahn Springs. Their resort has been one of the leading forces to the revitalization of Palm Springs. Their continuing efforts and investment in our tourism industry benefits everyone in our village. We look forward to having this ornamental archway as an addition to our tourism experience. On behalf of the PahnSprings Hotel&Hospitality Association: Jim Davis, Vice-president Pahn Springs Hotel&Hospitality Association EC d � X\o �04, � � F E B 2 3 2001 4 at _ PALM SPRINGS CHAMBER OF CCAMMERCE 190 WEST AMADo ROAD • PALM SPRINGS,CALIFORNIA 9 2 2 62-5 51 9 • (760)32 -� tN 1NG2DiViS 10 N http:www.pschamber.org • E-mail: pschamber®world Raymond Lovato, Co-Owner Desert Shadows Inn Resort and Villas 22 February 2001 Mr. Lovato: As a result of your letter of request dated 20 February 2001, The Board of Directors of the Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce made the following decision during the regularly scheduled board meeting today, 22 February 2001. The motion was made, seconded, and passed unanimously to support and endorse the private pedestrian bridge across Indian Canyon. This bridge will be an instant landmark and will establish a "point of entry" to the north end of our community, and business district. Understanding that Desert Shadows Inn Resort and Villas will pay in total for the bridge construction and maintenance of the structure, without having any identifying signs or logos associating with Desert Shadows Inn Resort and Villas, is a generous contribution and asset that will be of benefit to our business community, residents, and visitors for years to come. Thank you again for inviting the Palm Springs Chamber to be part of your continuing success, as the expansion of your property is again another economic development advancement to this world class destination, which is also our home. Respectfully, RalV to Presi 2000-2001 o O. ey, Preside lect 2001-2002 ISO CC=' ,85ckt IFDVO�,^z Q4 UQa.tnCi William Kleindienst �(er� KC From: Bret Cecil [bcecil@pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:44 AM To: 'Will k@ci.palm-springs.ca.us'; 'deynah@ci.palm-springs.ca.us'; 'jimj@ci.palm-springs.ca.us'; 'rono@ci.palm-springs.ca.us'; 'jeanners@ci.palm-springs.ca.us' Subject: Bridge over the Drive Indian Canyon Dear Mayor and Councilpersons: was present in a Planning Meeting, Monday, February 26, 2001, in which a conceptual plan for a proposed private-use pedestrian footbridge was presented by the owners/operators of the Desert Shadows Resort. I was pleased to be able to see and hear their ideas regarding this plan. I do have some concerns regarding their plans. I am NOT in agreement with their proposed use of public right-of-way. I believe that allowing this type of construction will create a dangerous precedent in Palm Springs. I personally enjoy the low-lying skyline provided by the style of building and development in Palm Springs, one of the characteristics of the city that has drawn me here. The idea was presented that no one's view would be interrupted other than the residents at Desert Shadows Resort. I beg to differ with that analysis, since a roughly 23 foot high structure of steel and other materials, will impact more than just the skyline of the residents on one single block. I appreciate the personal energy given by these gentlemen. I want to applaud their commitment to the area in which their business lies. I am keeping in mind (and I am requesting that you do too) that these gentlemen are real estate/property developers looking to expand their development. The 'greater good' that they are proposing for the 'city' would only benefit them and the 17 owners of new condominiums in their development. Certainly, I do not propose inhibiting their right to profit from their development, but please consider the cost and expense to those of us that will be living with aftermath of this construction. I am cautious in their presentation of this project as a possible piece of 'artwork' left for the city to design as long as Desert Shadows residents have 100% exclusive-use of the bridge. Is there another way that pedestrians could cross this street? We were told that tunneling was impossible. Somehow a tunnel was dug beneath the San Francisco Bay. At-grade crossings are looked-down upon by the city engineers, but can't a crossing of this type be made safe by timing street lights with the flow-of-traffic and the crossing of these pedestrians (as few as they might be)? Make the addition of warning lights and signs for drivers and pedestrians? In summary, I ask that you give serious consideration in NOT approving this project. It seems that there are other solutions that won't If require easement of public right=of-way and loss of beautiful skyline.' Thank you, Bret Cecil 553 S. Calle Encilia Palm Springs 760-320-7639 -OR- 415-441-1500 The Lathom Group p Lathom Note) Management D F E B 2 8 2001 PLANNING DIVISION February 28, 2001 Members of City of Palm Springs Planning Commission CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Dear Members, I want to show my support for the petitioner of the proposed Desert Shadows Development that you are reviewing today. Specifically, I want to lend my support to the building of the entranceway bridge to Uptown Palm Springs. As some of you may know, back in the early 1990s I was General Manager of the Riviera Resort. The comer of Vista Chino and Indian was the worst looking corner of undeveloped land in the city of Palm Springs. The vision of the Desert Shadows developer has transformed this corner into an attractive piece of property, which has led the way for the recovery of this part of town. The bridge is certainly a unique solution to what the developer needs to solve the tying together of his properties. What Uptown Palm Springs gets is an entranceway bridge that could be a spectacular feature if designed carefully and thoughtfully. As a property owner hn Uptown Palm Springs, I completely support this development and the entranceway bridge. I have heard continents that this could set a precedent for another developer wishing to build another bridge in another part of the city. I am hard pushed to think of a developer who would invest over$400,000 on a bridge linking two sites. If such a development exists now or z in the future, ilj should come under separate review apart from this proposed bridge today. I ur e you�q 4T�yNe this ptew4y bridpq #y f9v his petitioner but also for Uptown ah1i S,pipgs: Sincerely, C" Tim El s 777 orth Pahn Canyon Drive Suite 1 of Palm Springs,CA 92262 Phone: 760-323-7575 Fax: 760-323-7155 !gh �rs i - '4 1533 CHAPARRAL ROAD, PALM SPINGS,CALIFORNIA 92262 RECEIVED March 2, 2001 MAR 5 2001 PLANNING DIVISION City of Palm Springs Doug Evans Director of Planning PO BOX 2743 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Dear Doug, Due to the recent decision of the Palm Springs Planning Commission to not support our proposal for a Gateway Entrance to Palm Springs, via a walkway between our resort and our new condominium project, we would request an opportunity to appeal the decision to the Palm Springs City Council. We understand that we are scheduled to have our project presented on March 21, 2001. We would request that our appeal of the February 28, 2001 Planning Commission hearing be included in our scheduled project approval hearing on March 21, 2001. Regards, fS r s III Cc: Kim Chapin Sip/lp 03/07/2001 11:03 7G03239024 DESERT SHADOWS INN PAGE 04 416 vaM$MMW k CE9MLC ry P ' Roaort A Racquet Ciub I I MAR - 7 2001 U January 22, 2001 PLANNING DIVISION Dear City Council Member, The management team of the Riviera Resort and Racquet Club would'like to declare our support for Desert Shadow Inn Resort Villas expansion/bridge project proposed in the uptown Palm Springs area. We feel that this project would continue the transformation of our area into a positive extension of the Downtown "Village" area: After review of the current plans for the homes and bridge that the Desert Shadows team has presented...it is evident that .t ?; ,?g the development process has been well thought out and in the best interest of the 'N City and neighboring residents and businesses. , {i3°' Sincerely, :.. Jim P. Manion Managing Director Palm Springs Riviera Resort and Racquet Club JPM/dlv :memo/desert shadows support kr 1600 North Indian Canyon Drive Palm Springs,CA 972624602 760 327 8311 • FAX 760 327 4323 web:www.psriviera.com �gyr� naturist resort March 12, 2001 To: Pahn Springs City Council Pahn Springs City Manager From: Ray Lovato, Desert Shadows Inn I am writing you on behalf of Sue Lovato, Linda Payne, Steve Payne, and myself. We, the owners of Desert Shadows Inn Resort &Villas, are requesting that you give your approval to our planned construction of 17 town homes located between Indian Canyon, Palm Canyon and Stevens Road. These condominiums will further enhance our resort, further beautify our Uptown area by eliminating a blighted property that has been vacant for over two decades, provide additional tax revenue for the city of Palm Springs, and continue the revitalization of Palm Springs. These town homes will sell for approximately$350,000 dollars each. This project has been reviewed and recommended by the City of Palm Springs Planning Department. We are also requesting that you approve the plan for an aerial walkway that will be used to join these two pieces of property into one contiguous resort experience. This aerial walkway will be used exclusively by the homeowners and by resort guests on special occasions. The aerial walkway will begin and end inside each property and be locked with special key access only. This aerial walkway will also serve as a decorative arch denoting Uptown Palm Springs. Uptown Palm Springs has been without any public artwork, recognition, or ornamental enhancement for too long. We would ask the City Council to allow the Public Arts Commission or local artists to design the archway. It could also be designed in a style similar to the decorative arch across Alejo and Palm Canyon to create a common theme. The four of see this as a way of combining our resort needs with a contribution back to the city and to the area that we will have invested over $ 15 million dollars in. And to quote Frank Tyson from his comments at the City Council meeting of March 7, 2001, "The City Council cannot forsake the people who have put their money in this town." We feel that this will allow us to contribute something of value to our city. The Uptown Archway will become an instant landmark, a unique welcome to Palm Springs. This walkway arch would be constructed, paid for and maintained by the new Home Owners Association consisting of the 17 condominiums. We propose that no signage or banners denoting Desert Shadows Inn would ever be placed on the arch. The use of the DESERT SHADOWS INN, 1533 Chaparral Road,Palm Springs,California 92262,619-325-6410 or 300 292-9296(Outside California) Uptown Arch would belong exclusively to the City of Palm Springs to promote citywide events, Film Festivals, parades and other civic activities. With the future plans to improve the Indian Canyon off ramps at I-10, Indian Canyon will become an even greater gateway to Pahn Springs. This new project and Uptown Archway has the unanimous support of the Board of Directors of the Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce, the unanimous support of the Board of Directors of the Uptown Business Association and the Board of Directors of the Palm Springs Hotel& Hospitality Association. It has the unanimous support of the Board of Directors of the Desert Shadows Condominium Association, the neighborhood group of 115 Pahn Springs homeowners who are directly to the east of the new town homes and walkway and will be most affected by it. The project has the full support of the Riviera Resort & Racquet Club, the largest convention hotel in our city and our neighbors directly to the northeast on Vista Chino and Indian Carryon. It has the support of Wayne Gottleib, CPA, who owns three parcels of property along Palm Canyon immediately to the east of the project. It has the support of Dr. Richard Kraus, who owns the other two parcels of property on Pahn Canyon immediately to the east of the project. It is supported by Edith De Crinis, who owns the doctor's office directly to the south west of the project at Stevens Road and Pahn Canyon. It has written support from people in the apartments south of Stevens Road. The project has the neighborhood support of. Baker's Square restaurant on the corner of Vista Chino, Indian and Palm Canyon; Yousef s Mobile Gas Station on the corner of Vista Chino and Palm Canyon; and The Left Bank restaurant on the corner of Vista Chino and Indian Canyon. It is supported by Uptown business owner Linda Decker of Las Palmas Gallery. We had a neighborhood meeting, which was held at Desert Shadows Inn on December 30, 2000. Notices were sent out to 92 property owners who are in the area of the proposed project and aerial walkway. The scope and details of the proposed project were outlined and input was requested of our neighbors. There were no objections returned to the City by any property owner in our neighborhood. We hope that the City Council will continue to respect the overwhelming input of the affected neighborhood and the input of legitimate elected civic groups that have the best interest of the entire city at heart. We have done everything to involve our neighborhood in this project. We ask the City Council to reverse the negative decision proffered by the Planning Commission and allow us to join the two separate parcels of our resort with an aerial walkway that will serve as an Uptown Arch Landmark to welcome travelers and promote our city. i /16/y NORTH PALM CANYON 04 BUILDIN( LDING 2 It 11 ii Q I car: Cf) ILLJ RECREATI( J"y L. IJnwn DN L aul N Lul u L .......... "SE BUILDING 4 A "T Ou 6 FF INDIAN CANYON CRTH SCALE: I'-2C GRAPHIC SCAT �1 C 1 1 � 4 f, e�titl 111, � + I. it WA I l T I . I If 1 - ` i, �Ifl t 4 lu 10I a �` U il� Q,i Itj �$b110 �6�IM'S.T4 i r F WA .wu r 4� r 4A� iY . . ........ ............ A91............. nC g FAX ........... .. ..... .. . .... .. TO: Palm Spring City Council March 13, 2001 FROM: Erich Langmann, Owner and 130ard Member PSH&HA RE: Re- Proposed Desert Shadows Bridge Dear Members of our City Council; I would respectfully, but strongly request the Council to approve their proposed bridge which is critical Connection to ensure the success of their new project. The owner/developers, through great vision, personal risk, expense and much hard work, have removed a blighted empty lot and an outdated motel replacing them with upscale, TOT and increased property tax producing projects. They wish to continue. This area now looks modern and upscale compared to depressing look it had before they went to work. But the proven key to their removing yet one more empty lot and increasing the city's tax base is easy access to their central facilities. I understand that every business in their area is in full support of the Project and the bridge. For visitors entering Palm Springs from the high desert, this bridge will represent the formal "Welcome" to Palm Springs. My understanding is the city will have full use of the bridge for advertising the city, special events, etc. This area Of Palm Springs sorely needs improvement and motivation for others to invest and improve this area as Desert Shadows has so successfully done. Please approve their bridge. It will be good for the city, for the area and for Desert Shadows. Sincerely, Palm Springs Travelodge cc: David Ready, City Manager Desert Shadows 'G. 10J ....r¢'Ji.a u,:. �Se ?4'v-nss, 'PPV ZSa SP`.-nnEa, l_a9aIms .,0_ S'2OE2 February 23, 2001 0',:�` �5y fC { 5' To: The Palm Springs City Council �lVED David Ready, City Manager Doug Evans, Planning Department p°� I I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Pahn Springs Hotel& Hospitality Association to express our support for the expansion project of the Desert Shadows Inn Resort &Villas. We applaud their dedication to our community,their continuing efforts to change the face of their neighborhood and positive contributions over the past eight years to the City of Palm Springs. Their proposed pedestrian archway, dedicated to Uptown Palm Springs,will become an instant landmark and continue to beautify a section of Palm Springs that has been ignored for too long. This well thought out project v II fbrther enhance the vacation experience and the ambiance of north Palm Springs. Their resort has been one of the leading forces to the revitalization of Palm Springs. Their continuing efforts and investment in our tourism industry benefits everyone in our village. rile look forhrard to having this ornamental archway as an addition to our tourism experience. On behalf of the Pala..Springs Hotel&Hospitality Association.: /Tinavis, Vice-president Palmy Springs Hotel &Hospitality Association IShI? i6 Palm Smngs fP GF 3':S3fT 101 i l2esc r; ?: Racquet Club �^r)r January 22, 2001 Cz,1�9,y N Dear City Council Member, The management team of the Riviera Resort and Racquet Club would like to declare our support for Desert Shadow Inn Resort Villas expansion/bridge project proposed in the uptown Palm Springs area. We feel that this project would continue the transformation of our area into a positive extension of the Downtown 'Village" area: After review of the current plans for the homes and bridge that the Desert Shadows team has presented...it is evident that the development process has been well thought out and in the best interest of the City and neighboring residents and businesses. Sincerely, /Jim P. Manion Managing Director Palm Springs Riviera Resort and Racquet Club JPM/dlv wmemo/desert shadows support Itr i I i 1600 North Indian Cutyon Drive Palm Springs,CA 92262-4602 i, 760 327 3311 o FAx 760 327 4323 ! web: roww.psriviera.com DESERT SHADOWS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCMATION 1533 CHAPARRAL ROAD PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 a OF pqi. March 11, 2001 f J,ryl Palm Springs City Council City Manager, Palm Springs I am writing on behalf of the 115 members of the Desert Shadows Condominium Association. We are proud to be part of the revitalization of Palm Springs over the past four years. At our Board of Directors Meeting on March 11, it was the unanimous vote of the Board to support the continuing efforts of Desert Shadows him in our neighborhood. We have reviewed the proposed project and bridge and give our full support to the planned archway bridge over Indian Canyon. Since we are the neighbors to the immediate east of this potential landmark and are most affected by its construction, we assure you that we have no problems with any potential restriction of views or sightlines. We see this as the ongoing effort to improve our neighborhood and be seen as an integral part of the city of Palm Springs. Thank you for your support of this project. n. A t ."Ben JQhilson, President Mike h a ay, Vice-president f�. L�/' '4 Walt Edwards, Vice-president 3� •. PALM SPRINGS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 190 WEST AMADo Rono • PALM SPRINGS,CALIFORNIA 92262-5519 • (760)325-1577 • FAx(760)325-8549 http:www.pschamber.org • E-mail:pschamberOOworldnet.att.net P /z ,. Q li i Raymond Lovato, Co-Owner Desert Shadows Inn Resort and Villas j 22 February 2001 Mr. Lovato: C �+ As a result of your letter of request dated 20 February 2001, The Board of Directors of the Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce made the following decision during the regularly scheduled board meeting today, 22 February 2001. The motion was made, seconded, and passed unanimously to support and endorse the private pedestrian bridge across Indian Canyon. This bridge will be an instant landmark and will establish a"point of entry"to the north end of our community, and business district. Understanding that Desert Shadows Inn Resort and Villas will pay in total for the bridge construction and maintenance of the structure, without having any identifying signs or logos associating with Desert Shadows Inn Resort and Villas, is a generous contribution and asset that will be of benefit to our business community, residents, and visitors for years to come. Thank you again for inviting the Palm Springs Chamber to be part of your continuing success, as the expansion of your property is again another economic development advancement to this world class destination, which is also our home. Respectfully, Ralp hgrnt/onyPres 2000-2001 John OyAinkney, Preside vlJlect 2001-2002 gr/7 21 Case 5.0853 (PD 264/TTM 29988) Desert Shadows 3 LP 100 E Stevens Road February 28, 2001 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION TO INCLUDE A PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SPANNING INDIAN CANYON DRIVE NORTH CONNECTING THE PROPOSED 17-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT WITH THE EXISTING DESERT SHADOWS RESORT PROPERTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: The Engineering Department recommends that if this application is approved, such approval is subject to the following conditions being completed in compliancewith City standards and ordinances: Before final acceptance of the project,all conditions listed belowshall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. STREETS 1. Any improvements within the street right-of-way require a City of Palm Springs Encroachment Permit. Work shall be allowed according to Resolution 17950 - Restricting Street Work on Major and Secondary Thoroughfares. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE NORTH 2. The bridge clearance shall be a minimum of 17 feet from the road surface.The bridge shall not obstruct the view of the Vista Chino traffic.signal by northbound Indian Canyon Drive traffic at any point from 500 feet south of Vista Chino to the intersection. Minimum unobstructed stopping distance on Indian Canyon Drive is 500 feetfrom any legal intersection or crosswalk. 3. The developer shall obtain a License Encroachment Agreement from the City Engineerto construct a pedestrian bridge across Indian Canyon Drive North and shall agree to maintain and/or relocate or remove said structure upon the request of the City Engineer at such time as deemed necessary. The License Encroachment Agreement shall be submitted with the structural drawings. The Building Permit will not be issued until completion of the Agreement. 4. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Palm Springs providing for the maintenance of the pedestrian bridge or payment of same. /S k 23 Case 5.0853 Draft Conditions of Approval for Bridge March 21, 2001 Page 2 of 2 ON-SITE 5. Drawings shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. GENERAL 6. Structural plans shall be submitted to the Building Department to assure all requirements for the pedestrian bridge are met. 7. The bridge railings shall be of sufficient height to preclude dropping of objects onto the roadway. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: 9. The proposed bridge shall be subject to all the conditions of approval of Planned Development District 264. 10. The proposed private pedestrian bridge shall be designed so that pedestrian users are not visible from any off site private and/or public property. The applicant shall be required to submit sight study information to validate compliance with this condition. 11. Owners of the property(on both the east and west sides of Indian Canyon Drive North)shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City whereby the bridge shall be fully maintained, at the sole discretion of the City, by either the property owners or the City. All costs associated with operation, maintenance and repairof said structure shall be born bythe property owners. 12. Owners of the property(on both the east and west sides of Indian Canyon Drive North)shall enter into a License Encroachment Agreement from the City and shall agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair and relocate and/or remove said structure upon request of the City Council at such time as deemed necessary. The License Encroachment Agreement shall be submitted with the structural drawings. The Building Permit will not be issued until completion of the Agreement. 13. More specific conditions of approval will be recommended when final bridge design is submitted for approval of the Planning Commission. I���y No.7629- - - _ -- - - - - - CITY OF PALM SPRINGS URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1593 ` AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 92.17.1.0t.d.9 OF THE ZONING OR- DINANCE SO AS TO ALLOW ELECTRICAL POWER PLANTS IN THE "ll MANUFACTUR- �C -V� / ING ZONE SUBJECT TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. WHEREAS, Wildflower Energy LP, seeks to con- - struct a 135 megawatt natural gas powered elec- t/ trio generating plant on property located north of Interstate 10, west of North Indian Avenue in the AAGE k PROOF OF PUBLICATION City of Palm Springs, and Q WHEREAS, the proposed location of the natural Clay C�`` (2015.S.C.C.P) gaa poweretl electric generating plant is zoned M2" Manufacturngg Zone, and WHEREAS, the "M2" Manufacturing Zone is in- tended to provide for the development of locusts- al uses which do not create by-products to any degree which will adversely affect the resort-open space environment of the City; and WHEREAS, Energy Uses including solar collec- tors, wind energy conversion systems, and co- generation plants are permitted in the "M2" Man- ufactudrd Zone subject to the issuance of a Can- allUse Permit although natural gas powered electric generating plants are not specifically listed as a permitted. conditionally permitted or prohibited use; antl WHEREAS, the Palm Springs General Plan out- lines the CRy's commitment to promoting and en- couraging the use of alternative energy technolo- 9ies so as tg'meet the energy needs of the cam-I munity; and WHEREAS, the State of California, in,order to augment existing generation and develop new STATE OF CALIFORNIA generation, has implemented and Emergency Power Plant Permitting program to allow for ex- pedited review and approval of energy generating. County of Riverside__ _ _- _ _ llants. a _ ower Ener LP power plant is to generate much needed elep- tricity to serve the State of California; and WHEREAS, Wildflower Energy LP Is seeking per- , mitting approval-under the Stata'a Emergency Power Plant Permitting program- and WHEREAS,the Governor of the State of California has declared a state of emergency due to the im- ergy and ordered that certain electrical generation facilities be exempt from CEOA; and —WHEREAS—the Gft"f-Palm-Sprinr,s -suppertrea of encouraging the development of energy gener- ation tents that will address the energy needs for I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the Sate of California;and WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs recognizes the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen the positive fiscal Impacts of a natural gas pow- eretl electric generating plant establishing within years,and not a party to or interested in the the corporate limits of the City Palm Springs, above-entitled matter.I am the principal clerk of a and P P forinatu ash as poamendment ered electric required Qp loots printer of the,DESERT SUN PUBLISHING as conditionally permitted uses in the"M2 Manu- COMPANY a newspaper of general circulation, tactunng one, and WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs recognizes printed and published in the city of Palm Springs, the potential threat to the health, welfare and County of Riverside,and which newspaper has been safety of the residents and businesses of Palm Sprnggs and the Coachella Valleyy if there is insut- adjudged a newspaper of general circulation b the ficient power available,in the tlesert during the Y summer months and therefore wish to permit the Superior Court of the County of Riverside,State of use as an interim zoning use pending amendment of the Zonmg Ordinance; antl California under the date of March 24, 1988.Case WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections' 36937 and 65856 empowers cities to adopt by Number 191236;that the notice,of Which the four-fifths vote an urgency ordinance which is annexed is a printed copy(set in type not smaller necessary for die immediate preservation of the public peace health or safety than non pariel,has been published in each regular THE CITY G10UNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM g HE CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any SEC�ON�1W DECLARATION OF FACTS CONSTI-', supplement thereof ou the following dates,to wit: TUTING URGENCY The City of Palm Springs hereby finds that this Ordinance is required to prevent a current and immediate threat to the March 25th - Public health, safety and welfare, in that the al-' public of natural gas powered electric generat- _____________________ ing facilities, not to exceed 150 megawatts in --------- sae, In the "M2" Manufacturing Zone is neces- sary and desirable to prevent a threat to public health, safety or welfare in the loss of sufficient -------------------------- power on a siatewlde and regional basis This for has been documented y the Governor's declaration of a state of emergency due to lack of All in the year 2001 electrical power. SECTION 2. CEOA FINDING. The Cityy Council hereby finds that CEOA Section 2 210801b)(6) al- lows fife City to consider a zone change to allow', I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the a power plan use without preparing the CEOA documentation, where the Governor of the State foregoing is true and correct. of California has declared a state of emergency', 26th due the energy shortage and has orders that certain electrical generation facilities be exempt of Dated at Palm Springs,California this--------dayCEOA Pursuant to Governor's Proclamation of , State of Emergency dated January 17,2001 and March Governor's Order b-26-01, dated February 8, 2001. Further, similar uses were reviewed In the Of--------------------------,2001 Final Environmental Impact Report for the Sphere Expansion/Annexation Study,dated April 1993 an tl those findings remain adequate to address all environmental impacts SECTION 3. APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR ------ PERMITS FOR ELECTRICAL POWER PLANS_. WITHIN THE "ere MANUFACTURING ZONE.Thf Signature City Council hereby finds that tluringg the term of this , (,) conditional ordinance, within the "M2" fvay, be duringg Zone, p) conditional use permits may be ,ssuetl for natural gas poweretl electric generating plants, urap as cite for conddional use n pia for nat- ural ural gas powered eletnc generating plants shall continue n be accepted for processing or pro- cessed, and (lit) permits shall continue to be is- sue d for natural gas pow ere tl electrical power plants, by making application tor, and after ap- proval of, a 4.0 on al Use Permit. SECTION 4. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 92.17.ire or 9 OF THE ZONING DflDINAate a The Director of^Planning is tlirected to inhere a It 92 171.01.d.9 �I the Zoning Ordinance "Ever�]y ./ Uses" shall be amentletl to edof a new use untler Cl'd. Natural Gas Powered Electric Generating Fa- SECTION not exceeding 150 megawatts." V�--✓c{ 5. CONSISTENCY WITH ZONING OR AND GENERAL PLAN.The City Council i hereby finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance and General Plan in that it promotes consistency with the proper regulation of other uses within the com- munity and It atldrsssas the General Plan goal to meet the eneUrggRyy neetls of the community. declares this Ordinance to be an urrge al hereby mea- sure in accordance with Government Cotle Sec- tions 36937 and 65858 and that It shall take ef- fect immediately if passed by a four fifths 4/5 vote This interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect 45 days from the date of its adoption unless eMended by the Council prior to expiradon SECTION 7 SEVERABILITV. It is the intention of the City Council that the sections, subsections, clauses and phrases of this Ordmance are sever- able, and if any pportion of this Ordinance is for any reason held t0 be invalid Or unconstitutional by a court of competent Iurisd�ction such deci- sion shall not affect the validity or the remainder of the Ordinance, and the City Council would have enacted such remainder without the portion found to be invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 8, PUBLICATION, The City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted old published in the man- ner required by law. of AY S Membersis ift%g9ea,Jones,rch O01. Oden, Reiter- Bay yyrgln and Mayor Kleindienst NOES:None ABSENT None ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,CALIFORNIA /s/P ultra A.Sanders /s/William G.Klemdienst Ci lark Mayor RE WED BY:DRE PUB* March 25, 2001 �yOE P��o 181 z E � n✓ryCF�'FD OOF OF PUBLICATION This is space for County Clerk's Filing Stamp cLE aK (2015.5.C.C.P) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Riverside ----------------------------------------- I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of Proof of Publication of the County aforesaid;I am over the age of eighteen - -- ---- -- - years,and not a party to or interested in the No.7484 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS above-entitled matter.I am the principal clerk of a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case s Desert Shadows P 64 printer of the,DESERT SUN PUBLISHING oesert Shadows 3 LP 100 East Stevens COMPANY a newspaper of general circulation, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thatt the the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California will hold a printed and published in the city of Palm Springs, public heading at its meeting of March 21, 2001. County of Riverside,and which newspaper has been The public hearing will take place on or about 7.00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the will be held at they Council Chamber of the City Superior Court of the County of Riverside,State of Council of te % f Palm, PalmSprings, 3200 East P ty 92262. Canyonypangs, California California under the date of March 24, 1988.Case The purpose of the hearing is to consider an ap- Number 191236;that the notice,of which the peal to the February 29, 2001 decision of the Planning Commission denyingg an amendment to annexed is a printed copy(set in type not smaller an application for a Planned Develo ment District (PD 264) for Desert Shadows 3 LP to include a than non pariel,has been published in each regular privets pedestrian brmpe spanning Indian Canyon Drive North(to be located approximate)y 341 feet and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any south of Vista Chino)for the purpose of connect- ing the proposed 17-unit condominium project supplement thereof on the following dates,to wit: and recreation building on a vacant 1.85 acre par on at the northwest corner of Indian Canyyon Drive and Stevens Road 3/0-1 Zone g�ction March 9th TU-m-tr g esa a ows Hesor�-- — xGirvi*r Mee a All in the year 2001 I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 9th _ Dated at Palm Springs,California this------day March of ,2001 OTY Or PALM. SPRINGS Signature fan individual a 11 Accessory_ �� �1✓ �_ exam from the provi- _ vironmen[al Oualny Act- g (( gestStructuresn y be limit es the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues ice or at the public hearingg described in this notice la in written mission hewing ence. at or prr or to thepo Planning Commission said hearing An opportunely will be given at said hearing for all interested persons be di heard.Questions Ch regard- ing this case may be directed to ,(7 Chaffin, 45. De- partment of Planning and Building (A. SANDER . PATRICIA A. SANDERS CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PUB March 9, 2001