HomeMy WebLinkAbout21329 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/6/2005 RESOLUTION NO. 21329
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
ELEMENT SO AS TO REDESIGNATE APPROXIMATELY
12 ACRES SOUTH OF CALLE DE RICARDO, NORTH OF
CAMINO PAROCELA, EAST OF EL PLACER, AND WEST
OF PASEO DOROTEA, FROM L-4 (LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL 4 UNITS PER ACRE) TO M15 (MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 12-15 UNITS PER ACRE) FOR
THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 3760 CALLE DE
CARLOS AND 4022 CALLE DE CARLOS AND THE
SURROUNDING AREA AND REDESIGNATE A PORTION
OF THE MESA TRACT BORDERED BY EL CAMINO TO
THE NORTH, CAMINO CARMELITA TO THE SOUTH,
SOUTH PALM CANYON TO THE EAST, AND MESA
DRIVE TO THE WEST FROM L2 (LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL 2 UNITS PER ACRE) TO L4 (LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL 4 UNITS PER ACRE) FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1901 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE AND
SURROUNDING AREA
WHEREAS, Judy and Virgil Havener (the "applicant') has filed Case 5.1044 with the
City for a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Map designation from
LA to M15 for the properties located at 3760 Calle de Carlos, and 4022 Calle de Carlos
and,
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs (the "applicant') has expanded Case 5.1044 for a
General Plan Amendment to the General Plan Map designation from L4 to M15 for
approximately 12 acres, which includes the properties at 3760 Calle de Carlos, and
4022 Calle de Carlos; and
WHEREAS, Bob and Rebecca La Venia (the "applicant') has filed Case 5.1043 with the
City for a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Map designation from
L2 to L4 for the property located at 1901 South Palm Canyon Drive; and
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs (the "applicant') has expanded Case 5.1043 for a
General Plan Amendment to the General Plan Map designation from L2 to L4 for the
Mesa area (Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm
Springs to consider Case No. 5.1044 and 5.1043, requests to amend the General Plan -
Land Use Element was given in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2005 a public hearing to consider Case No. 5.1044 and 5.1043
was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and
Resolution No. 21329
Page 2
WHEREAS, on July 6, 2005 a public hearing to consider Case No. 5.1044 and 5.1043, '
requests to amend the General Plan - Land Use Element, was held by the City Council
in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality
Act, an Environmental Assessment was prepared and staff found that the proposed
project could not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence
presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including but not limited to the
staff report, all written and oral testimony presented.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Pursuant to CEQA and with regards to Case No. 5.1044 and 5.1043, the
City Council finds that the Initial Study and Negative Declaration
adequately address the general setting of the project and its potentially
significant impacts.
Section 2: The Amendment to the General Plan Map will re-designate the L-4 (Low
Density Residential) land use designation with the M15 (Medium Density
Residential), for approximately 12 acres South of Calle De Ricardo, North ,
of Camino Parocela, East of El Placer, and West of Paseo Dorotea
(Exhibit B). This will permit the allowed density to change from 3-4 units
per acre to 12-15 units per acre, which is consistent with the existing Zone
designation and existing developments in this area.
Section 3: The Amendment to the General Plan Map designation will re-designate
(1-2 (Low Density Residential) land use designation with the L4 (Low
Density Residential) land use designation located in a portion of the Mesa
Tract (Exhibit A), bordered by El Camino to the North, Camino Carmelita
to the South, South Palm Canyon to the East, and Mesa Drive to the West
which includes the property at 1901 South Palm Canyon Drive. This will
permit the allowed density to change from 1-2 units per acre to 3-4 units
per acre, which is consistent with the existing Zone designation and
existing developments in this area.
Section 4: The proposed General Plan Amendments to change the General Plan
Map designations are necessary and proper at this time, and will not be
detrimental to the adjacent property or residents.
ADOPTED THIS 6th day of July, 2005.
David H. Ready, City,64ar6 er
Resolution No. 21329
Page 3
,ATTEST:
J)Arhes Thompson, City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS )
I, JAMES THOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that
Resolution No. 21329 is a full, true and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on July 6, 2005, by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmember Foat, Councilmember Pougnet, Councilmember Mills,
Mayor Pro Tern McCulloch and Mayor Oden.
NOES: None.
p ABSENT: None.
® ABSTAIN: None.
J 7mes Thompson, City Clerk
ity of Palm Springs, California
Resolution No. 21329
Page 4
EXHIBIT A ,
L2 TO L4
N
/ � E
IN
E L
i L LH u
A8 E D
i
D
O
Z
O
Z
0
-LE-SR-AG
IA tJER O
A I
i
Resolution No. 21329
Page 5
EXHIBIT B
P AND L4 TO M15
1 p (Lp
Ivy �
GAL�E�E
n 1 J
'-
f1'1
7 I
�i
Ian + +� �
I,l ICI �_� I
C .CI -: ,
"'tl tI
I
CAM.11�_u
_ >`�LM1G-UF-
Resolution No. 21329
Page 6
EXHIBIT C '
CASE 5.1044 AND 5.1043
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
JULY 6, 2005
Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, the Director of Planning, the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief or
their designee, depending on which department recommended the condition.
Any agreements, easements or covenants required to be entered into shall be in a form approved
by the City Attorney.
PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
Administrative:
1. Any proposed development of the premises shall conform to all applicable regulations of
the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, or any other City Codes, ordinances
and resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations.
2. The owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Palm Springs, its ,
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of
Palm Springs or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul, an
approval of the City of Palm Springs, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or
administrative officers concerning Case 5.1044 and 5.1043 and Case 3.2669 and 3.2670
which are development project cases associated with Case 5.1044. The City of Palm
Springs will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against
the City of Palm Springs and the applicant will either undertake defense of the matter
and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the
matter by the City Attorney. If the City of Palm Springs fails to promptly notify the
applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold
harmless the City of Palm Springs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the
right to settle or abandon the matter without the applicant's consent but should it do so,
the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except, the City's decision to settle or
abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a
waiver of the indemnification rights herein.