HomeMy WebLinkAbout20866 - RESOLUTIONS - 3/31/2004 RESOLUTION NO. 20866
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, ,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE 5.0728 GPA, VARIOUS
AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AND
CIRCULATION ELEMENTS FOR 640 ACRES BOUND BY ALEJO
ROAD TO THE NORTH, SUNRISE WAY TO THE EAST, RAMON
ROAD TO THE SOUTH, AND SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE
TO THE WEST, ZONE C-1, C-1-AA, C-2, R-G-A(8), R-2, R-4, R-
4-VP, PD-101, PD-180, AND PD-164, SECTION 14.
AMENDMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
A) GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT TO:
i) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREAS FROM
H43/30 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO RC
(RESORT COMMERCIAL):
• SOUTH 3/4 OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE
ENCILIA, AMADO ROAD, CALLE EL SEGUNDO, AND
ALEJO ROAD;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE
ENCILIA, TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, CALLE EL
SEGUNDO, AND ARENAS ROAD;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE EL
SEGUNDO, TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, AVENIDA
CABALLEROS, AND ARENAS ROAD; ,
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY AVENIDA
CABALLEROS, TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY,
HERMOSA DRIVE, AND ARENAS ROAD;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
HERMOSA DRIVE, TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY,
SUNRISE WAY, AND ARENAS ROAD (DELETED
PORTION);
• NORTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE
ALVARADO, AMADO ROAD, AVENIDA
CABALLEROS, AND TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY;
• NORTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY AVENIDA
CABALLEROS, AMADO ROAD, HERMOSA DRIVE,
AND TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY;
• NORTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
HERMOSA DRIVE, ANDREAS ROAD, SUNRISE
WAY, AND TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY;
li) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREA FROM RC
(RESORT COMMERCIAL) TO CBD (CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT):
• EAST HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY ARENAS
ROAD, CALLE ENCILIA, RAMON ROAD, AND
SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE; '
Resolution 20866
Page 2
iii) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREA FROM CBD
(CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) TO RC (RESORT
COMMERCIAL):
• WEST HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY ALEJO
ROAD, CALLE ENCILIA, AMADO ROAD, AND
SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE;
iv) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREA FROM H30
(MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO H 43/30
(HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL):
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE EL
SEGUNDO, ARENAS ROAD, AVENIDA
CABALLEROS, AND SATURNINO ROAD;
v) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREAS FROM M15
(MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO H 43/30 (HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL):
• WEST QUARTER OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
AVENIDA CABALLEROS, BARISTO FLOOD
CONTROL CHANNEL, HERMOSA DRIVE, AND
RAMON ROAD;
• EAST QUARTER OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
AVENIDA CABALLEROS, BARISTO FLOOD
CONTROL CHANNEL, HERMOSA DRIVE, AND
RAMON ROAD;
• EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE BLOCK
BOUND BY BARISTO FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL,
SUNRISE WAY, RAMON ROAD, AND HERMOSA
DRIVE;
vi) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREAS FROM M8
(MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO H43/30 (HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL):
• SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
BLOCK BOUND BY ALEJO ROAD, AVENIDA
CABELLEROS, AMADO ROAD, AND CALLE EL
SEGUNDO;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
BLOCK BOUND BY ALEJO ROAD, HERMOSA
DRIVE, AMADO ROAD, AND AVENIDA
CABALLEROS;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
BLOCK BOUND BY ALEJO ROAD, SUNRISE WAY,
' AMADO ROAD, AND HERMOSA DRIVE;
(B) GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP AMENDMENT TO:
Resolution 20866
Page 3 '
RECLASSIFY SATURNINO ROAD BETWEEN CALLE
EL SEGUNDO AND AVENIDA CABALLEROS FROM
A SECONDARY THOROUGHFARE TO A
COLLECTOR STREET;
RECLASSIFY ARENAS ROAD BETWEEN AVENIDA
CABALLEROS AND HERMOSA DRIVE FROM A
SECONDARY THOROUGHFARE TO A COLLECTOR
STREET;
DELETE HERMOSA DRIVE BETWEEN ARENAS
ROAD AND BARISTO ROAD;
WHEREAS, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the City of Palm Springs (the
"applicant") have initiated Case 5.0728, a request for various amendments to the General Plan
Land Use and Circulation Elements; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs
to consider Case No. 5.0728 GPA, a request for various amendments to the General Plan Land
Use and Circulation Elements, was given in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 2003, a public hearing on Case 5.0728, requests for various
amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements was held by the Planning
Commission in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on January 28, 2004, a public hearing on Case 5.0728, requests for various
amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements was held by the Planning
Commission in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs to consider
Case No. 5.0728 GPA, a request for various amendments to the General Plan Land Use and
Circulation Elements, was given in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2004, a public hearing on Case 5.0728, requests for various
amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements was held by the City
Council in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
National Environmental Protection Act, an Environmental Impact ReporUEnvironmental Impact
Statement was prepared and it was found that with the incorporation of proposed mitigation
measures, the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence
presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including but not limited to the staff
report, all written and oral testimony presented.
THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The proposed General Plan Amendments are in compliance with the '
Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement has been
' Resolution 20868
Page 4
completed for the Section 14 Master Development Plan/Specific Plan and is in
compliance with CEQA, NEPA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA
Guidelines. The EIR/EIS for Case No. 5.0728 adequately addresses the general
environmental setting of the proposed Project, its significant environmental
impacts, and the alternatives and mitigation measures related to each significant
environmental effect for the proposed project. The City Council has
independently reviewed and considered the Specific Plan and determined that it
is in conformance with the information contained in the Environmental Impact
Report/Environmental Impact Statement. The City Council further finds that with
the incorporation of proposed mitigation measures and the adoption of the
Statement of Overriding Considerations, potentially significant environmental
impacts resulting from this project will be reduced to a level of insignificance and
therefore recommends certification of the EIR/EIS for this project.
Section 2: The proposed General Plan Amendments to the Land Use Element seek to more
closely direct the clustering of uses to particular areas while still allowing for
mixed-use and plan flexibility. In general, most of the medium density residential
designations that are surrounded by existing high density residential designations
have been replaced by high density residential. In addition, the Resort
Commercial designation has been extended along the Tahquitz Canyon Way
corridor and north towards Amado Road in order to eliminate areas of split
' General Plan designations on blocks of land. The Resort Commercial
designation may facilitate future, consolidated development at identified "catalyst
opportunity" sites. Chapter 9 of the Specific Plan links the proposed land uses
with existing General Plan policies. The proposed amendments will allow some
of the General Plan objectives regarding economic activity, the Central Business
District, Tahquitz Canyon Way, and circulation to be realized.
The proposed amendments to the General Plan Circulation Element include
requests to reclassify streets within Section 14 in order to match existing street
improvements. The proposed amendments will also facilitate the creation of
alternative street sections that allow for diverse modes of transportation (bike
paths, pedestrian walkways, shuttle lanes) and an attractive streetscape. The
traffic study completed for Section 14 indicated that many of the street
designations and future improvements would result in roads that have a greater
capacity than projected future traffic volumes (Year 2010). Special street
sections proposed for Alejo Road and other streets are not included in the
proposed amendments because they are deemed consistent with existing
General Plan Policy 7.1.5., which allows for modified street cross sections. City
and Tribal staff will continue to consult with regards to how the existing street
cross sections will be transitioned to proposed street cross sections, especially in
areas that are already built out.
Section 3: The amendments to the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan
' are necessary and appropriate in order to build consistency between the Section
14 Master Development Plan/Specific Plan and the General Plan Map and
Report.
Resolution 20866
Page 5 ,
Section 4: The proposed amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element is necessary
and proper at this time, and is not likely to be detrimental to the adjacent property
or residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the City Council
hereby approves the amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements as
shown in Exhibits A and B.
ADOPTED this 31st day of March, 2004.
AYES: Members McCulloch, Mills, Pougnet and Mayor Oden
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Member Foat
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
IV 14
City er City Manager
REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM
1
Resolution 20866
Page 6
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS
SECTION 14
I
ALWO
p �
�p.
I�IC ANDair1
C
n .RC Rc. xc
NSW
H3/3Q as (�]
044l0 w141ho H4.1</�0 i
D
C M '
Resolution 20866
Page 7
EXHIBIT B '
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP AMENDMENTS
SECTION 14
I
_ AI.A70
Iz I NIS 'M6 . Me Ma M Ewa
c IS
u I F a 4&P 4 .I 4a/jo .1alsot« .
I
o rti
C $ G RC 4ryJo 4S/30 j M4S/Jo K
RC ItC AC
xA1
_ TAB 4l T NCC
r. R
tt ACR secondary thorough are to collector strew ^
C �( W Nli/Jo � AllEi�,�i T
l et r r 1V
s�T�tJrrb .
C
f secondarythorough fare tocollectorstreet
0 �4SGsa s jtl i KC
ON
C M
1