Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20667 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/16/2003 ' RESOLUTION NO. 20667 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA OVERRULING THE PROTEST ON THE SPREAD OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT SPREAD FOR PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (SUNRISE NORTE TRACT 17642-2), FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-04. WHEREAS in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 that the Engineer of Work determine actual maintenance costs of the previous year and an estimate of costs for the ensuing year in order to prepare the annual spread of assessment; and WHEREAS July 16, 2003, was set as the date to hear protests on the spread of assessment for Parkway Maintenance District No. 7 (Tract 17642-2 "Sunrise Norte")- 53 Properties; and WHEREAS notice duly was given by publication etc. and a hearing duly conducted at which all persons interested testified; and WHEREAS written protests have been received representing less than fifty percent (50%) of the area of assessable lands within the maintenance area; and WHEREAS spread of assessment is forwarded to the County Tax Collector who, in turn, includes this assessment on the County Tax Roll. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Springs as follows: Section 1. That all protests, if any,are hereby overruled for Parkway Maintenance District No.7 (Tract 17642-2, Including: Mountain Shadow Dr., Twin Star Rd., Sand Springs Dr., Mica Dr. and Garnet Rd.)- Landscaping on San Rafael Dr. and Sunrise Way and 6 street safety lights at intersections,within tract to be maintained by district. Section 2. The improvements, assessment amount spread of assessment and the diagram as set out in the engineer's report are hereby confirmed for fiscal year 2003-04: 2003-04 Assessment: $23,747 ( $448.06 each for the 53 properties). 2002-03 Comparison: $23,747 (same as 03/04). Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment roll with the County Tax Collector in August, 2003, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption and the auditor is requested to collect such assessments on the tax roll in the same manner and subject to the same penalties for non-payment as are county property taxes. H:\USERS\HobM\➢ATA\DOC\PMD7.Public Hearing.FY2003-04.7-16-03.res.wpd . 9H Resolution 20667 Page 2 PMD. No. 7 (Sunrise Norte) FY 2003-04 Resolution- page 2 ' Section 4. This project is statutorily exempt from CEQA under Section 15273 of the guidelines as an ongoing maintenance charge.All work is in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15), Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2003 AYES: Members Mills, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Mayor Kleindienst NOES: None ABSENT: Member Hodges - Excused.. , ATTEST-- CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA City Jerk City-k-aVa REVIEWED &APPROVED: H:\USERS\13obM\DATA\DOC\PMD7.Public Hearing.FY2003-04.7-16-03.res.wpd $ tly Resolution 20667 Page 3 ' PARKWAYS MAINTENENCE DISTRICT fy�RP J� Y - r!'.t.Ilf/f-Z:O � � /A.oO N.evLf•rf"N: lif OAe� —'�Q 4....— � r[ hh � •� \ ITW� ; O re.m i +rH tsAIL •f/f� :�;y 1 Y la.p. pis ft LL� /.[ ( tf' pHf.ao A/. '® J/ ti: �M[N/. N CM/.n) �ACNIe� QAC.w k,,/y''1pp`�•4 /OAC.M. Q �` ff,00 eA:aO- •+}. lI N A� Jf r' ffi \NN.V Oy J/ L e . Y 7f ,y,: X .oa i AJ wq ♦ :bfi1' v'� .0 r c ®ioAcx[ q Ac.AY.© °.d .. ♦ gAd.Nt at�lll y: Q .w fpl0® �OIyp// wi .w f ,W IOYCAY.:. iV' AC.AY A/A'�5:^ AD.A'l. /.I GNL.•fY 11 p ACM.© •W q' ©N N: OY 1�RZ !J� ®}f w. h /I� 'Y. Y RL. V l� ./oAcnry. Q Ab't of Ak°AT/ 9 ni 5O 'n O Ali Of V A . ( • h AC NL w .e)Ir L it r w - o w fi/ p eo CNL l O AGMc� '�.°f ` ; 'iL��F/.`�=� t�•'.ON � °. U.0 Vf ` A'L n J gy oY .A p L Y• • o Q ©1UACMr IyALM[ / YVAf.t�� �'J..O � 1Qy( T 06.00 ia.ea ^'•1 q 1 A¢ ceR� p A/. w 0 1 AaAGNrr•/ C r,/.MARa Y y Y y ss • 90W /f.ffIf.f• iaefITFI.If LOf. n� . . ae"l .crovl..a .yw•sv +^.io �a.af 1�lY /I / /If/ /(A/ /!f� /fI/ Id'f/ r.[Y/ /If f Ir If ♦ f0 f/ or f) ff I[pAC. 0 [ppAO .fppA4 A AO. .Of.C. .ppAO• OOAO. A/AC. MAG qAO. WELLSI t•f;,: 0'Nl x N/. �[ NL •Nf. Nl. : AT. YLr[II / /,or , IN r ;© ;® // ® aC1Ear10" r �=64R RAFAEL- 7_//00 G15(rp ' Itr r AAf BOUNDARY DISTRICT SHOWNHOWNTHUStSt Ht� N AREA TO DE MAINTAINED SHOWN THUSt / tt Mfn' � lavvi .ffctrs� "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" VICINITY MAP A r CITY OP PALM SPRINGS !*� PARKWAYS REAL PROPERTY DIVISION MAINTENENCE DISTRICT NO.7 63 PROPERTIES FORMED 1990 J EWE D.EIEMS REAL PROPERLY SP0WLIST TRACT NO.17642-2 MAP BOOK 124/27-28 DESDN eYl :1Z FILE N0. JD I �I00 R-89- ICNECKED DY: DWO. NO.: SHEET NO. Sf IIOR , T. .5., R. .E.,S.SA,a M. EGBIBM I I OP 1 (Note: PMD-7 max.assessment approved at$23,747.00 in 1992/93)7113 _J DATE: June 18,2003 AGENCY: City of Palm Springs ' PROJECT: PARKWAYS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7(SUNRISE NORTE)-Formed in 1990 LOCATION: Tract No. 17642-2 at San Rafael Drive and Sunrise Way FISCAL YEAR: July 1,2003 through June 30,2004 FROM: David J.Barakian,Public Works Director/City Engineer (Prepared by George F.Farago,Associate Civil Engineer) ENGINEER'S REPORT A. PARKWAY MAINTENANCE ANNUAL COSTS 1. San Rafael Dr.and Sunrise Way (Maintenance Cost by PAC West Land Care,Inc.) $12,051 2. a. Sprinkler Controllers(S.C.E. Estimated Costs) $500 b. Desert Water Agency Water Costs(Estimated) $8,400 SUBTOTAL 1 &2(Parkway Maint.) $20,951 3. a. Maintenance,Parts and Repairs (Estimated 5%) $1,048 b. City Administration Costs(Est.) $625 TOTAL COSTS OF PARKWAY MAINTENANCE PORTION $22,624 (Note: Highest Maximum of$23,747 approved in FY 92/93) ' B. STREET SAFETY LIGHTING 6 Ea.intersection street safety lights maintained by Southern California Edison Company-(Interior of Tract) $1 040 TOTAL= $23,664 C. "Actual Costs"vs."Assessments"History(Previous closed out 5 Years): ACTUAL COSTS: 97/98= $19,645 98/99=$20,034 99/00=$16,463 00/01=$20,141 01/02=$21,934 ASSESSMENTS: $10,141 $ 5,429 $23,747 $23,747 $18,084 D. ACCOUNTING(Actual Costs vs.Assessments in 2001/02 and 2002/03): Account(Deficit)on 6/30/01 (carried forward from 2002/03Eirgineer's Report)= ($1,555) Assessment in 01/02= $18,084 Actual Costs in 01/02= 21 934 Account(Deficit)as of 6/30/02= ($5,405) Assessment in 02/03= $23,747 Projected Costs in 02/03= $20 700 Projected Account(Deficit) as of 6/30/03= ($2,358) E. ASSESSMENT FOR 2003/04=(Estimate from A&B above)= $23,664 (Plus"Deficit"estimated for 6/30/03)= $2,358 Subtotal=$26,022 Net Assessment in 03/04(Max. assessment set in FY 92/93)_ $23,747 F. NUMBER OF PARCELS IN DISTRICT= 53 G. ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST(PER PARCEL)in 2003/04= $448.06 Each (Same as 2002/03) H:NSERS/ENG/ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/PMD7 2003-04.Eng.Report Page �c�anuuvu �.vvv• Page 5 ' H. See Account No. 001-2451-43560 for budget expenditure detail This report has been prepared pursuant to the"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972."(Division 15,Part 2 of the Streets&Highways Code)and Article XIIID,Part 4 of the California Constitution(Proposition 218) Dated:_ DAVID J.BARAKIAN,P.E. R.C.E.No.28931 City Engineer H:/USERS/ENG/ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/PMD7 2003-04.Eng.Report Paget