The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20666 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/16/2003 RESOLUTION NO. 20666 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, ' CALIFORNIA OVERRULING THE PROTESTON THE SPREAD OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS,AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT SPREAD FOR PARKWAY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. S-A, 6-B AND 6-C FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003/04. WHEREAS in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 that the Engineer of Work has determined the estimated maintenance costs for the first year in order to prepare the annual spread of assessment; and WHEREAS July 16, 2003, was set as the date to hear protests on the spread of assessment for Parkway Maintenance District Nos. 6-A (Tachevah); 6-6 (Mesquite) and 6-C (Park Sonora); and WHEREAS notice was duly given by publication and a hearing duly conducted at which all interested persons testified; and WHEREAS written protests have been received representing less than fifty percent (50%) of the area of assessable lands within the maintenance area; and WHEREAS spread of assessment shall be forwarded to the County Tax Collector who, in turn, shall place this assessment on the County Tax Roll for FY 2003-04. ' i r,,m NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Springs as follows: Section 1. That all protests, if any, are hereby overruled for Parkways Maintenance Districts: 6-A: (Tachevah Dr., Valdivia Way, Montalvo Way and La Campana Way)-25 Lots 6-13: (Mesquite Ave., Avenida Evelita, Arroyo Vista, Nueva Vista)- 93 Lots 6-C: (El Cielo Dr., Sonora Rd., Loma Vista Circle, San Martin Circle)- 30 Lots Section 2. The improvements, assessment amount, spread of assessment and the diagram as set out in the Engineer's Reports are hereby confirmed for fiscal year 2003-04. 2003-04 Assessments: 6-A= $4;560; 6-6= $1,818; 6-C= $8,262 (New Year) 2002-03 Comparison: 6-A= $4,181; 6-B= $1,818; 6-C= $8,262 (Prior Year) Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment roll with the County Tax Collector in August, 2003, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption and the auditor is requested to collect such assessments on the tax roll in the same manner and subject to the same penalties for non-payment as,are,county property taxes. H:\USERS\BobM\DATA\DOCUMENT\PMDGABC.Public Hearings e FY2003-04.7-16-03.res.wpd Resolution 20666 Page 2 PMD Nos. 6-A, 6-13 and 6-C Resolution (FY 2003/04)- page 2 Section 4. This project is statutorily exempt from CEQA under Section 15273 of the guidelines as an ongoing maintenance charge.All work is in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15), Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways Code and Article XIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2003. AYES: Members Mills, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Mayor Kleindienst NOES: None ABSENT: Member Hodges - Excused ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, City Clerk City Manager F REVIEWED &APPROVED: 1 H:\USERS\BobM\DATA\DOCUMENT\PMD6ABC.Public Hearings.FY2003-04.7-16-03.res.wpd /y� r oyc a VISTA CHINO { 4 i r••�s CAA/MNA I✓AY - ALU/VA WA 1✓AY y 1 25 PROPERTIES FORMED 1980 'I V -lCNIrK O(. (Note:PUD-6A max.assessment approved at$5,154.00 in 1992/93) _ (Note:PMD-6B max.assessment approved at$1,818.00 in 1992/93) (Note:PMD-6C max.assessment approved at S8,262.00 in 1989/90) Y_ S11II 1 RAMON ROAD taY A'iflAlC I .— I -- �- O ISE A ArnAhle A{r, _ - r 3 aQU � EYdlTA - (� Auer/ Ya TA utYA ViITA W a- 93 PROPERTIES FORMED 1380 i s.N•MAArAr CK. _"_—_ AL C SO PROPERTIES FORMED 1960' —�„Y [,„ Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 " PARKWAYS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 A,B,& C C17Y OF PALM S Pill NGS,COUNT'( CIF RIVER SIOE,STATE OF CALIF 0RNIA 8� Resoluton 20666 Page 4 DATE: June 18,2003 ' AGENCY: City of Palm Springs PROJECT: Parkways Maintenance Districts Nos.6-A,6-13&6-C FISCAL YEAR: July 1,2003 through June 30,2004 FROM: David J.Barakian,Public Works Director/City Engineer (Prepared by George F.Farago,Associate Civil Engineer) ENGINEER'S REPORT 1. DISTRICT NO. 6-A"FAIRPORT DEVELOPMENT" (Chia, Tachevah&Valdivia Way)-Formed in 1980 A. Type of Maintenance:Plant,replace,trim,water and maintain decorative curb side planting;maintain and repair appurtenant fixtures necessary for their maintenance with and adjacent to the District boundary.City administrative costs are eligible incidental costs. B. Estimated Costs of Maintenance(Note: $5,154 Maximum Established in 92/93): (Contactor: $1,793,Water:$1,250,Incidentals: $500,Admin.$757)= $4,300 C. Actual Costs vs."Assessments"History(Previous closed out 5 Years): ACTUAL COSTS 97/98=$7,627 98/99=$5,147 99/00=$2,769 00/01=$5,305 01/02=$3,699 ' ASSESSMENTS $1,609 $4,509 $4,810 $4,012 $1,296 D.Accounting: (Actual Costs vs.Assessments in 2001/02 and 2002/03): Account(Surplus)on 6/30/01 (caiTied forward from 2002/03 Engineer's Report)= $1,562 Assessment in 01/02= $1,296 Actual Costs in 01/02= (13,699) Account Deficit as of 6/30/02= ($841) Assessment in 02/03= $4,181 Projected Costs in 02/03= $3 600 Projected Account Deficit as of 6/30/03= ($260) E.Amount to Assessment in 2003/04(see"B"above)= $4,300 (Plus Projected Account Deficit as of 6/30/03)= $260 Net Assessment in 2003/04= $4,560 F.Nunber of Parcels iu District=24 G.PAID-6A Assessments per parcel in 2003/04=4 Lots @$325.71 and 20 Lots @$162.86 each (Comparison to 2002/03=4 Lots @$298.64 and 20 Lots @$149.32 each) 2. DISTRICT NO.6-B"PARKSIDE ESTATES"(Mesquite&Avenida Evelita Area near Demuth Park) A. Type of Maintenance(Same as 1-A above) B. Esthnated Costs of Maintenance(Note: $1,818 Maximum Established in FY 92/93) (Cont•actor:$1,870,Water: $84,Incidentals: $200,Admin. $222)= $2,376 C. "Actual Costs"vs."Assessments"History(Previous closed out 5 years): ACTUAL COSTS: 97/98=$2,293 98/99=$2,361 99/00=$1,808 00/01=$3,775 01/02=$2,070 ASSESSMENTS: $1,818 $1,818 $1,818 $1,818 $1,818 Resoluton 20666 Page 5 D.Accounting:(Actual Costs vs.Assessments in 2001/02 and 2002/03): Account(Deficit)on 6/30/01 (carried forward from 2002/03 Engineer's Report)= ($3,765) ' Assessment in 01/02= $1,818 Actual Costs in 01/02= 2 070 Account Deficit as of 6/30/02= ($4,017) Assessment in 02/03= $1,818 Projected Costs in 02/03= $2 410 Projected(Deficit)as of 6/30/03= ($4,609) E.Amount to Assessment in 2002/03(Based on max. established in ITY 92/93)= $1,818 F.PMD 6-B Number of Parcels in District=93 G.PMD 6-B Assessments per parcel in 2003/04=$19.55 each (Same as FY 2002/03) 3. DISTRICT NO.6-C"PARK SONORA TRACT"(El Cielo Rd., Sonora Rd.,Loma Vista Cir., San Martin Cir.) A. Type of Maintenance(Same as 1-A above) B.Estimated Maintenance Costs(Note: $8,262 Maximum Established in FY 89/90) (Contractor:$5,154,Water: $1,950, Incidentals: $500,Admin. $267)= $7,871 C."Actual Costs"vs."Assessments"History(Previous closed out 5 years): ACTUAL COSTS: 97/98=$5,960 98/99=$6,158 99/00=$4,690 00/01=$5,924 01/02=$7,328 ASSESSMENTS: $2,981 $2,981 $6,264 $8,262 $8,262 D.Accounting: (Actual Costs vs.Assessments in 2001/02 and 2002/03): Account(Deficit)on 6/30/01 (carried forward from 2002/03 Engineer's Report)_ ($18,874) ' Assessment in 01/021= $8,262 Actual Costs in 01/021= 7 328 (Deficit)as of 6/30/02= ($17,940) Assessment in 02/03= $8,262 Projected Costs in 02/03= $7 860 Projected Account(Deficit)in 02/03= ($17,538) E. Estimated Maintenance Costs in 2003/04(See`B" above)= $7,871 (Add max. adjustment($8,262 limit)to offset defiicit)= 391 Net Assessment in 2003/04= $8,262 F.Number of Parcels in District--30 G.PMD-6C Assessments per parcel in 2003/04=$275.40 Each per parcel (Same as FY 02/03) 4. ACCOUNT DETAILS(refer to following Citv Accounts): A. District 6A(Fairport Dev.) Acet. 001-2451-43530 B. District 613(Parkside Est.)Aect. 001-2451-43540 C. District 6C(Park Sonora) Aect. 001-2451-43550 This report has been prepared pursuant to the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", (Division 15,Part 2 of the Streets&/Highways Code)and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution(Proposition 218). Dated DAVID J.BARAIAN,P.E. ' RCE NO.28931 City Engineer City of Palm Springs H:/USERS/ENG/ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/PMD6A,B,C 2003-04.Eng.Report