HomeMy WebLinkAbout20665 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/16/2003 RESOLUTION NO. 20665
' OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA OVERRULING THE PROTEST ON THE SPREAD OF
ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENT SPREAD FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 4 (EAGLE WAY AREA)- FISCAL YEAR 2003-04.
WHEREAS in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 that the
Engineer of Work determine actual maintenance costs of the previous year and an estimate of
costs for the ensuing year in order to prepare the annual spread of assessment; and
WHEREAS July 16, 2003, was set as the date to hear protests on the spread of assessment for
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Eagle Way Area-43 Properties); and
WHEREAS notice duly was given by publication etc. and a hearing duly conducted at which all
persons interested testified; and
WHEREAS written protests have been received representing less than fifty percent (50%) of the
area of assessable lands within the maintenancearea;and
WHEREAS spread of assessment is forwarded to the County Tax Collector who, in turn, includes
this assessment on the County Tax Roll for FY 2003-04.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Springs as follows:
Section 1. That all protests, if any, are hereby overruled for Street Lighting Maintenance
District No.4(Eagle Way Area: Eagle Way, Divot Lane, Birdie Way and Par Drive)-
' 43 Properties Total.
Section 2. The improvements, assessment amount, spread of assessment, and the diagram,
as set out in the Engineer's Report, are hereby confirmed for fiscal year 2003-04 at
$1,129 ($26.26 each for43 lots). (Same assessment as FY 02-03).
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the diagram
and assessment roll with the County,Tax Collector by August, 2003, together with
a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption and the auditor is requested to
collect such assessments on the talc roll in the same manner and subject to the
same penalties for non-payment as are county property taxes.
Section 4. This project is statutorily exempt from CEQA under Section 15273 of the guidelines
as an ongoing maintenance charge. All proceedings are pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and
Highways Code) and Article XIIID, section 4 of the California Constitution
(Proposition 218).
ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2003.
AYES: Members Mills, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Mayor Kleindienst
NOES: None ,
ABSENT: Member Hodges - Excused', ,
ATTEST CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
B�_ 7_
y__ �
City Clerk City M—andijer
REVIEWED &APPROVED:
H:\USERS\BobM\DATA\DOCUMENT\SLMD-4.Public Hearing.FY2003-04.7-16-03.res.wpd
�I
Resolution 20665
Page 2
52 51 50� 49 148Y47• 11 • 6P R ORIVE13 14 290
SCALE=1"=200' 12 15• 28 31 a 4
WI
J I I 16 Q 27 32 }Q 43
3
4 10 IT 26 33 42
N 9 l 18 25 34 4f
or • • A.
.Q e. 19 F. 24 33 W 40
t c> - A o ♦ l
oc t
2 T 21; ca 23 36 m 39
w A IL
6 21 22 37 330`1
0"'EAGL& WAY
J r5 I.4
SEVEN LAKES DR. 1`
O
W
(Note:SLMD4 mat.assessment approved at S2„689.00 in 1989t901 ?
O
WAVERLY a DRIVE
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
O
PROPERTY OWNERS SIGNING PETITION----
a
LOCATION OF STREET LIGHTS ------ • Q
O
a
m
EAST a
A
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE r HIGHk'AV, Vol&R V
: 01'STRICT Na 4 D E,
43 PFdNRTIES FORMED 1086
STREET LIGHTING'DISTRICT IN A PORTION OF v�y
TRACT No.2159, SECTION 30,T•4•S, R•5•E ,
S.B.B.6 M., IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,CA.
'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 '
IVVIV • �.VVV.I
Page 3
' DATE: June 18, 2003
AGENCY: City Council, City of Palm Springs
PROJECT: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Eagle Way Area)
FISCAL YEAR: July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004
FROM: David J. Barakian, Public Works Director/City Engineer
(Prepared by George F. Farago, Associate Civil Engineer)
ENGINEER'S REPORT
LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 4 (EAGLE WAY AREA)-Formed in 1986
A. Type of Maintenance(by Southern Calif. Edison Co.):
Repair or replace any of the installed lighting facilities as necessary within
this lighting district. Continue to provide power to all fixtures.
B. Actual Costs vs. Assessments Summary:
Account(Deficit) on 6/30/01 (from 02/03 Engineer's Report) = ($7,013)
Assessment in 01/02 = $1,129
Actual Costs in 01/02 = 1 151
Account Deficit as of 6/30/02 = ($7,035)
Assessment in 02/03 = $1,129
Projected Costs in 02/03 =. 1 490
Projected Account(Deficit),as of 6/30/03 = ($7,396)
C. ASSESSMENT in 2003/04 ($1,129 is max. approved in 98/99) continue to lower deficit=$1,129
D. Number of parcels in district = 43
E. Cost per parcel in 2003/04= $26.26 (Same as FY 02/03)
F. "Actual Cost" vs. "Assessments"History (Previous Closed Out 5 Years):
Actual Costs: 97/98=$804 98/99=$877 99/00=$820 00/01=$2,127 01/02=$1,151
Assessments $85 $1,129 $1,129 $1,129 $1,129
G. Budget (Expenditure Detail)-see Account No.001-4301-43630
This report has been prepared pursuant to the "Landscaping&Lighting Act of 1972" (Division 15, Part 2 of
the Streets and
Hiighways Code and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution(Proposition 218).
Dated: t[//71/0 Lv oG
DAVID J. BARAKIAN, P.E.
' RCE No. 28931
City Engineer
City of Palm Springs
H:/USERS/ENG/ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/SLMD4 2003-04.Eng.Repartt