HomeMy WebLinkAbout20664 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/16/2003 RESOLUTION NO. 2D664
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, ,
CALIFORNIA OVERRULING THE PROTEST ON THE SPREAD OF
ANNUALASSESSMENTS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENT SPREAD FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 3 (CROSSLEY TRACT)- FISCAL YEAR 2003-04.
WHEREAS in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 that the
Engineer of Work determine actual maintenance costs of the previous year and an estimate of
costs for the ensuing year in order to prepare the annual spread of assessment; and
WHEREAS July 16, 2003, was set as the date to hear protests on the spread of assessment for
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Crossley Tract- 75 Properties); and
WHEREAS notice duly was given by publication,etc. and a hearing duly conducted at which all
persons interested testified; and
WHEREAS written protests have been received representing less than fifty percent (50%) of the
area of assessable lands within the maintenance area; and
WHEREAS spread of assessment is forwarded to the CountyTax Collector who, in turn, includes
this assessment on the County Tax Roll for FY 2003-04.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Springs as follows:
Section 1. That all protests, if any, are hereby overruled for Street Lighting Maintenance
District No. 3 (Crossley Tract: 341'Ave, Lawrence St., Marguerite St. &Martha St.) '
Section 2. The improvements, assessment amount, spread of assessment, and the diagram,
as set out in the Engineer's Report, are hereby confirmed for fiscal year 2003-04 at
$2,492($33.23 each for 75 lots). (Note 02/03 Assessment was$2,484-$33.12 ea.)
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the diagram
and assessment roll with the County,Tax Collector by August, 2003, together with
a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption and the auditor is requested to
collect such assessments on the tax_roll in the same manner and subject to the
same penalties for non-payment as are county property taxes.
Section 4. This project is statutorily exempt from CEQA under Section 15273 of the guidelines
as an ongoing maintenance charge. All proceedings are pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and
Highways Code) and Article XIIID, section 4 of the California Constitution
(Proposition 218).
ADOPTED this 16th day of July 12003.
,,.
AYES: Members Mills, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Mayor Kleiindienst
NOES: None
ABSENT: Member Hodges -Excused'.: .
ATTE T: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
City er City-Nlar1aaP%"
REVIEWED &APPROVED:
H:\USERS\BobM\DATA\DOCUMENT\SLMD-3.Public Hearing.FY2003-04.7-10-03.re,s.wpd A N/
V v
Page 2
Resolution 15545 _
.. 34 TH AVE. �.
77 c 1.. 40
76 : : 41 •^1
• • t 2
0 423717
74 x 3
431 rt
73 "
• r r i4 J5 -
• 4 �[ •M-
• l
72 = : 45 34
71 n = 46 33
6
r 'r • • • r----�_i
Z0 : W ; tl 32 b W. 7
r
• • r
• • - 49 30
$ !
67• $ •• 30 29 $ b 10 I
• • r
66 W
4 w Z : 46
W W •
65 CC 52
3 27 a:ti 12
a • a •
r
43 34 24 c 14
24 $ is
•
so
i ryry i b7 22 e § 17
• .; A • 1
46 21
•2 = 14 l
roa-LOT • 1 I
20
1 74 'e
(Note:SLMD-3 max.Assessment approved at 54,283.00 in 1991192)
AI/[l3M[Ml NOMI[NI q[ TH[ JAW [NC[!1
I09 LOT 1 WHICH 11 A11NI1M[NT NO,n
AOT(NT OWH(IU 11"IN( ff TIT10N 1"" (HY11 •
76 PROPERTIES FORMED 1983
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT N0. 3"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 " D w�N
DATE: June 18, 2003 ,
AGENCY: City Council, City of Palm Springs
PROJECT: Street Lighting Maintenance District No.3 (Crossley Tract)
FISCAL YEAR: July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004
FROM: David J. Barakian, Public Works Director/City Engineer
(Prepared by George F. Farago, Associate Civil Engineer)
ENGINEER'S REPORT
LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 3 (CROSSLEY TRACT)-Formed in 1983
A. Type of Maintenance (by Southern Calif. Edison Co.):
Repair or replace any of the installed lighting facilities as necessary within
this lighting district. Continue to provide power to all fixtures.
(Maximum Assessment was $4,283 approved by City Council in IFY 91/92)
B Actual Costs vs. Assessments Summary:
Account"Deficit" on 6/30/01 (from FY 2002/03 Engineer's Report)= ($483)
Assessment in 01/02= $1,985
Actual Costs in 01/02= 2 218 '
Account Deficit as of 6/30/02= ($716)
Assessment in 02/03= $2,484
Projected Costs in 02/03= 2 130
Projected Account Deficit as of 6/30/03= ($362)
C. Estimated Costs for 2003/04 (Based on Projected Actual Costs in 02/03)= $2,130
Plus Projected"Deficit" as of 6/30/03= '362
NET ASSESSMENT IN 2003104= $2,492
D. Number of parcels in district = 75
E. Cost per parcel in 2003/04= $33.23 per parcel ($33.12 per parcel in 2002/03)
F. "Actual Cost" vs. "Assessments"History (Previous Closed Out 5 Years):
Actual Costs 97/98= $1,636 98/99= $2,107 99/00= $1,911 00/01= $2,321 01/02= $2,218
Assessments $2,350 $0 $0 $2,217 $1,985
G. Budget (Expenditure Detail)- see Account No.001-4301-43620
This report has been prepared pursuant to the "Landscaping &Lighting Act of 1972" (Division 15, Part
2 of the Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution
(Proposition4we
218).
Dated: 3 DAVID J. BARAKIAN, P.E.
RCE No. 28931
City Engineer, City of Palm Springs
HJUSERS/ENG/ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS/SLMD3 2003-04.Eng.Report