HomeMy WebLinkAbout20411 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/17/2002 RESOLUTION NO. 20411
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALI FORNIA OVERRULI NG THE'PROTEST ON THE SPREAD OF '
ANNUALASSESSMENTS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENT SPREAD FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 3 (CROSSLEY TRACT)- FISCAL YEAR 2002-03.
WHEREAS in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 that the
Engineer of Work determine actual maintenance costs of the previous year and an estimate of costs
for the ensuing year in order to prepare the annual spread of assessment; and
WHEREAS July 17, 2002, was set as the date to hear protests on the spread of assessment for
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Crossley Tract- 75 Properties); and
WHEREAS notice duly was given by publication etc. and a hearing duly conducted at which all
persons interested testified; and
WHEREAS written protests have been received representing less than fifty percent (50%) of the
area, of assessable lands within the maintenance area; and
WHEREAS spread of assessment is forwarded to the County Tax Collector who, in turn, includes
this assessment on the County Tax Roll for FY 2002-03.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Springs as follows:
Section 1. That all protests,if any, are hereby overruled for Street Lighting Maintenance District
No. 3 (Crossley Tract: 341h Avenue, Lawrence St., Marguerite St. and Martha St.) .
Section 2. The improvements, assessment amount, spread of assessment, and the diagram, '
as set out in the Engineer's Report, are hereby confirmed for fiscal year 2002-03 at
$2,484($33.12 each for 75 lots). (Note 01/02 Assessment was $1,985- $26.47 ea.)
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the diagram
and assessment roll with the County Tax Collector by August, 2002, together with
a certified copy of this Resolution ;upon its adoption and the auditor is requested to
collect such assessments on the,tax roll in the same manner and subject to the
same penalties for non-payment as are county property taxes.
Section 4. This project is statutorily exempt from CEQA under Section 15273 of the guidelines
as an ongoing maintenance charge. All proceedings are pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and
Highways Code) and Article XIIID, section 4 of the California Constitution
(Proposition 218).
ADOPTED this 17th day of July 2002.
AYES: Members Hodges, Mills, Oden, Keller—Spurgin and Mayor Kleindieust
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
City Clerk City M a ,
REVIEWED & APPROVED:
H.\USERS\BobM\DATA\DOCUMENT\SLMD-3.Public Hearing.FY2002-03 7-17-02 res.wpd
Resolution 20411
Page 2
34TH AVE.
7>
'� 40 39
• a • • o t 1
76 41 36
75 b 42
• 37 �A
• b•
T4 11 w 3
36 Rl � ♦
73 ° 44
- 0
?2 b 45 34
• b •$ S
71 46 33
1 r + ♦ ♦
r
W ° 47 32 W a' 7
� + • 0 $69
•
1 r
• (n b 46 31 b N $ 6
66 b 49 30
67 50 29
66 U u 51 2 +
II
Z + ♦ 0 w + •
W
65 0 3 : 52 27 b [r b 12
• J ♦ ♦ +
64 '° 1•♦ y7 26 13
♦ $
67 b 34 25
b 14
52 u SS 24 Is
•
• ♦ 0 $ •
b c 56 23 $ $
I{
40
$ 57 22 b S 17
• 66 21 19
Poll. +
LOT 0
(Note: SLMD-3 max.assessment approved at$4,283.00 in 1991/92)
AII[If MLMT MOMI[A[ AA[ TX[ SAW EXCEPT
POA LOT I WHICH IS AIEEIIM[MT 4C.n
1101,97, OYKAI "".AS "T ITIOM I"" THM 1:
75 PROPERTIES FORMED 1983
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 3
'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 " 17797
Resolution 20411
Page 3
City of Palm Springs
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIXED CHARGES SUMMARY REPORTING FORM
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3-"CROSSLEY TRACT"
FISCAL YEAR 2002-03
FUND NO. 68-2612 (Page 1 of 3)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. ASSESSMENT AMOUNT
681-281-003-9 $33.12
681-281-004-0 "
681-281-005-1 "
681-281-006-2 "
681-281-007-3 " -
681-281-008-4
681-281-009-5 "
681-281-010-5
681-281-011-6 "
681-281-012-7
681-281-013-8
681-281-014-9
681-281-015-0 '
681-281-016-1 "
681-281-017-2 "
681-281-018-3
681-281-019-4 "
681-282-001-0
681-282-002-1 "
681-282-003-2 "
681-282-004-3 "
681-282-005-4 "
681-282-006-5
681-282-007-6 "
681-282-008-7
681-282-009-8 "
681-282-010-8
681-282-011-9 "
H:\U'SERS\HobM\DATA\DOCUMENT\SLMD-3.Crossley Trac[.Fized:Charges 2002-03 RPT.7-17-02.wpd ,
S
Resolution 20411
Page 4
681-282-012-0 $33.12
' 681-282-013-1 Y
681-282-014-2
681-282-015-3 "
681-282-016-4
681-282-017-5
681-282-019-7
681-282-022-9 "
681-282-023-0
681-282-024-1
681-282-025-2
681-282-026-3 "
681-282-027-4 "
681-282-028-5 "
681-282-029-6
681-282-030-6
681-282-031-7 "
' 681-282-032-8
681-282-033-9
681-282-034-0
681-282-035-1
681-282-036-2
681-282-037-3 "
681-282-038-4 "
681-282-039-5 "
681-282-040-5
681-282-042-7
681-282-043-8
681-283-001-3 "
681-283-002-4
681-283-003-5
681-283-004-6 "
' 681-283-005-7
H,\USERS\BobM\DATA\DOCUMEN RSLMD-3.Crosslcy TracLPixcd Chhugcs.2002-03.RPT.7-17-02.wpd
6
Resolution 20411
Page 5
681-283-006-8 $33.12
681-283-007-9
681-283-008-0 "
681-283-009-1 "
681-283-010-1 "
681-283-011-2
681-283-012-3
681-283-013-4
681-283-014-5
681-283-015-6
681-283-016-7
681-283-017-8 "
681-283-018-9 "
681-283-019-0 "
TOTAL of 75 PARCELS(SLMD-3-Crossley Tract) 1 $2,484 TOTAL in FY 2002103
PAGE 3 of 3
H\USERS\BobM\DATA\DOCUMENIISLMD-3.Crossley Trac[.Fized Chuges.2002-03.RPT.7-17-02.wpd
7